Democrats are not center right unless you're an avowed socialist.
And no - many are not socialist leaning (more government-knows-best-nanny-statists)
Center right would be for a basic free market (not libertarian) and for federalism and a realization that the government does not solve all problems. THAT would be center right. So no. The Democrats are not center right.
I've been a union member. I'm also active in Libertarian politics. I read everything from the Reason, AEI, Cato and Heritage Foundation publications, The Economist, Wall Street Journal and have never seen "striking, unionization, the ability of workers to switch companies " associated with terrorism.
All free market people are completely supportive (in concept) with striking and switching companies. There is a problem with public service employees being unionized because there isn't anyone negotiating on behalf of the taxpayers. The politicians want the unions on their side so... who are the unions negotiating with. (That is the problem).
Please show me quotes equating striking, switching companies with terrorism. Now there have been union goons, but that is not the same as equating unionism with terrorism.
There are many cryptocurrencies out there trying to deal with these scenarios. There are some that exist primarily for lightning quick transactions and others for more perfect anonymity. There is room for more than one cryptocurrency and BTC may not be the winner.
It has, though, proved the value of the blockchain and proved that it's cryptographically secure. (Quantum computing may change the equation.)
It's not a "need to hide" issue. It's a privacy issue. It's a privacy from data mining. Do you want every gov't official (as well as business) to know when you come home, when you go to bed, when you wake up in the morning (which you can know from data regarding electric and water usage, not to mention Alexa).
how about we return to the anonymity of the dark ages (you know the 1990s).
I guess you never heard about vacations. How about house swapping? How do you deal with that.
Can there be abuse? Absolutely. Do I want my apartment building to turn into an SRO (Single Room Occupancy for those not in NYC).
But there are plenty of reasons to not be there when the renter is there. (Such as going to your girlfriend's house for the weekend while your apt is being used.)
Step 1. Owe the government back taxes and add to it an onerous interest rate.
Step 2. Make money and get taxed 90% before you even see it.
Step 3. Don't have enough to pay the tax bill. Interest keeps accruing.
Step 4. Make money again and get taxed 90% before you even see it.
Rinse and repeat.
Think about your claims and reread the quote " did not adequately support $2.8 trillion" and recognize that that is a strangely worded statement. It implies that the Armed Forces have "lost" or "stolen" 2.8 trillion.in the 3rd Q.
Hmm. Since the Armed forces budget is under a trillion a year - how does that make any sense.
Think about your claims and reread the quote " did not adequately support $2.8 trillion" and recognize that that is a strangely worded statement. It implies that the Armed Forces have "lost" or "stolen" 2.8 trillion.in the 3rd Q.
Hmm. Since the Armed forces budget is under a trillion a year - how does that make any sense.
Be careful about calling someone stupid and pwnd when you have such poor reading comprehension skills.
The US has a 3 trillion dollar budget. Even if the Armed forces had 1/3 of that (it doesn't) you would say it can't account (meaning lost or stolen) over 6 years worth of funding.
And you believe your bull$hit? Or is it that you didn't think about what you were reading?
7.03 firearm deaths includes accidental and suicide and self-defense. Stop twisting things around and compare like things. Murder to Murder.
There are no guns (practically speaking) in Japan. Therefore the suicide rate must be lower there than in NH. (oops, guess not)
At issue is not deaths in general; at issue is using guns to kill people out of rage, mad-man killing spree, terrorism, or crime.
Including deaths from suicide show your bias and displays a your intent to distort the data.
Including deaths from accidental accidents also shows your bias. Yes guns are dangerous. Same as skiing. Same as scuba diving. Same as parachuting. Same as technical climbing. Accidents happen. Mistakes happen skeet shooting. Mistakes happen shooting water fowl (a lot more than hunting deer). People are very careful and yet mistakes happen.
Actually it's not an affluent state. (At least not in many parts.) There are a lot of people who have homesteading lifestyle. (Not completely off the grid - but much more self-sufficient and much more bartering than in cities or suburban america.
But - you know the details from the f**king summary. Right?
You're cool with the EPA constantly changing the definition of wetlands; requiring more and more areas to be off limit for building - even in very suburban areas such as Westchester NY and Bergen County, NJ.
Your OK with the takings of property with no compensation.
You're OK with the politicization of EPA superfunds in order to siphon money from the federal government? (See Gowanus Canal in Bklyn).
These are a few local-to-me outrages done by the EPA. But nary a f**king peep from you about those. Those foolishness was done by (as you so nicely put it)
You are just repeating over and over again that freedom of speech comes first. Why? Is it for you an absolute value, an end in itself? Then there is no discussion possible, and I'm just wasting my time trying to reason with you.
Re BLM: I'm not searching for it. I asked for a concrete example, it would be nice of you to provide the link.
It doesn't matter if it's hateful. What the NOI says shouldn't be a prosecutable offense. Is it stupid, hateful, dumb, racist, vile, pathetic, ridiculous? Yes.
One of those is clear cut. The other is conjecture on your part.
This defines the problem.
You shouldn't be afraid to say what you're thinking. Freedom of Thought, Speech and Press are THE fundamental principles of a free society.
No freedom of speech and you're living under a tyranny. Tyrannies need not be repressive for the majority of the population. (Many people in China are doing quite well. It's still tyranny.)
Slashdot Mirror
Keep thinking that Bannon et al are stupid. You may not like them - but that doesn't make them stupid.
However pretending to yourself that your political opposition is stupid; now that says something about you.
And don't forget to thank those who want to restrict new development. Can't have that. Can we?
Corporate / Socialist
The divide is between individual liberty and government control. Even in a socialist state some animals will always be more equal than others.
The dictatorship of the proletariat will leave some in power and most without. Ultimately it's who controls - you or the govt.
Democrats are not center right unless you're an avowed socialist.
And no - many are not socialist leaning (more government-knows-best-nanny-statists)
Center right would be for a basic free market (not libertarian) and for federalism and a realization that the government does not solve all problems. THAT would be center right. So no. The Democrats are not center right.
so socialists care about person privacy?
(not responding to republican == KKK nonsense)
Striking means less revenue for the companies, so it is terrorism.
You're making that up. Competition also means less revenue therefore competition is terrorism? WTF?
I've been a union member. I'm also active in Libertarian politics. I read everything from the Reason, AEI, Cato and Heritage Foundation publications, The Economist, Wall Street Journal and have never seen "striking, unionization, the ability of workers to switch companies " associated with terrorism.
... who are the unions negotiating with. (That is the problem).
All free market people are completely supportive (in concept) with striking and switching companies. There is a problem with public service employees being unionized because there isn't anyone negotiating on behalf of the taxpayers. The politicians want the unions on their side so
Please show me quotes equating striking, switching companies with terrorism. Now there have been union goons, but that is not the same as equating unionism with terrorism.
Umm. Perhaps the gender equality and muslim outreach dollars were cut but STEM budget lines remained the same or increased,
Were you ever angry that NASA was converted in a propaganda tool.
A bitcoin can be divided into 100 million satoshis.
There are many cryptocurrencies out there trying to deal with these scenarios. There are some that exist primarily for lightning quick transactions and others for more perfect anonymity. There is room for more than one cryptocurrency and BTC may not be the winner.
It has, though, proved the value of the blockchain and proved that it's cryptographically secure. (Quantum computing may change the equation.)
OK. So you won't bitch when it is worth something. Right?
You'll quietly say that you were wrong and wish those who invested in BTC well.
It's not a "need to hide" issue. It's a privacy issue. It's a privacy from data mining. Do you want every gov't official (as well as business) to know when you come home, when you go to bed, when you wake up in the morning (which you can know from data regarding electric and water usage, not to mention Alexa).
how about we return to the anonymity of the dark ages (you know the 1990s).
this is a lie that striking has been equated with terrorism.
However take a look at the violence by the left (reminiscent of Maoist Red Guards) over talks by Charles Murray and Milo.
I guess you never heard about vacations. How about house swapping? How do you deal with that.
Can there be abuse? Absolutely. Do I want my apartment building to turn into an SRO (Single Room Occupancy for those not in NYC).
But there are plenty of reasons to not be there when the renter is there. (Such as going to your girlfriend's house for the weekend while your apt is being used.)
The "being there" requirement is overreach.
Step 1. Owe the government back taxes and add to it an onerous interest rate.
Step 2. Make money and get taxed 90% before you even see it.
Step 3. Don't have enough to pay the tax bill. Interest keeps accruing.
Step 4. Make money again and get taxed 90% before you even see it.
Rinse and repeat.
Think about your claims and reread the quote " did not adequately support $2.8 trillion" and recognize that that is a strangely worded statement. It implies that the Armed Forces have "lost" or "stolen" 2.8 trillion.in the 3rd Q.
Hmm. Since the Armed forces budget is under a trillion a year - how does that make any sense.
Why was I pwnd?
Think about your claims and reread the quote " did not adequately support $2.8 trillion" and recognize that that is a strangely worded statement. It implies that the Armed Forces have "lost" or "stolen" 2.8 trillion.in the 3rd Q.
Hmm. Since the Armed forces budget is under a trillion a year - how does that make any sense.
Be careful about calling someone stupid and pwnd when you have such poor reading comprehension skills.
And you believe this?
The US has a 3 trillion dollar budget. Even if the Armed forces had 1/3 of that (it doesn't) you would say it can't account (meaning lost or stolen) over 6 years worth of funding.
And you believe your bull$hit? Or is it that you didn't think about what you were reading?
But you probably complain about lack of money for the arts or education. Nice going. Waste money we don't have.
7.03 firearm deaths includes accidental and suicide and self-defense. Stop twisting things around and compare like things. Murder to Murder.
There are no guns (practically speaking) in Japan. Therefore the suicide rate must be lower there than in NH. (oops, guess not)
At issue is not deaths in general; at issue is using guns to kill people out of rage, mad-man killing spree, terrorism, or crime.
Including deaths from suicide show your bias and displays a your intent to distort the data.
Including deaths from accidental accidents also shows your bias. Yes guns are dangerous. Same as skiing. Same as scuba diving. Same as parachuting. Same as technical climbing. Accidents happen. Mistakes happen skeet shooting. Mistakes happen shooting water fowl (a lot more than hunting deer). People are very careful and yet mistakes happen.
Actually it's not an affluent state. (At least not in many parts.) There are a lot of people who have homesteading lifestyle. (Not completely off the grid - but much more self-sufficient and much more bartering than in cities or suburban america.
But - you know the details from the f**king summary. Right?
You're cool with the EPA constantly changing the definition of wetlands; requiring more and more areas to be off limit for building - even in very suburban areas such as Westchester NY and Bergen County, NJ.
Your OK with the takings of property with no compensation.
You're OK with the politicization of EPA superfunds in order to siphon money from the federal government? (See Gowanus Canal in Bklyn).
These are a few local-to-me outrages done by the EPA. But nary a f**king peep from you about those. Those foolishness was done by (as you so nicely put it)
Total, utter morons.
THANKS Dem voters.
You are just repeating over and over again that freedom of speech comes first. Why? Is it for you an absolute value, an end in itself? Then there is no discussion possible, and I'm just wasting my time trying to reason with you.
Re BLM: I'm not searching for it. I asked for a concrete example, it would be nice of you to provide the link.
Here's some. If you're interested there is more.
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2...
www.huffingtonpost.ca/.../black-lives-matter-toronto-yusra-khogali_b_14635896.html
http://www.torontosun.com/2017...
Why does Freedom of Speech come first?
What would it come after? Your feelings?
Should saying "Islam / Christianity is a barbaric, ridiculous religion" be against the law? No.
Would you make Islam illegal because it advocates killing infidels? No.
Freedom of Speech comes first.
It doesn't matter if it's hateful. What the NOI says shouldn't be a prosecutable offense. Is it stupid, hateful, dumb, racist, vile, pathetic, ridiculous? Yes.
google "BLM kill whitey"
also: "Yusra Khogali"
One of those is clear cut. The other is conjecture on your part.
This defines the problem.
You shouldn't be afraid to say what you're thinking. Freedom of Thought, Speech and Press are THE fundamental principles of a free society.
No freedom of speech and you're living under a tyranny. Tyrannies need not be repressive for the majority of the population. (Many people in China are doing quite well. It's still tyranny.)