You're pissing in the wind. These freaks of nature are working on their own logic ruleset.
For example, BY DEFINITION, large companies cannot release source code that is acceptable to their fickle, anti-social minds.
Also, BY DEFINITION, anything large and complicated, such that it cannot be understood totally by a single teenaged individual, is not acceptable source code.
Also BY DEFINITION, anything not written in C, C++, Perl or PHP cannot possibly be appropriate source code for their elite, superior minds.
So, by DEFINITION, Java will never, ever, be acceptable to them.
Dumb fucks. You're given the Moon so you try to take the Earth and the Sun.
What, is having the source code not good enough for you?
Try unzipping src.jar and you'll see the source code for the entire Java API. Look! It's right there!
Shit, even if you DIDN'T have the source code, it wouldn't matter, since there's a near-1:1 mapping between the source code and the compiled byte code. (Try downloading Jad and playing with it if you don't believe me)
So what they really missed is looking around the world and realizing we have the MOST free national laws (to use the term loosly).
Bwahahaha, you're cracking me up! AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA.
BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HOLY FUCK, DO YOU PIECE OF SHIT AMERICANS ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS CRAP? THAT IS SO FUCKING SCARY!!!
Give me a call next time you want to have consensual oral sex, I've got a direct line to your police department, I'll have a word or two with them.
Don't try to make 256-bit encryption software either, that's BAD! BAD AMERICAN! BAD!
Don't even think about badmouthing Ford automobiles or Oracle databases in your local crap-zine. BAD AMERICAN! THINK GOOD! DO NOT DO DOUBLE PLUS UNGOOD THINGS!
Java is not really a cross-platform development environment; it is a platform in itself (this is also pointed out by Bjarne Stroustrup, which is readily able to run on almost any machine, but one in which platform specific features can be used only with great difficulty.
But later on, on the subject of porting C or C++ applications between architectures, you say:
It can be pretty painful to perform such a port, but it can be done.
So why do you feel this need to single Java out in your earlier statement? I think you should reexamine your biases.
Sorehands! Still at it I see. Three years ago, I did data entry for a month with absolutely no ill side effects. I was tired at the end of every day, but I never had any pains in my hands.
You can't blame Mattel for your bad genetics for ever, you know.
I dun get it. One soundcard pushing through two 16-bit channels at 48khz is the same as another soundcard pushing through two 16-bit channels at 48khz. What gives?
Any Philosophy grads/majors want to give me the heads up on what the courses are like? After being crushed by a miserable Computer Science experience (now you know how trolls are made) I've realized that I'd make an utterly horrid Computer Scientist/Mathematician. The sheer repetition killed me. Does Philosophy have that same sort of repetition?* Anyways, even if it does, I can't see it being anything but sheer bliss after my experiences with Computer Science.
Note: I'm not knocking repetition as a mechanism for learning.
Re:I don't care how many time I have to say it!!!!
on
LotR Cleans Up at AFI
·
· Score: -1
You're kidding, right?
Re:I don't care how many time I have to say it!!!!
on
LotR Cleans Up at AFI
·
· Score: -1
I don't get the N'Sync --> George Lucas connection. Anyone care to explain?
Oh yes, such obvious effort was spent that I have no idea whatsoever who Arwen is, after watching that snooze fest for 3 hours. Only good part was the battle between Gandalf and Sauren (or whatever his name was) when Gandalf was pushed 'off' of the platform. That's what, 2 seconds?
Right.
Here's a brief synopsis of this movie: Close-up shots of talking heads. Far shots of New Zealand. Far shots of paintings. Medium and Far shots of really fake looking little CG characters walking.
Imperialism relies on viewing other societies as 'beneath' your own. Americans are bred to sneer at other countries. Just like their bred to blindly pledge allegiance to thier country. They can't help it.
Re:Kids, don't learn English from reading this rev
on
Review: Impostor
·
· Score: -1
They probably put that in because the order that constructors are called in Java is somewhere close to the exact opposite of intuitive. Like, say, the different behaviour of subclasses depending on whether the superclass has a default constructor or not(boy was that dumb!), despite the fact that that superclass itself inevitably has Object as it's own superclass (which has a default constructor of it's own) . It just dun make sense!
Re:Receiving Threatening Phone Calls Is Cool?!
on
Goodbye, "Majestic"
·
· Score: -1
Hey jackass, if it's your first date, she ain't your girlfriend. Hell, I went on six 'dates' with Persian Girl and I'd be a fool to have called her my girlfriend.
Slashdot Mirror
You're pissing in the wind. These freaks of nature are working on their own logic ruleset.
For example, BY DEFINITION, large companies cannot release source code that is acceptable to their fickle, anti-social minds.
Also, BY DEFINITION, anything large and complicated, such that it cannot be understood totally by a single teenaged individual, is not acceptable source code.
Also BY DEFINITION, anything not written in C, C++, Perl or PHP cannot possibly be appropriate source code for their elite, superior minds.
So, by DEFINITION, Java will never, ever, be acceptable to them.
Dumb fucks. You're given the Moon so you try to take the Earth and the Sun.
What, is having the source code not good enough for you?
Try unzipping src.jar and you'll see the source code for the entire Java API. Look! It's right there!
Shit, even if you DIDN'T have the source code, it wouldn't matter, since there's a near-1:1 mapping between the source code and the compiled byte code. (Try downloading Jad and playing with it if you don't believe me)
What more do you want than the source code? WTF?!
What... the fuck. Are you an idiot? A still object looks the same on a computer monitor whether you're getting 1FPS or 10000FPS.
WTF does Camera exposure time have to do with anything?
Yeah, if you like your computer crashing all the time, AMD is great!
Fucking AMD and Linux morons. You're "cheapskates," not "clever consumers". You do realize that, don't you?
No stop, you're killing me.
So what they really missed is looking around the world and realizing we have the MOST free national laws (to use the term loosly).
Bwahahaha, you're cracking me up! AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA.
BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HOLY FUCK, DO YOU PIECE OF SHIT AMERICANS ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS CRAP? THAT IS SO FUCKING SCARY!!!
Give me a call next time you want to have consensual oral sex, I've got a direct line to your police department, I'll have a word or two with them.
Don't try to make 256-bit encryption software either, that's BAD! BAD AMERICAN! BAD!
Don't even think about badmouthing Ford automobiles or Oracle databases in your local crap-zine. BAD AMERICAN! THINK GOOD! DO NOT DO DOUBLE PLUS UNGOOD THINGS!
Seriously though, I had to do a double take to make sure I read that right! In danger of falling foul of other countries' laws, indeed.
Perl, PHP, ASP, ColdFusion
No offense, but those are all third rate programming languages that are absolutely useless for large scale projects.
Java is not really a cross-platform development environment; it is a platform in itself (this is also pointed out by Bjarne Stroustrup, which is readily able to run on almost any machine, but one in which platform specific features can be used only with great difficulty.
But later on, on the subject of porting C or C++ applications between architectures, you say:
It can be pretty painful to perform such a port, but it can be done.
So why do you feel this need to single Java out in your earlier statement? I think you should reexamine your biases.
Sorehands! Still at it I see. Three years ago, I did data entry for a month with absolutely no ill side effects. I was tired at the end of every day, but I never had any pains in my hands.
You can't blame Mattel for your bad genetics for ever, you know.
With an Octopuses garden, in the shade.
^.^
I dun get it. One soundcard pushing through two 16-bit channels at 48khz is the same as another soundcard pushing through two 16-bit channels at 48khz. What gives?
Do you speak Persian? If so, I envy you.
( See my posting history ^.^ )
Anyways, I have to say, I envy you.
Let me get this straight, you went to a school with a CS Major and you dropped out because it was too EASY?
Fool.
Any Philosophy grads/majors want to give me the heads up on what the courses are like? After being crushed by a miserable Computer Science experience (now you know how trolls are made) I've realized that I'd make an utterly horrid Computer Scientist/Mathematician. The sheer repetition killed me. Does Philosophy have that same sort of repetition?* Anyways, even if it does, I can't see it being anything but sheer bliss after my experiences with Computer Science.
Note: I'm not knocking repetition as a mechanism for learning.
You're kidding, right?
I don't get the N'Sync --> George Lucas connection. Anyone care to explain?
Oh yes, such obvious effort was spent that I have no idea whatsoever who Arwen is, after watching that snooze fest for 3 hours. Only good part was the battle between Gandalf and Sauren (or whatever his name was) when Gandalf was pushed 'off' of the platform. That's what, 2 seconds?
Right.
Here's a brief synopsis of this movie: Close-up shots of talking heads. Far shots of New Zealand. Far shots of paintings. Medium and Far shots of really fake looking little CG characters walking.
You've got a degree, ergo you're a shoe-in for A)grad school or B)A plethora of non-software related jobs. I'm not sure what you're complaining about.
Only $45US/hour? Go fuck yourself, you spoiled little asshole.
Imperialism relies on viewing other societies as 'beneath' your own. Americans are bred to sneer at other countries. Just like their bred to blindly pledge allegiance to thier country. They can't help it.
Yeah, just like 80% of the other posters (including myself) Good grief...
Grr...
you could see what I've seen with your eyes.
They probably put that in because the order that constructors are called in Java is somewhere close to the exact opposite of intuitive. Like, say, the different behaviour of subclasses depending on whether the superclass has a default constructor or not(boy was that dumb!), despite the fact that that superclass itself inevitably has Object as it's own superclass (which has a default constructor of it's own) . It just dun make sense!
Hey jackass, if it's your first date, she ain't your girlfriend. Hell, I went on six 'dates' with Persian Girl and I'd be a fool to have called her my girlfriend.