Slashdot Mirror


Refrigerators To Cool With Sound (Cool!)

T-Kir writes "A very interesting report from the BBC where researchers at Penn State University are developing a prototype fridge that cools using metal plates and sound waves. If successful, this technology would help remove the dependance on gases that contribute to global warming. Talk about Cool!"

436 comments

  1. old! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 0, Troll

    I remember reading an article about this tech over TEN YEARS ago... maybe 15. Nothing has come of it since then...

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:old! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      hey, no troll! I'm serious.

      --
      This space available.
    2. Re:old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post shouldn't be rated 'troll'. I also read about this quite a long time ago (at least 8 years), and I even watched a TV special many years ago (on PBS?) that included this technology.

      Reruns. Yak.

    3. Re:old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is not a TROLL, those Piezo Electric fridges in use in some RVs work on the same principle.

      It was shown 20 years ago on Tomorrows world. They had a demo, where he heated the outside with a burner and it cooled the inside.
      They explained how the heat made the plates vibrate and how this effect drew the heat to the outside.

      THIS IS NOT NEW.

    4. Re:old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose that's why it's a /. new story now :)

    5. Re:old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut ups
      FIRST POST HEHE

    6. Re:old! by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      The post itself isn't rated troll, the sigline is.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  2. But... by Telastyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reduce the gases that contribute to global warming, but contribute to noises that drive Fido mad...

    </senseless humour>

    1. Re:But... by homer_ca · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd worry about my ears more than Fido's. The article doesn't say the frequencies are ultrasonic, so it's possible human ears will need protection too. I can't imagine how much sound insulation you'd need to hold in 173dB. What happens if the chiller doesn't cut off when you open the fridge door? I'm picturing the last scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark where the Nazis get their faces melted off.

    2. Re:But... by Randolpho · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article specifically mentions that the sound intensity necessary can only be generated in a super-compressed gas. The sound wouldn't be audible to you at all. Or to your dog, for that matter. It would only exist inside the compression tube.

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    3. Re:But... by RY · · Score: 0
      Great...
      My fridge makes enough noise already
      Now I get more noise


      It would be cool to route the fridge through the stereo though.


    4. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only happens if you're Michael Jackson

    5. Re:But... by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      "It would be cool to route the fridge through the stereo though."

      No need - just get a copy of Aphex Twins "Selected ambient works volume II" and you`re there!

    6. Re:But... by prell · · Score: 1

      the article mentions that the sounds cannot escape the heating/cooling chamber, because they can only be achieved with the altered pressure inside.

    7. Re:But... by istartedi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm pretty sure that Underwriter's Labs will reject an appliance that melts the user's face off everytime they use it. I've seen their checklist and "[x] make sure face doesn't melt" is on there. So, it will be hard to find any contractor who will install it, or any major department store that carries it.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah! It's people like you that ruin perfectly good sensationalist speculation.

      This is Slashdot, take your "facts" and your "knowledge" to somewhere that cares. ;)

    9. Re:But... by Mynn · · Score: 2

      I thought that the gasses weren't used in NEW fridges, just the old ones.

      --

      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
    10. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Technology is called Vanilla Ice.

    11. Re:But... by homer_ca · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It says compressed gas is needed to generate the sound. All that means is if someone breaks open the fridge it won't keep making 173dB noise. However sound conducts through many materials, solid, liquid and gas. While the chiller is running, you'll still have to soundproof 173dB of noise while taking into account things like heat exchanger tubes.

      How's this for an experiment. Turn your stereo speakers up to the loudest (that's maybe 110dB if you have a killer stereo) and try to build a soundproof box around it that's smaller than your fridge.

    12. Re:But... by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      Fine then, I'm off to Nutkinland. ;)

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    13. Re:But... by micromoog · · Score: 2
      How's this for an experiment. Turn your stereo speakers up to the loudest (that's maybe 110dB if you have a killer stereo) and try to build a soundproof box around it that's smaller than your fridge.

      Better yet, just stick the speaker in your fridge and crank it up.

    14. Re:But... by victim · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Not quite a proper analogy.
      • Shrink your speakers down to the size of soda can.
      • Realize that this thing operates at a specific frequency and set of harmonics. You are free to use all sorts of resonance tricks.
      • You never need to get inside. You can make a metal casting 23mm thick if you wish.
      • I don't recall reading that his operates in the 20-20kHz range. Maybe its above 20kHz so a small amount of sound leakage is tolerable. (Seems unlikely, but... high-low separation at 20kHz is a fraction of an inch at atmospheric pressure. At higher pressure the wavelength will be greater, so that might give enough space.)

      Suddenly it seems a lot easier to soundproof.

      There is also the issue of the density difference from the compressed gas media in the tube to atmospheric pressure (think about sound not transferring well from water to air or back), but I suspect that is a red herring given that you are going to a more dense material first before the atmosphere.

      Incidentally, I think they have a compressed gas because you can't do 173dB in free air. You rip the air down to total vacuum in the low pressure parts before you get there.

      Unrelated trivia note: Your hearing ends at 20Hz. If you put a mic on your body and pitch shift the 20Hz range up into audible frequencies you will find that your body is quite loud and distracting if you can hear it.
    15. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put a fishtank inside a room with your speakers. What is the SPL inside the fishtank? Perhaps more to the point, generate high SPL inside the fishtank. What is the SPL in the surrounding room?

      The different densities of the fluids prevents an efficient transfer of sound from one medium to the next. That factor alone significantly reduces the level of sound you need to dampen.

    16. Re:But... by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      How about we throw a muffler on it? ;)

      Seriously. A simple vacuum spaced seal and stabilizers capable of handling the vibrations at connection points. It wouldn't add much bulk at all. Factor in the (effective) energy loss leaving the compressed air to the compression tube to the normal-pressure air, and you could end up with a virtually silent machine.

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    17. Re:But... by Goose+Bump · · Score: 1

      To generate these sound pressure levels you most likely would use a tuned cavity and we already know that it contains a high pressure gas. If the cavity was damaged, leaked, whatever...the cavity would no longer be tuned, thus little sound.

      My guess is that the frequencies are also high to keep the size of the cavity down. At least it would keep my dogs out of the kitchen.

      The best way to keep it quiet is to make the system efficient. If the efficiency is high then all the acoustic energy will be turn into heat (on the hot plate).

    18. Re:But... by Christopher+Whitt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Look up impedance matching, particularly as it relates to sound transmission between differing media...

      Christopher

    19. Re:But... by VValdo · · Score: 2

      I'm picturing the last scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark where the Nazis get their faces melted off.

      Of course, from your own point of view it would be more like when Sigorney Weaver opens the fridge door in Ghostbusters...

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    20. Re:But... by Nef · · Score: 1

      Actually, a majority of currently available cooling solutions all use some type of Freon for the cooling medium (The major exceptions being HVAC units on large buildings which are typically bromide units)

      The only real change in this type of cooling is the types of freons available and the controls used when doing initial charge, recharge or disposal of the gases.

      IANAHVACTech but last I heard, the best freon solution out there was R-134a, which still poses environmental risks and causes great problems in reciprocating units (due to absorption in the lubricant...Imagine disposing of used freon tainted oil?!?!)

    21. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The density difference between the compressed air and the 'normal' air can cause quite a bit of reflection of the sound wave because of the impedance mismatch.

      A similar situation occurs with underwater sonar systems. The density of the water changes with depth, which changes the impedance to the sound waves. If a submarine is at a sufficient depth in the deep oceam, the active sonar from the ships above can't see it because the sound waves bend back towards the surface.

      I don't know how much loss would exist due to the mismatch in the fridge system, but hopefully it is enough to keep your hair from catching fire.

    22. Re:But... by awol · · Score: 2

      Why not just put it in a vacuum tube of some kind. Use microwaves to transmit the energy across the vacuum to power the sound thingy and as long as the vacuum tube has some form of heat insulation between its two halves, one side should be hot and the other side cool. No Noise at all :-)

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
  3. Also on Scientific American by Tyrnagog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out their article here. Unfortunately, no mention of peoples' hair igniting.

    1. Re:Also on Scientific American by oliverthered · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see a darwin award comming.....

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:Also on Scientific American by gclef · · Score: 2

      What neither the original nor this sciam article mentions (which I'm really curious about) is *which* gas they're using to propogate the sound in. If it's some nasty, corrosive mess, then this isn't much of an improvement. (yes, it's unlikely that this is corrosive, given that they're putting metal in there, but still...)

    3. Re:Also on Scientific American by jechoe · · Score: 1

      Good point ... it could be mercury vapor for all we know.

      --
      Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
    4. Re:Also on Scientific American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Please stop spelling "coming" with two M's. Every time you do that, an English teacher loses her wings.

    5. Re:Also on Scientific American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      comming, ha, i hate english teachers.
      comming, another one dead, soon no-one will be able to notice my spelling misstakes.

    6. Re:Also on Scientific American by will592 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Most likely it's helium or another inert gas. Small molecules are the key in this technology as I recall.

      Chris

    7. Re:Also on Scientific American by cpmte · · Score: 1

      another one bites the dust...

  4. excellent by enos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now maybe people will believe me when I tell them my fridge tells me to eat too much...

    --
    boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
    1. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of Garfield. We always see him eating out of the fridge because it told him to. :)

    2. Re:excellent by slashuzer · · Score: 0
      We always see him eating out of the fridge because it told him to. :)

      No we don't. He eats because he wants to. Sometimes food "talks" to him. Refrigerators (or "fridge" for you Pakistanis") doesn't talk to Garfield. Stop insulting Garfield.

  5. Doesn't really work. by radiumhahn · · Score: 1
    I've been caught once or twice talking to my beer...

    You are getting colder... very cold... colder...

    It didn't work though. :(

  6. Oh yeah... by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If my fridge were to emit some cool Barry White, that's be pretty ... well... cool.

    First there was the "Brown note" ... now the "cool note"

    1. Re:Oh yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just hope the manufacturer doesn't get the two mixed up. Yuck.

    2. Re:Oh yeah... by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      My fridge *already* says "Baby, this your appetite speaking" whenever I look at it. Or at least that's what the voice in my stomach tells me.

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Oh yeah... by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      Heheh..... The record industry could then go sue you because your fridge was violating the DMCA... :)

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    4. Re:Oh yeah... by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      Really? My fridge plays "Living in the fridge" by Weird Al everytime I open it.

      OK, no it doesn't. But when I shared a flat with Dick we seriously thought about getting a small MP3-player, hook it to the fridge's door switch and rig it to play that song. We did put a bio-hazard sign on it, used Whiteboard pens on it to keep track if the fridge inventory and had thin Ethernet everywhere, including both toilets and the oil-cooled[1] MP3 server in the kitchen cupboard.

      [1] We kept a 5-liter (~1.25 gallons) can of cooking oil next to it, an old P75 running NT4 and Winamp with wires through the back wall to the living room stereo system. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    5. Re:Oh yeah... by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1, Troll

      Then you should hear MY fridge...
      It screams "Remove this all this fucking month-old food or I'll kill you!".. And I can tell you it's not kidding.. Everytime I open the fridge I almost die...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    6. Re:Oh yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, can the fridge be rewired with a Line-in from a Cinch connector? Then I'll be the first one in my neighbourhood who can play NuMetal at 173db (and Boy, they are going to know it! :)

    7. Re:Oh yeah... by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

      and for high speed cooling (warm beer etc) Slayer would work fine. More speed? cp /dev/urandom /dev/dsp :) (newbies, don'T do it)

      Wow cool.

    8. Re:Oh yeah... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      When you can't tell if it's your anatomy or appliances that are talking to you, it's time to call it a day.

  7. Cooool by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.

    Thankfully, even if the fridge cracks open the vast sounds generated within will not escape because the intense noise can only be generated in the pressurised gas locked inside the cooling system. Thats a damn scary sounding (no pun) fridge!

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
    1. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn, and I was looking forward to a combination fridge and hair-dryer.

    2. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      your high powered microwave oven can evaporate all teh tissue in your arm to steam in less than 30 seconds. dont see that happenning..its safe because its contained.

    3. Re:Cooool by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I think the freq. would have quite a bit to do with it. thinking that 165 db at 32 cps would shake your ass up but your hair will be fine,give or take some aquanet.165 db at 440 cps would prolly rub strands together like a cubscout makin a campfire tho.
      wonder if they gave any concideration to building a wood burning refrigerator?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    4. Re:Cooool by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.
      Yeah, but what if I want to keep a human head in my fridge? Won't the hair catch fire and warm up the fava beans?
      --

    5. Re:Cooool by S.Lemmon · · Score: 2

      Yeah right. Where do people get this stuff? Most microwaves can't even heat up a ham sandwich in 30 seconds let alone "evaporate all the tissues on your arm". Just bringing a cup of water to a boil takes several minutes after all.

    6. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he said high-powered. your 100 watt unit doesn't cut it.

    7. Re:Cooool by |_uke · · Score: 2

      ROTFL... And this is why we put food in the microwave... So it can evaporate and then... ohh wait... where is the point in that =)

      --
      Luke
    8. Re:Cooool by S.Lemmon · · Score: 2

      Bull - no normal consmer grade microwave would. Any microwave that could "evaporate" an arm's worth of flesh in 30 seconds would instantly burn most foods to a crisp too. It's a microwave not a reactor core.

    9. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      food cooks in the microwave because the water in the food is vapourised into steam which then cooks the rest as it exits the food.
      hence the 'keep standing for 1 minute after removing from microwave label' on your food. thats to let the excess burning hot steam out.

    10. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but no. a governor prevents your normal uwave klystrons from operating at full power. a normal oven cranked up to the max with no safety circuits could output 8KW from the klystrons easily crisping your arm and anyhting else in its beam path. most klystrons typically operate in the 3-4KW range for brief periods before switching off allowing the food to cook slowly as a precaution.

    11. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course your breaker would trip...

    12. Re:Cooool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Assume your forearm weighs 2kg (very rough guess). Assume 70% of that is water - 1400 grams. Assume your forearm is 37C. Raising that to 100C (not factoring in the cost of the boiling state change) requires 88200 calories, which is 369000 watt-seconds. 30 seconds at 8KW only gives you 240000. Furthermore, only a small fraction of that 8KW (which sounds preposterous IMHO) will go into your arm (see the inverse square law), unless you chop it off and put it in a faraday cage with the klystron.

      Also, consumer microwave ovens use magnetrons, not klystrons.

    13. Re:Cooool by atomicdragon · · Score: 1

      This is why those of us really commited to music keep our hair short so we play our music louder than 165 dB. All of those "rock stars" and head bangers that have long hair just like quite, soothing music.

    14. Re:Cooool by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1

      Actually, the water melecules are friction heated by the changing microwave field. The microwave emitter is tuned to frequencies that causes the molecules to align/de-align (crap, I can't think of the word) and that leads to friction which is what causes the cooking.

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    15. Re:Cooool by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      It's a microwave not a reactor core.

      That would explain why I can't get my steak to cook properly in there.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  8. Greenhouse Gases that Kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, chlorofluorocarbons cause the greenhouse effect.

  9. Millions of dollars of research down the drain by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 5, Funny
    So, after all those Maytag commercials advertising that their product is the quietest ever...now they'll be advertising "The TURBOBLAST 9000!!! Generates 186 decibels of ear-splitting cooling power!!!!!".

    If this is so cool...how come my constantly loud neighbors haven't turned into icicles yet?

  10. Don't You mean Freon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A gas that contributes to ozone layer erosion, not the "greenhouse effect" underlying global climate change.

    1. Re:Don't You mean Freon? by raistlinjones · · Score: 1

      Idiots assume that greenhouse effect = ozone depletion. Obviously, they are two different things - the first is causing the earth to heat up, while the second is causing more UV rays to come in.

    2. Re:Don't You mean Freon? by mikerich · · Score: 3, Informative
      You're both right.

      The dominant effect of CFCs was to eat away at the Ozone Layer. However, CFCs are also greenhouse agents and actually far better at it than CO2.

      Most of the compounds we have now introduced to replace CFCs are also greenhouse agents.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    3. Re:Don't You mean Freon? by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1
      I'm still waiting for somebody to explain to me why the ozone hole is over the South Pole. Let's see, most of the CFCs were released by the Evil American Populace ("Death to American Populace!", cry the Greens) so by my calculations, most CFCs were produced in the northern hemisphere. (I could be wrong, I'm an American and there force terrible at geography.)

      So all these really nasty CFCs navigate to the South Pole area. Why? All I can figure is that they are sliding down the globe as it sits on the desk and spins. Is gravity heavier down there or what? Why doesn't all the air drop down there and hang out, suffocating the evil nasty Americans?

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    4. Re:Don't You mean Freon? by mikerich · · Score: 2
      It's sort of straightforward...

      Hold on to your seats.

      The CFCs quickly diffuse into the atmosphere and form a near uniform concentration. They eventually migrate into the stratosphere.

      Weather patterns over the Antarctic remain remarkably stable during the winter in a so-called circumpolar Vortex. Now, during the Antarctic winter, it is permanently dark and even colder than normal at altitude. Ice crystals grow in the intensely cold atmosphere and these trap the chlorinated compounds.

      The chlorinated compounds are busy reacting with water, hydrochloric acid and nitric acid all of which are found in the ice crystals. This produces (amongst others) molecular chlorine - a chemical which is not normally found at high altitude.

      Come spring, the arrival of the Sun brings an intense blast of ultra-violet light. Chlorine gas is readily dissociated by UV into chlorine atoms which are intensely reactive. Within a very short period of time, large amounts of atomic chlorine are circulating in the stratosphere.

      The chlorine atoms then start tearing ozone (O3) into O2 + a free oxygen atom, which then reacts with the chlorine atoms to form chlorine oxide - itself unstable, which breaks down under ultraviolet light to regenerate a chlorine atom.

      Eventually the chlorine atoms all settle down into stable molecules and the depletion ends. Gradually the influx of UV regenerates the ozone layer - just in time for winter when the process can begin again.

      The important point here is that a single chlorine atom can tear apart hundreds of ozone molecules, so you don't need much chlorine in the upper atmosphere to cause havoc.

      Outside of the Antarctic, the high altitude stratospheric ice clouds are much rarer. Without an icy substrate, the chlorinated compounds don't form chlorine molecules. No chlorine up there - no ozone depletion.

      Hope that helps,
      Mike.

  11. screwed? by IWX222 · · Score: 1

    kinda screws everyone who wants a nice quiet PC..........

    --


    .sig me!
  12. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now maybe I can overclock my Athalon XP without the fire hazard...

  13. Ice cream? by gwernol · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is that the least appetizing lump of ice cream ever? I wouldn't eat that, no matter what had cooled it down...

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
    1. Re:Ice cream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Man! Some people are just plain fucking sick... what kind of person shits then runs out of the bathroom, grabs his camera and takes pictures of it?

      Hehe ohh yeah.. a SINGLE PERSON..
      "Honey... whatcha doin' with the camera in the bathroom?"
      "Uhh... photographing my poo... its got the coolest green/blue tint... must've been that Icee I ate last night.."

    2. Re:Ice cream? by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

      That's not really the ice cream they are cooling...it's a stock photo! Just wait until someone figures out the true identity of the ice cream.

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Ice cream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helpful hint from Heloise: for truly colorful poo, think purple koolaid. Just eat it straight out of the packet!

    4. Re:Ice cream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think those pictures are for the benefit of people who have forgotten what a fridge and icecream look like.

      There is nothing in the pictures themselves to suggest that those pictures were created from the project itself, so they are just bandwidth wasters !

  14. Global freezing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this is what caused the Ice Age. I mean, we finally get this damn planet relatively warm and now people want to repeat the mistakes of our ancestors.

  15. Fine... by wls · · Score: 2

    But will it be cheaper to build and cost less to operate. If not, doubt it will catch on.

    1. Re:Fine... by captain_craptacular · · Score: 2

      Yeah just what we need. Another "environmentally friendly" product that costs twice as much and works half as well...

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    2. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you priced a compressor lately? How about a gallon of refrigerant? Freon(R-15) is still available, but it'll cost you your left nut. R-134 isn't much cheaper, and it doesn't work as well.

      A refrigerator for you home may only cost about $1000, but when you get into a large building, the prices on coolers, chillers, freezers, and compressor units goes through the roof. A water chiller(air cooled) can cost $20K on the low end. A compressor/condenser chiller can cost 10 times that much. A direct expansion coil in a rooftop A/C unit can cost an obscene amount of money as well. Walk-in freezers and coolers are in the $100K+ range too.

      Current cooling technology won't take much competition. A suitable replacement only has to be on the silver standard(instead of gold) and work 50% of the time(instead of 20%). And if you think I'm exaggerating, you've obviously never dealt with commercial chillers and compressors.

      I think we'll start to see this used quite a bit over the next 10 years.

    3. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refigeration is outrageously expensive because junk science environmentalism won the day and got freon banned. So, now instead we pump out more tons of CO2, and the major source of ozone-eating Chlorine radicals (the oceans) still remain unregulated.

    4. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Actually I know a fella who works in the acoustics department at PSU and he seems to think that there is no way that this will ever be cheaper or more efficient then a conventional fridge.

      From what he said it sounded like this approach was mostly being considered for applications where a super high reliability is desirable. Such as a space station or cooling satellite components. Since it has no moving parts there are less things that can wear out. Or so the story goes.

    5. Re:Fine... by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      Junk science didn't win the day, Dow Chemical won the day. They own the patent on R-134. Check the money trail on the research. They just used the junk science of the bed-wetting liberals to further their own profits.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  16. who want's a fridge when you can do this? by anonymous+loser · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.

    You know, that sounds way more fun that cooling some ice cream. Or maybe I've been playing too many videogames.

    1. Re:who want's a fridge when you can do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? Oh, I get it! HAHAHAHA!

  17. pollution is pollution by elmegil · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    So we substitute noise pollution for gaseous pollution. Joy. Am I going to want to open my fridge to hear it chilling at me? The noise of a compressor motor is annoying enough most of the time. Is the cost of soundproofing going to be cheaper than the current insulation? Esp given that you'll need temp AND sound insulation now? Is this going to drive my animals crazy even if I can't hear the sound?

    All around, it sounds like a brilliant idea.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:pollution is pollution by raistlinjones · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      "Thankfully, even if the fridge cracks open the vast sounds generated within will not escape because the intense noise can only be generated in the pressurised gas locked inside the cooling system."

      In other words, it seems to the case that you wouldn't hear any of the sounds that the fridge generates.

    2. Re:pollution is pollution by SpelledBackwards · · Score: 1

      Please read the article next time:

      "Thankfully, even if the fridge cracks open the vast sounds generated within will not escape because the intense noise can only be generated in the pressurised gas locked inside the cooling system."

      You won't need soundproofing because the sound won't leave the internal workings of the fridge. As for pets, it says the fridge produces loud sounds, not high frequency sounds, which are what would annoy pets.

    3. Re:pollution is pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your assumption is incorrect.

      pollution != pollution.

      Sound or noise pollution is a quality of life issue. Simply, the noise pisses you off. It doesn't kill trees, it may disturb animals (depending on the nature of the noise), it's not dirtying the air or eroding the ozone layer.

      CFCs which were emitted by refrigerants previously used (now phased out) do harm the ozone layer. If we were still using harmful cooling gasses, I'd gladly trade them in for a noisy refrigerator.

    4. Re:pollution is pollution by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      Junk science got freon banned, so why should we lose our faith in junk science here as well? I'm sure environmentalist groups will quickly publish studies showing precisely that loud sounds kill off plants, interfere with the mating habits of bees and flower pollination, cause migratory bird stress and precipitate particulate condensation of smog particles from the air into our precious groundwater, thereby poisoning the entire human race unless a new law (with corresponding funding) is passed immediately. And, of course, it will all be the fault of the evil Republicans and their slavish devotion to big business.

      You heard it here, first.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  18. Cooking? by ekephart · · Score: 1

    If this is possible, wouldn't it be equally possible to cook something as well using sound?

    --
    sig
    1. Re:Cooking? by jaredcoleman · · Score: 2

      Perhaps, but more interestingly, can it be used to nuke something?

    2. Re:Cooking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to legend, it has happened.

      There were these pidgeons in the speakers at a Ted Nugent concert in 1974....until the first chord.

  19. I imagine... by Gudlyf · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...that before long, we'll see this sort of thing cooling the insides of computers, totally doing away with those pesky noisy fans!

    Err wait a minute, they're cooling with sound...ummm nevermind. Move along.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  20. This cannot work. by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 1


    Sound can cool, because of the compression/expansion mentioned in the article. But heat does not just vanish, it is transferred to the sound by this process.

    If the sound is left to bounce around inside the fridge, then it will heat up. The total energy in the fridge is increasing - cooling somewhere causes heating somewhere else.

    If the sound is allowed out of the fridge, then this will cool the fridge. But who wants a 173dB fridge?

    1. Re:This cannot work. by raistlinjones · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      "All it takes to make a refrigerator out of this system is to attach heat exchangers to the ends of the stack."

      That takes care of the heat that is generated.

    2. Re:This cannot work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it doesn't, that heat still has to go somewhere. It sounds like they are just going to put a big head sink on the back, but then all the heat will go into our kitchen. Not very cool at all. Will I have to cut another hole in the wall to pipe the heat outside?

    3. Re:This cannot work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh!! Where do you think the heat from your fridge's compressor is going now?!?!
      Right out into the little airspace behind the fridge, our out under the front of the fridge where your old cat sleeps at night.

  21. Other ways to do this... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You can also make refrigerators using a Stirling-engine like gas compression cycle. The guys at Medis Technologies have designed this. See here for the brief description. I guess instead of trying to extract mechanical work from a Stirling engine, they are just removing heat from one area and piping it off elsewhere. They claim this uses no greenhouse depleting gases, and it sounds plausible to me.

    1. Re:Other ways to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: +1 (using Stirling Engine in a /. post)

    2. Re:Other ways to do this... by mikerich · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I seem to remember that Einstein took out a patent on a fridge. He had heard about a tragic accident in which a family was killed by ammonia coolant leaking from their fridge. (ammonia was the only common refrigerant before Thomas Midgely took time off from developing leaded petrol to invent CFCs).

      So he invented a system with a metallic coolant that was completely sealed in a tube. It was moved through the tubes using a magnetic motor.

      Anyone know more? I'd love to know what the coolant could have been.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    3. Re:Other ways to do this... by CommieLib · · Score: 2

      Actually, no piping is necessary. A Stirling engine works by converting heat into mechanical energy, and is reversible. So the mechanical energy supplied by a power source is actually converted into the cooling effect.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    4. Re:Other ways to do this... by Nefrayu · · Score: 1

      It's highly plausible that the metal was liquid mercury. Using liquid mercury as the piston in a rotary type stirling (or other reversible cycle cooling method) engine his highly plausible. Try Googling for some web pages. There are some good ones out there. It'd contribute too much to my CTS to explain it all here.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    5. Re:Other ways to do this... by Phronesis · · Score: 2
      You can also make refrigerators using a Stirling-engine like gas compression cycle

      Many thermoacoustic refrigerators are really variations on the Stirling engine that use standing pressure waves in place of the pistons (http://civil.colorado.edu/~muehleis/thermoacs/the rmoacs.html, http://www.lanl.gov/mst/engine).

    6. Re:Other ways to do this... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. If it converts heat into mechnical energy, and is reversible, it would convert mechnical energy into heat, when reversed.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:Other ways to do this... by NorthDude · · Score: 3, Informative

      Einstein fridge

      quick quote: It's basically an absorption-type refrigerator that uses ammonia, water and butane to create a chemical phenomenon that allows you to run the whole thing at a constant pressure, so you don't need moving parts like a pump or a compressor

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    8. Re:Other ways to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, the general device you talk about is known generally as a thermo-acoustic tube. Without getting into a gory discussion of the principles (and IP problems), it works by applying a heat source to one (closed) end of the tube. This is usually done by a torch or some other fuel gas. Some thermodynamics later, you arrive at a compressor that is a Stirling engine (external combustion engine). The pistion in this case is the gas itself! Doesn't matter what the gas is. Kinda neat that you add heat on one end, and end up with cold gas on the other side.

      Last I heard, the application for these were for cyrogenics. The idea is that there are no moving parts, not parts to oil, etc. Pretty neat stuff.

    9. Re:Other ways to do this... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Mercury.

      - 38 degrees (F) is the freezing point, so it could stay liquid at tempatures that would be useful for a fridge or freezer. One probably could make it flow through a cooling system. (Although I have no idea how the heat transfer at both ends of the system would work.)

      I doubt that Mercury would be something most people and environmentalists would approve of nowadays though. A fridge would use A LOT of mercury. It is dangerous to many organizms in tiny amounts, and would present a disposal or recycle problem when the appliance is replaced.

    10. Re:Other ways to do this... by ndege · · Score: 1

      I liked the part from this page you mentioned that states, "...including the U.S. Department of Energy's announcement that refrigerators produced in 2001 will use 30% less electricity than those on the market today."

      It would appear as though this is not only an exteremely efficent heat pump, but a time travel machine too. Can't wait for them to make their IPO!! Wait, maybe they already did, then decided it was a bad idea and went back and kept it from happening. I think they have some tall Austrian dude working for them that has a thick accent and is really just a machine under his skin....he also uses big guns and yells one word phrases to people. Wait, that must have been another time travel company.

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
  22. The technology isn't that new by CodeShark · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have been reading about sound-driven refrigerators in some of the electronics weeklies, etc. for more than a decade now, but it looks like the technology may be moving out of the lab into a prototype "consumer" unit.

    What I find more interesting than the projected "energy" savings (which I would have to see the science and the experimental data before I'd bank on), is that there is no compressor to wear out, no refrigerants, etc. Conceivably a service call would be something on the order of "open the sound box, unclip the sound driver, put in a new one", right?

    I wonder what the heat output on the hot side is -- enough to supply a home's hot water needs, perhaps?

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    1. Re:The technology isn't that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wonder what the heat output on the hot side is -- enough to supply a home's hot water needs, perhaps?

      Probably not. Best you can do is 100% thermodynamic efficiency -> 40 degF of cooling (taking the chamber from ~70 degF to ~30 degF) would mean about 40 degF heating of an equivalent volume of air. Not enough to heat water for my shower...

      Even if you did pick up some heat from friction, etc. you're not going to get the 80+ degF needed for water heating water.

    2. Re:The technology isn't that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember first seeing this tech in the early '90s in a NASA Tech Report, and then hearing more about it on NPR around 1997.

      As I recall, it was touted as not only enviromentally friendly (less gases, like freon), but also more energy efficient. There was some discussion that the tech could be minitaturized, and thus our Igloo coolers could actually cool, instead of just holding ice and slowly warming.

      So, I say, bring it on!

    3. Re:The technology isn't that new by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Good, it's not just me. I remember reading about this system in Discover magazine something like 10 years ago. Glad to know I wasn't just hallucinating that.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    4. Re:The technology isn't that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These thinsg have been around for some time. That prototype that flew on the shuttle was from four or five years ago, at least. The main problem with these things is they just aren't as efficient as current refridgerators. Which means the heat output from the back would be slightly more then what the one in your kitchen spits out.
      They could be really nice for niches (like the space shuttle) where low maintenence is desired. Another thing about the noise: it's extremely high frequency, and is attenuated very well by the metal that contains the acoustic wave.

    5. Re:The technology isn't that new by CodeShark · · Score: 1
      Unless I am reading this wrong, the thermodynamic efficiency drop you mention seems to me as taking place before the cooling point, i.e., the method of cooling isn't as effective as vapor compression. So unless you are taking 106 degrees F showers -- and nearly- or actually scalding yourself (not to the spermicidal effects of that much heat) the actual heat gain in the water should be pretty good.

      Here's my logic: Counter Flow heat exchangers can be up to about 90% efficient, heat pipes possibly more so, and keep in mind that the refridgerator is operating much more of the time than you are taking the shower. So it has a lot of time to supply heat into the water supply So assume an ambient water temp of say 70 degrees (F), and 90% of your 40 degree heat drop. (70 + .9*40 = 106).

      Granted, this isn't enough to kill all of the household microbial nasties (IIRC that takes something like 140 degrees F). Still, if all I have to do is heat the water the rest of the way to the required final temp, it'd would still make a fairly significant dent in the home energy bill, especially if (like I do in my house) you're using radiant heating instead of a furnace. Assuming that the efficiency of the fridge isn't too much lower than the currently marketd ones.

      --
      ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    6. Re:The technology isn't that new by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      True, but you can still use that excess heat to preheat your water, or send it through the return vent on your forced air furnace. Then the water heater/furnace has to work that much less than it would to heat 'cold' air or water.

      They already do have systems like this, heat exchangers that take the heat of your drain water and transfer some to incoming cold water. It can dramatically decrease your energy bills, and is as simple as wrapping your drain pipe around the incoming line a handful of times.

      More of this type of 'heat recycling' needs to take place.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:The technology isn't that new by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Uh... 106 degree showers aren't all that uncommon, and it's not likely to scald. The recommendation is to run your hot water heater at 120 degress Farenheight, since above that will scald, and do so quickly (especially for young children), and any equipment that needs hotter water (like your dishwasher) will have a booster heater that's more efficient anyway.

      BTW, you'd need to expose some household bacteria to 160 deg. F to kill them... and I think we both know there's better ways to kill bacteria than squirting hot water all over the damn place :)

      Regarding the thermodynamics -- I certainly don't know thermo much at all, but I really doubt you could use the output of this to reliably heat water. Even if you're cooling the refrigerator by 40 degrees from ambiant, that's mostly air that you're cooling. Heating water takes a considerably larger amount of energy than cooling air does. But, as you point out, we are running the refrigerator far more often than our hot water, so as long as you have a tank based system you can still heat dump into the water.

      Except that ground water isn't 70 degrees -- it is often as little as 40 degrees. Even with perfect thermal transfer, that's just not going to output enough heat. It might work as a backup method, but not as a primary heat source.

      Of course, like I said, I know very little about thermo, so I could be wrong. Correct me if so, please.

    8. Re:The technology isn't that new by CodeShark · · Score: 1
      Good points. The main idea I was trying convey is that even as a "booster" heater I wonder if it would be useful. BTW the tap temperature locally was 65 degrees, which is where I got my starting point.

      As far as the difference between cooling air and heating water, that's where the lag I mentioned comes in. There is also commercially developed "heat pump" hot water heaters that transfer heat from air in the house into hot water, adding the heat produced by the compressor into the mix. Most of these -- based on a residential size air conditioner -- produce three or four times more hot water than a household would reasonably use in a day, so they mainly appear in restaurants, etc. which have much higher hot water requirements.

      --
      ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  23. Sub-zero-woofer? by microbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I use it as a sub-woofer?

    Har, har.

    I've got nothing.

    1. Re:Sub-zero-woofer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Har, har.

      I've got nothing.


      Did you get permission from CalFed to use that? Or should we call Elvis SummerCamp^WShinyLamp^W Whatever-His-Name-Is to come over and get medieval on your ass?

  24. Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by flyneye · · Score: 1

    They arent gonna make a spits bit of difference in environmental saving of anything.Not when theres more to fear from farting and breathing of lifeforms and swamp gasses and other things we CANT DO ANYTHING REASONABLY ABOUT.Unless of course environmentalists would like to do their part by wearing buttplugs and to quit breathing.Now theres an idea!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by Cyclometh · · Score: 1

      Well, we could do something about the lifeforms (mostly cows) by reducing our appetite for them and their products, thereby reducing the need to keep so many of the flatulent beasts about...

      Of course, the day that happens will be the same day that we renounce all dependence on Middle Eastern oil.

      Which will also be the same day that Satan skates to work.

    2. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow flamebait...

      Which creatures is it that fart CFCs?

    3. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by flyneye · · Score: 1

      We could also increase our appetites for them and delete them one steak at a time.When the beef runs out tho, i fear all that will be left is barbequed environmentalist,enviro burgers,tree hugger stroganoff all the way down to greenpeace jerky.and for desert we can start workin on bunnyhuggers.hmmm maybe we are decended from t-rex and not apes.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    4. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by JPelorat · · Score: 2

      So when we hunted the bison nearly to extinction, we were doing a good thing.

      Hey, it's your own logic.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    5. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when theres more to fear from farting and breathing of lifeforms and swamp gasses and other things we CANT DO ANYTHING REASONABLY ABOUT.

      We could stop raising hundreds of millions of cows every year just so people in the developed world can have their choice from seven or eight brands of 99 cent cheeseburgers for lunch. Or is that "unreasonable"?

    6. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      Depends on your viewpoint. It reduced the military power of the American Indians we were fighting at the time (that was one of the primary reasons for systematic slaughter of buffalo). Of course, a lot of people with a whacked sense of history think the American Indians were in some sort of enlightened utopia until us evil white guys came along and turned them into a bunch of alcoholics, so pick your agenda and run with it.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    7. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that was absolutely not in any way relevant to any part of this thread. Congrats, you're an official Slashdot troll now.

    8. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by flyneye · · Score: 1

      ever smell a buffalo fart?
      bison mixed with beef = beefalo
      tasty but extremely hard to raise and aggressive as hell.could be we did a good thing making way for beef cattle.i think being generally good natured they generate less gas than the tense uptight buffalo(bison).youre correct it was a good thing.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    9. Re:Cool Tech,Bullsh*t Reason by flyneye · · Score: 1

      actually it is if you read up the thread.but then,anon cows often dont say anything worth a cows fart to contribute or detract from the conversation anyway.want to take part? log in and say something credible.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  25. CFCss... by MosesJones · · Score: 2


    Err 1990 calling Slashdot. Its been well over a decade since CFC were used as coolants in refrigerators. Hell the US Goverment have replaced CFC/ODS from ICBMs as it says here and other places.

    So while its cool the Ozone bit is already being dealt with.

    I still find it funny that something capable of killing millions of people is "Ozone friendly" apart of course from Ionising the atmosphere if it is used!

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:CFCss... by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Decades, and they still 'brag' about not having CFC's on many products.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:CFCss... by corvi42 · · Score: 2

      No, not CFCs - other greenhouse producing gases.

      CFCs were responsible for ozone depletion - that is different but related to the global warming problem. It is true that CFCs have been phased out, but other greenhouse gases are still in use.

      --

      There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
    3. Re:CFCss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If successful, this technology would help remove the dependance on gases that contribute to global warming.

      Ozone Depletion != Global Warming. At least not directly.

      The replacements for CFCs can contribute to global warming.

    4. Re:CFCss... by EABinGA · · Score: 2

      No, not CFCs - other greenhouse producing gases.

      Not really an issue. The gas (Freon) stays in the refrigerator and is not consumed in any way.

      It can only escape if the refrigerator develops a leak, and then it usually only a pound or so.

      Thats nothing compared to the days when a can of hairspray or deodorant contained about the same amount of Freon and millions of pounds where vented daily by people trying to look and smell good.

      Also, the refrigerant can be recovered and recycled when the old refrigerator is being disposed of.

    5. Re:CFCss... by corvi42 · · Score: 1

      And when the refrigerator ends up in the scrapyard - what then??

      --

      There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
  26. So Thats What Happened.... by TTMuskrat · · Score: 1

    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion

    ...to Michael Jackson in that infamous Pepsi commercial when his hair went up in flames...

    --
    Support bacteria! It's the only culture most people seem to get.
  27. Cool fridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the type of research that money should be spent on by the US government instead of making new laws, like forcing car companies to make SUV's use 1.5mpg less! If the government gave tax breaks and grants for stuff like this the effects would be greater than revamping old and current technology that is almost out of steam.

    I'll still wait for the second generation of them though..I like my hair.

  28. I was confused about the ice cream by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    I didn't know what they were talking about when they said that it would be used to cool "ice cream".

    I thought to myself, "How interesting. Cream made of ice, cooled with sound. I wonder what that means. Sounds exotic."

    Then, when I saw the image, I was like, "Oh, ICE cream! What was I thinking? Thank GOD they had that image of ice cream to put me back on track!"

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  29. Popular Science did an article on this... by z84976 · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately, it was long ago (10+ years) back when I subscribed. Too bad they have no online archives I can search, or I'd give a link. The technology isn't really new, and makes a lot of sense, really (think what the compressor/condensor cycle does in traditional cooling, then think sound waves, think sonic booms, etc... lots of similarities there...).

    All in all, neat stuff, though.

  30. Ohh... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
    Sad. I was really looking forward to being forced to wear hoods whenever I go outside to keep my flesh from melting off.... Darn, these stupid dark sci fi movies always get my hopes up...

    But then again, just as long as they discover a neural USB port, I'm happy.

  31. Re:In Soviet Russia by flikx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Vhaaat a kuunntreee!

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  32. Lesser of two evils? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    >> If successful, this technology would help remove the dependance on gases that contribute to global warming.

    Last I heard of this, it also uses ridiculously more energy to achieve it's cooling. It's kind of like a sonic peltier.

    So like many of these "eco-friendly" schemes, you just centralize the polution at the energy producer. Sure we save the use of a pint of freon (or whatever), but we produce 25x more CO2.

    Anyone know if they've solved this? The article doesn't say.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  33. Wonderful! by denzo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Now when there's farting sounds in the room, I can point to the fridge when my wife gives me a scornful glance.

  34. The Spinal Tap Frige. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, 174dB? The temperature knob definitely needs to go from 1-11.

  35. British Readers should start gringing about now by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    Picture this. You're sat eating breakfast in your kitchen, in the background you hear a permanent loop of:

    "And on.. and on... and Gaviscon... da da da da DE da da da da ... "

    (I probably remembered the name wrong).

    1. Re:British Readers should start gringing about now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [pedant]
      Yes, you did misremember. You meant "Ariston".

      "Gaviscon" is a heartburn / indigestion remedy. It's what you take when YOU are making strange and disquieting noises, not your fridge... ;-)
      [/pedant]

    2. Re:British Readers should start gringing about now by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      I knew I was wrong... hence the disclaimer. I'm convinced the wretched theme music was composed on an old 8-bit computer as well.

      (feeling a bit silly now)

    3. Re:British Readers should start gringing about now by arodland · · Score: 1

      Parent isn't Offtopic, it's Informative.

    4. Re:British Readers should start gringing about now by arodland · · Score: 1

      Either this page that I found is pulling my leg, or it was actually composed on a C64. :)

  36. Big deal... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Refrigerators To Cool With Sound"

    So what. I live near the Capital of Washington State. We plan on heating our homes through the use of political speeches!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  37. another refrigerant project by becktabs · · Score: 1

    very little info...but research is goin on at other places too..

    Thermoacoustic Refrigerant Pilot

  38. Read the article... by ryman · · Score: 1

    Sound is only produced within the compressed gas chamber, so I doubt it would be noticeable to humans. Animals might be another matter, though.

    --
    "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
  39. I've already got this. by neurojab · · Score: 2

    Cooling with sound waves? I'm pretty sure my Athlon Palomino system already does this... Otherwise it wouldn't be so friggin LOUD.

  40. Have been waiting for this for ages by omega_cubed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been waiting for this for ages. I first read the paper by Backhaus and Swift (and here is a more recent one) four years ago, and whichever site that directed my attention to that "promised" commercialization in the near future. Not exactly swift in high tech time, but still very much welcomed.

    Too bad I just bought a fridge for my dorm room. )=

    Werd

    --
    Engineers also speak PDE, only in a different dialect.
  41. I can make a better, silent, non-mechanical fridge by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Just dig a holw a few feet deep in the ground, and get a cool 4deg all year round.

    Easy, didn't take any rocket science, doesn't produce green house gasses (maybe some radioactive ones), doesn't make any noise, doesn't cost much to run, only a space and a pick needed.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  42. There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For a long time now. We've been able to use environmentally-friendly compounds in refrigeration for some time. In addition it is currently possible to build a refrigerator with no moving parts using peltier junctions which have come down in price dramatically since they first became popular, for obvious reasons. We currently only see this technology used in mobile coolers (coolers literally, with a 12V lighter plug) and in small refrigerators for RVs which have been heavily insulated to stop loss which will require additional power use.

    But it's possible to use ANY compressable gas for cooling. The ones we use now are simply very efficient because they can store a lot of heat. There are several ways to make a cooling system more efficient (at removing heat) assuming you have not already taken the particular step to the maximum.

    1. Add insulation. This is the most obvious. More efficient insulation means less heat loss. Of course it does raise the cost of opening the refrigerator door, in comparison to the cost ratio now. This does not completely absolve you from having quick cooling because of the resulting temperature variations.
    2. Move to a gas capable of storing more heat. This one's obvious. Of course we've gone in the opposite direction to get away from Freon. Not really a great solution unless we come up with something new.
    3. Run the system at a higher pressure. Requires a more powerful compressor, which in turn requires more energy put in at this stage. Also makes the system more dangerous as it is more likely to explode and more likely to be dangerous when it explodes. On the other hand if the gas is compressed farther it will be able to accept more heat, so you should be able to get a more rapid heat transfer, especially if you...
    4. Increase the quality of your heat exchanger. Maybe it's just larger, maybe you increase its outside surface area, maybe you increase its inside surface area, maybe you just make it bigger and thus (usually) heavier.
      Of course there are two heat exchange systems in a typical refrigerator; Those inside which are intended to absorb heat, and those outside which radiate it. In a peltier-cooled system the same heat exchanger(s) do both jobs. You also end up needing some kind of heat sink to increase surface area since the thermally active portions of peltier coolers are flat.

    By using some combination of these technologies we can move away from environmentally unsafe gases. While this new technology is certainly new and may be superior in many aspects, the only reason we have not moved to more efficient and/or "eco-friendly" designs to date is expense. Welcome to capitalist terra, my friends.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. Thermoacoustic Refridgeration by dopaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Though the BBC didn't get his name right (Garrett), I actually worked for his research lab at PSU. Very interesting stuff.

    There's more information about other projects the group is working on here.

    1. Re:Thermoacoustic Refridgeration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Though the BBC didn't get his name right (Garrett)

      Garrett? Is that you?

      And if the fridge fails, do you wail and gnash your teeth? Na, you tear it open, and cool it anew.

      SCNR:)

  44. Rocking Fridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incorporate a CD player (175db should be plenty loud) and a soda machine into the fridge and I'll be set for life!

  45. Read the article... by ryman · · Score: 1

    Sound is only produced when the compressed gas chamber is sealed. They also mention producing heat from high-decibel sound, but not in relation to refridgerators.

    --
    "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
  46. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by ivan256 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, that's great, except that an inrease in decibels represents an exponential increase in sound.

  47. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by dopaz · · Score: 1

    The dB scale is logarithmic, so a simple linear comparison doesn't work.

  48. This system cannot scale by flikx · · Score: 1, Troll

    Unfortunately, this technology is only practical for use with very small systems. Sure, it might be able to cool a small ice cream cone, but this sort of system has no hope of scaling to the point that it cool 45 kg of groceries. Because of diminishing returns, the amount of power consumed would far outstrip the power needed for conventional Rankine cycle refrigeration units. However, this technology could be used in a laboratory to cool substances down to about -450 C. Very interesting indeed.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:This system cannot scale by dopaz · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, they're currently working on a three-ton acoustic air conditioning system. It scales, and the efficiency is improving.

    2. Re:This system cannot scale by Make · · Score: 1

      erm, the absolute zero-level of temperature is at 0 Kelvin, that's about -273 deg celsius. You can't go below, it's a physical law.

    3. Re:This system cannot scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but YHBT.

    4. Re:This system cannot scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah i flunked som classes too... -450 C ... ok.

    5. Re:This system cannot scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With grammar skills such as yours, I'm not surprised in the least bit. YOU FAIL IT!!!

    6. Re:This system cannot scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good, you almost trolled convincingly that time! Well, not really. In fact the only people you'd be getting with that ridiculous bullshit you just spurted onto your keyboard would be people who didn't read the article..and I can see by the rating the moderators have given you that there's still hope for the world.

    7. Re:This system cannot scale by flikx · · Score: 0, Troll

      You know, I don't have the endless time to waste like our resident celebrity trolls. I'm a busy engineer, and speed trolling is all I have time for. YOU EXPECT QUALITY?? IN SOVIET RUSSIA ...

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  49. If sound could REALLY.... by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 1

    If sound could REALLY cool things down, my wife could single-handedly counteract global warming. Yap, yap, yap.....

  50. Uh ? by stud9920 · · Score: 2

    CFCs are not the cause for global warming, they're the cause for the hole in the ozone layer.

    On the other hand, producing the sound waves will cost some electricity, the production of which is still mainly a main CO2 producer. So my idea is it will enhance the global warming, if anything.

    1. Re:Uh ? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      you meant the shrinking hole in the ozone layer.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    2. Re:Uh ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CFCs are also excellent greenhouse gasses

    3. Re:Uh ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if more co2 -> enhancing global warming, and more electricity used -> more co2, and more electricity used -> lower efficiency, then why would we be using this technology in the first place?

  51. okay, that's cool but... by kingofthepineforest · · Score: 1

    i'm gonna wait until it plays my mp3s too

  52. You don't know what a decibel is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their math is fine. Yours is quite suspect.

  53. Says nothing about efficiency... by ivan256 · · Score: 2

    It doesn't say how energy efficient these things are. The gasses in your refrigerator typically stay trapped in the plumbing for decades. The gasses released by the power plant that makes your electricity don't. If these things are less efficient than current refrigerators, they could actually be worse for the environment.

    Anybody out there know anything about the efficiency of this type of heat exchange?

  54. Specialty application by toybuilder · · Score: 2

    The's a whole bunch of ways to cool things. It's just a matter of what works for a particular application.

    Thermo-acoustic cooling has been considered for use in space to reduce the weight and mechanical complexity of traditional refrigeration systems. iirc, there was also the advantage of using less dangerous/toxic gasses with acoustic cooling.

  55. More dangerous than CRT's by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

    Just imagine, like you (or just me?) used to tinker around with broken TVs even though you could get shocked...
    Now you're tinkering with a broken old fridge that will DEAFEN you and LIGHT YOUR HAIR ON FIRE if you accidently connect it up while yougot the box taken apart...
    If the idea does become commercial reality, I'll have to warn my kids... (Don't play with the fridge... it'll kill you).

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  56. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by athakur999 · · Score: 2

    Decibels are logarithmic. A 20 dB sound is 10 times are powerful as a 10 dB sound. A 30 dB sound is 10 times as powerful as the 20 dB sound (and 100 times more powerful than the 10 dB one).

    173 vs. 120 is more than 100000 times as powerful.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  57. Yeah, Global Warming by antis0c · · Score: 2

    We know exactly whats happening with that, just like we did with the Ozone. Damn hippies. ;)

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  58. Re: soundproofing by CodeShark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    These babies are quiet -- unless the housing containing the driver is ruptured. Your question: Is the cost of soundproofing going to be cheaper than the current insulation? doesn't make sense in terms of economics on two points:

    First, for soundproofing the easiest method would be to place the sound source and the hot/cold plates in a "double, hollow walled box" evacuate most of the air between the hollow walls. This leaves no way for the sound waves to propogate outside the cooling unit. The cooling effect takes place outside of the hollow walled box because the fridge will still presumably circulate a fluid (which has absorbed heat in the refrigerator box through the cooling unit and back to the fridge/freezer. So there's wouldn't be a sound source even when the refridgerator is opened. Then put a sound sensor outside the box that shuts down the fridge if the vacumn fails and the sound rises above a certain level.

    The second reason is that the current insulation in the refridgerator is still required --and the more the better-- to keep the heat from the rest of the world outside of the refrigerator or freezer box.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  59. Alternatives by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Global Cooling has been developing more efficient (and safer) CFC-free refrigeration and cooling (even cryo-cooling) systems for quite awhile, now.

    =Smidge=

  60. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

    So let's see then (simple arithmatic)
    173
    -120
    -----
    53

    Hardly what I would call "tens of thousands" ...

    http://www.howstuffworks.com/question124.htm

    "On the decibel scale, the smallest audible sound (near total silence) is 0 dB. A sound 10 times more powerful is 10 dB. A sound 100 times more powerful than near total silence is 20 dB. A sound 1,000 times more powerful than near total silence is 30 dB. Here are some common sounds and their decibel ratings:"

    Decibel is a logarithmic scale, not a linear one.

    So yes, 53db is 100,000x louder. Hundreds of thousands, actually.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  61. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    So don't stick your head in the fridge too much.

    (/me suddenly thinks of a brillant diet plan involvong sound-based fridges)

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  62. Gas not gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...intense noise can only be generated in the pressurised gas locked inside the cooling system."

    I thought this was supposed to get rid of the gas? Did I miss something?

  63. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by mrjive · · Score: 1

    The decible scale is logarithmic, not linear

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
  64. sonic fridge? by ocie · · Score: 3, Funny

    BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
    What did you say?
    BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
    I asked if you'd like a cold beer.
    BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    Seriously though, I've seen a demo of this technology about 5-6 years ago and It's pretty cool.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  65. But they still can solve the *real* problem... by Randolpho · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... the heat generated by the fridge. It's still more proportionately than the cooling it offers. Mark my words... global warming comes not from chloroflourocarbons (or however the hell you spell that), but from the heat let off by our refridgerators.

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:But they still can solve the *real* problem... by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. Global warming is caused by the sun.

      If the sun were to go out, the planet would cool off and die. It would still happen even if we had all the refrigerators on the planet running at 100% duty cycles in an atmosphere composed entirely of "greenhouse" gasses such as carbon dioxide and cow farts.

      BTW, the chlorofluorocarbons you mention are responsible for destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere, which allows more ultraviolet light through. That's a different problem, but related in the sense that now you could have sunburned, farting cows.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    2. Re:But they still can solve the *real* problem... by jakobk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      fridges would have to be damn hot to cause global warming by adding heat. A lot hotter than car engines or computers, for example. are you a troll or something?

    3. Re:But they still can solve the *real* problem... by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      I admit, the post was midly trollish (funny, it doesn't look trollish). But what post isn't? :D

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    4. Re:But they still can solve the *real* problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "now you could have sunburned, farting cows."

      And we have a new high water mark for "bizarre mental image on Slashdot."

    5. Re:But they still can solve the *real* problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew! I thought I was the only person who thinks Global Warming is much worse during the summer.

    6. Re:But they still can solve the *real* problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't use chlorofluorocarbons anymore. They use greenhouse gasses instead of ozone-depleting gasses

  66. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by omega_cubed · · Score: 0, Troll

    WRONG!!!

    Decibels are, by definition of "bels", on a LOG scale. It is based on Log 10:

    dB = Log( I/I_0) * 10

    where I is the Absolute Intensity in power/area, and I_0 a constant, which for sound is at 10^-12 Watt/Meter^2 (I think, or is it -10?)

    So a db different of 53 translates to

    10^(53/10) = 10^(5.3) which is approximately equal to 20 thousand times more intense.

    Werd

    --
    Engineers also speak PDE, only in a different dialect.
  67. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except the dB scale is logarithmic.
    +3 dB = 2 x as loud
    +10 dB = 10 x as loud

    53 = 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 3 = 10*10*10*10*10*2 times as loud = 200000 times as loud. So actual its much more than "tens of thousands"

  68. Wow, I see what you mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It nearly cracked my monitor.

  69. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, IANA-Scientist, but..

    Isn't the Decibel scale logarithmic not linear?

  70. Only one problem with this engine by Gladiator · · Score: 1

    It uses Helium which is very expensive compared to other cooling mediums. The engine is probably expensive too.
    Cryogenic systems use Helium because of its efficiency.
    Industrial systems use Ammonia (NH3) because it is very cheap and harmless to the atmosphere. The machinery is however more expensive/complicated than Freon systems.

    1. Re:Only one problem with this engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, Helium is much less dangerous than Ammonia if there is a leakage...

      What I wand to know is what gas is used in the refridgeration system of this sound wave cooler?

  71. interesting..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...]even if the fridge cracks open the vast sounds generated within will not escape because the intense noise can only be generated in the pressurised gas locked inside the cooling system.

    and

    The pair are hoping that their work will end reliance on the gases [...]

    Seems counter productive to me.

  72. The family dinner of the future by agusus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can just imagine eating dinner with the family:

    Me: So, how was your day?
    Mother: What?
    Me: I said, how was your day?
    Mother: WHAT? I can't hear you!
    Me: HOW - WAS - YOUR - DAY?
    Mother: OH! IT WAS GOOD! WE GOT THE NEW FRIDGE TODAY!

  73. "Microwave" fridge by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wonder if this could lead to a sort of inverse microwave oven, i.e., one that could freeze water in under two minutes. Aside from having Margaritas muy rapido: it seems like rapid cooling could have:
    • medical applications
    • automotive applications (cool engine with sound generated by engine; kind of an sound based turbocharger)

    and obviously, chip cooling. I always thought loud music was cool.
    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:"Microwave" fridge by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      All you'd need to do would be to keep some liquid nitrogen handy...

    2. Re:"Microwave" fridge by tandr · · Score: 1
      automotive applications (cool engine with sound generated by engine; kind of an sound based turbocharger)

      Are you part-time genius? :)

      This is VERY good idea, although I have some doubts that engine has the "right" frequency range. Plus, how 1st (or 2nd?) law of termodynamics will interfere in this case.

      But idea is still very good one.

      t.
    3. Re:"Microwave" fridge by davew666 · · Score: 1

      This would not be a turbocharger. A turbo compresses air into the cylinders. It would be more like an intercooler, which makes sure that the air from the turbo is not too hot (and therefore less dense)

    4. Re:"Microwave" fridge by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      That'd be top! An Oven/Fridge/Speaker combo!! Ideal for roadie's.

    5. Re:"Microwave" fridge by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

      It was done... As a BBC sci-tech April 1 joke. ;-) A microwave runs inverse.

      I'd give URL but, their "supero genious" search engine can't find a page I have sure read.

      One more note, their phones were locked because of that joke, people took it serious.

  74. Global warming is a farse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will probably be moded down, but give me a break. Global warming is a farse.

    It's getting harder to read Slashdot due to the liberal bias. Come on people, wise up, get your nose into the real world and out of your 24 hour cyber life!

    No time to log-in

    Quicker

    1. Re:Global warming is a farse by ylikone · · Score: 1

      You probably don't believe in the moon landing either, right?

      --
      Meh.
    2. Re:Global warming is a farse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global warming is an Iranian? Ah no, that's a Farsi. Oh you mean global warming is a punk/ska band...

    3. Re:Global warming is a farse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I do believe that the moon landing happend. I just don't buy all the left wing environmentalist crap.

      Yes, I am a conservative Republican. Probably one of the less than 20 that read slashdot.

      Quicker

  75. Obligatory Movie Reference by Spencerian · · Score: 2

    "Dude! Turn up the beer cooler to 11!"

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  76. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this will be really good for deaf fat people

  77. That's what this is. by benjamindees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was developed at Los Alamos.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  78. Article on Thermoacoustics by nyphot · · Score: 1, Informative

    Thought this article might provide some interesting background on thermoacoustics.

  79. High-decibel sound by silhouette · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At ridiculous volumes and/or frequencies, sound has some amazingly powerful properties, but I'm skeptical as to how practical such a technology can be. Here's why:

    A professor at my university was doing some personal research with a small team at his house on the properties of high-decibel sound. Based on incredibly complex differential equations, one could project two sound waves at ridiculously high frequencies and volumes to create a special kind of interference. This interference would in essence start a new sound (at a hearable frequency/volume) from where the two waves intersected, effectively making it seem like a controlled sound was being created out of thin air at any point in 3d-space.

    I don't think I need to point out applications to this technology. BUT - he decided to discontinue the project before it was ever completed. He had several pets in his house (dog + cats) that he tried to keep away from the testing, but they were still being driven crazy by the sound. He also started developing nasty headaches and suspected that his high-range hearing was being destroyed.

    Interestingly, one of the graduate students who worked with him on the project decided to continue the work on his own. From what I've heard, he had his work picked up and funded by the US military (DARPA, I think). When I heard this, it really didn't come as a surprise.

    --
    Experts agree: everything is fine.
    1. Re:High-decibel sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a company selling 'speakers' based on this technique. Multiple highfrequency sounds merged to create lower frequency sound (within hearing range). You can project the sound onto a surface and make it into a speaker, or, you can just stick your head in the focal point.

      And it does NOT require high power levels.
      won't damage your hearing, etc.
      (They are integrating the speaker system into a truck last I heard on CNN...)

    2. Re:High-decibel sound by medscaper · · Score: 1
      When I heard this...

      Ha, bloody Ha.

      :)

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    3. Re:High-decibel sound by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Old hat

      You're talking about beat frequencies I think.

    4. Re:High-decibel sound by silhouette · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm pretty sure it was more complex than that. IIRC the reason they got such an interesting result was because "the air was being compressed by the high-power sound waves into a medium that created non-linear interference" or some such.

      I guess the basic idea (and this is how it ties into the article, in case anybody missed it) is that high frequency/volume sound waves are so powerful that they do nasty, complex things to the air that they're travelling in, creating things like extreme temperatures or other unusual behavior.

      --
      Experts agree: everything is fine.
    5. Re:High-decibel sound by j1mmy · · Score: 1

      Hypersonic speakers. slashdot has reported on them before. I first heard about them from a college prof two years ago. I forget the company, but they're very near (or already in) production.

    6. Re:High-decibel sound by FirezX · · Score: 1

      This sounds like hypersonic speakers. Popular Science had an article on it a few weeks ago.

    7. Re:High-decibel sound by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      Wow, really?!? I read about that in Popular Science years ago, and it's been on Slashdot more than once, as well.

    8. Re:High-decibel sound by silhouette · · Score: 2

      Yes, thank you for completely missing the point. I'm not trying to post news, thankyouverymuch, if I wanted to do that I would have submitted something to the editors. And, seeing as how it's been on Slashdot more than once, it probably would have been accepted, too - ESPECIALLY if it was an article from Popular Science years ago.

      My post, if you had bothered to think about it at all, was about how extremely high-energy sound waves might possibly be DANGEROUS, and not, for example, something I would want happening constantly in, oh, I don't know, my REFRIGERATOR.

      Congratulations, you get: -1, Missed the point

      --
      Experts agree: everything is fine.
    9. Re:High-decibel sound by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      LOL, if you say so.

      Here's what I understand: Two high frequencies interfere, and the interference of those frequencies create a third frequency. This is the effect you're prof is talking about.

      Another point is that not only is there temporal interference, there is spatial interference. This allows for spatial placement of sound, IE, 3d positioning.

      Finally, sound, by it's definition, is the compression and decompression (rarefaction) of the air. That is how sound travels and propogates. So it's not unusual that *compressed* air heats up, or rarefied air cools down, which is partially how sound heat pumps might work.

    10. Re:High-decibel sound by silhouette · · Score: 2

      Sure, I agree with your description - no problem. I just didn't see anything on the page you linked to that discussed very high frequency interference. Then again, I was at work so I wasn't searching very thoroughly.

      Anyway, it's not important in any case because I wasn't trying to report some news or discuss some similar technology (which is after all not very new), but rather point out possible dangers of that kind of sound usage.

      --
      Experts agree: everything is fine.
  80. Cool PC by doctor_no · · Score: 1

    Maybe this technology can be used to cool PCs, it'll probably be more effective than a heatsink and fan.

    Just connect some B&w speakers and some Krell amps and your done.

  81. Thermalacoutic Engine by blu3b3rry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Los Alamos national lab currently holds the record on using thermal acoustic engine. The thermal efficient of their engine is about 30 percent, compare that to automobile engine. which is about 25 percent. http://www.lanl.gov/projects/thermoacoustics/TASHE .html

    1. Re:Thermalacoutic Engine by rcw-home · · Score: 2
      The thermal efficient of their engine is about 30 percent, compare that to automobile engine. which is about 25 percent.

      A typical automotive gasoline engine has a brake efficiency of 38% these days. State of the art is over 40% and the DOE believes natural gas engines will do 50% by 2010. 25% is a rating I'd expect from something with an FAA certification.

  82. Decibel Mathmatics for n00bz by e.m.rainey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Decibels aren't on a linear scale. Your 53db is a logrithmic difference. Every 3db in difference is a doubleing of intensity. 123db is twice as intense as 120db. So 53/3 = 17.6667 which means 173db is 2^17.6667 times as loud as 120db. Which is actually 208063.83 times as loud. Which means the article was still wrong. Here's a link about decibel math: here.

    --
    The next remark is false. The previous remark is true.
  83. This was done a while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naval Postgraduate school did this---even solar powered it. Those darn navy guys...
    PDF: http://phserver.physics.nps.navy.mil/hofler/asa/ST ADTAR.pdf

    and even cooler (pun intended), a beer cooler powered by solar *heating* and thermoelectric.
    http://phserver.physics.nps.navy. mil/hofler/stadta r.htm

  84. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can use my chillout albums to cool my food!

  85. 173 db by Professor+Oompa · · Score: 1

    So how does one go about creating 173 db worth of sound? I saw no mention of how they did that. Im guessing that AC/DC isnt chilling in the back anywhere...

  86. A Primer on Logarithms by snoopy75 · · Score: 1
    Hardly what I would call "tens of thousands"

    Of course, it helps to know that the decibel system is based on logarithms. A quick look in a physics textbook or a quick Internet search will show you that a difference of 3dB signifies a doubling of power!! So yes, 173dB is actually about 208,000 times more intense than 120dB!

  87. As a big fan of fossil fuels... by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

    Even though I think Global Warming is a myth and the ozone hole is a joke I think this is very kewl. Plus this will last longer then the old fridges.

    This is the thing the hippies don't get: To actually decrease our use of oil a better product must be developed. Example, Very few care about solar or electic cars that can't hit 85+ mph. A pollution free car is worthless if no one can\will use it. If someone developed a SUV that got 50 miles per gallon I would be the first to buy it, but until then I will keep my Explorer.

    --

    Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
    Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
  88. Re:I can make a better, silent, non-mechanical fri by feceus · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, for those who have basements underneath their kitchens, you'd have to explain why there is a trap door and ladder where the old fridge used to be...
    And if you wanted a freezer, you'd have to wait until winter, as burrowing further down won't help much =)

    I make up for the lack of fridge in my dorm room by putting my drinks near the cold, uninsulated windows. Works pretty well.

  89. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by charlie763 · · Score: 2

    How about we use glass doors on our refrigerators, the kind that have two panes and a vacume betweem them. This way we wouldnt have to open the door so much. Duh!

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
  90. What? No OGG?!? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2

    Well I'll just wait until it comes with Ogg Vorbis support before they get MY money!
    --

  91. good commercial applications. by Brigadier · · Score: 3, Interesting



    refregerators are one thing, but I see this being a good application for roof mounted HVAC equipment. which is noisy anyways and are usually mounted in remote locations. This also applies to most commercial walk freezers/coolers. They all use a remotely mounted condencing (cooling) unit. My biggest questions are 1.) weight 2.) power consumption. I imagine this would remove the need for a compresser and radiator type vents making it lighter.

    1. Re:good commercial applications. by fciron · · Score: 1

      The whole compression expansion process (using environmentally unfriendly refrigerants) is what allows the compressor to be remotely mounted. You just have to run a 1/2 inch copper line of refrigerant to the cooler.

      This sounds like it would need to be mounted directly to the cooler. (The article states that heat exchangers are placed on the ends of the sound generator.)

  92. But... by Nefrayu · · Score: 1

    Can the fridge play my .OGG files???

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
  93. CFC's by abouttime · · Score: 1

    Let us ask a question - Why does a helium balloon float?

    This effect is due to the helium atoms being lighter than there surrounding atoms so the balloon gets pushed up (think effect of air bubbles in water if it helps).

    Now, since this is why things float - and the ozone is approx. 100 miles or so above the surface of the earth, let us ask the real question: How can CFC's (carbon chain molecule with florine) being much heavier than air float up to that altitute?

    1. Re:CFC's by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a noodle scratcher!

      Before you get too far, how come you aren't also wondering why water floats up to a high altitude (in the form of clouds)?

      Must be magic, huh?

    2. Re:CFC's by abouttime · · Score: 1

      Water is H20 and as such has an atomic weight of 1+1+16 = 18 per molecule. Water evaporates basicly a molecule at a time.

      Air (mostly Nitrogen) is diatomic, so 2*14 = 28.

      Hence, water is ligher than air.

  94. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by MrEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Of course it does raise the cost of opening the refrigerator door, in comparison to the cost ratio now.


    You know what I want? A fridge built into my countertop that pneumatically raises up at the touch of a button, leaving all the cold air still down in the refrigeration pit. It'd work just like your adjustable office chair. Yes, I know it would be a pain to clean when your cat knocks half a jug of juice down there, but isn't that a price worth paying?


    Think about it... *whoooosh*... makes those 1950's techno-utopian dreams look almost attainable! ;D

    --

    Wah!

  95. Loud?!?! That's not loud! by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    The sounds pumped through the Penn State fridge reach 173 dB, tens of thousands of times more intense than any rock concert.

    Bah! That's nothing! My brother had a Stereo in a Ford Ranger that did 176dB!

    His truck *was* pretty cool, though, so who knows? Maybe this could work.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

    1. Re:Loud?!?! That's not loud! by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      So, what does your brother do to prevent his hair from catching fire?

      Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.

    2. Re:Loud?!?! That's not loud! by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

      Honestly? I think that little factoid is probably a crock of shit. But, being that the truck could only play for about 30 seconds before it drained it's 18 or so batteries, you'd loose your hearing long before your hair if you actually sat *in* the truck when they cranked it, and bro shaves his head anyways, we'll probably never know. :)

      --

      Ed R.Zahurak

      You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  96. file format by ifreakshow · · Score: 1

    Sounds cool but what level of compression will it use? I insist on 256 kbps using ogg.

  97. Global warming... by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    LOL

  98. Exactly by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

    Unless it is cheaper there's hardly any point.

  99. it's a fire hazard by putch · · Score: 0

    it cools, yet it is a fire hazard?!?!

    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  100. Cool Chips by davidmcn · · Score: 1

    There was another company called Cool Chip LLC that can be found over at http://www.pinksheets.com which claims to have produced a chip which, using electron tunnelling (as I recall) to create an ultra-efficient means of cooling using banks of these chips. In short they take a small amount of electricity and convert it using the tunnelling technique to cool air. They are also in the process of making it work in reverse, where heat alone could produce electricity. Apparently they demoed it to Boeing. Links to the articles should be available both at the Pink Sheets website and somewhere on Slashdot an article about this was posted, but I can't find it now.

    --
    Memories become legend, Legend fades to myth, and even myth is forgotten by the time that age comes again.-Robert Jordan
  101. Thermoacoustic refrigeration by phasm42 · · Score: 1

    If you are interested in this technology, google for thermoacoustic refrigeration or refrigerator. Apparently this is not as new as the article makes it out to be.

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  102. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "1. ...Of course it does raise the cost of opening the refrigerator door, in comparison to the cost ratio now. ..."

    Now we get to one of my pet peeves. Why doesn't any of the major, or minor for that matter, fridge manufactures make a chest style fridge. There are many chest style deep freezes, but no fridges. With a chest style fridge you'd only loose very little of the cold air in it when you opened it, rather than dumping darn near every bit of cold air out onto the floor as with the cabinet style fridges.

    Just my $0.02

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  103. Umm....no. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    That's just asking for it to break.

    I think the price of buying new lead-filled motors every year would offset any benefit of such a system.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  104. Global warming a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global warming is BS.
    How old is the earth, and how long has man kept records on temps? It may very well be natural for the earth to warm up, For all we know the records may of started on the bottom of a natural cool period, and we are just now warming up to normal.

  105. Thank God for Coal! by angryty · · Score: 1

    And since we're now using electricity to cool the fridge, we're burning coal to make the electricity to cool the fridge. At least we won't have to worry about any harmful gasses from those coal-burning electricity plants...

  106. Theoretically.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could a Beowulf cluster of these refrigerators be used to cool the Earth and stop global warming?

    Who is against global warming anyway? I hate cold weather and snow!

  107. Also at Penn State ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in the physics department, Julian Maynard works on thermoacoustic refrigeration. He does some pretty neat stuff. (I went to a talk where he was telling us how he was determining resonant modes in a quasicrystalline lattice. Instead of trying to solve the quantum mechanical Schroedinger equation analytically or numerically, he experimentally built a simulation of the quasicrystal by cutting out appropriately-shaped metal plates, putting tuning forks on them, and wiring the forks together to couple neighboring "crystals". He arranged it so the classical resontant modes of the simulated system would duplicate the quantum eigenstates of the real system, and just experimentally measured the normal modes.) He's always desperate for graduate students and has tons of funding to spare, because acoustics can be lucrative, but isn't trendy.

  108. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2
    Move to a gas capable of storing more heat. This one's obvious. Of course we've gone in the opposite direction to get away from Freon. Not really a great solution unless we come up with something new.

    I believe the new gases (e.g. Puron) are more efficient at this than Freon. I have a new air conditioner that uses Puron. It runs considerably quieter and uses less electricity.

  109. I can already cool with sound... by craenor · · Score: 1

    Rooms drop a good 10 degrees every time I ask a girl out in bar...at least it seems that way.

  110. Hmm by Fnagaton · · Score: 1

    Gives a whole new meaning to "chillin' vibes". Sorry :)

    --
    Martin Piper
    Owner - ReplicaNet and RNLobby
  111. Possible benefitial side effects.. by tassii · · Score: 1

    It creates heat energy... I wonder if it can be tapped off to create hot water so you can have hot & cold water spigot on your fridge with your icemaker. Kinda like what you find on a water fountain. Make ice tea off the front of your refrigerator without having to turn on the stove (or the coffee maker, or the microwave, etc).

    --
    "I drank what?" - Socrates
  112. go read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geez -- go read the article before posting please

    the sound can't get out of the heat exchange box
    because it's transmitted through a special pressurized
    gas of some sort.

    if the seal is broken, the gas depressurizes, and
    it's not possible to produce the 175+ db of sound
    anymore. (it's probably still pretty loud though)

  113. It's the Anti-Microwave! by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

    Sweet, now I can cool down my plasma bean burritos straight out of the microwave!

  114. I'd worry if they were ULF ... by Choco-man · · Score: 3, Funny

    We all know that ultra low frequencies can cause your bowels to, well, kick in and empty out, right? I wonder if you can buy a package deal - combo 'fridge/toilet. Kick in a TV, padded/heated seat on the toilet, and you've pretty much just created the ultimate guy Christmas present.

    1. Re:I'd worry if they were ULF ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your brown sound

  115. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rosie O'Donnel used in first on her television show.

  116. I'm still waiting for the Dune quips... by Randolpho · · Score: 1


    Tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooocho!
    </wierding-module>

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  117. RIAA Royalties? by Snowgen · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the RIAA will be seeking royalties for each item I stick in my sound-powered fridge?

    It's a joke--you're supposed to laugh now.
  118. /. Redeems itself by Lizard_King · · Score: 2

    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.

    This is the coolest thing that I've read on /. in a long, long time.

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
  119. We must have quiet fridges, that come in colors... by Traicovn · · Score: 1

    Great... Just when I had finally managed to get my computer nice and quiet, they came up with a way to make the fridge louder...
    I wonder though, if this could be used, or how logical it would be, to apply this to computers, especially as we get faster, and the processors temperatures get hotter. Perhaps instead of purchasing fans most computers will come with an audio coolant system standard?...
    Anybody have an idea how loud these things are?

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  120. Two piece refrigerator.. by nolife · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've often wondered why a two piece conventional freon refrigerator never caught on. You could place the compressor, condenser, and the support structure outside the house connected with two hoses (same as your whole house AC). This would eliminate most of the internal noise and be far more efficient as you are not releasing the hot air from inside the fridge + the electrical and mechanical losses into the house. In the fall through spring season cycle it would even be more an advantage as it is often much cooler outside then in the house and the compressor could even be bypassed. This would allow for smaller, quiter, and higher efficiency refrigerators and allow more flexibility as you could replace the inside and outside units seperately when and if needed. The inital conversion would be a little higher because you'd have to run lines and a concrete pad or wall hanging device outside but long term it would be much less. Installation in new construction would be simple. Anyone have some VC money they want to get rid of?

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:Two piece refrigerator.. by GooberToo · · Score: 2

      Ya, I've wondered about this exact thing before too. It always struck me as odd to pay refrig costs twice. Once for the frig to remove the heat from the frig and once again to remove the added heat from the house. It always seemed completely back assward.

      In fact, I recently wondered why you simply couldn't "plug" your frig into the house's cooling lines for the AC unit. At which point, I think the only reason you'd actually need to plug your frig into an electrical outlet would be to run the light and motors for water and ice.

      Perhaps even a hybrid approach (keeping the internal parts for emergency backup) would be possible while keeping costs close to what they are today. Plus, if you bought a unit which used your house's AC unit, in theory, I'd imagine the unit would become cheaper to own and run, assuming your AC unit knows about it.

    2. Re:Two piece refrigerator.. by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      I've often wondered why a two piece conventional freon refrigerator never caught on

      Probably because you've just added a massive number of points of failure, additional construction requirements, additional codes, etc. to the system which will double or triple the cost, and haven't really given much in return. Just how much do you think it's going to save you in cooling bills? And don't forget that come winter, you'll have to spend more on heating since you no longer have the refrigerator dumping waste heat into your living space.

      And installation changes from something doable by anyone who knows the right end of a wrench to something doable only by a die-hard DIYer or a pro.

      I question the flexibility as well -- with modern HVAC units you don't replace the compressor separately from the coils. They may be in two physically separate locations, but they're a matched pair. Yeah, it's doable if one fails, but you better hope that replacement parts for that exact model are available or else you're going to have a mismatch that will lower efficiency. Since what you're talking about is essentially another compressor/coil setup, you're going to run into the same issues here.

    3. Re:Two piece refrigerator.. by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      My $0.02 on this idea...

      ...in theory it's a good idea, but you would incur a lot of installation cost; so much so that it would probably be much more than potential money savings from energy savings. You would have to run insulated ducting to the outside from inside your kitchen, conduit for power to the outside pump, make sure the compressor is weatherproof, etc. A retrofit job for this might be as much as $2000, when all is said and done. I think refrigerator costs about $150/year in electricity to run; even if you were to save 25% of that, you'd save $37.50 per year. At that rate you'd make your investment back in a little over 53 years.

      But yes, installation in new construction would be much cheaper. And if you designed the house to accomodate this, like putting the refrigerator next to an external wall and putting the compressor nearby, you could make this system much more effective.

    4. Re:Two piece refrigerator.. by mindserfer · · Score: 0

      Also the temp and humidity cycles outside the house would cause it to age at an accelerated rate.

  121. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe it was Jeff Foxworthy, part of his "You might be in Soviet Russia" act.

  122. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the sciam article they explain this bit... apparently the dB scale is logarithmic

  123. In other news... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... refrigerator owners in Finland have been court ordered to pay royalties for the sounds generated by the space-age technology inside of their appliances. These royalties multiply depending on how many people are in the kitchen at the time. Hillary Rosen of the RIAA was quoted as saying "First they pirate our music, now they're cooling their food with it? Lots of people everywhere owe us money!"

  124. So instead of watercooling your overclocked CPU... by Spy4MS · · Score: 2

    use REALLY loud speakers.

    Then go to a lan party where you can frag your neighbor with 173 decibels. That would be coooooooool.

  125. OK, all together now... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    "Ozone Depeletion and global warming are two different issues."

    It's CO2 emissions that are allegedly a major factor in global warming. Unless your fridge is gasoline powered, this is not an issue.

    And CFCs have already been banned. I though /. was on the bleeding edge?

    ObSheesh: Sheesh!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  126. I Don't Get The Problem Here by Escape+Tangent · · Score: 3, Informative

    I feel compelled to lay to rest all of these posts about people going deaf from these refrigerators...

    Thankfully, even if the fridge cracks open the vast sounds generated within will not escape because the intense noise can only be generated in the pressurised gas locked inside the cooling system.

    Think about it for a moment. To generate the 120 dB in front of the speakers at a rock concert, you need some serious wattage. Those are powerful blasters, my friends. Also realize that the Decibel scale is logarithmic, meaning that the amount of "sonic energy" or volume -- whatever you want to call it -- between say 20 and 30 dB is a lot less than the amount between 120 and 130 dB. We're talking about a difference between 120 and 173 dB, which is, as the article points out, "tens of thousands of times more intense than any rock concert." I'm not a physicist or anything, but I'd assume that's why the sounds generated in the cooling unit work within a highly pressurized atmosphere -- so the sounds can (1) be created more efficiently and (2) carry through the gas properly. Open the unit into normal air and I don't believe it works anymore -- the atmosphere is too thin to produce those kinds of levels. On top of that, the unit is probably insulated in a vacuum anyhow, so as to prevent sound from escaping.
    You won't go deaf. Your animals won't go crazy. The most you'll probably ever hear is a soft hum.

    --
    On Slashdot, we don't say "thank you." We say "that's enough..." -_-;
  127. 'Fridges don't contribute to Global Thawing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refrigerants cause holes in the ozone... no connection to Global Thawing. Gonna burn your ass with UV while the temp goes up enough to bake bread in your shorts whilst you sit in the shade of your gas guzzling moped.

  128. Re:I can make a better, silent, non-mechanical fri by AJWM · · Score: 2

    didn't take any rocket science, doesn't produce green house gasses, doesn't make any noise, doesn't cost much to run, ...doesn't work worth a darn anywhere useful.

    Assuming that 4deg is Celsius (Only a few places on Earth - mostly covered with ice - where that might be Fahrenheit), you're still talking about pretty high latitudes. 4C == 40F, but most temperate latitudes the constant ground temperature is more like 50F - 55F, getting warmer as you approach the tropics. Not cold enough for a fridge (typically 4C/40F), and you'd have to dig more than just "a few feet" anyway.

    Unless you live in Greenland.

    --
    -- Alastair
  129. Re:High-decibel sound (already done) by Rambo · · Score: 2

    I can't recall what vehicle it was, but an experimental luxury car had two of these type of units integrated for the back seat. They were built into the headliner of the roof and (obviously) fired downwards, with the nifty effect of producing sound audible by the person below it but nowhere else. I'm not sure if it ever entered mass-production. At any rate, the theory was the same, where the interference between ultrasonic sound waves created an audible result. Aside from the aiming problems I believe the biggest issue was poor fidelity, as it was difficult to reproduce the full range of frequencies necessary for music with this technique.

  130. Val Kilmer? by zrodney · · Score: 2

    say... wasn't this the story of a movie?

    something like the one with the space laser some
    college kids redirected to the professor's house
    and ended up destroying with popcorn?

    http://www.dvdmoviecentral.com/ReviewsText/real_ ge nius.htm

    1. Re:Val Kilmer? by jgerman · · Score: 2
      That would be Real Genius.



      You are Chris Knight aren't you? I hope so I'm wearing his underwear.


      Hehe

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  131. Back in yr 2k... by Chembryl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was asked to do some work on alternative methods of refridgeration by a very large alcoholic beverage company. The real pioneers of acoustic stirling heat engines are located here at Los Alamos.

    Global Cooling on the otherhand produce rival products to Medis El based on the Free piston Stirling Engine.

    Despite being some impressive technology, Free Piston Stirling Engines haven't really been taken up to well. Its a shame because they do seem to be much more efficient.

    If you are really interested then you might want to check this out At Ames Lab. Gschneidner's work on the giant magnetocaloric effect is REALLY impressive. Its all about the exchange of entropy between magnetic and kinetic forms. Damn cool.

    --
    - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
  132. necessary litterary reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now FINALLY I can build those weirding modules!

    I'm sure there is a dB for getting one's organs to burst too!

    Artaxerxes

  133. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By using some combination of these technologies we can move away from environmentally unsafe gases. While this new technology is certainly new and may be superior in many aspects, the only reason we have not moved to more efficient and/or "eco-friendly" designs to date is expense. Welcome to capitalist terra, my friends.

    It's not as though expense can be omitted from the equation entirely. Cheap and easily produced refrigeration technology (and air conditioning, which is closely related) have probably prevented more illnesses than any recent development since antibiotics.

  134. Oh It Hurts! by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The research is being sponsored by ice cream makers Ben & Jerry's and Unilever. "

    "Humans feel pain when they hear sounds of 120 decibels, a level typically reached next to the speakers at a rock concert."

    So the purpose of this research is to improve on the ice cream headache? Why?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  135. haha by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    If successful, this technology would help remove the dependance on gases that contribute to global warming. Talk about Cool!

    Talk about cool? Haha, you guys get that one?!?! haha... sorry =P

  136. Re:I can make a better, silent, non-mechanical fri by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    opps, got caught out be the french again.....

    Well, a hole in the ground was good enough for a few thousand years or so, so I'm sure it's good enough now.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  137. Global Warming? Bah! by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    First the "scientists" say the earth is getting warmer... Then a couple cold winters, and they say that the global warming is causing colder winters. Then it's causing less rain/snow fall, now we're getting more snow than last year.

    The impact that everything humans have done can be easily toppled by a couple volcanos. I'm really getting sick of everyone from CEO's to environmentalists only looking at the near past and near future. It's causing kneejerk reactions to everything from 'this week's' profits, to 'this month's' temperatures. Everything has to be done now, stopped now, started now, fixed now. Until someone can give me the average weekly temerature report from when Mr. & Mrs. Dinosaur were releasing greenhouse gasses after munching some stinkweed in a swamp, I have a hard time believing that their constantly chaning opinions and "findings" are accurate.

    That's my rant, go ahead and moderate this down a bit.

  138. I'm starting a band! by bareman · · Score: 1

    I am so going to crack one of these babies open for the amplifier and start my own band.

    I think I'll call it...

    DISASTER AREA!

  139. Q: Is your refrigerator running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: Then you better go catch it!

  140. keep it closed? by MoreDruid · · Score: 1
    How do they keep the darn thing closed? I mean, in car-audio subwoofer systems you tend to build the sturdiest structure imaginable, just to keep the box from rattling (blasting) apart, because of the massive soundwaves (ergo airwaves) that are generated. Could someone explain how they will be able to prevent that from happening and still allowing the door to open easily? Or would they use a "soundbox" cooling entrapment and conductor setup?

    If anyone has more info than the PR-babble on both sites, I would appreciate that.

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    1. Re:keep it closed? by TinCanFury · · Score: 1

      its all about the frequencies being played.
      the thermoacoustic fridge uses very high frequencies that the compartment damps very well, plus all(most) of the acoustic energy is being used in the heat transfer so it won't be used elsewhere.

  141. Re: soundproofing by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

    First, for soundproofing the easiest method would be to place the sound source and the hot/cold plates in a "double, hollow walled box" evacuate most of the air between the hollow walls. This leaves no way for the sound waves to propogate outside the cooling unit. The cooling effect takes place outside of the hollow walled box because the fridge will still presumably circulate a fluid (which has absorbed heat in the refrigerator box through the cooling unit and back to the fridge/freezer. So there's wouldn't be a sound source even when the refridgerator is opened. Then put a sound sensor outside the box that shuts down the fridge if the vacumn fails and the sound rises above a certain level.

    I actually came to the same conclusion, but ran into one problem with it: The heat exchanger. At some point the heat exchanger is going to have to contact the metal plates in the sound tube. Thermodynamics being what they are, the most efficent way for the cooled metal plates to suck heat out is going to be through conduction with the fluid (possibly through a interum medium, such as a heat sink). Just cooling the metal plates and waiting for radiation to transfer the heat through a near vaccum is going to be slow, very slow.
    So now we have a heat exchanger, contacting the plates in the sound tube, the exchanger and contained fluid (if they use one) come into contact with both the air and the rest of the the fridge. making for one nice sounding board.
    On the upshot though, you could use nylon fasteners to mount the exchanger system, thus isolating it a bit, and also a bit of insulation around the heat exchanger, except where it must be exposed, could go a long way to damping the sound. Also, as the article mentioned the system uses a gas under pressure to propagate the sound at the desired level, so even if there is some vibration transfered out through the heat exchange system, it may not generate much more noise than a current fridge.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  142. greenhouse != ozone layer by g4dget · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The primary problem with CFCs is that they destroy the ozone layer, not their contribution to global warming. The two problems are rather different from one another. The destruction of the ozone layer is already a serious problem in some parts of the world, while global warming has not become such a big problem--yet.

    1. Re:greenhouse != ozone layer by JoeBuck · · Score: 2

      In some areas, such as Alaska, global warming is already a significant problem. Even anti-environmentalists like Alaska's Republican senator Ted Stevens are saying so.

  143. Re:I can make a better, silent, non-mechanical fri by fava · · Score: 2

    At about 6' down the ground temperature is roughly equal to the average yearly temperature of your location. If that is 4 degrees where you live then you dont have much of a summer do you?

  144. What a bunch of trolls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any child of the 80's knows that "In Soviet Russia" was Yakov Smirnov's schtick!
    Now get out of my comic book store!

    1. Re:What a bunch of trolls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent is the true troll!! The "In Soviet Russia" bit actually came from Bette Middler's first made for TV movie.

  145. Re:Puns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But -- it's really COOL -- because it's a refrigerator!!

    Feces -> Trousers

  146. First... prose: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Slashdot, ye layout look like crud. Thou art the grounds of many a flame-war and the grounds where many a brave troll stood. With many a great postings and tales we may deem tall, you cheerfully bring news from the techworld, faithfully, to us all.

    Here, Here!

  147. It was on Beyond 2000 a long time ago too. by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    I remember it pretty vividly. The demo unit they had was installed into a counter top. "Opening" the fridge consisted of pressing a button on the counter top, and a circular set of racks rose up out of the counter top.

  148. Green Party conversation of the future by sdhankin · · Score: 1

    "This refrigerator is really environmentally friendly..."
    "What?"
    "It cools through the use of extremely loud accoustical waves..."
    "WHAT ARE YOU SAYING?"
    "At first I was worried it would affect my hearing..."
    "I CAN'T HEAR YOU! WHAT'S WITH THE NOISY FRIDGE?"

  149. cool music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The researchers were using this CD in their initial studies.

  150. warning by josepha48 · · Score: 2

    Surgens general warning: Opening the refrigerator may cause strange noises.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  151. Cold Fusion you should respect! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Funny
    Future headline:
    Cold fusion has been reproduced by three labs using a Kenmore room fridge.

    The discovery was made by chemistry students who accidentally let the pressurized gas out of their acoustic beer cooler and replaced it with the only thing they had on hand a tank of pressurized deuterium. Since the tone producing chip ( a common 555 timer ) of the fridge was smashed by the same idiot who fell over and knocked the tube assembly and the students were too plastered to drive to Radio Shack, the students routed Aretha Franklin's famous R.E.S.P.E.C.T track through the sound circuitry creating fusion.

    The three cooked ramen noodles on the heat exchanger of their fridge and smoked some weed but were suprised when the tuble started to glow red and finally burst making a small hydrogen fireball in their dorm room.

    The next day the students were all very sick and were admitted to the hospital where they were diagnosed with radiation sickness. Sadly the two that sat in the room next to the cooking noodles died within 48 hours, but the third went back into the room and studied the device. Under more controlled circumstances, he has found that other CDs do not produce neutrons or excess energy and that fusion doesn't start until the first round of 'Sock it to me Sock it to mes'

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

    1. Re:Cold Fusion you should respect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice, except that fusion doesn't produce a substantial amount of radiation. That's fission you're thinking of.

    2. Re:Cold Fusion you should respect! by mythr · · Score: 2, Funny

      But I just went fission the other day! I caught a few trout, but no radiation sickness. ;)

  152. Vanilla Ice! by f64 · · Score: 1


    Power it with Vanilla Ice so at least some vanilla ice is cool!


    f64 : crack remarks since 1978 (the year crack was invented).

  153. Re: soundproofing by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

    Actually if the housing containing the driver is ruptured it will still remain quiet because compressed gas is required for the loud noise.

    --
    Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  154. Death of an old joke :( by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1

    Noone can say "Is your refrigerator running" in their prank calls anymore. Anyone who could answer "no" to that question would have their face melted off and therefore would be unable to answer the phone in the first place.

  155. Re:Wow the BBC uses /. math! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    200000 times as loud. So actual its much more than "tens of thousands"

    Not really; it's 20 tens of thousands.

  156. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by drunken+monkey · · Score: 1

    ooh, you can make the glass door a giant lcd or any one of those technologies used to make shading windows. This way you can have an opaque fridge, until you want to take a peek. To be honest, I don't want to see my moldy cheese to be so easily visible.

    narbey

    --
    -- "The evil stops here" -Petr
  157. That makes sense by finkployd · · Score: 2

    I was wondering what that annoying sound on campus was

    Finkployd
    PSU Programmer

  158. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by Tsar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we get to one of my pet peeves. Why doesn't any of the major, or minor for that matter, fridge manufactures make a chest style fridge.

    I don't understand your question. All refrigerators are chest style; they only set them on one end in the store so they'll occupy less space. Oh, wait--you aren't one of those idiots that installed it that way when you got it home, are you? Hahahahaha!!! How stupid can you get? I'll bet you put CD's in your PC's cupholder slot too, don't you?

    What a moron!

  159. built one these in high school by xmldude · · Score: 4, Informative

    A small team of 10 or so in conjunction with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory built a thermo-acoustic refridgerator. It didn't work to well but it sure did make a hell of alot of noise. :)

    Our most successful aspect of the project was the prototyping of the stack. We discovered that a form of carbon areogel had some very cool properties that made isolating the heat exchanges easy. To test the new stack we created a "hooter-tube" (or holfer tube) which is the opposite of the refridgerator. We created a difference in temeperature to generate sound. We dipped one end of the tube in liqued nitrogen and then heated the other end with a blow dryer. It was a blast to play with becuase it was about the size of a light saber and becuase the open end was the cold end the air around the tip would condense and allow you to "see" the sound wave (well, a quarter of it anyway).

    here are some photos and other stuff:
    photo of hooter tube
    photo of working refridgerator (very similar to ours)
    Navy page with lots of info

    BUNNY OF DEATH!

    1. Re:built one these in high school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jon, check it out, someone else at LLNL patented YOUR idea for the carbon foam stack a year or two after we finished working on the project.


      http://www.llnl.gov/str/Pat398.html


      BTW: I still have the base that our first carbon stack was built on (with some of the stack material as well) 8^)

    2. Re:built one these in high school by TinCanFury · · Score: 1

      My uncle is Jay Adeff(guy in that last link of yours, actually, he put that page together).

      He helped my build one 10 or so years ago for my Jr. High science fair project. It was small, but I could cool a soda can in it.

  160. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Agreed. The most important developments in public health to date are:

    1. Refrigeration
    2. Sanitation (waste removal and treatment, including water waste)
    3. Water Treatment (You could say chlorination)
    4. Inoculation

    Certainly expensive refrigeration wouldn't solve problems for the impoverished. Of course lots of people in the world STILL don't have refrigeration, which (as anyone who has played civilization 2 knows) lets you produce more food because you can store/transport more.

    On the other hand for most of the world it makes sense to purchase initially expensive refrigeration hardware because it will save on costs in the long run. It regularly pisses me off that it is generally impossible to get a refrigerator with a basic set of features (IE, no ice maker/crusher, no water spigot, no computer in the door) without industrial-quality insulation.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  161. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by rot26 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On the other hand if the gas is compressed farther it will be able to accept more heat, so you should be able to get a more rapid heat transfer

    Sorry, it's been a few years since I had thermogoddamics, but I'm not sure this is correct. The heat transfer uses ENTHALPIC heat, which is given up or absorbed when the material changes state. In other words, Freon (ammonia, whatever) absorbs heat when it changes from a liquid to a gas, and vice versa. You compress the gas JUST ENOUGH to change its state to liquid, compressing it further has no effect (besides, compressing liquids isn't really practical anyway.) I believe what makes the Freon family so suitable for heat exchanging applications isn't it's enthalpic heat capacity, but the temperatures and pressures at which it changes state, i.e. practical in real-world terms. For example a compound that changed from gas to liquid at 2000 PSI at -140C wouldn't really be useful for much of anything. Some substances don't go through the liquid stage at all at practical pressures (carbon dioxide)... they go straight from gas to solid (and vice versa). Hard to pump a solid through a heat exchanger.

    Anyway, you made some great points, but the solutions may not be as practical or simple as you suggested.

    And I didn't see any mention in the article of what kind of compressed gas was used in the sound chamber.... Freon maybe? haha.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  162. Re:So instead of watercooling your overclocked CPU by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

    That would be coooooooool

    In more ways than one, at least according to the article.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  163. I'm OK with Sound Waves if... by detritus. · · Score: 1

    So long they don't have singing fruit or vegtables in mind.

  164. Temperature gradient by Doubting+Thomas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heat engines convert temperature -differences- into mechanical energy. If you plop one inside a furnace, it'll just sit there getting warm. Reversible in this case means that you can convert mechanical energy into a temperature difference, and so it can be used as either a heat pump or as a refrigeration unit, depending on which end of the output you're interested in.

    --
    Just because it works, doesn't mean it isn't broken.
  165. Cool... by sonofbc99 · · Score: 1

    I find this very interesting as a similar or maybe the same technology was in one of the science magazines 10 Years ago! Also there is a new technology on the books that promises a chip the size of a pack of cigarettes that could cool a refrigerator with only 1/4 the energy. See it at http://www.coolchips.com Sam

  166. OT: Helium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trivia question...

    You have a helium balloon in a car. You step on the gas. What happens to the balloon and why?

  167. Slogan-that-never-was-dept by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2

    I scream, you scream, this fridge screams to cool ice cream.

  168. Some other new cooling technologies by bremstrong · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cold storage: cooling phase change materials by running the cooling system at night, then using the cold material for daytime cooling (lower nighttime electric rates, better efficiencies due to cooler nighttime air temp)

    http://www.cogeneration.net/thermalenergystorage .h tm

    Using high efficiency solid state thermionics for no-moving-parts cooling:

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/electricit yd evice.html

    Storing nighttime coolness in phase change materials embedded in drywall:

    http://doityourself.com/wall/phasechangedrywall. ht m

    Windows which can switch on and off to reject or transmit infrared radiation:

    http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/homeandwork/ ho mes/inside/windows/future.html

    CO2 based automobile air conditioning system:

    http://www.spacedaily.com/2002/021204065123.7v5m u3 3v.html

  169. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    You're probably right, the way I capped my karma (Actually I had 52 karma, about a day later the kap was instituted, sigh) was by bullshitting creatively. You know, just like everyone else.

    However it's not necessarily necessary :) to convert all the way to a liquid. If that's the way Freon works, it's neat to know and my hat is off to you.

    Oh yeah I forgot another way to increase the efficiency of a refrigerator; increase the airflow over one or another of the heat exchangers. I thought of this because the issue of converting to a liquid made me think of automotive intercoolers (which are compressing air which as you know is mostly nitrogen and oxygen and obviously not compressing it to a liquid.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  170. Hair Catching on Fire by serutan · · Score: 4, Funny

    At last, a fridge that goes to ELEVEN.

  171. obligatory 1337-speak misreading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How's this for an experiment. Turn your stereo speakers up to the loudest (that's maybe 110dB if you have a killer stereo) and try to build a soundproof box around it that's smaller than your fridge.
    Heh. When I first read that, I wondered what "llodb" meant. (A borrowing from Welsh, maybe?)
  172. This isn't new... by Steven+Rumbalski · · Score: 1

    My computer is already cooled by sound waves. If you don't believe me, come on over and have a listen.

  173. Re:So instead of watercooling your overclocked CPU by saskboy · · Score: 2

    I guess why my CPU hasn't melted yet, is because the cooling fan is churning out 173dB. That could explain why I'm deaf...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  174. Re:Also on Scientific American - degrees? by saskboy · · Score: 2

    "The coldest temperature we have achieved with this test rig is eight degrees below zero--well below the freezing point of water," Garrett says.

    Well since this is on a website with SCIENCE in the title, I think they mean Celcius.
    BUT is also has American in the title.

    I think my head is gonna explode! If it doesn't, I'll apply for a job at NASA.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  175. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a "cool" idea.

  176. We are.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Penn State!


    Joe Pa rules!
    -- -1 for gratuitous Collage Football ranting

  177. Another application for this... by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 1

    ...would be large scale building ventilation chillers. The problems associated with having a noisy refrigerator could be ignored if you instead used this technology to provide cooling for an office or apartment building. HVAC chillers and their associated pumps already make lots of noise, so another humming noise won't make much of a difference. Plus, the fewer moving parts would make chiller manufacturers happy; less maintenance to do.

    The article does mention that in these sound tubes, half the plates get hot and half get cold. It doesn't mention how hot these plates get. Perhaps they could be used for heating. Then a building mechanical equipment room could be much smaller; instead of having a chiller and a boiler, you could have just one rack of these sound tubes, a hot water heat exchanger, and a cold water heat exchanger.

  178. BZZZZZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always knew Drew Carey was ahead of his time with BZZZ Beer!

  179. So...If the fridge... by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 1

    falls in the forest, and nobody's around to hear it, does it make a sound?

    --
    If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
  180. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by rot26 · · Score: 2

    bullshitting creatively. You know, just like everyone else

    I resemble that remark. haha.

    However it's not necessarily necessary :) to convert all the way to a liquid.I guess I forgot more thermo than I originally thought. You're right, I wasn't thinking. But, in fact, it's more efficient to use the enthalpic heat thingy for common refrigeration and a/c applications, so they do. I tried to google up some specific facts but hard info seemed fairly difficult to come by. I did find a meaningless PDF buried on DuPont's site someplace but it didn't seem particularly quotable. Maybe tomorrow I'll check howshitworks.com or something, probably while I'm looking for nits to pick in somebody else's post. Guffaw. :-)

    I was glad they capped the karma, I never could get above 49 anyway. Some arsewipes kept modding my humor as "offtopic" and "flamebait". Go figger.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  181. Freeze Ray coming next! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they are working on a refrigerator with military funding. If they can cool with sound, how long before they make a sound cannon / freezer gun?

  182. Re:Also on Scientific American - degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for it. They can always use people who can't be bothered with units of measure. I think they have a few more space probes they need to crash into planets.

  183. Old news... by Hayzeus · · Score: 2
    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating caused by air undergoing such intense compression and expansion.

    I believe this phenomena has already been well-described in the science documentary "Rock and Roll High School".

  184. Um... this is so like, 1993 by jonbrewer · · Score: 4, Informative

    This research made some noise (ha!) about ten years ago. A company called Macrosonix holds the patents. Even NPR has covered this in the past ten years.

    The best explanation of the technology I've seen is in "Fluid Power Journal."

  185. humm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they don't mention the gas they're using.. instead of ruining the ozone, now we've got some mystery gas leaking into the atmosphere when the fridge breaks!

    Wonder how long it is until cheese eating highschool kids figure out a way to get high off it.

  186. This is the Audio Spotlight - read about it here: by HEbGb · · Score: 2

    This was on slashdot before. The device was invented by a guy at MIT, and he's now running a company selling them commercially:

    Holosonics (Audio Spotlight manufacturer)

    Looks like there are several automotive companies using them, as well as lots of exhibitors and whatnot. Really cool stuff.

  187. This is why... by AB3A · · Score: 1

    the hottest and/or coolest music should always be played as loud as possible.

    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
  188. Smart assed comment... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire...

    Marketing guy: Great! So we have Michael Jackson as a customer. Who else are we going to sell this thing to?

    **RIMSHOT**

    Thank you! Thank you! I'll be here all week!

    --
    That is all.
  189. Better yet... by core+plexus · · Score: 1

    ...why not devise a way to bring in cold air from outside, piped into the fridge? Surely this won't work for places like Floriduh, but where I live (and right now, much of America and Canada) are cool enough to save a few dollars in power costs, and reduce or eliminate the chemicals. Only question is where to get the cold air during the summer? The earth, of course. I'm going to try it. If it works I'll try it on my computers.

  190. Sound? Bah. by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 2

    I'm holding out for a fridge that cools with lasers, so I can make up a batch of Bose-Einstein condensate whenever I need some.

    --
    - - - -
    The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
  191. umm, the whole CFC thing is already solved by beakburke · · Score: 1

    In case you missed it, the Montreal Protocol banned Production of Freeon in 1990. Most cooling units built today use a non-ozone depleting chemical relative of Freeon. Actually there are a couple of them. So while it might be "cool" and "SUPERDOOPERLOUD", its a solution looking for a problem.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  192. Get your facts straight by Phronesis · · Score: 5, Insightful
    BTW, the chlorofluorocarbons you mention are responsible for destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere, which allows more ultraviolet light through. That's a different problem, but related in the sense that now you could have sunburned, farting cows.

    CFCs and their replacements, HCFCs and HFCs, are all tremendously potent greenhouse gases. They have global warming potentials several thousand times that of carbon dioxide. The ozone problem is pretty much solved because global CFC production has dropped to near zero following the implementation of international treaties to protect the ozone layer. However, the global warming potential of HFC and HCFC replacements is worthy of concern.

    Global warming is caused by the sun.

    Just as it is true that global warming is caused by the sun, so my body generates most of the heat that keeps me warm. Nonetheless, if I wear too many sweaters, I will get too hot. Taking them off will cool me down, despite the fact that the heat is all coming from my own body. The same principle applies to the atmosphere. The earth's temperature is determined by a radiative balance. We can't change the sun, but we can change the atmosphere (our sweater), and that can cause the earth's temperature to change.

  193. How efficient? by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

    This seems nifty and all, but how efficient can it be? I have no idea how much juice the typical concert PA system uses, but I'll bet it's more than my fridge. I'd love to have one though - It would be neat if I could shoot a hole in it and suddenly have a couple of locomotive horns going off in the kitchen, making people's hair catch on fire and so on...

  194. Centralized Heat by 3ryon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I would really like to see is a house designed around a centralized heat reservoir. Dump the heat generated by your Fridge and your AC into a stack where your water heater, your over, and your Heater can pull from. Obviously you'd also want a heating element there, but the energy savings of recouping the heat from the other applicances would be significant.

  195. Re:This is the Audio Spotlight - read about it her by silhouette · · Score: 2

    Yes!! This is exactly the grad student I was talking about. From the Holosonics site you linked, in the "technology" section:

    While a graduate student developing '3D Audio' at Northwestern University in the late 1990's, Joseph Pompei had similar ideas of using ultrasound as a loudspeaker ...

    He doesn't give credit to any specific people at Northwestern, but as I recall he did most of the work anyway. Interesting!

    --
    Experts agree: everything is fine.
  196. I remember seeing this 10 years ago... by kakos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't remember the name of the program, but it was one of those "Look what's new in science" type programs on the Discovery Channel. On this one I remember, I saw them talking about a sonic fridge. This was 10 years ago. They had a prototype 10 years ago. What happened to that?

  197. Updated prank call.... by shpedoikal · · Score: 4, Funny
    *ring* *ring*

    HELLO?

    Is your refrigerator running?

    WHAT?!?

    Is your refrigerator running?

    WHAT?!? YOU'LL HAVE TO SPEAK UP!

    Oh nevermind.. *click*

  198. Opposite of the microwave... by Chriscypher · · Score: 1


    I always wondered when they would invent the *macrowave* oven...

    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
  199. Re:Also on Scientific American - degrees? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm, no units, maybe it's Kelvin. That would be really impressive. :)

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  200. Once More, With Feeling... by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 1
    Are you telling me that This

    Are you telling me that This. Is. New?

    God i believe even NASA got in on the R&D for this years ago. That said, i'll be glad when this actually gets into the market place, though i am concerned about a few saftey and energy concervation issues.

  201. Lets strap on a web cam and watch the icicles form by ged68 · · Score: 1

    :-)

    Ged68

  202. Not hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would still have to generate the sound, and guess what they use...electricity. So much for...
    "The pair are hoping that their work will end reliance on the gases currently used in fridges that can contribute to global warming." They will merely trade one problem for another. Basically unsound, pun intended , engineering. Burning of fossil fuels to make electricity...greenhouse shit. Pollution. Inefficiency. Stupidity. Cuntlickers, oops OT.

    1. Re:Not hardly by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      Refridgerators already use electricity, the question is can they now use less?

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  203. finally! by pctainto · · Score: 1

    Now my fan can be utilized to actually cool my computer!

    --
    I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
  204. Re:Also on Scientific American - degrees? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I think 281 degrees Kalvin below the freezing point of water is so impressive, that it just might be impossible ;-)

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  205. Re: soundproofing by CodeShark · · Score: 1
    The system I originally read about used some type of dampening mechanisms similar to what you mentioned to make sure that the pipes to and from the "cooling unit" did not vibrate -- I assume in any audible frequencies. As far as the heat exchangers, the exchanger in the refrigerator would be air to fluid, and I assume that the heat from the plates would be similarly conducted to the outside of the fridge, much like on current refridgerators.

    Which is where the hot water idea came into play: I've seen a couple of test modifications where a tinkerer wrapped a heat exchanger around the refridgerator's hot coils and at least partially heated his home water supply.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  206. Re:Also on Scientific American - degrees? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if I were to crash them into planets, imagine how cold they'd get after their impact energy dissipated?
    They wouldn't even have to be working on this new refrigeration technology, if we could just cool stuff by storing it on Mars or the Moon.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  207. Ogg. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't care how cool or loud it is... if it doesn't support Ogg I'm not getting one.

  208. Big deal... by patrik · · Score: 1

    I want a laser cooling system! Who needs these wimpy 273.15K cooling systems I want a nice 0.0001K so I can preserve my food forever.

    Patrik

    --
    ----------
    Just your ordinary BOFH ;)
    http://killertux.org
  209. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has all already been done. All new refidgerators and freezers are very quiet compared to even just a decade ago. They are very well insulated and they are not using potentially ozone destroying gasses. They are also more energy efficient than ever before! In fact the peltier junctions don't really have an edge any more on efficiency and they still cost considerablby more than a traditional system.

    All in all the current state of refirdgeration is actually quite good. This idea is simply an interesting science experiment, but practically speaking it is not needed nor useful or practical (heh).

  210. Things not taught at school by Chasqui · · Score: 1

    "Sounds of 165 dB would cause a person's hair to catch fire from the frictional heating..."
    Ok, that was just too cool a fact NOT to include in the article.

    --
    my cube has a window...
  211. Reduce gases... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by stocking less baked beans in the fridge!

    ba-da-bsh.

  212. Browsing is a basic feature? by rherbert · · Score: 1

    Why would you want Internet Explorer in your refrigerator? Although Mozilla's Tab(TM) feature may significantly reduce your soft drink selection...

  213. Facts come first by doorbot.com · · Score: 1
    Just as it is true that global warming is caused by the sun, so my body generates most of the heat that keeps me warm. Nonetheless, if I wear too many sweaters, I will get too hot. Taking them off will cool me down, despite the fact that the heat is all coming from my own body. The same principle applies to the atmosphere. The earth's temperature is determined by a radiative balance. We can't change the sun, but we can change the atmosphere (our sweater), and that can cause the earth's temperature to change.

    Let's play the devil's advocate for a moment. Let's also ignore the very small number of lifeforms (including humans) who covert energy from geothermic heat. What are we left with? Lifeforms converting energy from the sun. We (or a plant we eat) will store this energy in our bodies for later use. When we run a mile in heavy clothing, some of this stored energy is coverted into heat (damn Thermodynamics!), and trapped by our clothing. The heat builds up and makes us uncomfortable.

    I don't think it's too much of a stretch (remember the role you were supposed to be playing) to see how global warming, and the "human overwarming problem" can be easily solved by unplugging the sun.

    The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
    A gigantic nuclear furnace
    Where Hydrogen is built into Helium
    At a temperature of millions of degrees

    The sun is hot, the sun is not
    A place where we could live
    But here on Earth there'd be no life
    Without the light it gives

    We need its light, we need its heat
    The sun light that we seek
    The sun light comes from our own sun's
    Atomic energy

    The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
    A gigantic nuclear furnace
    Where Hydrogen is built into Helium
    At a temperature of millions of degrees

    -- TMBG
    1. Re:Facts come first by Phronesis · · Score: 2
      I don't think it's too much of a stretch (remember the role you were supposed to be playing) to see how global warming, and the "human overwarming problem" can be easily solved by unplugging the sun.

      Please enlighten me how you propose to unplug the sun.

      We (or a plant we eat) will store this energy in our bodies for later use. When we run a mile in heavy clothing, some of this stored energy is coverted into heat (damn Thermodynamics!), and trapped by our clothing. The heat builds up and makes us uncomfortable

      Exactly. Just as greenhouse gases trap solar heat to make the world hotter than it would be without them. Your solution of unplugging the sun is much like proposing that if I'm too hot, I should shut off my metabolism (die) rather than taking off a sweater. Each to his own, I suppose.

    2. Re:Facts come first by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Forgive me for forgetting my tag, it was getting dry cleaned.

      While many people will argue that greenhouse gases are bad, and humans are the worst polluters in nature, they often gloss over (or ignore) the fact that a large volcanic eruption will put a large amount of CO2 into the air (not to mention other toxic gases), and put enough ash into the air to block out the sun (which mankind has "yearned to do since the beginning of time" - CMB). Global temperatures will drop by a few degrees F in a year which is far more damaging that a one degree increase every few years.

      Yes, humans should limit, to the best of their abilities, the output of greenhouse gases. But don't forget that nature can do just as much damage too. We should be preparing for both contingencies.

      If we pollute ourselves out of existence, is that really that bad? What would Darwin think?

    3. Re:Facts come first by Phronesis · · Score: 2
      a large volcanic eruption will put a large amount of CO2 into the air (not to mention other toxic gases), and put enough ash into the air to block out the sun. ... Yes, humans should limit, to the best of their abilities, the output of greenhouse gases. But don't forget that nature can do just as much damage too.

      You are right that nature puts CO2 into the atmosphere too, as well as aerosols. What's interesting is that despite all the volcanic activity that you note, humans have put more CO2 into the air in the last 50 years than nature did in the previous 10,000.

      At the end of the last ice age, around 10,000 years ago, the atmospheric CO2 concentration was about 270 parts per million by volume (ppmv). At the dawn of the industrial revolution in the 18th century, it was around 280 ppmv. In 1958, it was around 315 ppmv. Today it is about 370 ppmv.

      As to aerosols from volcanism, they can have a dramatic short-term effect, but they precipitate out of the atmosphere over a few years, whereas excess CO2 has a residence time of about 120 years (this is a fairly ambiguous number because there are many sinks, each with a different capacity and time constant. The plausible numbers I have seen range from around 70 to around 200 years, with a maximum likelihood around 120).

    4. Re:Facts come first by John+Sullivan · · Score: 2
      Please enlighten me how you propose to unplug the sun.

      By persuading it to sign an international treaty setting a reduced energy output level phased in over the next 10 years. Just like we did with America.

      --
      This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
  214. CPU Cooling... by juhaz · · Score: 1

    So they finally invent a system that isn't so FSCKING LOUD!

    Oh, wait. 173dB? Ah, nevermind.

  215. Chilled water????? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
    Running gas circuits around would be problematic, but ehat about using chilled water instead as an intermediary.

    Many large scale a/c systems produce chilled water for cooling the air. Sometimes the chilled water gets circulated, for example for conditioning areas. This water would also provide a convenient media for dumping the surplus heat from a refrigerator. It still remains two stage, but there isn;t the air buffer between the stages.

  216. Damn Kids! by demonbug · · Score: 1

    Turn that fridge down!

  217. Finally, a use for my neighbour's daughter by TekPolitik · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article claims that 165dB is sufficient to cool a refrigerator - my neighbour's daughter exceeds that by a long shot. Does this mean we can put her inside a tube and get her to keep my beer cold?

  218. 1995 by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

    wtf, I saw this report and the proto-tech on Beyond 2000 like 6 or 7 years ago. And for it to be on that retired program would mean it had to have been close to a year or two old.

    I guess now that we're 'Beyond 2000' its okay to reproduce near-decade old hype without copyright infringement fears. ;-)

    But let me know when I can cool my beer with a speaker.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  219. Re:Global Warming? Bah! NOT!!! by DuBois · · Score: 2
    The whole deal with Freon had nothing to do with global warming. Both Slashdot and the BBC got this completely wrong. Supposedly Freon depleted the Ozone Layer, but even that's wrong, as pointed out here.

    It would really be nice if reporters would bone up on this stuff and give us the science and the facts, not hearsay.

    For lots more debunking of just about every "science" fad, check this out.

    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  220. Re:Global Warming? Bah! NOT!!! by DuBois · · Score: 2
    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  221. Re:greenhouse != ozone layer & warmer Alaska g by DuBois · · Score: 2

    I'm not aware that the warming of Alaska would ever be bad, but of course, some people might think so. The problem is that local warming in Alaska isn't part of a global trend, and that carbon dioxide isn't the cause of global warming.

    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  222. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed using a more efficient compressor. Quite important because as I understand LG now have a linear compressor that is apparently 50% more efficient that the standard compressor (if a bit more noisy). Think about it for a moment, a linear
    magnetic motor pushes the piston one way compressing
    the refegerant and then pulls it back doing the same
    again. Cuts out all those mechanical losses of going from circlar motion to linear in standard compressors.

  223. Big Deal ... by bizitch · · Score: 1

    My fridge surfs the web! ;)

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  224. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by autechre · · Score: 2


    My uncle is a science teacher at the McGehee school in North Carolina. He and his students calculated that the mass of the air inside of a refrigerator is about that of a grapefruit.

    It's the same reason the temperature is different near the coast, or the ocean is still cold when the days are hot; air doesn't hold on to heat very well, at least not as well as ocean water...or grapes. Your refrigerator is much more efficient when it is full than when it is empty, because the food holds its temperature better than the air. Leaving the door open for several seconds isn't so terrible (however, you shouldn't keep very perishible items, such as eggs, on the door shelves, because they get waved around in the air away from all of the cold food).

    An oven works the same way; when you open it, much of the hot air escapes. But if you've let it preheat long enough, the walls of the oven will have been heated through, and the air inside will be able to heat up much faster after you close the door again.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  225. einstein invented a refrigerator by peter303 · · Score: 2

    He got a patent on a new kind of refrigerator .

  226. Fusion doesn't produce radiation? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    Deuterium fusion doesn't produce neutrons. Fusion of deuterium and tritium produces prodigious amounts of neutrons, hence the neutron bomb. And any fusion produces lots of gamma rays from the high-energy nuclear reactions.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    1. Re:Fusion doesn't produce radiation? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
      The conventional approach is to take deuterium - a harmless, stable isotope of hydrogen that has a neutron as well as a proton in its nucleus, and heat it to many millions of degrees. This strips away the electrons from individual atoms, leaving a soup or "plasma" of positively charged nuclei and negatively charged electrons. At these temperatures, a small proportion of the nuclei have enough energy to fuse with each other when they collide, forming a highly energetic neutron and nuclei of hydrogen, tritium and helium-3 in the process.

      Sometimes researchers use a mixture of deuterium and another isotope of hydrogen, tritium, which has two neutrons and a proton in its nucleus. This reaction results in a far higher number of neutrons but tritium is highly radioactive and difficult to handle. In either case, the big problem is how to keep the plasma contained. It is much too hot for any ordinary container to withstand, so it is held in place by a magnetic field.

      Source: http://users.rcn.com/zap.dnai/neutron.htm

      I think there is a 50% chance of fusing deuterium to make tritium and a neutron and a 50% chance of fucing deuterium to make helium 4 and a gamma ray

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    2. Re:Fusion doesn't produce radiation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GEEZ! all of you nerds get soooooooo into proving a JOKE wrong! ITS A JOKE! JOKES are not meant to be serious or have any REAL facts in them!

  227. Sounds promising, but.. by salimma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. bear in mind one thing: cost. Obviously any innovative solution that is ecologically sound is good and all, but the worry is that the uptake in 3rd world countries would be slow.

    The new fridge might be more reliable and does not pollute, but the old technology has an army of technicians who can service it, and I believe countries like China are still allowed to produce CFC coolants. In fact, when countries agreed to phase out CFC, China's phase-out was based on its production several years in the future, and as a result its production actually jump in the subsequent years as manufacturers took advantage of the loophole.

    More information here

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
  228. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

    So how many grapefruits would it take to fill a refrigerator? Mine's 4.4 cubic feet, and since a grapefruit with a diameter of 3.25 inches has a volume of 0.083 cubic feet, I could probably fit 53 grapefruits in my fridge.

    I think that the efficiency of a fridge should be measured in quantities of grapefruits.

  229. Nope by HEbGb · · Score: 2

    Just to clear this up:

    Beat frequencies are not 'real' frequencies at all - they don't exist as frequencies. The 'frequency' is simply an amplitude modulation.

    In a linear system, if you have two frequencies, they interfere and you get a beat, which is amplitude modulation at the difference in frequencies. The interference does NOT generate a new frequency, and does NOT permit 3-d positioning.

    In a nonlinear system (such as air in this case), the nonlinearity DOES cause a new frequency to be created - it distorts the air to make audible sound. This is how the Audio Spotlight works.

    1. Re:Nope by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Well, perhaps an oversight on my part, but I *was* talking about sound traveling through air (and thus rarefaction and compression), which does mean my (simplified) description of the interference between two frequencies causing an audible third frequency which also happens to be related to the beat frequency...

    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you, but your terminology is just off, and is keeping you and the readers away of the fundamentals of what is happening.

      Interference is a linear operation (adding/subtracting), while the Audio Spotlight relies on a nonlinear phenomenon (distortion). Interference has nothing to do with how the audible sound is made; it's a common misconception.

  230. Re:There hasn't been a DEPENDENCE on those gases.. by MrEd · · Score: 1
    I guess if you wanted to be scientific about it you could use the specific heat capacity of air with the average mass of air lost to the surroundings when the fridge door is open... It would probably work out to be about the same energy you would lose by taking an egg out of the fridge and eating it.


    But really, I just want the lifty-countertop-fridge for the 'cool' factor...

    --

    Wah!

  231. Just thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone tried attaching one of these to a model train yet?

  232. frig compressors, dears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just thought you should know...this is old news just now posted here? ie, five yrs ago, Tim Lucas -no relation, afaik -patented the soundwave compressor
    Lucas, who started his own company, MacroSonix Corp. in Richmond, Virginia, . . . has licensed it to one company (he won't say which) for refrigerator compressors--the part that compresses and circulates the coolant. The coolant passing through the cavity would be compressed when it encounters the high-pressure portion of the wave. Other applications might include cooling computer chips; "micronizaton," which is the pulverizing of particles down to microscopic size; and filtering out particles from factory exhaust (the sound waves would cause the particles to clump together). . ."

  233. So no gases, what about power req'ments by GT_Alias · · Score: 2

    What kind of wattage would it take to drive 173dB? OK, no gases, but more fossil fuels burned to power this thing, turning out more emmissions contributing the green-house effect. It's kind of like the whole electric car thing...electricity still requires energy from some source, and in most cases it's a fossil-fule burning power plant somewhere.

    1. Re:So no gases, what about power req'ments by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Depends on what you're using to generate the vibrations. Obviously if it's more efficient than the compressor used in a refrigerator, then it'll use less power. There is also a significant benefit in that you will have no excuse to use anything other than an electronic thermostat in a device like this, and that means the parts count goes down (though the complexity of individual parts may go up some, certainly the electronics are a known problem domain and pretty hard to do wrong anyway.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  234. Navy Research by TinCanFury · · Score: 1

    My uncle co-developed thermo-acoustic refrigerators for the U.S. Navy. He actually helped my build one for my Jr. High science fair project 10 years ago. Its still sitting in my garage.

    wish i had more to add, but its nice to see the commercial community is finally catching on to this.

  235. Obligatory RIAA dig by hplasm · · Score: 1
    Which creatures is it that fart CFCs?

    Why, the ones that work for the RIAA!! Boom-ching! Thangyow, thangyow....*sigh*

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  236. I think I'll wait for a Peltier-based fridge by mkweise · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the neatest, cleanest refrigeration technology would have to be based on the Peltier effect. No gasses, no moving parts, no noise. You can even buy Peltier-based refrigerators already, though of course not at mass-production prices.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  237. Real Genius by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Yup, you're thinking of real genius.

    But no, no oddball tricks with sound occurred in that movie. Definately nothing with ultrasonics.

    You're probably thinking of the scene where they hid a small radio in Kurt's mouth, and then speaking to him claiming to be God.

    "And Kurt... STOP PLAYING WITH YOURSELF!"
    "It really is God..."

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  238. Awesome, the louder the cooler? by redog · · Score: 1

    Now I can overclock my loudest pc's!