Slashdot Mirror


User: Eunuchswear

Eunuchswear's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,176
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,176

  1. Re:Unbelievable... on Galileo System To Include Jamming Capability · · Score: 1
    Oh god, please save me from the innumerate.

    Look, 1.00 EUR == 1.20 USD.

    If you have something priced at 1,000,000 EUR you will have to spend 1,200,000 USD to buy it.

    If you have something priced at 1,000,000 USD then you will have to spend 1,000,000 USD to buy it and I can spend 833,333 EUR to buy the same thing.

    Where on earth you get the 928,000 USD figure from I cannot imagine.

  2. Re:Unbelievable... on Galileo System To Include Jamming Capability · · Score: 1
    You're still doing your math the wrong way round:
    If the US can get the dollar to equal or just below the euro, then why spend 1,000,000EUR when you can spend $928,000?
    If you want to spend 1,000,000 EUR and all you have is USD then you'll have to put 1,200,000 USD on the table.

    This is a good thing for the US 'cos it increases the price of imports from the EU, so reducing the amount of EU goods bought by US consumers, and it reduces the prices of US goods for EU consumers, 'cos we have those more valuable euros.

    So the US should import less and export more. Some people think this is a good thing.

  3. Re:Unbelievable... on Galileo System To Include Jamming Capability · · Score: 1
    I sometimes wonder if this isn't just another attempt by the U.S. to undermine the value of the EURO against the US Dollar.
    Well if that's their evil plan they've sure fucked it up. 1EUR = 1.20USD and rising.

    Looks a lot more like they're trying to keep the price of the dollar down, to cut imports and increase exports.

    P.S., unless you're a FORTRAN programmer it's called the euro.

  4. Re:Well obviously the US on Galileo System To Include Jamming Capability · · Score: 1
    Does Europe have oil?
    Yes.

    WMD's as well.

    Next quetion?

  5. Re:Evolution of PDA into MicroPC on Sharp Zaurus SL-C860 Announced For Japan · · Score: 1

    Yup, I can just see it. The only place he can think of sticking his "hard disk" is into a PDA.

    Sad.

  6. Re:Evolution of PDA into MicroPC on Sharp Zaurus SL-C860 Announced For Japan · · Score: 1

    You want to stick a nine and a half inch disk drive into a PDA?

  7. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach on Motorola+Qtopia=Linux Smart Phone · · Score: 1

    Omaha? You mean a bloody disaster? Most of the dead never having a chance to fire a shot, dying in the water without even reaching the beach?

    Wouldn't you rather have Sword? Gold? Even Juno or Utah?

  8. Re:to paraphrase on Voyager 1 Reaches Interstellar Space · · Score: 1

    QM makes absolutely no sense

    What are you, some kind of lame brain like old Albert?

    Just go with many worlds & there's nothing hard about QM at all. Well, appart from the math of course. :-)

    ObSF Quarantine, by Greg Egan. Whoops wrong forum.
  9. Re:you never know... on Voyager 1 Reaches Interstellar Space · · Score: 1

    I have a Cig, but do you have a light?

    Gotta light, Mac?

    No, but I do have a dark brown overcoat.
  10. Re:My old uni! on Guy Fawkes' Explosion Would Have Devasted London · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hah! I was at UEA 26 years ago, and here I am reading slashdot.

    Might as well kill yourself now, you have nothing to look forward to.

  11. Re:wifi@SFO on Europe Vs. North America in WiFi growth. · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, of course.

    Next question?

  12. Re:wifi@SFO on Europe Vs. North America in WiFi growth. · · Score: 1
    ...vital it is to keep their populations from consuming more foreign than local goods for economic sanity's sake
    And another idiot fails econ 101.

    Hint: If someone wants to sell you something for less money than it takes you to make it: buy it from him!. Use the money you've saved to do something more interesting.

  13. Re:Some much for my mail server on AT&T Moves Toward Mail-Server Whitelist · · Score: 1

    That should be 587, not 2525.

    (Or 465 for broken clients that start TLS without
    doing a STARTTLS command).

  14. Re:Windows' use of CTRL-ALT-DEL on The Guy Responsible For Ctrl-Alt-Del · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has removed it from later versions of Windows for convenience, not security, purposes.

    If Microsoft had removed it from later versions of Windows that would have been stupid.

    Since they didn't remove it from Windows...
  15. Re:I ask everybody ... on Successful First Launch of Aerospike Engine · · Score: 1
    Sounds like a guidance failure rather than an engine failure
    People who bother to read the article will see:
    Preliminary analysis indicates that the most probable cause for the observed flight behavior is that part of the engine's graphite exit outer ring experienced excessive and asymmetric erosion, which in turn created a side thrust component.
    in the second paragraph of the article.

    Sure sounds like an engine failure to me.

  16. Re:Really? on Tzero Electric Car: 0-60 in 3.7 Seconds · · Score: 1

    The name "electron" gives you no clue?

    Maybe you'd better check out what the weak force is.

    Not many W or Z bosons involved in chemical reactions.

  17. Re:Um on Tzero Electric Car: 0-60 in 3.7 Seconds · · Score: 1

    an ICE car (internal combustion engine) uses purely mechanical force.

    Ah, in your alternate universe you load compressed springs into the tank instead of an inflamible liquid?


    Here we use chemical energy, that's to say the electromagnetic force, to produce heat, that causes a gas to expand, that produces mechanical force.


    Less direct, but easier to manage than carting all those compressed springs around.

  18. Re:No on Tzero Electric Car: 0-60 in 3.7 Seconds · · Score: 1

    The process of burning is the process of changing combinations of atoms (molecules) from a high energy state to a lower energy state. Thus, you're playing with the weak nuclear force,

    Ding! Sorry, no score, same player play again.


    All chemical (molecular) reactions are electromagnetic.


    That's where the idea of "smart matter" comes from (make fake "chemicals" by manipulating electrons with no "atomic" nucleus).

  19. Re:Use qmail on Buffer Overflow in Sendmail · · Score: 1

    No.

    Next question?

  20. Re:Not sure I can sympathize on Half-Life 2 - A Linux User's Lament · · Score: 1

    Huh, I played half-life 1 on a P1 233 with software rendering, no hw 3d support at all.

    Worked great.

    Got a bit dodgy with some of the later mods (the mad rotating boat trip in Heart of Evil :-)), but now I've got a hugely poweful PIII 700Mhz all is ok again.

    (cue 3 Yorkshiremen sketch. By the way, I was born in Dewsbury :)).

  21. Re:SCO is not targetting Linux with a lawsuit on SCO Volleys to Red Hat · · Score: 1

    What's not English about naive (naif)? What's not English about cooperative (imagine the trema over the second "o").

    AND THIS SHITTY SLASHCODE SOFTWARE WON'T LET ME DO IT RIGHT.

  22. Re:SCO is not targetting Linux with a lawsuit on SCO Volleys to Red Hat · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Aaargh! Some bastard stole my trema!!!!

    Naive. (Na(i-trema)ve)

    Nave. (Naïve.)

    Nave. (Naïve.)

    Who wrote this shitty code anyway?

  23. Re:SCO is not targetting Linux with a lawsuit on SCO Volleys to Red Hat · · Score: 1

    If you're going to pick nits it's naive, or possibly naif.

    You can't write English in ascii.

  24. Re:An Open Response to Darl McBride's Open Letter on SCO's Open Letter to Open Source Community · · Score: 1

    No, I think you are mistaken.

    Anyone can copyright a work derived from something in the public domain.

    In fact, since copyright is automatic unless disclaimed, any derirative work of something in the public domain is copyright unless the author (of the derirative work) says otherwise.

    You could argue that "small" changes might not be copyrightable.

  25. Re:The real question is: on ESR to Shred SCO Claims? · · Score: 1

    The sentiment is basically that, if I am in a software company, I have access to legal opinion (Can I use this code?)...

    And so how is it that the only credible example of stolen code in Linux came from someone working for SGI?