By releasing something under a true open source license, and calling it "Shared Source", they help to confuse the uninformed about exactly what Shared Source really is.
Maybe they meant to say "shared source" but MS Word's AutoCorrect capitalized it to "Shared Source" automatically?
The actual number of visitors is something like 10,016,000, it's just that their counter doesn't support that many digits so it's rolled over a few times.
Is that why the executive branch is growing in power at the expense of the Judicial and Legislative branches?
Which judicial branch are you looking at? Apparently not the one that's taken to re-writing and redefining the laws that the legislative branch voted for, and the executive branch signed. Shouldn't the judicial branch be deciding whether or not someone has broken the law, instead of whether or not the law is right?
There is no such material...at least google doesn't know anything about airplane anti-static shrinkwrap. Who are you going to trust, an anonymous aerospace engineer (or so he says), or Google?
I keep trying to explain that hackers are resourceful and can still find vulnerabilities without source code and before it's known to the public, but they deem that to be 'near impossible' and far too time consuming.
I think what we need to show these laypeople is a "Hackers Cookbook for Dummies" -- lay out some recipies for finding vulnerabilities. Show people that it's a simple matter of poking and prodding open ports in different ways to find buffer overflows and the like. Show them how easy (though probably tedious) it is for the hackers. Then see if their opinions change regarding security through obscurity.
However, some states do have laws that regulate the use of a person's image, especially with regards to endorsing some product. So you can't take that picture and put it on Kerry-brand penis pumps in California, for example.
True. Better make and market your Kerry-brand penis pumps somplace less well-regulated, like Russia.
I wouldn't call it the worst idea ever, but it does stink of bad business plan. How are you supposed to make money selling these things? Who's going to pay two hundred seventy dollars for the "convenience" of letting someone across the internet burn through the fragrance in a fifty dollar scent cartridge?
Based on a reading of the article, maybe Mandrake is only going to have to transfer domain name(s). Like Mandrake.com, and not rename the company altogether. The article is kinda sparse on those kind of details.
P.P.S. I'd sure like to figure out a way to make the word liberal lose its negative connotation...
Probably best to give up on that thought, and find a new word to describe yourself. You've heard of Sean Hannity's new book, Deliver Us from Evil : Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism, right? I think the negative connotation's here to stay.
Slashdot Mirror
Something like that....but not quite.
.com) may have been their first choice but it's already taken.
Amazon.com is 10 characters long...or A plus 9 more.
A5.com (A + length(mazon) +
Amazon.com => A9
.com to the end...I guess A5.com didn't sound cool enough or was already taken.
"A" plus 9 more characters.
But then you go an add a
Here's a freecache.org link to Turok.zip
save these guys a little bandwidth if you can: get your badgering fools through freecache.org
By releasing something under a true open source license, and calling it "Shared Source", they help to confuse the uninformed about exactly what Shared Source really is.
Maybe they meant to say "shared source" but MS Word's AutoCorrect capitalized it to "Shared Source" automatically?
If you don't want to install BitTorrent, just download from here, courtesy of the Internet Archive.
Not so! A meteorite landed in my Auntie Edna's pool back in 1972!
Are you sure it wasn't the neighbor kids throwing a rock over the fence?
Your quote attributed to Washington appears to be incorrect. See this page for a more accurate attribution.
The actual number of visitors is something like 10,016,000, it's just that their counter doesn't support that many digits so it's rolled over a few times.
Just look how "Lindows" Has had to change it's website to l---ws.com in several European countries
Funny thing is, though, that a search for Lindows on search.msn.com brings up Lindows as the first result -- as a "Top Pick" no less!
Is that why the executive branch is growing in power at the expense of the Judicial and Legislative branches?
Which judicial branch are you looking at? Apparently not the one that's taken to re-writing and redefining the laws that the legislative branch voted for, and the executive branch signed. Shouldn't the judicial branch be deciding whether or not someone has broken the law, instead of whether or not the law is right?
Step 4: Sell what is left of spammer to Hormel, makers of spam.
Makers of Spam, not spam.
And I suspect that thousands of Hawaiians would not take kindly to being involuntary cannibals. But then, I have had incorrect suspicions in the past.
There is no such material...at least google doesn't know anything about airplane anti-static shrinkwrap. Who are you going to trust, an anonymous aerospace engineer (or so he says), or Google?
Windows without all the unwanted crap would be Linux (or MacOS X or BSD).
What??!?!!
I keep trying to explain that hackers are resourceful and can still find vulnerabilities without source code and before it's known to the public, but they deem that to be 'near impossible' and far too time consuming.
I think what we need to show these laypeople is a "Hackers Cookbook for Dummies" -- lay out some recipies for finding vulnerabilities. Show people that it's a simple matter of poking and prodding open ports in different ways to find buffer overflows and the like. Show them how easy (though probably tedious) it is for the hackers. Then see if their opinions change regarding security through obscurity.
However, some states do have laws that regulate the use of a person's image, especially with regards to endorsing some product. So you can't take that picture and put it on Kerry-brand penis pumps in California, for example.
True. Better make and market your Kerry-brand penis pumps somplace less well-regulated, like Russia.
Great. I guess that means this probably isn't a genuine photo of Osama bin Laden on the surface of Mars.
And it's all digital photography there...so much for trying to get an original negative or print!
Wired did an article on this: Is RFID Technology Easy to Foil?
I wouldn't call it the worst idea ever, but it does stink of bad business plan. How are you supposed to make money selling these things? Who's going to pay two hundred seventy dollars for the "convenience" of letting someone across the internet burn through the fragrance in a fifty dollar scent cartridge?
What's the target market for this thing?
Based on a reading of the article, maybe Mandrake is only going to have to transfer domain name(s). Like Mandrake.com, and not rename the company altogether. The article is kinda sparse on those kind of details.
Try it yourself. apt-get and have fun.
:p
Hmm...lemme give that a try.
C:\Documents and Settings\donutz>apt-get install w3m
'apt-get' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
Oh well no fun for me
Your[sic] dealing with a administration... who thinks creationism is a valid science rather then a religious doctering.
And here is some incontrovertible proof to support your assertion. Right from whitehouse.org, no less!
Slashdot is pretty readable with w3m.
;)
Well back up that assertion! Give us some screenshots
You could always buy Deliver Us from Evil : Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism through this link and help me earn a buck or two. Thanks!
P.P.S. I'd sure like to figure out a way to make the word liberal lose its negative connotation...
;)
Probably best to give up on that thought, and find a new word to describe yourself. You've heard of Sean Hannity's new book, Deliver Us from Evil : Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism, right? I think the negative connotation's here to stay.
Maybe just stick with "whiney tree-hugger"?