I agree. IE just makes more sense to me. Simple stuff like this: follow W3C specs to develop simple HTML page with CSS, test in IE, works nicely, test with Netscape, all f***ed up. That kind of thing will make you give up on Netscape.
It't nice to see somebody with the same sentiment on/.
Look at JNapster (http://www.mp3s4u.f2s.com). They just put the following into their license:
Why should i not use jnapster?
Because jnapster is distributed for educational purposes only. You are only allowed to read the source code to learn how to write network applications with java. However, you are *not* allowed to use it for connecting to any napster and/or napigator server and/or for downloading any copyrighted material.
Any use of jnapster is possibly illegal
I guess it also has something to do with the type of movement in a FPS compated to tv or film.
In tv/film you mostly have very similar images following each other, e.g. a person walks across the screen, but the background remains the same. In this kind of a situation, at 25fps your brains 'blurs' the images together and everything appears to be fluid.
In FPS games on the other hand, it is common for 2 consecutive images to be completely different, e.g. when you do a 180 mouse flick to look behind you. In maybe 0.5s the background changes completely. In this kind of situation you brain might actually notice that 25fps, while 60fps would be much more comfortable.
The point nr. 3 (Standards) that James Hills makes is especially valid I think. To me linux always seems a forest of functionality (tools, directory structures,...). But lately, with all the new distributions appearing, and with the explosion of new linux development, this forest is turning into a jungle...
Slashdot Mirror
Is this real or just a scam? :-)
Check out http://www.brigebuilder-game.com
At last some positive news involving Belgium! Plus it's nice to so some noted work come out of the university I went to! Congrats to those involved!
I agree. IE just makes more sense to me. Simple stuff like this: follow W3C specs to develop simple HTML page with CSS, test in IE, works nicely, test with Netscape, all f***ed up. That kind of thing will make you give up on Netscape. It't nice to see somebody with the same sentiment on /.
Look at JNapster (http://www.mp3s4u.f2s.com). They just put the following into their license:
Why should i not use jnapster? Because jnapster is distributed for educational purposes only. You are only allowed to read the source code to learn how to write network applications with java. However, you are *not* allowed to use it for connecting to any napster and/or napigator server and/or for downloading any copyrighted material. Any use of jnapster is possibly illegal
Could this work?
I guess it also has something to do with the type of movement in a FPS compated to tv or film.
In tv/film you mostly have very similar images following each other, e.g. a person walks across the screen, but the background remains the same. In this kind of a situation, at 25fps your brains 'blurs' the images together and everything appears to be fluid.
In FPS games on the other hand, it is common for 2 consecutive images to be completely different, e.g. when you do a 180 mouse flick to look behind you. In maybe 0.5s the background changes completely. In this kind of situation you brain might actually notice that 25fps, while 60fps would be much more comfortable.
Let's see now, I think I could be talked into working for MS for that kinda money :-)
LOL!
The point nr. 3 (Standards) that James Hills makes is especially valid I think. To me linux always seems a forest of functionality (tools, directory structures, ...). But lately, with all the new distributions appearing, and with the explosion of new linux development, this forest is turning into a jungle...
It's clear that John has a bright future ahead of him in the technical management/stearing of a big company ones he's done programming :-)
Yaeh, a G400 pretty much rules. The duel monitor support is also pretty neat!