I was sort of half kidding there. I wasn't saying "this collider is a bomb." I was saying "anti-matter research will lead to anti-matter bombs." I was still half kidding.
Additionally, they recommend the State establishes a centralised technology division to handle all their IT needs reducing redundancy and generating further savings.
Ahh, this would be like the Navy saving money with the Navy-Marine Corps Intranet.... Well, when viewed against that as a model, it's clear that they'll save money.
Moore's law has no influence on password requirements. It's this simple.
1) Whatever you are authenticating to has a sleep time between login attempts. 2) Whatever you are authenticating to can lock out after a prescribed number of failed attempts. 3) Your shadow file is inaccessible to the attacker.
It would seem to me that processing power would have no influence on this equation. There are other variables to constrain, but the basic rules regarding password authentication are unaffected. The only difference is the crypto used to protect the channel used to authenticate over, which obviously has nothing to do with the passwords themselves.
You could think of us as the big, free Internet telephony company. We prefer to think of ourselves as a big group hug, even a present. Yes... that's it... we're a present... but without the ribbon.
I don't mean to be rude, but just how many people clicked that link? This is ComputerWorld here, there are probably a couple hundred readers at any given time. Even if all of them clicked on a link on that site at once, you would expect any reasonably advanced technology to not buckle under the strain.
Does/. only link to services run on Celerons or what? How the heck many of us clicked that link?
As an American professional software engineer. I'm glad to see that stories encouraging outsourcing of American software jobs are now appearing on/. It means that the readership of/. is growing. Such fine managerial values are at the core of the technical acumen that I have come to expect from the/. readership.
/snicker
It also means that I should probably stop posting, since my boss might be reading.
If I were putting up a web form requesting that people purchase my services designing missiles, you'd be sure that it would be over an encrypted stream...
Form Action: "http://aardvark.co.nz/cgi-bin/p19937.cgi"
Windows XP = Windows written using the buddy system, on daily builds, where code is thrown away at the end of the day if it isn't complete. The entire design is sitting on flash cards taped to a filing cabinet somewhere in a break room at Microsoft.
From briefly viewing some literature about Java 1.5.0 (er, 5.0... W0w!) the feature that excites me most about this is the ability to strongly type container classes, such as one can do in Ada or C++.
I was sort of half kidding there. I wasn't saying "this collider is a bomb." I was saying "anti-matter research will lead to anti-matter bombs." I was still half kidding.
...again.
Isn't that ALWAYS what they say about these things? Nobody ever says "This is to help us built anti-matter bombs."
That said, sounds exciting, let me go ahead and echo what the other poster said WTF happened to the SSC?
Additionally, they recommend the State establishes a centralised technology division to handle all their IT needs reducing redundancy and generating further savings.
Ahh, this would be like the Navy saving money with the Navy-Marine Corps Intranet.... Well, when viewed against that as a model, it's clear that they'll save money.
*evil laugh*
That isn't attacking the password, that is attacking the crypto.
Moore's law has no influence on password requirements. It's this simple.
1) Whatever you are authenticating to has a sleep time between login attempts.
2) Whatever you are authenticating to can lock out after a prescribed number of failed attempts.
3) Your shadow file is inaccessible to the attacker.
It would seem to me that processing power would have no influence on this equation. There are other variables to constrain, but the basic rules regarding password authentication are unaffected. The only difference is the crypto used to protect the channel used to authenticate over, which obviously has nothing to do with the passwords themselves.
Oh, you'll be able to play your old movies and games, they'll just be a bit bluray.
Hehe, more like, they changed the name of the article... Hope I don't get mega-modded down =(
Conjugate much?
I don't know if this is a new idea, but why not just use Linux as an acronym.
LINUX:
Linix Is Not UniX
Similar to PINE:
Pine Is Not Elm
Ok, here's a nickel. Go take it, and find a lawyer, and ask him if publicly airing your DVDs is legal.
Yes.
Yes, it's illegal, and the article states that it's illegal.
T3 Storage Array
s s= SunStore&cmdViewProduct_CP&catid=51844
http://store.sun.com/CMTemplate/CEServlet?proce
You could think of us as the big, free Internet telephony company. We prefer to think of ourselves as a big group hug, even a present. Yes... that's it... we're a present... but without the ribbon.
..can't ...hold ...back ...sounds like ...project kickoff meeting.
:-@~~~~*
*wharf ralf barf*
I don't mean to be rude, but just how many people clicked that link? This is ComputerWorld here, there are probably a couple hundred readers at any given time. Even if all of them clicked on a link on that site at once, you would expect any reasonably advanced technology to not buckle under the strain.
/. only link to services run on Celerons or what? How the heck many of us clicked that link?
Does
As an American professional software engineer. I'm glad to see that stories encouraging outsourcing of American software jobs are now appearing on /. It means that the readership of /. is growing. Such fine managerial values are at the core of the technical acumen that I have come to expect from the /. readership.
/snicker
It also means that I should probably stop posting, since my boss might be reading.
Toodles.
And someday... I'll get that email address just for grins.
If I were putting up a web form requesting that people purchase my services designing missiles, you'd be sure that it would be over an encrypted stream...
Form Action: "http://aardvark.co.nz/cgi-bin/p19937.cgi"
Buy a tape drive.
If you have money burning a hole in your pocket, but a tape changer, so you don't have to change the tapes.
Windows XP = Windows written using the buddy system, on daily builds, where code is thrown away at the end of the day if it isn't complete. The entire design is sitting on flash cards taped to a filing cabinet somewhere in a break room at Microsoft.
From briefly viewing some literature about Java 1.5.0 (er, 5.0... W0w!) the feature that excites me most about this is the ability to strongly type container classes, such as one can do in Ada or C++.
Joy.
It would be much more effective to watermark the disks so they could trace who it leaked from.
Skip to step 2 in that case ;-)
While I'm *cough* sure that this site has good intentions, the best thing to do if you lose your password is
1) Get the admin to change it for you.
or, if you've lost the root password
2) Boot through some external method (generally from CD or network) and change your password that way.
Admins should keep the shadow file safe from malicious access, but this is giving it to a 3rd party... bad juju.
Not to be rude, but who chose the name UML for User Mode Linux?
Do they have a diagram or something I can look at? I want to really understand what User Mode Linux "is".
Ok... what was the joke? That he made a copy? The he downloaded it? I completely missed it!