Slashdot Mirror
'Your AirPods Will Die Soon' -- The Shrinking Charge Capacities of Lithium-Ion Batteries (theatlantic.com)
Some of the same podcasters who first extolled AirPods are now complaining about them, reports the Atlantic:
The battery can no longer hold a charge, they say, rendering them functionally useless. Apple bloggers agree: "AirPods are starting to show their age for early adopters," Zac Hall, an editor at 9to5Mac, wrote in a post in January, detailing how he frequently hears a low-battery warning in his AirPods now. Earlier this month, Apple Insider tested a pair of AirPods purchased in 2016 against a pair from 2018, and found that the older pair died after two hours and 16 minutes. "That's less than half the stated battery life for a new pair," the writer William Gallagher concluded. Desmond Hughes, who is 35 and lives in Newport News, Virginia, has noticed a similar thing about his own set: At first, their charge lasted five hours, but now they sometimes last only half an hour. He frequently listens to one while charging the other -- not optimal conditions for expensive headphones. He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair....
The lithium-ion batteries that power AirPods are everywhere. One industry report forecast that sales would grow to $109.72 billion by 2026, from $36.2 billion in 2018. They charge faster, last longer, and pack more power into a small space than other types of batteries do. But they die faster, too, often after just a few years, because every time you charge them, they degrade a little. They can also catch fire or explode if they become damaged, so technology companies make them difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to replace themselves. The result: A lot of barely chargeable AirPods and wireless mice and Bluetooth speakers are ending up in the trash as consumers go through products -- even expensive ones -- faster than ever....
Of the 3.4 million tons of electronic waste generated in America in 2012 -- an 80 percent increase from 2000 -- just 29 percent was recycled.
The article notes that Wednesday Apple announced a new generation of AirPods -- but "did not say whether the devices would have longer lives."
They also report that Apple "does allow consumers to pay for what it calls a 'battery replacement' for AirPods, but each 'replaced' AirPod is $49."
The lithium-ion batteries that power AirPods are everywhere. One industry report forecast that sales would grow to $109.72 billion by 2026, from $36.2 billion in 2018. They charge faster, last longer, and pack more power into a small space than other types of batteries do. But they die faster, too, often after just a few years, because every time you charge them, they degrade a little. They can also catch fire or explode if they become damaged, so technology companies make them difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to replace themselves. The result: A lot of barely chargeable AirPods and wireless mice and Bluetooth speakers are ending up in the trash as consumers go through products -- even expensive ones -- faster than ever....
Of the 3.4 million tons of electronic waste generated in America in 2012 -- an 80 percent increase from 2000 -- just 29 percent was recycled.
The article notes that Wednesday Apple announced a new generation of AirPods -- but "did not say whether the devices would have longer lives."
They also report that Apple "does allow consumers to pay for what it calls a 'battery replacement' for AirPods, but each 'replaced' AirPod is $49."
SHOCKING I SAY!
Why, they very notion that an overpriced product that gives inferior sound quality, and has a propensity to get lost, or ingested by toddlers, could have such a shortened service life compared to the older tech it replaced! Who could have forseen it! /s
I have a great idea. What if you had headphones that didn't use a battery but instead plugged directly into a hypothetical Jack on a source of sound? I know it sounds crazy but it would work and could even be made universal.
It's also an issue with the size of the batteries: the smaller the battery, the lower the capacity.
Then, add that you insist to wear those buddies into your ears all the time (also for fashion purposes). It's clear you will run more and more charging cycles that will worsen the situation.
Use the wired ones, instead.
Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
Don't drain past about 30% and don't store them fully charged to maximize the number of charge/discharge cycles.
At first, their charge lasted five hours, but now they sometimes last only half an hour. He frequently listens to one while charging the other -- not optimal conditions for expensive headphones. He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
The best part is all the people who used to make fun of douchebags wearing bluetooth earpieces and talking to themselves are now the same people wearing AirPods and talking to themselves.
Not only that but having scammed themselves into buying shoddy, overpriced, short lived junk they then make the extra effort to do it again:
"He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair...."
I'm glad you included the age and location of Desmond. It really added something important to the summary.
I am writing this on my aging - but still fully functional - Samsung Galaxy Note 3. How can I use a nearly 6 year old phone you ask?
Why I can replace the battery! I'm on my third... (Well it was also a high end phone of the time, one of the first with 3 GB ram...)
But my point is; the reason it survive is I can change battery. And it is one of the last of its kind. Check gsmarena.com and you'll find almost no high end phones with replaceable batt from 2018 and forward.
But the are all ip 68 or whatever waterproof. Well I have yet to have a phone die of water. Most was replaced because of the battery (or because the keyboard broke). When I hear my colleagues getting new iphones, it is always the battery. My parents just bought a new one because of...
Am I the only one that believes, that the *true* reason all new devices are waterproof, is planned obsolescence?? ... Could be I'm just an old geek that doesn't care to buy a new phone that can the same (but slightly faster, of course) as the one I have. ... Or maybe you all drop phones in the toilet regularly? (really??)
If not, then spread the idea, and help save both money and the environment! Let's rebel! ... Regard my heading "by law" I mean, it doesn't have to be user replaceable, but eg that right-to-repair have an upper limit of what a new battery must cost, sufficiently low - like maybe 5% of the original price - to ensure that the can be replaced, and is not epoxy'ed inside.
"He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair...."
Idiot!
Aren't you a little old to be taken advantage of like that?
Because they can turn another piece of common mobile equipment into their own proprietary consumption item, which you have to pay for over and over.
It costs less than $10 to manufacture them -- they are just regular ear-buds with a microscopic radio receiver and a battery -- and they sell them for an unbelievable $200, knowing very well they are manufacturing a consumption item that you must replace regularly.
Give all your money to Apple if that's what you want -- they would love to take it -- but at least be honest about Apple and admit that they are dishonest, cunning, planning, and greedy.
They're powered by a cable I stick in the phone. Perhaps other phones will soon implement this handy feature.
As with the mobile phones themselves, if they limited the charge window to 80% or so of full capacity they would last years longer cos its cycling in the low and high extremes that kills the battery. But if they did that, they wouldn't be able to sell replacements every 2-3 years....
Do I have to solve everything?
He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair...
Yeah, that will really teach Apple a lesson!
they are Li Batterers they have a set charge cycle limit.
WE ALL KNOW THIS. and yet after 2 YEARS! they "ONLY" get 2H16M?
really this story is dumb as mud yes they are dieing at the expected rate of Li Batterers. they take what like 15 mins to charge ? i see no issue at all with this.
But would you listen? Nooooooooo!
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
"Mr. President, you hit the wrong link. This isn't Twitter."
Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
You sound surprised, what did you think would happen?
L'Idiot
My portable music solution is a bit larger, so each cycle of the battery involves more energy. It is also useful for activities other than listening to music.
I generally charge to 75% and discharge to no less than 25%. In the last 18 months, it appears to have lost about 2 or 3% of the original capacity.
Of course, replacing the battery when it is finally unable to hold a useful charge is going to cost a bit more, but by then I'll probably want to replace the whole model S anyway.
nice and great my final review https://myfinalreview.com/
You guys buy their stupid shit. Is there no 3rd person repair center?
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
This should be no surprise-- any device with a lithium-ion based battery sealed inside it will have to suffer the downsides that all common lithium-ion batteries have to suffer. Excess heat quickly damages their ability to recharge. But also normal heat, over the course of two to five years, gradually damages their capacity to recharge.
Drone battery? Better hope they produce the same form factor in three years.
Sport camera or camera gimbal? If it has the battery sealed in, the whole thing will be junk before you finally get around to using it on that big action vacation.
Thousand dollar smartphone with a case made of glass and unicorn farts? Better sign up for an appointment at the Einstein Bar to get the next magical upgrade, er, next generation smartphone.
[
This is no surprise for anybody that actually understands electronics. 2..3 years is all you get with non-replaceable LiPo batteries and daily use. One of the reasons I consider a phone or other device with a non-replaceable battery to be defective by design and will not buy it.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
The price for looking cool is high, but many are willing to pay it.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
I want my AirPods to use D-cell batteries, which would extend their service life indefinitely.
You pay, say, $150 per year, and every 2 years you get a new pair of them.That is if you send in your old ones. If not, you pay an extra $50.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
this is lies. Tiger batteries last forever and never need replacing. Also the length of battery life in online reviews is 100% accurate.
For some reason people decided wires were evil, we have wireless everything and they all take some sort of batteries. This certainly isn't good for the environment and yet nobody seems to care. All for the sake of convenience and more profit for wireless device makers.
Wow, it's almost like some people realised that batteries don't hold the same charge forever, and that being able to replace batteries in a consumer product is a desirable property.
Somebody please inform every phone manufacturer, every electric toothbrush manufacturer and anyone else who makes battery-powered items where the batteries can't be removed, therefore can't be replaced therefore can't be recycled even.
If only we'd made standardised cell sizes, voltages and properties such that we could easily replace them with a standardised battery by just flipping off a cover and pulling out some kind of module which we can buy in the shops...
One, the wires break a lot more if you're a clumsy twat or are too stupid to wear the thing so it's not pulling in the wrong place.
Two, you don't know how to find the break, cut it and solder a new plug on? I could do that when I was about ten.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Only a bit above TNT.
Nowhere even remotely near fossil fuels or high-carb food.
Never put food near your mouth! It might explode and kill you! /s
- - - - ;)
(For those that don't get it, or read what they want: It doesn't have to be dangerous just because it has a high energy density. As in: Don't buy low-quality batteries like from Samsung or Apple.
Morons can act as moronic as they want, of course. They can pick the inferior choice and harm themselves all they want. (In fact, if it results in giving non-morons an advantage, then *please*, do more of it!)
It's their right, unless it causes others to lose their rights.
Like the right to point and laugh at them publicly, for being such morons.
to a big battery suddenly looks like a good idea again.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
The article reads "They [batteries] can also catch fire or explode if they become damaged, so technology companies make them difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to replace themselves." It should say, " The profit margin on new devices is very high, so technology companies make them difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to replace themselves."
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
What would the other one be for? Fast charging without being wasteful? Faster data transfer? USB sticks? Input controllers without lag?
Don't be silly. That would take a REALLY courageous company!
As someone who still connects air traffic control sized, over the ear studio headphones to their device with a 3 foot coily 1970s cable, i say....mwah ha ha ha.
To be fair, most third party repair shops roll replace batteries for like Cdn$30, and this is for a galaxy s7
I got malfnctioning drivers, but never a broken cable. ...
I don't know what you guys are doing
Maybe you wires are too thin/cheap. Or they copied that retarded layout where both cables go to the front instead of one going around the back of your neck. Or you put your phone in stupid places, like in your jacket's outside pocket so that you have fun whenever you take of the jacket.
My point: I'm living proof that it's not cables per se. It's you.
And you know what headphones don't low battery alarm is less than half of the original battery life?
My wired ones
Also, they don't shoot potentially cancer causing radio waves into my ear canal and towards my brain
Remember that if you have any damage on the phone, it has to be repaired. 200 bucks plus for a battery replacement is pretty steep
> The electric energy merely heats it to above its boiling point and autoignition temperature.
I don't think I want a non-flammable substance at 2,000 degrees in my ear either.
LOL. Shitcocks!
Apple looks to be using planned obsolescence across their product lines. Apple has to keep the revenue flowing in somehow.
It's not just Apple, Ticpods, Sennheiser, Samsung, whatever also make wireless headphones. It's a common design feature...
Mostly random stuff.
Miopic nerds emotionally triggered by consumers who donâ(TM)t share their exact priorities? Shocking.
Just change the battery...
Planned obsolescence at its finest.
Apple technicians aren't good enough at their work to not have a high chance of breaking it further if they attempt battery replacement. Plus, being clumsy means they can rationalize a mandatory $200 charge to the average Apple customer.
The myth that Li-ion batteries die after only a few years has been proven false so many times that it gets tired now. I'm sure the earpods that were tested were not maintained well or the first generation earpod has a design flaw or just uses bad batteries to begin with.
-- Cheers!
Desmond Hughes ... noticed ... their charge lasted five hours, but now they sometimes last only half an hour. He frequently listens to one while charging the other -- not optimal conditions for expensive headphones. He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair....
They sucked the first time, are essentially unusable (one at a time, really?) after 2 years - and so he will go and buy another pair.
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
But from personal experience, the plebs do tend to dump their phone in the toilet a *LOT* of the time, particularly Apple and other high fashion debt inducing phone users. So of course the high end phones end up being waterproofed after all the complaints from customers.
The lower end phones however tend to be both more durable (although not waterproof) and better cared for, because for people poor enough to buy a cheap phone they have to CARE for it and make sure it lasts. Us nerds are split between the two groups. Those of us who use our hardware for *OUR* life, oftentimes replacing parts long after it isn't really cost effective, and the hipster nerds who destroy hardware and either brag or complain about it while being well enough off to either indebt themselves further getting replacement hardware or wealthy enough that they simply don't care.
That is my 2 cents, what are the rest of yours?
It's weird how my "old-fangled" wired earbuds still sound great. They must have a hell of a battery because I've used them for years and never gotten a low battery warning.
Can I pay more to own a set of earbuds that don't sound as good and die every few months, even though there's nothing really wrong with them?
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
i still have tool ni-cd packs from 15+ years ago, and they still have enough capacity to drive the circular saw or the reciprocating saw or a couple hours on the gooseneck light or a half a day on the LED light. whoever the idiot that thought "2 years as long as you keep it chaqrged up 'cause it exploders if you put it away dead then charge it 6 months later" was an acceptable lifetime should be put in public stocks so the people can throw shit at them
Snowden and Manning are heroes.
If you want truly wireless headphones just get some much cheaper ones on Amazon. The pricing on Airpods is absurd.
No... get out of here! Next you'll be telling me that *all* batteries have limited lifespans!
If somebody dropped a good chunk of money on these Airpods (which have a *tiny* Li-ion battery to boot) and didn't realise this was going to happen needed to get fleeced.
Maybe Apple will become cowardly, and bring back the standard headphone jack.
Personally $30 is the highest I will go for wireless headphones for this reason. Not paying more for something with a limited lifespan.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
But...but....COURAGE!
This is why I like my devices to have a headphone jack for use with corded headphones. No dongle, no recharging, no degraded rechargeable batteries.
Remember those pictures of George W. Bush captioned, “Miss me yet?”
Someone needs to remake that but with a photo of the bottom of an iPhone with a headphone jack.
Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
...Fu*k off customers!
No shit?
What cracks me up is the nudnik from the article that is preparing to buy *another pair*. As my grandfather use to say, "Don't let the same dog bite ya twice."
The way the summary is written makes it sound like the writer is blaming the short battery life on lithium technology. The fact is, the batteries in these things are tiny, so of course they don't hold as much energy as larger batteries. If they made them the size of a phone, they'd hold a lot more power and would last longer.
I have to disagree with the claim that a phone battery only lasts 2 years. I'm still using an iPhone 6S (bought on release date) on the original battery, and it has over 90% of the original capacity - I fully expect it to last 4 or 5 years.
Expensive electronic tat with irreplaceable batteries is a bad idea.
Next up:
Deep frying your balls is
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
The dumb rock said buying more. Some never learn..
Apple loves dumb people who are willing to fork over their dumb money for a dumb design. Dumb people are a key part of their business model.
People are dumb enough to buy a gadget that has a non-removable battery. Then people are dumb enough to complain about it. Those are the same people that are willing to pay a dumb $5 for an app on their phone when the same can by had elsewhere for $1.
if anything, this was all planned in by Apple, just to make another steady stream of income.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
Can't understand why Apple just doesn't make them run slower: https://www.cnet.com/news/appl...
Oh, wait, your iPhone cant do that.
So sad.