Same here, but Final Fantasy VIII is where they jumped the shark in my opinion. I do like the spin-offs like Tactics, Crisis Core & Dissidia, but I don't think I can be bothered to play a FF RPG ever again.
Yeah, it's not spelled out in small words on Wikipedia, but that's basically how it works. I've had to "help" Baker act people on two separate occasions. Once due to a friend taking way too much LSD & once due to a neighbor's schizophrenic episodes. The police are still involved, it's not like you can just go sign them up at the hospital.
Actually, in the US this would constitute a materially adverse change to your contract & by law they'd have to let anyone who requested it out of their contract with no fee.
Thank DEITY$ Bioware doesn't do this. NWN wouldn't have been half as good if they had ignored the input of their players. The same is probably true for their other games, but NWN sticks out in my head as a game that the devs actually listened to the players for the most part.
Supposing I have copies of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in my lap, which parts should I start reading to find these rights? Maybe you're from a different country than I am, so who grants these rights to whom and why?
No debate needed. According to the Supreme Court, you can start with the 9th Amendment in the Constitution & follow that up with the 3rd, 4th & 5th. None of which affords any inherent right of privacy to the U.S. government.
Oh , and ssshhh! We won't mention Assanges mind bogglingly hypocritical whinge about his case details being leaked...
Oh look, another idiot that can't understand the difference between a government's inherent right to privacy & an individual's inherent right to privacy.
But they kicked & screamed that this would harm the military & our spies as soon as the leaks hit, thus rendering your whole line of "damage control" reasoning invalid.
Parasite Eve wasn't so much an RPG as it was an interactive movie.
Same here, but Final Fantasy VIII is where they jumped the shark in my opinion. I do like the spin-offs like Tactics, Crisis Core & Dissidia, but I don't think I can be bothered to play a FF RPG ever again.
Sounds like Dr. Fredric Wertham all over again.
http://www.psu.edu/dept/inart10_110/inart10/cmbk4cca.html
Yeah, it's not spelled out in small words on Wikipedia, but that's basically how it works. I've had to "help" Baker act people on two separate occasions. Once due to a friend taking way too much LSD & once due to a neighbor's schizophrenic episodes. The police are still involved, it's not like you can just go sign them up at the hospital.
But it is very hard to help the mentally ill against their will.
Not in Florida. All you need is three people requesting that you be Baker acted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Mental_Health_Act
But the article is about T-Mobile, not Verizon.
Actually, in the US this would constitute a materially adverse change to your contract & by law they'd have to let anyone who requested it out of their contract with no fee.
Sounds a bit like Huxley's Brave New World minus the genetic tampering.
Aww, someone upset because someone else pointed out you were a fool?
Thank DEITY$ Bioware doesn't do this. NWN wouldn't have been half as good if they had ignored the input of their players. The same is probably true for their other games, but NWN sticks out in my head as a game that the devs actually listened to the players for the most part.
That is genius.
And who voted that clueless politician in again?
Let's see what happens when *Google* starts banning Italy.
Wow, 16 years. 16 years is way too long for an upper leadership role in any supposedly democratic country.
Google should one-up Berlusconi & block Italian IPs throughout all it's servers.
*Politicians* usually work incrementally.
There, I fixed that for you.
Supposing I have copies of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in my lap, which parts should I start reading to find these rights? Maybe you're from a different country than I am, so who grants these rights to whom and why?
No debate needed. According to the Supreme Court, you can start with the 9th Amendment in the Constitution & follow that up with the 3rd, 4th & 5th. None of which affords any inherent right of privacy to the U.S. government.
Sounds like a great start.
Oh , and ssshhh! We won't mention Assanges mind bogglingly hypocritical whinge about his case details being leaked...
Oh look, another idiot that can't understand the difference between a government's inherent right to privacy & an individual's inherent right to privacy.
I actually had no idea, I thought the only way to donate to Wikleaks right now was via Xipwire.
Come on Slashdot...
Stop feeding the crazies. I hope Google counter-sues her frivolous ass into the poorhouse.
But they kicked & screamed that this would harm the military & our spies as soon as the leaks hit, thus rendering your whole line of "damage control" reasoning invalid.
Never heard of them. After a bit of research I've discovered that they are only in North Carolina, so fat lotta good that does anyone.
http://eatcookout.com/
I find it hilarious that you don't know the difference between publicly available & copyright infringement.
p.s. the cables aren't under copyright either.
...proceeds going to the families of the Intelligence agents and sources who are killed from it's release.
You're making shit up. Please stop.