Christ, what kind of stubborn egomaniac are you? Just because it didn't work in your single test of a single modem, you're making the broad assertion that it doesn't work for anyone, that SecurityFocus is full of crap for carrying the article, and that all the first-hand accounts in this thread are lies.
If you're really a network engineer, I hope you're never in charge of my quality of service . . . your stubbornness blinds you to any new information comflicting with your own assertion.
Just admit it. Either your test was flawed, or there exist other configurations that you're unfamiliar with. You don't know everything.
Yeahyeahyeah. Of course he's going to have ideas that don't fit the template. In general, however, his ideas about software (the topic at hand) tend to follow a pattern. Extreme freedom in all respects.
That's ridiculous. I can run software written for pretty much any version of Windows (or DOS) EVER on my W2K machine. With [GNU/]Linux, I have to make sure I have compatible builds of this/that library, etc.
Re:Stallman is not on the left
on
The Stallman Factor
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I think both of you need a basic lesson in political science.
Draw a diagram with four quadrants, like this:
^ ---- | |1|2| Y ---- | |3|4| | ---- 0---X-->
The X-axis represents "financial freedom" (this goes along with "free-as-in-beer").
The Y-axis represents "personal freedom" (this goes along with "free-as-in-speech").
So what you're really saying is that you didn't read the article, what with the
both reflection and the cumulative effect of the radio waves were taken into consideration, the resulting electromagnetic field in a train carriage could exceed the maximum exposure level recommended by the International Committee for Non-Ionising Radiation (ICNIRP).
and the
Hondou's calculations show that it is possible to exceed ICNIRP exposure limits if 30 people, each with a mobile phone that emits radio waves at a power of 0.4 watts, all use their phones at the same time. The peak power a mobile phone is allowed to produce is two watts.
Just because you drive an obsolete stock Mazda with a high-output yet delicate-as-eggshells Wankel engine, you feel you have the right to make racist comments about other cars?
I am the CEO of a UK-based company. I send documents to you, with the instructions "Give me access to these documents on demand, unless you think I'm being subpoenaed". Then, when the subpoena comes, I'm supposed to tell the court "I can't give you those documents; I'm paying HavenCo not to give them to me"?!
I effectively made a contract with you designed to obstruct justice. They'll just lock me up for contempt until you hand them over. In that case, are you still planning to keep them locked up forever while your customer rots in jail?
You must have gotten Prince Roy pretty wasted before he signed the contract to allow you to do business in Sealand. He must be regretting jumping on the Internet bandwagon about now. This behaviour will eventually prompt Britain or the EU to take action and dissolve Sealand, and you won't care because it's not your little-recognized sovereign nation you destroyed with your shady business practices.
So you're saying if you specify price in hexidecimal British pounds, they'll give it to you for free? Sweeeet . . .
Re:To The Pain - The Reference
on
To The Pain
·
· Score: 2
Yeah, I really should have let it go, but my neurosis took over . . .
Re:Is this really healthy?
on
To The Pain
·
· Score: 2
My friend, who once commanded a six-figure salary coding C++ for a large development firm, has been crippled by these implements and now has to struggle with demeaning part-time jobs in order to put food on the table.
This is obvious bullshit. Anyone who's that good of a C++ coder could find employment in the field, even if it means coding v-e-r-y slowly with a stick between his teeth (or dictating to an assistant).
Re:To The Pain - The Reference
on
To The Pain
·
· Score: 2
Westley: "There's a shortage of perfect breasts in this world, it would be a shame to waste yours.."
Can't let it slip by . . . must correct reference . . . it's actually "...'twould be a pity to damage yours".
Slashdot Mirror
That's pretty funny. I'd kinda forgotten Delaware existed, and I guess CmdrTaco did too.
If you're really a network engineer, I hope you're never in charge of my quality of service . . . your stubbornness blinds you to any new information comflicting with your own assertion.
Just admit it. Either your test was flawed, or there exist other configurations that you're unfamiliar with. You don't know everything.
Good point.
Yeahyeahyeah. Of course he's going to have ideas that don't fit the template. In general, however, his ideas about software (the topic at hand) tend to follow a pattern. Extreme freedom in all respects.
That's ridiculous. I can run software written for pretty much any version of Windows (or DOS) EVER on my W2K machine. With [GNU/]Linux, I have to make sure I have compatible builds of this/that library, etc.
I think both of you need a basic lesson in political science.
Draw a diagram with four quadrants, like this:
^ ----
| |1|2|
Y ----
| |3|4|
| ----
0---X-->
The X-axis represents "financial freedom" (this goes along with "free-as-in-beer").
The Y-axis represents "personal freedom" (this goes along with "free-as-in-speech").
We have four main areas:
1 = "left-wing"
2 = "libertarian"
3 = "authoritarian"
4 = "right-wing"
So, you're both wrong. He's in quadrant 2.
Jesus Christ, relax, dude!
Just take that bitch apart. You're a nerd, right?
Your obnoxious technicalities expose your ignorance.
both reflection and the cumulative effect of the radio waves were taken into consideration, the resulting electromagnetic field in a train carriage could exceed the maximum exposure level recommended by the International Committee for Non-Ionising Radiation (ICNIRP).
and the
Hondou's calculations show that it is possible to exceed ICNIRP exposure limits if 30 people, each with a mobile phone that emits radio waves at a power of 0.4 watts, all use their phones at the same time. The peak power a mobile phone is allowed to produce is two watts.
And with that attitude, that's all you'll ever be.
Don't forget Hammer. AMD's in on it too.
You misspelled 'sociopath'
Thank you. Enough barely-coherent articles about subjects the author is far from understanding. Is JonKatz actually Taco's kid brother or something?
so . . . do it.
I noticed this on Etracks' page:
.
Response rates:
E-messaging 5%-15%
Traditional direct 0.5%-5.0%
Source: Jupiter Communications
Anybody know how accurate this is? I always though spam was less effective than junk mail . .
Wow, this bot's grammar is far better than the human editors at Slashdot!
So you think getting your news from a single source is somehow more objective than from a dozen competing sources?
Just because you drive an obsolete stock Mazda with a high-output yet delicate-as-eggshells Wankel engine, you feel you have the right to make racist comments about other cars?
I am the CEO of a UK-based company. I send documents to you, with the instructions "Give me access to these documents on demand, unless you think I'm being subpoenaed". Then, when the subpoena comes, I'm supposed to tell the court "I can't give you those documents; I'm paying HavenCo not to give them to me"?!
I effectively made a contract with you designed to obstruct justice. They'll just lock me up for contempt until you hand them over. In that case, are you still planning to keep them locked up forever while your customer rots in jail?
You must have gotten Prince Roy pretty wasted before he signed the contract to allow you to do business in Sealand. He must be regretting jumping on the Internet bandwagon about now. This behaviour will eventually prompt Britain or the EU to take action and dissolve Sealand, and you won't care because it's not your little-recognized sovereign nation you destroyed with your shady business practices.
cat >> /etc/hosts
2130706433 www.netscape.com
^D
So you're saying if you specify price in hexidecimal British pounds, they'll give it to you for free? Sweeeet . . .
Yeah, I really should have let it go, but my neurosis took over . . .
This is obvious bullshit. Anyone who's that good of a C++ coder could find employment in the field, even if it means coding v-e-r-y slowly with a stick between his teeth (or dictating to an assistant).
Can't let it slip by . . . must correct reference . . . it's actually "...'twould be a pity to damage yours".
Sorry. You spelled his name right, though.