Slashdot Mirror


MSN Search Blocking Results For XFree86?

Peacefire writes "Thomas Shaddack spotted this on http://www.root.cz/ (in Czech) -- if you go to http://search.msn.com/ and search for 'XFree86', it tells you that you've 'entered a search term that is likely to return adult content', and directs you to the porn search engine NightSurf.com, which lists a bunch of porn sites that ostensibly match the term 'XFree86'. If you search for 'XFree86' on Google, however, it's clear that the top matching terms returned by a normal search, are XFree86 sites, are not a bunch of porn sites. MSN is apparently blocking the specific term 'XFree86' and not just filtering on something stupid like the 'X' or the 'Free', since you can search for 'XFree85' and 'XFree87' with no problem. And search terms like 'Linux', 'AOL' and 'Macintosh' are allowed, so at least MSN hasn't simply blacklisted all competitors' keywords as 'porn', but why would they be blocking 'XFree86'?"

875 comments

  1. Mirror List by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since it's about to get Slashdotted, here is the mirror list section from the xfree86.org site:

    Web Mirrors

    Our web site is very busy and often causes timed out connections. The following sites have been verified as being both accurate and reliable in their mirroring process, and so we recommend these for the best access:

    Costa Rica
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Paris, France
    St. Denis, France
    Berlin, Germany
    Dortmund, Germany
    Athens, Greece
    Seoul, Korea
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Bucharest, Romania
    London, United Kingdom

    Not posting as AC 'cause the troll potential would be too high...

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      bullshit. not even one links leads to the xfree86 site. fucking karma whore.

      Heh, moderated as flamebait when the point made is 100% true. Not a single link in the story leads to the xfree site.

    2. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Since it's about to get Slashdotted... ...I suggest we nominate them for the only site to be slashdotted without being linked from Slashdot.

    3. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think this story begs to be asked: What intelligent person uses MSN as their search engine anyway? Sure, all the peons who have never heard of Google may, but why should we care? Why would someone aware of the existence of XFree86 be searching on MSN anyway?

    4. Re:Mirror List by Atrahasis · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why would someone aware of the existence of XFree86 be searching on MSN anyway?

      Because they're aware of its existence, but don't know anything about it. Just because you've heard of an open source project doesn't mean you are a Linux nut. People who are SEARCHING for XFree86 rather than just going to XFree86.org are more likely to be searching on MSN than a "better" search engine due to the fact that they're not savvy.

    5. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want savvy people running Xfree86?

      I sure dont. Stupid idiots should stay with their crappy windows and macs, and get the hell away from the complicated shit.

    6. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      hahah .. you can happily search for 'fucktoy' under msn.com .. just not 'xfree86'

    7. Re:Mirror List by Atrahasis · · Score: 3, Funny

      ONLY savvy people run XFree86. Perhaps you are using a previously unknown (ie made up) definition of "savvy".

    8. Re:Mirror List by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1, Troll

      Do you really want savvy people running Xfree86?

      I sure dont. Stupid idiots should stay with their crappy windows and macs, and get the hell away from the complicated shit.


      "Stupid idiots" should look up the words they don't know before they speak:

      savvy

      \Sav"vy\, Savvey \Sav"vey\, n. Comprehension;
      knowledge of affairs; mental grasp. [Slang, U. S.]

      Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, (C) 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

    9. Re:Mirror List by Unoti · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's hilarious! I was surprised to find out when searching the adult search engine that XFree86 has it's own live webcam:

      Free Live Cams Looking for xfree86? I deliver, and I'm live right now.

    10. Re:Mirror List by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      Clearly you didn't understand the conversation that just transpired. Look up the definition of savvy, and perhaps all will become clear to you.

    11. Re:Mirror List by mahdi13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That it too funny!!

      Live Now: Free cams with 'xfree86':
      FREE: Get 'xfree86' at the Websites of the Hottest & Naughtiest Webcam Starlets, Hunks, Couples & Groups in the World. Click any star to visit!
      Live Cams with xfree86 (free)

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    12. Re:Mirror List by prell · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Searches for "xfree87" and "xfree85" work perfectly fine. Sounds suspicious to me, and worthy of investigation.

    13. Re:Mirror List by the+cobaltsixty · · Score: 1

      Anything related, maybe, to the fact XFree86 does XWindows, thus "Windows"?

      btw, xwindows is a buzzword nobody remembers today.

      what about lindows, then?

    14. Re:Mirror List by dzelenka · · Score: 1

      I didn't have time to try all the wonderful word combinations that DO work at MSN, but I did notice that "blow me, Bill" works fine.

      So Bill, go XFree86 yourself!

      --
      Bah!
    15. Re:Mirror List by ultrasound · · Score: 4, Funny
      And the top hit on MSN when searching for xfree85 is..

      Your post.

      And I imagine THIS post will be showing up shortly. Or maybe I will be first cos I have mentioned MSN (twice).

    16. Re:Mirror List by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      Let's suppose someone around here knows people who host porn sites. If porn sites mention words like XFree86 (I can't imagine why they would), why not let them mention some nice terms people are familiar with, like:
      windows, MS-office, microsoft, visio, excel, MS-access, MS-word, ...

      It would really be nice to see MS blocking those search resulte :-)

    17. Re:Mirror List by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      That's rather interesting, actually, because searching for xfree87 or xfree85 results in:

      "Free Live Cams Looking for iFriends? I deliver, and I'm live right now."

      So maybe "xfree86" *is* returning pornsites for MSN. But why??

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    18. Re:Mirror List by gal1264 · · Score: 3, Informative

      try free and 86....what comes up first? Either it's really a mistake.....or they didn't try very hard....which sounds more like mister softie?

    19. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of you fuck-brains seem to think things like this have to come from the top. They don't. In Redmond, it's not only Bill and Steve who are crazy - they're ALL crazy!

    20. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because Microsoft do not sell Fucktoys?

    21. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      So maybe "xfree86" *is* returning pornsites for MSN. But why??

      I'm afraid the awful truth has finally gone out. The truth is that XFree86 users are mostly relatively wealthy single male nerds, so they are an excellent market for pr0n. Hence, MSN sold the search results for XFree86 to pr0nographers (for no less than about $1 billion).

      It's a win-win-win situation, for MSN which pleases its users, for pr0nographers who have direct access to their prime customers, for nerds which can get rid of their hormonal overflow directly on pr0n sites, rather than indirectly fighting frustatively with the millions options of XFree86, not to mention the modules, the NVidia binary kernel modules, etc...

    22. Re:Mirror List by bhtooefr · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Actually, XWindows is not/was never a buzzword. It's X Window System.

    23. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm, perhaps you could understand this rather simple situation.

      I get a new laptop, and install and older version of linux/X on it. Well, being a new laptop it has a new video card(yes, believe it or not). Perhaps I dont have netorking up yet, so I am at work and the next best thing is someone else's computer. Perhaps they have msn as their default page, and I need to search for xfree86 i845 patch!! Ever thought of that? I know its a complex concept to grasp, but try to imagine it.

    24. Re:Mirror List by Pope · · Score: 1

      Because MSN's search is the default action when IE can't resolve a domain, it puts the address bar's content into a search query to search.msn.com.

      So if you're like me and used to just typing in 'domain' as a shortcut for www.domain.com, and use IE at work, most of the time putting just the domain will result in a search query. I don't think that trying 'xfree86' to have it possibly resolve to www.xfree86.com is an unreasonable action for a lot of people.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    25. Re:Mirror List by abradsn · · Score: 1
      Really? All 30,000 plus people? And their children, and spouses too I bet? Personally I think most people who develop software may be a little strange, but I feel offended that you group so many people into that category. I'm not crazy. It's a really nice place to work. We get paid to develop software. I like that. I also like Linux. I see benefits to private development of software and open development of software. One nice benifit of closed source software is that software interoperates with less difficulty. I think this is driven by pride, and other things that are avaiable to open source developers... but in addition there is also the motivating force of having no job if you produce something that interoperates poorly.

      Linux has trouble with this. Too many base class libraries. Let's choose the best options we have and work collaboratively on them. I think the quality of open source software would improve in that case.

      On a way unrelated topic for a second. Is there an easy way to setup netscape mail with some mail client that comes with Linux? Can someone give me a link to a howto? I want to be able to spell check, and grammer check my mail before it is sent.

    26. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he made a typo, you fucking git?

    27. Re:Mirror List by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Perhaps they have msn as their default page, and I need to search for xfree86 i845 patch

      Then the search works. The only time I could get it to come up with that is when you search for "XFree86" just by itself. I even searched for "a XFree86" which returned correct results.

    28. Re:Mirror List by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > So maybe "xfree86" *is* returning pornsites for MSN. But why??

      Because some clever porn site operators keyword-spammed their sites with anything, including "XFree86." That's probably the answer, instead of the Redmond Conspiracy Theories.

    29. Re:Mirror List by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Any you use whatever search engine IE puts in front of your face when you're using somebody else's computer?

      Can't spell google all by yourself?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    30. Re:Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't?

    31. Re:Mirror List by Glamdrlng · · Score: 1

      Because IE does an msn search whenever you type anything it doesn't recognize as a URL into the URL bar, many users don't know of a search method other than typing their search into the URL bar. Anti-competitive much?

      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
  2. Obviously... by shog9 · · Score: 0

    6 is a terribly, terribly dirty number...

  3. XFree69 by vondo · · Score: 5, Funny
    Even a search for XFree69 doesn't return the porn warning.

    Something has gotta be wrong with that.

    1. Re:XFree69 by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if MSN has one of those big screen displays of search queries in real-time like Google does. If they do I bet there's a few people looking at the screen scrolling "XFree69" ad infinitum and wondering "WTF!?!" right about now.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Even a search for XFree69 doesn't return the porn warning.

      No, but it takes you to the MSN search page where you can secretly put in "Bill Gates love child" as a search term and come up with 666 matches for Steve Ballmer!

    3. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the people at MSN just find XFree86 erotic?

    4. Re:XFree69 by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny
      Nor does XFreeMissionary.

      You really need to get a bit more kinky and try 86.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    5. Re:XFree69 by Chundra · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where I come from that's a 69 with a fist up each ass, both partners' big toes up the nostrils of the other person, and three fingers in the vagina. Don't try it if you don't know yoga.

    6. Re:XFree69 by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

      My man! Can we get together sometime??

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    7. Re:XFree69 by ttldkns · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Xfree86 +sex +porn +boobs +nudity

      no porn warning on this one.

      what a f***** up world

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    8. Re:XFree69 by jelle · · Score: 5, Funny

      O.K. Now I have to click on that link at least once!

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    9. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, they probably have a wav file of Nelson from the Simpsons going "Haaa haaaaaaah!"

      Everyone in here who has searched for XFree86 on MSN before you heard about this, please raise your hand. Everyone in here who even uses MSN search for all their Free/GNU/Linux/BSD search needs, raise your other hand.

      Wait, nobody raised their hand. I'm sure there are millions of Windows users out there who are interested in learning about Open Source and Linux, and they just happened to know what 'XFree86' was, and they searched on MSN. When no results turned up, they said, "bummer, there is no free softwares on teh intar web, back two WindBLOWS for I can't find Lunix on teh intar web."

      This doesn't matter. If anything, they're probably just screwing with you guys, and you fell for it.

    10. Re:XFree69 by radixvir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      anyone else notice google on msn returns google as a 'top pick'? kind of like use this search engine instead please

    11. Re:XFree69 by hatrisc · · Score: 5, Funny

      what's funny is that the first result is a slashdot article. Slashdot | Congress Eyes Whois Crackdown

      --
      I write code.
    12. Re:XFree69 by arcanumas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually , the f****d up thing about this is that the first result is Slashdot.
      .. oh wait..

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    13. Re:XFree69 by EverDense · · Score: 5, Funny

      It isn't a porn warning, it says "You have entered a search term that is likely to return adult content." This is a good thing, Microsoft are admitting that their operating systems are childish at best.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    14. Re:XFree69 by rawshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      XFree86+XFree86
      no warning either.

      it is very strange

    15. Re:XFree69 by spood · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's a different article. Meaning that somehow we had another topic which pulled these keywords together. We can probably thank the trolls for that.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    16. Re:XFree69 by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      thats hilarious, the first link is a slashdot article

    17. Re:XFree69 by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      Neither does XFreeBukkake.

      ...although I am curious now...

    18. Re:XFree69 by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't know what is funnier. The slashdot article returned as a result by MSN, or the Porn site that has the world Xfree86 in it, as returned by Google.
      http://www.rr.iij4u.or.jp/~exitdc/teen/main.html

      And you are right about the Slashdot article being completely different , but it's not the trolls. The only Xfree86 occurence is a link (by slashdot) to the Xfree license story. The boobs,sex etc. is typical Slashdot language :)

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    19. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn - that was my next search term when I first read this thread.

      XFree69 dude...

    20. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Google has a big screen scrolling the current queries accross it?!?

      ooooooh noooooooo!

    21. Re:XFree69 by hope1ess · · Score: 1

      or for linux sluts =p

    22. Re:XFree69 by wpc4 · · Score: 1

      and the top search item for this is http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/02/05/1930246.shtml ?tid=103&tid=99 how weird is that

    23. Re:XFree69 by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 3, Interesting
      you bet your life they have realtime keyword ranking! their adword system certainly reports quite a few more interesting things, i guess.

      online, only msn france has some fancy keyword charts (might take a while until french /. readers' xfree searches turn up there):
      ie only

      (won't work with opera, for obvious reasons)

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    24. Re:XFree69 by Desprez · · Score: 1
      and searching for:

      xfree86 xfree86

      turns up relevant results.

    25. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try X Free 86 instead..

    26. Re:XFree69 by Handpaper · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have no idea why, but the above site also contains (among others) the words 'vengaboys' , 'furby', 'turbolinux' and 'marlin'. Perhaps they're trying to catch Googlewhackers?
      My Goodness! I've added a meaning to the word "Googlewhack". Tee hee!

    27. Re:XFree69 by Scottm87 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The time is now: Who wants to start the XFree69 porn site!? We can start with some open source porn, released under the Creative Commons or GPL, and maybe finish with some open source guru dating services.

      Scott
    28. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredible. More slashdot links from "lunx sluts" than on the front page of slashdot. (exaggeration)

    29. Re:XFree69 by rushfan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oddly enough Searching for [XFree86 "No devices detected,"] returns what you would expect (w/o any stupid warnings).

      I suspect it's probably a bug instead of malicious intent (I know, what's the chances of Microsoft having a bug...)

      -- Rushfan

    30. Re:XFree69 by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

      Which is a naughty-sounding word anyway.

    31. Re:XFree69 by exmsfty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep, I tried "XFree86" and was warned away... ...I tried "Free Pussy" and did not get a warning at all...just a lot of porn sights. That is why I am EX-msfty

    32. Re:XFree69 by iNetRunner · · Score: 2, Funny

      I didn't see any porn warnings on my query I did right after trying XFree86..

      --
      Store with salt
    33. Re:XFree69 by mysticgoat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just tried "XFree86 XXX" and guess what? No porn warning and the first 15 of about 4768 links to domains like sourceforge.net, gnomedesktop.org...

      The inner workings of corporate MS are truly beyond human comprehension.

    34. Re:XFree69 by Pedals · · Score: 1

      Searching for "X free 86" works fine. It's all a conspiracy to makes us waste time and energy to figure why this is blocked. Bet the M$ folks are laughing their @5535 off.

    35. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, good job. nice um ... sluething

    36. Re:XFree69 by jokrswild · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? It's a feature!

    37. Re:XFree69 by jvollmer · · Score: 1
      Re:XFree69
      Hey, eighty-six the sixty-nine talk! --Tammi Littlenut, "Strangers with Candy"

      If it's not Consolidated Lint, it's just fuzz

    38. Re:XFree69 by madpuppy · · Score: 1

      but if you type just "xfree" the first one on the list is xfree86.org, I don't understand why xfree86 would cause a problem and not xfree??

    39. Re:XFree69 by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suspect it's probably a bug instead of malicious intent...

      Actually, rather than a bug, I suspect that it's probably human error. Because the search engine only seems to match certain words as likely to return "adult" material, there's probably a human-generated list of terms. My guess is that they took a list of the top 1000 (or something) search terms, and assigned somebody to classify them as adult or not-adult. If the person was unfamiliar with XFree86, they may very well have guessed that it was related to porn (X and Free together).

      In other words, the only thing I think Microsoft is guilty of here is creating a remarkably poor filter.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    40. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical phishing tricks. They work against engines like MSN.

      I surf in author mode in Opera a lot, I come across sites that if you switch to user mode you would have a white background, and added in white text will be millions of terms like that. Everything from "Britney Spears" to "crack for" and a list of software/parts. View those same sites in author mode and you get 20K of phishing words.

    41. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      searching for X Free 86 works quite fine and guess what? shows no porn.

    42. Re:XFree69 by OneHungLo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you click on the one link they redirect you to, it's all porn. IMO, that's a blatant act of sabotage.

    43. Re:XFree69 by jamshedji · · Score: 0

      Thats because NightSurf has bought a PPC listing for the keyword XFree86 and not for XFree69.

    44. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, a search on XXX returns porn warnings (but still shows a long list of results (63 of 'em)!) sheesh!

      I guess Microsoft thinks XFree86 is too racy for the masses (it's porn for your computer... oh wait)

    45. Re:XFree69 by icedcool · · Score: 1

      Yea and if you just search for Xfree you get Xfree.org. How sneaky of microsoft.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    46. Re:XFree69 by Bastian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, the only thing I think Microsoft is guilty of here is creating a remarkably poor filter.

      And being far too innocent to set up a porn search term filter. "hardcore" and "hardcore love" are caught by the filter, while "hardcore ass love" goes right through and gives me "Anal Cravings - Sluts who love it up the ass!" at the top of the list. Who wrote this filter, some reject from an experiment in raising children entirely within the confines of Disney World?

    47. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gives a whole new meaning to 'make dep'

    48. Re:XFree69 by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you didn't find your way onto www.JimGettyse.cx

      One wonders what the rest of the "XFree86 XXX" is, though...

    49. Re:XFree69 by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Yay... Lets all slashdot msn.com!

    50. Re:XFree69 by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      You can bypass their blocker by typing

      XFree86 XFree86

      Same thing twice, meaning it shouldn't change the search criteria.

      How stupid.

    51. Re:XFree69 by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the extra post.. Try it out.. click here

    52. Re:XFree69 by liloconf · · Score: 0

      I view my porn in ascii you insensitive clod!!!

    53. Re:XFree69 by mysticgoat · · Score: 5, Funny

      You did get me wondering, so I looked at "XFree86 XXX" again. The first 45 entries were all about Linux or the X windowing system. No suggestion of pr0n at all-- very boring workaday stuff.

      Combined with the adult content warning for "XFree86", I find that there is only one possible conclusion that can be drawn from the data:
      Someone at Microsoft thinks that XFree86 is very, very sexy

    54. Re:XFree69 by hennie · · Score: 0

      Interesting...
      That search result is to this article!

    55. Re:XFree69 by kasperd · · Score: 1

      XFree86+XFree86 no warning either. it is very strange

      I tried a few searches. It is more strange than you would imagine. XFree86 is filtered, typing it twice bypass the filter. Porn is filtered, typing it twice cause msn to remove the space between the two instances of the word and instead search for pornporn which is allowed. But you can search for porn by typing it three times. Sex is filtered, typing it two or three times doesn't help. If you really want to search for sex, you must type it at least four times.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    56. Re:XFree69 by p00ya · · Score: 1

      ...and the best part is that the one result from said link points straight back here ;)

    57. Re:XFree69 by MHleads · · Score: 1

      Your link now returns the results with only link - to this very page!

    58. Re:XFree69 by permanentE · · Score: 1

      What's really funny is that a search for XFree69 now returns a link to this article! Cool

      --
      What was the last law that benefited people but not corporations?
    59. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this proof positive that Microsoft are using unfair and illegal busines practices?

    60. Re:XFree69 by msim · · Score: 1

      bahaha, if you do the search, you get the parent poster as a response.

      Results 1-1 of about 1 containing "XFree69"

      WEB PAGES - ABOUT
      Slashdot | MSN Search Blocking Results For XFree86?
      MSN Search Blocking Results For XFree86? -- article related to Microsoft, Censorship, News, and Businesses. ... If they do I bet there's a few people looking at the screen scrolling "XFree69" ad infinitum and wondering "WTF!?!" ...
      yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/03/03/233224.shtml

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    61. Re:XFree69 by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      Try 113448 hits mostly consisting of "Why Bill Gates is filthy rich" pages.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    62. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just getting funnier and funnier. The first and only result I get right now is a link to this slashdot-article.

    63. Re:XFree69 by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      Ok, I think we've broken it now, This is what I get when searching for XFree69.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    64. Re:XFree69 by psp · · Score: 1

      That search now returns your posting as only result.

      Interesting recursion...

    65. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inner workings of corporate MS are truly beyond human comprehension.

      Q: What's the next step beyond corporate BS?

      A: Corporate MS.

    66. Re:XFree69 by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      O.K. Now I have to click on that link at least once!

      And the cream of the joke is that if you do it links straight back to....

      This thread!

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    67. Re:XFree69 by geschild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah yes. The old "Never attribute to malice what can more easily be explained by sheer stupidity." Besides, we would expect something this crapy from Microsoft. It is right in line with the rest of their products. (Hey, this is /., MS bashing is obligatory.)

      You forgot, however, one thing: every rule has it's exceptions. In this case it goes something like this:

      Never attribute to malice what can be more easily explained by sheer stupidity, unless it concerns either Microsoft, SCO, or one of the others currently on the bad side of the /. community and the "mistake" negatively impacts one of our "precious'".

      There. So in this case, it must be on purpose!

      If you need a more expanded explanation (please, no!) just let me know, mkay? ;)

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    68. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft will probably soon proclaim...

      "Microsoft is dedicated to leading in the content filtering field.

      We plan to spend $1 billion to ensure that, as leaders in filtering, Microsoft will continue to constantly, constantly provide the best filtering options.

      You may wish to check out www.getthefilteringfacts.com which shows how google's filtering is much worse than ours."

    69. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a search for xfree85 on msn's search brings up this slashdot article as the first match.

      funny stuff, kids. funny stuff.

    70. Re:XFree69 by Emrikol · · Score: 1

      It's always nice seeing people wanting to run Lunix on their C64's

      --
      You're all bastards!
    71. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the search engine picks this post up when you click your link.

    72. Re:XFree69 by Isbiten · · Score: 1

      Try searching for XFree86 sucks, that will get you were you want.

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    73. Re:XFree69 by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      A search for XFree69 now goes to.... This page. Cool!

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    74. Re:XFree69 by draco+ni · · Score: 1

      best search engine ever:
      Searching for XFree69 now takes you to THIS PAGE! :)

    75. Re:XFree69 by jelle · · Score: 1

      hihi, it's true. I guess it updates quickly. Maybe it uses 'referrer' to figure out which sites to update first?

      Or maybe it knows that all tech stuff on the internet is summarized, ridiculed, flamed about, explained, hated, loved, put into context, taken out of context, etc all at the same time here at slashdot?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    76. Re:XFree69 by amerinese · · Score: 1

      Besides being human error, it could also be an artifact of computing efficiency. Let's say they started with some list of human generated key words (XXX, nude, cock, black moma's gone wild), and then expanded this list computational be mixing and matching, mutating the terms, or looking for associated terms on known pornographic websites.

      Then, with this expanded list, which is potentially huge, they might only keep the ones that are common. XFree86 could have been generated on the computationally generated list and then kept due to its high frequency. Human error but in design perhaps.

      So, yeah M$, I worship Linux, what? I can't hear you, all I hear is open-source...

    77. Re:XFree69 by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Lets all slashdot msn

      Good luck.

    78. Re:XFree69 by BitchAss · · Score: 1

      what's better is that if you click that link now, you get this slashdot article!

      I think their search engine is doing a great job indexing :)

      --
      Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
    79. Re:XFree69 by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1

      some reject from an experiment in raising children entirely within the confines of Disney World?

      Cory Doctorow?

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    80. Re:XFree69 by Mignon · · Score: 1

      I tried searching for that too. That is why I am ex-employee.

    81. Re:XFree69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget 'lorita'. I feel dirty now.

  4. What's weird by prostoalex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    XFree85 seems to work
    And so does XFree87

    Here's a search for a possible culprit - just x86. Seems fine, although notice how the first 9 results are all AMD, with some impostor Intel claiming #10 spot (and it's not even Intel's site, it's Solaris on Intel document).

    But back to searches for XFree86. So it wasn't the X86 part, how about
    free86 - oh, look, XFree86.org is listed with Microsoft search engine after all. You just don't search it by name, search it by keyword that's reasonably close.

    1. Re:What's weird by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Informative

      As does Xfree

    2. Re:What's weird by paulschroeder · · Score: 5, Funny

      The "Free" part is probably what scares them.
      "I have an alternative? And it's what?"

    3. Re:What's weird by gasgesgos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      XFree finds the XFree86 site as well... I think some porn sites plastered the term "XFree86" all over themselves so a majority of the search results are for porn sites. MSN sees this and won't show any of the results. A basic search for "porn" also yields the exact same result. A warning for adult content shows up, and there's a link for a search at nightsurf.com I don't see anything evil related to MSN specifically blocking any search terms. I just see a search engine that likes to block "adult content".

    4. Re:What's weird by Svartormr · · Score: 1, Informative

      And searching for ia32 doesn't have an Intel site in the first 15 hits.

    5. Re:What's weird by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a search for a possible culprit - just x86. Seems fine, although notice how the first 9 results are all AMD, with some impostor Intel claiming #10 spot (and it's not even Intel's site, it's Solaris on Intel document).

      This is unsurprising. Intel in general does not refer to them as x86.

      Google search result

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because lots of porn deals with 18 year olds, and the birthdate of someone 18 this year is 1986 that could be one, possible, if very far afield theory.

    7. Re:What's weird by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Obviously MS is trying to stifle competition in it's porn empire by blocking other porn sites. Now, let me get back to browsing the CarnalKnowledgeBase.

    8. Re:What's weird by ttldkns · · Score: 5, Interesting

      and so does "xfree8", "xfree6", "xfree 86", "xfree8 6" and "x free 86"

      curiouser and curiouser said alice

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    9. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And so does XFree87

      Uhm, is that the version that only works with a coprocessor installed?

    10. Re:What's weird by jelle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used this: XFree86 "4.4"

      and that search also returned xfree86.org as the first link.

      So to me it does not look like "some porn sites plastered the term "XFree86" all over themselves", but more like a suspiciously blocked search query.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    11. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN:

      Sorry, no results were found containing "CarnalKnowledgeBase"

      SEARCH TIPS

      1) Check your spelling. Are the words in your query spelled correctly?
      2) Try using synonyms. Maybe the site you're looking for uses slightly different words, like "film" instead of "movie".
      3) Make your search more general. For example, instead of using specific product names, try using the generic product category.

      Google:

      Your search - CarnalKnowledgeBase - did not match any documents.
      No pages were found containing "carnalknowledgebase".

      Suggestions:

      - Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
      - Try different keywords.
      - Try more general keywords.

    12. Re:What's weird by arkanes · · Score: 5, Informative
      XFree86 is certainly blocked specifically. XFree86+any other term is not. It's _not_ that the porn site results are hits for XFree86, nightsearch returns the exact same first page results for _any_ search, including random garbage.

      As other people have said, I doubt theres any gain for MS from doing this, so it's probably a term that was tossed in by programmers for debugging purposes or just for the hell of it, rather than some sort of official policy decision.

    13. Re:What's weird by Gherald · · Score: 2, Informative

      silly, intel writes ia-32 which has at least 4 intel sites in the first 15 hits.

    14. Re:What's weird by E-Rock · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow. Thanks for making me feel really old and really dirty all at the same time. 1986, fuck...

    15. Re:What's weird by ryanjensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your theory appears incorrect in Google. If a bunch of porn sites added XFree86 to their pages, wouldn't they also show up in the Holy One? I have a feeling the conspiracy theorists may be right on this one ... MSN (or just an employee) intentionally blocked access to "XFree86" on their search engine.

    16. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone try to seed a search engine with XFree85 (22 hits on MSN, 181 on Google) or XFree87 (6 MSN, 27 Google), when they could just seed XFree86 (2.4 million Google hits)?

      Yes, Google doesn't mention a porn site on an XFree86 search, but then again, Google has a better search algorithm.

    17. Re:What's weird by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1
      Other keywords (word - rank)

      apple - 6th listing

      sun - 1rst

      solaris - 2nd

      linux - 2nd

      irix - 2nd

      dell - 1rst

      sco - 1rst

      aix - 1rst

      ibm - 1rst

      hp - 1rst

      java - 1rst

      gnu - 8th

      gpl - 2nd

      aol - 1rst

      lindows - 1rst

      redhat - 1rst

      Obviously ranking keywords has come into play.

    18. Re:What's weird by snol · · Score: 1

      XFree (no number attached) works and gives xfree86.org as its first result....wtf

    19. Re:What's weird by wash23 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, even searching xfree86 + porn on google doesn't give anything remotely pornographic...

    20. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you type XXXFree you get sent to the porn site. Looks like XFree is just getting caught up in a bad grep. Either that or MS knows us better than we think they do!!!

      I really like the result from XXXFree86.

    21. Re:What's weird by garethw · · Score: 1

      Oddly, searching for "xfree86 porn" doesn't ummm... classify as porn either.

      Not that xfree86 porn is that exciting.

      --
      garethw
    22. Re:What's weird by RoLi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You winlots are a funny bunch. No matter what Microsoft does, in the end it turns out to be some kind of accident in which Microsoft is just an innocent victim.

      Please make up a theory why "XFree86" gets the porn warning, but "XFree86 sex" doesn't.

      Oh, yeah, now gasgesgos will say that Porn sites plaster "XFree86" all over, but never use the word "sex"...

    23. Re:What's weird by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Yeah, right. And because 18 is much too young for sex searching for "XFree86 sex" doesn't get you the porn warning.

    24. Re:What's weird by JonnyRo88 · · Score: 1

      Your tin foil hat must be made of some really AMAZING stuff (joking, mostly). That's a pretty interesting thing to just notice out of thin air. Cool.

      --
      The Ro Factor - Jeep/Linux Weblog
    25. Re:What's weird by gasgesgos · · Score: 2, Informative

      it was just a wild theory. I've done some clean searches on google and I've gotten many porn site results, especially in the first page. I just figured that the same thing happened to MSN, and that MSN blocked the results because of the prevalent adult content in the results.

      I'm not trying to defend microsoft, I was just trying to offer a rational explanation.

    26. Re:What's weird by Westacular · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's even less regular than this. You're right that XFree86+another term is not blocked.

      But then it seems that many simple modifications of blocked words, even combinations of individually blocked words, are not, themselves, blocked, despite the obviously adult nature of the top hits.

      For instance:
      "porn" is blocked
      "voyeur" is blocked
      "sex" is blocked
      "voyeur sex" is blocked
      But "voyeur porn" is not blocked

      I'm guessing that the entire search field, not just individual terms, is what is checked by the filter. There's probably a case where an unblocked word + a blocked word are actually blocked, but I've been unable to find a specific case showing that.

    27. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His theory is definately incorrect. Aguila showed that a search for the terms XFree86 porn does not even send you to the nightsurf search.

    28. Re:What's weird by Riktov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tend to agree with this explanation.

      Obviously there are tons of porn sites out there that include the keyword "XFree86" to divert searches, and the results of those searches have probably accumulated in the MSN search cache, far outnumbering legitimate XFree86 pages. All the other variations such as "XFree69", though, never hit the porn sites, so there's no porn cache for them. Instead, in those cases the search engine starts searching from X, then XF, then XFr, until it eventually makes a legitimate hit on XFree.

      Even "XFree86 porn" won't hit the porn cache, because the search engine will first look for the entire phrase "XFree86 porn", find nothing, then start searching from "X".

    29. Re:What's weird by Westacular · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's probably a case where an unblocked word + a blocked word are actually blocked, but I've been unable to find a specific case showing that.

      After reading through some other comments, I found one:
      "xxx" is not blocked (likely because of the movie), while
      "xx" is blocked

      Meanwhile,
      "xxx porn" is blocked, yet
      "xx porn" is not.

      This filter makes no sense.

    30. Re:What's weird by Viper233 · · Score: 1

      How about XFree86 linux
      Returned the XFree86 website also

      Notebly msn doesn't have that molestering the individual call 'Lucky' button... utter filth...

      Ooo... that'll burn some Karma

    31. Re:What's weird by Westech · · Score: 1

      I searched for xfree86 + "tinfoil hat" and the first result was a slashdot article. Surprisingly, it wasn't this one.

    32. Re:What's weird by arose · · Score: 1
      gpl - 2nd
      Just look what comes up first.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    33. Re:What's weird by EAB · · Score: 1

      Just tried 'X Free 86' on msn.com and the first result is
      ta da!
      XFree86(TM): Home Page

      -Abandon all hope, ye who press ENTER here.

    34. Re:What's weird by jkrausyao · · Score: 2, Informative

      The filter for these "bad" search terms is limited in that using it twice will produce results and not a block message.

      The first match for Xfree86 +Xfree86 is http://www.xfree86.org/

      While searching for porn +porn also finds many sites without a block message. The first found site also has a bunch of popups. Just had to check that the links worked :)

    35. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. First thing I thought of, too, and I'm nothing special.

    36. Re:What's weird by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      You searched that from your FireFox search box, didn't you?
      Admit it!

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    37. Re:What's weird by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      And that got modded funny?

      I'd say it's rather insightful, actually.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    38. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You doubt there's any gain for Microsoft from blocking people from searching for XFree86 ?

      Are you freaking crazy or what ?

    39. Re:What's weird by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

      You caught me, though I never meant to imply otherwise. Sorry if I offended in you in any way.

    40. Re:What's weird by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Your theory appears incorrect in Google. If a bunch of porn sites added XFree86 to their pages, wouldn't they also show up in the Holy One?

      No, actually; that's what Google's pagerank was primarily designed to combat. Porn and similar sites had just about made most search engines worthless before google came along, because they would include long lists of words completely unrelated to the topic.

      Although recently google has been showing some flaws -- some webmasters have become adept at creating hundreds of dummy sites in order to boost something's pagerank -- Google still cuts through the crap rather better than most search engines.

      Although for the record, I don't think that's what happened here. It looks more like the term was caught by a blacklist. (I don't think the conspiracy nuts are right, though -- this seems much more likely to be an accident than intentional.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    41. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But yet a search for "Xfree86" "Porn" does not result in a slert.

    42. Re:What's weird by srobring · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm looking for an explanation as to why a search for "XFree86 anal sex" has Slashdot as 10 of the top 11 hits.

    43. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't know how ms's porn filter works. out of all the open source techs one gets blocked by the filter and its a conspiracy? give me a break

    44. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YAWN, this message "thank for making me feel really old" appears from time to time on Slashdot...

      YAWNNN

    45. Re:What's weird by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      Because there's a lot of anal retentive grammar nazis here but they have never had any sex.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    46. Re:What's weird by dogles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So we can assume the NightSurf folks pay MSN for certain keywords that they can wipe out the search results for. We can also find that they only buy single words or specific strings of words. "porn" returns the nightowl link, "porn girls" does not. So somehow "xfree86" ended up on the list.

      The question is how this might end up on the list. Perhaps, and this is just a guess, the list of adult-content related phrases was compiled by MS. This makes sense, because NightOwl would want to buy the top X phrases searched for, so they get the most bang for their buck. The person at MS scanning top searched URLs to find the top 1000 (or more, who knows) adult-related ones mistakingly marks "xfree86" as adult, not knowing what it is. That's certainly not too far-fetched, with the "x" and the "free".

      Of course that's just me guessing, but it seems pretty damn plausible and likely. Mostly because why would MSN block xfree86? It doesn't make a damn bit of sense at any level. They don't block linux. XFree86 isn't exactly a household term, someone searching for that likely already knows that there other OS's out there besides Windows. To think there was some plot is just silly.

    47. Re:What's weird by asb · · Score: 1

      Please make up a theory why "XFree86" gets the porn warning, but "XFree86 sex" doesn't.

      Because Microsoft's search engine was designed to be just as good as everything else they do! Theis search engine sucks! They chose the most simple and easy to implement word matching they could figure out. You see, all search engines aren't as good and brilliant as Google is! Get it?

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    48. Re:What's weird by Kynde · · Score: 1

      I've done some clean searches on google and I've gotten many porn site results, especially in the first page. I just figured that the same thing happened to MSN, and that MSN blocked the results because of the prevalent adult content in the results.

      I dare challenge that. I use google hundreds of times every day for a wide range subjects and I have not seen a single pr0n site show up on the first page.

      The problem you are describing used to be a problem with older engines, like altavista, but this has never in my experience plagued google. Hell, this is _the_ reason I hopped over to google.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    49. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the 86 means 86 years old, popular with May West fettishists

    50. Re:What's weird by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      Hmm, mod insightful, not funny.
      -tsb

      --
      toresbe
    51. Re:What's weird by sundling · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be suprising to find AMD at the top of a search for x86. Keep in mind that Intel uses the term IA32 instead. For their 64 bit clone of AMD64, they use IA32e?! Regardless of the actual source, anything must have Intel in the name...

    52. Re:What's weird by gasgesgos · · Score: 1

      Try searching almost anything related to anime. "anime picture", a simple search, brought up some porn sites in the first few pages. This problem doesn't plague google in any way, but it is still present.

      And just to note, I searched google for "XFree86" and did find some porn sites... yes, they were way down in the results, but they do exist...

    53. Re:What's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the only remotely insightful comment on this story, and it's AC. Go slashdot, what a borked system.

    54. Re:What's weird by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      By that logic, "Britney Spears" and names of other "celebrities" would also be blocked.

    55. Re:What's weird by igi · · Score: 1

      However, XFree86 doesn't seem special in this way:

      "freesex" gives a warning, "freesex sex" doesn't.

      "freeporn" gives a warning, "freeporn porn" doesn't.

  5. they don't want another linux by meatbridge · · Score: 0, Redundant

    where is linux on their enemies list? they don't need someone else coming up and stealing more market share.

  6. X Windows by dukerobinson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps they are blocking it because anything that uses the term "Windows" they consider to be a threat. Just look how "Lindows" Has had to change it's website to l---ws.com in several European countries

    1. Re:X Windows by trmj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just look how "Lindows" Has had to change it's website to l---ws.com in several European countries

      I believe you mean lin---s.com

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    2. Re:X Windows by byolinux · · Score: 1

      well, it could have changed it to something else completely, it's just that IMO Michael Robertson's company seems to sell itself on the grounds of 'Well, we have a lawsuit with Microsoft over our name'

      Fair enough, Microsoft shouldn't be able to sue over ?indows, but Robertson shouldn't be allowed to base everything his company does on the fact the Microsoft sued.

    3. Re:X Windows by lullabud · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      That makes good sense, but yet I still find it incredibly absurd, considering that Macintosh had a windowing environment back when MS still had DOS. They just claimed the term windows for their own and now they defend it tooth and nail and then some. I hope this doesn't become the issues with the whole virtual desktop patent deal. When I look at the way the legal system works I understand where they're coming from, but in reality it's just silly.

    4. Re:X Windows by Hal-9001 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess then it's a good thing that it's not actually named "X Windows", but rather the "X Window System."

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    5. Re:X Windows by damniel · · Score: 1

      I guarantee it because it sees the 'x' and 'free' in the search terms. Whenever I search on these terms I always got pr0n.

    6. Re:X Windows by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Why even bother with the name lin---s, is it a sympathy plea or something? Why not just use the name CNR Linux in those countries?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    7. Re:X Windows by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Having a windowing environment is not the same as naming hte product windows. I agree it is pretty generic but do you honestly think the name Lindows is not an obvious play on the Windows name?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:X Windows by k_head · · Score: 1

      Because this way they can humiliate the countries which caved in to MS and attempted to cripple lindows.

      Think of it as a middle finger. Remember the photo of the US pilot who gave the middle finger to brazil for taking his fingerprint? Same thing.

      --
      The best way to support the US war effort is to continue buying American products.
    9. Re:X Windows by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. "x free" and "xfree" both come up with xfree.org as the first result.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    10. Re:X Windows by CmdrTHAC0 · · Score: 1

      But did you try them on MSN? "X" on there claims popular categories for X are Final Fantasy X, X-men, and "Malcolm X (civil rights activist...", as well as coming up with a list of non-porn results.

      --
      __CmdrTHAC0__
      In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
    11. Re:X Windows by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      Why not just use the name CNR Linux in those countries?

      I would prefer "Winux."

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    12. Re:X Windows by donutz · · Score: 1

      Just look how "Lindows" Has had to change it's website to l---ws.com in several European countries

      Funny thing is, though, that a search for Lindows on search.msn.com brings up Lindows as the first result -- as a "Top Pick" no less!

    13. Re:X Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not every day a spelling nazi gets +5 informative.

      You go, girl!

  7. Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that smart by themaddone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to beat the dead horse, but how many people using MSN as a search engine would know a thing about XFree86?

  8. XXXFree86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    new name?

    1. Re:XXXfree86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neither is xxfree86. So one X is bad but two or more X's are good !!

  9. What no porn? by fodi · · Score: 0

    Well, it's decided... I'm sticking with MSN search... pr0n me !!

  10. Maybe... by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they meant to ban XFree69, but just made a typo.

    1. Re:Maybe... by krusadr · · Score: 1

      Ban???

      I hope you aren't implying that microsnot would ever try and censor us.

      search msn for linux - get 414 results
      search google for linux get 12.5 MILLION

      I'm sure theres an innocent explaination.

      NOT!

      --
      while sco {
      wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
      }
  11. More likely a stupid mistake... by The+Uninformed · · Score: 2, Redundant

    otherwise searchinf for Free86 would have been blocked... right now it returns xfree86.org

    1. Re:More likely a stupid mistake... by KSoA · · Score: 2, Informative

      And searching "XFree 86" returns xfree86.org...

    2. Re:More likely a stupid mistake... by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I am sorry but, well, the original story poster isn't very bright. If you add on another relevant word--like say Linux--it finds the right stuff.
      Porn sights load web pages with as many words as they can. All this shows is that the person didn't add enough words on the subject he wanted to eliminate all the porn garbage that turns up if you don't narrow down the search!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  12. I see how it is by Zorak+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Linux with Xfree86
    2. ???
    3. porn

    I mean come on, can't you see that?

    --

    404 .sig not found
    1. Re:I see how it is by jmv · · Score: 1

      In the case of MS, I'd say it's more like:

      1. Profit
      2. More profit
      3. Block XFree86

    2. Re:I see how it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Linux with Xfree86
      2. ???
      3. porn


      Heh, that looks like the outline of a new advertising campaign to me...

    3. Re:I see how it is by jmccay · · Score: 1

      This isn't funny because XFree86 and Linux brings up the right stuff--besides the 1, 2, 3 joke is now old.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    4. Re:I see how it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what if it's old? Your mom jokes are "old", but if I hear a clever new one, I'll laugh. It's the same with "You're new here" and "1 2 3 Profit". You want to know what old is? Knock knock jokes. I estimate that nobody's come up with an original (and funny) knock-knock joke in at least fifteen years.

    5. Re:I see how it is by Bastian · · Score: 1

      But that plan works with almost any step one -

      1. FreeBSD with XFree86
      2. ???
      3. porn

      1. Darwin with Aqua
      2. ???
      3. porn

      1. Windows with. . . umm. . . Windows(?)
      2. ???
      3. porn

      They all work! The only exception I can find is my NextStation, where I had to modify the formula a bit:

      1. NEXTSTEP
      2. ???
      3. 2-bit grayscale porn

    6. Re:I see how it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think step 2 is:
      bash $ mozilla http://www.worldsex.com/ &

  13. It's there service by Solosoft · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It is there free service ... if you don't like it use somthing else like google or yahoo.
    Let MSN do what they wish ... you keep doing what your doing and they keep doing what there doing.
    Just my 2 cents

    1. Re:It's there service by Trillan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point, I think, is that the only way people are going to know it is doing stuff like this (and thus, be able to make an educated decision) is if stuff like this is public.

      I mean, if Google was blocking all search results for Linux-related sites, wouldn't you want to know? Especially if you already know the Linux sites, and thus don't search for their existence (if not content) on a regular basis.

    2. Re:It's there service by prat393 · · Score: 1

      And let MSNBC do as they wish, to. Go ahead, mislead the people. After all, they're just doing their civic duty in engaging in the shiftiest of business practices in order to delude the common computer user into thinking that XFree86 is somehow morally wrong (i.e. porn).

    3. Re:It's there service by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't expect anything if you don't pay for it, eh? Hell, sometimes people ask me for directions when I'm out walking my dog, and I'll send them in the totally wrong direction! Just for the hell of it! Sure, some of them look pretty desperate to get wherever they're going, but they're not paying me or anything, so it's not like it's wrong to lie to them.

    4. Re:It's there service by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      It's there service

      There, They're, Their

      There -- "Over there! That thing!"

      They're -- "They're over there doing that thing!"

      Their -- "They're over there doing that thing with their thing!"

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    5. Re:It's there service by samcentral2000 · · Score: 1

      Go figure. An arogant grammar-nazi with a

    6. Re:It's there service by samcentral2000 · · Score: 1

      Stupid submit button :''( The guy's point was important, not his grammar.

  14. Hmm... by mgcsinc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a use of market share to gain market share, which could easily be seen as an antitrust violation. The question is, does it count as hindering a consumer's capability to investigate competitors in this unique situation, where users would be attempting to do so via the infrastructure of the original company. Interesting indeed...

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're forced to use msn.com for searches which you aren't. There's many better alternatives which are *used*. Who actually uses msn anyways besides the person who submitted the article?

    2. Re:Hmm... by vensonOnSlashdot · · Score: 0

      I wonder if there's a law that states what search engines can do as regards the contents they list. Surely, if they start blocking all "linux" sites or other competitor's and merely making it another showcase for their own products, wouldn't that be violating the basic internet philosophy of sharing information etc without any tampering?

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, what drug are you smoking? There are no laws like that.

  15. Probably just a mistake by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Insightful
    search terms like 'Linux', 'AOL' and 'Macintosh' are allowed, so at least MSN hasn't simply blacklisted all competitors' keywords as 'porn', but why would they be blocking 'XFree86'?"
    Like the short man said, "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence".

    Of course the fact that such mistakes can be made, and left undiscovered for so long, speaks against closed blicklists like MSN's.
    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:Probably just a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I remember, we used to do a porn search engine service for one of the big search engines. The thing is, their filter was really really bad - it would send us queries it should have.

      For example, searching for "Dick Cheney" triggered it.

      It's probably a very simple, stupid error that nobody has cared to fix. Nothing to see here.

    2. Re:Probably just a mistake by MrLint · · Score: 1

      well i have seen both malice and incompetence. In case like this i have a hard time trying to figure out what kind of incompetence causes singular issue like this.

      of course coincidences cause some of the most unusual results.

    3. Re:Probably just a mistake by Dreadlord · · Score: 1

      I don't see how MS is going to say that the word Linux qualifies as pr0n, on the other hand, it's pretty easy for them to do so for XFree86 (with X and free).

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    4. Re:Probably just a mistake by k_head · · Score: 1

      Mistake?? What possible scenario would cause a mistake like this? Xfree69 is allowed but Xfree86 is not. Were they trying to blacklist xfree69 and made a typing mistake?

      Honestly can you describe a scenario which would begat a mistake like this.

      --
      The best way to support the US war effort is to continue buying American products.
    5. Re:Probably just a mistake by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      the fact that such mistakes can be made, and left undiscovered for so long, speaks against closed blicklists like MSN's.

      So if it's a "mistake" the Slashdot Spike will no doubt bring somebody's attention to it and it will be corrected.

      Ok, fine.

      Care to place any wagers on how long this presumed correction will take?

      Whatta ya say we all periodically keep checking back just to see what happens?

      Slashback anyone?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    6. Re:Probably just a mistake by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Except that they are blocking only XFree86, not X Free86, XFree, XFree8, XFree6, XFree 86, or XFree8 6.

      No, they are specifically blocking XFree86.

      --
      #include "sig.h"
    7. Re:Probably just a mistake by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Maybe you're right. Just in case, I had the courtesy to actually email the MSN.com search staff and let them know about the problem. Their incredibly informative response:


      Hello rcgspam,


      Thank you for writing to MSN Search regarding your search for "XFree86".


      We are currently investigating your issue and will respond with a resolution or suggestion on how to resolve this matter.


      If you have any additional information you can provide to us or if there is anything else we can assist you with, please feel free to write us back.


      Sincerely,


      Beth
      MSN Search Customer Support


      Well, make of it what you will. Is it incompetence or malice? It's pretty clear that _somebody_ did something maliciously, but that hardly indicates an organizational conspiracy. The real question is what will they do after hearing lots of bitching and whining from us about it - quietly remove the XFree86->porn mapping in their list, leave it, or decide it was such a good idea they should do the same for other "double-plus ungood" search terms.

  16. Maybe its the license? by ag3n7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they don't like the new license and are blocking it for our own good?

  17. Re:Well... by goates · · Score: 1

    XFree69, XFree85 and XFree87 appear to work though...

    goates

  18. Oh, they block Linux, Macintosh, and other terms by csoto · · Score: 1

    You better believe it. Google for something, then use MSN Search. You'll get vastly different results (always poor results on MSN).

    Google is the ticket. MSN Search blows.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  19. what about Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has anyone tried variants on "X Box"?

    1. Re:what about Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't seem to block the search "x box porn" as porn but most of the results are porn-related...

  20. nightsurf! by termos · · Score: 5, Funny

    I continued to nightsurf and i found another side of XFree86!

    Live Now: Free cams with 'xfree86':(Click to zoom)

    Get 'xfree86' at the Websites of the Hottest & Naughtiest Webcam Starlets, Hunks, Couples & Groups in the World. Click any star to visit!

    Looking for xfree86? I deliver, and I'm live right now.

    It sure it convenient with a graphical user interface but this is TOO MUCH.

    --
    Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
    1. Re:nightsurf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Neverwinter Sig!!

    2. Re:nightsurf! by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      That's probably just somebody's paying MS or spoofing variables to insert visitors' search terms into their adverts, to make them look more relevant.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:nightsurf! by arkanes · · Score: 4, Informative
      Despite the implication, nightsurf is not actually a search engine. It returns exactly the same results for any search term.

      Ah ha, upon further checking this is not true. It returns the exact same search results for anything thats not porn related, so this is probably a listing of the sites that paid for "any results" postings (Nightsurf doesn't even pretend to be anything other than pay-for-placement). A search for the sexual fetish of your choice does return results related to that fetish, however.

    4. Re:nightsurf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eureeka! This IS IT ! What?! This is exactly what needs to be done in order to unseat Windows as the defacto desktop O/S. Think about it for a sec. Everyone runs Windows and gets broadband internet for convenient access to pr0n. So, xfree86/linux takes it one step further, integrating the delivery of the pr0n into the desktop experience. This is so brilliant, I can't beleive that nobody saw it coming (pun sort of intended).

    5. Re:nightsurf! by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gotta ask... could this have been the result of enough adult sites trying to trick MSN's spider. Afterall, Google as a company doesn't exactly have a political stand on George W. Bush, but it was webmasters who got the "Miserable Failure" association made...

    6. Re:nightsurf! by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Of the top group of pictures, the girl in the lower left is the best of the used up bunch. I would like to make her GUI.

      -B

    7. Re:nightsurf! by wash23 · · Score: 1

      Xfree86: Webcams giving a nice GUI on the screen.

    8. Re:nightsurf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, that's not strictly true, either. It's not EXACTLY the same.

      A search for hantavirus returns "All Gangbang - Three-ways, four-ways and more-ways!" in the fourth slot, whereas a search for XFree86 returns "Kara's Amateurs - The one, the only, the original ... Kara's Amateurs!" in the fourth slot.

      I'm pretty sure they realize that scientists (interested in hantavirus) are more excited by gangbangs than in amateur videos, whereas computer geeks (interested in XFree86) would rather see the "girl next door" kind of stuff. Extrapolating from that, the NightSurf ranking algorithm looks to be pretty complex; far moreso than that Google "PankRank" nonsense.

      Google? Old and busted. NightSurf? The new hotness. I sure am glad Firefox makes it so easy to change your default search engine!

    9. Re:nightsurf! by Imperator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps, but why "xfree86"? The "miserable failure" thing was political, but associating XFree86 with porn doesn't seem in any way to serve anyone's interests. If you're paranoid you might accept that enemies of free software, or perhaps enemies of advertising clauses, want to smear the project's name. But come on, surely they have better things to do.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    10. Re:nightsurf! by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      It serves porn sites interests -- the more people that are directed to their sites the better. Especially if those people are searching for XFree86 -- lonely geeks are a fairly abundant market for porn ;).

    11. Re:nightsurf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      most of whom know how to get it for free...not that I have any experience is that sort of thing.

    12. Re:nightsurf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A search for the sexual fetish of your choice does return results related to that fetish, however.

      Not for me, I just get the generic stuff when searching for my fetish :( Guess I AM a freak.

    13. Re:nightsurf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an XFree86 fetish.

    14. Re:nightsurf! by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      I think they're confusing it with GNaughty.

  21. XFree 86 by The+UberDork · · Score: 0

    Odd enough .. search for XFree 86 .. and bingo the first result if XFree86.org

    1. Re:XFree 86 by antime · · Score: 1

      Same goes if you search for "XFree86(tm)".

    2. Re:XFree 86 by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those who missed it, the parent put a space between "XFree" and "86". Indeed, it does work, and returns about 3525 results.

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  22. Re:Well... by zuzzabuzz · · Score: 0

    Then why not XFree85 or XFree87?

    --
    -buzz
  23. NightSurf.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know who's behind NightSurf.com (other than WebPower, Inc)? I'm not used to this high profile a company not even having an address, etc. I searched "all the usual" places. I'm not sure which state WebPower is incorporated. I guess I could start with Delaware, most sneaky companies use Delaware.

  24. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by SQLz · · Score: 1

    True. If you have reached a level of cluefulness where you need to find information on Xfree86 then you are using Google as well.

  25. It's just the first step by ENOENT · · Score: 5, Funny

    MSFT is going to block all websites containing the letter "X", which will be all of their competition.

    I.e. Linux, Mac OS X, Unix, hot XXX grits, etc.

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    1. Re:It's just the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windows Xp

    2. Re:It's just the first step by a!b!c! · · Score: 1

      Don't forget windows Eks Pee!

      I challenge somebody to find a more moronic slashdot story.

    3. Re:It's just the first step by ENOENT · · Score: 1

      Shh. Don't tell Bill until it's too late.

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    4. Re:It's just the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox?

    5. Re:It's just the first step by HiyaPower · · Score: 5, Funny

      And Xbox?

    6. Re:It's just the first step by Kippesoep · · Score: 1

      Whoopee, no more DirectX and ActiveX.

    7. Re:It's just the first step by Homo+Stannous · · Score: 1

      1: I eat hot XXX grits for breakfast 2: My friends make fun of my southern roots 3: I am sad.

    8. Re:It's just the first step by CeleronXL · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, however, that Microsoft jumped on board with the whole fashionable X in the name thing, with Windows XP.

    9. Re:It's just the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agh, should have refreshed the page before posting that. It's been said.

    10. Re:It's just the first step by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      MSFT is going to block all websites containing the letter "X",

      XP
      ActiveX
      DirectX
      Xbox
      XML

    11. Re:It's just the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I challenge somebody to find a more moronic slashdot story.


      I accept:
      Sexbots and Message From Kabul. Don't you miss Mr. Katz?

    12. Re:It's just the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Xbox has two Xs, and a double negative makes a positive.

      Linux: 1 x (-)
      Mac OS X: 1 x (-)
      Unix: 1 x (-)
      hot XXX grits: 3 x (---) (-+) (-)
      X Window System: 1 x (-)

    13. Re:It's just the first step by a!b!c! · · Score: 1

      Brilliant. I had forgotten about Mr. Katz.

    14. Re:It's just the first step by dtperik · · Score: 1

      And DirectX, ActiveX, OCX, XP,... need I go on?

    15. Re:It's just the first step by 0x12d3 · · Score: 1

      What no SCOX?

    16. Re:It's just the first step by md65536 · · Score: 1

      The second step is to trademark "x" and force anyone using it or anything that sounds similar to change their name.

      Linu-
      Mac OS -
      -ylophones.com

  26. Re:Well... by jpmkm · · Score: 1

    XFree works, yet XFree86 does not.

  27. Re:Well... by E-Rock · · Score: 1

    That wouldn't explain why the 85 and 87 variants don't come up the same way.

  28. Well, or course... by switcha · · Score: 4, Funny
    Why of course it's naughty.

    Don't tell me I'm the only one who asks my wife if she wants to XFree86 tonight?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    1. Re:Well, or course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, I ask your wife that all the time as well...

    2. Re:Well, or course... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me I'm the only one who asks my wife if she wants to XFree86 tonight?

      You're not. I also ask your wife to XFree86 every now and then.

      *tiddy-boom*

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    3. Re:Well, or course... by LordoftheFrings · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, there are probably others who ask your wife that too.

    4. Re:Well, or course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think your wife IM'ed me a while ago offing to XFree86 with me and some of her freinds... - or at least I HOPE it was your wife...

  29. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Funny

    "how many people using MSN as a search engine would know a thing about XFree86?"

    Apparently none, given the MSN results.

  30. Re:Well... by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

    its weird though, because a search for xfree yields non porn results including xfree86.org

  31. MSN has strange blocking restrictions by nvrrobx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hotmail blocks my best friend's last name, which is Raper, because it's "offensive"...

    1. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Cerv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend has taken to spelling his name "C.umming" to get round exactly that problem.

      --
      sig
    2. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

      Feel sorry for the residents of this town then. It just kind of stands out at you, doesn't it.

    3. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They probably block rapeseed too. Thus the language continues to degenerate... between well-meaning content-censors and "grammar checking" word processors, all the juice is being squeezed out of english prose.

    4. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i'm sorry... but that really needs an explanation. totally lost on me.

    5. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your friend is offensive. Especially when he preforms his "Flames of Flatuence" routine. He showed it to my grandmother which in turn burned her eyebrows clean off her face. As far as I'm concerned, MSN is doing its job.

    6. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see why Raper might be a problem. Do they block Felcher too?

    7. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't it make my brown eye blue.

    8. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is offensive. Tell him to get it changed.

    9. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by philovivero · · Score: 1

      Heh. I used to know this guy named "Joe Blank" (well actually it wasn't Joe, but the last name was truly that) and all sorts of web forms would reject his applications because, well, "Blank" isn't a valid last name.

    10. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a little village in Austria called "Fucking"! No joke!

    11. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of the Benny Hill skit where he's putting up a sign for a doctor, and mistakenly splits it as:

      DR. JOHNSON
      THE
      RAPIST

      Get it? For the thick amongst us: THERAPIST = THE+RAPIST

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    12. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Err, the place is called Cunthorpe... c-u-n-t-horpe... does that help?

    13. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1

      Better not try to buy an RV, then.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    14. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and just what was your grandmother doing to be within range of the famed "Flames of Flatuence" performance???

    15. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Err, the place is called Cunthorpe... c-u-n-t-horpe... does that help?

      What would help would be to get the name right - it's Scunthorpe.

    16. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, this is the town of Scunthorpe, in Yorkshire England. I lived there briefly, and I never heard anyone single out that particular substring of the name.

    17. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Also live in the UK, and know of Scunthorpe. Never thought about it being pronounced that way before. Strangely enough though, there's a place just up the road from me called "Lord Hereford's Knob"!

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    18. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by bfree · · Score: 1

      How about Cockfosters in London. I spent an entire holiday laughing about it on holidays after I saw the name (along with some friends), typed it in when I got back to work and triggered their content monitor, access denied!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    19. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my friend has had to modify his name from Ihavesexwithhorsesanddogs.

      We cant figure out why thats the case though.

    20. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by julesh · · Score: 1

      The reference is due to the fact that for a few months some years ago, AOL's subscription form would not allow anyone from Scunthorpe to sign up for an AOL account, because it thought they were being offensive...

      Search for scunthorpe on the register, you should find a number of stories regarding this...

    21. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by timtactoker · · Score: 1

      Working in tech support, we had a customer with the surname 'Draper' who was trying to sign up to MSN. They kept on getting rejected and the rejection message was very ambiguous. It took us quite a while for somone to figure out that it was because she had the word 'rape' in her name. Then trying to explain it to the customer was a whole other story.

    22. Re:MSN has strange blocking restrictions by beady · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, quite a late reply and all but its worth sharing... My girlfriends surname is "Root" you can see where this is going...

  32. BTW is you search for XXX by t-maxx+cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    MSN returns all sorts of hits, it does not say anything about likely to return adult content.

    --
    Regards,

    Ryan Pritchard
    Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
    1. Re:BTW is you search for XXX by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only does search.msn.com work fine for XXX, but it also presents you a "featured site": NightSurf.com.

      So they accept paid ads from porn sites, but they intercept and redirecto XFree86 sites. Hmmm ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:BTW is you search for XXX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, X gets results, as does XXX, but XX returns the porn warning. Honestly, I can see rationales for the other blocked words: they don't like XFree86, they want to block porn, etc. But XX? What the fuck?

  33. Sounds like? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps they are doing soundex/metaphone type matching on the words to see if they are sex-related. Perhaps "xfree86" sounds like something you might find on a porn site.

    Either than or it's X FREE 86 where 86 is some position that involves finding a woman with two heads.

    John.

    1. Re:Sounds like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about a sexual position, but 86 looks like an emoicon with bulging eyes, a frown, and a tongue sticking out.

    2. Re:Sounds like? by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

      hey thats an interesting theory. someone plug stuff into perl's soundex module and see what happens.

      uh someone else other than me. i'm going home from work now and i'm sick of my computer for the day.

    3. Re:Sounds like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then all the people using MS Express to read their email should watch out, else they might find themselves in an M Sex-Press one day.

    4. Re:Sounds like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      86 is bulging eyes wearing a baseball cap with a curled brim.

    5. Re:Sounds like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reasonable hypothesis: 6 == six which is close to "sex". And eight is phonetically similar to "ate", or could sound similar to "eat", both of which probably also turn up in many such searches. By contrast, XFree85 or XFree84 would probably score lower in a soundex comparison, and the 6 -> "sex" soundex might be the key.

    6. Re:Sounds like? by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Technically 68 is "You do me and Ill owe you one". Women hear this one all the time.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  34. If you use MSN to search anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chances are you ware lookin for porn, not an open source GUI.

  35. Re:Well... by silverbolt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Doesn't seem to work like that.. if search terms Xfree85 and Xfree87 are behaving normally.

  36. Working terms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    - FreeX86
    - XFree87
    - XFree 86
    - X Free 86

    As you can see they are clearly only blocking "XFree86", and not other combinations. Not the site itself, which is clearly listed, but searching for XFree86 works.

  37. Another search term that works by ElNotto · · Score: 1

    xfree86-4 also works. This is truly interesting.

    1. Re:Another search term that works by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      so does "Xfree86 sex"

      im not joking

      --
      How many computers are too many?
  38. This is NO blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, come on. This is just a problem in their algorithm just because it starts with "X" and then it has "Free". It is like asking for "free sex", so they overdid it a bit with their algorithm.

    If you search for X-Free, it works PERFECTLY.

    There is no "blocking", it is just a glitch in their algorithm, obviously.

    1. Re:This is NO blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does a search for xfree80 not return the same "probably adult" result as xfree86? That was pointed out already -- you should try reading before posting your weak defense of M$.

  39. Next one is Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to think about it "Microsoft" is quite ambiguous. If XFree86 has some resonace with porn then Microsoft could allude to: moist asians, paedophilic content, unlucky sized guys having the ride of their life... hell, even XP alludes to "spandex", "Windows" to exhibitionists and Windows me so self-sex... har, har!

  40. Interesting - tinfoil hat time by LordKazan · · Score: 1

    who wants to be some microsoft cronies set that up so they could do that

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    1. Re:Interesting - tinfoil hat time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      who wants to be some microsoft cronies set that up so they could do that

      Can you type in proper english so we can at least understand half of what you said? jesus christ...

    2. Re:Interesting - tinfoil hat time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you put a 't' after 'be' it all makes sense...

  41. Art not Pr0n... by twoslice · · Score: 1, Funny

    No No No... If it is free then it is called art. If you have to pay for it then it is Pr0n.

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  42. Shameless... by humandoing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really just can't get over how obviously shameless Microsoft is in their business practices. This is a blatant and obvious attempt to mislead searchers, and potential users of XFree86, and what _REALLY_ pisses me off, is that stuff like this never seems to make it into the news. Why isn't this stuff taken to the masses via TV / News networks to show the rest of the world (eg: not just /. reader) how completely screwed up the business practices at Microsoft really are?

    1. Re:Shameless... by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe its just a bug, given the average quality of microsoft products, would it really be that surprising?

    2. Re:Shameless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our top story tonight... Microsoft's search engine is blocking a search for "XFree86"... which is something we don't really understand or use, and are fairly sure you don't understand or use, either.

      In other news, hundreds dead all over the world...

    3. Re:Shameless... by RobYoung · · Score: 1

      Your sig says it all: Nothing to see here.

      Another poster pointed out that a search for XFree86 on that adult search engine brings up a number of results, that have XFree86 in them.

      It's just porn operators placing a number of popular terms (like XFree86) into their sites so that they will come up as results for that search. It probably just happens that the MSN search blocking algorithm picked up XFree86 recently.

      The actual site isn't blocked, just the search term "XFree86". Nothing to see here, it's just the MSN Search algorithms doing their job, albeit poorly.

    4. Re:Shameless... by humandoing · · Score: 1

      Yah, after thinking about it more, this is a good point. Still a bit frustrating, nonetheless... Thanks for keeping it in perspective.

    5. Re:Shameless... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      No, the porn search engine returns a set of default listings if you don't search for something it knows about (try searching for asdfhsadhfasdhfashf and note that your results are identical to the Xfree86 search). It's not a search engine/spider in the sense that Google is, or even that MSN is. It's a paid listing directory service, nothing more. Also note that it's only a search for _exactly_ XFree86 and _only_ XFree86 ("XFree86 sex" provides good results, for example). I doubt it's a conspiracy theory, but it's certainly not an accident of the algorithm. Most likely, it's either a debugging codeword added by one of the algorithm programmers, or some bored programmed playing a prank.

  43. Roman numerals by tepples · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blocking web pages whose titles include a word starting with X would block the Super Bowl, which for the last few decades has used the letter "X" in the name of each event as part of the Roman serial number.


    Little kid told me that an "XXX" movie means you have to be thirty years old to get in.
  44. Then why can I search for "XFree85" and "XFree85"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. Re:Oh, they block Linux, Macintosh, and other term by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Keep in mind that the first set of MSN search results are paid advertiser links..

    In my (admittedly limited) use of MSN, top non-sponsored results are vaguely comparable to what Google returns.

    --
    I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
  46. But think of the proles! by MacFury · · Score: 1, Informative

    The general populous uses Microsoft products, if those products prohibit you from looking at alternatives...well...that's a big damn problem.

  47. Some Google Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google for 'xfree86', ~2440000 hits
    google for 'xfree86 porn' ~12300 hits
    google for 'xfree86 sex' ~3900 hits

    Clear proof that the XFree86 people need to work on their sex lives. And Microsoft is evil.

    Michael
    Login Free since Chips-n-Dips

  48. Why even bother searching on MSN?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... especially if it sucks.

  49. Funnier still... by thesolo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Guess what a search for XFree87 gives you as its top result? This slashdot article, talking about Xouvert (an XFree Fork)!

    Honestly, this seems more like incompetence than censorship.

    1. Re:Funnier still... by TwinkieStix · · Score: 1

      I agree. Perhaps it's a combination of the X the free, and the fact that a lot of port sites are using the xfree86 term in their search engine spamming.

    2. Re:Funnier still... by Stackster · · Score: 1

      Not anymore. Now the top result actually is the /. front page, and this story is the third hit (the former #1 is now placed second).

      --

      There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.
  50. XFree86 = X = XXX? by �berhund · · Score: 1

    We all know XFree86 is commonly referred to as just "X". Perhaps MSN's porn filter just stupidly associates that X with XXX.

    --
    -Uberhund
  51. Mod the whore down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the links in the story even come close to the xfree site. Worst karma whore ever.

  52. I had a good day too! by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    You went searching for XFree86 and got back pr0n. I had a good day too. While you're at it, go to google and search for "miserable failure".

    Oh those wacky guys and their search engines.

    1. Re:I had a good day too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why don't you try? I'd tell you to RTFA, but that not exactly the problem.

      You don't get porn. MSN refuses to do the search. The only option it gives is a porn only search engine.

      Try it and you'll see why your comment is not appropriate.

    2. Re:I had a good day too! by Tanlis · · Score: 1

      Except the latter is due to people abusing how Google handles their searching, not something intentional by the company.

    3. Re:I had a good day too! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Though when you search for XFree86 Porn it returns a Slashdot article.

    4. Re:I had a good day too! by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      i really don't think that the former is something done intentionally by MS. Screwed up algorithim? Sure, that wouldn't suprise anyone. But yes, i read an article (bbc.co.uk) about how the miserable failure thing was created.

  53. a much more interesting question by bach_m · · Score: 5, Funny

    perhaps a better question to ask is: Who the hell is using search.msn.com instead of google?

    1. Re:a much more interesting question by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      don't underestimate: i've had people on the phone unable to find - the blue e quickstart icon - the start button - their desktop.
      give them a search engine built into their OS and you can be absolutely sure that it will be used. plenty.

      or, as you might put it: build something idiot proof, and only idiots will want to use it.
      of course, these guys are rather unlikely looking for XFree86 or else would be glad to find some pr0n.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    2. Re:a much more interesting question by Eudial · · Score: 1

      perhaps a better question to ask is: Who the hell is using search.msn.com instead of google?

      or http://www.google.com/linux alt. http://www.google.com/bsd ?

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    3. Re:a much more interesting question by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps as a way to mock Microsoft, if you search google for "best search engine" one of the news articles that pops up is this very story on /.

    4. Re:a much more interesting question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget: http://www.google.com/mac

  54. It was Oswald! by airrage · · Score: 0

    From the movie, JFK, spoken by Mr. X:

    "Everything's cellurized. No one has said "he must die," there's been no vote, there's nothing on paper, there's no one to blame. It's as old as the Crucifixion: the Mafia firing squad, one blank, no one's guilty because everyone in the Power Structure who knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed. No matter how many die, how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat."

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  55. And people wonder why I worry by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not that I believe that Google is really doing their service out of the goodness from their hearts - they're doing it to make money.

    But people wonder why I don't want to see a Micorosft Internet Search built into Windows (oh, and made so you can't remove it without damaging the operating system, like you can't remove IE or Media Player or anything else Microsoft decides is essential).

    Call me crazy, but MS seems to have this weird habit of shutting down things they don't like. Is this just a stupid mistake? It could be - I mean, block things starting with X to keep kids from porn, right?

    Oops - but Xfree85 works, so that can't be it.

    MS gives away IE to shut down Netscape. That wasn't the crime that I thought was terrible - it was going to their OEM partners and threatening them with extra high cost of Windows if they put on Netscape.

    So if they should take over the search world, can we really trust it to reflect accurately? I'm all for giving something a fair shake, but if before the game really starts they're already blocking alternate product possibilities I think "trust" is something that won't apply to MSN search.

    Of course, I could be wrong. Could just be a simple misunderstanding.

    Sadly, even if it is, based on their past history, I don't think I could believe that's it.

    1. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 5, Insightful


      MS gives away IE to shut down Netscape. That wasn't the crime that I thought was terrible - it was going to their OEM partners and threatening them with extra high cost of Windows if they put on Netscape.


      It's refreshing to see another person not consider the Netscape fiasco a 'crime'. I was working for an ISP when IE came about. At the time, Netscape charged us $20-40 per copy that we shipped to our customers. You can imagine how quickly that adds up. When IE became an alternative, Netscape refused to negociate and lost out big-time. Meanwhile, MS would do advertising partnerships and offer a wide range of support services for free. A very tempting offer when your shop isn't making much money to begin with.

      Anyway, the people at Netscape didn't move quickly to improve their browsers and, for quite some time, IE was way better concerning stability in Windows. It's not like the 2 clicks and 10 minute download destroyed them.

      The anti-MS folks who always find fault in MS never really seemed to complain about Trumpet Winsock being put through the ringer by NT and 95 including their own network stacks. How about notepad.exe and calc.exe? Before that time, you could download and register shareware editors or look for freebies. I've never heard somone argue that Windows was destroying software companies by including it's own program to display image files.

      But anything to do with [potentially] commerical media, such as web pages and audio/video content, grabs everyones attention and ends up with MS back in court acting confused and innocent.

      I know, totally off topic. Back on topic, I promise:

      I think the reason for the search results problem is likely a goof-up. Likely a low-level employee who had no idea what XFree86 is, didn't care, didn't double-check, etc before adding it to the DB. It seems reasonable that many MS employees would not be familar with Unix at all.

    2. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, even if it is, based on their past history, I don't think I could believe that's it.

      and doesn't that hit the nail right on the head? Damnit, they worked hard to get that reputation; they earned it and even if they were to become the biggest philanthropists in the world for the next 50 years, people would still be looking closely at their actions and suspecting their motives.

    3. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      It could be - I mean, block things starting with X to keep kids from porn, right?

      How about searching for "Xbox"?

    4. Re:And people wonder why I worry by HiThere · · Score: 1

      MSIE wasn't even comparable to Netscape for quite some time. Not until long after it was bundled with their OS. But it was pre-installed. Yes, it was a crime. It was abuse of monopoly. (I.e., it's not a crime if you aren't a monopoly, but if you are, then it is.)

      Also, consider that selling Netscape was the main source of cash that Netscape had. For MS it was a sideline that they could use as a loss-leader to ensure their dominance of the market. Paid for with cash from their monopoly.

      When MS does something abusive, they must prove that it was a mistake. They've got too much history of abuse of power. Including, I'm convinced, buying their way out of the recent monopoly conviction. I don't know that they did. I haven't seen a "smoking gun". But they'll need to prove otherwise before I'll believe it. They have *no*, and I do mean zero, credibility for good intentions. And a lot for viscious & underhanded intentions. And it's based on their history. I used to favor MS as "not as bad as monopolies usually are", but it was just new to being a monopoly.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      MS gives away IE to shut down Netscape. [...]
      So if they should take over the search world, can we really trust it to reflect accurately?


      Yeah, like, Microsoft created game console and won 99% of console market.

      They'd have to do it better than the competition to grab the market, later they can do whatever they want. That's what they did during the browser wars. Same goes with media player. They couldn't do it with XBox, and there's not many chances that they could do it with search engine.

      History of MS is full of failed products they'd like us to forget.

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    6. Re:And people wonder why I worry by texroot · · Score: 1

      I not a lawyer, but you're exactly right in that the rules are different when you're a monopoly. IIRC you can't sell something for less than your cost to drive your competitor out of business, subsidizing those sales with profits from other products or sales in other localities.

      That's exactly what Microsoft did to Netscape by bundling IE. Netscape may well have helped them with its own stupidity but that does nothing to make Microsoft's actions either moral or legal.

      Oh, I forgot, a browser is an integral part of an OS. What if SQL Server had been made an inextricable part of the OS--just long enough to put Oracle on the ropes. Perhaps could/would never have happened, but would that have been ok too?

      I'm all for free as in beer when I can get it, but not at the expense of solidifying one company's proprietary monopoly to our long-term detriment.

    7. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, how much do you get paid by MS to astroturf Slashdot? I'm looking for a new source of income, and figured I could contact RedHat and convince them to pay me the same amount to spam the MSDN comment boards with "why do I have to pay this license money?" This is not a low-level employee who had no idea what XFree86 is, because he would have looked it up FIRST before adding a block to it. And would have seen from the MSN results THEMSELVES (try a search for XFree86a, XFree861, XFree85, to see what I mean) that it wasn't pornographic. So congratulations, you're either unbearably stupid or being paid off.

    8. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's refreshing to see another person not consider the Netscape fiasco a 'crime'. I was working for an ISP when IE came about. At the time, Netscape charged us $20-40 per copy that we shipped to our customers. You can imagine how quickly that adds up. When IE became an alternative, Netscape refused to negociate and lost out big-time. Meanwhile, MS would do advertising partnerships and offer a wide range of support services for free. A very tempting offer when your shop isn't making much money to begin with.

      It is called "cutting off the oxygen supply."

    9. Re:And people wonder why I worry by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      It wasn't so bad. You have to remember, I spent 8 hours a day doing nothing but dealing with Netscape and Internet Explorer problems. Both were buggy piles of crap, but IE was much less tempermental than Netscape.

      True, that it did become much more stable when integrated into the OS. The drawback being that it was still quite buggy by today's standards and would often take the system it was integrated into down with it. We all have to keep in mind that 95-98 were some crazy years for Internet related software. The masses wanted "more, better, now!" and for free. Both IE and Netscapes were both monumental efforts, but Netscape failed to find an alternative source of income to support it's product in a manner that allowed it to compete.

      It's not like Microsoft bent them over their knee and said Netscape was not allowed to diversify. They invested all their efforts into a single project and, suprise, it failed to compete with someone much further along in the industry. There are many examples of companies who did not allow this to happen to them while facing similar odds. Take Remington.. It all started with a single gun design; Once the market started to flood with similar quality arms for less, they diversified into sewing machines, typewriters, razor blades, etc while never abandoning their gun business, no matter what the short-term financial losses. This allowed their designs to evolve with the other guys, while maintaining a stream of revenue to keep the doors open.

      Netscape, with it's once-immense capitol, could have made some brighter investments than it did. They had every opportunity to hire the right people to manage their investor's cash, but chose to stick with a single plan until it turns inside out. If you want to tangle with MS and survive, you have to spend that money on the best lawyers and the best CFO you can afford. Don't win with courts, win by growing the company elsewhere for a while.

      As for my points, I still see nobody coming to the defense of Trumpet Winsock. For real, chew on the idea that they had implemented an Internet-ready network stack into Windows before Microsoft did. What right did MS have in turning around and implementing their own network stack in the next release of Windows? People keep ignoring my mention of that in every thread I bring it up in. It's exactly the same type of thing that happened to Netscape, but people don't want to think about being required to pay $29.99 to get their copy of Windows on the Internet, then have to pay another $35 for a browser, then another $40 if you wanted a good email program.. Yes, that could have ended up being some alternate reality in 2004 had some anti-trust crap come up over the socket being integrated into the OS as a monopolistic activity.

      My arguement is, if people are going to take the side of Netscape, they really need to consider going much further. Remember DESQview? Quarterdeck was on top of the world for a few years, that is, until MS released Windows. They were given the smackdown when Windows 3.1 was suddenly incompatible with QEMM (the once-excellent memory manager).

      Personally, I feel MS is worth having around for one reason: The natural tendancy for humans to tear down giants results in a lot of good, competitive software. Monumental accomplishments have been driven by a simple hatred for big companies. Kudos to them. Because of those efforts, one day things will be different -- and Microsoft knows it.

    10. Re:And people wonder why I worry by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I was dealing with Netscape until as recently as last year. It wasn't that bad. And it was a lot better than the early versions of IE. (Actually, on some of the old [underpowered] machines I was dealing with ancient versions of both of those as recently as last year. I definitely preferred Netscape, and so did the users of those machines.)

      Now it's fair to say that I am biased. I, e.g., talk people into using Mozilla just because I don't like dealing with viruses. (Well, we mainly use GroupWise, but some people are insistent.) But I'm also reporting on the consensus of the users of the older machines.

      N.B.: I'm not asserting that Mozilla makes you immune to viruses. Merely that there are fewer infections if you are running Mozilla than if you are using IE. You also need current Virus software if you run MSWind. And you need to disable a bunch of built in features, and block execution of certain file types (is it *.sms? I did it so long ago I no longer remember). Etc. And even that's not enough. But it helps!

      As for Trumpet WindSock...I've forgotten the details about that, so I can't reasonably respond. Sorry. If you want to assert that it was another case of MS abusing their monopoly, I'll easily believe you, but then MS has done so many similar things that I am more easily convinced that they abused their power than that they didn't. Not abusing their power appears out of character for them.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  56. Finally by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally a viable competitor to Google. I have been looking for XFree86 adult content for quite some time. Google could just never bring up what I needed.

    Thanks MSN!

    1. Re:Finally by banzai75 · · Score: 1

      Google could just never bring up what I needed.

      Sounds like maybe their tagline should be 'MSN: The little blue site'

  57. woman with two heads by nietsch · · Score: 1

    usually 40 feet in length or over with three cabins and two toilets, or heads in nautical terms...

    ai, i am talking ships captain!

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  58. MSN Search on Slashdot by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Funny

    Darn, I just did a search for slashdot on MSN and it seems MSN wouldnt let me because it was likely to bring up a very violent anti MS website.

  59. Search for "search engine" by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    heh, google lists itself sixth, but doesn't list MSN search at all.

    MSN lists itself first, and google is fourth - higher in the rankings than it is on google itself.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Search for "search engine" by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

      "and google is fourth"

      apparently not anymore, i scrolled through a few pages of results without a single mention of google...

    2. Re:Search for "search engine" by platipusrc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just clicked on your link. They must have noticed that google was listed fourth because it isn't even listed on the first page anymore. The only mention of google I saw is for "searches.com".

      On another note, I find it quite funny that AltaVista is listed number one in google for search engine.

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    3. Re:Search for "search engine" by rk · · Score: 1

      The best part of that search is all the ads on the right for companies that promise to improve your search engine ranking, but yet do not appear in the first few pages of the search itself.

      Does this immediately disqualify them?

    4. Re:Search for "search engine" by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      But it lists MSN second for "Worst Search Engine".

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    5. Re:Search for "search engine" by bebing · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I tried it and got same results as the GP.

    6. Re:Search for "search engine" by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Well, just in case they're really watching, I tried to leave them a message, wonder if they noticed.

    7. Re:Search for "search engine" by MyHair · · Score: 2, Interesting

      heh, google lists itself sixth, but doesn't list MSN search at all.

      That's because there are no links to MSN; everyone's browser points there to begin with.

      I was joking at first, but I may be on to something here...

    8. Re:Search for "search engine" by Miriwen · · Score: 1

      If you run a search for 'search engine' on other sites (I tried altavista, webcrawler, go.com and search.com myself), MSN does not come up either. I doubt this is so much something specific to Google as simply a result of the way MSN Search's site is set up. Search for 'web search', for instance, and MSN is the fourth result on Google. My guess would be that 'engine' doesn't feature very prominently on MSN's search, so it doesn't come up in results until much further down than other engines. Simply the fact that MSN Search comes up first on MSN Search shows that their engine is highly biased (as if that needs to be said).

    9. Re:Search for "search engine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      msn search is listed on page 5, genius
      link

    10. Re:Search for "search engine" by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      Ok, "not listed at all" is an exageration...

      But page 5? C'mon, This is slashdot - don't tell me you RTFAs, too?

      I stand corrected. Thanks.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  60. Why were you using MSN? by bee-yotch · · Score: 1, Redundant

    My question is why was the author using MSN as a search engine in the first place? Shouldn't any self-respecting geek be using google? ;-)

  61. What are you doing searching for X11 on MSN? by MMHere · · Score: 1

    Are you just _asking_ for trouble?

  62. error by name773 · · Score: 0
    /me thinks this is an error

    the search for xfree on msn works and turns up the xfree86 home page as the first entry

  63. Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    For people with a Windows background, the capabilities of X allow things that are so beautiful and sensuous that they could easily be considered porn. Your X server offers what? oooh baby, I'm still living in the stone age of display technology, I want you bad! You're so beautiful, and powerful, and configurable! And I love the way you show your independent spirit by not being tied to one window manager! Deeper oh yeah baby give it to me! You're such a slut! You'll display applications running _anywhere_!

    Ahem. Well, I challenge you to come up with a better theory then.

  64. microsoft pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's time to get www.free6.com as first result when searching for microsoft on google!

  65. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a stupid assumption. Didn't you read the story? XFree85 AND XFree87 work. Your theory is flawed. RTFA.

  66. Now you've done it by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

    MSN isn't responding ( maybe it's just me )
    Top story on TheRegister tomorrow "MSN goes down amid a torrent of Linux/Firefox HTTP headers, obviously a Linux geek community attack."

    --
    Slashdot sucks
  67. Must be hard to live with ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girl1 : Who are you going out with ?
    Girl2 : Raper ....
    Girl1 : What ?
    Girl2 : It's pronounced rAp`er..kinda french
    Girl1 : Oh, Cool

    1. Re:Must be hard to live with ? by Brian+Dennehy · · Score: 1

      Um, why would she mispronounce it the first time?

  68. dual standards by segment · · Score: 1
    On defending MS I offer the following:

    # whereis microsoft
    microsoft:
    # which microsoft
    no microsoft in /sbin /bin /usr/sbin /usr/bin /usr/ccs/bin/ /usr/games /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/bin

    # uname
    SunOS

    Ok all joking aside, here is a nice article. Search Engine Watch editor Danny Sullivan's Keynote speech yesterday was entitled "Search Wars."

  69. Possible meta tag culprit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet a bunch of porn sites have xfree86 in their meta information because everyone knows people who want X Windows want porn in 'em.

  70. 1986? by Reorax · · Score: 1

    Just a coincidence, but people born in 1986 will be 18 this year...

    --
    This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
    1. Re:1986? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a coincidence, but people born in 1986 will be 18 this year...

      I can attest to that! Anyone got a light?

    2. Re:1986? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Coincidence", ha! That's what they want you to believe!

  71. Doubtful this was intentional by saforrest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notice that a search for "X Free 86" returns xfree.org, the XFree86 website, as its first hit.

    If you think about it, it's unlikely their adult filter is catches pornographic searches by the query text alone. I can think of any number of queries which would give porn but which it would be difficult to computationally distinguish from non-pornographic queries.

    My guess is that MSN performs the search in any case, probes the first hits in their cache with some porn-detection algorithm, and redirects you if the algorithm thinks it might be porn.

    This would suggest that, for whatever reason, the first few hits for XFree86 (as opposed to "X Free 86" or XFree85") pass the porno test.

    On the other hand, the notice says "You have entered a search term that is likely to return adult content" which suggests strongly that only the query is being studied. So I don't know.

    Anyway, I'd be more inclined to think it's a crappy test than to think they've explicitly coded this as some incredibly obscure means of spiting XFree86.

    1. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by kinko · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, the notice says "You have entered a search term that is likely to return adult content" which suggests strongly that only the query is being studied. So I don't know.

      If you search for xfree86 with another term, such as linux, then you get decent results, www.xfree86.org first and www.debian.org second, so perhaps it does do the query first and rejects it based on the returned results. Also, server load made it take around 10 seconds (for me) when submitting "xfree86" alone, so maybe it is actually doing a search.

      Someone else mentioned the possibility of porn spammers targetting specific words as well, although I'm not entirely sure why they'd do it for "xfree86".

    2. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by clayasaurus · · Score: 1

      Also notice that a search for 'XFree86' returns xfree.org as well as other x related sites.

      This is either a crappy conspiracy theory, like, OMG, microsoft blocked one linux term, or microsoft did block it but never thought you could get around it by using 'these.'

      That'd be an easy system to get 'around.'

    3. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by DoubleD · · Score: 1
      --
      "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep in order to gain what he cannot lose."
    4. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by patbob · · Score: 1
      Anyway, I'd be more inclined to think it's a crappy test than to think they've explicitly coded this as some incredibly obscure means of spiting XFree8

      True. I suppose that somewhere they also have a list of search terms that do, or did, or are considered likely to, return porn sites. Perhaps somehow XFree86 ended up on that list. Perhaps it was via a complaint someone filed. Or perhaps it was entered with some other search term where the whole query returned porn sites. Or perhaps someone decided to spite a competitor to MS by getting the term on the porn list. Spite seems doubtful since most of the customers MS is trying to prevent from moving to Linux wouldn't know XFree86 from a hole in the ground.. meaning it was a pretty amusing attempt if it was meant intentionally.

      I prefer to get a chuckle off MS's inadvertant blunder (as would anybody who ran into it accidently) and be amused that they think their search engine is serious competition for anybody else's.. yet.

      --
      Welcome to the net of 1000 lies. Upgrades are scheduled soon that should bring us to the 10,000 lies mark.
    5. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by KOE21 · · Score: 1

      As someone pointed out already, searching 'xfree86 porn' doesn't trigger the porn filter. I guess two porn terms cancels each other out.

    6. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      My guess is that MSN performs the search in any case, probes the first hits in their cache with some porn-detection algorithm, and redirects you if the algorithm thinks it might be porn.

      Not only have people pointed out all the variants of XFree86 that work, but if you put in "porn" you get the porn warning. So far so good. However if you put in "porn porn" you don't get the warning, and the first sight returned is "blowjob pictures!!!" followed by "pornstar pictures!!!" and etc.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    7. Re:Doubtful this was intentional by saforrest · · Score: 1

      owever if you put in "porn porn" you don't get the warning, and the first sight returned is "blowjob pictures!!!" followed by "pornstar pictures!!!" and etc.

      Amusingly, the first hit for "porn king" is a Slashdot article.

  72. spaced out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you search for X Free 86 (with spaces), it returns almost the same results as a google search for XFree86.

  73. "why would they be blocking 'XFree86'?" by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
    why would they be blocking 'XFree86'?

    because they can?

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    1. Re:"why would they be blocking 'XFree86'?" by Aj · · Score: 1

      I Think that they are protesting the new License changes too.

    2. Re:"why would they be blocking 'XFree86'?" by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      I Think that they are protesting the new License changes too.

      um, why would someone like MSFT want to do that?

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  74. Licence Change by Rodrin · · Score: 1

    Seems like the XFree86 project has been getting alot of publicaty because of the licence change, and now this? Whatever...

  75. Re:Well... by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

    How the fuck is this interesting? It says right in the post:
    "...since you can search for 'XFree85' and 'XFree87' with no problem. "

    WTF? And obviously even the mod didn't read the post. Jesus, this adds a whole dimension to RTFA. At least read past the title.....

    --
    ymmv
  76. MS New Linux Lab by mackermacker · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thats not too surprising. My neighbor is a director in MSN, though on the NBC side so none of the news trickled down to him. Its kind of interesting someone just contacted me about a new position at MS. It is a non-publically advertised position for a LINUX sys. admin for the new hush-hush linux test lab just set up. Apparently there looking for people. The manager of the lab needed linux right away just to be productive , so I was told while he learned MS. I heard they have a lab, but can never find any information on it. From what there looking for, heavy linux knowledge and lots of shell scripting in bash. And from my friends at MSN, Linux is usually not ever mentioned in the worlplace, but is the top thing on everyones minds. I dont know, working as a linux admin for MS? Sac-religeous?

    1. Re:MS New Linux Lab by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me in the least if Microsoft has a Linux testing lab (and probably one for every other possible competitor) set up somewhere. It's one of the basic ideas of keeping an eye on the competition. As for publicity, I also don't blame them for keeping hush-hush (if it exists). One of the worst things you can do is publicize that you use opposing products, in any form or fashion.

      It's just a standard business practice, people, it's nothing personal.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    2. Re:MS New Linux Lab by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I dont know, working as a linux admin for MS? Sac-religeous?

      I'd do it, under the right circumstances. Make money working with Linux?
      Yeah, I'd do it. (Not right now; I'm fine where I am at the moment. But
      I mean in general, I don't have anything against the very idea.) For a
      while. Maybe some good would come of it, even. Perhaps, they might clone
      some useful features from OSS into Windows. That would be good for all the
      Windows users out there. Maybe for example they could sign a deal with
      ActiveState and ship their "server" offerings with Perl out of the box.
      That would be good for all concerned -- good for Microsoft, good for their
      users, good for the Perl community. Maybe they finally take the hint and
      code up some panel drawer functionality (a la Gnome) for Windows Explorer.

      In summary, good things can come from Microsoft having a Linux lab and
      testing out some competing software. They might learn something.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  77. MSN Search rooted? by nietsch · · Score: 1

    Maybe the servers gouverning the webserch blocking thingie were rooted bij some kid disgrunted with the new licence?
    Or Maybe MSFT does not like the new licence because thay will have to add more credits in their docs?

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  78. think about that one second. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    True. If you have reached a level of cluefulness where you need to find information on Xfree86 then you are using Google as well.

    Good thing M$ was unable to purchase Google. The effort to remain free is endless.

    -Twitter at work

    Friends don't help friends install Microsoft Junk

  79. adult content by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    ``You have entered a search term that is likely to return adult content.''

    Yes, so what? Just give me the results! I asked for it, now I want to get it!

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  80. Re:What's weird (xfree86 + desktop) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny that "xfree86 + desktop" appears to work fine as well.

  81. On a Side note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do a search on msn for "Freebsd" it comes up as a top pick.

  82. SCO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read what it says when you search for SCO.

    1. Re:SCO? by arose · · Score: 1
      Mod parent funny. For the record:
      SCO Long-time vendor of UNIX for PCs has made the transition to Linux. Learn about their consulting services and their software offerings. www.sco.com
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  83. This is some dirty stuff ... by slagdogg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's break it down ... X, as in XXX (porn), free, as in beer, and 86, as in people who have been 86'ed. I certainly wouldn't want my children seeing that :-o

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  84. Thank God... by wthynot · · Score: 1

    ...Google didn't get sold to Microsoft. That's all I have to say. Yeah, I guess if things got bad enough, people would turn to other search engines, but it would be painful waiting for (1) the general public to get a clue and (2) for other search engines to reach Google's present level of functionality. Thank God.

  85. they wanted to buy google by Barbarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You may remember from a few months back, Microsoft wanted to buy Google. I think now we can see the dangers of such a company getting hold of the world's #1 search engine. The more conspiracy minded could find the desire to block competitors as the primary reason for Microsoft wanting to buy Google.

  86. Searching for "Xfree 86" gives the right answer by HiyaPower · · Score: 1

    Who knows? M$ is so screwed up, it probably has to do with a buffer overrun... These guys are sad. What is even sadder is that they haven't made a good product of their own since Gate's basic interpreter and Flight Simulator. Everything else has been a reverse engineer or an outright purchase... It just goes to show that for the average person, pathetic is good enough providing you get Michael Dell to cram it down their throats.

    1. Re:Searching for "Xfree 86" gives the right answer by NullProg · · Score: 1

      What is even sadder is that they haven't made a good product of their own since Gate's basic interpreter and Flight Simulator

      Minor correction. They didn't make Flight Simulator. They bought it from a company called Sub-Logic in the mid/late 80's. I have the original boxed Apple version. I guess that just leaves them with BASIC :)

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
  87. Re:Well... by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

    Searching for "x free 86" works too, and the first link is to xfree.org.

  88. Overthinking this a little by rjelks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we're overthinking this. This could be a subtle way for Microsoft to block information about OSS, but I think it's because their search engine kinda sucks. Isn't it more likely that we're so used to engines like 'google' and 'alltheweb' that we assume that Microsoft must be up to something. Now, I don't believe that this would be beyond their scruples, just that this seems like a screwup. Anyway, how many of us use msn.com anyway? Try hitting 'alt-home' and you'll get my point.

    -

    1. Re:Overthinking this a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i would agree, except that doesn't explain why "XFree85" or "XFree87" works whereas XFree86 does not. very, very interesting if you ask me.

    2. Re:Overthinking this a little by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      Damn you! I tried hitting alt+home and it took me to the top of the page thereby causing me to lose my place! Is that a new trick like "Type alt+f4 if you love the backstreet boys!!!!"? :p

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
  89. The cheek! by holizz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was going to `submit a site' - www.XFree86.org - as they obviously don't have it when I am confronted with `Please Upgrade Your Browser'

    ` You are using: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8'
    They tell me what browser I'm using which is all well and good...

    `To view this site you must use:
    Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer or Netscape(R) Navigator 4.0 or higher'
    And have the CHEEK to suggest it's not good enough.

    `Click here to find the latest free browser from Microsoft'
    They already know I'm running `Linux i686' so are they saying IE 6 works under Wine? Or maybe they have a GNU/Linux version.

    Or maybe they're just big monopolistic meanies!

    (I had to go and check if Netscape was even available for GNU/Linux and it is. Their website is so wonderful that I had to type `download Netscape' into their search bar to find where to download it.)

    1. Re:The cheek! by k_head · · Score: 1

      It's microsoft programmers what else do you expect. The acid and crack dispenser machine was just filled up that day and they kind of overdosed on the stuff. Instead of taking one tab in the start of shift they took three tabs and several grams of crack. Washed it all down with pepsi and started coding.

      This theory also explains active directory too BTW.

      --
      The best way to support the US war effort is to continue buying American products.
    2. Re:The cheek! by strike2867 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just submitted it with IE. Dont have a heart attack though, Im typing this in Mozilla right now. Right after Im done Ill restart my computer and go back to Mepis.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    3. Re:The cheek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably because when an average VB coder hears the term "regular expression" he thinks it's a line containing only one print statement.

  90. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by Falshrmjgr · · Score: 1

    Exactly my first thought!. Kinda like AOL keyword c++

    --
    "I wasn't using my civil rights anyway...."
  91. Not blocked, just shitty MSN search technology... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    If run the search like so, it returns the results just fine. In my opinion, this is just a flaw in their search technology. But I suppose Slashdot readers don't really want to hear this...

    Took me less than a minute to do this...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  92. The simple solution by Bistronaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The simple, conspiracy-free answer to this riddle is that MSN just has a crappy search engine that DOES return porn sites when you search for XFree86.

    1. Re:The simple solution by patman600 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean to say " The simple, conspiracy-free answer to this riddle is that MSN just has an awesome search engine that DOES return porn sites when you search for XFree86."

    2. Re:The simple solution by prash_n_rao · · Score: 1

      You're right. Anyway, MSN Search is as relevant a search engine as the Queen of England as a leader of a few nations.

      --
      This is not my sig.
    3. Re:The simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, as has been pointed out many, many, many times, searches such as 'XFree86 sex' don't return porn sites or get filtered. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.

  93. Conspiracy by apoplectic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I may be blind, but after reading many posts here I think there is just a little too much Microsoft conspiracy paranoia running amok on this site. I would imagine that this is as deliberate as when Microsoft included the swastikas as a character in one of their fonts.

    Microsoft must be supporting white supremacists!

    A silly statement, but arguably not much more of a logical leap than assuming a plot to derail XFree86.

    1. Re:Conspiracy by Ironica · · Score: 1

      A silly statement, but arguably not much more of a logical leap than assuming a plot to derail XFree86.

      Or than assuming that a freelance web designer named Mike Rowe is going to be confused with MS...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    2. Re:Conspiracy by apoplectic · · Score: 1

      Or than assuming that a freelance web designer named Mike Rowe is going to be confused with MS...

      Or that assuming that much of the Slashdot community will embrace anything but biased negativity and contempt with regards to anything Microsoft.

      The article itself reads like a tabloid: And search terms like 'Linux', 'AOL' and 'Macintosh' are allowed, so at least MSN hasn't simply blacklisted all competitors' keywords as 'porn'

      Ah, yes, so it is a given that MSN as blacklisted competitor keywords as 'porn'. Blacklisted, eh? I can see the CNN headline now: Microsoft Blacklists Competitors as Porn.

      Heck, at this point I pratically believe that Microsoft did indeed do this intentionally. But only so that they can watch the ever-predictable Slashdot community scurry around like ants in a fire screaming "Conspiracy!!".

      I truly believe that Slashdot is turning into something more anti-Microsoft than it is pro-Linux or pro-OpenSource. How sad.

  94. in the interests of science by Disc2 · · Score: 1

    for purely scientific interests (honest) I went onto the first site recommended by NightSurf for "xfree86" and hit the source code. A quick search revealed that the word xfree86 isn't mentioned ANYWHERE.

  95. I just email MSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just sent a email to MSN and pointed them to this page, it will be interesting to see if and how they reply.

  96. RE: Microsoft's dis-service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, if we let them continue to provide misleading information, and only the vast majority of Internet users use it, we might end up with a situation where Americans are really bad spellers, who can't tell when they should use (for example;) "their" instead of "there" or "you're" instead of "your."

  97. Microsoft becomes less relevant every day by Mongo222 · · Score: 1
    Open source software, and its user base, isn't going to go away. I think that is pretty clear.

    These tactics by Microsoft to steer people away from it with browser incompatibly and search engine blocks isn't helping them at all. If the person is using MSN or IE already, and suddenly those tools stop providing something the user is already asking for it can only have one result. The user will switch to another tool.

    If I know enough to know what Xfree86 is, and want to search for it, and MSN won't provide the info, then I go to google.

    If I want to browse a web page, and it renders wrong in IE, then I try Opera or Mozilla.

    I honestly doesn't don't understand what they hope to gain from this kind of behavior. All it does is breed bad will against a company is already reviled by a large percentage of it's user base.

  98. Re:Oh, they block Linux, Macintosh, and other term by prat393 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the irony is that their motto is "more useful everyday." I mean, that's obviously true if one day they're as useful as a stab wound in the kidney, and the next day they're as useful as a heat lamp to a burn victim, but wake up here, people. It's all an obvious attempt to associate porn and other "morally wrong" materials with the open source movement.

  99. In teh simplist legal terms... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...Consumer deception....

    at a level I believe is illegal...

  100. Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odnfoi sks oosdv ocoisnfc ijjsd xsl. Jlkjdfjk si ojdfld djfdl. Bhci sdh hk s sdvdfd hc, hcvkjdf jdsfh xh kjdc qcovhd.

    - Hkjdf

  101. Re:Not blocked, just shitty MSN search technology. by holizz · · Score: 2, Funny

    *whispers* You searched for XFree89, this topic is about XFree86.

    To be honest as far as I know the only difference between the two is XFree3 but then I'm no professional geek.

  102. Has anyone considered the possibility.... by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

    ...that Microsoft's search engine is just crap? I mean, just look at their track record ;-)

  103. Hash collision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet it's just a hash collision in their search engine. They're rare, but they happen.

  104. Re: Wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is Slashdot... does fantasising count? ;p

  105. come on people! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    of Course XFree86 is "pornographic" in microsofts eyes! Look at some synonyms and you can definitely see.

    take for instance the synonym Licentious

  106. Hmm.. Incopetence is the key.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look.. Someone(s) at microsoft looked at common searchwords. Saw XFree86, did not know wat it was and labeld it as porn because he did not, nor did he try to find out, wat it was.

    It explains free86, xfree87, xfree89, linux and the rest. He/they knew what that was or the term wassn't a common searchword.

  107. Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Interesting


    And while XFree86 gets blocked on MSN, let's see how a search for "SCO" fares on the two engines. (Top 11, "Because it's one more, you see".)

    Hmmmm. Yep, no surprise there.

    MSN Search Results "SCO" (Top 11):

    1. SCO www.sco.com
    2. California State Controller Kids Site www.kids.sco.ca.gov
    3. Newsgroup: biz.sco news:biz.sco
    4. Reuters - MyDoom Worm Aimed at SCO Web Site
    5. DealTime - Sco Product www.dealtime.com/xGS-sco~NS-5320
    6. InfoWorld - SCO: IBM Cannot Enforce GPL
    7. Computer Business Consultants, SCO Unix Sales, Service & Support
    8. Calibex.com - Simple Tech SCO-QUBE3/256 256MB for Sun
    9. Bagpipe Marches & Music of Sco CD - Amazon.com
    10. Northern New Jersey Council - Camp No-Be-Bo-Sco www.nobebosco.org
    11. Northern New Jersey Council - Camp No-Be-Bo-Sco www.nnjbsa.org/camps/nobebosco

    Google Search Results "SCO" (Top 11):

    (Note: Includes the Google News "teaser" links just added.)

    News:
    1. SCO posts $2.3 million loss - InfoWorld - 2 hours ago
    2. Perth firm files complaint against SCO - The Age - 9 hours ago
    3. User group hits out at SCO - VNUNet - 11 hours ago
    4. www.caldera.com
    5. SCO | SCOsource www.caldera.com/scosource/
    6. OSI Position Paper on the SCO-vs.-IBM Complaint
    7. The SCO Group | SCO Grows Your Business sco.com/
    8. the SCO v IBM info website
    9. Analysis of SCO's Las Vegas Slide Show
    10. California State Controller's Office www.sco.ca.gov/
    11. GROKLAW www.groklaw.net/

    1. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by Nick_dm · · Score: 1

      I don't think its really fair to include the news links. They don't match up perfectly without them, but MS doesn't look quite so biased.

    2. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "I don't think its really fair to include the news links."

      I included them because it's exactly what showed up first in my generic Google search window as a Random Guy Doing A Search. So it's exactly what others would see. (Unless Google now has a "#ifdef MooseByte" directive. ;-) )

    3. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Camp No-Be-Bo-SCO

      No idea what the hell that is, but I think I'm going to send my kids there next summer.

    4. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by End11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      what the heck? that first MSN result has a broken link! ;)

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    5. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "No idea what the hell that is, but I think I'm going to send my kids there next summer."

      I'd mod you up if I could. :-)

    6. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by Duke · · Score: 1

      A Boy Scout camp in northwestern New Jersey. The name stands for NOrth BErgen BOy SCOuts. Bergen County is the county in the northeast corner of New Jersey. I spent many wonderful times there far too many years ago.

    7. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by marauder404 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you should include MSN"s search results for actual pages, not entire sites. MSN returns to you entire sites first, and then individual pages, in the belief that different sites of varying subject areas might get you to better stores of information. This is not a bad idea at all, since you might want to find different centers of high quality data rather than pages all about the same thing. For example, if you really were looking for the site about bagpipe songs and all you searched was "sco," you'd get a bunch of information that you didn't want. Both sites have its merits, but I do use Google for 99% of my queries. I'll have to re-evaluate after MSN releases its new search engine. Anyway, if you get down to indivdual pages, which is what Google does, the results are below.

      27. The SCO Group | SCO Grows Your Business
      28. the SCO v IBM info website
      29. SCO | SCOsource
      30. SCO | SCO Grows Your Business
      31. OSI Position Paper on the SCO-vs.-IBM Complaint
      32. SCO Unix Downloads
      33. SCO |
      34. The SCO Group | Scosource | SCOsource
      35. Exploit world -- SCO including Openserver section
      36. Ars Technica: The Nigerian SCO Connection - Page 1 - (8/2003)

    8. Re:Compare "SCO" on MSN v. Google by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "To be fair, you should include MSN"s search results for actual pages, not entire sites. MSN returns to you entire sites first, and then individual pages,"

      Jumping all the way down to the 27th MSN link to start comparing?!? You're joking, right? Sorry, that just doesn't make sense, any more than saying "Don't compare the front pages of the newspapers, you really have to look back in section D page 23 and compare that to the other paper's font page".

      People read the headlines, people focus on the first links they are presented with on a search engine.

  108. Could be... by JahToasted · · Score: 1
    maybe they aren't blacklisting sites, but they have some algorithm that automatically flags certain sites that have certain words that are used a lot on porn sites. X as in XXX, Free as in "click here for free pics" and 86 would probably appear on numbered jpegs at a porn site. And porn sites are generally popular, so something XFree{some other number} won't turn up because its not popular enough. The alogrithm probably has a certain threshold and XFree86 probably exceeded it.

    Of course I'd love to hear the conspiracy theories on why MS is banning XFree86, and not any other open source projects.

    1. Re:Could be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      altavista did exactly the same thing with "dick cheney" searches.

  109. Don't forget SCOX by prat393 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And they aren't even competition (well, ostensibly they are, but Microsoft's a UNIX licensee - does that mean they got all of these threatening letters, too?).

  110. It's Clearly 1 of 2 things . . . by Slavinski · · Score: 2

    Either they are blatantly "blocking" some search terms
    or this is just clear evidence of a shoddy search
    engine.

    Perhaps Microsoft is capable of both. :)

  111. Never assign.... by countach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Never assign to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity....

    1. Re:Never assign.... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      But... that would explain almost every aspect of human behavior...

      Democracy, capitalism, conspiracytheorism, advertising, religion, the lot; all explainable by stupidity.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Never assign.... by Argofickyusilf · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that someone's sig for the last 5 years?
      I'll find him....

    3. Re:Never assign.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never ASCRIBE to malice what can be explained by poor grammar.

    4. Re:Never assign.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never ascribe to stupidity what can be adequately explained by greed....

    5. Re:Never assign.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem here is that it cannot be adequately explained by stupidity.

  112. MSN have a search engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ;)

    But hey - since when has Microsoft adhered to any standard? Its their search engine, and by golly they'll do whatever they feel is best for them with it.

  113. Re:Not blocked, just shitty MSN search technology. by gral · · Score: 1

    But that is not what you would search for. XFree86 is the name found in Articles and such. Somebody wouldn't type in XFree89 because there search might misunderstand typing XFree86.

    That was the point of the post. It states if you search for 87 or 84 it works. The specific term XFree86 doesn't work.

    --
    Scott Carr
  114. Not necessarily. This will help lock 'em in. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have reached a level of cluefulness where you need to find information on Xfree86 then you are using Google as well.

    Not necessarily.

    If you start out as an MS user and hear about this other operating system, what is the first thing you need to do to BECOME clueful? Look it up. Right?

    So you look it up, using the tool you know. And the tool refuses, and tells you it's something pornographic.

    So you decide somebody's playing a joke on you and forget about it.

    And you never DO become cluefull enough to download it and try it out.

    And thus you never wean yourself from MSware.

    And you keep buying upgrades from MS.

    Multiply by millions.

    Multiply by hundreds of bucks each.

    Sounds like a GREAT marketing ploy.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  115. Just like Micro$oft by Coldeagle · · Score: 1

    It's just like Micro$oft to try to pull something like this. Xfree86 is what really makes Linux a Threat to them, because lets faces folks, most people can't hack the CLI.

    1. Re:Just like Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's just like Micro$oft to try to pull something like this. Xfree86 is what really makes Linux a Threat to them, because lets faces folks, most people can't hack the CLI

      ...whereas any script kiddie can hack windows :-)

    2. Re:Just like Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but most people can't hack raw XFree86, either. They need a full environment like Gnome or KDE, and an easy installer to get everything set up.

  116. bondage by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    "bondage" returns lots of results, mostly porn. I don't see a search engine trying to block "adult content."

    1. Re:bondage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because bondage isn't always sexual.
      Doesn't Microsoft want all of us to be in bondage to them? Straining against the yoke of software assurance? Restrained by the EULA? Struggling to close vulnerable ports?

    2. Re:bondage by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      That's because bondage isn't always sexual

      But every use of the terms "Master" and "Slave" is. Or is that because they are always racist?
      Hell, for all I know they might even have something to do with bloody computers, after all, this is /. ...

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  117. What Next? by reuben04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Browser Lockout
    link to MSN 3rd party Browser issue
    Disrespecting Privacy
    link to Bad MSN Bot
    Now building a search engine that removes our ability to choose?
    I seem to remember a few years ago jokes about what would happen if M$ provided searches....

  118. Sex education by Froggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I take it you haven't heard of the technique known as the '86'? That's like a 69, but the female partner's overweight.

    (As a lady of mature years, these days my husband and I mostly prefer the '96'. Zzzzz...)

    --
    It is a woman's prerogative to change other people's minds.
  119. Re: Microsoft's dis-service by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


    Sudbury General Hospital is in England

    btw. your grammar is appalling

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  120. Remove the X by sreid · · Score: 1
    remove the X and search for Free86 and it works

    not to defend msft

    1. Re:Remove the X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can also work it with X+Free86

      strange is it not

  121. Why? by Axoiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everything MS can do against competitors without getting sued, they will do.

  122. Workaround by ksemlerK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a workaround. Search for the term "XFree86+Unix http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=XFree86%2BUni x&FORM=SMCRT. This will pull up the most relevant sites related to the X Windowing system.

    1. Re:Workaround by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      But GNU's not Unix, and I want to use XFree86 with HURD.

  123. Like many others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like many other slashdotters, you are paranoid and making up bullshit "theories" to explain your suppression by society. Get a psychiatric!

  124. (I need to pay more attention...) by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you start out as an MS user and hear about this other operating system,

    Argh! I was THINKING BSD while TYPING about X. Guess I'm not being cluefull today. B-(

    But the point is still valid - finding out about a windowing system that's portable across other operating systems could help lead to conversion to the other op systems - and weaning from MSware.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  125. XXXfree86 by MrLint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    isnt blocked either. Something odd here. for sure

  126. Re:Nothing to see here by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Umm, I wasn't trolling. I thought the reference to Richard Nixon's enemy's list was funny.

  127. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1986 being the birthyear of 18 year olds would though. Porn is restricted to 18 years and over, and lots of sites advertise 18 year old women.

  128. bill gates is evil, remember by steak · · Score: 1

    duh.

  129. xfree86.1 seems to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/a

  130. wow, that's bad by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Funny... xfree86 returns adult content while "xxxfuck69" doesn't.

  131. 86 is actually shemale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-) 8=6<

  132. Flight Simulator is not orginated at Microsoft by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    I remember the very same engine at 8bits, C64 as well as ZX-Spectrum, with the same errors in maps (nav positions) as years later on IBM XT. So they used to buy a fully succesfull product to stamp it with their logo. BTW, the same happened with Dungeon Siege and Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  133. nothing to see here, lets move it on.... by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    MSN is apparently blocking the specific term 'XFree86' and not just filtering on something stupid like the 'X' or the 'Free', since you can search for 'XFree85' and 'XFree87' with no problem.

    I don't consider this unusual behavior at all.

    If I were creating a high-performance search engine that expected a lot of traffic and still wanted to block results that might be porn, I would want to optimize the matching process. I wouldn't want to consider every search term that raises even the smallest porn flag, that would take a ton of processing power and will block a lot of otherwise non-porn terms.

    So, I would want to set up a system where I would only have to match a term against a database of search term porn scores. The actual scoring could be scheduled, and would only take up massive processing time once a week or so. This makes the search processing more efficient because instead of generating a porn score with every term it only has to collect the search for future processing, and retrieve any currently existing score. This also lets me optimize the scoring based on a larger data set.

    So what data would I optimize the match with? Search frequency. Porn is without question the most searched for topic on the internet. So the best indication that something is porn is a ton of requests! I would create the porn score from a balance of possible porn triggers (such as 'X' and 'Free') with the frequency of the search term.

    So my search engine would probably yield the same results. 'XFree86' has porn triggers -- just like 'XFree85' and 'XFree87'. But what the others don't have is frequency. 'XFree86', by virtue of its own popularity, gets blocked by the system.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:nothing to see here, lets move it on.... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Any suggestions why "XFree86 fuck", "XFree86 sex", "Xfree86 whore", "XFree86 lesbian", "Xfree86 celeb" and "Xfree86 britney" return normal results?

    2. Re:nothing to see here, lets move it on.... by LuxFX · · Score: 0

      Did you read my whole message? Those terms won't match because they aren't searched for frequently enough. My concept requires BOTH porn triggers AND high search frequency. So, where a lot of people might search for "XFree86", not a lot of people search for "XFree86 sex". That would give "XFree86" a higher porn score.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    3. Re:nothing to see here, lets move it on.... by arkanes · · Score: 1
      Well, you almost had a point there for a while until your reply. XFree86 is obviously not a porn term in and of itself. If XFree86 hits a porn trigger (the mere existence of an "x" or a "free" does not trigger a porn block - "xx sex" does not hit a block, nor does "x sex".

      Whats far more likely, and in fact what my testing seems to indicate is that Nightsurf has bought certain, specific keywords and and for some reason xfree86 is one of those keywords. Since it's obviously not porn, it's probably an error or typo or a debugging keyword.

      "x sex" does not block. "xx sex" does not block. "xxx sex" blocks. "xxxx sex" blocks. "xxxxx sex" does not. "sex xxx lesbian" does not block. All of those searches do returns tons of porn, however.

    4. Re:nothing to see here, lets move it on.... by LuxFX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like your keyword theory. It doesn't explain why XFree86 was chosen, but it does a pretty good job of explaining the other results.

      But this:

      "x sex" does not block. "xx sex" does not block. "xxx sex" blocks. "xxxx sex" blocks. "xxxxx sex" does not. "sex xxx lesbian" does not block. All of those searches do returns tons of porn, however.

      Could also stregthen my argument. In my opinion at least, of these terms, "xxx sex" and "xxxx sex" are the one most likely to be used by someone searching for porn, and would therefore have the highest search frequencies. They all have more or less the same porn triggers, like the 'x' and 'sex', but the ones with the greatest theoretical frequency are the ones that get blocked.

      The "sex xxx lesbian" is the exception, I would have assumed that to be more frequent as well. But it's also the only three word phrase, which means that while the concept of "sex xxx lesbian" might be frequence, perhaps that particular order is not very common.

      To further the test:
      sex xxx lesbian PASS
      sex lesbian xxx PASS
      lesbian sex xxx BLOCK
      lesbian xxx sex PASS
      xxx lesbian sex BLOCK
      xxx sex lesbian PASS

      What does that mean? I have no idea. The two blocked searches are what I was expecting to be the most common searches, but that's just my opinion. Actually, analyzing this, I think it supports your theory. The keyword could be "lesbian sex" and the attachment of "xxx" is just coincidence.

      But it was fun to type in a bunch of sex terms and claim I was doing research for /. :)

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  134. Windows "X" P by Stu+Catz · · Score: 0

    i guess they are shooting themselves in the foot now

  135. Interestingly, XFree85 and XFree87 give you.. by stevek · · Score: 1

    A whole bunch of adult content as results.

    (Well, it gives you Xfree86 results, but since Xfree86 has now been declared pornographic..)

  136. gross specualation and prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do any of you people think this could be a simple mistake? The possibility of their search engine blocking it due to some data that isn't good spoiling it for the rest. You guy sall talk about open mindness and freedom yet when it comes to your enemies, these values are thrown out of the window. Not everything in this world is the result of a conspiracy bent on destroying your movement.

  137. First law of blame. by clintp · · Score: 1

    Never attribute to malice that which can adaquately be explained by stupidity.

    --
    Get off my lawn.
  138. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None. They don't want to use a windowing environment that requires knowledge of monitor resolutions, vertical and horizontal hz, interlaced or not, number of keys on keyboard, what kind of connector their mouse has, how many colors can their video adapter display, how much RAM their video adapter has, whether your video adapter is accelerated, opengl, glx, whatever, who is the manufacturer and what is the model number, how many buttons are on your human interface device, do you want an emulated third button, how the hell do you change the font in xterm, what window manager to use, how do I get true type fonts, how do I print, how do I do god damn anything with this piece of shit, why does mozilla screw up the font whenever I scroll the screen, why do I have to recompile a kernel to hear sounds, why do all the games look like they were written in 1990, why do I have 50 clocks and card games but no word processor, what the fuck is a netmask, dhcp, why do I have to write a script to dial my fucking modem, etc etc etc.

    Yes, I deleted the Linux partition and I've never regretted it!

  139. litigious bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  140. Re:Doubtful this was intentional. TRY x free 86 by jogariga82 · · Score: 1

    If you search for X FREE 86 with spaces you get the correct website on top. Strange?

  141. msn bans porn sex .. search in general??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try to search for "fuck" for example, or such stuff.

    it will give you the same output like xfree86

    what kinda world is this, where huge companies who have monopolies restrict you from certain parts of this world.

    jeezuz, when will they own the search engine market, and then simply block everything else that they want to.

    now i call this a really threatening process.

    have fun in this damn world.

  142. Paranoids out there by LS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Paranoids,

    Blocking XFree86 is not an indication of concious effort by Microsoft to divert traffic. Perhaps their blocking software has the following algorithm:

    For terms that have been searched for more than 10,000 times, block the term if the first letter is X and the second letter is a consonant.

    As you can see, this search doesn't consciously target XFree86. And XFree85 and XFree87 probably wouldn't meet the 10,000 criteria.

    Wouldn't you think that anyone who knows what XFree86 is would not be detered by MSN anyway?

    This is non-news. Hey everybody, the dots on acoustical tile above my cube spell out "Microsoft rules!" oh no!!!

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Paranoids out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, oh ...

      XBox???

    2. Re:Paranoids out there by LS · · Score: 1

      AC,

      While it can be debated whether MS blocks competitor keywords, a little common sense would tell you that that there must be an exceptions list to their blocking algorithms.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    3. Re:Paranoids out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For terms that have been searched for more than 10,000 times, block the term if the first letter is X and the second letter is a consonant.

      Xbox

    4. Re:Paranoids out there by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, your algorithm would label something very important to Microsoft as "possibly porn-related"

      The Xbox has more than likely been searched for more than 10,000 times.

      I'm willing to bet our boys in Redmond have sold this search term to a porn site and nothing more. If I was running a porn site, the lonely geeks looking for XFree86 would look pretty much like my target demographic. So why not pay to hijack a popular search term amongst lonely geeks - Microsoft will take the heat, and in the meantime, many lonely geeks will take a "side trip" from XFree86 to hotblondeswithgoats.com

      --
      Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    5. Re:Paranoids out there by RoLi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      For terms that have been searched for more than 10,000 times, block the term if the first letter is X and the second letter is a consonant.

      Oh, you mean like XBox, right?

    6. Re:Paranoids out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But with all the mentions of XFree85 and XFree87, don't you think those would reach the 10,000 mark as well? (Slashdot, folks.) And why does actually searching for porn return real websites, and not just an 'adult content' block?

      And anyways, why would they block things searched for over 10,000 times? That would make very common things like Employment and webmail. blocked as well?

      And, to refer you to a comment already posted, a person would use MSN search if they were a windowsite (90+% or whatever) and they hear about Linux and XFree86. They search, and find porn, thus deferring them from open source.

      Perhaps you're not paranoid enough.

    7. Re:Paranoids out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For terms that have been searched for more than 10,000 times, block the term if the first letter is X and the second letter is a consonant.


      What? That doesn't even make a remote amount of sense. Why would they block that? The ONLY thing I can think of is XX and XXX. When searching for things like XF and XG, I'm not looking for porn. Also, searching for XXX gives you both search results and the nightsurf link. This, I believe, took either concious effort, or is a BIG screw up on MS's part.
    8. Re:Paranoids out there by b0lt · · Score: 1
      --
      got sig?
    9. Re:Paranoids out there by tepples · · Score: 1

      And XFree85 and XFree87 probably wouldn't meet the 10,000 criteria.

      Given the presence of this Slashdot story, I'd guess confidently that the hit counts for those keywords, as well as for XFree69, have shot up over the last few hours.

    10. Re:Paranoids out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least five responses saying "Xbox", but not a single one mentioning... uhm... "XP"?

      I'm pretty sure XP would be searched for more often than XBox, if only to try and find ways to disable the myriad annoying and stupid things it does (I recently re-installed XP on my system, but I'm not bitter!)

    11. Re:Paranoids out there by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Why do you find it plausible that Microsoft uses an ludicrous blocking algorithm with an exception list including their products, but not that Microsoft uses an inclusion list including "xfree86"?

    12. Re:Paranoids out there by LS · · Score: 1

      Come on, use your brain. I never said that this was the actual algorithm, or that 10,000 is some magic number. It was just an example to show that perhaps it's not malicious intent on MS' part.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    13. Re:Paranoids out there by LS · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone find this so difficult to understand? I never claimed that MS ISN'T blocking XFree86. I only claim that we also don't know if they ARE blocking it. You can't know unless you see their actual code. It could be one of a hundred schemes, some malicious, some not. Don't you think that with the millions of search terms out there, it would be strange if certain things WEREN'T blocked by accident?

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    14. Re:Paranoids out there by tallpole · · Score: 1

      I may be being presumptious in this world of Microsoft bashing, but I find it curious that people list using the MSN search under the "Your Rights Online" category. Unless we're all trying to say that Microsoft is governmental in nature and provides us with necessities (unlikely coming from open source community members), then we can hardly consider MSN a right- more like a service provided by MSN for our benefit- we have as much right complaining that they filter certain results, as we do complaining that our rights are being taken away when we can't place AA batteries in an Ipod when it never expressed that it could use them in the first place. Arguably MSN claims to be a encompassing search engine- but how many car companies or other manufacturers tell you the advantages and (potentially superior) pricing of competitors products??? MSN a right- hardly, it's a voluntary service provided at the cost of another company, not at my cost!

  143. Nope by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps they are doing soundex/metaphone type matching on the words to see if they are sex-related. Perhaps "xfree86" sounds like something you might find on a porn site.

    Maybe it does, but "xfreee86" sounds the same, and returns real search results, and "xfree66" has more "six/sex" sounds in it and returns real search results. They're not filtering by sound.

  144. XFree69 by jkirby · · Score: 1

    Paranoia will destroy ya.

    --
    Jamey Kirby
  145. Explore MSN by slashdotters? by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    So, fellow slashdotters, let's try a msn search for more open source & linux stuff and make some public affairs to the official press out of those silly results!

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  146. Well, think about it (!) by Apostata · · Score: 1

    Not to be cruel, but let's face it - it's certainly a last name which, for an otherwise anonymous email user, seems conspicuous even though I realise it's totally legit.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  147. I wonder if anyone has bothered... by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to tell the powers that be at MSN that the search is producing 'erroneous results'? It might just be that they're overlooking a problem they don't otherwise know exists.

    Of course I haven't done this either... but frankly, I could care less.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:I wonder if anyone has bothered... by arose · · Score: 1

      I have seen many bugs mister insightful, but this would be the top. Could you provide one, just one reasonable scenario how they could flag XFree86 but NOTHING similar?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:I wonder if anyone has bothered... by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 1

      Software is an arbitrary, abstract construct that is for the most part only limited by the physical limitations of the hardware that the software is running on. But otherwise, completely spawn by mere mortals. Interestingly enough what constitutes a 'reasonable' quality is equally a human concept without the bounds of hardware. Trying to apply an arbitrary standard of reasonableness to the functionality a code that has few rules outside of the designer's/developer's mind is a fools game.

      For as long as I've been involved in implementation project either as an implementer or as a manager I have had many developers tell me what my customers in the field were seeing could not happen. They'd tell me this with a straight face while looking at the code in question. In essence they were taking for granted what was reasonable and saying, "I have seen many bugs mister insightful, but this would be the top." In the end they always failed when I brought them to the customer's environments and said show me. These weren't bad developers either, simply ones that figured they knew what was reasonable and failing to consider tangentally related code that might be causing an outcome.

      So maybe it's not a bug at all... it would not be unreasonable to think that some lower level, gung-ho guy at Microsoft may have actually caused this to happen without some conspiracy. Maybe that perrson just did it to get a rise out of the Slashdot crowd. This would still be something that a report to the customer support people at MSN and management would want to correct that they might not know was happening. And it is by no means unreasonable to think that the criteria Microsoft uses for catching porn sites happens to catch XFree86 and nothing else that you consider reasonablly similar (remember most people here have no clue how Microsoft does this). And, yes, just because your paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you; though intentionally obscurring search results doesn't seem to be the most stragically sensible way to achieve the MS's goals in this area.

      In honesty, I wonder if there isn't a contingent of Slashdotters that reads Slashdot all day and Art Bell all night.

    3. Re:I wonder if anyone has bothered... by arose · · Score: 1

      Spin it how you will, but the most sensible is to think that they have "xfree86" in some database, somewhere for some reason. It may be a bug that is showing that to us, but they seem to have it somewhere in there... And im not paranoid. It's just that Microsoft have shown again and again that they are evil. And it doesn't make much difference to me if they are blocking "xfree86" or just selling it to nightsurf.com.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:I wonder if anyone has bothered... by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 1

      It's not spin at all; and if so I challenge you to point out the inherent fallacy of the argument. Failing that I don't see how my suppositions are any less valid than yours.

      Look, all I am pointing out is that given the information set at hand there is no way to come to any meaningful conclusion without the noise of bias overwhelming the known facts of this matter. In fact, in my so called spin, I acknowledge that it could very well be intent but even if it is you can't say it's a coordinated Microsoft effort.

      So consider my original comment. I don't offer any one cause or theory per se. What I do offer is a suggestion that can produce a tangible result through action or lack thereof on MSN's part. The real underlying message of my comment, and first response to you, is this would not be the first time some accusation about Microsoft tainting search results was posted on Slashdot and made throughout the Linux community in general that was found to be baseless. I know of instances where it was downright untrue. So really, it's more a comment of what any given community is willing to accept as truth/dogma rather than some defense of MS.

      I do want to again answer your presumption of cause in this instance (rather than simply dismiss it ad hominem). Clearly there is bias in your response as you prescribe the label 'evil' to Microsoft; so much so that I could summarize your comments: 'Microsoft is evil therefore they must be manipulating their search results to suit their own evil purposes.' I can't say that isn't what's happening... but I can no more say that it is the most sensible conclusion.

      If I look at this from MS's point of view, it seems to me that they would actually dimmish their value by clouding searches for open source type projects. While they very decidedly own the desktop and can do what they will there, they don't yet own web search. If they dilute the effectiveness of searches using MSN searchers will catch on and make another choice: net result is that MS fails to earn the advertising revenue and screentime where they can evangelize their own message. If I were an MS senior manager I would try to make the searches as accurate as possible and adopt a modified 'embrace and extend' approach. In so doing I wouldn't alienate anyone with so little upside and I would, for a time capture eyeballs that may be receptive to my messages (i.e. banners, other content). Really, I would manipulate the order of searches long before I did something so blatant as obliterate the results. We also shouldn't forget that MSN is an operating unit and that they have their own financial goals within the larger corporate entity of MS. I really think MS chooses their battles more wisely than you're suggesting.

      Wow... I've spent more time on this whole thing than I intended. It's been fun debating, nonetheless... cheers!

    5. Re:I wonder if anyone has bothered... by arose · · Score: 1

      Damn it, what is /. comming to. All I wanted was to flame one of the "this MUST be a bug" posters. And of course I pick someone who turns it into a meaningful discussion, obviously hopeless for me.
      *Mutters while adding Steve to friends list*

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  148. Funny how... by UfoZ · · Score: 1

    ...a search for XXXFree86 turns up a result. Better try harder next time, MSN.

  149. W00 W00 CONSPIRACY! GET ME THAT TINFOIL FAST! by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    Man good thing I got a lot of tinfoil hats around, becuase I'm selling them like hotcakes right now and making a ton of $$ off all the fools.

    I'm also stocking up on clingfilm in case Roy Orbison ever starts posting here.

  150. Neat trick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fell for it. Clicked it. LOL.

  151. I bet this is Nightsurf.com's fault by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nightsurf.com must be a paying partner with MSN search. I bet they bought the keyword "xfree86" from MSN search, such that any searches on *precisely* that keyword will reroute the user to their search engine.

    My theory is backed up by the fact that if you search for "xfree86 xfree86" rather than just "xfree86", you get back the right results.

    I bet MSN Search would like to be notified of Nightsurf.com's trickery...

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  152. Shifted characters by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interestingly XFree*^ (SHIFT+86) returns the correct site listed as number one (xfree.org). Yeah, I did it by accident.

    --
    I think I'll stop here.
    1. Re:Shifted characters by Boing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, you know, that uppercase eight can be a tricky one. :)

    2. Re:Shifted characters by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      So does "XFree", though. Most likely, they strip strings of non-letter non-digit non-spaces non-quotes before they start searching.

  153. Re:Microsoft browses slashdot by plaisted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft browses slashdot too, you know. So they probably know where the spike in bandwidth is coming from even if they don't have one of those big screens.

  154. Weird rules by casious · · Score: 1

    Strange that this isn't porn:
    bill gates gay porn

  155. Funny... by dhoonlee · · Score: 1

    xfree86 is blocked, but seXbox, is not. just what is "adult content" to microsoft anyway?

  156. xfree86 and xfree86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interestingly, if you search for xfree86 xfree86"you get the xfree86 home page
    No sign of porn.

    1. Re:xfree86 and xfree86 by dropoffx · · Score: 0

      At least they get something right. Try litigous bastard.

      --
      This space for rent. Contact for our rates.
  157. xfree86.org by mculey · · Score: 1

    The best part is that searching for xfree86.org works just fine. Evidently the website isn't porn but the product is.

  158. This is Microsoft bashing, plain and simple by dalabrat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Goto http://search.msn.com select "Advanced Search" put in XFree86 then click on search.

    You'll get a page with a box that has "Sponsored Sites" at the top and a link to NightSurf.com

    Now click on the link below that box that says "Go Back to MSN Search"

    OMG.... it's the results of the search for XFree86.. perhapse their "BETA" search engine is having problems with the basic search and sponsored links code. Overall the original article is BS since they rushed to slam Microsoft and didn't double check everything.

    1. Re:This is Microsoft bashing, plain and simple by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Good catch, I knew I was hesitant to jump on this bandwagon for a reason...

    2. Re:This is Microsoft bashing, plain and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for me, when i go back to msn search, it says nothing found for XFree86..
      also if you search for Xfree86 and add any second word, it'll return the correct results. i don't see how this makes any sense at all... obviously there are valid search results for Xfree86 and they should be listed when you "Go Back to MSN Search" this isn't definite proof that MS is blocking Xfree86 but MSN Search still sux and deserves a good bashing.

    3. Re:This is Microsoft bashing, plain and simple by megabunny · · Score: 1



      Advanced search results below (view basic search results)

      Results 1-15 of about 222028 containing "xfree86"

      And a whole bunch of pertinent links below..

      No porn on the first two pages, except possibly the Cyrillic site. Unlikely to be porn sites seeding a popular term. Leaving the intentional block and stupid search engine theories.

      MB

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    4. Re:This is Microsoft bashing, plain and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this is Slashdot. The land of the free and home of the habitual complainer and whiner anything Microsoft.

  159. Time for open source search engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With MSN's censorship, Yahoo's commercialist priorities, and Google's waning dominance, is it time for the open source community to design an open source search engine of their own? A search engine free of commercial goals, a search engine dedicated solely to its own performance? Or is this the goal of Google, but it's just not keeping up with companies' improving their web site's rank by illegitimate means?

  160. Clearly... by sarastro_us · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly Microsoft objects to XF86's new license as being restrictive to the growth of Free Software worldwide!

  161. xfree86 porn sex hot tits ass cunt naked penis by Homo+Stannous · · Score: 2, Funny

    Turns up a result, and doesn't trigger the porn filter. Add "babes fuck breast" if you like.

  162. XFree86 Porn Search works fine by Aguila · · Score: 1

    I used these two terms: XFree86 porn

    If any search combination containing XFree86 as a term should be blocked for returning too high of a percentage of porn links that would be the one. After all, this search should clearly increase the proportion of porn related sites. However, that search works fine.

    I must admit, however, that the search did not return XFree86.org as the first result. Instead, the first result (and the fourth) were both Slashdot, which some people might argue, while not porn, does provide numerous goatse.cx and associated links.

    1. Re:XFree86 Porn Search works fine by Riktov · · Score: 1

      I must admit, however, that the search did not return XFree86.org as the first result. Instead, the first result (and the fourth) were both Slashdot, which some people might argue, while not porn, does provide numerous goatse.cx and associated links.

      That's because every one of those pages found contain both "XFree86" and "porn". I haven't checked, but I doubt that any of the pages hosted by xfree86.org contain the term "porn".

  163. Re:Oh, they block Linux, Macintosh, and other term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing morally wrong with pr0n! dagnabbit, papa needs his fix! Better go search for some eXtra FREE 86 year old honeys on msn. They always let ma searches through to the honeyfields!

  164. its because it then only searches for "xfree" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the trash carachters (differs according to what kinda language/region/keyboard you have) doesnt get searched or it still give the most hits for xfree

    in german keyboards it would for example search for
    http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=xfree%28%26&F ORM=SMCRT

    but its the same result as if it would only search for "xfree"

    http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=xfree

  165. Not to be me too.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    But the assumption that there is 'evol' going on here seems pretty silly. XFree86 isn't one of the sexier OSS pieces, its important, sure, but its much to deeply nested a component for it to a popular search string for new users. If they blocked/rerouted 'Linux' it would pretty much go without saying that they were being petty, but this certainly looks like a stupid error (or if intentional, a stupid joke).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  166. Does that include ActiveX, ASPX, DirectX, or XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does that include ActiveX, ASPX, DirectX, or XBox?

  167. Re:Microsoft browses slashdot by Cipster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes the Eye Of Bill is watching. I can sense it's Evil gaze.

  168. They blocked other things in the past ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Back in the good old days ... of the dot-com boom, I worked on the first web-based airline-travel reservation system ever (online in June 1995 to be precise). A while later, Microsoft got into that business, and at that point, we discovered that all traffic from MSN customers to our site was blocked. Prior to this, something like 5-10% of all hits came from there, and the drop in traffic was noticable. (We had breakdowns: AOL was about 10%-15%, Prodigy another 5%-10%, and netcom another 10%).

    We talked about doing the full investigation, and suing, etc. and even called the district attorney since this seemed to be criminal behaviour to us. We decided we were too small and too poor to pursue the matter as a civil case, and I don't know what happened w/ the DA.

    I thought it was pretty foul play, it was one of a number of incidents that helped turn me into a bitter Microsoft-hater.

    1. Re:They blocked other things in the past ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you consider that maybe MSN users were just being presented with a different option when they looked for travel reservation systems? That Microsoft would try to answer a query, on their own network, with a solution that they themselves provide?

      Did you have anyone log onto MSN and try to navigate too your site and fail before blaming it on some evil action on Microsoft's part?

    2. Re:They blocked other things in the past ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - they talked to the DA, but didn't even bother
      to "log onto MSN"...

      Idiot. Your accusatory tone makes me think you want
      to discredit the parent post.

      Idiot.

  169. You cheeky monkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness we all watched Austin Powers, or we'd have no idea what they're talking about..

  170. Scandels by WanderingFighter · · Score: 1

    Simple enough, anything to do with Free Microsoft has blocked.

    --
    $>man woman
    $>Segmentation fault (core dumped)
  171. Explanation by triiiple · · Score: 1

    Try surfing to Free6. I bet most pornsurfing Swedes now about that one. 6 is "sex" in Swedish, thus free6 --> free sex. I guess its use is more widespread now.

    Hey, atleast you have another source for porn now... D'oh!

  172. X free 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    X free 86 seems to work ok, they can't be too cunning.

    1. Re:X free 86 by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      You're right. This is just a cunning stunt.

  173. Linux by panxerox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well thats funny a search for linux on msn brings up only 414 results, I WONDER why? http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=Linux&FORM=SM CRT

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Linux by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Well thats funny a search for linux on msn brings up only 414 results, I WONDER why? http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=Linux&FORM=SM CRT

      That have been disscussed before, but actually I got 15281677 results when searching for Linux right now. Anyway the reason some terms sometimes give fewer results apears to be that the first results are sponsored results. And until you have gone through all sponsored results it shows only the number of sponsored results. Of course sponsored results might very well include pages explaining why Windows is better than Linux.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  174. Second Law of Blame by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Never attribute to malice that which can adaquately be explained by stupidity.

    Don't be so closed minded. They could easily be both evil and stupid.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  175. Most likely a fluke by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    Well... searching for something like

    xfree86 a (most pages contain the letter a somewhere :)

    will return valid results. My guess is that this is just some sort of fluke. Microsoft wouldn't do anything to block the pages of their competitors... that's just ASKING for another DOJ lawsuit. They're not iditots, and they're not necessarily evil.

    I'd actually expect this to be the other way around ---- Konqueror blocking MS's site, or something. Microsoft's not childish enough to do this...

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Most likely a fluke by smash · · Score: 1
      "Netscape developers are weenies" ring a bell? :D

      5 points for the person who picks out the source ;)

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Most likely a fluke by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      LAWBRAKER!! INFRINGER!! COPYRIGHT VIOLATOR!!! NT4_2k_SOURCE_CODE_STEALER!!!

      good one.

      shoot me in the poopshoot as i hate the crapfilter that trolls get around anyways cause im yelling when i intentionally want to but this place sux soo much

      --
  176. Strange... by mangu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did a search for "teen shemales fisting watersports anal toys"[msn.com], and got www.xfree86.org as a result...

    1. Re:Strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well that's strange, because I put in a search for "http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/vmhilden/" and got a picture of a man with breasts peeing on another woman with a dildo in her butt, and a fist in her...

    2. Re:Strange... by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Funny
      I did a search for "teen shemales fisting watersports anal toys"[msn.com], and got www.xfree86.org as a result...

      Well that is just great. Now how am I supposed to find my favorite teen shemales fisting watersports sites?

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    3. Re:Strange... by Super_Duck_ZA · · Score: 1

      Your saying that msn.com isnt your favourite? "Hey Baby, is that a butterfly or are you just happy to see me?"

      --
      - SD -
    4. Re:Strange... by cameleon · · Score: 1

      Well, msn might not be accurate, but they're fast: those search terms (yes, I had to try) now bring up this slashdot article...

    5. Re:Strange... by parksie · · Score: 1

      Not sure what's more masochistic, anal fisting or trying to configure X...

    6. Re:Strange... by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      "Well that is just great. Now how am I supposed to find my favorite teen shemales fisting watersports sites?"

      That's easy.
      1. Change your Slashdot level to -1
      2. Look for the trolls.
      3. Click on goatse.cx link
      4. ????
      5. Profit?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    7. Re:Strange... by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

      goatse.cx has been dead since January.
      They got sued and shut down. =(

      --
      void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
  177. But these work? by fdamstra · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The following search terms, which I'd think would trigger their detection algorithm, all work fine for me, and even return porn sites:

    Catholic Schoolgirls

    Hot teen sluts

    upskirt shots

    pictures of women licking my balls

    sexy XFree86 girls

    So, even if XFree86 was unintentional, what content do they think they're protecting us from?

    1. Re:But these work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pictures of women licking my balls

      I don't think that ever happened. :)

  178. "x free 86" works... by gregfortune · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "x free 86" returns xfree.org as the first search result. Something funky is going on..

    1. Re:"x free 86" works... by Bastian · · Score: 1

      So does "XFree86 X11."

      Either this was a joke on the part of some M$ developer, or the person who coded it wasn't very bright.

  179. Not everything is a conspiracy... by brundlefly · · Score: 1

    This is probably just the handiwork of some lone engineer at MS who found this amusing. Now he's out of a job. (Ever heard of an easter egg? This is a slightly nastier equivalent.)

    I seriously doubt Bill sent around a memo to MSN directing them to block searched for XFree86....

  180. Maybe they are blocking it because... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    ...Windows is becoming more Unix like but just using friendlier terms. I recently discovered in XP that the display manager and audio server in XP appear to operate in a very similar way to Gnome on XFree86 and esound. What led me to this discovery was that I started up a Cisco VPN client session and it hosed some of my network connections to my internal LAN. It also broke sound to where I couldn't listen to any media. When I disconnected from VPN, the sound came back. And if you think about it, the "Fast User Switching" feature in Windows XP is basically a nice GUI interface to switching between multiple display servers. Just like running multiple X servers each on a different virtual console and pressing Alt- to get to each user's desktop. Anyone think some of the improvements in the Windows GUI have anything in common with XFree86?

  181. XFree86 associated with porn? by BubbaFett · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where would they get that idea?

    1. Re:XFree86 associated with porn? by InvaderXimian · · Score: 1

      Not everyone is a perverted Freshmeat user, you sick, sick man!

  182. Follow the money folks by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a fairly competent internet programmer, so here's my analysis: follow the money. First thing to examine is the url that MS presents. I've split it into multiple lines for readability. Notice that it contains two other urls as parameters.

    http://search.msn.com/adpassthru.aspx
    ?ADTARGET=http://ads.msn.com/ads/adredir.asp
    %3F&TARGET=http://apps.NightSurf.com/~wsapi/nssear ch.dll
    %3Fdealcode%3Dmsn%26src%3D1%26key%3D&QUERY=xfree86
    &IMG=http://ads.msn.com/ads/IMGWB3/004400170001_TR .gif

    This url takes you back to the msn search site so that it can record your click. The search site responds with a code 302 (Document moved) and redirects you to ads.msn.com. Here is the url for that. Notice the similarity.

    http://ads.msn.com/ads/adredir.asp
    ?url=http%3a%2f%2fapps.NightSurf.com
    %2f%7ewsapi%2fnssearch.dll
    %3fdealcode%3dmsn%26src%3d1%26key%3dxfree86
    &image=http://ads.msn.com/ads/IMGWB3/004400170001_ TR.gif

    This ad site responds with another redirect that finally takes you to nightsurf. Here is the url for that.

    http://apps.NightSurf.com/~wsapi/nssearch.dll?de al code=msn&src=1&key=xfree86

    Now here's where it really gets interesting. Notice the dealcode and key parameters in particular. They would seem to imply that MSN has some kind of deal with NightSurf.

    I have to conclude that NightSurf paid MSN to feature it's ad (that's what it is, not a search result) when users type in 'XFree86'. I had difficulty understanding why a porn search site would want to do something like that, so I started investigating. First stop, betterwhois.com. Here's what they have to say about NightSurf.com.

    Registrant:
    WebPower Inc.
    ATTN: NIGHTSURF.COM
    c/o Network Solutions
    P.O. Box 447
    Herndon, VA. 20172-0447

    Domain Name: NIGHTSURF.COM

    Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
    Inc., WP av4xg8hq3ck@networksolutionsprivateregistration.co m
    ATTN: NIGHTSURF.COM
    c/o Network Solutions
    P.O. Box 447
    Herndon, VA 20172-0447
    570-708-8780

    It seems that this is a private listing from Network Solutions and any further investigation will have to include sending an email to the listed address.

    So the question remains, why is NightSurf.com (A.K.A. Web Power, Inc.) paying Microsoft for the XFree86 keyword? Did Microsoft knowingly accept that or was it more automated? Do I or do I not have a hole in my hat?

    --
    No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    1. Re:Follow the money folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does the search term Xfree86 Xfree86 return proper results (i.e. Xfree86.org)? Are they paying for only a single occurrence in a search term then?

    2. Re:Follow the money folks by T3kno · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good work, I was just about to post the same thing my self. An interesting search is this one site:nightsurf.com It looks like the dealcode paramater is the affiliate, for lack of a better term, who nightsurf is paying. Bomis is some kind of bogus search engine, and any key word that is listed on the google search in Bomis gives you a very similar page to the one search.msn.com gives you for the XFree86 result.

      Something very fishy is going on as it looks like there has to be some sort of agreement for nightsurf to like a specific query. Changing the dealcode to msn on one of the Bomis search strings redirects you to the dealcode=other site and porn is only for grownups warning.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    3. Re:Follow the money folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This article goes over the MS NightSurf bs. http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0106/tech-gu nn.shtml

    4. Re:Follow the money folks by Animats · · Score: 1
      Webpower is a Florida corporation. If anybody cares, here's their info:
      • WEBPOWER, INC.

      • 3918 VIA POINCIANA
        SUITE 5
        LAKE WORTH FL 33467

        MAILING ADDRESS
        7765 LAKE WORTH ROAD
        SUITE 341
        LAKE WORTH FL 33467

        Officer/Director Detail
        HADHAZY, ALLAN E
        7765 LAKE WORTH ROAD
        LAKE WORTH FL 33467

      Their primary business is porno video chat. Beyond that, Hadhazy had once owned "exclusive rights" to the first Internet-enabled dildo, but that product line was apparently unsuccessful.

    5. Re:Follow the money folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn being the only biz that makes money on the internet why wouldn't they pay they payed that guy with the mangeled kid friendly domains 10-25c a pop so why wouldn't they pay for pretty much anything else.....same reason spam has a 7% response rate poeple are stupid beyond all comprehension...

    6. Re:Follow the money folks by Vexware · · Score: 0

      I do not know if this will be read since this story will be out-of-date soon, but strangely, if you set the 'Key' parameter to 'XFree86' in a NightSurf search where the 'deal code' parameter is 'Bomis', it returns to the adult warning and defaults the deal code to 'other'. So indeed, the XFree86 search term only works on Nightsurf if the "affiliate" is MSN...

      --
      "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval
  183. Yes but, if you search for "operating system"... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    Windows doesn't appear until No 18 - under UNIX, Linux Online and X-Windows.

    So, if they are fixing their position for search engine, I guess we can assume they did the same for operating system, eh :)

    Or maybe they're trying to tell us something? ;-)

    .02

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  184. Well, *DUH* by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    X=universally accepted as a symbol for porn.
    Free=free porn! (all porn sites are "free" right?)
    69 (mutual buccogenital intercourse) + 17 (17-year-old horny russian teens boobs blowjob sex cum adult hot lesbian)=86

    Therefore XFree86=triple combo adult content! w00t! Thank you Microsoft Search!

    (Posting drunken. HARAM!)

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  185. They're suggesting something illegal too! by enosys · · Score: 1

    They're suggesting something illegal too! IE 6 isn't free. You're only allowed to run it on a legal copy of Windows.

    1. Re:They're suggesting something illegal too! by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 1

      oh really? It's freely downloadable if you have a copy of Crossover Office... so I guess I use it illegally?

      --

      Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
    2. Re:They're suggesting something illegal too! by enosys · · Score: 1
      Here is part of the agreement that you have to accept when you run ie6setup.exe. It was originally all caps and the slashdot lameness filter wouldn't let me post it so I made it all lowercase.

      note: if you do not have a valid eula for any "os product" (including, without limitation, microsoft windows 98, microsoft windows nt 4.0, microsoft windows 2000, microsoft millennium edition, microsoft windows xp, or any other microsoft operating system that is a successor to any of the foregoing operating systems) you are not authorized to install, copy, or otherwise use the os components and you have no rights under this supplemental eula.

  186. You're all overlooking the most obvious reason by ArmorFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    They've portscanned all you porn-downloading turkeys, and noticed that
    1) you have XFree86.
    2) you only ever use it to look at porn.

    And by the way, isn't there a porn-centric linux distribution yet, with tools for downloading huge tracts of porn from usenet etc?

    1. Re:You're all overlooking the most obvious reason by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's called Lesbian Linux (word play on debian).

      Cums with apt-slit and ypkg.

      --
    2. Re:You're all overlooking the most obvious reason by edwdig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's what you need - Lesbian Linux.

      Provides the porn-get package manager to provide all your porn needs.

  187. Mod-Parent UP!!! by Argofickyusilf · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of this before...and it doesn't seam improbable!

  188. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Don't tell me I'm the only one who asks my wife if she wants to XFree86 tonight?

    Really? I can understand you asking her for X Free 69, but X Free 86 means something quite different. It means:
    "To refuse to serve (an unwelcome customer) at a bar or restaurant. To throw away."
    (see http://phrases.shu.ac.uk/meanings/128100.html )

    If you ask your wife to 86 you, you're definitely too kinky for slashdot.;-)

  189. Re:Dipshits by Argofickyusilf · · Score: 1

    No. I don't stink AC.

  190. Heh! Try this... by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Funny

    I got the adult content warning and tried:

    xfree86 bullshit its adult content...

    for a laugh, which for some reason bought back a bucketload of Slashdot stuff (!?). Conspiracy against xfree86? No, it's just a really bad search engine.

    1. Re:Heh! Try this... by Rets.kcirt · · Score: 0

      Better, yet: linux bullshit.

  191. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course it's a conspiracy! that's how m$ was built. got clue?

  192. XFree86 Porn by SiMac · · Score: 1

    It's odd that XFree86 is apparently a porn term, but the query XFree86 porn works fine...

    1. Re:XFree86 porn by frazzydee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wow! What a horrible search engine! Xfree86 porn doesn't bring up the warning because it's not the EXACT term which they have in their database. I suspect that they compiled a list of terms likely to bring up adult content, but they fail to check if somebody used a combination of those words.
      Seach for porn, and you'll get the nightsurf thing. Search for nude, and you'll also get the nightsurf warning. But- if you search for porn nude then you'll get no warning at all!!! This is stupid even for microsoft standards.

    2. Re:XFree86 porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and searching for XFree86 porn doesn't come up with the adult warning, either.

      Go figure...

    3. Re:XFree86 porn by fulldecent · · Score: 5, Funny

      i believe the best demonstration is saerching for 'porn' and then 'porn porn'

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    4. Re:XFree86 porn by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously the MS programmer(s/oids) is(are/are) ANDing the evil bit flags instead of ORing them. They did check the for evil bit, didn't they?!

      Why do I get the feeling that if you manually overrode the "maxlength=150" and set them a nice custom GET with "bork" 17000 times on the MSN search line, somewhere in Redmond a server will go down?

      --
      --
    5. Re:XFree86 porn by abruvik · · Score: 1

      X free 86 or even xxx free 86 works:) (the last one does not give you the XFree86 homepage as the top result, though)

    6. Re:XFree86 porn by sosume · · Score: 1

      Actually, replaying your search led me to live nude cats ;)

    7. Re:XFree86 porn by Myco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, presumably if you type it twice, then you're sure you want it and don't need a warning.

    8. Re:XFree86 porn by nvivo · · Score: 1

      Searching for "Xfree86 Xfree86" works perfectly and the first result is xfree86.org. Hmmm... maybe microsoft is worried about people looking for free pictures of 86 years old nude ladies. Why not???

    9. Re:XFree86 porn by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 1

      Except for me, it tried to correct the spelling to "pornporn" (no space).

      I can't believe MS screwed up *that* much. But then, nor can I stop laughing.

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    10. Re:XFree86 porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probalbly nsfw, but a search for deep anal fisting yeilds a whole load of results... somehow I'm not surprised.

    11. Re:XFree86 porn by Handyman · · Score: 1

      I tried it with a hand-crafted "porn" URL, and it seems that they cut it off:

      Results 1-15 of about 75967 containing "porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn por"

      However, it did upset Firebird. After keeping Ctrl+V pressed for about 20 seconds on "+bork" the URL field went completely blank.

      Let's take a look at the score:

      Microsoft:

      +1 (Correctly handle loads of borks)
      -1 (XFree86 is porn)
      ==
      0

      Open Source:

      -1 (Incorrectly handle loads of borks)
      +1 (XFree86 can be used to view porn)
      ==
      0

      Total score: 0-0!

    12. Re:XFree86 porn by smyle · · Score: 1
      Obviously the MS programmer(s/oids) is(are/are) ANDing the evil bit flags instead of ORing them.

      Obviously not. In this case (porn porn) the result would be the same. Maybe they're XORing? Quick, somebody try "porn porn porn".

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    13. Re:XFree86 porn by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      no because if you search for "free x pictures of 86 year old wemon" you get xfree86.org.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    14. Re:XFree86 porn by PurpleWizard · · Score: 1

      Searching for x free 86 turns up the home page as number one.

    15. Re:XFree86 porn by KFury · · Score: 1

      What's more, this thread is the first result! At least their spider is fast.

    16. Re:XFree86 porn by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

      Right you are.

      --
      --
  193. Sometimes a banana is just a banana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Anna.

    You're being paranoid.

  194. search for X11 worked by alexc · · Score: 1

    i search for X11 ... i actually got valid results

  195. Search by brandona788 · · Score: 1

    You can search for "XFree 86" (note space). Foiled again!

  196. Lier Lier Pants On Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've got Google defaulted to 100 results per page and there are no porn sites on the first page of results. You sound like a shameless M$oft apologist (or a Republican.)

    In the interest of full disclosure however, MOST of my Google searches have porn sites in the results.

  197. Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    According to http://phrases.shu.ac.uk/meanings/128100.html it means:
    "To refuse to serve (an unwelcome customer) at a bar or restaurant. To throw away."

    So MSN must think that XFree86 is some kind of restaurant fetish. Oh waitress.....

  198. Stupidest fucking article ever by NineNine · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Look, "X" and "Free" together generally have something to do with porn. It's not a great search engine. End of story. This is the most paranoid, totally unfounded, ridiculous, asinine article I've ever read on /. (and let me tell, you, I've read a LOT of them).

    1. Re:Stupidest fucking article ever by kindbud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that searching for "x free 86" on MSN returns the XFree86 homepage as the first result (so does a search for "x free86" and "xfree 86" and just "xfree"). A search for "x free" returns some X-Men web pages, free speech sites, and other "free" stuff and "x" stuff - but no adult content results. Only "xfree86" returns the link to the "adult content" page. I think your theory does not stand up to a real world test.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Stupidest fucking article ever by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Then why is it that XFree 86 goes through, as does XFree87, XFree69, X86Free, etc unfiltered. Definitely worth at least a raised eyebrow here. I could understand if it were Advertised in porn sites or something, but it's a server product. Though admittedly, MS is proving themselves to be silly in the fact that we're talking about this over a half a day later. It just seems to me that something like this would have been handled quickly; it's not like it would be that hard to add xfree86 to the exclusionary filter when determining the "pornness" of a keyword.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  199. A reason maybe... by niittyniemi · · Score: 2, Informative


    > So to me it does not look like "some porn sites plastered
    > the term "XFree86" all over themselves", but more like a
    > suspiciously blocked search query.


    A "friend" (cough) told me that there is a porn site with xfree in it's URL.

    BTW, a search for "latex" comes up with Mac TeX second down but with the Windows port MiKTeX nowhere to be seen. I wonder why....

    --
    The Machine stops.
  200. That explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right!

    That means that XFree86 is all fucked up, so of course it's porn!

  201. Microsoft Proxy server blocks gnu.org? by sco_is_for_babies · · Score: 1

    Recently at a client site I tried to get GNU make, but was informed that the Microsoft proxy server was blocking my access to GNU.org. I doubt it was the client configuration doing it explicitly because I can't think of a single reason for it. How evil is that??? Anyone else had this experience?

  202. Graphical comparision of search results by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's what "XFree86" shows for two more search engines. Really is interesting graphical results.
    Yahoo vs. Google

  203. nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XXXFree86 movies!

  204. What's even weirder: by errxn · · Score: 1

    Do a search for 'Microsoft' on /. and see what happens. The returns are BLATANTLY anti-Microsoft! It must be a conspiracy! Those people at /. are OBVIOUSLY out to get Microsoft! They are evil, and must be STOPPED!

    See how silly it sounds when you turn it around? Next story, thanks.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    1. Re:What's even weirder: by maevius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) At least there are search results for microsoft and not some kind of porn... 2) In slashdot, you will find posters opinions ( forums). The don't have to be objective or even true, it's just an opinion. A search engine especially from a big company must have some objectivity.

    2. Re:What's even weirder: by kilimangaro · · Score: 1

      Hey Common!!
      search.msn.com is a search engine where one can hope objective neutral result !!
      /. is a discussion forum where one can hope find some opinion!!!

      --
      "Insanity in individuals is something rare, but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule." - Nietzsche
  205. How to successfully search for xfree86 on msn..... by wildtech · · Score: 1

    You search for xfree86 on search.msn.com

    A warning page says it is probably adult.

    Click on Advanced search at the top of the page

    Click on Search to redo your search for xfree86 as an advanced search.

    When it gives the warning about adult results,
    look below for a link that says "Go back to MSN Search". Click that link.

    There are your xfree86 search results with xfree86.org at the top.

  206. Y Windows by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is nitpicking but interestingly if you search for Y Windows Y MSN Gives you this and Google Gives you this. Google finds it without problems.

    I've tried a few other terms like Microsoft loses lawsuit and they don't seem to be filtering results. Interestingly searching for Microsoft Warez IS being manipulated pointing to microsoft.com/piracy. Don't blame them. Just interesting to compare the results with other search engines.

    While I can possibly see this as some form of censorship, especially when searching for Xfee86, what I'd like to know is what other terms they have manipulated which might be interpreted as a conflict of interest. What would happen if the US government had a Goolge like search engine - what kind of censorship would occur on their site? At what point will NBC (of MSNBC) become involved - if ever - to filter out searches whose results are not in their favor. Does CNN, the BBC the CBC and other media do the same thing on Internet searches on their websites?

  207. MS Links Back to Slashdot by soloport · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah. But if you search for XFree86 MS idiots!!! you bypass their pr0n warning and get a slew of links to Slashdot.

    How not-so-strange...

    1. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ROTFL

      The first result was titled:

      # Slashdot | MS Exec: 'Our products just aren't engineered for security'

    2. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by SpectreGadget · · Score: 1

      Or search for XFree86 Windows and the 1st choice is XFree86(TM): Home Page

      --
      Jim Harry
    3. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by UserGoogol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or, more practically, XFree86 of, which, as it happens, returns no porn.

      Now, either porn sites have something against prepositions, or Microsoft is doing something funny.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    4. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and if you search for XFree86 windows sucks. You come up slashdot. The way I see it this is a good thing.

    5. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try searching for "XFree86 bill gates gay porn."

      The first result is:
      Slashdot | Microsoft's Vision Of Future Workplaces
      That's a disturbing thought..

    6. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by tuxR0x · · Score: 1

      Even the search term XFree86 MSN is fucked up doesn't return a pr0n warning but does also return a heap of slashdot links.

    7. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just searching "Xfree86 Xfree86" bypass their pr0n warning.

    8. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's now

      Slashdot | MSN Search Blocking Results For XFree86?

    9. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It returns this:

      BACK
      ACCESS DENIED!
      HELP

      Internet access to the requested website has been denied based on your user profile
      and organization's Internet Usage Policy.

      User/Machine:
      DEFAULT
      IP:
      10.41.0.10
      Category:
      General_Pornography
      Blocked URL:
      http://search.msn.com/results.aspx

      For further options, click here.

      To submit this blocked site for review, click here. For assistance, contact your Administrator.
      8e6 R3000 Internet filtering provided by 8e6 Technologies. Copyright 2003. All rights reserved.

      Of course, it's filtered googling for "windows xp we suck more", too. This for the "fucking", that for the "suck".

    10. Re:MS Links Back to Slashdot by John+Courtland · · Score: 1
      ...either porn sites have something against prepositions...
      Probably weeds out all the asian ones at least ;)
      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  208. Who is Microsofts enemy? by quinkin · · Score: 1
    Who is Microsofts enemy? GNU/Linux or XFree86?

    It could be argued that the true enemy of MS is a free(license gripes aside) windowing system. Linux CLI is "just another Unix" system without a pretty GUI for mom and pop user.

    Q.

    PS. Darl McBride - I was kidding about the "just another unix" bit...

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  209. Try This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had a look at the msn search engine, it seems that "xfre86" comes up with the correct results. When you search for xfre86, the xfree86 homepage is the first result.

  210. Google doesn't have to defeat MS by Bob+Davis,+Retired · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will defeat themselves in the huge Google vs. MS search engine battle of the future. They have already jabbed a fork in their eye, and will not be able to build a reputation for fairness or accuracy with this kind of behavior. People use search engines for legitimate research nowadays, and if MS chooses to shut off itself as a viable source of data, they will suffer for it.

    I think that they've not embraced search engines long enough to start extending in this manner. There are too many competitors with better reputations to battle for these tactics to be successful.

    To continue with my fork analogy, "Rupert, genital clamp!"

  211. Egad, I they're even sicker than I that by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    Search for free 9 year old os in Google, you get a result set mostly of links about Mac OS 9. (Not what I wanted, but understandable).

    Searched for free 9 year old os on MSN. The first result is a link to search Dictionary.com for "free 9 year-old nude girls". When clicked, Dictionary.com offers a link to search for "free 1 year-old nude girls", which thankfully yeilds nothing.

  212. A simple explanation by TanRanger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although I don't think MS is beneath filtering XFree86 out, I think I know how they'll explain this (if they so bother).

    XFree86 does something that XFree69, XFree87, "X Free 86," etc. do not:

    It returns 2 million hits in google.

    (I quote figures for google since, obviously, msn's filters prevent us from measuring how many results their engine returns)

    I think MS will claim (again, if they decide to respond at all) that their algorithm notices the suspect strings ("X" and "Free") as well as the fact that the number of hits is similar to those for truly naughty searches.

    "XFree86" is a single 'token' that raises all three of these hypothetical red flags. If you enter "X Free 86" (including the spaces) into a search engine, the search string decomposes into three tokens that each raise no more than two red flags.

    Evidence:

    Search_Term, Google_Hits, MSN_Flags_as_porn
    XFree86, 2.4 Million, yes
    XFree87, 7, no
    XFree85, 181, no
    XFree69, 0, no
    X, 300 Million, no
    Free, 600 Million, no
    freesex, 2.2 Million, yes

    However, I should point out that the number of google results may not be a reasonable indicator of the frequency of occurences within MS's own database. If you search for "86" on both engines, google indicates 44 million hits, while MSN claims to have only 36 (that's thirty-six, not thirty-six million).

    (I still think they're doing it on purpose, though ;-)

    1. Re:A simple explanation by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      ExFree86 is not blocked. I had hypothesized they might be blocking based on some sort of soundex code. XFree is also not blocked, and returns xfree.org (an alias for xfree86.org) as the top hit. "The XFree86 Project" is not blocked. If they intended to block XFree86, they did a lousy job. I would bet this is just some sort of unintended regex match.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  213. Sorry by vga_init · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry, but your claims don't quite stack up. What you have found is a workaround to the cencorship, obviously something that was not intended for you to do.

    I was a bit skeptical myself, so, in order to prove that they were specifically blocking "XFree86" and categorizing it as being pornographic, I did a few experiments. Here are the results:
    86FreeX - passed
    FreeX86 - passed
    X86Free - passed
    XFree96 - passed
    XFree69 - passed
    Free69X - passed

    Based on these tests performed *by hand* and by yours truly, we find that the exact string "XFree86" is being purposefully blocked and categorized as pornographic. The other strings I used passed fine, even the *blatantly* pornographic "Free69X".

    It is obvious that the filter in question is not scanning the string for objectionable componants but forming an exact match as a whole.

    So much for your defense.

    1. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is obvious that the filter in question is not scanning the string for objectionable componants but forming an exact match as a whole.

      If I understand the previous poster correctly, they weren't disputing this. They were saying that "XFree86" is matched exactly and directs searchers to a porn site because the porn site paid for this to happen. Not that this should inspire confidence in the search engine. But the point is that Microsoft might not have chosen to block the term, but rather the porn site paid for it.

      Now I wonder how much it costs to secure advertising like this. I should enquire about directing the term "Windows" to my sister's ex's site www.stdinfectedshithead.com

  214. xfree85 and 87 by litewoheat · · Score: 1

    Funny, searching for Xfree85 or 87 brings results. Why just XFree86? Is that a popular porn serving platform? Hmmm...

  215. More Interesting Results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of curiosity I just tried this, searching for xfree86 returns no results and a link to nightwatch. However searching for free sex returns a link to nightwatch, without the "You have entered a search term that is likely to return adult content" wessage plus 19 results including some potentially adult content. I would love to know what they are playing at here!

  216. One more curious search. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    If "XFree86" is supposed to bring sex results, and "sex" is supposed to bring sex results (yes, it is blacklisted just the same way), shouldn't
    "XFree86 sex" bring all the more sex results?
    Well, it doesn't. Most of hits are slashdot though.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:One more curious search. by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 1

      I know that when I think "XFree86" and "porn," the next thing I think of is Slashdot! Not that this happens frequently. OK, it does. Never mind.

  217. Sorry, no by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    X FREE 86 also returns the correct Xfree86 homepage, and XXX free 86 doesn't generate a warning.

  218. MSN is stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSN was launched by Microsoft to be the end-all of ISPs in the genre of CompuServe. This was BEFORE Microsoft acknowledged the Internet boat had sailed without them (see "The Road Ahead", version 1.0).

    Anyone that uses MSN should expect massive pro-Microsoft censorship. Why in the hell is anyone surprised? It's run by a CONVICTED MONOPOLIST.

    I don't go to AT&T asking about VoIP.

  219. Still looks like number 4 to me... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    The same MSN link shows this, for me:

    1. search.msn.com
    2. www.searchenginewatch.com
    3. www.dogpile.com
    4. www.google.com
    5. www.altavista.com
    etc...

    If you see something different the Internet is broken, just as I have suspected all along.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Still looks like number 4 to me... by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      The internet is broken. I got the same search results as you on IE. But on Mozilla I get completely different results. Same link. I get this for number 4:Aqua11.com - Search portal. But XFree86 got me same results in both browsers.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  220. Not that I trust MSN anyways but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would never trust search engine that didn't return
    google.com as the number one search for google. It would have to be one fcked up algorithm if it didn't

    1. Re:Not that I trust MSN anyways but... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      It's not that it's the #1 result, it's that it's been marked as a "Top Pick" - I'm not sure how that's "awarded", but it's not normal.

  221. Search for GNU or GPL by giannifive · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know what's fun? Search for "GNU" or "GPL" on MSN, and compare that with Google. The GNU website is the first hit on Google, but doesn't even appear on the first page of MSN. The first MSN result is an African safari thing... The first MSN hit for "GPL" is: "InfoWorld - SCO: IBM Cannot Enforce GPL". Insane.

  222. Bilbo? by soloport · · Score: 1

    An all-seeing eye, wreathed in flame...

    1. Re:Bilbo? by meshmar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Flames ... no. Dollar bills is more like it.

    2. Re:Bilbo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you spelled the "b"'s in your subject line backwards.

    3. Re:Bilbo? by ejort79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microwaved twenties

      --
      The Internet couldn't tell a good bit from a bad bit if it bit it on its naughty bits.
  223. uh... by makeyourself · · Score: 1

    who uses msn search engine, to start with?

    1. Re:uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or IE for that matter?!?

  224. adult? by silex_reloaded · · Score: 1

    Try search for adult. So these are not adult content?

  225. Next Week... by soloport · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next week MS will put another easter egg in their search engine to keep Slashdotters busy for hours while MS programmers hammer out Longhorn and Sheephorn and Horned-owl and take over the WORLD!!!

    1. Re:Next Week... by jd10131 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This, and the changes in the XFree86 license would seem to indicate that MicroSoft will be using XFree86 as the graphics server in a later version of Windows; code name 'Horny Toad'

    2. Re:Next Week... by 00420 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems obvious to me. Microsoft is just as upset as the rest of the open source community about the license changes to XFree86. This is just their way of protesting ;)

    3. Re:Next Week... by That_Guy_Again · · Score: 1
      It seems obvious to me. Microsoft is just as upset as the rest of the open source community about the license changes to XFree86. This is just their way of protesting ;)

      Huh?

      --
      One of life's lessons: Its always easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.
    4. Re:Next Week... by MrLizardo · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? MicroSoft released the source for Win2K and XP to the Internet just last week!

      -Mr Lizardo

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    5. Re:Next Week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they're forced to acknowledge the use of XFree86 code in Windows...
      Wait, did I say that out loud?

    6. Re:Next Week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, did I say that out loud?

      How the hell should we know?

    7. Re:Next Week... by MrNybbles · · Score: 1
      soloport wrote: . . .and take over the WORLD!!!

      Pinky and the Brain Parody
      Steve Ballmer: So what are we going to do tomorrow night Bill?

      Bill Gates: Same thing we do every night Ballmer, TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

      Excel Saga Parody
      Gates: "THE WORLD IS CORRUPT! As you know Ballmer, our Secret Ideological Organisation Microsoft will soon be running the world! We shall first start by taking over the prefecture of x86 in the city of x86."

      Ballmer: "Haaaaaaaaail Gates! I Ballmer Ballmer will suffer for you, lie for you, die for you, vomit for you,. . . What's that rope you are about to pull do?"

      --
      Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.
    8. Re:Next Week... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Longhorn and Sheephorn and Horned-owl

      You forgot horny toad!

  226. +Linux by Durango_44 · · Score: 1

    A search for XFree86 Linux returns legit results, with no porn mentioned. And one gets a slightly different list searching for Linux XFree86. Odd.

  227. Maybe because you are in the UK? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    I don't know... it works for me.

    See my followup to the post after yours to see the top 5 I see.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  228. How about freshmeat ? by dom1234 · · Score: 1

    Has someone tried searching for freshmeat ? Oh, and don't forget to clear your form autocompletion cache to avoid trouble with your girlfriend.

  229. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keith packard's x xerver and freedesktop x server seem to work just fine. And that thing is alpha and it doesn't even do accelerated video yet, right? Microsoft has a strange taste in X servers. Apple has slightly more logical taste. =)

  230. The Man by PeaceTank · · Score: 1

    That's just life for you. I am always seeing example s like this of "the man" putting down unix and linux users. They know that open-source is the future, but they don't want it to be that way, so they try to keep us doewn like this. If this keeps up, they'll be asking what OS we use when we apply for jobs, and that is not something I want to see.

  231. It's not weird by bob_calder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and yes, they did it on purpose. You have to realize that the paranoia runs deep. It is very much a part of their behavior. They are essentially a reacitve entity.

    It is a successful model because it works. Simple minded but true. Have you ever been attacked by a competitor who will take a huge pile of insignificant crap and try to use it to leverage an advantage? It takes lots of your time to explain that the tower of shit is just a tower of shit and not advanced technology to the client.

    Meanwhile the compeitior has gotten the client to join an association of like minded people who sit around blowing smoke up one another's anuses. They believe it because they *want* to believe it and it comes with lunch and a 100 dollar bill under the plate once a month. Of course it doesn't make sense. It isn't supposed to.

    To summarize, this is just one of the turds in the pile. Small, but they do pile up when you have lots of people piling them. And it probably didn't cost the company anything but a double latte.

    --
    Any preoccupation with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct shows an arrested intellectual development. (Wilde)
  232. Dominatrix waitresses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So MSN must think that XFree86 is some kind of restaurant fetish. Oh waitress.....

    You've been a *BAD* customer. A really *BAD* customer. You need to be spanked.

  233. MSN search engine blacklisted Apache.org (fixed) by pganelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried to submit similar article on Jan 22 but it was not accepted. Evidently Microsoft responded to the complain and Apache is not blacklisted anymore. Below is my original one month old post. Sorry URL show proper results now and I did not saved the original search results.

    A few days ago I noticed that every time I use Internet Explorer (i.e. MSN search) to look for apache related projects I never got a reference to apache.org websites.

    Examples: jelly script , maven apache , cocoon framework .

    *.apache.org sites never came up. I am not even talking about listing it as "featured web site". It never came up as the link at all!!! The best you would get is a reference to XML.com website discussing the technology but not to technology itself.

    Even search for "apache web" got the reference www.apache.com as the featured site instead of www.apache.org Only "apache" got "apache.org" as the featured site at the second place after oil related Apache corporation. Yahoo and Google as you would expect did proper job.

  234. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by SQLz · · Score: 1

    why do all the games look like they were written in 1990

    1982 man, 1982.

    Linux is not for the average user. Its basically designed for the hobbyist/developer/administrator who need the kind of power to totally customize their environment for specific tasks, work, programs, fun, etc. If you want to use it as a general desktop system with no prior experience you need to reach at least...level 22 geek or enjoy computers enough to want to learn the OS.

  235. "the" Xfree86 by m3j00 · · Score: 1

    Ok nobody can say that the porn site might not have a "the" as a keyword (if it's not omitted automagically) http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=Xfree86+%22th e%22&FORM=SMCRT

    1. Re:"the" Xfree86 by m3j00 · · Score: 1

      f**k link fixed

  236. Re:XFree69 and XFree-86 by very · · Score: 1

    XFree69??????
    hehehehe

    On the other hand, if you entered "XFree-86" it will return relevant results.

    http://search.msn.com/pass/results.asp?RS=CHECKED& FORM=MSNH&v=1&q=&q=XFree-86&cp=125 2

    Ain't that interesting?

  237. Even weirder... XFREE = XFREE86 result by koa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try doing a search for "Xfree", it actually pulls up "Xfree68" as the first result!

    now thats odd.

    --
    ....move along....nothing to see here....
  238. Yup - you are correct IE and Mozilla are diff by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    I tried it with both Linux and Windows with Mozilla and the results are different - I get the same Number 4 as you: Aqua11.com...

    My search for "web browswer" comes up with something called "MSN Explorer" in the number one slot on all platforms.

    [Just in case you were wondering, I have lots of computers, and they all suck.]

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Yup - you are correct IE and Mozilla are diff by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Galeon on Linux -- same here, Aqua11, no mention of google on the front page.

      It's really hard to believe anything with MSN is "coincidence" when you get different results depending on OS!

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    2. Re:Yup - you are correct IE and Mozilla are diff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safari has google number 4, but IE on OS X has Aqua11 number 4 with no google on the first page.

      What the fuck is going on.

  239. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft has finally openly admitted it supports the porn industry??? That's what I take from this. Anytime you redirect a web surfer's request to a site that you support(in this case porn), well you decide...

    Either they're getting kick backs for re-directs or are openly supporting the site. Take your pick.

  240. Take the X off... by jvollmer · · Score: 1
    Searching on MSN search for free86 produces 699 hits, all of which seem legitimate.

    That 699 number seems familiar. Conspiracies anyone?

    By the way, Google produced 3,120 hits on the same string.

    If it's not Consolidated Lint, it's just fuzz.

  241. Re:Microsoft browses slashdot by halightw · · Score: 1

    Do you mean this eye? (Dollar Bill Great Seal)

  242. "Microsoft Sucks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that the search term Microsoft Sucks isn't blocked.

  243. inovative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the new search technology that Bill is going to innovate next.

    it is going to the best technology ever and take over the web.

  244. Re:xwindows by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    I tried xwindows, which worked, and the 3rd item listed was www.xfree86.org.

  245. XFree86 porn by Dlugar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Searching for Xfree86 porn works, too! Strangely enough ...

    Dlugar

    --
    Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
  246. Re:What's really weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XFree86 +msn yields something useful
    XFree86 -msn yields the adult content redirect
    Xfree86 -"Bill Gates" something useful
    XFree86 -hotmail yields the adult content redirect
    XFree86 +hotmail yields something useful
    XFree86 -mozilla yields the adult content redirect
    Xfree86 +mozilla yields the adult content redirect
    mozilla +XFree86 yields useful stuff

    WTF?

    Obligatory /troll comment:
    What kind of lame OS is this worthless search engine running on anyway?

  247. "rights under this supplemental EULA" by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Users in the United States don't need no steenkin' "rights under this supplemental EULA" because they have 17 USC 117, which provides a defense against copyright infringement to the owner of a "copy" (a "copy" being a physical medium, such as a hard drive, on which a work is fixed).

    1. Re:"rights under this supplemental EULA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if you are in the US, and illegally download something which you do not have permission to (britney.mp3 or iexplore.exe), once it is on your hard drive, they can't arrest you for copyright infringement?

    2. Re:"rights under this supplemental EULA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright law bans uploading copies.

  248. Single quotes give the correct search by shrtmn · · Score: 1

    Interestingly (or confusingly), searching for 'xfree86' works properly, but double quotes "xfree86" gives the adult content warning.

  249. I work for MSN Search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And the adult filtering is exactly the kind of desultory beauracratic list you would expect, 4305 terms that somone must have pulled from one day of sampling 2 years ago, with a {0,2} wildcard slapped on the ends. One of the terms is 'XXXFREE'.

    QED.

  250. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just fucking retarded. Why would XFree87 work, then? 17 year olds. You are just REALLY reaching...

  251. Hehe. by lukew · · Score: 1

    You follow the link through to "NightSurf.com", the blurb on one of the results contains;

    Looking for xfree86? I deliver, and I'm live right now.

    Classic.

  252. MAJOR IRONY... by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

    ...on the same site...

    Check out this picture.

    Irony strikes again...

  253. but why would they be blocking 'XFree86'? by quonsar · · Score: 0, Troll

    are you familiar with the term "stinking, lying, mealy-mouth cunts"?

  254. XFree86(TM) by LanceTaylor · · Score: 1

    If you search for "XFree86(TM)" or even simply "XFree" you get a long list of relevant sites.

  255. Wow by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised there aren't any post from people who have told your wife as well...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  256. adult content? -yes, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know the reason -- it's "serious stuff" and for they have no other section they put it there. Must have been reading too many powerpoint presentations :-))

    Could be "serious stuff" => hardcore => porn as well, but that's third stage between :-))

    c

    btw: "xfree" works

  257. it's a vast capitalist conspiracy by iggye · · Score: 0

    MSN Search is the worst search engine on the planet; any doofus that uses it gets what they deserve.

  258. Paranoid slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I searched nightsurf.com for xfree86, and it just turned up a bunch of porn sites -- clearly vindicating MSNs adult-content warning. It is plain that slashdotters are paranoid when it comes to speculating about Microsoft's motives.

  259. Something must be wrong- it doesn't block "XBox" by Yooden_Vranx · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know the number to the MSN search engine help desk? I know that Microsoft always only has our best interests at heart (if you don't believe me, just look back on Windows 3.11. Even though you might not have noticed the difference, I know in my heart that the good people of Microsoft wouldn't have released it just to break OS/2 for Windows. They *must* have had a good reason). Anyway, I'm concerned that they're not protecting us adequately. Seems to me that "XBox" is probably a lot more likely to return adult results than "XFree86". I just want to give them a call to make sure they know about this possible breach. I'm sure they'll listen and get right on it, right?

  260. What about fixing it? by nytmare · · Score: 1

    So now that Microsoft should know about this error, when are they going to get around to fixing it? I expect it will take them a long time, if they ever fix it at all, given their track record as an archetypical software company.

  261. Search for "XFree86 1" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you search for "XFree86 1", it works fine. Seems they're only blocking searches for solely "XFree86"...

  262. X Free86 returns the correct results by ganhawk · · Score: 1

    XFree and XFree 86 returns the right results !

    MSN SRCH for XFree 86

    XFree

    This might be a wierd bug in their system.

    --
    Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
  263. Your Rights Online? by jay-be-em · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Does /. have a fucked up perception of the term 'right' or what? How is it any person's right to any specific quality of search results?

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  264. Re:Linux is not for the average user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, and MSFT is gonna keep it that way. Remember, little things matter. Microsoft does little things like block terms in its search engine, secretly back SCO, campaign against free software in Congress, incorporate more and more features into Windows to kill competitors, etc. Look for them (and Hollywood AND Big Business) to lobby congress to require that all computers comply with a Microsoft proprietary standard for "inherently secure computing" that requires DRM for all data and software without a special government licence, that is if they (and Intel) can ever get "Palladium" to work. All these little things add up to maintain and extend Microsoft's absolute monopoly.

  265. You worked for XTRA OFFLINE too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO way.

  266. Re:Oh, they block Linux, Macintosh, and other term by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

    yes but they dont specify who its "useful" to. Remember you got to think like a lawyer when dealing with them.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  267. The real truth... by bartmans · · Score: 1

    .. went something like this:
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer1: "Hey I've invented a totally new function...
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer2:"Yes number one?"
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer1:"Yes and we can make money out of it too!
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer2:"Well that IS good news number 1"
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer1:"Ok here is the idea: We make some kind of pr0nfilter so that some keywords trigger a pr0nsite search site (which we own of course).
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer2:"Sounds good!"
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer1:"Do you want to test it? Then just give me a name to add to the pr0ndb"
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer2, who uses linux at home, is just reading the new licenses to XFree86 4.4:"Uhm, Xfree86?"
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer1:"Clickety click"
    MSNsearchthingyprogrammer2:"K3wl it works!!!"

  268. Attempt to block MSIE users? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    IIRC, MSIE by default does an MSN search for anything that name resolution fails on.

    So if people are used to just using the MSIE location bar to locate something, this will prevent them from reaching the xfree86.org site.

  269. Incompetence wins over malice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here are the number of results produced by a variety of searches at search.msn.com:

    x free 86 = 586526
    x free86 = 384
    xfree 86 = 3496
    xfree-86 = 1160
    x-free86 = 216
    x-free-86 = 33

    The results list valid sites that actually have material on the search topic. The huge discrepancy in number of results (some sites appear as results in several searches) is interesting, but I do hesitate to accuse M$ of malicious intent, this time.

    By way of comparison, Google also gives varying results: "about 2,320,000" results for xfree86 and "about 4,440,000" results for x free 86. I know which search tool I prefer.

    ---------------
    "If 50 million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing." -- Anatole France

  270. search for a substring of xfree86 by MightyJB · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just for grins, I searched for the following on MSN:
    • free86
    • xfree
    • xfree8

    They all pointed to an Xfree86 page. Kinda funny how just "XFree86" doesn't work. No wonder they want to own the search engine world. I'm not even anti-M$, but that's crap!
  271. I double dare you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try "xfree86 xfree86"!

  272. Re:X Free86 returns the correct results by linuxgnuru · · Score: 1

    He's refering to XFree86 (all one word; no spaces)

    --
    Linux: When reboots are for upgrades.
  273. Anti-trust by krusadr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The users of MSN (search engine) are mostly those who have a windows box and dont know about the alternatives (microsoft customers). IE brings up msn as the default home page. These people are usually in the same demographic group as those who install GATOR and HotBar et al.

    Usualy such windows software that spies, snoops or hijacks your browsing experience, to be legal, has to have a written disclaimer that you must click through. Gator for example, does warn you (if you read the microscopic print) that it will distort your browsing experience.

    I would say that MSN is as much of a browser hijacker as that in terms of manipulating the sites you view, but without the legality of the click through agreement.

    MSN's lack of any such statement or click through combined with it's default homepage status has to be ripe for an anti-trust suit I would say. You just can't get more incriminating evidence than this.

    --
    while sco {
    wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
    }
  274. ++Informative!!! /nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Text.

  275. OT: How to pronounce "SCOX" by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    Show of hands: how many people think this should be pronounced ESS'-COCKS?

  276. This works - XFree 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just put a space between the 'Free' and '86', and the first link was Xfree86.org. I'm not a Linux user, but I know about the program and always thought that it used logical english and had a space in the name, wouldn't the general population as well? Or those that just don't care about being exact?

  277. And to REALLY make the point... by MooseByte · · Score: 1, Funny

    MSN search for "goatse guy", raw results:

    TSN Message Board :: View topic - NEWS FLASH: Goatse Guy is no more
    Stern but Groovy Master Joined: 25 Apr 2003 Location: Williamsburg, VA Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2004 7:34 am It's a sad, sad day in Internet history. www.goatse.cx has been shut down by the people who ... seinman.uzipp.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=363

    Goatse
    Rarely do I archive shit I find on the internet. However I had heard too many people talk about goatse.cx that have never even seen the full photo gallery of the goatse guy. www.hektik.org/various/goatse

    TSN Message Board :: View topic - Which is worse: Goaste guy or Tubgirl?
    Poll :: Which is worse: Goaste guy or Tubgirl? (Click on View Results for links, if you haven't seen them yet) Who are you kidding? I like them. Stern but Groovy Master Joined: 25 Apr 2003 ... ... I've seen the Goatse guy before, that isn't that bad compared to that fat chick shitting in her face. ... seinman.uzipp.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=326

    Live Journal Review: The Tao of Goatse
    ... sure to be trolled, especially on Livejournal, but think of the goatse guy. Was he afraid to post his anus to the ... www.livejournal.us/archives/000426.php

    Gaters.net - Goatse planet
    This is a discussion forum powered by vBulletin. To find out about vBulletin, go to http://www.vbulletin.com/ . ... He ( goatse guy) should be in the guinness book of records! ... gaters.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3732&highlig ht=goatse

  278. Not only Porn, its Not even in the search database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after searching for xfree86, and getting the porn warning, instead of goign to night surfe you can click "Go Back to MSN Search" and it will return with a message saying
    Sorry, no results were found containing "xfree86"
    O_o

  279. It has to be one of these things! by rspress · · Score: 1

    1. Microsoft is blocking other operating systems so that windows customers won't know anything else will work on their computers...Since they hate Macs....this is a good place to start.

    2. Their programmers are so stupid that this term will always produce a "porn code".

    3. Their content labeling algorithms don't work or were badly designed.

    4. You deserved this because you used MSN for your search in the first place...Google is king, baby!

    It has to be one of those four.....Windows zealots, which one will it be?

  280. however... by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 1

    ....searching for XF86 ( http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=XF86&FORM=SMC RT ) works.

  281. X Free86 and XFree 86 by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    Both "X Free86" and "XFree 86" work. Gotta be deliberate.

  282. Name the company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was 9 years ago. What harm could it do now to name the company?

  283. How to bypass this. by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    use "Xfree86 Xserver" and it bypasses it.

  284. Re:Not necessarily. This will help lock 'em in. by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    you nailed it

  285. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

    If that's the case, then who found out that Xfree86 is blocked on MSN, and had the cluefulness to post it on /.? Apparently your argument does not hold water.

    --
    Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
  286. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  287. What's the big deal? by IDigUNIX · · Score: 1

    If I type the following right now:
    find / -name win.ini -print
    I get back:
    (root) bacchus#
    So it seems kinda symmetrical to me.

  288. Search for "XFree 86" by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and note the space between Xfree & 86. This will return xfree86.org link as desired.

    Looks more like a (stupid) bug, but then again bugs always cause undesired results.

  289. I don't think so..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you found a buffer overrun that allows unrestricted access to their search engine code....big deal....

    Just like the rest of their software......

  290. XFree86 people need to apply legal pressure. by openmtl · · Score: 1

    XFree86 is trademarked. Trademarks are valuable. Having MSN dilute it through saying its porn when in fact it isn't is diluting the trademark. Looks like its time for XFree86 to issue a demand to MSN to stop what they are doing and not redirect people to some porn search engine.

    --

  291. From my years as a typesetter... by freeBill · · Score: 1

    ...the first thing you check when somebody comes out with a new word-division algorithm: Do they break therapist correctly?

    If they don't, you see if it can automatically overridden. If it can't, you never, ever use that software. The risks of lawsuits are just too monumental.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  292. And My Theory Is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of their employees simply couldn't get Xinerama to work on his (covert) Linux installation. Frustrated, he gives up and with his special skillz he forever BLOCKS ALL access to XFree86 from msn.com. In a flash of brilliance he diverts it to an adult site, but his excuse to his PHB is, Oh, I was just looking at how they implement multimonitors in XFree heh heh

  293. Probable explanation by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I hate Microsoft for all the same reasons most of you do, I think in this case there's a non-malicious explanation. That redirection is probably triggered by the following conditions:

    (1) The search term contains certain things that tend to find X-rated content. The algorithm might look for dictionary terms and try to form seperate words out of the serch phrase (so if you looked for hothornybabes it would notice that it contains the words "hot" and "horny" and "babes".) So, "Xfree86" probably gets flagged because it's "X" followed by "free" and some irrelevant number. But, wait, you say 'Xfree87" and "Xfree85" don't trigger, so that can't be it, right? Well, it still could be because of the next point:

    2) It probably *also* only triggers the redirection if the search result returns a lot of hits.

    So 'Xfree86' triggers a lot of hits, and contains red-flagged terms, while 'Xfree87' has the same flagged terms, but triggers few hits, and so isn't assumed to be porn.

    Anyway, that's one possible explanation. I'd attribute this to stupidity on the part of the algorithm before attributing it to maliciousness.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:Probable explanation by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      But when you search for "the xfree86", like someone else suggested, you hit the same content and it is not blacklisted.

      I think it is stupid maliciousness. They blocked xfree86 but not *xfree86*.

  294. your sig... by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    your wife sells belly-dancing costumes?

    You, sir, must be a very happy man.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:your sig... by ArkanesWife · · Score: 1

      He is... ;)

  295. The burning issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but the question is will XFree69 will return adult content!

  296. re: by silverknifes · · Score: 1

    "Xfree86 farm sex penis nude xxx hardcore" does not bring up the filter

  297. IE6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N$ does the same with IE6 and does not allow one to download any .tar , .gz or gzipped files ...so what next ??

  298. 'XFree86' is pr0n, rest of words, no. by Oliver_Etchebarne · · Score: 1

    I can search pr0n with any other pr0n word, and search.msn.com will show it's best bet. Even, you can add any word or letter to 'XFree86' (like 'XFree86 linux'), and search.msn will do a correct search (for 'XFree86 linux', first result is Xfree86 website).

    They are desesperated, or they are really stupids :-D

    --
    drmad
  299. Additional experimentation by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    try searching 'the xfree86', you'll quickly see what a bunch of noobs the world is up against!

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  300. another good search by Greenrider · · Score: 4, Funny

    The MSN search isn't biased against Linux at all!

    For proof, just go here and read what it says in the title.

    For the lazy: "MSN Seach: linux -- More Useful Everyday"

    1. Re:another good search by vr · · Score: 1

      For me it says "MSN Search: linux -- More useful every day - Opera " :)

    2. Re:another good search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? For me it says: "MSN Search: Shut the fuck you idiot"

    3. Re:another good search by vr · · Score: 1

      Then why don't you do that. :)

  301. "This is stupid even for microsoft standards." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This is stupid even for microsoft standards."

    Please refrain from excessively pro-Microsoft statements.

  302. http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=XFree86+fuck+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XFree86 fuck me up the ass Bill returns a page on pricing for Windows XP

  303. Only Microsoft could take Xfree86... by HankB · · Score: 0

    and make it something dirty. Their search engine is so weak. Xfree86 and any other term does not redirect to the porn search engine. Is that what they're going to dominate the web with? No wonder they are trying to buy Google. They don't have anyone capable of writing their own.

  304. For a little recursive humor... by null+etc. · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a little recursive humor, trying searching "XFree86 adult" on MSN.

  305. Keywords by bahwi · · Score: 1

    The porn sites are just using well-chosen keywords. They know who (cough-slashdotters-cough) look up porn and are just trying to tempt them even more so.

    "Watch me hack X lib while f----g myself with this USB keydrive! OH XFREE86! OH XF86!!!! UGH!!! XLIBS!! XLIBSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

  306. Remeber the old Office Thesaurus thing.... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    where you type in something to the effect of

    I would like to see Bill Gates Dead

    Highlight it and click thesaurus, and it spits out something silly... The older version's reply (pre-office2k) was better than Office 2K's, which includes

    it's no trouble

    I think this whole thing is just an error in their search logic, similar to the way this thesaurus trick works... although it is strange that only xfree86 has issues, and not xfree85 or any other permutation of it.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  307. err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps because notepad and calc offered no features that made them any sort of threat to businesses who sold real editing and calculation programs? IE and WMP on the other hand, remain fixed towards feature creep and competition.

    maybe your examples were just bad, but there's a world of difference between them and their relationship to alternative vendors.

    however, i agree with the grandparent post as well. netscape's fate was largely in their own hands and they fumbled. their flagship browser went untouched for years (four?) during a huge techological boom in web rendering methods, for one. for another, they repeatedly tried to take the netscape name and move into areas of content delivery and diluted their own trademark. microsoft positioned their browser as internet explorer while netscape's browser was netscape (regardless of their attempts to dub it 'navigator'). as the netscape name was stretched thin, so was their image and identity.

  308. Recursive post! by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

    At the time of this writing, the single search result from clicking on that link is... the parent of that post!

    I must say they indexed that page pretty damned quick. I almost wonder if someone at MSN is having fun with this comment page, and thought, "Man, I gotta get that page indexed so we can all have a good laugh."

    --
    one hundred twenty
    is just enough characters
    to write a haiku
  309. MSN Xfree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see this it's much more dificult to veiw porn without a GUI :)

  310. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    The 86 is probably just seen as garbage, as the "x" and the "free" are ranked highly as likely pornographic search terms in its database.

    I realize reading one whole paragraph is an awful lot of work, but you might try reading the article sometimes.

    It was clearly stated that the search works fine with 85 and 87, generating no error. Or do you have a theory to explain that away too?

    All I can guess is that with your head stuck up your ass, the traditional "69" position takes on more of an "86" configration, so for you that seems dirty.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  311. hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you try searching for XFree69...

  312. Altavistya does it too! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    XFree finds the XFree86 site as well... I think some porn sites plastered the term "XFree86" all over themselves so a majority of the search results are for porn sites.

    I tried teh search on Google, Lycos, AlltheWeb, Yahoo,

  313. Who's the whore? by GTsquirrel42 · · Score: 1

    They all seemed to be pretty close to me (if not exactly the same). The German site was the only one that was really all that different.

    --
    "I was raised by a cup of coffee" -Homsar
  314. Altavista does it too! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    [Pressed the submit button by accident....]

    XFree finds the XFree86 site as well... I think some porn sites plastered the term "XFree86" all over themselves so a majority of the search results are for porn sites.

    I tried the search on Google, Lycos, AlltheWeb, Yahoo, and Altavista. The first 4 give expected links and no warnings. HOWEVER, Altavista gives a big warning:

    USER WARNING
    ADULT CONTENT NOTICE
    The search that you have just conducted will result in the display of links to pornographic content.
    Clicking "continue" and the same technical links appear. I paged through the first 6 pages and no porn.
  315. Re:What's really weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  316. Search results for "XFree86" by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1
    I've gotten this sort of thing before:
    • "Look for best prices on "diff'rent strokes" "fan fiction", only $199 round-trip!"
    • "Buy 'hanse medieval trade route guilder lubeck' without a medical license!"
    • "Looking for perscription Vermeer Delft? Only $49.99 after rebate!"
    • "Nude celeb photos of ascaron patrician medieval trade 3d!"
    • And my personal favorite: "Find sexy ruckers flemish harpsichord virginals spinet in your area! FREE trial will match you up with your ideal ruckers flemish harpsichord virginals spinet!"
    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  317. they won by timmyd · · Score: 1

    seems like they just found an easy way to get a million users to test their search engine and provide them with search data. brilliant.

  318. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1, Redundant

    No, XFree85 and XFree87 doesn't give you the porn-message.

    --
    Martin
  319. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by bonch · · Score: 1, Troll

    All I can guess is that with your head stuck up your ass, the traditional "69" position takes on more of an "86" configration, so for you that seems dirty.

    Is there any particular reason you're being so insulting? You come off as a basement-dwelling, anti-social troll.

    All it had to take was "The article said other numbers work." Yes, I did read the article. I must have missed that part. Thanks for the info.

  320. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    mod parent up!

  321. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is there any particular reason you're being so insulting?

    I was standing up for the greater honor of Slashdot, about which you were equally insulting.

    You come off as a basement-dwelling, anti-social troll.

    This is Slashdot. I get it out of my system here so I can be a lovable cheerful teddy bear in real life. For all you know, we work together, so you ought to be thankful. Heck, maybe I'm your mom. Or even you, during those mysterious blackouts.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  322. xFree86 Searches Just fine on MSN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparantly, a company paid for that right.

    Going here:

    http://search.msn.com/advresults.aspx?&q=xfree86 &F ORM=SMCDA&adv_f=all&adv_sort=&adv_rgn=&adv_depth=& adv_dt=html,pdf,ppt,msword,xl&adv_cf=&ar=1

    Works just fine. You just need to click "Go Back to MSN Search" rather than "Click here for search results on 'xfree86' at NightSurf.com" to see them.

  323. cheap joke, mod down :) by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

    Given the quality of spelling on slashdot, are you sure you haven't just mistyped XFree86 as "XXXFree69"? :p

    --
    Free as in mason.
  324. What is in common between XFree86 and iFriends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As others pointed out, searching for most things on NightSurf engine returns the same set of results. When searching for XFree86, result #3 always is:

    3. Free Live Cams Looking for xfree86? I deliver, and I'm live right now

    Searching for just about anything else, including "XFree85", #3 result is:

    3. Free Live Cams Looking for iFriends? I deliver, and I'm live right now

    It replaces X86Free with iFriends? I wonder.. Search msn.com for iFriends, and we get our favorite NightSurf warning!

    Searching for iFriends on google returns www.ifriends.com, some sort of web-cam chatroom site, with many adult sponsored links.

    The question is, what is the connection between xFree86 and iFriends? Could someone looking for adult web cams want to search for xfree86? I don't know.

  325. Not quite.. Close thow by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    Try: "Looking for xfree86? I deliver, and I'm live right now"
    This is the text to introduce one of the porn webcams.
    But when did xFree86 become a porn term?
    The only use of xfree86 as porn is on this microsoft affiliated website.

    The Christian Colition/700 Club has a habbit of rewriting english to get what they want.
    One populare example is to redefine "Religion" as a synonim for "Christanity" IE "If it's not christianity it's not a religion".

    So if xfree86 becomes a sexual refrence there is justification for adult filters to screen it out when kids installing Linux go looking for GUIs.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  326. Brand new formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. Knock knock!
    2. ???
    3. Your mom!
  327. XFree85 & XFree87 by benn333 · · Score: 1

    A search for either of these terms now returns this article as the first result. That's just rich.

  328. A fluke hash collision? by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

    XFree86 hashes to the same value as some search term they don't like? Remember, even "XFree86 XFree86" avoids the warning. And terms like "Linux", "AOL" and so forth are fine.

    Or maybe the top hit on "XFree86" is a page where someone is really, *really* rude about the new licensing terms.

  329. GPL porn by Peter+Harris · · Score: 1

    So... what does the general pornographic license stipulate? You must offer for download the script for the implausible dialogue as a text file and the cheesy background music as an ABC or lilypond source file?

    Er.. not that I know anything about porn.

    --

    -- What do you need?
    -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
  330. Get a clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is more likely that NightSurf.com added the term xfree86 to their database and that msn simply uses this database as a service. So it is NightSurf.com "fault".

  331. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by bitspotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My guess is that since 'X/Freee/86' is a plausible keyword combo for a porn site, *and* a popular search term for that other reason, those running porn sites would be tempted to submit a lot of sites optimized for that keyword. If the web crawlers that feed MSN's index pick up a lot more porn sites for "xfree86" because the keyword is being targeted more by porn sites, then it shouldn't be surprising that searches for xfree85 or xfree87 don't set off the message.

    Then again, I typed "xfree85" into nightsurf.com, and got the EXACT SAME 162 RESULTS, in the same order, with only the keyword changed...

  332. XFree86 by gal1264 · · Score: 1

    well.....I was doing a little microsoft bashing myself.... but just check this if you search for free and 86 as separate words....it's the first one that comes up....shady yes....worth anything..... nope

    1. Re: XFree86 by Stickney · · Score: 1

      I e-mailed customer support about it and got this is my e-mail within 18 hours: Hello IBStick, Thank you for writing to MSN Search Customer Support concerning XFree86. I appreciate your taking the time bringing up this matter to us. With regard to your inquiry, searches for XFree86 are not actually blocked by MSN. It is just the matter on how you have typed the keyword and how the server interprets it. As for your case, please be advised that this has already been noted and rest assured that we will do everything within our means to remedy the situation so that the next time you use the keyword XFree86, it will yield related results. For the meantime, I suggest that you use "X-Free86", "X Free86" or "Xfree" as your keyword to get the results you wanted. Thank you for using MSN Search. If you have further questions, please contact us again. Sincerely, Kathleen MSN Search Customer Support --- Original Message --- From: IBStick@hotmail.com To: msnsearch@css.one.microsoft.com Sent: Wed Mar 3 16:59:15 PST 2004 Subject: I want to report offensive search results Submit : "Xfree86", while one of your competitors, is not pronography and should not be classified as such by your search engine. This is slander! Especially since your engine has no problem with such searches as "free86", "xfree", or "xfree85". Please remedy this problem.

      --
      ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
  333. Re: Microsoft's dis-service by Solosoft · · Score: 1

    haha ... I know ... and also no it's in Ontario Canada ... prolly now known as "St.Josephs" or somthing ... also I spent 5 minutes on that site ... atleast it works and better then some apache page

  334. Not like this on msn.be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When searching for it on msn.be, it returns the correct results (with xfree86.org being the first of them). So the chances that it is human "error" are rather large.

    Anywayz, it's stupid

  335. Y-Windows does not show up either by cpdsaorg · · Score: 1

    At least not on the first 2 or 3 hundred results.

  336. Why would they? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    Okay, kicking a truly lousy search engine is a lot of fun, but... come on, exactly why would they block 'XFree86'?

    People who already know Linux would not only NOT use the MSN search engine, but they'd be directly linked to XFree86 info from their Linux distro sites.

    Poor SOBs who recently decided to dare to look over the Winows horizon will search for 'Linux', not 'XFree86'.

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  337. And by TwistedSpring · · Score: 1

    Windows XP?

  338. Inferior searching by alex_tibbles · · Score: 1

    Is this not simply because MSN search system is worse than google's and that porn sites littering themselves with keywords trick MSN but not google? It's a pretty old trick to put popular but spurious words on your page. Or am I missing something?

  339. :D by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

    FREE: Get 'xfree86' at the Websites of the Hottest & Naughtiest Webcam Starlets, Hunks, Couples & Groups in the World. Click any star to visit!

  340. curious by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

    searching for XWindow will find a link to the XFree86.org site: http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=XWindow&FORM= SMCRT Keith

  341. Search for free p0rn - first 18 links are slashdot by cjmckenzie · · Score: 1

    that's it.

  342. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hosts: ...
    127.0.0.1 www.msn.com
    127.0.0.1 search.msn.com
    127.0.0.1 www.msn.co.uk ...

  343. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    x/p

  344. MS trying to protect kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    presumably that's why they have this ridiculous porn warning system.

    but the stupidest thing about this is that it gives you no choice of results *other* than porn - it redirects you to a whole other, porn specific search engine for fuck's sake!

    at least if you had the choice, you mite actually find what you are looking for (xfree86) or, if you are a little kid, you may at least have other urls to choose from *besides* porn.

  345. why? by shadoelord · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone be using msn search? Are you glutons for punishment?

    --
    this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
  346. FEAR ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be possibly because of fear?

    You know XFree86 4.4 has a different licence which creates additional obligations for those who use it... could possibly M$ be afraid?

    (M$ was on purpose, idiot, f* off)

  347. NIGHTSURF IS A BIG SHAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They load your search query into the results in MULTIPLE PLACES! I did a search for 'satellite pictures of osama bin laden', and guess what?!? Nightsurf managed to find two results in the top 10, which both claimed to have exactly what I typed in. And ... both were from the same porno-webcam site. Great.

    How much did NightSurf pay M$ to get all that adult traffic? Any adult webmaster would KILL for a chance at that ...

  348. Never attribute to malice... by cms108 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...what can be adequately explained by Microsoft's search engine being shit.

  349. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by Darkangael · · Score: 1

    It also doesn't complain if you put Xfree by itself either.

  350. This Just In... by dbretton · · Score: 1


    MSN Search sucks!

    move along now...

  351. It is specifically XFree86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you search for XFree86 it does take you to porn. I have seen that it is SPECIFIC to XFree86 as if you search for "XFree 86" (with the space) the FIRST item is a link to Xfree86.org!

  352. no new news here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted to slashdot well over a year ago regarding a simple linux search at cnn.com and msnbc.com. Well I just repeated that search. Cnn found 791 items with linux...and they were mostly linux stories. Msnbc found 174...(last time I did this over a year ago I found less and almost none were really about linux)...and the top stories are about SCO. Repeat search of linux at msn and you get a WHOPPING 418 hits. The same search at google, 92,800,000 hits. Hearing that they block terms like xfree86 from their searches is no suprise. Hopefully you figured out a long time ago that you have better options than msnbc, msn and the folks at microsoft.

    p.s. I first tried to hit the msnbc page with mozilla. It didn't work. So warning! YOU MAY HAVE TO USE IE TO REPEAT THIS TEST! =P

  353. Funny by hesiod · · Score: 1

    It doesn't always return that it's adult content. I searched for "XFree86 is not adult content you fucking monopolistic tards!" and I got 0 results instead.

  354. Easy Explanation by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    We all know that even Google eliminates common words from its searches, things like "the", "how", etc. So removing useless words from the search has precedent. It's more efficient.

    Likewise, "free" gets mapped to NULL on MSN's search engine. You can see their reasoning behind this:

    "After all, software certainly isn't free, is it? No reason to help people find warez sites or useless "free" vi4gra."

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  355. Why dont you learn to MSSearch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XFree86(TM) works ya bunch of dorks!

  356. Well there IS a connection by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you saw pr0n at the command line?

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  357. google's relevance engine by saxgod007 · · Score: 0

    I think this is because google filters on relevance of the site.. I mean .. the first 1000 searches on google on xfree86 'ever' maybe also showed the porn search engine, but then users just scrolled past them and clicked the xfree86 links they needed. Google is 'smart' enough to know that those are the links it should put first, because it has most searched-for/link-clicked ratio. MSN probably doesn't have such a function (they didn't buy it from google yet), or maybe too few searches are done on xfree86 for the relevance to kick in .. or maybe u r just right ;)

  358. Reminds me of ... by JackDante · · Score: 1

    Some two years ago when MSN delivered wrong code to Opera Browser. Considering the amount of manipulation, how much can you "trust" in their news?

  359. MSN gets paid for pointing kids at sex by darkonc · · Score: 1
    They're willing to return Results 1-15 of about 258627 containing "naked hot slut sex"

    And they return a URL that MSN MAKES MONEY OFF OF when they effectively force an otherwise innocuous search to return pure porn when searching for something innocuous like Xfree86.

    . If there was ever a reason to tell people to not use MSN search, I'd say that this is a good one.

    What other innocuous terms are going to find our kids facing down a porn search engine? What happens if they decide that Mr. Rogers is competition?

    Sorry -- If I want porn at least I'll go to someplace honest about it like autopr0n.com.

    On the other hand, if you ever wanted a good excuse to look for porn....

    Honest mom! I was looking for "GCC" and MSN somehow pointed me here !!!
    guh!
    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  360. Republicans for Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll vote for Bush becuase I'm prolife even though I'm prolinux.

    I suspect MS thinks XFree86 is the biggest threat to their flagship product, Windoze.

    Republicans for Linux! Hurrah!

  361. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, you're just patently insane and have probably never touched a female in your life. It's okay. "Get it out here" on Slashdot.

  362. Good algorithm actually by Vexware · · Score: 0

    A search on MSN Search for "Microsoft CRAP" returns Microsoft's own Palladium project in second position. Heh.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval
  363. A relatively complete list of terms ... by Spatch3 · · Score: 1

    A relatively complete list of terms that bring up that idiodic site: nightsurf.com

    xfree86
    porn
    porno
    pornography
    fuck
    fuckin
    fucking
    sex
    cum
    cumming
    cum shot
    double penetration
    bdsm
    anal
    analingus
    rim job
    rimming
    orgasm
    fellatio
    blow job
    cunnilingus

    the following is interesting since it gives a link to nighshift but also gives other links the above terms do not:
    pussy

    Hope this helps show which words msn is re-directing to this idiotic site...

    Spatch

    --

    Every rule has an exception, and this is the only rule with no exceptions! Huh? -- Spatch
  364. Replying to my own post.... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Now I remember what the older version said....

    Ill Drink to that

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  365. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > mod parent up!

    Mod parent down, since grandparent is horribly, horribly redundant.

  366. 1986 by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

    Could have something to do with the year? 2004-1986 = 18 years old. Sounds right to me for porn..

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  367. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "X", "free"... both dodgy on the keywords, but if you go to the BBC website, under the health, sex, oral... category, you will find 68 under you do me and I'll owe you one... maybe change that round.... not getting a little bit tenuous at this stage is it?

  368. MSN indexes faster than Google by dtaczalski · · Score: 1

    The Ministery of Trust Search Engine is better in one thing than Google. It's the crowling and indexing speed.

    Right now (23:44 GMT+01), about 23 hours after the parent posting (00:22 GMT+01) MSN returned exactly one search result for "Xfree69": this one and Google still says: "Your search - Xfree69 - did not match any documents."

  369. Re:Why this probably isn't intentional... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

    Sure it is, but that's just because the parent of my message missed that whole thing.

    --
    Martin
  370. opera and xfree86 by LosManos · · Score: 1

    hi.
    I too thought it just was a mistake until I read about an obvious hostile action against Opera.
    http://my.opera.com/community/dev/articles/2003020 6/
    /LosManos

  371. Re:Because I'm so sure that MSN users are that sma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how was this discovered?

  372. Um? by MrNerdHair · · Score: 1

    "Spelling was corrected! Do not correct my spelling. Search for "porn porn" Results 1-15 of about 348 containing "pornporn""

    The spell checker removed the space and searched for popnporn, not porn porn. Hmm.... You'd think, if M$ had such a commitment to internet purity, that they'd stop the developers from stuffing the spellcheck database with smut...

  373. TO Microsoft XFree86 IS AN OBCENITY! by stuffduff · · Score: 1

    -nuff said

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  374. Reply from Microsoft.... by mini_me · · Score: 1

    This is their reply for my complaint about this issue:

    Thank you for writing to MSN Search regarding your search for "XFree86".

    We are currently investigating your issue and will respond with a resolution or suggestion on how to resolve this matter.

    If you have any additional information you can provide to us or if there is anything else we can assist you with, please feel free to write us back.

    Sincerely,

    Beth
    MSN Search Customer Support


    Looks suspiciously like an automated reply, the "suggestion on how to resolve" kinda gives it away. I mean, how am I gonna fix it? Hmm, I'd guess I could just use a different search engine (not that I would ever use MSN search anyway, I was just curious, heheh).

    I wonder if they'll ever follow on...

    1. Re:Reply from Microsoft.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And look at that, it's fixed. It's a miracle!

      search for xfree86

  375. Problem corrected by SunnyElLoco · · Score: 1
    I emailed them about the problem, and they seem to have fixed it.

    This is the email I received from them:

    Hello,
    Thank you for Contacting MSN Search Customer Support about the search results
    found when searching for "XFree86". The MSN Search team was notified of the
    incorrect search results and has now corrected the search query in the MSN
    Search database.
    We appreciate your bringing this to our attention. It is due to the input from
    users such as yourself that we've made such improvements as: ...


    So, whether you like Microsoft or not, or whether their search technology is inferior or not, they did do a good job in correcting the problem.

    -Teemu
  376. Management by blocking by StarBar · · Score: 1

    Blocking and redirection is quite common. I have visited many customers and suppliers and amazingly there are fundamental differences in freedom between different labs. I remember visiting a major x86 silicon vendor which we worked with at the time, 2 years ago. In the lab I saw a lot of pro-Linux stuff like the penguin doll and posters with penguins crushing windows logos etc. However using some spare time between meetings trying to connect to slashdot trough their LAN I was blocked! All other sites tried were no problem. This added to my suspision that their Linux commitment was not 100% solid throughout the organisation. No wonder we have another supplier for the next generation of products!