People with Brown eyes(on average) are less sensitive to flicker than people with blue or green eyes by about 5-10hz. (not sure about grey eyes). The internet's a bit lacking on information, so here's some info on colour sensitivity...
Sensitivity to Color:
Different areas of human eyes have different sensitivity to color. For example, the eye is not sensitive to color at the periphery. It is only possible to discriminate between colors only +_60 of the straight head position. The color awareness range is about 90 to the straight head position. The eye is least sensitive to red, green, and yellow at the periphery. Thus when designing interface for large screen, blue would make a good background color.
The front of the eyes is more sensitive to red, green, and yellow. If we put small blue objects on the screen, which will usually be in the front of the eye, these objects will tend to disappear form the screen.
Discernment of color differences:
Eye is also least sensitive to changes in the shades of blue. It is very sensitive to changes in the shades of red. Eye is sensitive to the differences between colors in various degrees and the discernment of color differences is not uniform across the spectrum.
The eyes need to refocus for the colors, which are not near on the spectrum. Thus it would be difficult (tiring) for human eye to focus if red and blue are placed together.
Hmm... By the looks of things there using a flat model, no CS/DS and a few other bits and bobs, it's not just the addressing that's changed by but the 'way' that you address memory.
This is a small step away from CISC, since the memory access model is becoming simpler, which inturn can give performance improvements.
Just dig a holw a few feet deep in the ground, and get a cool 4deg all year round.
Easy, didn't take any rocket science, doesn't produce green house gasses (maybe some radioactive ones), doesn't make any noise, doesn't cost much to run, only a space and a pick needed.
"Basically, Hammer (64 bit cpus) = larger addressing space, not nescessarily faster processing." I suggest you go read the developer docs for the hammer.
Memory addressing has been re-designed, because no-one uses the protection model in x86. etc.... Do you understand me, or the developer docs, probably not. now read Understanding the Microprocessor and say that the Hammer isn't an improvement.
I'd like to know that there was XYZ vunrablilty in a service I was running, so that I could implment a work-around until a patch comes alongs(assuming that one does).
Ok, My windows box at work started crashing, so support try to remotely fix the problem. Un-install/reinstall a few things, run reg-clean, that's about it.
Still crashing, so someone comes to the PC, backs up all the data formats the HDD and reinstalls Windows, it still crashes... Three days later the install is just about stable.
I still get the odd BSOD, so I try disabling a few drivers (obviously its a ring 0-1 problem) until I don't get a BSOD any more, and download the correct version of that driver. It took about 3hrs.
If I get problems at home, running Linux I check the logs, if I'm a little unsure I'll search on the web or isolate the fault, sometimes I need to get an updated version of xyz library, sometimes I have to make changes to a driver (e.g. when my USB ADSL modem stopped working, because of changes at my local exchange). I haven't formatted a HDD for years (probably more than 5). Unix may be more complex, but it's easier to find out what's going on, usually in a plain text configuration or log file, things tend to be more uniform etc....
Windows is easier to learn, but almost impossible to master, Unix is hard to learn but can be mastered.
It takes a hell of a lot more to be a 'GOOD' Windows admin than a good Unix admin, have you ever seen a 'GOOD' Windows admin? (nb not the one with a 'to re-install is good, to format is better' T-Shirt).
Slashdot Mirror
When it's that entities goal to turn those people into more-or-less slaves it can't be right.
If I were to quit my job tomorow I'd be ~=fucked, I am a slave.
communism socialism(capitalism c){
return(c-greed);
}
Or, write/find a good C++ framework and don't use C, which kinda makes sense seeing as most C projects are written C++ style
myfunction(mystruct* this,params.....)
I can usually notice 80hz (some of the time), not quite a flicker more a shimmer. And the cinima's a nightmare!!
One problem, He asked for it.
I'm blue colour blind..... So I need purple blue test cards.
People with Brown eyes(on average) are less sensitive to flicker than people with blue or green eyes by about 5-10hz. (not sure about grey eyes).
The internet's a bit lacking on information, so here's some info on colour sensitivity...
Sensitivity to Color:
Different areas of human eyes have different sensitivity to color. For example, the eye is not sensitive to color at the periphery. It is only possible to discriminate between colors only +_60 of the straight head position. The color awareness range is about 90 to the straight head position. The eye is least sensitive to red, green, and yellow at the periphery. Thus when designing interface for large screen, blue would make a good background color.
The front of the eyes is more sensitive to red, green, and yellow. If we put small blue objects on the screen, which will usually be in the front of the eye, these objects will tend to disappear form the screen.
Discernment of color differences:
Eye is also least sensitive to changes in the shades of blue. It is very sensitive to changes in the shades of red. Eye is sensitive to the differences between colors in various degrees and the discernment of color differences is not uniform across the spectrum.
The eyes need to refocus for the colors, which are not near on the spectrum. Thus it would be difficult (tiring) for human eye to focus if red and blue are placed together.
On a simpler level, I cold re-compile the book into a 'code' that only a few people understand.
Let's say the book was in Ancient Egyption and there was no rosetta stone.
Computers are really quite simple, and given a few years you could work out what was going on from a binary executable file, well kinda.
good point, how's Montana doing these days?
' You cannot "compile" a book into an unreadable format'
Sure I can, it's called PGP.
How can you be 'egotistical' in a 'communist' way.
Come on, please explain, I dieing to know, don't be selfish, share your thoughts with everyone.
good
opps, got caught out be the french again.....
Well, a hole in the ground was good enough for a few thousand years or so, so I'm sure it's good enough now.
Hmm... By the looks of things there using a flat model, no CS/DS and a few other bits and bobs, it's not just the addressing that's changed by but the 'way' that you address memory.
This is a small step away from CISC, since the memory access model is becoming simpler, which inturn can give performance improvements.
Decades, and they still 'brag' about not having CFC's on many products.
Just dig a holw a few feet deep in the ground, and get a cool 4deg all year round.
Easy, didn't take any rocket science, doesn't produce green house gasses (maybe some radioactive ones), doesn't make any noise, doesn't cost much to run, only a space and a pick needed.
I see a darwin award comming.....
"Basically, Hammer (64 bit cpus) = larger addressing space, not nescessarily faster processing."
I suggest you go read the developer docs for the hammer.
Memory addressing has been re-designed, because no-one uses the protection model in x86. etc....
Do you understand me, or the developer docs, probably not.
now read Understanding the Microprocessor and say that the Hammer isn't an improvement.
I'd like to know that there was XYZ vunrablilty in a service I was running, so that I could implment a work-around until a patch comes alongs(assuming that one does).
MrMRI : Hey Mr advertising guy, we've got this great Idea.
MRAdd: What?
MrMRI: Just lie down here, keep still and I'll tell you...
half an hour later.
MrMRI wispers
MRMRI: Well, you get people to lie down in an MRI machine and user ther brain waves to sell.......
Christ, I've no clue what he's talking about either.
agreed
Not to use Windows?
Ok, My windows box at work started crashing, so support try to remotely fix the problem.
.
Un-install/reinstall a few things, run reg-clean, that's about it.
Still crashing, so someone comes to the PC, backs up all the data formats the HDD and reinstalls Windows, it still crashes... Three days later the install is just about stable
I still get the odd BSOD, so I try disabling a few drivers (obviously its a ring 0-1 problem) until I don't get a BSOD any more, and download the correct version of that driver. It took about 3hrs.
If I get problems at home, running Linux I check the logs, if I'm a little unsure I'll search on the web or isolate the fault, sometimes I need to get an updated version of xyz library, sometimes I have to make changes to a driver (e.g. when my USB ADSL modem stopped working, because of changes at my local exchange).
I haven't formatted a HDD for years (probably more than 5). Unix may be more complex, but it's easier to find out what's going on, usually in a plain text configuration or log file, things tend to be more uniform etc....
Windows is easier to learn, but almost impossible to master, Unix is hard to learn but can be mastered.
It takes a hell of a lot more to be a 'GOOD' Windows admin than a good Unix admin, have you ever seen a 'GOOD' Windows admin?
(nb not the one with a 'to re-install is good, to format is better' T-Shirt).