What packet size my router receives (from iPlayer servers) has little if any relation to the packet size it sends to my device over WiFi even if it didn't encrypt it. The whole thing is snake oil, just like TV detector vans were.
What's worse is these custom 404 pages (not that there's anything that wrong with having one instead of a YSOD) usually don't themselves issue a 404 back to the client, but a 200 OK. This doesn't help the user, useragent, REST services, search engines, etc. as they never get the correct code.
If the URL gets hosed then they are compounding the stupid by sending a 302 ( even though a 303 was meant, thanks Microsoft) back to the client to start the GET all over again when Server.Transfer should have been used.
But then Microsoft have never "got" the Web (Bill Gates famously said he didn't see the point, but everybody thinks that is apocryphal like the 640K quote) so they implemented the usual assume infinite resources half-assed measure and never fixed it. This means it's only those who are clued up and want to use codes like they were supposed to be that jump through the hoops to do what should have been baked in from the start.
If it has truly been deleted then a 410 Gone should be issued. However, that means you have to have a record of what was deleted that is checked to issue that instead of a 404 Not Found. That's more effort with no real gain.
Users should only get 301 Permanent Redirect or 302 Found if the resource exists elsewhere. If it doesn't then redirectng them to something other than what they were expecting, *especially* the index page of the site, is incorrect.
You will get reimbursed for all those transactions when you report your card stolen. They might decide not to reimburse for all of them if it takes you a week to notice your card has been stolen, but then that's on you and your lack of vigilance. Most people will notice the same day it happens and remember what the last transaction they made was and where, which is what will be asked.
You haven't been using the internet since the early 1990s. You used a small subset of it, namely the web with a splash of email, probably through the AOL portal you got off the first CD-ROM they posted through your door. If that was enough for you, fine, but don't declare anything is of no use if you never used it or have no idea of what you're talking about.
Sounds like you ascribed a lack of value to it based on the delivery medium and thus didn't even click the link. Congratulations, you just applied a dark pattern to yourself as described in TFS, which is exactly what those who would utilise them hope for; that you don't know it is happening and that you wouldn't care if you did.
This isn't positivist enough for you, so you'll ignore this as well.
In my book, something that deliberately goes around a firewall is malware. I don't care what benefit it claims to give, as that has just given another attack vector for the "real" malware.
My contract had a clause stating that any development innovation I made on my own time was to have its ownership, copyright and all other benefits given over to the company. I refused to sign unless that was taken out and warned them about the breach of employment law they were committing if they had it in someone else's contract. Not that it was enforceable anyway.
No it isn't, you just need to get licenced and declare BIG SCARY NOTICE of "CONTAINS RAW MILK!!!11one" on any products that you manufacture using it to protect the weaklings of the herd.
Slashdot Mirror
You had hot gravel? Some people just don't know when they've got it good.
Hey! One of those was his father's! ... Well, that's what she told me, so I knew I wasn't on the hook.
What packet size my router receives (from iPlayer servers) has little if any relation to the packet size it sends to my device over WiFi even if it didn't encrypt it. The whole thing is snake oil, just like TV detector vans were.
What's worse is these custom 404 pages (not that there's anything that wrong with having one instead of a YSOD) usually don't themselves issue a 404 back to the client, but a 200 OK. This doesn't help the user, useragent, REST services, search engines, etc. as they never get the correct code.
If the URL gets hosed then they are compounding the stupid by sending a 302 ( even though a 303 was meant, thanks Microsoft) back to the client to start the GET all over again when Server.Transfer should have been used.
But then Microsoft have never "got" the Web (Bill Gates famously said he didn't see the point, but everybody thinks that is apocryphal like the 640K quote) so they implemented the usual assume infinite resources half-assed measure and never fixed it. This means it's only those who are clued up and want to use codes like they were supposed to be that jump through the hoops to do what should have been baked in from the start.
If it has truly been deleted then a 410 Gone should be issued. However, that means you have to have a record of what was deleted that is checked to issue that instead of a 404 Not Found. That's more effort with no real gain.
Users should only get 301 Permanent Redirect or 302 Found if the resource exists elsewhere. If it doesn't then redirectng them to something other than what they were expecting, *especially* the index page of the site, is incorrect.
Those are grey imports; LEGO does not sell bricks and sets that are made in the Chinese factory in the Western hemisphere.
Don't you have voicemail? In most places you wouldn't hear your phone ringing so you'd miss the call anyway.
That's, what, the fourth time he's died? Guy just can't catch a break. Still, at least he gets better, though that can't last forever.
Or maybe it can. A quart of baby blood on standby for Mr King, Nurse. The fresher the better, so you should draw the screens.
Nature isn't interested in my unusual length...
Is this a UK bank? I'm sure that they'd have to abide by acts of Parliament pertaining to consumer credit if little else.
You will get reimbursed for all those transactions when you report your card stolen. They might decide not to reimburse for all of them if it takes you a week to notice your card has been stolen, but then that's on you and your lack of vigilance. Most people will notice the same day it happens and remember what the last transaction they made was and where, which is what will be asked.
If your Clampettmobile is that slow you should consider upgrading.
This is the jump to the left.
How long until the second line of the chorus?
You haven't been using the internet since the early 1990s. You used a small subset of it, namely the web with a splash of email, probably through the AOL portal you got off the first CD-ROM they posted through your door. If that was enough for you, fine, but don't declare anything is of no use if you never used it or have no idea of what you're talking about.
Sounds like you ascribed a lack of value to it based on the delivery medium and thus didn't even click the link. Congratulations, you just applied a dark pattern to yourself as described in TFS, which is exactly what those who would utilise them hope for; that you don't know it is happening and that you wouldn't care if you did.
This isn't positivist enough for you, so you'll ignore this as well.
Tap water isn't meant to be flammable either, but that's what some people have; a Bunsen burner in their kitchen.
In my book, something that deliberately goes around a firewall is malware. I don't care what benefit it claims to give, as that has just given another attack vector for the "real" malware.
So, he gets a special pass because he had been a target himself?
You're a cretin.
Except political assassinations do happen, unlike being put in a Moon-bound boxcar, and encouraging them tends to be not looked favourably upon.
Did I just Godwin the thread or will that be ignored in place of a petty argument about what is considered correct grammar?
My contract had a clause stating that any development innovation I made on my own time was to have its ownership, copyright and all other benefits given over to the company. I refused to sign unless that was taken out and warned them about the breach of employment law they were committing if they had it in someone else's contract. Not that it was enforceable anyway.
Ok then, smarty-pants, how does gravity actually work? Answer should include a solution to the three body problem.
iplocation.net gives me four locations for my IP. None of them are correct and the nearest one is 3 miles away from me.
No it isn't, you just need to get licenced and declare BIG SCARY NOTICE of "CONTAINS RAW MILK!!!11one" on any products that you manufacture using it to protect the weaklings of the herd.
The NCC-1701 was a Constitution class starship, so you can't use that.
It's from El Reg, who, being British, would have specified Bouygues. That, plus Telehouse is in London and services British Telecom (the ISP part).