Even in the classic universe groups of 'things' can have properties that can change at FTL speeds but they like "spooky action at a distance" effects with entangled photons can't transmit information FTL.
For example in Maxwell equations Induced polarization current P has no constraints about speed.
Can someone please explain to me why this can't be used for instantaneous communication purposes?
Because that would require FTL transfer of energy/information.
It's like if three people were in a room and #3 put a nickle in #1's pocket and a dime in #2's pocket completely randomly. They all know there is only the possibility of a nickle or a dime but 1&2 won't know what coin until they actually look in the pocket.
#1 flies to Mars on a rocket. #2 stays on earth and looks in his pocket. He now knows instantaneously the value of the coin in #1's pocket on Mars.
Yes, like a car. Other than the starter battery for a few seconds the rest of the cars uses under about 400W (with 10%+ lost in wiring) even with the headlights,fans running, and much less without. Nobody in their right mind would use a 12VDC buss for a 3+kW power distribution system. The feeder fusing requirements would be so high that a dropped tool would melt before the protection opened the circuit.
How does quantum-randomness square with Chaos Theory? Consider the Butterfly Effect... where initial conditions determine an outcome that is not random, unpredictable, yet determined.
With Chaos Theory if you had perfect knowledge of every force and interaction you could predict the outcome but with quantum-randomness even with perfect knowledge (Godlike) the result would still be unpredictable.
The results show that the sequence generated by Quantis is easily distinguishable from the other data sets. This say Calude and co, is evidence that quantum randomness is indeed incomputable. That means that it could not have been be generated by a computer.
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvspy/epic-ktvu-fail-anchor-reports-pilot-names-including-sum-ting-wong-and-wi-tu-lo_b97368
the station claimed it had just learned the names of the 4 pilots on board Asiana flight 214 which crashed last Saturday
We had several KWR-37 devices that needed time sync to under one second worldside with the transmitting station when changing daily key cards. WWW()x was great until you where some where past SE asia, then we used the Russia time sync RWM to lock devices,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RWM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KW-37
http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/uss_pueblo/Section_V_Cryptographic_Damage_Assessment.pdf
Not so fishy: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukusa/
Random physical structures have been used for this purpose for decades.
Yes, using PUF devices for OTP, challenge/response and key generation is old tech.
All you really need is a large SRAM structure to generate unique random bits for each device. A simple microcontroller with a large SRAM block works nicely.
http://trudevice.com/Workshop/program/13%20M.%20Platonov%20TRUDEVICE_2013.pdf
If you don't think that criminals are terrorists, then you must be a communist. Or at least a socialist.
Or be for the fluoridation of water and foreign substances being introduced into our precious bodily fluids.
When I was a kid one of our class science experiments was to see who could make the best gunpowder using the classic Chinese formula.
Thank goodness for growing up in the 1960s when you could do fun things in school without being arrested.
Even in the classic universe groups of 'things' can have properties that can change at FTL speeds but they like "spooky action at a distance" effects with entangled photons can't transmit information FTL.
For example in Maxwell equations
Induced polarization current P has no constraints about speed.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0405062v1.pdf
http://www.iasf-roma.inaf.it/congress/public_html/Congress/Ardavan%20Rome.pdf
Can someone please explain to me why this can't be used for instantaneous communication purposes?
Because that would require FTL transfer of energy/information.
It's like if three people were in a room and #3 put a nickle in #1's pocket and a dime in #2's pocket completely randomly. They all know there is only the possibility of a nickle or a dime but 1&2 won't know what coin until they actually look in the pocket.
#1 flies to Mars on a rocket.
#2 stays on earth and looks in his pocket. He now knows instantaneously the value of the coin in #1's pocket on Mars.
You would use something modern like a 7805SR instead of a voltage divider or an old school 7805 that needs a huge heat-sink.
http://www.murata-ps.com/data/meters/dms-78xxsr.pdf
Even if his aim wasn't to aid the enemy the effect was the same because they learned valuable intelligence on our operations. I don't think he should get 365 years in prison like Jerry A. Whitworth did but when you can get life just for pimping out girls he should get out as an old man.
https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/856/856.F2d.1268.86-1256.html
http://www.koinlocal6.com/mostpopular/story/Portland-pimp-remains-defiant-sentenced-to-life/bDDaEtsAMEWQ824ZK-5R2g.cspx
What's next? A 'Shit River' combat mission award.
http://www.timjacobs.com/images/Philippines/Subic%20City/Shit%20River%20Patch%20Big.jpg
This is the legacy of the era.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/r9sfdocw.nsf/ce6c60ee7382a473882571af007af70d/1368bf2b217e29e288257007005e9462!OpenDocument
http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/r9sfdocw.nsf/7508188dd3c99a2a8825742600743735/f11948ed421fa45188257007005e9412!OpenDocument
http://mv-voice.com/news/show_story.php?id=6180
There is only one rule: http://druptest.dailywav.com/sites/default/files/wavs/obey2.wav
Oregon: Voted 3 weeks ago by mail. Drank a beer while marking up local issues on the ballot in the man cave.
They were selling speakers... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O58MvTWAI_M
This causes Brain Damage. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137260/Tony-Pietrantonios-face-turned-mush-brutal-knockout-blow.html#ixzz1tZHbsgUi
Football is a sport for girls.
Like in a car?
Yes, like a car. Other than the starter battery for a few seconds the rest of the cars uses under about 400W (with 10%+ lost in wiring) even with the headlights,fans running, and much less without. Nobody in their right mind would use a 12VDC buss for a 3+kW power distribution system. The feeder fusing requirements would be so high that a dropped tool would melt before the protection opened the circuit.
Using 12VDC on any type of system that uses more than a few hundred watts is insane. Only a Best Buy boombox tech would think it was a good idea.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp19qiash2U
A little more info about the 1960's version of AUTODIN.
http://rogerdmoore.ca/PS/ADINallB.png
http://rogerdmoore.ca/PS/ADINC.html
We had a UNIVAC DCT 9000 node at our site with plated wire memory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plated_wire_memory
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5292/5466910191_d889cb8990_z_d.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Digital_Network
http://jproc.ca/crypto/autodin.html
I managed a few Technical Control sites long ago. We could route normal telegrams on the system with a little creative address routing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Praying_Mantis
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ab/Bild-Prayingmantis5sahand.jpg/800px-Bild-Prayingmantis5sahand.jpg
Second round, bring it on!
Details: http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/varyagtransform.htm
How does quantum-randomness square with Chaos Theory? Consider the Butterfly Effect... where initial conditions determine an outcome that is not random, unpredictable, yet determined.
With Chaos Theory if you had perfect knowledge of every force and interaction you could predict the outcome but with quantum-randomness even with perfect knowledge (Godlike) the result would still be unpredictable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_systems#Complexity_and_chaos_theory
Quantum number generators produce random numbers that are measurably different from those that computer programs generate.
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25041/
The results show that the sequence generated by Quantis is easily distinguishable from the other data sets. This say Calude and co, is evidence that quantum randomness is indeed incomputable. That means that it could not have been be generated by a computer.