They should deploy machine gun toting robots onto a certain cyberharrassers that frequent your site that go to my former college, little jerks that they are, better yet, I think I should buy them a blow up doll....
I am sick of being slandered in my immediate area about their silly crap, and on this site all the time when they are bored. Maybe I should sue too..eh...not worth it
I know most people would consider 32 yr old widows who have only been with um 2 people to be whores and strippers...yeah, REAL NICE....PS....I STILL HATE YOU ALL....NOT GOING TO CHANGE EVER...
I figure hey, 900,000 users on this site, maybe one person from Pgh will read this and know the truth about me, I am tired of people thinking completely untrue things about me and being bothered.....
Did you actually "say" anything here?!
Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems...
on
In2TV Goes Public
·
· Score: 1
It's the error received after one installs the Mozilla plug-in and then uses the Hi-Q VIDEO link (and IE doesn't auto open for you) that send you to this ugly url.
You do realize, I hope, that this is exactly how the US balances the budget by calculating the future interest-income obtained through loans?
If the national interest rate were to actually reach 0%, only then is the national debt "in balance". However, money supply increases (printing it or in the form of credits) make sure "inflation" still occurs so we have some measure of looking prosperous.
I personally believe inflation is the result of increased interest rates, which in turn increses the cost of production, carried onto the consumer, who in turn asks their employer for a raise to help pay for rising cost of goods and services....vicious cycle as you can see.
If interest rates lower back down, the pay raise won't impose more costs to production because a new loan won't be needed and production costs start to stabilize. However, interest rates that stay relatively flat or increase cause production costs to invariably rise again and a new loan is established to maintain the current level of production. If the loan is unavailable, the price is increased to substantiate that employee's request for a pay raise. If the loan is available, the new interest costs dictate the rise in price....again, vicious cycle. The alternative, I suppose, would be to not give that person a raise to keep prices down, but now you're spending more on new trainees you didn't expect because that experience worker went somewhere else.
Indeed, here's a link that very much supports your concept of labor/production requirement....the labor of the working, imho:
If the buildings collapsed because fire weaken the steel support, then there are some serious safety issues that need to be addressed. But no one has really bothered with this. At the very least you would think building codes would have been updated to mandate better steel and UL would have to update it testing&certification process. Because clearly their certification that the steel used in the World Trade Towers was not up to snuff.
Yeah, because the NEXT time I have a jetliner crash into my building with a full load of the highest level of octane it takes to fly a JET (aka JET FUEL) burning ON TOP of that measured 2000F, I want the damn thing to stand still! Like you I can't believe they haven't flown some into buildings like crash-dummy tests! The lazy bastards!
(reality check -- fire was a concern, yeah, but it was thought the only burning material would be the walls and other stuff inside, not soaked with the full load of a jet fuel. Then there's basic science, mate....jet fuel alone burns at one temperature, material burns at another, combine the two and you get more temperature. At the time of construction, planes flying and hitting a building was considered as an accident...not flying kamakaze style INTO it!)
is Win really worth as good as its "popularity" claimed by the monotholic?
Or now that the primary rival of the easiest to copy software since (yes, and that contributed to the very success of aforementioned monotholic) is on release, will marketshare of actual installed machines be redefined in the near or far future?
The US has become full of so many cowards on both sides that I'm afraid we may fall prey to one of two horrible outcomes: 1. The lefties win and we end up with a pacifist state that can't survive the rise of a malevolent foreign power. 2. The righties win and we suffer a complete fall into a totalitarian police state.
I fear the worst: 3. Socialistic totalitarian police state that dictates you surrender to the new ethnic people or risk being jailed for prejudism.
What about the hostage situations where they die anyway? "release ALL muslim women, guilty or not, or we cut off this woman's head" is one example -- "release all our brethren or we cut off this innocent contractor's head" is another ---- America's worst act? having renegade soldiers parade naked prisoners around; wooh!
A hostage is alive only as long as they prevent death.
Look at the atrocities that have occured since 2001 under the guise of "protections"!
I also don't hear of any successful terrorist action here SINCE 2001, either. Oh yeah, it's the NON-citizens "rights" that are being violated without court order (yes, Virginia, you still need a court order for "citizens".
I am ashamed at your shame and the sad excuse you are.
I know this sounds like "won't someone think of the children ??!!?" but really
Do you have children ?
If not, you probably don't see it as clearly as many parents do
I have children and while I wouldn't fall into such nonsense as censoring (how anyway ?) the net to protect the poor children, I can still understand how 'victim' isn't such a bad word.
Yes, I also have children and still fail to see it "clearly" how censoring protects being a "victim". As I see it, this only sets up the environment for the perpetrators. Just thing, a whole country of naive, unknowing young adults filtered from the real world...prime.
It so happens that I know a kid whose irresponsible environment has quite negatively affected.
Basically he was under the care of his 20 years old half-brother not too smart that wouldn't find inapropriate to watch and comment porn with him on the sofa (he is six years old).
You should see how he is behaving now at school. in a matter of monthes he went from model classmate with exellent results to a "dark personality" teachers are concerned with when not straight scared at. Also his results are going down and his tendency to want to do funny things to the girls in his classroom is increasingly difficult to cope with...
Anyway, believe me it is extremely obvious he was negatively impacted (it is so obvious we just deduced it happened, it's not klike we knew it was happening or we would have of course not let it happen, but his behavior is just too clear to leave a doubt), and yes I consider him a victim. Don't you ?
(not that I have anything against your point of letting them see exesive violence.)
Your example is an environment that has nothing to do with the Internet and leaves out MANY questions -- where are the parents? - what happened to the parents? - who put this irresponsible adult in charge? - who IS in charge? - why is a six-year-old trying 'funny things' on a repetitive basis not being investigated instead of viewed as "difficult"??!! children tend to carry out 'actions' of thier proteges, not images they view or we'd all be blowing up cars. - where are the Grandparents? - countless other questions.
Sorry, but it sounds like the adults you associate with are 'filtering' themselves...hiding your heads in the sand will not help that little boy. It is my strong belief that this is our problem with perpetrators of today...that government, on behalf of 'society', dictates that everybody put their heads into the sand, too so that they are 'protected'. What results is the naive 'victim' grows into a 'perpetrator' just like any kid that gets sick the first time he has a chance to raid the candy store.
The assumption of people only being able to push their own bodyweight is unexplained as well.
It doesn't seem unreasonable to me. I can lift someone of my own weight if they're not resisting, but it's not easy.
I would like to point out here that 'pushing' and 'lifting' are two different physical actions with two different results. Like you, I can 'lift' someone of my own weight, albeit the strain...meanwhile I can 'push' two to three times my weight, depending on the resistance.
IMO, this 'study' should be debunked based on such miscalculations of mass, exertion, and gravitation variables. But I suspect it is being held up to 'discourage' the prank since it can be detrimental to the animal's health (recounts of cows chasing the tipper would indicate they agree).
As well as the helicopter...let's also not forget to mention the long believed theory that any living thing moving faster than 30 mph suffered from brain damage.
Re:Never underestimate the power of Nandrolone...
on
Cow Tipping is a Myth
·
· Score: 1
If a cow ends up on the wrong side, it's stomach ends up on it's lungs and they suffocate.
My point was that he and his cronies are responsible for the all pervasive attitude that America should own the world and everything in it. I can't help feeling that the current political climate in the US has a lot to do with the reluctance to share responsibility with the international community.
No, we have always felt that way...well before the Bush administration, so don't give credit where it doesn't belong.:) Fact is, it's currently out the hands of politicians and it needs to stay that way. To hand it over to an international committee is like inviting political influence and manipulation. Sorry, but That is the reason for reluctance, imo.
I do have to interject that it is now indeed a crime to speak of harming the president
AFAIK, so is the threat of harming ANY person, not just the President. Speaking ill of the President and his administration has been going on for the past six years already...nobody's been arrested or shot, either.
Moro666 isn't the best person to represent the unhappy natural-born-citizens in the US, but he is one on the, albeit dimmer, side of a rapidly growing group of disillusioned Americans and non-Americans affected by the US policies.
Considering his post about SUV's, hamburgers, and communist speech getting you shot, I would argue he is NOT a natural-born-citizen. Furthermore, being on the popular bandwagon does not necessarily make one RIGHT either...especially if they are disillusioned.
Please object, in our country you can and won't be arrested or shot, even if the claims are lies. But at least get the facts straight about the country in reference...SUV's and hamburgers ARE allowed in the US, communism will NOT get you shot or thrown in jail in the US...while in China, the opposite is true when it comes to speaking out against your government (please correct if i'm misinformed here, which i doubt).
Chapter 13 (the alternative form of bankrupcty...Ch.11 for businesses) allows court-imposed renegotiations and the repayment of judgements (court-imposed debts) based on income level for the next 36-60 months (3-5 years). If you owe taxes, they will get the largest portion while judgements and other secured debtors get in line after that, leaving un-secured debtors in the wind. Because of the implied goodwill of the debtor to "repay" vs "blowing off" (see Chapter 7), all of these debts would be considered satisfied pending the successful completion of the repayment plan.
The execption of course is ANY government-funded loans, such as student (in or out of the military) or home (HUD) loans. Instead these loans are deterred (including interest) until the successful completion of the plan; at which time you're allowed to negotiate repayment plans based on your income at that time. However, if you fail to contact them, even if unemployed, they will "take it".
This doesn't apply to "every" vendor that accepts major credit cards and I'm not versed in PayPal's protection practices; But what "normally" happens is the cancel/new charge scenario...by example:
I take my wife out to dinner and use my Visa card (PayPal or other banking institution) that has a $200 limit or remaining balance (funds available at PayPal, funds available via your bank's credit/debit checking account, your credit balance perhaps, etc).
Dinner costs $100 (i haven't been out in awhile, i don't know if this is a realistic number). This charge is put against the account, so they can bring your receipt to be signed. If no tip is applied, the deal is done. No more transactions are applied.
However, if a tip IS applied, the first transaction is then actually cancelled so that the new amount with the tip can be charged instead. Yet, because the first charge hasn't had a chance to be processed by the Visa-issuing bank within the business day, it's still out there showing as a "pending" transaction.
The cancellation also becomes a pending transaction, but is NEVER reflected against the available balance as the new charge ($115 with a tip of 15%) now brings the account over the available limit resulting in a denial.
Another common practice is for vendors (or their processing center that handles credit card transactions for them) to charge the same transaction TWICE and put a "hold" on the second transaction pending the first clears (AT&T Wireless does this for example). This still reflects activity against the account as a pending transaction which is automatically dropped once the first charge clears. As explained to me by a bank employee, this allows the vendor to have a pending charge against your account should the first transaction fail and first in line if a deposit/payment is made to the account in the immediate future.
For the debit/credit Visa cardholder in the above dinner example against a checking account this would result in a negative "available balance" (albeit temporary and not your "actual balance") and your bank will often invoke an NSF charge for going over balance (Key Bank does this)! Normal credit cardholders can experience a denied transaction if any of these transactions brought them over their available balance and they tried to use it afterwards, but before the next business day can happen to "clear".
Slashdot Mirror
I'm an American and I love not having the choice of phones, even though they would be compatible.
Did you actually "say" anything here?!
It's the error received after one installs the Mozilla plug-in and then uses the Hi-Q VIDEO link (and IE doesn't auto open for you) that send you to this ugly url.
o diac/template/pub%2Cinstall%2CGetIt.vm/moid/8cba9b d2-9d32-efcc-f56d-ebd94262dafa/m/d7a28aad-1f36-e5c f-8b0e-76a7412d3034/s/kdx/kget/urn:kid:aol_hqv:aol _hiq:moid:8cba9bd2-9d32-efcc-f56d-ebd94262dafa here
g if that does indeed mention that 64-bit is not included in support.
http://kontikiapp.stream.aol.com/zodiac/servlet/z
The actual message he sees (in case you don't) is http://cdn.digitalcity.com/_media/hiqvideo/error.
You do realize, I hope, that this is exactly how the US balances the budget by calculating the future interest-income obtained through loans?
a nking#Increased_money_supply_and_inflation
If the national interest rate were to actually reach 0%, only then is the national debt "in balance". However, money supply increases (printing it or in the form of credits) make sure "inflation" still occurs so we have some measure of looking prosperous.
I personally believe inflation is the result of increased interest rates, which in turn increses the cost of production, carried onto the consumer, who in turn asks their employer for a raise to help pay for rising cost of goods and services....vicious cycle as you can see.
If interest rates lower back down, the pay raise won't impose more costs to production because a new loan won't be needed and production costs start to stabilize. However, interest rates that stay relatively flat or increase cause production costs to invariably rise again and a new loan is established to maintain the current level of production. If the loan is unavailable, the price is increased to substantiate that employee's request for a pay raise. If the loan is available, the new interest costs dictate the rise in price....again, vicious cycle. The alternative, I suppose, would be to not give that person a raise to keep prices down, but now you're spending more on new trainees you didn't expect because that experience worker went somewhere else.
Indeed, here's a link that very much supports your concept of labor/production requirement....the labor of the working, imho:
http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/naij2.html
But you might this one more informative, if not slightly more substantial in facts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_b
If the buildings collapsed because fire weaken the steel support, then there are some serious safety issues that need to be addressed. But no one has really bothered with this. At the very least you would think building codes would have been updated to mandate better steel and UL would have to update it testing&certification process. Because clearly their certification that the steel used in the World Trade Towers was not up to snuff.
Yeah, because the NEXT time I have a jetliner crash into my building with a full load of the highest level of octane it takes to fly a JET (aka JET FUEL) burning ON TOP of that measured 2000F, I want the damn thing to stand still! Like you I can't believe they haven't flown some into buildings like crash-dummy tests! The lazy bastards!
(reality check -- fire was a concern, yeah, but it was thought the only burning material would be the walls and other stuff inside, not soaked with the full load of a jet fuel. Then there's basic science, mate....jet fuel alone burns at one temperature, material burns at another, combine the two and you get more temperature. At the time of construction, planes flying and hitting a building was considered as an accident...not flying kamakaze style INTO it!)
Maybe, just maybe, we should have a system that regulates lobbyists...
You have any idea how many problems that would solve? Now if we could just get a lobbyist to get this idea to congress members for us....
It's gotten to the point where I pretty much assume my info isn't safe. Too bad I seem to be in the minority on this.
At least you're not in denial as the majority are.
... that infamous question of debate....
is Win really worth as good as its "popularity" claimed by the monotholic?
Or now that the primary rival of the easiest to copy software since (yes, and that contributed to the very success of aforementioned monotholic) is on release, will marketshare of actual installed machines be redefined in the near or far future?
Just look on the spellin and grammer mistakes.
Just look at the spellin g and gramm a r mistakes.
You work at Wal-mart, don't you?
The US has become full of so many cowards on both sides that I'm afraid we may fall prey to one of two horrible outcomes: 1. The lefties win and we end up with a pacifist state that can't survive the rise of a malevolent foreign power. 2. The righties win and we suffer a complete fall into a totalitarian police state.
I fear the worst: 3. Socialistic totalitarian police state that dictates you surrender to the new ethnic people or risk being jailed for prejudism.
People negotiate hostage situations.
What about the hostage situations where they die anyway? "release ALL muslim women, guilty or not, or we cut off this woman's head" is one example -- "release all our brethren or we cut off this innocent contractor's head" is another ---- America's worst act? having renegade soldiers parade naked prisoners around; wooh!
A hostage is alive only as long as they prevent death.
Do you have any doubt that if given the opportunity they wouldn't stamp out porn as well?
5 7250&tid=111&tid=17
Only if they can regulate your hand. Perhaps you should see the "success" of the other "authority" -- http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/21/05
Look at the atrocities that have occured since 2001 under the guise of "protections"!
I also don't hear of any successful terrorist action here SINCE 2001, either. Oh yeah, it's the NON-citizens "rights" that are being violated without court order (yes, Virginia, you still need a court order for "citizens".
I am ashamed at your shame and the sad excuse you are.
I know this sounds like "won't someone think of the children ??!!?" but really Do you have children ? If not, you probably don't see it as clearly as many parents do I have children and while I wouldn't fall into such nonsense as censoring (how anyway ?) the net to protect the poor children, I can still understand how 'victim' isn't such a bad word.
Yes, I also have children and still fail to see it "clearly" how censoring protects being a "victim". As I see it, this only sets up the environment for the perpetrators. Just thing, a whole country of naive, unknowing young adults filtered from the real world...prime.
It so happens that I know a kid whose irresponsible environment has quite negatively affected. Basically he was under the care of his 20 years old half-brother not too smart that wouldn't find inapropriate to watch and comment porn with him on the sofa (he is six years old). You should see how he is behaving now at school. in a matter of monthes he went from model classmate with exellent results to a "dark personality" teachers are concerned with when not straight scared at. Also his results are going down and his tendency to want to do funny things to the girls in his classroom is increasingly difficult to cope with... Anyway, believe me it is extremely obvious he was negatively impacted (it is so obvious we just deduced it happened, it's not klike we knew it was happening or we would have of course not let it happen, but his behavior is just too clear to leave a doubt), and yes I consider him a victim. Don't you ? (not that I have anything against your point of letting them see exesive violence.)
Your example is an environment that has nothing to do with the Internet and leaves out MANY questions -- where are the parents? - what happened to the parents? - who put this irresponsible adult in charge? - who IS in charge? - why is a six-year-old trying 'funny things' on a repetitive basis not being investigated instead of viewed as "difficult"??!! children tend to carry out 'actions' of thier proteges, not images they view or we'd all be blowing up cars. - where are the Grandparents? - countless other questions.
Sorry, but it sounds like the adults you associate with are 'filtering' themselves...hiding your heads in the sand will not help that little boy. It is my strong belief that this is our problem with perpetrators of today...that government, on behalf of 'society', dictates that everybody put their heads into the sand, too so that they are 'protected'. What results is the naive 'victim' grows into a 'perpetrator' just like any kid that gets sick the first time he has a chance to raid the candy store.
I will eventually get a title from DMV that shows that I own that car.
Only when you "pay off" will you receive this title from the "loan institution" as they currently have possession of the existing one.
It doesn't seem unreasonable to me. I can lift someone of my own weight if they're not resisting, but it's not easy.
I would like to point out here that 'pushing' and 'lifting' are two different physical actions with two different results. Like you, I can 'lift' someone of my own weight, albeit the strain...meanwhile I can 'push' two to three times my weight, depending on the resistance.
IMO, this 'study' should be debunked based on such miscalculations of mass, exertion, and gravitation variables. But I suspect it is being held up to 'discourage' the prank since it can be detrimental to the animal's health (recounts of cows chasing the tipper would indicate they agree).
As well as the helicopter...let's also not forget to mention the long believed theory that any living thing moving faster than 30 mph suffered from brain damage.
If a cow ends up on the wrong side, it's stomach ends up on it's lungs and they suffocate.
I think you've just solved the mad-cow mystery!
My point was that he and his cronies are responsible for the all pervasive attitude that America should own the world and everything in it. I can't help feeling that the current political climate in the US has a lot to do with the reluctance to share responsibility with the international community.
:) Fact is, it's currently out the hands of politicians and it needs to stay that way. To hand it over to an international committee is like inviting political influence and manipulation. Sorry, but That is the reason for reluctance, imo.
No, we have always felt that way...well before the Bush administration, so don't give credit where it doesn't belong.
Unix. Which of course was created by Bell Labs. An American outfit
;)
Based in Cambridge, U.K. btw.
I do have to interject that it is now indeed a crime to speak of harming the president
AFAIK, so is the threat of harming ANY person, not just the President. Speaking ill of the President and his administration has been going on for the past six years already...nobody's been arrested or shot, either.
Moro666 isn't the best person to represent the unhappy natural-born-citizens in the US, but he is one on the, albeit dimmer, side of a rapidly growing group of disillusioned Americans and non-Americans affected by the US policies.
Considering his post about SUV's, hamburgers, and communist speech getting you shot, I would argue he is NOT a natural-born-citizen. Furthermore, being on the popular bandwagon does not necessarily make one RIGHT either...especially if they are disillusioned.
Please object, in our country you can and won't be arrested or shot, even if the claims are lies. But at least get the facts straight about the country in reference...SUV's and hamburgers ARE allowed in the US, communism will NOT get you shot or thrown in jail in the US...while in China, the opposite is true when it comes to speaking out against your government (please correct if i'm misinformed here, which i doubt).
Bush has straightforwardly declared he wants martial law and dictator powers if...
Back this bull$hit FUD up with a link you got this 'quote' from.
Chapter 13 (the alternative form of bankrupcty...Ch.11 for businesses) allows court-imposed renegotiations and the repayment of judgements (court-imposed debts) based on income level for the next 36-60 months (3-5 years). If you owe taxes, they will get the largest portion while judgements and other secured debtors get in line after that, leaving un-secured debtors in the wind. Because of the implied goodwill of the debtor to "repay" vs "blowing off" (see Chapter 7), all of these debts would be considered satisfied pending the successful completion of the repayment plan.
The execption of course is ANY government-funded loans, such as student (in or out of the military) or home (HUD) loans. Instead these loans are deterred (including interest) until the successful completion of the plan; at which time you're allowed to negotiate repayment plans based on your income at that time. However, if you fail to contact them, even if unemployed, they will "take it".
This doesn't apply to "every" vendor that accepts major credit cards and I'm not versed in PayPal's protection practices; But what "normally" happens is the cancel/new charge scenario...by example:
I take my wife out to dinner and use my Visa card (PayPal or other banking institution) that has a $200 limit or remaining balance (funds available at PayPal, funds available via your bank's credit/debit checking account, your credit balance perhaps, etc).
Dinner costs $100 (i haven't been out in awhile, i don't know if this is a realistic number). This charge is put against the account, so they can bring your receipt to be signed. If no tip is applied, the deal is done. No more transactions are applied.
However, if a tip IS applied, the first transaction is then actually cancelled so that the new amount with the tip can be charged instead. Yet, because the first charge hasn't had a chance to be processed by the Visa-issuing bank within the business day, it's still out there showing as a "pending" transaction.
The cancellation also becomes a pending transaction, but is NEVER reflected against the available balance as the new charge ($115 with a tip of 15%) now brings the account over the available limit resulting in a denial.
Another common practice is for vendors (or their processing center that handles credit card transactions for them) to charge the same transaction TWICE and put a "hold" on the second transaction pending the first clears (AT&T Wireless does this for example). This still reflects activity against the account as a pending transaction which is automatically dropped once the first charge clears. As explained to me by a bank employee, this allows the vendor to have a pending charge against your account should the first transaction fail and first in line if a deposit/payment is made to the account in the immediate future.
For the debit/credit Visa cardholder in the above dinner example against a checking account this would result in a negative "available balance" (albeit temporary and not your "actual balance") and your bank will often invoke an NSF charge for going over balance (Key Bank does this)! Normal credit cardholders can experience a denied transaction if any of these transactions brought them over their available balance and they tried to use it afterwards, but before the next business day can happen to "clear".
You were better off with the BBS.