Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Start Dumping Surface RT To Schools For $199

onyxruby writes "In a move that will remind many of Apple in the '80s, Microsoft is going to start dumping Surface RT computers to educational institutions. In an effort to try to gain mindshare for their struggling Surface RT platform, Microsoft is giving away 10,000 Surface RTs to teachers through the International Society for Technology in Education. They're also preparing to offer $199 Surface RTs to K12 and higher education institutions. The strategy of flooding the educational market was quite successful for Apple. Unfortunately for Microsoft, today's computers require management and the Surface RT presents significant management challenges in terms of the inability to join the computer to a domain or available management tools."

251 comments

  1. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How would this remind people of Apple in the 80s? The Apple II was not a dud product being price dumped to clear inventory.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Surface RT is not a dud, it is a great product and millions have been sold.

      -Steve

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Estimates are at less than 1 million RTs in 10 months. GREAT SUCCESS!!

    3. Re:Huh? by jedidiah · · Score: 0

      While the Apple II was certainly a dud by that time, it was not being sold at a discount comparable to what Microsoft is doing with the surface.

      This combination of absurd price and outdated tech was why the Apple II was such a dud if you weren't some sort of government entity spending someone else's money.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1 funny. The Apple II a dud? It was sales of the Apple II that made Apple the first personal computer company to reach $1 billion in annual sales in 1982.

    5. Re:Huh? by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      ...it was not being sold at a discount comparable to what Microsoft is doing with the surface.

      Two words. Tax writeoff. This relates to the machines being given away as well.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    6. Re:Huh? by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Your argument is like a McDonald's sign: Billions and Billions sold.

              Doesn't say anything about quality.

              Doesn't say anything about value.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Huh? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      How would this remind people of Apple in the 80s? The Apple II was not a dud product being price dumped to clear inventory.

      The RT is a stinker. Dump the Pro and maybe we'll talk. <_<

      I remember the Apple ][ computers showing up in school and thinking it was going to be real cool, until I found I had to get my own dubious copy of Integer Basic to boot from so I could have some fun with them :D

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Huh? by ackthpt · · Score: 0

      Surface RT is not a dud, it is a great product and millions have been sold.

      -Steve

      The Surface RT is to tablets what the Carp is to fishing.

      Maybe it will skip nicely on the water...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:Huh? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Estimates are at less than 1 million RTs in 10 months. GREAT SUCCESS!!

      It would be disingenuous to say you didn't see this coming from the very first day of launch, after the early product reviews.

      There needs no ghost, my lord, come from the grave. To tell us this.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Huh? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      But it does say it wasn't a dud.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    11. Re:Huh? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. I had an Apple ][, and it came with Integer Basic on the ROM. You had to run floating point Basic off a cassette tape (it was a while before I got a floppy disk) but Integer Basic was built in.

      Ah, the Red Book... ALL of the monitor code to read. Small enough that you could actually understand what was going on. Those were the days.

    12. Re:Huh? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. I had an Apple ][, and it came with Integer Basic on the ROM. You had to run floating point Basic off a cassette tape (it was a while before I got a floppy disk) but Integer Basic was built in.

      Ah, the Red Book... ALL of the monitor code to read. Small enough that you could actually understand what was going on. Those were the days.

      They had the lab ones monkeyed up, so you needed a boot disk so you could launch Integer Basic. I think it was supposed to be some sort of educational software, but not many people used them for it, most we like me and brought in a boot disk to get around it and start in on coding.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    13. Re:Huh? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      While the Apple II was certainly a dud by that time,

      By what time?

      1979?
      1983?
      1986?
      1991?

      The Apple II line was an extraordinarily long lived computer. Towards the end of its life, it was laughably obsolete. Towards the beginning, it was fairly advanced.

    14. Re:Huh? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your argument is like a McDonald's sign: Billions and Billions sold.

              Doesn't say anything about quality.

              Doesn't say anything about value.

      An analogy! Let me try: your argument is like a car: it doesn't understand what words mean.

      Dud
      a : one that is ineffectual; also : failure <a box-office dud>

      Love it or hate it, the Apple II was a massive success, becoming one of the best-selling computers of its day thanks in large part to VisiCalc, its affordable price, and the wide availability of apps for it, which allowed it to become an important component of the PC revolution of the '80s. Suggesting that the Apple II was overpriced and outdated (as you did in an earlier comment) is preposterous and factually inaccurate, and suggesting it's a dud on the grounds of quality and value (as you did in your last comment) is irrelevant since those are only indirectly related to whether something is a dud (not to mention that those arguments make no sense in historical contexts). The only thing you got correct was that the volume discount being offered by Apple to educational institutions was, while aggressive, still nowhere comparable to the sort of dumping that we're seeing Microsoft do here.

    15. Re:Huh? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Surface RT is not a dud, it is a great product and million have been sold.

      -Steve

      FTFY

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    16. Re:Huh? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The big thing Apple had going for it compared to Atari and Commodore was expansion. They had slots that you could put cards in that allowed it to do things:

      Serial cards (RS-232 serial interface)
      Parallel cards (Centronics/IEEE 1284 parallel interface)
      Multifunction I/O cards
      Internal modems
      80 column (or more) text cards (e.g., Videx)
      PAL Color graphics cards (required for color graphics in early European Apples)
      RGB cards
      Floppy disk controllers
      Hard disk controllers
      Network adapters
      Co-processor cards
      Memory expansion cards
      Accelerators
      Realtime clock cards
      Music and sound cards
      Miscellaneous cards

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    17. Re:Huh? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WindowsRT reminds me of the PCjr. IBM wanted to sell a cheaper version of the PC and so they made a crippled version so it wouldn't compete with the high priced units. It withered and died. Now MS seems to be repeating the idea. Very Ironic. They took IBM's monopoly away from them and now they repeat IBM's early mistakes with hardware. I love it.

    18. Re:Huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Many of those Apple computers ended up being unused. It was all part of the hype of "if your child doesn't learn about computers today then they will end up jobless in the future!" Remember that stupid Apple commercial about the kid dropping out of college and returning home dejected to his parents who failed to buy him an Apple II?

      My father was an elementary school teacher at the time and said the ones he had didn't do much. No one knew how to use them, they didn't fit into any educational plan, they were just paper weights that were occasionally used for games.

    19. Re:Huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Was it affordable? It was vastly out of reach for me though. The TRS80 was more affordable.

    20. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes. Cartridge Basic. Chicklet keyboard (wireless infrared too!) Sidecar expansion (after three expansions you needed a Power Supply expansion.) Good times.

    21. Re:Huh? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's as much a condemnation of the educational establishment as anything else. In 1987 when I was 12 I wrote a spelling program for the 4th grade teacher and showed her how to modify the vocabulary list. It was a laughably simple program, but she could put kids on it and they would get the equivalent of 1 on 1 education. It took a 12-year-old kid to write a lame program in order for the computers in her classroom to be useful... at least she had the initiative to ask me for help - most teachers wouldn't bother.

      And this is when the personal computer had been around for roughly 10 years. I don't know what they do with computers these days, but I'm sure they are just as underused. My kids' school district has a "language lab" with thousands of dollars worth of software sitting unused because the idiot school district can't afford the "sanitizable" headphones. When I suggested they buy dollar store headphones and issue them to every student they said that would be "unmanageable" because the students would lose them. Oy.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re:Huh? by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      I remember locally we had the supermarkets doing "Apples for the Schools" promotions, where you were encouraged to take your supermarket receipt to the school who would then use these almost as arcade tokens to trade in for Apple P.C.s

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    23. Re:Huh? by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Many of those Apple computers ended up being unused...
      > they didn't fit into any educational plan...

      And whose fault was that? I graduated from 6th grade in 1984 and we had a few Apple IIs at my elementary school. We had a teacher who had a clue and we learned BASIC and LOGO. I'm now a programmer. (And no 'GOTO considered harmful' jokes, please -- I'm no Dennis Ritchie, but it didn't break me.) I learned the basics of logic, data structures, how computers work, and enjoyed being able to make a machine do something neat.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    24. Re:Huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      You got lucky is all. Many of these computers were dumped on teachers. Not on just science or math teachers, not even only on high school teachers. So after a 10+ hour day getting the very basics done, how many of those teachers are going to spend more time trying to figure out what to do with the paper weight they were given and how to integrate it into the curriculum? And how many of those are going to be able to do more than just have some simple programs that students can run when they want? If additional software makes them useful then who pays for that when there's no budget? And chances are you don't get the very expensive floppy drive given to you with the computer.

    25. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple was, and compared to modern products is, a computer that made programming electronic controls accessible to everyone.

      Both it and the early DOS PCs had a parallel port that meant you could control various things --model Railroads was a biggie-- extremely easily.

      The difference between those two was that Applesoft was easier to program.

      Nowadays, the ports run compressed data, which admittedly is better for most users. But it means that the days of easy electronic control are over.

      So now if you want electronic control, I'd have to probably advise someone to look at Anduino. But even that isn't easy, the way working with an Apple ii+ was.

      And no ownership issues. Truly, the Apple empowered its users. No, Apple ii+ wasn't a dud.

      Surface? I wouldn't bother with it. Probably good for some users. Doctors and nurses, maybe. But I have no use for it, and no desire to deal with Microsoft wherever I am given the choice.

      Which is perhaps why microsoft disempowers users, to force additional sales. Also perhaps why Microsoft wants to ensure that government agencies use their product, to force businesses to buy if they have to interface with the government agencies. That game has been going on a long time.

    26. Re:Huh? by markjhood2003 · · Score: 2

      Wow, that's really too bad. In 1978 our high school computer class heavily lobbied our teacher to acquire an Apple II, since at that point we were programming on DecWriters connected to the public school district's single DecSystem-20. We learned how to program in 6502 assembly in order to access the 4-color high-res mode of the Apple II and write simple interactive games. To us kids this was a huge step up from writing boring FORTRAN and SNOBOL programs on line-mode printing terminals.

      It's hard to imagine an Apple II, at that time, sitting around as a paper weight in the classroom. Maybe elementary school was too early, but for those of us in high school back then we had to maintain a sign-up sheet for access to it, and many of us stayed after class to get more time on it, on into the evening.

    27. Re:Huh? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The PC, Jr. was a riot. They excised the DMA controller. It would run PC-DOS but everything it I/O-wise did had to pass through the CPU's accumulator. It had a Norton SI of something less than 1. When I played 3-Demon on a PC, Jr. (a wireframe 3-D version of Pacman) the machine would slow down dramatically if I turned to face down a long hall. A very crippled machine. DMA controller chips (the 8237 I think it was) weren't even very expensive at the time.

    28. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Steve. You must have dug finger holes into that chair you're clenching so tight in order to say that calmly without yelling.

    29. Re:Huh? by Trimaxion · · Score: 2

      The impact of the Apple II went well beyond sales revenue for apple.

      The Apple IIe's presence in my elementary school computer labs helped me develop an early interest in computers, and I'm sure it did the same to many other kids. Sure, we only played Oregon Trail, but computer lab was something we looked forward to every week. Lots of those kids are now holding well-paying engineering, IT, or development jobs, have started their own companies, and are contributing to the economy.

      I think the Apple II changed the world. The Surface RT has not and will not.

    30. Re:Huh? by D1G1T · · Score: 1

      You forgot my fave: Z80 processor cards allowing you to run CP/M and WordStar

    31. Re:Huh? by D1G1T · · Score: 1

      What, in your opinion, was a success at the time? There were labs full of Apple //e machines at my schools. Never saw anything else except in people's homes.

    32. Re:Huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I'd love to have a DecSystem-20 to write some 36 bit PDP assembler code instead of some boring old 6502 assembler :-)

    33. Re:Huh? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      It had a Norton SI of something less than 1.

      But was that really so bad? A PC/XT had a Norton SI score of 1.0.

    34. Re:Huh? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      what are you talking bought the c64 had its share of addons so did atri.

    35. Re:Huh? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The Lisa, not the Apple II

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    36. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would be disingenuous to say you didn't see this coming from the very first day of launch, after the early product reviews.

      Actually, given the reception RT has had in the market, they'd better be careful about dumping them in schools. Wouldn't that constitute child abuse?

    37. Re:Huh? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Three words Anti dumping laws, dumping products at artificially low prices into a market in order to seize dominant market share and force competitors out of the market before substantially raising prices. Seems the US in-justice system is asleep at the helm, to tired pursuing whistle blowers and doing the RIAA's bidding.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:Huh? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      An analogy! Let me try: your argument is like a car: it doesn't understand what words mean.

      Best car analogy ever.

    39. Re:Huh? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The C64 had serial. parallel and ROM cartridge I/O. It also cost a lot less.

    40. Re:Huh? by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      The impact of the Apple II went well beyond sales revenue for apple.

      The Apple IIe's presence in my elementary school computer labs helped me develop an early interest in computers, and I'm sure it did the same to many other kids. Sure, we only played Oregon Trail, but computer lab was something we looked forward to every week. Lots of those kids are now holding well-paying engineering, IT, or development jobs, have started their own companies, and are contributing to the economy.

      I think the Apple II changed the world. The Surface RT has not and will not.

      That is true for me and my son. I gave my son his first Apple II+ when he was five years old. I was going to trade it in on an Apple IIe but they wouldn't offer me enough. So I bought the IIe and gave the II+ to my son. Best investment I ever made. He is a well paid IT specialist because of the exposure to the II+. That was in 1980.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    41. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear sizzling steaks! Mmmm... Wait! What's that smell??? AH! My RT has locked up and melted! AH! AH!

    42. Re:Huh? by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      "I don't care who you are, that's funny right there" -- Larry the Cable Guy anticipating the parent comment.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    43. Re:Huh? by arkenian · · Score: 1

      So something to bear in mind about this is that apple was still putting IIe computers in schools through the END of the 80s. While I agree that in the early 80s they were awesome computers, at the end of the 80s, it was pretty much just dumping.

    44. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big thing Apple had going for it compared to Atari and Commodore was expansion. They had slots that you could put cards in that allowed it to do things:

      And what did any of those things provide the education sector at the time? Anything at all? "Realtime clock cards"?? Please.

      Unless you count the stuff already offered by Atari and Commodore, which is happily on the list as an 'expansion' when they're built in to the hardware, like serial communications, floppy disk controllers, and sound hardware.

      The truth is Apple managed to convince educators that their computers were great for their purposes and flooding schools with discounted hardware. They managed to do this because Atari and Commodore were also relevant gaming platforms with their advanced hardware, and by being subpar for gaming they convinced decision makers that the kids won't be wasting their time playing when they should be play-learning.

      It's the same way IBM architecture personal computers became the standard in business: because at the time they were so sub-par compared to more functionally advanced machines that it was enough to convince businesses that they could only be used for business.

      Between those two walls, Atari, Commodore, Texas Instruments, Fujitsu, and NEC all floundered and found their architectures squeezed out of the market.

    45. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY

      Whoosh!

      He who laughs last... probably didn't get the joke.

    46. Re:Huh? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      My father was an elementary school teacher at the time and said the ones he had didn't do much. No one knew how to use them, they didn't fit into any educational plan, they were just paper weights that were occasionally used for games.

      Except in this case it comes with Microsoft Office and a web browser. Between those two things most school use cases are taken care of. This isn't the 80s, schools know what to do with PCs, they know what to do with ipads and if the summary thinks a windows device is hard for a windows IT staff to manage... how the hell are they handling ipads?

    47. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there a similar argument to be made *for* the Surface as opposed to a less flexible/closed (from a hardware perspective AFAIK) iPad? At least you can plug some things into the Surface and of course the Pro is an all-out PC. I bought a Dell XP 12 and liked it so much I got two more for my home-schooled kids (it's a state public/home school program where they have to do part of their lessons online and interact with their teach and other students online).

      The public school system sent them these like six year old HP laptops that were enormous (kids are 7 and 8 years old). Kids loooove the Dell XPS 12s and started using them right away. We also have a Kindle (first gen), a Samsung Galaxy tablet, an iPad, four iPods, 4 Nintendo DSs, 4 Nintendo DS3's, and a bunch of other tech gear in the house for them.They all get used in different ways.

    48. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuses, excuses...

      And chances are you don't get the very expensive floppy drive given to you with the computer.

      Expensive floppy? In 1986 the Apple II in my school had two installed, and all the software was on copied floppies. Shocking, I know, that the librarians bought a single copy for the school district and passed around copies, but they had the children's welfare to think about.

      Sounds to me like you're just bitter about being a poor teacher.

  2. perfect by argoff · · Score: 1

    pick up a bunch of Surface tablets, and put Linux or Android on them

    1. Re:perfect by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      pick up a bunch of Surface tablets, and put Linux or Android on them

      "Secure boot" is mandatory on Windows RT(ARM) devices. I think that x86 Win8 devices are required to support it; but OEMs can do whatever key-fill they like, and can, at their option, support turning it off or end-user added keys.

      I'm not saying that they didn't make a mistake somewhere, more than a few locked bootloaders have gone down; but it isn't going to be trivial.

    2. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, that is not possible, the rt has a locked bootloader (rt is for arm).

    3. Re:perfect by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Is it actually required to not allow the Secure Boot configuration and keys to be changed, or just to have it enabled by default?

    4. Re:perfect by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately, Surface RT requires that secure boot must not be possible to disable. The only way to get Linux on these things is to install an additional key or an approved boot loader, and that can be very complicated.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:perfect by kthreadd · · Score: 0

      It probably is, but ARM is not the same as locked. The Raspberry Pi is ARM and it isn't locked.

    6. Re:perfect by MrDoh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like something schoolkids could figure out pretty quick.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    7. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I don't really get this, but why install Linux if it's a tablet made to run Windows? Wouldn't you get a Linux tablet instead?

    8. Re:perfect by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially since Linux drivers for a Windows tablet thats apparently designed be bootloader-locked aren't going to be forthcoming.

    9. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please be informed before posting you opinions. Installing another OS on a Surface-RT is not possible. UEFI is block for Windows only. No it's not possible to disable EUFI. It's not possible to install new keys. Microsoft expressively forbids it. This is a discussion I have had many times before

      "Like most mobile devices, ARM-based Certified For Windows RT devices, such as the Microsoft Surface RT device, are designed to run only Windows 8. Therefore, Secure Boot cannot be turned off, and you cannot load a different operating system. Fortunately, there is a large market of ARM devices designed to run other operating systems."

      http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/dn168167.aspx

    10. Re:perfect by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Why should I have to seek out a special "it's made to run Linux" piece of kit when such a notion is completely unnecessary and highly artificial. You can run any code on a general purpose computer. It doesn't matter if it was made by Atari, or Sun, or IBM.

      The market is currently dominated by what are essentially DOS clones. It's just that they don't have any special locks to interfere with the end user.

      Such locks are an Apple innovation.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:perfect by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How long will that last?

      DRM always gets cracked. Heck I bet there is a jtag or something on there just waiting to be mucked with.

    12. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that Apple learned that from Microsoft. It's just that Apple does it with hardware instead of software.

      Also known as the profit centers for each company. Hardly surprising.

    13. Re:perfect by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To run software that Windows RT isn't going to allow you to run? For example, one whole class of programs is excluded by Windows RT disallowing in-process native compilation (say "bye" to LuaJIT and V8 in your applications). Disallowing native compilers of scripting languages on underpowered hardware sounds like a really stupid idea to me.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:perfect by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      You can run any code on a general purpose computer. It doesn't matter if it was made by Atari, or Sun, or IBM.

      Yes, in the worst case, you write a bytecode emulator. The performance sucks when the OS manufacturer is throwing artificial hurdles into your path.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a man and at least 2 others who have no concept of CPU architecture or the drivers that a kernel (assuming one exists for a given architecture) must use to talk to the rest of the grab-bag of hardware surrounding said CPU. The OS is running at a much lower level than your myopic abstracted one size fits all Java fantasy.

      Hint: ARM != x86

    16. Re:perfect by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      How exactly is that enforcable? You let the user run code, and they get to run code. How exactly can you prevent them from doing things when they aren't calling system APIs to do it? You can't exactly distinguish between computing the derivative of some engineering problem and compiling bytecode...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:perfect by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      I think you are confusing "not possible" for "not permitted."

      I think you'll find the two are not equivalent out here in the Real World.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:perfect by FrankSchwab · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you can't stop the compilation - but you can sure as hell stop the execution.
      (in Agent Smith voice)
      Mr. Anderson, what good is in-process compiled code when you are unable to call it?

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    19. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long will that last?

      Well, how long has it been out?

    20. Re:perfect by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because you have the make-for-windows tablet for only $199, or your principal buys it and hands it to you and tells you to use it. Thus you need to put a reasonable OS on it to make it usable. Remember these RTs dont come with Windows 8, they come with Windows 8 RT, which means metro-only except for some extremely limited desktop, and all apps must be signed and approved (ie, Microsoft Store ONLY). Thus they ship as unusable devices by default.

    21. Re:perfect by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Informative

      All executables on Windows 8 RT must be signed before they're allowed to run. You won't even get an "are you sure" dialog box. Thus no software is possible without prior permission from Microsoft. Sure you may have some nice byte code emulator but it's useless if you can't get it signed.

    22. Re:perfect by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There's always "impractical". Given how difficult it is to tear down these Surface tablets to get to the electronics, it's impractical to hack the flash or boot loader electronically. Now maybe someone will crack the key signing process (and the root certificate gets published by the NY Times) but that may be a wait. Ultimately though, these tablets are going to schools, and I just do not see schools making it part of their official stance to break the DMCA and root the tablets before use.

    23. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would that even work?
      In an OS that actually has hooks for inserting code into a different process and running it as that process I can't imagine how they would stop you from executing whatever the hell you want.

    24. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It prevents data execution and randomizes address layouts. The best you could do is compile to a byte code, then execute everything in a big switch, but for that performance, you might as well not even try to JIT it at all and just interpret it. But sure, Internet Explorer can still do it, because they run native code. No mere device owner can install programs not in the Windows Store, but Microsoft won't allow native programs in the Windows Store, except what they themselves publish.

    25. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to tell us how, then.

    26. Re:perfect by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Check out the NX-bit. ARM has the same concept, though it's called something else. Only memory allocated for the program image can be executed. Data and stack are not executable.

    27. Re:perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Add to that that these are the 32GB versions, and the OS takes up about 26GB alone, leaving only 6 for everything else.

    28. Re:perfect by KZigurs · · Score: 2

      Hey, at least they have got Internet Explorer!

    29. Re:perfect by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      As a counterpoint to your claims of being "unusuable," my Dell XPS10 (another RT device) came with Microsoft Office Home & Student 2013. I could care less about Word, Excel and PowerPoint, but it did come with OneNote. This is not the crappy OneNote that is available for most other devices and does not support "ink" input. This is actual OneNote. Aside from that, I used my Transformer Prime for Netflix, Hulu, Emulators, and Couch/Toilet browsing. The XPS10 does all of those things. Just don't try finding any worthwhile games on the Windows marketplace for it. They're all just awful. Truly awful. *Note: I did not pay anywhere near full price for this device. We would be having a different conversation had I paid full price for the 64GB model with keyboard dock. *Note2: It has quirks - the tablet battery drains before the keyboard battery does and it sometimes has issues enumerating the devices on the dock. It does let me turn taps off, which I appreciate after millions of accidental clicks on the Transformer Prime.

    30. Re:perfect by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Because they're giving these ones out for free?

    31. Re:perfect by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Isn't there any developer mode or something like that?

    32. Re:perfect by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Undoubtedly there is, if you've paid the money and joined the developer program.

  3. Because that worked so well for Apple? by h4rr4r · · Score: 0, Troll

    This will be as bad for it as it was for Apple. Kids will think of Surface RT as that stupid thing the teachers make them use and how inferior it is to whatever they have at home or whatever smart device they normally use.

    Making kids use something is a sure fire way to get them to hate it.

    1. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      How did selling the Apple ][ to schools hurt Apple exactly?

    2. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by h4rr4r · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Because kids avoided Apple computers like the plague afterwords. Sure it helped for the time they were selling them, but a couple years later those kids remembered apple as the uncool computers the teachers made you use.

    3. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [citation needed] You know, actual evidence.

    4. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Michael dell suggesting they wind down the company and pay the money back to the investors does not count?

      You don't remember Apple nearly dying when those kids started to become consumers in their own right?

    5. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      But now you're talking about the 90's and the Mac. The Apple ][ in the 80's was a completely different story.

    6. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      Read what I said again.

      The kids who used those machines in the 80s, many schools still had them in the early 90s as well, grew up with a dislike of Apple computers because they were uncool due to the association with school. This meant later they did not buy them.

    7. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remembering the time when Apple was pushing Apple II's in schools, I sure don't recall kids "hating it" because they felt "forced to use something" --- for the majority of kids, it was their first and only opportunity to use a computer at all. Playing those Apple II games was something new and exciting, that they'd be unlikely to have access to at home (without both well-off and technologically cutting-edge parents).

      In this case, however, I agree with you --- a lot of kids (pretty much all of them from a middle class socioeconomic background) will already have seen better computers (or even have one in their pocket). Dumping crappy cheap tech on schools for a tax writeoff and some publicity isn't particularly going to be awe-inspiring for the kids. But, it will stall school administrations from considering switching to less Microsoft-centric platforms for at least a few more years; and, even if the kids don't like it, they'll be blocked from learning much about alternatives when they have to do classwork in Microsoft Office instead of [insert superior alternatives here].

    8. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A LOT of kids explicitly wanted an Apple II in the 80's. It was THE machine to get at the time before the PC boom happened. But I can understand if you had to use them in the 90's. Unless it was a IIgs, that one was actually kind of OK.

    9. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I remember kids hating them because they were outdated and we were forced to use them. This was likely because schools kept them a long time. Also because we were kids, who always hate whatever authority suggests they do.

    10. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember growing up with Macs in school (both 68k and PPC) and I hated them because they were so dog slow and Mac OS was so shitty until OS X (which was well after the time I was in school).

      Part of the problem was that we only had low-end ones (LC series). When the school system did computer refreshes, we got Windows 95 Dells and it was so much better than the Macs we had previously. Plus all of the kids had Windows at home so they understood the computers better.

    11. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The funny part of this is that you don't even realize or acknowledge the fact that Macs are in fact a product of the 80s.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by bmk67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did they? Because I went to high school during that time period, and it's my recollection that every geek wanted an Apple.

      Most of them ended up with Commodores, or worse.

    13. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Fair enough; I suspect you're right that, once Apple II's were well past their expiration date, playing 'Number Munchers' and 'Oregon Trail' wouldn't seem so cool to kids with access to a Nintendo at home (or at least at a friend's house). Of course, hating what authority tells you to do is sometimes quite an incentive to get interested in what even outdated hardware can do --- once you learn more about operating computers in the school computer lab than your teachers know, you can cause all sorts of amusing troubles for authority. Perhaps Microsoft will unintentionally drive a new generation of kids to enthusiasm for jailbreaking and hacking administrative access controls; perhaps a better outcome than teaching kids to be happily complacent towards the corporate authoritarianism embedded in their newest shiny smartphone doodads.

    14. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Casio invented and owned the graphing calculator market until the early 90's before TI stepped in and started heavily promoting their own offerings to teachers. Look where Casio is against TI today.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    15. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This is because there is no market for graphing calculators outside of what the school requires.

      This is why a Ti-83 still costs $100 even though it could be replaced by a $50 china tablet or something even cheaper.

    16. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will be as bad for it as it was for Apple. Kids will think of Surface RT as that stupid thing the teachers make them use and how inferior it is to whatever they have at home or whatever smart device they normally use.

      Making kids use something is a sure fire way to get them to hate it.

      I remember differently; most kids had never used a computer before, and they remembered "computer time" with the Apples as a welcome break from normal classroom studies.

    17. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      We had Apple ][ computers in elementary school. When I became a consumer, we had whitebox PCs and iMacs.

      There's a significant time lag in there that you don't seem to have accounted for. The Apple ][ didn't do the damage, the iMac and lockdown did.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I managed to get everything done without being forced to use Office to do it. My teachers didn't necessarily love me for it (more work for them), but they supported it by not tossing my work in the trash...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    19. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and that's why I have a TI-84 Silver, 10 years later? That I actually use?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by ackthpt · · Score: 0

      This is because there is no market for graphing calculators outside of what the school requires.

      This is why a Ti-83 still costs $100 even though it could be replaced by a $50 china tablet or something even cheaper.

      Show me a tablet that will run for about 2 years on a set of AAA cells.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    21. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      Show me a graphing calculator with a 10" screen.

      My question is just as nonsensical as yours.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    22. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I wish my school had been donated Apple II computers, we got Commodore Pets with tape drives.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    23. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Unless it was a IIgs, that one was actually kind of OK.

      Not quite an Amiga. Not quite a Macintosh.

    24. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, Surface may or may not be crappy, but all kids these days have already got their allegiance to ipad/iphone or Android, and dumping Surface at a slight discount is not necessarily going to do much for them. Hey, but if I were them, I'd probably try it too. Worth a shot. But my guess is MS will get bored with this quickly like they do with most of their ideas that don't generate instant cash, and that will be that.

    25. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      It was the abysmal quality control at Apple prior to Steve Jobs coming back that caused even die-hard Apple lovers to start buying PCs when their 3rd shipment of the same computer was DOA (my boss at the time found herself exactly here).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    26. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who had a //e. And not just any //e mine had a Transwarp, a Cider 10M Hard Drive, a Hayes Modem, and an 1M extended 80 col card. My //e was mackin. Further I learned a lot about computers from that system. However that came from my own personal learning and...

      Not from my school which had a room full of //e's that were not used really at all. If you are in a room of computers but your teacher/professor does not let you interact with them, or further teach you anything meaningful about how to further your knowledge about computers then they might as well be door stops.

      The idea that you can dump a bunch of hardware on schools and make it relevant has been proven ineffectual. I would venture to say that an industry would have to back it up with TON more of resources to make that investment pay off. That MS is about to have to dump a TON of resources into the XBone to make that even break even makes me wonder if they are going to fight a two front war at this point.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    27. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Schools are just never going to have up to date computers, they don't even have budget to hire enough teachers.

      Personally I think it's all wasted money anyway. Kids to not need to use computers in elementary schools. The Apple ][ was welcomed at the time because there was a lot of fear at the time that no one could learn computers unless they learned it at a very early age and Apple played off of those fears. There was hype about computer based education, and 40 years later it still doesn't exist in any reasonable form. The truth is that you can learn how to use computer in college without being handicapped, and many kids already have access to computers at home anyway. Stick a few in the library for those kids who don't have access to one, but you don't need them in the class room.

      The kids are really not learning anything from having access to the computers anyway. Sure they aren't scared of the mouse like grandma is but that's not because the computer is in the school.

    28. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      [humor needed] You know, an actual funny bone, to prevent you from taking every comment too seriously.

    29. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I was of that generation. I grew up with an Apple IIe. My first Mac was in college - I had a Centris 650 and it was very nice. Then I got a PowerBook 5300cs, and the only nice thing I can say about it was that Apple kept fixing it, eventually extending the warranty for 7 years IIRC. After that debacle, my next computer was a cheap PC (Cyrix processor!). Ever since, I've gone with a mix of Macs and PCs.

      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...

      That's why I worship him instead of Jesus.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    30. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I found the battery life to be approximately 3.5 months. Just long enough to get you half way through your final exam. . .

      I took to swapping batteries just before exams.

    31. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Kids got Commodore-64s instead. Same processor as the Apple II, not as open. But the schematic diagram of the C-64 was right there in the back pages of the user manual that shipped with every commie. Apple could/should have made a cheap entry-level machine to compete with the commie, but it would have cannibalized their existing product line.

    32. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      By that point anybody interested in computers had a C-64 at home, which did everything the Apple II did that they wanted, for far less.

    33. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      Perhaps everyone interested in computers with parents willing and (financially) able to support that interest... but, in reality, for the overwhelming majority of kids, the Apple II in school (or other school computer lab device) was their first and only chance to use a computer (to even find out if they were interested). A C64 at $595 in 1982 is equivalent to ~$1400 today (depending on how you inflation adjust) --- a pretty hefty chunk of money for a "kid's toy" in a world before computer use would be widely recognized by the general public as a vital skill.

    34. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by Zynder · · Score: 2

      It sounds all dirty when you call it a commie :D

    35. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      No, it's a bit more insidious than that. School administrators, even in rural midwestern towns, are mandating that students rent tablets (like iPads*) for school. But, as outlandishly expensive as iPads can be (compared to Android tablets), obviously Surface RT prices are even more galling. The obvious answer then is to undercut iPads and at least be price competitive with Android tablets. Add to that the promise of "it's like a laptop" and "comes with MS Office", and you'd be hard pressed to not see plenty of schools pushing for such devices.

      *Yea, as ridiculous as that. You'd think they'd go for Android tablets, if anything, to be cheaper for everyone concerned. I guess schools may be delusional and think those iPads are actually secure wall gardens, perfect for controlling their rented-out property. Personally, I think tablets for every student is outright an absurd idea even if they were free. They're simply too much of a distraction for adults, let alone for children. Beyond that, I'm generally against the idea of just about any company dumping (and possibly at all selling) their branded products at schools precisely because it's designed to create life-long lock-in. I mean, why else would MS or Apple or whatever push for schools to use their products, possibly even selling at a loss? Now, if the Gates Foundation were doing such a thing...I'd still be suspicious because I don't see the Surface RT as the right tool for the job, anyways.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  4. Pure economics` by kurt555gs · · Score: 1, Funny

    Better $199.00 from a school than $0.00 from the dumpster.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:Pure economics` by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 0

      Not for the schools if they waste time on a doomed platform the MS abandons in favor of the normal Windows Surface.

    2. Re:Pure economics` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they can claim to be philanthropists - PR is also happy.

    3. Re:Pure economics` by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Funny

      So they will abandon one doomed platform for another?

    4. Re:Pure economics` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may cost $199.00 to purchase, but it sure as hell will cost at least 5 times that in support costs since nobody provides support for Windows RT.

      Hell, what companies have even developed programs for that doomed OS?

    5. Re:Pure economics` by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Better $199.00 from a school than $0.00 from the dumpster.

      At least the dumpster has E.T. game cartridges to talk to

  5. $199 = Overpriced by Kimomaru · · Score: 0

    Yeah, just . . . that. Overpriced.

  6. Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Microsoft, nobody wants your crap. Go fix your crap instead of trying to tell everyone how great it is.

    You fucked up. Now go back to work and fix it. Instead of fucking around.

  7. Thin client? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft was smart about it they'd give Maddog a call and see if he would like some thin clients for his new high rise servers.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Thin client? by rogueippacket · · Score: 0

      +1 Funny.

  8. Re:impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not possible, UEFI Bios is locked to install Windows only

  9. Re:take a dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you install Linux on a Windows tablet?

  10. Re:No by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    Yep.

    At $49, I might buy one. At $199, I still expect to get something for my money. I discovered this recently when I bought a Chromebook on a whim. It was back in the box and returned in a few days. I thought I wouldn't care if it was just a toy at that price but I was wrong. I spent another $105 to get a quad-core 17.3" laptop and installed Chrome on it. Gives me the Chrome experience in addition to being able to do all kinds of other stuff.

  11. Biased article submitter much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the links posted say anything about "dumping", just discounts. I don't like Microsoft as much as the next neckbeard wearing unix sysadmin, however I don't see how this qualifies as dumping at all. Even the anti-MS troll stories are getting pathetic on /. these days.

    1. Re:Biased article submitter much? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Dumping: selling at below the cost of manufacture.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Biased article submitter much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A much hyped MS product did not sell.

      Less than half of the RT's that shipped to stores actually sold.

      But you are right, MS is not dumping it at this point, but if this fails to make it take off I bet that MS rather than dumping them on the market they will instead have them shipped back to them and destroyed.

    3. Re:Biased article submitter much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, I get what dumping means. Still the articles say nothing about dumping. How do you know this isn't actually Microsoft wanting to do the right thing and providing computing equipment at a discount to schools? Oh right, it's M$ or something...Jobs does it and he's a motherfucking saint.

  12. Oh God please no! Think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May God have mercy on their souls.

  13. Should have called RT something else... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they did was confuse the hell out of people. At first Microsoft was touting a tablet that could run Windows Apps called the surface. What they meant was the Surface pro. Instead the device that got released first was the RT and it still had the name "windows". Most people looking at them, and I know of one business that bought a couple, did so thinking they could run existing windows programs. They got 'em home and learned they couldn't.

    At least Apple makes it clear that while underneath the hood, both MacOS and iOS share many of the same parts, they are entirely different OS's designed for different purposes. Microsoft failed to do that with the Surface.

    The next problem is that the Surface Pro is $1000. At that price what is the incentive to buy it? You can buy a convertible ultra book for just a few dollars more.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:Should have called RT something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...if they called them "Sad Meals" no one would buy them.

    2. Re:Should have called RT something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS don't need a realtime or embedded OS, they make 230% (upt to Feb 2013) more from Android's royalty extended filename FAT licensing that all MS's embedded OS sales to date.

    3. Re:Should have called RT something else... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Best. Comment. Ever.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Should have called RT something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Surface Pro is a good buy for artists. It's got a Wacom digitizer that supports their nice pens and it's cheaper than a Cintique and doesn't need a separate computer to plug into.

    5. Re:Should have called RT something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep thinking Russia Today

    6. Re:Should have called RT something else... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Nah, you just missed the part where when the talk about running Windows Apps, they mean Microsoft Windows Apps--that they come preinstalled or you'll buy later on the Microsoft online store. Because (a) no one but Microsoft would be crazy enough to develop for the Surface RT and/or (b) at least the people involved with the Surface RT are so tunnel-visioned, they really only see Microsoft Windows Apps as they apps you'd actually want to run. I mean, chalk this up to the same sort of people who were so wowed by Gadgets in Windows Vista--which were about as much a clusterfuck as every other gadget setup I've seen on every other platform (slow/choppy behavior, huge memory leaks, huge security holes, unstable)--just to see them disappear just as fast. *shrug* I guess you shouldn't clone hollywood movie UIs.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  14. Recieved wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dumping 3rd rate technology in schools, in the hopes that children cannot tell the level of substandard they are presented with.

    Whether they are "substandard" or not, depends on what the children do with them. I.e. whether they work within the (assumed) confines of the technology, or are inspired to set and achieve their own limits.

    There was a time when geeks were defined by taking whatever was at hand and adapting/extending it to whatever their imaginations came up with. Now ./ is overrun with crabby fanbois who define geek as "good at XBox even though M$ is teh suxxor", apparently. Oh well.

    1. Re:Recieved wisdom. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Whether they are "substandard" or not, depends on what the children do with them. I.e. whether they work within the (assumed) confines of the technology, or are inspired to set and achieve their own limits.

      RT tablets are specifically designed so you can't "set and achieve [your] own limits". You can only run software officially provided by Microsoft or through the Microsoft Store, and even then, only MS can create apps that use the desktop. And you can't wipe the OS and install something else, either, since Secure Boot policy for RT tablets specifically prohibits any manufacturer from offering this option.

    2. Re:Recieved wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RT tablets are specifically designed so you can't "set and achieve [your] own limits". You can only run software officially provided by Microsoft or through the Microsoft Store, and even then, only MS can create apps that use the desktop. And you can't wipe the OS and install something else, either, since Secure Boot policy for RT tablets specifically prohibits any manufacturer from offering this option.

      Speak for yourself and then thank those that came before you and did not confine themselves to the same attitude.

  15. Surface won't pick up even if free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about what MS communicates in their PR anymore. Kids already have iOS or Android powered computers in their pockets. That's where all their apps and pals are too.

  16. Re:impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love all these people replying that it's impossible. Every major hardware DRM scheme that has been placed into consumer devices has been cracked.

    The only reason why the RT might be different is that it's so unpopular that nobody really cares to try.

  17. but but but.... by roc97007 · · Score: 0

    You can buy *new* netbooks that actually run Windows applications for around that much. For the average person, having an RT is about the same as having a Linux netbook -- the only apps you're likely to run are the ones that come with it, and realistically, you're only going to use it for web browsing.

    This is not worth $200.

    Does Microsoft think we'll pay extra just for the logo? They're the wrong company for that.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:but but but.... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      $300 today will get you a netbook that has a dual core AMD processor, Nvidia graphics, and can be populated with 8 GB of RAM. The earlier netbooks really stunk (the ones with Atom processors that Microsoft wouldn't provide OEM Windows for if it was possible to put more than 1G of RAM in) but the current line is quite usable. Look at the Acer Aspire One as an example.

    2. Re:but but but.... by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      Hey, that's unfair: Linux actually has some apps!

    3. Re:but but but.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      My apologies, you're right.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  18. Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by default+luser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It comes with Office, so it's a business computer that can also play the tablet game, right?

    Except that there's no Outlook. Try getting business done without that.

    And you can't join a domain. That goes hand-in-hand with the above.

    And most critical to anyone who just wants to get work done: it's not x86-compatible, and you're limited to Windows Store apps.

    Who the hell came up with this horrible hodgepodge of an OS? And who expected anyone to pay a premium price for it? They'll be lucky if they can get these things to move even for $200!

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Who the hell came up with this horrible hodgepodge of an OS? And who expected anyone to pay a premium price for it?

      Not sure, but I think it was Microsoft.

      > Except that there's no Outlook. Try getting business done without that.

      Also, the thought of doing Excel on a tablet just makes me shudder. Apple did a pretty good job with Numbers for the iPad, but it was tailored for a touch interface. Excel is just Excel, no special accommodations made for fingers.

      Dumb.

    2. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Lluc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that there's no Outlook. Try getting business done without that.

      Actually, the latest version of Office RT (2013) does include Outlook.

    3. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And thus the RT can be made to suck even more!

    4. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Actually, the latest version of Office RT (2013) does include Outlook.

      Yes, the latest version, which doesn't have a formal release date yet, which will be "coming out soon", does include Outlook. That's certainly good to know.

      If you're one of the lucky teachers or one of the students however, like those in the article, don't count on getting Outlook without being forced to pay full retail for Outlook separately, or pay full retail for Office RT (2013), or pay for full retail for an Office 365 subscription instead. After all even on the more expensive Surface Pro, the Office Home & Student 2013 edition does not include Outlook. And there is no reason to believe this is going to change for the RT edition once Outlook RT does get released.

    5. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD

    6. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isn't saying this, but the RT is intended to be a consumer managed device that has seamless access to corporate resources. stand alone, it is a tablet and you should treat it as one. Take it to work and connect it to a RemoteApp or RDS server and you have access to everything you do on your business desktop (in theory). From a security point of view, all your activity and work files stay on the corporate network (even if your using a VPN).

      If you mess the tablet up, do a factory rest. Log in with your live account to get back your store apps. Then reconnect to your RemoteApp server. Don't try to manage it more than you have to. let these be consumer devices so IT does not have to support them.

      That's the dream anyway. If they can get companies to buy into Microsoft VDI, then this RT stuff just falls into place. I can see where they have positioned it within its other product lines. But Microsoft isn't getting this message out and we are left with a tablet that thinks it Windows but it can't run our business applications without IT taking on a large project that they don't have time to take on.

    7. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But the Office version is actually Home and Student edition which prohibits any commercial usage. So you can't go buy RT and use it in your small/mid/home business. And for the large enterprises which hold site licenses, the thing doesn't allow joining domains.

      So RT is 100% useless for any commercial/corporate usage.

      (Unless you REALLY wanna torture yourself and go around the hoops and loops to make it work (or at least legal), it's just better and easier to buy some competing product.)

    8. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are missing another key demographic that could conceivably make use of a portable tablet with Office. How about students? They aren't going to care if they can't join a domain.

    9. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      It comes with Office, so it's a business computer that can also play the tablet game, right?

      Except that there's no Outlook. Try getting business done without that.

      I've been doing business without having used Outlook in all my life. And I know plenty of others.

      And you can't join a domain. That goes hand-in-hand with the above.

      Why? There's email without domains. Plenty of businessmen use google apps, or other alternatives for their stuff.

  19. TBOTE: The Beginning of the End by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Haven't we seen this movie ending before?

  20. Funny thing by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    I was recently running a poll, and I found out that at least 20% of our department faculty own a Surface tablet of one sort or another - and that was before this move was announced. 20% of our faculty, and that's assuming none of the non-responders own a Surface.

    I was seriously shocked. Android and iOS tablets are apparently less popular than Surface among our EE faculty. We've got some pretty close ties to Microsoft, but that is still surprising.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Funny thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The suprising thing is 20%. If you have close ties with Microsoft, it should have been 75%-90% of your faculty. So what gives?

    2. Re:Funny thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have centralized purchasing of IT equipment?

      That would be insane! Your IT department obviously can't stand up to management very well.

    3. Re:Funny thing by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Yes because as we've seen in business, the higher ups never choose their own personal devices and then expect their IT folks to make them work with the company infrastructure. No, I sure don't read those sorts of stories every week.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  21. Does this mean that the reference price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of Microsoft Surface in everyone's minds in now $199?

    It probably does.

  22. I've actually used an RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm probably one of the few on here who have used an RT. Picked one up for $99 + keyboard at TechEd, and used it all week at the conference to take notes/surf/do work. Honestly, for your basic user who wants surfing/word docs, it's perfectly fine.

    Also - I have an iPad that I love, but I couldn't dream of doing the work I was doing on the surface. The desktop mode is very nice, plus it just seems more workable when I can VPN in just like my PC at home. When comparing iPad to Surface for doing actual work, it's not event close, the Surface wins by a landslide.

    1. Re:I've actually used an RT by Lluc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah I'm amazed by the amount of Surface RT hate in this thread. I wonder how much of it is typed on an iPad :)

      I think that a $200 tablet for web browsing, email, and remote desktop would be pretty useful despite the limited app store. Maybe it's time to send my Touchpad to ebay and try one of these out...

    2. Re:I've actually used an RT by maccodemonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that a $200 tablet for web browsing, email, and remote desktop would be pretty useful despite the limited app store. Maybe it's time to send my Touchpad to ebay and try one of these out...

      Except the $200 price only applies if you are a school buying for your students... An individual can't get that price.

    3. Re:I've actually used an RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since the Surface RT has no 'apps' worth wasting time over, the school will more than make up for the discount in new purchases of Microsoft software and server infrastructure to manage their new 'almost free' toys. Microsoft could be giving these to schools and still make a profit in the end. $200 is just being greedy.

      Where's the 'total cost of ownership' campaign now??

    4. Re:I've actually used an RT by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      Is your current touchpad's ability to read the summary and/or article broken?

    5. Re:I've actually used an RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $200 or below is actually a price for which you can have an Android tablet.

    6. Re:I've actually used an RT by Nimey · · Score: 1

      RT won't work at all for us because there's no Cisco SSL VPN client for it, unlike Android and iOS.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:I've actually used an RT by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

      plus it just seems more workable when I can VPN in just like my PC at home.

      Isn't VPN for Windows RT not coming until version 8.1 (unlike iOS which has VPN support now)?

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    8. Re:I've actually used an RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will see. I think they need to dump some inventory so they can announce a new model running one of Intel's new chips. if they say something now, then the RT will be dead.

      Total speculation on my part...

    9. Re:I've actually used an RT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've actually used an RT (Score:3, Interesting)
      by Anonymous Coward on 06-18-13 14:14 (#44043477)
      I'm probably one of the few on here who have used an RT.

      Who are you? And why should we believe that you are anything other than a Microsoft shill when you are too cowardly to associate your identity with this comment?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:I've actually used an RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you care? Judge an argument based on it's own merit rather than appealing to authority. Not everybody who disagrees with you is a troll or a shill, but even if they were what is so wrong with arguing with microsoft over why their RT device was a stupid move--you would think that would be easy.

      More debate is never a bad thing, so quit trying to stifle it and ruin this community.

    11. Re:I've actually used an RT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why do you care?

      Because I want to call out shills when present.

      Judge an argument based on it's own merit rather than appealing to authority.

      That's what I'm doing. Someone who isn't willing to even associate their identity (or even a false identity) with their claim wants us to believe that they have used a Surface RT and that it's good. Well, in order to use the word "I" there has to be one, and we don't have one here.

      More debate is never a bad thing, so quit trying to stifle it and ruin this community.

      I'm not trying to stifle debate, I'm trying to stifle shilling. So far all I see is an anonymous assertion that RT is pretty decent, with nothing whatsoever to back it up. If it's decent, how is it decent? The point of asking who the hell is saying this is that if it were someone with a name and a reputation, we might be able to judge the probable value of their statements on that basis. But if an anonymous coward should make any assertion at all without any kind of reference or citation, we have no reasonable way to judge the value of their statement. They might be a phud or they might be a surly dirt-merchant or they could be my half-brother's grandkid.

      Also, you don't exist, so you don't get to tell me what to do, or even make suggestions. When someone with enough courage to have a name makes a suggestion, I'll consider it. Or at least look at their posting history.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:I've actually used an RT by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

      At first I thought your post was hysterical bollocks, but then I saw that you'd signed it "drinkypoo" and that instantly transformed its credibility.

    13. Re:I've actually used an RT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      At first I thought your post was hysterical bollocks, but then I saw that you'd signed it "drinkypoo" and that instantly transformed its credibility.

      At first it looks like you're assigning your identity to your Slashdot account, but then I saw you didn't even publicly display your email address, and blah blah blah insert the rest of your tired-ass comment here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:I've actually used an RT by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, you're a hoot! You are joking, aren't you? The only other explanation that comes to mind is you're a bit thick.

    15. Re:I've actually used an RT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, you're a hoot! You are joking, aren't you? The only other explanation that comes to mind is you're a bit thick.

      That's what she said, but I told her I'd go slow for her benefit. Just like when I'm talking to you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:I've actually used an RT by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

      Do you humiliate yourself like this often? I have a horrible feeling I'm mocking one of the afflicted now.

    17. Re:I've actually used an RT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Do you humiliate yourself like this often? I have a horrible feeling I'm mocking one of the afflicted now.

      I'm sure you have a horrible feeling, anyway. That's the feeling of your conscience, which explains your lack of familiarity with it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:I've actually used an RT by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

      Oh, NOW you're concerned about feelings? Gosh, do you read any of the bile you spout here? Look, I would take you seriously, but you haven't provided your credit card details, last three places of residence, favourite colour, and finger prints.

  23. require management? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly is the need for management on a tablet that can only run approved apps, which is hard for students to mess up? If anything, today's mobile devices with their walled garden appstores and cloud backup should require less maintenance.

  24. BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good I was looking to replace my HP Touchpad.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Richy_T · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a table that wobbles.

    2. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I don't see the point. Is your HP Touchpad not holding a charge anymore?

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    3. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have a table that wobbles.

      Good plan. You can save that coaster for a cold one. Get one for me, too, while your at it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      Good I was looking to replace my HP Touchpad.

      I don't see the point. Is your HP Touchpad not holding a charge anymore?

      This, plus Touchpad with Android (Cyanogenmod build) actually has apps....

    5. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's made by HP. That's enough reason to toss it in the bin.

    6. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It's too dented in to be used effectively as a doorstop. He needs a new one.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While my at it what?

  25. Re:No by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Yep.

    At $49, I might buy one. At $199, I still expect to get something for my money. I discovered this recently when I bought a Chromebook on a whim. It was back in the box and returned in a few days. I thought I wouldn't care if it was just a toy at that price but I was wrong. I spent another $105 to get a quad-core 17.3" laptop and installed Chrome on it. Gives me the Chrome experience in addition to being able to do all kinds of other stuff.

    Yeah, but this isn't offered to you, it's to schools. Schools will buy them, because they'll think they are getting a big fat deal. Then IT people in schools will point out what a pain they are to do anything with, but with enough tar or mortar could be used to patch holes in the roof.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  26. Re:TBOTE: The Beginning of the End by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    We use a recording of Windows RT to lure the tablets into Lake Michigan?

    Seems feasible.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  27. Re:take a dump by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Without x86 legacy applications, there just isn't that much reason to bother with Windows.

    On the other hand, pretty much anything available for Linux is available as source and can be rebuilt for alternative platforms. If not by the author than by some interested 3rd party.

    Windows on ARM is a shadow of it's x86 variant.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  28. Make it run Dalvik by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    MS should create an emulation layer that allows RT to natively run Android apps. That will solve the chicken and egg issue of limited app availability and make their platform a more compelling offering.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Make it run Dalvik by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because that worked so well for OS/2.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  29. Dumping? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Isn't attempting to flood a market with a device being charged at sub-standard pricing to subvert a competitor, like, illegal?
    I thought this was covered by anti-dumping laws.

    1. Re:Dumping? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      No, that only applies if the manufacturer in question is trying to gain a competitive advantage. Given Balmer's mishandling of Microsoft over the past decade, it's hard to argue that Microsoft is competing with anyone other than themselves.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Dumping? by darkonc · · Score: 1

      No, that only applies if the manufacturer in question is trying to gain a competitive advantage. Given Balmer's mishandling of Microsoft over the past decade, it's hard to argue that Microsoft is competing with anyone other than themselves.

      +1 funny, but it's still serious that MS has a big stranglehold on the desktop market and this can be seen as trying to subsidize it's way into a stranglehold on the tabletoid market by wedging it's way into schools. (or just screwing the schools over by selling them a product that they're about to orphan, which is probably slightly more legal, but less moral).

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  30. Surface, or Surface Pro? by Chirs · · Score: 2

    If they're running Win8 then I can kind of understand it. WinRT not so much...

  31. android is out of the MS app store and has 3rd par by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    android is out of the MS app store and has 3rd party apps so that is out.

  32. "dumping to"?? by yasny_jp · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm getting old, but when did "dumping ... to ..." become a valid phrase?

    TFA says "offering schools/colleges $199 Surface RT Tablets"... how does one turn "offering" into "dumping"?

    --
    Treat every day like it's your last; delete your browser cache before going to bed.
  33. Re:Huh? The Microsoft Hamburger by vettemph · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can feed it to my dog. ...and when he 'reboots', my other dog will try to eat it.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  34. Re:Good. by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have been glad to have one... if not for the bootloader lockdown bullshit.

    Foot, meet bullet.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  35. Re:No by Jeng · · Score: 1

    Before they can purchase an RT they will have to have a list of programs that they need that run on a surface RT.

    No programs.

    No purchase.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  36. Instead of Apple from the 80's, HP from 2 yrs ago. by tekrat · · Score: 1

    They should sell the RT for $99, just like the HP tablet, and build a user base. I would buy a Surface RT if it was $99, and I don't even like tablets.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  37. Re:Put Ubuntu touch on it by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Not with the bios-enforced bootloader lockdown, you won't.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  38. Microsoft Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or how massive of a failure it was when Microsoft did it with Office to dislodge Wordperfect & Lotus 123?

  39. MS taking a dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. Do that with your other junk too. Be regular, stay regular.

  40. Nice to know Microsoft is supporting education by Original+Cynic · · Score: 0

    So give my kid a surface RT. I will be nice and provide the hockey stick he will need to use it correctly. Can anyone say slapshot.

  41. I wouldn't call it "dumping" by elabs · · Score: 1

    Before the Surface RT came out there was quite a bit of excitement and anticipation that it would be priced at $199. So now that that price if finally a reality let's not call it "dumping". Just call it a great deal.

    1. Re:I wouldn't call it "dumping" by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Would have been a great deal at launch, with all the implications of shipping in thousands and somebody perhaps maybe bothering with more software for it. Nowadays - not quite so.

      Ecosystems have value. Their fate is often determined at launch.

  42. There is a jailbreak already, so it is possible by Myria · · Score: 1

    There is a jailbreak that allows running arbitrary Windows desktop-based programs on a Surface RT - if you recompile for ARM. It even allows kernel-mode drivers. Microsoft still hasn't fixed it, because it's not a security hole in the traditional sense--it requires Administrator privileges.

    Because it is possible to make a jailbreak that automatically runs soon after startup, and it is possible to use the jailbreak to load a kernel driver, it is possible to boot up another OS by doing the equivalent of a kexec(). The problem is merely that nobody has done it.

    I could write the code to do the kexec(), but I have no clue how to build a Linux kernel, let alone figure out how to interface with the hardware devices. If anyone wants to do that part, which I think is the hard part, let me know. =)

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  43. Dumping to maintain production levels by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    It is common to estimate sales rates when pricing is impacted by QUANTITY especially in a tightly contested market with thin margins (that is, unless you have a huge quantity discount allowing your margins to be high.)

    Such things are the reason why small players don't enter into such markets, they cost more and provide less with lower margins due to low production runs.

    Marketing, promotion, and possibly a tax write off - WHILE also maintaining sales levels. For marketing it doubles as PR and provides better statistics on units sold etc.

  44. Not new by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    This isn't news. It's been MS strategy for ages to give discounts to public and private organizations. It's a fine strategy. and it's not like Apple in the 80's because Apple software back then didn't run on a thousand different devices from a thousand different vendors, each potentially offering different features than the others, without breaking my existing software "ecosystem".

  45. Dumping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Microsoft sells a thing at or near cost, /. calls it dumping. When Google sells a thing (Nexus tablets), at or below cost it's called smart business.

  46. The "new" AOL disk by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Nice cafeteria tray you have. I especially like the glowy rainbow tiles. Oops, watch the gravy there."

  47. Re:android is out of the MS app store and has 3rd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was this jibberish meant to say? And how were you modded up?

  48. goddamn pen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is what you need when you're in school. And Surface RT lacks the stylus support that the pro version has, making it rather useless.

  49. Re:impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I don't remember anybody cracking the bootloader on my old Droid X...

  50. Re:Good. by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst your bubble, AC, but I've had mine since it launched in the US and I use it every day.

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  51. WTF?!?!?! by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    "The strategy of flooding the educational market was quite successful for Apple."
    Ummm it was a disaster that put Windows in charge of all home markets in the 90's actually.

    1. Re:WTF?!?!?! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ummm it was a disaster that put Windows in charge of all home markets in the 90's actually.

      Well, no. It was the only thing keeping Apple afloat, because without familiarity everyone would have laughed it off as an expensive fruit machine. Apple's disaster was sticking with 68k chips and making the Quadra, then not sticking with 68k chips and using the PPC, which at the time was only competitive with the 68060, not outrageously faster; and meanwhile, the PC processors just ran away from the PowerPC because IBM was slowwwww to develop it into a faster processor, shock amazement. On the first hand they stuck with the 68k longer than they should have in the name of compatibility, and then they went to the PPC in the name of performance in spite of the ppc601 being slower than the then-available PC processors. It wasn't until the G3 and G4 that they had a speed advantage which was lost by the time the G5 came out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:WTF?!?!?! by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      I heard a much simpler explanation that I totally lived too. Their early OSes up to 8 or 9 or so were absolute crap. They froze up constantly and the software rarely worked correctly. When I was in early grade school, we all had nonstop problems with our 100% Apple computers in the school. Apple's idea was get the kids on Apple and they'll want to use the familiar OS at home so they'll tell their parents to go buy one. Instead they were so awful, they told their parents to buy anything other than Apple because that was the cheap, non-working crap that they used every day at school. So their idea to sell to school at or near cost backfired and Windows took over. Then they decided to instead market overpriced machines to stuck up elitist douchebags and attempt to take over media editing, both of which have now fallen flat on their faces thanks to CUDA and way too many people owning Apple products.

    3. Re:WTF?!?!?! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Apple's problem certainly was elitism, but that actually worked for them (Academics are elitists, after all) until it started holding them back in performance. It was OK for the machines to cost more, but to cost more and then have a rinky-dink CPU? That was not OK.

      MacOS 9 should never have existed. Apple should have had something better by then. They didn't. MacOS 7 was pretty bad, too. MacOS 6 was quite good compared to the PC operating systems of its day, but that was a long time ago.

      If only Apple could have had Steve Jobs and BeOS...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:WTF?!?!?! by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about the same Mac OS 6 and Mac OS 7 that I remember?

      Mac OS 6 was good, as you say. But 'System 7' as they called it, was a huge improvement.

      * MultiFinder only (no more single-finder)
      * Aliases (eg, file system links to folders or files like symlink)
      * Organized subfolders within System Folder to fix the clutter. Seperate subfolders for Startup Items, Desk Accessories, Fonts, etc.
      * The Apple Menu folder. You could now customize the Apple menu. What items appeared in the Apple menu was dictated by the Apple Menu folder within the System folder. You could now put more than DA's in the Apple menu. You could put apps there. Or aliases to apps or other folders or frequently opened files. Oh, and nevermind that putting a real folders in the Apple Menu made it into a hierarchical menu. This added tremendous flexibility, customizability and convenience to the Mac.
      * Fonts as separate files instead of resources within the System file. No more Font/DA Mover.
      * DAs as separate files within the Apple menu. No more Font/DA Mover.
      * An invisible temp folder where applications could create active temp files. If the app crashed, these moved into the trash can as recoverable files. The most notable example was Microsoft Word (on Mac). If it crashed, of if the entire system crashed, your unsaved changed file could be found in the trash can and simply dragged out.

      I'm sure I'm leaving out some things. But those are the ones I remember best from twenty plus years ago.

      System 7 was a gigantic step forward for the classic Mac OS. System 8 and 9 not so much. System 8 had a few improvements, like dockable folders that could appear as tabs at the bottom of the screen. System 9 had no visible improvements. Then by that time classic Mac OS was beginning to stagnate by the late 1990's, Apple was fumbling with their new OS, and it was beginning to be obvious.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    5. Re:WTF?!?!?! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mac OS 6 was good, as you say. But 'System 7' as they called it, was a huge improvement.

      * MultiFinder only (no more single-finder)

      So because they took out the stable, single-tasking finder system and only made the unstable multifinder available, that's good? Understanding Apple, you fail it. Apple has told you all along that if they didn't have it, you didn't need it. Then it comes along in a later machine or release.

      * Aliases (eg, file system links to folders or files like symlink)

      Yeah, the problem with Aliases was that they only worked about half the time. Half the time an application tries to open the Alias as a file, the other half it tries to open the file the Alias points to. Half the early applications would see a folder alias as a folder, half of them would totally fail to comprehend it.

      Organized subfolders within System Folder to fix the clutter

      Totally irrelevant because System 6 let you sort by type, and because anyone who had enough fonts to go in there regularly had a font manager.

      * Fonts as separate files instead of resources within the System file. No more Font/DA Mover.

      Totally irrelevant because anyone who diddled fonts regularly used a font manager. Same answer for your "next" point, which is really the same point.

      An invisible temp folder where applications could create active temp files. If the app crashed, these moved into the trash can as recoverable files. The most notable example was Microsoft Word (on Mac).

      Please listen to yourself. In actuality, applications could always do this -- without hiding the files in some inscrutable temp folder. And they did. In fact, Word was one of these applications. I have an accelerated SE with Word 5.1. Sometimes I use it as a doorstop.

      System 7 was a gigantic step forward for the classic Mac OS.

      That was what I thought, until I used it regularly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. Domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unfortunately for Microsoft, today's computers require management and the Surface RT presents significant management challenges in terms of the inability to join the computer to a domain"

    At my organization we have to unfortunately deal with managing a couple thousand ipads. IT always gives our Apple rep a hard time about the shortcomings of the ipad and it being a consumer device trying to work in a corporate environment. Things like they can't really be managed period because users can just hard reset and easily wipe management profiles, and things like you can't join ipads to a domain. Any Apple rep will dismiss these concerns as non-issues so it is funny to see these types of issues be an issue with the MS haters when it comes to the surface. Not defending the RT it is pretty lame, although the Surface Pro is the best mobile device I have owned for the things I need to accomplish every day.

    Chromebooks make better sense than either in a school environment however. They can be managed easily and are affordable to replace. ipads and Surfaces break like a mofo when dropped compared to other devices and it happens all the time when these devices are handed out to kids in schools and is a huge expense in labor and repair/replacement costs. Not to mention that you can easily buy more than two Chromebooks for every ipad or retail priced surface which is a better value for the taxpayers who actually pay for this stuff. I would rather purchase Chromebooks all day any day over reduced price RTs or ipads for sure.

  53. Re:take a dump by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Without x86 legacy applications, there just isn't that much reason to bother with Windows.

    So true. At least one company knows the value of backwards compatibility (and it's not Apple).

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  54. Re:android is out of the MS app store and has 3rd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe Dragon is always rambling on with some incoherent stuff. I don't know if he isn't a native English speaker or if his grammar is just that bad but whatever it is, I think he has some alt accounts stackin up mod points to dump on himself. The more incoherant the post, the higher it gets modded and I call him out every time.

  55. Well, from D11 one thing is certain... by mitcheli · · Score: 1

    Microsoft does not have "the cool".

    --
    Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
  56. Re:No by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

    Ah, but the Chromebook would have given you portability and better battery life...

  57. Try Baby Stores... by Tim12s · · Score: 1

    They should rather start bundling Surface RT in baby/toy stores. Kids these days are starting early... Very early.

  58. I dunno by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the schools should be paid more than $199 per RT.

  59. And most important by cnaumann · · Score: 1

    Home-built cards on wire wrap boards.

    And the computer came with a full set of schematics.

    Unfortunately, one of the clock phases was missing on the expansion connector.

    1. Re:And most important by metaforest · · Score: 1

      >Unfortunately, one of the clock phases was missing on the expansion connector.

      That is because the missing clock phase(ø2) was redundant on the Apple ][. Phase 0(ø0 -- also the clock input of the 650x processors), as it appears on the I/O bus, was already delayed to be in the same relative phase angle as ø2 output of the 6502. When ø2 && ø0 are low the processor bus is not in use. In the Apple ][ this was used to stuff a video/DRAM read cycle on to the memory bus while the next address cycle was still in transition. One could argue that ø2 would be more accurate, however WOZ's insight was realizing that ø0 and ø1 were more than adequate to keep the I/O timing within spec.

  60. Word choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a blow to Microsoft, Apple wins $30M LA school iPad contract

    The choice of words is a little different when it an Apple product, isn't it????

    But no media BIAS, of course not.

  61. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the screen and keyboard can be made to run with a raspberry Pi, the bootloader doesn't matter any more. There may be even more usable parts, like a nice battery.