Slashdot Mirror


Motorola+Qtopia=Linux Smart Phone

lems1 writes "Start compiling the excuses you will tell your boss to upgrade your cell phone now. Motorola has opted to use Trolltech's Qtopia to power up the next generation of SmartPhones. Get the scoop/specs from here and a nice high-res picture from this other link. The phone will have 'digital camera, video player, MP3 player, speakerphone, advanced messaging, instant Internet access and Bluetooth wireless technology' capabilities. On top of being Linux-based of course." Update: 11/12 00:44 GMT by T : Yep, this is the same phone mentioned a few weeks ago.

176 comments

  1. "Phone"? by Beg4Mercy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MP3 player? Video player? These things are awesome, but are we sure we can still call them 'phones.' Somehow I think being a phone is no longer their primary feature.

    1. Re:"Phone"? by yog · · Score: 3, Informative

      yeah we need a new name for them. PCA's (personal communication devices) or something.

      I'd like to see a few more features:

      a real camera: 3 MP camera (minimum), 5x optical zoom, USB port and SD slot

      VGA port: display images on big screen

      takes mpeg video/audio clips

      webcam functionality--turn it on, scp an image every 3 secs to your server

      built in laser pointer

      voice recorder (can send as voicemail message to others, like a mailing list)

      IR beaming capability a la Palm

      PalmOS, for that matter

      wi-fi, embedded httpd; people could browse to your phone while connected

      MP3/Ogg/WAV stereo output

      biometric security: require your fingerprint or retinal pattern to activate

      about 128MB to hold all this stuff

      Am I forgetting anything?

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    2. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you put your "weed" in it?

    3. Re:"Phone"? by pilot1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, you're missing a SSH client.
      That would be a perfect phone - for people like us. Joe CellPhoneUser wouldn't even understand what most of the features are, let alone use them.

    4. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rotflmao - cause I'm high on weeeeeed

    5. Re:"Phone"? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 3, Funny
      yeah we need a new name for them. PCA's (personal communication devices) or something.

      Or maybe an acronym that actually makes sense?

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    6. Re:"Phone"? by bob_dinosaur · · Score: 1

      Why would you want a built-in laser pointer? It'd add weight and size and provide a useful service to 1% of the population (salespeople and professors). And for that matter, why on Earth would you want PalmOS? For my money, you missed the most important point: a decent flash for the camera.

    7. Re:"Phone"? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      Could you imagine if laser pointers became common on phones? Everywhere you go, some jackass would be playing "lets laugh at the guy with the light on his face - har har"

      We'd never enjoy another movie at the theater.

      --
      ymmv
    8. Re:"Phone"? by mlk · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can already get that for Nokia s60 phones, and Blackberrys. Old hat.

      Nah, maybe VNC? :)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    9. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5x optical zoom?

      Are you high?

    10. Re:"Phone"? by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      um.... do any LAPTOPS offer this? (forgetting the whole 'phone' aspect)

      do any DESKTOPS even offer all of these functions in one unit?

      either way, physical restrictions will prohibit this from being practical (gotta have big antenna to transmit high bandwidths, room for a speaker, optics for the high-quality camera, microphone for the recorder, place ti put your fingerprint for security, somewhere to hold a stylus, room for the VGA port and accompanying hardware. oh.... and a battery big enough to support this beast.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    11. Re:"Phone"? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      Am I forgetting anything?

      Yea, the kitchen sink.

    12. Re:"Phone"? by Trelane · · Score: 1
      We'd never enjoy another movie at the theater.


      Sooo... what you're saying is that there'd be no change in the enjoyment of the movies? ;)
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    13. Re:"Phone"? by Rewd · · Score: 1

      You've forgotten the built-in LCD projector.

      You won't need the monitor cables because you can just point your device at a nearby surface.

      Imagine if they were strong enough (laser-based?) to project a small image 50m or so ... you could beam a movie onto the wall next to someone from across the restaurant ... then imagine a crowd of people with thousands of these things, like New Year's Eve or a sporting event, or the cinema .... it would be an insane world.

    14. Re:"Phone"? by Shadwell · · Score: 1

      Am I forgetting anything?


      Coffee. It must make coffee.

    15. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing you forgot is a geforce 5900 and an audigy 2 so we can play some fps's.

    16. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS

    17. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's gotta hurt.

    18. Re:"Phone"? by kinnell · · Score: 1
      Am I forgetting anything?

      AM/FM/DAB radio, Television, knife, screwdriver set, marlin spike, toothpick, taser, comb, cigarette lighter, sattelite navigation, surround sound.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    19. Re:"Phone"? by srslif16 · · Score: 1

      Bah. All that, and more, can be found in Sony-Ericsson P900, which you can buy RIGHT NOW.

    20. Re:"Phone"? by TV-SET · · Score: 1

      Users of SonyEricsson P800/P900 enjoy both PuTTY and VNC. :)

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    21. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS. I want it to have a gps built in, too.

    22. Re:"Phone"? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      You forgot:-

      remote control device for bullet proof car

      homing beacon

      dual use electromagnet (picking up henchman's knives/undoing russian lady spy's zipper).

    23. Re:"Phone"? by ajaf · · Score: 1

      Yes, a phaser could be nice to be included.

      --
      ajf
    24. Re:"Phone"? by arafel · · Score: 1

      A backpack for the device and powerpack?

    25. Re:"Phone"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      homing beacon

      You aren't too far off with this. Why do you think GPS chips are going into phones?

    26. Re:"Phone"? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Users of all J2ME phones have VNC (written by me, thus the smiley).

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    27. Re:"Phone"? by Master+Cougar · · Score: 1

      The Shadowrun game had a name for this product, Pocket Secretary.

    28. Re:"Phone"? by TV-SET · · Score: 1

      Heh, thanks for pointing out, and... thanks a lot for the VNC. :)

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    29. Re:"Phone"? by mlk · · Score: 1

      tis alright.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  2. benard mina... by hatrisc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i'm not sure about you guys, but i think bernard is a girl, and i must say, she's pretty happy to be speaking to noone

    --
    I write code.
  3. One more step towards Star Trek... by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    Hey, this is awesome. Time to throw away those MP3 players, digital camera and others, and just get a cellphone.

    Seriously thou, isn't having that much options on a cellphone make it slightly more confusing to use? Especially for those who drive and talk?

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    1. Re:One more step towards Star Trek... by wed128 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe that's why driving and talking on a cell are illegal in some states? because now people are driving, talking, watching video's, listening to MP3s and IMing to their hearts content!

    2. Re:One more step towards Star Trek... by dark-br · · Score: 1, Funny

      Talk? What you mean you wanna *TALK* using your *PHONE*? Its for taking pictures, playing silly games, listen to music and frying eggs you morron! :/

    3. Re:One more step towards Star Trek... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Seriously thou, isn't having that much options on a cellphone make it slightly more confusing to use? Especially for those who drive and talk?

      Nah. I've discovered that if you just pay full attention to your phone you can handle it all right.

      Although everyone else on the road seems to get confused after that. What's with them anyway, don't they know how to drive?

      KFG

  4. Obligatory by jargoone · · Score: 0, Funny

    Since this runs Linux, and companies that you've done business with are allowed to call your cell phone, can we expect a call from SCO if we buy one of these?

    It had to be said...

    1. Re:Obligatory by boarder8925 · · Score: 1
      Since this runs Linux, and companies that you've done business with are allowed to call your cell phone, can we expect a call from SCO if we buy one of these?
      Yes, and they'll promise to pay you to switch to a Verizon phone running the cellphone version of Windows.
    2. Re:Obligatory by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      that 1.6% will be up for sale soon?

      though, what can they really do about it?
      .

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Obligatory by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      Canopy Group 4.1% owns SCO Group 1.6% giving us a total of... um 5.7%. This means that to the best of my knowledge TrollTech is um... 94.3% asshole free which is pretty good. Way better than where I work anyway.

    4. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was true, I would personally hand in my Qtopia-running Sharp Zaurus to a member of the GNAA for further ANALysis.

      But unfortunately, the GNAA more and more fails first post, so ^D^C
      EOF

      sed: processing stopped, process with PID 7365 does not exist

    5. Re:Obligatory by efti · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't worry, I did see him in metamod ;-)

      (Hope my meta-moderation does't get undone by the slashcode for posting here...)

      One more reason why your post was informative rather than a troll. Canopy Group / SCO's ownership of TrollTech was one of the recurring comments on /., so it was really useful to point out that combined they still only own about 5.7% of the company. Way too little to influence the decisions TrollTech makes.

      --
      I signed up for a /. account and all I got was this crappy sig
    6. Re:Obligatory by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Do you work at SCO or M$ then ???

      /me sharpens the swords

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  5. Never post a 2848x2562 picture!!! by dduardo · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for the person hosting the picture. His bandwidth bill is going to be a bit larger than previous months

    1. Re:Never post a 2848x2562 picture!!! by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about it - that's hosted on Motorla's servers.

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
  6. I wish they'd stop... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I went browsing for a new phone last week. Everytime I found a form factor I liked with a nice display or whatever, it always have some friggin' blasted camera function or voice recorder. Enough with the added features. Where I work, if I walk in with a phone that contains recording devices of any kind beyong phone number storage, many burly men in black suits will wrestle me to the ground and pummel me into submission while tossing my phone into an incinerator. On the second offense, *I* get tossed in after the phone.

    How about a solid, reliable phone that just makes really, really, really good, clear calls? To many of the current generation have that "disposable" feel to them.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:I wish they'd stop... by Davak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, we should trade phones!

      I want a phone into which I can dictate... then just sync it into my computer and let dragon dictate transcribe it for me.

      Palm, page, phone, and dictaphone... my belt makes me look like BATMAN these days.

      Davak

    2. Re:I wish they'd stop... by interiot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work at a place that makes friggin' blasted camera functions on phones. And guess what the company's policy is? The burly men will throw my Canon DSLR in the incinerator, but camera phones are just fine to bring in.

    3. Re:I wish they'd stop... by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you know why those features appear there? most of them don't really 'cost' anything, they're just bits of software. and really, if people just settled a phone that 'just phones well' the sales of phones would be much much much lower, there's been such phones available for years(this year for example massive amounts of people switched to color screen phones, that as phones essentially work exactly like their old phones did). though many just buy a new phone instead of shelling out the cash for a new battery too. the phone can't do miracles about the providers network though.

      how about a nice nokia 2100 if you don't want any features? or siemens a50?

      the thing is that those phones(that don't have much features) do exist, but they're a horrible deal to actually buy(cost nearingly the same as the next phone in the range with couple of more useful functions), you essentially save a bit(not nearingly enough) of money to have things disabled.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:I wish they'd stop... by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      At least read his post before responding.

      --
      ymmv
    5. Re:I wish they'd stop... by bob_dinosaur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get yerself a Nokia 7210. Nice form-factor, well made, useful addressbook and calendar display features, and no camera. Sorted.

    6. Re:I wish they'd stop... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      If the form factor was good what the hell do you care if it has a voice recorder. Don't use it.

      Because. It's. Not. Allowed. To. Be. There. In. The. First. Place.

      Security, don't ya know.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    7. Re:I wish they'd stop... by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      "Palm, page, phone, and dictaphone... my belt makes me look like BATMAN these days."

      Wait, I don't see what the problem is. I actually want more devices AND a utility belt. But only if I can carry a grappling hook around, too.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    8. Re:I wish they'd stop... by salesgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where I work, if I walk in with a phone that contains recording devices of any kind beyong phone number storage, many burly men in black suits will wrestle me to the ground and pummel me into submission while tossing my phone into an incinerator.

      INCREDIBLE! They wont trust you with a five minute digital recorder, but they will trust you with a very high quality four hour long range bug otherwise known as a cell phone? Ask any salesperson - the cell phone is the ultimate bug:

      1) Dial out to say your personal cell phone or assistant - make sure called party hits mute on their phone.
      2) do not hang up or end call.
      3) leave cell phone on table (or floor or chair)
      4) listen to prospects discussing your presentation or even evesdrop on the next salesperson or three
      5) Hang up (the cell phone will disconnect automagically).
      6) Call front desk tell them you think you left your cell phone in the conference room.

      My god security is a foreign concept to many human beings. Either they trust you or they dont. Cell phones are bad in sensitive areas. As bad or worse than recorders.

      --
      -- $G
    9. Re:I wish they'd stop... by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Same here. It seems like the more junk they add to a phone:

      1) the heavier & bulkier it gets. They were just about to get to the size of a lapel pin that I could wear on my shoulder like a star trek insignia.

      2) the more unstable it gets. There's nothing worse or more embarrassing than losing a call because your phone crashes. This happens even with relatively simple WAP phones, and all the time with the old VisorPhone I had.

      3) the less electronics I would buy. If phones and PDAs were separate and cheaper, I'd upgrade one or the other twice as often.

      Mobile phones should just be interfaces. My current phone was the cheapest I could find with GPRS, IR, and bluetooth. I can use it with my current Visor Pro & laptop with the IR interface, and I'll be able to use it even more with the bluetooth laptop I'm getting next.

      Back when I used the VisorPhone, I was pretty much stuck with the stupid PDA browsers, even when I had a laptop along.

    10. Re:I wish they'd stop... by Ian-K · · Score: 1

      Then buy a Sonyericsson T610 (if your network allows it). Quite cheap and good enough for a phone, I'd say. It has about 2MB of memory free (with your average set of ringtones/wallpapers/themes/games installed, which is more than enough for your average dictation.

      The other day I recorded a 20 minute talk and it took about 800K. Then connect it to a bluetooth-enabled PC and transfer the file to it. It's in AMR format, but you can get converters for it for free. I have one that does AMR to OGG.

      Then have your secretary install Winamp and you're off.

      ---

      On a relevant note to the conversation above, cameras on most phones are not really brilliant. I would love if we had the option to choose features in the phones (ie. the phones were modular, even physically).

      I say that because it'd be nice to choose between a camera-enabled T610 (for example) and a memorycard+mp3/ogg enabled version. (I'd choose the latter, btw). (yes, I know they've released an attachment that does this, but that's an extra 250!!!)

      This way we could have what we want without the bells and whistles some smart-head market analyst thinks will be cool on a phone.

      (yes, I can keep dreaming)

      Trian

      --
      I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
    11. Re:I wish they'd stop... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      What is wrong about having your PDA replace the dictaphone? Lots of PocketPC models and some PalmOS models have a hardware record and even the memory (or expansion ability to add memory) to make it worth while. I imagine there is some way to spit it out to/sync it with Naturally Speaking... They record just as WAV files.

      And a pager still? Wow, hello mr. dinosaur man. Why not consolodate the pager and phone? Work for some weird company who won't let you use a different page #, one that happens to be on the phone?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    12. Re:I wish they'd stop... by pablo_max · · Score: 0

      Check out the Motorola MPX200 then.
      No cam. But it runs Smartphone 2002. Has an SD slot. MP3 Player. I dont think it had voice recorder.

    13. Re:I wish they'd stop... by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      1) the heavier & bulkier it gets.


      Not really. Phones have been getting smaller and lighter, despite the fact that they have added features to it (camera, Bluetooth, GPRS, WAP, EDGE, color-screen, polyphonic ring-tones etc. etc.). The size is starting to reach it's limits, since the device still needs a keypad, and the screen (color-screen these days) are getting bigger.

      2) the more unstable it gets. There's nothing worse or more embarrassing than losing a call because your phone crashes. This happens even with relatively simple WAP phones, and all the time with the old VisorPhone I had.


      What does WAP have to do with disconnecting calls? I get disconnected calls VERY RARELY, so I would guess that your mobile-service just sucks. Of course, I'm in Finland, so.... And my phone has NEVER crashed. Not even when I use WAP over GPRS. Or when I make data-calls through Bluetooth and HSCSD. And my phone is on 24x7x365.

      We are currently testing Nokia 6600. Not a single hang-up or crash. We have had the phone for few weeks now.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    14. Re:I wish they'd stop... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      If your employer is so concerned over security, they should provide their employees suitable phones. And for the record: you employer is a bit paranoid. The voice-recorders are generally used to record phone-calls and make dictations over a short distance. Hardly a tool for spying.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    15. Re:I wish they'd stop... by orcrist · · Score: 1

      ROFL! It's the Maginot Line approach. I'm a consultant and I see it in all kinds of forms (both software and physical security) at companies I visit.

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    16. Re:I wish they'd stop... by BriSTO(V)L · · Score: 1

      Absolutely right - that's why some parts of my building ban cameras, but other parts ban cell-phones, pdas, laptops, everything... just depends on what stuff u work on ;-) Also - some of the cell-phone designers (LG?) ban camera phones from their own offices for the same reason.

    17. Re:I wish they'd stop... by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      I'm a consultant and I see it in all kinds of forms (both software and physical security) at companies I visit.
      I'm not a consultant, but I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express. I agree. People try some of the most ridiculous strategies for security - and most of the time overlook the obvious and most serious threat of all. Cover the basics before you worry about the extremes.

      --
      -- $G
    18. Re:I wish they'd stop... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are areas of my work where even cell phones are banned. Many are actually shielded in room sized Faraday cages.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  7. i am pleased by myom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems Motorola is showing the way, along with HP and IBM - All of these big companies that I had some antipathy against before are now showing some courage... Guess they are large enough to ignore Microsoft or try alternatives, while the smaller ones are ending up in either the Symbian or Microsoft camps.

    1. Re:i am pleased by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And as for alternatives, where are the itron cellphone/pda toys?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:i am pleased by dswt · · Score: 1

      Yeah -- here's Motorola ignoring Microsoft: MPx200

  8. But what network does it use? by Audent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone? I can't find it on the site. CDMA, GPRS, string? what?

    that's kind of important to those of us with a choice.

    looks nice though. I never liked the clamshell design but now it's growing on me... much better than having to lock the keypad all the time

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
    1. Re:But what network does it use? by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find it, either.

      If only it was an iDEN phone...drool...

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    2. Re:But what network does it use? by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      Please, Verizon, pleeeeaaaassseeeeee!

      If someone can determine if there's a CDMA version of this phone, please post below!

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    3. Re:But what network does it use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Update link:

      "Motorola launched its A760 Linux and Java
      smartphone in China today. The dual-mode
      GSM/GPRS phone uses ..."

      Looks like no CDMA. Have to keep wishing Verizon will enable the Samsung SPH-i500 somehow.

    4. Re:But what network does it use? by pablo_max · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is quad band GSM.
      850/900/1800/1900
      GPRS as well...an not thats not a seperate band. Uses 1900MHz.
      There isnt really anyone using 850 yet, but there are many carriers that will be adding it since analog is no longer required and the 850 GSM actually runs on the same freqs as analog. 824-849MHz.

  9. Yeah... by Davak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phones, PDAs, set-top boxes, computer games, medical equipment, industrial controllers, and other systems need graphical user interface software that is smaller, smarter, faster: and that runs on multiple platforms: including desktop and server platforms.

    What worries me about this wonderful Swiss-Army phone is the software. If it ran Palm OS, I could easily continue to use all my current favorite software.

    Where do I find software for this beast?

    If it runs pure linux stuff, yeah! But if it runs some hybrid, I'll wait a couple of versions down the line until the software is commonplace.

    1. Re:Yeah... by swv3752 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://killefiz.de/zaurus

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Yeah... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. that's the problem. and it doesn't really mean or matter jack if it runs qt or not internally if you can't do/get the software yourself(just because it has linux innards doesn't really warm me if i can't really get any programs, that do anything i want, for it).

      anyways.. series60(nokia+some others) symbian phones are starting to have a pretty good portfolio when it comes to software. since 7650 has been out for a year already, and the appearance of other s60 phones has made it pretty nice looking platform to develope for. but even they don't have _that_ much(though, you can find some pretty cool, and useful, stuff). not quite sure how moto is going to battle that, if they even get it out properly around here.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Yeah... by grotgrot · · Score: 1
      Where do I find software for this beast?

      Very well put. In the US you are at the mercy of your carrier as to what phones they will allow you to use. For example, try and get a J2ME enabled phone you can use on Verizon.

      Of course they have bucketloads using their GetItNow service (also known as Qualcomm BREW) and the apps only come for a fee (which Qualcomm and Verizon get a portion of).

      To write a "free" program for any Verizon cellphone would require me to spend over $6,000 a year at Qualcomm, get it certified by Qualcomm and Verizon, and then have a revenue sharing agreement.

    4. Re:Yeah... by connsmythe96 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just like with linux in general, despite the common conception that you can't find software for linux, you almost always can find software and it is likely to be free. I've had absolutely no problem finding whatever type of software I need for my Zaurus and I've never had to pay a cent for it. I also have considered paying for some of the theKompany stuff, which looks pretty good. I probably will eventually.

      --
      if(!cool) exit(-1);
    5. Re:Yeah... by beboploco · · Score: 1
      If it runs pure linux stuff, yeah!

      MontaVista has announced that it runs their Linux, so technically it should be able to run arbitrary Linux stuff. But information on how to download applications and on applications that are hooked up to the phone's buttons and display might also be needed... If it does run Qtopia then there are a lot of Qtopia applications available.

  10. What they don't tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is that this picture is actual size.

    1. Re:What they don't tell you... by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      Phew!

      I was afraid that was going to be a goatse link!

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  11. TrollTech partially owned by Canopy group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Although TrollTech is not fully owned by the Canopy group, they are 5.7% owned by SCO / Canopy.


    I don't think I'll be giving them any money soon.

  12. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a $1399 fee, you dumbass, not a 1499 fee. Now please shut the fuck up and go away. plzdiekthx

  13. So now we have the KPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all we need is the GPhone

  14. This is Linux's Omaha Beach by Ridgelift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And, the model A760 is ideal for execs on the move with secure and instant access to corporate e-mail and database applications. Everyone loves a multi-tasker.

    Cell phones are the battleground where Linux will defeat Microsoft for world domination in the OS war. When executives who buy Linux-based phones note how reliable the OS is on their phone, it's a short mental leap to see it's reliability on the internet, servers, phone systems, and eventually the growing server and desktop.

    Many techs think this is naive, but just ask a suit. You'll be surprised to hear the phrase "I thought Linux was dead". Executives are like salespeople; they only believe what they see, and what they see is the end product.

    1. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Your assuming people who use cell phones will find out or even care what the OS of the phone is. I bet money that no one but the few here care at all. People want cell phones that are inexpensive, feature packed, and have good reception. They could care less what's running under the hood.

    2. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Cell phones are the battleground where Linux will defeat Microsoft for world domination in the OS war. When executives who buy Linux-based phones note how reliable the OS is on their phone, it's a short mental leap to see it's reliability on the internet, servers, phone systems, and eventually the growing server and desktop.

      Then they'll have absolutely no interest in this, right? No business executive could possibly have a use for a phone that can sync directly with their Windows programs and includes pocket versions of Outlook, IE and Windows Media Player...

      I'm not saying you're wrong (well, yes I am), but you're incredibly naive if you think Linux is going to come in and sweep across cellular phone land. There are plenty of reasons why someone would choose a Windows-based phone over a Linux-based phone and a lot of those reasons have to do with what people are running on their desktop. (I also think the phone in the parent article is ugly as sin, but that's just me.)

      Myself, I don't give a crap what OS runs on my phone as long as my call quality and signal strength is good. That's still my measure of any phone (and it always will be).

    3. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When executives who buy Linux-based phones note how reliable the OS is on their phone, it's a short mental leap to see it's reliability on the internet, servers, phone systems, and eventually the growing server and desktop.

      First of all, they are unlikely to know or care what OS the phone runs. Secondly, you are asking for a (possibly correct) conclusion based on faulty reasoning, which is a terribly slippery slope. There are many phone (or PDA) operating systems, and most of them are utterly unsuitable on servers, the phone system, or a desktop computer. Finally, neither cellular carriers nor the OEMs who make the phones have strong incentives to emphasize "Linux", because they each have their own brand to promote.

      I like Linux, too, but I fear you are overly optimistic.

    4. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main thing Linux adds to this cell phone is an extra two meg footprint for that massive kernel. That means more flash is required, say $7 more in cost, which probably means the phone retails for $15-20 more than it could have. Multiply by hundreds of thousands of units, and it's it's millions of dollars that users had to spend for their "free" OS.

      By contrast, I know of a commercial RTOS that takes up a minimum of 2.5 K (yes, K, not M) for the kernel. The full-up configuration with a TCP stack is 5% of the size MontaVista claims. And it barely costs five figures for a royalty-free source code license, which you'd recoup on the hardware before you were done cranking out prototypes and samples.

      That's some mighty expensive beer Motorola is drinking.

    5. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by burns210 · · Score: 1

      WOW there cowboy... an exec who has a no-crashing phone will be AT BEST, content... if an exec has a crashing phone, he will just curse at it, and restart the damn thing. No million dollar migration will come from a cell phone, imo.

    6. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by bfree · · Score: 1

      Far more likely in my mind is that linux phones will win minds by having a simpler set of tools, which interoperate cleanly (just use standards, no integration beyond that) and go out of their way to minimise bandwidth usage over latency (i.e. use compressed tunnels for all data). Of course, the bandwidth thing will never happen as the carriers will all want to make sure they can charge you your 3/MB (current gprs/3g charge here in Ireland for a single phone user) and not the miserly 0.3 or less you would probably get away with using compression.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    7. Re:This is Linux's Omaha Beach by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Omaha? You mean a bloody disaster? Most of the dead never having a chance to fire a shot, dying in the water without even reaching the beach?

      Wouldn't you rather have Sword? Gold? Even Juno or Utah?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  15. Ogg Vorbis? by Pyro226 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The phone will have 'digital camera, video player, MP3 player...

    Anyone know (or have reason to guess) if this thing will play Ogg Vorbis or FLAC audio files? Despite my decided lack of money I would buy an iPod if it had Vorbis support, and while I don't need a walkman, I do need a cell phone.

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis? by robla · · Score: 3, Informative
      I can't speak to Motorola's specific productization plans, or to what sort of mechanism that will be available for updating software. However, Ogg Vorbis support isn't much of a leap for the following reasons: Any help we get with the Xiph project on Helix helps us toward making this happen.

      Rob Lanphier
      Helix Community Coordinator

    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis? by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      Too bad there hasnt been more work done on the armlinux/zaurus/qtopia port for Helix. It could already be there, had someone (real and anyone, for that matter) helped that project out a tad.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    3. Re:Ogg Vorbis? by robla · · Score: 1

      The webpage is severely out of date, but there's a lot of work going on with linuxarm/qtopia right now (because of Motorola, among others).

      Rob

  16. karma whoring (for the first time!) by mnewton32 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Trolltech Unveils Qtopia Phone Edition Oslo, Norway - 2003-10-31

    Trolltech(R), a leader in multiplatform development frameworks, today introduced Qtopia(R) Phone Edition (Qtopia Phone), a Linux(R)-based application platform for phones.

    The combination of Qtopia Phone and embedded Linux creates a robust operating environment with the flexibility to support phones with limited capacity, feature phones and high-end enterprise smartphones. Qtopia Phone provides all the base Qtopia applications, plus a user interface designed specifically for mobile phones.

    The Trolltech Qtopia Phone Edition comes with two types of user interaction; either by a phone's keypad or touch screen. Qtopia Phone will include all the standard Qtopia applications, customized to fit into a phone user interface, plus a 'Home' launcher that presents time critical data such as missed calls, messages received, and calendar events.

    Key features of the Trolltech Qtopia Phone Edition include: Phone User Interface: Designed specifically with a mobile phone user in mind, Qtopia Phone's user interface is designed to work on a variety of screen resolutions, such as 176 x 208 and 240 x 320 pixels, and can be used with either a touch screen or the phone's keypad. It can be personalized by end users and customized by manufacturers and network operators. Applications: Qtopia Phone includes a powerful suite of phone applications, including PIM, productivity, email, telephony (dialer, messaging client and others) games, and media player (MP3, MPEG, and others). Synchronization: Users can synchronize their phone with either Qtopia Desktop, a multiplatform desktop PIM suite from Trolltech, or with Microsoft(R) Outlook. Qtopia Phone can synchronize contacts, calendar events, to do items, as well as multimedia files and documents. 3rd party applications: Because Qtopia Phone Edition is based on the same development platform as Qtopia PDA Edition, the existing Qtopia applications (over 1000 thus far) can easily be ported. Java integration: Several Java Virtual Machines (JVM?) are already running on Qtopia Phone, including Esmertec's Jeode? and IBM(R) VisualAge(TM) Micro Edition. Java applications integrate seamlessly into Qtopia phone, providing phone manufacturers Java content with a native look and feel. Development Environment: Trolltech provides a suite of tools that developers can use to customize and extend Qtopia Phone Edition. The powerful development environment makes it easy to develop on a desktop system, then cross-compile onto a target device.

    Qtopia Phone Edition is the first solution in the market to offer a completely extendable platform for Linux-based mobile computing devices, said Haavard Nord, Trolltech CEO. Qtopia Phone provides unprecedented functionality as an out-of-box solution and can be easily extended and customized. This advancement in the feature and smart phone arena keeps us on the leading edge of innovation to provide our customers with the best-of-breed tools.

    In a related press release, Trolltech today announced that Motorola, a premiere mobile phone manufacturer, has chosen Trolltech's Qt/Embedded for the A760. Qt/Embedded is the software development framework used to develop Qtopia Phone.

    Find out more on our Qtopia pages.

    Availability:

    Qtopia Phone Edition will be released in Q1, 2004.

    About Qtopia(R) Phone edition:

    Trolltech's embedded Linux phone edition is a customized version of Qtopia designed to work in a memory-constrained mobile phone. With a modifiable user interface and low memory usage, phone manufacturers can create a stunning GUI that enables them to stand out from the crowd. Qtopia Phone is available in two versions: Keypad-driven and Stylus-driven.

    About Trolltech:

    Trolltech(R) is a software company with two flags

  17. Confused by Garabito · · Score: 1

    So, is Motorola betting on Linux (this phone, A760) or MS Smartphone (MPx200)? Or are they just playing with both to see which one wins?

    1. Re:Confused by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many manufacturers do, except for Nokia & Sony Ericsson. Samsung, for example, is pumping out phones in world markets will all kinds of OSes, just to see what sticks.

      What sticks are good UIs.

    2. Re:Confused by Banshee99 · · Score: 0

      MPx200 doesn't run on windows, it only has the windows user interface. Windows Mobile runs on many types of OSes (including linux).

  18. Re:Don't forget... by myom · · Score: 1

    Hot air: Since "SCO is pleased with the way the licensing program is moving along" they do not have to send the bills to the companies using Linux.

    My guess: They are afraid to do so, since the first time someone refuses to pay up and claims this is fraud, or at the very least not valid, those who have paid would join up in a class act. There are also some US federal laws that make it illegal to send bills that are a fraud. SCO has probably judged they would 1: lose, 2: get bad press, stopping the rise in their share prices. Besides, they are probably rather happy with the money they are getting from Sun and Microsoft - the two companies that are benefitting the most from the SCO FUD program.

  19. Qt/Embedded vs Qtopia by rhysweatherley · · Score: 4, Informative

    Qt/Embedded is the low-level widget library - essentially Qt ported to embedded Linux. Qtopia is a suite of PDA/SmartPhone applications that build on top of Qt/Embedded. I belive that Motorola is using Qt/Embedded and its own suite of applications on top, not Qtopia.

  20. TROLLTECH IS AN ENEMY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their license sucks and they're owned by SCO. THEY MUST DIE !

    1. Re:TROLLTECH IS AN ENEMY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get your facts straight before you go spewing your trash.
      The Canopy Group ownes a FEW shares of trolltech. NOT SCO, you idiot
      btw, something is wrong with your caps lock key.

  21. Save Some Time by dandot · · Score: 2, Informative

    To save some time, go here for the specs without the HTML junk.

    1. Re:Save Some Time by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Specs? There ain't no numbers in that page. Just lots of superlatives.

      Where are the specs?

      Also, which cell-phone companies support/permit it?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  22. VisorPhones by dark-br · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have the forefather, one of those old VisorPhones that you put in springboard of a Visor. It's about 2 years old now I think, and quite big in my pocket, if you compare with these new models. Still, I wouldn't trade for any of those other "smart phones" out there, except for this new Treo 600 of course. Why buy a phone that also tries to act as a pda, when you can get a really good pda, that can also act as a phone? I mean, the gadgets of a cellphone are more important than the phone itself, right. :)

    1. Re:VisorPhones by kb3hag · · Score: 1
      i'm reposting this because i beleive it still applys to this article
      Yes, some households have several phone numbers per person. However, other households have one phone number for several people. Cell phones, second lines, etc are moderately common, but far from ubiquitous.
  23. Re:Qtopia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a bunch of Average Joe contestants to me!

  24. Keep a level head about this by Tim_F · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Just because this phone runs Linux does not necessarily make it better than the other phones out there. Sure, if they had used GTK+ it would look like arse, but if this phone doesn't have the hardware to back up the software, it's simply not going to perform as it needs to. It's great to support projects that support Linux, but if those projects suck, your support is wasted. There are plenty other worthy cell phones out there that perform as advertised, such as those from Microsoft and Handspring/Palm. Don't let Linux be the one and only reason for choosing a phone. You may get burned.

  25. Coolest Phone ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well.. Thought I might write this in here. I saw the coolest phone ever so far. My friend's colleague has this Motorola that is still not in production yet. It has a cool form factor running Linux. It doesn't have any apps in it yet. All it had was a nice looking blue screen and nothing else. The cool thing is it was running telnet server. He telnets into it and nfs mounts his Linux desktop and uses the real player that is built into the phone. Is that cool or what?

  26. Not for me by JanneM · · Score: 1, Troll

    The idea of a Linux-based phone is nice, but Qtopia just isn't a very good environment. It was far too clumsy and 'desktop'-like on the Zaurus, and will likely be even worse on such a cramped device as a telephone.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Not for me by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

      I abandoned my SL-5500 and went back to a Palm PDA because the software was crap. The idea of a phone using PIM software inferior to what Palm were doing donkey's years ago is not appealing.

    2. Re:Not for me by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      I am sure in the two years since Sharp released a Qtopia 1.5.4 version, the Qtopia developers have managed to work out quite a few kinks.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    3. Re:Not for me by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Well, the basic "kink" is that the stuff looks and acts desktop-like. There's windows, button bars, scrollbars and so on - all stuff that makes good sense on a arge desktop, but not on a device where I will be running one app only at a time. The screen should _be_ the window for the apps; the whole idea of a title bar is anathema to the format. That is something the Palm does right and Qtopia does not.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  27. Didn't answer my questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it has bluetooth and can be a phone. Nice. Great.

    Does it support 802.11 and a web browser?

    And the syncing software/toolset (like jpilot)...where is this?

    How about an external keyboard (like the Targus folding keybords for Palms?)

  28. Will Qt/C++ pushing Java out of phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Qt/C++ is faster and uses less memory than Java (think: better games with Qt).
    I wonder if the other mobile phone makers will follow Motorola's lead.

    1. Re:Will Qt/C++ pushing Java out of phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is that about? Apologizing for your jacked up ac post. Do you like to hear yourself talk that much?

    2. Re:Will Qt/C++ pushing Java out of phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Solly!
      Your shirt be ready Tuesday, Mr. Asshole, sir.

    3. Re:Will Qt/C++ pushing Java out of phones? by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 0

      Yes, I am sure they will!

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  29. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Slashdot go nuts over anything that runs Linux? Ok, it's a phone that runs Linux. Hooray. I say big deal. It already runs on PDAs, GameBoys, and other handheld devices, it's not like a phone is a huge leap.

    Shameless plug:
    Blogzine

  30. Hearing Aid Compatible Phone? by nanospook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wonder if they are making this phone hearing aid compatible? For those of you who may not know (probably most of you), a hearing aid has a telecoil that picks up EMF frequencies. Most modern phones broadcast in EMF but cell phones are more spotty. My Samsong A460 does broadcast EMF but also provides lots of static and weird noises..

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  31. Re:I wouldn't buy it.... by SupeRobot+Ninja · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it's more AT&T than the phone. I have a T720 with Verizon and it almost always gets a good signal; the only time it doesn't always is when I'm inside a large building and far from a window.

  32. Re:I wouldn't buy it.... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    the way the phone handled it was totally motorolas fault though.

    however, learning yet why operator tie in sucks and how phones aren't 'free'? when you can change the operator if they suck without hassle(or big fees) the operators are far more likely to make the network actually usable(than just concentrating on locking the poor sobs in).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  33. mistake by penguin7of9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think Motorola made a mistake by choosing Qt/Embedded, and one that may cost Linux the phone market.

    Choosing Qt/Embedded means that Motorola is now tied to the fortunes of Troll Tech. The GPL option of Troll Tech's license may be acceptable for open source developers, but it wouldn't be an option for Motorola should Troll Tech decide to take a wrong turn somewhere with where they take Qt/Embedded (some would argue that they already have). Furthermore, commercial developers for these phones have a much higher cost of entry into the market than if Motorola had chosen one of the LGPL'ed toolkits.

    Altogether, Motorola is in roughly the same situation with respect to Troll Tech as they would be with respect to Microsoft if they had chosen Windows CE. But Microsoft at least is guaranteed to stay around a little longer.

    What is particularly sad is that Qt/Embedded really has technically no advantages over any of the alternatives. Even compared to X11 and Gtk+, Qt/Embedded is slow and memory hungry; it's less featureful and without open implementations.

    Congratulations on a good marketing and sales job to Troll Tech. But this is a pretty sad day for Linux and open source.

    1. Re:mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh, dude.. it's Trolltech. One word. Trolltech. Like that. Not Troll Tech.

      The GPL is never an option for device makers. Why? Because it doesn't make you any money. Nor can you have developers create commercial applications for it. so, why would anyone but hobbiests write software for it? How about when something goes wrong? Who do you turn too? Irc?!

      Qt/E has the advantage of being able to produce commercially viable applications, thus creating incentive to develop for it.

      Oh, a Qtopia developers license is a big whoppin' $200. My left toe could afford that! Plus, there are already thousand apps for Qtopia. Do you have that choice going with GTK + X11 in embedded environment? No.

      I suppose you have done performance/memory performance testing for Qt/E vs. Gtk+ + X11.. ya. thats what I thought. Suppositions. You also need to include ramdisk (harddrive) space.

      Ya, and X11 is featureful? HA! It doesn't even have focus! Get real. You need a Window Manager on top of X11 to do anything useful. Ever try using the X11 API? Ha! Didn't think so.

      Get Real

    2. Re:mistake by FrostedWheat · · Score: 0

      Qt/Embedded is slow and memory hungry; it's less featureful and without open implementations.

      You mean open implementations like this?

    3. Re:mistake by darkheavy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The huge difference of QT/Embedded Vs X11/GTK _and_ glib is that QT has an API that an eight y/o could code with. Have you ever tried to make "Hello world" with Xlib?

      Commercial developers have to pay to use QT? Big deal, it only means that their commercial margin will be a bit lower. And if they don't want to, they can distribute their software as GPL.

      But meanwhile there are lots of free software products hitting the internet instead of the shelves from the non-commercial developers. And guess what, they (the developers) don't need to buy a set of OS+IDE+Embedded tools to do so.

      Trolltech people had a propietary development and they set it free, under the GPL license. What else do you want, a box of free donuts with it?

      QT/Embedded GPL FAQ

      Oh, and I think there is a pretty lot of applications for qt embedded already in the market, that could be another good reason for Motorola, don't you think so?

      So, sad day for Linux and Open Source? If you want to be a zealot pray Ximian (now Novell) to work out a full implementation of a GTK Framework for embedded devices.

    4. Re:mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on a good marketing and sales job to Troll Tech. But this is a pretty sad day for Linux and open source.

      I am a Linux-fanboy and I agree 100% with penguin7of9. Trolltech has now screwed up the Linux Cellphone market just like they did the Linux PDA market. Sigh, the Linux PDA market seemed so promising. The Qt path is not the path to success. I'm all for Linux world domination but with friends like Trolltech who needs enemies?

    5. Re:mistake by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Motorola has already "chosen" Microsoft and Windows CE. Go to Best Buy or any cellphone store and buy a MPx200 phone. Soon to be released is the MPx220 as well. This linux based phone is just vaporware to see if there is any interest in a linux based phone. You will likely never see it for sale as their is no point to choose an unproven (in the cellphone world) OS/UI combo over a proven one (Microsoft or Symbian).

  34. Troll being the operative word. ;-) by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Nice one. I hate the GPL too.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  35. Zaurus software perhaps? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Since the Zaurus runs Qtopia, you would hope that a fair quantity of the Zaurus software would run on this phone. Whether the insanity runs as deep as I've seen for the Zaurus (i.e., running apache and sshd) is yet to be seen.

    Also, wouldn't it have support for J2ME as well?

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  36. Mot+Qtopia? NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, according to this article at LinuxDevices, Mot did NOT select Qtopia for the A760. Quoting from the LinuxDevices article: 'Trolltech has announced that Motorola's much anticipated A760 smartphone will be based on Trolltech's Qt/Embedded application development framework. However, the device will not make use of Trolltech's Qtopia Phone Edition, which Trolltech has pre-released to select customers but not yet formally shipped.'

  37. keypad? by wolf_m16 · · Score: 0

    heh, does anybody actually like to use these "dial pads"... seriously whos gonna take out a stylus everytime they want to make a call?

  38. i want the new pocket pc 2003 t-mobile phone! by rnd() · · Score: 1

    I want the new pocketPC T-Mobile phone (I don't think one has come out yet...)

    Why?

    Because you can use Visual Studio 2003 to easily write apps for the .net portable framework. I've already written a few simple ones using the simulator in visual studio and it's incredibly easy. I predict that as Visual Studio 2003 catches on and pocketPC 2003 catches on the number of pocketPC apps will spike and at least catch up with the number of palm apps.

    Just about any app you can think of that would be useful could be written straightforwardly using the portable .net framework.

    Does anyone know anything about the development kit for the qtopia phone?

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  39. Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Linux supposed to make stuff cheaper?
    $800 for a Phone!?

  40. $500+ for Visual Studio? by exhilaration · · Score: 2, Informative
    Visual Studio 2003 costs quite a bit of cash, Nokia provides the Borland C++ Mobile Edition for Series 60 for free. They also provide free plugins for Java IDE's.

    Nokia wants to sell phones, not software, hence it's in their best interest to provide free development tools. Thanks to this enlightened policy, there's a TON of software out there for Nokia phones.

    1. Re:$500+ for Visual Studio? by thehomeslice · · Score: 0


      Check out the leading non-telecom controlled SDK for phones:

      http://www.openwave.com/us/news_room/press_relea se s/2003/20030918_opwv_v7_0918.htm

    2. Re:$500+ for Visual Studio? by rnd() · · Score: 1

      very cool. My next phone may end up being a Nokia...

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  41. Some people pay for software by dbIII · · Score: 0
    Furthermore, commercial developers for these phones have a much higher cost of entry into the market than if Motorola had chosen one of the LGPL'ed toolkits.
    These people have much bigger overheads than a single software licence - we're not talking about a cottage industry here. Cost of entry is irrelevant, since you don't enter on a commercial licence - you don't learn how to use this stuff on a commercial licence, you write software to make money with a commercial licence.
    Even compared to X11 and Gtk+, Qt/Embedded is slow and memory hungry
    Are you smoking what SCO is smoking? The embedded environment is different to the desktop, you don't have a 128MB video card, you have a few kilobytes to play with for screen memory. How is Thai langauge support in Pango and other things that gtk+ won't build without going to go with limited main memory? Gtk+ was designed with other things in mind than Qt/Embedded.

    sad day for Linux and open source
    These things should be argued on their merits, not because RMS didn't like Qt five years ago. He would also give you a hard time about using the word "open". Motorola can keep on using and entending this no matter what happens to Trolltech, and porting other applications to this platform will be simple.

  42. Obligatory stupid comment by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

    [Insert stupid comment regarding wireless beowolf cluster of these here]

    --
    TIAEAE!
  43. *Two* bitches. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I do not blame you for mistaking Ragnhild's gender.

  44. ROAR! I want CDMA+Bluetooth and I want it NOW! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1

    I admittedly didn't research every fscking handset on that anouncement site. The general fine print I did read on the BT handsets pretty much pointed to the Bluetooth phones, once again, being only for GSM/GPRS.

    Sprint and Verizon, what gives? What the hell do you guys have against BT??? I work in the industry and have even queried a few manufacturer reps and higher-ups at the carriers and the results have been disparaging, to say the least. Reps scurry away quickly with hands firmly clamped over their ears screaming "HEAR NO EVIL! HEAR NO EVIL! No wana go to house of pain!" and the carrier suits just cast glaring, angered looks my way.

    Whatever happened to that Sony-Ericcson T68-like tri-band CDMA handset that Sprint nearly adopted the first part of this year? The same one that anyone who did have knowledge of it seems to have now been lobotomized. Well, at least Sprint recognized that Bluetooth exists. Um, Verizon, there's this nifty little wireless technology that many of your customers would like to see in their handsets... Your competitors all have it for the most part but their networks pale in comparison. Um, did I mention it was wireless? ;-P

    Goddamnit you CDMA carriers! I want bluetooth! And not that stupid Motorola T270 strap-on bluetooth battery cover horseshit either! Ah, if only I could sync some sort of svelte little phone with my Palm or iSync on my Mac... SANS DATA CABLES! It's just plain frustrating. The good cables cost a kings randsome and the cheapies, sometimes they work and sometimes you piss away a weekend getting 'em to work.

    Seriously though, if any of you fine folk out there in the industry know of any hope of a real BT/CDMA solution in the works then how about just a little tease, eh?

    Yeh, yeh, go ahead and mark me as a troll but I honestly felt it needed to be said. Again. Really, all I want for Xmas is a CDMA/bluetooth phone. WAH! WAH! WAAAAAAH! Ahem.

  45. Only one question is important to 80% of people by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    Does it sync with Outlook? Sad but true.

  46. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they allow normal phones?

    If something is so sensitive that cannot be photographed, I would imagine they don't want any audio bugs there either.

  47. Motorola+Qtopia= by Nailer · · Score: 1

    Motopia!

  48. "Motorola" and "smart" in one sentence? :X by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    You must be kidding. I bought one of their timeport phones and it was the total suckage. I asked a couple friends why that was, and they gave me that pittying look - "Look...that poor sod bought a motorola, how sad..."

    A lot of stuff runs linux nowadays. But just because you can slap linux on a machine doesn't mean it's a good machine...

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  49. Motorola? Eeeek. by haraldm · · Score: 1

    None of the Motorola phones I had were particularly ergonomic. The tri-band P7389 was particularly annoying. You can't simply add a number that you just dialed to your phone book. Nope, you have to enter the whole number one more time. Disgusting. Why should this be better now? As far as usablity, Siemens and Nokia still lead the pack by far.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  50. Where to buy it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone knows where to buy the A760? Is there any reliable online shop already selling it?

    1. Re:Where to buy it? by Banshee99 · · Score: 0

      Look towards china. That's where they are selling them. Hopes for a U.S. version? Probably not, but from what I've heard around here (motorola), linux is here to stay.

  51. mobile feeping creaturism by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Everytime I found a form factor I liked with a nice display or whatever, it always have some friggin' blasted camera function or voice recorder. Enough with the added features.
    ...
    How about a solid, reliable phone that just makes really, really, really good, clear calls?
    I hear you. I found a relatively simple model, yet it had many "features" I do not use and a few I do not want. The first thing I wanted to do (and still want to do) with my new phone was to hack the menu and delete about two thirds of the items and rearrange the remaing one third.
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  52. What matters is the interface by pointwood · · Score: 1

    I had a Motorola Accompli 008 (I needed a calendar) which can be described as an older version of this phone I believe and it sounds like this phone have some of the same flaws according to a small "review" I found here.

    Basically, the interface on the Accompli 008 sucked. It has got to be pretty easy to use or I'll simply not use it. I ended up only using it as a phone and it wasn't very hand in that regard. This smartphone sounds like it's become a bit better, but not that much. Today I have a SE P800 and I actually use its PDA features, mainly the calendar though.

  53. Too much... by ciphrix · · Score: 0

    This is great and all but at $800 I think I'll pass. Those of us in the USA are also left out of the loop as they currently only have networks available for this phone in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America. It's apparently suppose to be released in the USA sometime later but who knows when.

  54. No More Camera Phones by nberardi · · Score: 1

    I really wish they would stop putting these Camera's in phones. Because not only is it useless, at least for me, but I can't even bring the phone into work anymore because of my companies policy on camera's in the work place. It's almost like you have to buy a low-quality phone so I can use it everywhere, including my place of work.

  55. look and talk at the same time? by gummint · · Score: 1

    Integrating photography and telephony can be much better than just adding a camera to a phone. In the US across the 20'th century, persons spent about 80 minutes on the phone for each photograph taken. This is roughly the same ratio as picture sending/voice telephony today in Japan with camera phones. See Table 7, p. 125 and p. 135 in "Sense in Communication," available at www.galbithink.org. Getting more value out of photography probably requires new practices of use. A good start might be for mobile phone manufactures to figure out an appealing device design that enables talking and sharing images at the same time.

  56. Still looks like a toilet. by polyp2000 · · Score: 1


    While I applaud motorolla for choosing linux and qtopia, and would love to see it succeed in the marketplace, alongside symbian. Creating a mobile phone that looks like a toilet seat/lid is not going to do anyone any favours.

    Choosing linux is a step in the right direction for motorolla, I found their older phones interfaces somewhat cumbersome, although I quite liked my little clamshell one with a red backlight!. Motorolla need to produce some nice looking phones as well as putting a nice OS on them. Phones are as much fashion accessories for most people, as they are techie toys to us geeks.

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  57. And it costs how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because this says it's $799.95. $800 for a fucking phone? Are they insane?

  58. Remember! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mare doesn't use non-linux phones!

  59. $35 by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    SCO was talking about $35 for every embedded license.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.