But how are you supposed to know that IIS defaults to always using cookies in the first place? You can't get the answers if you don't know there's a question.
Sure, I know some people (from elsewhere) that got jobs reasonably quick, but that's because they KNEW SOMEONE on the inside, or had some high connections. I'm not being bitter, they've admitted it to me.
It's true (although knowing stuff helps as well)
When I got laid off, the company I worked for arranged a couple of sessions with an outplacement agency. I was told that the majority of jobs were through networking. Can't remember the exact figure, but the advice is ask people who have jobs if they know people who might be in a position to offer you a job. Typically you need to find a friend of a friend of a friend who knows of a vacancy.
Still, an aggressive assault on the job market and a willingness to relocate will yield results. Worked for me at least.
Yes, we will eventually see a lot of the jobs that are currently performed by humans performed by robots. Yes, vision systems will increase the number of jobs they can do. Also, we'll eventually see a cure for all forms of cancer, private space travel, and practical nuclear fusion.
The thing is, these will not happen overnight. We're not going to wake up one morning and be told that all jobs are going to be replaced by robots. They'll replace them as technology become appropriate, and society wil have time to adapt and find other mundane tasks for us to do. Society is robust like that.
I don't think that the yoga and meditation actually helps that much, but it does show that the company is interested in healthy motivated employees. An indication that the company cares about your health (even for selfish reasons) does tend to improve people's attitude, and reduce stress levels. They could probably get a similar result by playing volleyball during lunch or learning to juggle.
They simply argue that you are responsible for all use of your internet connection. If your machine was hacked, then you'll just have to convince people.
That's true, I guess, but Machester encoding (they do use this don;t they) is very robust in this respect. It has to be very bad damaged to lose the distinction between a rising and faling edge.
Depends on whether you mean the difference between a couple of bits of wire and a good quality cable, or the difference between decent quality cable, and ludicrously expensive cables with loads of whizzy buzzwords. After a certain level, the amount of improvement you can get even with a superconductor is so far below the threshold of hearing that it becomes pointless.
That would be good. I could demand that they pay for a licence if it turns out I'm using unlicenced software. Bet the small print covers this one though.
[Oh, and by the way, if the cables really make a difference you need to A) get out more, and B) switch to XLR balanced analog or AES/EBU digital connections.]
What!? You mean that pure silver digital cable I spent $100000 on isn't going to give me straighter ones and rounder zeroes!?
I'm pleased the MPAA is doing it this way. I really can't say that being forced to watch a few extra advertisements (Okay - I don;t live in the US, so I won't have to do that either) is going to do me a lot of harm, and if they have a case to make against piracy, they're welcome to make it, and try to convince me that downloading movies off the internet (most of which watch at the cinema anyway) is causing them great hardship.
Personally, I think they've got a hard fight on their hands. I pay for plenty of cinema tickets and DVD purchases. They don't actually have to fork out for the movies I "steal" from them, and I make no profit from them, so I reckon they should just find a way to cope with my watching a few movies without paying, but if they have a strong enough argument, I'm willing to listen.
They aren't actually selling a licence to Linux. They're simply selling the right to use the code. If you use use it in Linux, it may or may not be a violation of SCO's licence, but whatever the case, they agree not to come after you for it. This does not mean that the end user is not violating the GPL, but it sounds like SCO's terms will be carefully worded so that it doesn't implicitely or explicitely allow use of the code under the terms of the GPL.
Ype. That's something I plan to do when I get home. I reckon I can make it considerably more compact as well. I'm surprised he used a linear rather than rotational mechanism. Surely that makes it rather large.
You can get a much larger customer base, and hence considerably more exposure if its vaguely useful. You can even charge a small $5 shareware registration fee (and maybe even get $5 if someone likes the software enough).
Once Linux users start realising that they need such a tool, simply release a GPLed version for Linux.
Then please, criticise my punctuation- an aspect completely unrelated to capitalization.
Okay. Your punctuation sucks as well you worthless little turd. I don't give a flying fuck. It still makes you a hypocrite. You were the one who started the flame war.
Guess what, geniusoid: it wasnt repetition,
You said "You're a fucking moron, you fucking moron."
Note the use of the phrase "fucking moron" twice. It's called repetition. You see, you repeated it. Maybe I should repeat this sentence since your comprehension is so limited that you seem unable to grasp any concept that isn't repeatedly hammered home again and again.
You must have been shit to be around in preschool- "Moo? What's with the repitition? Couldnt come up with another letter? Why not 'Mao'? Huh?"
Well, that's an agreed spelling. You on the other hand seemed to want to insult me. In that case, just calling me a "fucking moron" would have been sufficient. Following up with the same insult again makes you look unimaginitive and pathetic. I'm just trying to be helpful here. If you want to look like a small pathetic half-wit, then you are quite entitled to.
I've noticed you seem to resort to using lame insults against everyone. I really think you should get professional help. You are showing clear signes of an inferiority complex. Really you should try to feel more positive about yourself than trying to bring everyone else down. It's a much more positive manner of self improvement.
PIRACY ISN'T THEFT! It isn't theft. It isn't murder. It isn't jaywalking. The "owners" of the signal haven't lost anything if you pirate it. They haven't even lost the money you would have paid, because they never had it in the first place.
It may be aquiring the signal by deception. It may be illegal, and unethical, but stop calling it theft.
This raises the opposite question - Why didn't they do this for the shuttle? Even if they need something bigger than a 747, it shouldn't be impossible to add a little more juice to something based on the existing design, and we've still got the fuel efficiency benefits of the 747.
OTOH, is the distance an important factor? I thought the requirement for a rocket was to get to a certain speed.
I think he meant that if you buy this release, you'll be kicking yourself when the decent version comes out. Not that you'll be kicking yourself for not buying them both.
I don't think it's quite like that (although with the screwy logic used to justify the royalty rates, I'm not totally sure). I think it's just that if you happen to want to play any RIAA music at all, you have to pay a minimum royalty. $2000 is a lot to pay for a station that has no actual revenue.
You own the real estate that the ads are displayed on (i.e your computer), and that's where the replacement is taking place. Gator et al. may be at fault for assuming they have the right to put their ads on your machine, but the injured party is the end user, not the advertiser.
Slashdot Mirror
But how are you supposed to know that IIS defaults to always using cookies in the first place? You can't get the answers if you don't know there's a question.
Sure, I know some people (from elsewhere) that got jobs reasonably quick, but that's because they KNEW SOMEONE on the inside, or had some high connections. I'm not being bitter, they've admitted it to me.
It's true (although knowing stuff helps as well) When I got laid off, the company I worked for arranged a couple of sessions with an outplacement agency. I was told that the majority of jobs were through networking. Can't remember the exact figure, but the advice is ask people who have jobs if they know people who might be in a position to offer you a job. Typically you need to find a friend of a friend of a friend who knows of a vacancy.
Still, an aggressive assault on the job market and a willingness to relocate will yield results. Worked for me at least.
Yes, we will eventually see a lot of the jobs that are currently performed by humans performed by robots. Yes, vision systems will increase the number of jobs they can do. Also, we'll eventually see a cure for all forms of cancer, private space travel, and practical nuclear fusion.
The thing is, these will not happen overnight. We're not going to wake up one morning and be told that all jobs are going to be replaced by robots. They'll replace them as technology become appropriate, and society wil have time to adapt and find other mundane tasks for us to do. Society is robust like that.
I don't think that the yoga and meditation actually helps that much, but it does show that the company is interested in healthy motivated employees. An indication that the company cares about your health (even for selfish reasons) does tend to improve people's attitude, and reduce stress levels. They could probably get a similar result by playing volleyball during lunch or learning to juggle.
They simply argue that you are responsible for all use of your internet connection. If your machine was hacked, then you'll just have to convince people.
That's true, I guess, but Machester encoding (they do use this don;t they) is very robust in this respect. It has to be very bad damaged to lose the distinction between a rising and faling edge.
Depends on whether you mean the difference between a couple of bits of wire and a good quality cable, or the difference between decent quality cable, and ludicrously expensive cables with loads of whizzy buzzwords. After a certain level, the amount of improvement you can get even with a superconductor is so far below the threshold of hearing that it becomes pointless.
That would be good. I could demand that they pay for a licence if it turns out I'm using unlicenced software. Bet the small print covers this one though.
[Oh, and by the way, if the cables really make a difference you need to A) get out more, and B) switch to XLR balanced analog or AES/EBU digital connections.]
What!? You mean that pure silver digital cable I spent $100000 on isn't going to give me straighter ones and rounder zeroes!?
I'm pleased the MPAA is doing it this way. I really can't say that being forced to watch a few extra advertisements (Okay - I don;t live in the US, so I won't have to do that either) is going to do me a lot of harm, and if they have a case to make against piracy, they're welcome to make it, and try to convince me that downloading movies off the internet (most of which watch at the cinema anyway) is causing them great hardship.
Personally, I think they've got a hard fight on their hands. I pay for plenty of cinema tickets and DVD purchases. They don't actually have to fork out for the movies I "steal" from them, and I make no profit from them, so I reckon they should just find a way to cope with my watching a few movies without paying, but if they have a strong enough argument, I'm willing to listen.
No.
They aren't actually selling a licence to Linux. They're simply selling the right to use the code. If you use use it in Linux, it may or may not be a violation of SCO's licence, but whatever the case, they agree not to come after you for it. This does not mean that the end user is not violating the GPL, but it sounds like SCO's terms will be carefully worded so that it doesn't implicitely or explicitely allow use of the code under the terms of the GPL.
Ype. That's something I plan to do when I get home. I reckon I can make it considerably more compact as well. I'm surprised he used a linear rather than rotational mechanism. Surely that makes it rather large.
You can get a much larger customer base, and hence considerably more exposure if its vaguely useful. You can even charge a small $5 shareware registration fee (and maybe even get $5 if someone likes the software enough).
Once Linux users start realising that they need such a tool, simply release a GPLed version for Linux.
I'd say a better comparison would be a school newsletter and a parish newsletter.
Then please, criticise my punctuation- an aspect completely unrelated to capitalization.
Okay. Your punctuation sucks as well you worthless little turd. I don't give a flying fuck. It still makes you a hypocrite. You were the one who started the flame war.
Guess what, geniusoid: it wasnt repetition,
You said "You're a fucking moron, you fucking moron."
Note the use of the phrase "fucking moron" twice. It's called repetition. You see, you repeated it. Maybe I should repeat this sentence since your comprehension is so limited that you seem unable to grasp any concept that isn't repeatedly hammered home again and again.
You must have been shit to be around in preschool- "Moo? What's with the repitition? Couldnt come up with another letter? Why not 'Mao'? Huh?"
Well, that's an agreed spelling. You on the other hand seemed to want to insult me. In that case, just calling me a "fucking moron" would have been sufficient. Following up with the same insult again makes you look unimaginitive and pathetic. I'm just trying to be helpful here. If you want to look like a small pathetic half-wit, then you are quite entitled to.
I've noticed you seem to resort to using lame insults against everyone. I really think you should get professional help. You are showing clear signes of an inferiority complex. Really you should try to feel more positive about yourself than trying to bring everyone else down. It's a much more positive manner of self improvement.
If you're going to criticise my typing, I'm going to criticise your punctuation.
What's with t the repetiition? Unable to come up with a differnt insult?
I really think that if you want to criticise my typing, you should learn how to capitalise.
Why is the X-Wing the only fightewr that looks like an letter from the back?
PIRACY ISN'T THEFT! It isn't theft. It isn't murder. It isn't jaywalking. The "owners" of the signal haven't lost anything if you pirate it. They haven't even lost the money you would have paid, because they never had it in the first place.
It may be aquiring the signal by deception. It may be illegal, and unethical, but stop calling it theft.
You aren't going to get a criminal record for losing a civil court case. They would not be able to make this stick as a criminal case.
This raises the opposite question - Why didn't they do this for the shuttle? Even if they need something bigger than a 747, it shouldn't be impossible to add a little more juice to something based on the existing design, and we've still got the fuel efficiency benefits of the 747.
OTOH, is the distance an important factor? I thought the requirement for a rocket was to get to a certain speed.
I think he meant that if you buy this release, you'll be kicking yourself when the decent version comes out. Not that you'll be kicking yourself for not buying them both.
I don't think it's quite like that (although with the screwy logic used to justify the royalty rates, I'm not totally sure). I think it's just that if you happen to want to play any RIAA music at all, you have to pay a minimum royalty. $2000 is a lot to pay for a station that has no actual revenue.
Wait... is every third line a }?
Yes, except they spelt it wrong.
You own the real estate that the ads are displayed on (i.e your computer), and that's where the replacement is taking place. Gator et al. may be at fault for assuming they have the right to put their ads on your machine, but the injured party is the end user, not the advertiser.