Slashdot Mirror


Why Offshore When Canada's Next Door?

Roblimo writes "A study by accounting and consulting giant PriceWaterhouseCoopers claims Canada could lose up to 75,000 IT jobs by 2010 to offshore outsourcing, but could also *gain* 165,000 jobs through U.S. outsourcing contracts. The trick is, according to this story at IT Manager's Journal, that while Indian, Chinese, and Russian programmers may cost 80% less than U.S. programmers, the time zone, language, legal, and other problems involved with sending work half way around the world can eat up much of the labor savings, while Canadian programmers are nearby, speak English with nearly American accents, have a similar culture and legal system, and get paid 40% less than U.S. programmers. Might be time to think about moving North, eh?"

1,111 comments

  1. Well, I'm one example by FractusMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work for MSN - MSN which is not offered in Canada, but most of the tech support sites (or so it seems) are located here in Canada.

    1. Re:Well, I'm one example by irokitt · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, you're incapable of using the tech support mantra:

      "Well, it works on my end!"

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Well, I'm one example by Techguy666 · · Score: 1

      What part of MSN don't we have in Canada? We have MSN Canada (www.msn.ca).

    3. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means the ISP-like service they offer

    4. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN Internet Access. It's like AOL except the MSN.com (ca) page loads when you open the browser.

    5. Re:Well, I'm one example by OECD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought that one of the big attractions of India et al. is that they're on the other side of the planet, so they can effectively extend the work day overnight. Are there going to be a bunch of third shift programming positions opening in Toronto?

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    6. Re:Well, I'm one example by Qamelian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not the website, the ISP. MSN provides internet access through a partner company called Qwest that Microsoft bought into a year or so back. That service is not available in Canada.

    7. Re:Well, I'm one example by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      That's one thing not mentioned in the blurb above. while we have similar languages and legal systems, there is a 12 hour time difference.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:Well, I'm one example by DrWhizBang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes we can - we don't use MSN.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    9. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what does msn.ca pertain to? surely not california, or i'd be ducking the drive by shootings on my way to newport beach. and i'd be doing a lot more winter sailing and motorcycle riding.

    10. Re:Well, I'm one example by strictnein · · Score: 1

      MSN provides internet access through a partner company called Qwest that Microsoft bought into a year or so back

      Microsoft didn't "buy into" this "partner company" (Qwest is the local phone provider for many states). They actually bought DSL and dial-up customers from Qwest.

    11. Re:Well, I'm one example by reidbold · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Used to be.

      I distinctly remember playing a game of Jedi Knight using msn internet in my youth, when in the middle of a big game, this stupid message took the focus away from the game and said something like 'We'd just like to remind you that your internet is coming from Microsoft' or something equally inane. And it cost me the game.

      --
      -Reid
    12. Re:Well, I'm one example by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1
      one step further, the existing qwest is actually a merger of two baby bells, us west and qwest.

      http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HDN/is _2000_April_25/ai_61699250

    13. Re:Well, I'm one example by strictnein · · Score: 1

      exactly... the original poster seems to think that Qwest is just some little company that MS partnered with, when in reality they serve tens of millions of customers.

    14. Re:Well, I'm one example by Agrivane · · Score: 1

      MSN is offered in Canada.
      http://sympatico.msn.ca/

    15. Re:Well, I'm one example by remikun · · Score: 1

      MSN is not offered in Canada?

      Anyways, it is now! Sympatico MSN

      I used to work for a company who had a contract with Bell Sympatico. I recently quit my job just in time, as the MSN services just started to be offered as a valued product with the Sympatico Internet access services.

      This means that the staff was doomed to all support the MSN products, including MSN Messenger, which we used to be outside our scope of support. We were already having enough fun with customers settings up their Internet access and trying to sell crappy antivirus software... Imagine now inserting pictures in HTML e-mails with customers who can't double-click. I'm glad I'm not there!

      The Canadian company I worked with also had contracts with some American ISPs.

      --
      Remi
      Home sweet localhost.
    16. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen sympatico's website lately?

      www.sympatico.ca

    17. Re:Well, I'm one example by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1
      the original poster seems to think that Qwest is just some little company that MS partnered with, when in reality they serve tens of millions of customers.

      For a broad enough definition of the word "serve," this is true.











      (I live in Denver. You can see the big blue "Q" on Qwest HQ from damn near everywhere in the city. I hate that thing.)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    18. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh Sounds like a good slogan to me ;)

    19. Re:Well, I'm one example by yournic · · Score: 1

      umm IIRC
      1.) you dont work for MSN... you are a subcontract working tech support via some other company
      2.) there are three US tech support sites for MSN, one in Canada, and one in Brazil.

    20. Re:Well, I'm one example by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RoadRunner and HP tech support is done out of a small town in British Columbia known as Kamloops. They also handle US accounts for American Express (damn, you guys get a hell of a lot more bonuses, perks, and extras than the Canadian side of American Express).

      Horrible place to work for, though. $11 / hr for phone support, $9 / hr for customer sales support. Great benefits, but doesn't make up for it at all. All trainees spend 3 months doing the 5am - 1:30pm shift. After that, they change your shift based on your test / training scores. They're the biggest employer in the city, yet have the highest turn over rate of any business in the city (gee, I wonder why?).

    21. Re:Well, I'm one example by cha0saddddddd · · Score: 1

      you dont work for msn.....you work for streams or sykes....and lots of the tech support is in the us.there are only a few canadian contractors that take msn calls

    22. Re:Well, I'm one example by ADRA · · Score: 1

      I have friends in Vancouver that work shifts throughout the night. It Happens.

      --
      Bye!
    23. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you don't work for RMH.

    24. Re:Well, I'm one example by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the big attraction of India is that it's popular with big name companies, so all the idiot pretenders can jump on the bandwagon. After all, time at a keyboard is the least important part of creating an effective program. Most of the real work is done in brainstorming sessions with experts and customers. The further insulated your developers and support staff are from the user base, the less effective they become...but right now, "cost savings" is seen as a bigger issue than "effective work," because sales are down and companies are afraid of shareholder lawsuits if they don't cut costs -- costs other than executive salaries, of course.

      In about three years, the big names will notice that product quality and sales have dropped dramatically while adjunct costs of outsourcing kept the price per product about the same, and they'll start looking to hire people here to clean things up. Either that, or all the great little startups popping up in this country will steal away their business.

      Oh, and maybe we'll get lucky and companies will reverse the process, start hiring Indian executives willing to work for mere hundreds of thousands a year, rather than millions. This will help us effectively extend the slacking-off day.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    25. Re:Well, I'm one example by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      You don't get a longer working day out of people on the other side of the world, just one that doesn't coincide with yours (well, if you own a sweatshop, you get a longer working day, but that's irrespective of time zones). For routine business its a pain, but you get to quote how these middle-of-the-night emergencies were handled by a first shift guy by virtue of first shift in India being third shift at home. In summary, the time difference to India produces a feel-good effect in managers, and little more. I'd say the end result is something like the Elbonian outsourcing project from Dilbert comics.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    26. Re:Well, I'm one example by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Canada has a 24 hour time difference...

      The only problme with canada is that there's only about 25 million people, so if you start to outsource tens of thousands of jobs from the US to CA, the CA tech market will heat up rapidly and the wages will rise fast.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    27. Re:Well, I'm one example by timts · · Score: 0

      how cheap is canadian salary? comparing to those "off-shore" ones? where they use that to get a decent life.

    28. Re:Well, I'm one example by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      Two points:
      1. $11/hr CAD = $8.40 USD

      2. Kamloops isn't what I'd call a small town; it's a small city. Merritt is a small town.

    29. Re:Well, I'm one example by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      Most of the real work is done in brainstorming sessions with experts and customers.

      When its outsourced, most of it is in "Copy/Paste" development cycle!

      /me ducks

    30. Re:Well, I'm one example by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Actually the correct statement would be:

      "Well, it works on my end, eh?"

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    31. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get 11/hr? im doing the same thing over in london ontari and i only make 10/hr, lucky buggers;)

    32. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea... then, you're stuck with the customer's mantra:

      "No, I haven't changed any settings or installed anything new"

    33. Re:Well, I'm one example by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Kyke's mum was right - Blame Canada!

      You know I would have a lot more sympathy when geeks complain about outsourcing if they had shown a bit more solidarity with manufaturing workers facing the same in the past, or wal mart workers getting paid minimum wage etc.

      After all most geeks spend their time replacing people with machines, so why the great outrage when they turn out to be free market loosers?

      The global supply of skilled labor is usually demand driven. Until recently the US had a major shortage of IT people and was issuing H1B visas to allow companies to recruit from abroad. It was only to be expected that restricting the supply of visas would cause the jobs to move abroad.

      I don't accept the doomsday scenarios being depicted. At the end of the day there is only so much work that is self contained enough for someone to do from the other side of the world. It is one thing to outsource customer service, admin etc, quite another to outsource product design and development.

      There are certainly Indian programmers who are every bit as good as US coders. But the combination of US based architect sending a design to a coder based in Dehli does not work half as well as when they are sitting next to each other.

      The other factor that makes outsourcing self regulating is the fact that salaries in India are not actually low. If you look in terms of living standards a programmer working in Dehli can easily earn enough to support a large household with several servants. The only reason the salaries are cheap in dollar terms is that the exchange rates do not reflect purchasing power. As work is outsourced, demand for the Rupee rises and the exchange rates adjust accordingly. In the immediate aftermath of the collapse of the USSR you could go to Moscow and buy a case of Vodka for $2, this did not last very long (the price, not the case of vodka, Dufus).

      The real problem for US based coders is the fact that a lot of jobs are not actually very skilled and there is quite a large supply of those skills in the wake of the dotcom boom.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    34. Re:Well, I'm one example by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      When flying somewhere (I think Frankfort to Chicago but it might have been another trip like Milan to Atlanta), the person next to me turned out to be a graduate of IIT (in India) and he was going to Detroit to spend 3 months learning how they did IT work so he could go back to India and teach employees there how this firm operated. He did not say how many jobs would be going to India but it appeared that he would be treated well (rental cat provided, nice apartment, etc. while in Detroit).
      Anyway, his job was not to "ride a keyboard" but to study the business processes and find ways to accomplish the same work from India.

    35. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They also handle US accounts for American Express (damn, you guys get a hell of a lot more bonuses, perks, and extras than the Canadian side of American Express).

      Hmm... Would that be the GlobalAssist contract? I used to work for a company in the US back when it was here.

    36. Re:Well, I'm one example by palpatine · · Score: 1

      However, given CA's immigration culture, they'll be able to give hundreds of thousands of people instant permanent residence and fill those jobs up right away.

    37. Re:Well, I'm one example by nacturation · · Score: 1

      He did not say how many jobs would be going to India but it appeared that he would be treated well (rental cat provided, nice apartment, etc. while in Detroit).

      Wow, you know you're living the high life when you get a rental cat as part of your compensation!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    38. Re:Well, I'm one example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, because that's exactly what happened with the manufacturing industry...it'll be moving back here any day now...

    39. Re:Well, I'm one example by perlchild · · Score: 1

      MSN is partnering with sympatico for dsl in Canada, so it seems that a similar, yet not identical, situation will happen for MSN US than MSN CA.

    40. Re:Well, I'm one example by gabe824 · · Score: 1

      I am one too. Well I'm a employee of a Canadian call center outsourcing customer service for a large american telecom. If you want to order local phone service or have questions about your local phone bill and live in NJ, IL, GA, MN, NC, SC, MA, MD, KS, AR, or OK, there is a decent chance your talking to someone north of the boarder. All day I get comment from customers thrilled to have reached an "American" and not some foreigner.

    41. Re:Well, I'm one example by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
      I believe the billing system company Convergys also has a major call centre in Kamloops.

      Not to be picky, but at around 80,000 to 90,000 people, Kamloops is more of a small city than a small town. Mind you, it is a little isolated... about 300km east-north-east of Vancouver, with mainly mountain peaks in between.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    42. Re:Well, I'm one example by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      The further insulated your developers and support staff are from the user base, the less effective they become.

      This must work on some kind of a polynomial curve, because the reverse is also true, that the closer developers get to the user base, the less work they get done because the fucking users won't bloody well leave them alone.

      I know that personally as a sysadmin working for a small ISP that insists that I also do technical support to cut costs, it takes at least four times longer to do any non-trivial task because I'm being constantly interrupted.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    43. Re:Well, I'm one example by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      A sysadmin working for a small ISP is NOT a developer. He does not make software for users, he makes software for himself to streamline his own tasks. I should know, as I'm also a sysadmin for a small ISP. I get user calls sometimes (not often, we don't advertise and only take knowledgable customers) -- but I expect to be interrupted thusly, because answering user questions is my job. Performing management tasks is secondary and not as important in terms of driving revenue as keeping customers happy (though certainly, they won't be happy if their backups are corrupt or the mail server is down).

      A developer shouldn't have to worry about answering user questions outside of prearranged meeting situations. Customers don't even have my phone number -- when they call with questions, they're forward to our tech support group. Our tech support group is ALSO multitasked to save costs, but it includes members of the QA, product management and sales teams. This frees up development to create the products that drive revenue, but also forces QA, sales and product management to maintain intimate knowledge of the products they are testing/selling/researching.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    44. Re:Well, I'm one example by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      He does not make software for users, he makes software for himself to streamline his own tasks.

      No, I make *servers* for users. The trick here is that systems administration is indeed a complex task like development that, should it be interrupted, is hard to get back into. Should it be interrupted 40 times a day by users wanting to set up their e-mail and people who can't spell their password right, nothing gets done.

      This is why developers are shielded from their users at least somewhat, and that they only interact with them rarely (and speaking to your customers once or twice a week is indeed "rarely", from my point of view).

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    45. Re:Well, I'm one example by Igneous · · Score: 1

      At their Winnipeg (pop. 650,000) center Convergys Customer Management Group pays $9.15 for customer service agents and $10.00 for tech support agents (starting wages in Canadian dollars). They do customer service for FedEx and Time Warner cable, and tech support for FedEx and Comcast cable.

      AT&T WorldNet customer service and tech support was recently moved from Winnipeg to India (possibly Bangalore). This was because WorldNet was no longer willing to pay for such high-cost workers.

      Although Convergys has grown significantly in Canada over the past five years, their current expansion focus is in India. Their near-shoring was pretty much an instant success, while their offshoring is taking much more time and effort. Time will tell whether the extra time and effort pay off for them.

    46. Re:Well, I'm one example by blix5 · · Score: 1

      I've been in the IT industry for 10 years, and most of the friends and associates that I've known in that time can tell you that the US didn't have a techie shortage.

      Companies either didn't know what they wanted, or they wanted to hire skilled people at unskilled wages.

      The good news is that as non-Microsoft platforms continue to grow, US companies will be more apt to hire people that actually know what they're doing beyond drag-and-drop development.

    47. Re:Well, I'm one example by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      If you lived here, and you experienced the attitudes of the locals, you'd realise we're still a "small town". Maybe, in ten years, when we hit the magical 100,000, we'll move into city status. :)

    48. Re:Well, I'm one example by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Many US-based companies, ISP's and the like, farm out their support to canadian call centers.

      Why ? Because we're not a bunch of disrespectful pricks.

      Thank you.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  2. And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am not willing to move north to get a job that pays 40% less than what is available here. I'd rather work outside my field.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      paid 40% and taxed 50%!

    2. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a Canadian, I have to say that I'm not here for the money. Yeah, it's a little disturbing that I get paid much less than an American does, but it doesn't bother me THAT much. What really matters to me is that I get paid to do something that I enjoy. And I happen to really enjoy the practice of programming. I will go to where I can get the job I will enjoy the most, regardless of pay, so long as I have enough to take care of myself.

    3. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if the cost of living was close to 40% less?

      Think of Canada as another state. Except that while they tax you in Canada, they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

    4. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Peale · · Score: 1

      But if the cost of living is less as well, it'd be a lateral move. But hey, if you can find work that pays the same outside your field, go for it.

    5. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by dontspellsogood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But pay $6,000 for a night in the hospital?

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
    6. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any canadians want to comment on the cost of living? 40% may not be that big of a hit if it's cheap to live. Try buying a house in Westchester, NY.

    7. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You also have to consider that while getting paid less, your cost of living could also be drastically reduced in Canada as well. I used to live in LA and made double than what I do now, but after moving back to Canada, my cost of living is 1/3 of what it used to be. Plus here I don't have to be paranoid about not using ATMs after dark. Of course, I will be a bit biased since I am Canadian.

    8. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by count0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the cost of living is also around 40% less (or close enough - sometimes less, sometimes more). Toronto and Vancouver are more spendy than Ottawa, Montreal, or Calgary. But you can have a very nice lifestyle making 40% of a New York or San Jose salary in those three cities. Even more so in places like Edmonton, Regina, or Winnipeg.

      One challenge would be paying any US debt load (student loan, US car payment, credit card debt) with Canadian dollars.

    9. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ploppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You miss the point. The choice is between earning 40%+ less doing something else, or earning 40% less by moving north. The high paying IT job is gone.

    10. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      I am not willing to move north to get a job that pays 40% less than what is available here. I'd rather work outside my field.

      Even if the cost of living was 60% cheaper?

      (I have no idea of the stats, but moving to a different country that pays less money when directly converted doesn't necessarily mean you'll get a lower standard of life - there are a lot of other factors)

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    11. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, the standard of living in canada is at *least* as good as in the US.....

    12. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

      Is Paul Martin's budget out yet?

    13. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never understood this. How is our standard of living lower? We have everything you do.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    14. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by GopherKhan · · Score: 1

      Hell, moving north is much more feasible than moving to India or the Philippines. These days any job's a good job, you know.

    15. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think folks are missing the point -- your employer would pay 40% less thanks to the relative strength of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar, combined with reduced health care premiums (most healthcare expenses are covered by the government here).

      Meanwhile, you would enjoy an equivalent salary in Canadian dollars. A pint of beer is $5 on both sides of the border, and once you start living in Canada, you wouldn't feel like you were making less.

    16. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Qamelian · · Score: 1

      Welcome to "Lives of the Rich and Masochistic". For some of us, the satisfaction of enjoying the job outweighs any financial benefit. What's the point in making a lot of extra money when working at a job you hate forces you to spend it on therapy for stress?

    17. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you for keeping that massive Chinese navy off the west coast at bay. Otherwise we'd need to dispatch our canoe death squad and vicious trained polar bears.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    18. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by madprogrammer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly... My guess is that that "40% less" is not 40% less than all states... just the ones that pay a lot, like California.

      But since the cost of living is so high in L.A. and San Fran things start to work out. From what I've seen living in both countries is that dollar for dollar many items are the same price or at least close. An American $499 Dell is Canadian $550. An American $2.00 loaf of bread is $1.00 Canadian.

      My standard of living will not be changing too much when I move from the States to Canada. Even though I'm taking a pay cut.

    19. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      Much lower standard of living then the US? Do you have anything to back that up? Canada was ranked 4th in the UN's best place to live ranking.

    20. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Interesting
      KPMG (the accounting firm) rated Edmonton as the #1 place to live in the western hemisphere as far as quality of living, tax levels, housing prices and job market.

      It's no wonder why we're home to Bioware, Quicken, and large support centers for General Electric and Hewlett Packard.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    21. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1, Insightful
      A lot of objections, some of which are smarter than others:

      1) The choice is NOT fast food or another programming job. I am a smart person, as are most of the programmers. I can easily get another tech job in NYC paying 20% less than I make now. It might not be as nice a job, but it is a tech job. The economy in the US is not bad, but not HORRIBLE. If you can't get another tech job if you are willing to take a 30% pay cut, then you are either a well trained moron, or getting WAY over-paid.

      2) I am young and put a large percentage of my paycheck into the bank for retirement funds, etc. 40% less pay check with 40% less costs of living, STILL COSTS ME 40% OF MY RETIREMENT FUNDS. If you have enough brains to save money for retirement, you have to be pretty stupid to take the 40% less job even with the cost of living reduction.

      3)Living in NYC has it's own advantages. Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums, never have to drive the death machine we call an automobile, can go out drinking without worrying about how I am getting home, can see world class plays, theater, etc. etc. etc. Living in Canada would be a marked decrease in my Life Style. It might be OK for people that don;t care about this kind of stuff, but not for me.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    22. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by yamla · · Score: 1

      Do you have any evidence showing that the cost of living in Canada is 40% less? Last time I checked, I found that the cost of living was actually pretty similar, despite the fact that Canadian programmers tend to get paid less in Canadian dollars than U.S. programmers get in U.S. dollars.

      I'm not saying that the cost of living is not much less in Canada, only that the last time I checked, I could not find evidence of this.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    23. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but shot 96% less. Works for me.

    24. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Not standard of living. You mean -Cost- of living.

      Quite differnt things. Standard of living is about the same (bleeding edge technology may be more avaliable in the US, but most other things are widely avaliably in both countries).

      Cost of Living is much lower in Canada on average. I'm sure that in some places of the US the Cost of Living is very similar to Canada however. Just not in the high tech areas (mainly because of property prices in those areas... what are you people thinking, trying to jam so many into such a small area?).

    25. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by adonoman · · Score: 1

      For example, here in Winnipeg Manitoba, I pay $650 CDN a month for a newly renovated two-bedroom 950 square-foot apartment, and that's high for Winnipeg because I live close to the University. I hear stories of what people pay in some American cities, and I'm glad I live here.

    26. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "keeping that massive Chinese navy off the west coast at bay"

      You bin to Canada recently?

      Seems like Vancouver _is_ the Chinese navy. Or at least the new home for all the kids&daughters of the chinese military elite. Seems higher chinese population than cupertino / san jose.

    27. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Oilers!

    28. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by iMMersE · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't have as many murders. Life just isn't as much fun if you know you're going to get home safely ...

      --
      codegolf.com - smaller *is* better.
    29. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      some might be smarter than others, but yours aren't.

      1) Your 40% cut does not have a linear connection to cost or standard of living, nor to disposable income. You have to consider two jobs in two places with full information about taxation (marginal taxation in Canada is not as far from US as most seem to thing, btw), cost of goods, etc.

      2) Now you are talking about disposable income, which you get to decide to save. This also involves tax law (e.g. 401(c) vs. RRSP) etc.

      3) Montreal, for example, is one of the top cities in North America for culture. No, it isn't NYC, but neither is any other US city.

    30. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ViolentGreen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What really matters to me is that I get paid to do something that I enjoy.

      Yes. That truely is what matters. Am I correct in supposing the cost of living in Canada is similar to that of the Northern US? I'm sure it is significantly less then tech-heavy places like California.

      If US companies are considering outsourcing to Canada, it seems like they could try other places in the US where they could hire people for less then in California or NY.

      I live in Lexington, Ky which, despite being in a state with an agriculture based economy, has a fairly large tech community. Some big name companies here are IBM and Lexmark (LEXmark LEXington.) I read somewhere where Lexington is ranked 9th in US cities in percentages of persons with at least a Bachelors degree. It's a city where you can live lavishly or have a quiet and comfortable life. Hey, I've even seen Shatner in a coffee shop here.

      I think there are still lots of opportunities in the US before the Canada route is taken. There are places other then the West Coast available for programming/tech jobs.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    31. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ikea5 · · Score: 1
      Think of Canada as another state. Except that while they tax you in Canada, they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

      Just outsorce the 'defence' to Canadian. there, 40% saving. No, wait...

    32. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by kyjello · · Score: 1

      I believe that Canada ranks higher than the U.S. in probably every U.N. development report That I can remember.

      I can honestly say every time I go to the United States I am always finding myself counting the days until I can come back to Canada.

      Check this out if you want to know more about how Canada stacks up.

      --
      kyjello is too damn smooth to make a signature.
    33. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by iMMersE · · Score: 3, Funny

      You bin to Canada recently?

      I tried to bin Canada last week, but it was way too big, and the garbage collectors wouldn't take it.

      --
      codegolf.com - smaller *is* better.
    34. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Any canadians want to comment on the cost of living? 40% may not be that big of a hit if it's cheap to live. Try buying a house in Westchester, NY.

      I wonder if we can get companies to "outsource" to Wisconsin. Cost of living is very low ($50,000 a year goes a long way!) and quality of life is very high. I know Madison has attracted a few large corporations because of the lower cost and high number of "smart people" from the UW.

      Of course, I've often wondered why companies think they have to have their building in downtown New York or smack dab in San Francisco. Just keep a "main office" there for valuation reasons, and have all the real work done somewhere else.

    35. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Qamelian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cost of living varies from one part of the country to another, but in general it's not bad. For consumer goods, most prices are reasonable when compared to the US. Same for housing. Strangely, when I was in New England last year, I was surpised to find that it was almost 35% cheaper to buy audio CDs at home in Nova Scotia than to buy them in the US where I would have thought the larger population would have caued the CDs to be at least a bit cheaper. Instead I found discs that were priced around $18.99US (about $26CDN) the same CDs at home were selling for $15-$18CDN.

    36. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      I have to imagine the parent poster meant to say "cost of living" rather than standard. I love to visit Canada every so often, and never once thought I was traveling through the third world.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    37. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by provolt · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the massive inferiority complex you would need to develop. :-)

    38. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez id say your getting ripped. they are only paying you 650 to live in Winnipeg?

    39. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Rei · · Score: 1

      I think I'll add the reason why a lot of people I know would be willing to move to our neighbor to the north. Three words:

      "Four More Years".

      You know, if you Canadians relaxed your immigration policy for Americans, you'd get a lot more of the more liberal-minded of us to move up there. Of course, with neocons firmly in charge of America then, the US would launch a dozen more attacks around the world, ending with an ill-fated attack on, say, Belgium, but hey, at least you wouldn't be involved. :)

      --
      Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
    40. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by mangledspine · · Score: 0

      Considering that tech-related jobs nowadays don't grow on trees, would you really give up the opportunity to have a job you may love but get paid a little less?

    41. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Think of Canada as another state.

      Uhm no, I think of them as competition. And judging from their taxes, outsourcing to Canada is a non-starter. It will take awhile for the PHB's to figure this out, and I'm sure some outsourcing will take place. After it becomes empirically obvious to the least astute holder of an MBA the business will either be pulled back into the US or placed offshore in Albonia.

      And it's Canuckistan, not Canada.

    42. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RLW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Especially snow. Better beer, but way lots more snow. The summers are nice there but winter comes with way lots more snow. Did I mention the snow ? If you like lots of snow most of the year then Canada is a really nice place to live. Not too crowded, laid back, good beer, but lots of snow. Somewhere I came across a statistic about how something like 80 or 90 percent of Canadians live with in 60 or 80 miles of it's southern border: something about even lots more snow further north. I figure with global warming Canada will be a really nice place to live year round in about 200 years.

    43. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Zareste · · Score: 1

      they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

      Gyahaha, I can't be offended when it's painfully true. But even then I'm way too skeptical; there's no way in Hell Canada's scam-tax rate is that much lower than ours.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    44. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      That's the best part about living in Edmonton. I never have to say I live in Calgary ;)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    45. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, I have lived in a few Canadian cities, and as mentioned by others, there is a lot of variation. Vancouver and Toronto are two of the most expensive cities, but I have lived in neither. I currently live in Ottawa, and the house prices are considered extreamly high. A townhome in the 'burbs (so your commute to downtown is like 30 minutes, no traffic jams), nicely outfitted, brand new is about 200,000 (average ish, 1700 sq ft). The same place 3 years ago would be about 150,000. The same home in Edmonton, will run in the 150,000 ish range. You can get homes for less than these numbers for sure, and you can spend more as well. There is one really cool older area in Ottawa that was built in the 60's, that have huge lots (half acre or so), no through traffic, old trees etc, surrounded by "greenspace" (no future development possible) and they go for about 350,000 +/-.

      Real estate is a bargain compared to the major US cities. As mentioned by others, Canada is very similar to the US in most ways, but a little different in others. I would not expect that many Americans would notice much difference in their day to day lives. You would at tax time, and you would after a hospital visit, you certainly would if you wanted to take your Glock out with you. But as far as the normal daily routine, not so much. Fewer people, more natural beauty (the US is beautiful, we just have more areas that haven't been developed yet), a little more laid back. I wouldn't want to live anywhere else, even with the cold, and the taxes. Nothing is perfect, but for me, Canada has a pretty good balance.

      Eh. (couldn't do a whole post without at least one, for authenticity)

    46. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Toronto and Vancouver are more spendy than Ottawa, Montreal, or Calgary. But you can have a very nice lifestyle making 40% of a New York or San Jose salary in those three cities.

      Well thats true in the US also.

      The last time I checked the cost of living comparison for my area (the Hudson Valley area in NY) verse NYC (Manhatten especially) is that 50k a year here is about equivalent to 126k there.

      Now what I've always wondered is how easy is it to have a residence in Canada but work in the US? Make US money but pay taxes and such in Canadian currency. Seems like you could do pretty well that way.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    47. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Yosemite+Sue · · Score: 1

      It depends on where you live ... both in Canada and the US.

      I'm not an expert on the States - I lived in Connecticut for a little over a year, so most of what I know about differences is second-hand. (Some of my colleagues came from different states: Montana, Illinois, California, Tennessee.) It sounds like there are differences, though.

      In terms of Canada, cost of living can vary quite a bit. I'm in Toronto, where a lot of things (like housing) are much higher than in other places I've lived - Saskatoon, Calgary. My husband has lived in Victoria and Vancouver. But there are a lot of factors - gas was cheaper in Alberta than in Saskatchewan. Grocery costs can vary. Etc.

      I think that programmer wages vary widely across Canada, too, so I don't know that "40% less" would be applicable across the board.

      YS.

      --
      "Arrr! The laws of science be a harsh mistress." -- Bender
    48. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I tried to bin Canada last week, but it was way too big, and the garbage collectors wouldn't take it.
      They certainly won't take it while Slashdot has a reference to it.
    49. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Oopsz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums, never have to drive the death machine we call an automobile, can go out drinking without worrying about how I am getting home, can see world class plays, theater, etc. etc. etc. Living in Canada would be a marked decrease in my Life Style.

      Someone's never been to Montréal...

    50. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who is disturbed by the idea that a programmer should move North so that they can get paid %40 less?

      By that reasoning, U.S. programmers should all be flying to India so that they can get paid 80% less instead!

      There is a good reason that we have so many Canadians in the U.S. Check the nationalities of many broadcasters/actors/musicians in the U.S. They didn't head south to get a job so that they could take a 40% paycut, either!

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    51. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Living in Canada, you may be making 40% less, but you cost of living is essentially 40% less as well, and that's including all the taxes and pension plans we pay.

      Consider that a chocolate bar or a can of Coke costs $1cdn here and when across the border the same candy or Coke costs $1usd, that alone accounts for the cost of living savings. Americans can't buy new Canadian cars and import them back to the US because they are cheaper here.

      Granted living in NYC has its advantages, but don't compare a large city such as NYC to some small city in Canada. Compare it to cities like Toronto, and Montreal, where you can do just the same things, and probably experience MORE culture there than in NYC. These are large international cities that host world events such as NYC, and dramatically a lot safer too. No worries of gun toting bandits in Canada.

      - I once went to a sporting goods store in the US, and found stacks and stacks of bullets sitting on the floor without any sort of security with a sign marks "On sale, 25% off all calibre bullets and shotgun shells". Don't they lock up dangerous goods behind secure areas???

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    52. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Shrug. No one will pay 26$ for a CD, but 15-18$ seems reasonable. Don't you think they'd charge 26$US in the states if they could?

    53. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Raagshinnah · · Score: 1
      Think of Canada as another state. Except that while they tax you in Canada, they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

      Yeah, our tax dollars are used to censor radio stations, "reintegrate" pedophiles and people who drink-and-drive, crappy health care(im speaking for Quebec, i havent looked at the other provinces much but it doesnt seem to be that much of a problem in the other ones), horrible education(i can barely speak english) and funding monopolies.

    54. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you can't get another tech job if you are willing to take a 30% pay cut, then you are either a well trained moron, or getting WAY over-paid.


      Either that, or stuck in a dead-end town with no tech companies other than the one that laid you off. "Move to another city/state," you say. Sure, I'd love to; I wasn't not exactly fond of the place I live in when I had a job. Problem is, nobody's interested unless you already live near them. Can't move w/o a job, can't get a job w/o moving (I'm not talking about some minimum wage job that barely pays for food and access to a shower, much less enough money to move out of the hell-hole that is Kansas).
    55. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you aren't invited anyways, just your jobs ;)

      --
      No Comment.
    56. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by His+Shadow · · Score: 1

      If you add up all the numbers, our rates may be significantly higher, but hey, we know how to run elections, and we just fix the damn streets when the money's available without having to have a vote on the matter.

      --

      Fiat Homos et Pereat Theos

    57. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually... you've never been north of the 49th parallel have you? Toronto is in every way a "global city". Montreal is as culturally rich as any city in the world, and oh yeah... they've had public transportation, a good health care system and running water for quite some time now.

    58. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Greedo · · Score: 1

      3)Living in NYC has it's own advantages. Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums, never have to drive the death machine we call an automobile, can go out drinking without worrying about how I am getting home, can see world class plays, theater, etc. etc. etc. Living in Canada would be a marked decrease in my Life Style. It might be OK for people that don;t care about this kind of stuff, but not for me.

      You've obviously never visited Toronto, or Montreal or any of the large cities up here.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    59. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by rikkards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cost of living is less.. if you are getting paid in American dollars. It appears that the major companies that work on both side of the border in general seem to be starting to price their products the same just in the countries currency i.e $10Cdn = $10US. Cuts down on accounting issues.

      However my trips to the states have shown that getting premium liquors (i.e scotch but not beer) is cheaper in Canada (esp Alberta and NorthWest Territories)

    60. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ploppy · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's where the US perhaps differs to the UK. I couldn't get an IT job paying 20%-30% less in the UK. In the UK when they see a PhD and principal engineer experience, they assume you'll leave at the first opportunity for a better higher paying job.

      In general when companies ask for a 'graduate engineer' (an an example) that's what they want, some-one inexperienced, docile and easily trained to their way of thinking. Its no good being an experienced guy who insists he's happy with the money and the responsibility. They won't believe you.

    61. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Slightly exagerated. Not only do a vast majority of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border, but take a look at a map, the majority of the population lives further south than all of your north western/eastern states (the most southern place in Canada, is actually further south than Californias northern border). Our winter weather on the most part is no different than what Chicago, Buffalo, and Detroit see. If you go way up north, sure you can get the winters that you describe, but almost nobody lives there. Granted, we do not get weather like the southern US, but it is almost the exact same as the norther 1/3 of the US.

    62. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by spuke4000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a software developer in Toronto, my brother is a developer in Sunnyvale, CA. He has 2 years more experience than me, but is comparable in skill and experience. He makes 30-40% more (30% now, but that's because the Canadian dollar is doing better against the $US) and pays 5-10% more for rent. The cost of living is higher in the states, but if you are living in a big city in Canada (Toronto, Ottawa, Vancouver, not so much Montreal) the cost of living isn't that much lower.

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
    63. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Qamelian · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you know absolutely nothing about Canada. If you think you can't get those things in a major Canadian city, you are not only wallowing, but drowning in ignorance.

      I've been to New York several times and have yet to see anything of interest to me that I can't find in Canada.

    64. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by wfeick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Under NAFTA, don't the US and Canada have the same policy towards each other?

      I'm a Canadian who came to the US under the Canada-US free trade agreement (the precursor to NAFTA) and all I had to do was show that I was a Canadian citizan, that I had a degree in one of the listed areas, and that I had a job offer from a US company. I paid a $50 processing fee at the border, and was given a one year work visa renewable indefinitely.

      Admittedly, I came to the US 14 years ago, but I was under the impression things were pretty much the same under NAFTA.

      Is it more difficult than that for US citizens to work in Canada?

    65. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Spankophile · · Score: 1

      I think you mean COST of living. The STANDARD of living is comparable.

    66. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you can tango dance to your hearts content in toronto or montreal just like in NYC. Toronto has the second largest of theatres in North America second only to New York (even more than LA). You can get home by taking cabs, transit and oh yes, get this you can even walk home at 3 in the morning without getting mugged.

      I think your arguement that you cant get culture in Canada doesnt have any real basis.

    67. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Canadians' beady eyes make me paranoid. I'm staying here.

    68. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by infinii · · Score: 1

      3)Living in NYC has it's own advantages. Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums, never have to drive the death machine we call an automobile, can go out drinking without worrying about how I am getting home, can see world class plays, theater, etc. etc. etc. Living in Canada would be a marked decrease in my Life Style. It might be OK for people that don;t care about this kind of stuff, but not for me.

      If you actually like to Tango dance everynight, we probably dont want you here ;) Although, it is legal for your kind to get married in Canada. LOL

      Spend that extra 40% buying 50% more beer because it takes that much to get drunk on your pisswater.
      NYC isn't the only place with taxis. I'm sure we could find you a taxi here in Toronto...if not a helpful Mountie on horseback might give you a ride home.

      Toronto has a thriving theatre district that hosts many world class plays/shows/musicals.

      Don't be so haste to lay judgement until you've actually tried it. Toronto isn't NYC but it's not that far off either. Sure there are many places in Canada that don't have what Toronto offers but then the same can be said about NYC vs. BumFuck, Iowa.

    69. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what are the income taxes like? Doesn't the IRS still want a chop of your income, even if you're working outside the US?

      Yes, I would *almost* move from Portland area up to Whatcom Co., Washington, and work in Vancouver or its suburbs. But Washington has sales tax (and is mulling an income tax. I think all the California transplants miss it).

    70. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Confused · · Score: 1

      > I am a smart person, as are most of the
      > programmers. I can easily get another tech
      > job in NYC paying 20% less than I make now.

      Unfortunately, those tech jobs are held most of the time by smart people, who have actual experience in the job, whereas you're just new to it.

      I'm also certain, that no prospective employer will hold it against you, that not only you have no experience in the new job, you appear also unable to find a job doing what you do best.

      Isn't it wonderful to be smart and know about it?

    71. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Your cost of living is less, but you are paying 50 fricken percent of all your income to the government. That is just insane to me. How in the world can a government think that they are entitled to 50% of _your_ money? Is Canada the highest taxed nation in the world?

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    72. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      40% less problably refers partly to the exchange difference, party to the fact that you have Cali skewing your stats. The cost of living and high average wage makes the average US wage seem much higher. Also cost of living here is much less.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    73. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by HBPiper · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Considering that Vancouver, B.C is the most expensive city to live in in North America, I would have to think that taking a pay cut to move there would be suicidal or at the very least, masochistic.

      --
      "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
    74. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You misunderstand. 40% less for a pension plan is BAD, not good.

      I take 20% of my salary now and save it away. It has grown to about $100,000. If I had a job in Canada, that would mean I would only have $60,000 saved up isntead of $100,000.

      YEs, moving to Canada after you retire makes a lot of sense, but to anyone that is currently saving to retire, it makes FAR more sense to get the higher paying job.

      If I lived in Toronto I could only go tango dancing 5 days a week, not 7. And I would not have choice of Milongas. I would HAVE to own a car, and have to worry about how I am getting home when I am drunk because your public transportation system is not as good as NYC's, especially late at night. You do have some nice plays and museums, but NYC has a slight edge there.

      While in New York City, I have NEVER, NOT ONCE, seen a gun in the hands of anyone except a NYC cop. NYC is currently one of the safest cities in North America, and like you said , you we have to compare Toronto to NYC, not general Canada to general USA.

      Canada is a nice place to retire too, but I wouldn't want to work there.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    75. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      it's not 50% all to one place. it's sorta a 30/20 split between the province (analgous to a state) and the feds. And it's not universly 50%. it's mor elike first 30k is 30% next 30k-40k is 40% and 50k+ is 50%.. thats payign both levels of government and other taxes.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    76. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides defence spending? They spend money on defence up here? Since when?

    77. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 1

      I think you're right-I'm a Canadian in the U.S., and I first got here under the TN-1 (NAFTA) visa. It's a one-year visa, can be renewed unlimited times, and there's no competition or lottery as there is for the H-1 program.

      IIRC, if you're on the list of NAFTA visa jobs (mainly scientific / technical), the procedure for an American to work in Canada is basically the same as it was for me to work here: find an employer willing to sponsor you, and apply at the border. The same should also hold true if you're Mexican and want to do something similar, or if you want to work in Mexico.
    78. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by HBPiper · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, I went and believed a person from B.C. who told me this and now I look it up and much to my chagrin....... It ain't so.

      --
      "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
    79. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      While this is true, I read a book the other day where the author describes how to extract your RRSP (that's Canada's 401k but not tied to your job) by moving to another country (and becoming a full "resident") later in your life and transfering your retirement with only a %15 tax hit. The book then goes on to describ how to setup a corporation in the Camen island and have it "help" you out...

      NOTE: Our Prime Minister owns a shipping company that has all of its ships chartered under the Flag in the Camen island to avoid paying corp taxed! If it's good enough for him, everybody should do this!

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    80. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who is a web graphics contractor. He lives here and has a full time job but makes most his money with the developement work. It's all in US funds. he makes 20k cnd a year at his normal job and 50k a year USD on side projects. He uses his normal job for benifits and can ussually do his project at work (he works at a computer retail outlet managed by his best friend and owned by the father of his best friend). So essentially he makes 66k usd a year while have few expenses.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    81. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Mainstream sports on Slashdot? You guys have been spending too much time with the Sales and Marketing department.

    82. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you come over for a few days, fall in love with the place and take any paycut just to be here...as a side comment, I've been unemployed for over two years and I'm renting next to 2 million dollar penthouses. So just to drive the point home, I have no income and I'm unwilling to move to the suburbs to find a cheaper place to rent...just come and visit, or I'll send you a postcard..they're real.

    83. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Quebec was part of Canada...j/k :)

      When I was living in Ottawa, I worked in Quebec. (got a wicked tax break). Just walking across that bridge you can tell the difference. Quebec is a very different province from all the others.
      They have different laws! Don't turn right on a red or they'll beat your ass, well unless you say something like "Excusez-moi" :)

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    84. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't they lock up dangerous goods behind secure areas??? "

      No we even have kitchen knives and box cutters for sale without waiting periods or background checks. It is a little thing called freedom, maybe someday you will get it.

    85. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 1

      The last time I checked, the tax treaty between the U.S. and Canada was based on residency, so you get taxed in whatever country somebody (not you) decides you live in. It's based on obvious things like where your home address is, but also on where you have a driver's license, etc. And after all that, they still look at how much time you spend in either country. Can't remember how it works exactly, but I believe if you spend more than 6 months a year in one country that's the one you get taxed in.

    86. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by FJ · · Score: 1

      Be careful if you have any kind of debt.

      If you have any debt which will follow you to another area be careful. The cost of living may be less, but your existing credit cards, school, automobile & other debt isn't adjusted. A not-so-close frend of mine moved across the country & didn't take this into account. Suddenly all her school debt which was painful in one area of the country was crushing in another. This can be especially hurtful with high interest credit cards.

      On the other hand, if you have a lot of equity in a house or other property, moving to an area with a lower cost of living can ammount to a nice chunk of change when you sell and pay for the same for less somewhere else.

    87. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Astreja · · Score: 1

      I work part-time IT (25 hours a week) in Winnipeg. With this and other income I have about $1900 CDN to work with every month.

      On this I manage to support three humans, nine cats, a car and a three-storey house. House only cost $45K CDN and is already half paid-off. So it can be done.

    88. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by bouncingbean · · Score: 1

      Actually living here in Victoria on Vancouver Island we experience very little snow, and very mild winters (although it does rain a fair bit in the winter). I think it snowed once last winter and the snow didn't last more than a day or two on the ground. In fact last time we had a reasonable snow fall was in 1996 and that caused panic! Not all of Canada is a snowy waistland, just Alberta. ;)

    89. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      take 20% of my salary now and save it away. It has grown to about $100,000. If I had a job in Canada, that would mean I would only have $60,000 saved up isntead of $100,000.

      I don't know for sure, but I'm assuming that reduced savings for a pension plan is because it's being paid into a required, state run plan - like U.S. Social <snicker> Security. As the entire world is now learning, this plan works great when there is an increasing birth rate, or high immigration rate of very young people, but since birth rates in developed countries are falling these plans, well, aren't so good...

      The baby boom is not a US only phenominom, as far as I've seen, everybody involved with WWII experienced it.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    90. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by dswartze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After things like your pay that you take home, the cost may be lower, there's far more stuff that the government pays for up here. Which seems like something else, with the government providing more services than in the States, does that mean these companies would have to pay less for benefits? Problem is you get taxed quite a bit more than you guys do down there. All in all, I welcome these american jobs, I'm 3 years from graduating, and would like to be able to find a job when I'm done school.

    91. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      25 caliber--that's not dangerous, you pansey!

    92. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by reidbold · · Score: 1

      What should you do with drunk drivers and pedophiles? Life sentence? Give them no support so that they run a high risk of repeat offense? Or helping them go live normal lives?

      And the CRTC is shit, everyone knows this, but I suspect the shutting down of that radio station will be overturned since every one is (rightly) up in arms.

      --
      -Reid
    93. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      "Living in Canada, you may be making 40% less, but you cost of living is essentially 40% less as well, and that's including all the taxes and pension plans we pay."

      I think that you missed the OPs point. The salary vs. cost of living equality only works if you spend all your money. If you are saving a significant part of your salary, then the net amount of dollars saved is less if you are paid less but saving the equivalent percentage. Again, that might not matter if the saved dollars are spent in the same market where they were saved, but if you choose to retire to a less expensive market, you are much better off having accumulated 40% more while living/earning in the more expensive market.

      BTW, bullets are not dangerous. It's the moron holding a gun that can be dangerous. And not everyone holding a gun is a moron. Maybe we should require backgound checks and a license to own or carry a hockey stick. It seems like the most damage done in the NHL by violent acts with hockey sticks occur when the vancouver team is on the ice.

    94. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      Er, I have to say that the high tech job market in Edmonton is fairly shitty. There's jobs, but there's also massive competition for it. There are *way* too many techies for the number of jobs here. While Edmonton is cheap to live in, and is a great city all round, that's not very useful if you're unemployed.

    95. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're a moron.

    96. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian I like to think of the USA as the 11th province.

    97. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

      Apparently KPMG hasn't heard of winter.

      --

      Remain calm! All is well!
    98. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by scowling · · Score: 1

      Not even close.

      Look, I live in Victoria, right across the strait. I know for a fact that rents are comparable, but that gas and food are cheaper in Vancouver. Thus, Victoria is more expensive than Vancouver.

      But I also know for a fact that rents are so much higher in San Francisco than either Victoria or Vancouver that nothing else matters in the equation.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    99. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey ho! I come from a small town in northern Ontario. We are talking way past Timmins. For those who need a geography lesson, that would be a 10 - 11 hour drive pretty much directly north.

      There is a fairly signifcant population up there, not comparable to the big cities, but essentialy zero crime, big tax breaks, etc. If you love nature, it's the place to be!

      And no my home town is not above the tree line. (You'd be suprised how many times I've heard that from Torontonians.)

    100. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't want *you*, we want your *job*.

    101. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Question is, what do you get for it? I (in Germany)pay quite a lof of taxes compared to US, but I get decent health care (and believe it or not, numerous studies have shown that public health care delivers more bang for the buck, due to lack of marketing expenses, etc.), decent public schooling and universities, etc. Plus, I don't have to be scared of an army of poor people.
      And while the things I list above are mentioned every time taxes are discussed, one thing is not: I save a tremendous amount of time, because I don't have to care for every frickin' detail privately, when in fact it is better taken care of socially, like health care. When I think how much time I have wasted choosing a mobile phone company (and in the end finding out that it's all the same), I shudder to think how much more time I would have to waste looking for health insurance. Ok, I have an additional private health insurance because I like luxury when choosing doctors and medicine, but I can sleep calm, knowing that my basic needs are taken care of.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    102. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      what I've always wondered is how easy is it to have a residence in Canada but work in the US? Make US money but pay taxes and such in Canadian currency.
      Then you would proably have to pay taxes here as well. I am not certain of that though. I am orginally from just outside of Philadelphia and if you worked in the city of Philadelphia, you paid a "Philly Tax", even if you did not live in the city. I now live just outside of Orlando and work in Orlando, and the tax situation is much better here. No state tax!
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    103. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      >> Don't you think they'd charge 26$US in the states if they could?

      This question mark DOES NOT BELONG!!

    104. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sadly, you are correct. It is a real problem here. The city is swiftly becoming divided over it - there is a lot of anti-Chinese resentment in Vancouver, and not without reason. They often seem to think our laws do not apply to them, and apply the same sorts of corrupt methods they used in China here. We are sort of a naive country, and tend to be overly trusting. The Chinese have taken massive advantage of that. I really wish they would leave.

    105. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by scowling · · Score: 2, Informative

      50%? Uh, no.

      I just got my paycheque. My income tax deduction was 20.097%, and I have extra taken off to ensure that I won't owe at the end of the year.

      I'm a technical worker, and my income is higher than the median income, nationally.

      Even if I paid GST and PST on every dollar I spent, my total tax rate could not be higher than 34.597%, logically, given 7% GST and 7.5% GST. Sure, there are those hidden taxes, such as on gas or liquour, but I think it all balances out. My tax rate is not more than 35%.

      I have read that in Norway it is possible to be taxed at a rate that is higher than your income, so I suspect that their median tax rate is hgiher than Canada's.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    106. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one point (no idea if this is still true) the 'British Properties' in Vancouver were the most expensive real estate area in North America: that may have been what your person was thinking of.

      This never had much to do with the costs in the rest of the city.

    107. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RobinH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly... My guess is that that "40% less" is not 40% less than all states... just the ones that pay a lot, like California.

      Try using the International Salary Calculator, it's handy. According to that, if you made $80,000 USD in San Francisco, you'd need to make just over $60,000 USD in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (a.k.a. "Silicon Valley North") to enjoy the same standard of living. Also, Ottawa is one of the top 5 most expensive places to live in Canada.

      The biggest difference, of course, is that housing is cheaper in Canada, and so is food. You save a LOT on your medical expenses, since Americans spend on average $5400 USD per year on medical expenses, and Canadians only spend about $3500 on average, (if I remember correctly), but get better care than the average American, though I suppose not as nice as the richest.

      Also, depending on the province you live in, you can save a lot of money if they have non-profit government run auto insurance. As well, automobiles themselves are cheaper, even ones built on the same assembly line. If you want to check, go to gm.com and do a "build your own vehicle", then do the same exact thing on gmcanada.com, and compare the final MSRPs. You have to do the conversion for the exchange, but it's much cheaper in Canada, even with the higher tax rate.

      Gas is more expensive in Canada (about 25% higher, depending) due to taxes, but the cities are smaller, so you tend to spend less time commuting. Other things taxed more are alcohol and cigarettes, but that's supposed to help pay for the health care. Might as well be the drinkers and smokers that carry the burden there, eh? :-)

      Food is cheaper in Canada, but clothing is more expensive. Electronics are more expensive, but you can always get a buddy to pick something up for you in the U.S. at cheaper prices.

      Broadband internet access is generally wider spread in Canada, and cheaper, because Canadians are more urban than our American counterparts.

      Income tax itself isn't that much different anymore, though it used to be. I know for certain, since I have to file both. I'm a computer engineer, and I find that I would pay the same in either country, within a couple hundred dollars. Sales tax, of course, is higher in Canada.

      If you're right leaning, you can always move to Alberta, which is a booming wild west place. If you'd prefer the government pay your way, there's always the east coast, and if you're a greenpeace member, there's always the west coast. If you're an accountant, then you'll be at home in Ontario, but Quebec's always close by for those big let-your-hair-down parties. In particular, if you can't shovel snow, Toronto's the place for you, because if it ever snows more than 3 cm, they'll declare a state of emergency and call the army in to shovel your driveway for you.

      Just to be fair... Manitoba's population density is 1.9 people per square kilometre and if your dog runs away there, you can still see him running 3 days later, and Saskatchewan is a cooler version of Arizona (dog thing also applies, but the dog will probably be eaten alive by grasshoppers by the 3rd day).

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    108. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Sepper · · Score: 1

      I could not find evidence of this.

      Someone posted this. Get you a good idea of price range.

      Of course it's all just numbers... Your experience may vary...

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    109. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Raagshinnah · · Score: 1
      What should you do with drunk drivers and pedophiles? Life sentence? Give them no support so that they run a high risk of repeat offense? Or helping them go live normal lives?

      Higher sentences for offenders. When a pedophile ends up with a 900$ fine, or 40 hours of community service, you can't expect others to be scared of doing the same thing. I don't know about you, but i don't think it's normal that someone who got caught drinking and driving 9 times is still freely roaming around like any other citizen.

      As for the overturning of the CRTC's decision, i wouldn't be too sure about that, this is quebec after all, where most politicians and journalists prefer to keep quiet about the recent events instead of pushing aside their different opinions and fighting for what is right. A lot of people are happy that CHOI will disappear, since it was one of the only radio stations who didn't have an extreme left pro-union speech(hence most bloc people not doing anything). The same goes for the other radio stations, do you think they'll do anything? The CRTC is helping them by removing the only competitor heh...

    110. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by mikael · · Score: 1

      I am not willing to move north to get a job that pays 40% less than what is available here. I'd rather work outside my field.

      For me, it depends on the quality of life; Size of house (backyard/rooms/basement) that I can buy, combined with the cost of items such as computers and the proximity to good schools.

      If I get half the salary while computers cost the same or even twice as much, then forget it.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    111. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by da_foz · · Score: 1

      Many other people have mentioned the lower cost of living in Canada. A couple of other points which you should remember, yes we are taxed more, but we have FREE HEALTH CARE. That alone can make up a very large part of the difference. Also, depending on where you live, most parts of Canada are considered much safer then comparable sized cities in the US. The level of crime (violent crimes ie that use guns) is much much lower. There is much more to look at then the simple fast that you get paid less. You have to look at what you are getting for your money.

    112. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a saying: your freedom ends where my nose begins. In other words my rights overrule your rights in my space. I'd say your guns and bullets have the potential to invalid my space so should be regulated like crazy.

      Its a little thing called caring about others, maybe someday you will get it.

    113. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by pszuch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had to register just to rebutt the safety comment here. While NYC has done a remarkable job in lowering its crime rate (down 80% in a few years), it is still nowhere near Toronto. The five boroughs murder rate of 70/million is still 3x higher than torontos 24/million. The same holds true for the national averages. http://www.primetimecrime.com/Recent/Sun%20BC%20ra nks.htm

    114. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Why would geeks fear winter? It's not like most of us would miss the outdoor summer sports for half the year.

      Wait.. did I say that winter in Edmonton is half the year? Oh my...

      Bork!

    115. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Might not take that long- if some of the climateologists are right, we could be raising Oranges in Oregon within 20 years. Of course, that's only if we can find the water for the trees- maybe in the Wilamette Valley, but the change in climate is going to make the eastern desert totally unbearable.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    116. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Consider that a chocolate bar or a can of Coke costs $1cdn here and when across the border the same candy or Coke costs $1usd, that alone accounts for the cost of living savings.

      You must be a sugar fanatic.

      Seriously.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    117. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by The0retical · · Score: 1

      Not to correct you or be insulting or anything but the standard of living is measured by how much money is REQUIRED to maintain a certain type of life style. Standard of living costs vary even within cities in the US, example being its cheaper to live in Mississippi than it is to live in Uptown Manhattan. Please check into this before insulting me next time. Please?

    118. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      It's no wonder why we're home to ...

      And this fat bastard.

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    119. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Magic5Ball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I correct in supposing the cost of living in Canada is similar to that of the Northern US? I'm sure it is significantly less then tech-heavy places like California.

      Not as such. Just as there is cost of living diversity among states and cities in the U.S., there are differences among provinces and even cities therein.

      Here in Alberta (debt-free province, no provincial sales tax, top 3 IT hubs in Canada), cost of living and wages are approximately 10-15 per cent less than in Toronto, Ontario. However, services like education can be up to 50 per cent cheaper than in Ontario or BC. Within Alberta, prices for many consumer goods and services are about 10-15 per cent cheaper in Edmonton than in Calgary, while the total cost of a four year degree costs about $1,500 more per student than it does in Calgary (yet students pay approximately the same in tuition). In both Edmonton and Calgary, it is possible for one to live comfortably on approximately $US 11,000 per year gross, and still be called a yuppie.

      Interestingly, Edmonton is always in demand for computer tech people with experience in the oil industry while Calgary seems to have a bit of a glut of such individuals at the moment. Some combination of the three hour drive between the cities, and the different cultures is appearently keeping the natural solution from emerging.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    120. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by abigor · · Score: 1

      I make $90 000 a year, and I don't have a 50% tax rate. Where on earth do you get your figures?

      The cost of living is less here. It is safe, the roads are fixed (not like the nightmares I had to deal with in New Jersey), and we don't let 25% of our population go without medical care. It seems worth it to pay a bit more in taxes when the reward is a better society.

    121. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't live in the city dude. There have been 2 shootings in the 25 years where I've lived in small-town Ohio. One was an idiot hunter who shot another hunter who he thought was a deer, the other was a man who shot his wife for cheating on him.

      Neither was exactly a "random act of violence" which is what you are probably worried about.

      People kill people...anywhere...with anything.

    122. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Cerberus9 · · Score: 1

      take 20% of my salary now and save it away. It has grown to about $100,000. If I had a job in Canada, that would mean I would only have $60,000 saved up instead of $100,000.

      If you spend your retirement in Canada as well then you haven't lost any ground at all. With one of the highest costs of living in the world, the US isn't exactly a magnet for foreign retirees, unless they were wealthy enough to have a summer house in France and a beach house in Florida already.

    123. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by The0retical · · Score: 1

      I did it again, I did mean cost not standard, thank you to those that corrected me not those that insulted

    124. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Why is that? It is a question.

    125. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by skarmor · · Score: 1

      I take 20% of my salary now and save it away. It has grown to about $100,000. If I had a job in Canada, that would mean I would only have $60,000 saved up isntead of $100,000.

      But you wouldn't need as much - so it pretty much balances out...

      YEs, moving to Canada after you retire makes a lot of sense, but to anyone that is currently saving to retire, it makes FAR more sense to get the higher paying job.

      As long as you don't mind living in NYC - home of the $4 pizza slice and the $20 cocktail...

      If I lived in Toronto I could only go tango dancing 5 days a week, not 7. And I would not have choice of Milongas.

      Those of us with a less voracious appetite for tango dancing are ok with that.

      I would HAVE to own a car, and have to worry about how I am getting home when I am drunk because your public transportation system is not as good as NYC's, especially late at night.

      This is true if by "especially late at night" you mean "only late at night". When I was living in Montreal however we didn't worry much about the Metro shutting down at 1am - everyone lived within acceptable walking distance from the clubs..

    126. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Dr.Zong · · Score: 2, Informative

      In particular, if you can't shovel snow, Toronto's the place for you, because if it ever snows more than 3 cm, they'll declare a state of emergency and call the army in to shovel your driveway for you.

      Oh, it would be so much funnier if it weren't true! Good ol' Mel!!! And I must say, it wasn't really that bad, ok, my car had some issues getting up this one hill on the way to class, but seriously... CBC - Toronto Calls in the Army

      --

      Party?!? What kind of party is this? Where's the damn keg?
      Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
    127. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ahhh... but try Calgary. Filled with big oil companies, has one of the lowest costs of living in the US or Canada.

      I make 40% less here than I did in Houston, but my quality of life is almost identical. On top of that, while I didn't save much in Houston, I save a lot every month here.

      Plus, you know... not in Texas. w00t.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    128. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      But you probably forgot to include transportation costs.

      I live in NYC. Costs per month for a 950 sqft apt could be around $1,200 in a nice neighborhood. But that neighborhood comes with a subway and bus system that is reliable and works 24 hours.

      I pay $70 a month for subways+bus, and maybe another $30 for taxis.

      Total cost for transportation + apartement = $1,300.

      How much do you pay for your car? Include everything - car payments, parking, maintance, gasoline, insurance. I bet your transportation + apartment costs are pretty close to mine.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    129. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by npross · · Score: 1
      People from BC are always telling people about how bad the weather is... how expensive it is...

      They constantly say things like: "Well the weather is beautiful now but this is abnormal for this time of year."

      The real truth is they want to keep it all to themselves. I've spent a total of 6 weeks in BC in the past two years on numerous trips and its all lies.

      The place is amazing.
    130. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the flapping heads that freak me out.

    131. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

      It's not the taxes, silly, it's the healthcare premiums. Since medicare is universal and federally-funded, they're much lower here for employers. Oh, and corporate taxes are generally lower here too!

      --
      Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
    132. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I work for an ISP in a rural area. The town I live in has about 10,000 people. I can get a 2000sq ft home on an acre of land to rent for $400 month. My $35k-40k a year goes a long way. Its peanuts for what I should be getting paid, but I get a good raise often enough that I will be making much more than that in 5 years time. In Toronto, I paid $1300/mo for a small 2 bedroom apt, and the requirements that they ask for in the city are crazy. You need a $40k education, plus $10k in certs to get a $30k job in Toronto. Its a scam. I gladly accept a relatively low wage in return for nice comfortable country living.

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    133. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think you'd stand a better chance of seeing Shatner in Canada, eh?

    134. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, the US basically has national health care, they just don't call it that. Low income people can get treatment for most conditions at county hospitals. There is usually a long wait, and it's not the absolute best medical care, but from what I've heard, it's not much different than the national systems in countries such as Canada and the UK. You're best off having insurance, but they won't let you die on the street just because you don't.

    135. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand. "Free Trade" in America means free trade by example. It's overtly a policy with China (which seems to have been working until Clinton bombed the embassy in Belgrade), but not so overtly with countries that were traditionally more open markets, like Canada, and the EU bloc.

    136. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian, I don't care for that fact that workers here always get paid so much less than our American counter parts. Canada is not a third-world country -- I'd like to think we can compete on the basis of having an equally skilled and dedicated workforce as our American counterparts. Not because we can be exploited as low-wage serfs.

      Yet the pattern in Canada since free-trade has been for virtually ALL successful Canadian companies to be sold to US owners -- our wages stay low, and the profits flow south to the American ruling class. Average American workers loose jobs (and Canadian workers that were bucking the trend and actually doing better than their American counterparts lost their jobs too -- mad race to the bottom).

      I think Americans need a law limiting the wage difference relative to the equivalent American worker for any company wishing to sell their products in the US. Canadians need to bring back the hangman to deal the traitorous bastards that sold us our country out in the first place (can't blame the USA for this one).

    137. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gurps_npc · · Score: 0
      Statisics lie very badly.

      U.S. constantly ranks last.... if you don't examine the numbers closely.

      Here is a sample.

      The United States has one of the WORST infant mortality rates... if you include infants born to teenage mothers.

      Planned Parenthood did two studies. They found out that if you ignored infants born to teenage mothers, for both the US and all other countries, the US ranked as one of the 5 BEST infant mortality rates. But our infant mortality rates for teenage mothers are so bad it drops us down to the bottom of the rankings.

      Basically, what happens in the U.S. is we get both the best and the worst. It works out to be average, but ONLY if you include the poorest people in the U.S., some of whom are releatively recent immigrants, others are illegal immigrants.

      If you just employ standard statsitical techniques (Just like the olympics, ignore the lowest and the highest scores), then the US is far superior in it's rankings.

      I, and most of the people on Slashdot, are not in the bottom 5%.Those statistics are not that helpfull to us, and I would not use them.

      The US is a land of extremes.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    138. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by skarmor · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that they would be paying anywhere near $650 for their car (yes, including all the operational costs). That is, if they even have a car - it is quite possible to live without a car in many cities.

      But even if they were paying $650/month for a car they are buying the freedom that you don't get from public transportation. The ability to get out of the city - to go camping, hiking, canoeing, climbing at no additional transportation costs..

      On the downside they have to live in Winnipeg..

    139. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Those taxes are generally based on the physical location of your main work site or business office if you travel more than 50% for work. If you are telecommuting then there is no way that you would pay income tax to any locality other than where you live.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    140. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      "How is our standard of living lower? "

      They get to see Stargate : Atlantis tonight and we don't.

    141. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by desikage · · Score: 1

      Not only is it not so, Toronto is rated as a higher cost of living then Vancouver (and is in fact the highest in Canada).

      --
      Not all dogs drink Coke.
    142. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ramdmc · · Score: 1

      Handguns are for Americans, we prefer to use our bare hands.

      Lighten up guys, and you Canucks out there, SHHHHHH, don't let them know... I thought it was our little secret?

      Yeah guys, I dunno what my fellow Canadians are saying, the taxes here are killing us, we have no freedom, left wing loonies on every block, and it snows 11 months a year, and gas works out to be like $6/gal. And the girls are fugly!!

      Just a lil fyi.

    143. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

      Until it is over a 50% pay cut I am not budging. If I am going to be cold, I certainly don't want to be compensated for it!

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    144. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you've never lived in Canada. '...lots of snow most of the year...' are you on fucking drug??? I drive my convertible, top down, for 9 months out of 12.

    145. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Americans can't buy new Canadian cars and import them back to the US because they are cheaper here.

      oh yes we can.

      my last 3 cars were canadian bought and then brought back to the US.

      it's called having my uncle buy the car with the money I sent him, and then he gives it to me as a gift.

      works great. Avoids all that stupid GM/FORD funded profit protection laws, and get's me a significant discount on my new cars :-)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    146. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Sepper · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a computer engineer

      For Americans this could be a downside:
      You can't be called an Engineer if you didn't do a 4 year college program... like, for exemple, MIT...

      So no "Sales Engineer" around here...

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    147. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by wfeick · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I know what you mean by "free trade by example". Can you elaborate and give some specific examples?

    148. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullets are only dangerous if you shoot them from a gun. Duh.

    149. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they don't need defense, they siphon it from their neighbors, much like their entire economy. Sure glad to be paying for all their medical R & D as well. Worthless bastards.

    150. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the uk:

      begin with 11% National insurance- pays for medical care

      than after about 4 grand there's 20% more tax

      then after some amount i can't remember its 40%.

      i'm young and a student so i'm not sure on the amounts but in the uk people are taxed a lot. also 17.5% sales tax on everything you buy... thats just for the government too, we then have to pay council tax on top of that. there are also different amounts of tax applied to petrol, alcohol and cigarettes which are extortionately high (don't mind in the ciggy case, they deserve it)

      so canada might be highly taxed, but the uk is bad too

    151. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Throtex · · Score: 1

      Well, in the US you can't technically be an "Engineer" unless you're licensed by the National Society of Professional Engineers, but that doesn't really seem to stop people much.

    152. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      "And the girls are fugly!!" too late, I already know better ;-)

    153. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, yes, let's see...

      Our police doesn't do shit. They way that they operate is wait until something happens then go after the guy. Legal system is very skewed to "be fair" on the side of criminals. They spend great money on education, result? greater output of stupid people.

      How about: (this was in my high school) "If you are stupid that you cannot spell, TDSB (Toronto District School Board) will buy them a laptop with M$ software and will pay for all additional software they want to install, while sometimes we didn't have toilet paper in toilets.

      Also a big mafia regarding textbooks. Schools can only use "certified" textbooks (I don't mind that part in theory, but read on) which cost $120+. There is no way that a picture book can cost>$100. What is happening is that folks in government make deals with publishing companies and sort of split the profit while taxpayers tout their public education.

      Similar things happen in various other government "funded" tax-funded branches. The result is that they are getting the same product but paying four times more for it.

      For fellow Americans this is also similar to 'defence' contracts where money is often split between companies of relatives and friends.

      So no, Canada is not much different, they just find more creative ways to hide connections and brush off trails.

      ~omi

    154. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's put your theory to a test - I'll meet you in the square, you bring a hockey stick and I'll bring a gun. Then afterwards we can let passersby vote on who's more 'dangerous'.

    155. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by KnacTheMife · · Score: 1

      "What's the point in making a lot of extra money when working at a job you hate forces you to spend it on therapy for stress?"

      What? I'll drink Scotch regardless so what's your point? :)

      --
      -- "Someone's gotta go back for a shit-load of dimes."
    156. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RLW · · Score: 1

      I've seen winter in these areas with lake effect snow. You can't tell me that even these most southern of Canadian areas don't get lots of snow. Chicago gets the least snow of the three US cities you mentioned but it still gets quite a bit. Buffalo is the snow capital of the US! If there's one place in the US that gets snow then it has to be anyplace east of a great lake. If this is typical of the areas you mention in Canada then they still get too much snow.

      In a relegated post about the western coast of Canada, I bet that's a really nice place to live. What's the average cost of living in Vancouver? Any programming jobs there? I would imagine that it gets it's share of rain just like Washington state or Oregon. But I could live with rain. It falls, it runs down to the rivers and then it's gone. About all snow is good for is skiing; which trekking up into the mountains for is fine.

    157. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by KnacTheMife · · Score: 1

      The North American Free Trade Agreement is a policy with China?

      --
      -- "Someone's gotta go back for a shit-load of dimes."
    158. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by rapett0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Having been born and raised in Chicago, moved various other major cities, went to the University of Kentucky, then to NYC, now I am in SoCal. Many places around the country do have substantially lower costs of living (in US, but I am sure applies to most countries), while still actually paying a decent amount (say in KY, in Dyslexington or Lville). I do alright now in Cali, but I busted my ass, the OC is freaking expensive! My rent is *four* times what it was in Lexington. Plus you got UK (and several other schools) in Lexington for your educational needs, without having to drive two hours in rush hour to some UC school here.

    159. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      No worries of gun toting bandits in Canada.

      In NYC, they just call 'em cops.

    160. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Informative
      paid 40% and taxed 50%! [ Reply to This ]

      Where does this 50% figure come from? The most I pay in combined Provincial & Federal taxes is about 35%.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    161. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Rei · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you need to find an employer willing to sponsor you. In most cases, this involves the employer getting approval from HRDC. Although, to be fair, I think there is an exemption for tech jobs.

      --
      Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
    162. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by westendgirl · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Toronto accommodation is better value. This is the cheapest house in Toronto. This is the cheapest house in Vancouver. (If the links don't work, go to MLS.ca and search for C451997 and 399618). I live in Vancouver and I've been through some of these crackshack houses. The lots are much smaller than in Toronto, too.

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    163. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      Or to say it more accurately, the US has public health care, but not national health care. The programs are funded by a combination of federal, state, & local money. Direct subsidies are means-tested (you gotta be poor to get it). Capital subsidies usually take the form of matching grants, so if a hospital puts up $1 for some mega-expensive machine, and they get $2 from the county, $2 from the state, and $6 from the feds. The idea is to leave at least some trace of market forces so that the bureaucrats follow market demand.

      It works fairly well for the rich, middle-class & the poor. The real losers are the "working poor" who aren't destitute enough to get free healthcare, they have (albeit low-paying) jobs so can't wait all day at the walk-in clinics, but they can't afford to buy at market prices.

    164. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, I went and believed a person from B.C. who told me this and now I look it up and much to my chagrin....... It ain't so.

      That study is probably misleading in this case because it doesn't take into account the local pay scale. Vancouver is still damned expensive. The houses cost a fortune, gas costs 10% more than Eastern Canada due to taxes & transportation, groceries cost more due to transportation and because the union at Safeway has such a sweet deal, and golf costs 20% more. Internet costs the same though.

      -a

    165. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RobinH · · Score: 1

      For Americans this could be a downside:
      You can't be called an Engineer if you didn't do a 4 year college program... like, for exemple, MIT...

      So no "Sales Engineer" around here...


      I wish this were actually true in Canada. It's certainly something that we ringed people want to believe, but honestly, I did a co-op at a networking company in Ottawa (I'll leave out the name to protect the guilty), and sat across the cube aisle from a "Sales Engineer", who was actually just a sales person. She had absolutely no technical training at all, other than what she'd read in the product's user manual.

      I can understand if a real engineer is working with the sales department, such as a so called "Engineer attached to Sales" or "Post-Sales Engineer", etc., but a Sales Engineer? Give me a break.

      At this company, in the States, there's a "Proposal Engineer", but he seems to have an electrical engineering background, so I don't mind. Still, only one person here has a professional engineer's certificate, but most of the employees have "engineer" in their title.

      To be honest, I think the "fad engineer" title left us with the dot-com crunch. I don't see domestic engineer and sanitation engineer (for house wives/husbands and garbage collectors, respectively) used much anymore.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    166. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RLW · · Score: 1

      Now that's a place I wouldn't mind living at. What's the relative cost of living in Victoria as compared to Canada in general? It is difficult to make ends meet with a 40% reduction in pay with no relief from a corresponding reduction in cost of living. if the cost of living relative to the rest of Canada is the same ratio that the cost of living in California is to the rest of the US then you'll be in the same shape as all those Californians living with triple mortgages.

    167. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      You're not getting paid 40% less. That's a myth.
      That 40% less nearly all of it comes from the exchange rate, which doesn't really matter (until you retire). That 40% _does_ matter to a US company making US profits though!

      If you get paid $45k USD in US, you get paid $45k CDN in Canada for similar positions.
      Dollar for dollar, almost everything is similar cost.
      $1 (USD) for bread in US is $1 (CDN) for bread in Canada.

      You'll get exactly the same standard of living, if not better. The only thing cheaper here (USA) relatively speaking is cars.
      I know, I'm one of the few who went the _other_ way, Canada to US. (Oh, I would stay in Canada if there were jobs!)

      I actually enjoy a slightly _lower_ standard of living by moving to US than when I was living in Canada when you count up all the "hidden" costs like healthcare (not so much for me), utilities, Television, etc.

      e.g. Up North, I paid $50/month for both digital TV and 10Mb/s Ethernet _combined_. Down here, it is $40/month for the Ethernet alone, and for digital TV another $50/month.

    168. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by HeyBob! · · Score: 1

      add 15% (varies by province) for the GST and PST

    169. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by KnacTheMife · · Score: 1

      "Don't you think they'd charge 26$US in the states if they could?"

      what's stopping them?

      --
      -- "Someone's gotta go back for a shit-load of dimes."
    170. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ramdmc · · Score: 1
      you bring a hockey stick and I'll bring a gun.

      Who said anything about hockey sticks? Dude, stop watching so much television, it's rotting your brain. You just don't get it do you. You don't need a gun to settle a disagreement, ever hear of tolerance? Look it up.
      If you insist on hurting me, why not do it like a man and use your bare hands. Only cowards bring a gun to a fistfight.

      My 2 CAN c
    171. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      Broadband internet access is generally wider spread in Canada, and cheaper, because Canadians are more urban than our American counterparts.

      That and the CRCT (somewhat like the FCC in the U.S.) has capped the price of broadband at $50 CDN.

      In particular, if you can't shovel snow, Toronto's the place for you, because if it ever snows more than 3 cm, they'll declare a state of emergency and call the army in to shovel your driveway for you.

      Okay, Toronto got itself into a bit of trouble during some snowstorms in recent years but you're exaggerating. I can only recall one storm where Toronto ended up declaring a state of emergency when there was relatively little snow - it had to do with the snowplows being put away for the season and then a big snowstorm hitting. That and you're lucky if you have a driveway living in Toronto.

      Saskatchewan is big. And flat. And there's really not much there except wheat and old people. At least that was my experience when visiting relatives in Moose Jaw. Admittedly we didn't stay in Regina or Saskatoon so I don't know what city life is like there.

      British Columbia is gorgeous and the weather is mild but (if I remember my statistics right) Vancouver has the highest cost of living in Canada.

      The Eastern Provinces have a lower cost of living but unemployment tends to be higher there, particularly in Newfoundland.

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    172. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Except that while they tax you in Canada, they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

      Yeah, right. Like, healthcare, perhaps?

      BULL!

      Canadian healthcare works like this: "You pay more in taxes to pay the salaries of politicians and bureaucrats who promise to provide healthcare."

      The bastards murdered my father, by robbing him of the money he could have saved over a lifetime of work to pay for the surgery he needed later in life. Instead, he got, "Saving your life is too expensive and not worth it at your age." He had decent private insurance before healthcare was nationalized. If he had chosen to subscribe to some national system, his death would be a result of his own choice. Rather, it was foisted upon him, by a succession of governments elected by a dubiously misled majority of the population. Democracy does not provide an excuse for murder, and damn it, I belive any Canadian who supports the forced subscription to nationlized health care, or an electoral and constitutional system that can give rise to same a party to that murder. Oh yeah, I have no problem applying the death penalty to mass murderers in principle.

      And, it isn't just 40% less salary: try 40% less salary, 300% greater income taxes (for the typical homeowner with a mortgage and family), and little of what those tax dollars are supposed to fund.

      Oh yeah, there's this little bit of legislation that says that a married man has to support his spouse "in the manner to which she has become accustomed". This means that if a married man has to take a lower paying job, regardless of circumstances, he can be jailed for not earning enough. The reason, of course, is to ensure his income tax payments. Few complain because laws like that get applied selectively against a small minority that dare to criticize the system. The message is clear: "Don't complaimn or we'll apply a law to lock you away." However, I expect that any Canadian that has found better work in the U.S. under a NAFTA visa might be subject to that law upon his return. (Divorce is not an out: support payments decrees are arbitrary and based on what the ex-husband 'should' earn, again to ensure tax revenue -- I personally know of a case where someone earning CA$40,000 was ordered to yay CA$60,000 in child support and, unable to do so, was jailed as a deadbeat dad.)

      So, that leaves me with a damn fine motive to go on what would be described as a murderous rampage against Canadians: philosophical opposition, and personal vendetta -- textbook psychos don't come any better than I. Means and opportunity are, of course, somewhat lacking. Furthermore I have no interest in shooting up a dozen people in a fit of rage -- I think they should be executed by the millions.

      Nevertheless, I can't help but wonder about two things: (1) How many others find themselves in a position similar to mine (I can think of lots of seniors who paid through the nose for health care and find they're not getting any)> (2) What would it take to overthrow the country? Winning a war trumps the argument that killing is murder.

      It's easy to understand the rage that drives "serial killers". Those motivated by politics rather than sociopatholigical defects (think McVeigh and Bin Laden as opposed to Ted Bundy only "fail" when they act in an impotent and thus ineffective manner. Properly amplified that rage can overthrow governments. You just need numbers, will. Powerful allies help.

      Unless Canada reverses its self-destructive Communist mindset, it will decay like Cuba, the Soviet Union, and all sililarly misguided nations. The resulting instability will leave hoards of refugees along the longest undefended border in the world. Sorry to put it crudely, but does the U.S. want another "Mexico" on it's hands? Right now, NAFTA permits skilled workers to enter the U.S. (and U.S. IT refugees to take shelter in the Canadian economy until the U.S. improves). Imagine 30 mill

    173. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by zogger · · Score: 1

      How many of the chinese immigrants there are sleeper agents of the PLA?

      It's not only civilian crime you have to worry about. It wouldn't take half a dozen dedicated agents/assymetrical warfare types to cause a tremendous amount of havoc at any time *they* pick in most cities. The US and Canadian lack of serious immigration oversight and restrictions will destroy both those nations sometime in the future. Europe can look out for itself with their governments and immigration laws and policies, I am primarily interested in north america above the mexican border, which has been decimated in the last decade from un restricted illegal immigration and too much legal immigration. Enoughs enough, if all those other places had such hot cultures, then the people there wouldn't be leaving, and they would have developed economies that wouldn't make them want to leave their home countries. Diluting the US and Canada will accomplish nothing more than dilution, and it's obvious it's hurtting the middle classes in both those nations. Way back in the 1800's when we still had a very small population and a lot of free land and opportunity, sure, we needed a lot of immigration, we could absorb it and it was welcomed, that was then, this is now, all the land, every single square inch of it, is spoken for, nothing is free, we've expanded coast to coast, many areas now are already completely maxed out with infrastructure costs, water resources, etc, so it's time to stop the massive transference of human populations from second and third world places to the last remnants of the first world. Let those other nations fix their own problems, they don't need to be exporting their problems, and the globalists need to be stopped on exporting still useful and necessary jobs.

      I think most people in the US and Canada are too naieve. They think wars are only things that happen overseas on television, and someplace carved in stone is a planetary rule that it can't happen to them. And they also still seem to think that the major politicians and partys we have are working "for the people" instead of "working for the globalist transnationals" which is closer to reality.

      And intel services? HA1!11 Phooie! There's a story running on Drudge right now about an entire brand new type of Chinese submarine that slipped past them guys. They didn't even see it. It got launched already.

      If they can't even pick up on an entire new submarine, don't count on them to see and stop nation-state sleeper agents, or to stop "independent" terrorist actions, or to even stop rogue elements from inside the governments themselves from doing similar actions.

    174. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy to be paid 40% less just to get the fuck out of the USA.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    175. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      Living in NYC has it's own advantages. Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums,

      NYC's advantages on this front are overbilled. To take the tango example, in Rochester, a city one twenty-fifth the size, tango dancing is available 3 nights a week (though not easy to find for a newcomer). Big-name theatre productions and museum exhibits are available when they are on tour, so you gotta see it when they are here, but, that said, it is easier to get a good seat when you are not bidding against the likes of Ted Turner & Richard Branson.

      In fairness, Rochester punches above its weight in this regard. Syracuse, only slightly smaller, disappoints Rochestarians who move there and look for "culture."

    176. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quality of life indices consistently rate canada at or near the top, internationally. The US has never been a threat. Of course, this is normalized over an entire population, but still, it tells you something --- it is entirely possible for you to move to Canada and maintain or increase your quality of life, if not your raw salary numbers.

    177. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by bouncingbean · · Score: 1

      Ah... Thats the problem with Victoria the cost of living here is high compared to the rest of Canada, very simular to Vancouver. My costs are 675.00 for a 1 bedroom basement suit (it allows dogs). Real estate here is expensive with alot of houses between 250,000 - 500,000. However you do get a bit of a yard with them.

    178. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Lexington is ranked 9th in US cities in percentages of persons with at least a Bachelors degree.

      Judging by the HR websites in Taiwan, at the good companies over there you need at least a master's degree to get a job cleaning the floor or making coffee. Even the CEOs have degrees! I feel so underqualified :-(

    179. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Omega+Leader-(P12) · · Score: 1

      The GST is not applicable to things like the necesities of life like rent, back market computer equiptment and the like.

    180. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      It must be all those sunny beaches and palm trees that make it so enjoyable.

    181. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by rof · · Score: 1

      And Vancouver has been on the first place (together with Zurich, where I live) in the William Mercers quality-of-life survey 2001.

    182. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by archen · · Score: 1

      As the entire world is now learning, this plan works great when there is an increasing birth rate, or high immigration rate of very young people, but since birth rates in developed countries are falling these plans, well, aren't so good...

      Not quite. The system should work no matter what. Really you have people contributing to the system, then the government sits on the money. If you include interest and modest management by investing, social security would have a never ending pool of money.

      But here's what happened. People are now forced to contribute to social security, and the politicians can't stand just having all that money sitting around and not "doing something" with it, so they gutted social security. What they did is essentially turned social security into a pyramid scheme based on population where I pay for my grandfathers social security. Which as you say only works if you have an expanding population. The system CAN work, but it's critical that you don't fuck with the money and don't use it for other things - and what greedy polititian can keep their fingers out of a treasure chest that big? Well, that's the real problem right there.

      As an aside, I would like to say this is what really pisses me off about the U.S. They claim lower taxes, but when you add on social security it's really outragous for what we get out of it - and social security is just that: another tax.

    183. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      Who are you quoting here? That quote isn't from my post.

    184. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by apankrat · · Score: 1


      We are the 3rd best city in a world to live in according to this

      and

      only 89th most expensive one according to this

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    185. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to add another data point:

      I'm a software engineer living in Vancouver, making $50k Canadian a year. That works out to about $33k Cdn after taxes.

      Rent for a 1 bedroom basement suite in a nice area (Kerrisdale) is $825/month, includes basic utilities, but phone ($40/month) and ADSL ($25/month) is extra.

      Car insurance is about $1400/year, I get a 40% safe driver discount, and I'm a 20-something male that drives a Firebird. :)

      Food costs me about $200/month although that isn't very accurate since that includes making dinner for the girlfriend, etc.

      Gas is fairly expensive, it's been hovering around 92c/L.

      CD's are cheap in Vancouver because of A&B Sound. Top 40ish artist picked at random:

      http://www.absound.ca/ProductDetailMusic.aspx?Pr od Type=Music&SKU=7559628922

      $18.00 CDN for a new, popular CD.

      The best thing about living in Vancouver is the range of outdoor activities available to everyone, hiking, fishing, hunting, climbing, sailing, etc.. I'm not into the bar scene so I have no idea what that is like.

    186. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1
      How in the world can a government think that they are entitled to 50% of _your_ money?

      The same way ANYONE can think they are entitled to your money - by providing you with VALUE. How much is it worth to have clean, safe streets even in the worst neighbourhoods in your city? Universal health care? Well-maintained roads? Cheap, good quality education? A foreign policy that causes you be welcomed when you travel abroad? A free economy that allows you to make too much money and then complain about how the government did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to help you get that way?

      If these things hold no value for you, then you have a right to be pissed. I suggest moving to central Africa or perhaps Haiti, where I'm sure you would never have cause to complain about over-taxation, and your opportunities for making millions would therefore be completely unbounded.

    187. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by chipace · · Score: 1

      ...and you believe an accounting firm? I prefer common sense over "professional" opinions.

      I have lived in Edmonton... and there isn't enough money to get me back there.

    188. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Your probably still holding on to your bubble salaries, which means your over paid, consider it your long overdue return to reality.

      An actor goes south, even a bad actor, for two things, greed and the chance to be in something that people actually watch they rarely satisfy either, though I would have a root canal before watching the crap that gets put on the air because it has to be x% Canadian content.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    189. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      Actually the largest outsourcer of jobs that have been outsourced in the U.S. IS the U.S.

    190. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to Montreal numerous times. Montreal is a 3rd rate Museum city. NYC is a first rate museum city. Chicago's a 2nd rate museum city. That's just the facts.

    191. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      "Bullets are only dangerous if you shoot them from a gun. Duh."

      Don't think outside the box much do you? Bullets can be used in many ways not involving a gun. The only requirement is that something detonates the primer cap on the back end of the shell or that the powder is otherwise set off. A great many traps can be made from shells and other things you find around (like nails and mouse traps). Even tossing a box of shells in a fire at a place where you need a distraction or wide spread confusion or mayhem as you get out of range can work quite well. This is what I get for growing up around a couple of ex special forces people.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    192. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ignorance was a valued commodity, you would be worth more than you already think you are. The list of scientific and medical advances contributed by Canadian researchers and Universities is well known by those who view the world as more than 50 states. The billions of dollars spent in Canadian pharmaceuticals R&D every year speak for themselves. As far as defense, well, Canadians have a bit different approach. Canadians prefer to pay their dues to the UN (as one of the UN founders), contribute far more per capita in foreign aid, and generally find alternatives to Armed Conflict if possible. But have no doubt, and read a little history. Canadians are often way ahead of the US when going into a justified conflict, and have transferred great percentages of their GDP/taxes when called upon. Good luck to those around you.

    193. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      The same thing is true in Canada. Only those who have a degree in engineering and are licensed by the provincial engineering association are allowed to call themselves engineers.
      Quebec's OIQ is trying to put an end to the title MCSE. click

    194. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Basic math's not your strong suit, is it?

      BTW, the 35% = Provincial + Federal + EI + CPP + etc.

      After tax income = 65%
      Provincial = 6.5%
      GST = 7%
      Total = 13.5%

      After some calculation, my total income goes like this:

      Taxes + Deductions = 35% of my total income
      PST+GST = 8% of my total income
      Actual Purchasing Power = 57% of my total income

      And that's OVERSTATING it because I'm assuming I pay on PST on everything, which I don't. It's closer to 5% for PST+GST and and I'm back up to 60% APP.

      But then again, in the US you also have State & County taxes, so what's the diff again?

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    195. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by zhiwenchong · · Score: 1

      Well, it is actually true in Canada. The title Engineer is protected by law - it is illegal for anyone to misrepresent him/herself as an engineer without the proper qualifications. Most of people do it out of ignorance, but ignorance is no excuse.

      Incidentally, graduate engineers (those who have completed a 4-year engineering degree) in Canada aren't allowed to use the title "engineer" either. They can only call themselves "junior engineer", up until they get professional certification from the provincial engineering body.

      The term "engineer" is protected by provincial law. Sure, people can call themselves sanitation engineer or whatever they like, but they can't put that on their business card or job description title.

    196. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Malc · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on the Province. My marginal income tax rate last year in Ontario was 43%, but my average was 27%. I considered moving to Quebec and looked at the tax rates there: I would see my marginal rate shoot up to 53%!

      This gives some information about the combined rates: http://www.taxtips.ca/tax_rates.htm#CombinedTaxRat es

    197. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      Let's put your theory to a test - I'll meet you in the square, you bring a hockey stick and I'll bring a gun. Then afterwards we can let passersby vote on who's more 'dangerous'.

      I don't get your point. If I was running around with my hockey stick swinging it at people, how is that not dangerous. In fact, if you had the gun and were trained to use it with precision and accuracy, it would be incumbent upon you to intervene for the welfare of my victims. They might consider you quite the hero.

      I didn't understand why the visiting Canadian would be freaked out by ammunition that was displayed openly in stores in the U.S. I'm actually a bit surprised given that Canada is largely rural and most farmers keep guns for hunting and to protect their livestock from predatory animals.

    198. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, regulations on the title of "Engineer" are done at a state level. Professional Engineers are certified by the state, not NSPE.

      I'm not a P.E., but I work at a firm full of them. Some engineers have 10-15 certificates on the wall, since each state requires that you publicly display your credentials at your place of work.

    199. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Well, if the truely worthless american currency continues to devalue (when it was taken off of the gold standard, and the government and banks got the ability to coin it out of nothing, and backed by oil, it's worth became entirely based off of americans will to take it), you'll soon be making about 40% less.

    200. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by code+addict · · Score: 1

      And they're even cheaper in Vancouver! Almost all new CDs are available for around CDN$10-12. Some of the less popular ones do get up to CDN$15-18 though.

    201. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure impressed with your rant. And I'm sure that our American friends will be terrified that you want to be one of them. As you vituperate, remember that people can only be helped if they want help. Your rage and contempt can be treated but be warned that rate for successful treatment of narcissism is quite low (...how can you treat somebody that thinks they know everything). Delusions can be so darned self gratifying :)

    202. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Malc · · Score: 1

      I would say salaries were 40-50% lower 18 months ago. Now I would say it's 20-30%, but that's because of the massive slide in the USD$ last year. This will vary by region. Of course, disposable income doesn't equate to quality of life either.

    203. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Buddy, I graduated from the University of Waterloo in Computer Engineering. I'm wearing an Iron Ring. I'm completely aware of what you're saying, and trust me when I tell you, I've seen the real world, and nobody enforces this, and nobody much knows about it outside of engineering graduates. I spewed the same crap that was told to me when I was in school, and it's pretty much just that: BS. Don't trust your professors to know much about the real world.

      The only time you'll actually see this enforced is if a company calls themself an engineering company, or tries to sell engineering services without having a bona fide P.Eng. on staff.

      If little miss sales person puts "Sales Engineer" on her resume or business card, nobody cares (except us). There isn't some crime fighting unit out there cracking down on mis-uses of the word "engineer" in Canada. In reality, for a person, the only time you'll get in trouble is if you say that you're a professional engineer without having the certification. That's rare.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    204. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "If US companies are considering outsourcing to Canada, it seems like they could try other places in the US where they could hire people for less then in California or NY."

      Like, for example, outsourcing to US prisons where they can get workers for less cost even than India.

      As a bonus, the people they laid off when they closed the previous factory (nextdoor to the prison) eventually end up in the prison (no job, no money, right?) and come back to work for "less than the cost of slave labor"

    205. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Malc · · Score: 1

      "The biggest difference, of course, is that housing is cheaper in Canada,"

      Perhaps that's because we can't deduct our mortgages from our taxes like Americans can. If that changes then I predict a rise in prices here.

    206. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if you make in excess of $1m, the top marginal rate of combined federal and provincial tax is approximately 46% in Quebec (the highest of each of the provinces)

      More realistically, at $100k Cdn., the rate is about 30% sliding upwards to about 40% closer to $200k

      Here is the definitive calculator

      http://www.ey.com/GLOBAL/content.nsf/Canada/Tax_ -_ Calculators_-_Personal_Tax

      Of course, speaking as a proud Canadian there's always the quality of life issue ...

      http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/Ne ws /2004/07/16/544515.html ... and the freedom from religion within the state issue, and the freedom from descrimination issue, and the fact that we more closely resemble the "liberal" ideal that the US framers intended (but that's for another post)

      Even if the cost of everyday expenses may be slightly more in real dollars than in the US, if you unburden each person from privately contracted healthcare, the real return on income is higher for more people on a per capita basis, than our esteemed neighbours.

    207. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have read that in Norway it is possible to be taxed at a rate that is higher than your income"

      Surely that's true everywhere if you have a bank account and no job?

    208. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans have no job so no income ... hahaha

    209. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "40% less pay check with 40% less costs of living, STILL COSTS ME 40% OF MY RETIREMENT FUNDS"

      Presumably you'd stay in Canada after you retire?

    210. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's because we can't deduct our mortgages from our taxes like Americans can. If that changes then I predict a rise in prices here.

      That means people would buy a bigger house, but the houses themselves wouldn't get more expensive, at least not in the long run. Construction companies would just make bigger houses, on average, to keep up with demand.

      These comparisons are done based on living in the same size house in both cities.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    211. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      It's perhaps not the most expensive place, but it's close. If you want a freestanding house on its own lot in Vancouver proper, you'd better be prepared for a half million CDN mortgage. Further out in the GVRD (Greater Vancouver Regional District), the prices drop, but you'll never see a house with a decent commute to downtown for under $300000. With a 2 hour commute you can get one for like $150000. Compare that with a place like Edmonton where a house on a lot can be yours for less than $100K...
      Oh, and did I mention the city planners in Vancouver seem to have a hate-on for cars and are eternally doing everything in their power to discourage people from using them? This of course means they just make it more expensive. Currently they're trying to make parking meter hours extend until midnight, and are looking at a "congestion" fee to enter downtown for cars like London has.

    212. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Like spending money on useful programs such as a 4 billion dollar gun registry or federal sponsorship!

    213. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      As other have pointed out, we're not just talking income tax here. We're talking income tax plus all of the other taxes that you pay almost anytime money changes hands. When you factor in all of the taxes that you have to pay, you would find that the average Canadian citizen is taxed at around 50%, if not more.

    214. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Sepper · · Score: 1

      The same thing is true in Canada. Only those who have a degree in engineering and are licensed by the provincial engineering association are allowed to call themselves engineers. Quebec's OIQ is trying to put an end to the title MCSE.

      Sorry for the confusion, I was talking about Canadians Engineering. I'm actually Member of the OIQ (student section).

      But thanks for the link, I did not have time to search for it...

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    215. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tried this? It is mainly urban rumor. Bullets and shells that detonate outside of a gun chamber go "pop" mainly from the primer but don't deliver a bullet with any real force.

    216. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Whyzzi · · Score: 1

      .. You must be one of those non-married types.

      --
      "BSD is about people pissing each other.." (Moid Vallat)
    217. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by ptr2004 · · Score: 1

      The internation salary calculator is a joke... I tried comparing Boston , MA to Bombay India and it said I would need to make more to live in Bombay than in Boston. Having lived in both cities I know for sure it is not so

    218. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by adachan · · Score: 1

      I am from West Virginia and I currently live in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Canada (at least Alberta) is very cheap for some things (food, housing) and very expensive for other things (computers, gasoline). However, to live in West Virginia is a small fraction of the cost to live here in Edmonton (which is considered to be one of the cheapest places to live in Canada). I really wonder what is going on in the US that keeps companies from locating in West Virginia... The land is cheap, business operation is low in taxes, and the labor force works for close to minimum wage. Granted we do not have a major airport, but Columbus, Ohio and Lexington, Kentucky are only 2.5 hours from Huntington, WV and Pittsburgh, PA is only 30 minutes from Morgantown, WV. If companies really want to keep Americans employed, my question is why not relocate them (and the company) to West Virginia? You can build a castle for the price of a 1 bedroom house in California. We have 2 major Universities in the State and as I said before large cities are merely a car ride away. And before you joke about the incest and the obesity, I ask you have you ever been there? Check out the rivers, mountains, lakes, wildlife, parks, low crime rate, low cost of living, need I go on?

    219. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that the 40% less includes the exchange rate. As a Canadian, whenever I've travelled in the US I've noticed that the dollar amounts for many smaller items such as food do not change when I cross the border. Differences like this will further reduce the 40% gap.

    220. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that's the case all across Canada. Engineer is a reserved title.

      I'm a member of the student section although I graduated. I have the license application just haven't gotten around to getting a passport photo taken. (Don't have a job either so no rush.)

    221. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      Not quite. The system should work no matter what. Really you have people contributing to the system, then the government sits on the money. If you include interest and modest management by investing, social security would have a never ending pool of money.

      With a guaranteed contribution based system, correctly administered, you're right. Guaranteed contribution says "you invest X now and get X plus or minus the accrued gain/loss" This is what US 401K's are

      Most pension systems are guaranteed benefit, you contribute X now, you're guaranteed Y, the administrators have to make up the difference through investing. This is both incredibly difficult to do correctly since it involves long range forecasting and even more difficult to audit due to the compromises the accounting industry has made. Most union and govt pensions are an example of defined benefit: You spend 20 years in the union contributing X dollars, you recieve Y dollars back for some period, often life. If you live longer than the actuary thought you would, or if the pension administrator is an idiot (google Orange County, CA), the pension fund runs out...

      But here's what happened. People are now forced to contribute to social security, and the politicians can't stand just having all that money sitting around and not "doing something" with it, so they gutted social security. What they did is essentially turned social security into a pyramid scheme based on population where I pay for my grandfathers social security

      You're absolutely right on the first part, though I think anything other than a defined contribution is a pyramid scheme, there's simply no way to take out more than what you put in + what that money earned unless you have a larger base paying in.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    222. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hockey is a mainstream sport now?

    223. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      I would HAVE to own a car, and have to worry about how I am getting home when I am drunk because your public transportation system is not as good as NYC's, especially late at night.

      I won't argue that NYC is an amazing metropolis, but take it from me and most of the people I know, you can get by just fine living in downtown Toronto without a car. The major buses are 24 hour and you can walk safely at night, and taxis are surprisingly plentiful.

    224. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tango Dancing?

    225. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Manitoba's population density is 1.9 people per square kilometre

      Isn't that stupid?

    226. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      I just did my taxes (yes, I did file for an extension in April), so I know how much I paid in US Federal and state income taxes; I will use myself as a test case of tax burdens. (All figures in US dollars.)
      My salary (in the public record) is about $72K (yeah, lower than it should be)
      My federal income tax was a little over $6K.
      My state income tax was a bit over $2.5K.
      My health insurance cost (since Canada has "free" health care) was about $5.5K.
      My Social Security and Medicare tax was about $4.8K.
      The local sales tax rate is a little over 6% (I think). Six percent of $72000-$18000 is a bit over $3.2K.

      So, income and SS tax accounts for about 18.5% of my salary. Health insurance takes about 7.5.% If I paid sales tax on all of my "untaxed money", this would amount to about 4.5% of my salary. All these things together add up to about 30% of my salary.
      I would be interested in a few actual examples like mine from Canada (or India).

    227. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Malc · · Score: 1

      That's presuming there's a sufficient supply of larger houses, or that people are willing to move out to the souless suburbs where they have the space to build bigger homes!

    228. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by archen · · Score: 1

      I think you are assuming that if you invest X that you will actually get Y. This isn't neccesarily the case. The average lifespan is around 72, the retirement age is now 67. Thats 5 years on average to withdraw money, assuming that somone will live long enough to even retire (which most do). I'm no expert on social security, but it seems to me the system is certainly geared towards giving out money longer than 5 years so the government makes more money in that exchange as well.

      It seems to me through reinvestment and compound interest (plus people not withdrawing all their money) would more than make up the difference reguardless of the population (provided there is no extreme difference in numbers between young and old when the system is started). We're only now starting to see real numbers in the system, and since it's been f'ed up we'll probably never really know if it would have worked if left alone (although I'm willing to bet I would have at least seen SOME money when I retire).

    229. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Malc · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember when I lived in the US paying municipal taxes where I worked and where I lived. What about property taxes, or do you rent? Does your health insurance cost cover both Medicaid and the contribution to work health plan, and all your co-pays, etc?

      Calculating the sales tax based on your disposable income is an interesting proposition. I travel a lot and so it's not so easy for me... oh and some taxes for flying are ridiculous - often 40% of the ticket price and sounding suspiciously like double-dipping!

      The other thing that affects tax rates is the things you can deduct. For instance, if I put money away for retirement, that comes off my gross income but also reduces my available disposable income (and thus affects the calculation for the sales tax). Who knows what rate the retirement savings will actually be taxed at when I come to withdraw them.

    230. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't mind living in NYC - home of the $4 pizza slice and the $20 cocktail...


      When I worked in downtown Manhattan (until late 2002), I usually paid $2.25 for a large pepperoni slice, and my favorite place had a special which was 2 slices with any topping + a medium soda for $6.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    231. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      I have only been to Edmonton once (in 1993) and I enjoyed my visit. From the view of IT, however, Edmonton and UA fall below Waterloo and UW. Lots of people used WAT4 and WAT5, Maple, etc. Waterloo and Berlin form a nice community. While UW looks rather strange, I like visiting there. If you can get a Maple job, go for it. (I took a tour in 1997 of the Maple company; very nice.)

    232. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by CrkHead · · Score: 1

      Isn't he talking about Toronto?

    233. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by phek · · Score: 1

      and that 2 hours only gets you like 10 miles.

    234. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Vancouver has a fairly high land cost, but a half hour out gets you over a 60% discount.

    235. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not willing to move north to get a job that pays 40% less than what is available here. I'd rather work outside my field.

      Great! One less poseur "developer" who was competing with me for jobs. I sincerely hope you do work outside the development field, maybe go study for MBA like your ilk tends to do.

    236. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by leerpm · · Score: 1

      Just not the #1 place to live for retail mall store operators.

    237. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by FPCat · · Score: 1

      But remember, you don't pay capital gains tax when selling your house in Canada, you do in the US.
      I prefer the Canadian system (I expect to make more profit on my house than I'll pay in intrest on the mortage)

    238. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I've never understood this. How is our standard of living lower? We have everything you do.

      "Standard of living" is an economic term. It incorporates not just what stuff you can buy (we do indeed have everything they do, including boatloads of American cultural products) but also how much you have to pay to get them. On average, I think that the American "standard of living" is higher, but this is an anomaly caused by there being a concentration of extremely rich people living there. However, when you look at the whole distribution, the lower 80% of Canadian workers enjoy a higher standard of living than the lower 80% of American workers. America is a great place to live if you are extremely wealthy. (Of course, just about any place is if you are extremely wealthy.)

      A related but different measurement is the "quality of life", which includes standard of living but also various intangibles. It is difficult to measure, but the UN publishes on version of the measurement that always puts Canada ahead of the US. Canada and Scandinavia are always on top, though most first-world countries are pretty close to each other.

    239. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im looking to move to canada very soon and i was born and raised in houston so this interests me, time to go read about calgary.

    240. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      My community has no municipal taxes. I was divorced in December and so rent right now; I do not (directly) pay property tax. My health insurance cost ($5.5K) is independent of Medicare and is my portion of (one of) the university health plan(s).

      "The other thing that affects tax rates is the things you can deduct. For instance, if I put money away for retirement, that comes off my gross income but also reduces my available disposable income (and thus affects the calculation for the sales tax). Who knows what rate the retirement savings will actually be taxed at when I come to withdraw them."
      What are you doing on slashdot if you are going to make insightful comments? :-)
      Seriously, you bring up a good point. Some of my salary is not subject to income tax. Lets see, deductions from gross income include retirement ($4.8K), "flex. spending - health" ($1.4K) and health premiums ($5.5K). The "flexible spending" account (actually the wrong name but I do not recall the correct one) takes (pre-tax) money from your "check" (direct deposit) and lets you repay medical bills (after health insurance) including dental bills and drugs; you never pay income tax on this money but any money you do not use (over the course of a year) is lost. The kids came with me after the divorce and one "child tax credit" of $1000 (actually $800) reduced my federal tax approximately from $7K to $6K.

      Now, on to you: (i) Could you do a similar 2003 salary and tax summary for yourself so we have more data? (I know, salary CN$250,000 just to make me feel bad.) (ii) In the US, there is no mandatory retirement age (ended in 1993 for university faculty) and I like teaching and doing research, so as long as I have good health and am doing a good job, retirement will remain in the far future (and I am not old enough to worry about this yet). What is the retirement situation like in Canada? (In Germany, you are required to retire at 65.)

    241. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by legojenn · · Score: 1
      You've obviously never visited Toronto, or Montreal or any of the large cities up here.

      hmm, I think you mentioned the name of both our large cities.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    242. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      So your taxes pay for 4 years at the universities? That is not too bad. College is getting expensive here in America. You can easily spend $10,000 per year for an average college. I have top notch health care, though it cost $160 a week. I pay $60 and my employer pays $100. I personally would not want a public health care where the service is poor. The last think I want when I am sick or in need of immediate medical care is to be treated like a number.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    243. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Klanglor · · Score: 1

      Stop spreading the rumor that montreal is cheaper!!!! now every one is moving back to montreal. the cost of housing cost increased of 75% over the past 4years! god!

      We had a good time with the low rent for a longtime when PQ and BQ was messing arround. :P

    244. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Sure, there are those hidden taxes, such as on gas or liquour, but I think it all balances out. My tax rate is not more than 35%.
      We have that here in the USA. We are taxed on our money that is already taxed. When I get my paycheck every week, I get the taxes taken out. Then when I buy gas, I get taxed and have to pay for it with money that was already taxed. If I buy groceries, clothes, entertainment, alcohol, tobacco, you name it, we get taxed again. We get taxed on our cable TV service, phone, electric, gas, etc. so it really is not that much better here, tax wise, in the USA.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    245. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Klanglor · · Score: 1

      No problemo! Protecting America with Past-Overdue British rusty subs, half a decade Seakings, and Stat of the Art CF-18 with with no qualified Pilots.

      Atless you have very good R&D Millitary Labs.

    246. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      $90,000 Canadian is about $68,775.79 US dollars. By the time your done paying all your taxes, not just income, but all of the taxes that you have to pay, you are left with about 50% of your income. $68,775.79 is not a bad income, even in the USA, though after your Canadian taxes, your down to only $34,387.50, which is not much to live on here in the USA, though it may be enough in Canada, I have never been there.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    247. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      I suggest moving to central Africa or perhaps Haiti
      Why the hell would I move there? I live in the USA, not Canada, so I don't have to worry about 50% taxation and I can still make as much money and luck or abilities allow.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    248. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      What should you do with drunk drivers and pedophiles?

      Why not execution? It'll deter that particular criminal from committing a crime ever again. Of this I'm fairly certain.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    249. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Shotgun shells can have that problem because the case isn't very strong. With metal casings, it's less of a problem.

      It's like dealing with most other types of explosives - the shape of the thing holding the charge matters because it can help focus the charge (a small tube can work wonders. Of course, it's possible to make a claymore style mine out of the contents of a few shotgun shells, a can, and an improvised trigger mechanism as well. Just be careful about static discharge.). Though for many gurellia applications for materials like this, it's at close range so it's not as much of an issue as you would think (doors, under seats, etc. It doesn't necessarily need the full effect of all of the powder in order to cause the intended damage).

      And to be honest, yes, I have tried some of the things they taught me while they were there. I learned the joy of things that go boom at an early age - both from them and from my great grandfather (who was an explosives man for the railroads in this area). I had the opportunity to play with lots of things from explosives to blades. It was an interesting childhood.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    250. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      the roads are fixed

      And a good thing, given that you people drive like maniacs.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    251. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I once went to a sporting goods store in the US, and found stacks and stacks of bullets sitting on the floor without any sort of security with a sign marks "On sale, 25% off all calibre bullets and shotgun shells". Don't they lock up dangerous goods behind secure areas???

      I once walked into a Canadian supermarket and found bags of nitrogen-based fertilizer and cleaning ammonia just sitting around on the shelves, without any sort of security. Don't they lock up dangerous goods behind secure areas there???

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    252. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      While in New York City, I have NEVER, NOT ONCE, seen a gun in the hands of anyone except a NYC cop. NYC is currently one of the safest cities in North America

      And this would be what we call 'a crock of shit'. NYC isn't particularly distinguished by a low crime rate, and in any event crime has NEVER been associated with rates of ownership of private firearms.

      Where I live we have one of the highest gun ownership percentages in the entire United States. And yet, we also have one of the lowest violent crime rates as well. Far, far lower than New York city, now matter how you massage the figures. Should we then conclude that higher gun ownership percentages result in greater personal safety?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    253. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      American debts and credit don't follow to canada, and vice versa. Our credit agencies don't talk to yours.

    254. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The standards set by the U.N. come with a distinct political bias leaning very heavily towards socialism. Worse, but some of these 'standards' don't actually mean anything; e.g., the worth of education is measured by dollars spent per capita, but there's no reliable correlation between dollars spent and education delivered beyond a certain point (far less than what any First World nation spends, by the way). And no one questions whether or not the 'education' inflicted upon our children is actually of any value in the real world, or if less-but-more-practical education, for fewer dollars, would be of much greater worth to the individual in real, measurable terms, e.g., average salaries after graduation.

      Some U.N. measures are good, solid, scientifically-based ones. Others are just a bunch of socialist horse shit.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    255. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of Canada as another state. Except that while they tax you in Canada, they actually seem to do something with the tax dollars besides 'defence' spending.

      Ya, spend it on expensive "policial" crack. Taxes up, wages down... Canadians get rooked by Canadian employers. Employers even pay less for health care so they should in fact be able to pay more, not less.

      Been on both sides, the American side smokes the Canadian side except for getting a green card. Them are tough suckers to get. It is likely easier to get as a whiner or Mexican.

      Too bad, Canada should add 9 stars to the US flag and let the other one go to France.

      And I am a Canadian, not an expat. But don't ask me to vote for Liberal or NDP money hungry greedy ... better stop here ot I will cut the snip.

      BTW: Canada could defend itself against anyone.

    256. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and did I mention the city planners in Vancouver seem to have a hate-on for cars and are eternally doing everything in their power to discourage people from using them?

      Except extending the skytrain. :-)

      Seriously though, having no highways within Vancouver city limits certainly adds a unique dynamic. Residents of the west side rarely even enter the east side of the city.

      -a

    257. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saskatoon is a nice city. Not too big, but big enough. The thing about the old people is that the young people all move to Alberta. :(

    258. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't like King Ralph?

      Better than the lying bastard we have in Saskatchewan.

    259. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Skytrain. Yeah... I'd love to see everyone get up and all take mass transit one day just like Larry Campbell's saying we should. BC Transit would be crippled by the load. My big bitch with it all is that they are fighting this war on cars, but not providing any realistic alternative plans for people that do leave their cars at home. I take the skytrain downtown to arrive at my office at 10:30 AM, and most trains are still sardine cans on wheels an hour after the "rush" has allegedly ended. Cars are the only viable option as long as the population keeps heading out to the 'burbs....

    260. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you bud, but if trends hold, Canada will be a majority Asian nation by 2050 (or earlier). Take a look at the latest census data for the big Canadian cities. More people identified themselves as Chinese, or Chinese-Canadian, than identified themselves as Canadian. My advice is to start learing Chinese language and culture now (or at least be sure your kids learn) because European decent Canadians are due to become a minority group not too far into the future.

    261. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      I'm also thinking about the costs for administration: personnel, audit costs (which seem to get more outrageous every year), and the normal costs of doing business. Yes, you can plan for the average but I still think defined benefit plans fail on their own design. I think if people had to contribute enough to truly cover the costs, they would revolt. I've also never been accused of being an optimist ;-).

      It is very true that the major failures in pension plans have been due to incompetance (Orange County), mismanagement (US S.S.), or fraud (the Teamsters pension fund).

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    262. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Even if you get paid more in the US, you have to factor in how long you get to keep your job and how long between jobs.

      Even if you get paid 66% more, but you only have a job one year out of every 2 years, you're getting paid less overall. That is worse for "quality of life". (but it's a lot colder :P)

      I don't live in Canada or the US.

      --
    263. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by really? · · Score: 1

      Well, if you don't like it do something about it. For example, move to Tokyo. :-)

      As a Vancouverite who has been living in Japan for a "few" years now it always kills me to hear people bitch about the train/bus/roads being "packed." I used to do it too, but now when I come back home I rather enjoy driving in the "rush".

      Just to give yo an idea of what's like here, I commute 22 Km, one way, by bicycle. I am willing to put any amount of $$/yen/what_have_you on the fact that on any random morning I will be in my office before anyone who does the same route by car. Bikes and "tuned" scooters will kick my butt, but cars and normal scooters don't have a chance. Oh yeah, I am old fat and slow compared to my commutting mate who doesn't even break a sweat on most bits.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    264. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      it's called having my uncle buy the car with the money I sent him, and then he gives it to me as a gift.

      And you and your uncle both claim these "gifts" of money and car on your tax returns, right? :)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    265. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Omega+Leader-(P12) · · Score: 1

      The issue is rifles vs handguns. Most canadians have little or no problems with rifles. Farmers need them and it makes sense in alot of places. It is the handguns in downtown at 2:00am that bothers people when they see another kid got shot on the news

    266. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by INT+21h · · Score: 1

      > I have read that in Norway it is possible to be taxed at a rate that is higher than
      > your income, so I suspect that their median tax rate is hgiher than Canada's.

      Uhm I live in Norway... max income tax is 50% (progressive tax), but in addition there's VAT, 24% on everything but food, which gets 12%. In addition there are levies on luxuries like cars, all things nicotine and alcohol, chocolate, fizzy drinks like Pepsi and Coke, in general stuff that is "bad" for you. Property-tax is low though, with the expected outcome: people spend their money on property instead of investments, which is IMHO definitely bad.

      As for health, the state pays for everything above (I think this year it is) approximately 200 dollars; that is: as soon as your health has cost you more than that one year, the state takes care of the rest that year. Furthermore, some medicines are heavily subsidized, especially medicines for chronic diseases like asthma, rheumatitis, hiv/aids... and of course cancer.

      Per dollar, Norway had the most effcient health-system in the world in 2002, and according to the UN it's the best country to currently live in, for the third year in a row or something (weather and especially temperature is obviously not factors in those calculations).

      I wouldn't recommend the weather though and you need to be able to tolerate queuing up, footie, and the usual western contempt for anything resembling intelligence.

    267. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Igneous · · Score: 1

      What do you call the people who drive trains? :P

    268. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Hey, it's a mystery to me too. After all, even the californians are trying to undercut me (with their cheap living standards) so I suspect it must just be critical mass. That can change (look at Montreal!)

      After all, Electronic Arts shut down the studios that made "the sims" and the Austin TX (ultima) games to move the staff into california so I guess cost of living doesn't come into company business plans much.

      Anyway, I thought it was kentucky that gets the writeup in TV magazines over here (e.g. obese poor 80 year old man marries 14 year old girl, who hopes to move into his shack...) where is "clay county"? (quick google... oh, there's one in every state. Sheesh, you yanks should try using native names or something, give a bit of variety to your place names... There is only one Eketehuna or Whangamomana in NZ) and west virginia is a brand of tobacco or something...

    269. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the magical money that he get's in his hands just before he buy's the car?

      oh and the gift of a car that is given outside the country and that I pay the sales tax on here?

      suer. he certianly does

    270. Re:And get paid 40% less? No thanks. by Sepper · · Score: 1

      What do you call the people who drive trains? :P

      I still call em Engineers but officialy they are "Railwayman" (Railwaymens?)

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
  3. Time to think about moving north? by mwood · · Score: 1

    To make 40% less?

    The beer-hockey sounds interesting, though. :-)

    1. Re:Time to think about moving north? by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

      I am An american that lives and Works In Toronto. Is it Cheaper not really its similar. I actually get paid teh same as I was getting paid in San Diego dollar for dollar. The lifestyle is not that different. My taxes are only slightly higher then what I paid in California. However In Toronto they seem to not like Americans very much Dunno about other cities but those I meet from elsewhere seem to be a little nicer.

      You can actually come to Canada and work if you get a job Offer in a few different areas which are covered by the NAFTA Agreement information concerning requirements and the actual occupations can be found here and here

      Considering everythign I must say North America is more different Eat to west then it is From Canada to the US. Somethign to Consider.

    2. Re:Time to think about moving north? by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! I've been in the U.S. for a couple months shy of 5 years now, and I've noticed WAY more difference between East-West than Canada-U.S. I'm originally from Northwestern Ontario, far enough west that it's almost due North of where I live in Texas right now. And I had a lot more to adjust to in moving to Toronto than I had moving to Texas. 'Cept for the heat of course. :)

  4. Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, type su, eh?
    % sua
    sua: Command not found

    1. Re:Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by zhiwenchong · · Score: 0

      Hahaha that's a good one...

    2. Re:Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by Yosemite+Sue · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're joking but ...

      I once was involved in a tech support call while I was in the US (I was doing the calling) where I was asked to spell out a username that had a "z" in it. Being Canadian, I used "zed". Every time I said "zed", the tech support woman said "What?".

      I felt pretty dumb once I realized the issue.

      --
      "Arrr! The laws of science be a harsh mistress." -- Bender
    3. Re:Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      That's ok, last time I was in the US, I really needed to use the restroom. So, I asked someone where the restroom was and they stood there with a dumbfounded look on their face while I was doing the pee-pee dance. The guys says, "...well there is a water fountain and bench down the hall..." to which I replied, "No i gotta take a leak!"

      He clued in and I eventually found my way. When I told my brother who lives there he cracked up and informed me that they don't use that term.

      The only other thing that bugs me about the US is that you can't find a bag of ketchup or dill pickle chips anywhere!

    4. Re:Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's either total BS, or you found the one guy in the entire US that doesn't know what "restroom" means.

    5. Re:Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by rsidd · · Score: 1
      last time I was in the US

      You mean last time you were out of the US? "Restroom" is the standard bowdlerisation in the US, it's the rest of the world that calls it by its proper name.

    6. Re:Canadian tech support is a pain in the ass by Jardine · · Score: 1

      I once was involved in a tech support call while I was in the US (I was doing the calling) where I was asked to spell out a username that had a "z" in it. Being Canadian, I used "zed". Every time I said "zed", the tech support woman said "What?".

      When I worked in tech support I would sometimes do that intentionally just for spite (too many rednecks who couldn't figure out the concept of right-clicking). Then the company told us to start using the phonetic alphabet to make sure we were understood. The NATO phoenetic alphabet. "Zed as in Zulu" just completely blew these callers' minds.

  5. Are costs of living... by double-oh+three · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are costs of living about 40% less as well?

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    1. Re:Are costs of living... by Opie812 · · Score: 0

      They could be. I'm not sure. With all the taxes I pay I'd never know.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    2. Re:Are costs of living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, almost, depends on the place, but for example in Québec cost of living is lower than other province, especially house, you can get a nice house for 80'000$US in montréal (or in the suburd). The same house will cost you 200'000$US in most place of the US.
      Gas is more expensive, but a lot of people have cars with small engine.
      (Oh and, Québec is one of the most taxed place in the world)

    3. Re:Are costs of living... by marcovje · · Score: 1


      And are this salaries or the total amount that the employer has to spend?

      I get half of the salary that people get in the US, but my employer pays pretty much the other half to various social securities and benefits, which I would have to have private insurances for anyway.

    4. Re:Are costs of living... by adubey · · Score: 1

      The cost of living is lower than in the US, but not 40% lower. You will likely earn less (after taxes) in Toronto than San Jose.

      Also, the country is pretty big, with big differences in cost of living. I hear Halifax is quite cheap, but Vancouver or Toronto are a bit expensive (but probably still cheaper than NYC or the Bay Area, though).

    5. Re:Are costs of living... by mini+me · · Score: 1

      The cost of living is lower, but that 40% is based on the exchange rate.

      If you made $100,000US / year in the US, and moved to Canada under this scheme, you'd still be making $100,000CDN / year. It's just the US company only has to pay $60,000US to give you $100,000.

    6. Re:Are costs of living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! Not by 40%. Here's the deal:

      For us, money is lower in the value system than for Americans. We make less and spend relatively more, but that's ok because we value other stuff more like national health care. Not that our system is better or worse, just different.

      -hadohk

    7. Re:Are costs of living... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      What about Possum Lake? I wouldn't mind living there. Apparently old junker K-cars are quite cheap....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  6. For the Record by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I live in Denver and will work for 40% less than average. And I don't say "eh?" all the time.

    -Peter

    1. Re:For the Record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Vancouver and will work for 40% less than average, and I don't say "Seacrest out!" all the time.

    2. Re:For the Record by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being this guy I actually don't own a TV.

      Based on what I found via google, this refers to some guy on a "reality" show about singing (!) who always reminds the audience that he is openly gay at the end of the show.

      No wonder Canadians think we are weird, they must watch our television programs!

      -Peter

  7. 40% Less Pay by HomerJay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work in the US about 5 hours from the Canadian border and I get paid about 40% less than the average US programmer.

    1. Re:40% Less Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be some kind of hoser, eh.

    2. Re:40% Less Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live 1.5 hours away from the Canadian border and wouldn't have had a job at all if I didn't telecommute.

    3. Re:40% Less Pay by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you have to look at the whole North American picture... the Canada/U.S. border doesn't change very much. There's some heavy fluctuation on account of dollar shifts, and expenses aren't very high...

      There might be a 40% difference, but you have to compare city for city, not country for country. The countries are far too large, and Canada doesn't have as many uber-expensive areas as the U.S... infact, I can only think of Vancouver, and even that isn't spectacularly expensive.

  8. But... by CptKron · · Score: 1

    But that's only half as cheap!

  9. So much for Canada being pompous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh, woo... you get our IT jobs. Take them. Maybe now the peabrained yokels that fill those jobs here in the US will need to actually LEARN something and perform a REAL job function.

    1. Re:So much for Canada being pompous... by cgsamurai · · Score: 0

      What? Like flippin Burgers for 8k a year? No thanks.

      McF-off :) hehe..
      (sry, just wanted to use "Mc" in a punny phrase)

  10. very few IT jobs in canada. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    canada does not have an outsourcing industry set up let alone the companies to outsoruce to. remember that sales and marketing is required as well as a cheap pool of labour. indian companies agressively market services in the US, while being able to retain a large pool of engineers on the bench (since labour is cheap).
    this alone make the difference. in canada you would have to pay engineers $40 CDN an hour while in india is $4 CDN or equivalent. this allows more engineers to sit on the bench, allowing faster scale up.

    1. Re:very few IT jobs in canada. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Canada does not have an outsourcing industry. But it has another advantage: most American companies have subsiduaries in Canada. For example, GE started opened a call center for US customers in Canada in the early 90's. The call center wasn't outsourced: it was still owned and run by GE. It's just that it was situated in Canada. Other companies followed suit.

    2. Re:very few IT jobs in canada. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      You're very wrong as far as outsourcing tech support. I work in Canada but our head office is in the US... on the launch of a new product we looked at call centers in the Toronto area and there were 5 good competitors that battled.

  11. The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although our legal system is "similar", we lack equivalents to silly little things like the DMCA and the Patriot Act.

    On the other hand, we're responsible for Celine Dion. On behalf of all Canadians, I apologize profusely.

    1. Re:The land of the free by sindarin2001 · · Score: 1

      And it's the lack of these equivalents, in addition to the ability to actually find a job, that makes Canada look pretty attractive. Surprisingly, being from Montana, you'd be amazed at how many people in other states think that Montana is part of Canada. I'm not sure where they studied geography, but I hope my children never go there :)

    2. Re:The land of the free by arhar · · Score: 1

      And while you're at it, apologize for Brian Adams and Alanis Morisette. Of course, we have to apologize for about 95% of everything else that's on the radio :-(

    3. Re:The land of the free by Linuxthess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummmm... what about the blank CD-R levy you guys pay?

      --

      I sig, therefore I was.
    4. Re:The land of the free by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you also gave us Gerald Bull. If your government hadn't been stupid at the time, Canada would have had the cheapest space launch system in the world - only hundreds of dollars per kg.

      --
      Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
    5. Re:The land of the free by MySt1k · · Score: 2, Informative

      we pay blank CD-R levy but we cant get sued by MPAA/RIAA.

      --
      Doh !
    6. Re:The land of the free by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we apologize for everything.

      I'm sorry.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    7. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Sokay. You also are responsible for Rush.

    8. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, now. The Canadian government has apologized for Bryan Adams on numerous occasions.

    9. Re:The land of the free by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, we're responsible for Celine Dion. On behalf of all Canadians, I apologize profusely.

      American radio stations are free to select whatever mix of artists they want to play, but Canadian stations must meet a quota of "CanCon" music... and I seriously think that leads to Canadian stars being created who otherwise might not have gotten a recording contract if they were American. The irony is that all of those Canadian stars then go to Hollywood to make their home base for business purposes.

    10. Re:The land of the free by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Drew Carey makes up for it.

    11. Re:The land of the free by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      That's what allows me to make legal copies of cd's that I own, or that I borrow from friends. I don't complain.

      --
      No Comment.
    12. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our free uploading and downloading of music makes it worthwhile!

    13. Re:The land of the free by birder · · Score: 1

      The levy isn't a burden. Buying a spindle of 100, stores sell CDRs for $0.25 each and DVD+-R for $0.70 each.

    14. Re:The land of the free by Zareste · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah, the DMCA is stupid, but to make a law restricting foreigners in music? That's so much stupider that I think Canada's in no place to bitch about 'silly' laws.

      Good so we're even.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    15. Re:The land of the free by discstickers · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because of what 2 of the "A"s in "MPAA/RIAA" stand for?

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    16. Re:The land of the free by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      You can do this legally in the US without buying music CD-Rs.

    17. Re:The land of the free by dan.hunt · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that cannot be said enough times.What about that other navel flashing skinny girl. I would also like to apologize profusely for that too.

    18. Re:The land of the free by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      American radio stations are free to play what they like but some disgusting percentage of them (half? three-quarters?) are owned by clearchannel, so they all want to play the same schmaltzy corporate shit. In other words, the majority of our recording stars have no fucking business being stars, they are corporate creations with no basis in talent.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:The land of the free by Hrdina · · Score: 1
      Apology accepted, but don't let it happen again.

      At least you gave us RUSH. And hockey.

    20. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you also gave us Gerald Bull. If your government hadn't been stupid at the time, Canada would have had the cheapest space launch system in the world - only hundreds of dollars per kg.

      This is Canada we're talking about here. You mean hundreds of dollars per keg.

    21. Re:The land of the free by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Given the fatc that Avril , sum 41, Sarah macglaclin (also can't spell), nickelback and a few dozen other popular artists are canadian and qualify, it isn't hard filling up 20%.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    22. Re:The land of the free by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      we pay blank CD-R levy but we cant get sued by MPAA/RIAA. Perhaps because of what 2 of the "A"s in "MPAA/RIAA" stand for? America - that continent that Canada is part of?

    23. Re:The land of the free by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 0

      I read on fox news the other day FOX isn't allowed in Canada. Maybe you have nothing called a 'patroit act' but it sure looks like you have your own freedom of speech problems in that case doesn't it? Also a poll shows 40% of Canadian teenagers hate the United States. Why should we send you jobs? Your country keeps benifiting from being next to one of, if not the strongest nation in the world but this 'friendship' seems to only go one way. I wouldn't give canada anything until they start helping us (or anyone in the world for that matter)

      Incase someone reads this before its modded down the article I got that stuff from is here

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    24. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull.

      Gerald Bull's cannon would only have replaced the first stage of a rocket. It still would have required upper stages to make the orbit circular.

      Instead of a satellite having to withstand a 6-G rocket launch, it would have to withstand thousands of G's from a cannon blast. And the typical school-bus sized modern satellite wouldn't fit down the barrel.

      The "hundreds of dollars per kg" only applies when all you want to launch is a kg of slightly deformed solid metal.

    25. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no current Levy on Blank DVD's btw... there is one proposed. Both are foolish, paying the CPPC money to back up my Data on CDR. Pisses me off. They can't do that in the U.S. ( too many guns... eventually they'd get rid of any such foolishness).

      http://www.sycorp.com/levy/index.htm

    26. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rush more than makes up for the Celine fiasco...

    27. Re:The land of the free by Morpeth · · Score: 1
      "sure looks like you have your own freedom of speech problems in that case doesn't it"

      Yeah, and The Patriotic [sic] Act allows gov't croonies to wiretap w/o court orders, investigate your reading habits without your knowledge, as they try to strongarm libraries and bookstores into giving up your info.

      In terms on media, do some research on who gets 'invited' to White House events, liberal journals/journalists get blackballed all the d*mn time. Question Bush and you're 'unpatriotic'. The media handles Bush with kid gloves and softball questions.

      40% of Canadian teenagers hate the United States
      Maybe b/c of remarks like the "'friendship' seems to only go one way. I wouldn't give canada anything until they start helping us "

      Have you even consider that fact that by NOT having a huge military and an aggressive foreign policy Canada IS doing the US a favor - the longest ungaurded border in modern history, allowing the US to commit resources elsewhere.

      "I wouldn't give canada anything until they start helping us"

      Interesting, and yet the US gives China most favored nation trade status even though they do nothing but snub the US, trade dump, and violate who knows how many human rights.

      And start helping you how? In what way? By joining in Bush's trumped up war? No thanks...

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    28. Re:The land of the free by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      My point is that some of Avril, Sum 41, Sarah whats-her-name and Nickelback and the others might not even have had radio-quality studio recordings of their work ever made if it wasn't for the existance of the CanCon laws...

    29. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox News isn't allowed in Canada? Gee, Canadiens are even smarter than the Mac users.

      Fox News shouldn't be allowed in the US either...

      Fair and Balanced my ass....

    30. Re:The land of the free by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      America - that continent that Canada is part of?

      America is a country, not a continent. Perhaps you were thinking of North America?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    31. Re:The land of the free by bouncingbean · · Score: 1

      Cool, we don't help the rest of the world... Like we don't send our military out peace keeping all the time, send billions of dollars to third world countries for aid releif and infrastructure programs and medicine... But we're not nice to Americans. Sort of like how the Americans violated the free trade agreement and posted a tarriff on the softwood that we send down, and won't take it off even though the world courts rule it's illegal. The friendship does go one way it seems at times, it goes from us to you. Mind you most Americans I've talked to and thats alot since I did customer service for at&t wireless were nice and friendly when they realized I had a bit of an accent.

    32. Re:The land of the free by Stoutlimb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Having listened to pop music from the united states, and watched their tv, I can certainly say that the Canadian Content rule is most certainly a form of quality control. :-))

      But seriously though, US media is a threat to national unity. If we allowed the airwaves to be flooded with US stuff, we'd lose a good deal of our Canadian identity.

    33. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox really is pissing off you liberals. (this is a good thing.) Is it the fact that they are not left wing or the fact that they have as many viewers as CNN and MSNBC combined. Get over it . One network that isn't liberal vs. all the others, (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.) Why is it that Liberals always talk about diversity, but only want it when it is for their side.

    34. Re:The land of the free by mikec · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Canadian Content laws? Which dicatate that at least x% of the music played is by Canadian artists? And God Forbid someone would want to watch Fox News...

    35. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the United States of America is a country, America generally refers to North and South America, the "New World" discovered by the Europeans.

    36. Re:The land of the free by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am proud of and impressed by any French Canadian (not counting politicians) who has the guts to go on National TV and communicate in English for more than 3 minutes at a time.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    37. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The media handles Bush with kid gloves and softball questions."

      hehe, It's 'chique' to bash this president, you must be kidding!

    38. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go to the Fox News website, and you'll see why (anyone who wants the actual news...) people don't like it. Most of their news reports and analysis belong on the opinion and editorial page, and the polls they put on thier site are not polls, they're PUSH POLLS.

    39. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everywhere **except** in the news media (where it counts). The wacky ultraconservatives still have a stranglehold there.

    40. Re:The land of the free by GedConk · · Score: 1

      Coming from Quebec, I won't try to say that the US have a good reputation here.

      I would like to make one distinction though. I would say that most teenagers hate the american government, not the americans. Many american citizens are great folks.

      You have elected that government, and as far as I know, we respect that. Are we happy with the results ? No. That is our right.

      I guess that is the whole idea of having 2 countries. You can do things your way, we can do it ours. Anyway, how many americans actually care what the canadians think ?

      As long as we respect our differences, we can cooperate, wether we agree on different issues or not.

      As far as Fox news go, I don't really care. I'd much rather listen to RDI (French CBC news network) or even euronews. Still the CRTC (the ones who regultate that kind of stuff) needs some changes IMHO...

    41. Re:The land of the free by Rei · · Score: 1

      Bull again.

      HARP demonstrated that even sensitive electronics could withstand the G forces if embedded in solid plastic first. The size of the rockets needed for HARP are simply to get orbital momentum; they're quite small.

      The estimated HARP costs per kilogram were including rocket costs. GLO-1A - the prototype - would have launched a 2kg payload to a low LEO orbit for 3,000$. The Martlet 4A project (GLO-1B), the non-prototype, was to carry 23kg to a high LEO orbit for little more.

      Now, to be fair, in the 1970s, a private analysis of gun launch set prices a lot more pessimisticly, but also set payloads a lot more optimisticly. The report suggested costs as low as (in modern dollars) 1800$/lb . More pessimistic than Bull's numbers, but still a great savings. And there's the other advantages of gun-launch as well - high throughput, consistant operation, low initial investment, low upkeep costs, low development costs, etc.

      Lastly, your "school-bus sized modern satellite" is quite wrong - satellites have been getting far *smaller* on average, not larger.

      --
      Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
    42. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On behalf of all Canadians, I apologize profusely"

      Ahh Jesus H Christ!!!
      Quit apologizing for everything!!!

      well actually that seems to come off as a little harsh ....sorry bout that eh?

    43. Re:The land of the free by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 1

      ....And you're responsible for Limbaugh.

    44. Re:The land of the free by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      I second that. I *like* the content rule. It should be kept and enforced. We have a lot of great artists who wouldn't get the time of day by the radio stations in their mad rush for Brittney Spears, or whoever is the pop-culture queen these days. I *like* being able to listen to Canadian music on the radio, like the Bare Naked Ladies, Great Big Sea, etc.

    45. Re:The land of the free by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 1

      .....and how much of that music is only on RIAA labels? Thats what I thought. They've all been bought up.

    46. Re:The land of the free by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 1

      and the polls they put on thier site are not polls, they're PUSH POLLS.

      I just did go to fox's front page and thier poll results are viewable from everyday since may 17th, you can read the results by Click Here for past poll results , they don't hide the ones they don't want you to see like SOME networks. Try going to fox news and read the front page yourself. But if you go to CNN you see only 3 polls unlike FOX having 36, all of the CNN ones which by the way are about kerry and edwards being great! Just try finding the Results for CNN's "quick vote" they do everyday, I couldn't. FoX's are right next to the 'vote' link

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    47. Re:The land of the free by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > On the other hand, we're responsible for Celine Dion. On behalf of all Canadians, I apologize profusely.

      man am I the only one who still thanks strange Brew for all Canada has given us.

    48. Re:The land of the free by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Except Shania... she's so hot, and full of Canadian goodness...

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    49. Re:The land of the free by Malc · · Score: 1

      What are you apologising for? You should be gleefully rubbing your hands together, cackling and muttering: "Thank you! Take her your fools, take her".

    50. Re:The land of the free by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Or pennies per donut. Just think how cheaply we could send Tim Horton's coffee to the ISS.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    51. Re:The land of the free by Tuzanor · · Score: 1
      I read on fox news the other day FOX isn't allowed in Canada. Maybe you have nothing called a 'patroit act' but it sure looks like you have your own freedom of speech problems in that case doesn't it?

      I don't agree with blocking them, but read up on the reasons why the CRTC did it. They try to keep a balance to keep enough Canadian content on the air.

      Also a poll shows 40% of Canadian teenagers hate the United States.

      So what? That's an opinion. And when most people say they hate the United States, they're refering to the government, not the people. That percentage swings wildly when different presidents are in power.

      Why should we send you jobs? Your country keeps benifiting from being next to one of, if not the strongest nation in the world but this 'friendship' seems to only go one way.

      Canadians are responsible for 40% of Florida's tourism industry. Read up on when Jeb Bush recently visited Canada, he was really trying to downplay Canada's refusal to participate in the Iraq war. It was really quite interesting.

      I wouldn't give canada anything until they start helping us (or anyone in the world for that matter)

      We sent troops to Afghanistan, of which four got killed by an American who only got a slap on the wrist. On 9/11 WE accepted hundreds of planes that could have been filled with terrorists. We didn't even get acknoledged by Bush. We spend a greater percentage of our GDP on foreign aid. We participated in the balkans bombing. Just because we don't use our military in our foreign relations projects, does not mean we do nothing.

    52. Re:The land of the free by Bloody+Pulp · · Score: 1

      >>America - that continent that Canada is part of?
      >
      >America is a country, not a continent. Perhaps you >were thinking of North America?

      America is not a country. It is a hamlet in Horst aan de Maas, a municipality in the southeastern Netherlands.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_aan_de_Maas

      Perhaps you were thinking of the United States of America?

    53. Re:The land of the free by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you were thinking of the United States of America?

      And London is a city in Ontario? No, the America that most people refer to has 50 states, lots of guns, and a monkey in the whitehouse. Don't be so literal.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    54. Re:The land of the free by legojenn · · Score: 1
      I read on fox news the other day FOX isn't allowed in Canada.

      Hmm, on my satellite receiver, I get Fox TV from Seattle and Boston. I think if I plug the cable in to the TV, we may get Fox from Buffalo or Detroit. It's been so song since I watched cable. I think we also have the Fox Sportschannel. Also, I think a lot of Fox programming oozes acorss the border in the form of rebroadcasted programming, like the Simpsons, malcolm in the middle, etc. How much access does Fox need?

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    55. Re:The land of the free by kraut · · Score: 1

      "foreign relations projects"? That only applies to the US if you define "relations" as "piss of your allies and make sure that anyone who's not your enemy already is one when you're done".

      My pet conspiracy theory is that Bush is controlled by Al-Quaida: You could not come up with a better recruitment strategy for them. :(

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    56. Re:The land of the free by Reziac · · Score: 1

      While I understand the desire to maintain a national identity, I think it says something about its *lack* (or at least its lack of real strength) if you need fear losing it to one of your nearest sister cultures. (To my eye, Canadian culture is more akin to British than to American, except in Quebec, where the identity isn't Canadian, but France-West.)

      Re that spoken in jest... in my observation, Canadian TV is not as technically advanced as American TV (mainly in that lighting and SFX tend to be weak, tho I think this is mostly due to having relatively low budgets for such stuff). But this isn't necessarily a bad thing -- if you can't dazzle the viewer with glitter, you've got to consider having *gasp* plot, writing, and acting. Consequently, some of the most consistently interesting series of the past couple decades have been Canadian-made (whether by native Canadians, or by American production companies fleeing from the excesses of Hollywood spending).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. 40% less pay sounds tempting! by mrkitty · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That is all...

    --
    Believe me, if I started murdering people, there would be none of you left.
  13. Always a good thing by dsanfte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Canadian in the IT industry, I'd be glad to see more jobs coming here, definitely. There really is very little difference between Americans and Canadians, besides cultural and political systems. None of that plays into how you sound over the phone, or how well you code.

    Canada really is the ideal place for US companies to outsource. If you have a Roadrunner cable modem and have ever called tech support, chances are you've been talking to someone at a local Ottawa firm called Convergys. I bet you never knew it, either.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:Always a good thing by garcia · · Score: 1

      If you have a Roadrunner cable modem and have ever called tech support, chances are you've been talking to someone at a local Ottawa firm called Convergys. I bet you never knew it, either.

      Local firm? Convergys isn't local. They are all over (Canada and the US). In fact, they handle quite a few different types of cable modems (ATTBI used them, AT&T @Home used them, several phone companies, cable TV companies, etc).

    2. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More jobs in Canada is definitely a good thing. I'm currently and unemployed programmer living in Kingston, ON. Something tells me though that over all we will end up loosing more jobs to other places then the amount of jobs coming here from the U.S. On a side note, it sounds kind of weird hearing the americans saying they would never want to live in Canada. This country truely is a beutifull place, and I would NEVER EVER EVER live in the U.S.

    3. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, they are based out of Cincinnati, OH.

    4. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a Roadrunner cable modem and have ever called tech support, chances are you've been talking to someone at a local Ottawa firm called Convergys. I bet you never knew it, either.

      Or Stream/Solectron in London, Ont where I had the misfortune of working for a year.

    5. Re:Always a good thing by Marillion · · Score: 2, Informative
      #ifdef NITPICK

      Strictly speaking, Convergys is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It is the result of what happended when a firm called CBIS aquired, merged and otherwise assimilated variety of other firms then changed its name. CBIS (Cincinnati Bell Information Systems) was, as the name implies, a spin-off of the local telephone company.

      They are no doubt taking advantage of wage advantages described in the article.

      #endif

      --
      This is a boring sig
    6. Re:Always a good thing by supertbone · · Score: 0

      Convergys is based in Ohio but are all over the globe. Heck, Utah has 6-7 Convergys centers alone. I used to work in the one in Logan.

    7. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a Roadrunner cable modem and have ever called tech support, chances are you've been talking to someone at a local Ottawa firm called Convergys.

      Try the Cincinnati location of an Ottawa firm.

    8. Re:Always a good thing by legojenn · · Score: 1

      Convergys bought out the small local company Taima. I met one of the brothers who owned the company at a New Year's party on e year. he thought he was foing people a favour by paying them starvation wages. When I worked for them, they had this six month contract where if you did not complete six months of employment, you were billed $1000 for training. I never completed my six months and was never billed, but during that time, I had surgery and a bout of depression. How good a job is that? I am lucky that I have a job now where I pay more taxes than I earned when I worked for them. Good riddance to Taima, though I can't imagine things got better after a multinational bought them out.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    9. Re:Always a good thing by spanielrage · · Score: 1

      Convergys is not a local Ottawa company - they have a huge call centre here in Winnipeg too.

    10. Re:Always a good thing by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      If you have a Roadrunner cable modem and have ever called tech support, chances are you've been talking to someone at a local Ottawa firm called Convergys. I bet you never knew it, either.

      As a matter of fact, I did know it and struck up an interesting conversation with the guy while my computer was rebooting. What tipped me off is he said "Turn off the modem and wait aboat one minute."

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    11. Re:Always a good thing by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      And if you use Comcast there's a real good chance you're talking to tech support and billing people in St. Catharines, ON. The same company is apparently now handline Time Warner from their branch in Brockville, ON (near Ottawa). Convergys has a centre in Welland, ON that handles AT&T Wireless. You'd be surprised how many friends of mine have spent summers home from school working at call centres in Canada that handle large American accounts.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    12. Re:Always a good thing by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      There really is very little difference between Americans and Canadians, besides cultural and political systems. None of that plays into how you sound over the phone...

      What aboot.... uhm, wait... what aboot... Oh, I thought I had something to say here. Can't think of it now. Nevermind.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    13. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The call centers in Edmonton and St. Johns also do Comcast support.

    14. Re:Always a good thing by Brando_Calrisean · · Score: 1

      I went for a job interview there, and upon reading that fact ($1000 if you leave/are fired early) in the contract they had given me to sign, promptly said "Thank you" and walked away.

      --
      Don't call me a cowboy, and don't tell me to slow down!
    15. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you said, "Aboat? You mean abaaaawwwwt" with slack-jawed drawlitutde?

    16. Re:Always a good thing by douthat · · Score: 1

      Convergys has offices all over the world. Not just in Canada and the US.

      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    17. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, am a Convergys survivor.

      I've written code that, if I fucked up, would have the FCC a'callin, and did that for 8 years prior to the '1999 Great Telecom Collapse' forcing my butt to the curb. In order to, you know, eat, I took a position at one of thier call centres. I had ulcers from University I had controlled until I started that job. All in all, the FCC was better. ;p

      Art was a god, tho. Props to u Art!

      TFOAE

    18. Re:Always a good thing by cygnusx · · Score: 1

      They are no doubt taking advantage of wage advantages described in the article.

      Yes, and they are planning to add 20,000 employees in India by the end of this year.

    19. Re:Always a good thing by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      If you have a Roadrunner cable modem and have ever called tech support, chances are you've been talking to someone at a local Ottawa firm called Convergys. I bet you never knew it, either.

      I always forget they're from Canada, until they inevitably say "eh" or "aboot".

      Or they suggest I go have a Molsen while my computer is restarting, and ask me if I'm a Leafs fan.

      No, honestly, I know they're Canadian because they're polite and nice. It's like the old joke: How do you get 20 Canadians out of a swimming pool on a hot summer's day? You say "please".

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    20. Re:Always a good thing by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      There really is very little difference between Americans and Canadians, besides cultural and political systems.

      Um, there's very little difference between the residents of any two countries in the world ... besides cultural and political systems.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    21. Re:Always a good thing by mirio · · Score: 1

      I called a IBM technical support several years ago and got this guy with a peculiar accent (yes, there is a Canadian accent). He was very helpful and answered all my questions. Before he hung up, it started:

      Me: "Are you in Canada?"
      Him: "Hmm..yeah, how'd you know?"
      Me: "Your accent"
      Him: "What are you talking aboot?"
      Me: "Nevermind"

      In all seriousness, I've never spent much time in the English-speaking provinces, but I spent 5 months working in Montreal in the dead of winter. In spite of the bone-chilling temperatures I was left with a good impression of Canadians...yes...even the French-speaking ones. :-)

    22. Re:Always a good thing by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      You forgot language and race.

    23. Re:Always a good thing by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Actually, you could end up calling someone in BC. Convergys isn't located in a single city, there are Convergys call-centers all over Canada. The local one here in Kamloops, BC just started doing RoadRunner support, along with HP and American Express.

    24. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Stream/Solectron in London, Ont where I had the misfortune of working for a year.

      I think they're back to Stream again. Someone else bought them.

      Other companies served in London, Ontario (not all by Stream):
      Hp/Compaq
      Verizon
      Verisign
      Lycos (not sure if that one came through or not)
      A whole bunch of dialup ISPs

    25. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, call-centre work... is that really the road to riches in Canada?

      Seriously, really, seriously, a lot of what the mainstream media is calling IT involves external technical support (of various levels). Quite honestly, there are reasons why there is a high staff turnover rate in external technical support. It's shit work. Period. Even the best external tech support positions are stressful and only the more specialized ones pay decent money, that I'm aware of.

      I only know of a small number of well-paid, relatively good external support jobs and those are mostly considered "support" because of the business arrangement. They're really more like internal support jobs contracted out.

      I'd love to see all those IT numbers after jobs that are *primarily* external technical support with *many* customers are taken out. I don't mean high level jobs where you're dealing with a single or small number of clients. Even some serious developers I know have to that in the private sector. Get rid of the shit call centre work and the shit external support positions and look at the IT numbers then.

      Even after that, you're left with a number of internal support positions, but those vary quite a bit and some internal support duties are sometimes shared by a lot of people working in different roles, e.g. systems administrators, etc.

      Financial necessity is the only reason I can think of why more IT workers don't leave the IT sector. When you have a mortgage and student debt, but a two-income family, you can probably scrape by with one person working on call cantre wages (or even both people sometimes), but wouldn't by taking two or three years off to study for a blue collar trade that would eventually pay 10K - 40K dollars more per year. Shit, even apprenticeship wages in some blue collar jobs appear to be better than many call centre jobs (which have some really experienced and educated people working in them). Once you "have your papers" in blue-collar work, cha-ching (for some trades).

    26. Re:Always a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has be gone for what seems like almost a year. They now have Fedex. You should post some News for Slashdot.

  14. Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Cavio · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems that the whole "Land of the Free, Home of the Brave" has been outsourced to Canada. While we fight our war on drugs, Canada has sane drug laws. While we meddle in the affairs of every nation on Earth, Canada just keeps on making beer.

    Beer == Good.

    So, bring it on. Outsource me to Canada. I'll move there, what with their reasonable immigration policies, and shack up with a burly lumberjack babe and start my life anew.

    --

    Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    1. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by cadfael · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry, the burly lumberjack babes are for locals only. You have to start with the hot quebecois babe and work your way up the ladder...

      Canada, our home and native land, and the home of amazing French women...

      --
      -- The Hollow Man
      Non illegitimati carborundum
    2. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Dav3K · · Score: 1, Informative

      If by reasonable immigration policies you mean 10X more costly than US immigration, a multi-year, non-informative process that prevents you from international travel (even crossing the US/CANADA border!) then yeah, things are pretty reasonable with immigrating to Canada from the US.

    3. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately they all speak french. at least on the east side, or so i hear.

    4. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone's welcome here, we only ask one thing...

      Leave your gun in the U.S.

    5. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Cavio · · Score: 1

      Well, that's better than "Drawly-Twang", which is what they speak here in north Florida.

      --

      Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    6. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by gvc · · Score: 1

      We make wine, too. The mass-produced ones are plonk, but there are some very respectable whites and serious reds as well. Some are even available in U.S. stores. Look for "Henry of Pellham" (Ontario), "Chateau des Charmes" (Ontario), and "Tinhorn Creek" (B.C) to name a couple.

      If you happen to be flying through Toronto, the duty free has a Chateau-des-Charmes Cab. Franc (1998) for $20 (CAD) that is worth trying.

    7. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Canada, our home and native land, and the home of amazing French women...

      Hosebeasts, you mean.

    8. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, not true about the beer anymore. Most of the brands are really just Molson or Labatt in disguise. And they've been moving steadily towards the American style of yellow water for beer for years.

      Ya gotta buy from a small time craft beermaker to get quality now and the US has just as many of them.

    9. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Beer == Good.

      Yeah, and we have real beer, that actually contains alcohol in it. Not that Near Beer that you guys try to sell as beer

      Seriously though, part of why it's 40% cheaper is the exchange rate, the rest is cost of living is lower. And I for one am glad to hear this, I'm a Software Developer that's working at best buy because no one is hiring fresh college grads anymore.

      And no... we don't live in igloos :D

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    10. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should bring that up. I have a family member (Canadian) who has been working in the US for 2 years. He now has to get some new paperwork done (9/11 stuff, read bullshit), and he can not leave the US while that process is taking place. Expected time till completion, 12 - 24 months. Oh, plus a huge fee for the pleasure. Sounds like things are the same on both sides of the border to me.

    11. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by theantix · · Score: 1

      I have to admit that I agree with the general thrust of your argument -- our drug laws, beer, and immigration policies are pretty good lately. But in terms of freedom there are still areas where the USA has us beat cold. For example, we have no equivelent to your first two amendments in the bill of rights. This means that (for better or for worse depending on your bias) the Canadian gov't can and does curtail free speech, and places a lot of restrictions on owning firearms.

      So on some important ways we are a lot less free -- in others we are more free. Therefore I don't think it's generally far to summarize our laws and think that we are more freedom loving than the USA. But I do love living in Canada. =)

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    12. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Laxitive · · Score: 3, Informative

      I dunno. My family, which was an Indian immigrant family living in the US, didn't have much in the way of problems immigrating to Canada. I think all in all, the process took less than two years. The barrier of entry to become a part of canadian society, is, in my experience, much lower than in the states.

      Even getting citizenship in Canada is a breeze compared to the states, especially for us "third world escapees". After I had lived here for 5 years, I applied for citizenship, and within a year and half, had gone through the entire process.

      I don't know where you're getting those statements from, but they definitely don't reflect my experience with Canadian immigration. I find the bureaucracy here to be much more tempered than in the states. Not nearly as much red tape to deal with.

      -Laxitive

    13. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the 2nd ammendment exists in the US. but i am willing to bet the restrictions are pretty similar. (maybe im wrong)

      but we may be gaurenteed the right to bear arms, it just isnt very easy.

    14. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and we have real beer
      I don't see much difference. There isn't anything made by Molson or Labatts which I would call "beer". Micro-brewery stuff is good, but you can say the same thing about the US.

    15. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by kabrakan · · Score: 1

      Also the nice thing about immigrating to the US is that you keep your old citizenship. If i immigrate in the next few years(or WHEN i immigrate if bush gets reelected), I will have to dump my US citizenship. But who cares, college will be incredibly cheap and it looks like i'll have some job security to look forward to!

      --
      Slartibartfast:"Is that your robot?"
      Marvin:"No, I'm mine."
    16. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      We also don't have property (land) rights. We have the privilege to use the land (or some part of it) as long as we pay our property tax and the government doesn't want it for something else (which can include forcing you to sell it to a construction company that wants to make a mall).

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    17. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by theantix · · Score: 1

      I'll take that bet.

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    18. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      On the other medicine in Canada is extremely un-free, all of it being under the control of a single monopoly.

      They also have some siginificant problems respecting freedom of speech - television is highly content-regulated, people can be prosecuted for publicly stating opinions the government opposes, etc.

      They also severely restrict people's self-defense rights.

      All in all, I still think the US is more free, although Canada certainly isn't as brutal in fighting the drug war.

    19. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      My statements come from the shared experience my wife and I have had with her immigration process from the US to Canada. We are 4 years into the process and although it is mostly complete now (still no Perm. Resident card!! ARRGGH!) it has been fraught with delays and contradictory statements from within various branches of the government. Neither of us have criminal backgrounds, health problems, or anything else to complicate the process. If I had chosen to immigrate to the US instead, it would have been less costly and much quicker to achieve the same goal.

    20. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I've never known anyone to be prosecuted for speaking out against the government here.

      For spreading hate against Jews and minorities, yes, I've seen the government do that. And that's just fine with me.

      Nobody made a fuss over a nipple on TV here. Heck CITY-TV in Toronto shows softporn every Friday night, and Showcase has it practically every night, except it's mostly gay. Darn. :)

    21. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by KanSer · · Score: 1

      TWO YEARS?! I'm an American and German citizen, my mom is a Landed Immigrant (i.e. a legal canadian) and it has taken me 5 fucking years with not a peep from Canadian Immigration. A while ago one of the hangups was they couldn't understand my parents divorce papers because they were in German.

      At the airport(YVR, vancouver) I can demand immigration assistance in something like 14 languages. But at the headquarters of immigration you can't find one person that can read German?

      Also, about 3 years ago a HUGE boatload of chinese illegaly came over. Something like 400 of em packed on to the rustiest piece of shit ever. I went back and reaserched it, and hundreds of em got Canadian citizenship before I even get a word on my application. (And yes, my MP Keith Martin has tried to help out, but he's done all he can.)

      But I don't complain, you know why? Vancouver Island grows the best pot. If you really need a reason to move here, do it for the b.c. bud man... I'm buying half ounces for 90 cdn of the most crhonic shit. (I went back to Cali recently, where I spent my life through middle school, and goddamn that weed sucks. Even the Humboldt stuff left me yearning for something with some northern flavour.)

      Move to Vancouver Island! Southernmost part of Canda, the capital of BC actually lies below the 49th parallel, as does much of the lower island. Some of the best fishing and crabbing in the world. I see orcas swimming in the juan de fuca from my deck, as well as bald eagles nesting in a nearby treetop.

      As far as Land of the Free goes, it's not the USA. Not anymore... (I loved America, too bad ignorance breeds right-wing politics eh?)

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    22. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the Canadian government doesn't send people to jail for selling bongs. Google Tommy Chong Jail They sent him to prison for 9 months for selling water pipes on the net.

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    23. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by iantri · · Score: 1
      This means that (for better or for worse depending on your bias) the Canadian gov't can and does curtail free speech

      Er?

      Constitution Act, 1982 (79)

      Enacted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, which came into force on April 17, 1982

      PART I

      Canadian charter of rights and freedoms


      Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

      Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

      1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

      Fundamental Freedoms

      2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
      a) freedom of conscience and religion;
      b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
      c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and d) freedom of association.

      No, we don't have the right to freely carry around guns. I really don't think this is a problem, but appearantly some people (mostly Americans) think it is.

      The strangest looking bit, to me, is the "Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God", which is a little less seperation between church and state than I would like, but I would say that, in general, this is DEFINATELY not a problem here.

      The horse's mouth.

    24. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by hodet · · Score: 1
      "...people can be prosecuted for publicly stating opinions the government opposes, etc."

      ummmm.... no, they can't! Did you just make that up?
      Check out the Canadian Charter of rights and Freedoms.

      ....and I quote

      Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

      a) freedom of conscience and religion;
      b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
      c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
      d) freedom of association

      I am free to bitch about my government as much as I want.

    25. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I had chosen to immigrate to the US instead, it would have been less costly and much quicker to achieve the same goal.

      If neither of you are US citizens, dream on. I speak from experience when I say US immigration system is the stinkiest of them all, bar none. And while I have no experience with candian one, there are plenty of testimonies from people haven't had much trouble with canadian side... and guess what, I've yet to find someone who found US INS (or whatever it's called nowadays) efficient, reasonably, consistent or anything positive in general.

    26. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by theantix · · Score: 1

      Eh? Perhaps you forget the case of racist journalist Doug Collins, who was fined for "hate speech". Or if that is too far back in the past for you, check out how the CRTC is requiring cable carriers to censor al-Jazeera over potential "hate speech". I'm sorry, we don't have the same freedom of speech that Americans do -- a hateful opinion there is protected free speech and here it is a crime. If that isn't enough, here is the law itself.

      And I'm glad we have gun control laws -- I'm all for it. But you must realize this is a freedom that we do not have. Maybe you don't have a problem with this loss of freedom -- nor do I -- but that doesn't change the fact that Americans are more free in this regard. Freedom isn't always a good thing, if we were all completely free there would be anarchy and chaos, and very few people advocate that.

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    27. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by iantri · · Score: 1
      Freedom isn't always a good thing, if we were all completely free there would be anarchy and chaos, and very few people advocate that.
      Exactly, that is what this is for.
      1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
      Many people, myself included, consider hate speech laws "reasonable limits".

      But that doesn't change the fact that Americans are more free in this regard.
      Well, I suppose in the most literal sense of the word, yes, but we'll be sitting back and laughing when Americans pass the next PATRIOT-style law.

      BTW, the CRTC issue, I doubt has to do with the hate speech laws (the article didn't say this directly), but rather more of the CRTC being that CRTC, that is, a complete abomination. :(

    28. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by theantix · · Score: 1

      You complain about the PATRIOT Act, but you don't complain about our own "Security Certificates"? It's nearly as bad as what Bush is doing in Cuba -- not as bad, but way too fucking close for my tastes. How about how just a few days ago our gov't denied a passport to a citizen by claiming "royal perogative" or some such bullshit. We are far from perfect, and yet you focus on the imperfections of others while pretending we have none of our own.

      My point was, and continues to be, that "freedom" is a very complex beast that every country approaches in a different way. The USA in some areas is more free than Canada, in other areas Canada is more free. That does not imply "better" or "worse" all by itself, though most of us will agree that the extremes of chaos and dictatorship are pretty shitty. If you like Canada better than the USA that's just fine -- I agree with you (!!) -- just don't pretend that we are more freedom loving people than them because it is a false belief as I've tried to show you.

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    29. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by Jonavin · · Score: 1

      Move to Vancouver Island! Southernmost part of Canda, the capital of BC actually lies below the 49th parallel, as does much of the lower island. Some of the best fishing and crabbing in the world. I see orcas swimming in the juan de fuca from my deck, as well as bald eagles nesting in a nearby treetop.

      Um, believe it or not most capitals of Canadian provinces are below the 49th parallel. More than 50% of the Canadian population lives south of the 49th. Toronto is further south than any location in BC including Vacouver Island. There are entire provinces (PEI, NB, NS) south of the 49th.

      I think you meant to say southern BC is the warmest place in Canada based on average annual temperatures.

    30. Re:Canada, a Freedom Loving America by murray_420 · · Score: 1

      Actually the bud in Albert County, New Brunswick is the best pot in Canada

  15. Its been happening for years..... by luckytroll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Outsourcing to Canada has been going on for a while, mostly because of Canada's trusted status in matters of security. Even the evil Haliburton corporations big clusters are now living happily in Toronto along with dozens of others. I should know - I installed them - (and my karma aches for it)

    1. Re:Its been happening for years..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. you work at HP king st and markham datacetners on rotating shifts ?

  16. This is like unemployment numbers by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone talks about first-time unemployment claims, but very few take the time to track what happens to the unemployed over time. Ditto for outsourcing projects. Most of the ones i've heard of or been involved with were ultimately cancelled due to incongruent labor laws, time differences, language barriers, quality control issues, et al.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:This is like unemployment numbers by Pahalial · · Score: 1

      You DO realize you're just agreeing with the original article, right? Those barriers are exactly why it's easier to outsource to Canada than overseas.

      --
      Stuff.
    2. Re:This is like unemployment numbers by HBI · · Score: 1

      I'm suggesting that outsourcing to Canada has the same problems. Albeit lesser, but the same issues crop up.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:This is like unemployment numbers by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      I'm suggesting that outsourcing to Canada has the same problems.

      I've worked in geographically dispersed projects before. They work best if the time zones are limited to +/- 1 hr., relatively frequent face-to-face access is available (say once every 6-8 weeks or so), language is not a barrier, and (most importantly) all parties involved are responsible and want the process to work.

      The downside is that you need to have a more structured process to deal with the decreased communication, but that can be obviated to some extent by tools like PC Anywhere or Lotus Sametime, a good speaker phone, and enough capital to pay the LD charges.

      For me, in Portland, there's not much difference between working with someone in LA, Denver, Phoenix, or Seattle. The travel time and cost (once you take into account time for getting to the airport) are all about the same (except for Seattle - I can drive there :-). I don't know why adding Calgary, Edmunton or Vancouver to the mix would be any different.

      --
      That is all.
    4. Re:This is like unemployment numbers by ADRA · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the Manufacturing and Textiles have NOT come back to America, unless your talking Mexico...

      Once the process has been streamlined, there won't be anything but politics and laws to control outsourcing.

      Now, we havre to come up with the 'next big industry' to stay above everyone else. I was thinking TV-Blog star!

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:This is like unemployment numbers by constantnormal · · Score: 1

      So what DOES happen to the unemployed folks that were canned during an outsourcing project that ultimately failed? After the dust settles, are they back at their old jobs, making a good living at another company, or working as Wal-Mart greeters?

  17. heh by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Funny
    speak English with nearly American accents

    <obligatory British joke>
    So they pronouce English slightly better then? ;)
    </obligatory British joke>

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:heh by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 2

      They should outsource to the UK, wages and cost of living here are only 50% more...

    2. Re:heh by ploppy · · Score: 1

      It's probably only Americans who can tell the difference. As a British person, Canadians sound the same to me.

    3. Re:heh by ploppy · · Score: 1

      The cost living in the UK maybe 50% more than America, but the wages are 40% LESS than in America for IT employees.

    4. Re:heh by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      Well, bye, you probly don't want to outsourcin' to the east coast, then. There's folks out there sound like welshmen on acid! And lard thunderin' Jesus, lets not even mention Ottawa valley twang...

    5. Re:heh by nine-times · · Score: 1
      'It's probably only Americans who can tell the difference. As a British person, Canadians sound the same to me.'

      It's probably true. British people can often tell what city in England your from from your accent, but can't necessarily tell the difference between different American accents or American vs. Canadian. On the other hand, I've known Americans who can't tell the difference very clearly between Scottish, Irish, English, and Australian accents. For them, all native-speaking but non-American English accents sound pretty similar. In order to tip them off, Australians have to say something like 'G-day, mate', British need to talk like chimney-sweeps from Mary Poppins, and Irish need to run around saying 'They're after me lucky charms!'

      Even in America, Northerners often can't tell the difference between different Southern accents. Non-New Yorkers can't necessarily tell the difference between different New York accents. Canadians often sound close to what most people would consider a 'normal' American accent, but it usually sounds different enough to be noticable. I think Canadians often sound like Americans (with a pretty standard unidentifiable American accent) who are just somehow talking weird. Like how you might talk a little weird if you had just visited the dentist or something, or if you were under a lot of stress. It's something I can't quite put my finger on until they say 'aboot' (about).

      But that's probably a far longer explanation than you were looking for.

    6. Re:heh by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      Compare like with like: IT salaries in the City of London (the commercial district which probably has 25% of the country's graduate-level jobs) exceed those in any market other than Wall Street, and the cost of living can be double that of a big US city. However, the cost of living in the North of England is much, much lower, but yes, wages will be lower than in the US. Cost of living comparisons with the UK are always skewed for three reasons: 1 - the cost of property in London is insane, but if you see it as an investment as well as a cost of living, it works out much better. 2 - we get a lot of stuff for "free" - not just the NHS but also a decent-ish social security system. 3 - The cost of labour - anything involving services are going to be expensive - from haircuts to eating out, but then you don't have to tip as much (or at all in many places!)

    7. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we pronounce it the same way. We just spell it correctly.

    8. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct John Crosbie reference is "Lord tunderdin' Jaysus, by"

    9. Re:heh by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      The reason so many Canadians are working in American television is that Canadians have a very generic accent .. it doesn't sound like a American-regional accent (southern, new york, or boston, etc).

      It's true about the English, though. I'm Canadian, and visited England recently, and quite a few people called me a "bloody Yank". I should have remembered to wear a maple leaf pin or something, lol.

      And no, we don't say aboot. They only say that in Newfoundland (and island off the east coast).

    10. Re:heh by nine-times · · Score: 1
      'And no, we don't say aboot. They only say that in Newfoundland (and island off the east coast).'

      Most of the Canadians I've known (personally) have had a slight accent. One, of course, they didn't believe that they had. Not all did, but most. And many of them say 'aboot', if only slightly. I haven't met a Canadian who will admit he says aboot, but I've met quite a few who do.

      eh, doesn't matter. I've met people in New York and LA claim I have a southern accent. I don't hear it.

    11. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing about American accents is that you're likely to find different elements of several US accents in the same person.

      I've been told that I sound like someone straight out of an Italian-American neighorhood. I've also been told that I sound a little Southern. It sounds like an unusual mix, but I think I do have elements of both in my speaking, which creep out every now and then, depending on what I'm saying. I'm Italian-American and I live below the Mason-Dixon line, so I think it makes at least a little bit of sense.

      I read somewhere once that the American accent used to be a lot more regional, but after better communication (radio, TV) and increased travel (automobiles, planes), it's sort of merged a lot.

      I can believe that. If you listen to a lot of older recordings of Americans speak, you will notice differences, and I'm not just talking about the poor sound quality back then. For example, it's been my observation that in a lot of older recordings, some of America's wealthier or more socially elite seem to retain a few elements of an English accent, of all things, which seem to have been phased out in the last century.

    12. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny you should mention Southern accents and Boston accents in the same parenthetical list. It reminds me of something.

      I knew a guy from a backwater town in Virginia who talked a lot like he was from Boston. Very much so. I was very surprised to learn he had never set foot in New England.

      I asked a bunch of people about this, and what somebody told me was that everyone in his part of Virginia talked like that. I'm told that the Boston accent actually originated in England, and that the English colonists who settled that part of Virginia came from the same place and at the same time as their counterparts in Massachusetts. And so, you end up with very similar accents in these two very different places.

      At least, that's what they told me. I'm still not sure if I believe it.

    13. Re:heh by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      speak English with nearly American accents

      Well, that depends, in Quebec people speak English with quite marked French accents.

      People outside Canada often forget that Canada is two nations in one country. If you are moving to Quebec, you would benefit greatly from learning French before arriving. Because Quebec is a French speaking nation and outside of the wealthy parts of the larger cities, most people don't speak English. Or they had a few years long ago in school and haven't used it since.

      The language situation is not as bad as it seems, though. English and French share more than half of their words. It's the pronounciation that's a real killer for anglophones (the fancy polite word for native English speakers). French has many more vowel sounds than English and it is spoken about twice as fast. Imagine deep south USA english spoken at three times the speed of a Mississippi conversation with half the words being completely different. That's what French can sound like to newly arrived anglophone.
      But like all skills, you can master it. It's worth it because Quebec is a great place. If you're a Slashdot reader, then you have experience at mastering difficult things. This is just one more on the list.

  18. awesome... by cecille · · Score: 1

    wow, I can't wait until I get out of school and get paid 40% less than a person 2 hours south of me. sweet.

    --
    ...no two people are not on fire.
  19. Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by Cycline3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not outsource to me in West Virginia...? I work cheaper than all of them combined. There are plenty of people in the USA who will work for less - it's better than no work at all.

    1. Re:Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by 44BSD · · Score: 0

      Hell, dude, anybody works for less than all of Canada put together!

    2. Re:Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not outsource to me in West Virginia...? Probably afraid of the language barrier. :)

      --
      "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    3. Re:Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

      ( Disclaimer: I understand its a joke )
      I'm from Southern West Virginia, and while spending 2+ years in Northwest PA has nearly stripped me of my accent, WV/Kentucky dialect is one of the closest forms of Elizabethean speech there is. This is mostly due to settlers that came to the area now known as WV/Va/Ky and figured it was too dangerous and not worthwhile to migrate out of the mountain ranges.

      Course, it could all be a WV urban myth created after that Deliverance movie destroyed our local economy :P ( and it was filmed / based in GEORGIA damn it )

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    4. Re:Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by gears5665 · · Score: 1

      because you're the bottom of the rung. They are outsourcing to the best in Canada and getting the best educated there for 40%.

    5. Re:Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Why not outsource to me in West Virginia...? I work cheaper than all of them combined. There are plenty of people in the USA who will work for less - it's better than no work at all.

      Not too far away from you is Hazard, Kentucky, where some of my folks are from. It had the dubious honor of being the first stop on Clinton's 1999 "Poverty Tour". Soon after, SHPS (a health care outsourcing company) opened up a call center there, on some reclaimed strip-mine land.

      The only problem is, only the most desperate locals will even consider applying there. Word got out quick that the management treats their employees badly, you'll never advance past that minimum-wage job, and you'll be so tired after you're done that you won't have the energy to even look for another job -- if there were any in the area, which there ain't.

      Call it spoiled, or call it self-respect... but there is a limit to what people in this country will put up with. Unfortunately for us, there are other countries where that limit is a lot closer to the bottom.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    6. Re:Why not outsource to me in West Virginia... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Ahh, West Virginia! The state that smells like it sounds! :-)

  20. Cost of Living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That depends. If cost of living is equivalent, or better, then I wouldn't mind it at all. If a house costs 85,000 instead of 220,000 (standard here in AZ), then I'd take that cut in pay.

    This is why people are leaving California. Cost of Living. They may make 100,000 a year, but have to pay 450,000 for a 1 bedroom 1 bath 'house'- with no yard or garage.

    1. Re:Cost of Living by nulleffect · · Score: 1

      450,000 dollars of American money?

      Hmm, let's see. That'll get you, well, a 1 bedroom 1 bath 'house' in Vancouver.

    2. Re:Cost of Living by king-manic · · Score: 1

      2500 sq ft 2 story house in a nice neighborhood: $250,000 cnd in Edmonton Alberta.

      Same house in Vancouver/richmont ect..
      $750,000 cnd.

      same hous ein brandon manitoba:

      $150,000 cnd.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  21. If You Choose To Move... by Greenisus · · Score: 2, Funny
    You'll have to learn the Canadian alphabet:

    A, ay!, B, ay!, C, ay!, D, ay! . . . .

    /thanks, don't forget to tip the bar

    1. Re:If You Choose To Move... by Techguy666 · · Score: 1

      It's "eh", eh, not "ay", eh. Oy vey.

    2. Re:If You Choose To Move... by TheCatWhisperer · · Score: 1

      Actually, its spelled "eh".. not "ay".. that's closer to "aye" as in "Aye Capatin"...

    3. Re:If You Choose To Move... by legojenn · · Score: 1

      Our alphabet is not nearly as funny as Gene Simmons doing a New York alphabet, "F***ing A, F***ing B, F***ing C ...".

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    4. Re:If You Choose To Move... by tbaggy · · Score: 1

      This is how they came up with the name of the country...
      C, eh!, N, eh!, D, eh!
      Hint for sloths, replace eh with A.

    5. Re:If You Choose To Move... by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1

      "Oy Vey" is Yiddish - spoken by many European Jews. Shares a lot with Hebrew. Brooklyn has a large Jewish community and because of that the expression "Oy Vey" is very commonly used there.

      - Thomas;

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  22. Good Idea by spikiermonkey · · Score: 1

    Good Idea, but still won't help US programmers!

    --
    "Where all men think alike, no one thinks very much." -Walter Lippmann
  23. Perhaps the real solution to keep Americans workin by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Is to have Canada Annex the United States- they're obviously doing SOMETHING right with their 40% pay cuts (I took more than that to start working again after being laid off), lower value money supply, and socialized medicine (Heck, my PARENTS could afford a 40% pay cut right now if they could get under socialized medicine- medical insurance is 60% of their current cost of living).

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  24. And the fast food industry appreciates that. by Blaede · · Score: 1

    Enjoy wearing that paper hat.

    1. Re:And the fast food industry appreciates that. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Wow. Most tech people I know can easily get a crappy tech job if they were willing to take a 30% pay cut.

      But if all you think you could get is a food industry job, well, good luck. I personally would get some additional training if I were you. Even someone with a minimal brain should be able to do better than a fast food job in this economy. It just is NOT a real depression.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:And the fast food industry appreciates that. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      26 months of unemployment shows me that isn't true. Neither are tech jobs that easy to get, OR fast food jobs. I ended up taking a 40% pay cut, am still working in the tech industry (sort of), but also had to claim a disability (migraines) and displacement from industry (offshoring) to get this contract with the government. I have PLENTY of additional training (have enough computer programming languages that I'm proficient in to turn in a 6 page resume easy if I listed ALL of my skills) and put out 100 resumes a month PLUS 3-4 fast food applications EVERY MONTH I WAS UNEMPLOYED. And my job search STILL took me 26 months.

      As far as the tech job market goes, we've currently got a higher unemployment rate than the nation did during the depression. As for fast food jobs- all I can say is you'd better be able to speak Spainish, because the kitchens in American fast food restaurants no longer speak English.

      There is no such thing as unskilled labor anymore- and 99% of the jobs you try to apply for you will be either overqualified or underqualified. If you have a college degree, you're REALLY in a bind in this economy- assumed to be overqualified for most jobs, underqualified if you missed even one buzz word on the resume (nobody assumes you can LEARN anymore, even if you've proven it by having a Master's degree), and don't even try to lie about it, most employers do credit checks these days looking for such things as college loans.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:And the fast food industry appreciates that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the problem is simply that you're a moron.

    4. Re:And the fast food industry appreciates that. by Rucker · · Score: 1

      Did you think about relocating? It has been my experience that if you have a high paying job in a (somewhat) specialized field, it isn't unusual to have to move to find an equivalent job if you aren't well-connected.

      Anyway, the unemployment rate is not higher than the great depression (which is what I assume you mean by "depression"). From factcheck.org:
      "In the 1929-1933 economic disaster an estimated one in four American worker were idle." and "In the Bush slump unemployment peaked at 6.4% ..."

      --
      Rucker
    5. Re:And the fast food industry appreciates that. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, the unemployment rate is not higher than the great depression (which is what I assume you mean by "depression"). From factcheck.org: "In the 1929-1933 economic disaster an estimated one in four American worker were idle." and "In the Bush slump unemployment peaked at 6.4% ..."

      I wonder what that unemployment rate would be if it only counted CITIZENS and not FOREIGN WORKERS.

      In Oregon, the High Tech Unemployment Rate has been estimated at 33%- I said in industry, not overall rate. I'm sure that's gone UP since I got my job also- there were very few high tech jobs created by the Oregon Transportation Investment Act, but lots of good construction jobs.

      Did you think about relocating? It has been my experience that if you have a high paying job in a (somewhat) specialized field, it isn't unusual to have to move to find an equivalent job if you aren't well-connected.
      I thought about relocating, but paying $3 million for an investment in an Indian factory to get a visa to earn $10/hr as a project manager didn't make any sense to me. And other states were the same or worse for computer programming- some, like Washington and Alaska, were much worse. As that guy at Microsoft says "Pick a Project to Move to India TODAY!".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:And the fast food industry appreciates that. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the problem is simply that you're a moron.

      Maybe by the standards of somebody who can't speak English and who doesn't know what the word "moron" means. I'd suggest you look it up, but that would mean you'd have to know how to consult a rather ancient and outdated technology known as a DICTIONARY, and why would an AC Script Kiddie know how to do that?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  25. Keep in mind the exchagne rate... by datastalker · · Score: 1

    ...and realise that US $100 is about CA $132. (As of this morning.)

    So if you have some money saved, a 40% "reduction" in pay (is that 40% factoring the exchange rate?) isn't really all that terrible, especially since the cost of living is lower.

    But then you have to deal with the cold, which might or might not be a problem depending on whether you like that or not.

    1. Re:Keep in mind the exchagne rate... by Mahoro · · Score: 1

      And that newegg.com doesn't deliver to Canada. And that prices on computer parts are pretty darn expensive. Good thing for the Toronto Fun League! Win all your parts by fragging!

  26. one of my buddies by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    works at a tech support cubicle farm, and sometimes has trouble understanding some US English accents, especially the thick ones from the Southern States...

    So as far as Canadian / US English language similarities are concerned, your mileage may vary.

    1. Re:one of my buddies by write_with_numbers · · Score: 1

      Whatch ya'll mean ya can't understand that there southern grammar? I was always learned that we was right and the rest of the world was the one with tha problem.

      I must stop now because even though I've lived in Tennessee for years just typing two sentences of that drivel makes my head hurt. Tell your buddy that as a southern citizen I am profoundly sorry. As a matter of fact I'll even grant you amnesty on the whole Celine Dion thing because of his struggles. Do, however, tell him to have a little sympathy for those of us that have to put up with such speech on a daily basis

      --
      You teach a child to read and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test. - George W. Bush
  27. Big $$$ in the Great White North by Musagetes · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yes, it's true - you can make as much as $40,000 Canadian dollars in programming. That's only $30,000 in American dollars but you might be able to own a house on that.

    Seriously, most of my fellow Canadians where I live are happy to have jobs in IT at all, and guys working in American call centres doing dubious 'IT' work like selling photocopiers make more than the programmers I know.

    1. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by Politicus · · Score: 1

      You might make less but you will live better.

      --
      Politicus
    2. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by PUN1SH3R · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. I got out of college with my Computer Programmer/Analyst degree and it took me nearly 2 years to find a job. I'm an IT Systems Administrator now but I do a lot of custom programming for the company I work form. I got a job in a factory, worked on the floor for about a year and a half and got my IT job at the same place. I'm one of the fortunate ones. I'm making around $42,000 right now. In 2 years my boss said I would be up around $50,000 - $60,000 mark. I started the position at $38,000. I didn't care thought because I was grateful to get the job.

    3. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Canadian software developer in Ottawa. Myself and some friends all make $70,000+ as intermediate developers. Different regions will have different salaries though, depending on the market and cost of living.

    4. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      That's only $30,000 in American dollars but you might be able to own a house on that.

      Damn... $30k is half of the downpayment on a cheap 1BR apartment in NYC...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    5. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by code+addict · · Score: 1

      As MUCH as CDN$40,000? I feel sorry for you. At my company an entry-level programmer makes CDN$50,000, with the more senior programmers pulling around CDN$90,000. This is in Vancouver though, so it is a little more expensive here.

    6. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by pszuch · · Score: 1

      My SO had no problems buying a house on $50K CAD/year. The house she bought was above the median on price too. Shes saved up enough to do >$10K in upgrades in the year since she moved in too.

    7. Re:Big $$$ in the Great White North by Musagetes · · Score: 1
      $40k isn't great as a ceiling, that's for sure. I'm in Nova Scotia and the salaries are generally lower here to begin with, and there simply aren't a lot of places to move up in.

      And again, most of the people that graduated with me don't have jobs at all or are working in call centres.

  28. Want your fries without gravy? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    While it's true that the accents are "nearly the same," there are *some* diffs that will creep in.

    BTW, even the McDonald's in Ottawa would offer gravy on their fries. Gravy on McDONALD'S FRIES??? What is this heresy?

    Tim

    1. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by wing03 · · Score: 1

      BTW, even the McDonald's in Ottawa would offer gravy on their fries. Gravy on McDONALD'S FRIES??? What is this heresy?

      Gravy on fries in Ottawa?

      Prove it.

      Poutine at BK and KFC while these gawd awfully too salty McLobster rolls out in Quebec and the maritimes but that's about it.

    2. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in Ottawa?

      I just moved to BC, after having lived in Ottawa for 6 years.

      Nowhere in Ottawa do I recall a McDonald's offering gravy on their fries. Perhaps in Vanier? At any rate, aside from Quebec and the Maritimes, you'll find a McDonald's menu to be pretty much as you'd expect across the rest of the country.

    3. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by understyled · · Score: 1
      Where in Ottawa?

      pretty much any mcdonalds these days has poutine as an option instead of french fries. but considering their fries suck, their gravy sucks, and you get something like 6 cheese curds, i'd go somewhere else. nothing beats chipwagon poutine.

      you hosers

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    4. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      the McDonalds in northern Maine sell Poutine. Lots of people also have French-Canadian accents. I live in Bangor, ME which is considered 'Northern Maine' as far as population density, but geographically would be slightly south of the center of Maine's landmass. If I drive the 3-4 hours to the northern tip of Maine( i recently had to go to a college friends wedding up there), it's like a whole different country.

    5. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this heresy?

      There is the biggest "diff." When a Canadian goes to another country and sees something done differently, they say "hmm that's different!" When an American goes to another country and sees something done differently, they say "but that's just ass-wrong! OMG, I just saw a woman's nipple! I better go see my shrink before I go totally nuts!"

    6. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Cuz no one ever put gravy on potatoes... yeap... not once...

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    7. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Gravy on fries is one thing (add cheese curds and you have poutine).

      Gravy on McDonald's fries? Whether you personally like them or not, they are by far the most consistently loved menu items at McDreadful's. To take one of the few foods they do consistently better than other fast-food chains, and put ANYTHING on it, is heresy.

      FWIW, the three Canadians I had lunch with two weeks ago thought it was REALLY STRANGE to eat a Krispy Kreme donut in comparison to a Tim Horton's. (I've noticed a distinct "food flavor" to this thread.) To them, it seemed heretical for someone to be able to sit down and eat a dozen KK's (quite practical for an average person with high glucose tolerance). In contrast, eating a dozen TH's would make moving around quite a challenge.

      Tim

      P.S. Not all Americans think Canada is worse than America, and I'm perfectly happy with the "heresy" of Tim Horton's lunch menu (donuts as side item to a turkey sandwich).

    8. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, gravy on fries in Ottawa. Try the poutine at the downtown McD's, or most any of the restaurants near the airport. My Canadian co-workers warned me to specify "no gravy" when ordering a meal, and sure enough, it was a standard at just about every chain, with the exception of an Outback steakhouse.

      Tim

      P.S. Poutine at KFC? I can't imagine how the awful (IMHO) KFC gravy would taste in poutine. The Colonel & Claudia must be turning in their gravies.

    9. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      BTW, even the McDonald's in Ottawa would offer gravy on their fries. Gravy on McDONALD'S FRIES??? What is this heresy?

      If you think that's bad, Taco Bell serves french fries too. Every combo meal has either large fries or Fries Supreme with it. Fries Supreme is fries, meat, nacho cheese, sour cream, tomatoes, and green onions. Looks horrible.

    10. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by wing03 · · Score: 1

      Yes, gravy on fries in Ottawa. Try the poutine at the downtown McD's, or most any of the restaurants near the airport. My Canadian co-workers warned me to specify "no gravy" when ordering a meal, and sure enough, it was a standard at just about every chain, with the exception of an Outback steakhouse.

      Shoulda specified... It's more that McDonald's is offering gravy that made me do a double take rather than we have gravy. IMO, the best thing that goes with their shoestring fries is their McNugget BBQ sauce.

      KFC's chicken gravy is a bit pale and anemic, but is semi decent.
      I'm from the Canadian capital with the world's biggest dildo (Toronto) and have travelled extensively across Southern Ontario and had only ever come across gravy at the big chain restaurants if they have poutine.

      Having said that, the best fries come from chip wagons parked around small towns and cross roads out in the country side where the fries are either hand cut or pressed through an old fashioned fry press.

      Gravy for fries is, IMO, best made from beef drippings. That dark rich luscious robust gravy....

    11. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      The "chip wagon" was the other thing that caught our eyes. My co-workers told us that there were trucks that would go around and cook fries to order, but we didn't believe them until we saw a blue panel truck in downtown Ottawa that advertised "Fresh, Fast, French Fries" (or something along those lines).

      The notion of driving around with a huge deep fryer out back seems a bit scary. However, upon seeing the truck, the American with me started looking at the back end. I asked what he was looking for.

      He said, "I'm looking for the trailer hitch."

      "Trailer hitch?" I replied?

      "Yeah... to tow the gravy boat."

      That's when I first felt frustration about Canada's concealed carry laws.

      Tim

    12. Re:Want your fries without gravy? by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      My Canadian co-workers warned me to specify "no gravy" when ordering a meal, and sure enough, it was a standard at just about every chain, with the exception of an Outback steakhouse.

      I really want to know what chains you went to in Ottawa, becuase I live here and gravy usually costs extra, unless they ask you first.

      I did encounter a pub the other day that offers "pickles" as one of their sides, and it was just 3 sliced pickles in a mug! Awesome.

  29. Overhead Absurd by artlu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very interesting because the population in Canada is not nearly what India/China come close too. For my company, we can have 20 Indian guys trained and if 10 of them leave we still have 10 more. However, if I goto Canada, I can have 4 Canadians to train and if 2 leave, my project will fail due to not enough resources and/or time to train new hires. While the overall cost savings may be equal, the total amount of resources will be much lower.
    Aj

    GroupShares Inc. - A Free and Interactive Stock Trading Community

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:Overhead Absurd by Josuah · · Score: 1

      Your logic seems based on the assumption that everyone in China and India are in IT or programmers. (Maybe you meant IT/developer population, and not general population.)

      I'm sure if you tried hard enough, you could train 20 Canadians for your project; although I really don't know what math you are using that tells you a project of X man-hours needs 20 Indians but only 4 Canadians.

    2. Re:Overhead Absurd by tgrigsby · · Score: 2, Insightful


      For my company, we can have 20 Indian guys trained and if 10 of them leave we still have 10 more.


      That's 10 programmers that:

      a. Have a tough time understanding what you're saying and making themselves understood.

      b. Don't completely understand our social and business culture.

      c. Will typically do only what is outlined in any spec you give them, or more importantly their interpretation of your spec, and will typically work to a level and standard they are comfortable with but that doesn't meet the generally accepted standards of a major US company.

      And I'm not just spouting here. I've worked for US companies that have been burned by Indian firms that did what they thought they were supposed to do simply because the US firms made assumptions that they thought the Indian firms would also make.

      There's a lot to be said about hiring people that share the same mindset and experience as you, or at least what you're used to dealing with. The one major problem I keep hearing is that Indian firms either produce shoddy or under-featured software, or they refuse to produce anything until the product is spec'ed to the nth degree, resulting in no real savings in either time or money.

      This, by the way, is not a slam against Indian programmers. They are, in my experience, very polite, very nice to work with, and have scads of tech skills. The difficulty is, primarily, the cultural difference. The language difference doesn't help, but the business and social cultures are the gating issues.

      So for you to say that more is better is naive.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    3. Re:Overhead Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, but Canadians will actually do a competent job.

    4. Re:Overhead Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have a thousand Chinese/Indian techs and it won't do a dang bit of good if you or your customers can't understand a damn word they are saying.

    5. Re:Overhead Absurd by Bellyflop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's some pretty strange math. If you had 20 indian programmers doing a job and 10 leave, how will that job get done? Did you just overhire by 10 people? Or did you expect that the 10 people would do twice as much work?

    6. Re:Overhead Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "c. Will typically do only what is outlined in any spec you give them, or more importantly their interpretation of your spec"

      And this differs from programmers anywhere else exactly how?

    7. Re:Overhead Absurd by _Qiang_ · · Score: 1

      how about outsource some more U.S people up to north ? ;)

    8. Re:Overhead Absurd by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Many project managers and executives make the mistake of not properly investing in manpower, which is quite expensive. If you go to India you have the luxury of being able to hire additional developers. However, if you stay in North America that doesn't mean you should hire the bare minimum for your development staff. That's dumb.

      A small overworked development team is only going to cause you headaches. You're going to hire a comparable staff, bid higher, mark up your software, and understand your available advantages with onshore development etc.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    9. Re:Overhead Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will someone please start modding down this artlu person until he stops advertising here on Slashdot.

      artlu, lose the ad and I'll have no beef with you.

    10. Re:Overhead Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats funny is you totally miss the concept of quality of work.

      ie, that code that costs so little from india has to be made usable by comptentant programmers, there goes your savings.

      theres been numerous stories about why outsourcing to india for programming is slowing and reversing. the code sucks and costs more to ship because of the expensive debugging costs later on.

      cheers

    11. Re:Overhead Absurd by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Most programmers in the U.S. will make certain assumptions about the applications they're creating, assumptions that fit with the overall business paradigm normally used in the U.S. Someone raised outside the U.S. and, frankly, in a society with a much lower average technological and business level, will lack a full understanding of parts of a spec that assume that the normal reaction will take place.

      When I look at a spec, my experience with other projects fills in the blanks. I've *never* been handed a spec that told me to the nth degree every label and field, every question and reply. And when these items are not there for a foreign programmer, their response will not be the same as mine, and their solution is not going to be valid in the face of U.S. cultural, societal, and business norms.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  30. I should have it so well. by michael+path · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, for 40% less than what I'm currently making, I could live in a nation that gives a crap about hockey, has a much smaller crime rate, has major domestic beers that don't taste like piss, and a health care system available to all its citizens?

    Where can I sign up? Really.

    1. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:I should have it so well. by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "...and a health care system available to all its citizens?"

      Just try to avoid non-life-threatening conditions that require surgery.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're too stupid to know how to get into Canada, America doesn't want you anyway.

    4. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Son, for every Labatt's, there's a Kokanee or an Iron Horse. Bad beer is brewed in every nation on God's green Earth.

    5. Re:I should have it so well. by coyote_oww · · Score: 1
      Put your crap in the trunk of your car and head north. Duh. Do it already.

      Of course when you get there your likely to discover that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence - and educated Canadian's are bailing out of the country left and right. See, the thing with socialism is that business of EQUALITY - where the high-school dropout screwing around working part-time in construction has the same right to the same stuff as you with your hard-earned degree, working 40+ hours a week. It isn't fair if you get more than him, is it? Well, of course not. So we'll levy hefty taxes on you so that we can provide him with all the stuff he otherwise couldn't afford...

      But you're certainly welcome to go if you want. Not me. I know too many ex-Canadians. Well, a lot of them have very mixed feelings about it. They don't like to make the connection betwen socialist goverment and lower wages for highly skilled people. Everyone wants their cake and the right to eat it too...

    6. Re:I should have it so well. by rtaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

      You missed one.. The cost of living is also around 40% lower in expensive Canadian cities than expensive American cities; so you really do go without much.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    7. Re:I should have it so well. by Spangston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a difference between "socialIZED" and "socialIST" that you should be made aware of. As far as I know, there's no ISM in our social programs....

    8. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beers that don't taste like piss,

      As an example of beers that don't taste like piss, you link to friggin' Labatt's. Christ!

      Well, I guess it is still miles better than American crap like Bud.

    9. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labatt's? Jesus Christ, grow some taste buds.

    10. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is something that many Canadians in the high-tech industry think about.

      With my PhD, I could have moved to (and have had job offers in) San Jose to work for a large IC manufacturer. I would have made the equivalent of ~$150K in Canadian dollars (after conversion, stock options, etc.).

      Instead, my wife and I chose to live in Toronto, where I earn about ~$85K CAD, no stock options.

      To us, the choice to live in Canada was simple: while we earn less money, we feel that we will be able to provide a better quality of life for ourselves and our (future) children.

    11. Re:I should have it so well. by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and how many "ex-Canadians" went back again after seeing how messed up the US is? I know one for sure that did, ME.

      By the way, you obviously have never been to Canada. It's about as socialist as my ass.

    12. Re:I should have it so well. by RollsDownHill · · Score: 1

      And can get Kilkenney on tap. Nectar of the gods!

    13. Re:I should have it so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget if your gay you can get married.
      Oh and weed is practically legal here cops don't care. (Atleast in B.C and Ontario)

  31. Because Canada is fucking freezing by DrPizza · · Score: 0, Troll

    And India has spicy food. I know which one I prefer.

    1. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to Canada? Canada has spicy Indian food, and bland American food to.

    2. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by jojowasher · · Score: 1

      I am sick of people thinking that Canada is cold, it was 32 degrees celcius here in Calgary yesterday, thats 96 degrees F. We have almost exactly the same weather as a place like Denver. The places were it is very cold in Canada, nobody lives. Jojo

    3. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking cold enough in Halifax lately

    4. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get a clue. Not all of Canada is a frozen wasteland.

      I live in BC. In a desert.

      Seriously.

      Portions of the interior of BC, around the Thompson-Okanagan region are actually considered deserts. We get little precipitation (ie: snow) and in the summer temperatures can hit 40 degrees C or 104 F.

      In winter, we don't usually drop below -10 (about 15 F).

      Vancouver, a 3 hour drive away, gets almost no snow in the winter (although a lot of rain) and is more temperate in the summer.

    5. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by metamatic · · Score: 1

      It's not the snow that's the issue for me, it's the -10...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 1

      You're complaining about -10 degrees Celsius?

      Good grief.

      Then move to Vancouver. Same client as Seattle.

    7. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 1

      that would be *climate*, not "client"...

      I should know better than to try and reply to Slashdot postings while invoicing my clients. :)

    8. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Or move to LA, which has a better climate than either of them.

    9. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Except that LA is more expensive, has serious power, water and pollution problems and -

      the top 2 reasons not to move to LA

      it's in the United States
      it has Arnold the Hummer-lover ( yes, both kinds)for Governor

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    10. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Bah... just like it's been said on this forum: you'd be paid more if you lived in LA.

      I live in the US, I know of noone who wants to go to Canada here. If you look at statistics, most Canadians are coming here.

    11. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 1

      Err...

      "Most Canadians are coming here" ?

      Last time I checked, we've still got a country full of them up here.

    12. Re:Because Canada is fucking freezing by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Haha, "more" is what I meant. :)

  32. 40% less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good grief,

    I was pulling down $80K Canadian last year doing joe-job programming. What do my US counterparts make?

    1. Re:40% less? by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      $80k canadian? is that enough to buy a CD player?

    2. Re:40% less? by Mysticode · · Score: 1

      Can I have your job? I made $36K Canadian last year programming.

    3. Re:40% less? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      AND 3 CDs. Currency is strong!!!

    4. Re:40% less? by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
      Either you live in Newfoundland or you "program" HTML/Javascript.

      I'm only half joking...

    5. Re:40% less? by Mysticode · · Score: 1

      Wrong on both counts, I live in Vancouver and I program in various languages for the job but right now Java using BEA WebLogic

  33. In my opinion ... by furball · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's aboot time people recognized this. Ootsourcing is better done in Canada. At least you can understand what people are talking aboot.

  34. Can we trust them? by NinjaFodder · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure that we can trust the Canadians yet. I'm still recovering from Brian Adams.

    --


    Cause everyone wants a free Xbox360
    1. Re:Can we trust them? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      True, but Canada giving us Shania Twain in a wet negligee went a LOOOONG way to earning MY forgiveness.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    2. Re:Can we trust them? by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Bryan Adams is bad for sure, but do I need to start listing the American artists that we have been subjected to up here?

      I didn't think so.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    3. Re:Can we trust them? by NinjaFodder · · Score: 0

      Point made, but have you really expected much out of us Americans? We are known for our sports, military, energy consumption, polution, and white trash television. Canadians, on the other hand, are known for being irritatingly polite, clean, and well educated. If you didn't set our expectations so d*mn high, we wouldn't get so mad! ;)

      --


      Cause everyone wants a free Xbox360
    4. Re:Can we trust them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bryan Adams is bad for sure, but do I need to start listing the American artists that we have been subjected to up here?

      I didn't think so.


      Snicker..

      as if what a Canadian has to say matters.

    5. Re:Can we trust them? by reidbold · · Score: 1

      See, the thing is, we pretend to be nice, but we're not. Since we hate you, we get rid of our shitty pop stars by throwing them at you. We're not sorry, at all.

      Now please enjoy the latest from avril.

      --
      -Reid
    6. Re:Can we trust them? by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      Look, look... can I finish? Can I finish?

      Look, Canada has already apologized for Brian Adams AND Celine Dion, and... can I finish? Can I finish?

      (I love Canada, but you gotta hand it to the Americans for coming up with South Park.)

    7. Re:Can we trust them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about Brian Adams, too!

    8. Re:Can we trust them? by Sideshow+Coward · · Score: 1
      Where to start on this one...
      • Brittney Spears
      • N Sync
      • Martha Stewart
      • Janet Jackson's Boob
      • Michael Bolton
      The list goes on and on and on. Us Canadians will never recover from these.
    9. Re:Can we trust them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll apologize for Brian Adams when you apologize for Vanilla Ice! (we've been waiting...)

  35. Burn down our whitehouse, then Celine Dion... by Crasoum · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... You guys have no limit for your evil. Can I move to Canada?

    1. Re:Burn down our whitehouse, then Celine Dion... by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      There's a "Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie" song about burning down the Whitehouse, actually. They're a band from Alberta.

      To be fair, you guys burned down the town of Newark (now Niagara-on-the-Lake) first. And there were only women and children there at the time.

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    2. Re:Burn down our whitehouse, then Celine Dion... by BGJayR · · Score: 1

      It's a common misconception that that the arrogant worms sing this song. I actually thought so myself until I checked on their site just now.

  36. Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Talk to all the Canadians who pay for American Blue Cross.
    I've lived in a socialist country (Scotland), and the medical system was crap. I knew a guy with an ingrown toenail, who even played minor league soccer, who had to wait 3 _YEARS_ for an operation, because people with more serious issues kept getting bumped ahead of him.
    Fuck that.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Xocet_00 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Canadian who pays for Blue Cross, and it certainly doesn't tally 60% of my cost of living. In fact, as a university student I pay about $22CA per month for it. Admittedly, that's a lot for someone like me who lives on loans, but in the long run it's nothing.

      Besides which, the medical system up here may have it's problems, but it does work. I too had a friend with an ingrown toe-nail and he had it removed two weeks after seeing the doctor about it. I've never been stuck waiting for medical treatment longer than it takes to get through the waiting room here.

      Regardless of all that though, your friend's experience in the Scottish socialized medical program is hardly representative of the entire Canadian medical system.

    2. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a clue...

      That's not how it works here. As for American Blue Cross - we buy that if we travel to the US because we don't feel like being hit up for thousands of dollars of medical fees if something should happen while we're stateside.

      I'm not sure whether you realized this or not, but Scotland != Canada. They're separated by a bloody ocean. Sure, we may both be "socialist", but the systems do differ.

      We don't wait 3 years here to get ingrown nails removed. I've had some minor medical problems that I needed to deal with over the past year (including minor surgery). In the surgical case, wait time was 1 week.

      Go spread your propaganda somewhere else. Or, better yet come live here before you comment on our system.

    3. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by david614 · · Score: 1

      I agree. My father is a diabetic and takes a quite large number of different medications. I live in the U.S. now, but am glad that my parents still live near Toronto. The costs of my father's medical care alone would have them in bankruptcy if they had to pay U.S. prices and deal with U.S. medical systems. Just outside Toronto they get to see a doctor on a fairly regular basis, have insurance with very low co-pay (around 35 cents CDN) for each of the medications they use, and they still own their own home. While not perfect, healthcare in Canada is at least a 21st century system -- unlike the victorian - no - Darwinian - environment that persists down here. No, I don't want to go back. But then again, if I ever lost my job (and health insurance) here, at least I still have an option.

      --
      ELITISM: It's always lonely at the top. Uninvited company is rarely welcome.
    4. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Who needs an operation for an ingrown toenail? I guess there certainly are some negatives to socialized medicine- some of the patients become whimps who can't use scisors or a pocket knife on their own toes.

      Operations under socialized medicine should be reserved for potentially *serious* cases that can't be cured any other way. Otherwise the system would become overburdened with hypochondriacs.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Heck, under the American medical system, WITH health insurance covering it, wait time for a minor biopsy that could have been *cancer* for me was a month.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is so much bullshit. And yes, I have lived and worked in both countries.

      Overall, the candian health system is pretty comparable by outcomes, which is the only really important measure. There are a few noticable exceptions.

      Basically, if you are very rich, the US system is better. If you are poor, or lower middle class, the CDN system is better. ...and the US pays about twice as much for health care.... sure as hell doesn't get twice the quality

    7. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You must be rather rich to be able to pay for a small operation like that in less than 3 years in the United States without insurance- and certainly EXTREMELY rich to do it even with insurance in less than a week.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Socialized medicine = no medicine at all by sjames · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, I had to fix my own ingrown toenail using tequila as anestetic because I couldn't afford any other choices. Good thing that's an easy one.

  37. But the flipside... by MrAndrews · · Score: 2, Funny

    Before any of you go packing your bags for Canada, just stop and think:
    sure, you'll have a job; and sure you'll be working out of your own apartment instead of driving 2.5 hours to a cubicle somewhere; and sure you'll probably earn more on the whole than any of your other Canadian friends...
    But really, half your income goes to the government, and what you're left with doesn't go as far, cause an iPod costs six hundred bloody dollars here, and... and... you have to say "bloody" in casual conversation... and "eh", sometimes, too... and...
    Please don't come here! I can't take any more competition!

    1. Re:But the flipside... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      you have to say "bloody" in casual conversation... and "eh", sometimes, too

      Shit.........When I finish school I definetly will stay in Australia.... ;)

      And I have to know, how cheap can an iPod be in the US that $600 is such a bad price?

    2. Re:But the flipside... by imroy · · Score: 1
      But really, half your income goes to the government, and what you're left with doesn't go as far, cause an iPod costs six hundred bloody dollars here, and... and... you have to say "bloody" in casual conversation... and "eh", sometimes, too...

      Bloody 'ell mate, Canada is starting to sound a lot like Australia!

    3. Re:But the flipside... by MrAndrews · · Score: 1
      And I have to know, how cheap can an iPod be in the US that $600 is such a bad price?

      $400! Every time I hear about a cool gadget selling for $400 on Slashdot, I have to remember that for me to afford it, I have to sell another kidney. Of course, I still have health insurance to take care of me while I'm on dialysis.

    4. Re:But the flipside... by MrAndrews · · Score: 1

      It's true, they do seem very similar. I was actually considering moving to Australia at one time, but after I heard about the crocodiles roaming the streets unchecked, I figured no, I'll stick to my igloo thankyouvermuch.

    5. Re:But the flipside... by imroy · · Score: 1

      Nah, down here in the southern states it's kangaroos that roam the streets. Down in Tasmania they have the tazzie devils snapping up any bunny rabbits or roadrunners that stray too close. Up north we have Steve Erwin and his kids to keep the crocs in check :)

    6. Re:But the flipside... by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative
      half your income goes to the government

      This kind of misinformation is annoying. I make about $55,000/year (CDN). About 23% of that goes to taxes. Other deductions (SuperAnnuation (Pension Plan), Uninon Dues, CPP (Federal Pension Plan), and EI (Employment Insurance)) work out to about 12% of my gross pay. So, I take home about 65% of my gross pay.

      Now I live in Saskatchewan (Regina to be exact) which is by no means a tax haven compared to the rest of the country. Living expenses are incredibly low. $150,000 will get me a 1600 sqft house. Property tax on that... say about $3500. Our provincial government has a mandate to provide the lowest utility rates (water, power, gas, phone) in the country. Registering and insuring a car? It depends on the car of course, but I pay about $850/year for my '99 Intrepid. However, since I have a positive rating (accident free for several years) I get about 2% knocked off that. Gas is pricey. Its floating between 80 and 90 cents/litre right now. However, I only drive about 20K to work (maybe 10-15 mins). Parking is $70/month. My wife and I can get groceries for a month for under $300, and we aren't just getting KD and dried noodles.

      Regina also has a very thriving tech sector as well. The low cost of living has attracted several call centres including Staples and StarTek.

      If you are interested in outsourcing here, or moving here, check out http://www.ir.gov.sk.ca/ The Sask Gov Industry and Resource Site.
    7. Re:But the flipside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This kind of misinformation is annoying. I make about $55,000/year (CDN). About 23% of that goes to taxes.

      Psst... buddy, you missed the point. We're trying to keep them away from the border! Don't go giving away all our secrets!

  38. I'm moving to Vancouver next month by madprogrammer · · Score: 3, Informative

    From L.A. But, I'm Canadian and just came down to L.A. to make some American money.

    I'm part of what Canada calls the "Brain Drain" where large numbers of highly (yet cheaply) educated Canadians rush to the States after graduating. The U.S. (California in particular) provided an opportunity to make a lot of money. My company stopped hiring Canadians (and actually anyone out-of-state) soon after I started, to cut out relocation costs.

    I've been saying that companies should out-source to Canada ever since this out-sourcing thing became a big deal. Now that the tide is turning, I wonder what they will rename the "Brain Drain" to!?

    1. Re:I'm moving to Vancouver next month by TwistedSquare · · Score: 2, Funny
      Now that the tide is turning, I wonder what they will rename the "Brain Drain" to!?

      Brain Suck?

    2. Re:I'm moving to Vancouver next month by stienman · · Score: 1

      Now that the tide is turning, I wonder what they will rename the "Brain Drain" to!?

      The economy is just further down the stream. Now it's the 'brain treatment plant'. If you're lucky you'll get a nice cushy job as 'chlorinated, flouridated brain'.

      -Adam

    3. Re:I'm moving to Vancouver next month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in a somewhat similar situation. I went down to the San Jose area for a few years and made and saved lots of money. Then when Al Qaeda attacked right after the Dot-Bomb and I lost my job, I wanted to stay in US and spend my money there, but INS said "no way, you go back to your country you remotely potential terrorist you Canadian." So I had to move to Vancouver and spend my American dollars there. I guess that's what Americans call "dollar drain." :-P

    4. Re:I'm moving to Vancouver next month by CGP314 · · Score: 1
  39. Question of priorities by hyderabadi · · Score: 0

    China, India, Russia - all moody nuclear powers - need to be kept happy - give 'em jobs Canada - Ice hockey, molson beer... - hell, idiots smile all the time anyway

  40. If the work won't go offshore, let the workers ... by alanxyzzy · · Score: 1
    As reported yesterday, Toronto (44%) and Vancouver (37%) have the 2nd and 4th highest proportions of immigrants of any city in the world.
    The City of Toronto's website says the largest groups of immigrants to Toronto in the five years before the 2001 census were from China (45,901), India (25,560) and Pakistan (17,495).
    unlike Miama (1st, 59%), where the immigrants come from neighbouring Cuba and Latin America, those in Canada have come from more diverse cultures further afield.
  41. Re:Perhaps the real solution to keep Americans wor by dontspellsogood · · Score: 1

    Shh. We've already begun negotiations to acquire Wisconsin - We require more cheese for our poutine. And they sound like us doncha know. Eh?

    And since the entire country migrates en masse in the winter, Florida also makes sense. We have nice conservation plans for the Everglades.

    --
    No, reelly I don't!
  42. Xerox outsources to Canada by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    On two different occasions, several months apart, I had to call Xerox for some assistance configuring one of their multi-purpose machines. In both cases I happened to get the same guy. He was working from Nova Scotia (I believe).

    He had just the barest hint of a 'Canadian' accent and it only occured on certain words. Had I not asked where he was while we were waiting for the machine to reboot I wouldn't have known he wasn't in the US.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Xerox outsources to Canada by texaport · · Score: 1

      It is pronounced "OOTsourcing to Canada" ...

  43. Damn Canadians - have to ruin everything. by xplenumx · · Score: 1
    Dang. It was easy hating India - they have a unique culture, live on the other side of the world, 'all look alike', and they don't speak perfect english. I like being xenophobic damn it!

    Now Canada has to come in and screw everything up. I have friends in Canada. I ski in Canada. Hell, I like Canada. Who should I hate now? Thank God for mindless, faceless corporations.

    1. Re:Damn Canadians - have to ruin everything. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Look up the page and you'll find the Canadians are also coming into our country, taking our jobs, posing as Americans and suggesting that we outsource to Canada. They should all be imprisoned for espionage. Clearly.

    2. Re:Damn Canadians - have to ruin everything. by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      Oh I've done much more than try to get you 'mericans to move to Canada... I've spread a little of my leftist/liberal propaganda too.

  44. 40% is all relative. by mdemeny · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think the cost of living is nearly 40% less as well - and as others have pointed out already, we get a fair bit in return for our tax dollar. With the exception of a few really interesting US cities - I would much prefer to live anywhere in Canada over any US city (and I've been to at least a dozen states for work, so I know what I'm talking about).

    As a point of interest, my company tranferred me to London, England for 2 years. Overnight my salary more than doubled, but my costs more than tripled. I've since moved back and despite the large paycut from returning to a Canadian salary, it works out better for me in the end due to cost of living differences.

    Mercer human resources has a chartoutlining cost-of-living differences in the world. Ottawa - my current home - is almost exactly 40% cheaper than New York. Canada's most expensive city (Toronto) is only slightly higher than the US's lowest city (Pittsburgh).

  45. Wait do I still lose my job? by VeeCee · · Score: 1

    Just kidding, of course I lose my job.

    Seriously though, I'm a young programmer, I've only been working in industry for a little under two years, and just recently I've had my first experience with outsourcing.

    The company that I work for decided to outsource a VB app to india. The labor costs were, as one would expect, quite low. Outsourcing is going to have it's share of sucesses and failures and I witnessed a major faliure. Over the 8 months that the application was developed, deadlines were repeatedly missed, and the application is in one word, terrible.

    My boss was staying up until the wee hours of the morning in order to talk to the indian company about the project and according to him, the language barrier was barely tolerable.

    Right now my full time occupation is re-writing whole modules and forms so that the application (an arcGIS program) actually does what it was intended to do. Will shipping jobs to Canada instead alleviate a few of these problems? Yea I guess so, but like I said "Don't I still lose my job?"*


    *I'm not actually worried about losing my job

  46. Canada isn't north of ME! by Burb · · Score: 1

    ...You insensitive clod!

    --

  47. It's The Productivity Rate, Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting



    Indian programmers cost 1/4th the amount typically paid for an American programmer. A 4:1 bang-per-buck ratio.

    What outsourcing firms wont tell you is that you're also buying into an average 6:1 loss in productivity. American coders are better educated, and have more experience -- This results in _better_ quality code that's produced _faster_ than their Indian counterparts.

    Sure, you're saving your company money, but you're also taking an enormous hit in productivity. Your offshore project is putt-putting along at 15 MPH when the rest of the industry is doing the equivalent of 10 over in a 65 MPH highway. By the time your product hits the street, your competitors are already dominating the market AND working on their next release.

    Something to think about.

  48. Why not Canada? by Whatthehellever · · Score: 1

    Canadians don't work for $0.05 a day.

    --

    ---
    IMHO, of course.
    May the SOURCE be with you.
  49. theregoes those plans by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    there go my plans to move to canada, eh?

  50. Personal experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm an american who HAS moved north up to Montreal to program (games for that matter), and cost of living in the city here are less than where I was in NY (Poughkeepsie), and if I were to move just 30 min outside of Montreal, cost of living would drop more than 40% less than where I was in NY, probably in the order of 60-80% less.

    For example, a typical, 2500-3000 sq ft house around Poughkeepsie (Hopewell Jct to be specific) went for about 300-800k USD. A friend of mine bought a 2500 sq ft (ranch) house 15 min drive from down town Montreal for 140k CAD, with a pool and a very nice neighbourhood.

    140k CAD is aprox 100k USD(at about 70 cents to the canadian dollar). So by this rough (I am sure prices in Hopewell have soared even higher), at worst the price is 66% less, and at best upwards of 88% less than the US counter part in that area.

    Is it worth it? Thats for you to decide. I know I have more disposable income, even when converted to USD.

    I do have the added benefit of being a dual citizen, but that is a minor issue. As long as you have a degree and a letter from a company stating you have a standing job offer in Canada, it's a matter of going to the border patrol office and they will do a little paper work (from what I have been told, less than a hour) and you are all set.

    1. Re:Personal experience. by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      lap dances in montreal are also cheaper at $10 a song ;)

  51. They can't do it... by jadenyk · · Score: 1

    I read a survey which stated that there would be a 50% loss of productive working time as many managers would burst out laughing when their Canadian counterpart said the word "about". This causes too much "down time" in the workplace.

  52. Keys to having a job by seniorcoder · · Score: 1
    I have been developing software for more than 30 years. I have never been out of work (except when I chose to take time off). There have been always been employment downturns. I found that the keys to continued employment are as follows:
    • Keep your skill set up.
      Too many developers let their skills languish over time.
    • Keep your business knowledge current.
      Too many developers focus only on their computer skills and fail to keep up with business trends in their sector - or ignore any aspect of business altogether and remain pure developers.
    • Do a good job.
      Too many developers develop crappy code.
    • Take pride in your work.
      Probably the same thing as the previous point.
    • Work in a sector where local employment is more likely.
      As the orinigator of this discussion is indicating, time-zone sensitive work is more safe than other types of employment. Also native language work requirements can be a major asset.
    1. Re:Keys to having a job by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I haven't been in the business nearly as long, but I've discovered this myself. Our IT department was cut from 8 people down to 3 (for a company with 250 employees), and the main reason I stayed on is that I've always been extremely productive, done good work, and kept a good attitude . Among those employees who lost their jobs were people who talked down to users, got management mad at them, or were just plain lazy. Granted these things may not apply as much in a large company, but that's exactly why I don't work for a large company.

      As for people complaining about not having jobs... there's plenty of jobs out there, just not the cushy ones you'd prefer. I lost my job a while back and had to do package handling at UPS while working part-time at my current employer. Over time I proved my worth and they took me on full time. Sometimes you have to take a non-direct path to getting a nice secure job, but sitting at home complaining about it on Slashdot helps no one.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  53. Quotes ahoy by DCheesi · · Score: 1


    Lost your job to outsourcing? Why not
    "Blame Canada!"? After all,
    "Theytookurjobs!"

  54. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US doesn't want to invade Canada, they don't need the headache. Maybe if we ditch Quebec they might consider it.

  55. Standard of living CanadaUS by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

    By almost every major metric, the Canadian standard of living is currently higher than the USA, and has been for a number of years.

    1. Re:Standard of living CanadaUS by clintp · · Score: 3, Funny
      By almost every major metric, the Canadian standard of living is currently higher than the USA, and has been for a number of years.
      That's because here in the US we don't use the metric system. Duh!
      --
      Get off my lawn.
    2. Re:Standard of living CanadaUS by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I now have to clean coffee off of my monitor. (if only I had mod points...)

  56. Canadian Accents? What's that aboot? by addie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    speak English with nearly American accents

    This quip really made my day. Now I know that accents vary over North America, but the idea that the "Canadian" accent is distinctly different from an "American" accent is really laughable.

    Compare a New England accent to a Southern accent to a Maritime, to an Ottawa valley, to who knows what other region. Accents vary by much greater degrees within the two countries than they do between them. Or do most Americans feel like Canadians all talk the same, and that is somehow different from all Americans? I'd love to hear opinions on this... Cue South Park quotes now...

  57. Re:Clearly... by Spangston · · Score: 1
    My friends and I used to have a joke about this in high school. We used to say that Americans would attempt to invade Canada, but since we're *always* stuck under a blanket of permafrost and ice, the Americans would keep driving North until they eventually found snow, all the way up in the Arctic Circle, thus having missed every major city in the country.

    Of course, getting back home would be another story entirely, as there'd be more than a millimetre of snow on the roads, you'd all go careening off into the pine trees and die in horrible crashes.

  58. And this stops outsoucing in Canada how? by js3 · · Score: 1

    IT jobs? You're just answering the damn telephone from a script. This is the job people on welfware or students do. The real IT jobs will be going to india anyways

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  59. Welcome! by spookyfluke · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new Canadian overlords!

    --
    you.bases.each{|base|base.are_belong_to=us}
  60. Too Bad by N8F8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Half of them think we are Evil

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Too Bad by danharan · · Score: 1

      40% of us Canadians think America is evil, which doesn't mean we think all, or even most Americans are evil.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    2. Re:Too Bad by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      As someone currently living in Canada, I can vouch for this. For a "tolerant people," Canadians make a whole lot of offensive generalizations about Americans. Of course, if anyone was to say the same things that are said about Americans about any other "group" of people, they would quickly get shot down on the grounds that it is not "politically correct." This hypocrisy annoys me to no end, and appears to be getting more prevalent as time goes by.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    3. Re:Too Bad by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Informative

      To American Farkers: Please don't take that link seriously. I'm a 3rd generation Torontonian (yes, there is such a thing) and I've never heard of a "Toronto Free Press".

      Second, the way these polls happen and the questions asked really bias the results. I will paraphrase what I interpret to be the majority opinion here: "Americans are really cool, and they're our best friends. But their government SUCKS ASS and some of those hardcore NRA members and Right Wing Christians really freak us out."

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    4. Re:Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that although there is a sizable portion of Americans who are tolerant and globally aware, the American election rules result in a government who acts in the interests of their party's beliefs in a utilateral way internationally that I think many Canadians find offensive. The grievences that many Canadians have with US policy is long and old: e.g. Lumber, Beef, Border Slowdowns, Non-Reciprical Security Demands, Air Polution etc.

      You can hate the American government and like Americans. I think what angers most Canadians is that the majority of Americans VOTED for their government and thus they are santioning its actions, even though often they are oblivious to them.

    5. Re:Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article (in some tiny far-left newspaper... yes those are allowed in Canada) was about the country not the people of the USA.
      I wouldn't be surprised if this nondescript non-newspaper just cooked up the stats.

      All that said, I do think the USA acts in an very self centered way around the world. I wouldn't use the word evil. Eg invading an oil-rich country for the oil for US cars. I guess, as a Canadian, I am intolerant about rudeness.

    6. Re:Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's pretty much because we ARE EVIL.

      cripes, just look at the asshats you drive with to work every day. 1/2 of them are jerks that would rather see you upside down burning in the ditch because you dared to drive 79 in a 45 zone in front of their Esclade.

    7. Re:Too Bad by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      Canadians don't actually think all Americans are evil. We do, however, think that a small number of them are evil, and they tend to have an immense amount of political sway in the country. But Canadians aren't alone in this view.
      Personally, I think Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft and the whole lot of them, are terrible people. But I have family in the US and I certainly don't think they're evil... well maybe my aunt...

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    8. Re:Too Bad by quax · · Score: 1

      Actually, even if you count only the percentage of Americans that actually do vote as all Americans the current administration didn't even get a majority vote from those.

      So no, the majority of Americas did note vote for their government in this broken republic.

  61. Canada cost of living by bg_27 · · Score: 1

    Canada has much lower cost of living, we have a wicked health care system compared to the US, but Canada does have its high priced areas in Toronto and Vancouver, they have high costs of living compared to other major cities in Canada. GO FLAMES GO :p

    1. Re:Canada cost of living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do masses of Canadians always keep coming down here for their medical care then, hmm?

    2. Re:Canada cost of living by vmaaw224 · · Score: 1

      Because this is where all of the Canadian doctors and nurses come for higher paying employment!

      --
      Whoever, Whenever, Wherever!
  62. What about piss testing? by swb · · Score: 1

    I'd expect Canada would have some worker-friendly laws about piss testing employees. Given the availability of BC bud, I'd hope so at least.

    1. Re:What about piss testing? by dontspellsogood · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, we don't have to take drug testing, and AFAIK, urine testing is against our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. And I work, in Toronto, for an American company which does drug test in the states.

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
    2. Re:What about piss testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piss tests are almost non-existant, except for a very few professions. If you are a commercial pilot, you pee in a jar (I'm sure there are others, but they are very rare). However, no tech company could do that AFAIK, unless they can show some extraordinary reason for it. I worked for a bank that tried it, using the excuse that since dope was illegal, in order to buy it you must be in contact with criminal elements, and were therefore in a position to be pressured into laundering money. They could only test you AFTER they hired you, it could not be used as a condition of employment, and if you tested positive, you could not be fired, but could end up getting therapy. Even using this reason, they were forced to back down.

  63. Canada as the newest 3rd-World Country... by Spangston · · Score: 1
    Glad to see we've been plunked into the same box as India and China, as far as the Americans are concerned.

    At least we can find ourselves on a map! :)

    1. Re:Canada as the newest 3rd-World Country... by dontspellsogood · · Score: 2, Funny

      >At least we can find ourselves on a map! :) You know, I grew up 30 mins. from Detroit, so all of our television stations (at least the ones with interesting kids shows) - and there was no Canadian Sesame Street then either - were American. Whenever the magical tv box showed a map of "my country", it was one of the US, even though I knew I lived in Canada. It was grade 1 or 2 and the teacher pointed to a map of Canada and I said "Thats not Canada! THATS Canada" [pointing to the US]

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
    2. Re:Canada as the newest 3rd-World Country... by js3 · · Score: 1

      I think it is sad that dumbass Canadians like you can refer to Canada as a third-world country

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    3. Re:Canada as the newest 3rd-World Country... by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      You should be proud to be lumped in with China and India, those are up and coming countries.

      Actually this whole post pretty much shows the provincialism and racism that underlies Slashdot. Instead of congradulating Indians on their success, Slashdot denigrates them.

      This is just one of the many reason why I rarely post to this idiotic site anymore (relative to how much I used to).

  64. I think outsourcing is fine by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Listen, I understand that being forced to train your outsourced replacement or you get fired anyways is completely unfair and cruel behavior by the big corp's. But outsourcing isn't entirely evil. For one thing, it means that there is *much* cheaper labor out there ready and willing to be the "code monkey's" who can slop together some PeopleSoft, C/C++, and SQL code to keep the big business CRM tool running. And if companies in the US are so willing to look half-way round the world to get such jobs done, it means there's more relevant, interesting work to go around for those in the US.

    Not to mention the fact that freeing up millions of dollars the company is currently spending to invest elsewhere can only be good in the long run. Yes, I know your job might be eliminated in the short term, but that doesn't mean you can't get back out there and learn new skills or take on a completely different job. No one ever said that living in America was a free ride. We've all gotta work hard to make our living here. More money being pumped back into our economy due to outsourcing will, IMO, continue to raise stock prices, make the rich richer who will in turn spend their money on more frivolous products, which drives business further ahead. Besides, when the mega-rich have more 'stuff' they need more people to upkeep it, which is a good place for the poor and unemployed to get themselves back on their feet in the short-term so that they aren't wasting their earning potential in the long-term.

    1. Re:I think outsourcing is fine by elrusoloco · · Score: 1

      I'm having a bit of deja vu here. Didn't Reagan push the same arguments for his "trickle-down" economics theories? This is hardly an original line of thought....albeit one I tend to agree with.

    2. Re:I think outsourcing is fine by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      I know your job might be eliminated in the short term, but that doesn't mean you can't get back out there and learn new skills or take on a completely different job. No one ever said that living in America was a free ride. We've all gotta work hard to make our living here. More money being pumped back into our economy due to outsourcing will, IMO, continue to raise stock prices, make the rich richer who will in turn spend their money on more frivolous products, which drives business further ahead. Besides, when the mega-rich have more 'stuff' they need more people to upkeep it, which is a good place for the poor and unemployed to get themselves back on their feet in the short-term so that they aren't wasting their earning potential in the long-term.

      In your (and the other outsourcing apologists) view of America, I seem to exist only to service the luxuries of the extremely wealthy. My friend, what you describe is not a free country, it is an oligarchy: A society run by (And geared completely towards the needs of) the vastly wealthy. In an oligarchy, the rest of us are along only to service broken-down Lexuses and Mercedes Benzes and fix hot-tub pumps out at the beach house. Sorry, but that theory of society was (allegedly) flushed down the toilet years ago. I'm not a serf, and my boss isn't a nobleman. I do not exist to serve him. That isn't how our country works. (Or, at least, it wasn't supposed to...)

      The fact is that the truly wealthy have what they want, and can afford their whims. They don't need to outsource your job to afford their toys. They don't need to outsource your job at all, but Corporations think they can make a shitload more money if they do it, so they go ahead. In reality, off-shore outsourcing can be summarized in one ugly word: Greed. An example of greed that is so out of control, that the minority in this country would actually sabotage our nation's future to give themselves a few extra bucks now. Off-shore outsourcing is a wealth grab, plain and simple.

      A self-serving means to drive down labor costs to permit the extremely wealthy in America to get control of the miniscule bit of wealth that isn't already theirs. It has absolutely nothing to do with making the country, as a whole, stronger because off-shore outsourcing does exactly the opposite.

      Ask an economist (a REAL economist, not one who works for King GeorgeW) whether highly-skilled workers "retraining" to flipping burgers helps society. (Althogh, according to King GeorgeW, flipping burgers is "manufacturing", and we all know that "manufacturing" is good for middle-America...)

      You're also missing a pretty big chunk of the puzzle here by implying that those who lose jobs can simply be re-trained and get new jobs. This is only partly true, (and it is a very small part.) The part the outsourcing apologists never want to mention is that we are replacing $45-80k per year jobs with $19-30k per year jobs--hardly a 1:1 replacement, like King GeorgeW and friends would have you believe.

      In fact, the only people who seem to get any positive benefit out of outsourcing are the majority stock holders (who are already super-rich) and the people in foreign lands now gleefully doing our jobs (for 1/5 the pay.) Show me a benefit to regular Americans, because I don't see it. (And "Cheaper consumer goods" doesn't fly, because unemployed people can't afford to waste their money on that shit. Know any unemployed people with new big-screen HDTVs? Of course not. Unemployed people spend whatever money they have on "survival," not "stuff", no matter how "cheap" that 42inch plasma screen seems.)

      Also, before I go, you might want to look into the trend of U.S. companies who not only outsource labor, but also structure the outsourced work as a foreign business to avoid U.S. taxes on profits they make from it. Of course, since the government still costs the same amount to operate whether the robber-barons' corporations pay their share or not, our taxes go up to make up for unpaid portions.
      --
      Who did what now?
  65. 40% less? I need to move to the US! by CokoBWare · · Score: 1

    If I make 40% less living in Canada, then I should be moving to the US... Anyone wanna hire an experienced Web Software developer? I could certainly use the extra 40%!

  66. well then by mpost4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We can really blame canada.

    1. Re:well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well. . .

      Dey took our jobs!

  67. As a Canadian Programmer by ShieldWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... while Canadian programmers are nearby, speak English with nearly American accents, have a similar culture and legal system, and get paid 40% less than U.S. programmers. Might be time to think about moving North, eh?"

    I think it might be time to move South!

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    1. Re:As a Canadian Programmer by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      Don't do it man!
      Reasons not to:
      - you'll have to pay more just to live
      - your tax money will be going towards the American military
      - you have to pay taxes, but you're not allowed to vote (taxation without representation)
      - the attitude here generally sucks
      - Bush owns you
      - the hockey (if you can find it) sucks
      - the beer sucks (unless you drink the expensive imports)

      I'm going back dude!!

      P.S. the chicks are hot... oh wait... damnit!

  68. haha by comet69 · · Score: 0

    DEY DOOK ER DERRRRSSSSSS

    --
    - Hi I'm Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux, Lih-nix..
  69. Dell call centre is coming to Edmonton, Alberta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for the Alberta Government and work fairly closely with the Public Affairs Bureau. They're keeping it rather quiet right now (why I posted anonymously), but they're getting ready to announce a Dell call centre is coming to Edmonton.

    Apparently the early numbers are 500 staff, but set to grow to 1,500 in three years.

    Our city was fighting against Boise, Idaho and won.

    1. Re:Dell call centre is coming to Edmonton, Alberta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boise, wasn't manly enough, eh.

  70. IT / Programmers by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    the article talks about IT offshoring, then jumps track at the end to talk about 40% salary for programmers.

    something be slightly askew

  71. 80% Savings 40% Savings by greymond · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Companies do NOT care if you have talk to a guy speaking Spanglish, Engrish, or Hinduish - They only care about saving money and doing things for LESS.

    COmpanies used to use child labor util we made laws about it. Companies used to work people round the clock until we made laws about it. From their past track record companies WILL DO whatever they can GET AWAY WITH - until we unite and make a law about it.

    SO GET OUT THERE and crack some skulls!

  72. Re:Clearly... by dontspellsogood · · Score: 1

    Bring it on. We will repel you with vast arsenals of Rush albums, blaring at you at great volume. Albums of mass destruction so to speak.

    And if that doesn't work we'll promise to keep Celine Dion in Los Vegas.

    --
    No, reelly I don't!
  73. Re:Clearly... by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

    Well, that's all fine and dandy, I suppose...but how am I going to dodge the draft for THAT war?

    Sneak into Mexico?

  74. sorry by GoClick · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Your morgage isn't tax deductable here. Not to mention there is SO much corruption and waste in government only like 20% of our 50% tax makes it anywere

    1. Re:sorry by Orick · · Score: 2

      But just think, you get all the government you can eat.

      It's like a socialist buffet!

      And people wonder why they get paid 40% less in Canada and many people up there want to head south for better paying jobs and better medical care....
      --
      Oreck Reviews

    2. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think that is somewhat of an exageration. Having worked for the mexican government and lived in texas. I find the canadian levels of corruption and waste quite low.

      I find that people often lack context when they make these accusations. 100% honesty and integrity does not exist anywhere. its a human failing and realistically any government, regardless of its checks and balances, is prone to it by virtue of the humans that comprise it.

    3. Re:sorry by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > Not to mention there is SO much corruption and waste in government only like 20% of our 50% tax makes it anywere

      Whereas our government efficiently pours it all out the bomb bay doors. I really need to get my degree so I can emigrate more easily. I was thinking New Zealand actually...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    4. Re:sorry by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd like to know how you're paying 50% tax.

      The maximum tax rate in Canada at the federal level is 29%, and that kicks in when you make more than $113,000. Since the tax rate is progressive, you pay nothing on the first $8000, 16% on the money between $8000 and $35,000, 22% on the money between $35,000 and $70,000, and 26% on the money between $70,000 and $113,000.

      The highest tax rate in the country is in Newfoundland/Labrador, and at it's MAXIMUM, you pay a TOTAL (that means including federal tax) of 47.02% on money over $113,000. Remember that the tax rate is progressive. If you make $113,001, you pay 47 cents of tax on that ONE DOLLAR, but everything below that is taxed at a lower rate.

      Nowhere in Canada does you full tax approach 50%. You may be paying anywhere from 30% - 40%, depending on how good a job you have.

      In Alberta (the lowest tax rate in the country - a flat rate of 10%), your personal exemption is $14,337 and the federal exemption is $8012. You pay 16% federal tax up to $35,000, and a flat 10% provincial tax.

      So, we'll do provincial tax first. You only have to pay tax on $20667 because of the exemption. It's 10%, so you pay $2067 provincial tax.

      Federally, you would pay tax on 26988. The rate is 16% in this bracket, so that's $4318. That's a grand total of $6385 on $35,000. That works out to a total of about 18% of your gross income.

      Please stop saying that we're taxed at 50%. It simply isn't true. I've given you the number, and you can do the math yourself. NOBODY IN CANADA PAYS 50% TAX.

      Whether or not there's corruption and waste in the government is another discussion. (Though it is worth noting that while the government pissed our money away, the books were still balanced. We haven't had a deficit budget in years.)

      Oh, and here's where I got the tax info from. Check my math yourself. It's possible that I made a mistake, but the conclusion is still true.

      http://www.taxtips.ca/tax_rates.htm

    5. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a notable difference in 'corruption and waste' between Canada and the US. And the marginal tax rates are actually pretty close. Canada's is slightly higher on the whole, but some provinces are taxed lower than some states, for example. Canadas corporate taxes are lower.

      don't talk out your ass.

    6. Re:sorry by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget:
      Gas tax
      Alcohol
      GST
      PST
      Drivers License fees
      Registration
      Capital Gains
      City tax
      water tax
      school tax
      Moving? Pay the Welcome Tax

      --next two aren't really taxes
      EI
      QPP (quebec pension plan)
      --

    7. Re:sorry by amwassil · · Score: 1

      You're not including a lot of non-income taxes that we in Canada pay over and above income tax that are not "progressive". That would be mostly GST and PST. Here in BC that adds 14.5% on every purchase (some stuff is PST exempt here, but everything except food bought in a supermarket is taxed GST at 7%!)

      There are other more or less hidden taxes as well. For exemple, here in Vancouver I pay a "transit levy" on my electric bill which is a dedicated tax to support local transit. This in turn is subject to GST! I also pay "network access fees" on my long distance plan. These "fees" are taxes that At&T Primus must pay and which they pass along to me. These "fees" again are subject to GST. So in these two cases I am actually paying tax on tax!

      Network Access Fees are also built into the service charges my bank and Interac pass on to me. I don't think these are subject to GST though.

      There are so many of these hidden taxes imposed by all levels of government (local, municipal, regional, provincial, federal - did I miss anyone?) that it's virtually impossible to calculate just how much tax you're actually paying. But I would bet a week's pay that 50% is pretty close when you include them all.

      To add insult to "progression" we get a GST rebate based on taxable income. The more taxable income you have the bigger the rebate. This means that those who really need the extra cash get the least and get nothing if their taxable income is zip. And in BC everyone gets a $50 PST tax credit on your income taxes no matter what your taxable income is. Of course, if you don't file you don't get it.

      So don't think no one in Canada is paying 50% taxes. Even if it's not 50% for most people, it's still way too much. And it's way too much because we have way too much government in Canada, every level of which is composed of incompetent twits who think they know better than me how to spend my money.

    8. Re:sorry by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      That's not quite true. I don't get the GST rebate anymore, 'cause I make too much money. (I really loved getting it when I was a student, though.)

      The thing about these sales taxes and things is that everyone, everywhere has to pay them. By that, I mean that Americans pay taxes on their gas, and booze, and property, and capital gains, etc. The main complaint of Canadians is that our income tax is close to 50% of our incomes, which is entirely not true. (A friend of mine, who's the son of an accountant, erroneously believed that our tax brackets applied to all your income. So if you were in the 29% tax bracket, 29% of your entire income was taken away.)

      As I said in a different response, PST/GST and other such taxes rely on you being a consumer and buying things. I don't buy a lot of stuff, don't drive, smoke or drink, and I'm fairly confident that I don't pay 50% of my income out in taxes.

      (Incidentally, I agree that we have too much government. Ideally, I'd like to see provincial governments removed. The logistical problems that existed when the country was founded no longer exist. Because of various means of high-speed communication and transportation, I feel that the only governments that are necessary are the Federal and Municipal. Those that don't live in cities would have elected representatives to act in lieu of a municipal government.)

    9. Re:sorry by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      The bad news can be found at http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tax/individuals/faq/taxra tes-e.html#provincial

      The top tax bracket in Canada is 29% federal + 18% provincial (if you are a Newf). That's a total of 47% not including City tax.

      So I would propose that one can end up paying more than 50% tax in Canada.

    10. Re:sorry by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd like to know how you're paying 50% tax.

      I live in Ottawa, make CA$82K and paid a total of 19.7% in income tax for 2003. I took advantage of RRSP contributions. This is also short of the 50% income tax rate that Americans like to comfort themselves by saying.

      We do pay more taxes overall, but we get more for them. The total Canadian tax burdon as a percentage of GDP is 35%. The American tax burdon is 28%. We get universal health coverage for 5% of the burdon; Americans stuff the coffers of private insurance companies. The 2% remaining is probably lost in economies of scale and snow removal. Regionally, Californians and New Yorkers probably pay more in taxes than I do.

    11. Re:sorry by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I already addressed this. The 29% tax bracket only applies to your income between $70,000 and $113,000. All of your other money is taxed at a lower rate. This is what's meant by a progressive tax system. A person that makes $120,000 a year doesn't have 47% of taxes shaved right off the top. That wouldn't make any sense. It would mean that at a certain point, you'd be better off making LESS money to stay in a smaller tax bracket, so that you could keep more of what you make. It's still always better to make more money, no matter what tax bracket you end up. By jumping into the next bracket, you'll never take home less than what you would have before you moved up.

      Just re-read my comment from the top. :)

    12. Re:sorry by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      I was just responding to your ascertion that people don't pay 50% tax in Canada. I was pointing out that you forgot about Provincial income tax.

      In reality 50% is probably a conservative estimate of the TOTAL tax that the AVERAGE Canadian must pay.

      We have only talked about income tax. We haven't even gotten into the 14%+ you pay on every friggen thing you buy or do, in short, everything you CAN spend your money on is taxed again. Let's see how many I can name:

      -GST 7%
      -PST (varies) 7% for me.
      -Liqour tax.. I don't know maybe 30-50%, I know that a bottle of vodka costs less than $5 before the tax, $35 after, and then GST on the tx of course.
      -Gas taxes another 30% or so duty.
      -Duties on all of the computer gear I buy from Taiwan.
      -2 words, dairy board.
      -CPP, people of my age will never collect this.
      -UI, another service fee.
      -Monthly health care premiums.
      -User fees for virtually every government service, drivers license, passport, etc.
      -Parking fees.
      -Homeowners tax.
      -911 tax on my phone bill.

      I could probably go on but I have to get back to work so that I can continue to generate enough cash to keep Ottawa paved with gold.

      I think its safe to say that most people in Canada pay more than half of their "40% off" salary into general revenue; so that the government can continue to buy Quebec votes and develop much needed golf courses in the PM's riding.

    13. Re:sorry by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I didn't forget about income tax. Not only do I mention that Newfoundland\Labrador has the highest maximum tax rate in the country, but I work out how much tax you would pay if you lived in Alberta, the province with the lowest total tax rate in the country.

      You pay 7% GST on all goods and services no matter where you are, and there's a provincial tax of varying rates everywhere except Alberta. I acknowledged later that people do have to pay these things, except that I feel that they're 'opt in' taxes, since you don't have to pay them if you don't partake in those goods or services. Groceries aren't subject to GST.

      So, given that I drive very little, don't spend a lot on random items, and don't drink, I don't pay a lot of these taxes. I may be somewhat anomalous, but I'm not a penny-pincher by any means. I DO own a car, I own several bicycles, and I do have computers and a house.

      UI isn't a 'service fee'. If you're unemployed, it pays out. It's part of our social safety net, but it's not a tax so much as a forced savings plan. The same goes for CPP.

      The 911 tax on your phone bill is so negligible, I bet you find enough tax-free money on the ground during a year to pay for it.

      The AVERAGE Canadian citizen certainly doesn't pay 50% tax, even under these circumstances. You'd have to be making over $113,000 a year and buying a lot of booze to be taxed at 50%.

      Keep track of your taxes for a year. I'm sure you don't pay more than 40% in taxes, total, even with this kind of spending. The progressive tax system doesn't allow for paying as much taxes as you think. Even at the highest tax bracket, you have to keep in mind that only money OVER $113,000 is taxed at 47%. Everything else is taxed at a much lower rate.

    14. Re:sorry by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      tax freedom day

      Contrast this the states: (April 11) taxfoundation

      Enter your particulars, does the date come out after June 30? Then you are paying more than 50% tax.

      Granted, this is an average, and assumes that you don't live like a hermit. Personally, I spend pretty much everything I make, and most of what I buy is subject to tons of tax. I don't sit at home munching on bulk crackers.

    15. Re:sorry by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Go to the top of the thread, and read it again. At least one person challenged the validity of the Fraser Institute's tax freedom day calculation.

    16. Re:sorry by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      Holy cow, one person didn't agree with the Fraser Institute? Well, I guess its got to be crap then...

      Seriously, if you can find another source on the net, that doesn't look like it was made by 4 year olds (eg. all text in <h1> and primary colors everywhere), I'd be interested to have a look. The Fraser one was all I could find.

      I don't have any great respect for them in particular, though they aren't excatly the Alex de Tourqville Institute.

      Anyway, given that the Fraser says its, on average, about July 10, which is pretty close to 50% and given that the Fraser is known to be a right leaning org, the true value is probably on the < 50% side. So you are probably correct in saying that Canadians pay less than 50% in taxes.

  75. Re:French-Canadians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about broken english with an american accent so? *grins*

  76. Pure genius by p3d0 · · Score: 1
    Canadian programmers ... get paid 40% less than U.S. programmers. Might be time to think about moving North, eh?
    Good logic. Oh, plus we pay almost 50% income tax.
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Pure genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Who pays 50% tax? Since your email is a .edu address I can guarantee that you don't. No student/professor in Canada would pay 50% tax. In fact, I doubt you could find one single Canadian who pays 50% of his/her income in tax. If someone you know says they do, ask to see their final return, I can promise you they have not paid that amount. I guess if you had a huge income (>400,000/yr), and no financial sense, you might, maybe, come close, but you would have to be the stupidest person on earth.

      So, which is it, are you full of shit, or are you the stupidest person on earth?

    2. Re:Pure genius by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      First, I got this Slashdot account years ago when I was in school. I am no longer in school, so your speculations about the tax I pay are moot.

      Second, I said "almost 50% income tax", which I think any reasonable reader could interpret to mean that we have a tax bracket well over 40% occupied by people without egregiously large incomes (which is, in fact, what I meant).

      What is "well over 40%"? Given that this was said in the context of comparing Canadian taxes against American, I don't think it's too unreasonable to say that residents of a province with a tax bracket over 43% would quality, since that puts them at 47% total tax when the GST (a tax Americans don't pay) is included, and that's "almost 50%". With this criterion, 8 of the 10 provinces qualify. If we consider only a reasonable income for a junior software developer (say, $65000/yr) then three provinces still qualify: Quebec, Nowfoundland, and Manitoba. As for the other 5 provinces, their top tax bracket starts at CDN$104648, which is certainly a reasonable salary for someone with a .edu email address.

      So, while you may disagree with some of the above logic, does it at least absolve me of "stupidest person in the world" status? :-)

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  77. Or rural America. by T-Keith · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I thought of this last time I visited Northern Minnesota. Years ago Northern Minnesota had a prosperous economy based on Iron Ore and taconite mining. Slowly the mining stopped, and most people were left without jobs. The "Iron Range" still has quite a few people living on government assistance because of this. These people would gladly work for a fraction of the salary of city workers, and it's got to be cheaper than the phone costs for overseas tech support. Other companies, such as Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN have moved jobs such as claims examiners up there, why not tech support?

    I have to believe for most the "Fargo" accent is easier to understand than an Indian one.

  78. Re:40% less? I need to move to the US! by TeddyR · · Score: 1

    yeah... but your expenses/cost of living would go up 60% (if i LA or NY)

    --

    --
    Time is on my side
  79. Re:Clearly... by steveb964 · · Score: 1

    It's past time to roll tanks into Canada

    Yeah...Thinking about it as a Canadian, I guess I can see how US Intelligence could see our beer and hockey sticks as a potential WMD threat, eh? ;o)

  80. Well, it's actually %60 less by argoff · · Score: 1

    That is, if you buy anything. I renember one time I was in canada and I bought a pack of chewing gum - thinking wow! what a great price. Then I brought it to the register and they tallied up the tax and I was nearly floored.

    There are some other funny things about Canada too, trying to find a restruant in torranto that served lemmonade was a lost cause, and one time I went to McDonnalds and they asked me if I wanted viniger with my fries - when I gestured WTF, the lady behind the couter said - "you must be an American" :)

    When I wnet thru customs, I made the mistake of saying I was there for work. I went thru this long and tedious procedure to prove to them that I wasn't going to steal Canadian jobs. I think I slipped past all the BS, because they didn't know what SCO Unix was. Yes I know, I'm so ashamed, thank God for Linux. (I told by boss back in 95 that SCO scuked and Linux was going to take over, they laughed and mocked me out of the company, well look now who'se laughing! :)

    Anyhow, if you hate American taxes and don't like the honesty-level in American politics, I would say you will hate Canada. If they're not a problem to you and you want free medical care at every one elses expense, then you probably won't find it so bad.

    1. Re:Well, it's actually %60 less by legojenn · · Score: 1

      I don't think too many people are terribly concerned about losing their job to you. My advice to you if you do want to steal someone's job would be to get someone to proofread your cover letter.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    2. Re:Well, it's actually %60 less by generica1 · · Score: 1

      Not every place in Canada has a ridiculous sales tax on products and services. There is a PST (Provincial Sales Tax) in all provinces except Alberta, and there is a GST (General Sales Tax) of 7% that is across canada. The PST is set by the province and can range from nothing (like Alberta) to hovering around 10%. It gets added onto the GST, so if you're paying 8% PST and 7% GST you've got $1.15 CAD to to pay every $1 something is priced at.

      Anyway, if you're shocked by high taxes in Canada, Alberta is the place to go - low taxes, the provincial government runs without a deficit and the alcoholic everyman redneck Premier (think Governor) runs the province like a business, and as a result we are nearly debt-free.

      Here in Edmonton the cost of living is low, but IT jobs are hard to get unless you know someone or are willing to work low-level helpdesk jobs. I work as IT Manager for a local publishing and marketing company (which employs about 50 people) and am paid on the low scale of what someone in my position would make (I earn in the $30,000 - 40,000 CAD range). However, because the cost of living is low and taxes aren't too bad, I at 24 years old am a homeowner and enjoy a comfortable standard of living.

      Some of my friends have done IT jobs that earn upwards from $40,000 - $60,000 but you need a combination of luck, determination, high skill and good connections to land that sort of salary doing IT here. If you're missing any single one of those traits (like I admittedly am) then you have to settle for what you get.

      A lot of brilliant technology-oriented minds end up in shitty call centre jobs employed by Americans trying to save money by outsourcing to Canada, but it's a mixed blessing really. Those people would not be working in their field if it wasn't for those jobs, and they pay well enough that you can not feel live a welfare case.

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
    3. Re:Well, it's actually %60 less by argoff · · Score: 1

      You know, when I was a kid - I was failing all my spelling and grammer tests because I was always playing on this new device that noone ever herd of before called a personal computer (CBM actually). Anyhow, many of those girls who who did so well on their spelling and were praised by the teacher while I was put down ended up becomming secrataries, while I ended up holding high level IT jobs at fortune 50 companies. So yeah, I admit my spelling and grammer really suck, but you know what - I'm not a bit sorry for it, and it hasn't really hurt me.

    4. Re:Well, it's actually %60 less by mwood · · Score: 1

      I never tried living and working there, but I have visited. I can say that there is some great scenery, the culture is understandable to an ignorant Yank, it does *not* snow all year 'round, and I never met any Canadian who was like Red Green.

  81. Canadian Sysadmin by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm more or less a sysadmin in my position (which is to say I generally take care of anything computer'ish here). Current wage is $25.5/h (CAD), with Blue Cross for medical/dental benefits, a pension, 3 weeks paid holidays (this is my year 2), etc

    If I moved, I could make a lot more, but I'm also currently living in a small town. So if you wanted to compare:

    • Wage: $25.5/h + benefits
    • Rent: 2bdrm apt at $415/mo, I've seen a full (nice looking) house for $700/mo
    • Gas: Currently around $0.80-$0.90/L
    • Nearest larger community: 115km (where I live, no theatre/mall but most of the rest of what you'd need to not go insane.)
    • Groceries a bit more expensive sometimes, but we just got a new grocery store so that should add competition
    • Electronics: fairly pricey, except for games which are oddly about par
    • High speed internet: $25.5-35.5/mo for residential ADSL, $85/mo for business /w fixed-IP (both fairly reliable)
    • Oh, and yes the majority of people my age are hicks or married. Ah well, can't win 'em all

    If I moved to a larger city, rent could probably be around $600-800+ for about the same accomodations as I have now, gas would be up a bit, car insurance insane... but I'd also be expecting to make a fair bit more so it would probably still put me ahead.
    1. Re:Canadian Sysadmin by thenextpresident · · Score: 1

      Actually, I live in Montreal (and I am an American who moved up here 2 1/2 years ago), and I have a 2 bdrm apartment as well, and it only costs me $450. And it's a nice apartment. Gas prices here are the same as what you mention. Really, the prices in Montreal are very reasonable, cost of living is low, and basically the city is just beautiful.

      As an American in Canada, I have no desire to leave anytime soon. Montreal is a beautiful city with wonderful people.

      Except they drive like crap. Don't get me started! =)

      --
      Jason Lotito
  82. Toronto Raptors by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

    Yes and no. The lifestyle in Toronto is superior to that of India. They have baseball, basketball and everything else is nearly identical to a Boston for example. More cultural than most US cities I have traveled to actually. What am I saying Toronto IS better than Boston too?!

    1. Re:Toronto Raptors by dtrent · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. The lifestyle in Toronto is superior to that of India.

      First off, you're comparing a city to an entire country, which is like saying Miami is superior to the Moon. Second, if you insist on using words like "superior" when comparing two places, at least qualify it. "The basketball scene in Toronto is superior to that of Bangalore", otherwise people will think you're some kind of nationalist fool.

    2. Re:Toronto Raptors by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear the hockey is better in Canada than in Indian, too, eh?

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:Toronto Raptors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which is like saying Miami is superior to the Moon.


      That would be an absurd claim. In fact, in spite of my fondness for breathing, I can't imaging prefering Miami.

    4. Re:Toronto Raptors by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, let's qualify it: Canada is vastly superior to the shit-hole known as "India". Is that clear enough for you?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  83. Where do I sign up by {Hecubus} · · Score: 5, Informative
    About once a week it seems when there is a story talking about Canada, invariably there are many posts to the effect of

    "Looks like I'll be moving up north" or

    "Where do I sign up?"

    Well, you can Sign up here

    Thats the Citizenship and Immigration Canada website, with all the forms and whatnot for admission to the country. Enjoy!

    --
    Unix is mysterious, and ancient, and strong. It's made of cast iron and the bones of heroic programmers of old -
    1. Re:Where do I sign up by Sharkford · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You needn't really bother going through the immigration processes on the CIC website; as Merkin Citizens you are eligible for the Free Trade work permit. Google for the details (and misc.immigration.canada is good), but basically you:

      (a) finangle a job offer from a Canadian company, which of course will be conditional on you getting the permit

      (b) show up at the border with the offer letter, your resume showing a couple years' experience, and proof of your education, and

      (c) convince the border worker that these docs are legit and, very important, that they are consistent in their content (trying to take a sysadmin job with an English BA will be problematic). Then

      (d) start work, find the beer store and buy suitable seasonal clothing, in whatever order suits you.

      The hardest part is (a). But keep an eye on workopolis.ca, and be prepared to cover your own travel for interviewing and relocation.

      S.

    2. Re:Where do I sign up by tpr · · Score: 1

      Already did that, moved, bought a house (no mortgage anymore :-) and started enjoying a more gentile, civilised lifestyle.
      Living costs are rated roughly half those of San Jose - where I used to live - and with property so much cheaper I don't need the mortgage. It's quieter, much much less traffic, cleaner air, negligable air traffic overhead and oddly enough I've seen more bikini babes in the last six months than I did in 12 years in silly-con valley.

      It's well worth serious consideration.

  84. It already happens by jojowasher · · Score: 1

    There are huge call centers here that are devoted to providing tech support for American companies, there is one in Northern Alberta that is a 3000 seat call center, they do tech support for companies like HP, earthlink, and many others, watch out, next time you call tech support you might actually get someone that is friendly!!

  85. SouthPark by DCheesi · · Score: 1

    Doh! My ObSouthPark faux-markers got clipped; apparently not faux enough. I knew the preview looked weird somehow...

  86. Canadian-Hungarian notation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, when a Canadian programmer using Hungarian notation declares a char array variable called, say, "Buffer", how's it declared?

    sZedBuffer

    ???

    1. Re:Canadian-Hungarian notation by ReplicantSD1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Close, but we would actually say this: sZedBufferEh

    2. Re:Canadian-Hungarian notation by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I thought a buffer was someone who programmed in the nude.

    3. Re:Canadian-Hungarian notation by grandbonheur · · Score: 0

      I could have sworn it was "plsFondleMyBuffer".

  87. If this a fund raising.. by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    I chip in CAD$ 10...

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  88. Hooray!!! by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    Now companies can fuck their employees over with a minimum of work and stress to the company executives!

  89. "Nearly American accents"? by 968134 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a Canadian, I think it is hilarious that the article claims that we have "nearly American accents". There is more variety within either country than there are differences between them when it comes to how their residents speak. What exactly is this "American accent" that we so nearly mimic? A southern drawl? A Brooklyn accent? Perhaps something milder from the midwest?

    I challenge the average Slashdot reader to grab a life-long resident of Alberta and Montana at random and decide who is who based not on their word choice or beliefs, but strictly their accent.

    1. Re:"Nearly American accents"? by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 0

      Never say out or about down here, its a dead give away,eh!

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    2. Re:"Nearly American accents"? by whitelabrat · · Score: 1

      If we use my neighborhood as a standard of an "American accent" then... Buen día mis amigos canadienses!

    3. Re:"Nearly American accents"? by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      All American and Canadian accents have a lot in common with each other in fact I can barley tell a west coast Canadian from a Californian Accent. I guess you have to be very used to the differences to hear them all. While I have heard the Texan, New York accents and yes they are all different. They have no where near the differences that occur on the little Island I live on at the moment called Britain. But then some American thought I sounded Scottish (WTF). So it depends if you look at the world as whole then yes it is nearly an American Accent, just like the NZ accent is a near Australian Accent.

    4. Re:"Nearly American accents"? by goon · · Score: 1

      yeah I laughed at the *similiar culture* but. US and Canada are like chalk and cheese. Candians being a commonwealth county have more akin to New Zealanders and Australians than Americans.

      But when it comes to business I dont think neither the accent nor the culture would really get in the way. Though you may have some fun calling them *bloody wankers* and them calling back *freekin shute*.

      Though I do have suspicions outsourcing may not get a foothold in Canada and may explain why outsourcing to cheaper countries is (to use that awful business phrase) gaining traction.

      offshoring ~ hidden profit centres?

      All through the 90's corporations have looked at ways of minimising taxes (Frontline ~ ~ Tax me if you can ~ feb 19, 2003) through leasing utilities akin to reducing costs as they did through downsizing. The concept relies on paying for recycling/rinsing money through foreign countries by leasing drains, trains and the like. Now the US tax authorities (IRS) have cottened onto these schemes. Could coding (an expensive reoccuring cost) in low wage third world countries be another attempt to avoid such taxes to improve profit?

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  90. 40%? by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm, outsourcing to Canada eh? Maybe that's why I haven't had trouble finding work through the dot.bomb. :)

    Seriously though, you guys/gals must be making a butt load of money down there. I thought I was pretty comfortable with what I was making. I can easily survive in a pretty expensive city (relative to Canada) on what I make now. I live in Toronto. If my salary is 40% lower than yours then either you live in a really expensive city (New York? The Bay area?) or you guyz are overpaid :)

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
  91. Re:Canadian Accents? What's that aboot? by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

    Do you suggest all southern accents sound alike? Can you not hear the difference between Tennessee and Mississippi accents? Yes, to me all Canadian accents sound similar. Maybe because I only hear tourists, and fake canadian accents in the movies.

    --
    word.
  92. you forgot one thing by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Canada has a big beaver problem:
    www.visit4info.com/details.cfm?adid=1457 6

    1. Re:you forgot one thing by king-manic · · Score: 1

      especially in calgary :)
      beaver

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  93. Health Care Costs by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I work in an internatinoal company. We have made a conscious decision to keep our software development in Canada because it's cheaper. Salaries are about the same in Canada, but in Canadian, not U.S., dollars. And health care costs are much less for Canadian companies because most of it is paid for by the government.

    The down side, of course, is more tax. And the CBC.

    1. Re:Health Care Costs by canfirman · · Score: 1
      The down side, of course, is more tax. And the CBC.

      And don't forget Don Cherry.

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
    2. Re:Health Care Costs by RobinH · · Score: 1

      The down side, of course, is more tax. And the CBC.

      Exactly what are you comparing the CBC to: CNN or FOX? Because compared to those, there is no comparison.

      Given all that, I still prefer reading the CS Monitor, but I prefer internet news to radio and television anyway.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Health Care Costs by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      Private broadcasters can put on what they want, and I can watch or not. Fox and CNN don't use my tax dollars to propogandize a political view point I disagree with.

    4. Re:Health Care Costs by Rick+BigNail · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with CBC? There are slighty left, but not too bad.

      Counter Spin?

    5. Re:Health Care Costs by AdamPiotrZochowski · · Score: 1


      Whats wrong with CBC?

      CBC2 is the only station in my town that
      bothers with Jazz / Classical / Electronica.
      Every other station does the easy 70s, 60s,
      or 80s, 90s, or top40. Ugh

      --
      /apz, Canada is FUN FUN FUN

    6. Re:Health Care Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What political point of view is that? "Not Right Wing"? The CBC is, by far, the most "fair and balanced" network on Canadian television. Remember kids, just because a network doesn't have a conservative/right wing bias, doesn't mean it has a left wing one.

  94. Lack of programmers may be a problem.. by d_jedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We Canadian programmers are all moving south to get paid 40% more!

    All we have to do is put up with the Patriot Act, DMCA, George Bush, and..

    Wait? Why did I want to take that programming job in the States, again?

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  95. Speak English in Canada? by ShwAsasin · · Score: 1

    "much of the labor savings, while Canadian programmers are nearby, speak English with nearly American accents,"

    Speak English? Obviously you've never met a programmer in Toronto. And it's a sin to speak any other language except Quebecois in Quebec.

  96. Sheesh. by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

    Flamebait?! SOMEbody with their finger on the mod button can't take a joke.

  97. Outsource to Canada? by subzerorz · · Score: 1

    There's an ironic aspect to this fear of outsourcing. The U.S. happens to benefit a lot when consumers in foreign countries outsource their wants and needs to American companies. Take the example of "copyrighted" products such as software, motion pictures, and sound recordings. The U.S. exports $90 billion US worth of these items each year. Canada also exports billions of dollars in cultural products each year. According to the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada's cultural industries export the equivalent of $5 billion Cdn each year. These cultural industries account for as many as 600,000 jobs.

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
  98. Re:French-Canadians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but I like listening to a French accent more than a Hindi one, especially when a woman is doing it. It sounds cooler to my ears.

  99. It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by gosand · · Score: 4, Interesting
    a health care system available to all its citizens?

    My wife has family all over Canada, and I can tell you that from their experiences, the healthcare system isn't all that great. While everyone has coverage, it can be pretty tough to get in to see a doctor. Things take longer because their system is swamped. And I remember something about how the banking industry isn't that good up there, so you don't get decent interest rates. Or something like that, I can't remember. I just meant to say that it is no "wonderland", they do have their own issues.

    But damn, are they polite up there. We went there on our honeymoon, took a 2 day tour on the Rocky Mountaineer. When we were pulling out of the station in Vancouver, there was graffiti sprayed on a nearby overpass. What did it say?
    "Welcome to Vancouver".
    Cracked my ass UP. Victoria was absolutely beautiful, I would move there in a second if I thought I could find a job.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by muonzoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I remember something about how the banking industry isn't that good up there, so you don't get decent interest rates. Or something like that, I can't remember. I just meant to say that it is no "wonderland", they do have their own issues.

      Wow, now that's a concrete and profound statement.

      Canada has Chartered Banks. This is a wonderful thing. It means that when you travel, you can find a branch of your own Bank! It also means that there is excellent inter-bank co-operation and the level of service is generaly quite good. It's certainly less risky and less confusion than all the Mom & Pop S&Ls that seem to dot the landscape south of 49.

      In fact, they look to be in fine shape.

    2. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by iserlohn · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should not have any problems finding a GP to see you in Canada. In fact, you could probably make an appointment and your GP (yes, you can choose your doctor) will see you the same day if you are in pain, the next for most other aliments.

      If you want to see a specialist. Well, that's another story... :)

    3. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by NormanEinstein · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian, and while our system does have problems, it generally works very well. It's wonderful to be able to walk into a hospital or clinic and have them patch you up without worrying about the cost.

    4. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by nfotxn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      For the sake of accuracy I'll clarify the problems with medicare here. It is not difficult to see a doctor or get emergency treatment in the least. There are waiting times for patients who are not critical at emergency rooms but I don't think that is any different than in the USA.

      One of the biggest problems we have here is with medical imaging. The cost of MRI equipement and technicians is absolutely astronomical which makes funding these clinics publically much more difficult than normal clinical staff in a hospital. Imaging is a pre-operative necessity in and this respect the entire system is gummed up at one point. Of course to the ignorant it looks as if the whole system doesn't work. That's not the case at all.

      Upon inspection of most public healthcare programs here the major stumbling points usually have nothing to do with the talent of the staff or funding as such but more so to do with economic pressure from the south. Millions of Canadian tax dollars are used to train RN's and MD's who take work south of the border every year. Canadian healthcare workers are a rare breed who get paid peanuts compared to their US counterparts because they believe in equal access for all. The idea of uncomprimised equality for all is a very much a part of our culture in Canada. It is indeed no wonderland however our detractors from south of the border usually don't know all the details.

      --

      _nfotxn

    5. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by da_foz · · Score: 1

      I just meant to say that it is no "wonderland", they do have their own issues.

      Yes it is:P

    6. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by metamatic · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While everyone has coverage, it can be pretty tough to get in to see a doctor. Things take longer because their system is swamped.

      You mean just like with my HMO, which is one of the top 10 US HMOs?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by billtom · · Score: 1

      Your information is incorrect. GP coverage in Canada is very uneven. Some areas are very well served, some are embarassingly underserved.

    8. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, lets see pretty tough to get in to see a doctor and interest rates are not very good in Canada.

      I work for a health care company here in the U.S. and I can tell you that it can take 2 to 3 months or even longer to see your doctor and last time I looked the interest rates here were not that decent, .15% on savings accounts at the local 5th 3rd bank.

    9. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by king-manic · · Score: 1

      While everyone has coverage, it can be pretty tough to get in to see a doctor.

      I have never experieinced this. I go to the doctors, I wait 20 min. I get to see him/her. Perhaps you should move to Alberta where we have mroe cash for health care (despite the feds) and generally pretty good medical infrastructure.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    10. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Pffft.

      I know people in New Brunswick who've been in town >1 year, and are still waiting for a GP.

    11. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1
      My wife has family all over Canada, and I can tell you that from their experiences, the healthcare system isn't all that great. While everyone has coverage, it can be pretty tough to get in to see a doctor. Things take longer because their system is swamped. And I remember something about how the banking industry isn't that good up there, so you don't get decent interest rates. Or something like that, I can't remember. I just meant to say that it is no "wonderland", they do have their own issues.

      That's funny. My friend works in the States and bitches to me every other week about how he misses Canada's healthcare system. No, I'm not joking. He says taxes + health insurance takes a far bigger chunk out of his paycheck than in Canada. And then he gets slightly worse than Canadian access. Takes a couple day to see a doctor, beg to see a specialist or get a necessary test and then get on a waiting list for that. And he pays for the privelege. Our system has problems, but don't think yours is all that much better. In fact, you should be fighting to get your money's worth because at least you can say you want to get what your paying for. ;-)

      Banking system. (Watches an old TV Nation episode) Looks like it's the same friggin' problem. But then again, considering we have credit unions and savings & loans as alternatives (and they are federally insured and generally well run), it's not a big issue either. Also, foreign banks are opening up. E.g., we have Citibank testing the waters and ING (which offers really good interest rates).

      Oh, and I can use my bank card anywhere in Canada and never pay more than $3 CDN in service fees. And usually, I can do a LOT better than that if I just walk a block or two. :-)

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    12. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      sorry but it is better than the US.

      My Gf has to spend over $1000.00 a month in medications. she has been laid off for 2 years now, no insurance and working part time/temp just to make enough so you can spend $1000.00 a month for your meds? that's bullcrap. 3 months ago we made a decision to violate federal laws and we buy her meds from canada.

      we get a 3 month supply for $500.00! that is 3 months not 1 month.

      in the USA the drug companies happily brutally rape the consumer/citizen with drastically inflated prices. and then try scare tactics that "canadian drugs are UNSAFE! Woooooooooo!"

      Sorry, but if she lived in canada she could actually live and even do something silly like eat and have her own apartment instead of having to spend over 50% of her income on medications that she needs to function/continue living and share her small apt with 4 other people.

      If I could get a way to emigrate to canada and a job doing what I am doing now at close to the same standard of living I'd do it in a heartbeat. (Even up in north ontario!)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1
      Canadian healthcare workers are a rare breed who get paid peanuts compared to their US counterparts because they believe in equal access for all.

      Yeah, I want my health care to come from a practitioner who's motivated by "the greater good" instead of one who trades his productivity for money. Those greedy capitalists will destroy the world!

    14. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada sets maximum pricing for medications. This allows them to get everything cheaper. The cost savings there are passed on the US consumers. So to all of our Canadian friends, "You're welcome"

    15. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you are just talking about regular doctor visits.

      It took me 3years to get healthy (I had major stomach and gastro-intestinal pains).

      Took about 3-6months to see a stomach specialist,
      another 6months to see another G.I specialist, and on and on...

      Turns out, the hospital didnt help me at all. I ended going to a naturopathic doctor and being put on a regiment of supplements and horse vitamins and eventually I got better.

      Maybe you are luckier then I was. But for any type of specialized care, expect to wait atleast 6months.

    16. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you've heard about the banking system but I've never really had any complaints.

      There's four big banks in Canada - CIBC, Royal Bank, Scotia Bank, and TD Canada Trust (there used to be five but TD and Canada Trust merged). There's also innumerable Credit Unions and a few self-serve-type services like ING Direct or President's Choice Financial. I can walk into any bank branch and change American money in for Canadian.

      Personally I use President's Choice Financial. There's no fees for day-to-day banking. For savings accounts they were paying 5% interest with no minimum balance when they launched. It's down to 2% now but it's better than some of the banks where a daily interest savings account actually loses money because of service fees unless you maintain a balance of $1000 or more.

      I walked into the President's Choice pavilion at my local supermarket with no credit rating. Half an hour later I walked out with a chequing account (free cheques!) and a savings account. My hold limit (the amount I can withdraw immediately when depositing cheques, etc.) was $200 and my daily withdrawl limit was $1000. Neither account costs me any money as long as I use CIBC's bank machines.

      Contrast this with my experience in New York State where they wouldn't change my Canadian money for American unless I was a customer and wanted $200 USD just to open an account.

      We certainly have our issues but I don't think banking and interest rates are one of them.

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    17. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually almost ALL other countries perscription medications are had drastically cheaper than in the USA.

      Mexico, you can get the EXACT SAME drugs for around the same price as in canada, europe has even lower rates.

      they know they can rob the american public blind because they are sheep that will pay anything they are told.

      as soon as the general american get's a clue or an IQ over 70 things will change there...

      until then the collective sound heard from the USA is.... Baaaaaaaa!

    18. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? The only place in Canada where I've lived (I've lived in BC/Alberta/Ontario) that you can see your GP the same day is B.C. and that was over 10 years ago now, so I don't know if that's still true. In Ottawa, if I want to see my GP, I need to book an appt. 2 months in advance. If I want to see a specialist I have to book 6 months or more in advance. Of course, I could go to a walk in clinic and wait for 3 hours to see a GP (who doesn't know me).

    19. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, he/she would have to be crazy to want to help the "the greater good", e?!

      Please stay DOWN in the USA.

    20. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Yosemite+Sue · · Score: 1

      You're not asking me, but this is /., so I'll jump in with my 2 cents!

      I'm in Toronto, and my doctor (and her office) is great. I can usually get an appointment when I want one (which could be the next day, or the next week or whatever). I might not be able to see my GP, but I can usually see one of the other doctors in that practise.

      Mind you, what's always been problematic is finding a doctor who takes new patients. In Saskatoon, Calgary and Toronto I had to call quite a few places before I could find a GP. (Toronto was the only one that had a hotline I could call that helped me narrow down my search.)

      When I lived in the US, I had *no* problem finding a doctor. But did it ever feel weird to have to cough up money each time I had an appointment! (Just the copayment, but still ...)

      YS

      --
      "Arrr! The laws of science be a harsh mistress." -- Bender
    21. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by code+addict · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I can't say I've EVER had trouble seeing a doctor when I needed one. I know a lot of people have complained about not being able to find a "Family Doctor", but that's not the same thing as not being able to see a doctor.

    22. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      When I went to E3 two years ago, getting money out of my Canadian bank account was as easy as walking up to the nearest ATM.

      It came out in American funds, and got converted on my statement. It was great! It beats the heck out of waiting in line at the bank before a trip just to exchange some currency, like in the "old" days :)

      Canadian banks are also ringing in profits in the billions for the last couple of years. No problems with our banks here. And loan interest rates are great too. But not that hot from an investment perspective.

    23. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're with the wrong GP then. I too live in Ottawa. The first time I needed a GP, I made 1 call to the nearest GP just down the block, and got an appointment 2 hours later. Finding a GP in Ottawa is a cinch, and most of them are easily available for same-day appointments.

      My GP is in a practice with 7 or 8 others, so I'm covered 24 hours a day, whether it's just a phone call or an appointment. This is the model that most doctors are moving to, through 'primary health care reform'.

      The problem with any socialized system is that it can't have market corrections for shortages. Right now, that's GPs in rural areas, many kinds of specialists in many places, and medical imaging. But finding GPs in urban areas is easy for those who know how to use a phone book.

    24. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Millions of Canadian tax dollars are used to train RN's and MD's who
      > take work south of the border every year.

      You identified the problem yourself, "economic pressure from the south" is just a obfuscating way of saying that Canada is offering less than the market price for something and wondering why supply is hard to find. Sounds like you and the government twits responsible need an Econ101 course.

      Three choices:

      1. Quit yer bitching and accept the shortage, knowing it will only grow worse.

      2. Offer competitive wages and accept the rise in taxes to pay for your more realisticaly priced socialized medicine.

      3. Leverage your socialized education system to forbid students educated by it from leaving the country for a period of time. Or stripping away the nice language, force them to sign Indentured Servitude contracts.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    25. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > in the USA the drug companies happily brutally rape the consumer/citizen
      > with drastically inflated prices

      No, the US is subsidizing those Canadian prices.

      There is only one solution to this problem. Since it is a product of governments interferring in the prices, a government solution might be the fastest solution. How about this:

      The world shall be divided into three classes.

      1. The 1st World, the US, Canada, Britian, France, Germany, Japan, etc.

      2. The Second world. Most of the rest of the EU, etc. Nations with real wealth but not wealthy.

      3. The third world.

      Drugs may not be moved between classes except under controlled conditions. Drugs, as with any other good under the WTO, NAFTA, etc., can be freely traded. Any nation violating our edict shall be blockaded until they relent. FUCK THE UN.

      Drug companies shall set their prices as follows. Major drug companies shall not be required to sell to the third world. However generic companies can make and sell any drug in the third world, regardless of patents in the rest of the world. Wholesale prices in the third world shall be set at 20% above cost of production.

      In the second world, the price shall be calculated by passing on the cost of production, half of normal prorated cost of R&D, plus 30% for profit.

      In the first world we pay cost of production plus a full share of the R&D cost plus a 50% net profit margin.

      Calculating the R&D costs and spreading them by company based on their R&D efforts would be a total bitch and lead to all sorts of creeping socialism, but less than than full socialised medicine brings.

      This law would have the effect of forcing you socialists on Canada and Europe to stop freeloading off of the US, lowering our cost of drugs, while at the same time making many drugs widely available in the third world. The really exensive ones still wouldn't be, but that's life.

      The other option is to encourage all of the drug companies to reloacte here, close their foreign offices and then tell the socialist governments trying to mandate drug prices to FOAD; pay whatever price we decide or do without. Violating the patent and making it local would be considered the opening move in an all out tradewar. In the end this one might even be the simpler choice.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    26. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No...the problem is the 40% spent on marketing in the pharmaceutical industry. If you search you'll find the figures. Regulation of how pharmaceuticals buy doctors would greatly reduce the cost of medication (most dramatically in the US).

    27. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      In the US you can open a bank with about $500 worth of paperwork. As a result there are about 2-3 banks per person. The banks dont talk to each other. They dont have a common banking network. They often go belly up taking all of their customers money with them.

      I dont know if the interest rates are better or worse in Canada. I do know that if you are interested in interest rates (interest hehe) then a bank is not where you want to go. Moot point.

      As we get a lot of US media, I am aware that VISA is pushing hard there "cheque card". In Canada you have been able to use your ATM card in retail outlets for a decade. This is as a direct result of having finite numbers of banks. People get there card more or less automaticly when they open a bank account. Retailers can rent the machine for about $25/mo, transaction fees are typically less then $0.10 per. So where as it is difficult for people, and retailers, to get a "cheque card" system setup, there is almost no barrier to do the same in Canada.

      As far as banks go, we win hands down.

    28. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      "Of course to the ignorant it looks as if the whole system doesn't work. That's not the case at all. "

      I'm sorry, but waiting in the emergency room for 50 hours without seeing a doctor when I was pissing blood(pretty much nonstop the first day), and seeing a kid with a broken arm come in, and end up going home because his dad gave up because they were waiting so damn long, amongst other things...something is wrong with the healthcare system here and it is not just 'ignorant' people or conservatives that feel that way. Personally, I think universal healthcare is a necessary goal to persue and well worth our taxdollars...but cmon, let's not ignore the lineups, shall we?

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    29. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Scott+Wood · · Score: 1

      In the US you can open a bank with about $500 worth of paperwork. As a result there are about 2-3 banks per person.

      Are you seriously claiming that there are over 600 million banks in the US?

      The banks dont talk to each other. They dont have a common banking network.

      So explain to me why I can use my ATM card in any bank's ATM (albeit for a small fee), wire money between accounts of different banks, have my paycheck deposited directly in my account without my employer having to have arrangements with the specific bank I use, cash or deposit a check drawn on another bank, etc.

      They often go belly up taking all of their customers money with them.

      Accounts are insured by the federal government up to $100,000 in the event that that happens.

      As we get a lot of US media, I am aware that VISA is pushing hard there "cheque card". In Canada you have been able to use your ATM card in retail outlets for a decade.

      I got a "check card" (usable like any normal VISA) automatically when opening a U.S. account about 8 years ago. This isn't new here either.

    30. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      Of the developed countries, the US has the worst infant mortality and lifespan rates. It's also the only G7 country without universal coverage and in a UN report on health care it was said that there's a third world country within the US borders. There are tens of millions of people that have no health coverage at all.
      Ironically, the US also spends the most per capita on health care. It makes sense if you think about it though. With privatized health care, you can charge any crazy price you want. The same treatment costs far more in the US, so the few things the US does pay for are ridiculously expensive.

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    31. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Millions of Canadian tax dollars are used to train RN's and MD's who take work south of the border every year. Canadian healthcare workers are a rare breed who get paid peanuts compared to their US counterparts because they believe in equal access for all.

      Those who are willing to pay get the goods. Why should it be any surprise that Canadian medical professionals, the smartest and most talented ones anyway, would seek the highest possible salary? If that level of pay and benefits cannot be found in Canada then they will go somewhere else. Would you want to go to school for 20 years and work your butt off so that you could earn peanuts? You cannot pay the garbage man and the doctor the same...the communists tried it but it just doesn't work.

      The statement, "From each according to his abilities and to each according to his needs," upon which liberal societies like Canada are based sounds great, but in practice it is a terrible way to organize an economy and actually results in a lower quality of life for everyone. People should be more concerned about the size of the total pie rather than the equality of its distribution.

      As Gordon Gecko said, "Greed is Good"

    32. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the problem is blind zealotry (which the Liberals use to stay in power).

      Canada could allow private services while offering better free health care (same funding, fewer patients) like the countries with the best health care in the world do, but the Liberals and NDP turn any mention of any change to health care into the outright elimination of it.

      We could charge a small user fee for frivolous use of the emergency rooms (don't charge it if there was a reasonable fear of something worse, but encourage people to phone in first, and put the charge on their tax bill, so the poor would be exempt)... but OMG!!!!! that would be a violation of the Canada Health Act!

      The status quo isn't working, but straying from the orthodoxy is political suicide.

    33. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by Rotten168 · · Score: 1
      In the US you can open a bank with about $500 worth of paperwork. As a result there are about 2-3 banks per person. The banks dont talk to each other. They dont have a common banking network. They often go belly up taking all of their customers money with them.
      You know, Canadian ignorance is pretty glaring on this particular story, but your above statement takes the cake.
    34. Re:It isn't necessarily all it is cracked up to be by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      The difference between public and privatized healthcare would be the difference between me seeing a doctor after 50 hours and not even going to the ER because I'm broke. privatization MEANS elimination if you aren't above the poverty line, and that's who needs healthcare the most. No one has to work in workplaces who blatantly ignore health & safety standards if they aren't totally afraid of losing their home in the next month, but many people do have this fear, and so they will continue to work at these places.

      Would privatization mean elimenation of healthcare for everybody? of course not; but it would mean making life worse for people who are allready have it pretty bad in the first place.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  100. 40% less for Canucks!! by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 0

    They I guess it's not worth my while to learn how to program. Dang I just bought all those books on Python.

    Hey can I make say 20% less if I'm from B.C. but live in Arizona?

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  101. Please, don't. by Morgahastu · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, don't move up north. We have the same problem here as the United States does. Too many programmers not enough jobs. That's why it's so damn cheap.

    You'll find it even harder to find a job then we do being a foreigner without a permanent visa.

    1. Re:Please, don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus we don't want our crime rate rising with a whole new batch of fear filled 'Merican cowboys.

    2. Re:Please, don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New American guy in Canada: "Help! Help! There's a black man walking in my suburbs and no one has beat him halfway to death yet!"

    3. Re:Please, don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, while there are many similarities when compared to other parts of the world, our culture and value system is quite different from USA. The summary is misleading there. Please don't move up here expecting people to think and act the same way, or expecting people to learn how to act from you.

      We're not better or worse than you, we're just different.

      -hadohk

    4. Re:Please, don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true... I just graduated from University in December and had a very good, very well paid job waiting for me. I was lucky enough to go through the COOP program though. My friends who didn't weren't so lucky.

      There are plenty of job opportunities for people that are skilled. Even though some of the big guys like Nortel aren't hiring as much, the smaller companies have picked up and compensated for it.

    5. Re:Please, don't. by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      I think sometimes they work this stuff out by working out what percentage of GDP is spent by the government. In the UK it works out as something like 52%...

      I'm not sure how government borrowing fits into this though...

  102. OT: It's not the draft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, the National Service Act is NOT the draft. It's obligatory 2 years of national service for both men & women. I don't know what Hollings was smoking when he came up with this one, but then he was never much for rational thought anyway...

    The National Service Act is currently under revue for comment by the pentagon where the military will keep it until Hollings is no longer elected or the USA is invaded. The pentagon doesn't want to antagonize him by killing his brainchild, but they're also smart enough to avoid antagonizing everyone under 30...

  103. Road Runner Support done in canada by fizz · · Score: 1

    I used to work for RR, and the majority of thier tech support is dont in canada. They have very large call centers there, however some people obviously are not american when you speak with them.

    We were listening to one call, and the lady is like, are you from canada? Tech says, did my accent give it away? She replies with, I dont know Eh?

    You had to hear it, one of the funniest things ive heard on the phone :)

    1. Re:Road Runner Support done in canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a salesman, whenever I correctly guess someone is Canadian, I claim I noticed it because of their politeness, not their accent. It butters them up for the closing.

  104. Look at it this way... by mark-t · · Score: 1
    As a Canadian, personally, I'd be quite glad of the improvement in our economy that would result from a thing like this, but I still realize that outsourcing is bad for the economy of the country that outsources, and would have to say that even using us isn't the wisest thing that the US could do.

    If you want to advocate programmers moving into Canada to get jobs that pay 40% less because of all the alleged cultural similarities between the USA and Canada, why not instead just advocate American programmers staying where they are and just asking for 40% less money?

    1. Re:Look at it this way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ". . . American programmers staying where they are and just asking for 40% less money?"

      Will those companies that hire us then sell their goods to us for 40 percent less ? Will the resulting economic improvement result in lowering our taxes by 40 percent ?

      Of course not. The US has economic problems that go far beyond such simplistic solutions. A general 40% devaluation of US currency would accomplish the same thing; but that seems to be slowly happening anyway, and the good effects are limited. Maybe if China quit artificially manipulating it's currency, that would make a bigger difference; but more likely, India and Russia, which have more honest valuations, would simply find themselves taking the lead from China.

      In the long run, what you suggest is happening. New programming graduates accept jobs that pay about $15/hr, and older ones go without a raise and let inflation cut their pay, or are unemployed at frequent stretches so that their average pay drops, or are laid off and take lowering paying jobs.

      In the end, because of the unhealthy tradition of unpaid overtime in the industry, many realize they have more free time and higher pay in some other line of work.

      Why should you expect programmers (or other workers) in the United States to be the sacrifice that solves an economic problem that is largely tied to mis-management by the large corporations (including the largest corporation of them all, the Federal Government) ?

  105. Re:French-Canadians? by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1

    Tell me about it. I can't believe the rest of Canada was actually against Quebec's seccession. I mean, I admit I'd miss Massachusetts a little if it went away, but... time heals all wounds, as they say, and I'm sure I could get a passport to visit every once in a while. It'd be a small price to pay not to have to endure any more Kennedys. I expect a third of America would say the same about Texas and a certain one of its favorite sons (the other third would be frantically getting votes for sending California floating gently into the Pacific sunset.)

  106. Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by Apostata · · Score: 5, Funny

    "3)Living in NYC has it's own advantages. Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums, never have to drive the death machine we call an automobile, can go out drinking without worrying about how I am getting home, can see world class plays, theater, etc. etc. etc. Living in Canada would be a marked decrease in my Life Style. It might be OK for people that don;t care about this kind of stuff, but not for me."

    Wow, what's Tango Dancing? Museums? What the hell are plays?

    This NYC place seems pretty darned fancy-looking! I should save up my 40% weaker Canadian dollars, sell my moose lodge, canoe down there, and experience what can only conceivably be a DREAM CITY IN THE **KING CLOUDS, YOU SELF-INFATUATED NY MORON.

    You think freaking Tango lessons set NYC apart from the world? If *that's* your basis for judgement, you'd do us all a favour and stay put, friend.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, $12 movie tickets set NYC apart from the rest of the world.

    2. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by pyota · · Score: 1

      $10.50 to be precise ; )

    3. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by gurps_npc · · Score: 0
      What a rude person.

      As I said earlier, others may not want the same things I want. But despite what certain arrogant Canadians think, there ARE certain advantages to living in NYC. If it was hellhole, then the population would be dropping, as people moved to the cheaper Canadian places.

      For me, Tango, etc. is important. For others, it could be something else. I listed the few things that I personally use, but NYC is one of the top cities in the world and has lots of things I didn't mention that can not be found in lesser cities like Toronto. Tango for example can only be found in better quantities and qualities in Argentina, a place that has 66% less standard of living, a far better "deal" than canada.

      Denigrating the things that I value just shows your stupidity, not your superiority.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Please clarify what you mean by "lesser cities." Are we talking strictly objective metrics like population or total aggregation of wealth? If so, it's still a very Canadian-tweaking way of putting it, for which I applaud you.

      Me, I live in Salt Lake. I'm momentarily carless. Mass transit seems to be working well enough. I don't know what the tango-dancing scene is like, but it's probably sufficient for most any hobbyist. The New Yorkian novelty known as the 'taxi cab' has become available here as well, if you're ever too drunk to operate a death machine of your own. We have some great symphonies and acting companies. I'm not sure I would be able to tell the difference between their performances and those of a "world class" place like New York (prettier buildings aside), but I'm positive my wallet could.

      I'm curious about this tango dancing thing. Do you really tango nearly every night? Is there a really cool tango troupe based in NYC that you're a fan of? How much money would you say you spend on this hobby? Are you paying for the best instruction that New York can provide you? If you're really so dedicated to the art of the tango that nothing less than the New York scene can possibly satisfy you, that's cool. No, wait, it's that other thing. Bizarre. But to each their own.

      You're not a moron, but I agree that you are a bit infatuated with NYC.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by ramdmc · · Score: 1
      Tango for example can only be found in better quantities and qualities in Argentina, a place that has 66% less standard of living, a far better "deal" than canada.


      Please, quit while you're ahead. When I read your first post, you sounded so much like a porteno/a. Argentinians are the Americans of South America so
      I understand your self infatuation. You cannot compare Argentina with Canada, I travel to Buenos Aires frequently and am still lmao at the comparison. I've seen half million dollar homes sell for 25KUS, it's on the upswing, but please, you're really sounding foolish.

      Have you been to Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver? ALl have their own Tango Social Clubs btw, and a large Argentinian community.
    6. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by Apostata · · Score: 1

      Denigrating the things that I value just shows your stupidity, not your superiority.

      I'm not denigrating tango dancing or your appreciation of it. I'm denigrating your haughty provincialism. I'm sure NYC is a great town - but you used tango dancing, theatre, and pedestrian travel as an argument for what came clearly across as cultural snobbery.

      Post 17th century architecture? You'd be on to something there.

      --

      This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    7. Re:Wow, NYC is a freaking Xanadu! by Morpeth · · Score: 1
      Too funny - you call someone arrogant then throw around terms like 'lesser cities'?

      Been to NYC to visit plenty of times - you couldn't pay me enough to live there. Dirty, too crowded, violent, people are rude as h*ll, prices on just about anything are insane

      What you talk about are advantages to 'you' maybe - but most of what NYC has to offer could never outweigh the cons to me.

      Chicago is the only US city I lived in and really enjoyed - maybe b/c it's in the midwest, it seems a bit friendlier than the east.

      New Yorkers are notoriously provincial, remember the famous print "A New Yorker's View of the World"? That about sums it up.

      Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver - I doubt you've really spent anytime in any of those cities. They have most of what NYC could ever offer without all the crap and attitude.

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  107. Or to Michigan by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or to pretty much anywhere in America besides the People's State of California.

    I almost headed out to Silicon Valley during the boom, but after considering that state taxes are literally double what they are here in Michigan, the cost of housing is 2+ times as much, traffic is worse, people expect you to work way longer hours, and federal taxes are going to bite down hard on that extra marginal income, I figured: what's the point?

    Plus I never did get the hang of Spanish...

    Oh yeah, the weather. Well, there are a lot of states that have better weather than Michigan, so there.

  108. Why move to Canada when there are jobs here? by retendo · · Score: 1

    I'm a hiring manager for a small software company in Atlanta, Georgia. We are having a *lot* of trouble finding good Java/J2EE and Flash developers. Why move to Canada when you can get a good paying job here in the US!

    Check out these positions:
    http://www.ajug.org/ajugcontext/servle t/getJobs

    Please send resumes to:

    hr@roundboxmedia.com

    People keep complaining that there are no jobs in the US. We can't seem to find people to hire!

    If you have any questions then please get in touch.

    http://www.roundboxmedia.com

    1. Re:Why move to Canada when there are jobs here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're looking for Java developers you should look for people who graduate from University of New Brunswick for computer science. They base almost their entire CS program on Java and their programming teams have beaten MIT and Stanford in contests before.

      http://www.unb.ca/ :P

      Maybe everyone is outsourcing because American Programmers are all bull-shitters who lie on their resumes, go to shitty universities with sub-par programs...

      P.S. I'm american, and a CS student :P

  109. Canada for students by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny
    I might also point out some of the benefits of doing your schooling in Canada (yes, we do have some good Colleges/Universities, but beware some do suck so scout them first)

    • Legal Age: 18-19
    • Age of consent:
    • Gambling: 19
    • Beer: Better, stronger
    • Lots of international cross-culturalization: cute [insert X country] girls/guys!
    • Less stodgy about various substances
    • Anonymous downloads (no RIAA supoena)!
    1. Re:Canada for students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You skipped age of consent.

      Age of consent: 14-16

  110. Might be time to think about moving North, eh? by yummy1991 · · Score: 1

    No.

  111. good news... by super_ogg · · Score: 0

    Man, do we need jobs here... or perhaps jobs for new grads.

    ogg

    --
    Black cat, searing pain, flames...? I must be in Heaven! - Homer Simpson
  112. Winter weather? No thanks. by cruff · · Score: 1

    Not to mention having to deal with a harsher winter in most of Canada...

  113. Re:French-Canadians? by French+guy · · Score: 1, Troll

    I live in Montreal, Quebec. Half the population in Montreal speaks English as well as any other Canadian. We have a call center here in Montreal. We answer in five languages. English, French, Chinese, Japanese and Arab. The same call center located in Toronto answers in English only. Agents in Toronto even get a salary bonus if they can answer in something else. Beleive me, English speaking people have a hard time learning any other language. That's because English is a pretty simple language. As soon as a little complexity is invloved, they generally abandon saying how useless it is to speak anything besides English. Three major cities are affected by offshoring in Canada: Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal. Don't worry, our French accent is nothing compared to France! The fact that Quebec is next to America gives us the ability to speak English better than French people in France.

  114. I like to see more of this, but reality is .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Posting Anonymously for obvious reasons ...)

    Oh, the irony ...

    I am in Canada, working in the subsidiary of a US Multinational provider of technology products.

    Corporate headquarters in the USA decided that they want to outsource ALL software development, and IT infrastructure to India, whether they are based in the USA on in Canada.

    We have been in a death march project porting an application from UNIX to Windows (many reasons here, including obsolete UNIX flavor, cheaper commodity hardware, AND the outsourcing company does not do UNIX, but only Windows).

    The project has been on for 2 years now, and still going. The outsourcing company is struggling with high attrition in their staff, and customer change requests coming in all the time.

    The result is that we will have no job a year or so from now, once the Indian company can get on its feet.

    Management here have been telling lies and saying that we will do new things once we give the "old products" to India, but no "new thing" showed up. They need us to ensure that "knowledge transfer" happens to the guys in India.

    If there are US companies outsourcing here, I would like to get a piece of that, since I will be laid off soon.

  115. Canadian programmers speak English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What a nonsense! These are the same Indian, Chinese and Russian programmers. The only difference is that they live in Canada and cost more.

  116. Aquiring citizenship is not all that easy by gelfling · · Score: 1

    As an emplyer you have to demonstrate that you have a specific need to hire someone from out of the country. Barring that as an immigrant you can short circuit the process by depositing a large sum of money in a Canadian bank. I know the Canucks here will scream about that but that's largely the case. Hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong came over that way.

    Anyway it has to make sense from the employees perspective. As others have noted here there wages are less and the taxes are more. It might not be in their economic self interest to do that. Perhaps, if the alternative is not working but again, then you have to demonstrate that you are in fact employable in Canada and someone has a job for you.

    There are lots of countries that speak English if that's your concern: South Africa, India, Singapore, Taiwan, Jordan and South Korea for the most part. I'd mention Israel too but I'm sure that would attract the usual crazies to say crazy things.

    1. Re:Aquiring citizenship is not all that easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wants to immigrate to Israel, when you can't own land, you only lease it from the government for 100 years because they are afraid you might sell it to someone of the wrong religion ? When you have to undergo examination for years by a primitive 16th century trodolyte to vote ? When you have to fight in the army to protect the stolen land of people who won't fight in the army because they are in "religous school" ?

      Does being Jewish mean you have to also be a sucker ?

  117. 50% tax rates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tax rates are tiered in Canada. For someone making $50,000 Canadian a year, their yearly tax would be about $12,000--this includes fed + prov + Canada Pension Plan + tax credits.

    The approximate tax rates are (fed+prov combined):

    Up to 35,000: ~22%
    Up to ~70,000: ~31%
    Over 70,000: ~38%

    But we also receive tax credits, and if you contribute $ to your retirement savings plan you can greatly reduce the amount of tax paid.

    Overall I pay about 26% tax on my yearly income. Nowhere near 50%!

    1. Re:50% tax rates?? by caduguid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you hear 50% tax rates, they are including all the ways the government taxes us, not just income tax.

      "[This calculator includes] all taxes from all levels of government that Canadians pay. This includes: income & sales taxes; liquor, tobacco, amusement & other excise taxes; automobile, fuel, & motor vehicle licence taxes; CPP/QPP and EI contributions, medical & hospital taxes; property taxes; import duties; profit taxes; and natural resource levies"

      You can find the Fraser Institute (right-wing thinktank) tax freedom calculator here. Just did mine (for Ontario) and it turned out to be almost exactly 50%.

    2. Re:50% tax rates?? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Just keep in mind that the Fraser Insitute is a right-wing think tank that is funded by the Conservative party and other corporate interests. I'm not disputing their numbers, but I'm certain that the perpective they present does not take into account quality of life.

      FYI -- I'm just as skeptical about sociology studies released by Canadian universities with their left wing perspective.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:50% tax rates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true that there are all sorts of different taxes, but when an American is comparing the amount of taxes on his salary, they're not including liquor, tobacco, car-related, house-related, and state sales taxes. Taxes on income.

      Whether someone lives in the US or Canada, they will still pay some/all taxes that you quoted, although the amounts might be slightly different (ie. state sales tax). Plus some of those you mentioned are "optional" taxes -- you don't *need* to own a car, smoke, drink, and own a house. What you do with your take-home pay is up to you, so comparing taxes on income is a good start.

      BTW, in my original calculations I included CPP/EI.

    4. Re:50% tax rates?? by caduguid · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I wasn't disagreeing with you... just trying to help show why there was a difference in the oft-quoted 50% tax-rate and the one you were quoting.

      To make a fair comparison, I guess you'd have to find an american think-tank that calculates the same sort of tax burden indicator and use that.

      (And beyond that, as you point out, you should really make sure that the tax burden measured would be applicable to your lifestyle. i.e., how much of your income do you spend on alcohol, cigarettes, etc.)

    5. Re:50% tax rates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom makes just over $100k CDN a year and her income tax is 46% or 48% I can't remember.

      Either way, she ends up loosing half of her $100k right away and then she has to pay sales tax and other taxes.

      After all the taxes she probably has $30k to spend for the year out of her $100k

    6. Re:50% tax rates?? by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm skeptical of the calculations they describe. Especially since they don't take into account the fact that Canadians are more likely to be prodigious accumulators of wealth than Americans, meaning we stick our money into tax shelters like RRSPs, and avoid paying tax on it. We also buy cheaper houses, because they don't cost as much as the same house in the U.S. They're assuming all the money is spent, but that's just not true.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    7. Re:50% tax rates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An important point though is that your salary doesn't get entirely taxed at whatever bracket you fall into. Portions of your salary get taxed at the different brackets. If you were paid $80000 per year you wouldn't be entirely taxed at 38%, it would go in stages:

      - the first $6000 (roughly) is tax free
      - the next chunk from $6000 to $35000 is taxed at 22%
      - the next chunk from $35000 to $70000 is taxed at 31%
      - the last chunk from $70000 to $80000 is taxed at 38%

      So based on just income tax alone you'd pay less than 38%.

      Then there's the sales taxes, property taxes, utility bills, cable, phone, internet... Adding that all up the total money remaining is small. Though I'm at the low end of the upper tax bracket and I have no difficulty saving up $2000 per month towards a place to live.

    8. Re:50% tax rates?? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      I just visited Quebec. Their sales tax is about 15%!

    9. Re:50% tax rates?? by beakburke · · Score: 1

      Or they are more likely to USE these tax shelters since the marginal tax RATE is so much higher. Simple logic. I'm not saying that Canadians are less likely to save, but higher rate make tax shelters more attractive.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    10. Re:50% tax rates?? by davecb · · Score: 1

      OOPS! That should be
      first 35,000 22%
      next 70,000 31%
      rest 38%

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  118. Beavers by vurg · · Score: 1

    So where are the beaver jokes? You know, the furry type.

  119. Re:French-Canadians? by novakane007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's not true at all. The only section of Canada that is dominated by French is Quebec (85%) and they don't even want to be a part of Canada... That's a whole other issue though. In fact most provinces have less than 5% French speaking citizens. Especially out west, we have less than 2% french speaking citizens. Your statement is like me saying that everyone in the US speaks with a spanish accent.
    Here's some census in fo for you.
    1996 Census info on Language

    --

    WURD!!
  120. No way, eh? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Canada's opportunity cost is much higher than that of India, China, Russia, Thailand, etc. Hence another country like India would be more economical to outsource to. Until India's economy grows and then the OC is too high and the work is moved to another country.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:No way, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By using that 5-dollar phrase "opportunity cost", and then abreviating it to show your intellectualism, are you trying to say that Canadian programmers have other more lucretive activities they would have to give up to do programming tasks from the United States ?

      What are those ? At a minimum, the 75,000 programmers who lost their jobs to India/China will be looking for work.

      If you want to blindly invoke "OC" to explain something, you at least have to tell what opportunity is being given up. "OC" doesn't explain the disappearence of programming jobs in the United States, because those laid off programmers aren't usually switching to higher paying jobs, they are getting lower paying jobs of remaining unemployed.

    2. Re:No way, eh? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Using Adam Smith's (you do know who he is, right?) theory that a person is more productive at what they are efficient at, we can show a Production Possibility Curve. What is a main income of Canda that Canada can produce more cheaply than the US? Wood or Lumber, the Canadian economy can produce more lumber than IT services. The US can produce IT services, but tends to pay a high cost for them onshore, the US also produces less wood than Canada and at higher prices.

      I was discussing macroeconomics, and you've switched the topic to microeconomics.

      Anyway Canada has to decide how much wood to produce, and how much IT services to provide. This is a production possibility curve. I am sure, you being an economics student, that you are aware of such a thing. As Canada takes resources away from wood, it puts them towards IT services. I guess Lumberjacks are going back to college to earn Computer Science degrees? Since wood is a major export of Canada, and the more Canada places on IT Services, the less wood it creates. Canadas OC on Wood is cheaper than its OC on IT Services.

      Now take India, the OC on wood in India is not as good as the one Canada has, but the OC on IT services is lower than the US and Canada. In India, IT college Tuition is free (paid for by the government), and India depends on IT services to grow its economy. A person working in a textile plant making towels has the same OC as someone doing IT services, about $200USD a month. The production possibility curve in India is quite different because of the labor costs. In Canada, a Lumberjack earns less than an IT worker, hence the OC for an IT Worker is higher. I am one of those 75,000 and I am doing the right thing by switching careers. Also the OC for making towels is cheaper in China, Thailand, and other Asian countries.

      On a Microeconmic level, it sure sucks to be an IT Worker at this time in history. That was me in 2001/2002, and rather than whine and bitch and moan about it, I went back to college in 2003 to earn a Business Management degree, because business is booming. True as an IT worker my salary would have been higher, but at least as a manager I will be able to work and have a lower OC, due to the fact that IT jobs are scarce. Yet my potential to earn more as a manager as I move up the ranks shows I can earn a higher income than an IT worker. Perhaps I can become VP of an IT department and earn $200,000USD a year? I didn't qualify before because all I had was an IS degree and no business or management experience. So I am becoming an expert in business management.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  121. Canadian Bacon by gvc · · Score: 1

    Michael Moore's Canadian Bacon provides a hilarious contrast between U.S. and Canadian cliches. Starring Alan Alda and John Candy.

  122. this is sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes me wanna cry.....or hurt someone

    nice
    not nice
    bash
    kill

  123. What about Mexicans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems Mexicans could be as cheap as Indians and they are closer, many of them speak English and they are in same time zone?

  124. Outsourcing by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    As an American professional software engineer. I'm glad to see that stories encouraging outsourcing of American software jobs are now appearing on /. It means that the readership of /. is growing. Such fine managerial values are at the core of the technical acumen that I have come to expect from the /. readership.

    /snicker

    It also means that I should probably stop posting, since my boss might be reading.

    Toodles.

  125. Why not outsource IT to Canada...? by clintp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not outsource US IT to Canada? They outsourced hockey to the US decades ago....

    --
    Get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Why not outsource IT to Canada...? by puppetman · · Score: 1

      Most hockey players in the NHL are still Canadian.

      In fact, during the Stanley Cup playoffs, CBC mentioned that Tampa Bay had more Canadians playing than did Calgary.

  126. Quebec by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1
    we're responsible for Celine Dion. On behalf of all Canadians, I apologize profusely.

    The solution: Free Quebec!

  127. Similar culture, oui-oui by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
    Now with 50% more French on your signs!

    (Although technically I suppose it's an infinite % more, since the closest thing to French I see around here is the occasional distance in kM...)

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  128. I don't aplogize about Celine. by asoap · · Score: 5, Funny
    With our military the way it is...

    Celine Dion is our weapon of mass destruction!

    Heck, if we ever attack a country, she's on the front line singing her heart out. After one of her Monster Ballots, we just walk in with our hockey sticks and Zambonies and clean up the enemies. We don't need fancy things like short range tactical missles, or ugh.. tanks, guns, ammunition.

    Actually, on a serious note, I like it that we don't spend anything on military. In the simpson's they used the joke (excuse me if I get this wrong):

    Scorpio: "What country do you like the least, Italy or France"

    Homer: "France"

    Scorpio: "No one ever says Italy"

    Then Scorpio blows up France. Well I like it that to the rest of the world Canada = Italy. The U.S. = France.

    I can just imagine terrorist meeting... "Guys what country do you like the least? Canada or the US?"

    -asoap

    --
    Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
    1. Re:I don't aplogize about Celine. by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      Celine Dion is our weapon of mass destruction!

      So, I take it you are familiar with the Minmay/Minmei defense.

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    2. Re:I don't aplogize about Celine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helps when you have a 1km long, 18 million ton, interstellar space fortress as backup though.

    3. Re:I don't aplogize about Celine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, if we ever attack a country, she's on the front line singing her heart out

      This brings back memories of those early Animes (Macross) where they would have bimbo divas singing in the middle of a space battle to motivate their own soldiers and demoralize the enemies.

      BTW...when the Chinese come knocking at your door and the red banner is raised above your capital you may regret that you spent very little on your military...

  129. In the not too distant future by Blacklantern · · Score: 1

    U.S. companies will outsource to the farting alien lifeforms found on Mars and slashdot signatures will say Dey tuk ouhr gobz!!!!!

    --


    "There is only a one in six billion chance that you actually exist"
  130. Three reasons I'd move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tim Horton's, Coffee Crisp and Peameal Bacon.

  131. Outsourcing to India & China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a developer who's been in IT since the early 90's, I've noticed that as the number of Indian and Chinese managers grew, so did the outsourcing of work to these countries. In my opinion, these managers sold the idea of outsourcing to these countries to the upper management and have a lot of input on where the outsourcing will go. There are not as many Canadians, Mexicans, Central Americans, etc in management, so there's not so much outsourcing to these countries.

  132. Re:Canadian Accents? What's that aboot? by clintp · · Score: 1

    Try watching hockey sometime. After a while of listening to the players, coaches, and commentators I -- an American -- have gotten a fairly good idea of who's from where but only in a really broad sense.

    Newfies and Quebeqois stand out pretty severely. I can almost tell the difference between someone from say, Toronto and Saskatchewan but sometimes get it wrong.

    Considering how broad the country is, there doesn't seem to be a really strong difference in regional accents though. Nothing like the US.

    --
    Get off my lawn.
  133. You know what? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This whole thing is stupid. Say a New York City or San Francisco company saves money by outsourcing to Canada, a place where a housing isn't $400 a square foot and salaries are not inflated. They could probably get very similar savings if they oursourced to WVa or TN and be sung praises as heros for boosting local American economies. On the same note, west coast and east coast companies spending millions on leases for data centers could save millions by moving to America's heartland. Plus they could just leave the windows open in the colder months and reduce their electric bills for cooling. Ok, the last part is a stretch.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
    1. Re:You know what? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian in IT (who would benefit big time from a strong domestic labour demand, even if I having a good job now), I agree with you 100%.

      Corporate interests in the US tend to be east coast/west coast oriented. there's alot of low cost labour centres that could be exploited in the US to reduce costs.

      The only real detriment to remaining in the US that I can see if the legal culture... lawsuit heavy and intellectual property quagmires.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cool your house when it's cold out?!

    3. Re:You know what? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      They could probably get very similar savings if they oursourced to WVa or TN and be sung praises as heros for boosting local American economies.

      On the other hand, some people like the 'city' lifestyle. Many individuals probably find it less jarring to move from New York or San Francisco to Toronto or Montreal than to West Virginia.

      You still get theatres, museums, cultural events, nightlife, and public transit--and you get to pay for all of it in Canadian dollars. As a bonus, you get lower crime and smaller rents.

      Actually, if your workforce is happy living in the suburbs, then their cost of living gets even lower, just as in the United States. Sure, you could move to Tennessee, but you could just as easily move to Manitoba.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:You know what? by mmcdouga · · Score: 1

      This whole thing is stupid. Say a New York City or San Francisco company saves money by outsourcing to Canada, a place where a housing isn't $400 a square foot and salaries are not inflated. They could probably get very similar savings if they oursourced to WVa or TN and be sung praises as heros for boosting local American economies.

      Up to a point, but in Canada you can get both the WVa/TN cost of living and NYC/SF-like environment. A company in Montreal will have access to an excellent infrastructure and a large cosmopolitan workforce that will accept lower wages than workers in a similar American city would demand. There's a reason companies like big cities, and in Canada (and India etc.) they can get that and still save money.

      Sure, some outsourcers are probably overlooking large cities in the midwest. But moving your
      jobs to dirt poor appalachia won't be much of a win because you will struggle to find qualified workers, get reliable power/water/Internet, etc.

    5. Re:You know what? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Plus they could just leave the windows open in the colder months and reduce their electric bills for cooling. Ok, the last part is a stretch.

      not by much.

      here in michigan the datacenter we have has air exchange units that will cool the building air by running through a heat exchanger that has outside air going through it.

      the cost of running 2 blowers and it is more effective than the huge leibert air conditioners kick in for cooling.

      the costs for cooling during summer are at least 30 times the cost of winter cooling.

      works great! and has the advantage of bringing in some fresh air all day long (a small unit routes enough fresh air in the building to turn over all the air in the building at least twice in a day, it could be more though... it never smells "stale" in the office.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:You know what? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      With outsourcing, you aren't MOVING your workers. What outsourcing is is you hire an already existing company with indigenous employees to do the work for you.

      It sounds like there are plenty of deep misperceptions about the midwest. Believe it or not, there are sizable cities in the midwest? And that they don't necessarily have the same crime rates as some of the coastal cities? With decent costs of living?

    7. Re:You know what? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      You have to have a working IT economy in those areas before you can outsource anything to them. Its like outsourcing IT operations to Ebonia.

      That said, if WVa or TN has a viable IT marketplace with a good set of IT individuals, then great. If you're trying to plant an office in Farmsville USA, then you shouldn't expect much. Just because you live there doesn't mean there are enough of you.

      --
      Bye!
    8. Re:You know what? by Rotten168 · · Score: 1
      The only real detriment to remaining in the US that I can see if the legal culture... lawsuit heavy and intellectual property quagmires.
      Yeah but this is what the dimwitted slashdot hivemind doesn't get, intellectual property protections are an asset, not a detriment. Don't base your opinions on silly Slashdot headlines alone.
  134. In that case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and Lexmark (LEXmark LEXington.)

    Could you do me a favor and stop by there and tell them to make better printers without encrypted ink cartridges?

    Thanks.

  135. In a word... by Fished · · Score: 1
    get paid 40% less than U.S. programmers. Might be time to think about moving North, eh?
    No.
    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  136. Lies... No jobs here... Move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No jobs here, just SARS, please stay out of Canada... Plus it's really cold, year round, and we don't have electricity in many parts of the country... Yeah... No opportunity here, move along.

    1. Re:Lies... No jobs here... Move along. by Alieninator10000X · · Score: 1

      Agreed, all those fat bastards should not even think about moving here.

  137. Outsource to the US by pchasco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where I live in Illinois, the cost of living is:

    55% less than New York, NY
    43% less than San Francisco
    21.5% less than San Diego
    18.8% less than Los Angeles

    And my city is slightly above the national average for cost of living.

    1. Re:Outsource to the US by moitz · · Score: 1

      Jeebus dude, where at in Illinois do you live? I gotta move there!

      I'm in the western 'burbs of Chicago, and I'm like 21% above the national average.

      -moitz-

      --
      Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
    2. Re:Outsource to the US by pchasco · · Score: 1

      Peoria/Pekin metro

    3. Re:Outsource to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate Illinois nazis.

  138. We call this nearshore by allden · · Score: 1

    We call this nearshore. A few indian companies I know of have nearshore centers in Canada.

  139. Oh Really? by composer777 · · Score: 1

    Do you make any distinction between work that you do at the beck and call of others, and work that you do for yourself? I ask this because I do make a BIG distinction. I enjoy programming quite a bit, but doing it as a job really reduces what I get out of it, that same goes for music, or any other creative endeavour. So, unlike you, getting paid just enough to eat isn't worth giving up the artistic freedom and control that I have over my work. Having control over my working life is worth more than that to me. It never ceases to amaze me how people make no distinction between programming that they do for themselves, and programming that they do because others tell them to do it.

    I also think the reason that you don't make a distinction between programming for someone else, and programming for yourself, on your own time, is because society encourages you not to make a distinction between the two. I literally had a co-worker accuse me of not enjoying programming and not being cut out for it. He couldn't understand that for me, having control over my work is a big part of my enjoyment of it, and if I'm not getting paid enough to give up that control, then I'm miserable because I feel like I'm being ripped off. I don't want to give my work away to people who don't respect it enough to pay it for what it's worth. This of course is the trap that many programmers who desire control over their working lives are in. When they ask for just compensation for giving up that control, they get accused of "not enjoying" their work.

    Finally, if you're a programmer, and you're a logical person, you should realize that it's a logical fallacy to place work you do for others and work you do for yourself in the same category. That's why you should get annoyed when someone tries to accuse you of not loving what you do when you complain about salary. You aren't getting paid to program, you are paid to give up control over what you program, and that is worth quite a bit in my opinion.

    1. Re:Oh Really? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I sympathize with that, I really do. But I am still a student, and I am just working an internship as a web programmer right now.

      The thing about my job though, is that other than being asked to use the common libraries and stylesheets, I am free to do whatever I like with the code. I have a great deal of fun with it, and I don't often follow the general policies and practices that the other programmers on my team follow. I AM given that creative control over my code, and I really like that aspect of it.

      The thing about my job that I really dislike about it is the nature of it... I am honestly not that interested in most of the languages used, and I am not overly fond of web programming in general. But as it is STILL programming, and I am getting to see my work being used throughout the company, it's given me a lot of job satisfaction.

      My work at home is more of the sort that I would like to do at work in the future, and it mainly involves a whole lot of low level C++ programming for gaming usage. If a game programmer makes less than a web programmer, and doesn't involve a lot of the niceties that a web programmer has... then I am happy.

      Besides, my basic personality type is that of a servant. I don't have much desire to lead, or to manage. I just like to have a clearly defined goal in mind, and make that vision a reality. Of course, I do have my opinions on the vision, but really, what it comes down to is that I like to just do the actual practical work.

    2. Re:Oh Really? by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. Back when I was in school I had a much better attitude about it. Just don't get your expectations too high. It sounds to me like you have a realistic attitude about what the job will be like. It's basically as you described it, "I just like to have a clearly defined goal in mind, and make that vision a reality. Of course, I do have my opinions on the vision, but really, what it comes down to is that I like to just do the actual practical work." If that is how you operate, then programming will be a good career for you. If you are at all attached to how things are done, or like to have control to any degree whatsoever, it can be a bad situation. You pretty much have to let your desires take back seat to the customer, employer, etc., which is ok as long as you're getting paid enough.

      I honestly believed that I would have more control over my work than I do. That was quite a disappointment when I got out in the real world. The other problem that I had when I got out of school, was that I didn't have an understanding of what it was that I liked about programming. I knew that I enjoyed programming, and I was confused at the fact that I wasn't enjoying my career as a programmer. I knew the pay and lack of opportunity for advancement had something to do with it. But, it finally dawned on me that the difference between programming in college vs at a corporation is control. Some people can handle giving up control, other's have a much harder time. It all comes down to motivation, programming is complex and diverse enough that people can enjoy it for different reasons.

      I tend to be a bit of an iconoclast. I don't like ordering people around, but on the other hand, I don't like authority unless it's necessary (which a lot of it isn't). Because of that, I don't really fit in very well with the corporate structure, or hierarchical organizations in general. If you are into the MBTI, my personality type is INTP. You're is probably ISTJ from the sound of it, which actually works quite well in corporate environments, just stay aware that there are others who have a tough time with it. More than likely I'll end up leading, if only because I can't stand being a servant.

  140. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Could I telecommute from Cancun/Cuba half the year?)

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Sure! Summers in Cancun, and winters in Winnipeg.

  141. Re:And get paid 40% less? [it's not just money] by Morpeth · · Score: 1
    If you're main (or only) consideration is money, then sure the U.S. is probably for you. I'm a Canadian living working in the US (Denver), but seriously thinking about returning to Canada, Im a Nova Scotia native, but love western Canada, esp Vancouver.

    However, some other things to consider:

    cities are cleaner and generally safer

    from east to west, beautiful lands and parks

    liberal politics (Canada is moving left as the US goes further right) - this may or may not be a pro depending on your views

    Some interesting culture, from the English/Irish/Scottish influence of the maritime provinces, to the French in Quebec (their quirks aside), to the Hong Kong/Chinese influence in the west.

    Health care system. Yes, has its pros and cons, but you always are covered.

    More and varied political parties, 4-5 major parties, and many more smaller fringe ones.

    Canadians as a whole are friendlier, more outgoing and generally more laid back

    If you like to travel, being Canadian is generally a plus, whereas I hate to say it, being an American isn't

    We use metric! ;-p

    Canucks can go to Cuba, Yanks can't ;)

    Hockey! Hockey! Hockey

    Disclaimer: My politics are pretty left, I'm agnostic, hate the religious right (wrong), don't give a f*ck who sleeps with, or who marries who (ain't my business), could care less if people smoke pot, love the outdoors, fun cities, and being around a range of people.

    Though I do really enjoy the US overall, social & foreign policy under the Bush admin really doesn't suit me, along with him being in bed with the highly political Christian right who think everyone's business is their own.

    So there's my 2 cents

    Cheers
    Morp -

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  142. Free speech issues by Zany+Paraclete · · Score: 0

    Since you guys let us have Neil Young and Leon Redbone, you needn't feel bad about Celine Dion. All things considered, even she isn't awful enough to counteract those two.

    However, IIRC Canada has European-style restrictions on "hate speech", which I'm not too keen on: Once you start banning the expression of ideas that all right thinking people disapprove of, who knows what "all right thinking people" may disapprove of next? To me, that seems just as malignant as atrocities like the DMCA or the Patriot Act.

    The US no-tits-on-TV thing is idiotic, certainly, but it's not a ban on tits in general; you can have all the tits you like in a magazine, DVD, or whatever.

    --


    I've never yet met anybody who'll admit to posting on Slashdot. So who are all these people?!
  143. Only problem by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    We tried outsourcing some services to Canada, but found we had a shrp increase in the number of moose-related outages and employee deaths.

    I don't even want to talk about the problems with the Bangalore outfit before that, to this day I still shudder when I read about the upcoming release of Tiger.

    YMMV (Your Moose May Vocalize).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  144. Mexico! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even cheaper and as close as Canada!

  145. Re:80% Savings 40% Savings by rice_web · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No.... corporations did.

    Again, this is a case of the small business getting lumped with Big Business. Just like Bush saying Edwards is against small businesses; well, no, he's not. He's against corporations that break the law.

    --
    The Political Programmer
  146. 51st State = Not Really Outsourcing by Thimble · · Score: 1

    Our cultures are so intertwined that Canada's practically an American state.

    We watch the same tv and movies, read the same book and magazines, and, judging by the several Canadian responses to this topic, browse the same sites as well...

    1. Re:51st State = Not Really Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not quite. For example, Americans and Canadians watch a lot of the same TV. When we watch "Friends" or "Seinfeld", for example, Americans are watching a television program but Canadians are watching an American television program.

      Even the title of your post is indicative of the differences. You refer to Canada as a 51st state but you wouldn't refer to your own country as the Southern most Canadian province.

  147. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome being your Canadian overlord...

    I'm a software developer that works on real time control software, including many American projects. Our last big project was the software for the newly reopened PATH subway line from New Jersey to the World Trade Centre station.

  148. UN says Canada is a better place to live by hey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to a recent U.N. report Canada is the 4th best place to live, above the USA.

    1. Re:UN says Canada is a better place to live by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      Of course, the U.N. didn't think that Saddaam-era Iraq was such a bad place either.

    2. Re:UN says Canada is a better place to live by flabbergast · · Score: 1

      This is also the same UN that claims Together we can defeat spam in two years.

    3. Re:UN says Canada is a better place to live by nahog78 · · Score: 0

      This is after a recent fall in rankings. Canada held first for nearly a decade.

  149. Thinking about moving North by matt-fu · · Score: 1
    Might be time to think about moving North, eh?

    Well, thinking about moving North IS the recent trend in election years.

  150. Re:If the work won't go offshore, let the workers by foidulus · · Score: 1

    And Canada was also hit very hard by SARS.....esp. Toronto IIRC

  151. Pay Scales in Canada by Serapth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To say you would make 40% less is a gross exagoration. From what ive seen, the payscale is pretty much inline to what most of the states is. The amount of money that you take home at the end of the month means squat. Its all about standard of living.

    As an example, im in London, Ontario, which has a population of about 350K. Im a fairly high level developer, basically one step below IT manager. I pull in about 60K a year. From my understanding, I could go to New York city and basically double my salary, and have a 10% less tax to pay. Ditto, I could go to Toronto, and make about the same almost double what I make now ( more like 40% more ), but really what does that money buy me.

    I am in the process of buying a luxury loft, 1,700 square feet in size, for about 150K. From what I understand, the same would cost me about about 400K in Toronto, and probrably well over 1/2 million in either NY or Cali. After, expenses, taxes and all that crap, im probrably left with about 1,500 a month of disposable income. That includes my mortgage, car payment, getting reamed for taxes ( that part aint a myth :) ).

    As to currency differences, to be honest, I dont really see any. When I go visit our Lansing site in Michigan, I pay basically the same as I would in canada when I eat out, get a hotel, order a beer. It used to be we could cross the border and save a ton of cash on things like gas, smokes, groceries, etc... but now, thats no longer true. Actually, I have a friend whos business consists of buying vehicles in Canada, and driving them up to the States for resale. Gives you a hit at how the exchange rates work :)

    There are plenty of reasons to chose one country over the other... but wage sure isnt one of them. Cost of living/standard of living is the most important thing... wage is... when comparing one location to another... just a useless number.

    1. Re:Pay Scales in Canada by iso · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Perhaps, but then you have to live in London, Ontario. That place is a complete cultural void. You're paying with your soul.

    2. Re:Pay Scales in Canada by Serapth · · Score: 1

      To each his own I guess. London has its downsides, and far to many friggin rich yuppies thanks to UWO, but it also has a bunch of high points. I lived in Montreal ( the bargain of the century for cost of living ), Toronto ( hell itself ) and Dallas Tx over the course of my life. I enjoyed each, except Toronto, but now that im at the age of settling down, having a family and all that crap, im best suited to London.

  152. Join a union by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It wasn't too long ago that a number of highly moderated posts made fun of the union stance that it was unfair to let volunteers do the job they were being paid to do. They were objecting to volunteers stealing their livlihood.

    Yet any time it comes up that companies are looking to get cheaper labor for the same work, Slashdot cries foul. It's all fun and games until it happens to you. Companies hire fresh college grads for less, too.

    What's the other Slashdot mantra...oh yes "adjust or die." Isn't that what we keep telling businesses like MS and the RIAA? Oh, but this affects YOU so we have to make laws banning companies from utilizing an international work force. Like I said, join a union.

    We are now in a global market. Companies for a very long time have been looking to take advantage of it. There are very few companies that don't have people working in foreign countries.

    If you don't like it, you need to convince your boss that you are worth your pay and some foreign person can't match your price to value ratio.

    People who work in tech fields are just simply not as valuable as they were 20 years ago. We've passed the time when people who could work in the field were few and far between.

    Ben

    1. Re:Join a union by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's the other Slashdot mantra...oh yes "adjust or die." Isn't that what we keep telling businesses like MS and the RIAA? Oh, but this affects YOU so we have to make laws banning companies from utilizing an international work force.... Like I said, join a union.
      You do appreciate the difference between the death of a person and the "death" of a business?

      A government IS a union, set up by the people living somewhere to help themselves live well, not just to enforce some pure ideology, even if it's capitalism. Businesses don't play favorites or have loyalties, they go for the best return on investment, whether hiring employees or buying a copy machine. But if my government feels the same way, why should I be willing to go fight and die for my country? I'm loyal to the government that's loyal to me.

      Don't assume that I'm all for protectionist tarrifs etc. based on what I said. In the long run I think that only generally market-based economies are viable. But I believe that the debate over US policy should revolve around what's best for Americans, NOT some ideological belief that capitalism is natural law which we must never be broken, and certainly not by a simplistic Econ 101 explanation of why current events are to be expected given current policy.

  153. Cost of Living in Canada by takochan · · Score: 1

    Cost of living in Canada versus 40% pay cuts..

    It will depend. If you are coming from California, or a high cost city in a high tax state, then moving to Canada probably makes sense, as standard of living, and taxation (about 50% or more in Canada) will be about the same.

    If you are coming from anywhere else in the continental US, where housing costs are more reasonable, and taxes are reasonable (most places except CA and NY), your standard of living is likely to go down moving to Canada, where (relative to income) housing is much more expensive, and costs of many imported goods, cars, fuel..etc, are much higher than in the US relative to the new lower salary you will be making.

    On the upside, your kids can go to university cheaply, and the free health care is good (though if you get 'expensive treatment' diseases, you are better off in the US as the treatment is not likely to be (as) available in Canada).

    Its very cold in Winter, but there is hockey, and the women are beautiful in Montreal and Quebec!

  154. Canada good. Bangalore better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Background: I am R&D Director for software and consulting firm of 15 people in Canada. I've hired, led, and fired dozens of programmers in the last five years.

    If your grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and style of communication are an indication of what I can expect from domestic sources, I'll stick with my outsourced programming team in Bangalore. Thank you very much. From the contract we have with them, our four programmers each earn enough money in Bangalore to support their families with a very high standard of living.

    By "high standard", I mean two of them are now able to pursue their MBAs. They all have at least a B.Sc. already, completed in English no less. I speak to all four on the telephone regularly, and their English is very good and extremely professional. I would rather have any of these folks speak to my clients on the phone than some of the domestic programmers I've hired. I've seen photos of one of their families and residence (including the domestic help they can afford to pay, since their spouses typically work also), and it's impressive by U.S.A. standards.

    It has been very difficult to find the combination of strong skills and strong motivation in the U.S.A. When we paid our programmers USD$70k, we still sometimes ended up with people who lied on their resume or who "got bored" and didn't work to their potential. Fair enough; I wish them well. It's just not a good fit for my company.

    It's entirely possible that Indian programmers will become fat, lazy, overpaid, and less literate. Until then, I salute them.

  155. In the not too distant future.. by Blacklantern · · Score: 1

    ..U.S. companies will outsource to the farting alien lifeforms found on Mars and slashdot signatures will say
    Dey tuk ouhr gobz!!!!!

    --


    "There is only a one in six billion chance that you actually exist"
  156. Why not just start.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a tech based company in one of the States in the US that has a lower cost of living.

    The fact that my friends can rent a 2 story house for ~$800/month in Texas, while I'm paying about $2000/month for a 1 1/2 bedroom apt. in New York City, is proof that costs in other states are lower.

  157. Hey, Canadians are Americans too... by jglazko · · Score: 1

    "Canadians...speak English with nearly American accents"... hey! Don't forget, Canadians are Americans also. We're all part of North America, the last time I checked.

    It drives many Canadians crazy when people call the U.S. "America" to the exclusion of everyone else. I cringe every time a U.S. legislator discusses how the "American People" have spoken.

    A friend of mine had an interesting incident at customs heading into Windsor, Ontario a few years back when he was asked his citizenship. He told the customs officer he was "American", to which the customs officer replied, "We're all Americans here. What country are you from?" ;)

    1. Re:Hey, Canadians are Americans too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, we are the Americas who didn't rebel.

    2. Re:Hey, Canadians are Americans too... by hey · · Score: 1

      Then you can say "The States" but there's this country called "The United States Of Mexico"
      (Estados Unidos Mexicanos).

    3. Re:Hey, Canadians are Americans too... by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      You're *North* American. Not American. We're Americans, you're North American (norteamericanos to our latino friends).

  158. new application - old idea by frAme57 · · Score: 1
    like a buddy of mine from Vancouver, B.C. used to say...

    Canadians: Americans for the price of Mexicans

    --
    "In a hierarchy every employee will rise to his level of incompetence". The Peter Principle
  159. Blame it on Canada....... by gwayne · · Score: 1

    I can hear the IT department singing it now.

  160. You want to get paid 40% less? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    I don't... Thanks but no thanks, and oh, by the way, taxes up there are MURDER mate, MURDER...

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:You want to get paid 40% less? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, kind of odd how we're bitching about taxes when US has the lowest tax rate around the world...

      Although that offset the fact that we don't have universal health care...

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  161. Re:80% Savings 40% Savings by danheskett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    COmpanies used to use child labor util we made laws about it. Companies used to work people round the clock until we made laws about it.
    This is not generally true.

    The labor laws that we have are designed to prevent outliers cases. Abominiations and whatnot.

    For example, by the time the civil war in the United States rolled around, a large number of plantations had started or already completed rolling back slave labour. Why? It is expensive. By the late 1800's, a number of factories in my home state (Maine) had limited the average work day, instituted minimum working age, and improved safety conditions considerably before the trend of unionization took over.

    Why?

    Because in the end, businesses are all about the bottom line. In the short term, sending unprofitable things and expensive things offshore saves the bottom line. But in the long run it is bad for business: bad for consumers, bad for the image of the company, etc. We are in the early phases of the outsourcing IT cycle. Some companies will go over board, some will do nothing, some will go down the middle. The ones who go too far will be burned, the ones who do nothing will be burned, the ones who choose just right will win.

    until we unite and make a law about it
    Yeah, that's what we need! Yet another protectionist law!

    Somehow I don't think a few more lines of law on top of the 110 million we already have are going to solve all of our problems...

  162. Language Barriers in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey say something in Canadian?

    Ok, eh.

  163. No Fox, but Al Jazeera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any one notice that Al Jazerra is getting a Canada license, but Fox isn't...

    1. Re:No Fox, but Al Jazeera by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 1

      Any one notice that Al Jazerra is getting a Canada license, but Fox isn't...

      I didn't know that!
      But sure enough, here is the link

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    2. Re:No Fox, but Al Jazeera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Jazeera gets a license because they are a news organization, Fox News won't because they are a bunch of high-pitched, simplistic, monosyllabic grunts who spin the lies for Bush and the RNC.

    3. Re:No Fox, but Al Jazeera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be a good boy now and take your medication.

    4. Re:No Fox, but Al Jazeera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would, but I can't afford it since I can't order from Canada anymore...

  164. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Too many programmer wanna-be's, and plenty of openings that cannot be filled because only 1 in 10 qualifies. I am in Vancouver, and I am yet to meet a professional programmer without a job.

    1. Re:Dude by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      That would be because there are no entry level programming jobs to be had. What few experience programmers there are get all the jobs and the masses of young inexperienced programmers can't find any entry level jobs so they go and work at a help desk.

    2. Re:Dude by canadian_widget · · Score: 0

      This is all too true. Luckily, I was able to find a contract job, or rather... my mother had connections to get my a contract job. But still, it's not my dream job. What's there to do when companies offer a Junior Programmer job at minimum wage and get a thousand applicants just for experience?

      Maybe I'm just too proud... but I won't do it. I worked for more right out of highschool with no qualifications... now that I got credentials, I won't work for so little I can't support myself.

    3. Re:Dude by apankrat · · Score: 1

      .. the masses of young inexperienced programmers can't find any entry level jobs

      Being responsible for hiring people, I can assure you that no reasonable employer expects an experience from a junior candidate. The education and an ability to think is what being looked for. Third quality is an attitude.

      All you as a junior have to do is
      (a) study hard
      (b) have a geniune interest in CS
      (c) realize that you know nothing yet :)

      And you'll be just fine.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    4. Re:Dude by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      I will agree with this as a Toronto-based observer. I am unaware of any competent grads from my Computer Science year (2000) who have any trouble finding employment.

      I had the displeasure of browsing the mountain of resumes that came in from an Intermediate Java Developer job posting my company put on monster.ca and it was ugly. Very ugly.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  165. MODERATORS: Parent is very, very funny. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 0, Redundant


    I ain't seen a mod point in a good couple of weeks, but if I had any...

  166. Re:Canadian Accents? What's that aboot? by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    There is a distinct difference, but that's not a bad thing. Honestly, I would much rather listen to someone who sounds like the MacKenzie brothers than someone who sounds like Fran Drescher.

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  167. MOD PARENT UP by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

    Well put, and thanks for the link... Looks like I was looking for about the right salary for my new job.

  168. ummmm....beer by tlay · · Score: 1

    At least the beer will be better, eh? Just watch out for bottles with mice in them. -TLAY

  169. Exactly - Free Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one in here has yet mentioned the Quebec problem. The entire government has been taken over by the french. There has not been an English Canadian Prime Minister with a proper mandate since 1965. Federally, it is impossible to vote them out because they run Elections Canada, the agency which does the counting. In the last election, the polls predicted a conservative Stephen Harper minority, Elections Canada assures us instead that Paul Martin (the Quebecer - don't be fooled by the name) won a comfortable minority. They would have liked to have cooked it so he had a majority but it wouldn't have been believed. Canada will never again be run by an English Canadian Prime Minister while Quebec is part of the country and frenchmen are doing the counting.

    1. Re:Exactly - Free Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice conspiracy theory until you realize Paul Martin came from Ontario, not Quebec. Check your facts moron.

  170. Thank you! by kmmatthews · · Score: 1

    Great! I was just idly wondering about it, and now you've gone and given me more information.

    :)

    Mod parent up!

    --
    feh. stuff.
  171. Another reason by jmv · · Score: 1

    ...speak English with nearly American accents, have a similar culture and legal system, and get paid 40% less than U.S. programmers.

    Here's another reason: just look at the education system on both sides. The canadian education system is quite good and I'd expect Canadians comming out of an average university to be more competant than for an average US university. Note that I'm not talking about MIT and the like here.

  172. The Liberals have a strangle hold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on the media here. It's the only supposedly democratic country I know of where the media spends more time attacking the opposition (Conservatives) than the party in power (Liberals). So yes, the Liberals aren't having FOX and Liberal propaganda seems to work best on teenagers.

    1. Re:The Liberals have a strangle hold... by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 1

      So? Its easier to damn the conservatives. They're the ones who will ive us tier one tier 2 healthcare.

  173. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many programmers not enough jobs.

    Too many programmer wanna-be's, and plenty of openings that cannot be filled because only 1 in 10 qualifies. I am in Vancouver, and I am yet to meet a professional programmer without a job.

  174. Effective tax rate by nuggz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Add in CPP and EI. (Mandatory 'programs' are just more tax).

    I don't know about you but I pay over $2k in property tax, 8% PST, 7% GST, fuel taxes, alcohol taxes and a health care levy.

    To me this comes up pretty damn close to 50%.

    1. Re:Effective tax rate by BlackSol · · Score: 1

      Being a Canadian working in the US the alchol and fuel taxes are what I notice the most.

      24 beer in Ontario is $34 (CND), where as 24 beer here is about $15. An no, the beer isn't better in Canada, I'm comparing Molsen Canadian prices.

      Gasoline is also about 50% less...

      --
      $sig=$1 if($brain =~ /idea\s+(.*)/i);
    2. Re:Effective tax rate by nuggz · · Score: 1

      Molson Canadian has at least two different versions. If you don't believe me compare them yourself, the Canadian one is better than the export version.

      And no I'm not talking about Molson export, I'm talking about Molson Canadian.

    3. Re:Effective tax rate by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      And this is different from the US how?

      Look what we get for our "50%" (which I don't pay and I make about $80 k) ->

      Public medical care, portable across the entire country. My sister in Arkansas pays $400 US per month for her insurance for a family of 4 and she can't pick her own doctor. Our Health Care Levy is no where near that.

      Very good infrastructure. Especially in major cities like Toronto or Montreal, most infrastructure (roads, sewers, power etc) are quite good. Have you tried to drive in Detroit lately? More potholes than road on the expressways and streets - and this is the place where they make the cars.

      Good social services. You may not need them but they are there if you do. Lots of people are able to survive without living on the streets. Been to New York or San Francisco lately (especially San Fran)? Remember what ole John Locke said: "No man should have so much land that another man starves" - land being the measure of wealth at the time.

      Low crime rate. Likely a direct result of the above social service. I've never been scared to walk the streets of Toronto at night. Even with out recent spate of gun-related violence, every single incident makes the news! That means it's so unusual as to be newsworthy. Our crime rates, for similar sized and diverse populations (Toronto and Manhattan) are orders of magnitude below that of the US.

      I'm not trying to put down the US. They are really great people. But lets be fair here. Is $400 per month for your HMO a tax? Technically no, but it still comes out of your pocket. I beleive there was a study done a few years ago that showed for the services recieved, Canadians and Americans pay out basically the same amount in taxes (sales tax, liqour tax, income tax) and fees (HMO insurance etc) up until about $60K US. After that, we contiue to tax on a graduated scale, while in the US they pay almost no other taxes. So the only real difference is we tax the rich more.

      I guess you get what you pay for, eh?

      BTW, for all this talk about too much taxes and stuff, I'd like you to know that due to my RRSPs and various tax credits (or kids) I have not had to pay taxes at the end of the year for about 10 years....

      Frankly I'm happy with what I get. I get pretty good value for my money, Sponsorship scandals not withstanding. I think it could be better, but being like the US is not better.

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  175. Count all taxes? by MDMurphy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know the tax rates in Canada, so I have no quarrel with your figures. But even without knowing the rates I can tell your figures are too low.

    Income tax is not the only tax. In Canada, as here in the US, after you're taxed on your income you get taxed again almost every time you spend your money.

    Sales Tax
    Alcohol Tax
    Tobacco Tax
    Gasoline Tax

    Again I don't know about Canada, but here in the US we can't get a bill in the mail without a sizeable number of taxes and "gov't mandated fees" ( same as tax as far as I'm concerned ). A basic phone bill has a large percentage of separately listed fees that are mandated.

    So the figures are all well and good, but leaving out all the fees paid post-tax is a pretty good omission.

    Just on the gas tax, if you earned $10.00, paid 18% you'd net $8.20. When gas is $2.00 a gallon you can buy 4 even gallons. In CA the combined State and Federal gas taxes are about $.46 a gallon. For the 4 gallons purchased you'd pay $1.86 in taxes.
    So, on this particular $10 you'd pay $3.66 in taxes, 36.6% being a little bit different than the 18% income tax.

    Not all taxes are as high as those on gas, alcohol, tobacco and other "luxuries", but any comparison of taxes for a region has to include the taxes on the post-tax income to be accurate

    1. Re:Count all taxes? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. There ARE other taxes to take into consideration. All provinces have a sales tax except Alberta, and there's the federal 7% GST which applies to all goods and services except food.

      However, I don't feel these give a good sense of how much people are taxed, since these are sort of 'opt in' taxes. The less you buy, the less you're taxed. The less you drive, the less you're taxed. The only way to avoid income tax is by not working.

      Since I don't smoke, drive very little (I commute by bike), don't drink, and tend to not buy too many things, I don't pay as much tax as someone else down the road who likes buying a lot of consumer electronics, drives a Hummer, and goes out every Friday to drink and smoke a lot.

    2. Re:Count all taxes? by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      One way economists simplify this sort of math is, instead of listing all sorts of tax rates, they compute government spending as a fraction of GDP. And if I weren't lazy I would provide a link comparing USA and Canada in this regard.

    3. Re:Count all taxes? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      I agree. That is why I think that sales taxes are the best taxes; that is, if we have to pay taxes. The are benificial in that if you find products @ a cheaper price, you also reduce the amount of taxes that you pay. It's something that the government should make more use of.

    4. Re:Count all taxes? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Note that sales taxes are regressive, meaning poor people pay MORE than rich people. In Quebec, the federal+provincial sales tax is about 15%. A poor person and rich person both pay $15 in sales tax on a $100 purchase. However, the poor person's $15 is a much higher percentage of their salary.

    5. Re:Count all taxes? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, for certain tax brackets, we have the GST refund once a quarter.

      I agree, though. This is why I'm so strenuously against flat taxes. They benefit the rich and shaft the poor.

    6. Re:Count all taxes? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I agree, though. This is why I'm so strenuously against flat taxes. They benefit the rich and shaft the poor.

      If a person makes $25,000 a year and has a 10% 'flat' tax - not really flat, as we'll see - that person pays out $2,500 in taxes a year. If a person makes $250,000 a year, then a 10% tax means that he'll pay out $25,000 to the government in a year - TEN TIMES what the poorer person does.

      How, exactly, is that unfair to the poor person? The rich guy pays ten times the amount in taxes, but does he use ten times the infrastructure that the poor person does? Do the police, fire, and emergency services respond ten times faster to a call by a rich person? Will damaged sewer, electrical and phone lines be repaired with ten times the speed? I don't think so.

      This 'flat' tax isn't at all flat. The more you make the more you pay, and you don't get anything more for your taxes than anyone else does. In fact, with each additional dollar you pay out in taxes the return to you in government services becomes smaller and smaller.

      I've never heard a decent argument for why the rich should pay vastly greater taxes than those who aren't rich. Most of the arguments I have heard are from liberal loons who think that being wealthy is a criminal offense, and would like nothing better than to institute a socialist state where everyone is equally destitute.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    7. Re:Count all taxes? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      There's an adage that I've heard: An American is distrustful of someone that's poor, while a Canadian is distrustful of someone that's rich.

      As for your question, yes, rich people DO use more infrastructure. They tend to have bigger houses, further away from their place of work, more vehicles, bigger vehicles, require more bureaucracy to support them (because they have more governmental needs in the way of businesses owned, etc., etc.), etc.

      Despite the fact that the percentages are the same, that $2500 is actually more meaningful to the poorer person than that $25000 is to the more wealthy person. The wealthy person won't have trouble making ends meet, looking after their kids or paying their mortgage. That $2500 may mean that the poorer guy is always scraping by. That $25000 may mean that the wealthier person can't invest as much in the stock market this year, or pay for a car outright.

      What a progressive tax system tries to do (in my mind) is distribute equal BURDEN across all people, so that they can equally contribute to the functioning of society. It's a social responsibility to maintain infrastructure that you may never use, and to pay for services that you may never see, because it means that society as a whole is more productive. If society is generally more productive and safer, your life is better, even if your taxes are higher.

      I don't think everyone should be 'equally destitute' as you say, but as I make more money, I'm happy to pay my taxes as I move through the tax brackets. Paying my taxes means that everyone gets to use good roads, enjoy a health care system that takes care of them regardless of income, and partake in the arts and culture of this country. At this point, it may well have become something of a cultural thing in Canada to not mind 'higher' taxes, since we all feel that we get something from them.

      Personally, I've never heard a good argument for flat taxes. The people that make them are ALWAYS more wealthy, because they seek to widen the respective social burden that is laid on them.

      But hey, I'm no economist.

    8. Re:Count all taxes? by Igneous · · Score: 1

      Municipal and school taxes are not insignificant and are not opt-in. Either you pay them directly, or they are included in your rent. They vary, but even if you live in the most minimal of dwellings, they are significant.

  176. Maybe programmers but ... by Stone316 · · Score: 1
    you can't say the same thing aboot other fields in IT. For instance, we were looking for a junior DBA and got absolutely no resumes submitted. We even called local universities and let them know we were looking for someone. Nada.

    But then again, there are lots of DBA's but not too many have half a clue what they are doing, so its a bit harder to find one.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Maybe programmers but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your still looking I can send my resume. Just post your email to this msg. I've worked a year in web design and have considerable e-commerce/db skills form it. I went to university and took 3 courses regauding DB. I have a BSC.

    2. Re:Maybe programmers but ... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      pardon me, I was the one who ask you to post a mail... I accidentally hit post AC instead of post with no karma bonus.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Maybe programmers but ... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's too bad /. doesn't allow private messages.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  177. Additionally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    While the highest PERSONAL income bracket is between 42-48% combined federal/provincial, it's generally considered A Good Idea(tm) to incorporate and work as a small business once you get past around $80k a year.

    Small businesses get taxed at a much lower rate. In Nova Scotia (where I currently reside), the combined provincial/federal tax rate on small business is a mere %18.1 for the first $300k AFTER EXPENSES, and you can expense damn near anything that's biz-related (trips, meals, cars, computers, etc). You can then also take personal funds from the company out up to $25k/year as a tax-free dividend (may be going up soon!).

    The upshot is if you incorporate and you have your wife on board as a signing officer, between the two of you you can pull out $50k @ %18.1 total tax, and the rest at a relatively low marginal rate, all while providing yourself with the trappings of money on the company dime through junketeering and expensing. And if your company grows, you can use additional corp funds by issuing yourself a shareholder loan for basically any amount, at any time.

    The mantra that Canada is 'business unfriendly due to taxes' is basically just a warcry for those who want even MORE tax breaks in a country where many businesses would already operate with less tax burden than US counterparts. The reality is that I pay at or below the tax rates of many people to my south (particularly california).

    If you're in Canada and making more than 70k/year, seriously look into incorporation. Your tax situation will improve dramatically.

  178. Why not the Midwest or South? by Mr.+Ghost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that a company can save ~40% in salary just by moving there operations from either of the coasts to the Midwest or South. I can speak specifically about South-West Ohio where wages are at least 35% lower that the NE or the West. Plus you get the advantage of no language barriers or import/export costs.

  179. My point exactly by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Now that obesity is a medicare recognized disease does that mean that you're being a fathead is reimburseable as a mental illness or a physical illness?

  180. you're all wrong: go philippines by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    filipinos are as competitively priced and as educated as indians, but their english and culture is more american

    plus, large segments of the population work overseas, so virtually the entire country, from its education, its politics, and its culture, is geared towards thinking cosmopolitan and globally

    people always talk about russia, india, canada... no one ever mentions our good friends the philippines, birthplace of the "i love you" virus, lol ;-)

    (i go to cebu every year, i'm not impartial)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're all wrong: go philippines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya but they pulling out of Iraq and quitting the war on terror...

      if they're not with us...

  181. Well at least you can move here by Stone316 · · Score: 1
    From what I understand you'll have no chance moving to India if you decide to follow your work. But at least up here we let skilled people in.

    Alot of people complain about Canada's healthcare system but for 99% of the population its good. I live in one of the biggest cities and have no problems seeing a doctor within an hour or so if I need to. Specialists may take a few weeks/months but if its going to affect your quality of life you can get seen quicker.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Well at least you can move here by Infe · · Score: 1
      Alot of people complain about Canada's healthcare system but for 99% of the population its good. I live in one of the biggest cities and have no problems seeing a doctor within an hour or so if I need to. Specialists may take a few weeks/months but if its going to affect your quality of life you can get seen quicker.

      I'm glad it's up to you or whomever to determine what operation is going to affect my quality of life. I don't necessarily have a problem helping the poor afford medical care, but I don't see why there should be health care for everyone, simply because of the limits it puts on freedom. If you only have a national health care system, and a doctor can't see you for a negotiated price whenever he wants, that's just wrong.

      --
      Posted by yintercept - "...science...[is] the study of the 'divine creation.' "
    2. Re:Well at least you can move here by Stone316 · · Score: 1
      You must be american because you simply don't understand that we see health care as a right not a privilege. If Canadians want to 'negotiate' a price for health care they can also cross the border and use the Amercian's wonderful system.

      How on earth it puts a crimp on freedom is beyond me. That doesn't make any sense at all.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    3. Re:Well at least you can move here by Infe · · Score: 1

      You have the "freedom" to go to another country to use the free market to get a doctor whenever you want? And *I'm* the one who doesn't make any sense??

      --
      Posted by yintercept - "...science...[is] the study of the 'divine creation.' "
  182. You forgot the GST and PST... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "half your income goes to the government"

    Sooner or later, you have to spend your money, and the GST and PST (Sales Taxes) combined can come to 15%... Your 65% take home - 15% = well, you do the math...

    1. Re:You forgot the GST and PST... by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Well, your math and logic are wrong, if you really want to get in to it, taxes (money that goes to the government) came to about 23%. Even if you were to add 15% that would only be 38%. However, you can't just add the 15%. That 15% does not apply to every penny I make, only a portion of what I take home (I don't pay sales tax on my mortgage/house, groceries, etc). If I spend every penny on taxable items, 9.5% would go back the government in sales taxes. However, take off things I don't pay taxes on, and its more like 3%. So, including sales tax, I give the government about 26% of my gross income. Add in my other deductions, and I'm still taking home over 60% of my salary. Go troll somewhere else.

  183. I am Canadian by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Yes we have our own issues.
    The health care system is a little overloaded, but when I had minor issues I just went to a walk in clinic.
    I went a 8:30 in the morning and I got in within a few minutes.

    Banking industry has some big players, but it is pretty competative, if you don't like it just borrow from another source.
    The reason our interest rates are so high is our government set the rate at about 3% and the US is still around 1%, so the entire market is about 2% higher.

    My opinion is that the middle class life isn't going to be much different in either country, like most first world countries you'd have pretty nice standard of living.

  184. Re:80% Savings 40% Savings by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    COmpanies used to use child labor util we made laws about it. Companies used to work people round the clock until we made laws about it. From their past track record companies WILL DO whatever they can GET AWAY WITH - until we unite and make a law about it.

    They still do.

    This is, after all, why the likes of Nike, Reebok, and Levis have exported their labour. Labour laws that apply only to domestic workers and not the products for sale, coupled with fairly efficient global transportation and communication networks ensures that companies continue to use exploitative labour. The countries where manufacturing labour gets exported to generally has few legal restrictions on working conditions.

    You can probably find something about this on Naomi Klein's nologo.org web site.

  185. Yes, you'd never know it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... from the policy of bilingualism and the huge predominence of frenchmen in federal public positions, but in fact the french make up about 20% of the total population. And they are a shrinking minority at that, having a very low birthrate. Makes you wonder how they keep winning the elections, eh?

    1. Re:Yes, you'd never know it... by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      Makes you wonder how they keep winning the elections, eh?

      Superior intelligence and wit ;)

      --
      :wq
  186. Maths by suffe · · Score: 1

    So why not save themselves some energy and just split the difference; the US sends 90,000 (165,000 - 75,000) people to canada, put the 75,000 to their own shipping quota and Canada doesn't have to send anyone at all. Makes perfect sence. =)

    --

    Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
  187. Why not outsource to Montana? by Trailerparkopera · · Score: 1

    Better yet, move your IT operation here. We've got plenty of dark fiber. Lots of space. Cheap cheap cheap real estate (with exception of Bozeman/Missoula), and cheap labor. I took a 50% salary cut to move here, but cost of living is such that we can get by on one salary (as opposed to two living in DC).

  188. It's not too far off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way the Liberals have destroyed the economy and the dollar. Ignore the Liberal propaganda that tells you a low dollar is good - following that logic, when it gets down to about 2 cents, we'll really be well off!. Personally, I prefered the 92 cent dollar under the Conservatives' Mulroney to the 62 cent dollar under Liberal Chretien...

    1. Re:It's not too far off... by Spangston · · Score: 1
      Either way, stuff costs too much! I saw this Optimus Prime Limited Edition 12" action figure, and it costs 112$!!!! Yikes!

      And don't get me started on the price of Lego!

  189. I cost moe to live here. by heybo · · Score: 1

    But it cost you 60% more to live here. Where is the savings?

  190. Re:French-Canadians? by king-manic · · Score: 1

    Ya gotta remember that a large portion of Canada primarily speaks French. Broken English with a heavy French accent can be just as hard to understand as broken English with a Hindi accent.

    You also have to remember they make up less then 1/4 of the country. Are heavily isolated from the rest due to language. And The rest of the coutnry would just as well not have them.... except the ladies. Montreal women are hot. Seriously, aside from ontario and some parts of the maritimes, the rest of the country would rather they just leave but ontario would then face 9 hostile provinces and 3 hostiel terrortories that all have a grudge against ontario and now have as many seats in parliment.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  191. Might be time to think about moving North, eh? by ChozSun · · Score: 1

    Might be time to think about moving North, eh?

    Way ahead of you. I am set to move to Canada in May 2005. See ya later.

    --
    ChozSun
    ChozSun.com
  192. Beer misconseption by amightywind · · Score: 1

    has major domestic beers that don't taste like piss [labatts.ca]

    Several times on this forum I have heard posters sing the praises of Canadian beers. Absurd. Canadian *mass market* beers like Labatts Blue, and Moosehead are no better than other international brands like Michelob, Coors, Bud, Fosters, Heineken. They should all be drunk at as low a temperature as possible to kill the taste. Happily in the U.S we have truely world class micro-breweries. If you have one near you support it! I greatly respect the beer reputations of Germany, Britain, Belgium, etc, and hope to sample beers in each of them someday. I just want to point out that the U.S. is a great place for beer enthusiasts.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Beer misconseption by Lexor · · Score: 1

      I think the real issue is that Canadian mass-market beer is full strength, 5% alc/vol. Alcohol content is not listed on American beer, because from what I understand it's illegal to do so.

      Sure, the U.S. has some fine micro-brews, but so does Canada and the rest of the world.

      --
      Regards, Lex
  193. We're full up! Please go away! by MagikSlinger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nope, nope. We're all full up here in Canada. Yes, please go away.

    You won't like it here. It's cold, yeah.... It's 25 C here in Vancouver. Brrrr.

    Yes, that's right. Our healthcare system sucks. That's right. Please go away. *cough*, *cough*. Just ignore the international reports saying we has slightly better life expectancies.

    Try Mexico or, maybe, India...?

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  194. Correct, it is about 50% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which shows that many Canadians have been brainwashed into thinking otherwise. But don't expect too much enlightenment from the Liberal controlled media here...

  195. Moving? Remember this... by Merdalors · · Score: 1

    Canadian weather is nine months of winter, interrupted by three months of bad sledding.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  196. Re:Perhaps the real solution to keep Americans wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since the entire country migrates en masse in the winter, Florida also makes sense. We have nice conservation plans for the Everglades.

    But can you teach them to drive?

  197. Canada's Next Door? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A Canadian must have written the title since they own 'Next Door'.

  198. Hmm, let's see by apankrat · · Score: 1

    Here's some numbers for Vancouver (subjective of course, but still representitive) -

    1200-1700 cad/mnth rents you a two-bedroom apartment in downtown with a sunset/water view. 600 will get you one-bedroom in 'uptown', which nevertheless is mere 30 min drive from downtown.

    1000 cad/mnth should be more than enough to feed two people on a rich restaurant diet. Technically 500 will feed two people with home cooking.

    200 cad/mnth gets you Hundai, 700 - Audi. Insurance is in 1200-2500 range per year.

    In other words, 3000 cad per month gives two people very decent live with some spending money. That's about 70K per year before taxes, which is a high-intermediate pay for a fulltime developer. Senior fulltime pay goes up to 120K (but rarely above it). Contracting gives you twice as much or more.

    Still not willing to move ? ;-)

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  199. Lots of good Canadian companies by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here are three Canadian tech companies that produce products I use at work everyday: Miranda, International Datacasting, Broadview Software. Nice to have NAFTA and not have to pay tarrifs!

  200. MSN pays C$9/hr in Canada by westendgirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My sister-in-law works for a company that contracts to MSN and MCI. The average hourly wage is $9 (CDN). She lives in a small town in Canada, but $9 an hour is still hard to live on. Her employer was recently quoted in the paper as saying that they view these jobs as secondary incomes and that people should therefore be happy to be making any extra money, or, in many cases, to have their first Canadian job (if they are a foreign-trained engineer, for example). In other words, the employer feels that white men have "real" jobs and that these C$9 an hour jobs bring luxury to the lives of women and immigrants. Ouch. This so-called "secondary income" employer is the main employer in several small towns in Canada. The jobs aren't secondary -- they're the only game in town.

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

    1. Re:MSN pays C$9/hr in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I read along it struck me: "This sounds like someone from BC." The "white men" line was the kicker. Sure enough, the name westendgirl suggests another Vancouver we-deserve socialist from an area where Liberal is considered far right. Travel, the world is far different than your little extremely exclusive and expensive Starbuck world.

    2. Re:MSN pays C$9/hr in Canada by westendgirl · · Score: 1
      While I don't take all reporting in the following article at face value, a company official said; "They're second jobs, they're not jobs for the primary breadwinner, but it gives a family that much more income...." Such a statement clearly devalues the work of the person performing the job, and suggests that lower wages are warranted because a primary breadwinner exists. However, in many cases, this income is just as important as that of the person's spouse -- if the person even has a spouse. The company's argument sounds suspiciously like the reason governments had to pass legislation that said there was no such thing as a "going market rate for women" and a "going market rate for men" (US: Corning Glass Works v. Brennan (1974), U.S. Supreme Court). While the company in question may hire men at the same wage, it generally hires immigrant men whose credentials have not yet been recognized -- these men are, in some ways, not yet emancipated to compete for full wage positions.

      I don't drink Starbucks, I have an Executive MBA from a top school (that means I have experience as a manager), and I've been to 17 countries other than Canada, including time spent living with families in five of them. I fail to see how I project insular or socialist views.

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    3. Re:MSN pays C$9/hr in Canada by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
      I have an Executive MBA from a top school

      Does this mean you are qualified to outsource jobs to India?

      Yes I am trolling... can't help it... don't like boasting of MBA's. Means you had time and money... that is all. It also means you place more importance on titles than in experience.

      Your trips to 17 countries are worth more than the MBA... to me... but not, probably, to others with MBA's who think they know how to run IT projects.

      You may flame me or mod me down now.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:MSN pays C$9/hr in Canada by westendgirl · · Score: 1

      I'm not boasting about an MBA. I was addressing your comment about my profile involving socialism. Few socialists could tolerate 2 years in such a conservative, pro-capitalism environment...let alone work as a business manager. This is not to say they're incapable of the work, but that they would most often be at philosophical odds with the system, whether academic or industrial.

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

  201. Re:80% Savings 40% Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only care about saving money and doing things for LESS.

    Uh they're a business ... of course the bottom line matters to them. If it costs 20 peices of gold to build something in the USA and only costs 5 peices of gold to build something in India I'd be interested to. The interesting part is the lengths people in India go to - to learn english and to rid themselves of any accent they have in order to get jobs with tech help firms. Something to be learnt there. We have a company here that is contracted out by big corporations to provide telephone support for some computer companies. The city had to compete with other cities...

    The American way has been to complain about the loss of jobs, threaten to create laws preventing companies from working outside of the USA (schwartzenegger talked about canadians taking jobs away from americans in the movie industry and wanted to put a stop to it) Sadly america CANT have it all. This is capitalism at work.

    As for the article itself? We do not have similar cultures and laws to our american counterparts. Completely disagree - watch some canadian TV(read a few canadian authors)and you'll see MAJOR differences in culture.

  202. What'll happen if /. readers move north en masse by ColonelPanic · · Score: 1

    Amazingly, the average IQ in both nations will drop!

    --
    "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
  203. Our company already "off-shores" to Canada by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    We do most of our cutting-edge R&D in the US and send our mature products to our Calgary division for late-stage releases and support. Its about 30% cheaper.

  204. Good Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, our culture tends to create a psychological conditioning where you are expected to give up rights in order to be employed...witness the requirement of some jobs that you give up the right to own any inventions/ideas that you make to your boss (working at a high-tech electronic taximeter firm in the 70's, I had to sign a contract giving anything I invented to by boss so that I could work at his firm, my first job, I needed that job, needless, everyone there was treated badly). The cultural "norm" for high-tech feilds is the accusation of "you are not very good/commited to your work/profesion etc. if you complain about treatment (workload) or salary. The distinction that your own time is the same as your work time also is very present and the fact that your own time/efforts are somehow inferior to your work time is also present and silly too...it was about 25 years ago that working from your home was considered to not be real work (I got insulted/ignored on the phone talking to suppliers back then (1980's)(working from home), perhaps it was better in the 1970's in silicon valley..(re:revenge of the nerds documentary by chringley). A good book (old time-life book) was the book: Status and Conformity, published in the early 1970's, just after the impact of the hippy cultural revolution...it's funny that the 1970's influenced to a great extent the development of the personal computer, because, just to work on a computer (mainframe or mini-computer) required you to go to university and get a CS BS just so you could program in cobal and assembler and the other popular languages of the time. The fact that Pc's are everywhere nowadays means that your typical boss will require you to work long hours and take advantage of you....the advantage of lots of eager people means lower wages for everyone...I live in canada and a friend works at a high-tech firm and the progarmmers do get paid a lot less (excuse: it's high-tech, go get a boring bank programming job if you want real money or go to the US if you want more money)....the internet makes outsourcing of high-tech jobs is fairly easy now and companies will want everybody to work at some sort of lowest common denominator wage eventually...the future of low wage jobs will eventually spread to all (better paying) jobs with the application of nanotech brain implants that allow your pointy-haird bos to connect to the lowest wage/most talented person/database-robot-ai somewhere in the world to figure out how to do biotech/medicine/nanotech/lawyer/you-name-applicat ion of the moment, if the boss doesn't do it, his cheap (hired off the street) employee will do it. With the growth of the worlds population and the rise if India/china/etc the ability to find well-paying work gets to be a more complex challange. Perhaps the only person making any real money some day will be the Bill Gates (read company owners) as all jobs (even up to the boss at the top (excluding the owner) will be outsourced, I think that the real danger of avanced AI (matrix, battlestar galactica, AIbrain(s) etc.) will not be the fact that they wipe us out with nukes/androids), but that they replace us with cheaper human workers and/or non-human workers by direct replacement or augmenting a human so he/she can do the work of many dozens/hendreds or normal human workers. (oops, getting carried away again, where did I put my medication?)

  205. News is already old by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 1, Informative

    This story is already stating what has happened for the past 2-3 years.

    And if you're an American programmer , you still will lose your job. What does it matter if it goes to Canada or India ? The only reason I could see is that it would be easier to move to Canada and integrate yourself into their society.

  206. Kingston by SEGV · · Score: 1

    I'm in Kingston too!

    What kind of skills do you have? I started my own business making software for PDAs.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
    1. Re:Kingston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the anonymous coward that posted earlier refering to Kingston. I am a recent grad of the three year Computer Engineering Technology course at St. Lawrence College (http://www.sl.on.ca/). I am mostly into C/C++ programming, but I find it pretty easy to pick up new languages (I've also done some Java and Perl). I have some experience in the HVAC feild as well, networking control systems equipment. I have thought of writing a couple Palm apps over the years, but I just never got around to it. Email me sometime, if you so desire. Ben[A]inKlaver@hot[B].com {A=jam B=mail}.

  207. Re:Clearly... by oldgeezer1954 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe anyone mod'd you as flamebait. (also tongue in cheek) I can't think of anything funnier than you folks invading us considering you failed the last two times you tried that. Maybe third time lucky? On a serious note... I can't think of two countries which are so similar yet seem to thrive on baiting each other!:)

  208. Or... by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

    You could also look for IT companies in Mexico. Cost of living there is cheaper, we share the same timezones as the US, we have similar cultures, etc.

    There are a couple of companies that can give you very competitive rates (not as cheap as India, but cheaper than the US).

    Disclaimer: I work for one of these companies, but I don't want to sound like an ad. Go and search for yourself. There are many.

    --
    Signatures are supposed to be funny?
  209. Re:Perhaps the real solution to keep Americans wor by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Why would a swamp need to know how to drive?

    And just FYI, typing "Why would a swamp need to know how to drive?" takes 17 seconds

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  210. Personally... by qtone42 · · Score: 1

    ...I'd rather hear someone in India who has a good reason for not understanding me, rather than a Canadian who is clueless, eh?

    No offence intended to Canadians, just worthless tech support.

    --QTone, not French

  211. Canada, bad..... US Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans, what ever you do, don't come to Canada. The US is much better than Canada. It is cold here, you would never survive. Go anywhere else but here. Please. Speaking as a Canadian, we love you dearly but we prefer if you stay lower than the 49th parallel. Don't listen to the people who say that Canada is better than the US. Here be dragons. In fact, please forget you ever heard of Canada. There is no such country as Canada. US good stay in US. Please.

  212. Real Life Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a small company that started with a development office in the US and one in Canada. We eventually also brought in an Indian contracting firm, and ultimately ended up opening our own Indian development office. Hiring in both Canada and the US has stopped (US hiring stopped first), and now all development growth is in our office in India. Once you go down the road of looking for the cheapest development approach (and the business types definitely do that) it is tough to justify Canadian development when Indian (or others) is even less expensive.

  213. Canadian Fanboy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Ontario, Canada and I just want to say Canada Rocks! The people are amazingly nice and friendly, and the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) is party central. Go Leafs!

    *drinks a kokanne and tokes a joint*

    1. Re:Canadian Fanboy... by Alieninator10000X · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Don't tell them that Canada Rocks, you don't want all those fat bastards to come here, don't you ?

  214. Re:Xerox outsources to Canada - Not NS by Graemee · · Score: 1

    More likely the large Xerox call center in Saint John NB.

  215. But you have to put up with smug Canadians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather chew glass while walking on hot asphalt with bare feet than deal with the Canadian sense of superiority.

  216. New York, New York by lysium · · Score: 1
    Let's dissect your comments, shall we?

    Living in NYC has it's own advantages. Here, I can go Tango Dancing every day of the week, see the best museums
    You pay dearly for those events, or you attend a free event with 149,782 other people in one room. Every room in the worthwhile musuems are carefully watched by dour-faced security guards;

    never have to drive the death machine we call an automobile,
    Take a look at the air-pollution levels for Manhattan. Take a look at asthma and cancer rates. You have not avoided the death machines after all;

    can go out drinking without worrying about how I am getting home
    But if you shake your hips to a song in an unlicensed venue, the entire bar can and will get shut down. Ditto that if you smoke. Or if the music/crowd is loud and the neighbors complain;

    Living in Canada would be a marked decrease in my Life Style.
    Try Vancouver. Most films pretend it is New York, anyway. There is more *actual* culture there, with a lot less attitude. You won't waste $90 on a night of drinks, either.

    ====---====

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:New York, New York by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Try Vancouver. Most films pretend it is New York, anyway.

      I read that the film industry uses Vancouver as "San Francisco North" and Toronto as "New York North".

  217. We get paid less? by d3am0n · · Score: 1

    Er, your sure there's no error in the exchange rate or anything? It's hard to believe that we get paid a full 40% less.

  218. Don't forget... by Mashiki · · Score: 0, Troll

    The taxes on the taxes, the manufacturing taxes, the pre-production taxes, the impact taxes. The billing taxes, leverence taxes, equalization taxes, recoup taxes, connection taxes, 'privitization' taxes, property taxes, school taxes(sometimes not counted in your property). Then we can get into the hidden taxes that we know, consumer, non-consumer, 'fresh stock', non-fresh stock, refiners fees, and on and so forth.

    I'm probably forgetting six or seven dozen others as well.

    I figured mine to being around 58% on $72,658/yr, that means my take home after taxes was around $30k. The average income of my area is around $60,000(meaning I live in Oshawa, London, Oxford) People who live here at $60k, are living OK. In truth...that's it. 60k or even 70k is enough to get by with a family of 4. The biggest thing I see now, is incomes all over Ontario climbing above for a family over 100K that's not 'high living' thats one person supporting the family, one person to supply excess 'slush' funds in most cases.

    Oh by whatever god you want...Canada Loves it's taxes. How else do we pay for blowing billions on useless programs? And throwing money away on 'legacy' and 'unity' projects.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Don't forget... by RungeKutta · · Score: 1
      Oh by whatever god you want...Canada Loves it's taxes. How else do we pay for blowing billions on useless programs? And throwing money away on 'legacy' and 'unity' projects

      Then my friend, you haven't heard of the U.S. Government yet.

      --
      You are free to do as we tell you.
      We want your soul.
      www.wewantyoursoul.com
  219. Another Advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the moose work even cheaper, eh?

  220. You *are* debt free. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
    Anyway, if you're shocked by high taxes in Canada, Alberta is the place to go - low taxes, the provincial government runs without a deficit and the alcoholic everyman redneck Premier (think Governor) runs the province like a business, and as a result we are nearly debt-free.
    There was an article in the paper the other day saying that you are debt free. Maybe I was skimming through too quickly, or my sources aren't reliable.

    People should also note, that when I was in Calgary, the government actually paid for some our electricity, because the government was doing so well.
    1. Re:You *are* debt free. by generica1 · · Score: 1

      Well, that was in the news indeed and it's why I mentioned it, however it's important to note that while the official media spin is that we are debt free, in fact we are bound to paying down our debt until 2008, due to long-term financing agreements and obligations. In fact, the opposition parties attacked the provincial government's use of "accounting tricks" to make it appear as if we are debt-free so that Ralph Klein will be re-elected. The article you read in the news was simply a regurgitation of the official press release that was put out, and was not representative of the actual truth. Just like most news articles, I guess...

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
  221. canadian support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i do support for hp pavilion and compaq presario desktops. india also does support for these. its pretty funny when almost every customer i get starts off with 'oh thank god you speak english' and doesn't want to let me off the phone for any reason because they know 9 times out of 10 they'll get india again.

    also, considering the horrible job india does (a lot of calls i get are fixing issues caused by their ineptitude), its surprising to me that they actually continue to outsource to india .. customers like us better, we're still cheaper than american counterparts, and we don't break everything, needlessly service machines, send out unneeded cds, etc.

  222. Re:French-Canadians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya gotta remember that a large portion of Canada primarily speaks French.

    Are you absolutely fucking retarded? That's nowhere even CLOSE to the truth. Seriously, why bother posting if you just don't have a clue?

  223. Re: All negative mods are meta-moderated 'unfair' by downwa · · Score: 1

    Regarding your sig, "If you don't like it, ignore it. All negative mods are meta-moderated 'unfair'. ALL OF THEM." I would just like to point out why I think your meta-moderation is misguided.

    The current moderation system has a top limit of +5. However, since slashdot has so many posters these days, there can easily be 50+ posts moderated at that level. For this reason, I ALWAYS moderate down, never up, so as to reduce the number of +5 moderations. As such, I'm not usually moderating because I don't like something, just because I think it is less qualified to be +5 than some of the other posts which made it to that level.

    --
    Life's a lot like money-- you spend it, then it's gone. Spend wisely.
  224. Re:80% Savings 40% Savings by csguy314 · · Score: 1

    Companies do NOT care if you have talk to a guy speaking Spanglish, Engrish, or Hinduish

    Umm, Hinduism is a religion, not a language. The language is called Hindi, and it's only one of many languages spoken in India.

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
  225. Re:Convergus in other Canadian cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Convergus in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (geographic centre of North America) employed a baffling array of high-tech to low-tech skilled people I know--as $8/hour computer support. They recently outsourced their cheeep support to India. The level 1 support people all were canned. The level 2s were going to canned later.

    $8/hour is around the poverty level in Winnipeg. Wage slaves now with wages (& jobs).

    Welcome to 2004, the big double 'O's.

  226. Stay in USA by Alieninator10000X · · Score: 1

    Oh please Americans, don't come in Canada, we don't need people who like to do war against any country just for the fun of it here.

    1. Re:Stay in USA by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1

      I agree, we should't outsource American jobs to any country whose populace is unable to engage in critical thinking and thinks that we send our troops of to war "just for fun".

      We don't need Canada, Canada needs us. Don't get angry aboot this simple fact, I resent it too.

      --
      Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    2. Re:Stay in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sent your troops in Vietnam and Iraq just for fun and after you were like : 'oh, we did a mistake again, we are stupid'.

      Stop making war if the only things you can do are all big mistakes.

    3. Re:Stay in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Btw, not only we don't need you in Canada, but we don't want you either.

    4. Re:Stay in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to ask your northern states if they agree with you or not. You might be shocked to see how much trade occurs across the border in both directions. I read something back a while, that well over half of the economies of the northern states depended on trade with Canada. Granted, percentage wise, we export more to you, but we are still your number 1 trading partner. Oh, and don't forget, I think we are your #2 oil supplier (fluctuates between #1 and #4), number #1 natural gas supplier, and we are way up the list on electricity supply as well. Guess which trade goods would stop first?

  227. Yes indeed we get paid less... by MagicBox · · Score: 1

    40% is conservative actually. In fact I'd say a more accurate figure would be 45-65% depending on the position. There is also a shortage of work. The % of unemployment has been steady between 3-3.5% higher than in the US for years now. Not to forget we are the true embodiment of a *working class taxed to death*. There is also laws which make it extremely difficult for outside companies to setup shop in canada and the tax bracket is so high that most small to medium size companies will not be willing to open up branches in Canada. Not to mention the new *medicare tax* we were slapped on this summer, (which translates into another $1000 CAD for someone in their mid 50Ks salary) to pay to the gevernment. In the mean time I haven't gone to the doctor in at least 6 years for anything......but I must give the fat a$$ed governemt beurocrats more money, so they can enjoy a better vacation. Our Liberal government is also close friends with CUBA, RUSSIA and CHINA. I wonder is that rings any bells to anyone...if not, let me just say that the Liberal flag is all red. It's only missing a star (that's because they are affraid of the US)

    Stats canada

    --

    The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
  228. Re:French-Canadians? by Etyenne · · Score: 1

    *cough*Texas*cough*

    --
    :wq
  229. Just be aware what they're measuring by... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...I live in the "best" country in the world, and I can tell you for one that I'd very much like to import some better climate. Being on the same latitude as Anchorage, Alaska means there's some room for improvement (even though the Gulf Stream helps)...

    On all the "society" scores (literacy, education, freedoms of speech, equality of the sexes, crime rates etc. etc.) we do well. But overall I don't feel we're that rich, because the cost of living pretty well match our salaries. What is cheap is imports - like e.g. computers. And so it going on vacation. But working here, making a living? Not too different from the rest of the world, I think.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  230. One example of Canadian "offshoring" by Squishy+Eyeball+Jeff · · Score: 1

    Here's a great example of a company that's doing some "offshoring" work in Canada and actively marketing it as a better alternative than Indian offshoring.

  231. Tax Freedom Day .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Yes and no.

    You're 100% correct that while the marginal tax rate might be as high as 50% or so, the effective tax rate is closer to the 30% mark. That's your income tax, and you'll only pay about 30% of your income on that.

    But, as has been pointed out, the amount of taxes we pay on other things add up. According to this
    'tax freedom day' calculator which factors in all of the other stuff, you actually do start hitting the 50% threshold with everything accounted for.

    This measures how far into the year you would have to go to pay your tax bill assuming that the government collected their cut before you got anything. The average Canadian is end of June/early July before that happens.

    So, according to the Fraser Institute (who are the ones that get cited in these things), cumulatively, most Canadians do actually pay about 50% of their total income in various direct and indirect taxes.

    Sorry dude.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Tax Freedom Day .... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

      The Fraser Institute is a right-wing think tank, basically a charity paid by Big Corporations to discredit our social programs and anything the government does. Their yearly "School Performance" reviews compares elite private schools on the same scales as the public schools in the poorest neighbourhoods then says "Proof that the private sector does it better". If the Fraser Institute says its raining heavily, I'll check for myself, and find it's at best a light drizzle.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Tax Freedom Day .... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the site's FAQ:

      The Personal Tax Freedom Day calculator, like Tax Freedom Day, includes all taxes from all levels of government that Canadians pay. This includes: income & sales taxes; liquor, tobacco, amusement & other excise taxes; automobile, fuel, & motor vehicle licence taxes; CPP/QPP and EI contributions, medical & hospital taxes; property taxes; import duties; profit taxes; and natural resource levies.

      In short, they're throwing in things that none of us consider to be taxes on income. They're saying "we" pay for corporate taxes and mining and petro royalties.

      If we did this to the U.S., it would work out the same because the U.S. also has price controls on tabacco, sugar, corn and a host of other foods. Not to mention the county and state taxes on the phone bill, etc. Don't buy the propoganda.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Tax Freedom Day .... by Igneous · · Score: 1

      A tax by any other name is still a tax. It's a favorite tactic of governments to call their taxes by other names in an effort to pull the wool over our eyes. If it's government revenue and you can't opt out of paying it, it's a tax.

      EI is a prime example of this. Benefits paid out by the program are much less than 'contributions' received, and the balance is treated as general revenue. EI is not an insurance plan, it's a tax.

      It's only through sleights-of-hand such as this (and not paying their portion of the pension contributions mandated by law for government and military employees) that they claim to have balanced the budget. When you make the rules, you can also ignore them when they don't suit you. This is something at which the Canadian government has had lots of practice.

      You specifically mention corporate taxes and mining and petro royalties. These are part of the cost of producing the goods we use, so as a consumer you still pay for them, even if it is somewhat indirectly.

  232. Re: All negative mods are meta-moderated 'unfair' by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    That's the most interesting comment that I've had on my meta-moderation decision. Most people just flame me for it.

    You bring up an interesting point. I probably won't change my ways, but I'll certainly consider this method of moderation.

    Frankly, there probably just needs to be a new moderation system. This current one seems to be breaking down under the sheer volume of posts that we have.

  233. Why India.... by anish1411 · · Score: 1

    When we got Ireland next door! (Go here if you don't get that.)

  234. A word on your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I also love to meta-moderate troll and offtopic moderations 'unfair', but I actually read the posts, and when it's a GNAA or other like-post, I either leave it 'neutral' or set it to 'fair'.

    Anything else seems sort of reckless and an abdication of the worst kind...

    But that's my conscience, not yours.

  235. very little difference my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Americans are cleary INDIFFERENT to their governement killing innoncents in Vietnam and Iraq just for the heck of it, they are so different to Canadians that it's not even funny.

  236. Hidden costs... by panicboy · · Score: 1

    Articles like this always downplay the loss of productivity involved. For example, the number of man-hours involved in changing all references of "back bacon" to "ham" would be staggering.

    1. Re:Hidden costs... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      Uhm, back bacon isn't ham...think pork backs...guys from the Sourth know what I mean..

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  237. No military in Canada by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    > I like it that we don't spend anything on military.

    Which is OK so long as you remember the price you pay for that. On the plus side you guys get a lot more money to cover up the failures of socialism and postpone the day of reckoning.

    On the other side it means you are a child nation, utterly dependent on others for protection. Namely the United States. You live carefree lives without a thought for defense or other matters of the world because WE take care of you, extending the protection of our arms to secure your safety. Your opinion in the councils of the world count for little for the same reason, the adults find it hard to take anything you say seriously because you not only aren't considered a real country, but also because in the end the world is still run by force and the threat of force and you lack the force to back up your words. You are basically Guam only bigger and with a seat in the UN general assembly. (Not that a seat in the UN counts for much, after all Morocco has exactly the same vote as all of Canada.)

    Even France's voice counts more in the councils of the world because for all that they are French (silly treacherous twits) they actually possess the means of defending themselves and a small ability to project their will on the global stage, unfortunately even including the Bomb.

    p.s. yes, I'm tweaking the Canadians a bit here. It's a slow news Friday, might as well stir things up a little.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:No military in Canada by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      The US has been the biggest threat to Canada through most of its history, and we're still around. If the entire USA suddenly dissappeared, Canada would be under little additional threat from anybody. It's like saying new zealand owes it's security to anybody. As for the failures of socialism, the Canadian federal government is the only G8 nation to post consecutive surpluses for the past decade. We're doing ok, as our life expectancy is 2 years longer and our crime rates are significantly lower. We do some things better than you, and vise-versa.

    2. Re:No military in Canada by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > The US has been the biggest threat to Canada through most of its
      > history, and we're still around.

      Canada used to be an adult. Canada fielded quite a large contribution to the Allied forces in WWII. That is no longer true. Now consider how fast the nations of Eastern Europe fell to Stalin at the open of the Cold War and how close Canada is to the old Soviet Empire. Had it not been for everyone understanding that the US simply would NEVER have tolerated Soviet encroachments into North America, what would have been your odds of speaking Russian right now?

      The world is an unsafe place, always has been and probably will be for the forseeable future. You Canadians hate our guts right now because we did what we thought we needed to do in the Middle East. The difference being we had a choice, you have none. If Usama decides to start blowing your shit up all you can do is ask US to kill him for you. In the end you have no choice but to accept whatever level of protection we provide you... and even more bluntly, to pay whatever tribute we ever decided to levy upon you for the privledge.

      Remember, someday you may actually be right; America might fall to the Dark Side and you have no defense against that, trusting us blindly to defend you unto death, asking nothing in return. When wolves guard sheep they don't always have the sheep's best interests at heart.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:No military in Canada by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      I suppose we are "close". But there is SFA between Moscow and the Berring Straight except frozen ground.

      Your point about the Soviets (possibly) attacking NA is, well, pointless. There was no Russian leader bent on global domination... Virtually every retired Soviet officer who was around durring the Cold War will tell you that they were on the defensive. MAD is MAD, but the 'Merkins came far closer to attacking the Soviets then the reverse.

    4. Re:No military in Canada by Serapth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My god, what a post... Your right... its a slow friday and your trying to stir the shit! :)Oh well, i'll bite

      Your right, Canada had a signifigant contirbution to WWII ( and I ), and in fact had the second largest Navy at the end of the second world war ( Mostly because of the shit kicking that Japan and Germany took... ). However, entering the war, that was not the case. Canada is a country that rallies at the time of war ( real wars, not political invasions... ).

      Now, the biggest irony is the reason why Canada is not a military power these days... The US! Do a search on a company called AVRO. The created the CF-100, then the CF-105(Arrow). The AVRO arrow was basically decades ahead of its time ( actually, it was heavily ripped off to create the F15 ... so think F15 tech in the late 50's ). Why did this amazing aircraft never come to see day, beyond test flights??? Well, basically it boiled down to political threats from "Canada's friends to the North". It came down to America dictated to Canada, scrap the Arrow and adopt the Bowmark (sp?) missle system, or the US would start doing missle tests over Canadian airspace.

      Now the real reason? Basically it boils down to one of two reasons. THe first one is a no brainer... War is a major industry for the US. Had Canada had the best jet fighter/intercepter on the market, how well would sales of the StarFighter, F4 Phantom, etc have gone? Second reason, basically boils down to the U2 spy plane. That plane was the backbone of US intelligence, however its only defence was the alltitude it flew at, and altitude the Arrow could easily fly at. Ironically, the U2 didnt prove to be that invulnerable in the end did it? I believe in the end, Gary Powers was shot down by an AA missle launch from a Mig25.

      So, long story short, Canada was on route to becoming a major military power, at least industrially. One of the biggest reason that Canada isnt these days, is because America basically dictated ( weilding a big stick ), come under our protection, OR ELSE!

      Finally... the world isnt really that dangerous of a place with two exceptions. 1) Nukes. 2) The US. With the end of the Cold War, the US is the only country maintaining a large and agressive force, with the possible exception of China. TO put things simply, I think the world was much safer before the US invaded Iraq, then it is now.

      However, thats the nice thing about Canada... should the US join "the dark side", watch how fast the "free world" unites against you, should you invade ( and not simply annex, big difference ). Also, dont kid yourself... Canada does not have nuclear weapons... but they are pioneers in the field. I imagine it would take a matter of minutes to create a weapon. The amount of weapons grade material in Canada if you were a parnoid, and Canada not a peaceful country, would probrably keep you up at night. Canada is a peaceful country by choice, not necesity. Dont get me wrong, should a landwar happen, Canada would get clobered... a budget of 100x to 1, and a population of 10x to 1 just cant be overcomed. However, if there is another WW, its going to be nuke based... population size and military budgets mean jack-shit in those situations.

      Todays conflicts are going to be resolved with terror, because frankly, the US is the only country heavily investing in the military. However, the nicest defence against terrorism, is not to be a prick. Thats a defence that Canada has mastered... the US still has a hell of alot to learn. Im not even gonna mention isreal here... they are going to be targeted by terrorists for a very very long time.

    5. Re:No military in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the US would have no trouble finding and killing Bin Laden. Oh, wait...

    6. Re:No military in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The loss of the avro arrow is the reason we don't have a military?

    7. Re:No military in Canada by SilverJets · · Score: 0

      On the other side it means you are a child nation, utterly dependent on others for protection. Namely the United States. You live carefree lives without a thought for defense or other matters of the > world because WE take care of you, extending the protection of our arms to secure your safety.

      We depend on you to protect us from the things that you have caused to happen. If it wasn't for the US's aggressive foreign policies, there would be little for you to protect us from. Remember, your government created Bin Laden.

      And Canada cares alot for world. Until recently we were the country most involved in UN peace keeping missions. That's peace keeping, not invading...something your country should learn.

    8. Re:No military in Canada by wolfdvh · · Score: 1
      It's like saying new zealand owes it's security to anybody.

      New Zealand owes is security to its remoteness and a big ocean...and that it has already supressed the natives.

    9. Re:No military in Canada by bluGill · · Score: 1

      So long as the US is seen as the most successful country in the world the US will be a draw terrorist who hate anyone more successful, or hate the way of life the US represents. If Canada was in our place, without changing anything else they would have drawing the terrorists on 9/11.

      Hate is not rational. (including your hate of the US, though yours is a little milder)

    10. Re:No military in Canada by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      The loss of the avro arrow is the reason we don't have a military?

      I believe his point was that it's the reason we don't have a military industry. Which is not quite the same thing but definitely linked.

    11. Re:No military in Canada by Serapth · · Score: 1

      LOL, my hate of the US? So, are you saying that being critical of the US is the same as hate? Well, hate to tell you then, but about 6 billion people hate the US.

      I have no hatred of the US, although I do see huge flaws. Next to the UK, the US is perhaps my favorite nation. I do have a hate for your current leader, but then again... so do half of your population! :)

      I do disagree with your assumption that the terror is directed against America because of their success, and that if you swapped the US with Canada, Canada would be the target of terrorists. What is causing the terror is US foreign policy. The US has been meddling in Middle Eastern affairs for WAY to long. Iraq, then Iran, then Iraq again, helping train the Mujaden (sp?), Afghanistan in general, Pakistan, Isreal, Kuwait... there arent too many countries in the area that America hasnt either supplied arms and political ( and covert ) pressure for, or against. That, is the cause of the hatred over there.

      Also, the worst part of all of it... Americans take a bad rap simply because of their Government. I dont think most of the anti-US nations ( such as france or germany ), that the average citizen has anything against the american citizens. Its just that Bush set back americas global image by 20 years.

      So, basically I have nothing against the States, and love most of the culture ( with the exception of FOX and UPN :) ). Your current government though... I hate with a passion. Canada itself came VERY close to electing a similar government, and in all honesty, I would have been just as negative towards Canada had harper been elected and behaved like Bush has. Its a shame nations get perceived by the acts of their politicans, but it is also a reality.

    12. Re:No military in Canada by asoap · · Score: 1
      I didn't think that this joke would have turned into a coversation about the arrow. I love the arrow!

      You are right the avro arrow was WAY ahead of it's time. I've done a bit of research into the plane, just because it's such a beautiful plane. It had many firsts.

      The reason why Canada built the plane was because the Canadian Air Force created on paper a list of what they would want from a dream fighter plane. Something that they could use to launch from Toronto and gaurd the Arctic poles from those crazy russians, and those crazy russian nukes.

      It was the first plane to fly by wire. All of the control surfaces were computer controlled, like the f117a. To go super sonic, it had a cooling system built into the leading edges of the wings so they wouldn't melt.

      The A.V. Roe company built a wack load of sub companies to build exotic materials that didn't really exist. The plane used lots of composite materials and exotic alloys. In the 60's it was just way ahead of it's time.

      But the demise of the Arrow is a lot more complex then that the just the "U.S. wanted it destroyed". There are many many many reasons. The first one is that the plane was grosely over budget. At first they were just going to build the air frame without the engine. They were going to buy somebody else's engine. Then when they realized that no one had the engine that they wanted, they decided to build their own, the Iroquos engine. This greatly greatly increased the budget.

      They eventually did get the plane flying, and as you know it was a sight to see. Apparently they had it at the boundary of super sonic flight, or I think there is rumors that they did go supersonic. Anyway, they fudged the records to make it look like the plane was slower then it was. They wanted the world to see the true performance of the plane only when it was flying under the Canadian built iroquos engine, which was 30% stronger, and something like 20% lighter. The engine was built, they knew that it was going to be impressive, but the day that they were to test it in the air frame is the day they pulled the plug. The plane was on the air strip ready to go. The engineers were claiming even years later that if that plane had flew it would broken the sound barrier at will.

      The other thing that the plane did suffer from was bad timing. The day that the plane had it's first air test(sucessful), was the day that North America found out about Sputnik. Everyone was starting to believe that planes were obsolete! Why would you need a plane to intercept other planes coming over the arctic when it was going to be missles coming over the poles.

      Also the U.S. president at that time wanted a joint program of missle defence to shoot down the Russian missles. He wanted to put them North of the Canadian cities, and he said that if Canada didn't agree he would have to put them on U.S. soil where the missles would be shooting down other missles Over Canadian cities.

      Also we do get to the U.S. military, but this is a double whammy. Parts of the U.S. air force wanted the plane destroyed, other parts of the U.S. air force wanted to BUY the planes. The parts that wanted to planes destroyed were connected to the U.S. industry that also makes planes. Apparently when the Canadian goverment wanted a report on how it's arrow project was doing they turned to the U.S. military. Where they gave them some kid to do the report, apparently this kid was bribed by the U.S. Industies to make the report look unfavoruable for A.V. Roe.

      But when the day came, when the plug was pulled, The American Air Force made an offer to pay for the rest of the project. They were going to buy every single last plane on the assembly line, they were going to pay the Canadian government to keep the project.

      But this gets to another point. The arrow project was started under a Conservative federal government, and then later switched to a Liberal goverment in the middle of the project. When the liberal goverment pulled the plu

      --
      Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
  238. There is a huge potential here by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 1

    I have been working on a long term American driven global application. I currenly have one other programmer working on contract doing the same.

    My team in the U.S. loves having a low latency on changes fixes and such. They have worked with large IT companies in India and have had complaints regarding issue latency. For a bug that would take 2 days to resolve specifics and fix, in Canada it would be 2 hours.

    One of the reasons this has not happend in Canada yet is the lack of involvement of the Canadian Federal, Provincial and Municipal governments to get involved in making such a formula work. The reason it works so well in countries such as India is the programs sponsored by the goverment.

    I'd love to see such companies start up in the near future. Any takers?

  239. Laugh while you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, you laugh at moving to Canada now, but what about global warming?

    Ten years from now, you'll be spending you're 40% on air conditioning while my vacation property up on Baffin Island will be looking pretty ***king sweet.

  240. Send me your jobs, please. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    I could use some variety ;)

    As it is now, I work for AT&T Wireless... they don't even have service up here in Canada, but I listen to americans whine about their crappy phones all day long anyway.

    Wait, no, I mean I listen to intelligent people compliment me on their most excellent cell phone service! Everybody should go buy a cell phone from AT&T Wireless, they're really the greatest!

  241. IT work: As long as a *foreigner* does it, it's ok by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    That seems to be the attitude amongst upper-management types (PHB's, "management weenies", etc.) these days and now, apparently, we find it's not just a problem here in the U.S. but it's a global "problem" (which, if we blow this thing way, way out of proportion and up to near ridiculous extremes -- and isn't that always fun? -- may just make a good thing (tm) out of it; as long as I have a job that supports my family and I can do it from home -- meaning "my homeland", not necessarily my house -- who cares if my PHB is on another continent?!?! We export jobs to India, who exports jobs to Isreal, who exports jobs to Pakistan (I know, unlikely, but just play along...), who exports jobs to Germany, who exports jobs to...US -- we could indirectly end up working for ourselves again!)
    Of course, all this sounds suspiciously pyramidical ...

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  242. It's all relative.... by Larmal · · Score: 1

    I get paid 43K a year here in the Province of Saskatchewan (about 750miles/1,200KM east of the Pacific Coast for those who have no idea where I'm talking about). Some of you in San Fran might think "Holy crap, only 43K!? No thanks!"... but lets look at my cost of living:

    • Rent: 525$ for a 900 sq. ft., spacious apartment with near everything
    • Car Insurance: 70$ a month ('96 ford escort, YEEHAW!)
    • Power & Utilities: 50$/ month
    • Hydro - Included in rent
    • Monthly Groceries - about 150 - 200$ for both me and my wife
    • Cable + high speed internet: 90$
    • Phone: 40$/mo.
    • Total: 975$

    The above is in CDN $ (of course) and includes taxes (where applicable). My monthly take home, after taxes, ei, cpp (canadian pension plan), health benefits deductions, and deductions from company shares is still 2,350$ a month. 2,350 - 975 = 1,375$ of play money in a city that's stupid cheap to live in.

    So off the top, yea, 43K looks like peanuts (and in some cities like Vancouver it IS peanuts), but where I'm at, in "big" city Saskatchewan, it's quite a bit of coin.

  243. Reminds me of a Dilbert strip... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    Dilbert: Do you see what's happening with our attempt at outsourcing?
    PHB: Yes, we sent all the work to India.
    Dilbert: Who outsourced it to Korea, who outsourced it to Vietnam, who outsourced it to Chile, who outsourced it to US! Don't you realize we're charging ourselves to screw ourselves?
    PHB: We should raise our prices.

  244. Re:80% Savings 40% Savings by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 1

    Companies do NOT care if you have talk to a guy speaking Spanglish, Engrish, or Hinduish - They only care about saving money and doing things for LESS.

    Don't you think you're being a little simplistic?

    In my experience, while I agree that companies care about keeping costs low, many of them are not willing to risk quality to save money. You also have to keep in mind that low quality usually suggests it is going to cost more money to use and maintain over time.

    If you don't think language is important in the software development process, then I'd like you to take notice of advertised positions emphasising communication skills. Not being able to communicate with the people designing your software is like not being able to communicate with the architect or foreman building your factory.

    Not everything can be boiled down to saving a buck, including predicting people's motives.

  245. Re:French-Canadians? by ghislain_leblanc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You talk of speaking french as some sort of disease...

    It's not the plague you know; as a french speaking IT worker I can say that most of us speak at least enough english to be functionnal in the workplace. As for non-IT workers in Quebec it's another story. The thing is, english is basicaly a necesity in computers since most litterature and jargon associated with CS is english. We do have some lousy translations for things like E-Mail (Courriel), Software (Logiciel), Freeware (Gratuitciel) but they never really got momentum as far as common use goes.

  246. Moving North by kryocore · · Score: 1

    Might be time to think about moving North, eh?"

    I will NEVER move North! I'd rather not be a programmer than move north. I think that Les Schwab might be hiring tire changers...

  247. now when I run into some curry from techsupport .. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    he pretends he's from Canada (so he doesn't know where Harvard University is). What's next? I run into some canuck and he pretends he's from Bangalor (so he doesn't know shit)?

  248. Re:Canadian Accents? What's that aboot? by beakburke · · Score: 1

    ... or cue the movie "Fargo"

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  249. Obligatory South Park Quote by csamuel · · Score: 0

    Canada has apologized numerous times for Bryan Adams

  250. Canada is basically an extension of the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, any over-sensitive Canadians out there, take a deep breath. This isn't a bash. I know Canada is the bigger country in terms of land mass. The reason I say Canada is basically an extension of the US is this. 90% of Canadians live within an hour of the US border. While Canada is a HUGE country all the people are hugging right up against the border.

    I once had an argument with a Canadian guy when I was in Guatemala. A local had said he thought Canada and the US were pretty much the same, which is why he just called us 'norteamericanos'. The Canadian guy kinda flipped out and said, "Canada and the US have TOTALLY different cultures!!" The Guatemalteco asked us, "Are most of you Catholic, like us?". No, we both answered our countries are protestant for the most part. He proceded to ask us about schooling, how old people were when they got married, family structures, eating habits customs, etc... Every answer was the same down the list. Finally I just asked the Canadian guy what two countries he thought were most similar out of Guatemala, the US and Canada. Did he really mean that the culture was TOTALLY different? He insisted that he did, but he still couldn't rationalize any answer to my question other than that the US and Canada did indeed have more in common with each other than either had with Guatemala. Then I asked how he felt if I threw in a country like China, where there's little Christianity at all, a non-indoeuropean language, a communist government, and really different family relationships.

    The fact is, like it or not, the two countries are about the same. Look at the demographics. In terms of race, language, and religion there's little difference. Sure there are some differences: America has more native (Amerindian) and part native people, Canada has more Catholics, the second languages are different etc... But both coutries are capatalist, comparatively free, mostly white but still diverse, have high divorce rates, don't have many extended family households, and around 85% of both populations speak English and very similar English at that.

    People talk about guns, sure. But gun ownership in Canada is pretty damned high. I've read some estimates at over 25%. Americans don't have that many. It may be easy to get a gun in Texas, but what about California? For that matter, what about Alberta? I have some family there, and they are the only gun owning family members I have. Hell, I, as a foreigner, was able to buy ammo in Canada. I'm not saying there isn't a lot of gun control in Canada. There is, especially in the south. But, it's not the stark contrast to the US that Canadian TV makes it out to be. Drugs? Once again, there's a difference but it's not that big. Pot is decriminalized in my home state as well as a couple dozen others. Gay marriage? Maybe it's not that controversial there. I don't know. Maybe someone will take that point and make a huge argument about how Canada is really more like France than the US. Whatever.

    The big difference I see culturally is that Americans don't hate Canadians, and we don't have any popular TV shows based on mocking people of any given race, nationality or religion (like the Canadian show "Talking to Americans).

    BTW, if any of this seems bitter, it's because about 2/3 of the Canadians I've met abroad have been absolute ASSHOLES to me upon learning I was American. 3 or 4 have even blamed me personally for US policy because of the fact that I PAY INCOME TAX!!! Come on, guys. Nationalistic prejudice is unbecomming, no matter who you direct it at.

  251. Or you could just us South Africans.. by wamatt · · Score: 1

    While the populace at large is 3rd world, South Africa have thousands of highly skilled, articulate IT professionals available.

    Its a mystery to me why US companies haven't exploited this, like the UK employers have. Indians for example are probably cheaper per capita, but with lower ROI due to some of the language/culture barriers.

  252. 3 types of pigmeat by panicboy · · Score: 1

    1. Bacon-ish
    2. Ham-ish
    3. "Other" ...unless you college boys wanna nit-pick.

  253. Worrying about what bugs Canadians is futile by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1

    Sorry, pal. That's the common usage. When someone says "American", 99% of the time it means "a person from the United States of America". Heck some langauges such as Japanese have taken America as a loan word to mean ONLY that. Considering that "the United States" is ambiguous in that it could refer to "the United States of Mexico", and no other countries in North America have "America" in their name, it's a quick and reasonable way to refer to the place.

    What do you want America to mean? Does it just include the United States of America and Canada? Should Mexico be included so that "America" means North America? Or how about including Central and South Americans too? Then "America" would mean the Americas. See where this is headed?

    It's simplest to just go by common usage. "America" means the USA. North America also includes Canada and Mexico, and the Americas means the entire "New World". Besides, if Canadians waste their time worrying about diction they can't change, maybe they won't have as much time to invest in making nationalistic insults, watching "Talking to Americans", or generally being rude to us. And THAT, would be good news for all Americans.

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
  254. I Have News For You by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Troll

    The last time I "moved North" to do a contract job in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, some assholes slashed all four tires on my car because it had US plates on it.

    They do NOT want Americans in Canada.

    Besides, who wants to always be looking at the side of the soup can in the supermarket that's in French (courtesy of the Quebecois)?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  255. Restroom names by trs998 · · Score: 1

    Personally I always ask for a "Toilet"

    However, I'm British.

    Colloquially, "bog" is a popular name.

    Never heard the term restroom spoken before - obviously there's no american pollution of english here yet. *ducks flames*

    1. Re:Restroom names by Yosemite+Sue · · Score: 1

      My father is from England. He had a very uncomfortable time when he arrived in Canada for the first time in the late 60s. He apparently wandered around the airport looking for signs for a "Toilet" for quite some time before breaking down and asking someone. (I can't remember if the signs said "restroom" or "washroom".)

      --
      "Arrr! The laws of science be a harsh mistress." -- Bender
  256. Poutine by Bilange · · Score: 1

    If you want to taste a real poutine, you have to go to Victoriaville, QC (or perhaps Drummondville, QC, but its discutable).

    Poutine in Quebec city lacks in cheese freshness (and Ashton (thats a small restaurant chain in quebec city, quite popular here) fries are not well cooked, IMO), and I once saw a restaurant in Montreal where there was no cheese curds but shredded cheese, and some kind of spaghetti sauce instead of gravy. Yuck.

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
  257. You don't lose 40% by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You may lose 40% compared to US dollars but you don't lose anything when comparing quality of life.

    You gain free universal health care, safer streets, lots of water, better beer and you get to live in the homeland of the most famous TV and music stars ;)

    1. Re:You don't lose 40% by Warlok · · Score: 1
      TANSTAAFL, my northern friend. (google it for a definition).


      And the cost of all this free healthcare and government service? Just a moderate, progressive, socially acceptable 50-75% tax rate. Oh, yeah, and artificially jacked up prices on cigarettes. Compared to that, learning French is child's play.

      --
      ...and you run and you run and you can't stop what's been done...
  258. Electronics. by Trillan · · Score: 1

    The cost of electronics varies greatly across Canada; in BC, they're dirt cheap.

  259. Right back atcha by Merk · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's more like when you go out to a bar with a friend who can't handle his booze. At some point he starts mouthing off, insulting anybody within earshot, and so on. If you're feeling generous, you either stand by him or at least try to calm the other bar patrons down. Sometimes though, he just gets to be a bit much and you pretend you never met him.

    When you don't routinely piss people off, your needs for self defense are quite a bit less.

    France has power on the world stage because their GNP is double that of Canada, and is #5 in the world. Sure, Canada's per-capita GNP is almost the same as that of Germany, Great Britain or France, it just doesn't have the population they do.

    On the other hand, if seats on international bodies is all that counts, Canada may lack a seat on the Security council, but that's a historical artifact. Afterall, Japan and Germany also lack permanent seats but both France and Russia have one? Canada is, however, part of the British commonwealth, along with India, Australia, Pakistan and Tuvalu -- overall 30% of the world's population.

    Clearly, the US believes that might makes right, and that the world operates on force. There are other countries that believe the same: Saudi Arabia, Russia, Myanmar, Sudan, Iraq (past and present)... On the other hand, the rest of the developed world thinks of using force as a last resort, only after diplomacy fails.

    Back to the bar metaphor, if it comes to a fight, Canada doesn't have to worry about going in alone. If you're a decent person, and you don't start fights, you know there will always be plenty of people to back you up.

  260. nope, not at all by spacefrog · · Score: 1

    >> An American $499 Dell is Canadian $550

    Nope.

    Dell's default configurations are different in Canada.

    I configured two low-end systems identically: Dimension 2400, 128mb, 80gb, 48x CDRW, 17" monitor, cheap speakers, optical mouse.

    The results...

    USD$628, $0 shipping, $50 rebate. Final: USD$578.00

    CAD$834, $10 shipping. Final: CAD$844.00.

    USD$578.00 is CAD$757.00. The system in the US also includes a free camera, which they do not seem to offer in Canada.

    Looks like not only are you completely and totally wrong, but the Canadian consumer gets pretty well shafted.

  261. outsourcing news again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, for those who are still lookng for an IT job in U.S., should we thank the outsourcing companies or blame the open-sourcing COM like Bigg Gates said earlier this month? :-)

  262. Move to Vancouver then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Perhaps you'd like to live in Vancouver. See all the plays and symphonies you want. Then go do some kayaking or sailing in the ocean. Thirty minutes later you could be up on the mountain snowboarding. Perhaps that's why it was rated the #1 place in the world to live (presently tied for #3 in the world). New York ranks 38th and is the most expensive city in North America (12th in the world). The first Canadian city that shows up on the expensive list, Toronto, ranks 89th in the world.

    How about personal safety?

    • "Canadian cities are the safest in North America, due to strict law enforcement and low crime rates. Calgary, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, and Vancouver share joint 25th position with a score of 113.5.


    • In the US, Honolulu, Houston, and San Francisco all take 40th place (score 106.5). Meanwhile, Chicago, New York, and Seattle share position 64 (score 100) in the rankings. The lowest scoring city in North America is Washington D.C, ranked 107 (score 85)."


    Perhaps your definition for Quality of Life is different, but the Big Apple looks a little rotten to me. Is it true that most New Yorkers don't get out much?
  263. American companies DON'T WANT Canadian employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American companies DON'T WANT Canadian employees or Canadian offices. The ones that maintain Canadian offices do so only because of specific laws and regulations about importing or manufacturing goods in Canada. If these laws were removed American companies would close Canadian subsidiary offices in a heartbeat.

    Some reasons American companies don't want to employ Canadians in Canada:
    sure, the Canadian gets paid less but there is more overhead such as health care, payment of unemployment insurance, workers compensation, canada pension plan and the associated costs to manage and remit these payments.
    employment laws and standards - in Washington state employment is "at will" - in Canada employers are required to justfy firings, give notice, pay severance, etc...
    different laws - privacy, etc mean you need to retain Canadian lawyers - more cost...
    cross border workers - you have an expert in the US - you can certainly send your American expert to other US offices where the certain skill is needed but you can't send your American expert to Canada to do work - he could get arrested by Canada Customs and your company will face expensive legal costs and fines. it's also the reverse for your Canadian expert - he can't work in the US without a permit - and those arent easy to get.
    new enhanced border security - yes, you can get into Canada but try coming back and see the hassle you will get - one of our people came back but had to surrender his laptop and technical gear to US Customs. This happened last year and we don't ever think we'll get the stuff back...
    let's hear from others about experiences both good and bad... I'm certain there's worse!
    new border security

  264. Top Three IT Hubs, My Ass by Vagary · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but what are the top three IT hubs and how are you measuring them?

    My understanding is that what little IT there is in Alberta is almost entirely internal stuff for company HQs in Calgary (ie: no software companies). And I could find any number of measures that consistently put Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, and Ottawa above anywhere in Alberta.

    1. Re:Top Three IT Hubs, My Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not strongly disagree with your list. My basis for calling Alberta one of the top three IT hubs in Canada comes from (among other factors): the number of CLECs operating in the province, one or more forms of high-speed Internet available to almost every urban home, high-speed network infrastructure via supernet and westgrid (among others), a primary home of the one of the largest (almost) all-optical optical voice and data networks in North America (TELUS), a primary home of the other large Canadian optical data network (Shaw), IT and other research facilities out of the University of Calgary and the associated research parks (Calgary Technologies Inc being somewhat important), pioneer research site for telesurgery and other biomedical visualization out of the Foothills hospital, Wi-Lan (802.11a/b/g), many corporate headquarters and associated IT infrastructure, many geological data systems companies to support the oil industry (and to buy each other), Nortel, much redundant banking systems, IBM reigonal call centre, and I suppose all those IT certification programs coming out of NAIT/SAIT and DeVry, and the CS programs at the universities of Calgary and Alberta.

      So no, we don't have Corel (Ottawa) or Microsoft or ATI (Mississauga/Markham?) and we sort of get the seconds after Vancouver has its way with hardware imports, but Alberta certainly is not lacking in IT activity. I'll call it top five if it would make your ass feel better.

      For R&D, Calgary is only behind GTA, for physical infrastructure Alberta is more wired and wireless where the population is than most of Canada, for IT imports we're just behind Vancouver/GTA/Montreal (although our base prices are cheaper than in any of those places, plus they have provincial sales tax), for corporate headquarters including IT we're number two or three (behind Toronto and/or Montreal).

      Many of these IT areas are non-obvious, big and important, and I'm sure there are some important ones I'm missing due to it being 3 a.m. presently.

    2. Re:Top Three IT Hubs, My Ass by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Ahh fudge. 3 a.m. post as someone who just coded for eight hours straight at the Uni. I'll login this time!

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  265. Its not just income tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot:

    GST - 7%
    PST - 0 to 17%
    Liquor tax - 135% liquor
    Road tax - 50% gasoline
    MSP premiums - 100/mo per family
    EI / UI premiums - chunk of first 40K
    CPP - chunk of first 45K
    Propertiy taxes - varies - 1% of my total income

    Canada's total tax burden is well over 50%. End story.

  266. Re:We're full up! Please go away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You did that wrong, when quoting Canadian weather, ALWAYS leave off the "C" part, so American just assume that it is measured in Farenheit.

  267. Re:We're full up! Please go away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahaha, fk'n eh!

  268. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  269. "like chalk and cheese"? by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1
    yeah I laughed at the *similiar culture* but. US and Canada are like chalk and cheese. Candians being a commonwealth county have more akin to New Zealanders and Australians than Americans.


    The article was comparing Canadian outsourcing to Indian and Chinese outsourcing.

    Look, I don't want to be rude here, but I keep hearing this kind of thinking from Canadians. I know lots of Canadians don't WANT to be like Americans... but face it, you are. Not the same, but very similar. Canadians and Americans aren't like "chalk and cheese". Canadians and Americans are like colby and cheddar. Canadians and Chinese are like chalk and cheese.

    For what it's worth, I'm sure working with Aussie's, while not quite as easy as working with Canadians (do to time zone and accent), is a heck of a lot simpler than working with Indians or Chinese. Take my word for it. I live in China, and though I speak and read Chinese, it's a hell of a lot easier to get business done with Canadians than Chinese. I don't have to deal with lots of attempts to cheat "the ignorant foreigner", guanxi, companies with connections to corrupt officials, or any of that crap. I don't care if a thousand Canadians argue until they're blue in the face about how different you are from Americans like me. To me, despite whatever nationalism prejudice you harbor against me, you are still familiar and easier to relate to or work with than just about anyone else in the world.
    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
    1. Re:"like chalk and cheese"? by goon · · Score: 1
      it's a hell of a lot easier to get business done with Canadians than Chinese.

      Yep your spot on here and I did make that point that when it comes to business I didn't think that working with canadians would matter. What I think I was trying to point out was that despite the geographic closeness the cultures of North America and Canadian are pretty different. I can't help smirking as I eat my Strong & Bitey cheese and vegemite sandwich that if you where from Canada we would be swapping monty python cheese shop sketch jibes :)

      To me, despite whatever nationalism prejudice you harbor against me, you are still familiar and easier to relate to or work with than just about anyone else in the world.

      more like 'taking the piss' out of the comment americans are like canadians and have a lot in common. ps: read the link carefully to see what I mean.

      Take my word for it. I live in China, and though I speak and read Chinese, it's a hell of a lot easier to get business done with Canadians than Chinese. I don't have to deal with lots of attempts to cheat "the ignorant foreigner", guanxi, companies with connections to corrupt officials, or any of that crap.

      now for this I'd agree. In Diamond Age there's a line that really rings true here ... something about people are the same the whole world over but cultures are totally different.

      Ahhh number 2 business as it's called. I'll give you an example of this from and Indian mate who fronted customs in India and was told in no uncertain terms ...this is not your face on you pasport as he was to board a plane. The inference being I'll let you board if you pay me. Charming. But guess what it's there culture and if they don't want to play the Marquess of Queensberry of business in their country so be it; Not much you can do about it.

      important bit

      outsourcing is a serious problem for technical staff this side of the pacific,across the Atlantic in the UK and back in the US. Ff you read tofler for instance you will see that in his powershift ~ knowledge, wealth at the edge of the 21st century you can see that he proposes that less workers will be able to do more. This is a trend is likely to continue. So more to use the ugly phrase *e-workers* (knowledge, meta, creative, digilog workers). Outsourcing could be seen as a way for business to be more efficeint. But why isn't business offshoring to cheap, easy to understand Canada, taking advantage of the stable, legal economy for instance? .... (though I think the revenge of English Raj was the fluency of Indians with english.) The time difference is minimal (maybe whey take advantage of 24 day processing) or is it for some kind of tax minimisation reasons? Have you any opinion on this?

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    2. Re:"like chalk and cheese"? by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1

      First off, I love Monty Python. I used to watch re-runs of it, Black Adder and Red Dwarf all through high school... Anyway, it's not just business. Many Canadian aquaintances just assume I'm Canadian until I mention something about growing up in Colorado. After all, we have the same sports (NBA, NHL, MLB), most of the same TV, similar social habits, etc... It's really not clear until either they start bashing the US (all together not uncommon), or we talk of (non-chinese) politics. Politics, THAT's where the difference is more than culture. Of course with a Brit, or an Aussie, they know right away by my accent that I'm not from there.

      Anyway, I can't speak with so much certainty about outsourcing in India, as I've never been there. But, I think the situation is similar to that in China, though less extreme. Basically, the big outsourcing companies usually pick Chinese workers instead of Canadians for the following reasons:

      1) Like you said, cost. Insurance, benefits, and legal concerns are are very expensive in Canada. The average Chinese IT worker makes 1/3 the salary of the average Indian. Comparatively, Canadians cost a fortune.

      2) Finding qualified workers really is easier in China. China has more highly educated tech job searchers than anywhere else in the world. It's not even close. If I post on chinahr.com looking for a DBA, I can expect to find dozens of candidates with advanced degrees willing, exhaustive knowledge of both Oracle and MS databases, and programming skills to match. In Canada, on the other hand, the people with exhaustive knowledge of any database system are few, far between, and already taken.

      3) China is an emerging market, growing at a tremendous rate. According to the World Bank- Economic Growth Indicators Report (can't do a direct link, sorry), China's economy grew by 10.1% anually during the 80's, and 10.7% during the 90's. This was by far the fasted growth of any country. India was #2, by the way. During 20 years, China's total growth was +723.5%, while it was only +97.1% for the US, and +68.4% for Japan. For many large businesses, establishing contacts in China is considered crucial as it is becoming an increasingly large market to sell to. For some products such as cell phones it's alredy #1 in volume. This makes China a little more attractive to set up shop in than Canada, but not nearly so much as points 1) and 2)

      --
      I'm a gnu world man.
  270. Your ass has been handed to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, Vagary, you almost asked for it with that subject line.

    Before judging Alberta for its visible IT stuff alone, consider what you discovered during your decision to attend Queens. The quality of the intellectual infrastructure is not determined by the number of visible software companies, but by why they exist. For every IBM, there are dozens, if not hundreds of IT shops that depend on and supply it. Only a rich envrionment in addition to what IT stuff we see in the public.

    Care to explain how your rankings are derived?

  271. Hold Your Fire by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1

    Hhahahaha, Rush albums!! You FOOL! That doesn't repel me, it gives me a reason to invade! "The ones who hold high places must be the ones to start!" Let's invade now, after all "we're only immortal for a limited time!" "Why does it happen? Because it happens, ROLL THE BONES", BABY, MUAHAHAHAHA!!

    uh.. about this Celine Dion person though... perhaps we could do a swap? We get Sarah McLachlan, Celine goes home? Oh, if "I could wave my magic wand..."

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
    1. Re:Hold Your Fire by dontspellsogood · · Score: 1

      >I'm a gnu world man.
      *groan*
      :)

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
  272. I remember what I heard about banking now by gosand · · Score: 1
    I now remember what I heard about the banking industry. Sorry for the vaugeness in the original post, but hey, it was a Friday.

    Now what I am saying is juse heresay, so you Northerners can maybe comment. I heard that you can get loans at really low interest rates. Something like 2% or less. Now while at first that sounds like a great idea for the consumer, it doesn't allow the banks to make much money on the deals. So the banking *industry* just doesn't have the money to advance. Or I guess I should say the banking business. Of course, the person I heard this from worked at a bank up there, and this was a few years ago, so perhaps it has improved.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  273. Too cold. by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    I suspect the reason more Americans don't move to Canada is because of the climate. I don't know about recently, but historically about 5 times as many canadians have moved to the US than vice-versa... plus for the job opportunities. I dunno how much this is changing.

  274. Re:If the work won't go offshore, let the workers by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    Oh c'mon, give up your hideous Canadian/Torontonian inferiority complex. Truth is that only a nitwit considers "foriegn born" to be equal to "culturally diverse".

  275. Oh move to Canada, eh. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    They got socialized medicine, eh. Great hockey teams, eh. Back bacon, eh. You can learn and speak French, eh. When the US brings back the draft, you can hide in Canada, eh. Work for 40% less, and have a government that works for you, eh.

    You can design web pages for Michael Moore, eh. He contracts out to Canada for his work, eh. Inbetween IT jobs you can always find work as a lumberjack, eh.

    "Warning, slippery when sarcastic!"

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  276. Re:Convergus in other Canadian cities by IncohereD · · Score: 1

    Convergus in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (geographic centre of North America)

    Isn't the geographic centre of North America Rugby, North Dakota? Or are you not counting Mexico or something?

  277. GST Rebates by IncohereD · · Score: 1

    To add insult to "progression" we get a GST rebate based on taxable income. The more taxable income you have the bigger the rebate.

    As someone else pointed out this is not quite true. The GST rebate actually works like an inverted U, as you make more (up to about $15k) you get more because you're spending more (and therefore paying more GST). Then as you start making even more (above around $25k) you start getting less, because you need the break less. And you actually get $56 every four months even if you're making 0 dollars, according to this.

    Personally I think this makes a whole lot of sense. And I was pleasantly surprised to discover my amount going up as I got better co-op jobs.

  278. wheres the cheese gromit? by goon · · Score: 1

    aww jeez they have a website for jobs! tried it but its all *greek* in firefox.

    compete using creativity not just cost & quality

    We live in interesting times where the economies can undercut in price and oversupply in key knowledge requirements. Edward deBono was on the National Press club (televised journalist club speech with variety of different quests) talking about this topic. Here's the link to read (Ideas unleash value' - Edward de Bono tells East ~ 13/07/2004) . In summary he reckons that when you have lowered all your costs, raised your quality levels as far as you can sustained creativity will be the differentiator.

    Here's another link that pretty much summarises what the talk was about.

    "If you've got China on your doorstep, where the average production wage is $100 a month and, I'm told, it can be as high as $3,000 a month here, that's a hell of a difference," he said. "What will happen -- as is already happening -- is that Japanese companies are opening factories in China, initially to serve the Chinese market.

    "But once they're there, they are going to be serving the world market. And that's going to have a drastic impact as it means employment here certainly won't be expanding," he said. As a result, Japan has two ways to compete with China's cheap production costs: It can automate, although this isn't much of a solution as it does not create employment; or it can put a lot of emphasis on creativity.

    Simply relying on the quality of products from Japan won't work, he pointed out, as "China is coming on in terms of quality and technology, so it's creativity that is going to be the key."

    [Edward deBono ~ Japan must think outside the box if it hopes to ... 17/07/2003]

    This is certainly a (but not the only) path I'm following.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  279. Your ass has been pwn3d!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    L3m@r... Horray for random attacks when you don't have any real information, or any real point to make.

  280. Alberta: IT Infrastructure in the Top 3 by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Ah interesting, I would certainly concede that Calgary has the best potential for IT grow in Canada. So why doesn't it have more of the other IT things, like software companies? Is it possible that its because Calgary is lacking in the Creative Class? (Whether it's true or not, even urban Alberta has a serious redneck image; could this be keeping IT talent away?)

  281. Re:"the US believes that might makes right" by nusratt · · Score: 1

    wrong.
    the Gang Of Bush does, but it's not the same.