Slashdot Mirror


LA Cops get Wi-Fi Drive By Access

An anonymous reader writes " A PC World.com article: "the Los Angeles Police Department plans to install 27 wireless local area networks (WLANs) at police stations throughout the city in the next three months, according to Roger Ham, deputy chief for communications at the LAPD. Ham says he plans to equip police cars with handheld computers from Symbol Technologies. The handheld devices will be equipped with 802.11b WLAN cards that communicate in the unlicensed 2.4-GHz band with access points installed in police stations at a raw data rate of 11 megabits per second-far faster than the 19.2-kilobits-per-second throughput in the department's 800-MHz wide area network (WAN) installed by Motorola two years ago and covering the city. Will Strauss, an analyst at Forward Concepts, called Ham's plan "a cheap way to get bandwidth" that would allow LAPD units to periodically pick up high-bandwidth data as they pass by police stations equipped with WLAN systems."

168 comments

  1. Poor choice of words by positive · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gah, don't put LA and Drive By in the same sentence!

    1. Re:Poor choice of words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wardrive now.... ask questions later??

  2. New and improved LAPD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Interesting. Will the use WiFi increase LAPD's capability for police brutality to new level?

  3. LA and Drive By by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    LA and Drive By Two things that go together better than Michael Jackson and little boys.

    1. Re:LA and Drive By by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.goatse.cx/

    2. Re:LA and Drive By by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up

  4. DUCK! by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't be the only one that instantly associated LAPD and Driveby am I?

    --
    Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    1. Re:DUCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just imagine....now they can not only beat *suspects,* but irradiate them as well.

  5. Must be fun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...to drive a police car and surf for pr0n at the same time. ;-)

    1. Re:Must be fun... by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

      Yes, it must. Not every grown man, unlike you, feels the need to masturbate to a digital picture on his computer screen. Do you really think that the sysadmins in such a network would allow that kind of filth or even general Internet traffic to their network?

      Please think about it ...

      --
      Wearing pants should always be optional.
    2. Re:Must be fun... by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Funny
      Please think about it ...
      Please think about sending in a requisition order to Central Supply for one (1) Sense:Humor.

      Thank you.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    3. Re:Must be fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please think about it ...

      Yes, why don't you think about it and get back to us about why, exactly, cops need "to periodically pick up high-bandwidth data". I mean, text messages ("Code 11, 123 anystreet, suspect is a black male") don't need high bandwidth. Voice is handled by the radio. So, that leaves Windows Service Packs, pictures, and video as high bandwidth uses.

    4. Re:Must be fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, dude.. Don't get all serious on us now.

      We all know you love porn.

      Must be fun to drive a police car and surf for pr0n and get head from some young girl all at the same time.

    5. Re:Must be fun... by dolo666 · · Score: 1
      • ...to drive a police car and surf for pr0n at the same time. ;-)

      They could classify this as "research for a sting operation", and just forget to sting...
    6. Re:Must be fun... by Helvidius · · Score: 1

      And the first thing that will happen is that their system will get hacked. Nothing better than sending out spams with the LAPD's IP on it!

      --
      "Care about people's opinions and you will be their prisoner." ~~Tao Te Ching~~
  6. Please... by koh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ham says he plans to equip police cars with handheld computers from Symbol Technologies.

    Please ensure the handhelds are soldered to the car. If they're lost or stolen our state-of-the-art cops will have trouble saving face.

    --
    Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    1. Re:Please... by d3kk · · Score: 3, Funny
    2. Re:Please... by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1
      The system could be setup to only allow specific MAC addresses to connect, so a lost/stolen handheld could easily be denied access. Although it's not foolproof, it will fool the average joe.

      Hell, the system can be setup up to alert the cops at the station when he tries to use his stolen unit as well.

      --
      Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
    3. Re:Please... by Cef · · Score: 1

      They could always use Xcellenet (a management utility, works with Palm and WinCE based devices), which allows you set up the device to be wiped cleaner than an egg if they ever reconnect to the network once they have been marked stolen.

    4. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And make them *really* easy to use. On account of the fact that most pigs are really fucking stupid.

  7. probably require s by stonebeat.org · · Score: 4, Insightful

    VPN tunnel, and 2-factor authentication (RSA secureID), to get connected. otherwise it would be very unsecure.

    1. Re:probably require s by pi_rules · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm seeing way too many of these posts. It's a non-issue folks. If you read the article (I skimmed it) you'll see they see it being used for:

      • Sending mug-shots over the air.
      • Sending maps.
      • Sending Amber Alert pictures.


      They need it for -- pictures. None of which are sensitive information. Mug shots can be obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Amber Alert pictures are intended to be public, and last I knew maps of your local town weren't a closely guarded government secret.

      Besides, do you really want police having information that's too secret for you? I sure don't.
    2. Re:probably require s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maps"???

      1) Carry a few of the old paper maps. You know, the ones from before computers? BETTER YET, know the streets of your city. I can see it now: "Charlie, we have an armed robbery in progress at 12 West street. Pull over and ask directions."

      What kinda stupid cops don't know their way around their own precinct?

      2) If you INSIST on electronic maps, they can be stored locally on the systems harddrive.

      "Mugshots"?

      Yeah, every cop needs to know who they arrested last week. (You do know mugshots are taken AFTER they arrest you, right?)

      Besides, the high bandwidth only works "as they pass by police stations". If they're more than, what - a mile away?, that can't get any of these things anyway!

      It's a way to waste taxpayer dollars.

    3. Re:probably require s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      National Security! National Security! National Security! Doesn't matter what the data is ... National Sec... Homeland Defense! Homeland Defense!

      Only terrorists wardrive.

      For the sake of the children and our fatherland we need more security and fewer rights!

    4. Re:probably require s by Sanat · · Score: 1

      Besides, the high bandwidth only works "as they pass by police stations". If they're more than, what - a mile away?, that can't get any of these things anyway!

      Each coffeshop and donut shop will be equipped as well as the police stations.

      Each cop can sit at the counter eating, drinking and surfing all of his webcams located in his territory. Maybe even automatically comparing 'face recognition' with the 'wanted for questioning' file.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    5. Re:probably require s by pi_rules · · Score: 1


      What kinda stupid cops don't know their way around their own precinct?


      That's funny... and something I didn't think about at first. I get lost around my own area of town, so it didn't occur to me. But when I'm paid to drive around it 8 hours a day every day of the week it'd be pretty hilarious for me to get lost in that area, or to not know how to get from point A to point B.

      The only upshot I can see to that is giving officers a map with some logistical reasoning behind it. Granted, if you need to actually plan your officer's time from crime to crime with precision you've probably got an issue. Maybe it would be useful for high-speed chases if there's enough data pickup-up points ou there, but that's far fetched.

      Yeah, every cop needs to know who they arrested last week. (You do know mugshots are taken AFTER they arrest you, right?)

      Ah yes, because we all know that criminals only ever strike once in their life and learn their lesson from then on out. :) The majority of criminals out there have a prior of some sort. You can get your picture taken for all kinds of crimes out there, and once you're on file it's handy for the police to have that. Even if they're stopping you for a traffic ticket it would be nice for them to look your picture up and visually verify that the guy behind the wheel is who they're dealing with.

      With your last point. I agree, it's a waste of taxpayer dollars.

  8. 802.11b now ... but 802.11g in the future by madro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ham said that he views WLANs as a stopgap measure and that police departments around the country need additional WAN spectrum ... large police departments would eventually need to buy wideband WAN service from commercial cellular carriers

    I think this guy's got the right idea, deploying wireless stuff around police stations ... but the article focuses on 802.11b when 802.11g is supposed to offer a substantial boost in performance -- can't they just upgrade their equipment when 11g gets stable instead of having to use up other parts of the spectrum?

    1. Re:802.11b now ... but 802.11g in the future by mshultz · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...can't they just upgrade their equipment when 11g gets stable instead of having to use up other parts of the spectrum?

      From what I've read, 802.11g becomes significantly less reliable than the b variety at the same ranges. In other words, range here might be a more critical concern than throughput. Just a guess...

    2. Re:802.11b now ... but 802.11g in the future by Cef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They could upgrade the Access Points, yes. For the LAPD however, if I was running the show, I'd be waiting till 802.11g is a proven technology, and that Symbol could produce decent equipment around the 802.11g standard.

      Other things of note:
      Symbol Technologies have not released an 802.11g capable device (Hand Held or Access Point) yet. The Symbol devices are very rugged, and they need a very long battery life if they are to be used in the field for any length of duration. Changing anything, including the radio card, could increase the drain on the battery. It's no use if you can get things 3-4 times faster if your battery only lasts 1/8th the time.
      Wideband WAN stuff will require special cards in the units, which once again will be a battery drain. An alternative option of course is to have Wideband from the patrol car to the network, while still using 802.11b/g from the patrol car to the Hand Held unit. A number of logistic companies use this sort of system (using systems capable of mobile data, such as GSM and GPRS), though many connect the device serially in the vehicle instead of via RF.

    3. Re:802.11b now ... but 802.11g in the future by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Car charger??

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
  9. Groan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does this make them Ham Radios?

    1. Re:Groan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. But it does make them porn networks.

  10. Security of their network? by rickthewizkid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder... 802.11 has large security holes... It's only a matter of time before someone snorts the WEP key and gains access to the system.

    It _would_ make it a lot easier to -say- make your speeding tickets "disappear" etc...

    RickTheWizKid
    ..."you can NOT leave the magic!"

    1. Re:Security of their network? by spanky1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some 802.11 implementations are very secure. Cisco, for example, doesn't use a static WEP key like home 802.11 equipment. The only wireless equipment I would trust with sensitive data is made by Cisco. For home use though I buy the cheap stuff and use 128-bit WEP with MAC filtering.

    2. Re:Security of their network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they are giving police the access they need to delete tickets from their car. This system probably offers read-only access to a very limited set of information.

    3. Re:Security of their network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm really sure that it would be very hard to get around there security.. Yeah right. They probably are running unpatched windows servers with all the default services running. Let the fun begin!

    4. Re:Security of their network? by mesach · · Score: 1

      I have been wondering that since Cisco is going to aquire Linksys, if the new linksys stuff will use the LEAP auth also...

      --
      moo.
    5. Re:Security of their network? by Cef · · Score: 1

      Since they mention they are using the Symbol units, I feel I should mention something about the Symbol Access Points (and their units).

      Firstly, Symbol now support a system they call Keyguard(tm) that basically adds TKIP (Temporal Key Integrity Protocol). This uses the inital wep key that is programmed into the units as an initalisation vector (or as set by some other authentication method, like Kerberos), and only as a data transport for key management when there is no other key. The keys are automatically rotated after a specific time limit (definable on the Access Point), and each MAC level device gets a different key.

      Secondly, Symbol supports EAP, 802.11x and Kerberos for authentication onto the network. With Kerberos rather than Radius (which is also supported by the Access Points), you get faster authentication times, and propagation across the Access Points, authorising access to the network (which in this case, is considered a service).

    6. Re:Security of their network? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As it stands it would take me less than two days to crack your network with moderate use.

      MAC auth is so easy to fake I wouldn't even bother.

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    7. Re:Security of their network? by ZorroIII · · Score: 1

      Have you sniffed on a Cisco access point? How many packets had weak encryption? I sent loads of data through a access point in our lab. Airsnort did not get enough packets to decrypt the web key, even if it sniffed the entire night.

    8. Re:Security of their network? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 1

      I have and I think that cisco is pretty secure if it's using LEAP. If it's not, it's just as insecure.

      WEP all uses 24bit IV keys and that's the problem.

      Use kismet and don't channel hop. Use the network for a few hours and do some math.

      Figure out when your wep key will be able to be cracked and besure to change it before it's time.

      It's possible.

      Also there is also the fact that someone can attempt to crack the 24bit IV with brute force on their workstation but this is less common. Infact I know of only one person doing this to crack wep. The good news about this is that it means that you don't really need much data at all to crack WEP, just time. The bad news is that it doesn't matter how much your keys change, data sniffed isn't secure. That means that passwords/stuff that may be important can still be had.

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  11. How much power? by TheDefunctMunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Either they would have to have high power transmitters or put the AP's close to the road. Another option would be to use a nice yagi....

    1. Re:How much power? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If they set up the system properly, they could use ad hoc mode and a dynamic routing algorithm to even further extend the range.

  12. increased efficiency by whovian · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hey Stan, it says here there is a new donut shop up ahead on Wilshire. We can even order over online! You game? I'll buy."

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:increased efficiency by Klugheitsucher · · Score: 1

      They will be more than doubling their donut ordering efficency, soon they will be able to control robitic units through the WLAN, making more time for "investigating" that "big crime scene" over at Winchell's. (usually refering to the lack of chocolate glazed)

    2. Re:increased efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that'd be a cool website- DoughnutPrecinct.com. All pictures of cops at doughnut shop!

  13. WiFi Security Issues by hillct · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wasn't it the Department of Homeland Security that was concerned about the security of wireless networks that extend far beyond the property of the network owner? The article says nothing about how the LAPD plans to secure this network. WEP just doesn't cut it, as we learned years ago when a variety of people broke WEP keys using timing and other techniques. I suppose they're going to follow everyone else's lead and place a firewall between wireless and wired networks, providing VPN access. I astonished me this was not even mentioned in passing in the article.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:WiFi Security Issues by joedavis123 · · Score: 1

      I think they just didn't want to put too much lingo into the article. Plus they got Roger Ham taking care of their wireless project, sounds like they are set. Is it just me, or does Roger Ham sound like it belongs to a man who is deputy chief of wireless communications?

    2. Re:WiFi Security Issues by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I suppose they're going to follow everyone else's lead and place a firewall between wireless and wired networks, providing VPN access.

      VPN access to what? The article says nothing about the internet.

    3. Re:WiFi Security Issues by hillct · · Score: 1

      The idea I was refering to is to maintain a firewall between the wireless network and the rest of the LAPD's internal network so even if someone unauthorized person were to drive by and obrain access to their wireless network through some means, they still wouldn't have access ot the rest of the LAPD's network. It's really a vary simple idea and comonly implemented, regardless of whether network in question is connected to the internet.

      --

      --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    4. Re:WiFi Security Issues by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The idea I was refering to is to maintain a firewall between the wireless network and the rest of the LAPD's internal network so even if someone unauthorized person were to drive by and obrain access to their wireless network through some means, they still wouldn't have access ot the rest of the LAPD's network.

      I see. I'd recommend even more than that. The wireless network shouldn't be connected to LAPD's internal network at all.

  14. uh oh by chillax137 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    so now other cops will know right away that i have already receieved my warning.

    --
    chillax137
    1. Re:uh oh by mesach · · Score: 1

      This is a good thing, that way you wont be pulled over again 2 blocks away by the cop that doesnt know that you were already pulled over...

      of course that could make harassing you alot easier also.

      --
      moo.
  15. This isn't efficient! by I'm+just+joshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    They need to put them in donut shops to reach the greatest number of cops.

  16. IM for the pigs by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yo. @ Randy's catching a cruller. Where ya?
    Wilshire. Gettin ready to go roll some whores for the night's take
    Kewl. Be there in a minute.
    sweet. well save sum pimp ass to kick
    dam
    ?
    just got pwdrd shug on my shirt
    LOL better clean it up b4 sarge sees ya.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:IM for the pigs by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      ? I think you are responding to the wrong thread.

      Interesting though, what type of Uranium processing require massive amounts of electricity? If what you are saying is accurate, it is pretty compelling.

      Thnks

  17. Great for the summer... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    LA will be a giant hot spot

  18. 802.11a secure? by MoeMoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know there are security issues in using Wi-Fi but on a serious note, the police department would be transmitting sensetive stuff which I'm sure could be intercepted and somehow read eventually with the right key... I wonder if they are atleast thinking of a way to make it more secure... They could encrypt data sent from the central station and decrypt from the car, they could use a handshake process for authentication or they could just let things be sent and received raw and wonder why no one is seen doing anything wrong all of the sudden.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  19. Radio is what made cops get stronger by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now they'll have what, video of a suspect if they do a drive by?

    Sounds good in theory, but in practice a few years down the road, people can hack an open system like that.

    1. Re:Radio is what made cops get stronger by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Sounds good in theory, but in practice a few years down the road, people can hack an open system like that.

      Better close it, cause we all know how well that security through obscurity works.

      There's nothing wrong with an "open system," as long as you layer adequete security protections on top of it.

  20. I can just see the error messages now by psyconaut · · Score: 1, Funny

    "file transfer corrupted by high speed pursuit"

    "rights violation while trying to access RodneyKing.doc"

    And surely they'd be better off putting the access points in Dunkin' Donut franchises? Then they'd get 100% coverage more-or-less all the time as the cops seldom leave the vicinity of a DD!

    -psy

  21. NJSP has had similar tech for years by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Informative

    I consulted on a deal to help NJSP patch the Win98 laptops installed in their cruisers. Apparently they too have a 19.2k link statewide, but have a higher bandwidth microwave link available when the cars are very close to the station houses. We built routines to pull down packages by ftp over the microwave link when they turned on the car and booted the laptop.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
    1. Re:NJSP has had similar tech for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's nice... and your point was?

  22. WarDriving by sokkelih · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Cops are having phun while doing oldskool Wardriving! Cool!

  23. Googling for felons by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now cops can search Google ultra-quickly for their criminals...

    "Hey Frank! That the guy?"
    "Hang on Burt, lemme do an Images search..."

    1. Re:Googling for felons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Frank, I found him! Its this guy!!!!

    2. Re:Googling for felons by mesach · · Score: 1

      Google has to be faster than their system... maybe then I wont be at the side of the road for almost an hour for just a speeding ticket.

      you would think that the could make some macros or something for their common tickets...

      but then someone might just write a virus for them then.

      --
      moo.
  24. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poster shows creativity and a lot more imagination than those "Score: 5" posts...

  25. Slow WAN by GlassUser · · Score: 0

    19.2 kbps is pretty slow. I had Ricochet before that, and it sometimes hit 256 kbps, never below 64. I wonder if there's something more, or if this is typical government stupidity.

    1. Re:Slow WAN by SN74S181 · · Score: 3, Funny

      There was a time when most of us envied the rich dudes who had the 2400 baud modems.

    2. Re:Slow WAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen it in use, and it was very fast. You've got to remember that low latency and reliablity (e.g. will it work when parked between two tall buildings or in dips and behind hills) is more important than raw capacity. Pages of text, like from looking-up a license plate, came-up very quickly. In fact, 19.2kbps is twice the speed most of us were used to using terminals at.

    3. Re:Slow WAN by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I was one of them. But times change, and at the time that WAN was installed, 19.2kbps was unbearably slow.

    4. Re:Slow WAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us still do...

    5. Re:Slow WAN by Turbyne · · Score: 1
      You know you're a geek if your home network has two or more computers whose only connections are ethernet and power.
      No, you know you're a geek if your home network has SIX or more computers whose only connections are ethernet, power, sound, central video, printer, coolant, compressed air, LN2, LOX, LH2, vacuum, ketchup, cheesecake, caffeine, secondary display, 10W-30 oil, beer, etc...
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  26. S.C.M.O.D.S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess SCMODS (as featured in the Blues Brothers Movie) is one step closer to reality.

  27. War-driving the cops by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now when you get pulled over in LA, you can use your war-driving setup to check the police records on the cops before they get of their car. You will be able to greet them by name and know if they are the type to give you the rodney king treatment for doing so.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:War-driving the cops by bobKali · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even better, you could man-in-the-middle to replace the 10 outstanding warrants, suspended liscense, and stolen car flag for a clean record, valid liscense, and no stolen card record as they're running your plates/ liscense.

    2. Re:War-driving the cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, while you are at it might as well give yourself diplomatic immunity or one of those james bond, "uber homeland security dude, do whatever he tells you, no questions asked, get of jail free" flags.

      Imagine getting pulled over and telling the cops to go get you a donut.

    3. Re:War-driving the cops by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Shit, while you are at it might as well give yourself [] one of those james bond, "uber homeland security dude, do whatever he tells you, no questions asked, get of jail free" flags.

      I believe it's called "Federal Courier". The delivery guys for nuke bomb parts, secret documents, etc. I hear they vary their appearance and routes, drive fast cars, and may borrow a friend's hot rod (or the friend as a passenger) for protective coloration on a trip.

      (I hear this from someone who claims to have been such a friend, who was taken on a wild ride one night. Got pulled over on a country road they'd been burning up, and the cop's attitude did a 180 when he saw the ID and he INSTANTLY sent him on his way. The guy says he still has no idea what, if anything, was being carried, pretty much had no clue what his buddy did for a living until then - and mostly still doesn't.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:War-driving the cops by mesach · · Score: 1

      or you could just Submit the car here, and hope for the /. effect

      Slashdot
      News for nerds. Sticking it to the man.

      --
      moo.
  28. Wouldn't jamming ... by fygment · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... be a problem? Judicious use of jamming technology in areas of importance (to the criminals e.g. gang turf) and suddenly all the functions ported to online are unusable. This may be a niche market here for the less scrupulous.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
    1. Re:Wouldn't jamming ... by cadillactux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is possible, but remember, each car will still be equiped with the 800Mhz 19.2k Motorola systems. If for some reason, WiFi was jammed, they could just switch back to the old system. I wonder if the WiFi system will be integrated in such a way where this will be an automatic function? Even with 27 stations throughout the city, the gaps between the WiFi signals will be great, and it would be a pain to have to manually switch it on and off when you think you might have a signal.

      --
      Is this thing on?
    2. Re:Wouldn't jamming ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jam the control channels on their 800 MHz trunked radio system, trust me, it's alot more fun.

    3. Re:Wouldn't jamming ... by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. The highly sophisticated gang banger that can't hold his gun with two hands and keep it in an upright position while he "puts a cap in some mo-fo's ass" is going to be jamming 802.11b equipment so his homey's can run rampant.

      What kind of shit do you people smoke around here? Seriously. I'll give you my address so you can send some over, becuase I'm obvioulsy a little to realistic at times.

      Okay, we'll assume some gang banger with the techno know-how to jam EVERY possible signal they have at their disposal actually exists. What the hell do you think a police officer would do when riding around and his radio and computer suddenly stop functioning? Hit high-alert mode and seek out the first suspicious human being.

      You think they're going to sit there while their shit crackles and say, "Oh, must be low-crime, our radio's on the fritz."

      You show me a person that's actualy jamming police transmission and I'll show you somebody's got that's more the the local PD after them.

      You show me a cop that's dumb enough to rely on electronics to let him know when there's bad shit around and I'll show you somebody with a very short career.

      Hi, I'm the Slashdotter that LEAVES MY HOUSE NOW AND AGAIN.

      If you READ the article you'd see that they police would be using this largely for mug shots, Amber Alerts, and getting quick maps of where they need to go as they pass the station. It's a time saver. Consider it the equivalent of the drive-through donught shop. It keeps the men out the road more; period. Jamming this is no more beneficial than causing a big line at the local Dunkin' Donuts with your buddies to keep the bacon out of their cars for longer.

  29. Obvious Douchebag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "They don't have nukes."
    Look what I said, No fucking shit! We all know! Everyone knows this except for the moron you replied to.
    "The CIA has admitted this fact."
    Where the fuck did I say that it was being denied by anyone moron?
    "They can't create nukes, they don't have the means."
    You must have just found out this fact recently and know want to show it off to all your fans on Slashdot, right? That's sad.
    "Since I am not willing to fight I am a homosexual."
    You said it. And I didn't really state that your homosexuality was related to your thoughts on war. Your reasoning and logic is fairly weak. Let me guess, you like to 'tinker' with computers but in reality have no formal training in Mathematics or Computer Science - right fag?
    "Man, you are a real winner, you Fascist."
    Might is Right.
    "Historical fact: Saddam Hussein was installed and supported with American money."
    Again, no fucking shit - your 'facts' are really well-known by most even somewhat educated people. What's your point? The fact that MY COUNTRY (not yours, you fag) supported him means that we can't correct an obvious mistake? When Chamberlain made certain concessions to Hitler, at the end of the war did we continue to attach that land to one of the parts of Germany? I mean, we let Germany take some land (an obvious mistake) so by your shitty "logic" (god, I hate to even admit that you have faulty logic - it's an insult to upright humans everywhere.) the Allies couldn't correct that mistake, right jackass?
    "Put your money where your mouth is!"
    You're not making an argument of any type here. I agreed that Iraq couldn't make nukes in my original reply to your shit. You responded to this by saying that Iraq couldn't make nukes. You're a fucking moron!
  30. It's a transport medium. Security is not it's job. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously. WEP isn't even real security.. if you need security, you use it at another layer.....

    Just because they are using 802.11b doesn't mean they aren't using anything else. They also haven't said what network protocol, or what mode 802.11b will be in, or what software they will use to do it... do you want all that too?

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. If this gets in the wrong hands.. by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    ..will there be drive by DOS attacks?

  33. Pardon Moi. by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Laissez-moi vous donner un autre non-sequitur sur lequel vous pouvez examiner vos grandes puissances intellectuelles! D'ailleurs, j'ai un pénis, je l'ai employé sur votre mère la nuit passée!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  34. Short-range patrol car detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Assuming the newly-equipped cars occasionally send out probe frames looking for those APs, then forget radar detectors! Just run Kismet and if one of these guys pops up, you know there's a patrol car around.

    This is going to show up more and more. A Sears repair van paid a visit to my area recently, and two new ad-hoc nodes showed up on channel 6. When he left, they did too. If I ever happen to go past that van again, it'll be quite obvious, since the MAC addresses will be the same. The same technique applies here with the police cars.

    1. Re:Short-range patrol car detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fast is the discovery? When you're going down the highway doing 180 kph, and there's a radar in front of you, you won't have 10 seconds to notice.

  35. They already have a p2p pr0n network.... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1
    LAKELAND - One Lakeland police officer was disciplined and another resigned after allegations they exchanged computer messages derogatory to the chief and dispatchers. Former Sgt. Monty Mathis and Officer William Knobloch, both of the traffic division, were caught exchanging messages that referred to the police chief and several dispatchers as clueless and to an accident victim with a severe brain injury as a turnip, police officials said Thursday.

    (from Tampa Tribune cached on google)

  36. Um, and this will do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously though, have they actually said -what- they are going to do with this? This is like politicians who show labs full of shiny new computers.

    "We replaced all those old and useless computers! Vote for me!"

    "But, uh, you still don't have a curriculum, and the kids were doing just fine on the old ones..."

    how does limited range faster wireless access available within limited range, help them 'serve and protect', especially when they've GOT a wireless network that works over the entire city and is decent enough to browse the web, certainly low-text internal department websites w/databases? Plaintext with the occasional well-compressed photo will fly over 19.2kbit.

    Sounds like someone from Symbol said "this is all the rage, do this!"...and Ham bought it hook line and sinker. Brought to you by the same company that thought it would be really Clever to roll out wireless cash registers, with no encryption.

    Let's face it, the #1 usage of police networks is looking up license plate numbers every time they see a car they can stop for the slightest violation(like, say, a missing license plate bulb or something hanging from the rear mirror.)

    1. Re:Um, and this will do what? by mellonhead · · Score: 1


      I am not familiar with what the LAPD is doing, other than from the PC World article.

      The typical uses of these networks that I am familiar with are for the following:

      1. Sending map data updates to the MDCs in the vehicles.

      2. Sending software updates to the MDCs.

      3. Sending mugshots to the MDCs.

      4. Sending offense and other reports from the MDCs to the database.

      These activites are bandwidth hogs to varying degrees and could potentially choke a 800mhz RF network. Especially if several hundred users were doing some or all of these activites at the same time.

      These networks (at least none that I'm familiar with) are not used to run registration checks, NCIC lookups, etc. Officers will drive to/near one of these locations and get a message such as, "There are map updates, do you want them downloaded now?"

    2. Re:Um, and this will do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . Sending map data updates to the MDCs in the vehicles.

      "Hey, Charlie, we got new maps in. Take oone with you when you go to your car at start-of-shift."

      Sending software updates to the MDCs.

      Okay, we all know Windows Service Pack are, huge!

      Sending mugshots to the MDCs.

      Why? So the cops know who they arrested last week?

      Sending offense and other reports from the MDCs to the database.


      Simple text. Old system is fine.

      Officers will drive to/near one of these locations and get a message such as, "There are map updates, do you want them downloaded now?"


      Because we all know how often streets change from the beginning of your shift to the end.

    3. Re:Um, and this will do what? by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      You have not been in LA county traffic or else you would not say that...

      The information could also include detours and "planned closures".... [think TV studios and stuff like the bazillion ceremonies that that have around LA]

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  37. Re:Must be fun... [OT] by thynk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I drove from CO to KS and back yesterday. The main thought on my mind was - what if even car on the road had a WAP configured to talk to every other car on the road, and to look for WAN access to the net - creating a HUGE mobile network. I'd be a LOT less upset by a traffic snarl if I could read /. AND the kids would of been a lot less roudy if they could surf cartoon network on the trip. Heck, could be a neat way to meet that hot blond in the BMW next to you.

    I seem to remember hearing this idea before... maybe it was on /.

    --

    Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  38. Cool great fast new powerfull gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they are spending xxxxx.xx dollar on wireless networks, really cool and all.... but is it still cool to ask questions like "what will it be used for" or is that unpatriotic in the current economy and should they just spend money like crazy?

  39. Re:Must be fun... [OT] by bobKali · · Score: 2, Informative

    Robert X. Cringley suggested that a while back. Seems like a good idea...but I'm just a little apprehensive about cars with more distractions in them. I'm already seeing an increasing number of cars with LCD TV screens on dashboards. I've even seen a few (ok, 2) people driving around watching pornos on them (I assUme they weren't driving stickshifts - but I didn't try to get a look in to verify that.)

    I can just see those "Hang up and drive" bumper stickers being replaced with "Quit surfing and drive" stickers.

  40. What are the chances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that this will be implemented correctly -- that
    someone who knows what they're doing will set it
    up securely and then keep it secure?

    And what are the chances that it will be thrown
    together with default security settings/passwords,
    quickly compromised (maliciously or not) leading
    to a flurry of ingnorant inflamatory statements
    by police spokespeople?

  41. Re:How new is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wouldn't be bothered to read the write-up? It replaces a slower city-wide system in the hot-spot areas around police stations.

  42. Some cities already do this... by LWolenczak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In some of the cities I've been in with my laptop in the Southeast US, I've seen police departments running (secured, and sadly, insecure) 802.11b. Infact, seeing the cop's network probe packets before my radar detector has gone off has saved me from most likely getting several tickets. I've picked up the cops 802.11b before they gunned me/other cars.

    So, can we get kismet to speak "Slow Down, Probe Detected" when it picks up a probe packet?

    1. Re:Some cities already do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Infact, seeing the cop's network probe packets before my radar detector has gone off has saved me from most likely getting several tickets. I've picked up the cops 802.11b before they gunned me/other cars.

      Complete garbage...

    2. Re:Some cities already do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU

      Gosh, if this is all you can come back with, I guess the AC was correct in the assertion.

      If you have actually ever done what you say, please describe the circumstances in detail.

      If not, go back to your Star Trek fantasies.

      BITCH.

  43. Re:Nigger Boo Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) I stated that everyone knew Iraq couldn't make nuclear weapons.
    2) You replied that Iraq couldn't make nuclear weapons.

    Why?

  44. wait a min by e1moSAYS · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute... wireless internet is notoriously insecure (i know this because my neighbors do online banking)... I don't want my information to be available to any bum that happens to have a laptop... What security measures do they plan to implement, does anyone know? Hey, maybe this'll save paper and thus the rainforests... more natural resources to spread around, yipee!

  45. Where should we really put these hotspots at? by EaTiN+cOfFeE+bEaNs · · Score: 1

    Why not every Krispy Kreme and Dunkin Donuts location in L.A.?

    --
    No TiVo and no caffeine make me something something...
  46. Re:Nigger Boo Jew by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    To fuck with an anonymous coward. The longer I keep you doing this, the less time you will have to go out and kill all of the people you hate. Game is over. Must go back to loving America!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  47. Speaking of WarDriving ... and ECM by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I suspect that this will lead to increased penalties for having or using software that does any ether sniffing on 802.11b. They can claim you're trying to intercept police transmissions.

    It will also lead to "prowl car detectors" for the crooks - little boxes that detect the low-level network protocols that WiFi cards occasionally mumble or can be provoked to emit. Even if they're firmware-hacked to shut up unless they hear an AP's broadcast you can still fake it and get them to respond.

    There are ways around this. But we're starting to get into major security mods.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  48. A logical progression: by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Cops find access to mobile broadband data useful, begin building out APs to more hotspots throughout City. Citizens note how much of the bandwidth goes unused and could be made useful by citizens whose tax $ put it there. City learns how to provide secure infrastructure traffic (cops, fire dept., public works, etc.) while making excess bandwidth available to citizens. Before too many years, City is pretty well provisioned with free (tax-funded) wireless.

    This makes too much sense - it'll never happen.

  49. Ham? *snicker* by forkboy · · Score: 1

    I don't know what's funnier...the fact that his last name is Ham and he's the deputy of communications (Ham Radio) or the fact that his last name is Ham and he's a cop. (Pig!)

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  50. w00t by Admiral+Lazzurs · · Score: 1

    I 0wn the p0l1c3!!!

    Well there goes my karma :)

  51. Re:Nigger Boo Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, I see you have no real reply. You didn't understand what I originally wrote but you're too pig-headed and arrogant to admit that. That's very sad. I feel sorry for you that your life revolves so closely around being right on Slashdot that you can't even admit that when you replied to me, you didn't understand what I wrote. So, I hope you turn over a new leaf in your life today. You have my pity and my support.

  52. Sometimes the choice of wording... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
    drive-by!

    makes me wonder whether you guys are all in it for the shits and giggles.

  53. Haven for Hackers? by DigiBoi · · Score: 1

    I dont believe im the only one thinking this will be a holy grail for hackers.

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat.
  54. Ouch by dolo666 · · Score: 1

    They could totally play CS over this network. Imagine being busted and forced to watch two dumbass cops pretend to be Terrorists sneaking their explosive into de_dust.bsp! The cops would prolly buy AWPs and camp all over that shit - the gimps.

    What would the ramifications be? Could you get off on a technicality - police brutality via electronic gaming device?

  55. Re:Nigger Boo Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man you are a fucking complete and utter moron. Get a life and leave the guy alone.

  56. 11 Megabits/sec?!?! not likely! by surph · · Score: 0

    raw data rate of 11 megabits per second

    Last time I did a transfer test of "raw data" w/ 802.11b, I saw around 3Mbits/sec...

    With wireless overhead, half duplex and other factors... noone see's 11Mbits/sec with 802.11b.

    --

    --------
    Don't Get Caught
  57. Another HORRID implementation by Symbol by MobileDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's take a few nuggets from the article and ponder.....

    (1) "Ham said he eventually wants to develop an interface between the WLAN radio in the Symbol handheld and the Motorola radio in the police car."

    Wants to develop? And he made a purchase decision PRIOR to getting this straight?

    There are rugged devices on the market today that fully support integrated WAN (CDMA/1xRTT, GPRS), WLAN, and BT in one device. Motorola private radio networks (Astro) usually have serial DB9 output. Again, there are other rugged device manufacturers that provide rugged vehicle docks with integrated serial DB9. A step further, there are BT enabled GPS units. Did the LAPD put any effort into this decision or are they just dumping budget dollars prior to their fiscal end of year?


    (2) "Though the range of WLANs is limited--approximately 300 feet--"

    "Will Strauss, an analyst at Forward Concepts, called Ham's plan "a cheap way to get bandwidth" that would allow LAPD units to periodically pick up high-bandwidth data as they pass by police stations equipped with WLAN systems."

    Let me see if I understand - with a range of 300 ft best case would be 600 ft while "passing by." (I'll ignore the introduction of directional since I doubt anyone related to the original article can even spell yagi...)

    Assuming the car/motorcycle is traveling 20 mph (or about 30ft/sec), each handheld will have about 20 secs to recognize coverage, authenticate, and download.

    Yeah, great idea.... Better to put UAPs in doughnut shops if you ask me.



    Amazing what those SBL pushers will sell - regardless of fit/use - to their customers.

    --
    10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
  58. Their slow, Idaho beat them to it. by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new, LA is behind the times. Post Falls, Idaho has been doing this and more for quite a while now.

    http://www.mitretek.org/publications/ccjt/vol6-1 7. html

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:Their slow, Idaho beat them to it. by gigabitme · · Score: 1

      Did you mean http://www.mitretek.org/publications/ccjt/vol6-17. html (note the actual URL shouldn't have a space between the 'dot' and the 'html')?

      BTW - don't know what their bandwidth can sustain, so here's the cached version:
      http://216.239.33.100/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859 -1&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mitretek.org%2Fpubli cations%2Fccjt%2Fvol6-17.html&btnG=Google+Sear ch

      Also, here are some related stories, by the 'wireless consultant' firm who actually built Post Falls' system:

      http://www.netgroupinc.com/adventures.html

      ...and the cached page:

      http://216.239.33.100/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859 -1&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.netgroupinc.com%2Fad ventures.html&btnG=Google+Search


      --
      If appearance and essence were the same thing, there would be no need for science -- Dr. Michio Kaku
  59. mugshots by ksheff · · Score: 1

    The mugshots are useful if the suspect has a previous arrest record. Or it could be used to send out composite sketches.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  60. Organized Crime Laughs by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

    Organized crime must be chomping at the bit for this to happen. Hackers are employed and are a hot commodity on both sides of the law (see: Las Vegas' recent trouble with Mob 0wn3d phone lines).
    Expect this to create a number of "Security Professional" openings, some on monster.com, some on IRC.....

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
  61. Re:My thoughts on this. by malia8888 · · Score: 1
    You'd rather see me in the pen, Then me and Lorenzo chilling in the Benzo. .

    Hey, homey, sorry but I think the lyric is "me and Lorenzo rollin in a Benzo" not "chilling".

    Your boo,

    Malia-dawg, 53, reppin the 808

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  62. Officers: Browse Here by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 0, Troll


    Here are a few suggested ways for you to use your new uplinks:

    http://www.dunkindonuts.com/find_a_store/framese t. jsp

    http://clients.mapquest.com/krispy/mqinterconnec t? link=find

    http://www.laokay.com/Donuts.htm

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  63. Will the handhelds work with the Starbucks WIFI?? by Newer+Guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Because everyone knows that cops spend most of their time at either Starbuck's or Dunkin Donuts.

  64. Everyone Else? by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

    What about everyone else? The people who have theirown WAPs setup? If the police WAPs cause interferance with them, are they going to be forced by the police to remove them?

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
  65. Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people thought they were going after wardrivers? Bet is scared a person or two...

  66. Re:Nigger Boo Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you are the same guy trying to pretend that other people support your stupidity - congrats on being a filthy kike.

  67. What a shame, Ricochet would be perfect. by Myself · · Score: 1

    This is an amazing kludge! They might as well have runners with CD-R's of the data, jogging up to the car as it passes by the station. Ugh. Cellular data is too slow, and wireless LANs are just too short-range. These folks would do better with a real wireless WAN system.

    That's exactly the niche where Ricochet fit: High speed data, anywhere in a metropolitan area. While stationary, Ricochet speeds routinely exceeded 128kbps, and while moving at up to 60mph, the acquisition of new nodes pushed the throughput down, though not much. It would pick back up as soon as you stayed within range of one microcell for more than just a moment. (Software tweaks could improve mobile performance too.)

    Imagine the applications of an ISDN-speed link in a moving patrol car: Realtime video from the dashboard camera. Instant images from headquarters displayed in the cruiser.

    It's unfortunate that the present owners don't seem interested in reactivating the network in most of the old service areas (only Denver and San Fran are up so far), and they're certainly not planning to deploy equipment in any new cities. The LAPD would've loved Ricochet.

    1. Re:What a shame, Ricochet would be perfect. by noweb4u · · Score: 1

      Indeed. We'll have to see what ever gets done with that.

  68. well, try again by westyx · · Score: 1

    it's operational information - if the crims know that the cops are looking for larry, they can tell larry to stay low.

    if all the cops get a map marked with "this where we're gonna raid", then, well, that's not stuff you want out in the general community.

    1. Re:well, try again by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      Well, given that I'm sitting here with a radio scanner dropping in on the local police department's communications I can hardly think that WiFi is really going to be a huge reason for them to finally get secure.

      Radio shack scanner to hit current air waves: $100 USD, maybe less.

      802.11b capable laptop: $1000 USD, perhaps less, but nowhere near 100 dollars.

      They didn't get with the program when it was cheap to eaves drop... and at long range. Why the snot would they start eavesdropping on the police only a few hundred yards away with expensive equipment?

      Police don't do anything horribly sensitive. They're marginally better than a group of 30 guys with nothing to do on their time (depending on the size of your town) that go out and wrangle up trouble makers.

      I appreciate what they do, but this is no CIA, FBI, or Navy Seals team we're talking about. They really don't have any information that is all that too valuable. I don't worry in the least bit that somebody might snoop on the communications. The drunk guy trying to beat up his wife, the crazy guy jumping up and down at cars on the side of the road, and the wreckless driver on the road don't really want to invest the time in snooping in on their business.

      Dirty Larry already knows when to stay low. He committed a crime, so stay low for a while and keep out of sight. You don't need an 802.11bb served webpage with your mugshot on it to show yourself that you're a suspect.

      For crying out loud, go out and commit a few small crimes. You'll find out how stupid you have to actually be to get caught doing shit.

  69. rely on WEP? you must be wappy! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    anyone with any experience in Wireless nows that WEP is an insecure method of communication that is brute force breakable.

    It is therefore easier to assume that all WEP protected comms are effectively plain text.

    It is from this position that one should build the network.

    Personally I would be using Inferno

    from http://www.vitanuova.com/inferno/papers/bltj.html

    Security in Inferno

    Inferno provides security of communication, resource control, and system integrity.

    Each external communication channel may be transmitted in the clear, accompanied by message digests to prevent corruption, or encrypted to prevent corruption and interception. Once communication is set up, the encryption is transparent to the application. Key exchange is provided through standard public-key mechanisms; after key exchange, message digesting and line encryption likewise use standard symmetric mechanisms.

    Inferno is secure against erroneous or malicious applications, and encourages safe collaboration between mutually suspicious service providers and clients. The resources available to applications appear exclusively in the name space of the application, and standard protection modes are available. This applies to data, to communication resources, and to the executable modules that constitute the applications. Security-sensitive resources of the system are accessible only by calling the modules that provide them; in particular, adding new files and servers to the name space is controlled and is an authenticated operation. For example, if the network resources are removed from an application's name space, then it is impossible for it to establish new network connections.

    Security mechanisms

    Authentication and digital signatures are performed using public key cryptography. Public keys are certified by Inferno-based or other certifying authorities that sign the public keys with their own private key.

    Inferno uses encryption for:

    *
    mutual authentication of communicating parties;
    *
    authentication of messages between these parties; and
    *
    encryption of messages between these parties.

    The encryption algorithms provided by Inferno include the SHA, MD4, and MD5 secure hashes; Elgamal public key signatures and signature verification [4]; RC4 encryption; DES encryption; and public key exchange based on the Diffie-Hellman scheme. The public key signatures use keys with moduli up to 4096 bits, 512 bits by default.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  70. Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As it stands it would take me less than two days to crack your network with moderate use.

    So why don't you do it?

    1. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I am too busy cracking networks that have things other than your moms pussy on them.

  71. Re:It's a transport medium. Security is not it's j by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    They also haven't said what network protocol, or what mode 802.11b will be in, or what software they will use to do it... do you want all that too?

    Absolutely. I want to know exactly what technological solutions my police department is spending my tax money on.

  72. Re:Must be fun... [OT] by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

    They said the same thing when the idea of installing radio's in cars came along.

    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
  73. Godwin's Law in action! by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

    Completely OT (like the thread...), but anyone remember Godwin's Law?

    "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.

    When I read that years ago, it really got me thinking. Here's something that was born on Usenet but indeed it does seem to hold true to real life as a natural law. Though this particular discussion is not a Usenet example, it is a discussion. Anyone notice consistant examples of this being demonstrated IRL?

    Fascinating.

  74. Links to articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.netgroupinc.com/adventures.html

  75. am i missing something? by ohzero · · Score: 1

    Exactly how does this improve anything? 802.11 is short range technology, and they're using radio to do data to the cars right now.

    So let's lay out the scenarios in which this could possibly be useful:

    1. An old lady gets mugged directly in front of the police station. The LA cops outside who watch it and laugh can send an IM to the cops inside, so that they can laugh also.

    2. LA cops can download the "Mr. T" skin for quake and play "pretend it's compton" with each other without having to go inside. Donut eating and racist "justice" are simultaneously accompished.

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com