The scenario which all parents hate seems to have materialized in the form of an Android app [called Magic Kinder] that lets strangers send texts, images, and videos to kids.
I understand the Facebook lawyers have filed for relief for prior art.
I cannot equate offshore assets automatically with malfeasance in office. Plenty of the world's massive family fortunes have been built on the backs of ventures in ruthless private industry.
Six members of the House of Lords, three former Conservative MPs and dozens of donors to UK political parties have had offshore assets.
For instance, I don't have any trouble believing some members of the House of Lords come from some good family names who's money was looted thousands of years ago.
Kelly's not the longest serving human aboard the Space Station, but the fact that he has an identical twin in the space program could provide valuable insight on physiological changes that occur during extended stays off the blue planet.
He is respectful of the Russians he has trained and served with, and the lesson of the dissolution of tribal prejudices could be more important than any scientific discovery made during his time in space.
A live TV cricket commentator in Australia made the comment "he completely buggered the other team". A story about the slip had the headline "not a maiden all day" (in cricket a maiden over is one where no runs are scored).
There's been a lot worse but that one was funnier than most.
An email was sent to assuage the fears of a group of valued employees during a downsizing.
"We value your experience and dedication. In short, you folks who know you're shit are safe!"
How is this not price fixing? Do Uber drivers have the capability to set their own rates -- or are they all colluding and charging the same rate?
Do taxi drivers have the capability to set their own rates, or are all the ones working for the same company colluding and charging the same rate?
I can understand the uproar from entrenched industry over an upstart company that's cutting into their profits, but let's at least stick to debate points where they differ.
You're absolutely correct: the first time a recipient of a National Security Letter can reveal is technically within the allowable classification of 1-1000 NSL requests.
This allowable action does give you a leg to stand on, legally, if the acronym people contest the warrant canary.
Regarding the switch to a new provider and back again, I will say this:
That's the only way to get offered any sort of discount service.
I was with a cable provider for years until I left for a package they didn't offer. I received a sweet sign on deal with the new company, and now the old provider is wining and dining me with the sort of offers I might've stayed for.
Slashdot Mirror
The router equivalent of your recorded answering machine message, "Leave a message; we're in Disneyland and you're not!"
Write a bot now that acts like the user's sycophant and your retirement is secure.
In future dating site banter, this may beg the question, "Are you all original or part GMO?"
The scenario which all parents hate seems to have materialized in the form of an Android app [called Magic Kinder] that lets strangers send texts, images, and videos to kids.
I understand the Facebook lawyers have filed for relief for prior art.
My 20ish son has used it to entice girls to his apt for some Netflix and chill multiple times with crafty lines like, "Do you like what you see?"
I swear it used to be more difficult than that.
I generally prefer to peruse at least another source or sometimes even two.
The fact that primary crossover is relatively rare is not reflective of its importance because of the relatively small numbers in which people vote.
This is the logical equivalent of "Well, the Americans don't seem to like Hitler, soooo...."
We can hope they're reworking a new 12 Days of Christmas.
Trump doesn't have that level of support. He's received roughly 42% of the vote on the Republican side to date.
If you think all the primary votes that Trump has received are from Republicans, you haven't been paying attention.
Six members of the House of Lords, three former Conservative MPs and dozens of donors to UK political parties have had offshore assets.
For instance, I don't have any trouble believing some members of the House of Lords come from some good family names who's money was looted thousands of years ago.
He is respectful of the Russians he has trained and served with, and the lesson of the dissolution of tribal prejudices could be more important than any scientific discovery made during his time in space.
A live TV cricket commentator in Australia made the comment "he completely buggered the other team". A story about the slip had the headline "not a maiden all day" (in cricket a maiden over is one where no runs are scored). There's been a lot worse but that one was funnier than most.
An email was sent to assuage the fears of a group of valued employees during a downsizing.
"We value your experience and dedication. In short, you folks who know you're shit are safe!"
Do taxi drivers have the capability to set their own rates, or are all the ones working for the same company colluding and charging the same rate?
Neither. The prices are fixed by law. Price fixing is not illegal if the government does it.
Ah! So it's like the lottery and killing people.
Was it a knockoffulus?
They have 360 degree filming and viewing ability, and their entertainment value is only exceeded by their ability to gather information.
There's no Santa, even Easter rabbits don't lay eggs, and Facebook isn't really free.
How is this not price fixing? Do Uber drivers have the capability to set their own rates -- or are they all colluding and charging the same rate?
Do taxi drivers have the capability to set their own rates, or are all the ones working for the same company colluding and charging the same rate?
I can understand the uproar from entrenched industry over an upstart company that's cutting into their profits, but let's at least stick to debate points where they differ.
These people are apparently quite frightening, though, as evidenced by the reditor's reluctance to comment further in the thread.
One thing the reditor would say is that they were dancing on a thin line with the warrant canary, as it was.
How about a new twist on the holiday?There is an achievement for solely having posted on that infamous 1 April.
How about revising a new April Fools achievement? Maybe, something involving a hard +5 moderation on the big day?
Most reviews on Slashdot have been highly favorable!
You're absolutely correct: the first time a recipient of a National Security Letter can reveal is technically within the allowable classification of 1-1000 NSL requests.
This allowable action does give you a leg to stand on, legally, if the acronym people contest the warrant canary.
If you need to legitimately collect information, consider that behaving like the Stasi probably sends the wrong message.
Folks are growing tired of the if you have nothing to hide ruse.
Just imagine what they might try to get away with if we didn't have a free market.
That's the only way to get offered any sort of discount service.
I was with a cable provider for years until I left for a package they didn't offer. I received a sweet sign on deal with the new company, and now the old provider is wining and dining me with the sort of offers I might've stayed for.
The Associated Press is reporting that TSA's PreCheck program is causing maddening long security lines at U.S. airports.
That doesn't make any sense at all... Please refrain in the future from including the TSA & long lines in the same phrase, you crazy bastard.
giving all those idiots who say 'I thought it was a gun' extra excuses.
If we're talking about the Polezei, a Ringding is more than enough to get you shot.
Realistically, is this a wonderful new product designed to improve outcomes? No, of course not.
Is it going to sell like hotcakes to a certain niche market? Absolutely.