Constitutional law is about arguing the constitution in court. -what arguments tend to succeed, what arguments tend not to. Unless the judge is receptive, it has nothing to do with normative truth.
Its not unconstitutional until the supreme court says so. You don't define unconstitutional. Thats the way we run our government. If you disagree, get voters to change it, but you don't get to redefine the words any more than the government does.
Considering that the supreme court is part of the government, your distinctions mean little.
Both perspectives? How naive. There are very often more than two perspectives, and you can't assume that a dialectic between the Western media and RT will get you any closer to the most interesting one.
Judge[13] Judicial district Date appointed Term expiry Reggie Walton (presiding) District of Columbia May 19, 2007 May 18, 2014 Rosemary M. Collyer District of Columbia March 8, 2013 March 7, 2020 Raymond J. Dearie Eastern District of New York July 2, 2012 July 1, 2019 Claire Eagan Northern District of Oklahoma February 13, 2013 May 18, 2019 Martin L.C. Feldman Eastern District of Louisiana May 19, 2010 May 18, 2017 Thomas Hogan District of Columbia May 18, 2009 May 18, 2016 Mary A. McLaughlin Eastern District of Pennsylvania May 18, 2008 May 18, 2015 Michael W. Mosman District of Oregon May 4, 2013 May 3, 2020 F. Dennis Saylor IV District of Massachusetts May 19, 2011 May 18, 2018 Susan Webber Wright Eastern District of Arkansas May 18, 2009 May 18, 2016 James Zagel Northern District of Illinois May 18, 2008 May 18, 2015
Roger Vinson, the guy who rubber-stamped the leaked Verizon order, is no longer on the court-- his seven year term expired.
It's odd that you would bring up Shakespeare. The Quarto and Folio versions of many of his plays differ. Pericles is in the third folio, but not in the first or second folios. There are "bad quarto" versions of Romeo and Juliet, Henry V, Merry Wives of Windsor, Hamlet, and Henry VI, parts two and three. There's also a false folio. Good fodder for PhD dissertation, bad for a slashdot analogy.
While the Apple II was certainly a dud by that time,
By what time?
1979? 1983? 1986? 1991?
The Apple II line was an extraordinarily long lived computer. Towards the end of its life, it was laughably obsolete. Towards the beginning, it was fairly advanced.
Exactly. the clips I showed were steadicam shots, but the important thing wasn't that they were done with a particular rig, it's that smooth moving camera shots are an important part of a film's vocabulary. There's a sequence in Joe Wright's Pride and Prejudice where the Netherfield ball is shown from the perspective of another party goer, another dancer--moving from room to room, listening in on conversations, and so on.
You can't do that with a tripod, where the camera is fixed in one position-- unless you use lots of tripods and lots of cuts, but then, the scene would lose some of its seamless qualities.
You can't really do that with a non-stabilized handheld rig-- as the attendant jerkiness would detract from the atmosphere.
I've heard inklings of the following ultra cynical argument.
Snowden went to Hong Kong not because of the city's "spirited commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent.”, but because the other secrets he knows would have the greatest value, should he need to barter them for protection and other expenses
Is it true? It doesn't need to be true. It only needs to be plausible.
STATEMENT FROM PHILIP NELKON (MATTEL) AS ISSUED IN DECEMBER SCRABBLE CLUB NEWS
After a great deal of heart-searching, Mattel have decided to end their 20-year relationship with Chambers. The decision was not taken lightly and we all have the utmost respect for the continual development of OSW that Chambers have masterminded over the years.
Our new partner is Harper Collins, publishers of the number one selling dictionary in the UK - Collins English Dictionary.
Sounds like old news-- though my ipad's scrabble app did update its dictionary options fairly recently. Since I'm a novice and have not yet memorized the dictionary,, I took little notice of the change.
At my local store, the durable goods are doing most of the crowding out. I suppose Amazon can't compete on gas ovens. They've gotten rid of a lot of the bluray/dvd backstock, it's comparable to what the Target next door has.
The miky way, our galaxy, is scheduled to collide with the andromeda galaxy in 4 billion years. What if we hit a black hole? This universe is getting more and more dangerous all the time.
Constitutional law is about arguing the constitution in court. -what arguments tend to succeed, what arguments tend not to. Unless the judge is receptive, it has nothing to do with normative truth.
Not much of a city.
Its not unconstitutional until the supreme court says so. You don't define unconstitutional. Thats the way we run our government. If you disagree, get voters to change it, but you don't get to redefine the words any more than the government does.
Considering that the supreme court is part of the government, your distinctions mean little.
That's a rather dangerous political perspective.
Most political relevant definitions are not cast in stone.
So much for informational security.
Both perspectives? How naive. There are very often more than two perspectives, and you can't assume that a dialectic between the Western media and RT will get you any closer to the most interesting one.
no, the judges aren't secret. The courtroom is one of those faraday cages, though.
from wikipedia
Judge[13] Judicial district Date appointed Term expiry
Reggie Walton (presiding) District of Columbia May 19, 2007 May 18, 2014
Rosemary M. Collyer District of Columbia March 8, 2013 March 7, 2020
Raymond J. Dearie Eastern District of New York July 2, 2012 July 1, 2019
Claire Eagan Northern District of Oklahoma February 13, 2013 May 18, 2019
Martin L.C. Feldman Eastern District of Louisiana May 19, 2010 May 18, 2017
Thomas Hogan District of Columbia May 18, 2009 May 18, 2016
Mary A. McLaughlin Eastern District of Pennsylvania May 18, 2008 May 18, 2015
Michael W. Mosman District of Oregon May 4, 2013 May 3, 2020
F. Dennis Saylor IV District of Massachusetts May 19, 2011 May 18, 2018
Susan Webber Wright Eastern District of Arkansas May 18, 2009 May 18, 2016
James Zagel Northern District of Illinois May 18, 2008 May 18, 2015
Roger Vinson, the guy who rubber-stamped the leaked Verizon order, is no longer on the court-- his seven year term expired.
Why would anyone write an app for an unloved platform?
I take it you didn't like Christopher Tolkien's "A History of Middle Earth", then?
Early printers used the letter 'e' to justify lines. Thus "Queen" and "Queene"
It's odd that you would bring up Shakespeare. The Quarto and Folio versions of many of his plays differ. Pericles is in the third folio, but not in the first or second folios. There are "bad quarto" versions of Romeo and Juliet, Henry V, Merry Wives of Windsor, Hamlet, and Henry VI, parts two and three. There's also a false folio. Good fodder for PhD dissertation, bad for a slashdot analogy.
It had a Norton SI of something less than 1.
But was that really so bad? A PC/XT had a Norton SI score of 1.0.
Unfortunately, the suit was not filed in the 9th district, but with the "UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT
WASHINGTON, D.C."
That particular court is packed with judges chosen by the chief justice--so expect deference to the NSA.
If that's germane to the case at hand, yes.Otherwise it's simply a venue for resolving legal disputes.
Unless it was a IIgs, that one was actually kind of OK.
Not quite an Amiga. Not quite a Macintosh.
While the Apple II was certainly a dud by that time,
By what time?
1979?
1983?
1986?
1991?
The Apple II line was an extraordinarily long lived computer. Towards the end of its life, it was laughably obsolete. Towards the beginning, it was fairly advanced.
Exactly. the clips I showed were steadicam shots, but the important thing wasn't that they were done with a particular rig, it's that smooth moving camera shots are an important part of a film's vocabulary. There's a sequence in Joe Wright's Pride and Prejudice where the Netherfield ball is shown from the perspective of another party goer, another dancer--moving from room to room, listening in on conversations, and so on.
You can't do that with a tripod, where the camera is fixed in one position-- unless you use lots of tripods and lots of cuts, but then, the scene would lose some of its seamless qualities.
You can't really do that with a non-stabilized handheld rig-- as the attendant jerkiness would detract from the atmosphere.
I've heard inklings of the following ultra cynical argument.
Snowden went to Hong Kong not because of the city's "spirited commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent.”, but because the other secrets he knows would have the greatest value, should he need to barter them for protection and other expenses
Is it true? It doesn't need to be true. It only needs to be plausible.
You can't make these sorts of shots with a tripod.
From 2003
Sounds like old news-- though my ipad's scrabble app did update its dictionary options fairly recently. Since I'm a novice and have not yet memorized the dictionary,, I took little notice of the change.
What's in Woz's backpack He does not travel light.
At my local store, the durable goods are doing most of the crowding out. I suppose Amazon can't compete on gas ovens. They've gotten rid of a lot of the bluray/dvd backstock, it's comparable to what the Target next door has.
A server doesn't need to be a large as a touchscreen, or a keypad.
The miky way, our galaxy, is scheduled to collide with the andromeda galaxy in 4 billion years. What if we hit a black hole? This universe is getting more and more dangerous all the time.
It's an iPod nano watch.