As long as they were unique, and only one per spam recieved, I don't see how it would be a problem (remember that I am a slashdotter, not a lawyer). Perhaps include the full header including the id string, so it's obvious each one is unique.
Ain't has been in the dictionary for a while. It's a contraction of "am not". For example, it is apparently proper to say "I ain't going home now" though it would still be improper to say "he ain't the mayor".
To be usable, it has to be mounted. But it does not necessarily have to be mounted to a drive letter. If a program requires that, it is not coded in a properly extensible manner. Tsk tsk.
It seems fairly easy to me. It's all there, there's just different ways to do things.
You should try it. You can also remove the drive letter assignment completely. So basically you can have a drive sitting there, connected and recognized by the system, but supposedly inacessable (you can actually refer to it by GUID, but only to mount and perform low level operations, I believe). And yes, before you spring with another arbitrary argument, all of this can be done from the command line.
The "intercom" calls are exclusively by Nextel (for the present any way) and they call it "direct connect". I've heard rumors that Sprint will be doing this soon. The benefits that help keep the cost low are: Stays on the same network Half duplex (half the bandwidth, and probably lower sampling rate too) Lower priority to deliver
These, of course, are mostly guesses, I don't work for Nextel. The problem with them is that their network sucks. The coverage is horrible, and the protocol drops calls all the time. But their customer service is the best I've found.
XTRA isn't claiming any property right on what you put on the Internet, such as Slashdot postings, email or files you upload to third-party web hosts.
Are you sure? That would seem to be covered under the "any form of communication" clause, as per:
However, by placing any Customer Material on our Websites or Systems (including posting messages, uploading files, importing data or engaging in any other form of communication), you grant to Xtra a perpetual, royalty-free, non-exclusive, irrevocable, unrestricted, worldwide licence (...)
I read that, I just can't get my paws on the keygen (or anyone else that could find it). It's no big deal - my company pays for all its software and mine too, I just want to see it in action.
Good point. And I would have nothing against boosting my AP to the legal max and aiming a tightbeam directional right at their AP, if they did something that had an effect on my existing operations. But it seems unproductive for it all.
What's with these bozos taking a free public resource, blocking it off, and attempting to profit from it? It might be different if they had purchased the bandwidth at auction, like cell carriers and television stations, but with effectively three channels available for 802.11b, it's a significant hit to personal use when you have these companies come in and set up shop.
Re:Other ways the market should be working
on
LCD Price Fixing?
·
· Score: 1
One of the labs I admin has 30 systems. we got them new in october with Dell 1702FP (17" DVI flat panels - $700 each at the time). Over 25% of them have at least one dead/stuck pixel. Oops. I didn't bother to look at the return policy, though, the boss said we aren't spending any time without (though in my experience, Dell would probably pre-ship us a replacement).
But then they charge you even more for DVI. Higher quality, I guess they claim. And of course the video cards with DVI sell at a premium too, even though nobody has to make the DAC/ADCs.
I've never been in a situation where I had to consider it, but I've heard that most credit card companies refuse to issue chargebacks on paypal. I have no idea how legal this is though.
Windows 2003 Server doesn't support the XP interface at all. It looks like 2000 and you cannot make it look like Windows XP. A lot of the "eye candy" is left out; it has no place in a server GUI. That is incorrect. The Themes service is disabled by default on 2003 Server. I do this on my workstations too (I prefer the standard skin - or lack thereof, and wish to recover the resources it uses). You can (or could, when I tested it) enable the service and apply themes. This is useful in terminal server environments.
That's pretty cool. I'm assuming you didn't stop it though, and were getting some kind of glowplug effect. I wonder if you could have just run it dry and gone back to gasoline?
Slashdot Mirror
Build a faraday cage into your house if you're that worried about it. It shouldn't be that hard.
Aren't these bunker buster bombs a tad heavy?
As long as they were unique, and only one per spam recieved, I don't see how it would be a problem (remember that I am a slashdotter, not a lawyer). Perhaps include the full header including the id string, so it's obvious each one is unique.
ERROR: DIVIDE BY ZERO
Ain't has been in the dictionary for a while. It's a contraction of "am not". For example, it is apparently proper to say "I ain't going home now" though it would still be improper to say "he ain't the mayor".
To be usable, it has to be mounted. But it does not necessarily have to be mounted to a drive letter. If a program requires that, it is not coded in a properly extensible manner. Tsk tsk.
It seems fairly easy to me. It's all there, there's just different ways to do things.
You should try it. You can also remove the drive letter assignment completely. So basically you can have a drive sitting there, connected and recognized by the system, but supposedly inacessable (you can actually refer to it by GUID, but only to mount and perform low level operations, I believe). And yes, before you spring with another arbitrary argument, all of this can be done from the command line.
The "intercom" calls are exclusively by Nextel (for the present any way) and they call it "direct connect". I've heard rumors that Sprint will be doing this soon. The benefits that help keep the cost low are:
Stays on the same network
Half duplex (half the bandwidth, and probably lower sampling rate too)
Lower priority to deliver
These, of course, are mostly guesses, I don't work for Nextel. The problem with them is that their network sucks. The coverage is horrible, and the protocol drops calls all the time. But their customer service is the best I've found.
Are you sure? That would seem to be covered under the "any form of communication" clause, as per:
This looks like a job for the RecipeTroll. Except sadly, he's been banned. I like that guy.
I read that, I just can't get my paws on the keygen (or anyone else that could find it). It's no big deal - my company pays for all its software and mine too, I just want to see it in action.
I've looked, I can't find it. The only "keygen" that appears to be out there rotates through a dozen known VL codes.
It's actually a plaintext file patch that fixes win2k so it doesn't need a key.
Except that it regularly crashes, has bugs with screen rendering, and the interface is revolting.
Good point. And I would have nothing against boosting my AP to the legal max and aiming a tightbeam directional right at their AP, if they did something that had an effect on my existing operations. But it seems unproductive for it all.
What's with these bozos taking a free public resource, blocking it off, and attempting to profit from it? It might be different if they had purchased the bandwidth at auction, like cell carriers and television stations, but with effectively three channels available for 802.11b, it's a significant hit to personal use when you have these companies come in and set up shop.
One of the labs I admin has 30 systems. we got them new in october with Dell 1702FP (17" DVI flat panels - $700 each at the time). Over 25% of them have at least one dead/stuck pixel. Oops. I didn't bother to look at the return policy, though, the boss said we aren't spending any time without (though in my experience, Dell would probably pre-ship us a replacement).
I'm not getting an LCD unless it's LVDS (laptop) or DVI. I have a 17" DVI LCD display at work, and I'm in love.
But then they charge you even more for DVI. Higher quality, I guess they claim. And of course the video cards with DVI sell at a premium too, even though nobody has to make the DAC/ADCs.
I've never been in a situation where I had to consider it, but I've heard that most credit card companies refuse to issue chargebacks on paypal. I have no idea how legal this is though.
Windows 2003 Server doesn't support the XP interface at all. It looks like 2000 and you cannot make it look like Windows XP. A lot of the "eye candy" is left out; it has no place in a server GUI.
That is incorrect. The Themes service is disabled by default on 2003 Server. I do this on my workstations too (I prefer the standard skin - or lack thereof, and wish to recover the resources it uses). You can (or could, when I tested it) enable the service and apply themes. This is useful in terminal server environments.
That's pretty cool. I'm assuming you didn't stop it though, and were getting some kind of glowplug effect. I wonder if you could have just run it dry and gone back to gasoline?
There is simply nothing else capable of what flash is.
Except, of course, HTML+script and SVG. Next?
Why this talk of developing for a specific browser? There are standards for a reason.
Yes, and I was one of them. But times change, and at the time that WAN was installed, 19.2kbps was unbearably slow.