There is room for two versions of microcode / kernel: default (slow) and root (fast) mode. In root mode there can be only one (root) user, but everything runs much faster.
Let's see here. We'll give people a choice between an immediate, measurable advantage and an advantage they won't see until the failure hits. Gee, I wonder which one everyone will choose, and then get hacked for.
Should Alexa by your child's friend? I would say "Why not?
Because, of course, it's not your child's friend. It is machine designed by Amazon to get you (or your child) to buy more Amazon stuff. That is its only purpose. Not to actually care about your child in any way, but only to get its "friend" to spend money on Amazon.
In my opinion, assuming Tim Cook is in the right, it's reasonable to ask for a retraction first, and then sue if that's denied. You don't have to (and to my mind shouldn't) always dial your lawyers first.
If they can't get it to work in Excel, do you really think that their database design and any associated code will be any better?
Of course not. The OP's point was that if they can't get it to work in Excel, it needs to be done by a professional using a professional's tools, not by them.
at least the limit is only around 1800 glyphs for South Koreans.
It's not much more in modern Japanese--about 2200. Post World War II, the Japanese did massive simplification of kanji, cutting it back to 2000. While it's not generally illegal to use the older characters, it is illegal to use them in official documents, and publishers can only be assured that their readers will know the official characters (you're supposed to know them all by the end of elementary school).
I'm reminded of the 1961 film "Mr. Sardonicus", where the producer William Castle promised two endings. Supposedly, the audience could vote to punish the villain at the end or spare him. Of course, the audience always voted to punish him. Good thing too, because Mr. Castle, being an astute observer of human nature, only actually made the "punish the villain" ending.
No matter how you look at it, having a human in the loop is a setup for failure. Public transportation yet again solves this problem in addition to just about every other problem you can think of..
I can think of a problem it doesn't solve right off the bat: people loathe it. A car takes you where you want to go when you want to go there. Public transportation takes you only where it goes when the schedule says it will. People hate that.
Slashdot Mirror
Let's see here. We'll give people a choice between an immediate, measurable advantage and an advantage they won't see until the failure hits. Gee, I wonder which one everyone will choose, and then get hacked for.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Harrassing local wildlife is not "minding your own business."
Because, of course, it's not your child's friend. It is machine designed by Amazon to get you (or your child) to buy more Amazon stuff. That is its only purpose. Not to actually care about your child in any way, but only to get its "friend" to spend money on Amazon.
...if you can get that damn straight four piece.
You're prejudiced against the overweight transgender community? Shame on you!
And get sued for insulting the special snowflake's unqiue gender identity.
Remember, remember the 1st of November...
Care to try again in English?
Not really a joke. I foresee trolls abusing the hell outta this.
You've invented the mass-market paperback!
In my opinion, assuming Tim Cook is in the right, it's reasonable to ask for a retraction first, and then sue if that's denied. You don't have to (and to my mind shouldn't) always dial your lawyers first.
We can go about our business. Move along.
True. But it's leaps and bounds ahead of a touch screen keyboard.
Which is not a smartphone or a tablet. It has a physical keyboard. The OP's point is that you don't try to write a novel on a touchscreen keyboard.
And still almost nobody uses them. That should tell you something.
When did the discussion become about entrapment? I thought it was about impersonation.
Ah, yes, when you're losing the argument, change the subject.
Of course not. The OP's point was that if they can't get it to work in Excel, it needs to be done by a professional using a professional's tools, not by them.
I would've thought we'd all learned by now that nobody ever loses an argument on the Internet--just ask them.
It's not much more in modern Japanese--about 2200. Post World War II, the Japanese did massive simplification of kanji, cutting it back to 2000. While it's not generally illegal to use the older characters, it is illegal to use them in official documents, and publishers can only be assured that their readers will know the official characters (you're supposed to know them all by the end of elementary school).
I noticed that their site doesn't use the font except when it shows you examples. The site content text doesn't use it.
So three times nothing is...nothing?
I'm reminded of the 1961 film "Mr. Sardonicus", where the producer William Castle promised two endings. Supposedly, the audience could vote to punish the villain at the end or spare him. Of course, the audience always voted to punish him. Good thing too, because Mr. Castle, being an astute observer of human nature, only actually made the "punish the villain" ending.
"Twitch plays Pokemon" comes to TV.
I can think of a problem it doesn't solve right off the bat: people loathe it. A car takes you where you want to go when you want to go there. Public transportation takes you only where it goes when the schedule says it will. People hate that.