What if you have a device that can play it "legally", but at the same time stream it out to another device that records it without the encryption (a la DVD to VCR copying)?
While I agree with most of your "rant", I don't thinks its correct to go after the "medium". You'd have to go after everyone inbetween: the communications company who laid out the cables, the ISP, the maker of the CD/DVD-ROMs, etc. etc. etc. - they're all just a link in the transport of (il)legal stuff.
Yahoo! Mail lets you auto-delete any SPAM. It would be nice for Gmail to give you that option. That way you wouldn't even notice the SPAM that get's sent and correctly classified as such.
Not to nitpick, but that same reference does not use the word "Mayans" in the plural. Instead, it says "n. A Maya; adj. Of or relating to the Mayas, their culture, or the Mayan linguistic stock". Saying "ancient Mayans" is not correct when you're speaking of the culture/group of people. If you're talking about the individuals, you could get away with it, but then the individuals would not be "ancient".
You clearly did not 'see the attachment for details'.
Actually, this is my personal experience/observation, not flamebait at all.
Just because your browser can run a certain plugin/extension does not mean it has to - unless you need it. You avoid potential issues by limiting yourself to the bare necessities.
From the article: '"More and more smart individuals, government agencies and corporations are shifting towards Apple and BSD environments in 2004," according to DK Matai, Executive Chairman, mi2g.'
According to the Cambridge Dictionary, "unconscionable" is defined as "An unconscionable size, amount, or length of time is too great and is unacceptable". So, it seems a bit odd using "unconscionable" and "short amounts of time" in the same sentence.
No, actually, you'd follow an algorithm to determine a "formula". In the code, you could tell the computer to follow an algorithm or to calculate the result of the formula, bypassing the first step altogether.
The point is to have the computer figure it out, rather than providing a formula that a human being came up with. I guess there is always going to be a fine line as to how much "human" logic goes into a program, hence the variety of solutions.
I don't remember much from my chemistry class, but apparently they tested it with "benzene, naphthalene, nail polish, perfume, lighter fluid, rubber cement, acetone, toluene, fertilizer on golf shoes, sugar, baking soda, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), paint thinner and more" and nono of these triggered the alarm. I'm sure some of these contain the nitrites you mentioned, no?
What if you have a device that can play it "legally", but at the same time stream it out to another device that records it without the encryption (a la DVD to VCR copying)?
From Canada to NZ is 20 min./$1 (CDN = US $0.83).
While I agree with most of your "rant", I don't thinks its correct to go after the "medium". You'd have to go after everyone inbetween: the communications company who laid out the cables, the ISP, the maker of the CD/DVD-ROMs, etc. etc. etc. - they're all just a link in the transport of (il)legal stuff.
I would say it makes no difference which browser you use if you do not keep up with all the security updates for the browser and/or OS.
I guess not too many Polish slashdotters out there... On a positive note, this is very good news.
Yahoo! Mail lets you auto-delete any SPAM. It would be nice for Gmail to give you that option. That way you wouldn't even notice the SPAM that get's sent and correctly classified as such.
Is the universe doomed?
Not to nitpick, but that same reference does not use the word "Mayans" in the plural. Instead, it says "n. A Maya; adj. Of or relating to the Mayas, their culture, or the Mayan linguistic stock". Saying "ancient Mayans" is not correct when you're speaking of the culture/group of people. If you're talking about the individuals, you could get away with it, but then the individuals would not be "ancient".
The plural of "Maya" is "Maya" or Mayas"
just block the advertising iframes, whatever they may contain...
You clearly did not 'see the attachment for details'.
Actually, this is my personal experience/observation, not flamebait at all.
Just because your browser can run a certain plugin/extension does not mean it has to - unless you need it. You avoid potential issues by limiting yourself to the bare necessities.
Disable Java in your browser unless you absolutely need it (rare). Period.
.you engineer-reverse worms the russia soviet In
That was easy! Got root no problem... deleted all your files! HAHAHA!
Ahhhh! So that's what I should have done! Doh!
And what if you ran it within a VM?
I guess MS saw that one coming.
From the article: '"More and more smart individuals, government agencies and corporations are shifting towards Apple and BSD environments in 2004," according to DK Matai, Executive Chairman, mi2g.'
According to the Cambridge Dictionary, "unconscionable" is defined as "An unconscionable size, amount, or length of time is too great and is unacceptable". So, it seems a bit odd using "unconscionable" and "short amounts of time" in the same sentence.
Wow!
No, actually, you'd follow an algorithm to determine a "formula". In the code, you could tell the computer to follow an algorithm or to calculate the result of the formula, bypassing the first step altogether.
The point is to have the computer figure it out, rather than providing a formula that a human being came up with. I guess there is always going to be a fine line as to how much "human" logic goes into a program, hence the variety of solutions.
0/0 = 1
1/infinity = 0
I don't remember much from my chemistry class, but apparently they tested it with "benzene, naphthalene, nail polish, perfume, lighter fluid, rubber cement, acetone, toluene, fertilizer on golf shoes, sugar, baking soda, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), paint thinner and more" and nono of these triggered the alarm. I'm sure some of these contain the nitrites you mentioned, no?
Don't forget that this is the "SPECIAL Relativity Theory" - not the "GENERAL" one...