Slashdot Mirror


Carpal Tunnel Syndrome not a Disability

An Anonymous Coward writes: "It turns out that the Supreme Court of the United States doesn't think Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a real disability. See here for details." Read the summary or the whole opinion. In a nutshell: just because a woman was sufficiently disabled that she couldn't perform her job due to carpal-tunnel, doesn't mean she was sufficiently disabled to be considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Everyone who has that nagging pain in your wrists should probably read this decision.

440 comments

  1. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    First they instill a president no one votes for, then they start taking away our rights in favor of big business. How long before we have corporate branding directly on the justices robes?

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. In fact, the majority of the Electoral College voted for GWB, making him the president.

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and that's another problem...if the popular vote differs from the electoral college then we have some serious democratic issues in this country

    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a Republic, knucklehead. Put down your Palm and pay more attention in your Civics class. When you graduate High School in a few years, it will be important for you to know these things so you don't make an ass of yourself.

    4. Re:Great by Not2Bryt64 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      we aren't a democracy. we are in fact a republic. There are major and important differences. Look them up, there will be a quiz tomorrow.

      --
      -These aren't my pants.
    5. Re:Great by nomadic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      No no no. We are a democracy and a republic; the two things are NOT mutually exclusive.

    6. Re:Great by medcalf · · Score: 2

      And a test in November.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    7. Re:Great by medcalf · · Score: 2

      Ummm, yes they are. In broad theory, a democracy decides governmental issues by popular vote, while a republic decides governmental actions through the votes of representatives, who aggregate the will of their served segment of the population. That said, it can be argued that we have not been a republic since the Progressive Movement (which passed popular election of Senators and got most states to go to popular vote, winner-take-all Presidential electoral contests with the Electors bound to their votes by law). Since then, the three elected parts of the Federal government are all elected, in effect, by the voting populace at large, with only the amount of people voting for a particular person varying by office. That would make us a representative democracy, rather than a republic.

      -jeff

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    8. Re:Great by nomadic · · Score: 2

      No, a democracy is a much broader term than that; it simply means government by the people, through majority opinion, whether that's through direct vote or through representation. A republic can often be used synonymously, but is usually somewhat more specific, referring to a state run by an elected official. You can check any print or online dictionary (here, here, and here for example.

      I'm not sure why so many people on slashdot set such narrow definitions for these two words.

    9. Re:Great by beenay · · Score: 1

      Actually, 50,456,062 people voted for George W. Bush. 30 states, MORE THAN HALF, voted for Bush. And of course, the Electoral College voted for Bush. This decision doesn't take away anyone's rights. This woman is still covered by workers' compensation at her employer's expense. (And Toyota is NOT insured, they pay for their own claims.) All this case says, is that Toyota doesn't have to invent a job for this woman to do. They still have to pay her for her disability, pay for her vocational retraining, and pay for all of her medical treatment. And, of course, this is a Supreme Court decision made by Judges. The Democrats continue to block George Bush's appointees, so you can't blame this one on him. It's a good court decision clarifying an idiotic, over-generalized, poorly written, liberal law.

      --
      ~ The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
  2. C-T by kidtexas · · Score: 0, Redundant

    My fingers are tingling....

  3. How will this affect disability benefits? by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 1

    Anybody know if this will affect those currently receiving disability for carpal tunnel and other related conditions?

    1. Re: How will this affect disability benefits? by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Disability is separate but related to the ADA. IF your CT is considered a job related injury, then it's more of an OSHA thing, with all the related hoo-ha. The ADA is a discrimination law, basically stating that hiring decisions can't be made on the basis of disability, unless the person's disability makes it impossible, without reasonable accomodation, to do a specific job. If this sounds vague, it is: Congress hasn't clearly written a law in years.

      So, if you broke your hands when you were trying to change the water in the water cooler, workman's comp law says that you continue to get paid your full rate until you can work again. (of course, they can make you come into work and answer telephones with a hands free set, but that's a light duty assignment).

      ADA says that, if an employer can make reasonable accomodations, they cannot hire or fire you simply because you have a disability. What's "reasonable accomodations"? No one knows, and Congress is letting the courts address it.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  4. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    wat d yu men its nt a disbilty?

    1. Re:WTF? by Hentai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Workers are a dime a dozen - primarily because PEOPLE are a dime a dozen. It ISN'T in a company's best interest to ensure that its work environment is safe and non-injurious, because if its work environment destroys its employees, it can always get more employees to replace them. Companies consider all of their parts in the same way - through cost-benefit analysis. If the cost of replacing X widgets every Y months is less than the cost of making those widgets tough enough to last longer, then you go with that. And, to be honest, people are CHEAP to replace.

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    2. Re:WTF? by Dante333 · · Score: 1

      Finally, someone realizes why Libertarians are they way they are, because they are smarter. For God's sake, Toyota had here working as a paint inspector. A paint inspector!!! If that wasn't a union job, it would be some between flipping burgers and airport security. If that isn't some kind of acommadation I don't know what is. And that wasn't good enough because she had to swab the cars to highlight the flaws. What the hell should Toyota do to accomadate her? Make her a professional seat warmer?

      At some point, if you can't do your job, your going to have to find a new one. Since when does one's inability to do a job not preclude them from having that job? Raise your hand if you've ever hired a C programmer who can't even turn on a computer, much write a Hello World program.

      The ADA is an execllent example of the road the hell being paved with good intentions. I'm all for reasonable accomadations for diabilites, but at some point, your gonna have to be the asshole and say enough.

    3. Re:WTF? by dstone · · Score: 2

      Do companies actually not realize that it's in their interest to attempt to ensure that their workers' jobs can be performed without injuring them?

      It's definitely not in a company's interests. And the court has said so again. I agree with you; it would be nice if there truly was an interest (ie, incentive) for employers on this front. But there simply isn't, and here's the ultimate proof. I mean, unless you believe in god or karma or something.

      So pursuing a livelihood doesn't meet the ADA criterion of "major life activity"?

      I think the court said that pursuing one specific livelihood isn't a criteria. It's a bad stereotype, I know, but autoworkers are probably left out in the cold in this case. But consider a more educated or retrainable person (say, technology worker) who gets the same affliction. If they can move on to another livelihood and then it's fair to say that their affliction doesn't affect "major life activities". Sucks to be an autoworker, and that's pretty ironic, considering cars make America go around.

    4. Re:WTF? by Harmast · · Score: 3, Informative
      From the beginning of the article:
      A UNANIMOUS COURT ruled that Ella Williams' partial disability did not obligate her employer, car manufacturer Toyota, to tailor a job to suit her wrist, arm and shoulder problems.

      So companies can require people to perform jobs that are injurous to them? I know the Libertarian readers will probably just respond by saying, "Get a job that's not on an assembly line", but then they probably have sufficient education and wealth that they can actually get other kinds of work.

      Isn't OSHA supposed to step in somewhere? Do companies actually not realize that it's in their interest to attempt to ensure that their workers' jobs can be performed without injuring them?

      This is NOT the Court saying Toyota can require her to do something injurous to herself. It is the Court saying Toyota does not have to redesign a job that has not be found unsafe by OSHA so that it is not painful or aggrevating for her. That is a big difference.

      You ask where OSHA is? Trust me, this is the auto injury and OSHA is there, probably with an inspector on the shop floor. OSHA has probility had this job redesigned several times to be safe for the average person. The average person does not have CTS so OSHA safety requirements don't apply.

      She argued that her CTS was bad enough that it qualified as a disability under the ADA. If she had won than Toyota could have been required to make reasonable (as defined by the court) accomodations, but even then it would not be absolute (otherwise a blind person could sue if not hired as a paint color match tester for example and the employer would have to find a way to make it work).

      The CTS defines a disability as interfering with major life activities of the average person. While making a living qualifies, making a living as a paint inspector does not. Why? Because while the average person does have a job, they do not have a job as a paint inspector.

      --
      Herb
      Again, feel free to sentence me to death if my questions annoy you. I'll come back in 5 minutes anyway. -Sythi
    5. Re:WTF? by CKW · · Score: 1


      Ahhhh, now *that's* a comprehensive explanation of the circumstances. Thankyou.

      Please mod parent up.

    6. Re:WTF? by Stalky · · Score: 1
      A paint inspector!!! If that wasn't a union job, it would be some between flipping burgers and airport security.

      It isn't a union job; Toyota's Georgetown plant, at least, is non-union.
      --
      Jeff
    7. Re:WTF? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      RareHeintz posted:
      "From the beginning of the article:
      A UNANIMOUS COURT ruled that Ella Williams' partial disability did not obligate her employer, car manufacturer Toyota, to tailor a job to suit her wrist, arm and shoulder problems."

      No. The court didn't say that. It seems the court felt they were being conned. That's all. They said: 'Although the court agreed that performing manual tasks, lifting, and working are major life activities, it found the evidence insufficient to demonstrate that respondent had been substantially limited in lifting or working. Id., at A--36 to A--42. The court found respondent's claim that she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks to be "irretrievably contradicted by [respondent's] continual insistence that she could perform the tasks in assembly [paint] and paint [second] inspection without difficulty." Id., at A--36. The court also found no evidence that respondent had had a record of a substantially limiting impairment, id., at A--43, or that petitioner had regarded her as having such an impairment, id., at A--46 to A--47.' http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1089.ZO .html

      RareHeintz posted:
      "Also from the article:
      Disability cannot be assessed by looking only at someone's fitness to work, the court said."

      Same thing. I know this is in the Associated Press Article, but we were all given the court's actual opinion. Why don't you please show us where this is in the opinion of the court. Thank you.

      Stephan

  5. Only specific to this one woman... by bahtama · · Score: 1
    The ruling does not mean that anyone with carpal tunnel syndrome or similar partial disabilities is automatically excluded from protection by the ADA.

    In other cases it may be different, although they said it may be harder to prove, but still posssible to be considered disabled.

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Only specific to this one woman... by DRO0 · · Score: 1

      But it probably will make such claims harder to prove, since the court makes clear that disability must affect a range of manual tasks or duties.

      This is the sentence that follows the one you quoted.

      Of course a lot of people in the real world can easily get fired if they can't satisfactorily carry out any of their required manual tasks at work. So I guess if I feel a case of carpal tunnel coming on I should saw off my hand?

      Seriously though, if the ADA doesn't cover "partial disability", what does?

    2. Re:Only specific to this one woman... by beenay · · Score: 1

      ADA doesn't cover anything. It is an anti-discrimination law which is intended to make companies and individuals take a serious look at their ability to hire, or continue to employ, people with disabilities. If you are injured on the job and have a resulting partial disability, you continue to be covered under workers' compensation laws. If you are injured due to someone else's negligence, then you are "covered" by suing them or filing a claim with their insurance company. If you are injured by chance, act of God, or your own negligence, you are covered by your own insurance, or you are on your own.

      --
      ~ The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
  6. Better Advice... by los+furtive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who has a nagging pain in their wrists should learn how to use a keyboard properly.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    1. Re:Better Advice... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a PS/2 interface installed in my head. Unfortunately, when i had my neural implant done in 1996, i didn't forsee USB or firewire. No neuralpr0n. :(

      Actually, i use a different technique Than the one which is taught to be proper - i learned on my own. Almost failed typing class even though I typed faster than the techer (90WPM against her 75) After a good 14 years of typing at least 8 hours a day (with very few exceptions), i can honestly say the only pain i feel is in my *fingers* (go figure).

    2. Re:Better Advice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's mouse usage that ends up hurting my wrist at the end of the day...

    3. Re:Better Advice... by Dead+Penis+Bird · · Score: 0

      Then get a trackball.

      --

      If I weren't nailed to the penis, I'd be pushing up the daisies!

    4. Re:Better Advice... by jmccay · · Score: 2

      One of the problems I see with this is getting the right equipment to be able to do these things. A case like the one talked about in the article will give support to those companies that don't want to provide their employee's with a good setup to prevent RSI injuries like CT. It might become difficult to get the setup you need to properly use a keyboard. I can't use a mouse that much any more. I have to use a touch pag which is easier on my hands and wrists.
      I am lucky because my employer has seen fit to provide me with the setup I need. I don't have any where near as much pain as I have had in the past 2 years.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    5. Re:Better Advice... by fliplap · · Score: 2

      So what is the technique? I don't see why this got modded interesting. Please tell us what you do so we may try it out. I'm not posting anon because I really want to know and most people(stupid people) don't read (Score: 0) posts.

    6. Re:Better Advice... by Negadecimal · · Score: 2

      Actually, i use a different technique Than the one which is taught to be proper - i learned on my own. Almost failed typing class even though I typed faster than the techer

      Same here. I learned to type by learning where all of the keys were - so I subconsciously hit keys with whatever fingertip happened to be closest.

      The whole "home key" thing just killed my rate.

    7. Re:Better Advice... by michael_cain · · Score: 2
      I had piano lessons before I learned to type, and the UCLA thing sounds a lot like the posture things the piano teacher harped on-- sit up straight, not too far from the keyboard, let your fingers hang down to the keys, move your arms rather than twisting your wrist to reach farther-- which is pretty much the style of typing that I find most comfortable.

      Is CTS a common problem for people who play the piano a lot?

    8. Re:Better Advice... by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Excellent question! Here's a grant for $50,000 I want answers in 6 weeks!

      If only I hadn't commented earlier, I'd mod you up to insightful.

      Cheers!

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    9. Re:Better Advice... by mitheral · · Score: 1
      i can honestly say the only pain i feel is in my *fingers* (go figure).

      Probably because you use one of those crappy membrane keyboards that OEM supply with new computers (bulk price $7). The pain is from your finger tips slamming into the key when the key bottoms out.

      Try to find a buckling spring keyboard. The best ones were made by/for IBM and they run around US$130 and $5 in the used bargin bin. These keyboards are basicly IBM Electric typewriter keyboards in a computer keyboard housing and are vastly superior to any other conventional keyboard I've tried. Don't sweat the cost though because they do not wear out. I've been useing the same one for over five years and it was abused in an academic computing lab before that.

    10. Re:Better Advice... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      i use Logitech stuff at home, and a dell keyboard which is based off the IBM/Logitech/Whoever owns it this week design of the enclosed spring keyboard that came with the IBM PC's. Aside from the fact that they dont feel bad, i love the nice, satisfying click given upon each keypress. In my workplace, where there is no acoustic tiles, everyone can hear me type! (Unfortunately this also means everyone can hear me NOT type).

      The worst, by far, are laptop keyboards. I'd gladly accept a laptop that's a tad bigger for a keyboard that doesn't suck donkey butt. On a tangent, by "b" key came off of my laptop. It wont go back on. I dislike dell. grr.

    11. Re:Better Advice... by autechre · · Score: 1

      Yes, musicians often have trouble with CTS. Someone above linked to an article that says that improper typing (moving wrists side to side too much) can cause injury. Think about how you play the piano!

      Interestingly, I play several instruments and also use the computer a fair amount, but I don't seem to have problems. It's probably because the motions aren't exactly the same.

      What I try to do is not be crazy; I don't go for 5 hours at a stretch if I can help it, and I try to use the mouse as little as possible. I also stretch my wrists out frequently (I take two martial arts).

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  7. Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CPS seemed pretty real when a friend of mine got it a couple of years back. She couldn't type or write much, which severely impeded her completing her academic studies. She had to get an automatic car (relatively unusual in the UK) so she could drive mostly one-handed. It caused her pain and discomfort for several months. If this isn't a disability under US law, then US law is broken.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Jack_of_Hearts · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Oh, come on.

      The Americans with Disabilities Act was designed to protect those people with disabilities that *severely* impair their ability to function day to day. To compare "pain and discomfort for several months" with, say, losing a leg, is more than insulting to those who are unfortunate enough to have a true disability and is a bastardization of the law's intended use.

    2. Re:Is this a bad joke? by transact · · Score: 1

      Nope. Read the decision. The Supreme Court said that the definition of disability in the law passed by Congress was not met by this woman's impairment as the Sixth Circuit court standard.

      I'm not a lawyer and I find it difficult to think the way they do, but presumably a broken arm would not meet the requirements of the ADA. Only having one arm presumably would. It's a matter of degree.

    3. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Patrix · · Score: 1

      id ytou think CTS is only pain and discomfort, you are severely mistaken. It starts like that. Then if you don't get it treated and don't improve your conditions, you'll end up being unable to use your hands properly, losing all grip strength. So read about these things before posting stupid comments.

      Cheers,
      someone who has carpal tunnel syndrome and nearly lost use of his right hand last summer.

    4. Re:Is this a bad joke? by bob_jenkins · · Score: 1

      That's a good comparison. Who's more impaired, a woman with carpal tunnel for a decade, or a woman with one arm with no carpal tunnel? Who would do better at changing diapers, brushing teeth, tending the garden, doing laundry, carrying groceries, and typing on a computer?

      I suspect the one-armed woman will do better at all those tasks except for changing diapers.

    5. Re:Is this a bad joke? by ArchMagus · · Score: 1

      Then if you don't get it treated and don't improve your conditions, you'll end up being unable to use your hands properly, losing all grip strength.

      Your above statement leads one to believe that if you get it treated and actually take some initiative to change your situation, the whole thing can be avoided altogether. If it's a disability that can be avoided by someone, why the hell should taxpayers foot the bill for shear apathy?

    6. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kind of hard to change your working conditions when the very basis of the work involved repetative operations. From keyboarding to nursing, RSI and CTS can happen over a large range of proffesions.

    7. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
      The Americans with Disabilities Act was designed to protect those people with disabilities that *severely* impair their ability to function day to day.

      Did you even read my original post? My friend could hardly type or write for a year, covering most of her final year at university. You don't consider that a serious impairment? You try it.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of hard to change your working conditions...

      Nope. Find another job. But then again most /.'ers are neither employed or even employable.

    9. Re:Is this a bad joke? by BadDoggie · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If it's a disability that can be avoided by someone, why the hell should taxpayers foot the bill for shear apathy?

      And your above statement shows you have had no direct experience with CTS or RSI.

      In the US, surgery for CTS costs no less than $3000 per hand. Only one hand will be done at a time: your other hand, if it also needs surgery, wont be operated on until you have about 80% of use back in the first hand. Recovery to 80% is about 6 weeks, so if you need both hands done, you're out of work for three months.

      Can you afford surgery for one hand? Do you have insurance? Can you go three months without a paycheck? Didn't think so. Will there even be a job for you when you get back? Probably not, so how much will it cost all taxpayers to have another guy on unemployment?

      Luckily, I'm in Germany (and was when CTS became my little nightmare[1]. Thanks to the health laws and insurance, I paid ZERO for the operations, had my job when I recovered, and had 80% (five weeks), then 60% (remainder of the time) of my paycheck.

      woof.

      [1] Speaking of nightmares, if you have CTS, you ain't getting much sleep thanks to the secondary pain it causes in your upper arms. It disappears the night after surgery because the nerves are no longer pressed. This upper arm pain indicative of later stage CTS and until the surgery has been done, you won't be sleeping much. Instead, you wake up with incredible pain that only slowly subsides when you shift yourself in a certain position on your back with your head and shoulders elevated, your arms at your sides with the elbows and wrists held at a certain, fairly relaxed angle. You will not be able to hold this position for long once you fall asleep again and you'll be back awake within an hour.

    10. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Squareball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The american's with disibility act is a crock. No american is worth more than another. we are all equil under the law. Giving special laws and treatments to a select few violates the equil protection under the law ammendment in the constitution.

    11. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to an article released last year (search for yourself, it might have even been on slashdot), computer programmers are at NO GREATER RISK than other professions for developing CTS. CTS obviously does have a greater impact on their work though.

    12. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No american is worth more than another. we are all equil under the law. Giving special laws and treatments to a select few violates the equil protection under the law ammendment in the constitution.

      Yeah, just like all spell checkers are equil (sic) to each other. Try one, you might like the equAlity it gives you with schooled folks.

    13. Re:Is this a bad joke? by blisspix · · Score: 1

      To compare "pain and discomfort for several months" with, say, losing a leg, is more than insulting to those who are unfortunate enough to have a true disability and is a bastardization of the law's intended use.

      I couldn't agree more. I think a lot of people also don't realise that those of us who are disabled try to find jobs that won't aggravate our conditions or require special treatment.

      I've got maybe 40% hearing (deaf in one ear, average in the other) which isn't severe hearing loss but enough to make things difficult. I went through university without a hearing aid because I didn't want to stand out. I avoid crowds now because I can't hear people over the noise, I don't use the phone much at work and I email instead. I didn't get a job as a waitress or at McDonald's while I was studying because I wouldn't be able to hear people's orders too well.

      I now work in a library. It's great. not much background noise. I can hear people, most of the time, and almost none of them have to know that I have a problem.

    14. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly lost the use of your right hand? That would have been WAY bad... I mean, how would you choke the chicken?

    15. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's part of a general trend in the US to ensure that employees have no rights and employers can do whatever they like as long as it is in the name of making money.

    16. Re:Is this a bad joke? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      The Americans with Disabilities Act was designed to protect those people with disabilities that *severely* impair their ability to function day to day. To compare "pain and discomfort for several months" with, say, losing a leg, is more than insulting to those who are unfortunate enough to have a true disability and is a bastardization of the law's intended use.

      I might agree with you, if US law didn't also favor the obese and drug addicts as "disabled".

    17. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Jack_of_Hearts · · Score: 1
      No, I don't consider that a serious impairment. If it's really that big of a problem that she couldn't function at school, then take a year off, get a job, recover, and go back to school - all universities let you take a leave of absence. Problem solved. Were she working, then she would *probably* be covered by her employers disability policy and get paid while recovering.

      I consider things like not being able to get out of bed in the morning serious impairments. Not being able to type simply doesn't qualify.

    18. Re:Is this a bad joke? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
      If it's really that big of a problem that she couldn't function at school, then take a year off, get a job, recover, and go back to school - all universities let you take a leave of absence.

      Aside from the fact that your claim here is untrue -- some UK universities impose restrictions on taking such time out, for example -- the damage to studies and career potential is still very real if you do interrupt your studies for a year.

      I consider things like not being able to get out of bed in the morning serious impairments. Not being able to type simply doesn't qualify.

      When will you people realise, this doesn't just mean not being able to type, it effectively means the almost complete loss of use of a hand. You can't type. You can't drive a manual (the normal type of car in many countries). You can't lift heavy objects. If you're, say, right-handed and your right wrist is the affected one, it's obviously even worse. You can't write. You can't even brush your teeth.

      If you think this is not a serious impairment, then you've obviously never seen it firsthand. Ty looking after someone in that position for six months and get back to us.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  8. Disabled!? What morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A little pain in your wrist that prevents you from typing is a sad excuse for not getting another kind of job.

    You're only disabled if you insist that the only work you can carry out is done with a keyboard! Get another job and stop being a slacker.

    Besides, the carpal tunnel syndrome is self-inflicted just like alcoholism and drug use. You should have thought about ergonomics and periodic rest before ruining your physique with the unnatural typing posture.

    1. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Just because I can no longer type well enough to be a software developer doesn't preclude me from other, similarly dignified fields of work for which I am qualified, such as making chalupas at Taco Bell.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Ma$$acre · · Score: 1

      Little Pain? Preventing typing? It appears you know very little about CTS. It can be crushingly painful and prevent ANY activity using your hands. And how about giving us a list of those jobs you can find that don't require some use of your hands. While I would have to grudgingly agree that CTS is typically due to lack of education about ergonomics, I hardly think it ranks with alcoholism or drug abuse. It's not as if any employers require you to repeatedly shoot up in order to maintain productivity!

      --
      Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information upon it. -Samuel Johns
    3. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      such as making chalupas at Taco Bell

      Maybe you should have made contingency plans for the possibility that you might lose your fingers or vision in the future. I'm a software developer (M.Sc. in '92) and I've got an insurance on my fingers and eyesight.

    4. Re:Disabled!? What morons by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're completely correct. By the same token, when you get disabled in a car accident you won't be disabled because you should have known that there were significant risks to getting into an accident.

    5. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      car accident you won't be disabled

      It all depends on the extent of your injuries.

      If you've lost the use of your legs and hands, then I'd grant you have the right to call yourself disabled. However, refusing to get another job after a lesser injury stinks of defeat and opportunism. Lost your arms? You can still talk. Get a job at a helpdesk, for instance.

    6. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, there's always prostitution. It doesn't always require the use of your hands.

    7. Re:Disabled!? What morons by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      No you seem to be missing the point. The point of the ADA is to protect those who have say lost the user of their arms and legs from being discriminated against. After all, why would a helpdesk hire someone with no arms and no legs and have to buy special equipment for them, when they could get someone who could pick up a standard handset? The ADA says that if the person can do the work they have to accomidate. So it's not really an issue of being marked as disabled so I can go home and eat bon-bons, it's being marked as disabled so that bozos like you won't tell me I'm unhirable because you don't feel like getting off your lazy ass and accomidating.

    8. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really have Carpel Tunnel then I doubt you could make taco's at Taco Bell.

    9. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Untrusted · · Score: 1

      The problem is that most companies, despite the prevaling evidence that it prevents repetitive stress injuries, do not inform their employees of the risks of sitting for 10 hours a day with no breaks working at a computer with a shitty keyboard and mouse. They know about the problems but don't have somebody come in and evaluate the work area, inform their employees of the need for correct posture, frequent breaks, exercise and stretching. Want to see something scary, look at the kids in grade school these days with their wrists all bent up hunched over a computer. By the time they turn 18 they'll be crippled. Oh, and to the asshole that thinks that people with carpal tunnel syndrome are a bunch of whiners and should aspire to be the head fry salter at McDonald's instead. Whatever. With severe carpal tunnel you can't even wipe your own bottom, much less do normal everyday things like hold a fork, open a catsup bottle or jar, etc. You definitely can't flip burgers with those wrists.

    10. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Ma$$acre · · Score: 1

      Some might disagree with that one.

      --
      Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information upon it. -Samuel Johns
    11. Re:Disabled!? What morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've got an insurance on my fingers and eyesight"

      Considering your talent, that couldn't have cost very much...

  9. Or better yet.... by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    Get this keyboard.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  10. I guess she won't get any money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. Not a disability?? by CitznFish · · Score: 0

    Explain that to my brother , an airplane mechanic, who has had 3 surgeries to correct this problem. He has missed 24 months of work and can no longer play the guitar (his great pleasure in life). Not a disability my ass!!!! >:[

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  12. court's opinion vs. insurance company's by corbettw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is interesting. The court is basically saying that if you can do "everyday life tasks" (brushing your hair, cooking dinner, whatever), you're not disabled for the purposes of the ADA. But on my disability policy, it states that if I can't do my regular job, they consider me disabled. Since my job (like most of yours) involves lots of typing, losing both legs wouldn't make me disabled, but C-T would. So now the question is, how does this court decision affect my policy? Can I expect a call from my agent telling me they've changed their definition to line up with the court?

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by Masem · · Score: 5, Insightful
      IANAL: The court's decision said that the woman had no right to sue under the ADA law. However, if your employer or HMO goes above and beyond the law to consider CTS as a disability, then they have every right to do that, and consider yourself lucky to have such a policy. Mind you, next time the policy's up for review, they may consider removing that because of this, but for a company that hires computer professionals, that would be a very Bad Thing.

      On the other hand, if your policy does not explicit cover CTS as a disability, you will have a much tougher time if you decide to sue for benefits or discrimation, as you will have to prove that you cannot perform daily tasks from it.

      In other words: this ruling cannot trump any policy that already allows for CTS disability payments. Just don't expect many of these policies to exist in the near future.

      --
      "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
      "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    2. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by eclarkso · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is interesting. The court is basically saying that if you can do "everyday life tasks" (brushing your hair, cooking dinner, whatever), you're not disabled for the purposes of the ADA. But on my disability policy, it states that if I can't do my regular job, they consider me disabled. Since my job (like most of yours) involves lots of typing, losing both legs wouldn't make me disabled, but C-T would. So now the question is, how does this court decision affect my policy? Can I expect a call from my agent telling me they've changed their definition to line up with the court?
      It's possible, but I would think unlikely. Aside from the fact that the case hasn't fully concluded, the ADA is a federal law perscribing the minimum employers must do to accomodate their employees' disabilities. Disability, for the purposes of the ADA, is defined as an impairment that affects everyday life tasks (as you stated)--but an employer is not required to restrict its policy just to that definition.

      My understanding is that your employer would be free to change its policy, but not compelled to do so.

    3. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      You've probably got it right, unless there is some clause saying that they can't change their rules (and what are the odds of that happening?) Even if they do not change it, it is also possible that they can deny it. You sue them. They point to US Sup. Ct. Case XYZ, and show that even though you are disabled by their terms, by broader legal terms, you aren't.

      What will actually happen is that the insurance company will use a combination of both interpretations, and not pay you in any event. That's how they work.

      (You don't think I got rich by writing a lot of checks?)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by SirWhoopass · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly. The court said that woman did not have a right to sue onder the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) It did not say that she was not disabled or that she could perform her job. She simply does not have a claim under the ADA.

      Before everyone rants about how terrible that is, you must consider the ADA. If CTS is a disability under the ADA, then a lot of things will have to be rebuilt to accomodate people with CTS (just like buildings have to add ramps, elevators, handicap-accessable bathrooms, etc). The ADA is to provide for people whose lives have been significantly impacted. I don't imagine that CTS is fun, and she probably has a claim under workman's comp, but it isn't an ADA issue.

    5. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by Nurlman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The court is basically saying that if you can do "everyday life tasks" (brushing your hair, cooking dinner, whatever), you're not disabled for the purposes of the ADA. But on my disability policy, it states that if I can't do my regular job, they consider me disabled. Since my job (like most of yours) involves lots of typing, losing both legs wouldn't make me disabled, but C-T would. So now the question is, how does this court decision affect my policy? Can I expect a call from my agent telling me they've changed their definition to line up with the court?

      One has practically nothing to do with the other. The notion of "disability" is used in many places in the law, and it is defined differently in each one of those places.

      For example, to be "disabled" under the ADA, you need to be impaired in your ability to work. (An oversimplification, but suitable for purposes of this example.) On the other hand, to be eligible for Social Security Disability payments, you have to be completely unable to perform any meaningful work. Same notion of "disability"; two very different meanings.

      The way "disabled" is used in your policy is yet a third meaning-- that is, how your insurance company defines you as being eligible for a payout. Their definition of "disability" should be spelled out in your policy-- most often in Long Term Disability policies, it means an inability to perform your current occupation. Your policy being an agreement between your insurance company and you ("I will pay you premiums if you promise to pay me benefits if I become unable to perform my current occupation") will not be affected at all by this decision. Although your insurance policy uses the same word "disability" as the ADA, it never incorporated the ADA's (or SSI's, or anyone else's) definition of the word, and is thus unaffacted by this decision.

    6. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by elmegil · · Score: 1

      It's more than unable to do work, else this woman would have won her claim. That's the whole point of contention that the SC ruled on.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    7. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Exactly - ADA isn't a "can you do your job" sort of thing, it's a "all public places and places of businesses have to accomodate you" sort of thing. If CTS were an ADA disability, then we'd have such bizarre things as every single doorknob in the United States having to be modified so people with severe CTS could operate it.

    8. Re:court's opinion vs. insurance company's by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Informative
      ...she probably has a claim under workman's comp...

      She in fact filed and settled a claim under workman's comp. From the opinion:

      In light of these restrictions, for the next two years petitioner assigned respondent to various modified duty jobs. Nonetheless, respondent missed some work for medical leave, and eventually filed a claim under the Kentucky Workers' Compensation Act. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. 342.0011 et seq. (1997 and Supp. 2000). The parties settled this claim, and respondent returned to work.
      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  13. bah by nomadic · · Score: 1

    We're just not evolved for doing that sort of thing. They should make an input device that mimics the tools that we ARE evolved to use, like chopping flint handaxes. Not sure how it could be done though.

    1. Re:bah by Wonda · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be too modern already? I think we need something more like beating animals you hunt with a stick, or something like that. Not an interface I'd like much :)

    2. Re:bah by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you chopped flint handaxes 8 hours a day you would probably have a much worse case of C-T than typists. I remember the first cases of C-T were from factoryworkers who had to hammer in some nails, a job that required them to swing a hammer for 8 hours a day, they would get C-T after only a few months on the job (before they were replaced with heartless robots that could do the job 10x faster despite the loud objections from the worker's union...)

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:bah by nomadic · · Score: 2

      From what little I understand of CTS, it involves the wrist just not having the neural bandwidth to handle too much activity on the part of the hand. Don't know how swinging a hammer could cause problems, unless positioning the nail required a lot of effort...

    4. Re:bah by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      I believe the "hammer-swinging" cases are more likely examples of Repetitive Stress Injury (RSI), rather than simply CTS. CTS is a sub-ailment of the broader RSI category, IIRC...

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    5. Re:bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You misunderstand CTS.

      The nerves and tendons to your hand feed through a "tunnel" of bone and tissue (the Carpal Tunnel). The tendons move around slightly through this tunnel as they are used. Repetitive stress can cause this area to swell. Now, any time a passage swells, it constricts (because the walls are swelling inwards), which makes the friction from the motion of the tendons even worse. Eventually, this can cause permanent damage.

    6. Re:bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The archeological record contains ample evidence for RSI in adults, in addition to more trsditionaly regarded types of occupational injury.

    7. Re:bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > From what little I understand of CTS, it involves the wrist just not having the neural bandwidth to handle too much activity on the part of the hand.

      Think again; carpal TUNNEL syndrome involves the mechanical inflammation of a tendon within the carpal tunnel due to longterm repetitive motion, causing pain etc when using that hand. Nothing involving neural bandwidth.

  14. And here we see a knee-jerk response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from a liberal masquerading as a troglodyte conservative to win brownie points with his troll liberal friends.

  15. 9-0 decision by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Interesting reading. The disability has to permanently impair "major life activities". Which means more than just the ability to perform the work in a certain job. So if your carpal tunnel syndrome prevents you from keyboarding, but not from driving, cooking, etc, and it's not permanent, it's not a disability. You mean that an inability to type isn't as disabling as losing a leg? Whoda thunk it.

    1. Re:9-0 decision by Buran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but what is considered to be a "major life activity"? What you might not see as a major loss would be to me. That inability to type would be as disabling as losing a leg -- it'd rob me of my ability to communicate in the best way I know how (and one of the relatively few options open to me.)

      I am hearing impaired, and I consider myself to be disabled. It isn't a disability that you can see, as the cause of it lies with destroyed nerves in my inner ears (my cochleas were damaged due to maternal illness before I was born). I do wear a hearing aid, which provides for some relief, but it's not complete; I still don't have normal hearing in my right ear, and my left is so far gone that an aid can't help. So I have no stereo hearing; I understand the principle of what stereo is, but I've never experienced it. It's sort of like trying to explain color to the blind. And until a few years ago, the sound of a bird chirping was foreign to me -- only recently have computerized hearing aids tailored to an individual profile been good enough to help. (I still can't hear all high-pitch sounds, though.)

      Are there things I can't do? Certainly. I can't handle large crowds (face-to-face RPG gaming is a no-no unless the group is four people or less; I found this out the hard way, so I've reverted to MUCKs for most of my roleplaying). I can't talk to people easily while at a swimming pool (hearing aids aren't waterproof). I can't be in the military or hold many different jobs where good hearing is a necessity. I can't understand the lyrics of songs without reading a transcript first. I must have closed captioning on all television shows I watch. I cannot tell where a siren is coming from while I'm driving and have to look around for the flashing lights.

      There are upsides (roomsful of screaming kids can be instantly silenced with the press of an 'off' button on a hearing aid, for instance) but the downsides are there, too. Under the ADA, I sometimes made use of a note-taker in high school and college because keeping up with lectures was difficult. (That sort of thing is what the ADA was designed for -- equal access where vital to those of us who otherwise would have to go without.) I think equal access to education is classifiable under "major life activity" -- but I don't go around claiming that the ADA means I have to be given a disabled parking placard or anything.

      There are limitations to what I feel I can ask for under the law. I've adjusted my activities to use the senses I do have. Some people might think I don't have a life, for instance, because I chat with people on the Internet rather than going out and going to parties -- no, I say; my life is enriched by that. I'm just as social as the next person might be; I just interact in a way that utilizes what I'm left with.

      As for the original topic, it does seem to me that the woman in this case did go a bit far in her efforts to get a "more acceptable" job ...

    2. Re:9-0 decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The disability has to permanently impair "major life activities".

      Sorry courts, but fingering my girlfriend is a "major life activity". I guess if this woman was a lesbian she'd have won.

    3. Re:9-0 decision by zenyu · · Score: 1

      You mean that an inability to type isn't as disabling as losing a leg? Whoda thunk it.

      I for one would prefer losing a leg over losing my ability to type.

      The decision really had me scratching my head until I realized supreme court judges have one of the 1% of jobs that don't require you to do anything as manual as typing or sweeping, much less clean a toilet. They read, debate a little and then give their law clerks a general idea of what to write in their opinion. The most manual thing they do is sign the thing.

    4. Re:9-0 decision by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1
      Whoda thunk it.
      Yeah, who would've thunk it that so many people would jump to the assumption that this woman couldn't type? Read the decision, she worked on an auto assembly line. She couldn't do a specific job on an assembly line. There were other jobs she could do, so it's not like her CTS was completely crippling. Details like that make the difference in court decisions.

      -sk

    5. Re:9-0 decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> You mean that an inability to type isn't as disabling as losing a leg? Whoda thunk it.

      > I for one would prefer losing a leg over losing my ability to type.

      Well, that's easy enough to simulate. Walkg using a crutch or get around with a wheelchair, etc. See how long you'd like to be doing that, then compare that again with not being able to type.

    6. Re:9-0 decision by zenyu · · Score: 1


      Well, that's easy enough to simulate. Walkg using a crutch or get around with a wheelchair, etc. See how long you'd like to be doing that, then compare that again with not being able to type.


      Done it. I've sprained both my knees and had one leg mauled by a trained attack dog. But bruised fingertips had a larger impact on my life.

      I just view typing as a major part of living. As I assume a few people here do as well. Just try tying your hands behind your back and try to download a speach recognition program and use it to post on ./ and do some C++ and assembler programming ;)

      Now I've heard the arguement that she can get another job. Now, with your hands still tied, try cleaning your toilet or serving food to you're family, simulating two jobs she could get. You may do these in a different order if you like.

      I bet you'd have a pretty lousy day.. I'd be sitting in the theatre watching a play in the wheelchair section.

    7. Re:9-0 decision by psamuels · · Score: 1
      The decision really had me scratching my head until I realized supreme court judges have one of the 1% of jobs that don't require you to do anything as manual as typing or sweeping, much less clean a toilet.

      Come on. They all used to be lawyers. Are you saying a lawyer doesn't have to type, take notes or other such manual activities? Or are you saying that you think the members of the Court are such pricks, by virtue of being in high office, that they have forgotten (to the man, to use an un-PC turn of phrase - remember, it was a 9-0 decision) what life was like as a lawyer?

      I didn't read the whole decision but I did read the summary - the Court didn't say anything about manual functions being unimportant in life. They also didn't write the ADA - they are merely interpreting it.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  16. Did anyone actually READ the judgement? by Karen_Frito · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nowhere did it state that Carpal Tunnel Syndrome was not a disability -- it stated that in the case of the woman named, they were not considering it a disability because she was not impaired sufficently to be unable to do her job.

    1. Re:Did anyone actually READ the judgement? by Katharine · · Score: 1
      Karen Frito is correct. Although the lady was not able to do one particular job, she wasn't able to show that she could not do other, very similar jobs, and admitted that there were other jobs that she had previously done at Toyota that she was still capable of performing.

      The case quotes the Code of Federal Regulations definition of an impairment in doing one's job sufficient to qualify as a disability:
      "The term substantially limits means significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities. The inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working."

      29 CFR 1630.2(j)(3), http://squid.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?T ITLE=29&PART=1630&SECTION=2&TYPE=TEXT

      I think a particularly important point for all you professional programmers out there is the part that refers to the inability to perform a range of jobs as compared with someone with "comperable training, skills, and abilities." Assuming that there really isn't anything else that you are qualified to do, then carpal tunnel preventing you from typing might well be a disability.

      I would also note that in Ms. Williams' case, she was able to do a large number of tasks that are not job-related. Many people with severe carpal tunnel have trouble doing things like combing their hair, opening soda cans, and sometimes even gripping things like cups, the telephone, etc. Even to a lesser extent, the inability to type might be a worse disability than the one cited by Ms. Williams (inability to work with her arms extended above her shoulders) in that it affects more kinds of jobs, and might even make it hard for one to go back to school-- you'd have to dictate all your papers and you'd probably have trouble taking notes even with pencil and paper.
    2. Re:Did anyone actually READ the judgement? by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Wrong. It said that it was not a disability because it did not affect her activities outside of the job. That is, the ADA has created a class system -- if you are _really_ disabled in normal life activities as well as the job, you get special privileges at work, but if you merely have problems with particular jobs, all you might get is workman's compensation, which doesn't pay all that much. Don't blame the courts, blame Congress; they passed the law, the judges have to struggle to interpret it.

      If you really can't work due to carpal tunnel from your job, you certainly should be entitled to workmans compensation, but that doesn't get you into the big-money settlements. Obviously, the employer can try to find a way to keep you working -- usually this makes economic sense, as compared to paying you somewhat less for no work. But it sounds like this woman somehow was unable to keep up with any job they put her in, and was a real pain to supervise for years, so by now they might think it worthwhile to pay out the full WC plus all the legal fees to fight the ADA case and never see her again.

  17. This is horrible by ennui · · Score: 0

    As one who suffers from various keyboard-related maladies, I only hope that common sense will prevail in the workplace and IT employers will continue to supply wrist braces and palmrests to those of us who so desperately need them.

  18. What next by epukinsk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guess we're going to be needing these after all.

    It's a pain in the ass to do them, but your wrists will thank you in five years. Young coders might feel invincible now, but any sort of 40hr+ work week will make quick work of the nerves in your hands and arms no matter how young you are.

    Also check out this informative (if cute) prevention handbook.

    -Erik

    1. Re:What next by Mr.+Eradicator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly ... there are ways to prevent CPS and people should be smart enough to do what they can to prevent it.

      Sure, there might be a few cases of CPS (possibly intensified by other circumstances or medical conditions) where it wasn't possible to prevent, but I don't want tax dollars going to disability funding for retards who don't understand the ergonomics of typing and using a mouse.

      It's like when I see some obese lard-ass rolling out of their cadillac in the handicap spot at McDonald's. They obviously aren't doing anything to prevent their "disability", but they'll take that front parking spot before an elderly woman can get to it.

      Reality check ...

      --

      That's Mr. Eradicator to you.

      trance-port
    2. Re:What next by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      As another suggestion, in an effort to reduce repetitive stress, I've learned to use the mouse with both hands. I currently have the mouse on my right side at home and on my left at work. I think this helps to balance the strain on my hands. While I'm only 23 and have not yet felt any signs of CTS, I'm a computer engineer, an avid piano player, ring handbells at my church, and play tennis from time to time. I'd say I'm at high risk for developing CTS and am willing to do what I can to prevent it.

    3. Re:What next by Fjord · · Score: 2

      This has been my experience too. I started developing the sharp pain in my right hand four years ago. Almost immediately, I switched my mouse to my left hand. Now I regularly alternate hands for the mouse and I haven't had a problem again (yet). I also use as many keyboard accellerators as I can.

      --
      -no broken link
    4. Re:What next by jallen02 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You have been Eradicated!!!

      Anyways I agree with you.

      (Quick Aside) You know, every time I see the name Eradicator now I cringe in rememberance of playing r.es on de_dust.

      Jeremy

    5. Re:What next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the first empty hand form, Sil Lim Tao, from Wing Chun Kung Fu. It can be done in one place with no leg movements and does a good job of building forearm and wrist strength and flexablity. I learned it from a book in a week.

    6. Re:What next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, until your employer fires you for wasting 30 to 60 minutes of your day doing gay "hand excersizes".

    7. Re:What next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say I know what to do next for IT folks..

      Create a keyboard-driven bath and toothbrush.

  19. CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.... by moniker_21 · · Score: 5, Informative
    "It is insufficient for individuals attempting to prove disability status under this test to merely submit evidence of a medical diagnosis of an impairment. Instead, the ADA requires them to offer evidence that the extent of the limitation caused by their impairment in terms of their own experience is substantial. Congress intended the existence of a disability to be determined in such a case-by-case manner."

    This doesn't mean that carpel tunnel isn't a disablity you dolts, it's a very serious problem. This woman's case simply didn't prove that her affliction was serious enough for her to be considered under the ADA.
    --
    I posted to /. and all I got was this stupid sig
  20. CP is totally preventable by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Use a keyboard with some ergonomic design principles incorporated into the design.

    Sit in your chair properly.

    Take simple preventative measures such as stretching to reduce pain and stress due to repeated tasks.

    This has all been commonly known for years now, and most businesses will provide rudimentary ergonomic audits for their employees.

    1. Re:CP is totally preventable by SarekOfVulcan · · Score: 1

      And type in Dvorak. I used to need HandEze gloves when typing for any length of time: I'm not even sure where my pair is now.

    2. Re:CP is totally preventable by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      I agree. Its not like the man that lost his arm in the large machine he uses everyday, even though he takes all necessary precautions.

      If you know there are ways to prevent it and ignore it, well, it isn't the companies fault (and passing out flyers/emails to employees about it is a good CYA method for employers).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:CP is totally preventable by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      Don't be so nearsighted! Severe cases of CT are often found in assembly-line workers (such as the claimant in this case). It is hardly limited to people who sit at their terminals all day.

      Some of the worst cases I've read about were minimum-wage butchers at meat processing plants. Try cutting 3000 pieces of meat in one day if you think that moving your mouse hurts.

    4. Re:CP is totally preventable by bobhope · · Score: 1

      Cerebral Paulsy is not really preventable. Sorry.

    5. Re:CP is totally preventable by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Palsy

    6. Re:CP is totally preventable by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 2
      Boy, normally I'd agree with you. Except that this case is about an assebly line worker, not a computer jock, so Ars-Fartsica's comments don't really apply here.

      While in my heart, I tend to agree with the SC's decision, I have to question it correctness. The ADA says that you qualify for protection if you're disabled (ADA's def: "...a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual..." my emph.) Work IS a major life activity. The Circuit Court concluded that Williams wasn't able to work, and since work is a major life activity, found she qualified for ADA protection. Everything after that was irrelevant. But now the Supreme Court comes back and says "This particular job isn't a common major life activity, so she doesn't qualify." Excuse me, but this job was one of her major life activities. Because Ella Williams wants to keep her job, "repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods of time" is a major life activity for her, even if it's not one for Justice O'Connor.

      -sk

  21. Can't Read by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone who has that nagging pain in your wrists should probably read this decision.

    Too... sore... to... move... mouse.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Can't Read by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      You silly monkey...

      Your mouse hand hurts becuase you use your right hand for the mouse, and you used your right hand to hit the ...period...button...a...bunch...of...extra...time s.

      Try using your *left* hand to hit the period button, or try using a left handed mouse, or try using another character available to your right hand. !!!exlamation!!!marks!!!work!!!fine!!!don't!!!you! !!think!!!?

      Of course, if you're left handed, this won't work and you're screwed. Just give up your computer work and go pick apples for a living, you sinister left-handed person.

      Better yet, you can use the emacs sequence M-x C-r 3 .. in place of three dots. Emacs works wonders, don't you think?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Can't Read by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

      must typ w/ gud hnd and use les chrs. ow

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    3. Re:Can't Read by psamuels · · Score: 1
      Of course, if you're left handed, this won't work and you're screwed. Just give up your computer work and go pick apples for a living, you sinister left-handed person.

      I can't decide if this pun [sinister == Latin for "left"] was intended or not. If so - good one, but a little redundant.

      Better yet, you can use the emacs sequence M-x C-r 3 .. in place of three dots.

      You mean `M-3 .' or `C-u 3 .' - stop giving Emacs a bad name by implying that its key sequences are obtuse. (:

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  22. Not quite by sehryan · · Score: 1

    This doesn't mean that anyone with Carpel Tunnel can't be considered covered under the ADA, it means this specific case. As the article states, to fall under the ADA, you have to have a disability that limits all parts of your life, not just your work. Get a bad enough case where you can't open doors or some such, and the ADA would apply.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  23. see what had happened... by bje2 · · Score: 1

    this is what happens when too many engineers file for Carpel Tunnel injuries that they claim were job-related, when they were actually personal life related...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:see what had happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea notice its always the right hand

      I wouldn't want to say it was mastubation either

  24. I agree with the Supreme Court's point of view by mrroot · · Score: 4, Informative

    In cases like Williams', "the central inquiry must be whether the claimant is unable to perform the variety of tasks central to most people's daily lives, not whether the claimant is unable to perform the tasks associated with her specific job," the court wrote.

    Many people who are in the construction industry, for example, get a bad back over time or are otherwise affected physically over the years of that kind of labor. Many of those people move on to other types of jobs, possibly relating to construction management, sales, inspection, etc. Just because their body no longer allows them to perform one job does not mean they have become disabled.

    On the other hand, if said construction worker cannot perform basic daily tasks, such as bathing or dressing, or cooking, they would be classified as disabled.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
    1. Re:I agree with the Supreme Court's point of view by DRO0 · · Score: 1

      But that's the irony of this decision. Does your employer really care if you can perform "basic daily tasks"? (Well I guess they would want you to bathe and dress before coming to work).

      And yet you could easily be fired if you can't get the job done at work.

    2. Re:I agree with the Supreme Court's point of view by SekretAsianMan · · Score: 1

      You could easily get fired for making a stupid mistake at work. However, stupidity isnt a disability. Just find another, more suitable job.

  25. Not a surprise. by Silver222 · · Score: 1
    We already know that judges have no idea how to use a computer, or what a computer can be used for. I'm not surprised that they don't consider CT to be a disability.


    Of course, some common sense would tell you that there isn't too much difference between a guy working on an assembly line and a guy keying in data all day. Both are repetitive tasks, and both can cause physical damage if proper safeguards aren't taken.


    The Supreme Court probably ruled this way to make sure none of those goddammed terrorist hackers ever got on disability :)

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Not a surprise. by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Dumbass, no computers were involved in this case. She was an assembly line worker.

    2. Re:Not a surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so conceited about your career.

      CTS affects lots of people who have to do a repetitive manual tasks, like grocery store checkers (not only from keying in stuff, but from moving stuff past the scanners), assembly line workers, etc.

    3. Re:Not a surprise. by Silver222 · · Score: 1
      Numbnuts, how many us would give a fuck if this didn't involve us in some way. You don't see stories about coal miners lung making it onto the front page very often, do you?

      --
      "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
  26. What bugs me about the Supremes... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    What bugs me about the Supremes is that George W. still hasn't added anyone to the bench. While I'm sure he will have a lot of help from President Cheney in making an intelligent choice, I'm pretty sure that if and when someone steps down his replacement will push the Supreme Court further to, what the average american Slashdot reader may consider, the loopy side of conservative.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  27. It's a good start by goldspider · · Score: 1
    Now all we have to do is stop rewarding people who eat 5 pizzas and 3 gallons of ice cream every day with a nice pension and the opportunity to work at home.

    Carpel Tunnel Syndrome, like being overweight (in most cases) is a condition that can easily be prevented, and we shoud stop rewarding people who refuse to take care of themselves.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  28. Because CT is not a disease! by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Informative

    Woah there moderators! Finish reading before you fire at me:

    I've HAD three or four different maladies related to finger-hand-wrist related movement over the last, (oh god, has it been that long?) 15 years.

    In all cases, the ones that were _computer_ related were cured by altering the work environment.

    The one situation that eventually required surgery, and that was initially thought to be work related, wasn't. It was a Sports related injury. The fact that myself, the office Clinician, and the Workers Comp specified specialist didn't catch it as that is irrelevant. When the _hand_ specialist reviewed it, he stated it was a totally different problem (Intersection Syndrome, not Dequarvains Tendonitis) and not caused by lumping along at a keyboard during the work week.

    That's not to say a company isn't liable for providing a safe environment for its employees, It is. But I wouldn't characterise CT as a modern equivalent of lead poisoning.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Because CT is not a disease! by Karen_Frito · · Score: 3, Informative

      Disabilties don't have to be diseases, or work-related to qualify under the ADA. If you become disabled in a car accident, through an accident of birth, OR a work-related injury or a disease, you can still make a claim with the ADA. IT doesn't HAVE to be work-related or a disease, just an injury.

      (and on that note, they didn't even say Carpal Tunnel was not a disablity. Just that this woman wasn't disabled.)

  29. A Lillte Enlightenment is Needed? by TandyMasterControl · · Score: 1
    Maybe someone should beat on their withered, liver-spotted forearms with a clawhammer so that they can't pick up a coffee cup, type on a keyboard, or steer a car without excruciating pain.
    Then maybe they'd begin to empathize? Isn't funny how a bunch of (mostly partisan hack) appointees who don't know what real work is get to decide what you can take and what you must put up with?

    As always the answer is: Move the government closer to the people.

    --
    Johnny Quest has two Daddies.
    1. Re:A Lillte Enlightenment is Needed? by Karen_Frito · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should get glasses and READ THE ARTICLE.

      It specifically states that it was just in this woman's case, and not in ALL Cases of Carpal Tunnel.

    2. Re:A Lillte Enlightenment is Needed? by cmkrnl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe you should go out and shovel concrete, fix steel, pick potatoes or work on a trawler for 10-12 hours/day, 6 days/week, and then see if your hands hurt.

      It just cracks me up to see young no-nothing pups (whose most strenous labour every day is scratching the back of their ballbag first thing in the morning) cry and whinge about how tough it is to bash a keyboard in a nice comfortable office all day.

      You miserable scrotes dunno how f*cking easy your lives are.

      Curmudgeon

    3. Re:A Lillte Enlightenment is Needed? by medcalf · · Score: 2

      That was most likely a troll, but I'll respond anyways.

      Isn't funny how a bunch of (mostly partisan hack) appointees who don't know what real work is get to decide what you can take and what you must put up with?

      The people who wrote the laws (that is, the Representatives and Senators) are not appointees, but elected representatives. The people who judged this case (that is, the Supreme Court justices) are appointees, but hardly partisan hacks (with a couple of exceptions).

      I wonder what your alternative method of dispute resolution would be? Shall we get the plaintiff and a lawyer for the company to fight it out? Perhaps we should elect judges to the Supreme Court, so that we can bring to the Supreme Court all of the integrity and discipline that so characterizes the Congress?

      You suggest moving the government "closer to the people." Are you suggesting that trials should be held in the Anglo-Saxon method, where whomever gets the most people of the highest social rank to speak for them wins? Or shall we vote on who wins cases?

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  30. WTF? by RareHeintz · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the beginning of the article:

    A UNANIMOUS COURT ruled that Ella Williams' partial disability did not obligate her employer, car manufacturer Toyota, to tailor a job to suit her wrist, arm and shoulder problems.
    So companies can require people to perform jobs that are injurous to them? I know the Libertarian readers will probably just respond by saying, "Get a job that's not on an assembly line", but then they probably have sufficient education and wealth that they can actually get other kinds of work.

    Isn't OSHA supposed to step in somewhere? Do companies actually not realize that it's in their interest to attempt to ensure that their workers' jobs can be performed without injuring them?

    Also from the article:

    Disability cannot be assessed by looking only at someone's fitness to work, the court said.
    So pursuing a livelihood doesn't meet the ADA criterion of "major life activity"?

    OK,
    - B

  31. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, exactly. Note that unanimous Supreme Court decisions are very rare in any case where there's substantial controversy -- I strongly suspect that this individual really didn't have very strong case (or maybe she had a really lousy lawyer.) I would be very surprised if this case turned out to set any significant precedent.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  32. Have a problem with your wrist? by neo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Take Aikido.

    Aikido focuses on joint locks, which include wrist locks. After taking Aikido you will quickly have wrists that can withstand the rigors of typing. Flexible wrists are the key to avoid carpal tunnel syndrome, IMO, and Aikido is the key to flexible wrists.

    Or you could just wait for speach recognition.

    1. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can somewhat verify this as a friend of mine took Aikido. Not only could did she learn how to bend her wrist back to look horribly disfiguring, she also looked very ballet like as she twarted attacks from my other friend sparing with her.

      Aikido = Great flexibility (esp hands) + Graceful Self-Defense

    2. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by scorcherer · · Score: 1
      Flexible wrists are the key to avoid carpal tunnel syndrome, IMO, and Aikido is the key to flexible wrists.

      Interesting, I've never had carpal tunnel problems, maybe it's because I do Yoga.

      Or you could just wait for speach recognition.

      Speech recognition for hacking Perl, anyone?

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    3. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by Courageous · · Score: 2

      Interesting, I've never had carpal tunnel problems, maybe it's...

      You misspelled "don't have the genetic predisposition". :)

      C//

    4. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by curunir · · Score: 1

      Carpal Tunnel in the wrists is not so much a result of too much time spent in the wrong wrist position and more a case of not enough time spent in the other wrist positions.

      I have terrible typing posture. So much so, that only about a year after I learned to touch type, I started feeling the early stages of carpal tunnel. A friend of mine showed me some exercises that you can do with your wrists (basically anything that uses the full range of motion of your wrists...just keep them moving in a circular pattern). Within a month of starting those exercises, there was no sign of any pain. I still type with horrible typing posture for 8 hours a day (programming) and I haven't had any discomfort for the past 6 years now. And all I have to do to avoid it is about an hour a day of the above exercise (I do it on the bus...I usually get my own seat since no one wants to sit next to the weird guy doing strange things with his wrists).

      So, if Aikido encourages this kind of variety in wrist posture, then I'm sure it's a great way to fend off CT.

      Oh...and Rockclimbing works well too.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    5. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by joshjs · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Neo, how many dans (black belts) do you have in your dojang? I'm in hapkido (similar to aikido), and _everyone_ that is 1st dan or higher has _very_ inflexible wrists. While wrist locks are good in the short term,it is fairly evident that they are damaging in the long term. Sort of like popping your knuckles.

    7. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which has the added benefit of proper spelling!

    8. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by neo · · Score: 2

      I doubt that anyone reading this will become a Dan.

      I'm familiar with hapkido, and will note that it's stresses balance and flowing movement less than Aikido.

    9. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by iphayd · · Score: 1

      True on both points. My point, however, is that wrist locks are no better to your wrists in the long run than popping knuckles is to your fingers.

      Although both types of long term damage feel good in the short term.

    10. Re:Have a problem with your wrist? by iabervon · · Score: 2

      In my aikido dojo, we never do anything to joints beyond a reasonable stretch. In general, the idea is to get the joints to the point where the person can't bend themselves farther, and then concentrate on joints farther along. Doing more to a particular joint hurts, but doesn't really force the person to move the way you want.

      Our black belts (of whom I know 6 from various times; people move and visit) all have flexible wrists when they actually want to bend them (they're also quite strong, and you probably won't actually bend them much in technique).

      I suspect that this may be a philosophical difference between hapkido and aikido. Aikido is intended as both a defense against assailants and against lawsuits: you should be able to defend yourself against any potential attackers without injuring them in case they try to sue you.

  33. RTFA!! by E-Rock · · Score: 4, Informative
    Or opinion in this case. She was given a special job to help accomidate her 'disability' but she bitched about that one too. Then her employer said, ok, bye-bye.

    Which of course she responded to by filing a lawsuit.

  34. Carp[e]l? Carp[A]l!!! by DrPsycho · · Score: 1

    Could someone please correct the spelling of the disorder in the body of this story. It's CARPAL not CARPEL, a reference to the eight small bones that make up the wrist. While I usually ignore minor spelling and grammatical errors (you occasionally have to on Slashdot), the fact that the actual disorder-in-question is repeatedly misspelled (beyond just a simple typo) is a little much.

    --

    -DrPsycho - Coping with reality since 1975

    1. Re:Carp[e]l? Carp[A]l!!! by DrPsycho · · Score: 1

      Oh. It's fixed now. Ask and ye shall receive, I guess.

      --

      -DrPsycho - Coping with reality since 1975

  35. Carpel Sindrome Prevention Exercises by andres32a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are several excerises for the prevention ff the Carpel Tunnel Sindrome Here.
    Anybody who spends lots of time in front the computer should check that link

  36. CTS is not a disability in THIS case by mrroot · · Score: 2

    The article simply says that in this case, the woman was not disabled to the point she could not perform her daily tasks. It explicitly says:

    The ruling does not mean that anyone with carpal tunnel syndrome or similar partial disabilities is automatically excluded from protection by the ADA. But it probably will make such claims harder to prove, since the court makes clear that disability must affect a range of manual tasks or duties.

    I wonder if the court has a list of manual tasks/duties that if you cannot perform, constitute being disabled.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
  37. Hey, We Resent that Implication! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    You better watch your step, buster, or the U.S. Supreme Court, brought to you by Microsoft, Nike and Starbucks, will find you in contempt!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Hey, We Resent that Implication! by chez69 · · Score: 0

      If you read the fucking article you nimrod, you would know that it was here case, not corporate interests that where the cause of her loss.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  38. Not the same by imrdkl · · Score: 1

    But I may have to quit my second job as a toothpaste cap technician at night.

  39. same old pattern by babbage · · Score: 1, Insightful
    They also think that we had a legit election a year ago. The sad part is that their opinions, no matter how wacked, are binding... :(

    <not trying to troll, just cynical about all three branches of the federal government, sorry...>

  40. The Case Is Not Over by Artagel · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is not a final victory for either the employer or the employee. The employee had walked into the Supreme Court with a grant of summary judgment (victory without trial). The case is just being remanded for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's clarification.

    In its brief on the merits, petitioner asks us to reinstate the District Court's grant of summary judgment to petitioner on the manual task issue. In its petition for certiorari, however, petitioner did not seek summary judgment; it argued only that the Court of Appeals' reasons for granting partial summary judgment to respondent were unsound. This Court's Rule 14(1)(a) provides: "Only the questions set out in the petition, or fairly included therein, will be considered by the Court." The question whether petitioner was entitled to summary judgment on the manual task issue is therefore not properly before us. See Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 129--130 (1954).

    Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment granting partial summary judgment to respondent and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

    1. Re:The Case Is Not Over by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 2
      While your point is certainly correct Artagel, most SCOUS opinions that reverse judgement are remanded back to the preceeding court. (No hard figures, but I have read more SCOUS opinions than your average non-lawyer/law student. IANAL) Even Bush v. Gore was sent back, "The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion." That's right, technically the SCOUS opinion that everyone slathered over wasn't the last word in the Bush v. Gore debacle.

      No offense, markmoss, but the quoted section is in English, and is pretty non-legalise for a court decision, especially that last sentence. Read it more slowly, and put a little though into it. Ignore the citations to other cases, skip over the adjectives, it's not so hard that you'd have to diagramit out, but if that helps, do it. But since you asked:

      In its brief on the merits, petitioner asks us to reinstate the District Court's grant of summary judgment to petitioner on the manual task issue. In its petition for certiorari, however, petitioner did not seek summary judgment; it argued only that the Court of Appeals' reasons for granting partial summary judgment to respondent were unsound. This Court's Rule 14(1)(a) provides: "Only the questions set out in the petition, or fairly included therein, will be considered by the Court." The question whether petitioner was entitled to summary judgment on the manual task issue is therefore not properly before us. See Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 129--130 (1954).

      Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment granting partial summary judgment to respondent and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

      Toyota asks the Supreme Court to reinstate the original court's decision. When they initially came to us, however, they only asked us to reverse the Circuit Court's decision. Rules are rules, so we reverse the Circuit Court's decision.
      Toyota screwed up their writ of certiori, and asked for less than they could have gotten. While a lawyer can certainly nitpick this, a writ of certiori is what you file to get your case heard by the SCOUS.

      I don't know why Frank T. Lofaro Jr. think summary judgement are so evil, the right to a jury trial is one given to the defendant, which they are free to waive if they like.

    2. Re:The Case Is Not Over by Artagel · · Score: 1

      Squirrel Killer also has a point. This case set forth a process for evaluating what a major life activity was that did not exist before, and pretty clearly sent it back for further consideration. The Bush-Gore case, having decided that the clock had run out as an essential element of its decision, didn't leave anything to do below except carry out the formalities of signing off on Bush' victory.

      Here the Supreme Court explicitly refused to hand the employer a victory. I expect the appellate court to remand for further proceedings, and for the case to settle prior at the trial court prior to a trial. (Civil cases settle 90% of the time or more -- nothing about this case would seem to give it any more legs than any other civil case at this point.)

  41. That's Not What The Decision Says by esme · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The decision doesn't say that carpel tunnel syndrome isn't a disability. They just said that you can't just look at a person's fitness to work to decide whether they are disabled. You have to look at what the person can do, what they can't, etc. In this case, the woman couldn't do a couple of things (like hold her arms out), but could do some other things.

    This decision just means that if you can't do one thing, but could do something else, it's not your employer's responsibility to accommodate you -- it's your responsibility to find a job that you can do. I don't think this really changes things for people who have disabilities (e.g., blindness) which would require accommodation in almost all circumstances. And it certainly doesn't single out carpel tunnel as not being a disability. If you had a case of carpel tunnel that made it difficult for you to do most jobs, ADA would still apply.

    -Esme

  42. Activist Court Strikes Again by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    See, it's not only the 'liberal' judges who believe in judicial activism. If my reading of the summary (linked above) is correct, the Supreme Court misinterpreted the ADA in a rather severe way. This law was meant to protect and help people who have difficulty performing their job. But the Supreme Court demanded a higher standard, requiring that the person have difficulty not only at work but in other areas. Sounds like a crock of it to me...

    Now, since I am too lazy to read the history, what exactly was Toyota suing for? What sort of accomadations was the woman seeking?

    And another point: should their be an OSHA investigation? I know as part of our company training, protecting employees from CTS and other RSI's is largely the responsibility of the employer. Failure to provide keyboards, desks, etc. that ameliorate these conditions is an OSHA violation. (And, yes, much of OSHA is big brotherism at its worst. I'm not saying, in this case, whether or not OSHA's decisions are correct, but that it seems Toyota contributed to this woman's condition).

    And I tell you what: there's about five minutes worth of my shower that gets pretty darned impaired if my wrists are flaring up too badly. If that doesn't count as a disability, what does?

    (Yup, think that covers it all: troll, insightful, humourous, Oh, need a flame: You suck, your momma sucks, your computer sucks, your OS sucks, and your editor sucks)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Activist Court Strikes Again by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1
      If my reading of the summary (linked above) is correct, the Supreme Court misinterpreted the ADA in a rather severe way. This law was meant to protect and help people who have difficulty performing their job.
      Well, your readings of both the decision and the ADA aren't correct. The ADA requires that the disability "...substantially limits one or more of the major life activities..." of a person. It's meant to help disabled people, not to get Ella Williams a cushy desk job. While I might quibble that perhaps a person's job should be considered a "major life activity", the Court found that Williams' CST only prevented one particular set of jobs ("repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods of time"), not all jobs.

      You also happen to be wrong about the term "activist judges". That term applies to judges who extend their power by a over-broad, generalized reading of the law. This decision shows that the SCOUS is making a conservative ruling, keeping the ruling strictly within the bounds of the law. Also, keep in mind that this was a 9-0 decision, maybe you're reading more controversy into it than you should.

      Now, since I am too lazy to read the history, what exactly was Toyota suing for?
      Here's where your laziness makes you look like an idiot. Toyota wasn't suing anyone, they got sued by Ella Williams. They're just appealing the circuit court's ruling (just as Williams appealed the district court's ruling.) As for the OSHA investigation, there were no keyboards in Ms. Williams' job, she worked on a assembly line. Toyota tried to make accomodations for her until she decided to stop showing up for work.

      -sk

  43. who is protected under the ADA by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

    The article mentions that one is protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act if one's disability prevents one from doing "major life activities", tasks which are "central to most people's daily lives". This woman didn't qualify as she was able to perform tasks at home and at work.

    It seems to me, though, that your job would qualify as a "major life activity", and should fall under the umbrella of being able to care for (ie. support financially) oneself. At least she still has her job (I'm assuming).

    --
    "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    1. Re:who is protected under the ADA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that doesn't mean she can't get a different job that doesn't cause her pain.

      If a professional athlete blows his/her knee out and is no longer able to play at that level but can do other activities just fine should they qualify under the ADA?

  44. Carpal tunnel history by hubie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does anyone know the history of this disability? I have always wondered why it has become such a problem in the last 10 years when there have been typing pools around for more than 100 years.

    Maybe this confirms my thinking that the mouse is an ergonomic nightmare and one should stay away from GUI-centric editors and do it all on the keyboard.

    1. Re:Carpal tunnel history by ptrourke · · Score: 1

      Typing pools historically used large typewriters on lowered desks, which would tend to mitigate CTS. Computers, on the other hand, use flat keyboards and are usually used on raised desks, resulting in more stress on the wrist and carpals.

  45. Like he said, read the decision by GMontag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US Supreme Court did NOT rule that CTS is NOT a disability. They ruled that whatever disability you have has to preclude you from leading a normal life.

    From the link to the decision, scroll down toward the bottom of the page:

    " The District Court noted that at the time respondent sought an accommodation from petitioner,
    she admitted that she was able to do the manual tasks required by her original two jobs in QCIO.
    App. to Pet. for Cert. A--36. In addition, according to respondent's deposition testimony, even
    after her condition worsened, she could still brush her teeth, wash her face, bathe, tend her flower
    garden, fix breakfast, do laundry, and pick up around the house. App. 32--34. The record also
    indicates that her medical conditions caused her to avoid sweeping, to quit dancing, to occasionally
    seek help dressing, and to reduce how often she plays with her children, gardens, and drives long
    distances. Id., at 32, 38--39. But these changes in her life did not amount to such severe
    restrictions in the activities that are of central importance to most people's daily lives that they
    establish a manual-task disability as a matter of law. On this record, it was therefore inappropriate
    for the Court of Appeals to grant partial summary judgment to respondent on the issue whether
    she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks, and its decision to do so must be
    reversed."

    1. Re:Like he said, read the decision by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      " The District Court noted that at the time respondent sought an accommodation from petitioner,
      she admitted that she was able to do the manual tasks required by her original two jobs in QCIO.
      App. to Pet. for Cert. A--36. In addition, according to respondent's deposition testimony, even
      after her condition worsened, she could still brush her teeth, wash her face, bathe, tend her flower
      garden, fix breakfast, do laundry, and pick up around the house. App. 32--34. The record also
      indicates that her medical conditions caused her to avoid sweeping, to quit dancing, to occasionally
      seek help dressing, and to reduce how often she plays with her children, gardens, and drives long
      distances. Id., at 32, 38--39. But these changes in her life did not amount to such severe
      restrictions in the activities that are of central importance to most people's daily lives that they
      establish a manual-task disability as a matter of law. On this record, it was therefore inappropriate
      for the Court of Appeals to grant partial summary judgment to respondent on the issue whether
      she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks, and its decision to do so must be
      reversed."


      In other words, tough luck lady. Be happy you aren't really disabled, and be happy the USA doesn't break unnecessarily litigious people's legs (try that disability for a lifetime).

      If her typing skills were so vitally important to her livelihood that she felt the need to sue (oh, and she might get a big settlement too, but I'm sure that didn't factor in) for her rights under the ADA, she should have gotten appropriate insurance. Just like an Olympic sprinter might get his or her legs insured.

      The courts need to stop protecting people from their own stupidity.

    2. Re:Like he said, read the decision by Katharine · · Score: 1

      If her typing skills were so vitally important to her livelihood that she felt the need to sue . . .

      Actually, the lady didn't make any claims about her typing skills. Her claim was that the task she could not perform was "repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder level for extended periods of time."

      The court noted that this task is not an important part of most people's daily lives. Further, it observed that she was able to do the tasks required by other jobs she had held at the company. The standard the court set forth is whether or not a person is precluded from performing a class of jobs, not just one specialized assembly line job.

    3. Re:Like he said, read the decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might qualify with your obvious mental disabilities.

  46. Wow, what a lame employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Okay, so she may have been injured. Fine. But if you read the opinion, she sued repeatedly, and by the end kept not showing up for work - even though she had a "modified duty" job!

    No wonder the unions took up her cause.

  47. A massive left-wing conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, the post above is a part of the massive left-wing conspiracy, right?

    And you people laughed at the venerable senator Rodham-Clinton for expressing a similar sentiment a few years ago...

    1. Re:A massive left-wing conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is saying this guy is part of any sort of 'massive' conspiracy. It's a small conspiracy, if one at all.

  48. poah man's prevention by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Pick yourself up a set of baoding balls. Other popular hand excercisers work, like those squishy things or even playing with a deck of cards, but these balls are immediatley recognizable to a lot of people and are a lot of fun to play with to boot.

    There's no reason to even let CTS become an issue to you; work out your hand while you're sitting there mulling over a piece of code and not only will it make your hands feel a lot more nimble, it'll sooth the inflammation that causes that numb feeling.

    I have no personal investment in these things, this isn't a plug. Just something I started doing once my fingers got numb one day and the effect was nearly immediate, my hand felt better within a few hours.

    For the link dependent, here is another person saying pretty much the same thing (with some other ideas, which I'm not exactly prepared to try out ;).

    1. Re:poah man's prevention by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      Those work, and when my right hand became really bad I kidnapped the egro keyboard of my former boss and the trackball of our former IT guy. (My organization has a lot of former employees ...)

      My hands are fairly good now. I can even write again :)

      Most organizations should be willing to purchase an ergo keyboard and trackball to avoid current and future problems. If not, they are worth the investment and label them as YOURS so that you can take them away with you.

    2. Re:poah man's prevention by ahaning · · Score: 2, Funny
      That second link has a few sentences that concern me a bit:

      My intuition led me into a Chinese goods store, and the store manager, who saw me holding my arm in pain, told me he knew just what I needed!

      He handed me a set of Baoding Balls used in Qi Gong. I twirled the jade balls maybe three times in my left hand, then fell to the ground in pain. I knew these were just what I needed; an answer to an unspoken prayer.


      Errr? Is this person just really masochistic or is the answer to CTS supposed to be twirling little oriental balls in our hands in order to feel terrible pain?

      (~OT: That evil guy in Akazukin ChaCha must have pretty bad CTS as he's always twiddling his balls.)
      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  49. Is there no logic here? by Cynikal · · Score: 1

    "an individual must have an impairment that prevents or severely restricts the individual from doing activities that are of central importance to most people's daily lives"

    I don't know about them, but being able to work and support myself (ie. keep living) is of sorta central importance to my life..

  50. Not always by S.+Allen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I agree about computer usage, CT can be caused by other factors. For example: we just had our first kid. As we found out, CT can sometimes be brought on by hormone fluctuations post-partum. This is the case with my wife. I've never known anyone with severe CT, but now I know how excruciating it can be. She's often unable to lift our child and she certainly can't drive a car. It may be temporary (we certainly hope so), but in the meantime, it's pretty debilitating.

    1. Re:Not always by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      My wife had similar joint problems after the birth of our daughter. It seems to have gone away, but we were very concerned for a while since the symptoms are a lot like Lupus, which can kill you. I would say that the problem went away somewhere around 12-15 months. I'll ask her for more details and maybe some advice when I get home and if she's got anything I'll post it tonight.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  51. Not suprising by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
    The Supreme Court takes the position that a disability is not a disability if it can be accomodated for. Ie, you are not considered disabled with diabetes, if you can take insulin. If an accomodation will work, then you don't need accomodation.


    But, the ADA test is still if the disability affects major life acitivities, not just working.


    Many states have a different definition for disability. In Mass, if you are injured on the job, you are automatically considered disabled.


    Of course, the definition for disability is always different. SSDI defines disbility different from the ADA which is different from the state version of the ADA which is different from workers comp. definition of disability which is different from an insurance companies definition of disability.

  52. causes by Kallahar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read an article a while back that claimed that the cause of most carpal tunnel syndrome was the use of the mouse rather than the keyboard.

    From personal experience being a programming who has used dvorak for 3 years, and using as many keyboard shortcuts as possible, I've never had a problem with carpal tunnel.

    1. Re:causes by Brigadoon · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I've used Dvorak for over a year now, and I've never had a problem, save those 10 hour LANs. I must say that Dvorak is much, much easier on the wrists than Qwerty is, all other things being equal.

    2. Re:causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had a lot of trouble with using the keyboard, but I agree that using a typical mouse can cause unnecessary pain. Using a mouse located off to the side of the keyboard aggravates my bad shoulder. If I get a new keyboard, it will be one with a trackball or touchpad mounted on it.

      I have a suspicion that keyboards that have loose or wobbly keys may contribute to CTS, but haven't seen the suggestion elsewhere.

      I changed to using dvorak a couple of years ago, and haven't regretted it at all. Typing now involves a lot less work, due to the increased effiency. I picked up an old IBM model 30 keyboard for $3 US in a local flea market, and just to confuse the rest of the family, switched the keytops to dvorak. It's noisy, but AFAIK still one of the best keyboards ever sold.

    3. Re:causes by cafebabe · · Score: 1
      I had major problems with CT a few years back. I noticed that my wrists hurt less when I used my laptop (which has a trackpoint) than when I used my desktop keyboard and mouse. I ditched my mouse completely and bought a trackpoint keyboard instead. It helped tremendously and I've had much less pain since. It also works wonders at keeping other people from borrowing your workstation. **grin**

      --
      When violence rules the world outside / And the headlines make me want to cry / It's not the time to just keep quiet
    4. Re:causes by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Switching the mouse to the other side helps. If you're unable to do anything else, do that at least.

      At home, I used an ergonomic mouse. At work, I used one mouse on the right and one mouse on the left. They were both on at the same time and the extra one was connected through the usb connection. That helped a lot.

      If you're in a bind and don't have many options, it seems variation is the key. I should probably say exercise as well, but I was too undisciplined to take regular computer breaks and do exercise.

      Stephan

    5. Re:causes by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      "I changed to using dvorak a couple of years ago, and haven't regretted it at all. Typing now involves a lot less work, due to the increased effiency. I picked up an old IBM model 30 keyboard for $3 US in a local flea market, and just to confuse the rest of the family, switched the keytops to dvorak. It's noisy, but AFAIK still one of the best keyboards ever sold. "

      Can you still use both types of keyboards without impacting your speed. I'd like to switch to dvorak, but I usually program with a programming partner sitting next to me and sometimes I have to work on the workstations of others.

      Stephan

  53. Re:Must be a Republican in the White House... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Flame the President all you want, but this isn't something he decided.

    This was the Supreme Court.

  54. Inconvienenced or disabled. by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The courts are being used to finally stop the abuse of the ADA. It should interesting to see what happens when the "compulsive behaviour" abuses make it to the court.

    Essentially they are stating, theres a big difference between being disabled and inconvienenced. The law was meant to help the truly disabled, not those who are lazy, or have good lawyers. (and I won't go into to alcholics)

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  55. Ok, let's get this straight by jd · · Score: 2
    On the one hand, the person has a disability. That seems pretty obvious. It's a disability that prevented them from doing their job. We seem to be all agreed on this. Most people are trained for 10+ years to do a specific job, and that is typically their sole source of income. At this point, we run into problems.


    Sure, the person can cook. What with? You can't live on thin air alone, and if you change career tracks, you're often faced with massively expensive education to get the bits of paper you need. Oh, and education means lots of writing (which is painful for someone with CTS).


    So, no job, no prospect of getting another job in the same field, and no prospect of being able to change fields.


    Essentially, the Supreme Court has ruled that it is legal to abandon someone to a life of welfare, which WE have to pay for, because THEY don't want the political hastle involved in actually providing any kind of support.


    Mind you, this isn't the first time. They ruled that a pilot who was legally blind was not disabled, because the person could fly an aircraft, even though the company the pilot flew for had sacked them, for being legally blind, which the Supreme Court then ruled was not discriminatory, because the person had a disability that prevented them from working.


    The world is a crazy place, at times. The rest of the time, it's a complete loony bin.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Ok, let's get this straight by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Damn mod this person up.

      Most career people their job is their life. If you have to switch jobs you have to be retrained, and still need to take extra precautions about your illness. To say that a person's job is not their life is a slap in the face by Judges who are appointed for life.

    2. Re:Ok, let's get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what wellfare is for.

    3. Re:Ok, let's get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They ruled that this person's disability did not meet the requirements of the ADA law she was using to sue her employer.

      She may well be able to use other laws to have her job modified, or she may just have to take one of the other jobs offered her.

    4. Re:Ok, let's get this straight by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1
      Most people are trained for 10+ years to do a specific job, and that is typically their sole source of income.
      Yeah, but in this case, Ella Williams was an unskilled auto line worker. Seeing as her CTS only prevented her from "...repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods of time." methinks she'll be able to find another job.
  56. Time to start following the money by DaveWood · · Score: 1

    I'd not be surprised at all to see a decision like this coming out of congress or the White House - things there are, for all intents and purposes, up for sale, and there are mountains of interests falling all overthemselves to bury CTS and other RSIs... Bringing a little bit more of the 3rd world home every day, I like to say.

    It's not just white collar employers like Microsoft who want to see CTS swept under the rug. It's _everybody_. The garment industry. Manufacturing consortia. Even agricultural concerns have RSI risk factors on the job. And it's just (gushing) _so_ much cheaper (gasping) if the problem doesn't exist.

    Thus, there's virutally endless money for brave politicians to step up and try to protect industry (and government) from responsibility for RSI injuries. The surprising thing about this is that it's _not_ congress or the White House. It's the Supremes.

    The judiciary is, for all its flaws, relatively free of the kind of quid pro quo corruption you see in elected officials... at least in it's higher echelons, and certainly the supremes. Or at least it has been.

    This year may spell the beginning of the end of that, with GWBush's rather blatant repayment for Scalia's 11th hour election decision, and, I suppose, with this decision. I hope there is adequate scrutiny of these justices; I had assumed there was, but now I am starting to wonder.

    1. Re:Time to start following the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if Clinton would have gotten off his ass and done something for the country instead of searching for his legacy (which turns out to be letting terrorists free), none of your argument would hold up.

  57. I can't believe you people sometimes by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two hours ago you were bashing opportunistic lawyers in regard to the German SuSE case, and now you are whining because the supreme court said that the same type of ambulance chaser lawyer can't sue over a "disability" that is minor in comparison to real disabilities.

    This decision is a victory for freedom, and limited government interference. It's also a victory for people with real disabilities.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:I can't believe you people sometimes by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      Minor? Let's shove a railroad spike into your wrist and do an interview with ya afterwards.

      Lemme guess... you're between 20 and 35, and don't believe you'll ever die or feel real pain, or more importantly, lose your job because of pain.

      Making a person who gets carpal on the job live on welfare for the rest of her life is not a victory for disabled people everywhere, and as for freedom... freedom for whom? For her? Exactly whose freedom are you talking about? The freedom to scream when you bend your wrist? The freedom to be canned after the job hurts you at last to the point you can't do it?

      Or is it the freedom of some yungyun to make lots of cash on the stock of the companies who no longer need to pay for such injuries?

    2. Re:I can't believe you people sometimes by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the case? This has nothing to do with workman's compensation insurance for injuries sustained on the job.

      Also, I have had major problems with my right wrist before (from incorrect mousing I'm sure) so bad I couldn't pick up or hold objects in the air with my right hand that weighed over a pound or two, so don't preach to me.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  58. Trackball may help? by lamj · · Score: 1

    I used to have early symptom of CT on my right wrist. I guess due to improper mouse usage posture. I immediately switched to a Logitech Trackball, it helps a whole lot. Within 3 weeks, I got rid of the pain.

    For those of you that have CT related to using the mouse, consider using a trackball.

    1. Re:Trackball may help? by simetra · · Score: 1

      I've tried those, they hurt my thumbs. I wonder if there's a name for that? Another option is to learn more keyboard shortcuts. That way, you don't waste time switching your hand off the keyboard and onto the mouse, and back again.
      Anyway, I got tendonitis from using a regular keyboard.. had to wear little wrist braces. But, after using an ergo board at work, things got better.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:Trackball may help? by Jordan+Block · · Score: 1

      I did that too, but at the time I was working in a windows admin job and I ended up getting a really sore thumb.... I ended up having two mice, and used whichever was less painfull.

  59. Strictly Speaking. by Irvu · · Score: 1

    ...That the Act defines "disability" "with respect to an individual," 12102(2), makes clear that Congress intended the existence of a disability to be determined in such a case-by-case manner. See, e.g., Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 , 483. An individualized assessment of the effect of an impairment is particularly necessary when the impairment is one such as carpal tunnel syndrome, in which symptoms vary widely from person to person. Pp. 11--14.

    (b) The Sixth Circuit erred in suggesting that, in order to prove a substantial limitation in the major life activity of performing manual tasks, a plaintiff must show that her manual disability involves a "class" of manual activities, and that those activities affect the ability to perform tasks at work...

    Strictly speaking the court made no ruling on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. What they asserted was that this woman was not disabled and that the criteria for proving disability which the lower court employed were incorrect.

    This does set the bar high for proving disability but the door to employing people in knowingly injurious jobs was already open. You can thank Tom Delay for that when he killed the workplace ergonomics Legislation the Clinton had Passed.

  60. Yes But.. by andres32a · · Score: 2

    The article also points out:" The ruling does not mean that anyone with carpal tunnel syndrome or similar partial disabilities is automatically excluded from protection by the ADA. But it probably will make such claims harder to prove, since the court makes clear that disability must affect a range of manual tasks or duties. "

  61. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by sommere · · Score: 1
    Yes, exactly. Note that unanimous Supreme Court decisions are very rare in any case where there's substantial controversy -- I strongly suspect that this individual really didn't have very strong case (or maybe she had a really lousy lawyer.) I would be very surprised if this case turned out to set any significant precedent.

    The Supreeme Court doesn't look at how good the case was. They look at how the law was interpreted. She may have had a bad lawyer, but that doesn't mean that, in theory, lower courts aren't supposed to follow the highest court's descision.

  62. What a joke. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

    You cannot fire an alcoholic, since he/she is 'disabled'. But if a programmer or other computer worker cannot use their hands, that isn't a disability.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:What a joke. by malarkey · · Score: 1

      You CAN fire an alcoholic, if it affects there job performance. They are protected if they are in treatment, and are not still abusing substance which affects their performance.

      This is about changing someones JOB DESCRIPTION so they can do the job with carpal tunnel.

      While Carpal Tunnel may not be a disability under the ADA, which says the problem must affect life activities, OSHA has been cracking down on repetitive stress injuries.

      If her condition is work-related, it's covered under workers compensation. In that case she would be eligible for _Workers_Comp_ disability benefits.

      Short and Long-term disability insurance is for illnesses or injuries, usually not work-related, which cause someone to miss work. Birth of baby/Pregnancy, for example, is covered under short-term disability benefits, but is NOT covered under the ADA. Same with broken arms, legs, pneumonia...

      There are different definitions of disability depending on which laws you're talking about.

    2. Re:What a joke. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      But if a programmer or other computer worker cannot use their hands, that isn't a disability.

      If someone cannot use their hands, that's a disability. It's also not the facts of the case at hand.

    3. Re:What a joke. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1, Troll

      that was his point, faggot

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  63. no effect. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Informative
    The defintion for disability under an insurance plan is very different from the ADA. Usually under an insurance plan, it is the ability to do your job. But, read throught he insurance contract.

  64. That's ok by scott1853 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's ok if it's not a disability as long as I can still use it as an excuse for misspelling words.

  65. Worked for me by conan_albrecht · · Score: 1

    I had serious problems with CTS in the early 1990's. My Karate teacher taught me to do exercises almost exactly like the site you link, and it worked wonders for me. I had visited specialists and was on the verge of surgery (your strength is never the same afterward).

    After doing exercises each night for several months, my CTS was basically nullified. I still have to do the exercises, and I still have to be careful of how much work I do with my wrists, but I've avoided surgery for almost a decade.

    For those interested, see the site above. I made 10 fists in front of me (as in the pictures), then I made 10 fists with my hands above my head. Then 10 with hands down at sides, then 10 with hands straight out left and right.

    Finally, (AND MOST IMPORTANTLY), bend your palms and fingers back to stretch the carpal area. This is what really achives the benefit. After the exercise, you stretch to increase your range of motion and decrease the swelling.

    FWIW, it worked for me.

    1. Re:Worked for me by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What works depends on the cause. CTS is a syndrome. That means that it's a collection of symptoms. They don't always have the same cause. Sometimes exercises make things worse instead of making things better. If it a chronic inflamation, then frequently exercises will help if you get the inflamation under control first. If it is not only chronic, but also mild, then it may be possible to use ibuprofen to get the inflamation under control. It is usually a bad idea to exercise while the inflamation is present (at least without being under close observation by a specialist in the field).

      P.S.: IANA MD. This is only a warning, not a diagnosis or prescription for treatment.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  66. Factors to consider by infernalC · · Score: 2, Informative
    • If you read the court opinion you will find that CTS was only the first in a string of problems, including neck and back injury due to oiling the finish of cars on the assembly line.
    • Toyota and the plaintiff (let's not say victim, we don't know for sure what happened) disagreed over the work attendance of the plantiff. I find it difficult to believe that she had no record of her attendance; I get this on my paystub, and since she was probably hourly, she should have carbon copies of her time sheet.
    • The plaintiff was only seen by Toyota's doctors.
    • Toyota's physicians actually ordered her to stop working (or so it seems).

    I think one piece of wisdom we can garner from this case is that it is important to keep good records of when you worked, what your medical conditions are, and your employer's evaluations. Perhaps it is good to be evaluated by impartial physicians as well.

  67. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by DRO0 · · Score: 1

    Disability cannot be assessed by looking only at someone's fitness to work, the court said.

    Cut-and-dried. Maybe the woman's condition really did prevent her from doing everyday stuff. But the federal court's reason was based solely on the impact of her CTS at work. Therefore, the SC is saying that no matter what the facts may have been, the legal reasoning used by the federal court was wrong.

  68. Question: What to do about pain in wrists/arms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just recently started to have some pains in my wrists and arms. Typing doesn't bother me, but using the mouse does. It feels like the daily mouse use is affecting my ability to grip smaller objects. I've been switching the mouse between my left and right hands, but there's still discomfort and it's definately not improving. What are others doing to deal with this problem?

  69. Re:Little girl may die - help save a life... by phoenix_orb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You are a dork.

    You need to die.

    Die Billy Die.

    Please die so that they may bury you in that burlap sack.

    Hey, and take that damn BSD is dead troll and Stephen King is dead troll with you

    --
    Blah Blah Blah.
  70. Read the ruling again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did they say that it's not a disability? They just said the employers don't have to tailor jobs for people.

  71. Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by cube+farmer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If memory serves, this woman had worked for Toyota in an assembly plant for a number of years. Over time, her carpal tunnel syndrome developed and resulted in significant absenteeism. After UAW-Management mediation, Toyota reassigned her to a job that was less physically demanding, e.g., inspecting the paint on new cars. While at that task, her attendance record improved dramatically. Unfortunately, after a time Toyota management again reassigned her to assembly work in circumstances that aggravated her carpal tunnel syndrome and again resulted in absenteeism due to chronic pain. I don't recall whether she quit or was fired prior to the filing of this lawsuit.

    The Supremes have ruled that Toyota is not obligated to provide a job for this woman, nor to provide reasonable accommodation in any existing job, because the carpal tunnel syndrome she suffers from does not significantly limit "major life activities" -- meaning, she can still drive, care for her own hygiene, hold a less physically demanding job, etc.

    In my view, Toyota is both a good guy and a bad guy here. After making a reasonable accommodation by transfering its employee to the paint shop, it then put her back in the circumstance that was a significant factor in the development of her carpal tunnel syndrome. Initially nice, then heartless. However, Toyota is in the right about asserting no responsibility to employ her because, as noted by the Supremes, its former employee is perfectly capable of choosing a less physically demanding career path, with equal if not better economic opportunities.

    This is similar to a construction foreperson saying she will not hire me for the physically demanding job of digging trenches if I suffer from obesity, chronic back pain, and uncontrolled hypertension. I'm simply not suited to the job.

    That being said, it sucks to be the plaintiff.

    --

    MacOS, Windows, BeOS, GNOME, KDE: they're all just Xerox copies

    1. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I don't agree. The CTS was caused by the job, therefore the employer is obligated to take care of them.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I don't agree.

      She was free to get a new job.

      I am hurt at the job because of something my workplace has done or hasn't done, then they are obligated. But if it's a preventable injury or it's caused by me, why should the workplace be taking care of me?

    3. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by cube+farmer · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. The CTS was caused by the job, therefore the employer is obligated to take care of them.

      I don't disagree with you. Rather, I took a different approach.

      The Supremes, to my recollection, did not rule as to whether the plaintiff's carpal tunnel syndrome was caused by her work-related activity; and thus that remains an open question.

      If, in fact, the CTS was directly related to her work activities, as others have noted already, she is entitled to workers' compensation and other remedies. But she still can't sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

      --

      MacOS, Windows, BeOS, GNOME, KDE: they're all just Xerox copies

    4. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by Cheshire+Cat · · Score: 2
      I don't agree. The CTS was caused by the job, therefore the employer is obligated to take care of them.


      Thats what Worker's Comp is for. But I agree with the Supreme Court that she's not eligible for ADA coverage.

      --

      Last night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas I'll never know.
    5. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. The CTS was caused by the job, therefore the employer is obligated to take care of them

      CTS can be cured (and prevented in the first place) through proper exercising of the joints. So maybe Toyota should be required to remind everybody to stretch in the morning.

      Okay, so I'm being a bit sarcastic, but this lady (and everybody else) needs to take some responsibility for taking care of themselves. It's not like CTS was diagnosed for the first time yesterday.

    6. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Something your workplace has done like, say assigning you to work that aggravates your (already known and once accommodated) CTS? Despite your pointing out to them that this is a problem they could avoid?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    7. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by CKW · · Score: 1


      However, Toyota is in the right about asserting no responsibility to employ her.

      Why not? Their job *created* her condition.

      If I want to run a company that churns through physically fit employees and spits out people with 5 years ditch digging experience and horrifically broken backs, there's nothing stopping me?

    8. Re:Valid Decision, Sucks to be Plaintiff by cube+farmer · · Score: 1
      As I noted in an earlier reply, the Supremes did not rule as to whether the plaintiff's carpal tunnel syndrome was caused by her work-related activity; and thus that remains an open question.

      My parent comment could certainly have been clearer on this point. Let me state unequivocably: If Toyota's management practices and work environment are shown to be the cause of this woman's CTS and/or repetitive motion injuries, then Toyota is and should be responsible for ensuring that she receives compensation and retraining. This is what Workers Compensation is for. Toyota is not, however, responsible for employing her, nor is her cause actionable under the ADA.

      --

      MacOS, Windows, BeOS, GNOME, KDE: they're all just Xerox copies

  72. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that means that persistent pain in my ass can't be considered a disability, just my girlfriend. :p - yes, i'm kidding.

  73. An[e]L? An[A]L!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheesh, don't you have anything better to do?

  74. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by deebaine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Moreover, Justice O' Connor pointed out that the test under the ADA is whether or not a person's disability affects his or her to perform normal daily tasks--not his or her ability to perform a specific job.

    In fact, the ADA specifically states that this is the test. As Justice O'Connor wrote, "Repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods is not an important part of most people's daily lives," O'Connor wrote. "Household chores, bathing and brushing one's teeth, in contrast, are among the types of manual tasks of central importance to people's daily lives." In sharp contrast to the rather extreme and dire view suggested by the story posting <rant>(which, in my view, is either misleading and downright shameful or simply reflects a total lack of understanding of the decision and the governing laws)</rant>, the Justices did not rule on the validity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; they simply verified the intention of the ADA as written and asked the lower court to reconsider its decision.

    In this case, the court held that the woman was not impaired in normal daily tasks, in spite of the fact that she was impaired in her job. There is a critical distinction here, and I firmly agree with the limitations placed on the ADA by the court here.

    -db

  75. Bad wrists, no work - Bad legs, go golf? by rw2 · · Score: 2

    I'm confused. Isn't this the same court that said Casey could join the PGA tour with his bad legs?

    I guess the supremes must be frustated golfers who never worked a line.

    1. Re:Bad wrists, no work - Bad legs, go golf? by cburley · · Score: 1
      Isn't this the same court that said Casey could join the PGA tour with his bad legs?

      It does seem a bit confusing, but, AFAIK, the only direct implication of the Casey decision was that the PGA was forced to change its rules regarding whether golf carts could be used at certain levels of play during tournaments.

      (There were plenty of indirect implications, of course.)

      That's a bit less of an impact than the gov't forcing an employer to keep an employee on salary doing something that someone else might do better, etc.

      Looking at other comments here, it seems as though the issue boils down to Casey having an ADA-compliant disability (his disability impairs his ability to do normal life stuff, i.e. walk) and the women in this suit having a disability that doesn't quite meet that standard.

      So, the PGA was forced to accommodate Casey's disability, but Toyota (or whoever) isn't forced to accommodate the woman's CTS disability, under the rules of the ADA.

      (Apologies if I have various facts wrong; haven't read the decisions, and I know basically nothing about golf.)

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  76. Excellent News by cmkrnl · · Score: 1


    Now lets start on all those pampered middle class wasters pining away, telling us how terrible their poor miserable lifes are with ME/CFS.

    F*cking freeloading b*stards! 'tis a running kick up the arse they need. They would soon get motivated & all the energy they need if there wasnt some idiot stupid enough to fall for that crap. Hunger beats CFS anyday.

    Curmudgeon

  77. Forget the conservative-bashing by ChrisWong · · Score: 1

    The decision was unanimous, meaning that conservative and liberal judges alike agreed to this. This is not a valid stick with which to beat up on conservatives.

    1. Re:Forget the conservative-bashing by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      It was a general observation. I wonder what a couple more Clarence Thomases would do.

      "We find the complaintant's claim invalid, furthermore we suggest she be confined to San Francisco Liberal Penal Colony with all the other wackos."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  78. C-P not realy cause by keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not sure how many of you read Populer Sciance, but thay had a study in their that found C-P is casue by life. Thay found that people who use the keyboard all day(programes, etc) did not show more or less cases of C-P then the avagrage person.

    Of course if we all used them ergonomic keyboards we should be ok. I also think their are some better keyboards out their in the wired shapes that spouse to be better for the hands.

  79. Bad precedence by 2Bits · · Score: 2
    Ok, maybe she didn't have strong case, maybe she had a lousy lawyer, but a unanimous Supreme Court decision like can set a pretty precedence.

    The next thing you will see is insurance companies will lobby to pass a law that CTS not eligible for any compensation anymore.

    The worst thing is to have bad laws stacking up on each other.

    1. Re:Bad precedence by philologist · · Score: 1

      Precisely. I'm not exactly inclined toward an alarmist reaction at the news of this case's outcome, but it does set a precedent that will be used by the respondents in disability cases to support their non-payment. Not only that, but this will have a ``chilling effect'' on others sho have been cheated by their employers, insurance, or by a government; people who suffer from Carpal Tunnel Syndrome will be much less likely to stand up for what should be a right.

      Now we need the employers to show some interest in preventing the conditions that are causing their employees to suffer a permanent disability.

      --

  80. Chinese exercise balls-seriously by billmaly · · Score: 2

    Since we're talking CTS (Carpal tunnel), anyone used Chinese Exercise balls to relieve pain or provide alternative motion for wrist and finger muscles? For those who don't know, they look a lot cooler than a dirty stress ball. I just ordered a pair and want to try them for my CTS that has been getting worse lately.

  81. The ruling isn't, but the headline is. by fizbin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As many others have already pointed out, this ruling is on what is considered a disability under the ADA, which is an American law that provides the minimum which everyone (employers, shopkeepers, public transportation, etc.) must do to accomodate disability. For example, I believe that it's the ADA which forces businesses that wouldn't normally allow pets on the premises to nevertheless accept seeing-eye dogs.

    This ruling has no bearing on whether or not carpal tunnel could be considered a disability under, say, a worker's compensation law. It merely states that in order to invoke the power of the ADA ones disability must extend to basic life tasks; merely making ones job impossible is insufficient.

    However, if your friend was forced to get a specially equipped car, then her disability was much more severe than the disability in this case, and in all likelihood meets the standard the court set in this case for invoking the ADA.

    1. Re:The ruling isn't, but the headline is. by slow_flight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? Then how did Casey Martin score a golf cart out of the PGA using the ADA? Playing golf, especially professional golf, is not a basic life task IMHO.

      --

      Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
    2. Re:The ruling isn't, but the headline is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because his disability wasn't his ability to play golf, it was his ability to walk moderated distances without exhausting himself.

    3. Re:The ruling isn't, but the headline is. by slow_flight · · Score: 1

      I don't think not being able to walk a minimum of 18 and a possible 36 holes of a very difficult golf course comes anywhere near a moderate distance. It's damn hard, actually, and not a basic quality of life question. My parents live just fine, and in fact take care of 8-10 race horses, but neither one of them could walk 18 holes of golf. That decision was plain wrong, and as you're probably starting to see, a real hot-button with me.

      --

      Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
  82. Smoking? by ganiman · · Score: 0

    Well, to put it plainly, carpel tunnel is caused by not knowing how to type or use a mouse correctly. So in other words, it's something you bring upon yourself. If carpel tunnel is a disability, would that make smoking a disability too?

    --
    geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
  83. Can I get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get Carpel Tunnal from masterbating.

    Damit, I might have to find a girl Friend.

  84. Big_Ass_Spork is Klerck's manwhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I believe your injuries come from stroking Klerck's dick too often.

    Admit it, you old sodomist!

  85. I know pain...embrace it even by Chundra · · Score: 2

    I've got a nagging pain in my wrists due to repetetive motions and it may even be Carpal Tunnel. Even if it was considered a disability, I hardly think that I could receive any compensation other than the monthly ammount I pay for premium binary newsgroup access.

    Gotta go. There's a massive flood on alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bluebird.reposts.

    Ow. Ow. Ouch.

  86. Mouse Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have reached the point where I can't use my right hand with the mouse for more than half an hour. So, I switched the button order and started using my left hand. After 2 weeks my left hand was nearly as fast as my right, and I have no more problems. I figure that by the time my left hand eventually develops a problem, my right will be ready again and I'll switch back and forth every other day.

  87. Simple Answer... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Go into the Hospital and get her wrists operated on. Once they've been cut open and require time to heal and physical therapy, she should easily qualify for disabled.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  88. Yes this is bad but... by GiorgioG · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...there's a simple fix for those of us who may be in the early stages of carpel tunnel and at least pain relief for those who already have it: go get yourself a keyboard & pointing device that doesn't screw up your wrists. Personally, I used to do email tech support - over 300 emails in 8 hours (yes, some were scripted; even still, my wrists/hands were NUMB at the end of the day.) The fix? $170 keyboard - Kinesis Ergo (www.kinesis-ergo.com) countoured keyboard. Yes, it took 3 weeks to get used to it, and people looked @ me funny in the beginning - but hell, we're IT people, we expect that. My wrists stopped hurting after about 2 months of using that keyboard. (No I don't work for kinesis) - In fact, I'm eyeing the DataHand (www.datahand.com) for my next keyboard...

  89. Finally.. by scorcherer · · Score: 1

    Light at the end of the carpal tunnel.

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  90. Re:Must be a Republican in the White House... by furiousgeorge · · Score: 1

    pinhead.

    This was the Surpreme Court. The white house has nothing to do with it.

    And has president Butthead.... I mean Bush appointed any judges to the court........ um - no.

  91. Not the ideal case for a CT victory by daoine · · Score: 1

    While this case doesn't get into the issues of whether or not CT is a disability (leaving it as a case by case basis probably to avoid setting a precedent) - this isn't quite the right case for CT arguers to champion. Her employer did actually make some attempts to keep her employed at the company by shifting her work. (I believe the last case that got significant media attention also had the same situation) If employers make reasonable attempts to keep the person employed, the employee loses significant ground for lawsuits.

  92. That reminds me by inerte · · Score: 1

    Of this:

    http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/world/1999/ 11 /29/suit/

    1. Re:That reminds me by inerte · · Score: 1

      Er... broken link. Correct one.

  93. Win the money to cure your disabillity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $$$ Win Mon€y $$$

    This is your 5th chance! The last 4 chances was wasted! COME ON, We have provided news for nerds, now we wan't to reward our users So heres the with chance to win! Don't delay! This money is waiting to be won!

    Welcome to the /. Moderators challenge 2002! You can win up to $1,000,000
    Just by moderating this post to Score : 5, Insightful! It is that easy yet people are WASTING THIS EASY MONEY

    Instructions

    Moderate it UP, NOT DOWN!
    go to Goat Cash, Inc to claim your prize

    $$$ Rules $$$

    You must moderate it to Score 5, insightful or you lose.
    Anonymous Cowards Can't Take part as they cant moderate
    No Linux or Mac users allowed as this uses IE6's VB Verification Routines
    Meta moderators are not allowed
    Replys moderated up do not count
    There are 10 chances, this is chance 05 of 10
    Goat Cash Inc is handing out the prizes, if they fail to do so then sue them not us!

    Good luck!

    The Slashdot Team

    Authentication (Needed to verify your moderation)
    01101004889598844959868485y736598-59874358870598 74 597975794543457457945745095785875:05

    (C) Copywrong 2002, Slashdot, Va software, Goat Cash inc, OSDN, Anonymous Coward Corportation

  94. It's a Workman's Comp case... by HardCase · · Score: 3, Interesting
    An Anonymous Coward writes: "It turns out that the Supreme Court of the United States doesn't think Carpel Tunnel Syndrome is a real disability.


    In fact, the article clearly states:

    The ruling does not mean that anyone with carpal tunnel syndrome or similar partial disabilities is automatically excluded from protection by the ADA. But it probably will make such claims harder to prove, since the court makes clear that disability must affect a range of manual tasks or duties.


    Well, for starters, the Court did not rule that carpal tunnel syndrom is not a disability. They ruled that the woman in question was not disabled from carpal tunnel syndrome.
    The law already makes clear just what this snippet from the article says. I think that in many cases, employers and insurance companies are concerned with the political backlash that may come from a close interpretation (that is, applying the law as written) of the law.


    Nonetheless, the law is clear that you aren't disabled if you can't perform your job...there is a much broader test to be satisfied to determine a disability.


    Certainly there would be a big bonanza for the plaintiff if an ADA violation was proved, but I wonder if this would have been more appropriately handled as a Workman's Compensation case? After all, she claimed that her injury came from a work-related situation...that seems tailor-made for a Workman's Comp case.


    Of course, the cynical side of my must point out there there is a lot more money to be had from an ADA lawsuit...


    -h-

    1. Re:It's a Workman's Comp case... by markmoss · · Score: 2

      According to the Washington Post, she lost the workman's comp case -- they didn't believe the injury was real.

  95. Abusing the "disability" label. by DrPsycho · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm reminded of an incident which illustrated to me in gory detail how the label "disabled" is often abused. I was working in the emergency department (in a major Canadian city) when a scruffy looking late teenage male was rolled in from the ambulance bay. He was in florid diabetic ketoacidosis, which (without too much detail) means his sugars were out of control, and his body didn't have enough insulin on board to utilize his sugar properly. (that's a gross oversimplification, but just go with me on this)

    Anyhow. Going through his chart I noted that he had a long history of letting his glycemic control get out from under him. He was a little out of it (thanks to the DKA) but was awake enough to give a pretty decent history. He was feeling a little off for a few days, but basically ignored it. Made no adjustments to his insulin regimen, nor did he seek medical attention until he was in pretty rough metabolic shape.

    I asked some pretty basic questions to get an idea of his disease state. He'd been diabetic from a very young age, always controlled with insulin, but didn't have a glucometer with which to check his blood sugar. Every diabetic should be checking their blood sugars with some degree of regularity. Why didn't he have one? He couldn't afford it.

    Couldn't afford it? Oooookay. I knew he hadn't been living with his parents for a few years, so he was out and fending for himself. Fair enough, but I gathered that he had to have some sort of income... not only to pay his rent, but to explain the Tommy Hilfiger branded shirt, designer jeans, and brand new Nikes he was wearing on his feet. So I asked him what he did for a living.

    "Nothing. I'm on disability."

    "Oh? What for?" I asked, thinking I had missed something. Instead he looked at me like he thought I was completely looney-tunes.

    "For diabetes, of course." He snorted.

    Not only was this guy munching up our public medical system's budget with his repeated and mostly preventable frequent flyer visits to the emergency department, but he was receiving government funding for his "disability". Sure, his diabetes was poorly controlled, but not because of the disease itself, but because this guy basically didn't give a flying fuck.

    Ultimately, I don't know what pissed me off more. There, of course, is the fact that this guy was milking his disease for disability benefits when thousands upon thousants of diabetics work and live and survive in the real world just fine, thank you. On top of that, some physician somewhere, at some time, had to sign the papers designating his patient as qualifying for government assistance because of his diabetes. I mean, crap, if I have asthma, can I get a cheque too?

    Granted, there's probably a whole psychosocial dimension to the story I haven't explored, but the entire situation does have to strike you as being more than a little absurd. To get back to the Slashdot story, I do think that there are musculoskeletal conditions that affect the wrists enough to severely impair one's ability to perform a great number of tasks, as well as being distressingly painful to boot. But a large majority of people who have repetitive strain injuries or "Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" can benefit from antiinflammatories, physiotherapy, and appropriate work modification (ergonomics and the like). They're probably not permanently disabled and in need of financial assistance. Save the money for the people who really need it.

    --

    -DrPsycho - Coping with reality since 1975

    1. Re:Abusing the "disability" label. by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My opinion of this case is fairly split. On one hand, I agree with the supreme courts strict ruling that "disability" as defined by the ADA constitutes more than "impairment". On the other hand, it seems to me from the case description that the woman's claim is that the employer was UNWILLING to make "appropriate work modification" as you put it for her to continue working for them. In other words, if you believe her side of the story, the employer was definitely behaving unfairly and there should be some remedy available to her. Unfortunately, suing under the ADA is not the appropriate avenue for that remedy, because she was not "disabled" as defined by the statute.

      Of course there is the employers side which argues much the same as you do that she simply wasn't showing up for work. Honestly, my impression of auto companies is bad enough that I'm more inclined to believe that they ignored her request for accomodation rather than believe that she simply stopped going to work.

      So the question is, given that the ADA is the wrong remedy for this particular situation, what is the right remedy?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  96. Re:FUNNY Slashcode easter egg by ganiman · · Score: 0

    sss ribbut

    --
    geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
  97. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Masem · · Score: 2
    She had probably a rather strong case; just that the strenght was on the side of the employer, not employee.

    From hearing this from NPR months ago (so the details are sketchy at best), the woman Williams was originally on the Toyota assembly line doing body/final touch work that involved repeative hand motions. She developed CTS on the job, and Toyota moved her to a desk position for some time after it was diagnosed. However, some time later, Toyota moved her back onto the plant floor, giving her a job that involved some reaching up to the top of cars and vans (though this was not the full duty of her job); this irridated her CTS and she complained to the management but they refused to move her from that job, or otherwise she would have been fired. She then filed the lawsuit for discrimination, which did go her way in two lower courts.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  98. Or better yet, dvorak by TheVillageIdiot · · Score: 1

    Or, better yet, learn dvorak. I know a quite a few people with carpal tonal problems that switched and quit having trouble. A couple of good links:

    http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
    This site has a lot of general information about it.

    http://www.karelia.com/abcd/
    This is a really good tutorial that I used. I was able to switch in about three days.

    --
    Perception is reality
    1. Re:Or better yet, dvorak by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      I've been typing in Dvorak for at least 4 years and I do believe that it does help reduce stress. I'm just suprised that people don't at least try Dvorak. I think its silly that they teach students how to type incorrectly and frustrate them. They should at least tell students that there IS a differerent way of typing.

      I think it is important to make sure that your work environment is as comfortable as possible. That means doing away with that old keyboard and deskchair.

  99. most painful motion by tricker · · Score: 1

    is hitting ctrl-n with only your left hand. sends shooting pains....

  100. Great news by Glytch · · Score: 2

    I'm sure this will be good news to my mother, who had surgery for carpal tunnel in the 70's. I guess it was just all in her head.

  101. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by cmuncey · · Score: 2

    IANAL, AIDPOOTV

    Half right. The quality of the case is not the criteria the decision is based on, but it is a limiting factor in how sweeping the decision can be -- and how binding a precedent can be as well. IMHO, they have not so much struck down CTS as an ADA covered disability, as said that it takes more than a diagnosis.

  102. US Law has been broken for a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The States is *so* ready for a revolution it's not even funny.

  103. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Artagel · · Score: 2

    On the contrary, this is a very significant case. It lays out the general rules for determining whether a major life function is impaired. Since CT may or may not rise to that level of impairment in individual cases, they must be sorted out individually. This one is being sent back for that to happen.

  104. What are you, a windmill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You evolved into being designed to chop flint-axes? Yeesh. People will believe anything these days...

  105. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Fishstick · · Score: 2

    Reuters (as published via Yahoo news) seems to interpret this as having a much more far reaching effect than this one case:

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a decision that may affect millions of Americans, the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) ruled on Tuesday that a landmark 1990 federal law protecting the disabled from discrimination only covered physical impairments that prevented them from carrying out tasks important to daily life.

    The SC probably wouldn't get involved on the factual merits of an individual case, they are in the business of overseeing the interpretation of law, no?

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  106. sigh...more bullshit lawsuits by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

    OK she has carpal tunnel..so do I (I'm 25 years old) if my pain becomes too much I'll get another job. It sucks but its the way it goes. Why should a company spend money to make the machines work in a way that does not hurt? Find a new profession ...stop bitching and stop filing lawsuits that waste money...pathetic

    --
    ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    1. Re:sigh...more bullshit lawsuits by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to check back and see if your opinion changes if you *do* get CTS or RSI. Foolish youngster.

  107. This is the 2nd or 3rd swipe at the ADA by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Earlier this year was the Post Office case where the court determined that facilities to accomodate handicapped individuals at the local post office were cost prohibitive and so didn't have to be provided. Then there was I believe a case related to a new definition of occupational disabilities. This is the next.

    This court has made it its personal crusade to tear down the ADA as well as most or all occupational disability statutes. Rehnquist basically said as much, the disability regulations are frivolous.

    1. Re:This is the 2nd or 3rd swipe at the ADA by gorilla · · Score: 2

      The ADA has always said that employers must make "reasonable accommodations". That means that if a accommodation will cause "undue hardship" to the employer then the ADA does not apply. Reasons for undue hardship include "the nature and cost of the accommodation needed".

  108. Employer was very supportive by Boone^ · · Score: 1

    The employer appeared to bend over backwards to her, and when they started giving a little, she tried taking a lot.

    My company does what it can to help as well, with Herman-Miller chairs, ergonomic keyboards, mousepad wrist rests, and workstation furniture that is fully adjustable. You can't do much more than that imo... since cubemates would get irrated at a voice recognition system that interprets verilog and C++.

    "always... symbol at... symbol left parenthesis... posedge... variable see ell kay... symbol right parenthesis... begin... newline..." :P

  109. Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have different purposes.

    Your insurance policy is supposed to protect you against loss of income.

    The ADA is supposed to help people who would otherwise be unable to participate in society participate. The idea is that if you're so disabled that you can't ever perform everyday tasks, it'll be impossible for you to get any type of job without government interference.

    They basically have completely different purposes (income protection vs. discrimination protection), so there's no reason for the two to correlate.

    Now, it's a much more difficult area than other types of non-discrimination laws as its requires active effort on the part of companies. (ie. no special measures are needed to comply with anti-racial-discrimination laws other than not being racist, but to comply with the ADA you might need to adjust your work processes around the disabled person or build special equipment like ramps or something.) But the resemblance to disability insurance is more coincidental than anything else.

  110. This woman in the article -- NOT OT!! by Xanlexian · · Score: 0, Troll

    If memory serves me correctly, this is the woman that "can not perform her job properly" anymore. She got CT from masturbating, she is a phone sex operator. She made news here in the Atlanta area a few months back.

    Now, I'm only assuming this is the same woman, since what was mentioned here in the Atlanta area said that she was going to take this thing all the way to the Supreme Court and sue under the ADA.

    The system is flawed because nitwits like this keep abusing the system.

    On a different note, I'm very double-jointed -- many years back, I tried to join the Army. I aced the ASVAB, but failed the physical due to "extreme double-jointedness". The army doctor/nurse/whatever-he-was gave me papers to get a handicap tag for my car... Never used it. I can walk just fine... It's shit like this that pisses me off.

    --Xan

    --
    "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
  111. No, this is just the court that put him there. by paranoic · · Score: 1

    This space intentionally left blank.

  112. Those who have a nagging pain in the wrists by gaudior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    should get a better keyboard, mouse, and desk chair. The responsibility for PREVENTING this condition is yours. If your employer won't spring for the stuff you need, get it yourself, or get a new job. This condition is PREVENTABLE. It's your job to look after your tools. If you type, your hands are your tools.

    1. Re:Those who have a nagging pain in the wrists by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been working with computers for 15 years AND playing with computers at hime for 14 1/2 years with no wrist problem. What's my secret? I take breaks from constant typing/mousing. If my wrists are tired, I browse source listings, go to the john, grab my 15th Coke, and wait until my hands are rested before going back to the keyboard/mouse. Usually (not always), if you don't abuse your body, it won't abuse you.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Those who have a nagging pain in the wrists by Peyna · · Score: 1
      Actually, I worked in an automobile factory one summer, and if you believe your job duties can result in RSI, and you don't speak up, and then you do get some sort RSI from it, you're going to have a difficult time getting much done about it.

      I'd say if your employer won't do something about, then you better find a new employer that cares about your health and safety a little more.

      Also, I believe that OSHA got rid of many of their ergonomics rules, etc., which might make it much easier for an employer to get away without having to provide employees with safe environments. (It should be noted that the UAW (and maybe others) still make the companies they work with to follow the OSHA ergonomics guidelines that were in place.)

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Those who have a nagging pain in the wrists by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Most likely the obesity that results from drinking all that soda cushioned your wrists and prevented damage.

  113. blaming mattel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I never blamed Mattel for my tendinitis. I blamed them for abusing the courts in continuing their baseless libel claim. I blamed MSI for firing me when I took time off to get medical treatment for a work related injury. A violation of my rights under MGL c.151B, workers comp, and the FMLA. And, for monitoring my internet access from home, for following me around the office and keeping a secret log.
    "Three years ago, I did data entry for a month with absolutely no ill side effects. I was tired at the end of every day, but I never had any pains in my hands."

    Try doing 3 years of continuous data entry with a 450lbs gorilla threatening to sit on your arms because you are not typing fast enough. Just because you can run 5 blocks does not mean that you can finish the Boston Marathon.

    1. Re:blaming mattel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be stupid and unmotivated in order to do data entry for three years. Dumbass.

  114. My pain by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    ...isn't my wrists but in my hands. What gets me is on the back of the hand abive the wrist, straight across from the base of my double-jointed thumbs (where the veins usually meet). I think it has to do with the way I mouse. I mouse with my fingertips, not my palm. My palm isn't rested on the mouse but is instead held up by my fingertips. I think that's what does it to me.

    1. Re:My pain by phossie · · Score: 1

      change your habits. it's worth the effort. if you're using one of those horrid apple "pro" mice (macdaddy?), get something that doesn't require your hand to be constantly tensed. those things suck.

      --

      [|]
  115. Conservatives are thieving, lying scum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention bloodthirsty killers. They are basically cowards though, so instead of doing the job themselves and getting their hands or bibles dirty, they get the government to do their killing for them.

    I'd prefer not to say any more about the US right wing. Their evilness speaks for itself.

    1. Re:Conservatives are thieving, lying scum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, you socialists will be the first to be lined up on the wall.
      Death to leftists

  116. Typing technique has little to do with it. by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    Actually, i use a different technique Than the one which is taught to be proper - i learned on my own

    Typing technique is not the main issue. You can type with two fingers and still manage to avoid CTS. Posture and elevation of the wrists, distance from the keyboard, etc... are what's important. If you want to brag, go talk to Mavis Beacon.

    I typed faster than the techer

    Good for you, now try working on your accuracy ;-)

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    1. Re:Typing technique has little to do with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I typed faster than the lecher.

  117. It was a ruling against one womans case of CTS by CamMac · · Score: 3, Informative

    RTFA

    Congress intended the existence of a disability to be determined in such a case-by-case manner.
    ...
    An individualized assessment of the effect of an impairment is particularly necessary when the impairment is one such as carpal tunnel syndrome, in which symptoms vary widely from person to person.

    It was not decided that the Americans with Disabilities Act didn't protect CTS. It was decided that in this woman's case, her specific form of CTS wasn't a disability under the ADA. In order for someone with CTS to be protected by the ADA, their form of CTS must "severely limit major life actives."

    Rather, the central inquiry must be whether the claimant is unable to perform the variety of tasks central to most people's daily lives. Also without support is the Sixth Circuit's assertion that the question whether an impairment constitutes a disability is to be answered only by analyzing the impairment's effect in the workplace.
    ...
    Moreover, because the manual tasks unique to any particular job are not necessarily important parts of most people's lives, occupation-specific tasks may have only limited relevance to the manual task inquiry

    That speaks for itself. Just because your impairment won't let you perform your job, its not a disability, and your not protected by the ADA. So, we return to CTS. For many of us, it WOULD impair MAJOR life activity. IANAL, however I think that you would have a hard time of it in court.

    --Cam

    --
    All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
  118. Thus spake the AC counter-troll by ArchMagus · · Score: 1

    Get a real opinion you Right wing yokel.

  119. Whose Responsibiliy Is It? by DrNibbler · · Score: 1

    A lot of folks here have very cavalier attitude about buying a keyboard and setting up the appropriate environment to avoid RSI and where I agree with what everyone is saying I don't believe it is the employee's responsibility to provide the environment. I just left a major financial institution that was ergonomicly aware for a small health insurance company who doesn't seem to know the first thing about RSI.

    I am sitting in a folding chair at a simple pressed board desk. My arms are probably at a 75 degree angle (my elbows are actually lower then the top of the desk). After requesting equipment I have given up and brought in my own keyboard, and installed keyboard drawer. I will probably replace the chair at the end of the week.

    --
    Sean.OutaHere()
  120. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 3, Informative
    Just a couple of clarifications, based on the reading of the Supreme Court's decsion:
    1. She wasn't moved to a desk job, but moved to an assembly floor position that didn't require as much manual labor. Specifically she was assigned to a quality control team which did four QC-related tasks, she initially was assigned to rotate between two of the four, two which didn't aggrevate her CTS. Management then got the bright idea to make everyone on the team to rotate through all four tasks, the other two which did aggrevate Williams' CTS.
    2. The district court (Eastern District of Kentucky) found for Toyota ("granted summary judgement for petitioner" in SCOUS terms means the person in front of the "v."). The Sixth Circut court overturned the district court, ignoring the fact that Williams didn't seem to have any problems keeping up with her hygine and household chores (which appears to be a requirement to qualify for ADA protection.)
    -sk
  121. You know, its amazing how many people by Richthofen80 · · Score: 0, Troll

    *want* to be disabled. People fighting for jobs that they can't do, and they want a company to make the job somehow 'doable' for them.

    Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, and other repetitive strain injuries suck. But Toyota and other companies need certain tasks to be performed... tasks too expensive to automate robotically or otherwise. And its just plain smart business sense to hire and retain people who can do jobs, as opposed to people who can't. Actually, Toyota moved the woman involved in this case to an easier, less straining job. But eventually, all tasks become repetitive...

    If a pilot of a jetliner for a major airline goes blind, are we outraged if he is fired or forced into retirement? Or are special neural implants required for this man's disability, much like in Star Trek? Listen, its too bad people get disabled... but that's all it is, *too bad*. It doesn't become a companies responsibility to tend to this person's every need. All a job is, is a contract to give one person money in exchange for services.

    Otherwise, Wouldn't Schitzophrenia or Turrets Syndrome be a disability? Would you want a schitzophrenic or a Turrets person doing sales for your company?

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:You know, its amazing how many people by Tviokh · · Score: 1

      Hm, I must say I disagree with the moderation of this post as "troll".

      There are some very valid points made here.
      They might not be "politically correct" or "sensitive to people who are differently abled"(you have no idea how painful it was for me to use the PC term;)), but really...if something like this offends you, perhaps you should take a good look at yourself; you're probably one of the people this guy's complaining about.

      --
      http://pebkac.net
  122. Not that mine is any better. =) by ArchMagus · · Score: 1

    Bah, who am I kidding, we're all bipolar board trolls.

  123. Life activities? by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or beavis and butthead get smarter:

    Beavis:
    'Uh-huh-huh, you said "repetative motion", your honour...uh-huh-huh-huh.'

    Butthead:
    'Is that why they wear those robes, Beavis?'

    Beavis:
    Well, eeeheeeheeheee, we submit to the court...

    Butthead:
    Huh-huh, you said submit.

    (SMACK)

    Beavis:
    Quiet! That one man's "repetitave motion" is another man's life activity... Just look at my associate....

    Butthead:
    You said Ass...Hey, shut up Beavis, don't make me kick your ass again.

    {and no, I did not read the article, seeing as +4 posts explained all I needed to know quite well, thank you}

    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  124. Or Kickboxing... by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

    Or take kickboxing. After a couple years worth of breaks and bruises, you won't care much about piddly little wrist injuries. My wrists hurt too, but it's nothing compared to the 2-piece sternum I've been walking around with. Seriously, though: the ADA is for people who are unable to compensate for their own disabilities, and require assistance from the rest of the world. Wheelchairs and blindness qualify. Painful joints don't.

    --
    Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
  125. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *you* try getting a decent chair out of my HR department :-(

  126. Not a chance by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

    Sorry, but using a Dvorak keyboard layout isn't the magic bullet you might hope. I've been using Dvorak for several years, but it hasn't really helped my wrist pains at all. Qwerty may not be great for a lot of reasons, but Dvorak is not really any better for RSI, especially for programmers (who have to reach farther for the more commonly used [] keys). Basically, while Dvorak is nice, it is still important to follow all the normal ergonomic advice.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Not a chance by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      (who have to reach farther for the more commonly used [] keys)

      Maybe you should try Python? There's a lot fewer {}s! With a decent editor you rarely have to hit the key for indentation as well.

      Now I've gone and done it. A language flamewar and an editor flamewar all in one message!

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:Not a chance by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      You bastard! Okay, I won't kill you because you picked the right editor... But I'll be watching you, you dirty pythonite!

      Though, much as I like emacs, any benefit from not having to indent will be more than offset by the need to hit Ctrl, Meta, and Esc all the time. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  127. Facts vs. Law by DRO0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Again, IANAL, but my understanding is that the fact could very well be that the woman had such a bad case of CTS that she can't in fact do everyday stuff well or at all.

    The problem from the SC's POV is that the federal court used faulty legal reasoning in deciding for the woman, the faulty reasoning being that the "disability" has to extend beyond the scope of work-related duties.

    So in U.S. law, it's not if you win or lose, it's how you win or lose that counts. In this case the SC said the federal court screwed up and misinterpreted a law, irrespective of the facts surrounding the case.

  128. Read the actual judgment? Surely you jest... by JohnnyX · · Score: 2, Funny

    To actually read the underlying judgment, and the extensive news coverage of the company's attempts at accomodation would take time away from composing witty on-line flames.

    Yours truly,
    Mr. X

    ...NPR had excellent coverage of this story from the beginning...

  129. MMMkay. by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    Then if you're in a wheel-chair, and can still brush your teeth, then you're not disabled?!?!?!?!?! Do you have to be a quadraplegic vegetable to be considered disabled??????????

    Btw, I'm 24 and have cronic tendonitis, too much wacking I guess. ;)

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  130. Keyboard by diadem · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboards and gel-pads are your FRIEND.

    --
    Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
  131. No. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    It's still a disability. It's just not a disability as defined by the ADA. The woman was not suing her employer under some employment disability clause, she was saying they violated the ADA.

    If it WAS, many other things would have to be done.. like, doorhandles changed on every public buildling so someone with CTS could open it, etc.

  132. Sarcast shows carpal tunnel is a fish by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    The real cause of CTS. LOL. I always could swear that I felt a fish wiggling around. ;)

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  133. Early /.ing by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    I was one of the first to post here, just after the article went up. I tried to follow the link, but got no response in a few attempts, so assumed a /.ing. Presumably others found likewise. Fortunately, someone's been good enough to post the relevant snippet a few posts up -- thanks.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  134. Good trend by mikec · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've noticed a very good trend in recent Supreme Court decisions: they have been very strict in their interpretation of laws passed by congress.

    All courts in recent times have largely ignored the actual wording of the Constitution and simply made stuff up. Personally, I think this is bad, but the Constitution is vague or silent in many areas, and it's very hard to fix because the amendment process is so difficult. So I can sort of see why it happens.

    However, in the last few decades, the Supreme Court has routinely done the same with laws passed by congress. There is really very little excuse for this; congress can and does change laws all the time. However, in the last few years, this has largely stopped. The Supreme Court now seems to be interpreting laws passed by congress as written. A very good thing if you believe in representative democracy and the rule of law. It will force congress to write clear laws and explicitly change them when necessary.

  135. The whole definitions of disabled and handicapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are messed up If you are still ABLE to work, you are handicapped not disabled.

  136. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by agusus · · Score: 1
    Justice O'Connor wrote, "Repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods is not an important part of most people's daily lives,"
    Um, but it's an important part of my daily life. It's all a matter of what we see as important and essential to our daily living. To many people, using the computer is no less important than brushing their teeth.
    I think sometime in the near future, we may see computer use start to be considered "an important part of most people's daily lives."
  137. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It lays out the general rules for determining whether a major life function is impaired.


    This has already been done by the supreme court.

  138. No, it's not by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    I know the friend I posted about earlier very well. She had been using a computer for several years, and was well aware of how to set up a workstation in terms of seating position, keyboard position, etc. I saw her room often enough to know that she acted on that knowledge. Much good it did her.

    A lot of "experts" claim that there's no medical evidence supporting CTS, or that it's completely preventable and/or all in the mind. And yet, there are an increasing number of cases where people who've followed all the "good practices" still somehow get it. Anyone would think the experts might be wrong.

    Maybe that's why the new keyboard I got at work has a big sticker on the bottom, claiming that any keyboard use over extended periods could be harmful, and disclaiming responsibility for any injury caused by repetitive use.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  139. Hey, Macarena! by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Guess we're going to be needing these [carpal tunnel exercises] after all.

    What about these exercises?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  140. The UK is not in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She had to get an automatic car (relatively unusual in the UK) so she could drive mostly one-handed.

    Not sure what the relevance of the rarity of automatic transmissions in the UK has on this story, unless you are speaking of someone that lives in the UK. Perhaps you are pointing out how backwards the people in the UK are unless they have an injury. No telling from your writing style.

    Any ole' ways, if someone is supposed to be the ward of a corporation for life in the UK, because they are afflicted by a temporary condition, that DOES NOT prevent them from doing other work and does not impact their daily life then it is the UK that is broken, not the USA.

    Please, compair and contrast the space exploration programs, military prowess, general commercial developments, inventions and quality of life between the UK and the USA and defend your statement.

    BTW, the standard transmission in the USA is an automatic. The modern automatic transmissions can now take heavier loads than manuals. If properly maintained automatics are more reliable than manual transmissions. I had to hunt for a manual transmission version of my truck, personal preferance.

    Perhaps you and your fellow subjects of the queen (Liz not Elton, George or David) should petition the crown to import a few automatics to pass around at random, similar to your healthcare and unemployment systems?

  141. What I like to do... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

    Is read all the comments first so my head gets filled with a nice preconceived notion of what the article doesn't say, and then read the article with that in mind. It's fun, like reading a raving review of a movie written by a moron, so you'll know all the parts of the movie you won't give a damn about before seeing it. :)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  142. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 2
    Justice O'Connor wrote, "Repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods is not an important part of most people's daily lives,"

    Um, but it's an important part of my daily life. It's all a matter of what we see as important and essential to our daily living. To many people, using the computer is no less important than brushing their teeth. I think sometime in the near future, we may see computer use start to be considered "an important part of most people's daily lives."

    Why don't you try using a chair?

  143. super by mindflux · · Score: 1

    neat, another thing us geeks can't count on. disability benefits from CTS.

  144. Wrist stretches by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    There are stretches and strengthening exercises you can do to prevent carpal tunnel. I discovered them through my martial arts school. Obviously if someones going to be practicing wrist locks on you, you want your wrists to be both strong and flexible, but I discovered that my carpal tunnel also went away when I started doing these excercises.

    I won't try to describe them since I'm not sure I could do a very good job without having some pictures. Any martial art that uses joint lock tchniques should also teach stretching and strengthening exercises for those joints. If you have problems such as carpal tunnel I recomend looking into it.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  145. The ADA is worse than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked on Large scale ops center when the ADA was passed. People came thru to determine who could and would be able to perform the job, and our company was forced to get voice recog software because a blind person applied for the job. Beside the fact the person was a total moron, we spent several hundred thousand $'s equiping things for this ONE PERSON who stopped showing up for work and later tried to go out on disablilty. I was a witness at a hearing in which I stated, I do not beleive the person was capable of performing the job even if they were sighted. Sounds mean but I am convined the whole job application was an attempt to get $ from us. In the end he was told to take a long walk, and we offered to hold his hand even, but he got NOTHING from us...

    1. Re:The ADA is worse than that... by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the problem is not the ADA but your companies hiring and recruitment practices. Laws can't compensate for the cyclic nature of poor HR hiring poor employees.

  146. Catch 22 by richmaine · · Score: 2, Informative

    This isn't the first ruling of this nature. In
    essense, the whole ADA is being pretty much
    gutted by a catch 22.

    If your disability is such that you are not
    capable of doing the job, then you have no
    case under ADA. Reasoanbly enough, the ADA
    doesn't demand miracles - the employer only
    has to make "reasonable accomodation". If
    "reasonable accomodation" won't allow you to
    do the job, then you have no case.

    If your disability is such that you might be
    able to do the job with reasonable accomodation,
    then you don't have a disability recognized by
    the ADA.

  147. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a normal life?

  148. Mod this up as Funny... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I assume the author intended this to be humorous, and to fish out lots of eager moderators who've clearly never trained aikido...

    It's true that with good training, aikido (and other martial arts that involve wristlocks) will increase your wrist flexibility and strength. I've been training these things for years, and also play the piano as well as typing lots, and I've never encountered serious wrist problems. After a while, I even developed a reputation for having exceptionally bendy wrists amongst my peers, so I got to be the first guy anyone new tried them on -- if they worked on me, they worked on everyone.

    Everything was great, until one day an overenthusiastic training partner slammed a wristlock on a bit too hard. My wrist still worked afterwards, but was obviously badly weakened, probably due to a connective tissue injury. I've been forced to give up training stuff I love for well over a year, while I let the wrist recover. After all, if it goes, I can't drive to work or type when I get there, and that's not a risk I'm prepared to take.

    Sorry to go all serious, but while the parent post was amusing, I think it's important to avoid misleading people, just in case anyone goes out and starts doing this stuff after reading it.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Mod this up as Funny... by neo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wasn't being humourous. You're situation is not normal and most people will not have this type of injury practicing Aikido.

      There are risks in all physical activities, and Aikido is no exception. Arts like Ju Jitsu have much higher injury rates, and there are "softer" and "harder" forms of Aikido.

      In short, YMMV, but Aikido is a great way to help your wrists...

    2. Re:Mod this up as Funny... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You're situation is not normal and most people will not have this type of injury practicing Aikido.

      Of course not; I didn't intend to suggest that they did. However, it's only fair to point out those risks if you're seriously suggesting it as a possible preventative treatment for CTS.

      Arts like Ju Jitsu have much higher injury rates, and there are "softer" and "harder" forms of Aikido.

      Actually, speaking as someone with many years of background in several aikido and JJ styles, I can testify that aikido (aside from the really soft styles) has a significantly higher rate of serious injuries. But I digress; the point about injury risk is valid in either case.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  149. Strict Constructionists by metachimp · · Score: 1

    In the words of John Dean, former Nixon White House counsel: "A strict constructionist is one who favors the prosecution in criminal cases and the defendant in civil cases"

    --
    The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  150. CFIDS is real, bozo by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    Now lets start on all those pampered middle class wasters pining away, telling us how terrible their poor miserable lifes are with ME/CFS.

    Yeah, you're a troll. Now that Slashdot has given users in good standing an automatic bonus point for their posts, it's easy to see who the trolls are.

    However, I have to bite here.

    From 1991 to 1995 I had Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome. It was a mild case by comparison to those who are bedridden by it, but it was nonetheless pretty debilitating.

    Imagine you have the worst fsckn flu you've ever had. No energy, aches, pains, chills, hot spells, and worst of all, a fog descends on your brain that makes it impossible to think clearly.

    Now imagine that this flu doesn't go away.

    That's CFIDS.

    The first CFIDS episode lasted several months, and left lots of puzzled doctors in its wake. Basically I was diagnosed with CFIDS because all the known causes for symptoms like mine were ruled out. I had a few more active episodes before my last one which was in late 1994.

    There are deficits left over from the CFIDS. I don't drive (not good in LA) because I sometimes have lapses of consciousness. They are brief, less than a few seconds in duration, but enough to mean I could be dangerous on the road. I find I have a harder time moving information from short-term memory to long-term memory than I did before my CFIDS. My stamina is certainly not what it was pre-CFIDS.

    However, I did manage to lift myself up through my own effort. I learned HTML and for about 5 years worked out of my home building websites for people. I have even had contract positions where I worked on-site. The Internet industry went into the crapper but I spent a year retraining and now I'm hitting the bricks again looking for a desktop support/hardware support/junior Windows sysadmin position.

    Lucky for me I had the support of good friends, family, and most importantly my spouse. If it weren't for them I probably would have starved during that period. And I will have you know that in that entire period, I never ONCE was on SSI or Disability.

    I hope one day you have to deal with a chronic disease. I hope it's nice and painful and lays you out to where you can't fend for yourself. Then I hope someone takes the same attitude you have. "Here's that kick up the arse, mate! Get with it!"

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  151. Civics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lesson on the power of the president.
    1. The president does NOT appoint anyone to the supreme court. That is the job of the senate and more so the senate judicary committe. The president selects possible canidates and hands them over to the senate to decide if they are qualified. Checks and balances are the way of the land.

    1. Re:Civics 101 by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      The president does NOT appoint anyone to the supreme court.

      No fooling? And here I was thinking I had only to pay a courtesy call on W. on my way to the SJC and he didn't even have to like me.

      Last time I looked, the pres appoints them, but the SJC confirms (or doesn't depending upon concerns of dope smoking or childcare by illegal aliens, but not for chasing secretaries around the office) that appointment.

      With a balance struck by a conservative president and a liberal (or left of center) senate, hopefully the next pick won't be a wacko, but then, Thomas did get past a Dem. controlled congress...

      I if any of the present retire that they're replaced by someone tech savvy and people oriented.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Civics 101 by bluGill · · Score: 2

      but not for chasing secretaries around the office

      Gotta give them credit for consitenty though, they don't remove a president from office for that either. Though in my more cynical days I suspect that is because they are all doing the same, and so they can't cast stones. (beind polititions non-cynical days are very limited, and normally don't last when I'm awake.

  152. New OSHA Standard by SlashRaid · · Score: 1

    Just a quick parallel for those interested. OSHA's new Ergonomic Standard is set to go into effect on January 16, 2002. You can read the final standard yourself, be patient though, it's a large page.

    --
    God Moving Over the Face of Waters
  153. IANAL by markmoss · · Score: 2

    So, can anyone translate that to English, please?

    1. Re:IANAL by Artagel · · Score: 2
      In its brief on the merits, petitioner asks us to reinstate the District Court's grant of summary judgment to petitioner on the manual task issue.

      At the trial court, the employer was given a win without having to go to trial because of a ruling regarding the employees ability to do manual tasks. Assumed in the sentence is that the employer's win was taken away at the appellate court. The employer is asking the Supreme Court to give it its instant-win back.

      In its petition for certiorari, however, petitioner did not seek summary judgment; it argued only that the Court of Appeals' reasons for granting partial summary judgment to respondent were unsound.

      When the employer wrote the Supreme Court to ask it to hear the case, it did not ask for the instant-win back. It only asked that the employee's instant-win be taken away.

      This Court's Rule 14(1)(a) provides: "Only the questions set out in the petition, or fairly included therein, will be considered by the Court." The question whether petitioner was entitled to summary judgment on the manual task issue is therefore not properly before us. See Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 129--130 (1954).

      The Supreme Court has a rule regarding what questions it will address based on what you asked it to address. Therefore, the instant-win for the employer is not in front of the Supreme Court, and it is not going to look at it.

      Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment granting partial summary judgment to respondent and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

      The Supreme Court is taking away the employee's instant-win in the appellate court, and sending the case back down for the appellate court, and maybe the trial court, to think about things more, get more proof, have a trial, whatever.

  154. Summary judgement is evil by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or does it strike anyone as a bit fascist (not to mention unconstitutional) that one can win a case without trial.

    7th Amendment:

    In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    1. Re:Summary judgement is evil by zenyu · · Score: 1

      Toyota prolly didn't ask for a jury trial. Jury's often decide an issue on basic fairness instead of a strict reading of the law. Corporations tend to shy away from them.

      PS Did anyone notice McDonalds went back to thick 3mm styrofoam cups for their "good" coffee. They still have that snide warning about coffee being hot that they added after they burned millions of Americans with introduction of the super thin 1mm styrofoam cups.

    2. Re:Summary judgement is evil by Artagel · · Score: 2

      Juries are mostly about figuring out who is telling the truth, or who is right about what happened in the real world (the facts). Judges are the final voice of what the law is, in fact, just before the jury goes into the jury room, the judge tells the jury what the law is.

      The instant-win (called summary judgment) is used only in civil cases (not criminal) when the key facts are not disputed, and the law disposed of the case. It really does save a lot of time and money, because jury trials are not only expensive for the parties, but it would unfairly impose burdens on the jurors when only one outcome is possible under the law.

      However, no matter how strong the proof is against you in a criminal case you have a right to a jury trial.

      There is also the right to due process. The law must protect against totally unfounded and irrational results. (That is, results that could not be the result of law, but rather the result of racial prejudice, for example.) One person's right to a jury trial is confined by the other person's right to due process.

  155. avoid carpal tunnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    this has nothing to do with legislation but is serious. I hate to make this recommendation because it involves microsoft, but get a microsoft natural keyboard (before the elite series so you have standard size keys). I developed carpal tunnel in '96, doc said to wear a wrist brace which helped, but only succeeded at keeping my wrist perfectly straight, which was a pain on a regular keyboard. I found the ms keyboard about that time, have never had carpal come back on me. I put one everywhere I use a computer (bad bad bad microsoft everywhere I go). Anyway, it's understandable that die-hard anti-MSers will never buy this keyboard, but it really does help. there are off brands, etc, but MS is the only one that has the perfect wrist-to-arm angle. don't ask me why. just a suggestion if you haven't figured it out already.

  156. sorehands by kirkb · · Score: 1

    I keep waiting for the inevitable post from that www.sorehands.com guy who's always battling with Mattel. I hear that he types with his nose now, so it might be a couple more hours before his post is finished...

    --
    Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
  157. Not a disability? by CatherineCornelius · · Score: 1

    Th hl t snt.

  158. Car Pool Tunnel Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that were you get stuck in traffic during rush hour due to people slowing down going through tunels?

  159. Re:DP is totally preventable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it is.

  160. Huh? by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    I can only guess what your message means, but it looks to me like the whole thing pisses you off so bad that you actually stuttered while typing.

    ;+)

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  161. Get out, get active. by BlueFrog · · Score: 3, Interesting
    after about 5 years at the keyboard (college, plus a couple years of full-time programming & posting to /.) I started noticing problems with my hands and wrists. (Tingling, stiffness, dull pain, etc.)

    As soon as I started weight training, it all evaporated. I make sure to do some stretching (it's become something I just kinda do while I'm thinking), and I get out to the gym three nights a week. (Soon to be joined by weekly hocky games.)

    There are a bunch of us here at work that type for a living. I've noticed that the guys who are in good shape (we've got a few ex-motocross riders) don't suffer from RSI. I have a friend who's a physical trainer, and she's helped a lot of people with wrist/CT problems just by getting them to do a little strength training on their wrists. My pet theory: RSI & CT seem to be caused by overuse of underpowered muscles. Typing isn't stressful enough to make your arms stronger, but it is stressful enough to cause strain and eventual damage to over-worked muscles. Beef up, and you might avoid the problem.

    There are several excercises that you can do to strengthen your wrists. My favorite is:

    1. Tie a weight (5 lbs or so) to the end of a string, and tie the string to the middle of a 2-foot pole. (I use a cut-off hockey stick, and a small milk jug for the weight.)
    2. Hold the pole in front of you with both hands, palms down, with the string hanging between them.
    3. Now, reel in the weight. Turn the pole away from you until the weight comes all the way up. Then turn the pole toward you untill the weight goes all the way down and back again. Repeat.
    You can do this with your arms resting on your knees, or train your shoulders and posture by doing it standing.

    I'm fully aware that strength isn't the only factor in RSI and CT. But anything that trains strength and flexibility seems to help. Good luck, all!

    1. Re:Get out, get active. by smaughster · · Score: 2

      My pet theory: RSI & CT seem to be caused by overuse of underpowered muscles.

      I can agree with your pet theory out of personal experiences. One other tip to train underpowered muscles, especially those arm, finger, neck and back muscles, and have fun while doing it: start climbing. Indoor or outdoor don't matter, it's easy to start and it does wonders for your back, belly arms and neck!

      --
      I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  162. Oh well by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

    Since now I can't claim carpal tunnel, i will go back to the old fashioned ADD. They won't take that from me. And yesss, all the spee^H^H^H^H ritalin i will ever need.

    --
    badness 10000
  163. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey shit-for-brains, I told the moron above to try doing data entry for 3 years. I never said I did data entry. He tries to compare doing data entry for 3 months to doing programming for several years.

  164. And use xwrits as a reminder! by devphil · · Score: 3, Interesting


    (Yes, there's an intentional typo in the name.)

    The xwrits tool occasionally pops up reminders to stop typing and do your writs exercises. And if you ignore it, it makes rude gestures at you. Debian users can just apt-get the xwrits package, and there's source and RPMs and stuff on the project page.

    It definitely helped me. My wrists rarely hurt anymore (but I should keep doing the exercises anyway).

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  165. The ruling by Secret+Coward · · Score: 1
    You can read the ruling at Cornell School of Law's web site.


    In reaching this conclusion, the court (sixth circuit) found that evidence that respondent could tend to her personal hygiene and carry out personal or household chores did not affect a determination that her impairments substantially limited her ability to perform the range of manual tasks associated with an assembly line job.

    ...


    In this case, repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above shoulder levels for extended periods, the manual task on which the Sixth Circuit relied, is not an important part of most people's daily lives. Household chores, bathing, and brushing one's teeth, in contrast, are among the types of manual tasks of central importance to people's daily lives, so the Sixth Circuit should not have disregarded respondent's ability to do these activities.


    So basically, the court is saying that Williams CTS was not sufficiently sever to sue under the ADA. If her CTS had prevented her from carrying out ordinary tasks, then the ADA would apply.

  166. Yeah, right... by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    ...and we'll see how you feel when you get to that point. You gonna give up the profession you love just so your company can get off cheap?

    Why *shouldn't* a company spend money to make machines work in a way that does not hurt? Why *should* it be painful? I agree that there is a limit, but companies can spend very reasonable amounts of money to help people out. Sound like she got grabby, but it isn't reasonable IMHO to think that companies shouldn't try to help out all the same.

    What's pathetic is not thinking about your answer before hitting submit.

    And BTW - Metallica's Black Album rocks.. so there! :)

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  167. or use a command-line oriented OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like Linux. mice are for wimps.

  168. So they killed CTS, but Alcoholism would still... by pmowry911 · · Score: 1

    stand and count as an ADA case. after all, it effects your everyday life. I hate when the government trys to do good deeds.

  169. CTS != Repetitive Stress Injuries by epepke · · Score: 2

    Repetitive stress injuries can be cured or prevented by stretching. I've had problems with these in the past, with the tingling wrists and the numb palms and sometimes actual pain, and that goes away easily.

    Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, on the other hand, can't. Some people get it and some people don't. I haven't ever heard of a study that shows that repetitive stress injuries lead to CTS, and I've seen at least one (don't have a ref) that doesn't show any significant correlation of CTS between occupations you'd expect and occupations you wouldn't. Although stress can make CTS hurt more, it doesn't seem to make it be there. This is true of a lot of diseases. Hot peppers don't cause ulcers; in fact, they might help ulcers by promoting mucus production. However, they make stuff hurt more, including ulcers, and might make people think they have ulcers when they really don't.

    The trouble is that people confuse CTS and repetitive stress injuries. I assume that this woman has real, diagnosed CTS. In that case, it's just a condition, which responds well to surgery but not much else, and it was probably not caused by her job, but may have been made to hurt more.

    In any event, it sounds as if Toyota made reasonable accommodation by switching her to another job. I also don't think it was heartless to put her back; if it really did get better, then it was a repetitive stress injury and not CTS, and that's perfectly appropriate, just like putting someone back on the basketball team after their knee heals. If, on the other hand, she had a diagnosis for CTS at the time, then it may have been heartless or may have been ignorant. However the fact that it took a while for the symptoms to come back is suspicious. With real CTS the pain would start right away, bang! unless there was some other inflammation in the same place that just added to the pain. In any event, the fact that whatever did get better seems to be pretty good evidence that it isn't permanent or long-term and so would not constitute grounds for a lawsuit under the ADA.

  170. This means... by odin53 · · Score: 1

    Summary judgment can happen when both sides agree to the facts of the case, and so the court only has to decide the suit as a matter of law applied to the facts.

    This is certainly not unconstitutional. Juries are triers of facts, not the law. Obviously, then, if there's no dispute as to the facts, there's no need for a jury. Also, remember that a motion for summary judgment won't be granted if the other side (or the judge) believes that there is a dispute as to the facts, or that there's a reasonable chance that the facts will be in dispute.

    BTW, remanding is not that big of a deal. The court below is constrained to decide "consistent with" the SCOTUS's opinion. Not much wiggle room, there.

  171. Someday YOU'LL be disabled by mbstone · · Score: 1
    Most of the comments from y'all are really heartless and negative, not only as to the plaintiff in the Supreme Court case, but towards disabled people in general. I bet most of you are under 35, no, make that under 25, and healthy. Some day, real soon now, you will have your very own pillbox with 7 compartments representing days of the week, and I bet that WHEN you are over 45 you will find yourself, at least once and probably several times, looking for a gig and suddenly realizing it's no picnic anymore. The Supreme Court decision may or may not make sense as applied to this plaintiff, whose basic problem was that she answered a bunch of trick questions at her deposition like admitting she could brush her teeth when the real issue should have been whether she could hold her arms high above her head and work on a moving assembly line for 8 hours a day with carpal tunnel syndrome. The reality of employment litigation is that you, the employee (don't assume you won't ever be a plaintiff in court) and your lawyer, if you can afford one (no rational attorney takes employment cases on contingency) will be up against the Man and his unlimited litigation budget. You will spend so many days at your deposition your head will swim, being grilled about every sordid and non-sordid irrelevant detail of your life, and you will finally admit you can brush your teeth, just to get out of there. Assuming your lawyer wins all of the motions to throw out your case that they will file, and you actually get to plead your case to a jury, and there are no Slashdot types on the jury, you will then get to wait for 5 more years while the corporation appeals.


    For example: I know a woman who is an IT project manager who has a medical condition that limits her walking. She can walk, but it is very painful for her. Recently her company decided to move to
    new quarters. Everyone knows she has a handicapped parking placard -- surprise! The new office space is up two flights of stairs, quite (illegally) inaccessible. When she asked for a reasonable accommodation, the snide remarks and gossip came quickly. "You don't look so disabled." "It's only two flights of stairs." "Why didn't you tell anybody you were handicapped?" She has now been assigned to a differerent, accessible building but there are no other employees assigned to this building, it is empty office space, she has no PC! Not even a -chair-. They didn't fire her, yet, but she gets to do -nothing-. Yeah, she gets paid, but don't try and tell me you wouldn't go bugfuck stir crazy.

    Today's Supreme Court ruling is yet another victory for the strong who would oppress the weak. It will embolden employers to play bullshit games like this with human beings and their livelihoods and families. Disabled people will be made to produce reams of privacy-invading medical reports to justify their claims for reasonable accommodation, which will be denied. And if you are one of those cruel people who would mock and ridicule the disabled among us, might I remind you that there but for the grace of God go you. It only takes one bodysurfing or rock-climbing or bike accident. IAAL.

  172. Iyengar Yoga helps by yogivan · · Score: 1

    As a certified Iyengar yoga teacher I can recommend Iyengar Yoga.

    In special medical classes you learn poses that heal/prevent CTS.

    See this article by a computer programmer and this article by a teacher.

  173. Re:CT not proven to be a disability in THIS case.. by mshiltonj · · Score: 1
    "Congress intended the existence of a disability to be determined in such a case-by-case manner."


    This doesn't mean that carpel tunnel isn't a disablity you dolts, it's a very serious problem. This woman's case simply didn't prove that her affliction was serious enough for her to be considered under the ADA.

    That's not rule by law. That's rule by lawyers -- which is very lame.
  174. Re:FUNNY Slashcode easter egg by jjsoh · · Score: 1

    So freaking hilarious!! Simplicity at it's best.

    Nothing like an unlikely funny to make me spit out some Coca-Cola®.

  175. Wing Chun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first empty hand form in Wing Chun, the Sil Lim Tao, works for me. It is stationary, only working the upper body, and builds strength and flexability in your wrists and forearms without risking your joints like Aikido. I just stand up at my desk and do it every few hours. It can be learned from the William Cheung book in a few days.

  176. Moron, You Say? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > A little pain in your wrist that prevents you from typing is a
    > sad excuse for not getting another kind of job.


    Um, according to the facts of the case, she has a job in an assembly plant that requires her to use her hands above shoulder level for extended periods of time. There's no mention of typing, and there are currently no ergonomic standards for preventing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome due to this sort of work.

    > You're only disabled if you insist that the only work you can carry
    > out is done with a keyboard! Get another job and stop being a slacker.


    Get some reading comprehension lessons and stop being a dope. There was no mention of keyboarding.

    > Besides, the carpal tunnel syndrome is self-inflicted just
    > like alcoholism and drug use. You should have thought about ergonomics
    > and periodic rest before ruining your physique with the unnatural
    > typing posture.


    Again with the typing! I won't even comment on that. I will, however, comment on the situation in this case. To say that this woman's CTS is self inflicted is on some level true, but the same could be said of anyone working any job, and would remove any responsibility for any employer to safeguard its employees by blaming the employees for taking dangerous jobs in the first place. That's just plain silly. Just so you know, a large number of repetitive motion injuries are not typing injuries. Many are industrial in nature, stemming from factory floor work, vibration or poorly designed work areas. None of these things are (usually) within the worker's ability to change, it becomes difficult to blame the worker for simple laziness or bad planning.

    Virg

  177. Holy Crap, how did you find me? ;) by Mr.+Eradicator · · Score: 1

    It's a small web afterall ...

    --

    That's Mr. Eradicator to you.

    trance-port
    1. Re:Holy Crap, how did you find me? ;) by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Its Bah, check out the user number ;) I have been here a little while. :)

  178. Insurance by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > Maybe you should have made contingency plans for the possibility that you might lose your fingers or vision in the future.

    Most people have such a contingency, at least in corporate America. It's called disability insurance. That's not what this case is about. The person in question doesn't want to collect disability payments, she wants to use the Americans with Disabilities Act to get her employer to add accessibility modifications so she can do her job. It would be the same (in her eyes, but not in the eyes of the Supreme Court) as demanding wheelchair access to her workplace if she couldn't walk.

    Virg

  179. right... by Publicus · · Score: 1

    I know, you probably don't want to hear a personal story related to this subject, but...

    My brother in-law had surgery on both of his arms a few years ago because of carpel tunnel syndrome. He's been a carpenter since his teens (he's near 40 now). Insurance paid for the surgery, as it should, but I'm not sure if he should be collecting disability from the government. His hands are fine now that he's had the surgery.

    I think the real matter of concern is that HMOs can basically decide not to pay for this kind of surgery and normal people would be able to do nothing about it.

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  180. This is years old news. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2
    I've known for years that Carpal Tunnel isn't a disablility. How do I know this?

    First not everyone that gets CTS is a computer user. It usually strikes factory line workers. My father works in a printer/binder shop [printing those IDG books is a million $ acct] on the line.

    The older women who work there doing routine things often talked about 'early retirement'. This was getting CTS and going on SSDI. But years ago they stopped giving out SSDI for CTS because it can be fixed with simple surgury.

    Sorry kids, it's only a temporary problem.

  181. CTS is for lazy unhealthy people by thePredator · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Finally, its about time some sense comes to the supreme court. almost all people who work out regularly NEVER get CTS, and what is the main cause of CTS? Obesity, I am done paying for fat lazy people.

  182. Night of the Living Carpal Tunnel by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

    Just look at the pictures. ;)

  183. I dunno, but... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    I dunno, but I've been using keyboards for the most part of my waking hours for the last 23 years or so, yet I never had the slightest smidgeon of any kind of repetitive injury whatsoever.

    I suppose that, ultimately, it burns down as something that psychosomatically induced????

  184. You JUST dont get it. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    a) The Court's consideration of what an individual must prove to demonstrate a substantial limitation in the major life activity of performing manual tasks is guided by the ADA's disability definition. "Substantially" in the phrase "substantially limits" suggests "considerable" or "to a large degree," and thus clearly precludes impairments that interfere in only a minor way with performing manual tasks.

    Most people spend 9+ hours at work. That makes it a very substantial part of a persons life.

    Just cause she can brush her teeth they voted against her. Again, its a slap in the face by Judges who are appointed for life.

    1. Re:You JUST dont get it. by number+one+duck · · Score: 2

      So vote for representatives that write clearer laws that are less prone to interpretation. The Supreme Court only has the wiggle-room that they are given.

  185. Work related injury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One interesting thing to note is that if you take all people with work-related injuries and divide them into two groups, those with lawsuits and those without lawsuits, the people who didn't seek legal action had a recovery rate of around 50-60%. If any sort of legal action was involved, the recovery rate dropped to 0%. NONE of those people ever returned to work. I admit that there is a certain percentage of those people do have justifiable disability, but there's also another group trying to abuse the system in order to obtain disability status.

  186. So when I die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    who's gonna sue for me to be covered under the ADA?

    This is the same damn law that airlines got sued under for not hiring all-but-blind pilots.

    WAAAAH! FUCKING WAAAAAH! MY PUSSY HURTS!

  187. An HMO's requirements for disability by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Can the patient feed herself? If she can, she doesn't qualify.
    2. Does she have family members who can feed her? If so, she doesn't qualify.
    3. Can she afford to pay someone to feed her? If so, she doesn't qualify.
    4. Can she sign the neccesary paperwork? If she can, she's not disabled enough. If she can't, then we're ready to pay - as soon as we have her signature.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  188. +1 Funny on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    Or you could just wait for speach recognition.

    Speech recognition for hacking Perl, anyone?

    Better that than using it for APL I suppose. But I think what you really need for hands-free Perl is a personal (i.e. trainable) facial expression encoding system.

    -- MarkusQ

  189. It's not CTS by AutumnLeaf · · Score: 1


    What I mean in my subject of "It's not CTS" is that her symptoms do not sound like the result of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. CTS is overused and misused as a diagnosis of RSI - repetitive stress injury. CTS is when the passage way letting the nerve through the wrist is too tight. Usually, a bone in the rist that has a spur on it that holds the nerve in place impinges on the nerve in certain sections of a range of motions.

    Most people experience wrist pain as a result of RSI injuries. It's mistaken as CTS often because 'That's where it hurts.' Often RSI sufferrers are hard working people who turn to help only when they can push on. And when they do turn to help they are often met with a hostile reaction, accusations of being lazy, and a lack of understanding about what the hell is going on with them. Many RSI victims have fluid buildup in the wrist as part of muscle inflammation, and THAT is what causes their CTS-like symptoms. CTS surgery for these people usualy results in a relief of symptoms for a short period of time, and then fluid build up, nerve aggravation, and muscle injuries catch up again and the symptoms recurr.

    RSI victims complaining about pain in a certain area are often unknowingly complaining about the area that hurts most, and at the moment. The area of intense pain often moves around because most people compensate for the pain and muscle fatigue, thus overstressing a new area and causing a new injury.

    RSI injury is not a "Oops I pushed it today" injury. It's a "Oops, I pushed it too hard for many years" type injury. Variables unique to an individual, and unique to the job at hand all make the impacts of certain activities different for everyone. But, there are some constants. Holding your arms out in front of you for years will fatigue your back and upper extremities. It can take years before your muscles reach such a point of fatigue and spasm, and your nervers suffer a certain threshhold of damage.

    Without a doubt, the workplace is the most dangerous place for these activities. Be it typing, or working on an assembly line, when you put your body through millions of repetions, and it involves using your arms, you are in danger.

    From the comments I read on this article, most slashdot readers would do well to read "It's not Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: RSI Theory and Therapy for Computing Professionals." -- Suparna Damany, et al; Paperback

    I think the person in this case is not just a CTS sufferrer. Rather, she is more likely an RSI victim.

    For those of you who sneer at the woman in this case, and pompously preach about preventative measures, my response to you is "You're right. At the same time, I hope you never suffer the way she seems to have."

  190. My quik, worthless take. by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

    First off this looks like a simple, Employee gets fired, finds some lawyer advertising on the back of the phonebook, tries to live out the american dream and get rich quick. Also, it seems that anyone who types for a living should understand that continuous repetitive use of the wrist will lead to pain. Just like anyone who shovels dirt for a living understands that it's going to give them back pain. I do think that there should be research into what exactly causes carpal tunnel, and that every effort be made to fix it, but until then, if you type for your job, then be prepared for it. The ADA was designed to give people in wheelchairs and such access to the same things that the rest of us have. And if these people without legs had lost them at their last job in the production dept. of legs R us, then no, I wouldn't want them to have better parking spaces or those nifty lifts on the bus. I know it's a lot to expect the American people to think about the consequences of their actions, but I can dream can't I?

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
    1. Re:My quik, worthless take. by HawaiiPiglet · · Score: 1

      You're dead right, quick regarding Supreme Court decisions is worthless. The woman who brought the action wasn't asking for money. All she sought was a job she could do -- which was readily available on the terms she requested, one that did not continur or aggravate her carpal tunnel problem. She won an earlier action but the employer later wanted to put her off the job the negotiation won for her and, in effect, put her back on a damaging job. All she sought was to be given work she could do. The court said the damage wasn't sufficient because they made a literal reading of the text of the law. The Congress apparently made an error and many think their language will be cleaned up. Meanwhile hold off on the 'get rich quick' language because it is neither fair nor accurate.

      --
      Those who would surrender freedom for security soon have neither.
  191. I don't get it... by AA0 · · Score: 1

    We spend years in court making decisions when all we could have done was redesign the keyboard to eliminate this. Its not that hard, and we are bound to make typing faster now that typewriter limits aren't in effect.

    Because everyones unwilling to change, thousands will suffer wrist pains for years and years. The solutions that are being used to reduce it, aren't good enough, a patch is never as good as something done right in the first place.

  192. Some carpal tunnel is treatable... by oobeleck · · Score: 1

    For those of you who have carpal tunnel you might want to look into deep tissue massage therapy.
    Basically I had carpal tunnel to the point that I could not bend my wrist back more than 40 degree angle. I feared the worst and was about to go to the doctor when my friend (who does deep tissue for a sports/medicine place) said give me 2 1/2 sessions with you.

    To make a long story short. It hurt so bad I cried but it cured me. I also started using an ergonomic keyboard (which was hard at first) but now I don't get near as sore. Anytime it gets bad I have him work on me and he fixes it. Also he has me fill on kitchen sink with hot water (as hot as you can stand) and the other with cold (as cold as you can stand) and alternate dunking your arms in it past the elbow. Do that 10 times and then stretch your arms/wrists really good. It does wonders.
    Also, since I have taken up weightlifting again it has not been nearly as bad. (Again the stretching)

    This may not work for everyone but SERIOUSLY it has helped me.

    I hope it helps you.

  193. Could not help myself by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    it's nice to see the original posted story be corrected as to the spelling of Carpal instead of Carpel. I 'd have posted this sooner but have had to hit backspace so often because of this pain in my wrists....

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  194. Good for the most part.... by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

    Carpal Tunnel is preventable to a great extent, and usually can be caught before it gets to a point of nagging pain, being both a musician and a computer professional (and student), I'm in a high risk group for Carpal Tunnel, so I take steps necesary to try and prevent it. Sorry lady, if your wrists were sore from typing, you should have taken a couple sick days or just not typed for a couple days. Also...one word: ergonomic. Why should my tax dollars go to pay for someone else's problem, particularly one that they might (you can't always) have been able to prevent? That's why you buy disability insurance!

    --
    Derek Greene
  195. Rants and ranting... by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be great if the WC3 set a standard for the <RANT> tag? I'm talking an annoying font like Comic Sans, bright red letters, and at LEAST 30 points high. Yeah, that would be sooo cool.

    Ooh..even perhaps bring back the blink!

    When I'm in charge, things are gonna be DIFFERENT!

    --
    That? That was a pigeon.
  196. CTS is a disibility if severe enough. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    They say it does not prevent a neccessary task.

    Well supporting yourself financially is a neccessary task. How do you brush your teeth if you cant afford a toothbrush!

    Finincial disablity is just as severe as a physical disability.