Slashdot Mirror


TRON 20th Anniversary Edition DVD Reviewed

gevmage (Craig Steffen) writes with the review below of the new DVD boxed set of Tron, which he says is a "must-have for any science fiction fan." So whether Tron brings back fond memories, or only serves to show you what movies before your birth, read on for his take on the set. If you're not familiar with Tron at this late stage, beware of a few spoilers within.

Review: TRON 20th Anniversary Collector's Edition, 2 Disc DVD set

January 15, 2002, issued a special edition DVD set of TRON. For those of you who have never seen the film, I mention some plot details revealed in the third of the film.

First, the film itself. It's a fantasy about a computer programmer who gets pulled inside the mainframe at the company where he used to work while trying to hack into the system to retrieve evidence that one of the execs stole programs from him. While inside the computer world (on the other side of the video game screen) he's forced to play the games that he's programmed, while trying to keep the computer world safe for democracy. It's an interesting plot premise, and who wouldn't want to go inside his computer and interact with programs as people?

The film is paced reasonably well, the script carries through but is kind of klunky in some places. The computer world scenes are visually stunning, and the DVD is an excellent transfer. If you have the means, I highly recommend watching it on a progressive-scan player. The original film was released in 6-track magnetic 70mm, and the sound track carries through very well. In addition to the back-lit animation for the "program" characters in the computer world, the film has 20 minutes plus of pure CG generated footage, unheard of at that time.

If you like the film at all, the special edition is definitely worth the extra money. Disney's standard DVDs are single-layer letter-box; this is two double-layer disks. The first disk has the film, on a THX certified "Enhanced for Widescreen TVs" presentation. The commentary track on the film is interesting and informative.

The second disc has all the extra material, and there's a huge amount of it. There's a 1 1/2 hour "making of" feature; also many hundreds of storyboards and photographs from the set for comparison. There are shorts talking about specific aspects of the production, and the usual previews, deleted scenes, publicity material, and lots of interviews with production and cast members.

An excellent presentation of an excellent film; a must-have for any science fiction fan.

Film Ratings:
Plot Originality: 8.5
Pacing: 7
Characterizations: 6.5
Dialog and Plot Coherence: 6
Visual Impression: 8.5
Geekness "Cool!" Factor: 8
Overall: 8

DVD Specific Ratings (Special Edition):
Film Transfer: 8.5
Sound Transfer: 7.5
Commentary Track: 7.5
Making Of Feature: 8
Other Additional Material: 8
Overall: 8

(All ratings are from 0 to 10 inclusive, 10 being better, with the ratings 2 through 8 encompassing 99% of all films.)

402 comments

  1. And if you don't like the DVD.. by PopeAlien · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you don't like the DVD, you can recreate your own deadly 'Discs of Tron' game in real life!

    1. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by HeelBiter · · Score: 1

      Holy Jebus!! I thought I was the ONLY PERSON IN THE WORLD who remembered that game! I can't think how many carpal-tunnel-inducing hours I spent glued to that thing. Nice to find someone who at least doesn't look at me blankly (figuratively speaking) when I say "Intellivision." (Oh, funny post as well...)

      --
      ------------------------------
      ...harder than Chinese Algebra.
    2. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by JWW · · Score: 1

      No, you're not the only one. It was truly a great game.

    3. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      Aye. 'Twas a relic of its era...and it is sad to think how well it would stack up with even the best of the more modern games, despite all these years of "progress".

      ("Even the best" used deliberately - there was a lot of junk then, and a lot of junk now. If you're going to compare based on nostalgia, only the best usually gets remembered...so compare the best to the best.)

    4. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, nothing quite like the familiar "TCH! sssshhHHHHhhhh!" of sending a disc through one of the bad guys. I actually asked Keith Robinson (one of the Mattel Programmers) during a panel at CGExpo why the bad guys were blue and the good guys red in Tron. He dismissed the question as the geekiest question he'd heard. :-) (scroll down the page to see the paragraph mentioning the question.)

      I found out later from a friend that apparently Disney had dithered back and forth right up until the end on what colors the good guys and bad guys would have. Apparently, the Mattel folks had worked from a pre-screening which had the good guys in red and the bad in blue. (I tried to find a link to the article my friend sent me, but Dave's Videogame Classics seems to have gone away.)

      <plug type=shameless> Speaking of Intellivision, I'm actively developing games for it. I've released one game called 4-Tris and I'm presently working on another. I've even made cartridges! :-) </plug>

      --Joe
    5. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by boster · · Score: 1
      If you don't like the DVD, you can recreate your own deadly 'Discs of Tron' game in real life!

      Every seven year old boy in my neighborhood did just that the year the movie came out. The scary thing is that the frizbees lasted so long. I guess we didn't throw them hard enough...

      --
      Madness takes its toll. Exact change please.
    6. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by rikki_t · · Score: 1

      But I have to say I liked the Tron game itself (the Arcade version) better. It had the Spider Battle, the Tank Battle (the hardest one), the Lightcycle Battle (the easiest of them all) and the MCP battle. It was 4 games in one, plus it had both a spinny control and a joystick! It was, to say the least, an excellent game.

      --
      Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    7. Re:And if you don't like the DVD.. by esper · · Score: 1
      That's one of my current pet peeves... There are a lot of "Tron" games out there today, like, for instance, Xtron:

      Xtron is a simple one or two player version of the old classic TRON. The game is simple: avoid running into walls, your own tail, and that of your opponent.

      That's not the full Tron game! It's just lightcycles, which, IMO, is the lamest of the four games in the arcade Tron. MCP is a nice twist on breakout, but the spiders and tanks are the ones I really liked. But noooooo..., to all the world it seems that "Tron game" means "lightcycles" and nothing else.

      Furrfu.
  2. One of the only movies... by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So whether Tron brings back fond memories, or only serves to show you what movies before your birth,

    Back before you were born, computer movies were about real computer components with real terms; obviously, they had contracted computer technicians/scientists to ensure they were truely discussing computers so that the computer intelligent would not be offended... Unlike movies like "Hackers" or "The Net" where they didn't even ask a computer person anything, they just made stuff up...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:One of the only movies... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny


      Yes, "WarGames" and its ilk were technically accurate to a much greater degree than more recent movies like "Mission: Impossible"...

      Uh-oh, the Sarcasm Alert has hit DEFCON 5!

    2. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      "Hackers" was actually technically accurate in what could and could not be done with computers and technology. "The Net" was the movie where they made stuff up. So were "Swordfish" and "Sneakers".

      "Hackers" is usually criticized because it is a "teen exploitation film". Teenagers are oppressed by adults and authority figures and in the end they save the world from disaster and are finally appreciated. The graphical visual elements of the computing scenes are superfluous, but the capabilities of those systems do not go into the "supernatural" realm like they do in "Sneakers" or "The Net".

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    3. Re:One of the only movies... by AlexDeGruven · · Score: 1

      Back before you were born? Hmmm... I remember seeing this movie first run, does that make me as old as I feel? ugh. Anyway, I agree completely. There's nothing worse than a movie that is supposedly about computers and is merely nothing more than a bunch of buzzword dropping, and a load of made up terms slogged together into an incomprehensible mishmash of hype and Pokemon-ish flash. All Hail Research!

      --
      Randal Graves says: I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class... Especially since I rule.
    4. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know accurate is was/is :-( , ....

    5. Re:One of the only movies... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Back before you were born?

      No, I'm not that young. I, too, saw it in the theaters. I was just playing off the original quote. How young does tim think the /. crowd is?

      The film was made in 1982....

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    6. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hackers" is usually critized because the main characters are magazine-cover pretty. That a bombshell like Angelina fricking Jolie would be an elite 00b3r haX0r is patently ridiculous.

    7. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emanual Goldstein from 2600 consulted on hackers - not that he's proud of what they ended up doing to it - but they did talk to some "real" computer people - and besides, you get to see angelina jolie all hot looking, so all in all it can't be that bad can it?

    8. Re:One of the only movies... by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sneakers was a little bit of a stretch, but pretty accurate, if you suspend disbelief long enough to assume a device could be created that would do the instant decryption thing. I think Sneakers embraces more of the hacker spirit, in that they were creative, smart, and did a lot of homework before hacking their way into something.

      As far as most technologically correct, I'd have to say Antitrust is the most accurate. The first movie I know of to use valid IP addresses in it, and even smart enough to put them in 10.X.X.X, which is much like the well known 555 exchange for phones, for all intents and purposes. As far as whether his half-brained plans would have gotten them as far as they did, that is a different issue.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:One of the only movies... by cdf12345 · · Score: 0

      wait wait wait, Angelia Jolie is not a super l33t haxor?

      Damn.

      --
      Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
    10. Re:One of the only movies... by Aanallein · · Score: 1

      Back before you were born, computer movies were about real computer components with real terms

      Well, accurate computer movies are still being made. AntiTrust for example had only a few points where I frowned over things that didn't seem exactly right, but other than that it was quite accurate, and even a semi-good movie in itself. (Besides already being fun because of the obvious Microsoft parallels.)

    11. Re:One of the only movies... by greenfly · · Score: 2

      Hackers was accurate? So all those hackers could chat so graphically and browse 3d graphic high-end mainframes over their 14.4 (assumed, since they freaked out over a 28.8 modem on the notebook) modems?

      I like Hackers, heck I have the DVD, but I like watching it *because* it's so inaccurate.

    12. Re:One of the only movies... by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      It always cracks me up when they talk about Pentiums and related PC hardware when the Apple product placement is so obvious and ubiquitous.

    13. Re:One of the only movies... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3

      HEY! WarGames was the bomb, baby! I modeled my whole life off of that movie!

    14. Re:One of the only movies... by hrieke · · Score: 2

      DEFCON 1 is the lowest rating for DEFCON, 5 is status normal.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    15. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for setting these people straight. Hackers was excellent technically and only used graphics as a visual metaphor. what other flick had people doing hard core dumpster diving and social engineering to hack systems.

      Excellent flix, excellent sound track.

    16. Re:One of the only movies... by Gareth+Williams · · Score: 1

      Hey, what about "The Matrix"? Don't get me wrong, I love that movie, but...

      "We have to get a lock on your input output carrier signal so we can pinpoint your exact location"

      "This is where we broadcast our pirate signal and hack into the matrix"

      Ok, I could think of many more but you get the idea. I mean, WTF were the producers thinking?!?

      --

      --Gareth
    17. Re:One of the only movies... by tps12 · · Score: 1
      I like watching it *because* it's so inaccurate.

      Also, I believe you get to see Angelina Jolie's nipples in two different scenes. Not bad for PG-13.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    18. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      The graphical junk is "fluff" added because it's a movie. The capabilities are real though. Remotely downloading a file, planting malicious code in a supertanker control program, etc.

      Also, for the year when the movie was made, it had an amazing soundtrack.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    19. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Not in Hackers. There weren't any Mac's, and the only Apple computer was an old Apple //e that the lamer newbie guy had.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    20. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      That was the point I was trying to make. Hardly anyone agrees with me though. Someone even modded me -1, Flamebait.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    21. Re:One of the only movies... by Dwaynewayne · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a line in Mission Impossible (the movie), The "computer expert" in his list of requirements cites a "prototype RISC 686 chip" (or something very close).

    22. Re:One of the only movies... by HCase · · Score: 1

      bah, thats just wrong. you are definately right. the graphics were just there because something needed to be done to show what was happening, how how interesting and understandable would someone running a bunch of commandline shit be?

    23. Re:One of the only movies... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
      Back before you were born, computer movies were about real computer components with real terms;

      I dunno, I can remember a lot of movies depicting computers completely wrong back in the 70's. Tron at least used some correct terminology, but I still thought it was tommyrot when I saw it. IMHO the arcade game was better than the movie.

      Think about making a movie like that today, where you have to get past the Firewall, or dodging packets, or taking a fast ride on the AGP, or heck, going to meet the Kernel! :)

      There's a 1 1/2 hour "making of" feature

      Think of this as "History", since you could probably do a lot better now with the PC you are sitting at.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    24. Re:One of the only movies... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      WTF were the producers thinking?!?

      Too many of these people are still stuck in the concepts of what the average man on the street had of computers back in the 50's and earlier. Take a good look at some really old comic books, like Captain Marvel or Batman and you get some idea. The were boxes that did amazing things. Problem is as more people have PCs the average man on the street is going to look at this view and go "whaaaaat?" The least that they could do is stop calling these things computers and call them something else. But at the rate stupid ideas get turned into $100 million movies, I don't expect them to take a sip from the fountain of reality anytime soon.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    25. Re:One of the only movies... by Mimsy · · Score: 1

      In the Movie WarGames, DefCon 1 is "World War 3" and 5 is The lowest Condition, but in "Real Life" 1 is Lowest and 5 is "World War 3" They got it reversed, as is noted by the Writer/Director's comments on the DVD Edition. It is because there wasn't a whole lot of declassified info on that at the time, and they guessed. I think the actual term is ThreatCon instead but I could be wrong.

      --
      A Jedi doesn't drink Coors, a Jedi Drinks Guinness or Bass!
    26. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is you were not "computer intelligent" then and so you didn't get the movie. That's OK. You're still not "computer intelligent", or even intelligent.

      You should broaden your outlook, and not think that things suck just because you don't get them.

    27. Re:One of the only movies... by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      You are simply hanging out with the wrong hackers.

      '-pp

      A few manage not to look like Baron Harkonnen.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:One of the only movies... by tringstad · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sneakers was a little bit of a stretch, but pretty accurate, if you suspend disbelief long enough to assume a device could be created that would do the instant decryption thing.

      Actually, one of the cooler things about Sneakers, is that (right now) there is no way to prove that such a device can't be built, assuming it's purpose is to be used against private/public key encryption, or anything that doesn't use a OTP.

      Or am I wrong? I haven't seen the movie in a long time, and admit I may be missing a point somewhere.

      -Tommy

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
    29. Re:One of the only movies... by madrouter · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the 17" mac monitor on the cover of the DVD and Videocassette, I bet all the laptops except for dade's were macs.

    30. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right...conceptually janik's "black box" could easily be some kind of quantum computer or other device that did very rapid factorization.

      lots of it couldn't literally be true, of course, but the concept makes sense on at least a mythical level, which is why geeks that know their stuff still like this movie.

    31. Re:One of the only movies... by PlaysByEar · · Score: 1

      Actually just to confuse you a bit THREATCON is assigned letters, where Alpha is the highest threat condition. And DEFCON 1 is maximum readiness, not DEFCON 5. Just shows you how much those hollywood types know. PS My first slashdot post, yay

    32. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I appreciate TRON much as anyone, it's not without its flaws.

      My personal favourite nonsensical quote:

      "C'mon, you SCSI data. Be in there!" - Flynn

      The movie also features the world's first tri-state bit ;-)

    33. Re:One of the only movies... by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt wrong
      Threatcon goes from Alpha to Delta, with Alpha being the lowest. Alpha is "almost normal" condition whereby everyone on base is a little more alert to the possibility of a threat, and Delta is complete lockdown.

      And yes, I do know what I'm talking about. I work on an Air Force base in south Texas and we've been stuck in Bravo since 9/11. I remember getting stuck in a building for about 5 hrs when we hit Delta shortly after the incident.

    34. Re:One of the only movies... by PlaysByEar · · Score: 1

      Dammit, of course you're right. I've only been out of the Navy for three years and my memory is fading fast. I guess I should've thought about why "Threatcon Alpha" sounded so familiar, cause that's what we were at practically the whole time I was in. I think I did see Bravo once or twice. Delta must really suck. I hope I'm remembering DEFCON right, though... command and control was a big part of my job for the last year or so. But I guess I've been trying to forget the whole thing

    35. Re:One of the only movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe - there's one scene earlier on where Matthew Broderick's character puts the phone headset into the data coupler one way, and then there's a scene later on where he puts the headset into the coupler the exact opposite way. That has always bothered me...

      But hey, not a bad computer movie for it's time...

  3. Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by vrmlguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is TRON, for gawd's sake. It's a slam-dunk 10 on the geekiness scale.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      I really have to agree. Tron is the geekiest movie ever.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by invenustus · · Score: 1

      How about, "the geekiest movie ever not directed by Kevin Smith"?

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    3. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      It reminds me of the Simpsons Halloween episode where Homer was trapped in the 3rd dimension:

      "What's it like in there?"

      Homer: "Did you ever see that movie Tron?"
      Every character responds in turn: "No."

      Of course, by making this Tron reference through a Simpsons reference, I have gone past 10 on the geekiness scale....

    4. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Tron was devised and implemented by Computer Graphics Professor Ken Perlin, whose CGI techniques won him an OSCAR that year.

    5. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by agilen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen that episode.....whenever its on, I laugh hysterically, and nobody else has seen tron.

      Its like how Moses in South Park is the MCP...nobody ever seems to understand what Moses is supposed to be, I just think its hilarious.

    6. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      With bonus points for having early appearances of Londo (accounting program) and Sheridan (Tron) from Babylon 5.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    7. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by zephc · · Score: 2

      yeah tron was on the other night and they have the MCP and so I said jokingly to my roomie "Dude, it's THE Moses!"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    8. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by texchanchan · · Score: 1

      Finally after 20 years I've found the other people who like TRON as much as I do. I saw it 7 times that summer. (ET once, which was plenty.) It was the first movie I ever saw that showed my kind of people in my kind of universe doing the kind of things I'd like to do.

    9. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by Dwaynewayne · · Score: 1

      So... the Geekiness scale .. it goes to 11?

    10. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Tron was denied any Academy nominations because they "cheated" on the visual effects by using computer graphics (from the making-of DVD details).

      That was the Academy's opinion, in the day. Imagine that..

    11. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by WinPimp2K · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck no.
      Everybody knows the geekiness scale goes all the way to "F" (except for you trapped in a merely mortal decimal world)

      --

      You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  4. TRON SE by DarrenBaker · · Score: 0, Troll

    And again, I have to eat the cost of my fist TRON DVD, purchased before I knew there would be a TRON SE disc. Sigh.

    1. Re:TRON SE by Tebriel · · Score: 1, Troll

      You mean your pirated copy? There was no regular release, foo!

      Cry me a river.

      --
      The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    2. Re:TRON SE by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      There was a release of Tron on DVD when DVDs first started coming out, but they later pulled it pending the release of the new edition.


      It's still available here.

    3. Re:TRON SE by Tebriel · · Score: 2

      Doh! Of course, I'm now very upset that I missed out on it.

      --
      The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    4. Re:TRON SE by tabman · · Score: 1

      Uhh, I think you'r the fool.. There was another DVD release of TRON, about 4 years ago, when DVD's were new.

      Yes, it sucked.

      I've got the LD TRON release, with a lot of the DVD stuff duplicated..

    5. Re:TRON SE by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, actually, I'm holding the official first run release in my hands right now. White keep case. Look it up.

  5. Impressions from a kid by crumbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw TRON at the theater when it cam out. I was 9 or 10 at the time. We got a Sincalir ZX-81 with 16k RAM about the same time. That movie got me into computers like nobody's business. Imagining the CPU and RAM and electrons flowing through them. WOW! It is a little bit dated now, but when you are 9 years old you absorb the images and ideas like a sponge.

    1. Re:Impressions from a kid by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying, is that you were trying to find a way to get yourself in that 16k of RAM?

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Impressions from a kid by s3hel · · Score: 1

      Ah, the Sincalir ZX-81! I loved that computer! I spent days worth o time on a flight sim for that computer. Talk about being pulled inside a computer. I wish I still had one...

    3. Re:Impressions from a kid by s3hel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in my day, 16K of RAM held a lot more. We got 2-3 people loaded in to that much ram! We were less bloated back then. Somethime we would have to take turns if there were more than 3 of us.

    4. Re:Impressions from a kid by crumbz · · Score: 1

      I actually built a larger than life ZX-81 out of a refrigerator box. The RAM module was a dishwasher box and connected by a small access door.

      Umm, no I didn't......

    5. Re:Impressions from a kid by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      So, basicly what you're saying is that today's overweight American's will no longer fit into 16k of ram? I can see that: bigger people = more ram need to hold them. More likely is that today's overweight people create overweight "program/people", who can no longer fit into that tiny 16k "world/computer". Makes sense to me, but then it's after 4pm on a Friday, and my mind is mostly gone by now anyway. -Ed

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    6. Re:Impressions from a kid by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, RAM didn't "Hold more." People are just a lot fatter these days.

    7. Re:Impressions from a kid by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      We should be able to offset this with good compression, though...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  6. Tron for the next generation by serenarae · · Score: 1

    Seeing as how Tron came out before I was born, I only got to see it for the first time recently. Even though it's old and outdated, it still kicks :) I'm definatly going to buy the dvd set and have a girls night out and make all of em watch it *evil laugh

    --
    see sig. see sig run. run sig run.
    1. Re:Tron for the next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Female! On Slashdot?

      Wanna breed?

  7. Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Petersko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realise this is slightly off-topic, but is anybody else disgusted with Disney's habit of putting out letterboxed versions, rather than Widescreen"Enhanced for 16x9 Television" editions?

    I wanted to buy Hercules the other day - only letterboxed editions available. I have a 16x9 HD-Ready television, and it's either watch a terribly distorted picture, or watch it in 30% of the viewable area of the display.

    Thankfully, their "Collectors Editions" (when available) have the enhanced versions, but some are simply not available.

    Technology marches on, Disney! I won't buy them

    1. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to buy Hercules the other day

      I think a lot of those Hercules movies got onto MST3K, so those DVDs might have what you want. Worth checking out.

    2. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Sc00ter · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Correct me if I'm wrong but letterboxed movies are the aspect ratio that the movie was ment to be.. That's why if you have a standard 3:4 TV and a few letterboxed movies made at different times by different studios the black bars could be larger or smaller.


      Enhanced for 16:9 versions are "modified" to fit correctly for a 16:9 TV, must like how they used to pan and scan for 3:4 TVs. It's not as bad as when they did this for 3:4 screens, but it's still not what the original intented aspect ratio.

    3. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Aexia · · Score: 2

      I may be off, but the first edition of TRON was released several years ago, long before 16x9 TVs were even available.

    4. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, there is a BIG difference between "letterboxed" movies, and "anamorphic", or enhanced-for-widescreen-TV movies.

      I can't possibly explain the difference as well as these guys can, so I won't even try. Go there and read this, it's a great explination. It's true that both present a wide-screen picture, but you lose a lot of information in a letterboxed format.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    5. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grow a brain please

    6. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Junta · · Score: 2

      Movie theater screens are 16:9 ratio, they didn't just draw a new ratio out of thin air, they wanted the TV to more closely match the movie standard.

      Now if they take a version that was pan and scanned to 4:3 and then modify it again to 16:9 without the original, then it is messed up.

      Letterboxing in general means to present 16:9 aspect ration in an assumed 4:3 screen geometry. When the actual screen is 16:9, then you get horrible horizontal strecthing. Switching TV to show 4:3 corrects ratio, but it means you have big black areas above, beneath, and on either side, when you could get proper aspect by simply filling the screen.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Sorry, not all movies are 16:9.. Newer movies are yes, but if you start looking at older movies they are much wider then they are tall..

    8. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Erm what do you mean by "modified"?

      Most theatrical releases are either 1.85:1 or 2.35:1. IIRC a widescreen TV's aspect ratio is 1.77:1 (I could be a little off), so there are still black bars at the top and bottom -- they're just significantly smaller.

      Widescreen enhanced means that the image has higher vertical resolution because there's less black bar in the way. It doesn't imply that the movie was cropped or that the aspect ratio was adjusted in any way. Some 1.85:1 movies are opened up a little to fill the screen entirely, but that's usually because the movie itself was open matte, and they're just reducing the size of the matte (thus the aspect is slightly off from the theatrical presentation, but it's insignifantly small and you're not losing information and likely not screwing up the intended framing).

      Anyway, Disney -- from what I've heard -- isn't screwing the consumer out of 16:9 transfers anymore. They've found better way to screw consumers.

    9. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by gea · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, you're wrong.

      All DVDs encode the material at a resolution of 720x480. A flag in an MPEG header indicates whether the bitmap represents a 4:3 image or a 16:9 image; either way the pixels aren't square.

      On a DVD box, "Enhanced for 16x9 televisions" means the bitmap represents a 16:9 image. When played on a 4:3 TV, vertical scaling is performed in the DVD player, producing a letterboxed image.

      For whatever reason, some DVD creators letterbox the film first, then encode the letterboxed image. So some of the 720x480 bitmap is wasted on the image of the black bars, resulting in lower picture quality.

      So if the Tron DVD is "enhanced for 16x9" then Disney did it right.

    10. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

      Wrong, too. The aspect ratio of the movie screen depends on the film format. 35mm is 16x9, but 70mm and 135mm are much wider. Most movies today are indeed shot in 35mm, but not all, particularly epic movies (Last of the Mohicans comes to mind).

    11. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong too, the aspect ratio of movie screens has been standardized to 1.85:1 (Academy standard) or 2.35:1 (Anamorphic/Cinemascope) (at least, in the US). Although, there may be slight variation from theatre to theatre because the aperture plates which define what part of the frame is actually shown, are usually hand cut to match the geometry of a particular auditorium. The actual aspect of the screen is usually changed by either moving curtains on either side, or lowering a black mask from the top.

      Which ratio is used is up to the cinematographer and/or director and is a function of the lens used.

      Old movies were filmed with a ratio closer to standard TV. 16mm may also use this ratio, but I've never worked with 16mm.

      70mm prints, although wider than 35mm, also had taller frames, so the aspect ratio was still the same. This provided higher resolution and less film grain. Very few movies are shown in 70mm anymore, because with the smaller screens and improved film, the only real advantage 70mm had was it's 6-track magnetic sound. With digital sound, that's not even a consideration anymore. 70mm prints are much more expensive and don't deliver any benefit.

      I've never seen or heard of 135mm film in standard movie theatres. Even IMAX only uses 70mm film.

    12. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      That's probably just panoramic.

      It would be far better to make no assumptions about the display equipment when mastering the disk and simply allow the DVD player to put in the necessary bars for normal or panoramic letterboxing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. I want to see the whole movie. by Captoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    For those of you who have never seen the film, I mention some plot details revealed in the third of the film.

    Why are they only releasing a third of the film on DVD? :)

    1. Re:I want to see the whole movie. by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to go to Region 2 for the second third, and Region 4 for the third.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  9. If this was AICN I'd be first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a film to geek out on get the new release of Evil dead. Tron is almost as boring as waiting for the Enterprise to fly all the way through V'ger.

    1. Re:If this was AICN I'd be first by bmorton · · Score: 1

      What?? Are you saying you wouldn't want to interact with programs as people??

      Damn...I almost faint at the thought...

    2. Re:If this was AICN I'd be first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up Harry.

    3. Re:If this was AICN I'd be first by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      I know I would....

      I have an Accounts Receivable balancing application I'd like to slap upside the head....

    4. Re:If this was AICN I'd be first by Flounder · · Score: 2
      What?? Are you saying you wouldn't want to interact with programs as people??

      User, you've got some 'splaining to do!

      Of course, those are just from my earlier spaghetti code years, not now. No way.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  10. This is a great DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One of the cooler extras: CG animation dating from about 1974(!), developed for advertising purposes. Slightly disappointing: less work-in-progress on some of the famous sequences than I would have liked to see. Well worth the buy nonetheless.

  11. Greetings program. by spagma · · Score: 1

    I don't know about everybody else, but I already picked up a copy of Tron. It may not have been as good as the Star Wars movies, but it was one of my favorites when I was growing up. Do you believe in users?

    --
    If it won't boot, Fsck it!
  12. The CG was great for it's time by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

    I was happy as a clam that only 6 years later, I was doing similar CG on my Amiga (minus the 'light trails' from the flying discs)

    1. Re:The CG was great for it's time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Lisberger explains on the commentary, the light trails were hand-drawn anyway. So don't feel bad.

    2. Re:The CG was great for it's time by Dino · · Score: 2

      Yup, The Amiga was fully capable of Tron-eqsue graphics. Way back, before I was an Imagine Jockey, I re-created the flying two-legged ship thingys in DPaint III of all places. I would "render" each facet of the ship's body using DPaint's 'Move' command. It was tiring work! I was so happy to discover real 3D rendering! "You mean I don't have to render each polygon separetely! What will they think of next!!"

      I also remember the 8-player tron-motorcycle game that was released for the Amiga as freeware. Man, those were some fun times.

      --
      That's not what I meant.
    3. Re:The CG was great for it's time by PD · · Score: 1

      I was doing all that on my TI-99/4A, (minus the part where it actually displays on the screen.) It was just like getting in the car and imagining what it would be like to actually go somewhere.

    4. Re:The CG was great for it's time by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      OK... getting off topic here, but in reply:

      Didn't Jim Sachs do most of his excellent animations in DPaint only? If you remember some of his work, you'll appreciate the patience he must have had in doing them.

      Then of course, Eric Schwartz did wonders with MovieSetter (I think)

    5. Re:The CG was great for it's time by ChadN · · Score: 2

      I remember Leo Schwab (ewhac on /.) describing how Kim Sachs used to work; If Jim wanted to change the color of something, he would manually repaint each pixel. Then, if he wanted to change it back, he would repaint each pixel again. He wouldn't just do a simple palette change.

      Now that may sound foolish, but if you saw Jim's work you'd see that he was very adept at blending and texturing with colors, and using dithering techniques, and so by changing the color of a few pixels, he would then repaint the surrounding pixels so that it looked just right. A simple palette change would not have had the same effect, because each pixel color was predicated on its neighbor. In short, it took a LOT of patience and mouse clicks (in fact, he used to talk about how many mice he wore out from clicking)

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    6. Re:The CG was great for it's time by sharkey · · Score: 2

      the flying two-legged ship thingys
      are called Recognizers.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  13. Look out -- grid bugs! by quistas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This has always been my favorite part of tron -- the 5s grid bug creation CG, which is commented on and then never mentioned again in the entire movie.


    I'm convinced it was done earlier as a proof-of-concept or something, but they thought it was so cool they had to work it in.


    Can someone who has the new edition comment on that -- were the grid bugs supposed to be important and then cut down, or are they just a funny aside tossed in?


    -- q

    1. Re:Look out -- grid bugs! by wikthemighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      This scene was worked in because they developed the arcade game at the same time, which had a grid bug sequence in it...

      --
      "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
    2. Re:Look out -- grid bugs! by mblase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More details, from that same URL:

      As every good Tron fan knows, the grid bugs were almost entirely edited out of the movie (what was left was about two seconds of an animation of a grid bug creating itself). Grid bugs appear in the game because of pressures to develop the arcade game in time for the release of the movie (all part of Disney's sales strategy for the movie's launch -- posters and trailers ended with a tagline along the lines of: "See the movie. Play the game.") So, game programmers had to use whatever script elements they could from the movie before the film itself was actually completed. Light cycles, tanks, recognizers, and the MCP, of course, all made the final cut -- the grid bugs did not.

    3. Re:Look out -- grid bugs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm looking for the person who rendered the Grid Bugs -- possibly while stoned.

  14. "dear lord, computers can do that?" by stalwart · · Score: 0

    i remember not going near a computer for a while after seeing that movie, for fear it would bring malicious acts against me. midnight commander had never been so evil looking.......

  15. Tron! by Carmody · · Score: 2

    Raise your hand if you can close your eyes and make yourself "hear" the sound of the cycles warming up from the video-game... if you can make yourself "see" the guy ALMOST losing his balance from Disks Of Tron... if you can perfectly picture the exact shade bright blue that permeated the movie....

    Tron!

    --
    God is real unless declared integer
    1. Re:Tron! by CyberDong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thankfully, there's a MAME download for those who can't imagine it...

    2. Re:Tron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the sound that the original Tron video game made when a segment started? When a segment ended? Do you still remember your lightcycle segment patterns, like the question mark drawn in reverse for the first level?

      Did you ever read the Tron paperback book, which sure made it sound like the writer had surprising (firsthand?) awareness not just of technology but of the slightly depressing everyday life of a corporate slave tech geek, which didn't come through with quite as much BOFH Dilbertesque edge in the film?

      Tron rules.

  16. Here's the copy edited version : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gevmage (Craig Steffen) writes with the review below of the new DVD boxed set of Tron, which he says is a "must-have for any science fiction fan." So whether Tron brings back fond memories, or only serves to show you what movies [were like] before your birth, read on for his take on the set. If you're not familiar with Tron at this late stage, beware of a few spoilers within.

    Review: TRON 20th Anniversary Collector's Edition, 2 Disc DVD set

    January 15, 2002, [Disney] issued a special edition DVD set of TRON. For those of you who have never seen the film, I mention some plot details revealed in the [final] third of the film.


    And that's just in the first few paragraphs! Can we have a little copy editing here?

  17. wow! I want it!!! by ndege · · Score: 1

    The powerful graphics, the realism, the plot.

    Excuse me while I drill my eyes out with a dull screwdriver.

    --
    Sig Return: 204 No Content
  18. Sequelitis by Cinnibar+CP · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, and the review neglects to mention the overpowering hints on the DVD regarding "Tron 2.0".

    The sequel is coming.

    1. Re:Sequelitis by LoveMuscle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tron 2.0 ie. Troff .. -love

    2. Re:Sequelitis by MuteflY · · Score: 1

      Check Tron Killer App (Tron 2.0) for more, though not much more.

    3. Re:Sequelitis by Utini420 · · Score: 1

      If you haven't go to www.tronkillerapp.com RIGHT NOW. And remember, all the cool kids have Level 6 Access...

      --
      A little inaccuracy sometimes saves tons of explanation.
    4. Re:Sequelitis by PONA-Boy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I don't think a sequel will be able to capture the same early-geek innocence. It was a little like the Old West back in the days... the graphics avaialable today will just kill it for me...

      --
      +that's funny...I don't FEEL tardy.+
    5. Re:Sequelitis by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Little do people know that the movies TRON and THE MATRIX occur in the same universe.

      Isn't it obvious? After all... the Matrix must be the Tron game-world using a GeForceXXVI.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  19. ... did anyone see the movie 'Tron'? by merz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hibbert: No.
    Lisa: No.
    Marge: No.
    Wiggum: No.
    Bart: No.
    Patty: No.
    Wiggum: No.
    Ned: No.
    Selma: No.
    Frink: No.
    Lovejoy: No.
    Wiggum: Yes. I mean... um, I mean, no. No, heh.

  20. What have I done? by Aaron_Pike · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just saw Tron for the first time and... *sob* WHAT HAVE I DONE? All those programs I've deleted over the years... Oh, the humanity...

    1. Re:What have I done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be the programity?

    2. Re:What have I done? by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      And in CounterStrike, Doom, Quake, Tribes, etc etc..

    3. Re:What have I done? by egarff · · Score: 1

      You should be de-rezzed for doing that.

    4. Re:What have I done? by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      Dear God .. I just 'rm -rf /home/shared/beta' .. I'm going to Hauge now, for sure!

  21. Better reviews by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you'd like a review with some actual depth, check out DVDFile's, which goes into much greater detail as to the picture & sound quality as well as what the extras are all about. This thread at Home Theater Forum also has more useful feedback about the disc.

    IMHO, it's a pretty nice disc. The picture quality is good, the sound is sweet and the extras really show you in great detail how it was all done.

  22. Re: Real Life Tron scene by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Better yet, get some Jai Alai equipment and re-enact the Jai Alai like scene from the movie.

    No challenge you say?


    Consider that you would still have to bounce the ball off the ceiling. AND that 99.999% of us have never touched and a piece of Jai Alai equipment and even coming close to someone should earn you a point like in horseshoes.

    I guess you could use those cheap plastic "scoops" to get a one-on-one game going

    Takes me back to when my friend had a "Thundertree" rigged up with tire swings and platforms that was inspired by Beyond Thunderdome...anyways, I'm rambling

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  23. Interacting with Personified Programs Stinks by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny
    and who wouldn't want to go inside his computer and interact with programs as people?
    Me: Where am I?
    Program: It looks like you're trying to go to MSN.
    Me: How do I get out of here?
    Program: It looks like you're trying to buy some data. Would you like to use your Passport account?
    Me: Do you ever shut up?
    Program: It looks like you're trying to access help on help. Please have your Windows activation code ready.
    1. Re:Interacting with Personified Programs Stinks by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      Oh, I don't know. That one might make a good test subject to find out just how many ways there are to delete a program. Hit with disc, falling from an erased platform, hit (or near miss) by tank projectile, stomped by recognizer, run into lightcycle wall at high speed...and let's not forget the wall of pain. ^_-

    2. Re:Interacting with Personified Programs Stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Me : Where am I?

      Program : In the village

      Me : What do you want?

      Program : Personal information

      Me : You won't get it

      Program : By hook or by crook, we will

      Me : Who are you?

      Program : The new paperclip

      Me : Where is a real help file?

      Program : That would be telling. You are serial number DHJ42-2XPFV-A6D32-9V432

  24. Tron and MS by Derkec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recently I heard an interview with one of the main guys at Disney who has been with Tron. He described it as being similar to the early "Bill Gates story." Bear with me. The MCP is the classic big iron central computer of the time. It was controlling and monolithic, like say.. IBM. It locks up programs and does mean things to users. In comes a rogue force which strikes back at the monolith. By going inside (like MS getting IBM's contract) it finds the weakness of the monolith and destroys it. This brings happiness to the programs and the users. While I don't think they really intended it to be the "Bill Gates story" (how could they at the time) the themes that made MS successful early on resonate soundly. Tron is a entertaining when you watch it with that perspective.

    1. Re:Tron and MS by sharkey · · Score: 2

      And now, the parallels are still there, is you cast:

      Bill Gates/Microsoft as Dillinger/MCP/SARK
      Linus Torvalds as Alan/TRON
      Tove as Lora/YORI
      Eric S Raymond as Popcorn Guy/RAM
      Alan Cox as Flynn/CLU
      and... RMS as Walter/Dumont

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Tron and MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also entertaining when it's viewed as a modern day Alice in Wonderland. Quite the rabbit hole you've fallen down, Alice.

    3. Re:Tron and MS by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that in the sequel, Tron is super powerful and trying to control everything and HE needs to be taken down?

    4. Re:Tron and MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought it was the Bill Gates story, but not with him as the hero. I mean an all-encompassing software program that incorporates all the useful features from other programs and then eliminates them. What the hell ELSE could the movie be about.

    5. Re:Tron and MS by Derkec · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Bill Gates of today, but not the Bill of 1980.

  25. Tron games. by billn · · Score: 2

    If you're a big fan of the movie, check out 'Armagetron' over on Freshmeat. Windows and X clients available, BE SURE to get the movie packs for images and sounds. The game is already well done, show some support and it can improve. (LAN play is fine, net play gets a little hairy.)

    --
    - billn
    1. Re:Tron games. by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like GLTron better. Closer to the movie in visuals. GPL'd.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:Tron games. by JWW · · Score: 2

      I concur, GLTron is awesome. Espically the latest versions with the split screen multi-player.

  26. Time to get out more... by Spamhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and who wouldn't want to go inside his computer and interact with programs as people?

    Uh, me for one. Time to get outside more, dude.

    --
    Everybody Wang-Chung tonight!
  27. No Tron for me... by PeterClark · · Score: 5, Funny
    I thought Disney was the bad guy? Undoubtably, someone is going to get on my case for expecting some standards here at /., but really, this is DISNEY, bringer of evil acronyms, like SSSCA, and part of evil four-letter acronyms, like MPAA. But look! Shiny lights!


    Bah. A pox on your house.


    :Peter

    1. Re:No Tron for me... by kammat · · Score: 1
      Actually, I see this more of an encouragement to tell them what we really want.

      Yes, give us our DVDs with a nice pack of extras, make it something we want.

      But no, don't take away our freedom to use the movie within our rights.

    2. Re:No Tron for me... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yeah. well dont be surprised if Disney pulls Tron in a few months and refuses to sell it for several years, just 'cause they're jerks. They do it all the time with their kids' movies for no reason other than to create artificial demand and screw the customers. Or maybe they'll buy another Congress and force a pay-per-view system into every DVD player. Who knows?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:No Tron for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call shenanigans on this post!

    4. Re:No Tron for me... by tempest303 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Completely agreed.

      While I'd love to own this movie, especially on DVD, I refuse to give another cent to Disney. After what I read about what Eisner had to say at the Senate hearing, I will NEVER purchase another Disney product, and I encourage others to do the same.

      Check out this quote from the above link:

      "Eisner confessed that the only reason he could think of for Michael Dell not to build in ubiquitous copyright-policing functions in his products was that Dell wants to sell his products to infringers."

      In the face of such blatent corporate doublethink, how can anyone who's at all concerned about Fair Use justify the future purchase of even a single Disney product?

    5. Re:No Tron for me... by Bilestoad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes! Disney, RIAA and MPAA are all iredeemably wicked.

      They are symbols of corporate abuse of power and show complete contempt for us as consumers. They regularly use their lobbyists in Washington to try to influence lawmakers to further restrict our rights to what we pay for. They wish "fair use" would just go away.

      But they do make shiny things that CmdrTaco likes to buy.

    6. Re:No Tron for me... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you realized how hard it is to boycott Disney?

      They just dont sell old movies, and over packed theme parks.

      I lived for 2 years in Orlando, Fl... seat of the Disney/Eisner Kingdom...

      Let me tell you something... Disney owns EVERYTHING. They have a 10billion dollar a year general aquisition fund, for buy NON-Disney like companies...

      Though you may not like them the Cristian Coalition also tried to boycott Disney... they failed miserably..

      BTW: Disney is not all bad. They were one of the first major coroporations to offer benifits to same sex couples. (since this message will be archived for the next Gazillion years on Google, I should probably mention I'm not gay) And they do a heck of allot of charity. Just because they don't GET tech doesn't make them evil, just a little (or a lot) slow.

    7. Re:No Tron for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I had a random thought about this whole copy protection thing the other day.

      Why is it we assume fair use for music (the ability to mix tracks, the right to get the information in a non-encrypted format) but not for video. I'd really like to be able to take my favorite scenes to The Matrix, The Fugitive, Tron, et. al, and mix em up for a treadmill DVD.

      I mean, if we have the right to do this with audio, why not video? I think we need to push for enshrining (ie., yes, legislation) guaranteeing certain "fair use" rights regardless of the type of product.

      This gets confusing and interesting when thinking about books and libraries, software and source code...

      :-)

    8. Re:No Tron for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to counteract that, I should start a "TheLoneCabbage is gay" homepage.

      That way no one will ever know the truth! MUHAHAHA :)

    9. Re:No Tron for me... by fleener · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No Tron for me because I bought the DVD when it was first released. It's quite a racket to release a barebones edition, have all the diehard fans buy it up, then wait a few years and release a bigger version to sell to the same audience again.

      No thanks.

    10. Re:No Tron for me... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Why do you assume /. must cater to a specific agenda? They pst stories about thing for nerds. TRON qualifies. Wether or not you want to buy it, is up to you. I don't think anybody wants /. to tell us our opinions.
      so, who did you vote for in the last election?
      If you don't vote, you are being a huge hipocrite when you complain about problems like this. Thats far more important then anything on /. .
      if you do vote, thanks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:No Tron for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (since this message will be archived for the next Gazillion years on Google, I should probably mention I'm not gay)

      Not that there's anything wrong with that...

    12. Re:No Tron for me... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      "Disney is not all bad. They were one of the first major coroporations to offer benifits to same sex couples."

      That was actually the reason that the Christian Coalition tried to boycott them.

    13. Re:No Tron for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right!
      nobody should buy this dvd, go out and pirate it instead!

    14. Re:No Tron for me... by elmegil · · Score: 2

      Buy the soundtrack by Wendy Carlos then. She's not Disney, and the music is pretty darn cool.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    15. Re:No Tron for me... by tempest303 · · Score: 1

      ... y'know, trolling is one thing, but putting out my email in plain text is just lower than low. So I curse thee, wicked troll! May a plague of spam come down upon thy head like in a swarm of Low Mortgage Rates and Nasty BBW Teen Bitches!

    16. Re:No Tron for me... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but I have the laser rotted (seriously) laser disk of tron - and I bought this before I found out how evil disney is - does this mean I can still watch the thx certified movies I have without feeling too guilty?

    17. Re:No Tron for me... by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      It's quite a racket to release a barebones edition, have all the diehard fans buy it up, then wait a few years and release a bigger version to sell to the same audience again

      I hope you aren't implying that only Disney does this. Every studio does this. And will continue to do this.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    18. Re:No Tron for me... by Ricdude · · Score: 2

      She? I thought it was still going by "Walter" back then (before the new age years)

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    19. Re:No Tron for me... by Utini420 · · Score: 1

      You can. I do.

      --
      A little inaccuracy sometimes saves tons of explanation.
    20. Re:No Tron for me... by dinivin · · Score: 1


      She had gone through the sex-change operation some time in the mid to late 70s. She was definately Wendy when Tron was produced.

      Dinivin

    21. Re:No Tron for me... by elmegil · · Score: 2
      She prefers to be referred to as Wendy regardless of the specific time of original release. I respect her wishes by referring to her as such and not worrying about when the change was made.

      You'll note that reissues are all listed by Wendy, including the reissue of S-O-B which definitely was recorded prior to the change.

      Sorry if you're incapable of treating another human with respect, but most of us don't have much trouble with doing so.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    22. Re:No Tron for me... by Storm+Damage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Disney may offer benefits to gay folks, but they have more than their share of employee abuses. For instance, this fall, thousands of Disney employees in the Orlando area had their workweek cut significantly short, and had their pay reduced to match. Middle management and the labor force have routinely been screwed over the years since Eisner took over, while the share price has gone through the roof, and Eisner has pulled hundreds of millions a year in bonuses and option compensation.

      Disney is one of the most piggish and corrupt corporations around these days, and like you said, they are EXTREMELY hard to boycott. To do so effectively, one would have to avoid all of its business outlets (including possibly all advertisers on its media outlets)

      For instance, In addition to the Disney-labeled media outlets, Disney owns over 19 TV networks including ESPN, A&E, the History Channel, Lifetime, E! and Fox Family; 6 magazines like US Weekly and Discover; 6 movie studios including Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, Miramax, Dimension and Buena Vista International; 50 Radio stations; 9 resorts; 5 book publishers, including Hyperion, Talk Miramax, and ABC Daytime Press; 2 sports teams (Anaheim Mighty Ducks and Anaheim Angels); and lots of other businesses, including 4 large theatrical productions, a Broadway theatre, 741 Disney Stores and the Disney catalogue, tons of licensing deals of characters for clothes, toys, teaching aides and videos/films for schools...as well as stakes in NFL.com and Movies.com and the 4900-acre town of Celebration, Florida.

      Oh, that's just it's media holdings. Who knows what else they've got investments in.

      Even if you successfully avoid exposure to Disney-sponsored entertainment (a herculean task), it's nearly impossible to get widespread success with this, and you'll still be buying products from companies that advertise through Disney.

      Basically, it goes like this:

      Disney: I OWN J00

      You: WHAT YOU SAY!

      Disney: T4KE 1T!

    23. Re:No Tron for me... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the 6 or 7 (that I've heard of) 'Adult Film' Companies that Disney owns... Guess people while have to boycott porn to... That might be hard for some of these slashdotters...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    24. Re:No Tron for me... by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

      Out of that whole list, the only thing I'm going to miss is Miramax films.

      Oh, and I'm not selling my Disney stock. I'm keeping it so I can vote against the board of directors when they come up for renewal.

    25. Re:No Tron for me... by Storm+Damage · · Score: 1

      I also forgot to explicitly mention ABC, only one of the four largest TV networks in the country...but who's counting, right?

    26. Re:No Tron for me... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      good point, I forgot about that one... But I was trying to point out some of their more hiden & lesser known ventures first...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    27. Re:No Tron for me... by Storm+Damage · · Score: 1

      Why, when you can point out the almost obvious fact that a good portion of your monthly cable (or satellite) bill goes straight to Disney in the form of carry-fees. Successfully boycotting means sticking to antennas or pirating satellite, and never watching any Disney-owned channels.

    28. Re:No Tron for me... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well I don't have cable anyways (I live 'to far' from a large city), so I don't ahve to pay such things...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  28. I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by Aexia · · Score: 2

    It'd be interesting to see what the computer program inside are like now. Would they have multiple personalities because of all the people involved? Would open source programs be transparent?

    Is the MCP still around, only he's calling himself Windows?

    1. Re:I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by PD · · Score: 1

      It's the same stuff, except they move a lot faster, like a Charlie Chaplin film. (shot at 18 fps, shown at 24 fps).

    2. Re:I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      "Is the MCP still around, only he's calling himself Windows?"

      No, Tron 2.0 takes place outside of the computer now.. and the MCP is an MCP (Microsoft Certified Professional) now. It's also been reclassified from Fantasy to Horror.

    3. Re:I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by sharkey · · Score: 2

      and the MCP is an MCP (Microsoft Certified Professional) now

      Ahh. Minesweeper Deathmatch.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, here's a top secret synopsis of Tron 2.0:

      Flynn must stop a mysterious User known as "The H@cker", who is bypassing the copy control mechanisms in the computer and making rogue copies of programs and sending them all over "The Grid". Flynn must hunt down each rogue copy and destroy them so only the rightful Users can control programs. Then, in the climactic finale, Flynn has to stop The H@cker from obtaning the most closely guarded program in the computer -- "Decis". This mysterious program is a gateway between the data streams and the Users. With control of "Decis", The H@cker can spread the data stream around the world; thus creating chaos.

  29. Problem with the first disc by Lord+Javac · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was really excited about this edition and bought it shortly after its release. Unfortunately, there is a flaw in the disc which makes it unplayable on a PS2. In the eighth scene, during a conversation in the holding cell, there as a graphic error that causes a PS2 to totally flip out. Fortunately for everyone with a real DVD player, this is a small enough glitch to go unnoticed on all but the PS2. I did try returning the disc, but the replacement had the exact same flaw and when I took it back again, they guy at the store said there had been complaints at other stores.

    The movie is great, if you can get it to play, and the special features are nice. My favorite part of the disc is the menus. I will try purchasing this edition again when either Sony updates their DVD drivers to address issues like this or Disney re-issues the disc with a new master (to remove the flaw).

    --

    End of Line
    1. Re:Problem with the first disc by dekker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard from friends that this disc won't play on PS2. If that's your only DVD player, you're SOL on this one.

    2. Re:Problem with the first disc by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Did you try this with both the original PS2 DVD drivers and the "updated" ones that came with the official Sony remote, or did you not have both available?

    3. Re:Problem with the first disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just skip past that one scene and then scan backwords you only miss a few minutes of the whole movie the rest of the disc is fine.

    4. Re:Problem with the first disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That same problem is on the original release DVD as well. I just thought I had a dirty disc or something.

    5. Re:Problem with the first disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problem. However, if you start fast forwarding right before the glitch until you are past the glitch, the rest of the disc plays normally.

    6. Re:Problem with the first disc by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      Happens with both the standard driver, and the one they ship with the remote control. Very frustrating, and yes, my PS2 is my only DVD player (other than my PC, but that's in the office, not the living room).

      Weirdly enough, it only seems to be in that one frame. You can FF over it, or rewind back to just after it, and everything is hunky-dory. Makes me wonder exactly what's happening in that frame. Some form of retarded region control no doubt...

    7. Re:Problem with the first disc by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, there is a flaw in the disc which makes it unplayable on a PS2.

      The top-level menu is widescreen (16x9) formatted, but plays in 4x3 on my DVD player, so you only see part of the picture. Of course, the highlight graphics when you select items are in 4x3, so they don't line up with the images behind them. Shows up on my Samsung 7something, but plays fine on the cheapo Apex player we got my parents for Xmas.

      The second disc is fine, though...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    8. Re:Problem with the first disc by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      This goes to prove...as I constantly try and explain to friends...that not all DVD players are created equal. (Especially those trying to play DVDs off their company laptop via a composite video output telling me that it's comparble to my progressive scan, component video setup!).

      (I'm not saying the PS2 DVD playback is inferior either, it could actually be legtimate to stop on whatever error there is).

      Just my 2 cents of bitching ;-)

    9. Re:Problem with the first disc by wilhelm · · Score: 1

      I already returned one, and when the same thing happened on the second copy I got, I was afraid that my PS2 was broken. This is good(ish) news. Now of course since I've just moved, the other DVD player must have gotten jostled the wrong way, and has decided to not put out any video any more.

    10. Re:Problem with the first disc by Lord+Javac · · Score: 1

      If you look really closely, there is a pixel (or so) that doesn't look right (white when it should be blueish). My guess is that this is the source of the problem. When I played it on my computer (Mac), there was a portion of the image that was misaligned by the error. This has done nothing to improve Disney's track record on DVD, "The Emporer's New Groove" special edition simply wouldn't play portions of the disc on thre PS2, at least they're decent when it comes to returns.

      --

      End of Line
    11. Re:Problem with the first disc by TheTick · · Score: 1

      I worked around this by power cycling, selecting the scene following the messed-up 8th chapter, and scanning back. It was a pain, but it let me watch the whole movie.

      Fortunately, it was a rental.

      --

      --
      bachiatari na torisetsu o yome!

    12. Re:Problem with the first disc by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Happens with the GT3-35001 PS2 also.

      I don't know if this is the standard driver, or as up to date as the remote control.

    13. Re:Problem with the first disc by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really? I have an original Apex AD600A player, and the goldurned thing won't recognize the anamorphic flag on this movie - I end up with tall-skinny-Boxleitneritis. If I want to watch it in the correct aspect ratio, I have to use my computer because there's no way to override it on the Apex. It's probably time to replace the thing anyway. It was a good deal when it was new, but it really is cheap - it overheats, it won't handle seamless branching correctly, and various other problems as well.

      Certain DVDs incorporate widescreen menus - _Tron_ is one, _Gladiator_ is another. It uses the pan-and-scan flag to tell the player to zoom in on the menu image when playing on a 4:3 display. These menus usually don't have actual selectable menu items on the sides which would get cut off, just extra background image. It sounds like your Samsung isn't getting the pan-and-scan flag right. (This flag was supposed to enable anamorphic DVDs to act like cropped discs so that both crowds could be pleased by the same disc, but a lot of players don't seem to get this right.)

      My favourite part of the extras on this disc is when someone describes generating animation frames by hand. He actually had to write down the camera coordinates on paper - six spatial and angle coordinates each for hundreds of consecutive frames - to be manually input into the system that rendered the images, because apparently there was no mutually compatible storage medium (floppy discs, etc) between the system they used and the rendering system! Compare that to, say, _Monsters Inc._ - talk about stone knives and bearskins...

      --
      "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
    14. Re:Problem with the first disc by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      Thing is, it doesn't stop. What happens is that you get a matrix of little green squares wobbling around in front of the film (which carries on playing). These green squares don't actually go away until you reset the PS2, so I'm inclined to believe it's a bug in the driver.

    15. Re:Problem with the first disc by NineNine · · Score: 1

      You have friends?

    16. Re:Problem with the first disc by PrincessLeia2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we had this problem too, at first I thought it was just another faulty dvd (i've had bad luck in the past) ... I was actually kinda glad to find out that there was a real tangible problem with this and my ps2. Unfortunately now I'm stuck watching Tron on my little computer monitor and 3 year old dvd drive... *sigh*

  30. Tron2k - Tron Killer App by Flamesplash · · Score: 3, Informative

    Keep an eye out for the new tron movie.

    http://us.imdb.com/Title?0208650

    I don't see how this can't be a total flop, given historical sequals/remakes of classics, but we can hope.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Tron2k - Tron Killer App by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, when Steven wrote the first Tron, he was a young(ish) man writing about himself and his own fascination with computer graphics and their potentiol in the real world and in movie making. The characters were all about his age, young(ish) adults, but (as the other posts attest to) the movie was readily acessable to kids as well as adults (He made the movie FOR adults).

      Now Steve is an old man and is helping to write the new one which stars young kids. I'm very afraid that it'll be nothing more than a typical kids disney film with virtually zero adult interest. and ironicly probably even less kid interest than the old one.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    2. Re:Tron2k - Tron Killer App by sharkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rumor has it that Jeff Bridges will reprise his role as Flynn. The character is supposedly retreated fully into cyberspace.

      www.tronkillerapp.com is the official website for the movie. Just a single Flash applet.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Tron2k - Tron Killer App by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      I hope it's a sequel more in the vein of the later published book Neuromancer (1984) than seemingly right now more like a sequel to Lawnmower Man.

      One is about how "cyberspace" can be visualized and interacted with much like the real world through avatars (whether the avatar represents a real or virtual entity).

      The other is about transferring the entirety of the human consciousness into the computer. Subtle differences IMO.

  31. CRACK!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wasn't hacking his former work system, he was CRACKING IT!

    If the astutue can't get it right, how can we expect the neophytes in the news media to get it right.

  32. Re:wow! I want it!!! by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1, Troll
    Stop putting so much effort into trying to be cool 'cause it clearly won't do you any good.

    The movie is fsck'ing 20 years old.

    Are you?

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  33. You mean Swordfish ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    with its super duper transvergent multiple crossing psychodellic translucent quadratic multiple attack virus create by a macho programmer at an interface we ALL HAVE, jumping for joy, excited, and programming away like he's in a Quake tournament isn't reality?

    I'm shocked! Now I have nothing to work for.

    As for Tron, excellent movie. Just and FYI for anyone who does not know. Watch the landscape when there on "air ship" (with the sails) moving along the "bus" (network cable?). You will see something .. screwy programmers.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    1. Re:You mean Swordfish ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an animated GIF of the Solar Sailer Easter egg at http://www.hiddenmickeys.org/Movies/Tron.html.

  34. tron in ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fyi. when you play the new tron dvd in ps2. when it switches between layers. it puts little green blocks all over the screen.. you need to fast foward through that part of the movie (10 seconds) and it will play fine... ericxedge

  35. dododo dododoDO DOOODOOO DOOOO DOOOO by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Not only was the movie cool, but for 3 years it was the only movie my family had on VHS...


    We were living in England and something about the formats was different over there...luckily a friends dad had a GIANT tape collection but it was all on BETA!!! So my dad went over and dubbed Tron but never got a round to anything else...

    That music haunts me sometimes though...

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  36. I want this, but I won't buy it. by Bonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, I loved TRON so much when I was a kid. Besides seeing the movie and renting the VHS cassette over and over again, I pumped dozens of dollars into TRON and DISCS of TRON game machines.

    When I first heard that TRON was going to get a SE DVD I was ecstatic. Then I remembered who produced TRON. I remembered the fight in congress to introduce the SSSCA, which has been largely fueled by that same company.

    So, thank you, Disney, for giving me a wonderful experience in my youth. Thanks, but no thanks, for the TRON SE DVD. I won't spend my money to help a company that wants to surgically remove my rights to do what I want to with my computer or any media I buy.

    If you have any feeling at all about the SSSCA don't spend your money on the TRON SE DVD.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:I want this, but I won't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, there should be a concerted effort to rip this particular DVD and upload it to as many places as possible.

    2. Re:I want this, but I won't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Perhaps you should write a letter to Disney and let them know this.

      The Walt Disney Company
      Attn: Michael Eisner
      500 South Buena Vista Street
      Burbank, California 91521

      (818) 560-1000

    3. Re:I want this, but I won't buy it. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I actually broke down and bought the DVD at Costco. My wife and kids never seen it, so I had to buy it.

      Then I ripped it, and encoded it with Divx5 and the AC3 audio stream, just a couple CDs, very nice. Humm, lucky I don't have broadband, I might put it on gnutella. (-;
      -
      quote removed by RIAA copyright control via .net architecture

    4. Re:I want this, but I won't buy it. by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 2

      Buy a used copy - Disney won't see a cent of your money. Of course, you could construe this as an indirect subsidy or endorsement, if you'd a mind to... Just a suggestion.

      --
      "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
  37. Now more than ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is pointed out time and time again, but it bears repeating:

    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' MPAA, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Totally.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' fascists, tryin' to bring us down.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Yeah... they want to take away our fuckin' civil rights. Jack Valenti is such a fuckin' bastard.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Word.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Word.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: So, how about that new TRON DVD?
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Fuckin' cool, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Hey... what were we talking about?
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Dunno. Wanna go see THE TIME MACHINE?
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Sure.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Cool.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' MPAA, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Totally.

    1. Re:Now more than ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? My ass. It's this kind of moderation that is turning Slashdot into a shrill, shitty parody of itself.

      Every day, the hypocrisy of these editors and moderators becomes more ridiculously apparent.

      Is the truth too painful to confront? That we are gleefully supporting a system that distracts us with entertainment while working to erode our basic rights as human beings? Fucking sleepwalking sheep, that's what we are.

  38. Thanks a lot Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I got that damn Tron theme stuck in my head.

  39. Please buy by r_j_prahad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everybody must buy this DVD, even if it won't play in your region. Michael Eisner and Jack Valenti need all the money they can get to combat evil movie pirates.

    Just trying to burn off karma.

  40. Re:I'm sorry by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 2

    but that movie was never any good. "Ooo a movie about computers!" Puh-lease. That doesn't make up for a weak plot and bad acting. If this movie was released now-days with up-to-date effects, it would bomb badly

    You obviously never experienced it in all it's glorious theatrical release.

    The Geek factor alone, at the time, made it worth sitting through three times in a row. It was a world previously experienced only by SIGGRAPH attendees, and only then in 10 minute shorts.

    This movie was that world delivered to the masses, Drooling Geeks, included. And we loved it!

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
  41. Bought it last week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember tron from when I was a kid, and wanted a
    copy since I couldnt remember parts of it too well.
    All in all the DVD was well done, but I dont recommend this
    for people born after 1980. It will probably bore them.

  42. And is the video anamorphic? by Dimensio · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll avoid the natural comments about Disney and the MPAA and SSSCA and all that crap and address the review.

    This is kind of a minor nitpick for a rant, but someone has to bring it up.

    One of the common elements in DVD reviews that I read is whether or not the video is anamorphic. For some viewers -- especially those with TVs that can take advantage of the enhanced resolution -- that is an issue. Whenever a widescreen DVD is reviewed it should be noted whether or not the video is anamorphic, I've refused to purchase discs because of that issue.

    BTW, the video, from what I've read, is anamorphic -- though Disney in the past was notorious about only releasing "letterbox" movies in 4:3, not 16:9.

    1. Re:And is the video anamorphic? by denzo · · Score: 2

      Short answer here: Yes, it's 2.20:1 anamorphic. And it's THX certified to boot.

  43. Sweet! by fizban · · Score: 1, Funny

    PRON 20th anniversary! Let's go check out some nekkid people!

    Oh, wait...

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    1. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll by the PRON over this stupid Tron crap any day. The whole movie is just blue lines for gods sake. sure the story ranks 10 on the geek scale, but it's poorly executed, and the acting is terrible.

  44. A true geek ... by The+MoMo+King · · Score: 0

    I first realized that I was a geek when I was younger programming on my C64 and I was acting like my programs were from the movie TRON. Anytime I couldn't get a program to work I could swear the MCP was behind it.

  45. Pointless reviews by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 1

    I reckon there's more information about the film from the "Buy it now" page at Amazon than this "article". What's the point of writing a review if it's only going to be a few hundred lines long. Why not just write "It rocks!" and leave it at that?

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  46. For a 5 year old by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Tron ruled! Its probably still pretty cool. But I have a thing about giving disney my money... Maybe for tron 2.

  47. Re:I'm sorry by DLWormwood · · Score: 1

    What makes you think it didn't bomb in the first place? (-:

    TRON supposedly had poor original box office. There have even been jokes about it in both The Simpsons and Freakazoid!.

    I personally liked the movie, but the added depth of the movie's novelization makes it clear that Disney was too afraid to pursue the "user as god, program as worshiper" story concept to its fullest. The novel also included the "romantic" deleted scene as a key plot element.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  48. Re: Real Life Tron scene by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    I've partaken in both of these things. Somehow I managed not to kill myself? Then why do I need little plastic plugs in all of the outlets for kids these days?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  49. Soundtrack is out too by NetRanger · · Score: 2, Informative
    Admit it -- you like the music. The soundtrack is now on CD for the first time too, to coincide with the 20th Anniversary release. The composer has some really interesting notes on how it was nearly lost forever until it was baked. Yes, baked, as in an oven.

    It makes for a fascinating story, especially considering the future of classic works -- will they be lost forever when the media disintegrates?

    --
    -- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
    1. Re:Soundtrack is out too by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      The composer [wendycarlos.com] has some really interesting notes on how it was nearly lost forever until it was baked. Yes, baked, as in an oven.

      Baking audio tapes is actually a fairly common with media from that era. The media was fairly unstable, so recovering the audio, or data, tracks would involve baking it, then quickly copying the data to a new medium, hopefully one which is more stable.

      It makes for a fascinating story, especially considering the future of classic works -- will they be lost forever when the media disintegrates?
      Tale as old as time here. Think of all of the thousands of priceless history books torched during the dark ages, or the books that have rotted away, or the movies that have disintegrated because the early film was closely related to gunpowder.

      Essentially, the only thing that's changed here is the fact that there's now an additional layer of indirection here needed to reach the information. Perhaps situations like this is why we need a way to bootstrap computer technology; that is, create a way of designing instructions to build up to the point to where a future society can read the information we've left behind. Think about all the technologies that have fallen by the wayside - for many of those devices, the schematics aren't even available anymore, so any information on them is essentially lost forever.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  50. Re: Real Life Tron scene by JWW · · Score: 4, Informative

    The really neat thing about the Jai Alai scene is that Flynn's competitor Pete Jurasick the same guy who would go on to play Londo Mollari in Babylon 5. It really hard to recognize him without Londo's trademark hair.

  51. Electical outlet plugs by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Funny
    Then why do I need little plastic plugs in all of the outlets for kids these days?

    OBVIOUSLY, to avoid having little 2 year old "lit-up" Tron re-enactors.

    Turn off the lights and the kids glow as they fly across the room


    ZZhhCK. "Mommy!"

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  52. TRON memories by vrmlguy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I saw TORN in the theaters when it came out in '82, and I still recall how for weeks afterward my geeky friends and I would say "Greetings, program!" when we saw each other on the street.

    I bought the 20th anniversary edition the day it cam out, and watched it that night with my 17 year-old son and a buddy of mine. I've got a 36" screen (non-projection) TV, and normally like to watch with some lights on in the room, but I made an exception for this viewing, and it was well worth it. The TRON universe, for those out of the loop, is *black*, with the only light being provided by the inhabitants. It was visually stunning in a dark theater 20 years ago, and it was equally so in my dark living room.

    As for the CGI, I was a regular attendee at SIGGRAPH in the early '80s, and I think I recall seeing some previews of the movie's special effects. Of course, as is pointed out in the "making of ..." feature, this was before it was called "CGI". I was doing a far amount of computer modeling back then (which is why I was at all those SIGGRAPH's), so several other parts of the "making of ..." feature resonated with me. At one point they talk about running a program to calculate a trajectory, getting a printout, and then reading it over the phone to someone on the other side of the country who was entering the numbers into a computer at their end. Speaking as someone who once or twice did something similar, that doesn't just make you appreciate the Internet, it makes you appreciate modems!

    BTW, there is one complaint that I have with the "making of ..." feature. There aren't any chapters! The show is divided into three sections, but there's no way to skip directly to any of them.

    The review doesn't mention it, but the 2nd DVD also has a couple of deleted scenes. While just about everyone interviewed says that, in retrospect, they wish the scenes had stayed in, I have to say that I agree with the decision that was made at the time. The "love scene" doesn't add anything to the plot, and in fact undercuts the later scene where Flynn kisses Yori.

    Finally, there's one other surprise on the DVD. These days, most DVD's start with a "Coming Attractions" bit that you have to skip over. This one starts with something that looks and sounds at first glance like the standard Disney previews, except that it says "Coming soon from the scret lab". What follows strongly hints that TRON 2.0 is in productions. I can hardly wait!

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:TRON memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw TORN in the theaters
      ^^^^

      ... must .... resist .... urge to link to goatse.cx...

    2. Re:TRON memories by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      I saw TORN in the theaters when it came out in '82, and I still recall how for weeks afterward my geeky friends and I would say "Greetings, program!" when we saw each other on the street.

      My wife and I still greet each other that way sometimes.

      Our poor children...

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    3. Re:TRON memories by wizards · · Score: 1

      I have extremely vivid memories of TRON as well; I was on the team at Information International (triple-I) who worked on the high-res CGI (MCP, Solar Sailer, etc.) We got to visit the set and watch some filming of the live action, too. I was given the 20th anniversary DVD for my birthday this week. Sadly, we do not have a DVD player as yet, so will have to wait on viewing it.

    4. Re:TRON memories by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Wasn't TORN the comeback (no pun intended) film for Ginger Lynn Allen?

  53. You've seen the movie, played the game, now... by Alea · · Score: 1

    ..read the book! I read the book when I was about 9. It was pretty good (when you're 9). It had a lot more detail, a more romantic relationship between Tron and whassername. It also had them chased by Grid Bugs and a lot more complexity in the solar sailer (?) sequence. I always thought the Grid Bugs were cool.

    The movie, game (first game), and book had such an impact on me as a kid that I programmed crappy little text-based Tron games of a complexity a little higher than "Hunt the Wumpus". Of course, that was on an Amdahl mainframe running Sharp APL, so I might be forgiven if they were less than visually stunning (the terminals were Volker-Craig 415 PFs). I personally think that writing in APL set my programming ability back by about three years in the long haul, but I digress.

  54. gee what a coincidence by goudaboy · · Score: 1

    this DVD just happens to be the Movie pick of the month at http:\\www.dvd-dweeb.com\reviews\pick.htm go figure

    1. Re:gee what a coincidence by goudaboy · · Score: 1

      oops i mean here

  55. To Burn Karma And Set The Mood... by istartedi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...I now present you with the lyrics to Heat of the Moment, combined with some extraneous text to sqeeze by the evil awful "not enough characters per line" filter. Many characters of useless stuff required to bypass this filer. Mary hada little spam. Tweedle deedle dee. Dubm-dilly-um. And all that other good stuff that *they* don't want you to have.

    I never meant to be so bad to you
    One thing I said that I would never do -
    A look from you and I would fall from grace

    And that would wipe the smile right from my face.
    Do you remember when we used to dance
    An incident arose from circumstance.
    One thing let to another
    we were young

    And we would scream together songs unsung.

    It was the heat of the moment
    Tellin' me what our hearts meant

    The heat of the moment shone in your eyes.

    And now you find yourself in '82

    The disco hot foots hold the jump for you.
    you can't concent yourself with bigger things

    You catch and pull a ride on the dragon's wings.
    'cause it's the heat of the moment

    The heat of the moment
    the heat of the moment
    Shone in your eyes.
    And when your looks are gone and your alone

    How many nights you sit beside the phone?
    What were the things you wanted for yourself -
    Teenage ambitions
    you remember well.
    It was the heat of the moment
    Tellin' you what your heart meants

    The heat of the moment shone in your eyes.
    It was the heat of the moment
    the heat of the moment

    The heat of the moment shone in your eyes.
    Heat of the moment
    heat of the moment
    heat of the mom

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  56. A classic geek movie by Jack+Admiral · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I liked this movie when it first came out because of the (then) high-tech graphics. The problem was, being only 12 at the time, and having just bought my first computer (a 16K TRS-80 color computer), I couldn't yet understand some of the concepts being presented in the movie. (What the hell was an I/O port?) Imagine what other, non-geek type people must have felt about the movie.

    Now, after having used computers for 20 years, earning a living through computers, and after being exposed to the current 3D games and movie SFX, I realize just how dated the graphics seem now but which probably cost a lot to render back then.

    The pacing of the movie is a little slow and will bore people especially if they don't have an affinity for computers. I like computers but I just couldn't wait to see the next scene. They could have sped it up a bit instead of dwelling on one particular area in order to present, fully, the computer world.

    I like the girl in the movie though and I can now understand the concepts fully. I love this movie very much because it brings me back to those days of yesteryear when computing was so much simpler. and there still was so much to discover and to explore. This ranks up there with War Games (with Matthew Broderick).

    There was an old BASIC command that I used to type just to get the feeling that I was bringing TRON to life. The command was TRON (TRacer ON). TROFF did the opposite which was to turn the TRacer OFF. This basically just listed the number of the program line that was being executed at that moment.

    I'll recommend to my rich brother to buy the DVD so I can watch it too.

    1. Re:A classic geek movie by magic · · Score: 2
      One of the saddest moments in my life was when I accidentally hit F4 follwed by F5 in BASIC, which causes it to execute


      SAVE "TRON


      Which, though bizarre (because of the lack of a close quote), was legal in BASIC and caused it to overwrite my first 3D game (Tron, of course) with an empty file. Fortunately, I didn't decide to throw in the towel on 3D, but I did can the Tron project because it was too emotionally painful to rewrite after the loss.


      -m

  57. Old Computer Movies by Ken+Hall · · Score: 1

    For the record, I liked Tron too, and I bought the SE, but if you want a movie that really kind of almost tries to get it right, catch "Paper Man" when it runs on late night TV sometime. Everyone forgets this movie, but it has elements of "War Games" and others of that ilk, and came out in 1971! It was a TV movie, but unfortunately it never made video. I'd love to see it uncut.

  58. Bah... no QA by The+Taco+Prophet · · Score: 1

    I bought a copy of the anniversary edition when it came out, and it had one of those annoying manufacturing errors where there's a bubble on the DVD medium. 20 minutes into the movie, everything goes green. I took it back to the store and exchanged it for a new copy, and had the same damn problem in the same damn place. Lousy manufacturing.

  59. Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every dollar you spend on buying DVDs these days goes to propping up a regime that is actively trying to take your freedoms away.

    I hate extremists almost as much as I hate getting up on a soapbox, but for christ's sake, if you absolutely need to see a DVD, try checking it out from your local public library (if your library has DVDs) or at least rent it from blockbuster instead of buying it. And then, make sure that you rip it to divx format and share it on gnutella so no one else will buy the DVD either. Sure, today you're a pirate if you do that, but in one hundred years, you'll be a patriot! Just remember, the Boston Tea Party was a terrorist act...until they won.

  60. Yes, we are old. Forbin Project anyone? by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Old enough to understand the in-jokes. Old enough to understand the technology when it wasn't yet kewl.

    I haven't watched the Colossus, The Forbin Project for a while (talk about BIG iron) but I recall it as far more intelligent then anything made about computers since despite very dated tech. Colossus ordering the execution of the techies trying to disable it may have seemed a bit overboard but the intelligent firepower currently in use in Afghanistan is only one step away from being able to autonomously identify, target and kill an adversary.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Yes, we are old. Forbin Project anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, I bought the VHS version, and I'm still waiting for the DVD to come out... I'm also waiting for "Soylent Green" on DVD too, btw. Oh, memories of good movies with good stories. I hate the new flash-only movies. Kinda reminds me of something called "Flash" we see on the net today. ;-)

      Oh well, at least "The Time Machine" is already available on DVD.

  61. Walter/Wendy Carlos' later career is such a pity.. by emil · · Score: 2

    Of course, as a youth I really enjoyed Switched on Bach (I even have the double CD set of Switched on Brandenburgs in my car right now). It's amazing that she was a personal friend of the Moog family.

    However, when I consider her later work (Digital Moonscapes, Beauty in the Beast, and even the Tron soundtrack), I see unrealized potential. I think that the recent "Switched on Bach 2000" is really sad from this perspective. My favorite piece that she actually composed herself was "Country Lane" from her Clockwork Orange soundtrack (I love the Dies Irea theme; I wish that she'd had more time to work on this score).

    I don't know much about her decision to get a sex change, but sometimes I wonder what sort of an effect that had upon her musical output.

    Still, AFAIK, Switched on Bach was the hottest-selling classical music album of all time...

  62. Poll idea by lightspawn · · Score: 2

    Fun as it is to watch President Sheridan as a young geek who 'invented' Space Paranoids...

    The poll I'd like to see: Considering the MPAA continued attacks on freedom, and the region coding/Macrovision issues, would you like slashdot to cover American DVD releases or not?

    1. Re:Poll idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you watch the movie? Or are you simply so crippled that you couldn't keep pace with a movie intended for a target audience of seven to twelve year-olds?

    2. Re:Poll idea by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was Flynn who 'invented' Space Paranoids.

      'President Sheridan' wrote Tron.

    3. Re:Poll idea by lightspawn · · Score: 2

      Corrected we stand. It was several years since I've seen it.

      At least they 'invented' games, not 'discovered' them.

    4. Re:Poll idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrected we stand.

      So which personality is talking exactly?

  63. Re:Want a Sinclair? Here ya go.... But Hurry! by ashitaka · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  64. Most definately a MUST-PASS. by person-0.9a · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > An excellent presentation of an
    > excellent film; a must-have for
    > any science fiction fan.

    As big of a science fiction fan as I am, and as much as this film appeals to my inner-geek-child, I consider this movie a must-pass.

    Disney is pushing hard for the SSSCA, because (near as I can tell) they consider you, me, world+dog a criminal.

    Jon Johansen was indicted for the henious crime of distributing a tool that allowed people to watch the DVD's that they own in a manner that the wish to.

    I dislike being treated as a criminal, and I prefer to not do business with organizations that do. I refuse to give any of my money to an organization that might use it to lobby congress for the SSSCA. I prefer to not help any member of the movie industry that would support such draconian acts as Mr. Johansen has endured.

    Maybe I'll used the money I might've spent on the DVD and buy one of these

    1. Re:Most definately a MUST-PASS. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      I agree with your principles, but ultimately they're doomed. Because it is very very unlikely that a critical mass of people will get on this bandwagon. Especially geeks - geeks are such anti-joiners, that as soon as they hear that 2 people had done something, they will immediately go to work to explain why they won't be the third.

      The real solution is to get one's political hands dirty, to do civil disobedience (and be willing to go the course) or to participate in lobbying efforts. Not buying DVD's isn't going to do much.

  65. Antitrust was the worst!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn tim robbins. Shawshank best movie ever, Antitrust third worst movie ever. #2 was The Mangler from the King short story. #1 was The Banker a crappy movie like American Psycho, a friend of mine thought it was the best movie ever so we rented it and he later confessed the first time he saw it was at 4:30am on cinimax while tripping acid.

  66. Who knows? by mblase · · Score: 2

    I guess the "grid bugs" were just mentioned to explain why they couldn't afford to jump out of their simulation/ship when they got attacked a few minutes later. But yeah, it would've been nice to see them mentioned more than once.

    I have a bigger problem with "Bit", personally. It hangs around Flynn's program at the start of the film. Then it hangs around Flynn. At no point does it offer useful advice to either one. And then it's gone, poof. Why was it even there? Probably just to make the movie look cooler or more "computer-like". *shrug*

    1. Re:Who knows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak not evil of Bit, swine! ;-)

    2. Re:Who knows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didn't you listen to the dialogue? flynn calls bit "another mouth to feed" (to which the bit replies "yes yes yes").

      bit was obviously flynn's offspring (flynn must have created bit when writing the "dogged and relentless" first program you see). so bit became orphaned when that program was destroyed, and it started following flynn because the poor bit needed a dad.

    3. Re:Who knows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    4. Re:Who knows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    5. Re:Who knows? by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      You mean Clu's bit (whom was told to "get out of here!") found Flynn.

      That's kinda cool, and explains that "bit" of the movie now..

    6. Re:Who knows? by bakes · · Score: 2

      Bit was OK, but the problem I had with it was that it had three states. It had the 'yes' and 'no', but it also had a kind of 'neutral' state as well. Maybe it hung around Flynn because it was actually from an early prototype trinary computer and was lost?

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    7. Re:Who knows? by hyperionfarmer · · Score: 1

      sigh........

      The value is just "undefined" until an expression is proccessed. or in this case,a question is posed.

      I mean you could simply tell by it's color and shape it was somewhere around 2 volts....

  67. Tron 2.0 Scoop! by indole · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the Coming Attractions page:

    "At the start of the Tron 20th anniversary menu screen, a cryptic promo is seen. After several moments of watching 80's computer graphics and designs (looking as if they're straight out of the original Tron movie) flash over a rolling timeline, the promo ends on the year 2003 and a web address flashes on the screen: www.tronkillerapp.com.

    When you go visit that website you're given the impression that you have entered a restricted site by accident. A multiple answer question prompts you for your "Level 6" security clearance. Regardless of the answer you select, you are then taken to a screen where you appear to receive a communique from somebody trapped in the system:

    Please...I need your help
    System wide failure imminent
    Must destroy system corruption Will continue contact shortly
    Do not believe their lies

    We've checked the WHOIS registration for www.tronkillerapp.com and it's owned by Buena Vista. If that doesn't convince you this is some kind of viral marketing idea for Tron 2.0, nothing will."

    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
    1. Re:Tron 2.0 Scoop! by rtos · · Score: 1, Troll

      Viral marketing doesn't work. Tell everyone you know.

      --
      -- null
    2. Re:Tron 2.0 Scoop! by omega9 · · Score: 2

      Well, someone is paying heavy attention to access to that site. Hitting that site causes tronkillerapp.com and hitbox.com to attempt to lay *seven* different cookies, high considering there are no adverts on that page.

      Once you answer the question, it attempts to lay *nine* more cookies, and still no adverts. Aurgueable, of course, that the whole site is an advert, but 16 cookies means somebody is extremely interested.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    3. Re:Tron 2.0 Scoop! by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Apparently nobody finds this kind of humor funny... I got rated down for a similar joke a few weeks ago.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    4. Re:Tron 2.0 Scoop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've checked the WHOIS registration for www.tronkillerapp.com and it's owned by Buena Vista. If that doesn't convince you this is some kind of viral marketing idea for Tron 2.0, nothing will."

      They actually had to check WHOIS to figure out that the site whose URL's displayed in the coming attractions of a Buena Vista DVD was owned by Buena Vista?

    5. Re:Tron 2.0 Scoop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to figure it out, just to be certain of that.

  68. Wow! I'm a science fiction fan but I... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

    ...hated this film. It's almost as bad as Last Starfighter - but at least that had real CG.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  69. And Wargames... by airship · · Score: 1

    Tron and Wargames were two of the most ACCURATE computer films of their day. Of course, they are also quite dated technologically, but still fun for us old-timers to watch. I still find myself tuning in just about any time they show up on the tube.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:And Wargames... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you say Wargames is the most accurate representation of computers????

      1) His IMSAI PC circa 1979 talked damn well
      2) His IMSAI had a TRS80 Monitor
      3) The computer talked back to him and had conversations with him.
      4) The computer followed him when he was abducted and taken to NORAD and even knew what conference room he was in when nobody else was there.
      5) WOPR was able to equate Tic-tac-toe to nuclear warfare and grow a conscience. 20 years later, AI still isnt that advanced.
      6) NORAD - our nations leading defense post - regularly gives tours to civilians.
      7) His 300baud accoustic coupler modem was able to autodial for wardialing (how did he hang up the phone? to go to the next)
      8) His terminal program nicely recreated a U.S. map and followed trajectories via what protocol at the time?
      9) "Help Games" would be available from a login prompt.

      ... and worst of all...

      10) A hot teenage girl would fall for a computer geek before the age of 20 or before his first million dollar IPO.

      I will give the writers credit. If any of you have the DVD watch it with the audio commentaries. They did do a lot of creative thinking and put some effort into it. They even invented wardialing which makes all the other innacuracies believeable.

    2. Re:And Wargames... by tomoe27 · · Score: 1

      WarGames is my all-time favorite movie! :) Too bad many people i know have never heard of it :(

  70. Re:I'm sorry by gmezero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, Tron did bomb in the theaters when it first came out... and I'll tell you why. It came out the same time as E.T.

    I personally went and saw Tron by myself while my parents took my little sister to see E.T. (which I never bothered to see in the theaters), and I never regretted it.

  71. It's Disney's fault. by Jakobud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, there are problems with Tron in the PS2. I work for SCEA and talked to our hardware guys about this problem. They contacted Disney to find out what the problem was and found out that even though Disney had PS2's to test their DVD's on, they forgot to test them...so basically Tron is jacked up on the PS2. Stupid Disney.

    Jakobud

  72. Mod that one up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're not familiar with Tron at this late stage, beware of a few spoilers within.

    Mod that one up +5 Funny!

  73. Coming in 2000 -- tron 2.0!! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "Take that, MCP ^H^H PAA!"


    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  74. Re:The CG was great for it's time - Jim Sachs by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Informative

    A very talented artist. I was always amazed at what could be produced at 320x200x32. Note, that's 32 colours, not 32k!

    A portfolio of his work is here.

    The women in your life will love these gifts [blatent plug link]

    Nah, they'll like these better. :-)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  75. You're kidding right? by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Bit was there for two reasons:

    First, it was the logical personification of a computer concept: a "bit" that can only say yes or no. How can you NOT put that in a movie based in a computer world?

    Second, comedic value. You can argue if you like if it was funny, but no doubt it tried to be. I can still hear the little guy "NONONONONO" as Flynn crashes his way around

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:You're kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes!

    2. Re:You're kidding right? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      That bit actually represented more than 1 bit's worth of storage -- it was closer to 2.1 bits or so.

      Bit was a superset of the "tristate" -- High-Z (idle), Zero (No), and One (Yes). To that TRON's Bit adds two more states -- Really No (NO NO NO), and Really Yes (YES YES YES).

      --Joe
  76. Spoliers!? by jovlinger · · Score: 1

    On a 20 year old movie?

    I mean isn't that a weee bit of an oxymoron?

  77. Just how many people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    are in both Tron and Babylon 5 anyways?
    Bruce Boxleitner and Peter Jurasick make two.

    1. Re:Just how many people... by angelo · · Score: 1

      David warner (Dillinger/MCP/Sark) guested on an episode.

  78. I'll second that by megalomang · · Score: 1

    Disney == Bad. I'm hoping AOL tries to buy them out soon like some rumors indicate.

    However, that's not the real reason why I won't be buying that movie. Am I the only one here that thinks Tron sucked? I saw it again a few years ago and no, the geek factor is not 8, it's off the charts. In fact, it's so high it ruined the whole movie. I couldn't stand to finish the movie.

    In typical Disney fashion, it wasn't a movie written by geeks for geeks, but rather by geeks for geeks' Moms and children who need a personified analogy for all the parts of the computer in order to better understand computers. I could go on about how it could easily be the opening scene in the "Computers for Dummies" puppet show, but this is beginning to bore me...

  79. ibm vs. microsoft by ciscoeng · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ironic that the movie mirrors "Big Blue" IBM vs. "little red" Microsoft, at the time anyway. http://www.angelfire.com/mn/nn/Tron.html

  80. Spoilers? by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

    I read the whole (short) review, but where exactly are there spoilers in here, especially from the 3rd act of the movie? The review devotes only a few short sentences to the plot itself, and in most generic of terms. Almost everyone knows the basic premise of this movie, so this does not give anything away. Usually I appreciate the warning about spoilers, but here it's hardly necessary, as no details about the outcome are revealed, or any successes/failures of any of the characters.

    --
    Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    1. Re:Spoilers? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
      The review devotes only a few short sentences to the plot itself, and in most generic of terms.

      Hell, the commentary audio track on the DVD barely mentions the plot! It's the producers and directors chatting about how they did this or that effect, the problems they had with the film, or the management, or the locations, etc.

      This is probably because the plot is barely there to begin with... the movie is a showpiece, driven by the technology (backlit animation and computer graphics), not because the story needed to be told.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  81. The Gospel According to Tron by Tin+Weasil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flynn=Jesus Christ

    According to the New Testament, Jesus was God... then he became Human so that through his sacrifice, all mankind would be saved.

    According to Tron, Flynn was a User... then he became a Program, and by his sacrifice, all the user-created Programs were "saved".

    Was this parallel on deliberate, or simply coincidental?

    1. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was very deliberate. Tron was written as a retelling of a modern gladiator flick, and those were basically allegory's for Christ.

      The God (Flynn) is incarnated as a program (Man/Jesus) who free's other programs (men) from the tyranny of the MCP (Rome). There is even a babtism in the energy river.

      This came right from an Interview I read from the screenwriter some time ago. The parallels were not by coincidence.

    2. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the movie, the character RAM exclaimed "My User" at least once (during his death scene if I recall correctly). An obvious reference to the phrase "my God." Also during the whole movie, it mentions that some programs don't believe in users.

    3. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by btempleton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's even deeper than that, but it's a mishmash of some other religions too. For example, it is panthiestic, and there are many users, both good and bad, who are equal in the higher world.

      TRON is sort of a John the Baptist predicting the coming of Flynn, but he has his own user, and provides a key tool in the defeat of the evil one.

      Also particularly telling is the scene where Flynn "dies" after performing a miracle and then comes back to life.

      But the theme of the gods, who created the world, incarnating and acting in it, performing miracles etc., is certainly a deliberate religious theme. Not that the writers were trying to push a religion, I think, it's just a classic story.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    4. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Tin+Weasil · · Score: 1

      Right. RAM's exclamation resulted in his realization that Flynn was a user... moments later, RAM died.

      But RAM was an Open Source program, and was integrated/resurrected into the TCP/IP stack for FreeBSD. That was fine and dandy... until Microsoft integrated the BSD TCP/IP stack into Win2k, and then RAM started wishing that he had died on the game grid.

    5. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > TRON is sort of a John the Baptist predicting the coming of Flynn, but he has his own user,
      > and provides a key tool in the defeat of the evil one.

      But then Bob wanted his keytool back.

      Chris Mattern
      "Glitch, BS'n'P!"

    6. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Tin+Weasil · · Score: 1

      I've never looked at TRON as a "John the Baptist" figure, as there is no evidence to suggest that TRON expected a user to become incarnate as a program, while John the Baptist seemed to understand the nature of Jesus.

      And I'm not quite sure of the panthestic nature of the users either... sure, there were many users, but the programs almost always refer to them being a collective... kind of the way Christians refer to God as being one, even though he is also a "Trinity."

      I agree with your assesment however. I don't think that the storytellers were deliberately trying to push any particular religion on the viewer, but rather that they identified the fact the the "Christ Story" has nearly universal appeal (hence there are similar stories in many world religions and mythologies [Moses, Hercules, etc.])

      You are quite right. It is a classic story, and one that appeals to the human psyche (ir)regardless of the exact method of it's telling or the factual details.

    7. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Kronovohr · · Score: 1

      shouldn't that be "Bob"?

    8. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by btempleton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The users are independent. Each program seems to have its own personal user, and appears to us as looking like that user. In addition, we have evil users of equal power to Flynn.

      And of course we have MCP. MCP has no user. Sark is the character with an evil user. MCP has power in the real world as well as the system. There's nothing like this in the Christ story, but there are such beings in other mythologies.

      In the Christ story, Jesus is the incarnation of the soul of god on our plane. Flynn however is just an ordinary mortal on our plane, if a smart one.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    9. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      But the theme of the gods, who created the world, incarnating and acting in it, performing miracles etc., is certainly a deliberate religious theme.

      IIRC, Sark actually calls belief in the Users a religion.

      I need to watch it again.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    10. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Caraig · · Score: 1

      It's much more akin to the monomyth, where Flynn, the flawed hero, must go into the Underworld and retrieve the elixer to bring life back to the kingdom.

      In this case, to get the evidence to smackdown on Dillinger. (No nookie for Flynn, though, "Atomic John" Sheridan already got his squeeze. =)

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    11. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      For example, it is panthiestic, and there are many users, both good and bad, who are equal in the higher world.

      In that case, I think the word you meant to use is polytheistic. They would be pantheists if they thought all things (including themselves) were a part of one universal User.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    12. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the MCP is none other than South Park's Moses.

      Anyone else see the resemblance?

  82. Oh, GREAT.... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

    If you don't like the DVD, you can recreate your own deadly 'Discs of Tron' game in real life!

    Oh, great. See what you just made me do? I'm now having to waste my time playing Deadly Disks of Tron on MAME rather than work on writing the next game...

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  83. Greetings Programs! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    The DVD really is very good.. I hadn't ever seen Tron properly, but knew that I just HAD to buy it when I heard they were making it into a special edition DVD - the game LightBikes (http://www.lightbikes.co.uk) kinda inspired me :)

    It amazes me how the old computer graffix manage to come full circle and look quite impressively retro :)

    Definately reccommend this DVD to anyone with a Sci-Fi interest, and of course it should be a part of ANY geeks DVD collection :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  84. Deleted Scenes by freakinPsycho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damnit, the one thing that bothers me about DVDs including deleted scenes is that you are seeing them completely out of context.

    DVDs need the option of viewing the deleted scenes as part of the movie. I've seen it done (once, I think) and it was a lot of fun.

    Take your favorite movie DVD and picture the option of viewing the extra scenes as part of the movie so it's seamless.

    Maybe I just ask for too much...

    --
    "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
    - Alexandar Woolcot
    1. Re:Deleted Scenes by choklut · · Score: 1

      That's what Nuon was supposed to let you do. But Nuon didn't get big uptake. Oh well, at least I can play The Next Tetris (Got up to level 200-and-something).

  85. Correction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Every character responds in turn "No" except for Prof. Frink you lets slip "yes", but then quickly switches to "No".


    And you call yourself a geek! Now get out of my comic shop!

    1. Re:Correction: by silhouette · · Score: 1

      Actually that was Chief Wiggum.

      God, I'm so geeky that I just can't pass up the opportunity to correct a Simpsons reference, no matter how trivial. And here's the kicker - people like me are allowed to reproduce! Imagine the children! A horde of nerd spawn, each more like the comic book store guy than the last.

      --
      Experts agree: everything is fine.
    2. Re:Correction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legally speaking, people like you (are there really very many?) are allowed to reproduce, but in reality - never happen.

  86. i hate tron by j1mmy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and i hate all of you

    1. Re:i hate tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we *LOVE* you!

  87. Tron as modern Galdiator/Jesus flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gained more appreciation for Tron when I read an article about it some time ago.

    Tron is basically a modern day Gladiator flick. Moreso the parallels to Christ are quite numerous (in fact the screenwriter I think admited it was a modern reteling of Christ).

    Think about it. The programs (us) are led to believe in the powerfull users (god). So one of the user's becomes a program (Jesus) and then free's the programs by dying and is reborn again (as a user/god). It even has the energy river that acts as a symbolism for babtism. There were a few more, but it's been some years and many beers since then.

  88. 99% by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

    "ratings 2-8 encompass 99% of films."

    So in Plot Originality, Visual Impression, and Film Transfer, the DVD is better than 995 out of 1000 other DVDs (at least, I suppose his scale must be logarithmic or exponential?)

    Sounds a little high.

    1. Re:99% by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Exactly my thought. I doubt the reviewer has seen more than 20 films in his whole life. When he can talk about the Spartacus references in Tron, I'll be more impressed.

  89. but what about armagedtron? by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    sure you all love tron, but nothign is more fun than playing it for yourself!

    armagetron

    mad fun at lan parties, and theirs a linux release!
    do i get a +5 for mentioning linux?

    --
    -
  90. That's right folks... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... Do your part for Disney's political contributions for SSSCA and for the MPAA by running right out and buying this.

    Sometimes I think the geek worldview would depress me if it weren't so f*cking pathetic I had to laugh...

    --
    That is all.
  91. Makes me wonder..? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Seeing as it was really one of the first films ever to use Computer Graphics to produce such an impressive end result, I wonder how many of the (apparently few) people watching saw what was going on and realised it was time to change what they were doing and get into the computers in a BIG way?

    I have to say.. if Tron wasn't a HUGE advert to show what potential computers had back then, I dont know what else was.

    It still astounds me what they managed to do in 1982... I was still using a BBC Micro in 1990 and being really surprised what that could do!

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  92. Anamorphic == "Enhanced for Widescreen TVs" by gevmage · · Score: 1

    I'm glad people are concerned about this. What we have is conflicting terminology.

    Anamorphic is technicaly a lens system used in film cameras to squeeze an image.

    DVDs use two methods to store widescreen movies. One is letterboxing, a-la VHS. This however puts out those that have widescreen TVs.

    The other mothod is to stretch the image vertically. When played back by the DVD player on a normal TV, the images is compressed back and the black bars are added on the fly. However, on a wide screen TV, the image is stretched horizontally, filling the whole widescreen TV.

    The second process is by far superior, but there is no industry standard way to label movies that have this feature. The mis-nomer "Anamorphic" is sometimes used. However, the term that is starting to become more standard is "Enhanced for widescreen TVs", which I mentioned in the review and that's precisely why I made a big deal about it.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:Anamorphic == "Enhanced for Widescreen TVs" by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I did a word search to see if you'd used any terms mentioning the 16:9 ratio of the presentation, and I either mistyped or forgot to search for "widescreen". My apologies.

      I am aware of "anamorphic" lenses -- a clear sign of them is when lens flares are oval rather than circular -- but it's become so common to refer to 16:9 presentation on DVD movies as "anamorphic" that it's just another definition of the word to me.

  93. Yeah I've been saying this for years... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    You've got a master control computer (can we say anti-christ) forcing all programs to recant their beliefs in their creator(s). [the users]

    Than you have a "user" come down and dwell as a program. He then defeats the anti-christ/master control computer. And ascends into the heavens/users world.

    Now, I see two possibilities for TRON 2.
    1) The second coming?
    2) Reality...this has been my idea and I think this is the one they are going to go with. And if you think about it; it makes sense. Computer graphics are starting to become extremely realistic and hard to tell apart from reality. I could see a dual plot one in which Flynn and Capt. Sheriden, I mean TRON return. And a second plot in which a program enters the world of the users. Think about it. Could be interesting.

    TRON was the first "Matrix" and I could see a combination of Matrix/Terminator (think man from past chasing terminator) combo. I just hope they don't #$*&## up like they did with Neverendingstorytwo...

  94. Re:Tron2k is a continuation of Tron 20 years later by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    I remember reading somewhere that tron2k is a continuation of TRON with the 20 years that really passed having also passed in the story line.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  95. It is nice to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...somebody other than JonKatz putting out movie reviews. Kudos.

  96. TRON didn't get any Oscars by gevmage · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of Steven Lisberger's (writer/director of TRON) constant beefs is that TRON didnt' even get nominated for any Academy awards.

    So no, I don't think that's true.

    Sorry.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:TRON didn't get any Oscars by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      To clarify, it appears Ken Perlin got his Oscar for "Perlin Noise", which he generated after doing TRON. He actually set about developing Perlin noise in 1983 after being frustrated by TRON's heavy computerish look.

      Here is a talk by Ken himself which is somewhat enlightening on the technique.

      --Joe
  97. I admit the Geekness should have been higher by gevmage · · Score: 1

    I have to say upon further reflection, the Geekness "Cool!" rating should have been higher, considering that's one of the extrordinary things about the film. I would say it should definintely an 8.5, and I think perhaps a 9.

    When I wrote this, I was trying to stay away from "Oh, it's so great, it gets all 10s!" sort of review that dilutes the effectiveness of a really great review. That's why the end mentions the scaling is designed to make 99% of movies fall in the 2 to 8 range. However, given the Ultra-geekness of this film, and being that's one of the greatest things about it, I think that a 9 is appropriate.

    Realize that this the first formal movie review I've ever written, so the scaling needs a bit of work. :-)

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:I admit the Geekness should have been higher by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      And the other aspects - plot, for example - much lower. 4, maybe. 3, even. It was a *bad* script. *Bad.* The storyline got soggy towards the end, and the dialogue was cringe-worthy.

      As a visual piece though, and in terms of art direction, it was ground-breaking, of course.

  98. Tron 2.0 (Sequel information and possible spoiler) by rtos · · Score: 2
    Anytime someone mentions Tron, everyone is quick to mention the upcoming sequel. Coming Attractions has some spoilers on Tron 2.0 that I will ruthlessly blockquote below:
    ---BEGIN SPOILER---
    Jeff Bridges character does play a Colonel Kurtz-like character now permanently in cyberspace. The script also features a cyberspace ghetto where all of the obsolete software and videogame characters go when no one uses them anymore. This project had been cold for quite some time until recently, when Disney execs were surprised to learn of the strength of advanced sales for the 20th anniversary DVD going on sale next month (and which may be the best DVD ever produced by Disney). As a result, the sequel has apparently gained momentum as of late. Glimpses of pre-production material for Tron 2.0 will appear on the DVD."
    ---END SPOILER---
    For those wondering, Kurtz is from Apocalypse Now (1979) where:
    "Burnt out Captain Willard is sent into the jungle with orders to find and kill Colonel Kurtz who has set up his own army within the jungle. As he descends into the jungle he is slowly over taken by the jungles mesmerizing powers and the battles and insanity which surround him. His crew begins to succumbs to drugs and are slowly killed off one by one. As Willard continues his journey he begins to become more and more like the man he was sent to kill."

    There is also some good info here as well, but it's mostly a rehash of other sites. Surprisingly UpcomingMovies.com doesn't appear to have any info on this.

    --
    -- null
  99. Tron had 20 minutes of pure CG footage by gevmage · · Score: 1

    Sorry you don't like the film--I admit its cheese factor is pretty high.

    And the computer world stuff with the people was live action. HOWEVER,

    Every scene in the computer world was composited people in the foreground with CG generated backgrounds. All of those scenes were shot on a black set--I don't remember the number, but I think there was about 40 minutes of live+CG footage in the film. Granted, the CG backgrounds and the live action were probably optically composited.

    In addition, there was roughly 20 minutes of pure CG in the film. The flying sequences and the MCP sequences in particular.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
  100. Actually Google probably won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like slashdot tells it not to access these pages (comments.pl) in its robots.txt
    Is there a way of accessing comments without comments.pl?

  101. What does this rating system mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (All ratings are from 0 to 10 inclusive, 10 being better, with the ratings 2 through 8 encompassing 99% of all films.)

    and tron gets an "8" overall, despite getting 6.5 for some things. So that means Tron which is an 'excellent movie' in the review is encompassed with the other 99%? So 99% of movies are an "excellent movie" and the other 1% are not?

    "The commentary track on the film is interesting and informative. " ... Wow that's detailed.

    "There are shorts talking about specific aspects of the production, and the usual previews, deleted scenes, publicity material, and lots of interviews with production and cast members. " ... Again, so much detail. Did you even see this disc, or did you just copy everything from the press kit/IMDB entries?

  102. So, what if you have level 7 access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or is it level 5. Confusing, never can tell whether it's the higher numbers or the lower numbers with the better classification

    I'm number 1! Uh, no wait, I'm not a number, I am a free man!

  103. tron cycles wallpaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a wallpaper I did inspired by Tron (lightcycles) to the original techinician's credit, the 1982 ones look better n' mine, and I'm using a bazillion times more advanced hw/sw, but the wpaper still looks pretty cool on your desktop.......

    http://www.customize.org/details/8843

  104. Association for legitimate integers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so its 11:5? interesting.

    1. Re:Association for legitimate integers by denzo · · Score: 2

      It's 2.20:1 because the whole movie (both "real world" and "computer world" scenes) were shot in 65mm, the quality of which you can really notice on the real world scenes.

  105. Rating system Meaning by gevmage · · Score: 1

    What I meant by the comment at the end was was that I was trying to prevent rating inflation. Making all ratings of reasonably good movies 10s on a 10 point scale dilutes the value. So the idea is TRON is better than 99 other randomly chosen movies, but not 999.

    I did, in fact, spend 4 or 5 hours on a laptop going through the various sections of the DVD before writing the review, which is why I've seen it on a progressive display.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:Rating system Meaning by Apotsy · · Score: 2
      Hey dude, thanks for the review.

      By the way, you're probably one of only a handful people on Slashdot who is aware of 5-perf 70mm 6-track. I was just a kid when Tron was release, and it was actually the first time I became aware of 70mm. In later years, I would refuse to go see big summer movies unless I could find a place that was showing them in 70mm. Fortunately, that was very common where I lived in those days, and I believe I was often able to go for months if not a whole year at a time without ever seeing a movie in 35mm.

      Boy do I miss those days. I recently saw the 70mm re-release of "2001", and it was the first 5-perf 70mm print I'd seen in years. The way things are going, I may never get to see another one... :-(

  106. Mickey's Cameo, Unique Insults. by de_boer_man · · Score: 1

    I was watching this the other day and noticed something I hadn't seen before. When the protagonists are riding the solar sailer toward the MCP, Mickey Mouse's face shows up in the landscape below the solar sailer. The Disney people just can't help theirselves, can they?

    On a completely different note, I've been using insults that I gleaned from TRON 20 years ago. You should see the looks I get when I call someone a "null program." Cracks me up every time!

    --
    .sig wanted. Inquire within.
  107. MCP = OS by trancelucent · · Score: 1

    Is the MCP still around, only he's calling himself Windows?

    Yup -- and Linux, and OS X, etc ... I seem to remember that "Master Control Program" was a term coined in the late 70s at Burroughs(?) for a program that managed all the other programs. A short while after TRON was released, someone quietly renamed it "Operating System."

    (This being Slashdot, someone will of course gleefully correct me if I'm wrong ...)

  108. Most DVD start with a coming attactions bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which stupid studios do that.
    The DVD's I've actually been buying make them something that has to be accessed through the menu. I'd like to keep staying away from the ones that stick them right at the beginning.

    1. Re:Most DVD start with a coming attactions bit? by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

      Well, I've got a four-year-old, so my buying habits are a bit biased. That said, everything that we own from Disney starts off with a "Coming Attractions", as do, I think, many of the other animated features we have for her. I want to say that some others do to, but I'd have to go home to check.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  109. Modded down because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got modded down because... well, I have a lot of trouble believing that you're being serious, simply because your opinions are so, so far from the mainstream.

    It's like you said "I think George W. Bush is a clever and articulate man," or "The Shawshank Redemption was a dull and uninteresting movie."

    Apologies if you meant that seriously, but it really did smell like you were trolling, given that the overwhelming sentiment 'round here is "Yay Sneakers! Boo Hackers!"

    --grendel drago

  110. President Sheridan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention ISN's pics of President Sheridan riding his horse... *sigh* those were the days, when a man could program and ride his horse to his heart's content.

  111. I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It shouldn't be that hard to add and remove content without having to do weird things with the chapeters and stuff... It's just so un... un... I don't know... I don't have the word for it... It's just UN.

  112. Disney's DVD offering by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    True, it's a Disney offering.
    True, Disney's Michael Eisner is behind the SSSCA all the way.

    Now, can you watch it on your computer?

    Enquiring minds might want to know.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  113. Good maybe for an example primitive CG methods by second+class+skygod · · Score: 1

    Relatively few triangles (almost all of which
    are flat shaded), no textures, etc. As a CG
    engineer, I find it difficult enough to watch
    on analog TV. Watching sharper artifacts
    isn't my idea of a great time in front of the
    tube.

    SCSG

  114. Serial Experiments: Lain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like a good point to mention Serial Experiments: Lain... Don't know why, but it just does...
    http://www.pioneeranimation.com/titles/la in/
    http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Gulf/9755/scri pts.h tml

  115. TRON Rules by Hellraisr · · Score: 0

    3 words:

    OH MY USER!

  116. No kidding by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    There is nothing wrong with giving credit where credit is due as far as the classic nature of Tron goes- but I have no interest in supporting the Empire any more than I'm forced to.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  117. Right... by JeremyYoung · · Score: 1, Troll

    Back before you were born, computer movies were about real computer components with real terms;

    You mean, perhaps, "The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes" with Kurt Russel?

    --

    Go Lakers!

  118. Tron Review by Teh+Grammar+Patroll · · Score: 0

    My oh my, the troubles with this review begin with the very first sentence. "Gevmage writes with the review below of the new..."

    How does one write with a review below?

    The reviewer goes on to warn that he will reveal plot details "in the third of the film."

    I give up! Two paragraphs in (counting the introduction), and I cannot make heads or tails of this review. Thanks for making my job easier.

    If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and attention to detail are essential, if you want people to take you seriously. This review is merely another case in point. I didn't even bother to finish reading it, because it was crystal clear that the writer is incapable of effective written communication.

  119. Re: Macs... by litui · · Score: 1

    Um...hate to burst your bubble here but check out this directory where I've placed a couple screenshots that show almost uncontestable evidence of Mac use. And yes, I did have too much time on my hands.

    --
    I send you this message in order to have your advice.
  120. I thought the 2nd disc was for throwing... by invid · · Score: 1

    ...but it never came back. :(

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  121. Re: Tron, a bad movie? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I felt a little bit of that when I saw it for the first time. I was very interested in computers back then (even if all I had was a Timex Sinclair 1000 and 16K RAM expansion pack). I found it just a little too much that we're supposed to believe that inside a computer is all of this "life", and that you could somehow be beamed into that world to explore it as a person.

    I saw it again, not that long ago, on satellite though - and I found it sort of enjoyable. I think it's old enough now that it's easier to smile at it, call it a "classic", and appreciate the advances we've made in computer graphics since then - while still realizing all the work that went into producing it.

    Sometimes you just have to "let go" of reality enough to enjoy a movie or a book, and not let believability get in the way. I think this is something it took me a long time to come to terms with, as generally - I prefer movies to tell stories that are fathomable and believable, even if "far fetched".

  122. Anyone have the Tron Game by RoguePsion · · Score: 0

    Good call man. I have spent quite a bit of time trying to find a version of Tron Arcade for download, but to no avail. Does anyone out there know where to obtain such a thing?

    1. Re:Anyone have the Tron Game by Acker_42 · · Score: 1

      www.mame.org and then of course you need the roms or I can find you a real arcade game www.arcadeshopper.com

  123. Question?? by T3kno · · Score: 1

    Which came fist TRON or the snakes game that someone ported to my Nokia phone?

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  124. DVD and PS2 by Vertigo+Donkey · · Score: 1

    The only big downside to the DVD is the fact that after about halfway through the showing, it gets "blocky". In other words, the screen is filled with green blocks of color, making it impossible to watch the film. This is not an issue in the XBox or computer DVD drives. *(It however may be an issue with this single PS2 system, as I have yet to find someone else with one to test it out on.) It is at the same spot in the film, and is recreated with multiple DVD disks. If you have had the same experience, I would be interested in hearing about it. My next attempt will be to see if a little "tinkering" with the PS2 internals will correct the problem. I suppose this is something I should have expected as the PS2 is rather limited as part of a home entertainment system. You can't even watch VCD's for crying out loud.

    1. Re:DVD and PS2 by Inside_Joke · · Score: 1

      It's not just you.

      The TRON DVD doesn't play on the PS2 very well. It works fine up until I think chapter 8, then goes haywire. My advice is to watch the film up to the point where it gets blocky, then reset it and start over at the next chapter. The rest of the movie will be fine after that.

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that you're an idiot!
    2. Re:DVD and PS2 by Vertigo+Donkey · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I could do that, that's for sure. I think I'll just use my actual DVD player instead. I more mentioned it out of idle curriousity than anything else.

    3. Re:DVD and PS2 by schatten · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, but one question regarding this - do you have the updated DVD Player driver which comes with the Sony PS2 DVD Player Remote Control? I don't currently have it, but hear that it helps out these effects on some movies. Might be worth the extra 20 bucks.

  125. Jeff Bridges as Bill Gates by invid · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that the director of TRON saw Jeff Bridges character as Bill Gates, fighting the evil empire of IBM in order to bring computing to the masses. Ironic, isn't it?

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  126. im confused by NewSegway · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I know about the website T.R.O.N but there is a DVD out about it now?!

    http://www.niftyness.com/

  127. MCC password by evenprime · · Score: 2, Funny
    Finally after 20 years I've found the other people who like TRON as much as I do.

    I loved that flick, but was amazed at the amount of detail some people can recall. One year at defcon a jeopardy question was "what was the password for the master control computer in TRON"....I was amazed that someone in the crowd actually knew it was "reindeer flotilla"

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  128. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With Disney being the benefactor of any procedes from this, let alone that it's a DVD, you're here, on slashdot, advertising their latest warez, after the news of the crap the trying to buy through congress? One or more things in the chain: you, slashdot, .., suck.

  129. Re: Real Life Tron scene by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

    A 'Thundertree' huh? Sounds good, I guess, but when I was growing up, I just went over to the municipal thunderdome.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  130. Favorite line from Tron: by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    That's a big door!

    Fuzzy
  131. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone find it ironic that Disney is now the MCP with their SSSCA ?

    Disney make Tron. Disney pushes for SSSCA. Disney put real life people in jail trying to control what they can and cannot do with their computer.

  132. Re:Tron and Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MCP == Disney's SSSCA

    The MCP is the classic big iron central computer of the time. It was controlling and monolithic, like say.. Disney (aka MPAA). It locks up programs and does mean things to users.

  133. overheard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' MPAA, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Fuckin' Disney, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' fascists, tryin' to bring us down.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Yeah... they want to take away our fuckin' civil rights. Jack Valenti is such a fuckin' bastard.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Word.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Word.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: So, how about that new TRON DVD?
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Fuckin' cool, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Hey... what were we talking about?
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Dunno. Wanna go see a movie about Hobbits?
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Sure.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Cool.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' MPAA, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Totally.

  134. Time to upgrade my Betamax collector's edition by Beatlebum · · Score: 1

    nm

  135. TRON is also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might be of interest to geeks that TRON also stands for The Realtime Operating system Nucleus(sucky acronym, I know), a project at the prestegious University of Tokyo that develops software for embedded systems. Their universal character encoding format is also interesting because it isn't Unicode.

  136. Re: Real Life Tron scene by dswensen · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I had "Thundertree" once. I was in the toilet nearly the whole day.

  137. When I first saw Tron... by MsWillow · · Score: 1

    I was working at a small plastics company, as their programmer / designer. We were using an H-89 that the president of the company had built :) and I was writing their accounting system on it.

    We had a company picnic, and I was stuck on the softball team with the guys, wearing our "MCP" tee-shirts (I was #101, binary, for the geek factor). I recall seeing the movie afterwards, and actually catching so many of the little "in" jokes - things like the map of what "sector" Tron was in on the wall, the disk read/write head used to move programs around, and the spindle where the evil MCP lived (the hub on the hard drive).

    It was awesome, and the sound track was just as good - yay, Wendy Carlos! I may have to go buy a dvd player for this one :)

    --

    Lemon curry?
  138. Tron 2.0 Trailer - Spoilers ahead by Skevin · · Score: 1

    Flynn: I have to stop and rest.
    Tron: Not here.
    Flynn: Hey, wait, I remember this place... but what happened to all the 'water'? Smells like sh*t!
    Tron: Everytime we take a big TCP dump, Primary Domain Controller now sends it all down here and fouls the energy.
    [Large monstrous creature with glowing body-circuits rises out of the murky depths. A look of recognition crosses Flynn's face.]
    Flynn: WordPerfect? What happened to you?
    WP [in a deep demonically-possessed voice]: You may call me Word, now. MS-Word.
    Flynn: But you're so bloated... and slow.
    WP: No, the Redmond PDC made me better and stronger. Redmond gave me more secrets than you will ever dream of, Flynn.
    [With a loud burp, two brightly painted easter eggs drop out of Word's writhing, oozing flesh.]
    WP: Now you both die. Prepare to be de-res'd.
    [With a loud cry, several spider-like creature jump off Word's body, and proceed to advance on Flynn and Tron.
    Tron: Run!
    Flynn: I don't remember spiders looking like *that*...
    Tron: That's because they're Macros! Move it!
    [Both characters bend over and form light cycles, which immediately flicker and sputter before coming to a complete stop.]
    Disembodied Female Voice: Warning: you have attempted to engage a security circumvention device. Countermeasures are now active.
    Tron and Flynn simultaneously: Goddamn DMCA!

    [Cut to: another scene approved for spoiler/trailer use.]
    Tron: That was close.
    Flynn: Can't we rally all your friends? Where's Sybase?
    Tron: Gone. Also corrupted by the Redmond PDC. He's known as "SQL Server", now.
    Flynn: Lotus?
    Tron: Excel.
    Flynn: Widget?
    Tron: ActiveX. Look, I've told you, they're all gone and twisted into evil version of their former selves.
    Flynn: Netscape? [Pauses. Looks up.] I.E....
    Tron: Yeah, I.E..
    Flynn [frantically]: No, Sark v54.1.23.475.21b (Stable Release) has found us! Aaiiyyeee!
    [RPDC forces, AKA 313373 shock troops, close in rapidly.]
    Tron: Damn it, Flynn, we probably could've escaped if you didn't spend all that time saying his Version Number! There's no other choice: we must contact my User!
    Flynn: You mean Allen?
    Tron: No, I have a new user now. Cowboy Neal.
    Flynn [jaw drops]: We are so doomed.
    Tron: My User isn't answering! We need a miracle now!
    [Gigantic pig with glowing body circuits lands on Sark's 313373 shock troops, crushing them to death.]
    Tron: Spam! I knew Redmond couldn't corrupt you into their ranks!
    Spam: *Oink*!
    Flynn: I guess Redmond isn't so bad after all.
    Spam: *Oink*!
    Tron: Flynn, this is Spam. He can find anyone, no matter where they're hiding.
    Spam: *Oink*!
    Tron: Wait a second! There must be thousands of Slashdot Users willing to help us! [To Spam] Go boy! Email all of them. Get help!
    Spam[Emphatically]: *Oink* *Oink*!
    [Four days later...]
    Tron[despondent]: No one's responding. I don't get it: I've sent Spam to everyone's email address, dozens of times over, and no one's going to help us.
    Flynn: We should keep moving. Keep sending Spam...

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    1. Re:Tron 2.0 Trailer - Spoilers ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BRAVO.

      You should write here.

  139. The Wizard of... Tron by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Has anyone else noticed how similar Tron was to The Wizard of Oz?

    - The main character is transported into a strange, magical world.
    - Many of the people in the other world look like people in the real world.
    - The characters journey along a golden path (yellow brick road in Oz, the gold power beam the Solar Sailer moves along in Tron).
    - The villains have flying beasts to do their dirty work (flying monkeys vs. Recognizers).
    - There's a big, powerful wizard figure at the end of the road, but he's ultimately just a little old man hiding behind smoke and mirrors.
    - The wizard has the power to send the hero(ine) back to the real world.

    Freaky eh?

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  140. Okay, date yourself... by gtwrek · · Score: 1



    ... 10 points if you know what "TRON" stood for.
    -- I don't remember if they explained it
    in the movie or not.

    ... 1000 points if you ever used TRON to debug
    your program.

    Fun times. Now we have purty IDE's and debug
    tools that a moron could use... In my day...

  141. Volker-Craig 415 PFs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Volker-Craig 415 PFs

    That sounds more like something you'd find in the Luftwaffe than a terminal.

  142. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not worth the $22 for the DVD.

  143. Done for Stargate by just+someone · · Score: 1

    Get the Staargate special edition

    Broke my first player when it came out, had to send it in for a firmware upgrade.

    1. Re:Done for Stargate by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Usually, when I see the deleted scenes, I end up agreeing that it was a good idea to delete them. However, Stargate and Aliens are too very noteable exceptions, where I instead find myself saying "what were they thinking when they took that out"? IIRC, in both of these movies they delete a lot of dialog that lets you get to know the characters more. In Stargate (again IIRC), it's the minor characters, but in Aliens, it's the main character!

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  144. TRON SUCH A HORRIBLE MOVIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah about you and 7 other people will actually buy it. The rest of us assholes will wish you idiots didnt remind us how horrible of a movie it was. I feel dumber now even thinking about that retarded film.

  145. What's going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From my understanding, this is a point in the film where the reader is switching "layers" to get to the next scene. Not sure if it's true, but it makes sense I suppose.

  146. Unfortunately... by ctar · · Score: 1

    Yes, its unfortunate that the majority of the great modern artworks (films, music, games) can only happen with the financial backing of a large corporation. And so, unfortunately the only source for this great piece of geek art is the Disney store...

  147. Any one find the Easter Egg :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not if it was in the original, but Pac Man makes an appearence in the movie. You can hear a familiar "waka waka" sound to give you a hint when it is being showed.

  148. Must...get... to... suncoast... by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    Annonymous Cowards(aka "closet geeks who 'think' they're being funny") take heed. This is a classic film.

    You idiots are on crack. TRON, for its time, was a cutting edge film. You kids are spoiled with your Jurassic Parks and your Prince of Egypt "2 years to render 7 minutes" CG. When TRON came out, I was around 6 years old. It wasn't untill a few years after that I saw it (the arcades drew me in), but then, it blew my still young and mallable mind.

    When you're little, your sense of imagination is much more developed than you AC fools have now. The CG and premise of TRON, for its day, was unheard of. Getting inside your computer, interacting with the machine on a more human level. And let's not forget GAMES GAMES GAMES!!!

    You AC fools take what you have for granted, thinking the world owes you something. Truth is you owe the world (and Disney in particular) for giving your kind the imagination to create the computing possibilities you have today. Would Linus Torvalds have created Linux if he weren't first exposed to UNIX? Would the Modern Rock you love exist without bands like Ozzy, Floyd and Zeppelin? Would you ACs still be complete losers without playing D&D, drinking Jolt and downloading hacked pictures (and BAD hacks at that) of Gillian Anderson and Sarah Michelle Gellar? Would you have developed into the "my opinion is king" fanboys you are today?

    .Do us all a favor. Stop being a coward, fearing history and get your ass to whatever DVD retail outlet suits you choose (if you want to use the one where you found all of the Urotsukidoji films at once, that's fine) and pick up this disc set. History would do you good. After all, you can't possibly know where you are going when you have either no clue of or respect for what's happening around you instead of being little hemret men with a fraction of what most welfare recipiants call a good life......

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  149. Not just a movie by Ironpoint · · Score: 1

    In the source we see:

    _mlc="/BVInteractive/Product/Tron"

    Buena Vista Interactive makes games. But I can't imagine a game coming out w/o a movie. I can't imagine a movie without a Happy Meal action figure.

  150. Watch real close by Mathness · · Score: 1

    As Pac Man, Mickey Mouse (shadow) and some less know figures makes brief aperances in the movie :)

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  151. What Tron means to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It brings back embarrassing memories; how could I have liked such a totally unrealistic movie as a kid so much. I saw the movie many times and the book is probably still at my mom's house.

    C'mon, computer programs represented as people in costumes with glowing stripes, please!

  152. Re: Real Life Tron scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The really neat thing about the Jai Alai scene is that Flynn's competitor Pete Jurasick the same guy who would go on to play Londo Mollari in Babylon 5. It really hard to recognize him without Londo's trademark hair.


    You my friend are never going to get laid

  153. Re:Wow! I'm a science fiction fan but I... by stevey · · Score: 1

    It's almost as bad as Last Starfighter

    Wow, I'd forgotten all about that film, I've seen Tron a couple of times now, but the Last Starfighter was the first film I ever went to see at a Cinema, (I think I was about 8 or 9), so hearing it mentions fills me with nostalgia.

    Tron was great at the time I watched it, and I've spent a lot of time over the years merrily playing Tron light-cycle games .. but I can honestly say it didn't make too much of an impact on me.

    The Last Starfighter, though, was something that was in the back of my mind for years when I was watching sci-fi films, and probably had a huge affect on me. I'm gonna have to go and see if I can get it on video/dvd now!

    Maybe I'm just too young, and got spoilt by later films.. *shrugs*

  154. Why knock a good movie? by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    Annonymous Cowards(aka "closet geeks who 'think' they're being funny") take heed. This is a classic film.

    You idiots are on crack. TRON, for its time, was a cutting edge film. You kids are spoiled with your Jurassic Parks and your Prince of Egypt "2 years to render 7 minutes" CG. When TRON came out, I was around 6 years old. It wasn't untill a few years after that I saw it (the arcades drew me in), but then, it blew my still young and mallable mind.

    When you're little, your sense of imagination is much more developed than you AC fools have now. The CG and premise of TRON, for its day, was unheard of. Getting inside your computer, interacting with the machine on a more human level. And let's not forget GAMES GAMES GAMES!!!

    You AC fools take what you have for granted, thinking the world owes you something. Truth is you owe the world (and Disney in particular) for giving your kind the imagination to create the computing possibilities you have today. Would Linus Torvalds have created Linux if he weren't first exposed to UNIX? Would the Modern Rock you love exist without bands like Ozzy, Floyd and Zeppelin? Would you ACs still be complete losers without playing D&D, drinking Jolt and downloading hacked pictures (and BAD hacks at that) of Gillian Anderson and Sarah Michelle Gellar? Would you have developed into the "my opinion is king" fanboys you are today?

    .Do us all a favor. Stop being a coward, fearing history and get your ass to whatever DVD retail outlet suits you choose (if you want to use the one where you found all of the Urotsukidoji films at once, that's fine) and pick up this disc set. History would do you good. After all, you can't possibly know where you are going when you have either no clue of or respect for what's happening around you instead of being little hemret men with a fraction of what most welfare recipiants call a good life...

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  155. Region 1 only ? Inexcusable ! by rklrkl · · Score: 1
    I watched Tron in the movies as a kid and all I can say is thank goodness for DVD sites like play.com who sell Region 1 DVDs at good prices to UK users (15.99 pounds for Tron - I ordered it 2 months before its US release and actually got the DVDs on the Saturday *before* the US release).

    I don't see any sign at all of these Tron DVDs for Region 2 - this is extremely poor indeed, there's no excuse I can think of for a 20th Anniversary DVD set to come out at different times in the US vs. UK (Tron didn't get a theatre re-release or anything, so regional differences should be irrelevant).

    As for the discs themselves, it's a good 2-DVD set - not quite on a par with the US Terminator 2 Ultimate DVD edition (hey, but that's set a DVD benchmark in extras, sound, branching and picture quality that no-one's beaten yet, IMHO, plus it's a great action movie of course).

  156. Too Good by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2

    I remember seeing Tron in a theater, when it originally came out. I was a little kid then, and it *really* impressed me to the point I *knew* I wanted to do stuff with computers later. I think it had a bigger influence on me than WarGames or any other movies of the kind.

    Yeah, Tron turned me into a geek when computers were still a curiosity where I lived back then... People gave me eerie looks, really. After all, I suppose I'd be equally (well, not quite) puzzled if an 8-year old kid came to me and started talking about pretty much unknown technology...

    It'll be a pleasure watching it again! Sure beats Starfighter...

    /max

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  157. Commentary by hyperizer · · Score: 1

    The commentary track on the film is interesting and informative.

    Geez timothy, this sounds like a fourth-grade book report. Can anyone fill in the details here? Who does the commentary? What types of insights does it offer?