Slashdot Mirror


Search for Terrestrial Intelligence

joshv writes: "Scientists have prepared a new message to be beamed out to the stars. Unlike the messages of the past this one tries to include some basic resistance to the noise that might be introduced in transit. The CETI project page contains a link to the new message. It a big bag of 0's and 1's. About 10% noise has been added. Can you crack the code? Details of the project as well as an interview with the one of the creators of the new message can be found in this New Scientist article. A hint to decoding: think simple raster based images and remember your powers of 2." Might want to get your copy of Beyond Contact or at least look at the first message they sent.

342 comments

  1. The Message by bofus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I got it on the first try: All Your Base Are Belong To Us.

    1. Re:The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone on this forum read the Killing Star? This is so stupid to shout our position from the roof tops for everyone to see when the only thing we know about alien races is:

      1. High tech civilizations are top dog, you dont become the rulers of your planet being wimps.

      2. They would choose their survival over our own.
      They will act cunningly, viciously and quickly if they ever felt they were in any danger.

      3. They assume the previous two about us.

      Sounds like a package deal to get a relativistic bombing for all our trouble. You think that the universe is silent maybe for a reason? Maybe everybody out there isnt stupid enough to send out targetting infromation.

  2. Terrestrial Intelligence? by rhekman · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all knew there's no intelligent life on earth, what I want to know is there any in outer space!

    Reid

    --
    I like teamwork. It's easier to assign blame that way.
    1. Re:Terrestrial Intelligence? by Hatechall · · Score: 1

      I am going to put my Karma on the line to say this, but what the hell.
      How is this a troll?
      He interpreted the phrase correctly and pointed out the error without being obnoxious or adding any slashdot post flames.
      Sure i didnt exactly crap my pants laughing when reading this, but the poster was not so damn cynical to be labled a troll.
      I just dont get it.
      (Hey AC, Shut up, would you)

    2. Re:Terrestrial Intelligence? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      You`re new here. Anyone can moderate. It shows. Its not fair. Life`s not fair. I wouldnt worry about it.

    3. Re:Terrestrial Intelligence? by atlep · · Score: 3, Funny
      We all knew there's no intelligent life on earth, what I want to know is there any in outer space!

      I don't think you got it. The search for terrestrial intelligence was aimed at us /.'ers to see if we could decode the message.

      In fact, noone seems to have done this fully, the black and white pictures presented are okay, but there is more!

      In addition to the clear pictures, the pythagoras, the chemistry, the planets etc. there seems to be some random patterns in the form of blocks. They're not random. If you tilt your head 45 degrees to the left an try to focus into the patterns, you will actually see som real cool 3D images!

      I won't tell you what the pictures are, go see for youself instead. (I saw a link to a gif somewhere else here in the discussion.)

    4. Re:Terrestrial Intelligence? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      The Slashdot headline was not an error - it was a joke. This guy didn't get the joke. That's why it was modded down.

    5. Re:Terrestrial Intelligence? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      You're joking, right? If not, what page of the transmission are you talking about? I can't find anything like that.

    6. Re:Terrestrial Intelligence? by atlep · · Score: 1

      Of course I'm joking :-)

  3. First Message in PDF? by ayden · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wonder no one responded!

    Perhaps they'll have better luck with plain text.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    1. Re:First Message in PDF? by hypnos · · Score: 1

      don't bother looking for terrestrial intelligence, probably won't find it...extraterrestrial, maybe...

    2. Re:First Message in PDF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, plain text would be just as unreadable. There are still primitive extrasolar civilizations using EBCDIC instead of ASCII!

    3. Re:First Message in PDF? by Grue · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, a scary alternate universe where IBM is still king. Sounds like a good sci-fi story to me. Night of the Living dead with soul-less suits wandering the earth.

      Now that we've replaced IBM with Microsoft, things are much better.

      Josh

    4. Re:First Message in PDF? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

      well, they did also include an Adobe Acrobat installation CD for Windows 95... oh yeah, and a Windows 95 Installation cd for an x86 compatible platform, so it seems they got their bases covered.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    5. Re:First Message in PDF? by Verne · · Score: 1

      >and a Windows 95 Installation cd

      They are going to smite us for that one...

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
  4. Hah! Stupid Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look, they can only count to 1! Zarqblast, how do you think they made it to radio's with only 0 and 1's?

    1. Re:Hah! Stupid Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple there are only two channels!

    2. Re:Hah! Stupid Humans by mother_superius · · Score: 1

      no; they are counting well past 1; merely in base2 rather than base10. You can count to more than 9; right?

    3. Re:Hah! Stupid Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was a joke, stupid.

  5. Terrestrial Intellegence? by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 1

    What about these people? They had the idea a long time ago...

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
  6. Huge mod points by Publicus · · Score: 1

    For the first person who puts that sucker through a perl script and translates it to ASCII

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  7. Please... by BrianGa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As if the type of message we send is relevent...If 'they' are advanced enough to recieve and translate a message of ours, making it with less noise, this language or that language, is for naught. Either someone/thing gets the message, or they do not. There is no in between.

    1. Re:Please... by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Actually, I believe the idea is that they're trying to make the message available to even the most basic of intelligent life forms that may receive it. In other words, they're transmitting messages based on the way they themselves look for them.

      The idea for cutting down the noise is so that whatever has a chance of picking up the message won't just ignore as more noise. This message will stand out, and if anyone happens to hear a bit of it, they'll stop and think, "Wait a second... I don't know what that is, but that's definitely SOMETHING". It's like putting their message in large, bold print on a billboard instead of putting it in small, italic print on a flyer. It makes whatever has a chance of seeing it actually notice it, rather than pass it over.

      And remember, this is the sort of message that even we can receive. Many people assume that aliens will be energy-based lifeforms millions of years ahead of us in development like the Vorlons or the Taelons, but the reality is that this sort of message could be picked up by aliens that haven't even mastered space travel, and may even be in their own unique technological equivalent to the late 19th or early 20th century. I always wonder why so many people are convinced that whatever we come across could actually be a little bit behind us in development... maybe it's humility, or maybe it's just too much science fiction TV shows. ::shrug::

    2. Re:Please... by nomadic · · Score: 2


      Actually, I believe the idea is that they're trying to make the message available to even the most basic of intelligent life

      I know about some marketing executives they could test it on...

    3. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should put the message in a larger font so they'll be sure to see it. Of course, then bandwidth becomes an issue . . .

    4. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is indeed NOONE "out there" ... only us, out here, but of those that might be, what passes for understanding might vary enormously. All it has to do is survive ( reproduce ) and even geeks manage to do that.

  8. I decrypt it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The message should read :
    Have you seen Bin Ladden??? If so, please contact us at :
    Federal Bureau of Investigation
    J. Edgar Hoover Building
    935 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
    (202) 324-3000

    1. Re:I decrypt it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the message is simply looking to gather anonymous tips or leads. hence, no jurisdiction is needed.

    2. Re:I decrypt it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, mod down the Arab AC you fucking Jew moderators!

  9. what about the transporter? by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    they didn't include directions on how to build the massive transporter device, so an alien civilization can send one of their foremost extraterrestrial researchers to earth to meet her deceased father in a hallucinated dream-world.

    1. Re:what about the transporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have to start it with a broadcast of hitler remember?

  10. if you're bored... by 3prong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dunno who wrote this, but this story reminded me of it:
    ----

    Imagine if you will... the leader of the fifth invader force speaking to the commander in chief...

    "They're made out of meat."
    "Meat?"
    "Meat. They're made out of meat."
    "Meat?"
    "There's no doubt about it. We picked several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, probed them all the way through. They're completely meat."
    "That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars."
    "They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines."
    "So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact."
    "They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."
    "That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat."
    "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat."
    "Maybe they're like the Orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage."
    "Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take too long. Do you have any idea the life span of meat?"
    "Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the Weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside."
    "Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads like the Weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through." "No brain?"
    "Oh, there is a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat!"
    "So... what does the thinking?"
    "You're not understanding, are you? The brain does the thinking. The meat."
    "Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"
    "Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you getting the picture?"
    "Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat."
    "Finally, Yes. They are indeed made out meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years."
    "So what does the meat have in mind?" "First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the universe, contact other sentients, swap ideas and information. The usual."
    "We're supposed to talk to meat?"
    "That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there? Anyone home?' That sort of thing."
    "They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?"
    "Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat."
    "I thought you just told me they used radio."
    "They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat."
    "Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?"
    "Officially or unofficially?"
    "Both."
    "Officially, we are required to contact, welcome, and log in any and all sentient races or multibeings in the quadrant, without prejudice, fear, or favor. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing."
    "I was hoping you would say that."
    "It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?"
    "I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say?" `Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?"
    "Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they only travel through C space. Which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact."
    "So we just pretend there's no one home in the universe."
    "That's it."
    "Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you have probed? You're sure they won't remember?"
    "They'll be considered crackpots if they do. We went into their heads and smoothed out their meat so that we're just a dream to them."
    "A dream to meat! How strangely appropriate, that we should be meat's dream."
    "And we can mark this sector unoccupied."
    "Good. Agreed, officially and unofficially. Case closed. Any others? Anyone interesting on that side of the galaxy?"
    "Yes, a rather shy but sweet hydrogen core cluster intelligence in a class nine star in G445 zone. Was in contact two galactic rotations ago, wants to be friendly again."
    "They always come around."
    "And why not? Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the universe would be if one were all alone."

    1. Re:if you're bored... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... Time for an intergalatic BBQ.

    2. Re:if you're bored... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the three dollar crack kicking in, and on a Troll Tuesday, no less!.

    3. Re:if you're bored... by SAFH · · Score: 1

      This was written by a friend of mine, Matthew.

      --

      I cannot confirm nor deny the allegation or allegations you may or may not have just made

  11. Search for.. by ParisTG · · Score: 1

    Terrestrial Intelligence? Well it's obviously not here!

  12. Message designers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seem to have an irresistible urge to "invent" a new numbering system with space-invader-like digits every time they send a message. What will space aliens think if they receive more than one message? Base-10 left-to-right 0123456789 digits aren't that bad, and have the benefit that an alien reply using our numerals will be understandable by all earthlings directly.

  13. Not on slashdot! by metatruk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, if you're looking for terrestrial Intelligence as the headline to this article says, you're looking in the wrong place!

    1. Re:Not on slashdot! by brianvan · · Score: 2

      Well, it doesn't matter where you look. Won't find much of it anyway.

  14. waste of money! by racme_2000 · · Score: 0

    i think da subject says all ;)

    1. Re:waste of money! by superpeach · · Score: 1

      nah, if we made contact with _them_ we might be able to talk them out of firing random comet like objects towards us before they actually get it right and hit us.

  15. If you print it out... by loosenut · · Score: 4, Funny

    and wrap it around the space shuttle, you get the Pepsi Logo.

  16. Not Chapter 2 by Un1v4c · · Score: 1


    Hope they haven't been waiting on chapter 2 of the first message..., "Damn Orgloff, no more pictures!"
    May as well beam up my calculus III book, they'd probably have better luck...

    --

    I gave myself to Jesus, but now he never calls
  17. Crack the code? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sheeeesh, why don't they make it more obvious, not something that has to be "cracked"?

    Like a regular sequence of on/off that just can't be missed (your "start bits" that get noticed :-), and then raster images of what they want to communicate, repeating over and over.

    "Hey, look at this regular pattern of signal! That's weird. And it's interspersed with these garbage; if we just kind of line it up in rows, look, images!" (Assuming the concept of images means anything to whatever intelligence comes across it :-)

    (Of course, I might be way off base, as I didn't read the article. Will I get kicked off /. because of that?)

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Crack the code? by SIGFPE · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Who's interested in getting responses from dumb aliens?

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    2. Re:Crack the code? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      Okay, I guess it's not too bad. Wonder why they used 127 instead of 128. And there is kind of a "stripe" in it, which acts as a hint to line it up (although it's not perfect; is that the "noise" they introduced? Why not just make it noise-resistant, than introduce noise??)

      Here's an ugly perl command to reformat it (I started doing so in vi, then realized there were 6000 more lines to do :-)

      perl -n -e 'chomp; $a .= $_; if (length($a) >= 127) { print substr($a),0,127), "\n"; $a = substr($a,127); }' output_stream.txt

      -me

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:Crack the code? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      D'oh! One more post from me. That "stripe" of on bits, is actually kind of a "start bit" sequence. The hole image need to be shifted up to the first 1's, in order to line up right. Sorry 'bout that. Modified perl is left as an exercise to the reader :-)

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    4. Re:Crack the code? by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "Who's interested in getting responses from dumb aliens?"

      That explains why none of them have really bothered to contact any of us.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    5. Re:Crack the code? by mlk · · Score: 1

      if they are looking at our signals, them? ;-)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    6. Re:Crack the code? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Like a regular sequence of on/off that just can't be missed (your "start bits" that get noticed :-), and then raster images of what they want to communicate, repeating over and over.

      Yup, that's exactly what they did. (Which makes sense - at least to a being that thinks in two dimensions and represents thought with two-dimensional symbols. The goal is, after all, to make it easy to figure out, even with noise.)

      Assuming http://www.huntthepickle.org/~dan/decoded.txt is the decoded version (Yeah, you didn't read the article, and I was too lazy to download Perl for this old Windoze box ;-)...

      "Hmph. Frame 8. Stupid Earthlings haven't even realized that the outermost body in their system is actually two bodies rotating about a common center of mass, not one."

      Of course, any extraterrestrial recipient of this signal that had interferometers good enough to call us out on this point would know who we were anyways. I mean, something has to be replenishing the third planet's atmosphere's huge stockpile of molecular oxygen! ;-)

      The only thing I don't get is how the aliens are supposed to figure out what the figures in Frame 9 are. They might conclude they're lifeforms (by the chemistry below them), and assume they're the senders of the message, but it'd still be a wild-ass guess.

      (The projection of the planet's geography was pretty neat, though.)

    7. Re:Crack the code? by oni · · Score: 2

      (The projection of the planet's geography was pretty neat, though.)

      I've been wondering about that. We are used to thinking of continent (land surrounded by water) How many planets do you think have more water than land?

    8. Re:Crack the code? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1
      Or in bash, this seems to work;

      dd if=seti.txt bs=1 skip=69 | fold -w127 | sed -es"/0/ /g"| less

      I can recognise the circle, pythagoras, pictures of DNA and stuff. Also the message loops around.

      Ahh shit, someone's posted an image already, my cow-orker just printed it off..

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    9. Re:Crack the code? by GekkePrutser · · Score: 1
      Sheeeesh, why don't they make it more obvious, not something that has to be "cracked"?



      Good idea. If they crack it we'd have to arrest them when they visit, for violating the DMCA!

    10. Re:Crack the code? by anshil · · Score: 1

      Well I guess for now any alien will do.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    11. Re:Crack the code? by hatchet · · Score: 1

      So they can put \n as 128th char, silly.

    12. Re:Crack the code? by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Let's just hope they use a rectangular coordinate system and not polar... :) I'd imagine it is possible...

      If you refute this with the fact that rectangular coordinates are easier to deal with, then just remember that most humans use base-10 for math.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    13. Re:Crack the code? by biggertex · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they didn't stick a corporate logo in there... "Brought to you by the good people of Coca-cola."

    14. Re:Crack the code? by alanh · · Score: 1
      How many planets do you think have more water than land?


      Well, we've found one so far....
      --
      - AlanH
    15. Re:Crack the code? by oni · · Score: 1

      One data point huh?

    16. Re:Crack the code? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      Earlier they define symbols for water and dirt, by explaining their chemical composition. Those symbols appear on the water and land, so there wouldn't be any confusion over which is which.

    17. Re:Crack the code? by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      They used 127 instead of 128 because 127 is prime. So is 23. So when the aliens get this string of 370967 bits and decide to try making a picture out of it, there's only one way to make it line up evenly: 127 by 127 by 23. Let's just hope they don't try making 127 pages of 127 by 23, fail to make any sense out of it, and give up. I guess that isn't very likely.

  18. This reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This reminds me of some story from the beginnings of SETI back in the late 60's or early 70's; some big-wig scientist brought a message to the table and said "this is what we should send to ET." All the other big-wig scientists spent a while looking it over and finally said "we give, what does it mean?" The first big-wig explained that it was a message which made no cultural or biological assumptions about the listener, and was based on resonant frequencies of hydrogen and such, etc. All the scientists agreed that it was a very good message to send to ET, but the fact remains that some of the world's finest scientific minds could not figure out what it meant.

    So, if we require a hint to figure this message out ourselves, what makes us think ET won't just ignore it as a random burst of static?

  19. arnt they listening ? by sh0rtie · · Score: 1



    This presumably is if they havent got our radio and television signals that we have been sending into space for the last 100years and have a concept of "digital" or even language, look how much english has changed in 2000 years.

    the more i read this the more i think it is merely some bored students thesis project to get their degree more than a serious scientific project

  20. DUH!!!! by ryanh50 · · Score: 0

    Ok, we as the arrogant humans that we are are assuming that aliens not only can understand our language (english, french, german, or whatever) but also that they use and will interperite the binary system. If we want to contact other races why not send out the most unnatural most interfering em (electro magnetic) noise we can. Make it far reaching. Send out probes that only send out the most destrubing noise we can muster. This would most likely provoke attention and cause the finder to look for a source of this disruptive noise.

    1. Re:DUH!!!! by mlk · · Score: 1

      Still assming they know about (and/or care about) EM.

      Nope, your best bet is to fire a Nuke at every planet we can find. Have a very clever cluster bomb nuke the word
      "Hi" in the ground :)

      What I'm really worried about is what if we've just sent "Ya mam stinks" in Alien?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:DUH!!!! by Wumpus · · Score: 1
      Send out probes that only send out the most destrubing noise we can muster.

      Are you sure we want to launch Britney Spears into space?

    3. Re:DUH!!!! by Antity · · Score: 1

      Nope, your best bet is to fire a Nuke at every planet we can find. Have a very clever cluster bomb nuke the word "Hi" in the ground :)

      Rather paint it in US colors and have it write "Terrorists win." on their largest continent.

      I still wonder why aliens should even think of talking to a species that every few months ignores even the very simplest form of diplomacy.

      --
      42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  21. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering how SETI would be expecting to receive a signal if we didn't even send one ourselves.

  22. What will SETI@Home make of it? by afree87 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Sure, there are a few globs of 0s and 1s one can see in the textfile, but if I ran this through SETI@Home, would it recognize this as intelligent?

    Can we get a program to see the output in SETI@home? Maybe it'll at least give us a hint as to the encoded message.

    1. Re:What will SETI@Home make of it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. SETI analysizes radio information gathered by an array of telescopes. This is manufactured traffic with noise tossed in. The data is fundamentally different. I assume that the SETI work units are formatted in a particular way...

    2. Re:What will SETI@Home make of it? by oni · · Score: 3, Informative

      SETI's automated systems make no attempt to find a message, they are looking for a signal. Note the difference: a signal is an EM spike - a message is the information that spike contains. But to answer your question, if you broadcast this message on frequencies that are commonly used by celestial objects then no, SETI probably wouldn't pick it out. If on the other hand, you used a dish as powerful as arecibo to broadcast it at the frequency of say pi*H then yeah, I think some buzzers would go off.

    3. Re:What will SETI@Home make of it? by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 1

      Not really, to avoid this kind of interferences, they match their results with another observatory. (In Englang IIRC)

  23. Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Univrs by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Just by coincidence, I was hearing radio ads today for Lily Tomlin's play "Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe" which she's doing here in San Francisco. Terrestrial intelligence being in such short supply, perhaps she can help...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  24. Nebula-nominated short story by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's by Terry Bisson. He's aware that it's circulating the Internet unattrubuted, but fortunately it seems he doesn't have a problem with it.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  25. All your stars are belong to us! by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or perhaps they transmitted DeCSS source code so some intelligent life may make use of it...

    1. Re:All your stars are belong to us! by Trem · · Score: 1

      If an alien civilization then rebroadcast the same signal back to us, what kind of legal action would you expect in response?

  26. intel or motorola by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

    How do we know whether the aliens use big or little endian??

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:intel or motorola by goingware · · Score: 2
      I just published an article on that very topic!

      --
      -- Could you use my software consulting serv
    2. Re:intel or motorola by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Yes, we know your pumped about your "new" article. But seriously, your article was only vaguly on the same topic. Don't stretch it.

    3. Re:intel or motorola by einer · · Score: 1

      You're kind of an asshole... Did you know that?

    4. Re:intel or motorola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he has a point. I can't believe I clicked on that tripe.

    5. Re:intel or motorola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're supporting this shameless self-promotion. What are you, a Jew or something?

  27. Dear earthlings, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    --- BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE ---

    1010 101:

    10001010110101011011100100. 1010100000100101010?00101001011101 "0101011010101101101010" 101010... 101101010100101010010100010100/.1010010100131337. 001001101010ph34r. 10111001010id41000101110. 1010010101011100101111111001010010010100 :-)

    11010000100101011011101010010110000!!! 11001010111101000101000011100. 10101011000001101010101010101010010101

    1101011101,
    110111

    --- END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE ---
    Visit our website at http://www.yahoo.com/~cthulhu

    1. Re:Dear earthlings, by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Your message cannot be verified.
      Terrestrials may have forged your message.
      If you want earthlings to take you seriously,
      you'll need to include your sig and fingerprint next time.
      Looking forward to your next message in 42 light-earthyears.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  28. Advanced alien civilization unlikely by CyberDruid · · Score: 4, Interesting
    With large probability, no civilization exists (nor will ever exist) which is significantly more technically advanced than we are right now. This can actually be proven given some basic assumptions and the (much underestimated) technique of proof through observational bias .

    As a warm-up, consider the following computer program: Create an array of agents ("the world"), with 50% probability it contains 10 elements and with 50% probability it contains 100 elements. If an agent knows nothing about the world except the rules, for all it knows there is a 50/50 chance that there are only 10 agents in the world. On the other hand, if it knows that it lives in slot #33, it can conclude that there are 100 agents alive. Now for the twist. If it knows that it lives in, say, slot #9, there is not still a 50/50 chance. Instead the probability is 90% that there only are 10 agents because of observational bias. It is so improbable that the agent should find itself among the 10 first if there really were 100 slots that this strengthens the probability of just 10 agents (write the program and let the agents evolve their guesses through genetic algorithms or something, if you don't believe me). Furthermore if we improve the experiment and let the array be of random size, than the best guess for a smart agent would be that he lives in the last slot or in any case that it is very unlikely that the array is, say, a factor 10 more than its slot number. How does this map to reality? Well, you and I know which slot in time that we inhabit (actually the time is not as important as our birth-number). Based on the same argument it is very unlikely that our race will survive for much longer. If we imagine that we will able to colonize planets sometime in the future, and thus increase our numbers even more, it makes the odds even worse.

    On to the aliens. For the argument above to be fair, we cannot just make an arbitrary division and count the number of humans. We must count everyone/thing that can somehow reason about this issue. Using the exact same argument, we can note that if there is, somewhere in space-time, a race that spans a large amount of stars (i.e with vast technical superiority compared to ours), it is extremely unlikely that you and I would not be one of them.

    The only escape from the logic of the above arguments is, as I see it, either:
    1. In the future we will become like the Borg, one hivemind and thus the actual number of people does not matter, since that one mind does not affect the statistics.
    2. In the future we will evolve to something very strange, which will be uncapable of posing these questions.

    By the way... A little something to make your heads spin even more ;). The above argument also applies to your age. I'll let you figure out the consequences of that one for yourselves... This is not just some crackpot theory of mine, the people who support this theory is an impressive bunch (Hawking, Tipler, Barrow, Davies, etc).

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

    1. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Ybrog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wonderful. However, there's something else you're forgetting. Whatever messages we send would not reach wherever we think this intelligence exists during my lifetime, unless it's in or very close to our solar system, right?

      So, it's more a chest-pounding look at us type thing. Maybe down the line some civilization that is more advanced than us will not only be able to travel the incredible distance to reach us, but would try because of a message generated long before they began to exist.

      OK, so it doesn't really do us much good, does it?

      I'm wondering if we'll bounce it off the moon or some satellite and get the SETI@Home folks overly excited for no reason.

      --

      bleh

    2. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by jd142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it knows that it lives in, say, slot #9, there is not still a 50/50 chance. Instead the probability is 90% that there only are 10 agents because of observational bias.



      Huh? Given the following results of flipping a coin, what is the probability that the next flip will be a H:

      HHHHHHHHHHH


      50%. Because only a 2^12 chance of having a sequence HHHHHHHHHHHH in a series of 12 flips, that is no greater or no less than any other sequence, such as HHTTHTHHTTHH. Just because you are in the 9th slot, that does not affect the outcome of the occupancy of the other 99 slots. Obviously, the first 10 are always filled in your example. So the fact that something occupies those slots does not in any way affect the probability that the other 90 will be filled, at least in your example.

      And in the real world, there's no way of knowing if even the other slots are filled



      Another probability exercise I've heard is which is more likely, that we are unique in the history of the universe and will continue to be unique in the future of the universe or that we are in the middle of the "bell curve" of life/intelligence distribution throughout the universe? Given that the universe has existed for around 12 billion years and will continue to exist for quite a number more, and that there are rather large number of planets now and were a rather large number in the past and that the odds are that there will be planets in the future, is it more likely that we are the rule or the exception?

      It is like the joke about the guy who always carried a bomb whenever he flew because the odds of there being two bombs on a plane were astronomical. There is no dependent relationship between the two acts, so he didn't affect the probability at all.



      Of course IANAPE (Probability Expert) so I'm willing to be shown the error of my ways.

    3. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only escape from the logic of the above arguments is, as I see it, either:

      You forgot one:
      3. We shoot all the statistics people and get one with our lives.

    4. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      (Reads the site and the synopsis of the Doomsday argument)

      How many angels? On just one pinhead you say?

    5. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think you're forgetting some very important factors that renders your "proof" invalid.

      First off you make the absurd claim that With large probability, no civilization exists (nor will ever exist) which is significantly more technically advanced than we are right now.

      you then go on w/ a "proof" of said claim. you give a statistical analysis of a well defined system with well defined rules. oh look at the cute computer program everyone!

      welcome to your existance. you naive little fool.

      We've barely placed any thought to the inner workings of the universe, of life, how it all works. We've yet to figure out whether or not we are unique... A mere statistical oddity... Or whether we're just one more race striving to reach a level of mental capacity and technological advancement to reach the stars.

      I submit that your list of supporters of your theory are impressive, but I would hesitate to bow down to a theory like this.

      heres a little twist on your example. given that we exist now, is there not a good possibility that someone else exists somewhere? in the future or past? or even the present? with the billions upon billions of stars in our known universe, what are the odds that we are THAT much of a fluke?

      as for your possible escape routes.. a borg mind is the best you could come up with?!?!


      from the primer you linked


      There are also a number of possible "loopholes" or alternative interpretations of what the Doomsday argument shows. For instance, it turns out that if there are many extraterrestrial civilizations and you interpret the self-sampling assumption as applying equally to all intelligent beings and not exclusively to humans, then another probability shift occurs that exactly counterbalances and cancels the probability shift that the Doomsday argument implies.


      now couldn't we take that and notice that we are still here =) and that every day we are still here, the probability goes up that this loophole in the doomsday scenario is valid... that humanity does not comprise the set of all possibilities in the scenario, and that ETs do in fact exist? Just a thought.

      --
      I ate my sig.
    6. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 1
      Given the following results of flipping a coin, what is the probability that the next flip will be a H:

      HHHHHHHHHHH

      It would depend on the coin. Your example would raise the probability of some asymmetricity in the coin.
      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    7. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a PE either, but it's pretty obvious.

      If there are 100 agents, then there would only be a 10% chance of being in the first 10 agents. If there are 10 agents, then it's a 100% chance. If there are 100 agents, there's a 1% chance you're #9, if there are 10, than it's a 10% chance. So, if you're number 9, you might as well assume it's not because you lucked out.

      At least, that's how this argument goes, it seems pretty fishy to me, but I can't really explain why.

    8. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Digicaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While that is very nice in a simple closed model, it cannot hold true as a model for the supposed existance or non-existance of extra-terrestrial life. While we, as a people, would like to imagine that we comprehend the rules governing the 'array' of intelligent beings, we do not. We cannot comprehend the number of elements in the array without comprehending one of the following:

      1. The requirements for elements in the array
      2. The number of element in the array

      Since knowing the number of elements in the array is presumptious for the nature of this discussion, let us reason that the only possible way to know the total number of elements in the array is to derive the requirements for all elements in the array. Since we have yet to fathom these requirements, we cannot formulate the statistical likelyhood that if we exist as Array(N) then there exists Array(N+1).

    9. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by zettabyte · · Score: 1

      After reading through the primer at the above mentioned site, which mostly speaks of our impending doom, here's my take (if you didn't read their primer, this won't make sense):

      We may very well be destined to doom soon, but who's to say that 200 billion is the likely 'soon' number? Why not 200 trillion? Which would mean we have a long time to go before we doom soon. Or better yet, why not 1 billion? Which would put us well past the doom soon scenario. And just because we're able to think up this 'thought experiment', how does that have any real impact in the real world, where there are a seemingly infinite number of variables that could impact the situation postitively or negatively...

      The whole thing sounds contrived. And you know what they say about statistics...

      But then again, those guys are much smarter than my dumb ass, so what do I know.

    10. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by alister · · Score: 1

      While that's interesting, it also means that you are setting a boundary on our universe, and we've no idea whether there is one (that we can comprehend). I don't think the 10 or 100 agents argument can work here. The best you can do is estimate a probability, but that's as reasonable as estimating whether the glass on my desk is full or empty - without being able to see my desk to even know whether there's a glass on it, or whether indeed I even have a desk.

      Remember folks, in an infinite universe, not only are all things possible, they're actually happening right now. I think it's likely that should we find "life" on another planet, we won't recognise it as life, let alone as intelligent life. For all we know, Neptune could be a life form.

      Alister

    11. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by FFFish · · Score: 5, Funny

      The chances are so close to 100% as to be 100%: you're obviously flipping with a two-headed coin. Odds are 1:2^12 that you're not cheating!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    12. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by hackerhue · · Score: 2
      Furthermore if we improve the experiment and let the array be of random size...

      Of course, you need to define a distribution for that to make any sense at all. Plus, the priors are unknown. In order to get anything meaningful out of Bayesian analysis, you need to know the priors, and we obviously don't.

      Next, you assume that vast technical superiority = many more inhabitants. Simply not true.

      The above argument also applies to your age.

      Hmmm. Did you read the FAQ from the site? Question 10.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    13. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is one of those glass half-full/half-empty type arguments which isn't even worth mentioning. I'm wondering if these sort of people who buy into anthropic reasoning go around all day saying "Wow! I saw 3 blue cars driving into work today!! What are the odds of seeing not 2, not 4, but exactly 3 blue cars! It seems the universe has been tailor made such that on this very day I was meant to see 3 blue cars!"

      Anthropic reasoning says, roughly, "since human life and consciousness seemingly require an extraordinary number of 'coincidences' or improbable events in the artificial set of rules we have derived for the behaviour of things, it follows that the universe was either predesigned to result in human consciousness, or human consciousness is an unavoidable consequence of 'the stuff' universe is made of." How is this unlike saying "it is extraordinarily improbable that my horoscope says that 'you will have many challenges today, and you will meet a tall dark stranger', and yet I had many challenges today and met a tall dark stranger! It follows that my life is an unavoidable consequence of my horoscope!"

    14. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by supruzr · · Score: 1

      Ok, now that you've told us where the esteemed Lucasian professor stands, I want to say two things:

      a)that's a bunch of crap; I hope you don't believe it. The anthropic principle always strikes me as a bit spurious. There's something about it which doesn't seem kosher, and that post illustrates my point. I mean really, saying "we must be the most advanced culture in existence" isn't an anthropic viewpoint, it's an anthropocentric viewpoint.

      and

      b)here's an equally-if-not-more-valid proof that shows the opposite:

      Our galaxy contains about 200 billion stars. All our assumptions will be conservative, and thus the probabilities can likely be greater.

      Assume that 10% of the 200 billion stars in the universe are yellow stars like Sol. Assume that 10% of these yellow stars have planets orbiting them. Assume that 10% of these planetary systems have planets like Earth. Assume that 10% of these earthlike planets have atmospheres capable of sustaining life. Assume that 10% of these atmospherically ideal planets actually have life on them in some form. Now assume that 10% of these planets harbor intelligent life.

      Out of 200 billion stars, we still have 200,000 that fit the criteria.

      Of course this doesn't imply at all that these 200,000 cultures will evolve even remotely in the same time period, but you said "no civilization exists (nor will ever exist) which is significantly more technically advanced than we are right now".

      To make the same disclaimer: this isn't just my crackpot theory, it is a very VERY rough equation credited to astronomer Frank Drake of the U of Cal at Santa Cruz. George Wetherill of the Carnegie Institution of Washington places the odds better, using a computer simulation using the same rules of solar and planetary formation that the universe uses, with the benefit of accelerated time. He claims that Earth-type planets with Jupiter-type companions (to deflect most asteroids from the smaller inner planet) are quite common if the galaxy formed at all the way we believe it did. We've already found a whole bunch of extrasolar gas giants, and when our monitoring equipment gets better we might be able to see those Earth-sized inner planets.

      Maybe it's a more rough approximation, but it beats anthropocentric bigotry.

    15. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by vidarh · · Score: 2
      This is utter bullshit.

      What the "doomsday prinsiple" referred to on the site you linked says can be distilled into: "given probability X of humanity becoming extinct at any point, then the probability of humanity being extinct increases over time." That is of course true. They follow that up with saying "thus the more humans have lived before you, the more likely it is that you are towards the end of the total number of people that will be born". Which is also true.

      However, the first problem is that we don't know how likely it is that humanity will become extinct at any one point in time.

      Further, all other factors being equal (which they obviously aren't due to changes in population size, changes in our environment, changes in technology level etc.), the longer humanity survives, the more statistical reason we have to adjust our chance of extinction at any one point in time down, as if the chance of extinction is high, then it would be highly unlikely that we'd made it this far.

      Given your reference to applying the argument to my age, then by your reasoning, the older I get the higher my chance of dying soon is. But this is plain wrong for the general case, and can easily be demonstrated to be by looking at real data.

      The reason it is wrong is that we have no fixed upper limit on the length of our life and no fixed statistical chance of dying at any point in our life. At birth, my chances of dying at various ages can be calculated fairly well, and from that my chance of being dead at any particular point in time is relatively easy to calculate, since we have a vast amount of data on it, and it will approach 100% after a fixed amount of time.

      But at any given time it is not given that if I live an hour longer, my chances of dying in the next ten year increases. In fact you'll find that all else being equal (I don't suddenly decide to live a healthy life, for instance), for many time intervals my chances of dying in the next ten years will decrease.

      Why? Because at some ages we are more likely to die than others. If you survive your first year, for instance, you are more likely to be free of birth defects that would kill you early, and thus your life expectancy increases. The same is true for many other periods of your life, even towards the end: Living past a certain age may indicate that you're at low risc for a lot of diseases and problems that statistically would show up in most high risc patients before that age, and thus give you a statistically a higher chance of living ten more years than what you had a year or two earlier.

      The same line of argument holds for the human race, but we can't calculate the actual chance of extinction because we have no data to calculate the chances with. We can make rough guesstimates, but thats it. Even so, it is pretty clear that if we just take factors we can estimate, the chance of survival will increase or decrease over time.

      To go back to the doomsday principle, the example on their webpages uses a constant population for any unit of time. This is clearly not true for humanity, as the number has been growing steadily, so using the "birth number" as they suggest would flaw their entire argument.

      If the entire population of humanity over time will reach 200 billion, then you also need to know the distribution in time of those 200 billion to know whether it is likely or not that you should be conserned about being number 199 billion.

      This is easily illustrated by pointing out that common estimates of the number of people that have already died are typically lower than the current population of earth.

      The problem is again that we don't know the chance of extinction, we have now basis for assuming we know the expansion of the human race in numbers or placement in the galaxy, nor do we have any basis for estimating the total number of humans that will live.

      All of this means that we lack the fundamental basis for using the doomsday principle for anything but hyperbole.

      Indeed, the fundamental assumption of the doomsday principle is making an estimate of the chance of extinction at any point in time, and that a higher number of people born before you means that humanity is more likely to go extinct soon.

      But this breaks down as it is easily shown that as with age, for some increases the probability of extinction will indeed go down. Given a population of 1 I give you a close to 100% chance of extinction after 120 years. If that population is increased to two, the chance is relatively high that they will be of opposite sex, capable of having children, and will have children. The chance of reaching 120 before extinction is still small, but it is most certainly higher.

      Thus, you having a high "birth number" may actually mean that the chance of humanity to survive the next 1000 years or a million years from your birth may be higher than it would have been had you been born a generation ago, when the population was dramatically smaller. Of course a lot of other factors also affect this.

      To finally touch on the aliens. Yes, if we get to randomly choose who to become from X number of individuals being born, and a large part of X are non humans, then the chance of choosing human would be small.

      However, we have no reason to assume that we ended up as humans as a result of a random process. Actually we have tons of reasons to assume we ended up humans as a decidedly non-random biological process.

      And even if we did end up human on a completely random basis, to be able to estimate the likely size of an alien population, we would need to know at the very least the chance of us becoming human.

      Currently we can't tell whether our data sample is accurate (if there's no aliens), or completely useless (if there are lots of aliens, and we just don't know about them), so we can't make any reasonable assumptions about that chance.

      Which means that using self observations is completely futile and statistically utterly bogus - it's like trying to calculate the likelyhood of being born black by taking a sample of white babies, isolating them at birth so they can't know anything about the existence of black people, and letting them estimate the chance of that existence without using any knowledge of biology.

    16. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by jd142 · · Score: 2

      It would depend on the coin.


      You are correct. Right after I hit submit I said to myself, "Self," I said, "You really should have pointed out that you were assuming a standard coin with an equal probability of landing either Heads or Tails with no probability of it landing on its side."

    17. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2

      If it knows that it lives in, say, slot #9, there is not still a 50/50 chance. Instead the probability is 90% that there only are 10 agents because of observational bias.

      Huh? Given the following results of flipping a coin, what is the probability that the next flip will be a H:
      HHHHHHHHHHH
      50%.

      No, no, I think you're solving the wrong question.

      The situation is that there are either 10 agents or 100 agents - no middle ground. Why this should be assumed, I don't know... Nevertheless, the question, based on this assumption, is this: How probable is it that there are only 10 agents given that a random selection from them (yourself) has resulted in the ninth instance?

      I'm no probability expert myself, but I do know that this question is not the same as the one you answered. See, if there were a hundred agents, the odds you would have ended up being ten or less was only 10%. If there were only ten, obviously, the odds were a 100%. And, uh, I can't really figure more than that, with my limited expertise.

      I'm still unclear on the applicability of this to the real world, though. (Which is not to say that I think it's invalid... I just don't have time to think about it). :-P

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
    18. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by CKW · · Score: 1
      MSc Physics. 98% in my Statistics classes.

      One of the "Doomsday Arguments" starts off like this:

      The core idea is this. Imagine that two big urns are put in front of you, and you know that one of them contains ten balls and the other a million, but you are ignorant as to which is which. You know the balls in each urn are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 ... etc. Now you take a ball at random from the left urn, and it is number 7. Clearly, this is a strong indication that that urn contains only ten balls.
      I would like to propose the following as a counterpoint:

      There is only ONE big urn in front of you. It contains an unknown number of balls numbered consecutively, 1, 2, 3, 4 ... etc. You take a ball at random and it is number 7. This tells you that there are at least 7 balls in the urn. Clearly, it tells you absolutely nothing else about the probability of there being 10 or 10,000 balls in the urn.

    19. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so half the time you create 10 agents, and half the time you create 100 agents, so run the program twice and you create 110 agents. Pick one of the 110 agents at random. There's 1 chance in 11 that the agent is in the 10-agent pass of your program, 1 chance in 11 that the agent is one of the first 10 in your 100-agent pass, and 9 chances in 11 that your agent is in the last 90 of your 100-agent pass.

      Now if you told me (or the agent) that the agent picked at random is one of the first 10 in its pass of the program, then we can eliminate the 9 chances in 11 that the agent is in the third group. That leaves 1 chance that the agent is in the first group for every 1 chance that the agent is in the second group. That's even odds.

      Another way to look at it: By telling the agent he is in the first 10 of his universe, you've given him enough information to reduce his probability of being in the 100-agent universe from 10/11 to 1/2. So the observational bias is there, it just doesn't work the way you think it does. In this case it works to overcome population bias.

      If you want to know how to predict the future duration of a phenomenon based on it's past duration, assuming that the time from which you make the prediction does not have any special circumstances; i.e., there is no a priori knowledge other than the history of that unique phenomenon, then you would use Gott's method. Google will give some references (not all of them positive, because many people ignore the "special circumstances" exclusion when they criticize the method). Unfortunately, it would be impossible to agree on a starting point for human civilization, so I don't know if you can apply Gott to this problem.

      But wait, there's one more rebuttal point: Even if you could make a valid Doomsday argument for our civilization, that does not mean that *other* civilizations will not reach a more advanced state. You are simply misapplying the anthropic principle.

    20. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by curril · · Score: 1

      This tells you that there are at least 7 balls in the urn. Clearly, it tells you absolutely nothing else about the probability of there being 10 or 10,000 balls in the urn.



      Actually, if you were to run a simulation, you would probably find that the odds of the urn having more than a hundred or so balls would be less than ten percent. This "hidden information" encoded in the ball number is similar to the classic game show paradox where a prize is hidden behind one of three doors, and you choose a door but get a chance to change your mind after the host opens one of the other doors. While the host can always pick an empty room, the fact that he opened one of the doors adds information and you should change your choice. Similarly, once you have a ball number, you have a small amount of information on possible distributions. Picking another ball will give you more information, and so on. By taking out a relatively small number of balls, you can be very confident in your prediction about the approximate number of balls in the jar.

      But I definitely agree with you in that the "Doomsday Argument" is fallacious. The error is in mixing dependent and independent variables. The jar analogy assumes that you are free to choose any ball out of the jar, but that is not really the case. A better analogy would be to have a large packing crate separated into small compartments that may or may not have a ball in them. You then reach into the crate and examine a compartment, but there are many compartments that you can't reach and you aren't sure how many compartments there are.

      In this scenario, the balls aren't numbered, and I helped you out by saying that there is at least one ball in the box and showed you a compartment with a ball in it. In order for you to make any informed predictions about the number of balls in the box, you need to examine more compartments plus get a rough idea of how many compartments there are. The Drake equation is a rough estimate of the probability of a compartment's being occupied as well as how many compartments there are out there. It is certainly heads and tails above the misguided "Doomsday Arguments".

    21. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by geekoid · · Score: 2



      actually its says that there WHERE at least seven balls

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, the two-urn experiment and the cubicle experiment (which the original poster in this thread translated to a software agent experiment) are not even the same experiment.

      In the two-urn experiment, the observer is not part of the experiment at all, so the observer is completely objective. Therefore, the observer's a priori odds of selecting a particular urn are 50-50.

      In the cubicle experiment, (or software agent experiment), the observer is *part* of the experiment, and so is subjective. If I were participating in the cubicle experiment, then I would have a much higher chance of being selected for a 100-person run of the experiment than for a 10-person run, if both variations are carried out with equal frequency. So once I've been selected and taken to a cubicle, I have a priori 10-to-1 odds that I am in the 100-person experiment.

      The authors of the subjective cubicle argument and the objective two-urn argument are mistaken in believing that the same a priori probabilities apply to both the objective experiment and the subjective experiment.

    23. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is inaccurate. In fact, the anthropic principle is an argument AGAINST intelligent design. Although there are different versions of the anthropic principle, this is the one I've heard:

      Humans evolved as a combination of chance and the laws of physics. The fact that this is very improbable says nothing about design or predetermination:

      (from skepdic.com)
      "...the odds against DNA assembling by chance are 1040,000 to one [according to Fred Hoyle, Evolution from Space,1981]. This is true, but highly misleading. DNA did not assemble purely by chance. It assembled by a combination of chance and the laws of physics. Without the laws of physics as we know them, life on earth as we know it would not have evolved in the short span of six billion years. The nuclear force was needed to bind protons and neutrons in the nuclei of atoms; electromagnetism was needed to keep atoms and molecules together; and gravity was needed to keep the resulting ingredients for life stuck to the surface of the earth." -Victor J. Stenger*

      ". rarity by itself shouldn't necessarily be evidence of anything. When one is dealt a bridge hand of thirteen cards, the probability of being dealt that particular hand is less than one in 600 billion. Still, it would be absurd for someone to be dealt a hand, examine it carefully, calculate that the probability of getting it is less than one in 600 billion, and then conclude that he must not have been dealt that very hand because it is so very improbable." --John Allen Paulos

      from anthropic-principle.com itself:
      "Contrary to one fairly common misconception, anthropic reasoning does not aim at reinstantiating Man as the center of Creation. On the contrary, anthropic reasoning potentially has important counter-teleological implications: it holds out the prospect of an alternative explanation of why the universe appears to be "fine-tuned" for life, an explanation that does not invoke a Designer. The idea is that our universe may be but one in a vast ensemble of physically real universes. If the physical constants of these universes have randomly different values, then just by chance a few of them can be expected to be life-permitting. And, of course, it is in one of those exceptional universes that you would find yourself."

    24. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by CKW · · Score: 1

      This "hidden information" encoded in the ball number is similar to the classic game show paradox...
      Hmmm, that's the best explanation of the game show paradox that I've seen, and now I understand it much better, thank-you (although I still think that the game show paradox is often misquoted and misused, so I always have to be careful). None-the-less, something still bothers me about all of this. Something to do with past independent random events not influencing the future independent random events, or to-do with the assumptions necessary to go from *being* the seventh ball to being an independent third party observer who can equivalently consider the scenario where we get to randomly pick more "balls" from the urn and thus get a statistical picture of how many balls the urn likely contains. You might be right, but I still need to discover that "aha!" thought that clarifies my thinking. I'm not at all comfortable with the complexities of these "compartment/cubicle-farm" experiements.

      AFAIK it should be possible to simplify it down to a linear real number line where you are only free to choose one random position between zero and N where N is a number greater than zero that you do not know. (Of course this leads into the idea of a numerical simulation, which you alluded to...)

      I'll keep thinking. :)
    25. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by shrikel · · Score: 1
      Simple way to verify the experiment: Fifty percent of the agents which find themselves in 9th place are in a world with 10 agents, and fifty percent are in a world with 100 agents.

      HOWEVER: 91% of all agents in the experiment find themselves in a world with 100 agents.

      Just because an agent finds himself in the 9th position doesn't increase his chances in the least that he is in a 10-agent world.

      It's estimated that 10% of all the human population ever living on Earth is alive now. Does that mean I have a 10% chance of living forever?

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    26. Re:Advanced alien civilization unlikely by SEE · · Score: 2
      Except your argument must assume the array is bounded. If your array size is even potentially infinite, then all birth numbers are equal. No matter what your number, you are not going to be the last; in fact, no matter what your number, you are always going to be in a set infinitessimally smaller than that of those born after you, since the number before you is bounded and the number after you is unbounded.

  29. First Interstellar IRC chat... by eggstasy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hi, we're the humans, look at all the cool scientifical data we got!
    a/s/l?

    1. Re:First Interstellar IRC chat... by vectus · · Score: 1

      lol, you know that won't happen

      It'd be more like this;

      Hi, we're the humans, look at all the cool scientific data we have. Oh wait, can't show you that, it's a trade secret. Can't show you that, or that, or that, or that, or that. Hmmm... how is wherever you're from like at this time of year?

    2. Re:First Interstellar IRC chat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be "Hi, we're the humans and we would like your advice on this..."

      ...which was probably what saved the world in ID4.

  30. Please mod it back up. by billstewart · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    OK, so it's intended as humor, but it really *is* relevant to deciding what kinds of messages to send to Extra Terrestrials. Maybe they're not made of meat.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Please mod it back up. by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Maybe they're not made of meat.

      I'd probably even go so far as to say they're probably not. Space is harsh. And who's to say we won't be obsolete by our own inventions 1000 years from now.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  31. My god, it's full of Xenus! by graveyhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    I decoded the image and here it is! Those damn scientologists were right! This just proves my theory that the reason all those powerful folks become scientologists because they have actually spoken to Xenu! This "Search for Terrestrial Intelligence" is really just another scientologist ploy to get other alien races to follow the wisdom of Xenu!

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    1. Re:My god, it's full of Xenus! by Leven+Valera · · Score: 5, Funny
      I decoded the image and here [xenu.net] it is! Those damn scientologists were right! This just proves my theory that the reason all those powerful folks become scientologists because they have actually spoken to Xenu! This "Search for Terrestrial Intelligence" is really just another scientologist ploy to get other alien races to follow the wisdom of Xenu!


      +1, Litigious Scientology Reference
      --
      Woot w00t w007.
  32. Decoding script and decoded file. by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since slashdot will lameness filter out the asterisks in it, heres a perl script to decode it (sorry about the crap code):

    #!/usr/local/bin/perl
    my($out) = "";
    while()
    {
    chop;
    s/1/*/g;
    s/0/\ /g;
    $out = $out . $_;
    }

    # Remove first 69
    $out = substr($out,69);

    $rowlength = 127;

    my($nextrow) = "";
    do
    {
    $nextrow = substr $out, 0, $rowlength;
    print $nextrow . "\n";
    $out = substr $out, $rowlength;
    }
    while($out ne "");

    exit;

    The output wont go through lameness filter :-(

    But its here anyway.

    Mr Thinly Sliced

    1. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by herbyderby · · Score: 5, Informative
      The top part of the first page comes at the bottom of the message, probably to simulate catching the message partway through a loop.

      Here is the message as a monochrome png.

      --Chris

    2. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quess we should send the script along with the message?

    3. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by herbyderby · · Score: 4, Informative
      FYI, after realigning the message text you can generate a png yourself by prepending
      P1
      127 2149

      to the top of the message, and running the command:
      pbmtopgm 1 1 output_stream.txt | pgmtoppm white | ppmtogif | gif2png -fO > msg.png

      --Chris

    4. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Holy furtles, check out the tits on that babe!
      Hubba hubba!
      I quote:
      .ooo .. .oo oo asdf asf awe asef
      .o.o oo .oo.o o asdf fweaf asdf wea
      .o.o .o o ooo asdfa we fawef fafasf

      Anyway, that's all I could get through the lameness filter, and even that with a LOT of creativity and extra garbage at the end of this post, BUT, her tits are CLEARLY visible!
      A selection from Vergil's Aeneid follows, in the original Latin.
      (You can check out a HOT translation here. No credit card, no registration required! Absolutely free! Here's a teaser:
      Ev'n haughty Juno, who, with endless broils,
      Earth, seas, and heav'n, and Jove himself turmoils;
      At length aton'd, her friendly pow'r shall join,
      To cherish and advance the Trojan line.
      Yeah baby! Angry chicks are HOT and if you treat them right, they just might advance your line too, if you know what I mean :)))!)

      `Cuncta equidem tibi, Rex, fuerit quodcumque, fatebor
      vera, inquit; neque me Argolica de gente negabo:
      hoc primum; nec, si miserum Fortuna Sinonem
      finxit, vanum etiam mendacemque improba finget.
      Fando aliquod si forte tuas pervenit ad auris
      Belidae nomen Palamedis et incluta fama
      gloria, quem falsa sub proditione Pelasgi
      insontem infando indicio, quia bella vetabat,
      demisere neci, nunc cassum lumine lugent.
      Illi me comitem et consanguinitate propinquum
      pauper in arma pater primis huc misit ab annis,
      dum stabat regno incolumis regumque vigebat
      consiliis, et nos aliquod nomenque decusque
      gessimus. Invidia postquam pellacis Ulixi---
      haud ignota loquor---superis concessit ab oris,
      adflictus vitam in tenebris luctuque trahebam,
      et casum insontis mecum indignabar amici.
      Nec tacui demens, et me, fors si qua tulisset,
      si patrios umquam remeassem victor ad Argos,
      promisi ultorem, et verbis odia aspera movi.
      Hinc mihi prima mali labes, hinc semper Ulixes
      criminibus terrere novis, hinc spargere voces
      in volgum ambiguas, et quaerere conscius arma.
      Nec requievit enim, donec, Calchante ministro---
      sed quid ego haec autem nequiquam ingrata revolvo?
      Quidve moror, si omnis uno ordine habetis Achivos,
      idque audire sat est? Iamdudum sumite poenas,
      hoc Ithacus velit, et magno mercentur Atridae.'
      Tum vero ardemus scitari et quaerere causas,
      ignari scelerum tantorum artisque Pelasgae.
      Prosequitur pavitans, et ficto pectore fatur:

      `Saepe fugam Danai Troia cupiere relicta
      moliri, et longo fessi discedere bello;
      fecissentque utinam! Saepe illos aspera ponti
      interclusit hiemps, et terruit Auster euntis.
      Praecipue, cum iam hic trabibus contextus acernis
      staret equus, toto sonuerunt aethere nimbi.
      Suspensi Eurypylum scitantem oracula Phoebi
      mittimus, isque adytis haec tristia dicta reportat:
      ``Sanguine placastis ventos et virgine caesa,
      cum primum Iliacas, Danai, venistis ad oras;
      sanguine quaerendi reditus, animaque litandum
      Argolica.'' Volgi quae vox ut venit ad auris,
      obstipuere animi, gelidusque per ima cucurrit
      ossa tremor, cui fata parent, quem poscat Apollo.
    5. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by dghcasp · · Score: 1

      My gosh, the people are naked!

      Somebody call the FCC they're planning to broadcast a program with full frontal nudity!

    6. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by 8string · · Score: 1

      looks like braille

      hehehehe

    7. Re:Decoding script and decoded file. by 8string · · Score: 1

      if you fold it in 1/2 like a mad magazine back cover, it becomes pornographic.

  33. Cultural bias by tc · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what this would really prove. I mean, sure, it would be nice to know that a human could decode the signal, but does that show that aliens (if they exist) could do it? For example, it might be obvious to us to try formatting the data as a raster image, but why is this necessarily an obvious thing for an alien to try? It's obvious to us because we're in a culture that transmits 2D images around the place a lot, but is that necessarily a safe assumption about the aliens?

  34. I... am a genius! by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's true. I've figured out what the message they've sent is! It's 0 and 1 a whole bunch of times! Lots and lots of 0's. And 1's. Over and over again. ;-)

    --
    If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
    1. Re:I... am a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Stupid Fucking Moron

  35. Contact by Digitalia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still think the most interesting approach to extraterrestrial exploration is to use a fleet of autonomous probes. One such design I'm most partial to is a simple payload cylinder with a solar-sail affixed. If the sail is physical, then build in some radiation shielding. If it's electromagnetic as some physicists have suggested, then your shielding may be unnecessary. Inside, the payload consists of a rack of fertilized cells in stasis, and variously encoded data about our society. Use a long-term radiothermal battery to power it, and launch as many off as we can, in various directions. Make it strong enough to survive the ages and eventually, assuming there is other intelligent life out there, one will eventually be encountered. Furthermore, if we include our own cells, these things could serve as modern day arks. Build them using old missile chassis and we've killed three birds with one stone.

    --
    Pax Digitalia
  36. The Contact Project by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 1

    This story is not complete without a link to the wonderful Contact Project: http://www.ibiblio.org/lunar/alien.html Much more interesting to try to figure out an alien civilization -- this message is really well done!

    -Lars

  37. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The aliens had trouble translating our message and read it as :

    all your base are belong to us

  38. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have already found aliens, they are Amiga users.

    1. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they are. We're not interested in un-intelligent alien life forms.

  39. Getting the image is the easy bit... by damyan · · Score: 1

    ...working out what the heck the image means is much harder.

    (getting the image took me about 10 mins in emacs)

    I understand the pictures :-)

    Looking at their paper, I guess the rest of it is explaining mathmatical principles and stuff like that.

  40. here we go again.. by bo0push3r · · Score: 1

    .. flushing money down the crapper on beaming information out into space. this is tantamount to cramming LPs into a spacecraft and flinging it to the far reaches of the universe. so, 10,000 years from now, when we've all been dead 9,900 years from nuclear holocaust, some race of beings will just be getting this signal.

    percentage of noise regardless.. this approach to contacting distant civilizations is totally lame. we're taking information loaded with earth-centric logic and counting on someone (or something) else to 1.) pick up the information 2.) have any idea what it is or what to do with it 3.) care enough to do anything about it.

  41. Once we DO make contact.... by nizo · · Score: 2

    Our relations will depend entirely upon a) how well armed they are and b) how good they taste with ketchup.

    1. Re:Once we DO make contact.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be a bit more concerned with how WE taste with ketchup...

    2. Re:Once we DO make contact.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. If i was a moderator i would put that under the insightful column. But im not, and ill just post this anonymously so as to not loose karma for being an offtopicite.

  42. It a big bag of 0's and 1's by slashdot.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, actually, right now there's also '\n's.

    Which actually gives us a hint on where to start with decoding: there's an obvious pattern, however, the length chosen for the lines is not identical to the pattern.

    In other words, first thing to do is rearranging the line lenghts to match the pattern.

    If I take the random piece:

    00001000000001100000000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000110000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000000011000000000000110011
    00100010001001010010001000100000001010000
    00000000000011000100110000001000000101001
    00100001000100001100000000100000000000011
    00010000000001010010010101010010000001100

    I would rearrange it as:

    00001000000001100000000000000000000000000*
    00000000000001100000000000000000000000000*
    00000000000001100000000000011001100100010*
    00001100000000100000000000011000100000000*
    (*end of line cut due to lameness filter)

    The noise is obvious from the fourth line. It becomes a bit trick if you get noise in the time-domain, but still nothing to complex. It certainly looks like they use a fixed 'word' length.

  43. For those lamer than I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    open(TXT,"message.txt");
    while(<TXT>){
    s/\n|\r//g;
    tr/0/ /;
    tr/1/*/;
    $string .= $_;
    if(!$test && length($string) > 127){
    $string =~ s/^.*(\*\*)/$1/;
    $test = 1;
    }

    next if length($string)< 127;

    print substr($string,0,127,undef),"\n";
    }

    print $string;

  44. Organise the data into rows of 127 characters... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2
    ...you can see pythagoras's theorem, a map of the earth, a diagram of the solar system and even some ASCII porn of the m/f variety. There's also some DNA in a cell and dividing.

    I can't figure out what language it's in though. Those characters are weird. I'm guessing that the mathematical notation, besides using weird characters, is pretty like what we're used to. In that case I think I can also make out A=pi*2^2 and C=2*pi*r next to a picture of a circle.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  45. Wait a min by mystik · · Score: 1

    Hey, Shoulden't that be Extra Terrestrial Intelligence?

    Or mabey they really haven't found any on Earth ...

    --
    Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    1. Re:Wait a min by davidj0228 · · Score: 0

      terrestrial, adj. of or relating to land as distinct from air or water. so according to the title they are searching for any type of life that lives on land not just on earth's land, there is land on mars, and on some desolate rock in the middle of nowhere googles of light years away.

  46. How can they understand the pictures? by pgpckt · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I mean, I speak english, I live on earth, and the pictures by themselves are meaningless to me.

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    1. Re:How can they understand the pictures? by kimihia · · Score: 2

      Exactly my thought. We find it hard to understand - what about the intended recipients?

      I also worry that they've just gone and given away some of our most important discoveries (eg, three cubes around a right angled triangle) for free to any hostile race, and a map of great locations to hover spacecraft over in preparation for destroying.

      Good one! What clown thought that up?

      ;-)

      (And I hope it wasn't government funding that paid for it either. Gee, my taxes going to help get myself killed.)

    2. Re:How can they understand the pictures? by freeweed · · Score: 2
      I think the odds of an extraterrestrial understanding english, and currently living on earth, are .. well about zero, hence the definition of the word 'extraterrestrial'. I also think scientists are aware of this.

      When they want to send a message to you, they'll just put it on prime time.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:How can they understand the pictures? by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 2

      I speak english

      As aliens probably don't speak english, you first have to learn to think without language. Then you'll have to learn the new language which is defined in the picture itself.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    4. Re:How can they understand the pictures? by naasking · · Score: 1

      And exactly how much time and energy have you expended in trying to understand it? 5min? Think of linguists trying to decipher a new language. It takes YEARS of devoted effort to understand something alien to you. Same here. It's not impossible.

    5. Re:How can they understand the pictures? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Well, it's obvious we have an adult human male and female pair. I guess children are irrelevant here.

      Then there's a map of the solar system.

      A fold-up map of earth. There seems to be a symbol in Asia.

      A bit of a primer on cellular biology & DNA, etc. It looks like we have some (bio?)chemistry in there too.

      Maybe the common atmospheric gasses.

      Some mathematics, maybe the pythagorean theorem there. Probably the value of pi with that circle / radian thing.

  47. Interstellar Contact Service by Nick+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fun-loving bipedal species with reasonable sense of humor seeks intelligent alien race for meaningful exchange. Must not have too much hair or too many legs. Not willing to serve as breeding stock. Brain-eaters need not apply.

  48. how did they decide on the symbols? by sasha328 · · Score: 1

    My question is about "the first message". I mean, they do not look "simple". Braille and other symbols are simpler. Actually Arabic numerals and operands are visually simpler. Anyone know why they chose the symbols that they chose?

    1. Re:how did they decide on the symbols? by mlk · · Score: 1

      To make the scients look smart.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:how did they decide on the symbols? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they can be recognised even if they have been [somewhat] marred by transmission noise.

    3. Re:how did they decide on the symbols? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the explanation of the first message sent, they say that these symbols have been chosen because they "resist" better the noise. If you lose a little piece of each symbol it could still been understood. This doesn't happen with arabic numbers and greek-roman letters.

      BTW, why not send "first post"?

      As you can see, english is not my mother-tongue language

  49. lets hope... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

    Lets just hope the message is not "ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US" because either they will not respond, come attack us, respond with "YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE, MAKE YOUR TIME," or make another response with "Dude, we have known that quote for EONS."

  50. The 'decoded' image. by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 5, Informative
    There isn't any actual 'code' in this, it's just an on/off raster image just like all the other message we send out. The first 69 bytes (?!) appear to be noise. If you cut those off, remove all the line feeds, then wrap every 127 bytes, then replace all the 1s with 0xFF, 0s with 0x00, load it into Photoshop as a 127x2148 RAW image file, enlarge it to 400% for readability, and save it as a GIF, you end up with this: http://www.perlstorm.net/message.gif

    Of course, making sense out of the resulting image could take a while. At the top they're counting in binary, and seem to be assigning an arbitrary symbol for each number. The symbols seem to have been chosen in an attempt to make them out even when partially garbled. Those symbols and certain pictures are then used throughout the rest of the image. Heh, and check out the naked ppl!

    1. Re:The 'decoded' image. by rbeattie · · Score: 2

      WHOA! Is that a freakin' DEATH STAR? What are we trying to do, scare the aliens off?

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    2. Re:The 'decoded' image. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Looks like the Game of Life, gone amiss. Whattabuncha gobbledegook. I think an enterprising alien would stand a good chance of understanding that there was some meagre form of intelligence involved in the making of this data, but I doubt it's going to be very much impressed...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:The 'decoded' image. by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 2

      OK, I actually made a mistake the first time. I was trying to figure out what the bytes I cut off at the beginning were, and I realized the whole image is a loop, which was started partway through. So, I've moved the partial section from the bottom to complete the section at the top, and updated the GIF accordingly. It should now be correct, except for the noise.

    4. Re:The 'decoded' image. by cosmol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the fonts aren't even antialiased

    5. Re:The 'decoded' image. by zurab · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey, Qrlkustn... dude look what I got - some alien pr0n!"

      On another note, it was recently discovered that when Hilary Rosen found out about this message, she sent one from RIAA soon thereafter. The message contained a complete copy of the DMCA and a legal warning that any attempt to "crack" the message would be in violation of the law and would be strictly prosecuted. Tomorrow, Ms Rosen plans to argue in front of the House judiciary committee that such attempts to send hidden messages to aliens are outside of RIAA's direct control and, could therefore potentially be used as tools for illegal activities such as transferring copyrighted content to aliens.

    6. Re:The 'decoded' image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.perlstorm.net/message.gif doesn't

    7. Re:The 'decoded' image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how the man is waving to the aliens, and the woman looks bored. They look like a couple at a nudist Star Trek convention.

    8. Re:The 'decoded' image. by oliverk · · Score: 1

      As I was reading through the first chunk of the image, I thought "holy shit, we sent them Space Invaders!"

      See, now that's the "cool" version of First Contact...just, um, sponsored by Atari :)

      --
      ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
  51. Try this to visualize it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cat output_stream.txt | tr 1 Z | tr 0 0 | rawtopgm 127 2000 > k.pgm && gimp k.pgm

    Doesn't remove the noise.

    1. Re:Try this to visualize it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the noise there in the first place?

  52. Decoding under Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Load text into a hex editor and replace the 0x0D 0x0A with nothing (XVI32 works well) then replace the 0x48 with 0x01 and the 0x49 with 0xFE.

    Open up a graphics program that allows you to load RAW files (Paint Shop Pro worked for me). Load the file and set the width as 127 and the height as 2149. Presto! You got yourself a pretty looking graphic.

  53. Im no expert but.... by RTPMatt · · Score: 1

    sorry, im not gonna decript this thing but with my (very small) knowledge of binary, wouldnt the decription of this message by an alien intelagence require them to not only have an understanding of how we use the binary system, along with an understanding of how we translate those results into our language? wouldnt it make more sence to send a message such as this with a "rosetta stone" of sorts, so who/whatever recieves this message might have some clue as to just what the hell it is?
    well, thats my 2 cents! hope someone postes a translation!

    1. Re:Im no expert but.... by Shanes · · Score: 1
      If you study the translated imagemaps you see that the first lines explaines the numbers with dots increasing with one by one (from 0 to 12 and then 14, 15 and 20), then 2^(some binary) equaling the same number. Then comes a sign repeted all the time (equal sign) and some signs to the right of them again which then obviously are the signs they use for those digits. If they can count they'll get that. And to make sure they get it there's a listing of the first 25 primes from 2 to 97 using these signs at the end of page 1. Primes will most likely be a well known consept.

      The added noice makes it a bit hard to read at first, but asuming ET is smart enough to receive the signals they should have no problem making sense of the numbers at least. What they'll make of the nudes, I don't know though.

  54. hehe, neat by blank_coil · · Score: 1

    Go to the message page, and scroll down by holding down the 'Page Down' key. You start to see a kind of diagonal line moving from right to left over the numbers.

    --
    No sig for you.
  55. No wonder there has been no response... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    We sent the equiliviant of the IRC message....

    A/S/L?

    Supries that the planet hasn't been kick/banned already.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:No wonder there has been no response... by BrianGa · · Score: 1, Funny

      *** [ET]-Alien sets mode: *** Added *!*earth@127.0.0.1.SETI.NASA.gov to ignore list

    2. Re:No wonder there has been no response... by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Well if we want a response we should answer our own message with the planetary equivalent of:

      "barely 18/female/in my bed - Anyone want my webcam address?"

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    3. Re:No wonder there has been no response... by Lord+of+Caustic+Soda · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps one of these days an asteroid will be heading for a direct collision with Earth and on it will be a metal plate engraved with the response:

      "Fuck off lamer"

      --
      Kill'em! Kill'em all!
    4. Re:No wonder there has been no response... by mcknation · · Score: 1


      I don't know if that would be such a bad question!!

      Look at the picture of man and woman in the message. You might get the impression that men are not capable of smiles. The woman seems satified but the guy sure dosen't. McK

    5. Re:No wonder there has been no response... by theNeophile · · Score: 1
      -- If someone tells you that Linux isn't ready for the desktop, thay are an idiot or a liar. Linux IS ready.

      Heh heh *snort* heh
      Er... sorry. It's been a while since I've seen a .sig that ironic.

    6. Re:No wonder there has been no response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is typical of human relationships.. The damn woman won't put out!

  56. ET has already replied (Chilbolton) by The_Messenger · · Score: 0
    I can't believe this hasn't been on Slashdot before, but... did you know that ET as already replied to our original message? Check it out.

    I'm sorry, but to me, crop circles have to be proof of something. A recent investigation of the absolutely breathtaking Milk Hill incident showed that it could not have been created by humans on the ground without several days' work and heavy plowing equipment -- but the pattern appeared overnight, without disturbing any nearby residents. And it's so geometrically perfect! If it isn't ET, than someone is having some fun with an orbitting laser a la Ed in Cowboy Bebop.

    Cool stuff!

    --

    --
    I like to watch.

    1. Re:ET has already replied (Chilbolton) by DrColossus · · Score: 1

      uh, crop circles have proven to be man-made. that's why you don't here about them anymore and new ones don't seem to get any attention.

      --
      eh...
    2. Re:ET has already replied (Chilbolton) by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but to me, crop circles have to be proof of something

      Indeed. Crop circles are proof of two things:
      1. People are gullible
      2. There are other people who will go to great lengths, including getting up in the middle of the night to go out and flatten the barley, to demonstrate number 1.

  57. the message: by jjeffries · · Score: 2

    "Hi, I send you this message in order to have your advice..."

  58. Is this really such a good idea? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it really prudent to be advertising our location like this? Why is it always assumed that any alien civilization that hears a message from us would want to be our friends?

    1. Re:Is this really such a good idea? by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
      This isn't the only person that's asked whether it's wise to transmit info about ourselves to potentially hostile aliens.

      Probably this is obvious, but...

      It doesn't matter.

      It's extremely unlikely that there are any aliens with the ability to receive (and therefore transmit) radio messages within 100 light years that have been broadcasting for >100 years.

      This is because we would have heard them by now. If they have only been broadcasting radio for 100 years, they aren't very dangerous (unless they *stopped* broadcasting radio 10^7 years ago :-).

      Since it's impossible to exceed the speed of light (without, as an unintended consequence, creating a time machine), and even assuming instant acceleration, no decisions by committee, etc., it would take a minimum of 200 years for any alien spacecraft to reach here.

      By this time we will have either killed ourselves off or we will have passed through a technological singularity that makes it impossible to predict whether we will a) care, or b) have any reason to be worried.

    2. Re:Is this really such a good idea? by Tompie · · Score: 1

      I suppose thats true, but as you might have noticed, the message also includes information on how our DNA looks like.
      I'm not paranoid or whatsoever, but i really don't see a good reason to tell the aliens what we are made of (and thus how we could be destroyed)

  59. Partial crack. by grub · · Score: 2


    I've got it partly deciphered.
    It starts: "Make Money Fast!"
    I'll work on the rest tommorrow.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Partial crack. by bentriloquist · · Score: 0

      Me too.

  60. That's just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've given them a blueprint of how to destroy the Earth. I hope you are happy.

  61. It's the goatse.cx hello.jpg image! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I decoded the message, and that's what I got -- nasty!

  62. DMCA by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

    I just realized something... what if those aliens were circumventing our copyrights on media thats transmitted by radio waves?!? (radio and some TV) to think that they could be listening to our music without paying for it...

    I guess we should hook up transmitters and beam all of our DVD's and MP3's into space

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    1. Re:DMCA by onepoint · · Score: 1

      this can only prove that there is no life outside of earth.

      why .... DCMA would have an office there for billing.

      onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  63. Can't wait for the response to Voyager by lucidvein · · Score: 1

    ...Be quiet!

    --

    "I have a cunning plan..."

  64. Raster images huh? by Ooblek · · Score: 1
    I hope they didn't make it in GIF format or the aliens will get sued by Compuserve the moment they land.

    Maybe we'll get lucky and that big silver law-enforcement robot thing will vaporize their lawyers.

  65. Almost cracked it by loosenut · · Score: 2

    The 42 character line length is a little misleading. It appears to be a 64 bit wide binary image.

    If you open the file in a hex editor and get rid of all the line breaks, and replace the 1s with a hex value of FF, and the 0's with a hex value of 0, then open it as a raw image with a width of 64 in Photoshop, you can see the image.

    I didn't quite get it right, the image is shifted one pixel per line. But it looks like it contains a picture of earth, and some human figures, among other things.

    I just hope the aliens have Photoshop.

    1. Re:Almost cracked it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only did you get it wrong, but you made an ass of yourself after many people posted the CORRECT solution.

    2. Re:Almost cracked it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but I was retarded enough that I didn't even see the link to the solution.

      Oh, well, it was fun for a minute.

      By the way: fuck off.

  66. Easy to decode... by marko123 · · Score: 1

    They can just copy and paste it into Microsoft Windows NotePad, turn word-wrapping on, and resize the window until it makes a recognisable image.

    OTOH, they will be pissed off when it takes fifty years to transmit a one year subscription key for their new version of Windows from Earth.

    I think a good message to send would be "All your base are belong to us" We would find out if they had a sense of humour or not.

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    1. Re:Easy to decode... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if they had a sense of humor they'd img-timeline us and nuke your house.

  67. Puhleeeze... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    ...take a look at the Drake equation. It makes a hell of a lot more sense then your argument.

    Here is the Drake equation from the google cache.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  68. my translation by whovian · · Score: 1

    "Decryption of this message is prohibited by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of the United States of America of Planet Earth of the Sol system in the Milky Way Galaxy, and is punishable by a fine of 1,000,000 credits, or disintegration, or both."

    P.S. Who wants to take a stab at Microsoft on this?

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  69. translation 2 by whovian · · Score: 1

    W3 4rE l33t dOodZ 0f 34r7h!!! W0rd!!!

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  70. Suspicious by Merry_B.Buck · · Score: 1

    ...that the FBI would announce Magic Lantern, and two weeks later SETI releases an "improved" version of its message.

  71. Message cracked: by Nick+Smith · · Score: 1

    It says: "where do you want to go today?"

    1. Re:Message cracked: by chicolindo · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that aliens would implement a Microsoft architecture?
      I think if they did [or have] then we would all know about it by now.
      They have probably already heard about the lousy customer support...

  72. They were a year late... by tunah · · Score: 2

    OMG i've got it! It's a picture of the tall black monolith off 2001!

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    1. Re:They were a year late... by tunah · · Score: 2

      When i say picture, i mean ascii art.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  73. The Message is outdated by Shanes · · Score: 1
    At the end of page 2 (after listing the first primes) they've written 2^6972593 -1 which used to be the largest prime we knew. But two months ago a new record prime was found: 2^13466917 -1.

    Can someone submit a patch, please? We don't want ET to think we're complete retards.

    1. Re:The Message is outdated by Antity · · Score: 1

      [Shanes noticed that there was a high prime in the transmission that was not the highest one currently known to mankind]
      Can someone submit a patch, please? We don't want ET to think we're complete retards.

      What do you think they'll think about it anyway? Even this new highest prime was found using a quite old algorithm that didn't use any advanced technology. The only thing we'd show this way is that we don't yet know a working formula to calc any prime.

      Currently, higher primes are only found by using more and more plain violent computing power, not by any advanced mathematical knowledge. I don't think this impresses anybody.

      <sarcasm>Include a picture of Hiroshima instead, so they know we can handle nuclear fusion.</sarcasm>

      --
      42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
    2. Re:The Message is outdated by Shanes · · Score: 1
      > What do you think they'll think about it anyway?

      They'll think that this is the largest prime we know.

      Then they'll look it up on the Intergalactic "Civilisation-level as a function of Record Prime" curve that the higher ranked civilizations of this galaxy have agreed upon and give earth a Civ-score based on that curve. And if the score is too low, they'll either exterminate us or (best case) just ignore us.

      So, as surely you must agree on now, we better give them the highest prime we can.

      > Even this new highest prime was found using a quite old algorithm that didn't use any advanced technology.

      The computers used are quite advanced. We could never have found this number 10 years ago. And the algorithm used to find the Mersenne primes is only a couple of decades old. The math behind it is not trivial at all. And the way mankind found it was by a collaboration involving thousands of earth-individuals in a distributed project, using spare computer-cycles and calculating for many years on (close to) the earths most high-tech computers. That's quite advanced in a society-civilization kind of way. Not quite the Borg, but still.
      And if they got our previous message, then the time difference between our record-primes should say quite alot about how fast or slow we evolve.

      Now, maybe ET has been there and done all that a long time a go and is way, way ahead of us. Where we'll be in a million years or so. But maybe she isn't. Anyway, even if all this is a joke, when we send them a large prime, we should send the largest we know. Just for show.

      Regarding nukes, they'll understand that we know about them from the physics info we give.

  74. bucky fuller tribute in the message! by mlas · · Score: 1

    Didja notice the map in the decoded message is Buckminster Fuller's Dymaxion Map Projection of Earth? Nifty cool. Also, there's a marking on the map over what appears to be Siberia. The location of the transmitter, perhaps?

    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
  75. Galactic scale ASCII art! by Axe · · Score: 1
    Now they just need to transmit ASCII version of Mr. Goatse, and no alien invasion is ever to happen..

    Cheap alternative to missile shield.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  76. What?? by Uberminky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As so many others have pointed out... how the heck are these aliens supposed to actually get anything meaningful out of this? Assuming they even notice this transmission (forget whether or not they EXIST..), why is it supposed to occur to them that this is a 2-dimensional image? That it is exactly 127 pixels wide? (Yes I noticed the bars down the sides. That's barely even useful, if you know nothing about the incoming signal whatsoever.) That what they see has any meaning at all? Why wouldn't they first assume it to be a serialized language, or a soundclip, or......? I suppose the important thing is that there is a transmission at all, which will say "Hey, somebody out there is broadcasting!" But seriously. If I saw some 5x5 pixel bitmap floating across my holodeck, do you think I'd have any CLUE what it was? As others pointed out.. I'm human. I speak English. And I can't make out squat on that thing! Alright.. I just won't question it. Clearly I don't get this whole SETI thing...

    --

    The streets shall flow with the blood of the Guberminky.

    1. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a thought - 127 pixels... nothing to do with a power of two like the idiot SlashDot writer wrote - it's a Mersenne Prime!

  77. Earth's location by whovian · · Score: 1

    I have to go back and look on that cosmology page. Question is, Why not include information on where Earth is? Is that possible? How about triangulation (er, quadrangulation) to pulsars or stars or somesuch?

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:Earth's location by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      If you picked up thesignal somewhere it would be pretty easy to determine exactly where it came from. When you pick up a signal that has been traveling for trillions of miles it is little more than a point of EM radiation coming from a specific point. Once you have the LOS it has been traveling you can do a shift analysis ro figure our how far away the planet was that sent it. Then you turn your high powered telescope onto that point and blamo you see a little blue ball orbiting a slightly green star next to a trinary system in the middle of nowhere. That assumes of course they're in this galaxy, for most people outside our galaxy they'd be able to tell what galaxy the signal came from and hopefully from the content of the message figure out what sort of people sent it. Let's just hope the goats.cx trolls don't get ahold of a powerful transmitter or we're going to be paved over to make for an interstellar overpass.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  78. A pretty bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Suppose that we received a similar message, detailing a planet habitable by complex life forms with plenty of oxygen, water, and rare heavy metals. What is the one task that the human race would become utterly fixated on, would unite to strive to do, and absolutely would not stop until it had been accomplished? You got it. So do we really want to be broadcasting that there's a lot of great heavy metals and a colonizable planet free for the taking right here? Sheesh.

    So now we need a project wherein a message will be sent that those other earthlings sending messages are glue huffing 'tards and not to pay any attention to them. Think they'll buy it?

  79. last comment by whovian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [blow]
    How to cook
    [blow]
    How to cook humans
    [blow]
    How to cook for humans
    [blow]
    How to cook forty humans

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  80. *TERRESTRIAL* intelligence?!?!?!?!?! by volpe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think we've just been insulted.

  81. naked people? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    Great, now aliens are gonna come here and expect to see everyone walking around naked and waving. Boy won't they be surprised if they land in the middle of a San Francisco Gay Pride Parade!

    1. Re:naked people? by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      we gotta send them some porn or they won't come.

      (get it?)

  82. I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    them message say:
    "Help! We the Earth-race is being suppressed by an evil entity known as Microsoft, its destroying our entire civilization."

  83. A Silly Problem by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
    I am reminded of the Greek philosopher who `proved' that one can never get from Point A to Point B. After all, one must pass through a point exactly halfway between A and B; let's call it Point A'. And one must pass through a point exactly halfway through a point exactly halfway between Point A' and Point B; let's call that Point A''. And one must pass through A''', a point exactly halfway from A'' to B. One can prove that there are an infinite number of points between A and B, and since no-one can traverse the infinite in finite time, no-one can cross from A to B. QED.

    Except that I can cross from A to B. QED.

    This is much the same sort of silly nonsense.

    I figure that alien life probably doesn't exist--but I don't resort to silly arguments to `prove' it.

    1. Re:A Silly Problem by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > I am reminded of the Greek philosopher who `proved' that one can never get from Point A to Point B.

      Zeno's Paradox ignores the fact that Space & Time are quantized.

    2. Re:A Silly Problem by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      One can prove that there are an infinite number of points between A and B, and since no-one can traverse the infinite in finite time, no-one can cross from A to B. QED. [...] Except that I can cross from A to B. QED.

      Difference between a philosopher and an engineer: They're at a bar and the philosopher says to the engineer "You can't make love to that women, cause there will always be a space halfway between you and her, therefore you can never actually get close and touch her, because to move towards her, you must first move to the halfway point between you and her."
      Engineer says "Oh, i'll get close enough."

      ~z

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:A Silly Problem by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      Fractal theory also poses a similar question.

      For example, how long is the coastline of Great Britain? A textbook may say 2000km (I have no idea what it really is) but fractal theory says that any answer is wrong. Why?

      Pretend there's a large triangle that has all of Great Britain within it.

      Then add another side to the triangle to get a more accurate shape.. then add another side.. then another.. and so on, until you've got many millions of 'sides' that accurately map the coast of Great Britain..

      The problem is that you can keep going on adding more sides to the 'polygon' around Great Britain. Where do you stop? The perimeter could become so tight that you end up measuring around individual rocks, grains of sand.. then atoms, etc.

      Therefore, fractal theory says the coastline of Great Britain is of infinite length. Of course, in the real world it's total BS.

    4. Re:A Silly Problem by Shmibbon · · Score: 1

      Doesn't differential calculus disprove Zeno's Paradox? Limit of f(x) as x -> infinity, with f(x) being the total distance covered at each interval of time, and x being the decreasing intervals of time? That's what I always thought would take care of it.

      -Shmibbon

    5. Re:A Silly Problem by scotch · · Score: 1
      You can stop when you get to atoms - HTH

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    6. Re:A Silly Problem by DohDamit · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't.

      Actually, it depends on whether or not your infinite series is a convergent or divergent series. Your series of rocks around Great Britain is most likely of the convergent type. Yes, you may keep counting forever, but there is an asymptote you'll be able to observe. Take a math class beyond calculus I...they'll get to it.

  84. Relative age of civilization, radiotelescopes by Goonie · · Score: 2
    Most of us assume that the human race will be a) around for thousands of years to come, and b) will have at least the same capabilities to monitor interstellar radio transmissions as we have now, and that c) further technical development will increase our chances of picking up an extra-terrestrial signal if they are out there.

    Given that, the odds seem reasonable that any civilization that spots us has likely got more advanced technology (at least in terms of radio astronomy) than us, and has probably been around for a lot longer.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  85. What the first frame means. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm looking at that, and here's what I see in it.

    a. first frame

    1. first off, there is the sequance oooxxxxxoxo which is binary for either 1797, 250, 760 or 1287, depending on binary notation, this doesn't mean anything to me.

    2. Basic counting. A number of boxes, a symbol, a binary expression of the number where most signifigant digit is first, x = 1 and o = 0 then the symbol again, then a symbol wich appears to represent the value.

    3. when you get to 10, there's the number symbol, the 1 symbol and a 0 symbol. 11 is number symbol, 1 symbol, 1 symbol and so on, skiping a few. at 20 we have number symbol, 2 symbol, 0 symbol.

    next is a bunch of value symbols. what i can make out is 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83,87

    primes, other then 15, person making this must've messed up.

    then ooooxxxxoxo binary for 122

    this frame is clearly teaching aliens how we count.

    1. Re:What the first frame means. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      primes, other then 15, person making this must've messed up.

      That 15 is in there just to f*** with their heads. We can't have the aliens thinking we're too smart, or being totally sure that the sequence with 15 in it isn't somehow important.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:What the first frame means. by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Actually, it's probably there to intice them to make the correction. In the original PDF version, they end the message with some questions. This one doesn't have that page, so maybe rather than asking basic questions the first round, we just want to send them a little quiz...

      Actually it makes more sense than trying to ask a question, as it makes for something obvious to talk about in a reply.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    3. Re:What the first frame means. by CaseStudy · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's probably there to intice them to make the correction.

      You mean the first message another species receives from us is a troll?

    4. Re:What the first frame means. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      I've beem working on the second frame, there's a few errors there too, like 1-2=1, 2^0=2, 2^1=4 and 2^2=8

      I'll post the translation of frame 2 when i finish it.

    5. Re:What the first frame means. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1
      I emailed the creators of the message and got this response

      bacilly you got it.



      The binary number at the upper right is the number of line from the end of
      the message. And you will find a similar number at the lower left of each
      section. This number of the number of the actual line. Those values are
      simply reference for continuity.



      the probleme related to 15 has been fixed.

    6. Re:What the first frame means. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      the probleme related to 15 has been fixed.

      Why does that not inspire confidence?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:What the first frame means. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1
      Why does that not inspire confidence?


      If our scientists are making stupid mistakes in this, who knows what other stupid mistakes they are making.

  86. Zeno's paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The arguments do look strikingly similar...

    -LaoTze

  87. This is really disturbing.. by bmajik · · Score: 1, Troll

    I don't think NASA is sending the right message. I hope any civilizations don't figure this out, because if they do, I don't think they'll be on friendly terms when they come to visit us. The message contains detailed information on human anatomy..

    I decoded the message and got:

    http://www.mattevans.org/nasa_message.html

    warning: this isn't a link, because the message we're sending isn't a good one. View at your own risk. You may be ashamed of the scientific community :(

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:This is really disturbing.. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      bah, ascii art of the goatse.cx guy.

  88. Any Have a Finer Picture of This? by DrColossus · · Score: 1

    I've seen the blocky png and gifs, but can anyone get it fine enough to read it?

    Or is the blocky version the best thing and aliens would be looking at huge pixels?

    --
    eh...
    1. Re:Any Have a Finer Picture of This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass. It's MEANT TO BE BLOCKY.

      Next time, try following the article links (like the .PDF link) BEFORE you make an ass of yourself.

  89. For those who don't use IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A/S/L = Age/Sex/Location

    I had to look it up(not all of us are owlish dorks people;))

  90. why not unary? by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    OK...this is great and stuff, but if I detected the ones and zeroes on my radio telescope, and wasn't particularly interested in intelligence, I don't think I'd bother to look. We seem to be making a LOT of assumptions.

    Why not send out a much simpler message: the first N primes in unary.

    What I mean is (imagine each dot as a flash of light, delimited by a pause)

    2 ..
    3 ...
    5 .....
    7 .......
    11 ..........
    13 .............

    and so on. No number system convesions, no pictures cryptic even to our own race. Something you'd recognize as intelligent if you were out stargazing one night.

    Besides, what if it's a devolved civilization that's using our equivalent of MFC and Java, instead of Perl? How would they hack the script to decode the message???

  91. hey! by SmellMyTeenSpirit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they used Buckminster Fuller's map. he made the first (and only, i belive) map to show the earth without any distortion of the continents.

    its all cut up and the things are in odd places, but thats cool that they used his map.

    --
    "Cornflakes are not the innocent critters they seem"- Sterling Morrison
  92. The important question is... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    If an alien civilization received this, would they get an Outlook virus from it?

  93. Their disusting english prose by Leeji · · Score: 1

    I sure hope that "the message" is written a hell of a lot better than the embarassing english prose in their description of it.

    As an aside, they describe the dots beside the naked man and woman as: "The dotted line on the left side, give (sic) a representation of Up (sic) and Down (sic). It is ballistic trajectory, showing clearly where the gravity goes (sic)." They should have just drawn the woman a little older, so the aliens could just look at her wrinkled breasts to see where the gravity goes!

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  94. mod this down.... by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    how is this "funny"?? It's standard goatse trolling....

    1. Re:mod this down.... by ymgve · · Score: 1

      But adequately disclaimered and everything - it's not even made into a link. You have to deliberately cut and paste the link to see what's there.

  95. Weird things in the message. by wackybrit · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Did you notice that near the end of the message there's a map, and a weird symbol right over China?

    This seems a little suspicious. Are they suggesting that the aliens dump their weapons or land their ship in China?

    2) The people in the picture have no pubic hair, and the guy has a small wang.

    3) Both Earth and Jupiter are marked on the map. Why Jupiter? Is this a 2001 thing? Is Jupiter going to turn into a second sun as predicted by Arthur C Clarke?

    4) Why does this message look like the average instruction manual you get with motherboards nowadays?

    1. Re:Weird things in the message. by houston_pt · · Score: 1

      I just read the .pdf of their previous message sent in 1999 (Evpatoria Message), by the way it was much bigger and had a lot of more info.

      Jupiter's mass and size are indicated because it's the biggest planet of our solar system, the one probably easier to see on a first glimpse of it through a telescope, just like Jovian planets are the only ones we've been able to see with our own telescopes.

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard ©
    2. Re:Weird things in the message. by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      2) The people in the picture have no pubic hair, and the guy has a small wang.

      The people in the picture are a copy of the images etched into the plate attached to Pioneer 10.

    3. Re:Weird things in the message. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) The people in the picture have no pubic hair, and the guy has a small wang.

      The people in the picture are a copy of the images etched into the plate attached to Pioneer 10.


      Obviously modelled on the average scientists then.

  96. Odds of Advanced Alien Civilizations by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    First off you make the absurd claim that With large probability, no civilization exists (nor will ever exist) which is significantly more technically advanced than we are right now. you then go on w/ a "proof" of said claim.

    etc.

    Actually the odds are at least roughly similar to the collections of civilizations that we have had here on earth at any random period of time for the history of the species. Say the past ten thousand to fifty thousand years. Select a bunch of random samples, times and locations (ten square Km or mile areas), and see what you get.

    the odds may be comparable. and are at least based a bit on reality.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  97. Re:Organise the data into rows of 127 characters.. by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    I've seen this picture before. It isn't in any language; they're defining the characters as they go along. The characters are chosen to be distinguishable even with lots of noise.

    They start with O = 0 and X = 1 to express binary numbers, and then use those to define digit characters. They go on to define other things with those digits.

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  98. I've always loved this story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time I read it I thought, "y'know, this would explain a lot.

  99. xscreensaver by Kev+Vance · · Score: 1
    Haha, this is too much. I made an xscreensaver hack ceti that scrolls this down your screen. Run it on a few monitors at once :)

    Don't tell me how many things are wrong with the code, I just needed to visualize that thing scrolling!

    --
    F0 07 C7 C8
  100. Look, Xebgor! by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    Look, Xebgor! A map! Ooooh! And look at that tasty chemistry!

    Got any plans for the weekend, or you wanna go conquer some idots?

  101. The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the message of course is:
    "Good evening gentlemen. All your base are belong to us!"

  102. Have you looked at the first message?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see our Alien friends landing in Farmer Joe's field and approaching him with a message written in what they think is our language...Boy is he going to be confused.

    It may be me, but my one year old son has books that explains numbers in a far easier way. Maybe we should transmit that instead!

  103. Makes you wonder about the stars by user+flynn · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you got a map of the stars, rated a star as a one, and empty space as a zero and opened up the text map you ended up with spacing at various widths (127, 255,1023,2047,4095, etc..) if you would find some deity graffiti? Something along the lines of: j00 r 0\/\/N3|> - 60|> .

    Someone should check it out. I think if you take the stars (spaced at 80) that make up orion you get "B33r is gooD!".

    --
    In the distance you hear an ominous moo.
    1. Re:Makes you wonder about the stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, just pictures of animals and fanciful creatures.

  104. No voices in the sky by xxSOUL_EATERxx · · Score: 0
    All this money, all this work, all this energy, all those SETI screensavers. For what? For a quixotic attempt to contact intelligent life forms that may be somewhere out there. A colossally expensive and time-consuming act of denial.

    Denial of the fact that in all likelihood there is no one out there, and if there is, we will not be able to contact them, and if we do receive their messages, we will not be able to understand them.

    Why this obsession with talking to aliens? Why do we not try talking... to each other? It seems we have finally given up hope of communicating with our fellow human beings? We have finally relented to the hatred that has left a trail of the dead through Israel, Yugoslavia, New York City. We instead turn our eyes to the sky, where God once was, hoping for a kind word from above, hoping that as-yet-undiscovered intellects from across the stars will provide the answers we have failed to find within ourselves.

    We hope in vain.

    1. Re:No voices in the sky by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      None? Really? What, theres millions of galaxies, each with millions of stars, some proportion of which are going to have planets going around them, and you seriously think we are the only life forms? Why? What makes you so sure.

      I agree that SETI is a waste of time, however.

    2. Re:No voices in the sky by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

      Why isn't the parent at a +5 (Insightful/Informative/Underrated) yet? This is one of the most insightful posts *ever* on this forum. If there is sentient, advanced, intelligent life in other galaxies, by the time they arrive they will conclude that we were not intelligent because we managed to kill each other and make the planet uninhabitable for all other Earth species (well, except roaches).

      On a side note, have any of the SETI people considered the possibility that sentient beings from other galaxies may not speak English?

      --
      "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  105. One CD to rule them all, and in the DMCA bind them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it says:
    Three for the elves
    seven for the dwarves
    nine for the men
    one ring to rule them all...
    you know the rest

  106. Jinkies! (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t = That's a clue.

  107. is this a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do we really want to be announcing our presence to the cosmos?

  108. We're sending Sex into Space by Antity · · Score: 1

    Geeks, there's even a nude woman in it. Starts at about offset 176910 (print the columns with 127 bits per line).

    On the other hand, by placing a well-built Ken beneath her, at least we show to aliens that we know about the basic principles of heterosexuality.

    I wonder if they will send the signal 24 hours a day into the sky or only after 11pm to give German government a chance to protect our poor children from smut like this.

    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  109. in viewing the decoded message by malkman · · Score: 1

    From http://www.perlstorm.net/message.gif

    In the apparent sketch of the earth, under South America.......

    Why, it's a rubber ducky! I can see why they put it there; everyone knows your never alone when you have a rubber ducky, even aliens.

    --

    Robort knows all.
  110. This actually isn't a new message by supruzr · · Score: 1

    This is just THIS MESSAGE encoded differently. I downloaded this about 9 months ago from a more obscure site. I wouldn't call it "new" given that age. The message in jpg form will be difficult for some to decipher, doubtless. They should at least update the Mersenne prime.

    1. Re:This actually isn't a new message by Shanes · · Score: 1

      There are a few minor differences if you look carefully. And they have updated the Mersenne prime. The prime on your link clearly is 2^3021377 -1 (listed on page 1), while this new message lists 2^6972593-1 on page 2. Of course that number is also outdated now. Mankinds largest prime as of today is 2^13466917-1.

  111. Prime Productation by MjDascombe · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it have been better to set the length at the product of two primes? That way there'd only be one possible way of interpretting it, and any species without factorisation isn't worth contacting :

  112. Cant wait for the reply in kind.... by gorehog · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....50 or 60 years outgoing, maybe 10 years to decode it...then a reply coming back at us 50 or 60 years later. Using a conservative estimate, IF someone is listening... Well it seems to me that we might have to wait 150 to 200 yrs for a response if one is forthcoming. I wonder if anyone willremember that this msg was sent. My question is, what poor sap on earth is going to receive the messsage and have to crack the coded response?

  113. Don't bother, here is the message: by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    The translation is right here.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  114. Spam ?! by ErrorCode · · Score: 2, Funny

    After years of sending unsollicited messages, we're probably already blacklisted every SPAM list for the next gazillion years ;)

    If we ever get some message back it'll probably be:

    DON'T SEND ANY MORE UNSOLLICITED MESSAGES
    Failing to do so will result in legal action.
    ;)

  115. Skylarov? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, like, when the aliens decode the message, does that mean their first visitors to our planet will be arrested for violating the DMCA?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  116. The decoded message is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi! How are you?
    I send you this in order to have your advice.

    Seriously, the grammar in that .pdf file is at about the same level...

  117. So was the space program by QuantumG · · Score: 2

    Millions of dollars spent to send test pilots up into low earth orbit. The whole race to the moon. The current hope of sending people to mars. What a waste of time!

    sigh.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:So was the space program by YogSothoth · · Score: 1

      At its peak size (in the 60's), nasa's budget never even amounted to any more than 1% of the GNP and economic research shows each dollar spent on R&D repays itself 7 times over on average over an 18 year period. Perhaps this article will prove enlightening.

      What I think is a waste of time is a "live for today" mentality that is so narrow it categorically rejects any pursuit that does not produce a profit immediately.

      --
      there are two kinds of people in this world - those who divide people into two groups and those who don't
    2. Re:So was the space program by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yer.. perhaps I should have put "/sarcasm" in that post. I'm sorta of the opinion that measuring something as monumental as contact with an alien species in terms of "dollars" is pure insanity.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  118. Here's the message decoded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cat message | sed 's/\(0\|1\)*/First Post/'

  119. No, it's TERRESTRIAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For those who can't be bothered to even read the /. synopsis:

    Can you crack the code?...A hint to decoding: think simple raster based images and remember your powers of 2

    The question in the synopsis, to which the title applies, is posed to earthlings. It's a funny. Get it yet?

  120. We Must Warn Them!! by faqmaster · · Score: 1

    We must warn them before it's too late. If they break the code they could face prosecution under the DMCA!

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
  121. The Search for Terrestial Intelligence already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    existed at http://totl.net/STI/.

  122. hardyharhar by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1

    Top Ten possible decoded messages in no particular order:

    1) Resistance is Futile. You will be assimilated.

    2) You've got mail!

    3) Hi, how are you? I send this to you to have your advice.

    4) w007!

    5) link to goatsex

    6) iFellOverandBroke <snicker>

    7) All your Base are Belong to Us.

    8) Get your *FREE* University Diploma!

    9) For Entertainment purposes only. This message has been billed at $5.00 per AU

    10) and last, but not least, this

  123. aliens probably don't speak english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but... but... but... all aliens speak english on Star Trek. You mean that's not true?

  124. Apes, porpoises, parrats, velociraptors ... by peter303 · · Score: 2

    are among earthly creatures promoted as being highly intelligent, if we could communicate with them.

  125. the message is... by wagens · · Score: 1

    hello world

  126. Translation of the message! by GdoL · · Score: 1

    Why don't sent the message on plain language? Or even the message with the explanation? It can be found some centuries from now on a earth outpost and they will very much appreciate the help to translate it.

    And don't forget to add a line to refuse unsolicited spam mail! :-)

    --

    ------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
  127. Try, it *is* possible by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
    These messages are hard to make because they have to be completely self explanatory, ie no language. If you actually try for a while you *will* start to pick up a few things. Although it looks like the noise has scrambled the message, the symbols are designed to be very different from one another. A lot of damage has to be done before you can't read the symbols.

    At the top it introduces numbers (0-12 then a few others). It shows a number in base 1 (just dots), then in binary, then the symbol they want to use for it, with their symbol for equals in between.

    It then goes on to basic math and by looking at the numbers you can figure out what the operator is and its symbol. I make the first one out to be 1+1=2 and the second one (going down) is 1+2=3. Then comes geometry, atoms, spectral lines (?), etc.

    The idea of these messages (they really need to be much longer to be useful) is that, by the end, you have an entire working language and can then start telling them stuff. I have a problem with this message because it wastes lots of space on pictures that have meaning to us but probably aren't very interesting to the aliens (case in point: the map of earth). These messages should be long and focus on text (symbols) and diagrams when necessary (the atoms).

    For a *decent* article on these messages read Let's learn Lincos on the New Scientist website.

    Note: I'm no linguist so If I can read it so can you. Give it another shot!

  128. Only speed of light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the message arives to the aliens we will already be there to decode it.

  129. Complexity of the message? by GdoL · · Score: 1

    Did anyone make a measure of the complexity of this message? That is a measure of the power of the sender.
    The Knowledge Complexity of a message is one of most important measures of information. It takes out all the 'random', 'non-info' part of the message and try to see if there is any relevant info left.

    --

    ------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
  130. ROLF! by hunte · · Score: 1

    cfr. subj.
    :)

    --
    about me A - B
  131. They call this noise? by FlexAgain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About 10% noise has been added.

    Except this appears to be in the form of removing 1s and replacing them by 0s only. If every 1 in 10 characters were inverted that would be more representative, but I don't really understand why they think that adding the noise demonstrates anything.

    In practice this message should be broadcast repeatedly, eventually by averaging you should be able to remove most of the noise.

    Frankly, I find the whole thing overly complex and obscure, as others have stated. If we have such a problem understanding it, what chance have any non-human intelligences? They are almost certainly to be totally unlike us, alien to be exact.

    --
    Actually it is rocket science...
  132. Proof of no Terrestrial Intelligence! by Petrus · · Score: 1

    Of cousrse there is no Terrestrial Intelligence.

    If there were, they would realize the fraud stop payments to those charltans seeking something there isn't and marketing it as science.

    This reminds me of those alchemists of middle ages who were searching for elixir of life and philosopher's stone and we werenot able to laugh at their 'science' until after few centuries.

    Petrus

    Gloria in excelsis Deo et in TERRA pax hominibus bonae voluntatis.

  133. Re:The Message Cracked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ban Jon Katz From Slashdot.

  134. Re:Hehe by CyberDruid · · Score: 1
    You missed the point completely and got "5: interesting"... It's OK though ;)

    The keyword here is observational bias. If there are 100 slots for the agents to exist in, it is unlikely that an agent would find itself being among the 10 first by pure chance, when there is a another explanation that says that there are only 10 slots in the first place. This is a simple and undebatable fact, and hardly the part of the argument that lends itself to attack.

    //Consider this simple program:
    int sum=0;
    for(int i=0, int nr;i<N;i++){
    if(rand()<0.5) nr=10;
    else nr=100;
    int you=random(nr);
    Agent.Tell(you);
    sum += (Agent.Guess() == nr);
    }
    Write Agent so that sum (# correct guesses) is maximized. (obvious solution: if(you>10) return 100; else return 10;)

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  135. Who's first? by jafuser · · Score: 2
    Ok, so my response is: What if we're the first civilization to advance to this point?

    Somebody (some civilization) has to be the first, and that somebody will probably create the same probability scheme to explain why they haven't heard from anyone else yet.

    In a hypothetical universe where civilization eventually comes about, some civilization has to be the first one. That civilization is going to be quite depressed that there's nobody else out there. It's a self-centered assumption, because the probability seems low that you'd be the first, but if there are any number of civilizations throughout the timespan of the universe, one of them had to have been the first one.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  136. I DECODED IT! by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    It says:

    FIRST POST!

  137. Re:*sigh* by CyberDruid · · Score: 1
    OK.. "proof" might be slightly of target.

    welcome to your existance. you naive little fool.

    Gee... Always nice with an ad hominem attack. What are you so bitter about?

    We've barely placed any thought to the inner workings of the universe, of life, how it all works.

    Correct. If the universe works very differently from what is currently thought, the argument certainly fall. This is of course implicit in just about every argument that anyone has ever given for anything.

    as for your possible escape routes.. a borg mind is the best you could come up with?!?!

    Under the assumption that the model is correct, that is one of the few ways that I can see. That does certainly not mean that I think it is the only out.

    heres a little twist on your example. given that we exist now, is there not a good possibility that someone else exists somewhere? in the future or past? or even the present? with the billions upon billions of stars in our known universe, what are the odds that we are THAT much of a fluke?

    Neat twist... You did read the title, right? The argument obviously allows civilizations to get to our population level. Just as long as they do not have significantly higher population and/or are aware of a significant number of other civilization (which would arguably follow advanced technology). If you have a million spots with equal probability that you exist in any of them, you will end up on one of them. Big deal. The quotation from the website refers to this scenario.

    now couldn't we take that and notice that we are still here =) and that every day we are still here, the probability goes up that this loophole in the doomsday scenario is valid...

    That's simply invalid logic.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  138. The last section by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    Translation: For you young aliens!
    1. Cut along the edges.
    2. Fold along lines.
    3. Use Universal Bonding Strips to tape the edges together.
    4. Enjoy your model Earth.
    and a small bit that says: Not suitable for aliens under the age of 1.7^19 cycles of Cs(133).

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  139. A good idea? by DrCode · · Score: 2

    Why does everyone assume that those we contact will be peaceful? What if we bring ourselves to the attention of the Kzinti, or their even nastier cousins, the Kilrathi?

  140. Decoded the message by Shafalus · · Score: 1

    It's a picture of the opening ceremony of the 1936 Olympic Games.

    --

    Linux advocates are in a no Win situation

  141. Huhuhuhuhuhuh by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

    There's pr0n on page 01111.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
  142. It's easy to crack by dalleboy · · Score: 1

    - Remove all the linefeeds.
    - Remove the first 69 chars in the textfile.
    - Insert linefeeds so that every line is 127 chars wide.

    And what do we get from this?

    - PI
    - Pythagoras formula
    - Our solar system
    - Some basic chemestry formulas
    - A picture of our cells
    - A map of Earth
    - And some stinky pr0n

    1. Re:It's easy to crack by dalleboy · · Score: 1

      Opps, missed a post up there, disregard this post...

  143. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The program needs to be rewritten so that it matches the stated problem. There needs to be an inner loop:

    //Consider this simple program:
    int sum=0;
    for(int i=0, int nr;ii++){
    if(rand()&lt0.5) nr=10;
    else nr=100;
    for(int j=0; j j++) {
    int you=random(nr);
    Agent.Tell(you);
    sum += (Agent.Guess() == nr);
    }
    }

    This correctly reflects the population bias in the stated problem. I don't believe Agent can return a statiscally better guess than to always return 100.

  144. haha by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Isn't this spam?
    think about it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  145. Do I se an error in the message? by 2buck · · Score: 1
    No one's talked about what's in the message. The first page contains our numbering system and then lists primes. I think they're primes. 2 3 5 7 11 13 But then it lists 15. Is that an error or is that not a list of primes?

    I made a nice but bulky and incomplete page at http://newmanservices.com/seti

    1. Re:Do I se an error in the message? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      I got the same thing, and more errors in the next section. I should have section 2 translated by this evening, email me if you want a copy of what i have.

  146. Cosmic Sterilization by ezekeze · · Score: 1

    Speaking of doomsday, an interesting show on PBS last night (Nova: Death Star) speculated that the power and frequency of mysterious gamma ray bursts might explain why life isn't more common in the universe. Significant areas of entire galaxies can apparently get sterilized by one of these gamma ray events! Read more at pbs.org ...

  147. Re:*sigh* by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 1

    yeah sorry about that. I think it was the whole borg mind thing... and you just seemed a bit too sure of a theory that didn't seem valid to me, and I got out of hand. you made some wild claims using ideas extrapolated from a VERY simple example to describe THE most complex system we know of...

    also, even given your example, we just don't know WHAT significantly higher means. we can only guess at the size of the sample space. There is nothing well defined in the system. I believe that at this point, its all just mental masturbation.

    as for my final parting shot... it seems quite logical to me... whats wrong with it?

    --
    I ate my sig.
  148. Attn: Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attn: Earth

    Please cease and desit with all spamming activities.

    /Hodzjxr, Crab Nebula Information Office

  149. Error in the message by fabben · · Score: 1

    I've start encoding the message at http://www3.sympatico.ca/stephane_dumas/CETI/outpu t_stream.txt and found some serious errors:

    It says that 2^0=0, 2^1=4 and 2^2=8 in the second page, and the list of prime numbers have 15, that isn't prime...

    The second page:

    1+1=2 1-1=0 1*1=1 1+2=3 1-2=1 1*2=2 3+2=5 3-2=1 3*2=6 1+0=1 1-0=1 1*0=0 1/1=1 1/3=0.33333... 1/2=0.5 4/3=1.33333... 3/2=1.5 1/9=0.11111... 1/0= 2/3=0.66666... 0-1=-1 1/11=0.09090... 1^1 =1 2^0 = 2 = OOOO 3^1 =3 1^1 =1 2^1 = 4 = OOXO 3^2 =9 1^2 =1 2^2 = 8 = OOXO 3^3 =21 1^3 =1 2^3 = 8 = XOOO 3^4 =81


    4^2 =16 5^3 =125 9^3 =81


    --------------
    is infinity or undefinied.

  150. Decoder Big Improvement by 2buck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Still not great but I think you'll be impressed. Click a "Glyph" (5x7 or 5x7 pixels) and it tries to figure it out. If it can't, you can add to it. But once you close you browser, your changes go away. http://newmanservices.com/seti/

  151. Site reads glyphs for you by 2buck · · Score: 1

    Still not great but I think you'll be impressed. Click a "Glyph" (5x7 or 5x7 pixels) and it tries to figure it out. If it can't, you can add to it. But once you close you browser, your changes go away. http://newmanservices.com/seti/

    1. Re:Site reads glyphs for you by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

      Hey that is pretty cool. What kind of 'training' is it you use? Do you just compute the number of elements different from existing glphs, or use something more complex? (neural net/other AI stuff)?
      Big kudos :-)

  152. Too little, too late. by neoevans · · Score: 1

    You probability experts drive me crazy.

    The odds of ANYTHING happening are 100%. The odds of anything NOT happening are also 100%.

    The odds of someone attempting to analyze the probability of an event and succeding OR failing, are also 100%.

    Try and extrapolate the Uncertainty Principle. Black holes even among the smallest order have a gravitational pull that will distort the very fabric of space-time and yet...particles still escape.

    Why? because anything that can happen will, and anything that can't...still will. Even the laws of physics are just a set of observations.

    And I disagree, "Given the following results of flipping a coin, what is the probability that the next flip will be a H:

    HHHHHHHHHHH"


    100%. Same thing for T, 100%. My point is, you can't know this before flipping the coin! Just like you can't know the path of a photon until you observe it. By doing so, you've effectively altered that path.

    Any prediction is made bias by the observation...

    --
    "You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake."...Tyler Durden