I mean, they could just ask people when they install the thing which search engine they wanted to use. Default to no search engine unless they explicitly select something.
Because the people that care are in the minority, so why inconvenience everyone with an additional step?
And... and... and... WTF WERE THEY THINKING??? Make it so addon authors need to update things and/or re-create is bad enough, but then remove the underlying functionality? That's insane! It shouldn't be LESS CAPABLE.
It's almost as if to address the performance issues that people have been bitching about would require a major architecture change, but no that's not it, they, like any company, specifically asked YOU what would piss you off and did that instead.
1. Do the text to speech directly on the pocket computer rather than relying on a service on the other side of the Internet that won't be available on an offline tablet anyway. Pocket computers nowadays are over a thousand times faster than the 8-bit MOS 6502 clocked at 1.02 MHz on which SAM (Software Automatic Mouth) ran.
2. Sync the settings only when the settings activity is frontmost. Open no sockets when the settings activity is not frontmost.
3. Seek Google's permission to whitelist the "remote assist feature" for your Google Play Store publishing account.
Wouldn't #2 still require that the app needs network access?
When they were kids, they were the generation that would rather own Beany Babies than stocks. Since the bottom dropped out of the Beany Baby bubble, they are looking for something else.
1. They were kids 2. The ones that "invested" in Beanie Babies were adults at the time and not Millennials
"It'd still end up loading less data than a half-dozen JS frameworks and ad exchanges' real-time bidding scripts."
I'm sure that's the case on strawman.com
Outdated information for dynamic values (as in something that often changes, like a sports score, or stocks)
"When I want up-to-date information, I'll request it myself. My F5 key isn't broken, you know."
"Full page reloads for any action from the user."
Would you care to cite any websites that do what you claim that aren't just a list of articles?
"I can, for example, get the weather on National Weather Service (weather.gov) without script.
Thanks for the example. Weather.gov looks great on my phone (not). It's a perfect example of what curmudgeons would want. If web development just stopped around 2004.
Not that I'm moving goalposts, but I'm wondering if there is an example of something like an e-commerce site (therefor few/little ads) and is something more complicated than a Google question.
If I wanted something more interactive than an HTML form, I would download an application, compile it, and install it on my computer."
We're sorry, the following website is not compatible with your operating system.
Full page reloads for any action from the user.
Outdated information for dynamic values (as in something that often changes, like a sports score, or stocks)
Would you care to cite any websites that do what you claim that aren't just a list of articles?
Slashdot Mirror
Net Neutrality != free content
must be the word "neutrality" you have a gross misunderstanding of then
Because, when he inevitably dies from this, the other Flat Earthers will claim he was killed off by some conspiracy to keep the "truth" a secret.
It doesn't sound like Pennsylvania understands the meaning of "upgrade".
Pennsylvania doesn't understand a lot of things.
Source: I grew up there.
The One True Flawless most perfect browser that makes everyone 100% happy that everyone here claims could exist.
The people from Nintendo involved in this movie are the exact same people that are developers and also manufacturers?
Mario: Charles Martinet
Luigi: Charles Martinet
Wario: Charles Martinet
Waluigi: Charles Martinet
If it's that dystopian, they could just, you know, have the person killed.
I mean, they could just ask people when they install the thing which search engine they wanted to use. Default to no search engine unless they explicitly select something.
Because the people that care are in the minority, so why inconvenience everyone with an additional step?
C'mon people. Everyone here seems to know what would make the most perfect flawless browser. Why has no one here done it?
And... and... and... WTF WERE THEY THINKING??? Make it so addon authors need to update things and/or re-create is bad enough, but then remove the underlying functionality? That's insane! It shouldn't be LESS CAPABLE.
It's almost as if to address the performance issues that people have been bitching about would require a major architecture change, but no that's not it, they, like any company, specifically asked YOU what would piss you off and did that instead.
1. Do the text to speech directly on the pocket computer rather than relying on a service on the other side of the Internet that won't be available on an offline tablet anyway. Pocket computers nowadays are over a thousand times faster than the 8-bit MOS 6502 clocked at 1.02 MHz on which SAM (Software Automatic Mouth) ran. 2. Sync the settings only when the settings activity is frontmost. Open no sockets when the settings activity is not frontmost. 3. Seek Google's permission to whitelist the "remote assist feature" for your Google Play Store publishing account.
Wouldn't #2 still require that the app needs network access?
Perfect proof that you can twist *anything* to make it sound nefarious.
This is slashdot, "$Company does $thing" is always met with anger, even, as the case here, when $Company does the opposite of $thing
When they were kids, they were the generation that would rather own Beany Babies than stocks. Since the bottom dropped out of the Beany Baby bubble, they are looking for something else.
1. They were kids
2. The ones that "invested" in Beanie Babies were adults at the time and not Millennials
iR (baboon)
So no (mobile) websites should have drag and drop functionality?
This is slashdot, everything new is bad!
Apple is dismissive by offering consumers no alternatives running on custom laser-sealed hardware. You call this "courage".
Where did GP do this?
Hmm. Maybe web sites looked better and operated a hell of a lot faster in 2004 than the overloaded sites we have today.
Yes I love having to constantly zoom in and out on my phone.
Full page reloads for any action from the user.
"It'd still end up loading less data than a half-dozen JS frameworks and ad exchanges' real-time bidding scripts."
I'm sure that's the case on strawman.com
Outdated information for dynamic values (as in something that often changes, like a sports score, or stocks)
"When I want up-to-date information, I'll request it myself. My F5 key isn't broken, you know."
"Full page reloads for any action from the user."
Would you care to cite any websites that do what you claim that aren't just a list of articles?
"I can, for example, get the weather on National Weather Service (weather.gov) without script.
Thanks for the example. Weather.gov looks great on my phone (not). It's a perfect example of what curmudgeons would want. If web development just stopped around 2004.
Not that I'm moving goalposts, but I'm wondering if there is an example of something like an e-commerce site (therefor few/little ads) and is something more complicated than a Google question.
If I wanted something more interactive than an HTML form, I would download an application, compile it, and install it on my computer."
We're sorry, the following website is not compatible with your operating system.
Full page reloads for any action from the user.
Outdated information for dynamic values (as in something that often changes, like a sports score, or stocks)
Would you care to cite any websites that do what you claim that aren't just a list of articles?
I agree! Everyone knows all websites have the static functionality of a Wikipedia article.
if (TFS.includes("microsoft")){
return topic + " is a bad thing!!"
}
That implies that they are more similar than different. There cannot be any similarities.
There are only two parties. Mine, which is true and good and flawless, and the other one, which is evil and stupid in everything.
Democrats are more liberal than Republicans and as there are only two parties because every issue is black and white, they are the definition liberal.