POPFile, maintained by John Graham-Cumming, is the best spam filter I've used. There may be small flaws with the fundamental concept of Bayesian filters, but POPFile still blocks all my spam.
Is there a central page listing the books in your series?
I did find perens.com/Books, but it doesn't look to have been updated recently. Also, I found the links to the actual books somewhat cryptic--the link text should be the title of the book, not a strange URL like "http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnI nquiry.asp?isbn=0130354732".
The only reason why you would want to use the LGPL, is that you want to keep your code proprietary and to yourself.
Or he wants to release his code under a less restrictive open source license.
Qt is superior to gtk because it is created by professional developers, not college students.
I have no direct experience with either of these toolkits, but I can draw many comparisons between software that's developed by professionals and software developed by college students wherein the college students made the better product.
Yearh, they're a very evil company because they make closed source software that uses a free, open document specification.
Fuck off. If they make a specification, they should at least provide an open source viewer as an example to those who want to make a compatible editor/viewer.
You're referring to the DTD itself. However, the company that developed the DTD also made a viewer/editor, and it is not open source or even free as in beer--yet they expect this format to be picked up on.
Personally, I'm not going to try to make a second viewer/editor for a format that I can't even see in a pre-existing viewer.
And if the case isn't a sure thing but they know the guy did it they should let him off? The reason they have trials is because they don't necessarily have a sure thing. If they did, there'd be a plea bargain.
will always recommend Debian-based distros over others.
Of couse. Zealots will only reccomend their distribution to others. I, on the other hand, will tell users that I've used all sorts of distros (Debian being one of them) and that its more of a matter of personal taste than anything else that should guide their decision.
I'm not a zealot--I've tried numberous RPM- and DEB-based distros, along with Gentoo and Slackware, and because of my experience I will always recommend Debian. One of the reasons I haven't mentioned yet is dselect-upgrade, which I doesn't work with RPMs because of the nature of RPMs.
"Unfortunately" you will have many more packages avaliable.
I've never had a problem finding something with apt. Sometimes you can't find something in the official apt repositories, but there are always other repositories. Lack of a package in an official repository is not a problem in RPM-based distros though, due to the lack of an official repository.
"Unfortunately" you have many, many times more people with the same system building software for you.
There are more people building RPMs for RPM-based distros, but that doesn't mean there are more people taking the time to make sure the RPMs they build work correctly. It's not like there's a central place with guidelines for people who make RPMs.
"Unfortunately" RPM is the defacto and most-common packaging system avaliable.
"most-common"? You mean "most-commonly used"? I'm not quite sure how many people use RPM-based vs. DEB-based distros, and quite honestly I don't care. I will always recommend Debian-based distros over others.
Ok--it's still illegal, even if they call it circumvention instead of copyright infringement. However, it still reduces my rights by essentially undoing fair use. It may not say so, but under most definitions of fair use I would be allowed to make a copy of something I own, legally. The DMCA says I cannot if it would mean circumventing the copy protection.
And DRM still does not manage any rights.
> The DMCA even states itself that DRM merely restricts...
I agree--that was my original point in this thread.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes. He says there's ways to beat it, but that they're complicated to do.
POPFile, maintained by John Graham-Cumming, is the best spam filter I've used. There may be small flaws with the fundamental concept of Bayesian filters, but POPFile still blocks all my spam.
^M is a carriage return--^H is the backspace.
Thanks
i t
for
putting
your
own
newlines
in--
helps
a
lot
in
readability.
Is there a central page listing the books in your series?
I nquiry.asp?isbn=0130354732".
I did find perens.com/Books, but it doesn't look to have been updated recently. Also, I found the links to the actual books somewhat cryptic--the link text should be the title of the book, not a strange URL like "http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbn
I would assume MinGW and Visual Studio would both work fine.
I have no direct experience with either of these toolkits, but I can draw many comparisons between software that's developed by professionals and software developed by college students wherein the college students made the better product.
- wxPerl
- wxPython
- wxBasic
- wxLua
- wxJavaScript
- wxJava
- wx4j (alternative Java binding)
- wxRuby
- wxEiffel
- wxHaskell
- wx.NET (C#)
I'd say that covers most of the languages I'd program in.But once it became an established standard with the w3c they released Amaya.
I'm saying that there's a reason the courts use "beyond a reasonable doubt" instead of "100% sure".
You're referring to the DTD itself. However, the company that developed the DTD also made a viewer/editor, and it is not open source or even free as in beer--yet they expect this format to be picked up on.
Personally, I'm not going to try to make a second viewer/editor for a format that I can't even see in a pre-existing viewer.
And if the case isn't a sure thing but they know the guy did it they should let him off? The reason they have trials is because they don't necessarily have a sure thing. If they did, there'd be a plea bargain.
I believe while the original poster didn't mention it, he meant for criminal trials.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Along with these:
Whose Line is it Anyway?
Who Wants to be a Millionaire? (it did last two years in its prime (more than most shows) and is still running)
So that explains why nobody invited me--the site's down.
There are more people building RPMs for RPM-based distros, but that doesn't mean there are more people taking the time to make sure the RPMs they build work correctly. It's not like there's a central place with guidelines for people who make RPMs.
"most-common"? You mean "most-commonly used"? I'm not quite sure how many people use RPM-based vs. DEB-based distros, and quite honestly I don't care. I will always recommend Debian-based distros over others.
Unfortunately, even if you're using apt on a RedHat-based distro, you're still using RPMs.
Most of SCO's stock is owned by its executives or corporate allies, and they trade amongst themselves to keep the stock price high.