Whether it's happening or not is irrelevant - the problem is that it is possible! We should have technicians constantly monitoring the newsfeed, at his expense of course.
Wow. Mr. Chernin has just admitted that his network could be used for piracy! I guess we need to cripple his network to make it impossible for newscasters to read technical information.
Re:I am not "stealing" a damn thing.
on
Chained Melodies
·
· Score: 2
If no CDs are sold, then the record publishing companies will fail. The sound studios will then have to charge the artists directly, so they will get a cut of the $5 that was sent directly to the artist. This presupposes that home audio equipment will never be good enough to produce the music. If that assumption is wrong, then the studios will not be necessary, and they will join the buggy whip producers and blacksmiths in niche-markethood. And the operator of the home audio equipment will be part of the band, recieving a percentage of that $5.
What if they use the same barrel design, teamster unions, cargo train companies, and nozzle manufacturer, so they can interface with the same end users and national transportation systems?
Now why are *you* insisting the government *force* its anti-religous view on the schools?
Anti != Non.
Let the schools decide.
How would a school decide? By vote? So if there were 30 Catholics, 20 Baptists, and 20 Jews, then the school should teach Catholic dogma? It's much better if the parents and religious leaders teach religion during services/sunday school/home sessions/etc.
But what I am really trying to ask is why can't the US ammend the laws to allow each school to decide for themselves on what they want to do? I realize that this opens a whole can of worms, but the free market allows each company to set its own prices. Why can't the schools have the same freedoms?
There isn't a free market on public (gov't run) schools. There often isn't any overlap between the served areas of schools, much less enough for one school per major religion plus an extra for the odd ones out. Are you assuming that all communities have only one religion, and people should segregate themselves by the local school's religious affiliation? Private (non-gov't) schools are free to have any religious affiliation they wish. They provide the alternative for people who want religious instruction to be part of their school's curriculum.
Because there are other reasons for using Flash, and your limited example of instructional exams isn't enough to justify disabling the back button. You've even admitted that you could handle it.
Um, "Reload" will start the test over completely. There's no reason you couldn't do after each question the same thing you do at the end of the test to record the score.
Third -- the "usability" whiners. No, you can't use the back button, and that's a good thing when you're talking about instruction. Did you give a wrong answer? Well oops, I guess you just hit the back button and do it again -- that sounds like a really bad way to give tests to me.
Why? That's how paper tests work, unless you require an uneraseable ink pen and no whiteout or scratchouts.
I mean most of us here are pretty firm believers in Darwinism,
Believe that it happens? Yes. Believe that it's a good way to set up a society? No way. I don't think that many people would want to live in a Darwinian society.
Slashdot Mirror
Whether it's happening or not is irrelevant - the problem is that it is possible! We should have technicians constantly monitoring the newsfeed, at his expense of course.
Wow. Mr. Chernin has just admitted that his network could be used for piracy! I guess we need to cripple his network to make it impossible for newscasters to read technical information.
If no CDs are sold, then the record publishing companies will fail. The sound studios will then have to charge the artists directly, so they will get a cut of the $5 that was sent directly to the artist. This presupposes that home audio equipment will never be good enough to produce the music. If that assumption is wrong, then the studios will not be necessary, and they will join the buggy whip producers and blacksmiths in niche-markethood. And the operator of the home audio equipment will be part of the band, recieving a percentage of that $5.
Just have all of the geocities pages link each other, too.
What if they use the same barrel design, teamster unions, cargo train companies, and nozzle manufacturer, so they can interface with the same end users and national transportation systems?
What about Exxon, BP, Shell, Texaco, etc? Are they illegal because they compete with Amoco?
Careful, if you do that, you are circumventing the effective access control for digital data!
With bonus points for having early appearances of Londo (accounting program) and Sheridan (Tron) from Babylon 5.
Remember, there is no disagreement, because they all of a sudden became followers in the same religion!
Would they also forbid anyone from a different religion from moving in later? Because that is illegal, too.
Now why are *you* insisting the government *force* its anti-religous view on the schools?
Anti != Non.
Let the schools decide.
How would a school decide? By vote? So if there were 30 Catholics, 20 Baptists, and 20 Jews, then the school should teach Catholic dogma? It's much better if the parents and religious leaders teach religion during services/sunday school/home sessions/etc.
But what I am really trying to ask is why can't the US ammend the laws to allow each school to decide for themselves on what they want to do? I realize that this opens a whole can of worms, but the free market allows each company to set its own prices. Why can't the schools have the same freedoms?
There isn't a free market on public (gov't run) schools. There often isn't any overlap between the served areas of schools, much less enough for one school per major religion plus an extra for the odd ones out. Are you assuming that all communities have only one religion, and people should segregate themselves by the local school's religious affiliation? Private (non-gov't) schools are free to have any religious affiliation they wish. They provide the alternative for people who want religious instruction to be part of their school's curriculum.
What's the difference?
Thanks, I didn't want to mention it...
As I stare intently into the glowing eyes of your bear, I can almost make out a message...
Which came first?
We need MS media to criticise media companies, and the media companies to criticise MS.
Because there are other reasons for using Flash, and your limited example of instructional exams isn't enough to justify disabling the back button. You've even admitted that you could handle it.
Um, "Reload" will start the test over completely. There's no reason you couldn't do after each question the same thing you do at the end of the test to record the score.
Third -- the "usability" whiners. No, you can't use the back button, and that's a good thing when you're talking about instruction. Did you give a wrong answer? Well oops, I guess you just hit the back button and do it again -- that sounds like a really bad way to give tests to me.
Why? That's how paper tests work, unless you require an uneraseable ink pen and no whiteout or scratchouts.
It makes German zeppelins sink.
Cold fusion, perpetual motion, or FTL travel. Note that they must be making the product, not just researching it.
One:
Best picture
Three:
Actor in a supporting role
Directing
Writing (adapted screenplay)
Nine:
Art direction
Cinematography
Costume design
Film editing
Makeup
Music (score)
Music (song)
Sound
Visual effects
The big one, three major ones, and nine techncal. I guess the dwarves get no respect, just as in the books.
I mean most of us here are pretty firm believers in Darwinism,
Believe that it happens? Yes. Believe that it's a good way to set up a society? No way. I don't think that many people would want to live in a Darwinian society.
Ahem... My post was in response to someone who was using that argument, so you are making my point for me.
I'll believe Creation when I see God create a CAT from nothing.