private university and theirs costly software, when free alternative exist, be dammed.... thanks, to be able to search for a judgment and it's reference without VPNing to my old uni is certainly appreciated.
replying to myself, I apologize... If the blue ray decryption device was a dongle that came with the disc 342.1 (1) would apply but happily it is not the case.
The part of the criminal code you cite does not event applies to the personal backup situation as : 1-> A copie is just that a copie, it is not :
(a) obtains, directly or indirectly, any computer service
(b) by means of an electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device,
intercepts or causes to be intercepted, directly or indirectly, any function of a computer system,
therefore 342.1 (1) is irrelevant.
And the supreme court indirectly judge that 342.1 (1.1) is also irrelevant as making a backup is a lawful use of data.
I won't VPN to my Alma-mater to Lexis-Nexis for you but if you have a lawful access to that database search for judgment referencing [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC 13, you will see the broadness of that judgment. Also remember that in a common law regime, judges are supposed to take under great consideration previous interpretation made by upper courts.
no it's not ! I like the customization potential and the low cost that the generic PC provide to the experimented admins and power-users..
Annecdote: I built an HTPC in a wodden case with spare part laying around my house. It is totally wife approved and it would be impossible to achieve that level of customization without jail-breaking an iThing. Spare parts, a licence I got at a random conf, XBMC, a few plugins I customized and a bunch of AutoIt scripts was all that was needed in the generic PC world.
Cost : - 0$ as it was made of spare parts and spare woods... - a weekend to have it working perfectly to my wife taste Benefit: - hacking is fun when work is:meeting,telephone,meeting,Visio,meeting,IM,email, a snippet of code, goto meeting - an happy wife
Breaking any type of "digital" lock on something, whether copyrighted or not, without the owners permission under Canadian law is illegal.
Please cite the law as I will cite the a judgment CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC 13:
... Under s. 29 of the Copyright Act, fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright. “Research” must be given a large and liberal interpretation in order to ensure that users’ rights are not unduly constrained, and is not limited to non-commercial or private contexts. Lawyers carrying on the business of law for profit are conducting research within the meaning of s. 29. The following factors help determine whether a dealing is fair: the purpose of the dealing, the character of the dealing, the amount of the dealing, the nature of the work, available alternatives to the dealing, and the effect of the dealing on the work. Here, the Law Society’s dealings with the publishers’ works through its custom photocopy service were research-based and fair. The access policy places appropriate limits on the type of copying that the Law Society will do. If a request does not appear to be for the purpose of research, criticism, review or private study, the copy will not be made. If a question arises as to whether the stated purpose is legitimate, the reference librarian will review the matter. The access policy limits the amount of work that will be copied, and the reference librarian reviews requests that exceed what might typically be considered reasonable and has the right to refuse to fulfill a request.
The Law Society did not authorize copyright infringement by providing selfservice photocopiers for use by its patrons in the Great Library. While authorization can be inferred from acts that are less than direct and positive, a person does not authorize infringement by authorizing the mere use of equipment that could be used to infringe copyright. Courts should presume that a person who authorizes an activity does so only so far as it is in accordance with the law. This presumption may be rebutted if it is shown that a certain relationship or degree of control existed between the alleged authorizer and the persons who committed the copyright infringement. Here, there was no evidence that the copiers had been used in a manner that was not consistent with copyright law. Moreover, the Law Society’s posting of a notice warning that it will not be responsible for any copies made in infringement of copyright does not constitute an express acknowledgement that the copiers will be used in an illegal manner. Finally, even if there were evidence of the copiers having been used to infringe copyright, the Law Society lacks sufficient control over the Great Library’s patrons to permit the conclusion that it sanctioned, approved or countenanced the infringement....
also there is another case in the lower court that used that judgment to allow personal backup so please cite the law you refer to
My fines Scotch bottles have drinkingrights ! for the Aberlour Abund'ha #30 and the Lagavulin single malt 16y, the drinkingrights are a limit of 2 oz every 1 month, for the Aberlour Abund'ha #35 and the Aberlour single malt 16y, the limit is 2 oz every 2 week, for the Aberlour single malt 6y and the Glenmorangie, it is 2 oz every 1 week, the cheap blend are drinkinglefts.
What do you have against the Genesis or the Saturn or do you have a problem with Sonic.... wannna fight..... Mouth rabidly foaming
Re:You want copyright to protect the content creat
on
A Copyright Nightmare
·
· Score: 1
25y of copyright and if the entity having the right dies or disappears before the end of the copyright , the copyright and it's royalties, fixed at their level before the right-holder disappearance time, belong to the government for 20y after that event. That way unless the gov is seriously corrupted beyond repair, the authors are compensated, no one has an incentive to murder them and we gradually get rid of those bratty estates.
Re:Part of a money conflict within the King family
on
A Copyright Nightmare
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I would not dare to try to says that to the Harley riders around here, they really don't give a fuck about other people freedom of speech but they do care and take affirmative action about theirs hurt feelings by capping your knees !
This is something that I don't understand, MS research rocks but the result of those research always appear on the market 10years late with half the feature they had in research or they buy a company with a similar but less stellar product than the one coming from the lab.. Does anyone knows what happens between research and productivization at MS?
Not my post but how about no, I, and almost everyone else around 30 I know, use fag to denote effeminate manners in a male regardless of the sexual orientation. You can be gay without being a faggot and you can be a faggot without being gay. We have to stop that fucking political correctness, freedom of speech meant that I should to be able to hurt other people feelings if I feel that they deserved it and derogatives words are perfect for that. Stop being such a pansy...
ASM assembler : http://asm.ow2.org/ is what you need if you ever decide to patch a library for covariance support to maintain backward compatibility or some esoteric shit like this...
You do a google science search, find an article that support your point and say something like this : According to that emeritus researcher in HR, removing access to music during work reduce worker productivity by n%. Therefore the cost of blocking music is 500*p$(employee)*n% per year while the cost of efficiently stream it is a one time cost of 200$ + 40$/Hr*10Hr plus a maintenance cost of 1Hr*40$/Hr per year, what do you choose.
when it's being a little too expert at being a politician that's the problem.
Exactly, politic is supposed to be power for the people, not power on the people by the politician.History seems to indicate that every system of government gradually become a system of professional politicians and then shit start to happen, therefore, I think that we should try a system that remove the condition to allow the spawning of professional politicians... I propose randomization as most metagouvernement system could be worse than random selection
Slashdot Mirror
private university and theirs costly software, when free alternative exist, be dammed.... thanks, to be able to search for a judgment and it's reference without VPNing to my old uni is certainly appreciated.
What is your outlook version so that I request "downgrade" to it because my outlook takes 1.7Gb !
Firefox32 nightly only takes 147Mb with 3 tabs...
replying to myself, I apologize...
If the blue ray decryption device was a dongle that came with the disc 342.1 (1) would apply but happily it is not the case.
But I dont want other people junk, I want to make my own ! ;)
You read as bad as I write !
The part of the criminal code you cite does not event applies to the personal backup situation as :
1-> A copie is just that a copie, it is not :
(a) obtains, directly or indirectly, any computer service
(b) by means of an electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device,
intercepts or causes to be intercepted, directly or indirectly, any function of a computer system,
therefore 342.1 (1) is irrelevant.
And the supreme court indirectly judge that 342.1 (1.1) is also irrelevant as making a backup is a lawful use of data.
I won't VPN to my Alma-mater to Lexis-Nexis for you but if you have a lawful access to that database search for judgment referencing [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC 13, you will see the broadness of that judgment. Also remember that in a common law regime, judges are supposed to take under great consideration previous interpretation made by upper courts.
no it's not !
I like the customization potential and the low cost that the generic PC provide to the experimented admins and power-users..
Annecdote:
I built an HTPC in a wodden case with spare part laying around my house. It is totally wife approved and it would be impossible to achieve that level of customization without jail-breaking an iThing. Spare parts, a licence I got at a random conf, XBMC, a few plugins I customized and a bunch of AutoIt scripts was all that was needed in the generic PC world.
Cost : :meeting,telephone,meeting,Visio,meeting,IM,email, a snippet of code, goto meeting
- 0$ as it was made of spare parts and spare woods...
- a weekend to have it working perfectly to my wife taste
Benefit:
- hacking is fun when work is
- an happy wife
the without colour of right part is important as case law interpreted the copyright law as a right given....
Breaking any type of "digital" lock on something, whether copyrighted or not, without the owners permission under Canadian law is illegal.
Please cite the law as I will cite the a judgment CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC 13 :
...
Under s. 29 of the Copyright Act, fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright. “Research” must be given a large and liberal interpretation in order to ensure that users’ rights are not unduly constrained, and is not limited to non-commercial or private contexts. Lawyers carrying on the business of law for profit are conducting research within the meaning of s. 29. The following factors help determine whether a dealing is fair: the purpose of the dealing, the character of the dealing, the amount of the dealing, the nature of the work, available alternatives to the dealing, and the effect of the dealing on the work. Here, the Law Society’s dealings with the publishers’ works through its custom photocopy service were research-based and fair. The access policy places appropriate limits on the type of copying that the Law Society will do. If a request does not appear to be for the purpose of research, criticism, review or private study, the copy will not be made. If a question arises as to whether the stated purpose is legitimate, the reference librarian will review the matter. The access policy limits the amount of work that will be copied, and the reference librarian reviews requests that exceed what might typically be considered reasonable and has the right to refuse to fulfill a request.
The Law Society did not authorize copyright infringement by providing selfservice photocopiers for use by its patrons in the Great Library. While authorization can be inferred from acts that are less than direct and positive, a person does not authorize infringement by authorizing the mere use of equipment that could be used to infringe copyright. Courts should presume that a person who authorizes an activity does so only so far as it is in accordance with the law. This presumption may be rebutted if it is shown that a certain relationship or degree of control existed between the alleged authorizer and the persons who committed the copyright infringement. Here, there was no evidence that the copiers had been used in a manner that was not consistent with copyright law. Moreover, the Law Society’s posting of a notice warning that it will not be responsible for any copies made in infringement of copyright does not constitute an express acknowledgement that the copiers will be used in an illegal manner. Finally, even if there were evidence of the copiers having been used to infringe copyright, the Law Society lacks sufficient control over the Great Library’s patrons to permit the conclusion that it sanctioned, approved or countenanced the infringement. ...
also there is another case in the lower court that used that judgment to allow personal backup so please cite the law you refer to
My god you are right ! ;)
I should lobby for a blended scotch ban, as this commoners things is drinkinglefts.
My fines Scotch bottles have drinkingrights !
for the Aberlour Abund'ha #30 and the Lagavulin single malt 16y, the drinkingrights are a limit of 2 oz every 1 month,
for the Aberlour Abund'ha #35 and the Aberlour single malt 16y, the limit is 2 oz every 2 week,
for the Aberlour single malt 6y and the Glenmorangie, it is 2 oz every 1 week,
the cheap blend are drinkinglefts.
What do you have against the Genesis or the Saturn .....
or do you have a problem with Sonic.... wannna fight
Mouth rabidly foaming
25y of copyright and if the entity having the right dies or disappears before the end of the copyright , the copyright and it's royalties, fixed at their level before the right-holder disappearance time, belong to the government for 20y after that event. That way unless the gov is seriously corrupted beyond repair, the authors are compensated, no one has an incentive to murder them and we gradually get rid of those bratty estates.
Cocaine !
I would not dare to try to says that to the Harley riders around here, they really don't give a fuck about other people freedom of speech but they do care and take affirmative action about theirs hurt feelings by capping your knees !
This is something that I don't understand, MS research rocks but the result of those research always appear on the market 10years late with half the feature they had in research or they buy a company with a similar but less stellar product than the one coming from the lab.. Does anyone knows what happens between research and productivization at MS?
Not my post but how about no,
I, and almost everyone else around 30 I know, use fag to denote effeminate manners in a male regardless of the sexual orientation. You can be gay without being a faggot and you can be a faggot without being gay. We have to stop that fucking political correctness, freedom of speech meant that I should to be able to hurt other people feelings if I feel that they deserved it and derogatives words are perfect for that. Stop being such a pansy...
I only saw the B&W version and it was damn fast however the color one might have some power hungry mathemagic behind it...
ASM assembler : http://asm.ow2.org/ is what you need if you ever decide to patch a library for covariance support to maintain backward compatibility or some esoteric shit like this...
that most developers who are writing Java either don't give a shit, or just downright bad
the correct affirmation would be : that most enterprise developers who are programming either don't give a shit, or are just downright bad
http://www.mirasoldisplays.com/ from qualcomm is just one example
Wow, I am impressed !!! Your, hopefully hypothetical, PHB is HP CEO material !
You do a google science search, find an article that support your point and say something like this : According to that emeritus researcher in HR, removing access to music during work reduce worker productivity by n%. Therefore the cost of blocking music is 500*p$(employee)*n% per year while the cost of efficiently stream it is a one time cost of 200$ + 40$/Hr*10Hr plus a maintenance cost of 1Hr*40$/Hr per year, what do you choose.
C# is Java done right without the legacy crap, it is a nice language to develop in but it's Windows-centricity is a big turn off...
when it's being a little too expert at being a politician that's the problem.
Exactly, politic is supposed to be power for the people, not power on the people by the politician.History seems to indicate that every system of government gradually become a system of professional politicians and then shit start to happen, therefore, I think that we should try a system that remove the condition to allow the spawning of professional politicians... I propose randomization as most metagouvernement system could be worse than random selection
well, thank for the detailed explanation. And the effective summarization of my point: you have to trust the hardware to do it's job at some point !