These are a bit different because they require you to do a bit of soldering, and then write some code. More like Seeed Studio Grove or some of the Adafruit stuff.
These kinds of things are actually quite useful for prototyping, not just for Arduino users.
It pretty much was though, wasn't it? Not the detail, but the basic parameters of the deal were decided on day one by May's red lines. Barnier produced that famous diagram showing what was available.
Well she kind of tried with the 2017 general election, but of course it massively backfired and basically destroyed any chance of there being a non-fuck-up brexit.
This is the problem with a binary choice referendum. The whole thing was a dumb idea.
Compare them to the Samsung ones, which use a standard coin cell and are relatively easy to replace when the time comes. They got 6/10 on iFixit, not great but better than the 0/10 that the AirPods got.
Breaking up the UK would solve a lot of problems, but it would also destroy the party that was in charge of it. So there is no way the government is going to propose or allow that if they can help it.
It's not Parliament's fault, it's May's fault. She didn't have a realistic plan, just some intractable red lines that completely fucked up the negotiations and ensured she would get a deal that everyone hated. Her priority has always been her legacy, and by extension keeping her party together, not getting a good outcome for the UK.
Parliament hasn't exactly covered itself in glory either, but May could easily have avoided all this be agreeing a realistic proposal for leaving with Parliament before triggering Article 50.
Cancelling is the best option now. If someone wants to try again let them put a very specific proposal in their manifesto and then before Parliament first, then we can trigger Article 50 again.
The Brexit that was promised isn't actually possible.
Indeed, the official Leave campaign's leaflet and web site said that the UK would negotiate a deal before triggering Article 50, which is impossible and had already been ruled out by the EU when they said it.
Having said that, at least deciding what deal they were going to try to negotiate and getting Parliament to approve it before triggering Article 50 would have been a very good idea, and avoided this crisis. Assuming they had proposed something vaguely realistic of course, which given May's red lines was unlikely.
Also note that the claims that votes came from North Korea are dubious as they are based on geo-location of an IP address. IP addresses change hands from time to time and such databases are known to be unreliable, especially in places like North Korea where their internet peering is via China.
Only 17.4 million voted for brexit, not 30 million.
This isn't a second referendum. The point is to show support for a cancelling Article 50 so that politicians, who next week will likely get to vote on doing just that, can see that there is quite significant support for it.
In fact it's by far the most popular opinion that the public has expressed since what brexit is became known. Back in 2016 no-one knew that this would be the deal because it didn't exist, but now we do and cancelling is so far the most popular option people have shown support for.
The leavers are having their little protest but it's a complete flop. A couple of hundred people at peak compared to a million in London today in support of a second referendum.
We need people like Stallman to stick to their ideology rigidly, even if the rest of us don't. His suggestion is a good one - it informs people but doesn't stop if they want to go ahead anyway.
Everyone blindly clicks through EULAs without reading them. A literal devil on site to discuss their contents sounds like a great way to get people to take notice.
Banning is effective. It makes it harder to draw new people in and radicalize them, because you can't just post a link. Of course they can get around the block with some work, but that barrier means there will be a lot less casual/blind clicks through to that content.
It censorship wasn't effective it wouldn't be so popular and people wouldn't get so upset about it.
The problem is the system that given two choices picks the one least able to effectively lead the country and make things better for people, mostly because of innuendo and bullshit.
Because people piss their pants if it's not a technology related story on Slashdot, so someone needs to find a tech angle for Mueller to get that posted. Here we have the WhatsApp/Facebook aspect.
Japan actually banned them from doing tests on customers. Tesla cars in Japan have old versions of the software because the regulator realized it was incredibly dumb to do constant over-the-air updates that alter the behaviour of the car and which have not been certified or properly tested.
It's not clear if the car would have avoided the lane divider. It doesn't look like it but it's possible.
Either way, this is a known weakness of the Tesla system. It doesn't prompt you to take over, and there have been multiple crashes.
If I were writing that software then suddenly finding that the lane was very wide or a major correction was required would sound all kinds of warning bells.
To be fair half the stuff on the list was just rolled into other products. Like news and weather is part of Play Newsstand now, and Reply is built in too Gmail.
Slashdot Mirror
Whenever I use them I always use an external programmer and raw C for the ATmega though, because the Arduino IDE drives me nuts.
Maybe some people used to play in a sands pit with their waters pistol.
These are a bit different because they require you to do a bit of soldering, and then write some code. More like Seeed Studio Grove or some of the Adafruit stuff.
These kinds of things are actually quite useful for prototyping, not just for Arduino users.
Doing that isn't exactly an overnighter
It pretty much was though, wasn't it? Not the detail, but the basic parameters of the deal were decided on day one by May's red lines. Barnier produced that famous diagram showing what was available.
Everything else was just cakeism.
Well she kind of tried with the 2017 general election, but of course it massively backfired and basically destroyed any chance of there being a non-fuck-up brexit.
This is the problem with a binary choice referendum. The whole thing was a dumb idea.
Interesting that Chrome isn't one of the ones on the list though. Too valuable or too secure?
Compare them to the Samsung ones, which use a standard coin cell and are relatively easy to replace when the time comes. They got 6/10 on iFixit, not great but better than the 0/10 that the AirPods got.
https://www.ifixit.com/Teardow...
https://www.ifixit.com/Teardow...
Breaking up the UK would solve a lot of problems, but it would also destroy the party that was in charge of it. So there is no way the government is going to propose or allow that if they can help it.
It's not Parliament's fault, it's May's fault. She didn't have a realistic plan, just some intractable red lines that completely fucked up the negotiations and ensured she would get a deal that everyone hated. Her priority has always been her legacy, and by extension keeping her party together, not getting a good outcome for the UK.
Parliament hasn't exactly covered itself in glory either, but May could easily have avoided all this be agreeing a realistic proposal for leaving with Parliament before triggering Article 50.
Cancelling is the best option now. If someone wants to try again let them put a very specific proposal in their manifesto and then before Parliament first, then we can trigger Article 50 again.
The Brexit that was promised isn't actually possible.
Indeed, the official Leave campaign's leaflet and web site said that the UK would negotiate a deal before triggering Article 50, which is impossible and had already been ruled out by the EU when they said it.
Having said that, at least deciding what deal they were going to try to negotiate and getting Parliament to approve it before triggering Article 50 would have been a very good idea, and avoided this crisis. Assuming they had proposed something vaguely realistic of course, which given May's red lines was unlikely.
Also note that the claims that votes came from North Korea are dubious as they are based on geo-location of an IP address. IP addresses change hands from time to time and such databases are known to be unreliable, especially in places like North Korea where their internet peering is via China.
Only 17.4 million voted for brexit, not 30 million.
This isn't a second referendum. The point is to show support for a cancelling Article 50 so that politicians, who next week will likely get to vote on doing just that, can see that there is quite significant support for it.
In fact it's by far the most popular opinion that the public has expressed since what brexit is became known. Back in 2016 no-one knew that this would be the deal because it didn't exist, but now we do and cancelling is so far the most popular option people have shown support for.
The leavers are having their little protest but it's a complete flop. A couple of hundred people at peak compared to a million in London today in support of a second referendum.
We need people like Stallman to stick to their ideology rigidly, even if the rest of us don't. His suggestion is a good one - it informs people but doesn't stop if they want to go ahead anyway.
Everyone blindly clicks through EULAs without reading them. A literal devil on site to discuss their contents sounds like a great way to get people to take notice.
Banning is effective. It makes it harder to draw new people in and radicalize them, because you can't just post a link. Of course they can get around the block with some work, but that barrier means there will be a lot less casual/blind clicks through to that content.
It censorship wasn't effective it wouldn't be so popular and people wouldn't get so upset about it.
Blame is fine. "Her emails" as defence of your own shitty behaviour is not. Take responsibility.
The problem is the system that given two choices picks the one least able to effectively lead the country and make things better for people, mostly because of innuendo and bullshit.
I wish there was a statute of limitations on using Hillary Clinton to excuse bad behaviour.
It's 2019 and "but her emails" is still going strong. Is this going to be the campaign slogan for 2020?
Because people piss their pants if it's not a technology related story on Slashdot, so someone needs to find a tech angle for Mueller to get that posted. Here we have the WhatsApp/Facebook aspect.
Japan actually banned them from doing tests on customers. Tesla cars in Japan have old versions of the software because the regulator realized it was incredibly dumb to do constant over-the-air updates that alter the behaviour of the car and which have not been certified or properly tested.
It's not clear if the car would have avoided the lane divider. It doesn't look like it but it's possible.
Either way, this is a known weakness of the Tesla system. It doesn't prompt you to take over, and there have been multiple crashes.
If I were writing that software then suddenly finding that the lane was very wide or a major correction was required would sound all kinds of warning bells.
To be fair half the stuff on the list was just rolled into other products. Like news and weather is part of Play Newsstand now, and Reply is built in too Gmail.
Oh, so only the police are allowed be have an opinion? Opinions are oppression now?
You really are very silly.
Monty Python was mocking the far right, not flirting with it. They didn't promote people on the far right like PDP did.
But Netflix/is/ 30 cents an hour. It's less if you watch more. I'm being generous.
They can afford to make high budget stuff on that.
Saying that I can't even buy it for a buck either.