At least one 5 gallon jug per person. We have 10 gallons per person, which is pathetically inadequate.
Wait, what? If you should have a 5 gallon jug per person, how is 10 gallons per person "pathetically inadequate"? Isn't that twice as much as the minimum need?
Not true, really. It *is* true that many types of cancer are difficult to cure, and that telling a cure from a temporary remission is also difficult. But there are definitely plenty of people who have had all detectable cancer eradicated and it never reappears in their lifetime. They continue to be checked because, as stated above, it's difficult to tell a cure from a remission where the cancer remains in undetectable amounts.
Meh, while I'm sure Oracle would love the idea of holding your data hostage in the cloud, at the moment they're not insisting on it. As I understand the news article, customers are having to pay them for cloud services but don't actually have to use it.
The defenders of the Alamo died to the last man, but in the end, they won, didn't they? Texas got its independence and then joined the US, just like they'd wanted.
Also, there's the implicit assumption that all arguments can be resolved by "facts."
More importantly, there's the implicit assumption that these facts will always be available in correct and undistorted form from Google, which is so wrong-headed I can't even begin. Slanting Google to their worldview is a hobby (or even a business) for some people.
It's gone up because it was going up--people wanted stocks that had been steadily racking up large gains. Now that it's not going up anymore it's tough to see where the floor might be. That's how a bubble works.
The problem isn't identifying an overpriced craze. This isn't hard if you look at it with a clear eye. The problem is figuring out when the bubble will pop. If you try to sell short too early, you'll be swimming against the tide and the market will crush you.
"Lately"? There's a book I'd like to recommend to your attention: Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, which discusses this phenomenon in excellent detail. It was first published in 1841.
Slashdot Mirror
How is free "overpriced"?
No, the court said that you weren't liable because you stated up front that your reviews aren't reliable.
Wait, what? If you should have a 5 gallon jug per person, how is 10 gallons per person "pathetically inadequate"? Isn't that twice as much as the minimum need?
My burns have almost healed!
Buy a good stock, wait until it goes up, then sell it. If the stock doesn't go up, don't buy it.
"cishet"? I have no idea what that means.
By lying on the registration form and using stolen credit numbers to pay for it.
Nah, it'll just convince corps that they have own every conceivable TLD with their name in it.
Which is presumably why they called it "Proxyham".
...never buying a new car again. Only cars old enough not to have this crap.
More directly to the point, it is, in a lot of Mario games, what Mario says when he dies.
Not true, really. It *is* true that many types of cancer are difficult to cure, and that telling a cure from a temporary remission is also difficult. But there are definitely plenty of people who have had all detectable cancer eradicated and it never reappears in their lifetime. They continue to be checked because, as stated above, it's difficult to tell a cure from a remission where the cancer remains in undetectable amounts.
Japanese quirk. They don't say cancer; the word is taboo.
Meh, while I'm sure Oracle would love the idea of holding your data hostage in the cloud, at the moment they're not insisting on it. As I understand the news article, customers are having to pay them for cloud services but don't actually have to use it.
The article says the patent specifies deuterium or tritium. Only if the engine uses tritium will there be any radioactive fuel to be spread.
And you know how you get to be able to ride the horse and rope your cattle?
BY NOT CHANGING THE DAMN INTERFACE EVERY TWO WEEKS!
The defenders of the Alamo died to the last man, but in the end, they won, didn't they? Texas got its independence and then joined the US, just like they'd wanted.
More importantly, there's the implicit assumption that these facts will always be available in correct and undistorted form from Google, which is so wrong-headed I can't even begin. Slanting Google to their worldview is a hobby (or even a business) for some people.
Okay, pretty much stopped reading at that point. The fact is that it's as easy to propagate lies through the Internet as it is truth.
Bingo. If you implement this strategy successfully, you can make a lot of money, but you've got better odds in Vegas.
It's gone up because it was going up--people wanted stocks that had been steadily racking up large gains. Now that it's not going up anymore it's tough to see where the floor might be. That's how a bubble works.
You do realize that an apartment building is utterly worthless if you can't get paying tenants for it, don't you?
The problem isn't identifying an overpriced craze. This isn't hard if you look at it with a clear eye. The problem is figuring out when the bubble will pop. If you try to sell short too early, you'll be swimming against the tide and the market will crush you.
"Lately"? There's a book I'd like to recommend to your attention: Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, which discusses this phenomenon in excellent detail. It was first published in 1841.