This is another contradictory bit of doublethink. Can't talk about PDP flirting with the far right because that's what they want. On the other hand, the way to defeat the far right is to win the argument by debating their ideas directly and preserving free speech.
Anyway, I don't suppose you can actually cite something he said that makes what you claim seem believable, can you?
You are suggesting that it was mere coincidence, even though he was clearly influenced by YouTube videos (even titled his manifesto after a Lauren Southern video which he also cited) and chose to mention it right before the terror attack?
Well, don't worry, I'm sure he will confirm it for us during the trial.
I just wish there was a simple way to pay a reasonable price for what I want. Is that too much to ask?
Like I can subscribe to Netflix for a month for 8 bucks and watch a season or two, maybe three. So let's say 30 hours of TV, or 30 cents/episode. And that's the upper limit, you actually get two steams for that and some people watch a lot more than 30 hours worth.
Can I just pay 30 cents/episode to watch Game of Thrones, or The Man In The High Castle, or any other show?
Because it's effective. Shining a light on people like her works. She has already been banned from half the world.
As much as I dislike banning people, the marketplace of ideas has failed to deal with the problem and she directly endangers people. Directly, as in she went to the Mediterranean and endangered shipping.
Shaun is also very good, producing a lot of debunking videos.
Just waiting for the wave of videos about Lauren Southern to hit now, given that the Christchurch terrorist cited her "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory prominently in his manifesto, even using it as the title.
"Harmless" but that guy who murdered 50 people in Christchurch last week did tell people to subscribe to him on his live stream right before doing it... Because the far right uses people like PewDiePie to get people interested in their ideas even if only as a joke or way to rebel.
This does nicely illustrate the strange doublethink going on right now regarding people like PDP. On the one hand they are harmless, what they say has no effect and is just messing around. On the other hand freedom of speech is absolutely vital because speech is a powerful tool and the most fundamental way we communicate ideas and influence others.
PewDiePie is what we call "alt-lite", he dabbles in far right ideas and imagery but only as a "joke".
Examples include the use of Nazi imagery and anti-semitic tropes in his videos, and of course the infamous "death to all Jews" sign incident. Supporters claim he's just an edgy comedian but then far right mass murders tell people to subscribe to his channel on their murder-spree live stream.
So maybe he personally isn't really into that stuff, maybe he is, it doesn't matter. He acts as a gateway, normalizing it and even promoting it as a way to rebel against "the man" who for some reason gets all triggered by swastikas and people calling for genocide.
Rowling doesn't play to the progressive crowd, she trolls homophobes by making hot gay sex canon in Harry Potter.
Actually they are the same code base. For example Tesla uses machine vision to provide blind spot warnings using the side cameras, which is also used by the self driving code to know when the neighbouring lane is clear.
They are incrementally adding the features they need to get to full self driving, such as the ability to read traffic lights and road signs. Those features become available in the level 2 driving aids for live beta testing by their customers. That is their stated plan - let customers test the tech and train the AI.
Tesla has some level 2 driver assistance tech. Audi has level 3 but can't seem to get it approved for release, GM and Waymo/Google have full level 4 self driving.
Blocking people from jobs because of where they were born or their heritage is taking us right back to the 1930s.
As it happens Chinese companies do allow westerners near their secrets. Plenty of jobs for foreign engineers over there. They are also getting into open source, e.g. Creality has open sourced both the software and hardware for its very popular range of 3D printers.
Wiping your browser history and personal stuff is pretty standard before leaving a company, hardly suspicious.
If he did steal their tech then you have to wonder if it's worth it. They are years behind in this area, rolling back their promises and no longer talking about a timeline for it.
Aren't drug prices subsidised too? In the UK there is a fixed cost per prescription, about â10. That is usually a month's worth of drugs. You get medical equipment for free too, they will even come and modify your house to your needs if necessary.
What we pay is based in earnings and hard to calculate as it's rolled up with other social security items, but it's affordable and free for those on lower incomes.
It was supposed to be impossible to get HDCP keys for devices that would let you make copies of protected streams. The standard even includes the ability to revoke keys if they are used for that purpose, and some older software and physical players need updates to replace the key with a new one due to revocations.
But of course it didn't work and there was high demand for devices which make copies or strip out the protection - not least from TV channels and streaming services. There is a Chinese company that makes a popular line which is used by Netflix and several TV networks to rip Bluray discs for streaming/broadcast.
I don't know what they thought would happen... I suppose it stops causal copying at home, but all that says is that they didn't anticipate the internet even in the post-Napster world.
Alternatively, go ahead and publish, but include the note that the job isn't actually finished.
That's what they are arguing for. Too many scientists won't submit and too many journals will reject based on the p value alone, which means some interesting ideas and data goes unpublished.
They are not arguing for "crank" research, just that the p value isn't the be-all and end-all, and in fact no single data point should be. Work should be considered on all its merits.
Cars today are far more reliable than cars from 50 years ago, but are also vastly more complex. Modern cars have many, many more features than older ones and thus many more things to go wrong, yet are still more reliable.
At least that's how it is in Europe, where laws mean that if a manufacturer makes an unreliable car it's going to cost them. Even out of the warranty period they usually end up paying most of the cost of expensive repairs due to quality issues or design flaws. Volvo are operating in that environment.
Being forced against your will to participate in pornography is sexual assault. Legally I mean, depending on the jurisdiction of course. Mental injury is considered equivalent to physical injury for some crimes, in the same way that mental illness is considered as real and serious as physical illness by many legal systems.
The other advantage with AI is that you can observe it's thought process and see how it made decisions. It will give you a detailed breakdown of the factors it considered, how it weighted them and what logic it used. Try getting that from a politician.
I don't think people would be happy with the AI in control but it might be an interesting tool for generating advice and analysis.
Slashdot Mirror
I would get YouTube Premium if it was 2 bucks a month. The current price, higher than Netflix, isn't worth it.
This is another contradictory bit of doublethink. Can't talk about PDP flirting with the far right because that's what they want. On the other hand, the way to defeat the far right is to win the argument by debating their ideas directly and preserving free speech.
Anyway, I don't suppose you can actually cite something he said that makes what you claim seem believable, can you?
You are suggesting that it was mere coincidence, even though he was clearly influenced by YouTube videos (even titled his manifesto after a Lauren Southern video which he also cited) and chose to mention it right before the terror attack?
Well, don't worry, I'm sure he will confirm it for us during the trial.
I just wish there was a simple way to pay a reasonable price for what I want. Is that too much to ask?
Like I can subscribe to Netflix for a month for 8 bucks and watch a season or two, maybe three. So let's say 30 hours of TV, or 30 cents/episode. And that's the upper limit, you actually get two steams for that and some people watch a lot more than 30 hours worth.
Can I just pay 30 cents/episode to watch Game of Thrones, or The Man In The High Castle, or any other show?
Because it's effective. Shining a light on people like her works. She has already been banned from half the world.
As much as I dislike banning people, the marketplace of ideas has failed to deal with the problem and she directly endangers people. Directly, as in she went to the Mediterranean and endangered shipping.
hbomberguy did a video specifically about PewDiePie: https://youtu.be/GjNILjFters
Shaun is also very good, producing a lot of debunking videos.
Just waiting for the wave of videos about Lauren Southern to hit now, given that the Christchurch terrorist cited her "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory prominently in his manifesto, even using it as the title.
"Harmless" but that guy who murdered 50 people in Christchurch last week did tell people to subscribe to him on his live stream right before doing it... Because the far right uses people like PewDiePie to get people interested in their ideas even if only as a joke or way to rebel.
This does nicely illustrate the strange doublethink going on right now regarding people like PDP. On the one hand they are harmless, what they say has no effect and is just messing around. On the other hand freedom of speech is absolutely vital because speech is a powerful tool and the most fundamental way we communicate ideas and influence others.
PewDiePie is what we call "alt-lite", he dabbles in far right ideas and imagery but only as a "joke".
Examples include the use of Nazi imagery and anti-semitic tropes in his videos, and of course the infamous "death to all Jews" sign incident. Supporters claim he's just an edgy comedian but then far right mass murders tell people to subscribe to his channel on their murder-spree live stream.
So maybe he personally isn't really into that stuff, maybe he is, it doesn't matter. He acts as a gateway, normalizing it and even promoting it as a way to rebel against "the man" who for some reason gets all triggered by swastikas and people calling for genocide.
Rowling doesn't play to the progressive crowd, she trolls homophobes by making hot gay sex canon in Harry Potter.
How much do they charge for what amounts to a small extra LCD display and a light bulb?
Actually they are the same code base. For example Tesla uses machine vision to provide blind spot warnings using the side cameras, which is also used by the self driving code to know when the neighbouring lane is clear.
They are incrementally adding the features they need to get to full self driving, such as the ability to read traffic lights and road signs. Those features become available in the level 2 driving aids for live beta testing by their customers. That is their stated plan - let customers test the tech and train the AI.
Tesla has some level 2 driver assistance tech. Audi has level 3 but can't seem to get it approved for release, GM and Waymo/Google have full level 4 self driving.
Blocking people from jobs because of where they were born or their heritage is taking us right back to the 1930s.
As it happens Chinese companies do allow westerners near their secrets. Plenty of jobs for foreign engineers over there. They are also getting into open source, e.g. Creality has open sourced both the software and hardware for its very popular range of 3D printers.
My arguments are based on evidence, but I use stories to illustrate them because it's an effective tactic.
Wiping your browser history and personal stuff is pretty standard before leaving a company, hardly suspicious.
If he did steal their tech then you have to wonder if it's worth it. They are years behind in this area, rolling back their promises and no longer talking about a timeline for it.
Aren't drug prices subsidised too? In the UK there is a fixed cost per prescription, about â10. That is usually a month's worth of drugs. You get medical equipment for free too, they will even come and modify your house to your needs if necessary.
What we pay is based in earnings and hard to calculate as it's rolled up with other social security items, but it's affordable and free for those on lower incomes.
Stop lying. Stop with the Fox talking points.
Just stop.
We have heard it all before. The evidence, the data says otherwise. This is the worst kind of decision making by feelz instead of facts and reason.
It was supposed to be impossible to get HDCP keys for devices that would let you make copies of protected streams. The standard even includes the ability to revoke keys if they are used for that purpose, and some older software and physical players need updates to replace the key with a new one due to revocations.
But of course it didn't work and there was high demand for devices which make copies or strip out the protection - not least from TV channels and streaming services. There is a Chinese company that makes a popular line which is used by Netflix and several TV networks to rip Bluray discs for streaming/broadcast.
I don't know what they thought would happen... I suppose it stops causal copying at home, but all that says is that they didn't anticipate the internet even in the post-Napster world.
Softcore porn, as in nudity designed to arouse, e.g. Playboy, is still porn. At least in the eyes of most legal systems.
I wonder what the cost/benefit ratio for the DRM looks like.
Costs:
- Develop the DRM
- Manage the keys/accounts
- Protect secrets
- Piss off customers
- Lose sales to people outside your ecosystem/who hate DRM
Benefits:
- Lower piracy for a limited time
- Regional pricing for a limited time
- ???
Alternatively, go ahead and publish, but include the note that the job isn't actually finished.
That's what they are arguing for. Too many scientists won't submit and too many journals will reject based on the p value alone, which means some interesting ideas and data goes unpublished.
They are not arguing for "crank" research, just that the p value isn't the be-all and end-all, and in fact no single data point should be. Work should be considered on all its merits.
A friend took his three daughters to see the new Mary Poppins film and a McDonalds. Cost him 140 Euro.
Cars today are far more reliable than cars from 50 years ago, but are also vastly more complex. Modern cars have many, many more features than older ones and thus many more things to go wrong, yet are still more reliable.
At least that's how it is in Europe, where laws mean that if a manufacturer makes an unreliable car it's going to cost them. Even out of the warranty period they usually end up paying most of the cost of expensive repairs due to quality issues or design flaws. Volvo are operating in that environment.
A decent post ruined in the last sentence by a random outburst of homophobia. Come on AC, you can be better than that.
Being forced against your will to participate in pornography is sexual assault. Legally I mean, depending on the jurisdiction of course. Mental injury is considered equivalent to physical injury for some crimes, in the same way that mental illness is considered as real and serious as physical illness by many legal systems.
The other advantage with AI is that you can observe it's thought process and see how it made decisions. It will give you a detailed breakdown of the factors it considered, how it weighted them and what logic it used. Try getting that from a politician.
I don't think people would be happy with the AI in control but it might be an interesting tool for generating advice and analysis.