No, but they do belong to the Queen. And the Commonwealth has slightly more money down the back of the sofa that Europe at the moment. But geographically you are CORRECT!
They'll only throw a lot more tax at it to beef up the system and then make those programmes / programmers illegal. You need TRON to fight for the users.
:) - magic idea. I've been wanting to get a BBQ smoker but thought it too much bother to have to cook something for hours. What do you call the "hard parts"? maybe those are the easy bit for me.
I'm not using the sarcastic comment section of my brain right now. You're soooooo lucky. Hmmm... Still can't think of any sarcasm. Thinking of Boobs again. That's got to be more than 10%. Superman Vs boobs?(13%) Hmmm. Must do some work (0.05%)... Battery screen time drain (65%)
I expected the weather (by that I mean clouds) to move faster. I may just be used to seeing weather maps on the TV update in 4 hour slides. I'm sure the 100mph winds I'm looking at, at that scale is fast enough:)
Is that good? Surly the point is, old game looks old. The UI is awful and sound is dire; but somehow they are still better that today's games EVEN if you don't heap on a ton of nostalgia.
It would be a shame/crime to change some of them. I loved the work by Team 17's artist Rico Holmes when I was playing their stuff year ago. Whilst looking for Rico's surname I found reference to a Leisure Suit Larry remake Team 17 made. Code masters touched it, so no shock it was awful. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leisure_Suit_Larry:_Box_Office_Bust
I'd love to play old Amiga games on my phone. I wonder how I'd fit the disc in?
Is there a law about taking Viagra and enjoying the patdown? Let the holiday start before take off. Not the best thing to do when wearing a Kilt I guess; but I don't claim this to be a wise idea.
Wrong (almost) - draft law dropped doesn't seem to matter. They come up with these ideas and keep pushing a tweaking them and pushing them and in a few years they are in place. . So yes you are correct. "That FA" may be wrong or old; but it isn't dead - Got to keep the fight going.
I think you have to go into the billion billion range of odds and think up the scenario that allows that 1cm bit to land with its cargo intact. It landed on a still forming plant that didn't have much atmosphere at the time? Is a billion billion enough for this?
To clarify further - I took it for granted that people would expect those figures to be off by more than a few percent given that governmental rules mean it is best to hide the true facts best they can. (I know it says that in the article - it's a given)
I thought it so obvious, i deleted the paragraph I wrote saying that even if you added 10% to each of these you still end up with the basic fact that being able to sack a person on the spot doesn't help unemployment. Firing people makes unemployment!
+1 to unemployment every time.
I then wrote a bit saying it was easy to fire a person in the UK during their 3-6month probation period. If you hire a person that is crap at the job, get rid of them. Easy. No worries required. Better yet, get a decent person to hire the right people in the first place. Staff training and high turnover is expensive. It's ludicrous to think a company wont hire because they are worried about not being able to fire. Maybe for short term crap jobs - but that is what temp agencies cover. How did anyone every start a company in the first place?
The Serfs in the 1700s fought and died for the worker's rights I enjoy today. Being rich or a powerful corporation doesn't give the right to treat people like a commodity and there is no reason to accept them doing so.
After posting, I also thought I'd get a lot of people from the states posting about how socialist it was to expect not to be fired from a job for no good reason. The women should have every right to sue for wrongful dismissal; but as it's not "their" money, it's the taxpayers - it just wastes more tax. AND BLAR BLAR BLAR.
I glad it's not like that in Europe. I don't think I've ever read so much utter nonsense. Apart from the social aspect of hiring a person, which I don't think you'll get. You seem to thing that being able to fire someone easily leads to lower unemployment?
Lets back this up -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rate
It's very hard to fire a person in German and they've got one of the lowest unemployment rates (5.7%) in Europe. In Japan (4.7%) they tend not to fire people even if they are awful, they just get moved to another office. The USA and UK are both ranked at 8.3%. That's a whole country worth of people in the US without a job and no social system to fall back on - erghh. Does that mean the poorest country is inside the richest country? How do they pay rent?
Greece(21%) and Spain(23.6%) no longer have any jobs to be fired from, so it doesn't matter what the hiring laws are, you can't hire or fire a person for no job. I've lost the point to this. back to work...
So we shouldn't try to do things(or discuss them) because it falls outside the scope of things we can currently hope to deal with.
I will SFTU as I have nothing to gain from dealing with you. These crayons are more fun than you too. I wonder where my imagination will take me?
Slashdot Mirror
How very dare you and so close to the Diamond Jubilee. :)
I've not been able to find the collective debt of the commonwealth. I'm sure Europe can still be proud of the amount it holds.
I like reading about a decent Judge. It's like hope for the world.
No, but they do belong to the Queen. And the Commonwealth has slightly more money down the back of the sofa that Europe at the moment. But geographically you are CORRECT!
Maybe he was just making a general request.
Nothing, come in and enjoy the smell.
They'll only throw a lot more tax at it to beef up the system and then make those programmes / programmers illegal. You need TRON to fight for the users.
:) - magic idea. I've been wanting to get a BBQ smoker but thought it too much bother to have to cook something for hours. What do you call the "hard parts"? maybe those are the easy bit for me.
That's more like it. The main one in TFA seemed like a waste of time!
I'm not using the sarcastic comment section of my brain right now. You're soooooo lucky. Hmmm... Still can't think of any sarcasm. Thinking of Boobs again. That's got to be more than 10%. Superman Vs boobs?(13%) Hmmm. Must do some work (0.05%) ... Battery screen time drain (65%)
I expected the weather (by that I mean clouds) to move faster. I may just be used to seeing weather maps on the TV update in 4 hour slides. I'm sure the 100mph winds I'm looking at, at that scale is fast enough :)
What would Jesus do?
But how do I know if that's true?
Is that good? Surly the point is, old game looks old. The UI is awful and sound is dire; but somehow they are still better that today's games EVEN if you don't heap on a ton of nostalgia.
It would be a shame/crime to change some of them. I loved the work by Team 17's artist Rico Holmes when I was playing their stuff year ago.
Whilst looking for Rico's surname I found reference to a Leisure Suit Larry remake Team 17 made. Code masters touched it, so no shock it was awful. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leisure_Suit_Larry:_Box_Office_Bust
I'd love to play old Amiga games on my phone. I wonder how I'd fit the disc in?
Is there a law about taking Viagra and enjoying the patdown? Let the holiday start before take off. Not the best thing to do when wearing a Kilt I guess; but I don't claim this to be a wise idea.
Wrong (almost) - draft law dropped doesn't seem to matter. They come up with these ideas and keep pushing a tweaking them and pushing them and in a few years they are in place.
. So yes you are correct. "That FA" may be wrong or old; but it isn't dead - Got to keep the fight going.
Never. Call it "Not solved yet" and leave it open to the future to waste time on.
I think you have to go into the billion billion range of odds and think up the scenario that allows that 1cm bit to land with its cargo intact. It landed on a still forming plant that didn't have much atmosphere at the time? Is a billion billion enough for this?
To clarify further - I took it for granted that people would expect those figures to be off by more than a few percent given that governmental rules mean it is best to hide the true facts best they can. (I know it says that in the article - it's a given)
I thought it so obvious, i deleted the paragraph I wrote saying that even if you added 10% to each of these you still end up with the basic fact that being able to sack a person on the spot doesn't help unemployment. Firing people makes unemployment!
+1 to unemployment every time.
I then wrote a bit saying it was easy to fire a person in the UK during their 3-6month probation period. If you hire a person that is crap at the job, get rid of them. Easy. No worries required. Better yet, get a decent person to hire the right people in the first place. Staff training and high turnover is expensive.
It's ludicrous to think a company wont hire because they are worried about not being able to fire. Maybe for short term crap jobs - but that is what temp agencies cover. How did anyone every start a company in the first place?
The Serfs in the 1700s fought and died for the worker's rights I enjoy today. Being rich or a powerful corporation doesn't give the right to treat people like a commodity and there is no reason to accept them doing so.
After posting, I also thought I'd get a lot of people from the states posting about how socialist it was to expect not to be fired from a job for no good reason. The women should have every right to sue for wrongful dismissal; but as it's not "their" money, it's the taxpayers - it just wastes more tax. AND BLAR BLAR BLAR.
In short, Firing in the US is shit.
I glad it's not like that in Europe. I don't think I've ever read so much utter nonsense. Apart from the social aspect of hiring a person, which I don't think you'll get. You seem to thing that being able to fire someone easily leads to lower unemployment?
Lets back this up - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rate
It's very hard to fire a person in German and they've got one of the lowest unemployment rates (5.7%) in Europe. In Japan (4.7%) they tend not to fire people even if they are awful, they just get moved to another office. The USA and UK are both ranked at 8.3%. That's a whole country worth of people in the US without a job and no social system to fall back on - erghh. Does that mean the poorest country is inside the richest country? How do they pay rent?
Greece(21%) and Spain(23.6%) no longer have any jobs to be fired from, so it doesn't matter what the hiring laws are, you can't hire or fire a person for no job. I've lost the point to this. back to work...
I love that the grammar's the bit that's annoy's you the most. :) sorry couldnt' help it.
Yet websites are made to run and expected to run on loads of browser version and types. It's not hard (it is) but it's doable even with a small team.
They could do this with LotusNotes too. Lots of people use shite that's not fit for purpose at work.
My Teens!!!!
Why is the project stupid?
So we shouldn't try to do things(or discuss them) because it falls outside the scope of things we can currently hope to deal with. I will SFTU as I have nothing to gain from dealing with you. These crayons are more fun than you too. I wonder where my imagination will take me?