Every time that someone whines about about automation, I think about excavators. Here is a machine that does the work of 100 or more men. Over the years these machines have taken the job of thousands of workers. The travesty! Then there is also the average computer. These infernal machines have made hundreds of accountants jobless! Also can you even imagine how many farm workers are out of jobs, because of what tractors can do? Ban these infernal machines
I may be wrong, but congressional intent is also worthless. If they intended something else, they should have written a better law.
That's why the courts exist. They determine if the interpretation was correct or not. Congress may be law maker, but they are not law enforcers.
So you will volunteer to look trough hundreds of thousands videos to make sure they are appropriate for children? Youtube isn't a library where there are only a few thousand books to look trough.
Yes, but if the car washer is that NBA star, you can say that he is the one who is washing the cars. iPad is the name of the product, if you sell it, give it away or talk about it, how will you do it without mentioning the products name? Also according to your logic, you infringed upon Apples trademark, because you mentioned their name in your post to promote the point you made and so you profited from it.
Slashdot Mirror
Every time that someone whines about about automation, I think about excavators. Here is a machine that does the work of 100 or more men. Over the years these machines have taken the job of thousands of workers. The travesty!
Then there is also the average computer. These infernal machines have made hundreds of accountants jobless!
Also can you even imagine how many farm workers are out of jobs, because of what tractors can do? Ban these infernal machines
Why did you start out with the asinine ass-cover and then bull ahead with something you thought could be bullshit that *was* bullshit?
Because I was not sure if I was right or wrong. So could you please tell me now why I am wrong?
I may be wrong, but congressional intent is also worthless. If they intended something else, they should have written a better law. That's why the courts exist. They determine if the interpretation was correct or not. Congress may be law maker, but they are not law enforcers.
By unwanted software do you mean Google Chrome and Google Toolbar? That stuff is really bundled in many things. Please stop bundling it.
You got it all wrong. Some people use it for stupid things like socializing, but it's actually pretty nice gaming platform.
Aren't you required to report any law breaking anyway ? I don't think it matters if you are a teacher or not.
Too bad that the opposite approach was with a bad game. Had they tried it with a more popular game, it would have been more useful for info.
So you will volunteer to look trough hundreds of thousands videos to make sure they are appropriate for children? Youtube isn't a library where there are only a few thousand books to look trough.
Yes, but if the car washer is that NBA star, you can say that he is the one who is washing the cars. iPad is the name of the product, if you sell it, give it away or talk about it, how will you do it without mentioning the products name? Also according to your logic, you infringed upon Apples trademark, because you mentioned their name in your post to promote the point you made and so you profited from it.
And also like that, a remainder of IO.com should be fine. No need to keep the actual thing running for remembering.
So the Japanese should still be kept in camps, because that's history and it's important to preserve it?