...all the few who persist on warfare need to be constrained in some psychopathic mental institute not called government. Don't know about anyone else but I don't approve of my tax dollars being spent the way.
Hell if we got the politics and the oil company greed out of the way... as well as teh banks backing it all with fiat money.... there wouldn't be mpg with petro. We'dd all be using water (HHO) and/or magnetic instead. But if you insist on petro.... we should be getting well over 100 mpg already.
Usenet in regards to social interaction. So maybe its time for an upgrade from text based???
The down side, unlike facebook that only allows "like" biasing it towards the positive, usenet history is filled with negative bias... Message boards can also result in negative interaction.... showing the maturity level of the social network perhaps needs positive bias type of constraints to offset the kids egos.
I knew that would get a troll rating. But the fact of the matter is, there are probably certain buildings of military significance across the country that are most probably wired for the installation of explosives to take the building down in the event of overthrow or invasion, etc.. So to keep sensitive data from being obtained by.... WIKILEAKS....shrug...
boycott. don't buy any material falling under this law. When enough do this sales will drop and they will notice. Out of sight & sound out of mind and ear. It doesn't exist.
As the world awakes to the games of the few... Hopefully this backfires in the way of enforcing the reality that the majority of the people on this planet are more alike than they are with the few in positions of command and control. When enough realize this, to few will participate in fabricated, expensive and damaging warfare. Adn we all know there are those few who thrive on what is not beneficial to the rest of us.
... the many? Are they becoming that skerd of those they are supposed to represent? If so then why, unless they are lying their asses off to the people they are supposed to represent and fear retaliation by the people if or when found out.
I did not approve of my taxes being spent this way, which can't possibly reduce crime in a reasonable reflection of what it is costing. Not to dismiss misuse of such... lets call it what it is.... spying on its own citizens.... No why would they want to do that? With media control they have a feed back loop for manipulating the public.
No taxation without representation.... Is this representation?
Most common office suite? Shouldn't that not be so biased but rather focus on the general usage of such software such that whatever office suite one might need to use at some point, they can pick it up and adapt to the peculiarities of that package more easily.... for even MS office changes enough in time that they are going to better need to understand a useful approach to any software usage than to be pigeon holed into one.
If you want to teach MS office than name the course properly.
So four weeks on hardware, general software, OS's, binary numbering (numbering systems in general might be better or in addition to), file systems and other things SPECIFIC to WINDOWS..... Do you think Windows is the only computer that should be covered in a course titled "Introduction to Computers"? If so then perhaps you need to update your course for as technology changes so does the devices used for computing, i.e. iphone.
Clearly to focus on Microsoft products is not a direction that supports free enterprise... So which country are you from?
Introduction to Computers should be about teaching the general knowledge to productively use computers regardless of which software is run.
And it seems it only takes 4 weeks to do this? The remaining 12 weeks focused on product biasing? A filler to justify the course cost to the student?
And intro to computers course might teach the basic use of specific software but only to such a degree that it helps the student understand the general usage and understanding of a computer. After taking such a course the student should be able to talk with tech personnel well enough to be useful to the tech person in resolving problems beyond what the student learned in "intro to computing".
Its really not difficult to understand this and with it realize the school promoting MS office as a credited course on Intro to computing is not being honest with its students. The students are not going to learn what they are paying to learn.
... and the real question is : why do the few want to monitor the many? There really is only one answer. It is so to commit wrongs against the public in all the many ways monitoring can provide such.
Wars are started and played by the few with the bravery of being out of range. The results of war are proving to be far more damaging to the public than, if at all, the few instigating the wars. By monitoring the public and controlling the media a feedback loop for manipulation is created. Additionally should the few decide to kill off a portion of the public then having control over the things you'd want control over become available to use, I.e. traffic, communications, energy, food , etc. Standard warfare manual stuff.
The expense of monitoring is paid for by who else but the tax payers and the crime reduction amount (not considering the crimes such monitoring makes possible) is not justified for such expense. This alone is should send a red flag.
This is the wrong approach to crime reduction. The better approach is to work towards applying that which inherently causes a reduction. Knowledge begets knowledge and specific knowledge begets more of its own, I.e. warfare begets more warfare... and so it is also with peaceful a direction of improvements to teh environment and lifestyles will beget more of that.
It is not the people who need to be monitored, it is those who are supposed to represent the people in need of being monitored in what they do in that job. This no different than and employer knowing what their employees are doing.
... as in an application/add on/option type of functionality. And to increase interest, not that google general search results always find what you want, provide the users with easy to use filtering.... so if they boycott a company, they don't have to see their ads when searching.
Of the things that universally agreed cannot be patented: Abstract ideas, Physical Phenomenon. Natural Law. Because they cannot be enforced and out of these comes mathematical algorithms as a forth.
Slashdot Mirror
So many Americans think they are helpless against the size fo the government....
So in essence they want us to help them spy on us and we pay them for it? HUH?
...all the few who persist on warfare need to be constrained in some psychopathic mental institute not called government. Don't know about anyone else but I don't approve of my tax dollars being spent the way.
... for I can think... Therefor I AM! And that is who is I.
...Sounds like bank officials.
as experience seems to suggest... the goal is the opposite of what is projected..
Not trying to be a troll, it just so much anymore the end result of claims is the opposite.
Hell if we got the politics and the oil company greed out of the way... as well as teh banks backing it all with fiat money.... there wouldn't be mpg with petro. We'dd all be using water (HHO) and/or magnetic instead. But if you insist on petro.... we should be getting well over 100 mpg already.
... like in how the GMO food is causing serious health issues and in the US there is a lack of proper labeling.
Maybe if the patents go away more farmers will adopt GMO so obamacare is justified? shrug...
Usenet in regards to social interaction. So maybe its time for an upgrade from text based???
The down side, unlike facebook that only allows "like" biasing it towards the positive, usenet history is filled with negative bias... Message boards can also result in negative interaction.... showing the maturity level of the social network perhaps needs positive bias type of constraints to offset the kids egos.
I knew that would get a troll rating. But the fact of the matter is, there are probably certain buildings of military significance across the country that are most probably wired for the installation of explosives to take the building down in the event of overthrow or invasion, etc.. So to keep sensitive data from being obtained by.... WIKILEAKS....shrug...
...based on WTC building 7, the thing to include is explosives.
...dotSlash
Does this mean there is only 15 more years?
boycott. don't buy any material falling under this law. When enough do this sales will drop and they will notice. Out of sight & sound out of mind and ear. It doesn't exist.
There is plenty available for free.
Now that's or MSM..... Not news. So they apologize when they accidently show something real
As the world awakes to the games of the few... Hopefully this backfires in the way of enforcing the reality that the majority of the people on this planet are more alike than they are with the few in positions of command and control. When enough realize this, to few will participate in fabricated, expensive and damaging warfare. Adn we all know there are those few who thrive on what is not beneficial to the rest of us.
....stick your tongue on a nine volt battery...
... the many? Are they becoming that skerd of those they are supposed to represent? If so then why, unless they are lying their asses off to the people they are supposed to represent and fear retaliation by the people if or when found out.
I did not approve of my taxes being spent this way, which can't possibly reduce crime in a reasonable reflection of what it is costing. Not to dismiss misuse of such ... lets call it what it is.... spying on its own citizens.... No why would they want to do that? With media control they have a feed back loop for manipulating the public.
No taxation without representation.... Is this representation?
... cd/dvd drive for a live copy of linux?
Most common office suite? Shouldn't that not be so biased but rather focus on the general usage of such software such that whatever office suite one might need to use at some point, they can pick it up and adapt to the peculiarities of that package more easily.... for even MS office changes enough in time that they are going to better need to understand a useful approach to any software usage than to be pigeon holed into one.
If you want to teach MS office than name the course properly.
So four weeks on hardware, general software, OS's, binary numbering (numbering systems in general might be better or in addition to), file systems and other things SPECIFIC to WINDOWS..... Do you think Windows is the only computer that should be covered in a course titled "Introduction to Computers"? If so then perhaps you need to update your course for as technology changes so does the devices used for computing, i.e. iphone.
Clearly to focus on Microsoft products is not a direction that supports free enterprise... So which country are you from?
Introduction to Computers should be about teaching the general knowledge to productively use computers regardless of which software is run.
And it seems it only takes 4 weeks to do this? The remaining 12 weeks focused on product biasing? A filler to justify the course cost to the student?
And intro to computers course might teach the basic use of specific software but only to such a degree that it helps the student understand the general usage and understanding of a computer. After taking such a course the student should be able to talk with tech personnel well enough to be useful to the tech person in resolving problems beyond what the student learned in "intro to computing".
Its really not difficult to understand this and with it realize the school promoting MS office as a credited course on Intro to computing is not being honest with its students. The students are not going to learn what they are paying to learn.
... and the real question is : why do the few want to monitor the many?
There really is only one answer. It is so to commit wrongs against the public in all the many ways monitoring can provide such.
Wars are started and played by the few with the bravery of being out of range.
The results of war are proving to be far more damaging to the public than, if at all, the few instigating the wars.
By monitoring the public and controlling the media a feedback loop for manipulation is created.
Additionally should the few decide to kill off a portion of the public then having control over the things you'd want control over become available to use, I.e. traffic, communications, energy, food , etc. Standard warfare manual stuff.
The expense of monitoring is paid for by who else but the tax payers and the crime reduction amount (not considering the crimes such monitoring makes possible) is not justified for such expense. This alone is should send a red flag.
This is the wrong approach to crime reduction. The better approach is to work towards applying that which inherently causes a reduction. Knowledge begets knowledge and specific knowledge begets more of its own, I.e. warfare begets more warfare... and so it is also with peaceful a direction of improvements to teh environment and lifestyles will beget more of that.
It is not the people who need to be monitored, it is those who are supposed to represent the people in need of being monitored in what they do in that job. This no different than and employer knowing what their employees are doing.
... as in an application/add on/option type of functionality. And to increase interest, not that google general search results always find what you want, provide the users with easy to use filtering.... so if they boycott a company, they don't have to see their ads when searching.
Software is not of patent-able subject matter.
Of the things that universally agreed cannot be patented:
Abstract ideas,
Physical Phenomenon.
Natural Law.
Because they cannot be enforced
and out of these comes mathematical algorithms as a forth.
All these together describe software and there is more
see http://abstractionphysics.net/
... sane conversations..... Who'd thought? Oh wait... Do I get paid to think?