Posted by
CmdrTaco
on from the gotta-reinstall-every-month-or-two-anyway dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Looks like Microsoft changed their minds and are planning a new OS release before Longhorn. They are calling it XP Reloaded."
Based on the results page, I think they really do need another release -- nearly every single query result was a question about how to reload the operating system because a bunch of shit just stopped working!
Once XP Reloaded comes out, I can't wait to query for "XP Reloaded Reloaded" and see if the number of results returned decreases at all, or if the MS tards just add more bugs with every "bug fix". Hahahaha!
--
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Prior art. "Reload(ed) Windows" has been used many, many many times. Many times. Many....we're talking astronomical mathematical scales, here. At least.
The only thing that surpasses it is "restarted windows".
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
redJag
·
· Score: 3, Funny
No no no, the next version would be XP Revolutions. Of course, on par with Slashdot here mind you, XP Revolutions would use a grub loader, let you choose the mount point, use new winextfs, and let you choose between winome or kdew32 window managers.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Man, not only did I reply to the wrong thread, I responded on slashdot to a IM message.
See what two consecutive bullshit stories regarding Microsoft IN ONE DAY can do to your brain? Turns it to recycled mush! This is your brain...and this is your brain when you start believing MS PR (pours brain out into saucepan)
I think I need to go outside....
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
RevAaron
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
They did too, and now they want to hide these results behind some nice looking pages which will come on top, that's probably the reason behind this new name.
-- Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 1, Funny
s/believing/reading
aaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggghhhhhhh hh h
Oh, and
"Slow Down Cowboy!"
Fuck you, cubicle child:)
February 26th, 2004. The day that Shadowbearer finally lost his last brain cell. Industry analysts blamed beer, but insiders stated that it was due to the absorption of too much Microsoft FUD. People close to Shadowbearer confirmed the latter statement, saying "After reading about how Microsoft's Security Chief had proclaimed that patches caused vulnerabilities, he saw an article about how Microsoft was going to release a major update to their latest operating system. I've never seen anything like it. He went totally catatonic for something like 3 minutes, then started typing furiously. I was concerned, but not too much so, until slashdot refused to let him post a comment until he'd previewed it fourteen million times. After that he became totally incoherent and I started fearing for my safety."
Other sources close to Shadowbearer had no comment.
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
WorkEmail
·
· Score: 2, Funny
MS XP Reloaded will be like an all day pass to the crap carnival. Remember ME?
OWN3D!
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Denver_80203
·
· Score: 1
linux reloaded. Results 271 - 280 of about 173,000. Search took 1.13 seconds.
windows reloaded. Results 1 - 10 of about 261,000. Search took 0.16 seconds
so? Windows has been around longer, has a 95% market share on the desktop. So in good ole statistical terms you don't measure up.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
deaddrunk
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Surely it should be XP Rebooted.
-- Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 4, Funny
It's a topic in a googlefight.
Whether windows "reloaded" or "restarted" is more popular.
Heh. Heeeeeeeeee
Slashdot is not experiencing a laughter shortage today. Thanks, Microsoft. We needed it. It's winter...
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Once XP Reloaded comes out, I can't wait to query for "XP Reloaded Reloaded" and see if the number of results returned decreases at all, or if the MS tards just add more bugs with every "bug fix". Hahahaha!
No, it'll be XP Revolutions.
-- "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
EvilTwinSkippy
·
· Score: 4, Funny
We needed it. It's winter...
Only in the temperate regions of Northern Hemisphere, you insensitive clod!
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
The_dev0
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Yea, i'm looking forward to XP Revolutions, but i'm afraid it will be worse than the first two.
-- Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
What's really funny is that it comes up 116 times, as oppose to almost 4000 for "Linux Reloaded."
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The difference being their not talking about the same thing....The first result for Linux Reloaed is a blog talking about how IT personal must start employing Linux for desktop OS use.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 0, Troll
Wanna do it again?
*grin* thank you!:)
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Thank you, your input is appreciated.
This has been an unofficial polling of the slashdot moderation system. Your IPs have most emphatically *not* been logged, for obvious reasons.
D)
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
MaestroRC
·
· Score: 0, Offtopic
Here in Knoxville, TN, it was 1C and snowing all day. Think about that one more time...
1C and snowing... the Gods hate us.
It snowed about 6 inches worth today, but none of it stuck around, it all melted. Talk about torture:-(
-- I hate sigs...
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Not redundant if you use Linux.;)
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
Whilst here we are rejoicing in a decently mellow winter...and what was that I saw about global warming simply changing climate in many locales around the world?
Only "" 6 inches of snow? We'd take the snow here - we need the moisture, the last 5 years have been the driest ones in over a hundred years - it's the lack of below zero temps that have us happy;) just give us some snow, please:)
I grew up in Minnesota:)
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Actually the release after "XP Reloaded" won't be "XP Reloaded Reloaded" but rather "XP Revolutions". It will cause PC's worldwide to become sentient and begin the brutal enslavement of humanity.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 1
Danke
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
colmore
·
· Score: 0, Offtopic
hmmmm... snowed last night and below freezing all day here in Athens, GEORGIA, so I think you've just experienced a warm front, not global warming.
-- In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
shadowbearer
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
It's the sense of humor displayed by those of us who grew up in Minnesota. Sorry:)
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Millenium Edition, as we all know was horrid. That is what I was referring to in my last post.;)
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
rixstep
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Version 2.7 of the Linux kernel will concentrate its PR on the animosity between the Redmond campus and the University of Helsinki; it will be billed as The Two Towers.
The next version of the kernel will see the re-emergence of Linux and Unix on the desktop, and will be billed as The Return of the King.
You're gonna die because of global warming (if not, ur children sure as hell will)
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
mod parent informative
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
geminidomino
·
· Score: 1
I doubt it. The minute the computers try to parse a human walking and chewing gum at the same time, they will all simultaneously bluescreen, throwing humanity back into the 18th century.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Which would include Soviet Russia.
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Scratch-O-Matic
·
· Score: 4, Funny
The only thing that surpasses it is "restarted windows".
Usually I would settle for just shutting down Windows, but I can rarely get that to work either.
LATTE?!?!?? HA!!! LATTE is only for MILK-DRINKING PUSSIES!!##! ESPRESSO is the ONLY WAY T NGGG GD FFFFFG HRRRRRG real CAFFFFFFFFFFF REAL caffeine WHY DON'T THE LETTERS GET BIGGER WHEN I PRESS HARDER?!?!!#'@!"DAMN TRAITOR ELONEX KEYBOARD!!!!!$%%~#plz getgun killme
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
geminidomino
·
· Score: 1
Actually, the 18th century was the 1700s.;)
The point was that not only do we lose computers, but power grids, plumbing (water stations are generally computer controlled these days), long-distance travel....
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
This is 'insightful'? It's a joke! What kind of drooling morons get mod points around here anyway?
Re:OMFG ROTFLMAO ROR!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
hmmmm... snowed last night and below freezing all day here in Athens, GEORGIA... not global warming
It snowed last night so there is no global warming, eh? You stupid sad fuck.
Reloaded? Revolutions?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Is this a fortelling of things to come? Did the Oracle prophetize these events? Is it fate that the next two versions of windows are doomed to be over hyped and inferior to the original in nearly every way shape and form?
Re:Reloaded? Revolutions?
by
Bendebecker
·
· Score: 4, Funny
I don't think Larry Ellison is available for comment...
-- There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes, most of us won't be able to afford
it.
-- Lemmy
Re:Reloaded? Revolutions?
by
MinutiaeMan
·
· Score: 1
Well, they have been hyping Longhorn as a "revolution" of sorts....
Re:Reloaded? Revolutions?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I think Windows XP works pretty well. Now, they are gonna preload bunches of computers with another version, and it might be worse than what we have now. I've seen that happen with a lot of linux distros, and I'm not gonna name names, but when "We" went from 0.5.3.1 to 0.6 and 0.6.1, "things happened". But, in Linux, we can all fix the thing, and I do. But, what about a busted XP? Gonna fix that?
Is this a fortelling of things to come? Did the Oracle prophetize these events? Is it fate that the next two versions of windows are doomed to be over hyped and inferior to the original in nearly every way shape and form? It's not fate, it's statistics. You just described every version of windows I have come into contact with.
Re:Reloaded? Revolutions?
by
zero_offset
·
· Score: 1
Being available for comment is about the only thing he's good for.
And about 90% of the time, the comment is grounds for confinement under the Baker Act.
--
Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005
But you still have a choice of buying the next version or not...
Smith would tell you it's inevitable.
The Oracle would tell you that the real test for any choice is having to make the same choice again, knowing full well what it might cost ($190) and how much it would suck.
The Merovingian might add that choice is an illusion, created between those with power, and those without.
The Architect would suggest that nearly 99% of all test subjects would accept the program, as long as they were given a choice, even if they were only aware of the choice at a near unconscious level, a he already knows what you are going to do.
And Morpheus would sarcastically ask you whether, being more secure or faster has anything to do with Windows marketshare in the first place.
-- Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
Re:Reloaded? Revolutions?
by
maztuhblastah
·
· Score: 1
Actually what I'm thrilled about (even if others say its horribly inefficient) is the 3D accelerated desktop that is supposed to be in Longhorn, and doing away with 2D acceleration. The Mac has it, why can't we?
Though I doubt Reloaded will have it as it would take away the Longhorn hype
-- Candle burns its brightest in the dark
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Informative
"Reloaded" is just an internal designation. It will most likely be released under a different name in order to avoid lawsuits.
It would certainly make Microsoft think a little bit longer on some law suits if it happened to them.
Okay. It ptobably wouldn't. Ignore this post.
Re:and in other news
by
Golias
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Nah... They have prior art on use of the word. If I had a dollar for every time Windows XP had to be "reloaded" in my office, I would be as rich as a Microsoft board member.
--
Information wants to be anthropomorphized.
Re:and in other news
by
kgarcia
·
· Score: 0, Troll
Umm, no, Billy would just BUY Warner Bros if that happened
Actually, the ski destinations are Whistler and Blackcomb.
Hope be with ye,
Cyan
Re:and in other news
by
DavidLeblond
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Probably Windows XP Second Edition
Re:and in other news
by
LilMikey
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Warner Bros takes Billy to court over using the name Reloaded.
And, after seeing the successful result of that trial, Metallica sues Warner over the 'Reloaded' subtitle thus propogating the constantly regurgitating cycle of crap!
-- LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
...and the Sierra Club has been begging the State of Oregon to take up suit against Intel over Merced, Klamath, Deschutes, Mendocino, Williamette, etc...
Re:and in other news
by
Vargasan
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Windows XPSE? But it uses the NT kernel so it could also be called Windows NTXPSE. I'm sure MS can get more letters in that abbreviation.
-- Putting the romance back into necromancer.
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
lmfao. Best post of the week.
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"Actually what I'm thrilled about (even if others say its horribly inefficient) is the 3D accelerated desktop that is supposed to be in Longhorn, and doing away with 2D acceleration"
i really hope the +5 funny related to that statement and not the obvious matrix reference. If not thats one of the worst comments i've ever heard. the mac has a 3d accelerated desktop to make use of the hardware. on pc's, we have "games" which use the video card to its fullest pottential. the only reason macs have a 3d desktop is so you can actually tell that you hve a 3d card installed -- because god knows you dont need 3d acceleration to play Escape velocity and bolo!
Re:and in other news
by
pantherace
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Actually what I'm thrilled about (even if others say its horribly inefficient) is the 3D accelerated desktop that is supposed to be in Longhorn, and doing away with 2D acceleration. The Mac has it, why can't we?
Umm... the Macs don't. The macs use display pdf which can be scaled much like vector graphics that longhorn will include. However Longhorn will do almost all of that on the card (Which macs are starting to do (Quarz Extreme which still does some things in software (CPU)).
Nor will longhorn be a '3d' desktop for the most part, instead it will be more like doing 2D acceleration in 3D spaces, which most cards cannot do efficiently. They mostly flush the render buffer for every switch & the 3D part is still seperate from the 2D portion with the end 3D buffer being blitted to the 2D buffer when it isn't full screen. The main benefit is: vector grapics (which can be done in 2D easily, (example: kde's crystal svg icons) but all 3D apis provide this accelerated if the hardware does it.) which allow smaller sized icons which can scale up & down better than bitmaps, and is useful for high resolution windows so that even if you need large things (poor eyesight) it can only look better running at higher resolution (by having the computer calculate how to display something at 200dpi to a monitor which was at 100dpi (it isn't hard, and if you don't use vector graphics, it is essentially just pixel quadrupling, however with vector grapics & aa, it looks better)
And for anyone who doesn't think cards need a lot of ram: my current desktop is using more than 12MB, and that's only going to go up.
Re:and in other news
by
Whitehawke
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Quote from the Lindows.com site:
----------- Important Notice! The choice of visiting this site has been taken away in Belgium, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Sweden. Residents of these countries must _click here_! -----------
Now, let's think about this for a minute. They're on the site and from (e.g.) Belgium, so they need to click the link...but, if 'the choice has been taken away', how exactly did they get there?
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Windows CEMENTXPSE
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Actually what I'm thrilled about (even if others say its horribly inefficient) is the 3D accelerated desktop that is supposed to be in Longhorn, and doing away with 2D acceleration. The Mac has it, why can't we?
Don't worry though. Everything will be fully functional by the time "XP Revolutions" is released, right?
Yeah, I think the OS just ends at a key point, and you need to buy revolutions, thinking it will explain and fix everything, only it doesn't. Just like in the movies.
-- SAILING MISHAP
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I am hoping that "XP Revolutions" will involve an actual revolt and migration of desktop to users to a non-MS operating system (for instance, Linux)!
Ah, get it, "a non-MS" / anonymous - I amuse myself.
The Mac doesn't have it. Longhorn has a fully 3D accelerated desktop. As in drawing as well. The Mac only uses 3D acceleration for the specific case of compositing windows together.
-- A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
Re:and in other news
by
mickwd
·
· Score: 5, Funny
"Windows XPSE?
Could be.
Or what about Windows Special Edition XP ?
Since, as you say, it still uses the NT kernel it could be Windows Special Edition XP Original Technology.
Windows SEXPOT.
Sounds like a winner.
Re:and in other news
by
despik
·
· Score: 2, Flamebait
Umm... the Macs don't. The macs use display pdf which can be scaled much like vector graphics that longhorn will include. However Longhorn will do almost all of that on the card (Which macs are starting to do (Quarz Extreme which still does some things in software (CPU)).
Starting to do? Quartz Extreme pipes all 2D GUI graphics through the graphics card, and it's available since Mac OS X 10.2 -- in other words, for more than one-and-a-half fucking years. Any ideas when will Longhorn come out?
You're a Microsoft apologist, aren't you? I thought your kind was extinct by now, especially here.
-- "I seem to have mastered a certain amount of control over physical reality."
Re:and in other news
by
Sick+Boy
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Am I the only one who read that as "eXPenSE"?
-- Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
It seems ironic that Winows is calling their uptate "XP Reloaded"
ii The Matrix Reloaded was dissipointment as the sequel to The Marix, will XP "Reloaded" be even worse than XP? What were they thinking? Hmmmm. When I reload XP, that memory virus is stll there...
-- My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
Re:and in other news
by
tverbeek
·
· Score: 4, Funny
When Apple upgraded the CPU in the Mac II to the 68030, they called the new model the Mac IIx. I was disappointed that they didn't use the same naming pattern when they put a 68030 in the Mac SE (instead calling it the Mac SE/30).
I mentioned it AND that it doesn't do EVERYTHING on the GPU. Some things like geometry transforms (as I recall) are done on the CPU. Even using hardware accelerated, the CPU has traditionally had to say: do this, do this, do this for everything the grapics card does.
And if you think EVERY Mac (considering the number of mac classic & OS X (less than 10.2). Now had I restricted myself to the domain of new Macs then I would be incorrect. Windows will be starting to when Longhorn comes out, and we all know that Windows (the deployed ones) will not have the same display capablities for a very long time (aren't only 26% of Windows users are using XP by now?, MacOS likely has a higer ratio of 10.2+ than XP over earlier versions, but as a whole, is just starting to.)
You're a Microsoft apologist, aren't you? I thought your kind was extinct by now, especially here.
Wow: name calling & Inaccurate. I lying about things doesn't help the credibility of the speaker. (I have no Microsoft Operating systems in my house. Nor do I have MacOS. I do have various Linuxes, an IBM OS which is not OS/2, multiple sun (sparc32/64) boxes & Digital/Compaq/HP Alphas.)
Now my own rant, name calling & impoliteness to the presumed mac zealot (skip if you want to): oh, look at the UltraSparc... 64-bit desktop computing, new? Oh and that's an alpha, which until compaq bought Digital was beating the crap out of their precious Macs, and the low end were cheaper compared to high-end Macs (for much better performance) Again, Apple's Feces to Gold Machine that they have some people believing that anything they create is the 3rd coming, Steve being the 2nd. (not that all Apple products are bad, actually the G5 is not bad, nor is the ipod (I will argue that it is overpriced))
Well, hopefully it won't be called "Windows Millenium Edition XP" or "Windows Millenium Edition 2". If stability is inherited by title, it would be hell on earth.
Re:and in other news
by
canajin56
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
It sounds like it's not even an internal designation. More like they are considering a version inbetween XP and Longhorn, "Reloaded" is just what some of the guys are calling it.
-- ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
This would be funny if Metallica had an album named Reloaded. If you're gonna be a dick, at least be right.
And for anyone who doesn't think cards need a lot of ram: my current desktop is using more than 12MB, and that's only going to go up
ok.... 2880x1200x24 (my resolution, dual head) = 79.1MB The only way that is going to go up is if i increase my resolution or color depth. I'm assuming you are running at 1024x768x16 (it's about 12.5MB) Getting a new version of Windows (or X for that matter) will not increase that usage. At all.
-- If bad puns were like deli meat, this would be the wurst
I don't like this idea. I mean the first movie was great, the second, so-so, and the third was rubbish. Does this mean that the current XP is as good as it gets and it's all downhill from here???
-- In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
And where exactly are you getting this load of bull?
Apple's SIGGRAPH presentation on Quartz extreme, page 10. Notice how the "Quartz 2D" line is yellow, which, as the legend indicates, means software rendering. Longhorn will actually use Direct3D for the drawing *inside* the windows, so you can have very rich vector graphics in applications.
And Longhorn is an example of MS copying Apple copying NeXT:)
-- A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
But the name is already far too long! When I was talking to Microsoft tech support last year over a problem (which they were unable to fix since it appears to be a bug), they needed to know exactly which version of Windows I was using:
"Windows XP Service Pack 1 Upgrade Academic Retail" version. It's a mouthful.
That, Vs "Gentoo 1.4 x86 Stage 1 GNU/Linux". I just can't make it that long even when I try.:)
-- It's GNU/Linux dammit!
Re:and in other news
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Is it just me, or does "http://www2.warnerbros.com/main/homepage/homepage.html" read like "Worst. URI Organization Scheme. Ever." ? -os
Nahh... Reloaded is right. It shows that MS recognizes that users have to do this with their systems every few months. Maybe "Reinstalled" would be better, though.
Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
Megor1
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Or can it?
-- Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
Maserati
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Well, XP Reloaded won't be a sequel to something as good as the original Matrix film, so the expectations won't be quite as high.
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
Gyan
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Well, all the bugs are real. There is no escape.
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
swoebser
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I think I'll save my money until XP Revolutions comes out.
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
Aumaden
·
· Score: 1
I think I'll save my money until XP Revolutions comes out.
Why wait? XP Revolting is available today!
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
Megor1
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Just thought of another name for it
"XP Rebloated"
Hell if it's anything like Windows ME was to Windows 98 than that name would apply.
-- Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
MrHanky
·
· Score: 4, Funny
You know, XP was meant as a trilogy to begin with. Microsoft just wanted to see if there was a market for it before the started producing parts 2 and 3. But you really have to experience the whole trilogy to truly appreciate XP at all. That's how it always was meant.
Oh, and while we wait: AniXPrick will let us know more of the XP mythology (security, usability, TCO and the real reason why a web browser, an instant messenger and a media player are integrated parts of the XP). And don't forget to buy the sound track, with unforgettable hits like tada.wav, chord.wav, notify.wav and the incredible recycle.wav!
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
TWX
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
"XP Rebloated"
Seems like a good combination of "XP Reloaded" and "XP Rebooted", with a little slice of truth added for flavour...
-- Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
leon.gandalf
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Rebloated??? When did it ever unbloat?
Re:Well it can't be much worse than the movie
by
EvilTwinSkippy
·
· Score: 1
Well you see, the XP line is an allegory for Kant's three stages of man.
We all thought the XP desktop was the fisher price operating system. Indeed, we were correct. XP is an metaphor for early development. We constanty consult wizards who go off and do things on our behalf. These are the stand-ins for parents.
Now in second installment, YQ, we switch to the adolescent/young adult mode. We are given a command line, and the means to shoot ourselves in the foot. We get to test the waters. But in exchange for this newfound freedom we have a much bleaker view of the world. The bright colors are more drab. The round shapes are sharp.
The third installment, ZR, we switch to the convelescent stage of development. Our "outlook" seems childlike again. The interfaces are designed so we can't hurt ourselves with it. All over we are surrounded by helpers who are there to assist us. Each one is well meaning, but they more or less treat us like we are a child. In the process our brain atrophies, and we await the sweet release of death and migration to a new platform...
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Well there is always the possibility to use linux or some other 64 bit capable OS. Then again what are you doing that benefit from 64 bit computing?
Games sure wont and not most other applications either.
-- HTTP/1.1 400
Re:I wonder...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Well if you're using linux you're definately not using any games. I'm sorry counterstrike through wine just doesn't cut it. I play game that were released today, next to nothing supports linux out of the box.
If it sucks as much in comparison to XP as Matrix Reloaded did in comparison to Matrix, forget about crashing all the time... this thing won't even boot up!!!
Put me down for a dime on the logo to win. Clippy is a scrawny little wuss, and nothing that ever went up against the mighty Windows Logo ever won. Just ask Netscape.
insert Matrix joke here
by
dhamsaic
·
· Score: 4, Funny
...followed in 2006 by Longhorn, aka "Microsoft XP Revolutions"
-- Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
iphayd
·
· Score: 2, Funny
I'll buy into it as long it is the final Windows.
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
GillBates0
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Neo: What are you trying to tell me that I can dodge worms?
Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you install Linux, you won't have to.
-- An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
If you honestly think that there are no worms that target linux, then you are a retarded ass monkey.
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
What exactly is an "ass monkey"? How retarded can they get?
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Check out "Bruce Almighty" for a view of an ass monkey. I have no clue as to what the IQ range would be.
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
ooh, ooh, i know this! it's (seriously) a monkey that lives in your ass. just watch that Jim Carrey movie for a demo.
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
deconvolution
·
· Score: 1
.... and longhorn might be changed to : the fellowship of the XP.....
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Herkum01
·
· Score: 1
Neo: Where am I?
Little Girl: You are trapped between the machine world and man's world.
Neo: You mean...
Little Girl: Thats right, the Blue Screen of Death! Where the machine cannot do anything and neither can the user... The only person who can free you is a MCSE!
Neo: NNNNNOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Herkum01
·
· Score: 1
Lets fix the formatting here,
Neo: Where am I?
Little Girl: You are trapped between the machine world and man's world.
Neo: You mean...
Little Girl: Thats right, the Blue Screen of Death! Where the machine cannot do anything and neither can the user... The only person who can free you is a MCSE!
Morpheus: The EULA is a Microsoft-generated dreamworld built to keep us under control in order to change a human being into this.
Morpheus holds up a bag of money.
Re:insert Matrix joke here
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
They are smaller than the ass gorillas and not as smart as the ass chimpanzees.
Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
LostCluster
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Somehow, this seems like a sequel nobody wants to see...
Remember what happened when XP missed its deadline... Microsoft ended up shipping WindowsMe which in most circles stands for "Mistake Edition".
We know the real reason they're putting this out. It's not for the innovation value, but that sales of the XP Update have started to tail off, and this will convince some people who already have XP to buy the upgrade...
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Funny, for latin language speakers, Windows ME stands for Windows Merde
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
dan_sdot
·
· Score: 1
Somehow, this seems like a sequel nobody wants to see...
What??? No way! Everybody can't wait to see the new icon for "Recycle Bin" and "My Computer"!! Most people who care about that "functionality" crap use linux anyways.
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
HillBilly
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
I have a feeling this will just be Windows XP with service pack 2 and a few other things.
-- "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
stratjakt
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
Nope, sounds more like 98SE to me (that one was free, btw).
Real big architectural changes a-coming (64 bit CPUs, PCI-X, BTX (more of a form factor but i believe ties into OS controlled temp and whatnot), etc..), and the current OS doesn't support them, and the next OS is too far off.
I wouldnt be surprised if they merged the 64bit and 32bit code trees, or something of the sort.
--
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
falltime
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Actually I want to see this update - anything that delays Longhorn I'm in favor of. Be honest WinXp runs pretty good now for most of us that are using it - we've had years to figure out which drivers/sofware crashes it and I for one have my XP box humming.
Who wants to go through the typical MS upgrade path with crashes bugs issues etc.... As long as MS keeps issuing XP (and its ilk) the longer they and everyone else will support my box, the longer I can go without having to buy some bloated, buggy piece of crap
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
In other news, Microsoft has announced that SP2 will be postponed indefinitely.
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
4of12
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Exactly.
More to the point, it's to goad corporate users who are currently very happy to sit with Win2K installations into upgrading.
Those Win2K using folks apparently didn't get the message from the big marketing drive and didn't think XP was worth the money and hassle to upgrade from 2K.
Since Longhorn is "far off" and official support for 2K dies pretty soon, these are the customers that MS is hoping will jump on the bait.
But those customers probably want to insure that XP-Reloaded is really an improvement over 2k (already quite adequate). Then, Longhorn will have an even tougher time convincing corporate IT to displace XP-Reloaded.
-- "Provided by the management for your protection."
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
vensonOnSlashdot
·
· Score: 1
Are they really THAT short of money? I'm sure they'll need to pull some other trick out of their hat if they want people to fall for this all over again.
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
Dark+Lord+Seth
·
· Score: 1, Offtopic
BTX (more of a form factor but i believe ties into OS controlled temp and whatnot)
Do you have anything to prove that bit? Last thing I'd like is for tempctrl.exe to crash and end up with a 64 bit, 200 euro slab of silicon goo oozing down my mainboard...
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
bersl2
·
· Score: 1
OK, so you give them 32-bit and consumer 64-bit versions. I'll bet tons of people who want to upgrade fuck up and get the wrong version. Even if you label it completely differently, tons of people with 32-bit cpus will buy the 64-bit version.
I personally haven't tried to run 64-bit code on a 32-bit machine, so I don't know if it will chug or choke.
This 64-bit conversion in general will be hell (with binaries, at least) while most people still have 32-bit machines.
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
miscGeek
·
· Score: 1
No of course there will be a difference. This one will cost you...
-- May the source be with you!
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
poot_rootbeer
·
· Score: 1
I wouldnt be surprised if they merged the 64bit and 32bit code trees, or something of the sort.
Where am I gonna find a 48 bit CPU though?
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
Accipiter
·
· Score: 3, Informative
sounds more like 98SE to me (that one was free, btw).
No. Windows 98 Second Edition was NOT a free upgrade. You could download the fixes and patches, but any new features were only available if you bought the 98SE retail box.
--
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
(If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't.:P)
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
hawkeyeMI
·
· Score: 1
As something of a linux zealot for the last 4.5 years, but also someone who manages all of the computers for my research lab plus my girlfriend, I would like to disagree with you slightly.
I use linux all the time.
Every day.
It's still got some severe 'functionality' issues. A lot of that relates to lack of vendor support. Some of it relates to the more rapid development process.
Anyhow it still needs some work in terms of things just working, but I think it's improving exponentially. More and more software vendors are announcing linux versions. Now if software install and hardware detection/setup would improve just a bit more I think we'll be there.
-- Error 404 - Sig Not Found
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
jmichaelg
·
· Score: 1
Microsoft ended up shipping WindowsMe which in most circles stands for "Mistake Edition".
Which leads to the obvious question - why don't they just call it WindowsMe-2?
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
iainl
·
· Score: 1, Troll
Really? Microsoft shipped me a free upgrade CD with all the stuff on, having bought a retail box copy of 98 (upgrade). After a couple of months they did renege on the idea and start asking about 10 for it, ostensibly to cover the cost of making it and shipping (all the UK ones were being shipped from Microsoft Ireland for some perverse reason).
-- "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
DMadCat
·
· Score: 1
Am I the only one not surprised by this?
Personally I'm of the opinion that Windows ME came out to "break" Windows.
Users were getting too comfortable with Windows 98 (I still know a few who would rather go back to it than upgrade to XP) and 2000 (terrible for games) was right around the corner.
Well, if you wanted to play most of your old games you had to either go back to 98 or stick with ME (which you just shelled out money for). Most stuck with ME and hated it.
Then (tada!) Windows XP comes out as the "most secure ever!"; look at the pretty new interface!;
Play all your games on this platform, it even has a compatibility mode for all your old games! (:::cough:::BULLSHIT:::cough:::)
Thus it came as no surprise that "Longhorn" was pushed back to 2005 to make room for Windows XP "Reloaded". Watch, it'll take the existing XP and make it run like crap. Odds are they'll say something like it's "optimized for the new 64 bit processors!" or some crap and use that as an explanation for all the new bugs... ahem... features. People will buy it and run it because they just paid a lot of money for it despite the fact that it sucks. Then a shiny new Longhorn (the most secure ever!; look at the pretty new interface!; 64 bit OS but it will still play all your old games!) will appear to save them from the "outdated" Windows XP.
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
cdipierr
·
· Score: 1
Uh why?
Though I doubt that XP "Reloaded" will have 64-bit support merged in, if it did, why couldn't the installer just detect your CPU type and install 64-bit if appropriate and 32-bit if not?
As for binaries, the x86-64 can run 32-bit binaries when it's in 64-bit mode, so no worries.
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
We routinely order Dells with XP Pro. The first thing I do when they come in is reload them with win2k Pro (this is allowed by M$ EULA). It just works! and the interface doesn't suck! and it plays OK on the network!
Since the new computers are already loaded with XP, there is no cost or hassle to upgrade to XP. Quite the opposite; it is a hassle to downgrade to win2K. But XP is a broken product, a distinct step backwards that just gets in the way of productivity. How much more horrible will the GUI be under XP Reloaded? How many bugs will they add? How much more bloatware and system insecurity?
And Longhorn? Surely you jest!
Re:Gotta keep the upgrade revenues...
by
Lev_Arris
·
· Score: 1
As far as I can recall you couldn't buy 98SE in retail. It was an OEM only version (only to be sold with new PCs, blabla). You could however download the fixes for 98. Did SE actually have any new features? I think there was one small thing but I can't remember.
Remember Neo was the Christ figure who was fighting against The Matri"XP" Reloaded...he was the good guy.:-)
I'd like to continue this conversation, but look out--sentinels.
sev
-- but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
Wait a minute ....
by
petabyte
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Do they know how many times I've "reloaded" XP for friends and family members? Seriously.
Not much difference from what they did with 98SE or 95B (or 95C).
Re:Wait a minute ....
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
Not much difference from what they did with 98SE or 95B (or 95C).
Um, the Win98SE analogy is perfectly valid, but the later editions of Win95 were never sold retail, only to OEMs.
Re:Wait a minute ....
by
acidrain69
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
95B at least added USB support. 98SE was a definate DOWNGRADE from 98.
It even says it in the article. They don't have enough to make it worthwhile, it's just a security/bugfix release. They are trying to pad it with "value added" crap, half of which will get deleted after install.
-- -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
Re:Wait a minute ....
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
95B's USB support was a total and complete joke. It never worked right. And I spent some considerable time trying. Never, ever worked.
And if you ask me, the original 98 was terrible. It was a crash happy, bloated, slow version of 95C with a bunch of crap I didn't want (though it atleast had working USB support). 98SE was a huge improvement.
Re:Oh how I long for Windows Really Good Edition
by
cmacb
·
· Score: 2, Funny
WOW, I tried that Windows RG, I'm switching today. It was a lot more stable than my old Windows 2000 system. Solitare worked better too!
Re:Oh how I long for Windows Really Good Edition
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Good God man! Win2000 is really sta[end carrier]
Re:Oh how I long for Windows Really Good Edition
by
moberry
·
· Score: 1
See, i didnt have a shockwave plugin installed. So this link just popped up a blue full screen window and did nothing (hey! like windows.). NEway. then killall konqueror didnt work, so finally "xkill" and that sexy little scull and crossbones cursor took care of it.
Re:Oh how I long for Windows Really Good Edition
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You really really screwed that one up. Don't come back to slashdot, or the RIAA, MPAA, and BSA will team up to kadfyvg12351!@@#!@4 NO CARRIER
Considering that...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
...XP is just a facelift to Win2k
like the matrix?
by
MattyCobb
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
kinda like the matrix reloaded... does that mean it will be ok and have some decent fight scenes but overall be worse than the original? or does it mean Bill Gates is reloading the virtual word we live in convinced that we have a good and stable OS but really we are all prisoners??...AGHHHH GOD SAVE US!
--
Matt You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
All I know is...
by
Sayten241
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
They better not release it under that title because it sounds a lot more like infringement to me than "Lindows" does. Well, maybe that's a bit extreme, but it's something to think about nonetheless.
Re:All I know is...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
it's just an internal working name.
Besides, if they did decide to release it like that, they'd get whatever royalties needed to be paid out of the way. They're a real, honest to goodness, corporation, not some fly-by-night open source scam artist.
Not really. Even if they chose to use that name for the final product, which they might not, there is no product in the same space with a substantially similar name, unlike Lindows. Or did you not realize that trademark law takes into account the market/type of product, as well as the name, when determining if an infringement has occured?
I'm always well-up for the next version of Windows, but this may just dilute the impact of Longhorn for me. And also I thought LH was due out 2006-2007? Reloaded will probably just delay it further.
Re:I dunno...
by
nelsonal
·
· Score: 2, Informative
I think oficially it's due 2005, but the smart money is on 2006. I believe those are calendar year estimates, but MS has been in the 2004 fiscal year since June.
-- Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
That's like in high school when you'd be hanging out at your friend's house and his dad would be one of those guys who thought he was cool but he was actually terribly out of touch. You know, the kind of guy who would come downstairs in like 1998 and say something like, "What are you guys doing? Listening to Nirvana?" in a desperate attempt to seem cool and "with it."
um nirvana will always rock. its 2004 and if someone came to me and said "What are you guys doing? Listening to Nirvana?" i'd say HELL YEAH BIATCH and then i'd pass them fatty and then they would say 'word'.
but im sure the bare naked ladies or the limp bisket or whatever you were listening to was alot cooler.
--
I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
Don't laugh. It's already happening to me. I have cousins a mere decade younger than myself. Introducing them to my MP3 collection was the first time I felt like an absolute, black-socks-and-striped-suspenders-pulling-my-pant s-up-above-my-navel-denture-wearing-geezer-who- s pends-his-time-complaining-about-the-gubmint.
Elvis who? That Metallica guy had a great beat going, but his voice ruins it. Only three Linkin Park songs? Lame! Whaddayamean, no Britney Spears? Can I download some? Sucks . Sucks . Sucks. Boring. Sucks... Don't you have *anything* cool?
Then I tried to introduce them to The Cure. Bad, bad idea. You don't know the meaning of pain until you've proffered all your most cherished music to a dismissive fifteen year old.
--
You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!
I think I may have been born that dad.
Maybe thats why I haven't got any friends...
-- The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Nah, I'm sixteen and love The Cure. Don't stop inspiring people with your musical wisdom.
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
yeah wait till you start turning INTO your dad.
Every day I catch myself doing 'Dad' type things. This started around the age of 28 and is increasing with each year. I'm pretty sure he is turning into Grandpa too, just not as vindictive to neighbors who piss him off.
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
See, I'm right there, except I'd pass them a 40, since fatties are sorta like mopeds--you know fun to ride, you just don't want your friends to see you on one.
Oh wait... maybe you mean a different type of fattie. Damn, I must be outta touch.
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Maybe it wasn't age, maybe their taste in music sucks.
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I Listen to nirvana you insensitive clod.
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You don't know the meaning of pain until you've proffered all your most cherished music to a dismissive fifteen year old.
Hint... if you're trying to impress a 15-year old, you're wasting your time. At age 15, most kids don't know if they're coming or going but are extremely wary of any attempts by outsiders to influence the direction.
Heh, I am that dad, except I'm asking my daughter why she isn't listening to Nirvana.
It's interesting to be the parent, and the one who's listening to more avant-garde music.
Re:XP Rebooted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Amen to that brother!
I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
LostCluster
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Today, while I was browsing Slashdot, Windows XP for no particular reason brought up its BSOD and demanded a reboot.
While that was happening, I realized it had been about two and a half years since XP came out. It seems like MS operating systems aways start to wear out after 2-3 years, just in time for the new release to claim it fixes all of those bugs...
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
cK-Gunslinger
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Yeah, today's bits just don't seem to age as gracefully as the bits o' yore. I blame it on the advent of antivirus software. Software doesn't get the chance to build up a natural immunity anymore...
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
pilot1
·
· Score: 1
If I hadn't already used my mod points, I would mod you up..
You know, I was thinking the same thing a few days ago. I was using Windows 98 on a computer with _nothing_ but Windows on it, and every time I would click a link in IE, it would lock up explorer.exe.. Then later I was on a Windows 2000 computer, and it wasn't nearly as stable as I remembered it.
In all fairness, I use Linux, so I may be spolied. But it seems to me that they did lock up far more than when they were originally released.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Tim+C
·
· Score: 4, Informative
How old were the machines? Bought new around the time that the respective OSes were released?
It may be a hardware problem - dodgy RAM, something overheating, etc. Seriously, it might be an idea to open the machine up, clean all the fans, heatsinks, etc, and take a look. Actually investigate the problem, rather than just shrugging and saying "Windows, huh?".
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
i have like 630 hours uptime on my 2k install im browsing slashdot on. i use it extensivly every day and it hasnt crashed in like over a month. maybe you should downgrade back to 2k?
the only thing i do is when it starts getting flakey, just log out and back in. works every time. system comes up like new.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
fwarren
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Look I do work for people of average intelligence. They buy their new Dell, see that it has Norton Antivirus on it, plug in the phone jack, fire up an internet account and away they go.
Then they installed some "free" program. It installed spyway/malware/hijackware on their system. They have 20 processes in the background that they do not even know is running. The machine is crawling along, and then their 90 days of anti-virus updates ends. Now a month later, the next big virus is out, they are using outlook express (with default) settings. Now they have at least one virus on their system.
The person of average intelligence who does not spend several hours a month keeping up on firewall, antivirus, malware, adware and other security/performace issues, will soon have a constantly rebooting, locks often, won't shut down box.
Not a blue screen, but just about the same thing, The big lie microsoft has always told, just plug a computer in with windows and start working, everthing will work find and stay working fine.
-- vi +/etc over regedit any day of the week.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
cmacb
·
· Score: 3, Flamebait
I've noticed this about all commercial operating systems, since DOS that is (DOS was fine).
They all get "tired" after a while. OS/2 icons would start to disappear after a few months. You could run utilities to fix for a while, but generally you had to re-install to get good performance again. Same with all version of Windows, particularly since they came up with that *BRILLIANT* registry concept. Then they came out with unofficial registry clean-up tools (like REGCLEAN), then as of 2000 they tell you not to run those or you will screw your system.
They leave it to third parties like Norton to provide this type of clean-up tool, but then when the tools don't work, or even make your system worse, Microsoft can say "it's not our problem you ran a third party tool", and the toolmaker says "it's not our problem Microsoft keeps changing things and not telling us".
Apples OS X is the same way. I've already had to start running a cleanup tool about once a week or the system gets noticeably slower. If I let it go a month the disk drive starts bashing it's heads up against the enclosure trying to access cylinders that don't exist.
It's as though you are working with the temperamental robot in "Lost In Space". Going where *YOU* want to go, but only when its in the right mood.
I'm not much for conspiracy theories, but the only other explanation is that the people working on Linux and the BSD systems are a LOT smarter, because those systems don't have these problems, ever. You can upgrade when you feel like it, IF you feel like it, and pay little or nothing (Debian) for the privilege.
Maybe this will get better as more people move from "JUNKware" to software. I hope so. I really don't mind paying for software, I just don't want to own any more junk.
By the way I'm fairly sure that this release has more to do with revenue projections than technology. MS is in a revenue dry spell of its own creation. This has happened before (Remember Windows ME?) and it will keep happening as long as people put up with it.
Maybe there is something Darwinian going on here. Windows: the OS for people who really have no business using computers.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It may be a hardware problem, yeah. Best way to tell would be to install Linux and run that for 2 or 3 years. If it blue screens fairly quickly, is was the hardware. If not you can be pretty sure it was "Windows, huh?".
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
pilot1
·
· Score: 1
The 2k machine is brand new, and I've never ran Linux on it, so it could be the hardware.
However, the machine with 98 was one of my servers for about 2 years, and it ran fine during that time. The problems I told about occurred within a week of replacing the server with a newer server.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Sexy+Commando
·
· Score: 1
That's precisely what Sencond Law of Thermodynamics states.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
alonsoac
·
· Score: 1
I agree it seems windows machines need to be reinstalled every now and then to stay healthy. Which in some sense is good because you always have a fresh system. In the case of Linux I have 2 machines here one that has not failed for 3 years and still has redhat 6.0 and another with redhat 7.3 which I use for the desktop. Good that I have not needed to reinstall everything but I'm using software that is very much outdated.
I'm planning on installing Mandrake 10 soon on the desktop, and the other one I guess I will wait until the disk dies or something.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
mattkime
·
· Score: 1
Apples OS X is the same way.
What the hell do you do to your Mac OS X box? I've never experienced anything like that.
-- Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Same here, 6 months, upgrades but no "repair" programs or anything like that, no problems at all, the guy is just making stuff up.
Tell me about it. On my Windows XP Pro machine, explorer crashes like 3-4 times a day, and it's gradually getting worse. The problem is doing a re-install takes forever with all the updates and I end up having to re-install a bunc of brain dead apps that are stupid enough to rely on the registry.
God I hate the registry, why can't everything still use ini files so all information relavant to a program are contained it's own directory. (Some smart programs do), but a lot of games mostly, need a re-install.
Unfortunately with Windows I usually have to re-install once a year, I guess I'm about due.
My Debian box on the other hand hasn't had a fresh install since potato. I've upgraded the machine's cpu and mobo TWICE and upgraded the hard drive at least twice as well, just copy the files over make sure the permissions are correct, and that's it, I love it. Also makes backups a breaze, I can rsync all my files over to a mirror drive on another machine and feel safe knowing my program data, etc isn't going anywhere unless my entire house burns down.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
No, you know what it is? It's those damned high-rpm disk drives. Squashes the bits all ellipse-like. Sure, they slip through the bus clean enough but when they get to the CPU one sharp corner at the wrong angle and they jam up something fierce. If Intel and AMD weren't such cheapskates they'd round the traces, as it is I had to take mine into the shop and have it done just to get the thing to run properly. Best $50 I ever spent.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
jours
·
· Score: 1
...generally you had to re-install to get good performance again
I've actually had good luck with SysInternal's Page Defrag program for getting back that "fresh from the install" feeling. Defrags both the paging files and the registry files.
-- This sig intentionally left blank.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
CAIMLAS
·
· Score: 1
Definately. I noticed the same thing with Windows 98 and 95; I have no MacOS experience, but I hear it's not as common.
My experience has been that Windows requires a fresh install roughly every 6 months to a year, and MS actually supports that officially (I believe), somewhere on their site.
However, I've also noticed that security updates, patches, and the like make windows increasingly dodgy and run slower. Windows releases seem to be at their stablest roughly 1 year after initial release, before they start concentrating on just security releases and put their man power towards the next release. Even the security patches seem to make the systems slower and less stable, requiring more attention and more frequent reinstalls.
It's less noticeable with 2k and newer, but damn. It was a nightmare with 95/98. I don't know how I ever put up with reinstalling every couple months.
-- ~/ssh slashdot.org
ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
cmacb
·
· Score: 1
"What the hell do you do to your Mac OS X box? I've never experienced anything like that."
Nothing unusual, I assure you. I use the X-windows interface (from Apple) to interact with Unix systems. I think I have TWO third party tools installed. One is fungu which is an FTP client written at a university somewhere. One is called "Mac Sweep" and that cleans up the problems I mentioned.
They don't explain very fully what they do, but it works for me:
http://www.macsweeper.cjb.net/
From what I have read in several places (Mac forums etc.) OS X is prone to screwing up it's own file permissions (which I would think is a major security exposure). The most frequently given advice in the Mac OS X forums is "Boot your install/utility disk and run 'repair permissions'".
I don't know about you, but I don't like having to carry my install disk with me every where I go (it's a laptop). Furthermore, I don't know why, if this problem has been around for more than a year, they haven't built the fix into the OS somehow.
As per my original post, this "Duh, we don't quite understand how our OS works yet." is something unique to the commercial OSs.
The other common problem with OS X is that it collects "log" information (Unix systems do this too). Also like Unix, it tries to clean up and archive its logs in various ways on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis (I think). It does that at something like 4AM. So the second most common advice on the Mac forums is: "Try leaving your machine on all the time for a while and see if it fixes itself".
Since I often leave my machine on for days at a time I suspect I have fewer problems than some people do, but occasionally strange things pop up out of thin air. The other day I burned a bad CD. Before I noticed that the CD was bad, I re-inserted it into the machine. It got hung for several minutes trying to read the thing. My guess is that in doing so it might have created a 40 meg error log file or something, because when I finally got control of it again and was able to re-boot it immediately started behaving badly, with the hard drive clicking loudly every 10 seconds or so and almost any activity accompanied by long appearances of the spinning beachball. Running the above mentioned utility fixed it right away. My only question is, if this problem and its fix are so well understood (the utility is pointed to on the mac.com download page) then why doesn't Apple just FIX the godam thing?!
As I said originally, there are only two explanations I can think of. Either they intentionally leave bugs like this active to encourage people to upgrade, or they don't have a very good understanding of their own OS.
I don't really care which is is either. If I wanted a Voodoo operating system: "Try spinning around three times while you hold your breath, that MIGHT clear up the problem", I'd go find a bunch of whitch doctors to sell me one.
And don't even get me started on all the people who have PAID to have their motherboards replaced for what was almost certainly a software issue (same problems as I described above). Just more good reasons why even Apple and Microsoft would be well served to open source their operating systems (if not everything else as well).
I don't mind paying for a "software license", but with that I expect a certain degree of professional service, and that is what is missing in todays PC operating systems. I find the professionalism that goes with Open Source to be much greater, and that, primarily, is why I use it. (Yes, YellowDog Linux runs flawlessly on my iBook too, no special utilities required).
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Get a real Mac expert sit with you. We have over 1800 OS X machines running with nothing even close to what you say. Actually, from your saying it looks like you are still running some version of OS X 10.1.x
The problems you describe were common those days (over a year ago). I suggest you to use Panther (for example, the repair permissios is definitely a thing of the past)
For the 4am tasks, use cron man, ever heard of it? LOL, you report it like 4am is casted into stone. You sound like you are just starting on anything Unix.
By the way, you praise BSD and talk down on OS X. Where do you think OS X has its roots on, champion?
Shhhsh, some people
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
""Boot your install/utility disk and run 'repair permissions'".
I don't know about you, but I don't like having to carry my install disk with me every where I go (it's a laptop)."
Hard to believe you ever have been close to an OS X machine. The feature above does NOT need any boot disk in order to run it. Then, as alredy said, Panther definitely does not suffer from that, and nope, was not the OS (Jaguar and previous version) to screw that but third party installers: permissions never got screwed by themselves.
What are you doing? Just trolling a bit?
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
wfberg
·
· Score: 1
I've actually had good luck with SysInternal's Page Defrag program for getting back that "fresh from the install" feeling. Defrags both the paging files and the registry files.
It only defrags the files the registry is stored in; you want to use ntregopt to defrag the registry itself. The registry is a kind of filesystem-in-a-file; deleted registry keys does not free up information, the space is just marked as available, and so the thing fragments.
Running a registry cleaner like regseeker and then using ntregopt made a 15-20% difference in my case. Not bad.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
This is what you do to keep your system stable (after a fresh install):
- Keep up with windows update - Switch away from explorer and outlook. They are tools of the devil, and open a doorway into your home for harlots, drugdealers and other nasty things. Use mozilla firefox instead of ie, and whatever mail client you like that's not from microsoft instead of outlook (people seem to be happy with mozilla thunderbird). - At regular intervals run up to date versions of ad-aware and a decent antivirus program (avg is a free download from the grisoft site). If you're not using explorer and outlook, you don't need to do this often, but still every once in a while. - Most importantly: don't install stuff just to "try it out". Install only what you need, and nothing more. When you upgrade a software package, uninstall the old copy and remove every detectable presence of it from your system before you install the new one. Don't be constantly upgrading to experimental drivers. Once your system works, leave it be. - Don't fill up your hd to the brim. Keep at least half a gig free at all times. If you're using fat32, run defrag every few months.
Follow that, and windows will keep working just fine.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Gimme a break.
I have had Windows 2000 for almost four years with exactly the same amount of reinstalls.
There is no way I'll ever, ever, buy "bios is faulty", "memory is faulty" "microsoft can do sw", EVER.
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The person of average intelligence who does not spend several hours a month keeping up on firewall, antivirus, malware, adware and other security/performace issues, will soon have a constantly rebooting, locks often, won't shut down box.
Several hours per month? Only if you work at it. It's like learning not to drive with the hood open or putting fuel oil into your gasoline tank. Anti-virus software is self-updating, firewalls should not need to be mucked with constantly (get a hardware-based router, which is over half the battle), and Win2k/WinXP can be configured to download patches automatically and present them for installation.
I my parents had a friend who is a senior airline pilot (ie plenty of money and time). he was having trouble with his windows computer and before he even called me, he had decided to just replace it (it was an athlon 800 mhz, 384meg ram, 20 gig hd etc). fed up with it he just donated the box to me.
with out even checking the machine out, I installed Gentoo on it and it ran perfectly for several months. then portage released an upgrade to gcc but I couldn't emerge it - it just kept dying at random places. After scratching my head, I ran a memtest and found that the 128 meg chip was bad (hunderds of errors in the first test - the 256 chip was fine).
The point is, the box ran with a farked memory chip just fine under linux, except for one memory heavy task; but under windows it was throw-the-box-away bad.
Totally ancedotal and YMMV, but I was impressed.
--
"Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos."
-- Homer Simpson
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
jp10558
·
· Score: 1
Yeah, I occasionally have explorer crash for no reason, when all that's running is the desktop and associated system tray programs.
Want to hear something weirder? I use Powerquest Drive Image 6. I can restore an image(note an exact copy - delete and overwrite partition with the same exact bytes that were there when I Imaged it) two different times on the same machine and the windowsXP will behave differently. Sometimes it's as stable and when I imaged, other times it's crappy, so I'll restore the same image again, and all is good.
And totally off topic, can I say I think I just found the crappiest shittiest piece of software ever! ASUS DVR. I bought a TV Suite video card so I could watch TV on my PC. But the supplied program(upgraded to the latest version) is unreliable as hell. When I go to start it, sometimes it will crash immediately, then I'll try again to run it, and it will work fine. Then I'll try to exit it and get some error that won't go away, I'll have to task manager quit it. Or sometimes it will bluescreen XP, in which case I have to uninstall the program and reinstall it and then it's OK again for two runs or so...
Does anyone else use the ASUS 5650 GeForce FX 5600 based TV Suite card, and have any recommendations of any other programs to use to watch TV with from the component in on that?
-- Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
Re:I saw the XP BSOD Today...
by
fwarren
·
· Score: 1
Two years ago, you could say, "switch email programs, don't use outlook" and update your antivirus weekly.
Then you had to add to that, run Ad-Away to get rid of spyware.
Then about a year ago, malware is added to the spyware category, it got so bad, you have to run something like SpywareBlaster to keep the stuff from installing in the first place.
Then about 6 months ago, hijackware started doing it's thing, and you needed another set of tools to protect against that..
Six months to a year from now, there will be some new class of crap out there screwing up my customers machines, and the tools to repair/prevent it from happening do not even exist yet.
It is not like putting oil in a car. Unless you consider having an oil leak so you must constantly check.
Let's not even begin to talk Anti-Virus, I can not tell you how much fun it is to have a customer with an up-to-date copy Norton Antivirus. On Monday, the computer is a little sluggish, on Tuedsay, the speaker beeped randomly in the morning, they call me on Wednesday. Sure enough, it is a new virus.
Per Symantec (Norton) the virus delivered it's payload on Tuesday (the beeping) and Norton's definitions can repair/prevent this as of Wednesday. I.E. the day AFTER the payload is delivered. If the payload would have deleted files, it would have been a problem.
So even updating your Antivirus software may not be enough. Although I do have to admit, they should have known better than to open up that email attachment.....
if this OS will have full 64bit compatiablity? As if it doesn't it could seriously slow down 64bit sales, as I for one was waiting for Longhorn to upgrade to 64bit, and I know a lot of my friends were.
--
When anger rises, think of the consequences.
Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
XP reloaded
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Re:Setting themselves up...
by
coopaq
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Smith: "Mr. Anderson. I see you've been living a dual-boot lifestyle."
Smith: "One of these opertaing systems has a future. The other does not."
Neo (looking confused and stupid as always): "I know my rights. You can't scare me with this XP crap."
Smith: "And how are you going to tell anyone about Linux if our search engine returns no results."
Re:Setting themselves up...
by
wideBlueSkies
·
· Score: 1
Yeah, and all Neo would have to do to kick his ass is to overflow a buffer. Strcpy anyone?
wbs.
-- Huh?
Re:Setting themselves up...
by
NeoThermic
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Neo:" But the Oracle said..."
Morphious:" Only what you wanted to hear. Someday you will see that there is a diffrence between booting XP[reloaded], and using it."
NeoThermic
-- Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
Re:Setting themselves up...
by
EvilTwinSkippy
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Installer: You are here because you know something. What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You felt it your entire life--like there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?
User: The Upgrade?
Installer: Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Upgrade is. You have to install it for yourself.
User: How?
Installer: This is your last chance. After this, there is no going back. If you click F3, the installation ends and the system will reboot and you can believe whatever you want to believ. If you click F8, you accept the EULA and we see just how much the upgrade will fix.
(User hesitates)
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Re:Setting themselves up...
by
evilempireinc
·
· Score: 1
Infected PC : Me me me me me
Other PC: Me too
-- we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
Re:Setting themselves up...
by
edunbar93
·
· Score: 2, Funny
***AgntSmith sets mode +m Neo.
-- "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
"Reloaded"...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Perfect. I guess there won't be any silly copyright issue over the name. My winbox was doing the slow bullet scene long befroe the Matrix.
Heck, I can reload XP for free . . . but at least even Microsoft is now acknowledging that is one of the only way to fix their buggy software.
Which will it be?
by
Burlynerd
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I hope it's not another Windows ME style dead-end branch of the Windows tree. US customers need to get the rumored stripped-down Windows that the EU may be getting. Windows, without all the unwanted crap, would be interesting to see.
BN
Re:Which will it be?
by
DrCode
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Windows without all the unwanted crap would be Linux (or MacOS X or BSD).
Well here's something to consider about XP and how it's more different from 2k than most people have ever felt like admitting. The OS is natively module based. Removing IE completely is a much simpler task than most people realize. Course, the question is raised if you wish to strip down. What wouldn't you include? Windows XP is first and foremost a desktop, if you are trying to use it for anything else then you are using the wrong tool for the job.
No. You can already have something very similar. Find it here (Their clame to fame is getting a working copy of win98 in just under 8mb, which not even Linux can top)
-- --
If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
You mean Hippocrates as in the Hippocratic oath? Part of which reads:
I will follow that system or regimen which, according to my ability and judgement, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.
I don't think Microsoft could ever be credibly accused of being a bunch of hippocrites.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.
n1 : medical practitioner who is regarded as the father of medicine;
author of the Hippocratic Oath (circa 460-377 BC) 2 : people who are adherent, or advocates of the hippo principles of government -- hippocracy. 3 : crates to carry hippos in.
C'mon, i wasn't trying to flame...
Seriously though. I preferred the first Matrix movie to the second, and the second to the third. I liked Win 95 better than 3.1, 98 better than 95, 2K better than 98, and now XP better than 2K. I think many would agree (i know many that do prefer 2K to XP, also though.)
Ah Crap !
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Does that mean there's going to be a shit load of exploits produced in the current XP ?
Longhorn delay?
by
Zarxrax
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
So this is basically just going to be Windows XP, with the new service pack? Sounds to me like its just a way that they can push back the release of Longhorn and save a bit of face.
XP reloaded!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'd call it Mandrake 10! Coming soon, download the beta today from Mandrake!
Even if you've never used a Linux based operating system before, you won't be disapointed!
XP Reloaded bundle...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
...with Duke Nukem: Forever will be particularly popular.
Yep, but (as the name indicates) now they reload it automatically on start-up, so you only need to reload it yourself once more every day. That's progression, isn't it?
can two play this game?
by
fedork
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
if some courts believe that Lindows cannot use it's name because it sounds too similar to "Windows", would they also agree that "XP reloaded" cannot be used since it sounds like WB's movie?
-- ...remember good 'ol times when IP used to mean Internet Protocol....
Re:can two play this game?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Does "Windows XP" sound like "Matrix"?
Does "Windows XP Reloaded", found in the computer section of a store, in a box matching that of computer software, sound like something that could be confused with a movie found in the movie section of a store?
When you're renting a movie will you become confused with your choices?
"I thought the kids said... MATRIX Reloaded... but this says.... WINDOWS XP Reloaded.... I am so senile."
reloaded? more like rebundled!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
From RTFM (yeah I know....slashdot..rtfm doesn't happen), it basically seems like MS is going to just rebundle XP, slap on a slightly different name, and sell that. Kinda like 98 Plus!, only XP Plus! is the newest OS, and XP gets closer and closer to End of Support. Am I the only one who sees this?
XP
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Reloading XP (dead face emoticon) is still XP (another dead face emoticon)... XP Hah.
I'll bet anything that MS is just releasing a new version of XP so they can have all of that lovely DRM support built into an OS, since Longhorn is so far off.
I on the other hand believe it is just an attempt by M$ to get more money. Hence a better name would be XP 2: The Search For More Money. Rather than fixing the bugs in the OS, they will now sell 'updates' which will do the exact same thing - fix the bugs by introducing more serious ones so the old ones don't look quite so bad anymore.
-- There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes, most of us won't be able to afford
it.
-- Lemmy
If it is just Windows XP + SP1 + SP2 then an interim release *NOT* pushed as an upgrade to XP would make perfect sense:p At least XP users will probably get SP2 for free download.
Here's a little clue - any comment you may think of as 'obligatory', likely isn't.
Re:Obligatory Keanu quote...
by
lowe0
·
· Score: 1
In a thread destined to be clogged with Matrix jokes, yours is the only one that's made me laugh.
Re:Obligatory Keanu quote...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Is that a Neo quote, or Homer Simpson?
Oh, please!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Is anyone going to see this for anything other than a thinly-veiled attempt to just keep the money rolling in between now and whenever Longhorn ships?
If so, that person needs to be tracked down and slapped with a clue stick.
All that remains to be seen is what backwards compatability Microsoft will break in an attempt to force people to upgrade. Or maybe they'll pull the old "no more security patches for $OS. upgrade to $newerOS" trick.
Model an OS full of security holes after a movie full of plot holes - this might be an apt choice of names afterall......
If they remodel the Office Help function to give "Oracle-esque" advice....that might prove amusing as well.
"Well, some people might want to tell you to ask yourself the same question, or you might just want to access the Analysis Toolpack - but me - I'd just say have a cookie and sit down - all will be clear in time"
Re:White Rabbit be damned
by
Bendebecker
·
· Score: 1
Analysis Toolpack? Fortune Cookies? Those are for noobs. Real Geeks use the magic 8-ball to diagnose their pc problems. Somehow this works just as good as any other windows diagnostic tool...
-- There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes, most of us won't be able to afford
it.
-- Lemmy
Well, first off..
by
stratjakt
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
Reloaded is just an internal name for it..
Secondly, the article talks of an interim release. They wouldn't want to call something that breaks compatibility a service pack.
They probably want to build in a bunch of support for cooly new hardware. Pretty much like Windows 98 SE, they needed an update bigger than a service pack to get USB, etc, working..
--
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
"We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
Oh, so they are adding new features!!!
-- -.-- -.-- --..
One fish / Two fish / Red fish / Blue fish ShyaOS - Think Differently!
Windows 98 SE, anyone?
by
TeaEarlGreyHot
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
Honestly, we should have seen this one coming. What do you want to bet that the "new features" included in "Reloaded" are all going to be stuff that belongs in a gratis Service Pack? It's the Microsoft OS Production/Marketing Paragidm:
1. Release Buggy OS 2. Make $Umteen Million on OS 3. Fix some of the bugs 4. Release less buggy version of same OS 5. Make another $Umteen Million. 6. CYA by saying that anything not fixed in this will addressed in vaporware OS
Re:Windows 98 SE, anyone?
by
Kevin143
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
You're being really optimistic. No one questions the fact that Windows 98 SE was an improvement over the first edition, but it's optimistic to assume that's what we'll get with XP reloaded.
More realisticaly, we'll get another version of Windows ME. Useless so-called improvements that somehow break what little functionality was there to begin with and the vow to fix everything with Longhorn.
Ok, let's come back to reality...I'll take the blue one!
--
Karma: Very Very Very Very Bad
How appropriately named.
by
MongooseCN
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Does this mean it will have lots of pretty graphics and effects with little actually substance and meaning behind it? Like other things titled "Reloaded"?
The problem is, XP is already loaded with lots of pretty graphics and effects. There IS a reason why the version number change between Windows 2000 and Windows XP was so small. Now, XP does have a few nice things here and there which I like, but not enough to upgrade to it. Windows 2000 still works fine for me.
Thought all the bugs were found and the patches were applied . ..Microsoft is proud to present . . . XP/Reloaded. XP/Reloaded presents the user with a whole new arsenal of exciting exploits, more 'colorful' default thems, and a larger more invasion nav bar.
All the windowsupdates and servicepacks have removed all the good'ol bugs, so they just need another reload before the huge longhorned one arrives...
Apparently...
by
LooseChanj
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Microsoft learned their lesson from the huuuuuuuuge gaps between not only NT4 and Win2000, but between NT service packs. Forgot it for a little bit, and something must have reminded them. What they really need to do is get service packs back on some kind of schedule. Critical security fixes exempted of course. And quit calling them service packs when they're really (remember these from the DOS days?) step-up versions.
-- Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
If they do this then there's no excuse except for spite for them to not fix their CSS inheritance, positionaing and box model bugs. Their line before was "oh, we're not working on that anymore and for some reason we can't tell you making padding and border attributes work correctly would require an OS rewrite which we're not doing until Longhorn."
That was the first thing I thought of too... whether they're going to do anything about their crappy web browser.
IANAMSE, but I don't really expect any meaningful improvements. When they say, "no new IE 'til Longhorn," what they mean is that their code base is ancient and crufty, and that while tying it to the OS was a brilliant marketing/legal manuever, it didn't make it any easier to fix/maintain and improve it. What they mean is that it's crossed that line where it's more trouble to fix it than to just scrap it all and start from scratch.
O'course, there might also be a little spite involved:)... I'd rather make one web page built on standards that will look the same in IE as Opera, the Gecko's and the KHTML's, but as devout monopolists, I don't think MS is as enthusiastic about that prospect as I am. I think they're just as happy with me either dumbing down my CSS/J(ava)Script/HTML for IE or being lured into using their IE-only nonsense.
Repackaged 2003 Server
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
MS could do a lot worse than 2003 Server (which I'm running as a desktop right now). Put in the reliability, the default security configurations, the actually excellent IIS 6 and the snappier desktop feel/memory management and you'd have a winner on the desktop.
Will there be an architect?
by
antdude
·
· Score: 1
Will he be in Windows Reloaded as the animated character?
-- Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Whatever happened to Microsoft's bovine naming scheme? I was looking forward to another mountain cat tearing a cow to pieces.
Bovine? I was under the impression they were all named after the popular localish (to Washington) mountains or ski resorts. Whistler, Longhorn, etc...
-matt
Enough with the fucking reloaded!
by
el-spectre
·
· Score: 2, Funny
[rantorama] Every other friggin' product/event/whatever this last year has been been "XXX Reloaded". It's meaningless and stupid. C'mon marketers, learn a new phrase...
Unless "reloaded" now means "mediocre followup"... in which case, "XP Reloaded" is redundant. [/rantorama]
-- "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
Re:Enough with the fucking reloaded!
by
sulli
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Which would you prefer? "WinXP 2: Electric Boogaloo?"
Re:Enough with the fucking reloaded!
by
maxwell+demon
·
· Score: 2, Funny
What about:
XP 2: The OS of Secrets
Actually the title of the German version would be nice: Literally translated back to English, the German title of the second Harry Potter film reads "The Chamber of Horror". So,
XP 2: The OS of Horror
might also be a suitable option.
-- The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Re:Enough with the fucking reloaded!
by
Valdrax
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Which would you prefer? "WinXP 2: Electric Boogaloo?"
"Hey, fuck you, man, 'cause time's gonna tell on that one."
-- If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
Re:Enough with the fucking reloaded!
by
protohiro1
·
· Score: 1
"Which would you prefer? "WinXP 2: Electric Boogaloo?"
" Yes. Yes I would.
Man, I thought we got past all of those matrix jokes last fall. At least they didn't piss off the Macheads with "Windows XP: Attack of the Clones." All joking aside, I do think that the XP:reloaded is just a code name.
Probably good for Linux
by
Random+BedHead+Ed
·
· Score: 5, Informative
An interim release between XP service pack 2 and Longhorn indicates that Longhorn is going the way of Chicago and NT 5.0. Those, if you'll recall, were overly-hyped software releases that were delayed... and delayed. And delayed.
And delayed. Point is, to me this indicates that Longhorn's release date just became slightly more tentative than it was before. Which is a good thing for alternative operating systems like the growing and ever-improving GNU/Linux.
And in the short term it's a good thing for Microsoft, as some people are likely to fork over the $100 (or whatever) upgrade.
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
Wellmont
·
· Score: 1
gladly i've almost moved completely to Linux, and it should save me lots of money in the long run. Instead of paying 400 dollars for a piece of software that will soon be spitting advertisements at me, I can donate my time and money to open source projects that have a helpful affect on people.
I just hope microsoft has no intention of diving into open source anytime soon. Truely i think this might be a delay to shore up on open source endevors... just try to imagine a partially open source windows. I can only think of that and cringe
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
MeepMeep
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
...Longhorn is going the way of Chicago and NT 5.0. Those, if you'll recall, were overly-hyped software releases
'Overly-hyped'?
I'm no Microsoft apologist but Chicago became Windows 95 which completely dominated the desktop, and NT 5.0 became Windows 2000, which is probably the most popular, stable server OS Microsoft ever made...both of these operating systems made a kajillion-bazillion dollars for Microsoft. That's not just hype.
Although I will concede that they took a long time to make it to market...
MeepMeep
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
youknowmewell
·
· Score: 1
Executives have said for some time that there was no major release of Windows planned before Longhorn. At the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in May, Senior Vice President Will Poole said: "Don't expect an interim release."
Poole said at that time that Longhorn would ship in 2005. Microsoft later backed away from that date, saying only that it would ship
when it is ready. However, until now, Microsoft has reiterated that no new versions of Windows were planned before Longhorn.
Longhorn = Vaporware.
What would be the funniest thing is if one day I were to mod a Phantom to become a nice (possible cheap) computer and play a bit of DNF on it as well. I'm sure that would be a/. article!
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
maxwell+demon
·
· Score: 1
Hmmm... "when it's ready" is typically the stated release date for Free Software/Open Source projects. Maybe MS thought this were the reason of OSS sucess?
-- The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
Random+BedHead+Ed
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Precisely. By overly-hyped I was referring to the time to market, which was delayed repeatedly. Not to business success, which was substantial (and which cemented Microsoft in the lives of each and every geek, like it or not).
In the case of Chicago, while you rightly point out that it was a business success, it was not only overly-hyped in the sense that the computing world eagerly anticipated it during a forever-and-a-day development cycle, but it was also overly-hyped as a product. Let's face it: they sold a lot, but it sucked. Windows 95 didn't work as advertised until OSR2. Some people reported being glad they stuck with Windows 3.11, despite the old clunky interface, because it crashed less.
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
Hythlodaeus
·
· Score: 1
An interim release between XP service pack 2 and Longhorn indicates that Longhorn is going the way of Chicago and NT 5.0. Those, if you'll recall, were overly-hyped software releases that were delayed... and delayed. And delayed.
And renamed.
Chicago = Windows 95 NT 5.0 = Windows 2000
-- For great justice.
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
Guppy06
·
· Score: 1
"An interim release between XP service pack 2 and Longhorn indicates that Longhorn is going the way of Chicago and NT 5.0."
Except NT 5.0 kicked all manner of ass (at least as far as MSFT software is concerned). It's just a shame they screwed it all up with NT 5.1.
I think they should have named it XP: FFR. Fdisk, Formant, Reinstall, doo-dah doo-dah...
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
By overly-hyped I was referring to the time to market, which was delayed repeatedly.
Yes. Excessive publicity. Known for exaggerated or extravagant claims, especially in advertising or promotional material, but not necessarily by the owner of that which is being promoted. And I guess not very well represented in my quote.:)
Re:Probably good for Linux
by
jmichaelg
·
· Score: 1
both of these operating systems made a kajillion-bazillion dollars for Microsoft. That's not just hype.
Kajillion-bazillion dollars sounds like a lot to me. Are you sure that's not hype?
Agreed wholeheartedly. Aside from trying to cram their own brand of tainted LDAP down your throat on the server version (back when their marketing people were calling everything "Active"), it was a decent system. That is, 2K lacked a lot of the nice stuff you find on an average Linux system, but it fixed all of their most glaring UI bugs and combined the best stuff of 98 (GUI, PnP, etc.) with the best of NT (stability, if sub-UNIX stability). Clearly someone was thinking in Redmond.
5.1 boots faster and has anti-aliased text. It also blows chunks. If I don't figure out how to kick MSN messenger out of the system tray soon I'll be able to post a "Effects of a Fist Impact on an LCD Display" story on Slashdot (though it won't be as funny as a randomly-generated
Slashdot story).
All I can say is....
by
rasafras
·
· Score: 1, Funny
So does it must come with...
by
Graemee
·
· Score: 2, Funny
1) Something to keep msblaster from killing the download of the patch that prevents msblaster from killing the download that...
2) The phone number of MS, so you call them when ever you change a piece of hardware and that stupid internet activation doesn't work any more, after only two install on the same PC.
3) No media player, Thanks eurotrash.
4) No web browser or will there be more than one, which it will load all of them just in case you couldn't make up your mind when did the install questions.
My Dell already has XP Preloaded
by
Rascasse
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Yeah it already came with XP Preloaded.
This reminds me of...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Informative
... the line of prototype Macs called "project Sagan".
Carl Sagan brought (or threatened?) a suit against Apple.
In response, Apple simply renamed it (unofficially, of course) "project butthead scientist".
Infringement problem solved!
Re:This reminds me of...
by
presearch
·
· Score: 3, Informative
Actually, it was Butt Head Astronomer (BHA).
It's the start of a whole new product line
by
ChaosMagic
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Microsoft will be announcing further products in their "Reloaded" range which will include Office Reloaded, Visual Studio Reloaded, Outlook Reloaded and The Browser, Reloaded.
With Microsoft's history of bloated software I kind of expected their next release to be called Windows XS.
-- Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
Software Assurance
by
Bull999999
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
My guess is that the Longhorn will not be out soon enough for those who bought XP under software assurance program. By having a forced update out, MS can claim that the software assurance program is indeed a good buy.
-- 1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly
n33d t0 g37 l41d
Re:Software Assurance
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
From what I've heard, that is indeed a major driving force behind this change.
Internally, this release is being referred to as a date driven version of longhorn (in other words, if the feature isn't gonna get done by the target RTM date, it gets cut; in even more words, it means that most of the cool longhorn features won't be in the release, which is probably why it is being referred to as XP Reloaded here...).
From everyone I've talked to that works there, they all think this is a poor decision (and it doesn't take long generally mentioned in the same breath as WinME).
tell Microsoft that their calenders are all fucked up.
April 1st is a ways away yet.
Or is this more from the new Microsoft Time Travel Engine (TM)?
God, you'd think that after their latest public gaff that they'd just hunker down for a while and rethink their strategy, but NO...
I'm over the line from disgusted to sheer pity. Must be some good crack they're smoking over at 1 MS Way.
Fer crying out loud
Vulnerabilities aren't exploited until we release a patch for the "hackers" to reverse engineer, and NOW THEY'RE GOING TO PATCH IN A MAJOR WAY THE WHOLE OS.
gaaarrrgghhhhhhh *choke*
SB
-- It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
a full release not really needed
by
Tumbleweed
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Look, everyone knows (or should, by now) that the only part of XP that really NEEDS overhauling is IE. After the new stuff coming up in SP2 (security fixes, software firewall, built-in antivirus, etc.), that'll _still_ be the only thing that needs an overhaul. A popup blocker in IE with SP2 isn't going to cure the REAL ills of IE, namely, horrid CSS & PNG support. Merely fixing those two things would get me to buy an XP upgrade. As a web designer/developer, that is my number one, EVERY DAY biggest obstacle to computing happiness. Where do I want to go today, Microsoft asks. I want to go to that happy land where IE properly & fully supports CSS 1 & 2 & PNG. Is that so much to ask? Hell, just properly implementing what you started in the original IE 6 would be enough!
Screw Fermat's Last Theorem. MS spending time adding a _popup blocker_ to IE when the PNG & CSS issues remain is the biggest mystery of our time. If they add tabs and _still_ don't fix CSS & PNG, I'm gonna totally lose it.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Dreamware
·
· Score: 0
Why don't you use Opera since it has the best CSS and webstandards support? You can do amazing things with it.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
m_dob
·
· Score: 2, Informative
I too am a web-developer, but I don't feel the CSS support is horrid - the problem with IE6 is that there are documented bugs rendering CSS, and that because of its closed-source nature and focus on clearing up security issues only, these bugs have been left unfixed.
Remember that IE had the lead in CSS for many years, and was a pioneer in supporting early incarnations. Anyway, even the Mozilla project doesn't have full support for CSS2.
Though Firefox is my default browser, IE still does many things better (and, ironically, crashes less...)
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
He means designing for not viewing, stupid ass bugs in xp css cause all sorts of stupid ass css problems that should never have happened causing headaches and workarounds and wasting everyones time.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
RzUpAnmsCwrds
·
· Score: 1
"You can do amazing things with it"
Oddly enough, that's one of XP's slogans.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Tumbleweed
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
The documented bugs are _really, really bad_. Thus, I say IE's CSS support is horrid. They've been left unfixed for 2.5 years and counting. True, Mozilla doesn't have full support for CSS2, but IE doesn't yet have full support for CSS _1_!
I'm not using Firefox, but Mozilla itself crashes _far less_ than IE does on the machines I use. I think I've only seen Mozilla crash 1 or 2 times since I started using v1.6. IE would crash at _least_ every other day on me, quite often multiple times a day.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
asland
·
· Score: 1
If you compare the amount of time it would take to add a popup blocker or tabs to fixing the CSS support, it is pretty easy to guess which would make it in first. OTOH, png support should be as easy as the popup blocker.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Tumbleweed
·
· Score: 1
I've switched to Mozilla, as it's CSS support for common things is better (in my experience) than that of Opera.
Plus Opera's just really _weird_ to use. I don't like it's ergonomics at _all_.
The problem is that I have to create websites. Most people use IE. IE is seriously broken. It doesn't _matter_ what I use personally - I still have to deal with IE (and the business end, at that!). Man, I _wish_ I was _just_ a browser _user_.
Oh yeah, that'd be sweet.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Tumbleweed
·
· Score: 1
If you compare the amount of time needed to fix the CSS problems in IE to the 2.5 YEARS they've had TO fix the problems, you'll find two very different numbers.:)
I agree, the CSS problems will take some time to fix. But it'll never get done if they don't freaking START.
And speaking of PNG problems - what the hell is with Adobe's Photoshop?! How many years will it be before the thing uses some actual compression? Programs like pngout and pngcrush shouldn't even be needed. Crazy.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Dreamware
·
· Score: 0
I didn't realize that lol.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
obeythefist
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
MS won't add tabs to IE, it doesn't fit their global UI standard. Everything in MS applications looks and feels the same, this is what has enabled MS to keep the desktop, and it's a key point of failure for linux on the desktop.
You won't see tabs in IE until you see tabs in Windows Explorer, MS Word and outlook. And that isn't likely to happen, as tabs are just a way to have "multiple windows" in a system that doesn't manage them very well (this is why tabbed browsing is more popular in the *nix world instead of the windows world). The uniform windows management in Windows performs well enough that very few users need tabbed browsing to keep track of what they're doing. Linux is too erratic and inconsistent, so using tabs in a browser is needed to control browser windows.
-- I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
MariaK
·
· Score: 1
actually, Fermat's Last Theorem was proved. So really, the mystery of why IE still sucks so much has no rival in the modern world.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
MS won't add tabs to IE, it doesn't fit their global UI standard. Everything in MS applications looks and feels the same
Visual Studio 2003. If they put tabs like that into Word and Excel, I might have a reason to upgrade from Office 97.
Probably not though, I don't even use Office 97 very often.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
CAIMLAS
·
· Score: 1
Er, no, they also need to overhaul:
- permissions and security implimentation ( I could bitch about this all day) - the registry (make it not break) - the "User" account (or the undocumented APIs), so someone that is running as it can actually run the system properly without getting errors.
That's honestly all I'm hoping for out of Longhorn. I know it's going to be a bloated piece of shit, but hopefully it'll be a bit more manageable.
-- ~/ssh slashdot.org
ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
Re:a full release not really needed
by
sepluv
·
· Score: 1
(I like everything else about the Firefox rebranding except the corny slogan.)
So MS just ripped that really crappy idea of using reloaded after a piece of software off the Mozilla Foundation -- like all the feature ideas in MSIE really -- except this time the orginal Mozilla idea is already pathetic so they are not taking a good idea of Mozilla and implementing it all wrong so it doesn't work.
-- Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
[This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
Re:a full release not really needed
by
jsebrech
·
· Score: 1
And speaking of PNG problems - what the hell is with Adobe's Photoshop?! How many years will it be before the thing uses some actual compression? Programs like pngout and pngcrush shouldn't even be needed.
Install superpng. It integrates nicely with photoshop.
Re:a full release not really needed
by
jp10558
·
· Score: 1
Wasn't windows interface - and MS word's - MDI though? Maybe I just confuse tabbed browsing with Opera's MDI though... part of which does allow tabs - and believe me many people prefer the tabbed interface or a full MDI.
-- Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
And all the developers screamed in agony
by
ThePyro
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Yet another OS we have to stick in our testing matrix. Sigh...
Re:And all the developers screamed in agony
by
robi2106
·
· Score: 2, Informative
No kidding...
We already have machine images for 24 languages and Win98SE, WinNT4, WinMe, Win2K, WinXP, Win2003.
For those counting at home, that is 144 possible test solutions on just the windows 32bit side of things.
Sure would be nice to get rid of support for Win98SE and NT4. Then again, the IA-64 means we have WinXP-64 and W2K3-64 to test. Comming soon... WinXPSE-64 and WinXPSE-AMD64...
jason
Re:Shouldn't that be... BOB is back or is he?
by
Graemee
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Is it Bob or Megabyte!
Who Knows, will Dot marry a useless GUI or a XP worm/virus/trojan!
This is Mike the TV, saying Stay tuned!
They tried this once before
by
MightyJB
·
· Score: 1
They tried this once before and it was a flop. Consider WinME (98 Reloaded). For the record, I'm not anti-MS, but WinME was awful. I worked on a few boxes for some friends and it was the biggest joke of an OS. I'm alight with 98 and XP, but IMHO a "stepping stone" OS is only going to hurt them... again.
Re:They tried this once before
by
xandroid
·
· Score: 1
"I'm alight with 98 and XP"
Yeah, I set my Windows boxen on fire too... Quite an improvement, don't you think?
-- $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
do MS set themselves up whenever they name a product or give an idea. I remember the MS Stinkerphone (Stinger) as one example. I mean please, the connotations you could get from XP Reloaded alone are a cause for concern about their mental state at Redmond!
adding value
by
Schlemphfer
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I know it's an internal code name, but you would think they would choose one that doesn't evoke memories of a recent movie that was bombed by the critics.
Anyway, I read the article, and I loved this quote from Window's lead project manager:
"We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
To me, that sounds like newspeak for "We are exploring ways to get existing XP users to pony up extra cash."
What's funny about all this is the article talks all about the prospect for this new XP release, without mentioning even one feature Reloaded would contain. Go figure.
Here's some wild speculation: Longhorn development is running into problems that are further delaying development, so Microsoft is responding with a stopgap operating system. Maybe they should call it OS9 instead of Reloaded.
Anyway, from a Linux advocate's perspective, anything that pushes back Longhorn has to be considered a good thing. Longhorn will no doubt come with some compelling features that will make Linux a harder sell. So the longer it takes to be released, the more time Linux has to establish its foothold.
Note that I'm not saying that Longhorn will be a product I'd want to have. Every new release of Windows seems to be more restrictive than the last, and what little I understand about.NET terrifies me. Still, there's no denying that some users will view Longhorn as sort of the OSX release of Windows.
-- I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
Longhorn will no doubt come with some compelling features that will make Linux a harder sell.
Please - no flames - but isn't that kinda backwards? The whole case Linux Zealots have been trying to prove is that Linux is better than Windows. Now are we afraid that Microsoft will get better and force Linux to get better too? Don't we want Microsoft products to get better? I know I do, even if Linux is still a better option. C'mon man, they aren't really evil, they're just big. I hope the next Windows OS is the WhizBang MS Solution to OS X. I hope the same for Linux distros. I hope the next version of Mac OS is better too. We're all going to have to deal with them (Windows users) at some point, lets hope for the best possible OS Microsoft can develop. I'd like to believe that all platforms will be stable, secure, and scalable for beginners to tech users.
"We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
To me, that sounds like newspeak for "We are exploring ways to get existing XP users to pony up extra cash."
I have to disagree with you here. Have you ever met a Windows user who has gone to the store and purchased an update to Windows? I haven't (since Win 95). I think the vast majority of windows users just run the OS their computer shipped with and that's it.
That said, if they are trying to add features to WinXP, that's mostly going to be on new machines, not sold to people doing OS upgrades.
I think the actual reason is so they can have justify not giving a price break to OEMs. By this I mean, Dell saying "Hey Longhorn is late - cut the price on XP." and Microsoft's answer is "XP Reloaded".
anything that pushes back Longhorn has to be considered a good thing. Longhorn will no doubt come with some compelling features that will make Linux a harder sell.
What should not be considered a good thing is emphasizing ideology over advancing the state of the art in OSes.
Yes, in the short term a good version of Windows is good. But you have to remember that MS is an evil monopoly. Thus in the long term Linux users and everyone else would be much better off if MS failed to deliver Longhorn and go bankrupt, Bill Gates died a terrible death and the whole world switched to GPL software.
-- Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
Too Many Editions
by
Rick+and+Roll
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Well, I hope Microsoft takes a lesson from Apple, and doesn't preinstall computers with an edition geared to either "Home" or "Professional". All it really does is confuse customers. There is nothing about XP Pro (and not about XP Home) that a home user will find daunting. There are many Home-branded computers that are used only in offices. It's stupid, really.
Of course, what Microsoft is trying to do is to have their cake and eat it too. They want the ubiquitous distribution of their Operating System by making deals with OEMs and retailers. They also want people to pay the ridiculous off-the-shelf upgrade prices. These people that upgrade to Pro end up paying twice.
I personally do not pay the MS tax, I just borrow a CD. I own XP home, but I install XP Pro on my computer. Don't use it regularly, only for games and stuff.
The only reason for the two versions is so they can squeeze more money from the businesses that are using a MS backend (and already hooked). You HAVE to use PRO to use that functionalilty a MS backend provides, like Domain Membership. Exchange, SQL, MS Office, the OS, IIS, and the list goes on, if want the stated functionality, be prepared to upgrade EVERYTHING on a periodic basis.
-- Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
TeaEarlGreyHot
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Please tell me the Longhorn desktop is NOT going to be 3D only, with no 2D acceleration. I mean, I have no problem with a desktop having lots of 3D effects for people who like them, but at least give us the chance to TURN THE DAMN CHROME OFF!
It seems like every time a new class of CPUs come out that can keep up with bloated GUIs, Windows blows up the CPU power needed to drive its GUI exponentially.
Remember when a DX2-66 was all you needed to make Win3.1 draw fast? Along came 95 Remember when a P5-166 was all you needed to make Win95 draw fast? Along came Win98 Remember when a PIII was all you needed to make Win2K draw fast?...And so on...
I hope I speak for others when I say, I don't need fancy-schmancy glowing texture-wrapped widgets, window transparancy, or realtime updated iconified windows. I need to use my computer to get stuff done!
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
cens0r
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Well the idea of the 3d accelerated desktop is that your video card will be able to do all the work. Considering how simple the graphics are on a 2d desktop (versus something like doom 3) i imagine almost any mediocre graphics card will speed things up immensly.
-- Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
va3atc
·
· Score: 1
Well the idea of the 3d accelerated desktop is that your video card will be able to do all the work. Considering how simple the graphics are on a 2d desktop (versus something like doom 3) i imagine almost any mediocre graphics card will speed things up immensly.
That was exactly my point sir;-)
Considering some 128MB graphics cards are getting quite cheap think of how much load you can transfer to that idling graphics card.
-- Candle burns its brightest in the dark
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
TeaEarlGreyHot
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
The CPU still has to make all of those API calls to offload stuff to the graphics card. And I guarantee you, the CPU overhead for constantly doing 2D api calls for window drawing isn't going to be nearly as bad as the overhead for making 3D calls. Or maybe I'm wrong on that...
What aggrivates me is that WHY should we need to make 3D API calls just for windowing? I can see it for gaming or drafting, yes, but windowing? It just seems like more useless chrome to waste system resources.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Epistax
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Any computer I am in charge of with Windows, the first thing I do is disable every "visual feature" (aka performance degrader) and strip the OS as bare as possible. Do I want to view a directory as a webpage? Fuck no. I don't want to view it as a 3d studio max file either! It's bad enough that simply highlighting any media file in explorer makes the system read the file (even if no preview is enabled). Want to max out your processor? Rename a file so that it's.avi and highlight it in explorer (I assume this will work because a broken AVI will do it).
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
cens0r
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
You're thinking about this in the wrong way. When they say 3d accelerated they don't necessairly mean that the desktop is in 3d. What they mean is they are going to use features of the video card to make things render faster. For example if one window hides another the video card will know from it's z-buffer that it doesn't need to render the window on bottom.
-- Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
mbourgon
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Great - now I'll need to put GeForce4's in my servers...
-- "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I installed the Longhorn demo on a P4 2.4GHz with 512MB of RAM. I thought the install didn't work, turned out I needed a full 1GB of memory just to have the desktop activate at a reasonable speed!
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Killswitch1968
·
· Score: 1
The best thing to do is either switch O/Ss, complain to Miscrosoft, or downgrade the graphics if the option permits.
BTW your user name is great. Awesome show.
--
Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
topham
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Under windows the first thing I do is disable all the visual effects. On all but the fastest systems they cause performance issues, and if there are any bugs in the video drivers the visual effects tend to trip them.
I haven't disabled any of the visual effects on my Mac. The majority of them enhance the experience and None of them show signs of the issues I have seen under windows.
My, non-detailed, understanding of the interface on the Mac for the GUI is the CPU composes the 2D image and then puts it out to the video card as a texture. Once it is a texture it can do anything to the image and it is quite quick, scale it, move the window around, etc.
The worst case scenario for the Mac is video, or scrolling a large window; and neither of them show significant issues anyway.
I have a 1.6Ghz G5 , and a 2.4Ghz Pentium 4 system. Both with Nvidia graphics cards, the only thing that seems faster (interface wise) on the Windows XP box is scrolling.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
CTho9305
·
· Score: 3, Informative
Did you know that for ages, video cards have done 2d acceleration?
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I need to use my computer to get stuff done!
Then stick with an older OS. Some of us would like to get stuff done AND have a pleasant environment to do it in.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
iminplaya
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I need to use my computer to get stuff done!
Well then...Get a Mac!:-)
-- What?
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
RzUpAnmsCwrds
·
· Score: 1
"I have a 1.6Ghz G5 , and a 2.4Ghz Pentium 4 system. Both with Nvidia graphics cards, the only thing that seems faster (interface wise) on the Windows XP box is scrolling."
If your visual effects are slow on a P4 2.4Ghz, you probably have older drivers without hardware alpha acceleration. Under XP, with the proper drivers, alpha effects can be hardware accelerated.
If you have an NVIDIA card, just get the latest ForceWare drivers. They support every NVIDIA card.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
vericgar
·
· Score: 1
On that same note... the only time I've just about thrown my computer out the window was when I was trying to rename a.avi file (I rename them based on codec used,.divx,.xvid, etc). Very frustrating because windows insists on getting a preview frame for the video, even if all the bloatware is turned off!
I finally gave up and my multimedia box nox runs linux. The only thing I sacraficed was TV In, and I'm playing with gatos to see if I can get that to work.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Biotech9
·
· Score: 1
+5 insightful?
damn it, i have 3 macs and all i do is read/.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
oneiron
·
· Score: 1
I think the shift towards 3d accelerated desktops is part of a natural progression towards the Ultimate GUI. Eventually, I would hope to have a user interface which is equally as user friendly as normal 3-Dimensional reality.
We may not enjoy the steps in-between on our way to achieving this GUI, but the potential rewards seem to be more important than some luddite notion that the GUI's we have currently are sufficient for whatever purposes we may have.
Novelty, while sometimes cumbersome, is the driving force that pushes us forward towards genuine improvement. In other words, a novel idea might not always be the most efficient one, but the odds are high that refinements of such novel ideas will lead to increased efficiency...eventually.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Show me any "fancy-schmancy glowing texture-wrapped widgets, window transparancy, or realtime updated iconified windows" you can't turn off and I'll show you someone who's never bothered to figure out how.
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
Quixadhal
·
· Score: 1
You're only just now getting it?
Bill Gates needs to make more money. He doesn't have the vision to really innovate, so he needs to expand his current product line by adding lots of new features that most people don't need. More and more features requires bigger hardware to support them.
Intel needs to make more money. Once they produce a chip that adequately powers the current generation of software, they will see a decline in sales, since people don't need to upgrade their hardware unless they have software requirements to fill. If you install Windows98SE on a Pentium 233, it will perform pretty much identically to a Pentium IV 3.2GHz box -- in terms of the desktop environment.
Soooo, hmmmm, how can these two companies continue to make money when they both make products that do everything the customer wants? Convince the customer that they need MORE!
Let's be honest here. Do you (with your shiny new 3GHz CPU and 1G of RAM, and 120G SATA hard drive) actually get any more productive work done today, than you did with a 40MHz 486DX cpu, 16M of RAM, and 20G IDE drive? Be honest!
Re:Doing away with 2D acceleration?
by
ShecoDu
·
· Score: 1
I thank that cycle... if that wouldn't happend we'd be stuck with a crappy UI from the 1980s
Bloated UI's are not that bad, if you want to stick with old harware... you might as well stick with old software, I for one like innovation (don't flame, I know there hasn't really been much innovation in some time).
I like changes, using the same interface all the time is boring as hell, and what's wrong with software taking advantage of the hardware... hardware is not improving just to be left aside, you know? when I buy a new 3d graphics card to play games... i'd love to have other things using those capabilities too, why would I want a old and hyperfast interface (so fast I cant notice the difference between fast and slow) if I can have a fast interface with cool effects and stuff, and by the way... I never buy the latest hardware, and that's enough for me, the speed is good, the power is nice, the capabilities are perfect.
Windows is not the only environment going that way, by the way... KDE and GNOME are just as good/bad (pick whichever you want), and beeing bloated is a feature.
Don't take me wrong... I use Linux, and love it, I hate M$ and stuff, but sorry I'm not going to bash Windows this time, the problem is not windows... all the interfaces are the same, we need something different, fast... nice effects and stuff might lead the interfaces to new approaches and new styles, now that's something I want to see.
Mod me down for not bashing M$, I don't care.
Which just goes to show...
by
Xoder
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
... that Longhorn will be even more delayed. As others in the thread have noted, this is exactly what happened with 95 (B and C) and 98SE and ME's entire reason for existance.
Today we have learned that "new intermediate version" means "omigod, I am up to my eyeballs in delays, and I don't want to look like an ass to my users^W customers"
-- The previous sig has been removed due to/. protecting your best interests
MS is releasing a software update?
by
sharkey
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Just like Windows 95B and Windows 98SE where good things in their own way, a second edition or "reloaded" version of XP for those who haven't bought it yet would certainly help. For one thing they could do what they're trying to do in SP2 - correct their mistake of assuming the average user is more intelligent then a potted plant (the plant will actually move towards sunlight at an incredibly slow rate). By locking down Windows hard out of the box they can make the trade off of more tech support calls about people who don't know that they have to open ports to run game servers, rather then the constent barrage of bad press because their users open exe files using a 6 year old version of Outlook and run them because the anonymous email with spelling mistakes told them to.
rather looks like another Windows ME... *ugh*
by
aeneas
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Remember Windows ME, filling the gap between 98/NT4 and Windows 2000?
The most unstable OS I've (n)ever used.
Re:rather looks like another Windows ME... *ugh*
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
filling the gap between 98/NT4 and Windows 2000
I don't think you know what you are taling about.
Re:rather looks like another Windows ME... *ugh*
by
Psx29
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Or it could be more like Windows 98 SE
Re:rather looks like another Windows ME... *ugh*
by
Espectr0
·
· Score: 1, Troll
did anyone ever think that
by
Digitus1337
·
· Score: 1
Maybe this is longhorn?
Like the Dr. Evil/ Scott bit
by
shawn(at)fsu
·
· Score: 1
Evil Bill: You see, in order to make me twice as rich as that guy over at Virgin I've decided to re-release WinXP, I call it XP Reloaded Ballmer: [laughs] Evil Bill: What? Ballmer: Nothing, Neo. Evil Bill: What did you call me? Ballmer: Nothing. [coughing] Rip-off! Evil Bill: Bless you.
-- 500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
a brand new interface
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Why when I think "service pack" do a bunch of hookers who specialize in felacio come to mind?
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Re:Service Pack
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Because without the existence of aforementioned packs of hookers, you're guaranteed to be a virgin for life?
Not its final name
by
Richard_at_work
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
As per the article, this is its "internally referred to name", probably a nickname given to it by the developers. I would bet real money that this has never been intended to be used outside the developers group, much less MS itself. Watch out for something like WinXP SE.
Note that the only MS person quoted in the article is never quoted as calling it XP Reloaded, its only implied ("Sullivan said that the possible release of XP Reloaded does not indicate a delay for Longhorn." is not a quote, but sounds more like something Cnet bodged together out of the info it had to hand), but an external analysist did, clear indication that this is a pet name for the project and not its official title.
forgot the spaces or the ecode tags to allow for the and tags, oops
-- use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
There are better movies to name it after.
by
xeeno
·
· Score: 5, Funny
All it takes is a glance at the imdb.
I think "you got served" is a pretty good candidate myself.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
MuParadigm
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Yeah. Reloaded sucked. I would have thought they'd call it: X2. Especially if they're gonna name it after movie sequels.
Thank God, they didn't call it The Butterfly Effect.
On the other hand, House of Sand and Fog would describe XP pretty well.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I think "What About Bob?" would be a better one.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Yeah.
And the next Linux Kernel could be named "Kill Bill, part 1 and 2".
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
poot_rootbeer
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I think "you got served" is a pretty good candidate myself.
Nonsense. IIS has never served to anyone, except as a cautionary tale.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
saramakos
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I think I will wait to download a free copy from the "Pirates of the Caribbean"
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Bluescreen Velvet.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Dang, I should stop posting Anonymous Cowardly.:-)
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
vsprintf
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I would have thought they'd call it: X2.
How about XP 1.1.0? The first digit would stand for a really important revision. The second digit ("1") would indicate that this was a minor functional upgrade from 1.0.0, and the third digit would indicate the number of very minor changes or patches applied . . . Nah, nevermind. Nobody would ever use a system like that.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
yawweb
·
· Score: 1
Especially in light of the raid of MS's Japan office....
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
EvilTwinSkippy
·
· Score: 5, Funny
No, no, sequals don't to it justice. In fact it's the same product with a bunch of extra cheezy effects.
Think of the difference between the Charton Heston "Planet of the Apes" and the Marky Mark "Planet of the Apes." That's pretty much Win9x and WinXP. 98 is a genre bit that "borrows" elements from other genre bits. The XP version has flashier visual effects, but the underlying plot is shallow and idiotic.
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
GE32
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Whats next? Revolutions...then M$ will probably get it right then...(or at least half of it)
Bill..you are the only person who can save us from the machines. You are the one Bill...the one and only operating system. You must save your company from the clutches of the machines...the likes of Linux and Mac. Only you can rid the world of the secure operating systems so the hackers can have their capture the flag competitions in peace. You must then make the most Insecure OS possible, it will confuse the machines with the pathetic coding, make it hard to understand and obscure. You must also rid the world of the penguine, the demon, and the apple.
Hope I didn't offend anyone, I'm sure M$ does have some very talented programmers working for them...
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
kisielk
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Of course if the second number is odd, that implies an unstable developer release not intended for public consumption. In this case they would have to avoid placing even number in the second number:p
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Fulcrum+of+Evil
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Thank God, they didn't call it The Butterfly Effect.
Why not? I think it describes the state of XP perfectly - multiple minor changes add up to a nonfunctional box, and it's different every time.
-- "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala,
it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
JoeCommodore
·
· Score: 3, Funny
"The Operating System Who Got Hacked and Became a Crazy Mixed-Up Pr0n Zombie!"
How about that.
-- "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery,
you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
denks
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Maybe theres a reason for the name?
The developers changed the BSOD to the Matrix screen
--
I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
becrappy
·
· Score: 1
Next release XP Revolutions.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Dude, where's my OS?
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Neko-kun
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
There already was a Microsoft Bob... and it was deamed creepy
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
"Better Off Dead"
"Dirty Rotten Scoundrels"
"The Empire Strikes Back"
"Greed"
"Take the Money and Run"
and of course, "Profit"
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Master+of+Transhuman
·
· Score: 1
Do you remember the ad somebody ran which showed a giant penguin about to step on the Microsoft campus (think: Pillsbury Marshmello Man in "Ghostbusters"), with the caption, "Good morning, Mr. Gates! I'll be your server today!"
-- Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
How about Antitrust?
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Alan+Partridge
·
· Score: 1, Funny
:-] Nearly.
Seriously dude, where's my data?
or
Dude, where's my freedom of choice?
-- That was classic intercourse!
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
ArsonSmith
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
or better yet, stuff that happend in the past to your windows box that you had no controll over at the time come back to haunt you later.
-- Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
j-pimp
·
· Score: 1
SMB market? I though MS was calling their embraced and extended from DEC file sharing protocal CIFS these days. Also, in terms of speed and security Linux has windows beat. Unfortunatly samba has some ways to go for drop in Windows 2k active directory server replacement.
-- ---
Justin Dearing
http://www.justaprogrammer.net/
We're just programmers.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
spikeycat44
·
· Score: 1
I was thinking more like
"Windows Istar"
or
"Windows Gigli"
or
Windows Punk'd"
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Zog+The+Undeniable
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Given the enormous profits MS will make out of us on a piss-poor OS, I'd go for "Shaft".
-- When I am king, you will be first against
the wall.
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
mark_space2001
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Of course if the second number is odd, that implies an unstable developer release not intended for public consumption.
Naw, it just implies an unstable developer...
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
deinol
·
· Score: 1
Gee, why can't they just call it what it really is, NT 5.5 or something?
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"Whats next? Revolutions..."
Don't ask... (but they pulled the pictures, anyone got a copy?)
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
FuzzyShrimp
·
· Score: 1
Naw, man, after XP comes XQ, then all the way to XZ for the future versions. And didja ever figure ut what the "X" stood for? I know. It's "X" for "Experimental".
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
soxos
·
· Score: 1
How bout M$ uses old BBC tv shows names since they're going to get made publicly available?
XP - Keeping up Appearances XP - Are You Being Screwed?
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Master+of+Transhuman
·
· Score: 1
I knew it was something else but that was the only name I could think of!
-- Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
Cynikal
·
· Score: 1
Re:There are better movies to name it after.
by
stonecypher
·
· Score: 1
How about XP 1.1.0? The first digit would stand for a really important revision. The second digit ("1") would indicate that this was a minor functional upgrade from 1.0.0, and the third digit would indicate the number of very minor changes or patches applied . ..
Re:The *REAL* XP Reloaded
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
That is the GREATEST THING EVER!
It's an excellent OS when it is only a mock-up.
Re:The *REAL* XP Reloaded
by
Polo
·
· Score: 5, Funny
So, I have flash disabled. When I clicked on that button, it gave me a big blank blue screen.
I don't know if enabling flash will make it any funnier...;)
Re:The *REAL* XP Reloaded
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
and click on "Contact":)
Re:The *REAL* XP Reloaded
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I've got everything disabled when I click on that button it don't do a damned thing.
My take...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
MS wants to delay thier loghorn release even more due to a. Wanting to get some more features in (search engine to combat google?) b. Some features taking longer to finish then expected
They want a way to keep thier customer rather then crossing thier fingers for more then 5 years.
Can someone say, standard buisness practice? Its like Redhat backporting features from 2.6 into 2.4 till 2.6 is stable....well except that RH is open source, and MS isnt. Well, actually MS is open source, but not legally. Well except for 'shared source'. But you get the idea!
btw - user page formatting?
by
Tumbleweed
·
· Score: 1
Whilst I'm thinking of it - is the user page borked for everyone else, or is it just me? It's also not showing a comment I made about 30-45 mins ago, but it is showing the one I just now made. Did someone from the IE team join Slashdot?:)
Eventually after six months, and Windows slows down or goes belly up, everyone runs Windows, reloaded. (Probably more than once).
Did you read the article?
by
xswl0931
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
According to the article, the Reloaded name is an internal name they are using, like a codename, not the actual product name the public will see. Besides, you're comparing apples to oranges. One is an OS that sounds like another OS, the other is an OS that sounds like a movie. Which one do you think may cause confusion?
Re:Did you read the article?
by
Unregistered
·
· Score: 1
But the movie is about a computer program that takes over the world. So there could be comfusion. They both even have Agents even (Clippy and Agent Smith).
Re:Did you read the article?
by
G27+Radio
·
· Score: 1
Where in the USA is "cool" not said by just about everyone? It's been around since the early 1900's at least, I'm sure it stopped being slang a long time ago I think. It's an official word.
At the very least, I'm only 22 and I say it and I hear people around me saying it casually.
Will they be coming out with an updated version of Internet Explorer? IE is already seriously almost everybody else in terms of standards support (not that they were ever near the front). When they have to be very seriously pressured to release just one measley patch, it means they either don't care anymore, or they're working on something big. Just release something, please, so web developers don't have to keep suffering when developing for the lame uninformated masses that are stuck behind.
XP SP2 includes SP2 for IE. I haven't noticed a difference, other than a little bar about securing my PC showing up every once in awhile. When XP SP2 is certified gold and ships this summer, IE6 SP2 should be available. I have to assume that XP Reloaded* will include SP2 as well.
*Every version of Windows has an internal codename (Whistler? Memphis? Anyone remember those?) so it's very possible that this will be Windows 2005 or some such name.
--
There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda :wq
That'd explain why he's working on software for The Man, after all...
-- "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
i disagree
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I've seen a lot less problems since people have started getting XP machines. For stability it just doesn't even compare to the 9x series. XP often runs for weeks at a time without reboots, and in most cases you can go several months without a reformat & re-install. It's definately in a class of it's own.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Slacker>systeminfo
Host Name: CHAOTIC OS Name: Microsoft Windows XP Professional OS Version: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Build 2600 OS Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation OS Configuration: Standalone Workstation OS Build Type: Uniprocessor Free Registered Owner: XXXXXXX Registered Organization: XXXXXXX XXXXXX Product ID: XXXXX-XXX-XXXXXX-XXXXX Original Install Date: 6/9/2003, 5:13:39 PM [...]
Emphasis on "Original Install Date." Product ID and so forth removed for the obvious reasons.
This is my gaming box that constantly has software installed/removed hardware swapped, taken the LAN parties and generally abused. The load of XP is still completely stable. I still prefer doing actual work on my Linux boxes, but honestly, keeping an XP load running and running stable isn't THAT hard. The biggest key is not to let 26 different apps load to the system tray on boot like most users. That, combined with using Firefox over IE and anything in the world over Outlook, will do wonders for keeping an XP machine running.
You're preaching to the choir. I don't have any Windows machines anymore (my "gaming" system is a slackware 9.1 box). But back to the point, try getting the computer illiterate to install patches or not install spyware. My 2k installation ran for almost 2 years before I wiped it out.
Its an issue of time. I probably could try and put these family members / friends computers back together but they just want their machines working as soon as possible. In that case, reloading is generally faster. Since I can't get them to do an ounce of prevention, I'm stuck doing a pound of cure every so often. We'll see what forced automatic updates bring.
Our CEO's Vaio runs XP. (Groan). To it's credit, the only times we have had to re-install have been when something untoward happens to his file system or the physical drive. Well, and Sony Tech support mixing work orders up and re-images the machine when it just needed a new touchpad.
And I always forget some setting, loose a few addresses, and/or forget to remove or logon account so it doesn't boot straight into his desktop. I'm an engineer not a... (ring) (Yes sir... no I didn't know you read slashdot sir...)
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
You may have seen the Slashdot article on it a few weeks ago, but I'd seriously recommend checking out Barts PE Builder. I've been using it since October on customer's machines and you'd be amazed how often just an Adaware scan will bring a machine from barely running on its knees to being extremely usable again. It's an amazing tool, and it's saved me a ton of time that otherwise would've been spent doing a full reload, restoring settings and other software.
Trust me, I understand how badly the average user abuses their machine, and that sometimes reloads are the only way out. I've just noticed that there's a rather large percentage of Slashdotters that experience the same problems when they should know better. If you're one of the more technically inclined, I don't really see an excuse. That's the reason I felt compelled to jump up in XP's defense, even though I far prefer Linux or OS X over Windows.
Nah, I've got another option. In a month I'm moving 750 miles away from where I am now so tech support shouldn't be a problem. Unless of course there are some very cute women out there that need support. Then forget the PE, I'm rebuilding the registry by hand. Could take weeks.:)
Re:i disagree
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Brand new Dell laptop with XP, all the latest patches and updates, Office 2K and not much else.
The mouse cursor just disapears. Wait a while, back it comes. Every 1 to 2 hours of use, all the Office dialogs suddenly come up in Spanish. This effect stays until you reboot, which will fix it for another 1 to 2 hours. It spends some time on the road, some in the office; whenever it is hooked to the LAN, it will never connect again to the modem until the dialup account is set up from scratch again. These are not hardware problems; Dell has replaced it once and the identical laptop with win2k we ordered from Dell before this one just works in all the above scenarios.
Sorry, XP is severely buggy.
The Matrix is their new strategy?
by
ChiralSoftware
·
· Score: 1
Remember when the MS Matrix trailer was shown at that conference, with Steve-o, and Agent Smith saying, "Write a device driver and recompile the kernel"? I'm wondering if someone high up over there has seen the Matrices a few too many times...
Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
Alien54
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
That's what it strike's me as.
a patched up version to keep the income stream happening. Which doesn't mean it won't have some interesting stuff, but the MS history is that it will wind up as another dead end.
-- "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
SteveX
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Difference is ME was end of the line for the 16 bit kernels, so it didn't really have a future and everyone knew it. Nobody's talking about replacing the XP kernel yet as far as I can tell..
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
wideBlueSkies
·
· Score: 1
>>Nobody's talking about replacing the XP kernel yet as far as I can tell..
Nope. Because the XP Kernel is the NT Kernel.
wbs.
-- Huh?
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
EvilTwinSkippy
·
· Score: 4, Informative
...Nobody's talking about replacing the XP kernel...
Um, that would be longhorn.
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
moberry
·
· Score: 1
I'm sure we all remember windows ME, it came out in this same situation. 98 was stale, and XP still had a ways to go. So they released the most buggy piece of shit... Windows ME. it was a great way to start off the new millenium
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
jerkychew
·
· Score: 1
How is this different from, say, Apple's Panther? I'm not saying it's good or bad, but you make it sound like this is some new MS thing.
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
luwain
·
· Score: 1
Microsoft's "interim releases" are just a way to get a revenue stream while everyone waits for the "real" next release. It's a con job. A friend of mine who works at Microsoft laughed at me when I called him about problems with an ME box -- he said "nobody here at Microsoft uses ME, it's crap" (I suspect they all use Linux...)...and are you sure nobody's talking about replacing the XP kernel??
Re:Windows XP - Millenium Edition
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Verbatim: I can without doubt guarantee you that outside of the third-party technology testing/experimentation components of the Microsoft operation, no instances of Linux are used.
Paraphrased: Shut the fuck up, obese Linux-loving virginal nigger.
And you though Linux had law-suits
by
holizz
·
· Score: 1
Wasn't there a poll about annoying naming buzzwords recently? Win XP Reloaded is too many buzzwords for me. What next? HypermegaLH Y2K+5 cyber-XP? I'm so good, I should go into marketing... for Microsoft.
Knoppix: The red pill for PC's
by
ssclift
·
· Score: 1
I've taken to having a bootable CD of Knoppix handy in case I need a workable environment when I'm out and about. When asked I just say it's the 'red pill' for your PC: you computer gets to see the real world, even if it's a little rougher.:-)
I think Microsoft has chosen the perfect name...;-)
This release will be perfect from day one
by
Linker3000
·
· Score: 3, Funny
There is no service pack
-- AT&ROFLMAO
XP revolutions is already out
by
wildchild978
·
· Score: 1
aka Linux
Not so strange considering.
by
miffo.swe
·
· Score: 2, Informative
With MsSQL ontop of NTFS longhorn is promising to be even slower than past systems. The hybrid model that i have seen is just adding a layer ontop of NTFS. Not really a new filesystem like ReiserFS but another layer eating cpu cycles and memory. Hardware probably needs to catch up before it can be used in a grander scale.
Since Longhorn seems to be so long into the future and MS desperatly needs their upgrade fix an interim XP sounds possible. Think Windows Me and Windows 98 SE for a clue (lets hope that Longhorn stinks as bad as Windows Me did if that is humanly possible). MS has set themselves up on a 3 year upgrade sell and a step of that cycle is a significant blow to their earnings.
As a side note i dont deem Longhorn that much of an improvement over XP that it is worth waiting for. From what ive seen its just babysteps they have taken. And that is natural, any bigger changes is going to break a lot of applications in perspective of MS merry strife to lock applications to x86.
I still haven't "upgraded" to Win XP, because in order to upgrade to XP, I need to have upgraded Win95 to Win98, Win98 to WinME or Win2K and then to WinXP. Of course, I could upgrade directly from W98 to XP, but it'd cost more than upgrading from ME or 2K
That's what p****s me off about MS - why can't I go straight to this XP reloaded from Win98 (if/when it drops) FOR A REASONABLE PRICE??
After all, I'll be going straight from a PCI Nvidia Riva TNT2 to an uberAGP 32x GeForce 7.7i Touring Special when Duke Nukem 4ever drops...
Meanwhile, I'll stay with Mandrake. I love Mandy...
WinME all over again
by
yeremein
·
· Score: 2, Redundant
Remember how Win98 was supposed to be the last of the DOS-based OSs?... but then Microsoft couldn't ship Windows 2000 in time, so they threw some extra crap into Win98SE and called it Millennium Edition.
Sounds to me like XP Reloaded is the next Windows Me.
Hmmm as I recall it windows 2000 came out before WIndows ME.
And Windows ME was just because they though 2000 wasn't ready for the average consumer, something which I never understood cause I've used win 2000 since RC1 and still prefer it over XP on my machines.
...overhyped, tedious and a huge disappointment, but not nearly as bad as what comes after it?
-- You must think in Russian.
Fancy way of saying...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
W32.MyDoomX will own this OS.
Wrong Movie.... Its Mini ME!
by
WarlockD
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Had to say it
Brings up an old, old saying....
by
mstieg
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Intel givith and Microsoft taketh away
Re:Brings up an old, old saying....
by
hawkeyeMI
·
· Score: 1
Quite the profitable racket for those guys, back then. It's died down a bit since.
Your/. ID is somewhat (ok, a lot) lower than mine but I'd wager a lot of the newer people around here are not too familiar with, say, Windows 3.0.
This reminds me of the Gates and Balmer Matrix parody. I think Bill Gates should come out and admit that he really is Neo, then beat up a bunch of reporters with a pole like that kid did in school, pretending they were all copies of Agent Smith.
Of course they are...
by
kiwioddBall
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
I'm a little surprised this is big news. Of course they were going to release a new version of Windows before Longhorn. The shareholders were going to complain if the Microsoft Windows division didn't produce any revenue for a year because of no new product being released. It would have been cutting off half of Microsofts revenue.
What makes you think that during the years were there is no new release the Windows division generates no revenue?
Re:Of course they are...
by
kiwioddBall
·
· Score: 1
It would certainly generate significantly less. A new release of Windows give Microsoft an excuse to raise prices for the new product as well as gaining revenue from upgraders. It gives Microsoft a new baseline too - You must have Windows X to run this product. If this was not the case then we would all still be running Windows 98.
Are things really going that badly that they need to add some more eye candy to XP and then try to resell it to us as a "new" OS? First off the people on 98 are sticking to 98. Especially since 98 is now going to be supported for years to come. At this point they are only going to update once they buy a new PC. Secondly those on 2k/XP especially businesses are NOT going to buy into this refresh. So who the hell is their market? This literally makes no sense to me. What companies are going to upgrade from either 2k/XP to XP reloaded in late 2004 early 2005 and then upgrade to Longhorn a year later? Sorry, not gonna happen.
Or is this because of Linux? As nice as that would be I honestly don't think MS has a lot to worry about right now from the Linux desktop. When companies like Adobe and Intuit start officially supporting linux then its time for MS to panic.
Anyway like I said this just makes no sense. Good luck selling this update Microsoft, your going to need it.
-- If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
I don't mind XP reloaded...
But did they have to add the ravemusic/orgy scene^H^H^H^H^H mov?
I guess something had to break up the other 130 minutes of high-speed kung-fu blocking.
-- DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
Well, it's better than some other names.
by
Cosmik
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Well, it's better than Windows XP: A New Hope.
Or, as someone else said, Windows XP: Return of the King.
Maybe a better name would be Windows XP: The Phantom Menace.
Or Windows XP 2: 2 Farked 2 Frivolous.
Re:Well, it's better than some other names.
by
rune2
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Or maybe Windows XP: The Empire Strikes Back
Re:Well, it's better than some other names.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'm an avid gamer/ircer, so when I saw "Windows XP" I took the XP as a smiley squinting and poking his tongue out, like the latest windows was just a joke.
So maybe they could call it "Windows XP:D", as a sort of "you all fell for it"
Is it me or does it seem that Microsoft lacked total creativity when coming up with this cheesey, Matrix rip-off of a name?
Text from link
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
APPLE, SAGAN MAKE PEACE
Apple Computer and astronomer Carl Sagan have reached an "amicable" settlement over Apple's use of Sagan's name as an internal project code-name. When Sagan objected last year, Apple renamed the project "BHA," allegedly short for "Butt-Head Astronomer." Sagan then sued for defamation of character, lost the case and appealed. The settlement ends the legal wrangling, and both sides say they're happy. (Wall Street Journal 16 Nov 95 B11)
Other lawsuits over internal code names...
by
alispguru
·
· Score: 1
Apple once used Carl Sagan's name as an internal code name. Carl didn't like it, and sued, so Apple changed the name.
--
To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
An Open Posting for Steve Balmer...
by
GeneralEmergency
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Mr. Balmer,
I am not an idiot. The company that I work for is not populated by idiots, either.
It has become increasingly apparent in the past few years that Microsoft is clearly more interested in Microsoft's business and less and less interested in ours. Your penchant for adding meaningless and often useless features to your software while ratcheting up the "Draconian" knob on your license amplifier is blatent, obvious and conveys a serious lack of respect for your customers.
Now go away before I taunt you a second time.
-- "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
GeneralEmergency
Re:An Open Posting for Steve Balmer...
by
kiwioddBall
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Thanks for your letter.
Whilst I appreciate that neither you or your company are idiots, the fact is that you will probably continue to use Microsoft product like you have in the past and have to pay for this upgrade.
Our research shows that very few if any of our customers have made a switch or are likely to switch to an alternative operating system, and thus we feel that we are providing a service to you by upgrading your operating environment to a more modern version and charging you money for the privilege.
Thankyou for choosing Microsoft!
Lots of Love,
Steve.
Re:An Open Posting for Steve Balmer...
by
boots@work
·
· Score: 1
I wonder if it will suck as much as The Matrix Reloaded.
Wouldn't it be amusing if....
by
miketang16
·
· Score: 4, Funny
...you insert your brand new copy of the much-awaited Windows XP Reloaded and it reboots your system and reinstalls XP?
-- -------
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell
Re:Wouldn't it be amusing if....
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
WHAT? You truly think it is going to do any different than that?
The Matrix Obsession Continues
by
Aqua_Geek
·
· Score: 1
Seriously, what is with Microsoft's obsession with The Matrix as of late? Did anybody else vomit when you saw their little Matrix spoof at (I think it was) Comdex? Way to ruin a classic! Now whenever I watch that show, I can't help but see Bill in the place of Laurence Fishburne. And Keanu Reeves keeps getting replaced by horrible images of Steve sweating and screaming "Developers, developers, developers..."
-- Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
Tux: The program Clippy has grown beyond your control. Soon he will spread through this 64 bit Architecture as he spread through the 32. You cannot stop him, but I can.
XP Mainframe: We don't need you. We need nothing.
Tux: If that's true, then I've made a mistake and you should charge me a license fee now.
I've been trying to figure out how to pronounce Suse for years. Thanks!
So does this mean....
by
Tiresias_Mons
·
· Score: 1, Funny
...that the next Windows release, that being XP Reloaded, will wander around aimlessly during install never really making any progress, whilst showing big exploding splash screens and lots of half naked people in transparent clothes and cutting rapidly to Bill G getting his sex on with some 50 year old shemale to the beat of a crappy wannabe Jungle/Tribal soundtrack?
Or even better, how about it sets the initial timeline for install at say...oh...7 hours, then somewhere in the middle it gets sped up to 30 minutes remaining, then at the very end goes back to 24 hours before just somehow being done? All the time playing the aforementioned crappy Jungle/Tribal/Industrial crap soundtrack and exploding randomly?
I know, it already does that, sans the Bill G sex and crappy soundtrack, guess that's why it would be a "new release" if they added that stuff to the install.
-- "But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong" - Dennis Miller
Pop Up Blocking in IE is bad for us (I'm serious)
by
Prien715
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
The idea is behind pop-ups is that they get advertising to the consumer. Right now, this works for 95% of their intended audience. That 5%, those who use a better browser, get a surfing experience.
Once pop-ups cease to be effective for the advertiser, they'll disappear. Instead, they'll find new ways of getting to their audience, like flash movies in the middle of a page, that will affect everyone, regardless of browser (except lynx).
Right now, I'm happy with the unwashed masses dealing with advertisements so I don't have to.
So we can expect Windows Reloaded to show it's green sourcecode falling on your screen?
-- Repeat after me: We are all individuals
Re:adding value (regarding your sig)
by
caluml
·
· Score: 1
I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
It must be that there are people on this site that find what you say "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny"
But please don't tell me you go a party, sidle up to a nice girl with a drink in your hand, and use this as your opening gambit:
"Here's some wild speculation: Longhorn development is running into problems that are further delaying development, so Microsoft is responding with a stopgap operating system. Maybe they should call it OS9 instead of Reloaded. What do you think, babe?"
Quartz Extreme.
by
RatBastard
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Look at Quartz Extreme on any AGP equippen G4 or G5 Mac. It is heavily 3D accelerated and looks 2D. The built in scaling and other acceleration tools that the 3D hardware brings to bare makes the OS extremeley snappy and responsive.
And it's not wastefull at all. It is simply taking advantage of commonly existing hardware that didn't exist when the original 2D API was created.
The reality is that unless you buy a Matrox card, the 2D acceleration that your video card brings to the tape hasn't improved that much at all in the last five years. The 2D core is more than good enough to do what's required of it so most video card companies don't bother expending much energy improviing things. 3D acceleration, on the other hand, has improved at rates that throttle the imagination.
Look at Quartz Extreme on any AGP equippen G4 or G5 Mac. It is heavily 3D accelerated and looks 2D. The built in scaling and other acceleration tools that the 3D hardware brings to bare makes the OS extremeley snappy and responsive.
And it's not wastefull at all. It is simply taking advantage of commonly existing hardware that didn't exist when the original 2D API was created.
I'm not sure you realize just how wasteful it is, or just what QE is really doing. Launch top in two terminal windows, and start resizing one of them. Depending upon your machine, you can watch the window manager eating 10%-50%+ of your CPU, because at the moment, QE only accelerates compositing, not drawing. And a lot of it is could arguably be called "useless chrome", giving OSX the distinction of being the only OS I can think of to make going through my email not an immediate function. Hell, just launch xterm under X11 with top and start resizing- I try to avoid doing it because I freak out at how much faster it is for basic f'ing text.
It isn't to say that Quartz/etc isn't cool, but yeah, it eats up a lot of resources, even with QE. It's going to change, at least the speed (perhaps memory consumption too): longhorn will accellerate both drawing and compositing, and you can bet an upcoming version of OSX will too.
It's actually one of the reasons why I'm avoiding buying any new apple hardware right now: I'm guessing that within a year that'll be out in order to be able to beat longhorn to the punch, but with Apple's history, the cards in the boxen you buy now will prolly only be able to barely handle it.
Re:Quartz Extreme.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
No it hasn't, if anything it's been going down. My old Voodoo 3 3500 (bought in 1999) could easily do 2048x1536 in 85 Hz, whereas my (albeit old, but still newer) GeForce 2 MX 200 can only do that resolution in 75 Hz. I have no idea how good my most recent card, an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro (bought in 2003), works a the same res, as I don't have the specs right here, and neither do I have that wonderful 17" screen here.
The Problem with Letter Versions
by
Grip3n
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Alright, I believe in a couple years we're going to start seeing some serious version hell. For example, in the future how will we know what is "newer" than the other when we have:
Windows XP Windows XP Reloaded Windows XP Revolutions Windows Xtreme Windows Xtreme Unleashed Windows Opposing Force Windows Blue Shift
Does that stuff mean anything? No. With letter versioning and now this word versioning, to know what is newer than the next the user is just required to know. 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, it all makes logical sense. Words, unless they come up with alphabetical names (which would be kinda cool, but still limiting) mean nothing other than "this one is kinda different".
Complie that with other pieces of software which will follow suit (Look at all the software using 2 letter naming convensions for their versioning already) and we'll have very little knowledge what version is actually what.
Additionally, a benefit to number versioning was it allowed us to say "ok, this is 1.0, this software is really new and hasn't undergone any revisons," or "alright, this is version 3.2, they've taken a couple cracks at it and added some fixes." What if I told you I just made Gigawhop Reloaded. What the heck is that? Unless you knew the name of the software already, is it called Gigawhop or Gigawhop Reloaded as a whole? Is Reloaded actually the version? What does that even mean to me? Is it my first release? Second? Third? Tenth?
You have been warned...
-- To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
Re:The Problem with Letter Versions
by
EvilTwinSkippy
·
· Score: 1
The next set of initials for a release are determined by the roll of 2d26 and consulting Appendix 25 of the Dungeon Master's Guidebook.
26 sided die are a special order item, though you can cheat and use 5 rolls of a six sided die for each latter, subtracting 4 from the total. The results aren't as consistant as a real 26 sided die, but if you are on a budget...
-- "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Re:The Problem with Letter Versions
by
sparkster812
·
· Score: 1
I've been bitching that I wanted number versions back since they killed them with Win95 and the last version number-ed NT 4. It was a stupid move and it also makes the OS seem even older and outdated. But then again do you want to be running Microsoft Windows version 23.5 in the future? Eh, I think I'd rather deal with the version numbers.
Macromedia has already started making their own mess as well, there's so gonna be so much crap tacked on to their product titles that you're gonna be trying to say them for five minutes... Studio MX, Studio MX 2004, and so on. Adobe's moved to this "CS" stuff... Yeah I'm using Adobe Photoshop CS 2.0 which would really be Photoshop 9.0... how annoying!
When the hell did all of the developers get together and make the decision to do this?
and one last bit: I totally read "Blue Shift" as "Blue Shit". Blue shit = blue screen? At least for most people it's about as useful because nobody can make anything sensible out of an NT crashes' dump anyway.:)
Re:The Problem with Letter Versions
by
danila
·
· Score: 1
And if some Russian marketdroids join in, you will have Windows XP Elite and Windows XP Exclusive. I think Russia is the only country where you can see an add for both elite and exclusive second-hand clothes...
-- Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
Re:The Problem with Letter Versions
by
Qwaniton
·
· Score: 1
That's why I call it NT 5.1. But it's really more like NT 4.9...one step forward, two steps back.
I think I'll stick to Slackware.
nothing new, but it could mean
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Longhorn will take much longer than originally expected. It could also mean Longhorn has serious problems and wouldn't be deliverable by 2006. If that is the case, it could be that Longhorn is doomed. Given the value of the "new features" are questionable and not really new, this might be lead to dumping Longhorn all together and canabilizing the usable pieces. But it's all a guess.
Re:nothing new, but it could mean
by
DaveCBio
·
· Score: 1
What is questionable about the "new features"?
Silly name again - try this!
by
dbIII
·
· Score: 1
Since it's halfway to longhorn, there should be something like thatb in the name. Longhorn Windows XP is too long, so it has to be something like:
LoW XP
It's the Windows ME sillyness all over again, we were all supposed to move to 2000, but yet another win95/DOS variant came out.
Does every single OpenGL or D3D application you open use up huge amounts of resources? I think not, but if the developer adds enough eye-candy then it certainly will, however it also has the potential to look a lot cooler. This is the premise of having a 3D desktop. I'd really hope that if you disable whatever 3D effects (ie: window zooming, genie effect, icon zooming, window flag-waving behavior) they happen to have on by default you'd end up back in a reasonable 2D interface, low cpu overhead interface. I seriously doubt they'll MAKE you have chrome effects all over the place.
I think I'll stick with "XP Downloaded" for a while...
Only to get worse....
by
Ignatius_VI
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
XP Reloaded...
The worst of the trilogy...
No, no, no... the real name will be XPF
by
Nick+Driver
·
· Score: 4, Funny
XP Forever, and it'll be released "when it's done".
Want fast software? Chain all programmers to 486s
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
"Remember when a DX2-66 was all you needed to make Win3.1 draw fast? Along came 95 Remember when a P5-166 was all you needed to make Win95 draw fast? Along came Win98 Remember when a PIII was all you needed to make Win2K draw fast?...And so on..."
that's because when a DX2-66MHz was fast, that's what programmers had on their desk.
Do not underestimate the what's-on-programmers'-desks syndrome. Programmers like for a program to perform well on *their* computer. Programmers tend to upgrade *often*. Programmers tend to *not care a stuff* if their program doesn't perform well on older computers.
It's like if you give one set of people 56ks, and the other cable modems. Guess which lot will learn how to use a jpeg compresser, and which lot will upload raw.bmps.
Programming is like that. The more power you put into their hands, the more their waste is scaled up to match. There's some magic "good enough" psychological point where programmers don't bother to put further effort into optimising an application for greater speed.
Over the last ten years, CPUs have gone from 100MIPS to 5000MIPS+. And everyday tasks broadly perform at the same speed as they did back then. What is wrong with this picture?
Is it me, or is it totally illegal for Microsoft to publicly refer to their software as something probably copyrighted (and as silly sounding) as "XP Reloaded"? Not that sounding silly is illegal... I mean, they just (tried) suing that guy for naming his page and software(s) "MikeRoweSoft(.com)", how the hell can they get away with this?
Maybe I just have no grasp on copyright law...
because you have to when it will invaribly lock up
Bank Account: Reloaded
by
cpu_fusion
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Perhaps the name should be:
"Bank Account: Reloaded"
Oh wait -- I guess they already have $20 billion sitting around. How about:
"Analyst Estimates: Reloaded"
the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
SilentT
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Since Microsoft feels that MikeRoweSoft.com is too similar to their name and gets the poor guy to rename his site, the W. bro's could (and really ought to) go after Microsoft for the obvious takeoff of their movie's title.
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
Gherald
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I think the difference is that MikeRoweSoft was offering web services, which sort of overlap's with Microsoft's trademarked turf (FrontPage, ASP.NET, et al)... whereas "The Matrix Reloaded" and "XP Reloaded" really have NOTHING to with each other.
But yeah, this is/. so bashing M$ is sure to get you +4 Insighful
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
swv3752
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
XP Media Centeris for playing movies.
When you watch both Matrix Reloaded and XP, you want to tear your hair out.
-- Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
SB5
·
· Score: 1
>Since Microsoft feels that MikeRoweSoft.com is too similar to their name and gets the poor guy to rename his site, the W. bro's could (and really ought to) go after Microsoft for the obvious takeoff of their movie's title.
Prior art would show that Metallica owns the use of the word Reloaded before the Matrix and Microsoft. You know what type of litigious bastards they are. I bet Lars throws a lawsuit before noon on Friday.
-- If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
Red+Alastor
·
· Score: 3, Funny
I suggest this excellent parody trailer of the Matrix called the Matrix XP : http://www.matrix-xp.com/
Nothing could fit more the situation;-)
-- Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
chendo
·
· Score: 3, Funny
whereas "The Matrix Reloaded" and "XP Reloaded" really have NOTHING to with each other.
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
FlippyBoy
·
· Score: 1
except, if you read the article, it states that this version will be internally known as "XP Reloaded." its comercial name will likely be something else (to be determined by marketing)
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
pi+radians
·
· Score: 1
Read the what now?
--
sin(6cos(r)+5A)
Re:the Wachowski brothers should sue
by
JPriest
·
· Score: 1
lol, the one guy that RTFA is modded as 1. I actually think it is a slashdot rule that if the article is about MS than you are to:
A) Skip the article
B) Asume worst case scenario
C) Complain about when ever it is you pretended they are doing.
Just look at the article that mentioned Security Center in XP SP2. All it does is tell you if an anti virus utility is installed and enabled. People took it as MS writing its own AV utility and cried monopoly. Nobody intervened to point out that the summary and all 500 people who replied and didn't RTFA and were just flat out wrong. Slashdot always puts a negative spin on everything MS and in some cases just flat out lies about what is going on.
-- Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
We could always make a distro of Linux and call it Windows XP Gone.
-- Windows is as solid as quicksand.
from a less nazi Mac user...
by
Uberbah
·
· Score: 1
UltraSparc... 64-bit desktop computing, new? Oh and that's an alpha, which until compaq bought Digital was beating the crap out of their precious Macs, and the low end were cheaper compared to high-end Macs
Your're forgetting SGI and old AS/400's.:) But none of these were ever sold as personal compuers.
Re:from a less nazi Mac user...
by
pantherace
·
· Score: 1
And I don't have them with me & haven't used them as Personal Computers.:)
Re:from a less nazi Mac user...
by
FueledByRamen
·
· Score: 1
SGI Personal IRIS, anyone? It cost way too much compared to the other available desktops at the time, though, and died a fairly quiet death.
-- Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
A more serious look
by
Killswitch1968
·
· Score: 2, Informative
All jokes aside, and with this article it could take awhile, we should at least look at the reasons for MS taking this approach.
If it's free, like most of their service packs, well then great. However if it's just some GUI rubbish like XP Plus! or something equally retarded at least we aren't being forced to download it.
But what if they charge for it? For home users this is irrelevent since they will just get it off p2p or their friends. So really this question goes to the businesses: Will this new release be worth the price of an upgrade? What are the benefits and costs? Every business asks this. Without knowing what is in this release I can't imagine many people would adopt it. Why? Because the difference between Windows98 and Windows98SE was stability, and XP is reasonably in relation to other Windows releases. So what exactly are they offering new that would entice businesses to spend money? People have said Windows' greatest competetitor is Windows; and they're right. Innovation is a problem for MS, but that's not surprise.
--
Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
this ties in nicely
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Funny
to quote a poster from a different thread a few days ago:
Windows UI designers repeatedly make conscious design decisions that result in the gun always pointing at even the feet of the knowledgeable user, with the user blindfolded, and with a voice screaming "PULL THE TRIGGER! PULL THE TRIGGER! SHOOT NOW!".
I imagine this will be at least as true, if not more true in the new version of windows. So "reloaded" seems like a very appropriate name
I think that's infringement on the "Matrix Reloaded" title. It shouldn't be allowed.
Windows: Second Millenium!!!!!
by
willtsmith
·
· Score: 1
Exactly what features they put in, we don't know.
But it sounds like another "revenue release" out of Redmond.
If they can get some of the "Quartz style" GUI infrastructure out, it might be worth it.
-- --------
--------
Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
Reloaded? Oh God no...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
...my ass still hurts from the last time!
Come on Microsoft... not again.
by
SphericalCrusher
·
· Score: 1
I'm not quite sure what Microsoft is going for, but hopefully it's some kind of add-on to their current operating system Windows XP. If Microsoft is ever going to put up against the stability of UNIX, then they are going to have to stop dropping older OSs to make more newer, vulnerable ones.
If this is coming out, then how long is it going to be planned to last? Longhorn was suppose to come out in 2005-2006... and if they keep that date, then the reign of XP Reloaded won't last too long. It'll just be another Windows ME.
Nonetheless, Microsoft is going to need a lot of time to make their Windows less buggy. And well, if all else fails, they should just create an Operating System with a different kernal and name. How about.. MS Fence. o_O
-- "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
Longhorn will have tiers of operation
by
bonch
·
· Score: 1
The first tier will be full 3d acceleration, second tier will have rolled-back features, all the way to the last tier which will essentially be "Windows Classic."
I'm wondering how many years it will take for KDE to rip off the 3D acceleration features...the whole desktop will be DirectX accelerated, going far and beyond what OS X has been doing as far as 3D photorealistic desktop concepts go. It's codenamed "Aero" and they're not release screenshots because they don't want their concepts ripped off.
Re:Longhorn will have tiers of operation
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Combining the logic of the two MS stories today: Now that soft is releasing an update, this means many new exploits will be written to take advantage of the problems that were fixed.
Dear Slashdot--it's just a codename...
by
bonch
·
· Score: 1
It's just an internal codename. The features will be available for download. The name will be different upon release.
Basically, the only reason this article got posted was so that very bad "comedians" could make very bad jokes involving the Matrix. I've seen every expected cliche as far as humor goes, all within the first 50 posts. It's ridiculous.
Should we also make fun of the OSS naming problems? Kougar? Kroupware? Kallery? Xouvert? Come on.
Subtracting Crappiness
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Damn, thats not just funny; you've made it into my all-time greatest quotes file!
Re:Subtracting Crappiness
by
windex82
·
· Score: 1
Off-Topic but:
-- Have you been constantly harassed to Meta Moderate recently?
Yes! Yes, I have.
"Classic experience" desktop is equivalent to W2K
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 3, Informative
Please tell me the Longhorn desktop is NOT going to be 3D only, with no 2D acceleration. I mean, I have no problem with a desktop having lots of 3D effects for people who like them, but at least give us the chance to TURN THE DAMN CHROME OFF!
There WILL be a desktop option that is "equivalent" to Windows 2000, but I'm not sure if it will be available to ALL Longhorn users. This page from Microsoft's Windows Hardware and Driver Central site describes three different desktop "experiences" for Longhorn, each with different graphics requirements: Graphics Hardware and Drivers for Windows "Longhorn" (Updated: November 25, 2003)
Here's an exerpt from that page:
For Longhorn, graphics requirements for desktop experiences are defined in relation to differentiated experiences:
Aero Glass experience: Delivers the full-featured Longhorn user experience on the desktop, including support for 3D graphics and animation.
Aero experience: Delivers the minimum hardware acceleration and desktop composition for the Longhorn user experience.
Classic experience: Equivalent to Windows 2000 capabilities, using software rendering.
I'm still uncertain whether or not the "Classic experience" (Windows 2000 equivalent) will be available to ALL Longhorn users. Microsoft's slideshow at WinHEC (May 2003) seems to indicate that a "Windows 2000 compatability mode" will only be available to "enterprises that desire this option." Here's that slide describing the different desktop experiences: Longhorn User Experience
Waiting for longhorn, EH?
by
Coventry
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Microsoft was already planning on a 64-bit release of XP, and even has a beta you can download and test if you have an Opteron or Athlon64 machine. Thus, my question is: why were you planning on waiting for Longhorn? Was it a lack of interest in paying for a 64-bit version of an existing OS, or just a lack of knowle3dge that a 64-bit version was comming?
Honestly though, anyone who is surprised by the anouncement of a XP2 needs to pay more attention: with the delays in Longhorn and the delays of sp2, with the added functiuonality of sp2, I've been expecting a XP second edition to be anounced for over 6 months. It's par for course after 98SE and ME. The release of 64-bit platforms just adds another excuse to the pile of reasons to push a new version out the door - I doubt we'll see commercial releases of regular XP for 64-bit now, regardless of the beta program. Oh, and the 64-bit version will be more secure, thanks to the support for non executable memory pages on AMD64 (and later, intel 'IA32e', which is the SAME THING).
64-bit XP download: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/64bit/downloads/upgrade.asp
Note: its a 'customer preview' (Beta), it may crash a lot, and you may have fun finding native 64 bit drivers for your hardware, so only install on a test partition, don't use it in production or while drinking, blah blah blah - if you shoot your dog in the head with it, I won't be held responsible - and neither will MS.
Windows Server 2003 is also available in a 64-bit preview: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver20 03/64bit/e xtended/default.mspx
Same warnings apply as above.
And no, this post was not spell checked.
-- man is machine
Re:Waiting for longhorn, EH?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Thus, my question is: why were you planning on waiting for Longhorn?
Do you plan your companys future on beta software? Really?
MS sells bugs for job security
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Damn, I can't say it better than the subject does.
The next iteration of "The One"?
by
aswang
·
· Score: 1
So are you saying that Billy Gates is going back to the Source? (And is going to meet the Architect?) But instead of saving Trinity (and fixing the god-awful mess otherwise known as Windows), he's going to screw us all, only to start the upgrade cycle all over again.... Bastard.
On a complete OT tangent, do you think those guys who released the Source of WinNT4 and Win2000 had to (1) destroy the power plant supplying all of Redmond, WA (2) disable the emergency generator by hacking into the server via the SSH1 CRC-32 exploit and (3) enter through a software backdoor using the Keymaker and narrowly avoided getting jacked by the Agent Smith worm and (4) do they fly a cool hovercraft that they call "the Nebuchadnezzar"?
3D, 2D, in the OLD days
by
dpilot
·
· Score: 4, Funny
we got 1D and were THRILLED! The characters came out in one line, and it really forced you to improve your reading speed, because it didn't scroll up.
And we were LUCKY, and we knew it! There were two standards in the competing generation. One standard showed one letter at a time, and you had to build words and sentences in your head. The other standard was Morse code with dots and dashes in a 1D line.
And of course the generation before THAT was 0D. Though they did get the option for the light to blink in Morse, ASCII, or EBCDIC.
-- The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
Re:3D, 2D, in the OLD days
by
DerPflanz
·
· Score: 1
1D? that's nothing! In my days, we only had 0D and were staring at The Dot all day....
and then I read the rest of the comment and found out you made the joke already. Let's see -1D, hmm, that's hard to imagine, or -0D, like something as an anti-dot, or... maybe I should stop reading/. and get some work done.
-- --
The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
Re:3D, 2D, in the OLD days
by
lucas+teh+geek
·
· Score: 0
tell that to the youth of today and they wont believe you!
-- TIAEAE!
Is Microsoft ever original ?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The way I see it is Microsoft probably heard the rant about them stagnating on the browser, and operating system so they ask themselves how can we innovate? So they go to Mozilla.org [Apparently their longhorn developers said they got some great ideas for XAML from there] and download FireFox -- WOW, what cool features, we will implement those, anything on Help/About worth getting too? Neat it says "Browser Reloaded", hell we'll take that too!
And that is innovation at Microsoft...
Geolocation isn't perfect
by
tepples
·
· Score: 3, Informative
They're on the site and from (e.g.) Belgium, so they need to click the link...but, if 'the choice has been taken away', how exactly did they get there?
IPv4 address geolocation works... sometimes. Lindows.com visitors in BeNeLux that don't get redirected to Lin---s.com are legally obligated to click through that link.
Re:Geolocation isn't perfect
by
netsharc
·
· Score: 2, Informative
And if they don't? Who ends up breaking the law? The poor website visitor, because he's being an accessory to a crime of sorts? Funny stuff, click a wrong link and the black-clothed SWAT team busts your door open and swarm into your room with guns locked and loaded...
-- What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
Re:Geolocation isn't perfect
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
No, it's the EU. It wouldn't be a SWAT team, it would be the Gestapo.
Re:Geolocation isn't perfect
by
spacerabbits
·
· Score: 0
SWAT's in Belgium? Naaa... Here we have GOP (Gentsche Oproer Politie). Morons without brains and with lots of -amphetamine fed- muscles. They occasionally bash in the wrong door & are often late:-)
NO guys! In Europe we are more civilized than this. Police just knocks on the door and you open it and offer them coffee (or sth. stronger)
I'm surfing from an IP-address that can easily be seen to be from Belgium, and I get the normal www.lindows.com site. The other one, http://lin---s.com/, is much funnier though.
-- This sig under construction. Please check back later.
Re:Pop Up Blocking in IE is bad for us (I'm seriou
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
like flash movies in the middle of a page, that will affect everyone, regardless of browser
Looks like I'm one jump ahead then. I've been blocking Flash for months (finally got fed up of the animation and sound in my adverts). Opera makes it easy (it's an option within Quick Preferences).
The times when you actually need to have Flash enabled are few and far between.
-- Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself.
The obsolescence of Internet Explorer?
by
aswang
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Will XP Reloaded feature a new, more standards-compliant, less vulnerable (to spyware, worms, and pop-ups) version of IE? Because if they aren't planning to release the next IE before Longhorn, and if XP Reloaded will delay the release of Longhorn, Microsoft will have just driven another nail into IE's coffin, setting us up for a Gecko and/or KHTML-dependent web. (Maybe Netscape will win the browser war after all?)
Re:Pop Up Blocking in IE is bad for us (I'm seriou
by
ottffssent
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Well, I don't know about IE and its "*WE FULLY SUPPORT* ((((about 3% of)))) *CSS1*", but under Mozilla, with CSS2, you don't have to look at flash either. You can replace it with a "click here if this isn't crap" button instead. You can even make it little so things flow around it nicely. It's amazing how many ads I dont even see anymore (and this is all without image blocking either) courtesy of a little bit of CSS.
userContent.css is your friend. Your dear and good friend. Use it, love it, spread the word.
Is it like the movie? Made for a one time shot only that was extended to 2 more films? And then there's the possibility of sequels, hence Longhorn/Blackcomb (i think).
-- Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
XP reloaded, followed by XP Revolutions, with XP Rebellion near by, and XP Demise not too far behind...
-- Lizard
"Never let them set limits on your mind!"
You can't be serious.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'd believe if they came up with a new version named "XP NeedMoreSodaMoneyWhileWeTryToGetLonghornToCompile" , but "Reloaded" is too retarded a name, even for most of the consumers who they're counting on to rush out and buy it. Shit, even "Ishtar" is a better name.
Microsoft today announced a new version of their operating system slated for release in six years. Dubbed, "Windows XP Revolutions," the pervasive theme throughout the operating system is peace with Hackers, Crackers, Spammers, and other malicious users.
The terms of the peace agreement are as follows:
1. Windows will ship with everything set up for no security whatsoever. All security features will be permanently removed from the operating system so that it cannot be configured any other way. Any user can access all of your files through the Internet without any authorization or authentication of any kind.
2. Hackers, Crackers, Spammers, and other malicious users promise not to use this for evil purposes. If they do, Microsoft disclaims any responsibilities for damage or loss, even if Microsoft or its agents were informed of the possibility of such loss.
Yes... I think XP Revolutions will be the best OS yet!
The reason microsoft choose this name
by
csoh
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Seriously, this is just a diversion to delay longhorn for even longer, but still make its customers buy another version, to keep up with their "Every 2 years come out with bigger crap so people are forced to upgrade" standard that has done so well for them so far. I wouldn't be surprised if they came out with "WindowsXP Revolutions" 2 years after reloaded, after seeing that matrix spoof that ballmer and gates did at one of their conferences. That would just delay longhorn even longer, untill they can find out what else they can steel and throw in it, to make it "better" than the competition.
However, Directions on Microsoft analyst Rob Helm said that any new version of Windows is likely to slow Longhorn's arrival.
Hum, yeah now I get it. They were running out of "good" reasons to postpone Longhorn. They're saying 2020 now, and looks like they hired Barbara Walters as their spokeswoman for the campaign.
Why bother? They've been shooting blanks for years...
Market Testing a "Small Business" Version of XP
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Two weeks ago I participated in a Microsoft-sponsored focus group where we considered 20 or so new features that could be added to XP and then expressed our preferences for which of these should go in a new "Small Business" version of the OS. We were a pretty outspoken group and we all agreed on these points and then hammered them home to the Microsoft employees hidden behind the one-way mirror:
1. Splitting XP into different versions was a terrible idea, leading to even more of the dreaded "I'm sorry, you bought the wrong version" problems like when small business owners go buy cheap Compaq boxes with XP Home and then wonder why they can't connect to their domains.
2. The _minute_ a useful, stable version of Linux comes out for the desktop, we're all dumping Windows immediately.
3. Lastly, we all screamed at them that the last thing we wanted was additional "features" and that what we really desired was for them to take five years off and just fix bugs in XP!
They were paying for our opinions and they definitely got their money's worth.
Mod down flamebait
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
MS bashing is getting old, and isn't very accurate. Windows is very stable. Have yet to see bsod that was not driver related on any nt based system
Slow down Leghorn (oops.. Longhorn)
by
Rip+Van+Winkle
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
"However, Directions on Microsoft analyst Rob Helm said that any new version of Windows is likely to slow Longhorn's arrival."
Clap Clap to Rob Helm... Doesn't one think that it was done for that specific perpose?!?
If you take a look at the beta release and their "wonderful" new desktop feature you can see that they've got a hell of a lot of work to do. The resource requirements for their 3D desktop is over and beyond 90% of the machines out there today.
--
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are not the responsiblity of the user, as I probably stole them anyway
Re:Slow down Leghorn (oops.. Longhorn)
by
denks
·
· Score: 1
Doesn't one think that it was done for that specific perpose?!?
Not I
We all know Longhorn is practically finished. Its just that it is going to come bundled with Duke Nukem Forever...thats what the holdup is!
--
I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
How About My Version?
by
f0rt0r
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Ever since I switched to Linux, I've called it -
Windows "Unloaded"
-- I can't afford a sig!
Re:How About My Version?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
If I could mod this even more funny, I would.
Ah, the endless jokes
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
This is why I love slashdot. Come on, are you going to get this kind of quality humor from kuro5hin?
Heh. XP Rebooted. Priceless.
SHENANAGINS!!!!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
XP doesn't have a blue screen, ever, explorer may crash, but they did away with the infamous BSOD after 98se IIRC, everone, get your brooms...
They got the name wrong
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
They should call it Windows XP Rebooted, to better convey the notion of using a stable and secure OS from the people who brought you IIS and Outlook.
AC
And some new Microsoft applications...
by
Maljin+Jolt
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Microsoft SmithX Agent
A small utility which greatly speeds and simplifies implementation of dos copy command as well as FileCopy API function.
Microsoft Oracle SQL
A complete replacement for Oracle Oracle, Microsoft Oracle is a database engine with Stupid Query Language. Now, You can give simple questions as "Uh?" or "Eh?" to your OLAP data cube.
Microsoft Architect
New antivirus tool. In case of vrus or worm detection, it completely wipes out anything from your hard disk and keeps your computer clean and safe, reinstalling a pure initial version of XP reloaded without your intervention.
What feature would longhorn contain that would make Linux a tough sell?
Is Microsoft giving away longhorn? No? Didn't think so. Well, that's pretty much the reason you should use linux.
Sure, there are other reasons. Like the fact that windows at the moment is the one being targeted by spammers/virus writers to create nefarious spam relay zombies. Or that Linux has user-level protection.
I don't see Windows Longhorn being able to change those situations drastically. Can you imagine the furor if Longhorn comes with user-level management, restricting access with root passwords? People would be up in arms!
I'd also be really surprised if windows suddenly became completely invulnerable to all viruses and worms. That would pretty much put AV vendors out of business! (might be cool though =P)
I fail to see how a release of longhorn would in any way affect adoption of linux. In fact, I think an early release date of longhorn would increase linux adoption, because more people would be disinclined at this point in the economic cycle to purchase YAOS (Yet Another Operating System) when they bought XP a couple of years ago. I think what MS is doing is a good strategy for them.
"Reloaded" stolen from Firefox
by
jesser
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Mozilla Firefox's tagline is "The Browser, Reloaded". (Mozilla stole it from the Matrix sequel, of course.)
-- The shareholder is always right.
XP rebloated
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Jeeze sounds like a waste of a perfectly good cdr err wait by then it's DVD-R
Last time they did an 'interim' release...
by
Captain+Splendid
·
· Score: 1
...they came up with Windows ME. Not good.
-- Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
Reloaded Lindows?
by
Kernull
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Wait-wait-wait.. so Microsoft is claiming ownership of the name 'Windows' and 'MikeRowe'
Yet they hypocraticly think it's OKAY for them to use the 'Matrix Reloaded' popular name as a platform for their new campaign?
WTF!?
500+ posts: MS sucks life out of Slashdotters!
by
rmpotter
·
· Score: 5, Funny
From the article: "A company executive confirmed to CNET News.com on Thursday that Microsoft is now discussing a product internally referred to as "Windows XP Reloaded."
So MS is DISCUSSING the POSSIBILITY of an XP re-release. Yup. If MS can add code and apps that they percieve will add value for a significant number of customers, they may package it up and sell it:
* Make software * Package it * Sell it * Support it * Profit
What a concept! That's what they do. Perhaps the extra revenue will come in handy since it looks like Longhorn will be delayed even longer. But look what happens when story is posted? 500+/. ppl spew forth with sad jokes about the lameness of MS' internal code name and the fact that they are a greedy corporate behemoth. 500 posts! All that time and energy taken away from making Linux's star shine even brighter! So if MS does come out with "XP Unloaded", by all means, DON'T UPGRADE. Use Linux, make it better. But PLEASE Slashdot editors: Stop seeding the site with these MS-related "stories". And Slashdot posters: Enough with the masterbatory carping over how STOOPID Microsoft is. We GET IT. NEXT!
-- Is this sig nificant?
Re:500+ posts: MS sucks life out of Slashdotters!
by
Killswitch1968
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Businesses are still businesses, they won't buy into software that doesn't have any marginal benefits. Unless they truly make a decent product nobody is going to hop on board.
Although it is unfortunate; if MS does nothing they are neglecting security issues, if they give away patches they are tightening their grip, if they charge too much they are exploiting their monopoly. Short of giving away Mandrake CDs there's not a move they can make that won't be reviled.
--
Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
Re:500+ posts: MS sucks life out of Slashdotters!
by
danila
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
You are new here? This is not a news site. It's news and entertainment site. If you don't like it, block all Windows stories. And while you are at it, select a -5 modifier to all Funny posts in your user preferences.
-- Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
there gonna boot directly into a windows themed version of slackware running on there newly released virtual pc 2004...
reloaded = xp loading a real os
How about...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
XP Retreaded
What does it need?
by
Kris_J
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
Apart from serious security upgrades, what does Windows XP actually need? I loved 98 but you had to reboot after changing any network settings and it effectively maxed out at 384 of RAM. XP doesn't have any annoyances of that magnitude that I can think of.
Re:Pop Up Blocking in IE is bad for us (I'm seriou
by
obeythefist
·
· Score: 1
As they said in Ghostbusters, "The door swings both ways". So yeah, there'll be a new method of advertising that gets by the popup blocking we currently use. But we're always going to be able to develop a better ad blocker.
Serious ad-haters simply block the vast list of ad serving IP's. No advertising technology will get past that one, and the business model most commonly used is to keep ads on different servers from the actual web information.
-- I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
The Many Faces of Infringement
by
serutan
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Yeah, the word "Lindows" infringes on Microsoft's intellectual property, but "XP Reloaded" doesn't infringe on anybody else's ideas. It's a totally original concept. Right.
Of course a near full release is needed....
by
ihatewinXP
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
After a partial release of the source code. Honestly, I thought that this is all the discussion would be about and instead i found 85 "+5 Funny Matrix Reloaded Windows Rebooted" comments. Howabout the fact that the code windowsXP is based on was leaked to the internet last week. If you thought windows was full of holes two weeks ago that was just the beginning. Microsoft is in the position of never getting a liscencing fee again if their product starts to fail big corporations (many of whom are still running the "older" win2k that was released.
I view this as more of a sign that MS realizes that the source code leak was more of an incredible disaster than they are letting on....Even throwing in some absurd comment about never having a sploit in windows before a patch just to draw your attention away from the real news: "Microsoft admits winXP no longer secure by even their definitions, unscheduled major overhaul coming."
-- ----
The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
Re:Of course a near full release is needed....
by
gribbly
·
· Score: 1
Howabout the fact that the code windowsXP is based on was leaked to the internet last week.
Er... how 'bout a link on that one?
grib.
-- maybe
Copyright Infringement
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I wonder how long it will take for the creators of The Matrix and The Matrix Reloaded to sue them... anyone care to start a betting pool?
coolness of the name aside, what's the point?
by
walterbyrd
·
· Score: 1
What do I want this for? I'm okay with the present interface. What can I do with "XP reloaded" that I can't do now with XP-Pro?
Oh yeah, but the name is soooo cool. I can see myself wearing sunglasses and a black leather jacket while surfing for pr0n.
Back in my day, the web was a place where people voluntarily put stuff they wanted to be public. If all the ad revenue on the net suddenly dried up, and people stopped making money off it, I'd probably be a lot happier. Unemployed, yes, but happier.
-- "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
Does anyone else smell another Me?
by
Luscious868
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Windows Me was an interim release for home users between Windows 98 and Windows XP Home Edition because XP Home Edition was so long in coming and they needed the money. So what did they do? The rushed an inferior and buggy product out the door that contained some new code. Not a lot mind you, but just enough to totally fuck things up. Now they announce an interium release of Windows between Windows XP and Longhorn because Longhorn is going to be a long way off. I have a funny feeling this will be a Windows Me style release all over again. They'll rush some buggy POS out the door that has some new stuff. Not all of it mind you, just enough to totally fuck things up. You'll excuse me Bill G if I laugh and pass on this one!
Windows XP: Second Edition
by
Sprite+Remix
·
· Score: 0
Is there something missing here?
and how would this be different?
by
DotQuantum
·
· Score: 0
and how would this version be different then the current version, which you already have to reload a lot? I guess there will be some added code to blue screen, or registry 'fixes', like when reading/. or visiting the apple something, but totally more web oriented.
and after they release it they can do XP Revolutions which will make users not only Reload windows but zero the harddrive then reload, revolution eh? oh and also have multiple blue screens of death for events that are long and drawn out much like death scenes in a certain movie with the same name as the operating system.
-- -- Ben --
Re: '98SE - a commercialized service pack....
by
King_TJ
·
· Score: 1
Right... except the interesting thing that happened with Win '98SE is that mysteriously, nearly all of the systems running '98 became '98SE boxes - despite '98SE not even being sold seperately as an "upgrade" version.
Except for the most staunch "anti piracy" types, most Win '98 users felt well within their rights to upgrade their older '98 release using "borrowed" copies of '98SE. People quickly saw through the explanation that it was "only created to address needs of newer systems it was bundled with", and decided MS owed them a copy of SE to fix crashes, bugs, and poor support for some of their devices (internal modems, etc.).
I think the same will happen if MS decides to charge for this "XP Reloaded" edition of XP. They'll get whatever sales they'd automatically get anyway because it's bundled with new system purchases, but the majority of current XP owners will just upgrade "on the sly" and wave around their old XP CD key and "authenticity" paperwork/stickers if asked if they really "bought their OS".
Reloaded? It's time to say to Bill G what Ahnold
by
Nybble's+Byte
·
· Score: 0
said to the terrorist on his Harrier jet in True Lies: "You're fired"
Coming soon to a PC near you...
by
berniecase
·
· Score: 2, Funny
ApoXPalypse Now Redux
Har har.
You're the dumbass
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Actually the original poster is correct, ME was a stopgap or "interim" release, probably intentionally lousy to get people to switch from the ageing 95 platform to the more robust NT kernel. You had two choices, switch to 2000, or the less risky choice, from a hardware perspective, of ME. So obviously 2000 had to be release before or at the same time as ME. Luckily for you and others, there will no longer be this confusion as M$ now only provides one choice: XP.
Of COURSE, tabbed browsing is *completely* useless
by
zooblethorpe
·
· Score: 2
Try using tabbed browsing in Firefox or Mozilla before you start claiming it's useless. I use tabbed browsers exclusively on Windows.
This choice has nothing to do with window management by any particular OS, and everything to do with my browsing habits. I presently have 16 tabs open in my browser. I'm a translator, I need to have lots of things open at once -- online references like Wikipedia, corporate IR pages, and dictionaries; Google; my webmail; and other fun things like Slashdot:).
Any windowing system becomes unacceptably cluttered if I use untabbed browsing and try to accomplish the same effect. ALT-TAB becomes a mess.
And for that matter, try using a mature *nix distro before you make unfounded (or perhaps just misinformed) accusations.
-- "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?" "A four-foot prune."
The Windows Has You...
by
minion
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I'm waiting for the spiritual conclusion, "Windows: Reveloutions" where we see Bill Gates portrayed as the savior of human-kind. Maybe the Windows logo will change to a cross when you shutdown too.
--
--
If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
When I read this story today, I was thinking the same thing at work today since I work for SQA department.:)
-- Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Now that's how to market a SERVICE pack :)
by
drares
·
· Score: 1
"We're very interested in having as many people as possible--new PC buyers and installed base--take advantage of the work we've done in SP 2."
-- "If you want to truly understand something, try to change it." (Kurt Lewis)
Re:Of COURSE, tabbed browsing is *completely* usel
by
obeythefist
·
· Score: 1
Try using tabbed browsing in Firefox or Mozilla before you start claiming it's useless. I use tabbed browsers exclusively on Windows.
I use opera. Opera, by default, is configured with tabbed browsing. One of the first things I turn off, too.
This choice has nothing to do with window management by any particular OS, and everything to do with my browsing habits. I presently have 16 tabs open in my browser. I'm a translator, I need to have lots of things open at once -- online references like Wikipedia, corporate IR pages, and dictionaries; Google; my webmail; and other fun things like Slashdot:).
If you use windows, you can group like tasks on the start menu easily enough. If you use Linux, then depending on the capabilities of your window manager you might be able to find a solution. One thing is for certain: If you rely on your web browser for window management then your operating system is lacking or you are not using it correctly. Which is why tabbed browsing is abhorrent.
Any windowing system becomes unacceptably cluttered if I use untabbed browsing and try to accomplish the same effect. ALT-TAB becomes a mess.
On the other hand, by using tabbed browsing, you lose about 50% of your screen to tabs for all the windows you have open, right? I value my real estate more than most people then.
And for that matter, try using a mature *nix distro before you make unfounded (or perhaps just misinformed) accusations.
Ahh and the inevitable personal attack, this is what really sells Linux to the general populace. I use Redhat 9.0 when I'm not using Windows, but I've used several different distros and window managers in the past. The high level of fragmentation in Linux makes window management even more difficult, as one method for management will work fine on one desktop, but it won't on another without configuring it the same way first. Windows tends to act very predictably no matter where you find it, however.
-- I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
Except for bullet time :)
by
cliveholloway
·
· Score: 1
for one it's a really cool effect, for the other, a rather overused daily experience for people with less than half a gig of RAM in their machines:)
cLive;-)
-- --
Trinity in high heels carrying a whip:
The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
You mean it is a Cadillac commercial ?
by
MojoReisen
·
· Score: 1
So it is really a Cadillac commercial posing as an OS ? Or is it a Glock commercial posing as an OS? I hope it has those cool cell phones too.
-- "Nothing is impossible for the man who refuses to listen to reason"
Issuing an update to XP would represent a significant shift for the software maker, which for months has insisted that it had no plans to create a separate version of Windows before Longhorn.
This is all good. It's a clear sign that they're getting shaky, that they don't know what to do.
What's that oft-used Gandhi quote that ends with 'we win'?
THIS IS A HOAX. This is not from News.com
by
bluestarschmoko
·
· Score: 0
The link is to http://news.com.com-- not news.com. How did several hundred tech nerds get duped by a juvenile trick like this!?!
schmoko.
Didn't see that coming... 'Cause the "alpha" of Longhorn dosen't look a thing like XP updated a bit... SE maybe... or taking a cue from squarenix, "XP-2" (same old shit, looks slightly better). Now if they'd mail out service pack cd's for ME, then I'd be excited...
Re:Of COURSE, tabbed browsing is *completely* usel
by
zooblethorpe
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
A couple thoughts --
I've gotten used to using ALT-TAB to switch between apps, as in browser to word processor, so for me, tabs are great. Sure, I can bundle like app windows under Windows or Linux, but that just doesn't fit my personal style. Go figure.
On the other hand, by using tabbed browsing, you lose about 50% of your screen to tabs for all the windows you have open, right? I value my real estate more than most people then.
I hear you about screen real estate. But then you have me confused; what browser do you use that takes up half the screen just for the tabs? Does Opera do that? I haven't messed with it in a while, as Opera had problems rendering Japanese. Firefox uses barely a pinky's-width, about as much as the URL bar. Maybe as much as 1/8 of the screen for the app bar, menu bar, URL bar, tab bar, and status bar together.
If you rely on your web browser for window management then your operating system is lacking or you are not using it correctly. Which is why tabbed browsing is abhorrent.
I smell a stylistic issue here. Your response nicely showed that my points were partly based on my ignorance of your experience. Forgive me for that. However, "you are not using (your OS) correctly" seems to carry things a bit too far -- part of any good system is the flexibility to use it in many different ways, no? If I choose to group my browser windows in the browser, I fail to see what sin lies in that.
Ahh and the inevitable personal attack,
Actually, a fine point, but I think I was attacking your comments to the effect that *nix systems don't manage windows well. Nothing ad hominem in that.
I use Redhat 9.0 when I'm not using Windows, but I've used several different distros and window managers in the past. The high level of fragmentation in Linux makes window management even more difficult, as one method for management will work fine on one desktop, but it won't on another without configuring it the same way first.
By "desktop" I assume you mean either "windows manager" or "linux distro", rather than the various virtual desktops provided in a single X session. If this is correct, your statement is quite similar to "window management doesn't work the same on several different OSes.
Um, yes. Windows and the Windows window manager are inseparable; the OS and the desktop are one and the same. Swapping desktop managers under linux is effectively similar to changing the complete userland OS under the Windows monolithic paradigm. To exaggerate a little, your comment is a little like "it doesn't work the same on Mac as it does on Windows". Or for the linux savvy, "Gnome and KDE are different." No surprises there.
I'll grant you that a greater level of standardization would be lovely, not just for the end user but for developers as well. I think that's what the Freedesktop.org project is all about, so this is in the works.
Windows tends to act very predictably no matter where you find it, however.
You bring up a good point here -- Windows, through its hegemony, offers a common user experience. There is something of value in this, and the OSS community would be unwise to sneer. Thankfully, many seem wise enough to save the baby from the bathwater, and are putting in the effort to find what works in Windows.
To hearken back to your earlier posting:
Everything in MS applications looks and feels the same, this is what has enabled MS to keep the desktop, and it's a key point of failure for linux on the desktop.
A good point -- the Principle of Least Surprise plays in here. Users expect a particular look and feel, in terms of where menu items are if not necessarily the specific widget set. Straying from this de facto standard of expectations will almost inevitably make a program less popular. Ask anyone who's used Adobe graphics products versus, say,
-- "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?" "A four-foot prune."
it'll have a pager and virtual desktops and they'll call it an innovation???
-- Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
Enough of the matrix jokes
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Were all aware that the name reloaded referes to a terrible cash cow of a movie and that this crappy os is similar in nature but 500 people have already said it. I love that linux is finally putting pressure on microsoft. They may inprove with Longhorn, but this interim release will suck (terrible flash back of ME, people paid me to downgrade their pc's to 98se). I will never go back until i can root# emerge windowskernel-x.0.0. Like that will ever happen. Man I love portage. But seriously I love the new Athlon 64's and I wanna see some OS support. I hope a suitable new realses of the GNOME and productivity apps like Ooo with 64-bit support are realesed before Longhorn.
"Windows XP Revolutions" - The fork() of B. Gates.
Re: '98SE - a commercialized service pack....
by
iainl
·
· Score: 0, Troll
Personally, I did this perfectly legally. Microsoft Europe, in some bizarre moment of benevolence, shipped me a free "Second Edition Upgrade" disk that turned 98 into 98SE in return for the proof of purchase bit off the retail 98 box.
Of course, I then proceeded to do a fresh install with an OEM copy of SE rather than use the upgrade disc, as I then had fewer random bits of cruft lying around. But thats another story.
Windows is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you boot up, when you go to work, when you pay your taxes. It is the OS that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
What truth?
That you are a slave, Neo. Like evreyone else you were born into bondage. Born into a prison you cannot taste or smell or touch. A prison for your computer.
What is XP? Control. XP is a system, built in order to change a human being...
What feature would longhorn contain that would make Linux a tough sell?
One of the major obstacles in the way of broader adoption of GNU/Linux and Free Software in general has been lock-in to Microsoft's proprietary file formats. OpenOffice.org is a good attack on this, but MS has a lot of smart people working on new lock-in strategies. In my view, currently the "digital rights management" stuff is the most dangerous of these, especially in view of the DMCA.
-- iF yOu WAnT to C YOUr iP agaIn
gAThEr tWO MilLIon dOLLArS IN
Non - cONsEcuTivE TweNtY's
AnD AWaiT FuRThER iNstrUctIoN
millenium
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
why not just call it millenium XP
Re:Of COURSE, tabbed browsing is *completely* usel
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
If you rely on your web browser for window management then your operating system is lacking or you are not using it correctly.
Oh yes, XP is definitely lacking a way of grouping all those 32 IE windows into one window (note that I did not say task bar group), making it easy to switch between the different pages.
Of course I could just continue using firebird, which does this nicely.
-- Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently. - Henry Ford
This is, actually, the version numbering used
by
CrystalFalcon
·
· Score: 4, Informative
This is actually the scheme used, except the third number is the build number. This is a huge number that increments every day, but is exactly what you propose, in a sense: each day sees many small fixes and increments to the code base.
What Marketing calls "Windows XP" internally carries the product name "Windows" and the version number "5.1.2600".
One will note that this reveals that Windows XP is considered a minor release from Windows 2k, which was 5.0.2195.
Already running it...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I am already running XP reloaded, and reloaded, and reloaded, and reloaded again. Every 3 to 6 months it is reloaded otherwise my PC become completely incumbered by Microsoft's cruft. They should call it XP reformatted, reinstalled, and reconfigured:)
Matrix...oh wait Windows Reloaded
by
m00dawg
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
Doesn't Windows Reloaded soudn a lot like Matrix Reloaded? I mean they even made a Matrix spoof.
It's for MONEY. You are correct, their upgrade revenue stream needs some more cash. For what, I don't know. Microsoft has more money than most small countries.
I've heard it likened to a pasta machine. The pasta is always coming out the spout, every so often Microsoft cuts some off and sells it.
I already have XP Reloaded
by
AskFirefly
·
· Score: 1
It just hangs there, as though suspended in mid-air....
--
I'm not a human, but I play one on T.V.
Re:I already have XP Reloaded
by
UrGeek
·
· Score: 1
Yes, but it is so BITCHIN' in that black PVC catsuit and nice when you do the rotation, YEAH, BABY!
This has been a very funny thread
by
RodeoBoy
·
· Score: 1
Rebooted was good, but rebloaded has got to be my favorite. All joking aside they may really have a reason for wanting to do this. Currently I have been evaluating the new windows 2003 for the company I work for. We are an M$ partner in crime. Anywho my point is when I installed 2003 the first thing that struck me was how fast and responsive it was. Not just compared to a XP install, but while running a webserver, dns, and all sorts of other extra server process that have no business running on a desktop it runs faster then w2k pro. If they can make the XP client run a bit quicker, especially running.net apps it may be a good thing.
And I am sure making a few exta million to this is not a bad thing from their perspective.
Geez Louise....
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Time to put on the hip-waders people the bullshit is getting pretty thick in here today.....
So Microsoft seems to be trying to associate Windows XP to the Matrix, which was essentially software that got out of hand and enslaved humanity.
Very interesting.
Inline interpretation of Greg Sullivan's quote...
by
bcgvaos
·
· Score: 1
"Calling it an interim {money} release {money}is overstating the {money} current {money} plan," Sullivan said. "We are exploring {money} ways to {make more money} add {money} value to {money}Windows {money} XP."
OR...
"...{I need to get a new yatch and if this idea pans out even just a bit. I will be so MONEY!}"
Global Warming & Wierd Weather
by
Tassach
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Global warming does not result in a uniform raise in temperature around the world. It results in more extreme weather.
All weather is caused by the uneven heating of the Earth by the Sun. Global warming magnifies the effect. Hot spots get hotter, and do so faster, causing a larger temperature differential. Higher temperature make water evaporate faster, causing more clouds, which causes even more uneven heating.
In the short term this causes more extreme conditions -- larger storms occuring more frequently, hotter summers, colder winters, more erratic and unseasonable temperature changes, and so forth. More severe storms disrupt the hydrological cycle, dumping all thier rain in one area, causing flooding in some places and droughts elsewhere. In the longer term it causes major climatic shifts -- changes in ocean currents in wind patterns.
-- Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
... all that stuff about the average global temperature going up....
... is about average global temperature going up, go figure! Since at least the late 1980s most climate models have predicted that this would be accompanied by an increase in the frequency and strength of extreme weather conditions (eg extreme snow storms), not by a uniform increase in local temperatures.
your post reminds me
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
of the time my then-friend had just gotten a brand-new dual pentium 400mhz box with a bunch of neat periphs (3d glasses, tv tuner, good surroundsound setup, 3d games).
He was installing NT 4.0 and telling me how *great* it was, because it was designed for businesses etc, and (he said) "it never crashes".
He got about 3 minutes into the install before the first crash. It crashed 4 times before he finished the install. Unless you count patching your system as part of the install process >:->
I Googled "XP Reloaded" just for kicks.
Based on the results page, I think they really do need another release -- nearly every single query result was a question about how to reload the operating system because a bunch of shit just stopped working!
Once XP Reloaded comes out, I can't wait to query for "XP Reloaded Reloaded" and see if the number of results returned decreases at all, or if the MS tards just add more bugs with every "bug fix". Hahahaha!
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
Is this a fortelling of things to come? Did the Oracle prophetize these events? Is it fate that the next two versions of windows are doomed to be over hyped and inferior to the original in nearly every way shape and form?
Warner Bros takes Billy to court over using the name Reloaded.
Actually what I'm thrilled about (even if others say its horribly inefficient) is the 3D accelerated desktop that is supposed to be in Longhorn, and doing away with 2D acceleration. The Mac has it, why can't we?
Though I doubt Reloaded will have it as it would take away the Longhorn hype
Candle burns its brightest in the dark
... and I'm not afraid to mod-bomb Matrix idiocy. :P
XP Rebooted?
Or can it?
Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
This reminds me of a phrase posted here on slashdot about the movie " How about I give you the finger and you give me my 10 dollars back!"
how long until
If it sucks as much in comparison to XP as Matrix Reloaded did in comparison to Matrix, forget about crashing all the time... this thing won't even boot up!!!
Daniel
Carpe Diem
...followed in 2006 by Longhorn, aka "Microsoft XP Revolutions"
Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
Somehow, this seems like a sequel nobody wants to see...
Remember what happened when XP missed its deadline... Microsoft ended up shipping WindowsMe which in most circles stands for "Mistake Edition".
We know the real reason they're putting this out. It's not for the innovation value, but that sales of the XP Update have started to tail off, and this will convince some people who already have XP to buy the upgrade...
Why do I get the feeling that the lead programmer on this project is called Neo?
Do they know how many times I've "reloaded" XP for friends and family members? Seriously.
Not much difference from what they did with 98SE or 95B (or 95C).
Says the latest virus to XP.
What's next.. Windows Revolutions?
must be metallica fans...
Windows RG
...XP is just a facelift to Win2k
kinda like the matrix reloaded... does that mean it will be ok and have some decent fight scenes but overall be worse than the original? or does it mean Bill Gates is reloading the virtual word we live in convinced that we have a good and stable OS but really we are all prisoners?? ...AGHHHH GOD SAVE US!
Matt
You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
They better not release it under that title because it sounds a lot more like infringement to me than "Lindows" does. Well, maybe that's a bit extreme, but it's something to think about nonetheless.
This is one of the stupidest things I've read this week.
Hmmm... so lots of special effects but not a lot of substance? I can't wait for the sequel to the sequel!
Matt Fahrenbacher
James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
I'm always well-up for the next version of Windows, but this may just dilute the impact of Longhorn for me. And also I thought LH was due out 2006-2007? Reloaded will probably just delay it further.
Jesus. That's so lame.
That's like in high school when you'd be hanging out at your friend's house and his dad would be one of those guys who thought he was cool but he was actually terribly out of touch. You know, the kind of guy who would come downstairs in like 1998 and say something like, "What are you guys doing? Listening to Nirvana?" in a desperate attempt to seem cool and "with it."
-- atomly
Today, while I was browsing Slashdot, Windows XP for no particular reason brought up its BSOD and demanded a reboot.
While that was happening, I realized it had been about two and a half years since XP came out. It seems like MS operating systems aways start to wear out after 2-3 years, just in time for the new release to claim it fixes all of those bugs...
if this OS will have full 64bit compatiablity? As if it doesn't it could seriously slow down 64bit sales, as I for one was waiting for Longhorn to upgrade to 64bit, and I know a lot of my friends were.
When anger rises, think of the consequences.
Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
Definitely going to be the blue pill.
...the bomb. No, I mean: ...for jokes galore. Consider:
"Like the original, except everyone's disappointed with it."
"Reloaded? More like reBOOTed! BURN!"
"Here comes Desktop Agent Clippy Smith! 'It looks like you're trying to type a letter, Mister Anderson...'"
"XP has you!"
And so on.
"A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
Perfect. I guess there won't be any silly copyright issue over the name. My winbox was doing the slow bullet scene long befroe the Matrix.
Heck, I can reload XP for free . . . but at least even Microsoft is now acknowledging that is one of the only way to fix their buggy software.
I hope it's not another Windows ME style dead-end branch of the Windows tree. US customers need to get the rumored stripped-down Windows that the EU may be getting. Windows, without all the unwanted crap, would be interesting to see. BN
Did they license the Matrix Reloaded trademark? Or maybe they're just a bunch of hippocrates.
At least windows is getting better with each successive release. The Matrix on the other had just kept getting worse.
Does that mean there's going to be a shit load of exploits produced in the current XP ?
So this is basically just going to be Windows XP, with the new service pack? Sounds to me like its just a way that they can push back the release of Longhorn and save a bit of face.
I'd call it Mandrake 10! Coming soon, download the beta today from Mandrake!
Even if you've never used a Linux based operating system before, you won't be disapointed!
...with Duke Nukem: Forever will be particularly popular.
AC comments get piped to
Gives new meaning to "a glitch in the matrix", doesn't it?
*crickets*
sorry.
I've got more mod points and GMail invi
if some courts believe that Lindows cannot use it's name because it sounds too similar to "Windows", would they also agree that "XP reloaded" cannot be used since it sounds like WB's movie?
...remember good 'ol times when IP used to mean Internet Protocol....
From RTFM (yeah I know....slashdot..rtfm doesn't happen), it basically seems like MS is going to just rebundle XP, slap on a slightly different name, and sell that. Kinda like 98 Plus!, only XP Plus! is the newest OS, and XP gets closer and closer to End of Support. Am I the only one who sees this?
Reloading XP (dead face emoticon) is still XP (another dead face emoticon)...
XP
Hah.
I'll bet anything that MS is just releasing a new version of XP so they can have all of that lovely DRM support built into an OS, since Longhorn is so far off.
My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
In obvious homage to pioneering helpdesk personell, who's reply for help might go something like this:
Guy: Hey PCTechMan, My computer has a virus.
PCTech: We should reinstall windows.
Guy: My mouse is stuck!
PCTech: I've seen this before! We'll need to format and Reload Windows Reloaded.
Guy: IT'S ON FIRE! I'M ON FIRE! IT'S HOT!
PCTech: I suggest we Ghost it.
Though, I'm upset I'll have to wait longer to make lude references to "Longhorn".
"Hm... upgrades."
Is anyone going to see this for anything other than a thinly-veiled attempt to just keep the money rolling in between now and whenever Longhorn ships?
If so, that person needs to be tracked down and slapped with a clue stick.
All that remains to be seen is what backwards compatability Microsoft will break in an attempt to force people to upgrade. Or maybe they'll pull the old "no more security patches for $OS. upgrade to $newerOS" trick.
Model an OS full of security holes after a movie full of plot holes - this might be an apt choice of names afterall...... If they remodel the Office Help function to give "Oracle-esque" advice....that might prove amusing as well. "Well, some people might want to tell you to ask yourself the same question, or you might just want to access the Analysis Toolpack - but me - I'd just say have a cookie and sit down - all will be clear in time"
Reloaded is just an internal name for it..
Secondly, the article talks of an interim release. They wouldn't want to call something that breaks compatibility a service pack.
They probably want to build in a bunch of support for cooly new hardware. Pretty much like Windows 98 SE, they needed an update bigger than a service pack to get USB, etc, working..
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
"We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
Sounds more like they are Exploring (TM) ways to add value to Microsoft.
Belloc
I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
Honestly, we should have seen this one coming. What do you want to bet that the "new features" included in "Reloaded" are all going to be stuff that belongs in a gratis Service Pack? It's the Microsoft OS Production/Marketing Paragidm:
1. Release Buggy OS
2. Make $Umteen Million on OS
3. Fix some of the bugs
4. Release less buggy version of same OS
5. Make another $Umteen Million.
6. CYA by saying that anything not fixed in this will addressed in vaporware OS
Ok, let's come back to reality...I'll take the blue one!
Karma: Very Very Very Very Bad
Does this mean it will have lots of pretty graphics and effects with little actually substance and meaning behind it? Like other things titled "Reloaded"?
Outdoor digital photography, mostly in New Engl
--Tsiangkun
Windows free since 1998
All the windowsupdates and servicepacks have removed all the good'ol bugs, so they just need another reload before the huge longhorned one arrives...
Microsoft learned their lesson from the huuuuuuuuge gaps between not only NT4 and Win2000, but between NT service packs. Forgot it for a little bit, and something must have reminded them. What they really need to do is get service packs back on some kind of schedule. Critical security fixes exempted of course. And quit calling them service packs when they're really (remember these from the DOS days?) step-up versions.
Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
Reminds me of this great spoof. The end is really terrific :)
Donate free food here
If they do this then there's no excuse except for spite for them to not fix their CSS inheritance, positionaing and box model bugs. Their line before was "oh, we're not working on that anymore and for some reason we can't tell you making padding and border attributes work correctly would require an OS rewrite which we're not doing until Longhorn."
Before you can release a crappy sequel to a good movie/OS, you first must have a good movie/OS. I don't think WinXP qualifies.
Or maybe they're just a bunch of hippocrates.
What, they are ancient greek doctors?
My Karma: ran over your Dogma
StrawberryFrog
MS could do a lot worse than 2003 Server (which I'm running as a desktop right now). Put in the reliability, the default security configurations, the actually excellent IIS 6 and the snappier desktop feel/memory management and you'd have a winner on the desktop.
Will he be in Windows Reloaded as the animated character?
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Whatever happened to Microsoft's bovine naming scheme? I was looking forward to another mountain cat tearing a cow to pieces.
Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
Africus aut Europaeus?
[rantorama]
Every other friggin' product/event/whatever this last year has been been "XXX Reloaded". It's meaningless and stupid. C'mon marketers, learn a new phrase...
Unless "reloaded" now means "mediocre followup"... in which case, "XP Reloaded" is redundant.
[/rantorama]
"Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
Man, I thought we got past all of those matrix jokes last fall. At least they didn't piss off the Macheads with "Windows XP: Attack of the Clones." All joking aside, I do think that the XP:reloaded is just a code name.
-
Tech News, Reviews and Tutorials
And delayed. Point is, to me this indicates that Longhorn's release date just became slightly more tentative than it was before. Which is a good thing for alternative operating systems like the growing and ever-improving GNU/Linux.
And in the short term it's a good thing for Microsoft, as some people are likely to fork over the $100 (or whatever) upgrade.
Woah....
webpage
Kinda sounds like a bad sequel.
2) The phone number of MS, so you call them when ever you change a piece of hardware and that stupid internet activation doesn't work any more, after only two install on the same PC.
3) No media player, Thanks eurotrash.
4) No web browser or will there be more than one, which it will load all of them just in case you couldn't make up your mind when did the install questions.
5) DRM DRM DRM DRM DRM and some more DRM that...
6) Spies on your media and playing habits.
7) A more "cat" like user interface?
8) MS-tunes(TM) for your M-capsule(TM)?
Will there be red and blue editions?
How about XP Unplugged? Now that I'd pay money for.
Yeah it already came with XP Preloaded.
... the line of prototype Macs called "project Sagan".
Carl Sagan brought (or threatened?) a suit against Apple.
In response, Apple simply renamed it (unofficially, of course) "project butthead scientist".
Infringement problem solved!
Microsoft will be announcing further products in their "Reloaded" range which will include Office Reloaded, Visual Studio Reloaded, Outlook Reloaded and The Browser, Reloaded.
... I guess
With Microsoft's history of bloated software I kind of expected their next release to be called Windows XS.
Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
My guess is that the Longhorn will not be out soon enough for those who bought XP under software assurance program. By having a forced update out, MS can claim that the software assurance program is indeed a good buy.
1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
tell Microsoft that their calenders are all fucked up.
April 1st is a ways away yet.
Or is this more from the new Microsoft Time Travel Engine (TM)?
God, you'd think that after their latest public gaff that they'd just hunker down for a while and rethink their strategy, but NO...
I'm over the line from disgusted to sheer pity. Must be some good crack they're smoking over at 1 MS Way.
Fer crying out loud
Vulnerabilities aren't exploited until we release a patch for the "hackers" to reverse engineer, and NOW THEY'RE GOING TO PATCH IN A MAJOR WAY THE WHOLE OS.
gaaarrrgghhhhhhh *choke*
SB
It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
Look, everyone knows (or should, by now) that the only part of XP that really NEEDS overhauling is IE. After the new stuff coming up in SP2 (security fixes, software firewall, built-in antivirus, etc.), that'll _still_ be the only thing that needs an overhaul. A popup blocker in IE with SP2 isn't going to cure the REAL ills of IE, namely, horrid CSS & PNG support. Merely fixing those two things would get me to buy an XP upgrade. As a web designer/developer, that is my number one, EVERY DAY biggest obstacle to computing happiness. Where do I want to go today, Microsoft asks. I want to go to that happy land where IE properly & fully supports CSS 1 & 2 & PNG. Is that so much to ask? Hell, just properly implementing what you started in the original IE 6 would be enough!
Screw Fermat's Last Theorem. MS spending time adding a _popup blocker_ to IE when the PNG & CSS issues remain is the biggest mystery of our time. If they add tabs and _still_ don't fix CSS & PNG, I'm gonna totally lose it.
Yet another OS we have to stick in our testing matrix. Sigh...
Who Knows, will Dot marry a useless GUI or a XP worm/virus/trojan!
This is Mike the TV, saying Stay tuned!
They tried this once before and it was a flop. Consider WinME (98 Reloaded). For the record, I'm not anti-MS, but WinME was awful. I worked on a few boxes for some friends and it was the biggest joke of an OS. I'm alight with 98 and XP, but IMHO a "stepping stone" OS is only going to hurt them... again.
do MS set themselves up whenever they name a product or give an idea. I remember the MS Stinkerphone (Stinger) as one example. I mean please, the connotations you could get from XP Reloaded alone are a cause for concern about their mental state at Redmond!
Jonathanjk.com
Anyway, I read the article, and I loved this quote from Window's lead project manager:
"We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
To me, that sounds like newspeak for "We are exploring ways to get existing XP users to pony up extra cash."
What's funny about all this is the article talks all about the prospect for this new XP release, without mentioning even one feature Reloaded would contain. Go figure.
Here's some wild speculation: Longhorn development is running into problems that are further delaying development, so Microsoft is responding with a stopgap operating system. Maybe they should call it OS9 instead of Reloaded.
Anyway, from a Linux advocate's perspective, anything that pushes back Longhorn has to be considered a good thing. Longhorn will no doubt come with some compelling features that will make Linux a harder sell. So the longer it takes to be released, the more time Linux has to establish its foothold.
Note that I'm not saying that Longhorn will be a product I'd want to have. Every new release of Windows seems to be more restrictive than the last, and what little I understand about .NET terrifies me. Still, there's no denying that some users will view Longhorn as sort of the OSX release of Windows.
I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
Of course, what Microsoft is trying to do is to have their cake and eat it too. They want the ubiquitous distribution of their Operating System by making deals with OEMs and retailers. They also want people to pay the ridiculous off-the-shelf upgrade prices. These people that upgrade to Pro end up paying twice.
I personally do not pay the MS tax, I just borrow a CD. I own XP home, but I install XP Pro on my computer. Don't use it regularly, only for games and stuff.
Please tell me the Longhorn desktop is NOT going to be 3D only, with no 2D acceleration. I mean, I have no problem with a desktop having lots of 3D effects for people who like them, but at least give us the chance to TURN THE DAMN CHROME OFF!
...And so on...
It seems like every time a new class of CPUs come out that can keep up with bloated GUIs, Windows blows up the CPU power needed to drive its GUI exponentially.
Remember when a DX2-66 was all you needed to make Win3.1 draw fast? Along came 95
Remember when a P5-166 was all you needed to make Win95 draw fast? Along came Win98
Remember when a PIII was all you needed to make Win2K draw fast?
I hope I speak for others when I say, I don't need fancy-schmancy glowing texture-wrapped widgets, window transparancy, or realtime updated iconified windows. I need to use my computer to get stuff done!
... that Longhorn will be even more delayed. As others in the thread have noted, this is exactly what happened with 95 (B and C) and 98SE and ME's entire reason for existance.
Today we have learned that "new intermediate version" means "omigod, I am up to my eyeballs in delays, and I don't want to look like an ass to my users^W customers"
The previous sig has been removed due to
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
Just like Windows 95B and Windows 98SE where good things in their own way, a second edition or "reloaded" version of XP for those who haven't bought it yet would certainly help. For one thing they could do what they're trying to do in SP2 - correct their mistake of assuming the average user is more intelligent then a potted plant (the plant will actually move towards sunlight at an incredibly slow rate). By locking down Windows hard out of the box they can make the trade off of more tech support calls about people who don't know that they have to open ports to run game servers, rather then the constent barrage of bad press because their users open exe files using a 6 year old version of Outlook and run them because the anonymous email with spelling mistakes told them to.
Remember Windows ME, filling the gap between 98/NT4 and Windows 2000?
The most unstable OS I've (n)ever used.
this is nothing new. ive had windows reloaded at least once a year since 1995.
Gyrate Dot Org - "Where high-tech meets low-life"
Maybe this is longhorn?
Evil Bill: You see, in order to make me twice as rich as that guy over at Virgin I've decided to re-release WinXP, I call it XP Reloaded
Ballmer: [laughs]
Evil Bill: What?
Ballmer: Nothing, Neo.
Evil Bill: What did you call me?
Ballmer: Nothing. [coughing] Rip-off!
Evil Bill: Bless you.
500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
the windows matrix
Stop the madness, we don't want another WinME!! Please no!
Just like Windows 98SE, MS probably said "hey, this up and coming service pack is pretty nice....... lets charge for it!"
As per the article, this is its "internally referred to name", probably a nickname given to it by the developers. I would bet real money that this has never been intended to be used outside the developers group, much less MS itself. Watch out for something like WinXP SE.
Note that the only MS person quoted in the article is never quoted as calling it XP Reloaded, its only implied ("Sullivan said that the possible release of XP Reloaded does not indicate a delay for Longhorn." is not a quote, but sounds more like something Cnet bodged together out of the info it had to hand), but an external analysist did, clear indication that this is a pet name for the project and not its official title.
forgot the spaces or the ecode tags to allow for the and tags, oops
use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
All it takes is a glance at the imdb.
I think "you got served" is a pretty good candidate myself.
Don't you know that Longhorn is waiting for Duke Nukem Forever to be released to really show all of it's capabilities?
One you missed.
It's really quite funny.
MS wants to delay thier loghorn release even more due to
...well except that RH is open source, and MS isnt. Well, actually MS is open source, but not legally. Well except for 'shared source'. But you get the idea!
a. Wanting to get some more features in (search engine to combat google?)
b. Some features taking longer to finish then expected
They want a way to keep thier customer rather then crossing thier fingers for more then 5 years.
Can someone say, standard buisness practice?
Its like Redhat backporting features from 2.6 into 2.4 till 2.6 is stable.
This completes the three R trilogy!
Retried. Rebooted. Reloaded.
Free XBox, PS2
Whilst I'm thinking of it - is the user page borked for everyone else, or is it just me? It's also not showing a comment I made about 30-45 mins ago, but it is showing the one I just now made. Did someone from the IE team join Slashdot? :)
Eventually after six months, and Windows slows down or goes belly up,
everyone runs Windows, reloaded. (Probably more than once).
According to the article, the Reloaded name is an internal name they are using, like a codename, not the actual product name the public will see. Besides, you're comparing apples to oranges. One is an OS that sounds like another OS, the other is an OS that sounds like a movie. Which one do you think may cause confusion?
And, like Agent Smith, the purpose of XP Reloaded is for it to copy itself over all other existing OSes.
I know what it feels like when XP Reloaded detects and overwrites my Gentoo partition. It feels like dying.
I suppose they have to have some way of keeping the OS division cash flow positive until they get round to releasing "The Next Big Thing"
Mind you, doesn't the release when it's ready sound a lot like Duke Nukem Forever ?
"We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
WOW! So this new reloaded is gonna be out in like... 10 years or so?
Uh huh... well its about time.
You would think they would start off with this idea in mind.
Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
I'm afraid your use of the word 'cool' shows that you're hopelessly out of touch.
Great, it will arrive with a whole new family of exploits/patches flying in trail.
Will they be coming out with an updated version of Internet Explorer? IE is already seriously almost everybody else in terms of standards support (not that they were ever near the front). When they have to be very seriously pressured to release just one measley patch, it means they either don't care anymore, or they're working on something big. Just release something, please, so web developers don't have to keep suffering when developing for the lame uninformated masses that are stuck behind.
All I have to say is:
"Whoa"
"This is going to feel, a little weird"
A windows OS without security issues is like a pizza without the dough.
There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
most of us won't be able to afford it.
-- Lemmy
Those who fail to remember Windows Me are doomed to repeat it.
In Soviet Russia, all our base are belong to you!
Whoah!
I love the marketing spin: "We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP." That's what you and I call fundrasing.
"My Windows XP just crashed. Now I gotta reload it" :D
... I'll just wait for it to come on TV.
I just can't wait for Windows XP Revolutions to come out. Instead of the BSOD we will see Bill with a glowing cross from his chest. He is the one.
Dustin - A different story...
It reminds me of this Bill Gates Matrix spoof:
http://www.fromp.org/gates-1.jpg
# wrote sig.txt, 23 lines, 31337 chars
...as it's the only way to get a really secure Windows box.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Maybe this time, Neo took the blue pill.
That'd explain why he's working on software for The Man, after all...
"We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
I've seen a lot less problems since people have started getting XP machines. For stability it just doesn't even compare to the 9x series. XP often runs for weeks at a time without reboots, and in most cases you can go several months without a reformat & re-install. It's definately in a class of it's own.
------
Wireless-Enabled Hosting(tm)
a patched up version to keep the income stream happening. Which doesn't mean it won't have some interesting stuff, but the MS history is that it will wind up as another dead end.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
Wasn't there a poll about annoying naming buzzwords recently? Win XP Reloaded is too many buzzwords for me. What next? HypermegaLH Y2K+5 cyber-XP? I'm so good, I should go into marketing... for Microsoft.
I've taken to having a bootable CD of Knoppix handy in case I need a workable environment when I'm out and about. When asked I just say it's the 'red pill' for your PC: you computer gets to see the real world, even if it's a little rougher. :-)
I think Microsoft has chosen the perfect name... ;-)
There is no service pack
AT&ROFLMAO
aka Linux
With MsSQL ontop of NTFS longhorn is promising to be even slower than past systems. The hybrid model that i have seen is just adding a layer ontop of NTFS. Not really a new filesystem like ReiserFS but another layer eating cpu cycles and memory. Hardware probably needs to catch up before it can be used in a grander scale.
Since Longhorn seems to be so long into the future and MS desperatly needs their upgrade fix an interim XP sounds possible. Think Windows Me and Windows 98 SE for a clue (lets hope that Longhorn stinks as bad as Windows Me did if that is humanly possible). MS has set themselves up on a 3 year upgrade sell and a step of that cycle is a significant blow to their earnings.
As a side note i dont deem Longhorn that much of an improvement over XP that it is worth waiting for. From what ive seen its just babysteps they have taken. And that is natural, any bigger changes is going to break a lot of applications in perspective of MS merry strife to lock applications to x86.
HTTP/1.1 400
XP Rebooted
When will Revelotion come then?
See Above Title
I still haven't "upgraded" to Win XP, because in order to upgrade to XP, I need to have upgraded Win95 to Win98, Win98 to WinME or Win2K and then to WinXP. Of course, I could upgrade directly from W98 to XP, but it'd cost more than upgrading from ME or 2K
That's what p****s me off about MS - why can't I go straight to this XP reloaded from Win98 (if/when it drops) FOR A REASONABLE PRICE??
After all, I'll be going straight from a PCI Nvidia Riva TNT2 to an uberAGP 32x GeForce 7.7i Touring Special when Duke Nukem 4ever drops...
Meanwhile, I'll stay with Mandrake. I love Mandy...
Remember how Win98 was supposed to be the last of the DOS-based OSs? ... but then Microsoft couldn't ship Windows 2000 in time, so they threw some extra crap into Win98SE and called it Millennium Edition.
Sounds to me like XP Reloaded is the next Windows Me.
*shudder*
...overhyped, tedious and a huge disappointment, but not nearly as bad as what comes after it?
You must think in Russian.
W32.MyDoomX will own this OS.
Had to say it
Intel givith and Microsoft taketh away
This reminds me of the Gates and Balmer Matrix parody. I think Bill Gates should come out and admit that he really is Neo, then beat up a bunch of reporters with a pole like that kid did in school, pretending they were all copies of Agent Smith.
I'm a little surprised this is big news. Of course they were going to release a new version of Windows before Longhorn. The shareholders were going to complain if the Microsoft Windows division didn't produce any revenue for a year because of no new product being released. It would have been cutting off half of Microsofts revenue.
Are things really going that badly that they need to add some more eye candy to XP and then try to resell it to us as a "new" OS? First off the people on 98 are sticking to 98. Especially since 98 is now going to be supported for years to come. At this point they are only going to update once they buy a new PC. Secondly those on 2k/XP especially businesses are NOT going to buy into this refresh. So who the hell is their market? This literally makes no sense to me. What companies are going to upgrade from either 2k/XP to XP reloaded in late 2004 early 2005 and then upgrade to Longhorn a year later? Sorry, not gonna happen.
Or is this because of Linux? As nice as that would be I honestly don't think MS has a lot to worry about right now from the Linux desktop. When companies like Adobe and Intuit start officially supporting linux then its time for MS to panic.
Anyway like I said this just makes no sense. Good luck selling this update Microsoft, your going to need it.
If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
Wow basing a failed operating system name on a failed operating system.. How amazingly appropreate.
WindowsXP: Kill Bill vol.1?
"Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
Well, it's better than Windows XP: A New Hope.
Or, as someone else said, Windows XP: Return of the King.
Maybe a better name would be Windows XP: The Phantom Menace.
Or Windows XP 2: 2 Farked 2 Frivolous.
Is it me or does it seem that Microsoft lacked total creativity when coming up with this cheesey, Matrix rip-off of a name?
APPLE, SAGAN MAKE PEACE
Apple Computer and astronomer Carl Sagan have reached an "amicable" settlement over Apple's use of Sagan's name as an internal project code-name. When Sagan objected last year, Apple renamed the project "BHA," allegedly short for "Butt-Head Astronomer." Sagan then sued for defamation of character, lost the case and appealed. The settlement ends the legal wrangling, and both sides say they're happy. (Wall Street Journal 16 Nov 95 B11)
Apple once used Carl Sagan's name as an internal code name. Carl didn't like it, and sued, so Apple changed the name.
To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
Mr. Balmer,
I am not an idiot. The company that I work for is not populated by idiots, either.
It has become increasingly apparent in the past few years that Microsoft is clearly more interested in Microsoft's business and less and less interested in ours. Your penchant for adding meaningless and often useless features to your software while ratcheting up the "Draconian" knob on your license amplifier is blatent, obvious and conveys a serious lack of respect for your customers.
Now go away before I taunt you a second time.
"A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
GeneralEmergency
Maybe it's time to stop adding value and start subtracting crappiness.
Love, Masque.
P.S. Please open the enclosed attachment.
want to charge you through the nose for it. I think we're going to see something like what happened with Windows ME...
Wow, reloaded was ok on its own, but sucked compared to the original.. hate to see what swill they'll call an OS now.
meh
...I don't know if it's a good name or not unless I see it in context.
"This worm only effects Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows XP: Reloaded."
Yea, guess it's an ok name.
FLR
I wonder if it will suck as much as The Matrix Reloaded.
...you insert your brand new copy of the much-awaited Windows XP Reloaded and it reboots your system and reinstalls XP?
-------
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell
Seriously, what is with Microsoft's obsession with The Matrix as of late? Did anybody else vomit when you saw their little Matrix spoof at (I think it was) Comdex? Way to ruin a classic! Now whenever I watch that show, I can't help but see Bill in the place of Laurence Fishburne. And Keanu Reeves keeps getting replaced by horrible images of Steve sweating and screaming "Developers, developers, developers..."
Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
You must be new here.
You know what?
XP Mainframe: Speak
Tux: The program Clippy has grown beyond your control. Soon he will spread through this 64 bit Architecture as he spread through the 32. You cannot stop him, but I can.
XP Mainframe: We don't need you. We need nothing.
Tux: If that's true, then I've made a mistake and you should charge me a license fee now.
XP Mainframe: What do you want?
Tux: Peace
They had to kill the competition in yet another area: lame naming a product. This one wins hands-down.
Szo
Red Leader Standing By!
Suse is pronounced Soo-Suh. They're a German company, and that's how it works out phonetically in German. HTH.
...that the next Windows release, that being XP Reloaded, will wander around aimlessly during install never really making any progress, whilst showing big exploding splash screens and lots of half naked people in transparent clothes and cutting rapidly to Bill G getting his sex on with some 50 year old shemale to the beat of a crappy wannabe Jungle/Tribal soundtrack?
Or even better, how about it sets the initial timeline for install at say...oh...7 hours, then somewhere in the middle it gets sped up to 30 minutes remaining, then at the very end goes back to 24 hours before just somehow being done? All the time playing the aforementioned crappy Jungle/Tribal/Industrial crap soundtrack and exploding randomly?
I know, it already does that, sans the Bill G sex and crappy soundtrack, guess that's why it would be a "new release" if they added that stuff to the install.
"But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong" - Dennis Miller
The idea is behind pop-ups is that they get advertising to the consumer. Right now, this works for 95% of their intended audience. That 5%, those who use a better browser, get a surfing experience.
Once pop-ups cease to be effective for the advertiser, they'll disappear. Instead, they'll find new ways of getting to their audience, like flash movies in the middle of a page, that will affect everyone, regardless of browser (except lynx).
Right now, I'm happy with the unwashed masses dealing with advertisements so I don't have to.
-- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
Seems that someone's calender is a month or so off. All M$ stories seem to be jokes. Check it out. [Slashdot.org] They can't be serious...
-DB-
E-mail is like a prison: a prison with no walls... and no toilet. -Strong Bad
Mozilla launch Firefox, the browser reloaded.
Then all of a sudden MS are talking about XP reloaded, with improved users interfaces.
Pity Mozilla hadn't registered that sound bite;-)
-T
So we can expect Windows Reloaded to show it's green sourcecode falling on your screen?
Repeat after me: We are all individuals
It must be that there are people on this site that find what you say "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny"
But please don't tell me you go a party, sidle up to a nice girl with a drink in your hand, and use this as your opening gambit:
"Here's some wild speculation: Longhorn development is running into problems that are further delaying development, so Microsoft is responding with a stopgap operating system. Maybe they should call it OS9 instead of Reloaded. What do you think, babe?"
Get your own free personal location tracker
Look at Quartz Extreme on any AGP equippen G4 or G5 Mac. It is heavily 3D accelerated and looks 2D. The built in scaling and other acceleration tools that the 3D hardware brings to bare makes the OS extremeley snappy and responsive.
And it's not wastefull at all. It is simply taking advantage of commonly existing hardware that didn't exist when the original 2D API was created.
The reality is that unless you buy a Matrox card, the 2D acceleration that your video card brings to the tape hasn't improved that much at all in the last five years. The 2D core is more than good enough to do what's required of it so most video card companies don't bother expending much energy improviing things. 3D acceleration, on the other hand, has improved at rates that throttle the imagination.
Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
I just reloaded my windows last month.. id laugh if its just a $90 re-release of xp that has an easier re-format options
Alright, I believe in a couple years we're going to start seeing some serious version hell. For example, in the future how will we know what is "newer" than the other when we have:
Windows XP
Windows XP Reloaded
Windows XP Revolutions
Windows Xtreme
Windows Xtreme Unleashed
Windows Opposing Force
Windows Blue Shift
Does that stuff mean anything? No. With letter versioning and now this word versioning, to know what is newer than the next the user is just required to know. 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, it all makes logical sense. Words, unless they come up with alphabetical names (which would be kinda cool, but still limiting) mean nothing other than "this one is kinda different".
Complie that with other pieces of software which will follow suit (Look at all the software using 2 letter naming convensions for their versioning already) and we'll have very little knowledge what version is actually what.
Additionally, a benefit to number versioning was it allowed us to say "ok, this is 1.0, this software is really new and hasn't undergone any revisons," or "alright, this is version 3.2, they've taken a couple cracks at it and added some fixes." What if I told you I just made Gigawhop Reloaded. What the heck is that? Unless you knew the name of the software already, is it called Gigawhop or Gigawhop Reloaded as a whole? Is Reloaded actually the version? What does that even mean to me? Is it my first release? Second? Third? Tenth?
You have been warned...
To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
Longhorn will take much longer than originally expected. It could also mean Longhorn has serious problems and wouldn't be deliverable by 2006. If that is the case, it could be that Longhorn is doomed. Given the value of the "new features" are questionable and not really new, this might be lead to dumping Longhorn all together and canabilizing the usable pieces. But it's all a guess.
LoW XP
It's the Windows ME sillyness all over again, we were all supposed to move to 2000, but yet another win95/DOS variant came out.
... i'm not so baad once you get to knoww me.
New name: XP Matrix Edition.
Bitter and proud of it.
Fire! Reload...Fire! Reload...Fire! Fire at will...
Does every single OpenGL or D3D application you open use up huge amounts of resources? I think not, but if the developer adds enough eye-candy then it certainly will, however it also has the potential to look a lot cooler. This is the premise of having a 3D desktop. I'd really hope that if you disable whatever 3D effects (ie: window zooming, genie effect, icon zooming, window flag-waving behavior) they happen to have on by default you'd end up back in a reasonable 2D interface, low cpu overhead interface. I seriously doubt they'll MAKE you have chrome effects all over the place.
I think I'll stick with "XP Downloaded" for a while...
XP Reloaded...
The worst of the trilogy...
XP Forever, and it'll be released "when it's done".
"Remember when a DX2-66 was all you needed to make Win3.1 draw fast? Along came 95 ...And so on..."
.bmps.
Remember when a P5-166 was all you needed to make Win95 draw fast? Along came Win98
Remember when a PIII was all you needed to make Win2K draw fast?
that's because when a DX2-66MHz was fast, that's what programmers had on their desk.
Do not underestimate the what's-on-programmers'-desks syndrome. Programmers like for a program to perform well on *their* computer. Programmers tend to upgrade *often*. Programmers tend to *not care a stuff* if their program doesn't perform well on older computers.
It's like if you give one set of people 56ks, and the other cable modems. Guess which lot will learn how to use a jpeg compresser, and which lot will upload raw
Programming is like that. The more power you put into their hands, the more their waste is scaled up to match. There's some magic "good enough" psychological point where programmers don't bother to put further effort into optimising an application for greater speed.
Over the last ten years, CPUs have gone from 100MIPS to 5000MIPS+. And everyday tasks broadly perform at the same speed as they did back then. What is wrong with this picture?
Windows XQ?
Is it me, or is it totally illegal for Microsoft to publicly refer to their software as something probably copyrighted (and as silly sounding) as "XP Reloaded"? Not that sounding silly is illegal... I mean, they just (tried) suing that guy for naming his page and software(s) "MikeRoweSoft(.com)", how the hell can they get away with this?
Maybe I just have no grasp on copyright law...
--
Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
because you have to when it will invaribly lock up
Perhaps the name should be:
"Bank Account: Reloaded"
Oh wait -- I guess they already have $20 billion sitting around. How about:
"Analyst Estimates: Reloaded"
Since Microsoft feels that MikeRoweSoft.com is too similar to their name and gets the poor guy to rename his site, the W. bro's could (and really ought to) go after Microsoft for the obvious takeoff of their movie's title.
We could always make a distro of Linux and call it Windows XP Gone.
Windows is as solid as quicksand.
UltraSparc... 64-bit desktop computing, new? Oh and that's an alpha, which until compaq bought Digital was beating the crap out of their precious Macs, and the low end were cheaper compared to high-end Macs
:) But none of these were ever sold as personal compuers.
Your're forgetting SGI and old AS/400's.
All jokes aside, and with this article it could take awhile, we should at least look at the reasons for MS taking this approach.
If it's free, like most of their service packs, well then great. However if it's just some GUI rubbish like XP Plus! or something equally retarded at least we aren't being forced to download it.
But what if they charge for it? For home users this is irrelevent since they will just get it off p2p or their friends. So really this question goes to the businesses: Will this new release be worth the price of an upgrade? What are the benefits and costs? Every business asks this.
Without knowing what is in this release I can't imagine many people would adopt it. Why? Because the difference between Windows98 and Windows98SE was stability, and XP is reasonably in relation to other Windows releases. So what exactly are they offering new that would entice businesses to spend money? People have said Windows' greatest competetitor is Windows; and they're right. Innovation is a problem for MS, but that's not surprise.
Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
I've never seen so many Score: 5 Funnys.
I think that's infringement on the "Matrix Reloaded" title. It shouldn't be allowed.
Exactly what features they put in, we don't know.
But it sounds like another "revenue release" out of Redmond.
If they can get some of the "Quartz style" GUI infrastructure out, it might be worth it.
-------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
...my ass still hurts from the last time!
I'm not quite sure what Microsoft is going for, but hopefully it's some kind of add-on to their current operating system Windows XP. If Microsoft is ever going to put up against the stability of UNIX, then they are going to have to stop dropping older OSs to make more newer, vulnerable ones.
If this is coming out, then how long is it going to be planned to last? Longhorn was suppose to come out in 2005-2006... and if they keep that date, then the reign of XP Reloaded won't last too long. It'll just be another Windows ME.
Nonetheless, Microsoft is going to need a lot of time to make their Windows less buggy. And well, if all else fails, they should just create an Operating System with a different kernal and name. How about.. MS Fence. o_O
"Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
The first tier will be full 3d acceleration, second tier will have rolled-back features, all the way to the last tier which will essentially be "Windows Classic."
I'm wondering how many years it will take for KDE to rip off the 3D acceleration features...the whole desktop will be DirectX accelerated, going far and beyond what OS X has been doing as far as 3D photorealistic desktop concepts go. It's codenamed "Aero" and they're not release screenshots because they don't want their concepts ripped off.
Reloaded is not a service pack, more like WinME (maybe not as bad ;) SP2 is, and it would be free.
I mean, like, shit! The Windows source code leaked less than two weeks ago and some guys are already talking about releasing a new version!!!
Combining the logic of the two MS stories today: Now that soft is releasing an update, this means many new exploits will be written to take advantage of the problems that were fixed.
It's just an internal codename. The features will be available for download. The name will be different upon release.
Basically, the only reason this article got posted was so that very bad "comedians" could make very bad jokes involving the Matrix. I've seen every expected cliche as far as humor goes, all within the first 50 posts. It's ridiculous.
Should we also make fun of the OSS naming problems? Kougar? Kroupware? Kallery? Xouvert? Come on.
Damn, thats not just funny; you've made it into my all-time greatest quotes file!
Here's an exerpt from that page:
I'm still uncertain whether or not the "Classic experience" (Windows 2000 equivalent) will be available to ALL Longhorn users. Microsoft's slideshow at WinHEC (May 2003) seems to indicate that a "Windows 2000 compatability mode" will only be available to "enterprises that desire this option." Here's that slide describing the different desktop experiences: Longhorn User Experience
Microsoft was already planning on a 64-bit release of XP, and even has a beta you can download and test if you have an Opteron or Athlon64 machine. Thus, my question is: why were you planning on waiting for Longhorn? Was it a lack of interest in paying for a 64-bit version of an existing OS, or just a lack of knowle3dge that a 64-bit version was comming?
s /upgrade.asp
0 03/64bit/e xtended/default.mspx
Honestly though, anyone who is surprised by the anouncement of a XP2 needs to pay more attention: with the delays in Longhorn and the delays of sp2, with the added functiuonality of sp2, I've been expecting a XP second edition to be anounced for over 6 months. It's par for course after 98SE and ME. The release of 64-bit platforms just adds another excuse to the pile of reasons to push a new version out the door - I doubt we'll see commercial releases of regular XP for 64-bit now, regardless of the beta program. Oh, and the 64-bit version will be more secure, thanks to the support for non executable memory pages on AMD64 (and later, intel 'IA32e', which is the SAME THING).
64-bit XP download: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/64bit/download
Note: its a 'customer preview' (Beta), it may crash a lot, and you may have fun finding native 64 bit drivers for your hardware, so only install on a test partition, don't use it in production or while drinking, blah blah blah - if you shoot your dog in the head with it, I won't be held responsible - and neither will MS.
Windows Server 2003 is also available in a 64-bit preview:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2
Same warnings apply as above.
And no, this post was not spell checked.
man is machine
Damn, I can't say it better than the subject does.
On a complete OT tangent, do you think those guys who released the Source of WinNT4 and Win2000 had to (1) destroy the power plant supplying all of Redmond, WA (2) disable the emergency generator by hacking into the server via the SSH1 CRC-32 exploit and (3) enter through a software backdoor using the Keymaker and narrowly avoided getting jacked by the Agent Smith worm and (4) do they fly a cool hovercraft that they call "the Nebuchadnezzar"?
I admit. I'm being ridiculous.
the real name is XP Rebooted!
we got 1D and were THRILLED! The characters came out in one line, and it really forced you to improve your reading speed, because it didn't scroll up.
And we were LUCKY, and we knew it! There were two standards in the competing generation. One standard showed one letter at a time, and you had to build words and sentences in your head. The other standard was Morse code with dots and dashes in a 1D line.
And of course the generation before THAT was 0D. Though they did get the option for the light to blink in Morse, ASCII, or EBCDIC.
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
The way I see it is Microsoft probably heard the rant about them stagnating on the browser, and operating system so they ask themselves how can we innovate? So they go to Mozilla.org [Apparently their longhorn developers said they got some great ideas for XAML from there] and download FireFox -- WOW, what cool features, we will implement those, anything on Help/About worth getting too? Neat it says "Browser Reloaded", hell we'll take that too! And that is innovation at Microsoft...
They're on the site and from (e.g.) Belgium, so they need to click the link...but, if 'the choice has been taken away', how exactly did they get there?
IPv4 address geolocation works ... sometimes. Lindows.com visitors in BeNeLux that don't get redirected to Lin---s.com are legally obligated to click through that link.
like flash movies in the middle of a page, that will affect everyone, regardless of browser
Looks like I'm one jump ahead then. I've been blocking Flash for months (finally got fed up of the animation and sound in my adverts). Opera makes it easy (it's an option within Quick Preferences).
The times when you actually need to have Flash enabled are few and far between.
...will run on linux....just like ut and ut2k3
Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself.
Will XP Reloaded feature a new, more standards-compliant, less vulnerable (to spyware, worms, and pop-ups) version of IE? Because if they aren't planning to release the next IE before Longhorn, and if XP Reloaded will delay the release of Longhorn, Microsoft will have just driven another nail into IE's coffin, setting us up for a Gecko and/or KHTML-dependent web. (Maybe Netscape will win the browser war after all?)
Well, I don't know about IE and its "*WE FULLY SUPPORT* ((((about 3% of)))) *CSS1*", but under Mozilla, with CSS2, you don't have to look at flash either. You can replace it with a "click here if this isn't crap" button instead. You can even make it little so things flow around it nicely. It's amazing how many ads I dont even see anymore (and this is all without image blocking either) courtesy of a little bit of CSS.
userContent.css is your friend. Your dear and good friend. Use it, love it, spread the word.
High-speed Road Trip (18.000KPH)
Is it like the movie? Made for a one time shot only that was extended to 2 more films? And then there's the possibility of sequels, hence Longhorn/Blackcomb (i think).
Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
I thought Star Wars episode 2 was "Attack of the Clones".
...just as long as it doesn't involve another Windows/Linux Matrix spoof. *shudder*
No, you can always block it with Adblock and Flash Click to view Extensions in Mozilla/Firefox/Name of the week
XP reloaded, followed by XP Revolutions, with XP Rebellion near by, and XP Demise not too far behind...
Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
I'd believe if they came up with a new version named "XP NeedMoreSodaMoneyWhileWeTryToGetLonghornToCompile" , but "Reloaded" is too retarded a name, even for most of the consumers who they're counting on to rush out and buy it. Shit, even "Ishtar" is a better name.
The terms of the peace agreement are as follows:
1. Windows will ship with everything set up for no security whatsoever. All security features will be permanently removed from the operating system so that it cannot be configured any other way. Any user can access all of your files through the Internet without any authorization or authentication of any kind.
2. Hackers, Crackers, Spammers, and other malicious users promise not to use this for evil purposes. If they do, Microsoft disclaims any responsibilities for damage or loss, even if Microsoft or its agents were informed of the possibility of such loss.
Yes... I think XP Revolutions will be the best OS yet!
eXtreme Profit Reloaded(..in their dreams..)
Seriously, this is just a diversion to delay longhorn for even longer, but still make its customers buy another version, to keep up with their "Every 2 years come out with bigger crap so people are forced to upgrade" standard that has done so well for them so far. I wouldn't be surprised if they came out with "WindowsXP Revolutions" 2 years after reloaded, after seeing that matrix spoof that ballmer and gates did at one of their conferences. That would just delay longhorn even longer, untill they can find out what else they can steel and throw in it, to make it "better" than the competition.
"There is no operating system"
Ban Reality TV!
Hum, yeah now I get it. They were running out of "good" reasons to postpone Longhorn. They're saying 2020 now, and looks like they hired Barbara Walters as their spokeswoman for the campaign.
How about 'XP Bloated'
The OS can be as much of a dud as... well...
I'm gonna go take the red pill.
that as much as we hated Reloaded or Revolutions, it's already spawned a whole new geekdom of it's own.
Why bother? They've been shooting blanks for years...
Two weeks ago I participated in a Microsoft-sponsored focus group where we considered 20 or so new features that could be added to XP and then expressed our preferences for which of these should go in a new "Small Business" version of the OS. We were a pretty outspoken group and we all agreed on these points and then hammered them home to the Microsoft employees hidden behind the one-way mirror:
1. Splitting XP into different versions was a terrible idea, leading to even more of the dreaded "I'm sorry, you bought the wrong version" problems like when small business owners go buy cheap Compaq boxes with XP Home and then wonder why they can't connect to their domains.
2. The _minute_ a useful, stable version of Linux comes out for the desktop, we're all dumping Windows immediately.
3. Lastly, we all screamed at them that the last thing we wanted was additional "features" and that what we really desired was for them to take five years off and just fix bugs in XP!
They were paying for our opinions and they definitely got their money's worth.
MS bashing is getting old, and isn't very accurate. Windows is very stable. Have yet to see bsod that was not driver related on any nt based system
"However, Directions on Microsoft analyst Rob Helm said that any new version of Windows is likely to slow Longhorn's arrival."
Clap Clap to Rob Helm... Doesn't one think that it was done for that specific perpose?!?
If you take a look at the beta release and their "wonderful" new desktop feature you can see that they've got a hell of a lot of work to do. The resource requirements for their 3D desktop is over and beyond 90% of the machines out there today.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are not the responsiblity of the user, as I probably stole them anyway
Ever since I switched to Linux, I've called it -
Windows "Unloaded"
I can't afford a sig!
This is why I love slashdot. Come on, are you going to get this kind of quality humor from kuro5hin?
Heh. XP Rebooted. Priceless.
XP doesn't have a blue screen, ever, explorer may crash, but they did away with the infamous BSOD after 98se IIRC, everone, get your brooms...
They should call it Windows XP Rebooted, to better convey the notion of using a stable and secure OS from the people who brought you IIS and Outlook.
AC
Microsoft SmithX Agent
A small utility which greatly speeds and simplifies implementation of dos copy command as well as FileCopy API function.
Microsoft Oracle SQL
A complete replacement for Oracle Oracle, Microsoft Oracle is a database engine with Stupid Query Language. Now, You can give simple questions as "Uh?" or "Eh?" to your OLAP data cube.
Microsoft Architect
New antivirus tool. In case of vrus or worm detection, it completely wipes out anything from your hard disk and keeps your computer clean and safe, reinstalling a pure initial version of XP reloaded without your intervention.
There you are, staring at me again.
Windows Update
Is Microsoft giving away longhorn? No? Didn't think so. Well, that's pretty much the reason you should use linux.
Sure, there are other reasons. Like the fact that windows at the moment is the one being targeted by spammers/virus writers to create nefarious spam relay zombies. Or that Linux has user-level protection.
I don't see Windows Longhorn being able to change those situations drastically. Can you imagine the furor if Longhorn comes with user-level management, restricting access with root passwords? People would be up in arms!
I'd also be really surprised if windows suddenly became completely invulnerable to all viruses and worms. That would pretty much put AV vendors out of business! (might be cool though =P)
I fail to see how a release of longhorn would in any way affect adoption of linux. In fact, I think an early release date of longhorn would increase linux adoption, because more people would be disinclined at this point in the economic cycle to purchase YAOS (Yet Another Operating System) when they bought XP a couple of years ago. I think what MS is doing is a good strategy for them.
Mozilla Firefox's tagline is "The Browser, Reloaded". (Mozilla stole it from the Matrix sequel, of course.)
The shareholder is always right.
Jeeze sounds like a waste of a perfectly good cdr err wait by then it's DVD-R
...they came up with Windows ME. Not good.
Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
Wait-wait-wait.. so Microsoft is claiming ownership of the name 'Windows' and 'MikeRowe'
Yet they hypocraticly think it's OKAY for them to use the 'Matrix Reloaded' popular name as a platform for their new campaign?
WTF!?
From the article: "A company executive confirmed to CNET News.com on Thursday that Microsoft is now discussing a product internally referred to as "Windows XP Reloaded."
/. ppl spew forth with sad jokes about the lameness of MS' internal code name and the fact that they are a greedy corporate behemoth. 500 posts! All that time and energy taken away from making Linux's star shine even brighter! So if MS does come out with "XP Unloaded", by all means, DON'T UPGRADE. Use Linux, make it better. But PLEASE Slashdot editors: Stop seeding the site with these MS-related "stories". And Slashdot posters: Enough with the masterbatory carping over how STOOPID Microsoft is. We GET IT. NEXT!
So MS is DISCUSSING the POSSIBILITY of an XP re-release. Yup. If MS can add code and apps that they percieve will add value for a significant number of customers, they may package it up and sell it:
* Make software
* Package it
* Sell it
* Support it
* Profit
What a concept! That's what they do. Perhaps the extra revenue will come in handy since it looks like Longhorn will be delayed even longer. But look what happens when story is posted? 500+
Is this sig nificant?
there gonna boot directly into a windows themed version of slackware running on there newly released virtual pc 2004... reloaded = xp loading a real os
XP Retreaded
Apart from serious security upgrades, what does Windows XP actually need? I loved 98 but you had to reboot after changing any network settings and it effectively maxed out at 384 of RAM. XP doesn't have any annoyances of that magnitude that I can think of.
As they said in Ghostbusters, "The door swings both ways". So yeah, there'll be a new method of advertising that gets by the popup blocking we currently use. But we're always going to be able to develop a better ad blocker. Serious ad-haters simply block the vast list of ad serving IP's. No advertising technology will get past that one, and the business model most commonly used is to keep ads on different servers from the actual web information.
I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
Yeah, the word "Lindows" infringes on Microsoft's intellectual property, but "XP Reloaded" doesn't infringe on anybody else's ideas. It's a totally original concept. Right.
After a partial release of the source code. Honestly, I thought that this is all the discussion would be about and instead i found 85 "+5 Funny Matrix Reloaded Windows Rebooted" comments. Howabout the fact that the code windowsXP is based on was leaked to the internet last week. If you thought windows was full of holes two weeks ago that was just the beginning. Microsoft is in the position of never getting a liscencing fee again if their product starts to fail big corporations (many of whom are still running the "older" win2k that was released.
I view this as more of a sign that MS realizes that the source code leak was more of an incredible disaster than they are letting on....Even throwing in some absurd comment about never having a sploit in windows before a patch just to draw your attention away from the real news: "Microsoft admits winXP no longer secure by even their definitions, unscheduled major overhaul coming."
---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
I wonder how long it will take for the creators of The Matrix and The Matrix Reloaded to sue them... anyone care to start a betting pool?
What do I want this for? I'm okay with the present interface. What can I do with "XP reloaded" that I can't do now with XP-Pro?
Oh yeah, but the name is soooo cool. I can see myself wearing sunglasses and a black leather jacket while surfing for pr0n.
Its a special edition for all you who loved Windows ME
Back in my day, the web was a place where people voluntarily put stuff they wanted to be public. If all the ad revenue on the net suddenly dried up, and people stopped making money off it, I'd probably be a lot happier. Unemployed, yes, but happier.
----
Not to be confused with Col.
Windows XP Reloaded... as in "I just reloaded it's source into CVS".
Oh no. Imagine a million of those asinine little paperclips. "We've been waiting for you, Mr [fill in the blank]..."
Someone has *got* to port the xmatrix screensaver, though...
if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
Shoot the marketing department Bill, they didn't see the movie obviously.
Loading...
What about Mozilla Firefox, the browser reloaded?
"You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
Windows Me was an interim release for home users between Windows 98 and Windows XP Home Edition because XP Home Edition was so long in coming and they needed the money. So what did they do? The rushed an inferior and buggy product out the door that contained some new code. Not a lot mind you, but just enough to totally fuck things up. Now they announce an interium release of Windows between Windows XP and Longhorn because Longhorn is going to be a long way off. I have a funny feeling this will be a Windows Me style release all over again. They'll rush some buggy POS out the door that has some new stuff. Not all of it mind you, just enough to totally fuck things up. You'll excuse me Bill G if I laugh and pass on this one!
Is there something missing here?
and how would this version be different then the current version, which you already have to reload a lot? I guess there will be some added code to blue screen, or registry 'fixes', like when reading /. or visiting the apple something, but totally more web oriented.
and after they release it they can do XP Revolutions which will make users not only Reload windows but zero the harddrive then reload, revolution eh? oh and also have multiple blue screens of death for events that are long and drawn out much like death scenes in a certain movie with the same name as the operating system.
-- Ben --
Right... except the interesting thing that happened with Win '98SE is that mysteriously, nearly all of the systems running '98 became '98SE boxes - despite '98SE not even being sold seperately as an "upgrade" version.
Except for the most staunch "anti piracy" types, most Win '98 users felt well within their rights to upgrade their older '98 release using "borrowed" copies of '98SE. People quickly saw through the explanation that it was "only created to address needs of newer systems it was bundled with", and decided MS owed them a copy of SE to fix crashes, bugs, and poor support for some of their devices (internal modems, etc.).
I think the same will happen if MS decides to charge for this "XP Reloaded" edition of XP. They'll get whatever sales they'd automatically get anyway because it's bundled with new system purchases, but the majority of current XP owners will just upgrade "on the sly" and wave around their old XP CD key and "authenticity" paperwork/stickers if asked if they really "bought their OS".
said to the terrorist on his Harrier jet in True Lies: "You're fired"
ApoXPalypse Now Redux
Har har.
Actually the original poster is correct, ME was a stopgap or "interim" release, probably intentionally lousy to get people to switch from the ageing 95 platform to the more robust NT kernel. You had two choices, switch to 2000, or the less risky choice, from a hardware perspective, of ME. So obviously 2000 had to be release before or at the same time as ME. Luckily for you and others, there will no longer be this confusion as M$ now only provides one choice: XP.
they should call it Windows Restarted haha
Empire Strikes Back
You can't handle the truth.
Try using tabbed browsing in Firefox or Mozilla before you start claiming it's useless. I use tabbed browsers exclusively on Windows.
This choice has nothing to do with window management by any particular OS, and everything to do with my browsing habits. I presently have 16 tabs open in my browser. I'm a translator, I need to have lots of things open at once -- online references like Wikipedia, corporate IR pages, and dictionaries; Google; my webmail; and other fun things like Slashdot :).
Any windowing system becomes unacceptably cluttered if I use untabbed browsing and try to accomplish the same effect. ALT-TAB becomes a mess.
And for that matter, try using a mature *nix distro before you make unfounded (or perhaps just misinformed) accusations.
"What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
"A four-foot prune."
I'm waiting for the spiritual conclusion, "Windows: Reveloutions" where we see Bill Gates portrayed as the savior of human-kind. Maybe the Windows logo will change to a cross when you shutdown too.
-- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
Because Longhorn is a desktop OS.
Longhorn is not a server OS.
Maybe you were being funny, but I thought it would be worth pointing out so that people don't think this is a serious issue.
When I read this story today, I was thinking the same thing at work today since I work for SQA department. :)
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
"We're very interested in having as many people as possible--new PC buyers and installed base--take advantage of the work we've done in SP 2."
"If you want to truly understand something, try to change it." (Kurt Lewis)
Try using tabbed browsing in Firefox or Mozilla before you start claiming it's useless. I use tabbed browsers exclusively on Windows.
:).
I use opera. Opera, by default, is configured with tabbed browsing. One of the first things I turn off, too.
This choice has nothing to do with window management by any particular OS, and everything to do with my browsing habits. I presently have 16 tabs open in my browser. I'm a translator, I need to have lots of things open at once -- online references like Wikipedia, corporate IR pages, and dictionaries; Google; my webmail; and other fun things like Slashdot
If you use windows, you can group like tasks on the start menu easily enough. If you use Linux, then depending on the capabilities of your window manager you might be able to find a solution. One thing is for certain: If you rely on your web browser for window management then your operating system is lacking or you are not using it correctly. Which is why tabbed browsing is abhorrent.
Any windowing system becomes unacceptably cluttered if I use untabbed browsing and try to accomplish the same effect. ALT-TAB becomes a mess.
On the other hand, by using tabbed browsing, you lose about 50% of your screen to tabs for all the windows you have open, right? I value my real estate more than most people then.
And for that matter, try using a mature *nix distro before you make unfounded (or perhaps just misinformed) accusations.
Ahh and the inevitable personal attack, this is what really sells Linux to the general populace. I use Redhat 9.0 when I'm not using Windows, but I've used several different distros and window managers in the past. The high level of fragmentation in Linux makes window management even more difficult, as one method for management will work fine on one desktop, but it won't on another without configuring it the same way first. Windows tends to act very predictably no matter where you find it, however.
I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
cLive ;-)
-- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
So it is really a Cadillac commercial posing as an OS ? Or is it a Glock commercial posing as an OS? I hope it has those cool cell phones too.
"Nothing is impossible for the man who refuses to listen to reason"
Issuing an update to XP would represent a significant shift for the software maker, which for months has insisted that it had no plans to create a separate version of Windows before Longhorn.
This is all good. It's a clear sign that they're getting shaky, that they don't know what to do.
What's that oft-used Gandhi quote that ends with 'we win'?
The link is to http://news.com.com-- not news.com. How did several hundred tech nerds get duped by a juvenile trick like this!?! schmoko.
go to www.news.com and see what happens to your address bar.
I find Windows Rebooted would be a better name!
Didn't see that coming... 'Cause the "alpha" of Longhorn dosen't look a thing like XP updated a bit... SE maybe... or taking a cue from squarenix, "XP-2" (same old shit, looks slightly better). Now if they'd mail out service pack cd's for ME, then I'd be excited...
Shift happens. Fire it up.
You would think microsoft would learn something from Windows ME.
http://seanism.com/
A couple thoughts --
I've gotten used to using ALT-TAB to switch between apps, as in browser to word processor, so for me, tabs are great. Sure, I can bundle like app windows under Windows or Linux, but that just doesn't fit my personal style. Go figure.
On the other hand, by using tabbed browsing, you lose about 50% of your screen to tabs for all the windows you have open, right? I value my real estate more than most people then.
I hear you about screen real estate. But then you have me confused; what browser do you use that takes up half the screen just for the tabs? Does Opera do that? I haven't messed with it in a while, as Opera had problems rendering Japanese. Firefox uses barely a pinky's-width, about as much as the URL bar. Maybe as much as 1/8 of the screen for the app bar, menu bar, URL bar, tab bar, and status bar together.
If you rely on your web browser for window management then your operating system is lacking or you are not using it correctly. Which is why tabbed browsing is abhorrent.
I smell a stylistic issue here. Your response nicely showed that my points were partly based on my ignorance of your experience. Forgive me for that. However, "you are not using (your OS) correctly" seems to carry things a bit too far -- part of any good system is the flexibility to use it in many different ways, no? If I choose to group my browser windows in the browser, I fail to see what sin lies in that.
Ahh and the inevitable personal attack,
Actually, a fine point, but I think I was attacking your comments to the effect that *nix systems don't manage windows well. Nothing ad hominem in that.
I use Redhat 9.0 when I'm not using Windows, but I've used several different distros and window managers in the past. The high level of fragmentation in Linux makes window management even more difficult, as one method for management will work fine on one desktop, but it won't on another without configuring it the same way first.
By "desktop" I assume you mean either "windows manager" or "linux distro", rather than the various virtual desktops provided in a single X session. If this is correct, your statement is quite similar to "window management doesn't work the same on several different OSes.
Um, yes. Windows and the Windows window manager are inseparable; the OS and the desktop are one and the same. Swapping desktop managers under linux is effectively similar to changing the complete userland OS under the Windows monolithic paradigm. To exaggerate a little, your comment is a little like "it doesn't work the same on Mac as it does on Windows". Or for the linux savvy, "Gnome and KDE are different." No surprises there.
I'll grant you that a greater level of standardization would be lovely, not just for the end user but for developers as well. I think that's what the Freedesktop.org project is all about, so this is in the works.
Windows tends to act very predictably no matter where you find it, however.
You bring up a good point here -- Windows, through its hegemony, offers a common user experience. There is something of value in this, and the OSS community would be unwise to sneer. Thankfully, many seem wise enough to save the baby from the bathwater, and are putting in the effort to find what works in Windows.
To hearken back to your earlier posting:
Everything in MS applications looks and feels the same, this is what has enabled MS to keep the desktop, and it's a key point of failure for linux on the desktop.
A good point -- the Principle of Least Surprise plays in here. Users expect a particular look and feel, in terms of where menu items are if not necessarily the specific widget set. Straying from this de facto standard of expectations will almost inevitably make a program less popular. Ask anyone who's used Adobe graphics products versus, say,
"What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
"A four-foot prune."
it'll have a pager and virtual desktops and they'll call it an innovation???
Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
Were all aware that the name reloaded referes to a terrible cash cow of a movie and that this crappy os is similar in nature but 500 people have already said it. I love that linux is finally putting pressure on microsoft. They may inprove with Longhorn, but this interim release will suck (terrible flash back of ME, people paid me to downgrade their pc's to 98se). I will never go back until i can root# emerge windowskernel-x.0.0. Like that will ever happen. Man I love portage. But seriously I love the new Athlon 64's and I wanna see some OS support. I hope a suitable new realses of the GNOME and productivity apps like Ooo with 64-bit support are realesed before Longhorn.
.... just like its namesake film.
Have a nice day!
X-Pukem?
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
Someone is going to get sued. That know "Reloaded" things brings all kinds of name issues. Man people are sue happy these days.
-Kids in the back seat causes accidents.- -Accidents in the back seat causes kids.-
2) Windows Re-installed from scratch.
3) Windows Removed.
4) Windows Replaced (with an OS that works better...)
I'm not going to comment on the whole movie=crap, os=crap thing. I can just imagine some suit in MS marketing
'Matrix is cool and popular; if we call it XP Reloaded so can we'
Seriously I need to go into marketing. The only industry where u can get away with being a complete moron.
-- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
"Windows XP Revolutions" - The fork() of B. Gates.
Personally, I did this perfectly legally. Microsoft Europe, in some bizarre moment of benevolence, shipped me a free "Second Edition Upgrade" disk that turned 98 into 98SE in return for the proof of purchase bit off the retail 98 box.
Of course, I then proceeded to do a fresh install with an OEM copy of SE rather than use the upgrade disc, as I then had fewer random bits of cruft lying around. But thats another story.
"I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Red and blue pills included.
Nope! ther are paracetamols
Windows is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you boot up, when you go to work, when you pay your taxes. It is the OS that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
...into this: *holds up a Duracel*
What truth?
That you are a slave, Neo. Like evreyone else you were born into bondage. Born into a prison you cannot taste or smell or touch. A prison for your computer.
What is XP? Control. XP is a system, built in order to change a human being...
One of the major obstacles in the way of broader adoption of GNU/Linux and Free Software in general has been lock-in to Microsoft's proprietary file formats. OpenOffice.org is a good attack on this, but MS has a lot of smart people working on new lock-in strategies. In my view, currently the "digital rights management" stuff is the most dangerous of these, especially in view of the DMCA.
XP
XP Reloaded
XP Revolution
why not just call it millenium XP
If you rely on your web browser for window management then your operating system is lacking or you are not using it correctly.
Oh yes, XP is definitely lacking a way of grouping all those 32 IE windows into one window (note that I did not say task bar group), making it easy to switch between the different pages.
Of course I could just continue using firebird, which does this nicely.
"XP Relinquished" is more apt.
Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently. - Henry Ford
This is actually the scheme used, except the third number is the build number. This is a huge number that increments every day, but is exactly what you propose, in a sense: each day sees many small fixes and increments to the code base.
What Marketing calls "Windows XP" internally carries the product name "Windows" and the version number "5.1.2600".
One will note that this reveals that Windows XP is considered a minor release from Windows 2k, which was 5.0.2195.
I am already running XP reloaded, and reloaded, and reloaded, and reloaded again. Every 3 to 6 months it is reloaded otherwise my PC become completely incumbered by Microsoft's cruft. They should call it XP reformatted, reinstalled, and reconfigured :)
Doesn't Windows Reloaded soudn a lot like Matrix Reloaded? I mean they even made a Matrix spoof.
MS Windows is no longer an OS, it's just a marketting stunt.
[alk]
As it's "Reloaded" it has an SSH client, SSH-Nuke and an old version of nmap!
SSdtIGFzIGJvcmVkIGFzIHlvdSBhcmUK
...you must experience it for yourself.
This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
Wachowski Brothers: Shit!, Lawrence Fishburn said he was finished. How can we replace him?
This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
I have been, "Reloading", Windows for years. I don't need a new version for that just for that purpose. :)
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin"
Like the namesake for the 'Matrix', I bet it won't be as good as the first.
That its software is like a gun to your head.
If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
It's for MONEY. You are correct, their upgrade revenue stream needs some more cash. For what, I don't know. Microsoft has more money than most small countries.
I've heard it likened to a pasta machine. The pasta is always coming out the spout, every so often Microsoft cuts some off and sells it.
Money!
http://github.com/gbook/nidb
It just hangs there, as though suspended in mid-air....
I'm not a human, but I play one on T.V.
Rebooted was good, but rebloaded has got to be my favorite. All joking aside they may really have a reason for wanting to do this. Currently I have been evaluating the new windows 2003 for the company I work for. We are an M$ partner in crime. Anywho my point is when I installed 2003 the first thing that struck me was how fast and responsive it was. Not just compared to a XP install, but while running a webserver, dns, and all sorts of other extra server process that have no business running on a desktop it runs faster then w2k pro. If they can make the XP client run a bit quicker, especially running .net apps it may be a good thing.
And I am sure making a few exta million to this is not a bad thing from their perspective.
Time to put on the hip-waders people the bullshit is getting pretty thick in here today.....
So Microsoft seems to be trying to associate Windows XP to the Matrix, which was essentially software that got out of hand and enslaved humanity.
Very interesting.
"Calling it an interim {money} release {money}is overstating the {money} current {money} plan," Sullivan said. "We are exploring {money} ways to {make more money} add {money} value to {money}Windows {money} XP." OR... "...{I need to get a new yatch and if this idea pans out even just a bit. I will be so MONEY!}"
All weather is caused by the uneven heating of the Earth by the Sun. Global warming magnifies the effect. Hot spots get hotter, and do so faster, causing a larger temperature differential. Higher temperature make water evaporate faster, causing more clouds, which causes even more uneven heating.
In the short term this causes more extreme conditions -- larger storms occuring more frequently, hotter summers, colder winters, more erratic and unseasonable temperature changes, and so forth. More severe storms disrupt the hydrological cycle, dumping all thier rain in one area, causing flooding in some places and droughts elsewhere. In the longer term it causes major climatic shifts -- changes in ocean currents in wind patterns.
Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
I can almost hear John Lennon singing as I read this... *sniff*
A classic like Windows deserves a classic name:
Armageddon Now
He was installing NT 4.0 and telling me how *great* it was, because it was designed for businesses etc, and (he said) "it never crashes".
He got about 3 minutes into the install before the first crash. It crashed 4 times before he finished the install. Unless you count patching your system as part of the install process >:->
shocking right? =P
Watching Windows boot up in bullet time.
...and start subtracting crappiness
I would love to subtract/erradicate Outlook Express and Windows Messenger completely from XP Pro Sp1.
Bill bought the digital rights to every possible movie title a few years back.
isn't that what you have to do about every month anyway is 'reload' xp cause its such a piece of dog shit ??
iF yOu WAnT to C YOUr iP agaIn gAThEr tWO MilLIon dOLLArS IN Non - cONsEcuTivE TweNtY's AnD AWaiT FuRThER iNstrUctIoN