Don't forget that each first-time user of these PPV coupons is that much more likely to use (and pay for) PPV the next time they want to watch a movie.
Compare it to a loss-leading promotion to familiarize users with their service.
The terran troop carrier in StarCraft - the one that kinda looks like the lander from Aliens - plays a second or two from the Aliens soundtrack when clicked on. It's some stuff the woman pilot (dunno her name) says when they are descending onto the planet in the begining.
2.6 is getting more positive reports and more good buzz on lkml than I have ever seen for a 2.x stable series. There can be no comparison to 2.4's rocky childhood, for example.
I think 2.6 is going to be the smoothest early stable series yet, and that 2.4 is going to be looked back upon as a relative stinker. The subtext in Marcello's posts about 2.4 imply that he thinks the same.
Sometimes I wonder if the difference between 2.4 and 2.6 is the change in the development maintainer's (Linus') source control model -- that is to say, he finally started using one (bitkeeper).
But anything that goes up the cable still has to be accelerated to orbital angular velocity, doesn't it?
No, because if you think about it, anything that goes up to geosynchronous orbit is already at orbital angular velocity, without requiring any tangential force at all.
That's what geosynchronous orbit is, after all. The stable orbit with no velocity relative to the earth's surface below.
In 2001, the monoliths were of the proportion 1x4x9 (1^2 x 2^2 x 3^2), presumably as a hint from their creators that they were artefacts of intelligent beings.
The Flight of the Dragonfly
describes an evolved culture of intelligent gaseous creatures living in a gas giant planet
No, that was Saturn Rukh. Flight of the Dragonfly was about intelligent amorphous creatures living on the ocean of a roche world. (You usually find FotD in the extended form called "Rocheworld").
I've finally figured out what this SCO debacle reminds me of: a game of Calvinball.
Contract disputes are legal play, except on Reverse Days or while standing in the Invisible Box. SCO attacks Linux users with FUD, and Novell makes them sing the Sorry Song. But SCO claims Novell was in the Reciprocity Zone, so it has to sing the song instead.
SCO says it owns IBMs code because IBM crossed the Hidden Contract line, but IBM claims today was negative day and now it wants everything that SCO owns.
The score is now 12 to Q, and I eagerly await the next round.
Maybe you're thinking of the ounce, which in the US has two meanings (ounce of weight vs. fluid ounce or "fl. oz." of liquid volume)
I was an engineering student, so I've had both systems drummed into my head. I think we all preferred metric, of course. Working in slugs mass and Rankin absolute temperatures is just bizarre.
LSB doesn't prevent competition, it encourages it.
on
LSB & Posix Conflicts
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
The LSB doesn't prevent competition, it encourages it:
- The LSB prevents distribution lock-in by lending similarity to competing distributions. This reduces pain and training costs when a user changes distributions.
- The LSB helps new distributions by providing an open documentation of best practices. This reduces research costs and interoperability problems for a company bringing up a brand new distribution.
The LSB also makes Linux systems in general a lot cleaner. I used to use Slackware in 1995, when it wasn't uncommon to find files in/etc symlinked to three or four different places in the filesystem.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't forget that each first-time user of these PPV coupons is that much more likely to use (and pay for) PPV the next time they want to watch a movie.
Compare it to a loss-leading promotion to familiarize users with their service.
Or are you just kidding? :-)
This board has been hijacked by trolls!
Are you a bad enough dude to save it?
You know what they say, more people died at Chappaquiddick than Three Mile Island...
Add these lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list to get experimental DEBs for Debian Unstable:
./ ./
deb http://people.debian.org/~ccheney/kde-3.1.95
deb http://people.debian.org/~bab/kde-3.2
These packages currently conflict with openoffice and koffice, I would uninstall them first.
The Columbia was heavier than the other shuttles, it was not capable of reaching ISS's orbital inclination.
Gnumeric also pulls it up just fine (including the column headers which seem to be missing in the Google version)
Konqueror has had tabs for a while now... 3.1.0 I believe.
"In the pipe -- five by five"
I disagree, in this case.
2.6 is getting more positive reports and more good buzz on lkml than I have ever seen for a 2.x stable series. There can be no comparison to 2.4's rocky childhood, for example.
I think 2.6 is going to be the smoothest early stable series yet, and that 2.4 is going to be looked back upon as a relative stinker. The subtext in Marcello's posts about 2.4 imply that he thinks the same.
Sometimes I wonder if the difference between 2.4 and 2.6 is the change in the development maintainer's (Linus') source control model -- that is to say, he finally started using one (bitkeeper).
I've been meaning to get one of these for years, but I cannot believe I never noticed that these are sold by Cliff Stoll (of Cuckoo's Egg fame).
It's a fixie. Rear brake comes from pushing back on the pedals.
This is probably because your PCMCIA hardware uses ISA internally.
I believe you mean that anyone who copied (distributed) it would be infringing, and liable to action from the copyright holder.
Think of the word copyright. It is the right granted to the maker of a work to control how that work is copied.
What does the Mint have to do with it?
Bills are made by the BEP, not the Mint.
No, because if you think about it, anything that goes up to geosynchronous orbit is already at orbital angular velocity, without requiring any tangential force at all.
That's what geosynchronous orbit is, after all. The stable orbit with no velocity relative to the earth's surface below.
In 2001, the monoliths were of the proportion 1x4x9 (1^2 x 2^2 x 3^2), presumably as a hint from their creators that they were artefacts of intelligent beings.
I've finally figured out what this SCO debacle reminds me of: a game of Calvinball.
Contract disputes are legal play, except on Reverse Days or while standing in the Invisible Box. SCO attacks Linux users with FUD, and Novell makes them sing the Sorry Song. But SCO claims Novell was in the Reciprocity Zone, so it has to sing the song instead.
SCO says it owns IBMs code because IBM crossed the Hidden Contract line, but IBM claims today was negative day and now it wants everything that SCO owns.
The score is now 12 to Q, and I eagerly await the next round.
Is there an USian dry pint?
Maybe you're thinking of the ounce, which in the US has two meanings (ounce of weight vs. fluid ounce or "fl. oz." of liquid volume)
I was an engineering student, so I've had both systems drummed into my head. I think we all preferred metric, of course. Working in slugs mass and Rankin absolute temperatures is just bizarre.
The LSB doesn't prevent competition, it encourages it:
/etc symlinked to three or four different places in the filesystem.
- The LSB prevents distribution lock-in by lending similarity to competing distributions. This reduces pain and training costs when a user changes distributions.
- The LSB helps new distributions by providing an open documentation of best practices. This reduces research costs and interoperability problems for a company bringing up a brand new distribution.
The LSB also makes Linux systems in general a lot cleaner. I used to use Slackware in 1995, when it wasn't uncommon to find files in
Also, I never used it much myself, but thanks from me for hosting torrentse.cx.
<3 HELLO.JPG <3
5 manbabies lol i wish i had ur life!!!
oh shi