This is why you pay by credit card. If they sell you something under false pretenses (it helps to have it documented), and refuse to take responsibility, dispute the charge.
Yeah, that's what got me. He's there running an open relay, but keeps whining about how it's not an open relay. Someone needs to whack up him upside the head.
That's why you have a tablet that runs RDP/X over 802.11b. Or a. The only problem is games and video . . . well, it was a nice idea. I don't forsee video being able to be carried over anything but multichannel audio/signalled digital/fiber cable in the near future.
Absolute freedom of speech is pretty much impossible. You may be legally permitted to say something, but if you fear to speak that particular thought because of potential reprisal, you don't have freedom of speech. Abhorrent as some notions may be (for example, racism), if you cannot freely discuss all opinions on those notions without any fear of adverse reaction, you don't have absolute freedom of speech.
As I understand, the constitution isn't necessarily there to give specific rights to people, but to limit the government's ability to limit those rights.
iDVD is part of the i-suite of provided FREE applications with the sole reason to boost sales of Macintosh systems and Apple hardware in general. They don't make a single penny on iDVD per se, but on the drives it supports - if somebody now makes buggies work with third-party actuators instead of whips, they take away the only reason why it is provided at all.
Apple is a good business. It's up to the US Government to ensure they continue to make a profit, no matter what they want to give away for free.
Nope, not that way. Instead, I emulate a CDROM driver and pipe from the ISO to the virtual device. For an easily-installed version of this (with a few extras) look at www.daemon-tools.com
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET PEOPLE IN HOUSTON TO DO FOR MONTHS.
Help me! I am trying everything I can think of to get people to participate in something like this. I get everything from "that's illegal!", "if it worked, why isn't it here?", and "yeah, until they start charging per month" to "wireless sucks, my uncle bob tried to do it in his steel shed and it didn't work, loser".
I am even willing to personally finance the first few hubs, just to get some momentum, but I just can't find anyone that cares.
I am busting my butt trying to get people in Houston interested in something like this. Except, of course, that the ninth can doesn't point to an internet access point, but to another hub. And maybe the same for the tenth and eleventh cans too.
Not really. Most of us just hide, afraid of the slashflames. Exchange is quite simply the best collaboration system out right now. I run exchange 2000 at several locations. It doesn't crash. I have never had a virus go through exchange or outlook. I had to reboot my exchange server three and a half months ago, but that's because it was moving across town, and that's the one I use for client hosting.
Even with all that, I don't like it. Why not? Because, while she treats me very very well, exchange is not very interoperable. That's not really exchange's fault though. As far as I know, there is no standard for calendar and scheduling. If there were, and usable software supported it, I would pick the standards-compliant solution. That's the biggest gripe I have about the open source genre, that there just isn't enough quality software out there. Yes, I realize that this is my fault, at least in part. It might be yours too. Will you help me change?
You're absolutely right, Sony does produce pretty much the highest quality consumer-level electronics (at least consistently) - my home entertainment system is almost entirely Sony (I just couldn't find any cabinets with their logo . ..). The thing is that I refuse to buy anything of theirs that relies on proprietary technology (like memorystick). If it's supported in addition to a standard, that's fine, I just won't use the proprietary bit, but I refuse to rely on proprietary technology.
BACK to SACD, it sounds good, yes. But I don't like the proprietary nature. I'll be more enthusiastic when non-sony-licensed/blessed hardware can read it in its entirety. I don't have links, but I've heard that the read quality of the redbook-compatible layer is significantly worse than that of a true redbook disc. Also, I'm not entirely sure about the idea of having two separate data streams that aren't in some way tied together (ex they may just put teaser content on the redbook-compatible layer, saying listen to the digital layer for all this great stuff!). Excepting that, and the issues of outputs tied to encrypted digital out, I think it sounds like it has some potential. But personally, I'll wait till there's a standard.
You may have me on the minidisc side. I don't know it well enough. Nobody I really know has one, and CD works just as well for me. For memorystick, most people I know have specifically avoided sony digicams, because of this. They'd much rather (and more wisely, IMO) have CF.
Eh, as far as I can tell, minidisc and memorystick are pretty much failures too. I know one person who uses minidisc (well, "know" on IRC, he lives 2000 miles away and I've never met him in person). I don't know anyone that uses memorystick. I actually know several people that, at one time, had a betamax player. That would seem to indicate that, while still a dismal failure, was less of one than the other two you mentioned.
That's incorrect. The first amendment only guarantees you the right to free speech. It does not guarantee that you will be heard. Nobody has any legal obligation to listen to me. I have no right to use their resources to try to make them listen to me. The problem with junk faxing is that the faxer is using the faxee's resources (paper, toner, line time - and don't say that it's a flat rate per month, often a needed fax won't go through because a junk fax is taking the line). That has both direct and indirect costs to the faxee, which can be significant.
You may notice that fax.com is also a business. Many fax recipients are individuals. If you want to look at it as a conspiracy, at least realize that it's at least partially in favor of individuals.
Betamax was also first, and had superior quality. It was also not a standard (I don't call someone's proprietary format a standard). It was also made by Sony. See a pattern?
There's no way to switch dynamically (you have to go through the GUI) (and it doesn't support many useful CSS2.0 [IIRC] attributes), but IE can have a user stylesheet specified.
Slashdot Mirror
This is why you pay by credit card. If they sell you something under false pretenses (it helps to have it documented), and refuse to take responsibility, dispute the charge.
Yeah, that's what got me. He's there running an open relay, but keeps whining about how it's not an open relay. Someone needs to whack up him upside the head.
Got a PNG?
That's why you have a tablet that runs RDP/X over 802.11b. Or a. The only problem is games and video . . . well, it was a nice idea. I don't forsee video being able to be carried over anything but multichannel audio/signalled digital/fiber cable in the near future.
48.5
)(
forgetit
Yes, that would be the problem I have.
Thanks, but what would annoy me even less is to have something that uses a codec I can play.
As I understand, the constitution isn't necessarily there to give specific rights to people, but to limit the government's ability to limit those rights.
AVI --> Audio Video Interleave. Two of three for the association game.
iDVD is part of the i-suite of provided FREE applications with the sole reason to boost sales of Macintosh systems and Apple hardware in general. They don't make a single penny on iDVD per se, but on the drives it supports - if somebody now makes buggies work with third-party actuators instead of whips, they take away the only reason why it is provided at all.
Apple is a good business. It's up to the US Government to ensure they continue to make a profit, no matter what they want to give away for free.
No, but if you go buy a BMW and remove the computer system to put it in your cavalier, and they gripe, will you honor their demands to stop using it?
Nope, not that way. Instead, I emulate a CDROM driver and pipe from the ISO to the virtual device. For an easily-installed version of this (with a few extras) look at www.daemon-tools.com
$#()$#!($#!@
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET PEOPLE IN HOUSTON TO DO FOR MONTHS.
Help me! I am trying everything I can think of to get people to participate in something like this. I get everything from "that's illegal!", "if it worked, why isn't it here?", and "yeah, until they start charging per month" to "wireless sucks, my uncle bob tried to do it in his steel shed and it didn't work, loser".
I am even willing to personally finance the first few hubs, just to get some momentum, but I just can't find anyone that cares.
I am busting my butt trying to get people in Houston interested in something like this. Except, of course, that the ninth can doesn't point to an internet access point, but to another hub. And maybe the same for the tenth and eleventh cans too.
Not really. Most of us just hide, afraid of the slashflames. Exchange is quite simply the best collaboration system out right now. I run exchange 2000 at several locations. It doesn't crash. I have never had a virus go through exchange or outlook. I had to reboot my exchange server three and a half months ago, but that's because it was moving across town, and that's the one I use for client hosting.
Even with all that, I don't like it. Why not? Because, while she treats me very very well, exchange is not very interoperable. That's not really exchange's fault though. As far as I know, there is no standard for calendar and scheduling. If there were, and usable software supported it, I would pick the standards-compliant solution. That's the biggest gripe I have about the open source genre, that there just isn't enough quality software out there. Yes, I realize that this is my fault, at least in part. It might be yours too. Will you help me change?
You're absolutely right, Sony does produce pretty much the highest quality consumer-level electronics (at least consistently) - my home entertainment system is almost entirely Sony (I just couldn't find any cabinets with their logo . . .). The thing is that I refuse to buy anything of theirs that relies on proprietary technology (like memorystick). If it's supported in addition to a standard, that's fine, I just won't use the proprietary bit, but I refuse to rely on proprietary technology.
BACK to SACD, it sounds good, yes. But I don't like the proprietary nature. I'll be more enthusiastic when non-sony-licensed/blessed hardware can read it in its entirety. I don't have links, but I've heard that the read quality of the redbook-compatible layer is significantly worse than that of a true redbook disc. Also, I'm not entirely sure about the idea of having two separate data streams that aren't in some way tied together (ex they may just put teaser content on the redbook-compatible layer, saying listen to the digital layer for all this great stuff!). Excepting that, and the issues of outputs tied to encrypted digital out, I think it sounds like it has some potential. But personally, I'll wait till there's a standard.
You may have me on the minidisc side. I don't know it well enough. Nobody I really know has one, and CD works just as well for me. For memorystick, most people I know have specifically avoided sony digicams, because of this. They'd much rather (and more wisely, IMO) have CF.
Eh, as far as I can tell, minidisc and memorystick are pretty much failures too. I know one person who uses minidisc (well, "know" on IRC, he lives 2000 miles away and I've never met him in person). I don't know anyone that uses memorystick. I actually know several people that, at one time, had a betamax player. That would seem to indicate that, while still a dismal failure, was less of one than the other two you mentioned.
I'm probably feeding a troll. Oh well.
That's incorrect. The first amendment only guarantees you the right to free speech. It does not guarantee that you will be heard. Nobody has any legal obligation to listen to me. I have no right to use their resources to try to make them listen to me. The problem with junk faxing is that the faxer is using the faxee's resources (paper, toner, line time - and don't say that it's a flat rate per month, often a needed fax won't go through because a junk fax is taking the line). That has both direct and indirect costs to the faxee, which can be significant.
You may notice that fax.com is also a business. Many fax recipients are individuals. If you want to look at it as a conspiracy, at least realize that it's at least partially in favor of individuals.
Right. Everyone knows a real troll would write "f1st pr0st"
Actually the IT department would just get the enterprise edition that doesn't require this. Like I did (yes, we paid for the licenses).
That's what people will warez.
Betamax was also first, and had superior quality. It was also not a standard (I don't call someone's proprietary format a standard). It was also made by Sony. See a pattern?
There's no way to switch dynamically (you have to go through the GUI) (and it doesn't support many useful CSS2.0 [IIRC] attributes), but IE can have a user stylesheet specified.
I get gratification in knowing that I helped rid a spammer of money. Right now, that's enough for me.
And with a Haiku
Your skills have beaten my skills
I have no talent