Slashdot Mirror


Some Ways To Avoid Spam On Gmail

jafo writes "In general, Gmail has been extremely spam-free. More recently, however, it's gotten dramatically worse. I've written up some thoughts on Gmail spam and keeping the spam down. Want less spam on Gmail (and likely others)? Try generating an account name using "apg -M L -t"."

308 comments

  1. I hate my postman!! by MrRTFM · · Score: 5, Funny

    My postman is such a putz - ever since I subscribed to the 'slashdot postal catalogue', he has [rather cunningly] worked out that I read slashdot.

    Now, since that my address is 1 Aardvark Avenue, Australia; I am the first person that gets his mail delivered off the truck.

    So just as I go out the door on my way to work, he drives up - delivers my mail (very dramatically) and yells "FIRST POST" ... then he drives off laughing like an idiot - it is very annoying and I would like it to stop - can anyone give me some advice?

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    1. Re:I hate my postman!! by jaredbpd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would tell him that "In Korea, only old people use the post office."

    2. Re:I hate my postman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod him troll of course.

    3. Re:I hate my postman!! by MrRTFM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hey, this was a joke (ok - a bad one)

      The point is that information is not always shared in the way we think it will be shared - whenever there is a human contact in the process, then there is the chance that your details will be made public. It might a postman, your ex-wife, a workmate, etc.

      You never really know when your details are made available to the spammers, but more often than not it is a 'harmless' passing on of details, that does the damage.

      --
      You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    4. Re:I hate my postman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to check off "Post Anonymous" eh?

    5. Re:I hate my postman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hey, this was a joke (ok - a bad one)

      Slashdot moderation: where you leave your brains and your sense of humour at the door.

      Seriously, I laughed at the image of the FP postman. As long as he doesn't start frosty-pissing in your mailbox... :)

    6. Re:I hate my postman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      no - it was a deliberate post under my username. I was curious to see what would happen [I'll post anon now, because it seems people dont see the funny side to it]

    7. Re:I hate my postman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought it was pretty funny...

    8. Re:I hate my postman!! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      That's it... Now I know where you live.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    9. Re:I hate my postman!! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      hey, this was a joke (ok - a bad one)

      Yes it was, and you fucked it all up by taking it seriously. Get a life.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    10. Re:I hate my postman!! by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Damn you - everyone is looking at me now that I've burst out laughing in the office for no apparent reason.

      That was DAMNED FUNNY.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    11. Re:I hate my postman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey if you live there I know you... your my badass neighbour! anyway.

      Google, for all your cosmetic needs

  2. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    and then you end up with an email address that you have to keep written on a post-it stuck to your monitor so you can remember it.

    1. Re:Great by adeydas · · Score: 1

      i agree with you and i don't quite agree with the author of the article. i have a gmail account with the first letter of my firstname followed by my surname as my username and it yields just 10 results in google. after publishing it on my website for some time, i started getting about a 100 spam mails daily.

    2. Re:Great by dextroz · · Score: 1

      you lucky dawg! I'm missin my fair share of the daily "nekkid natalie portman"

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good idea, then it'll be next to my password...

    4. Re:Great by adeydas · · Score: 1

      want me to forward it to you...

    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're no worse off than Verizon DSL users?

    6. Re:Great by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > and then you end up with an email address that you have to keep written on a post-it stuck to your monitor so you can remember it.

      I have got to get more sleep. I read this as "post-it stuck to your mother".

  3. Hey Bob can I get your email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sure, it's "tiasi54ffcb44334bcvxw53ezz3wr@gmail.com," that is t as in this, r as in really, i as in is, a, s as in stupid, i as in idea...

    1. Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... by koi88 · · Score: 5, Funny


      Sure, it's "tiasi54ffcb44334bcvxw53ezz3wr@gmail.com," that is t as in this, r as in really, i as in is, a, s as in stupid, i as in idea...

      Hey, I wanted this gmail adress... dammit, the good names are always gone when I want to register something...

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    2. Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... by Doppleganger · · Score: 2, Funny

      tiasi54ffcb44334bcvxw53ezz3wr@gmail.com
      ,r as in really,

      Wow, not only do you make it really difficult to memorize, you also spell it wrong when you give it out! Pure genius! I'll bet you never have to worry about any mail!

    3. Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

      You are missing the "r as in really". That's a good way to not receive ANY email at all.

    4. Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck it.. If Gmail isn't up to the task, I can filter my own spam using Spambayes/Spamassasin/etc... What's so hard about setting up your own server that fetches POP mail, filters out spam, and delivers it to your Maildir which makes it available on your IMAP server?

    5. Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... by shokk · · Score: 1

      Server? Who needs to go through that when there are many built-in client solutions of equal or better quality ready to use?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  4. Amateur! by kzinti · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have absolutely NO spam on my gmail account. Why? Because my email address is l1OO0100lO1l100lO1l01@gmail.com. Or 1O00100lO1l1O0lO110l@gmail.com. Or 100O100lOl11O0lO110l@gmail.com... I forget which. But that's an implementation detail; the important point is that I get absolutely no spam!

    1. Re:Amateur! by prodangle · · Score: 1

      And it's just been spirdered, so you'll be getting buckets 'o spam now!! :)

    2. Re:Amateur! by theefer · · Score: 2, Funny

      And no real mail by anyone either, right?

      --
      theefer
    3. Re:Amateur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No see, his real email is actually twos complement.

    4. Re:Amateur! by JavaBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Strangely I've never seen one bit of spam on my abuse@ account...

      Maybe that could be a solution, use a sub domain as the actual mail address, and just prepend abuse@ as the address, so instead of spam-me-not@domain.com you'd use abuse@spam-me-not.domain.com.
      Those buggers won't be able to figure out which addresses are 'safe' to spam, and which ones may quite likely bring down hell upon their little minds.

    5. Re:Amateur! by flynniec6 · · Score: 1

      LOL!

    6. Re:Amateur! by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1

      This is idiocy. Both Slashdot's idea and your post. No matter how you account is named, it's matter who have your address and how can you filter spam.

    7. Re:Amateur! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Or a method I found:

      Embed a random email address in a webpage somewhere (i.e. in the source, with a 0 character hyperlink). Spammers, upon skimming the page, find the address ognewfir@domain.com, and promptly send it spam.

      Your mailserver then automatically trains *anything* coming to that address as spam. Instant, self training bayesian filter (as long as you make sure you train some legitimate email from other accounts).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    8. Re:Amateur! by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1

      "Thank you Ted, that was the joke." (Obligatory Family Guy reference)

    9. Re:Amateur! by LSD-OBS · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you weren't reading the article (this is /. after all), but the point is even though spammers *do not know* most of these gmail addresses, they still send spam by using a dictionary attack.

      I have 12 gmail accounts, and the ones that have "normal" words and names in them get loads of spam. But the other, stranger names get none. And I have given the addresses out equally (to a select few people).

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    10. Re:Amateur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good idea ! :)

    11. Re:Amateur! by mrak+and+swepe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have 12 gmail accounts

      Why?
      Multiple personality disorder?

    12. Re:Amateur! by LSD-OBS · · Score: 1

      Some for different types of correspondance, and some for pure online storage space abuse :)

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    13. Re:Amateur! by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spammers don't spam abuse and postmaster addresses mostly because they're far less likely to go to users who are likely marks. If that starts to change....

      PS: JavaBear... I'm shocked that someone with such an old account is someone I've never heard of before. Drop me a line sometime.

    14. Re:Amateur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      way to crack the case, retard.

    15. Re:Amateur! by boinger · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of me?

      hehe.

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    16. Re:Amateur! by ajs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think we've crossed paths once or twice in the past (too lazy to go figure out where ;-).

      Looks like JavaBear just posts very rarely.

    17. Re:Amateur! by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Maybe that could be a solution, use a sub domain as the actual mail address, and just prepend abuse@ as the address

      I tried that, and it may help a bit, but you will still get spam. I tried exposing kasperd@ and abuse@ on the same domain equally much in my signature. In half a year 67 spam mails were sent to kasperd, 1 were sent to abuse, and 30 were sent to use. (Don't know how they got that idea). Anyway, it seems the address was not exposed enough.

      On another domain the abuse address was used as from address in 151 usenet postings in the time from june 5th 2004 until the july 4th 2004. So far I have received 455 spam mails on the abuse address, and 5 spam mails sent to the Message-ID of some of my postings.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    18. Re:Amateur! by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      I think _this_ is my sixth post on Slashdot, so you may be right :-)

    19. Re:Amateur! by nomel · · Score: 1

      If gmail had filtering that allowed NOT operands, I would have 0 spam. All spam comming to my account is to someone with a similar name@gmail.com. If I could filter using "if to is not myaddress then send to trash", everything would be dandy.

      Recommend that feature to them.

    20. Re:Amateur! by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're just lucky, my experience is much different. I recently came off a four year stint in Earthlink's abuse department and we got a ton of spam addressed to abuse@, security@, you name it.

      Unsurprisingly, spammers really are that stupid.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    21. Re:Amateur! by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Strangely I've never seen one bit of spam on my abuse@ account..."

      If you've got control of your DNS, you should be able to receive mail with address@ftc.gov.yourdomain.com or such-like.

    22. Re:Amateur! by Derf+the · · Score: 1


      So do you read without posting...
      or just visit infrequently?

      I'm a reader.

      That might make a good a couple of good Poles:
      Reading to Posting|Voting frequency

      --
      No. You can't look at my Sig; it's mine, and I'm not showing you.
  5. guessing names spamming by acomj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a couple gmail acounts. The spam they get, and its not alot so far, seems to be guess the name type. The name in the "to" field is close but not exactly my address. I think gmail just delivers it but marks it instantly as spam so the spammers don't know which are "live" addresses and which are non existant ones.

    just my experience..

    Its going to get worse though. As more people use it and when it goes out of beta and some spammers can start getting accounts and testing...

    Heck I have a domain with one email addess (which is a catch all). I've never ever given out the address, yet I get spam there... Lots of it.

    Its making email so much less usefull

    1. Re:guessing names spamming by mrand · · Score: 1

      > Its going to get worse though. As more people use it and when it goes out of beta and some
      > spammers can start getting accounts and testing...

      While I wish spammers were that stupid (maybe they are on your planet), here on Earth basicly anyone that wants a gmail invite can get one by asking in almost any news group, forum, or mailing list. Or they can visit one of the many gmail invite web sites.

      Rest assured they were some of the first ones to get gmail accounts and have been banging on the spam filter ever since. There will be no sudden spam spike when gmail goes fully public.

      --
      -- PGP keyID: 0x4C95994D
    2. Re:guessing names spamming by akadruid · · Score: 4, Informative

      I actually forwarded my domain catch-all address to gmail because of the amount of spam bouce messages I was recieving - something in the order of 1500 per day. My Mozilla Thunderbird behind a Brightmail-filtered ISP just wasn't coping with the load so I dropped it all on gmail. It did a fantasitic job, with a few tweaks set up, and now that my spam load has died down again a bit, I'm hooked on gmail despite my love for Thunderbird.

      Here's the tweaks I used

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    3. Re:guessing names spamming by peragrin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Want to know a secret?? Gmail does have POP3 access. configure it from your preferences. You have to manually enable it.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:guessing names spamming by infestedsenses · · Score: 1

      I was concerned about these spam mails reaching me despite being addressed to someone else. After all, if that were possible, you would have quite some privacy issues, right?

      I sent Google a support request and this is the reply I got:

      Hello,

      Thank you for your message.

      If you receive a message and don't see your email address in the 'To:' or 'Cc:' fields of the header, the sender has mailed you a 'blind carbon copy,' or 'Bcc:.' Please note that the 'Bcc:' field is not displayed in the header of received messages. This means that you won't see your email address at the top of any message you receive as a blind carbon copy.

      We hope you enjoy Google's approach to email.

      Sincerely,

      The Gmail Team

    5. Re:guessing names spamming by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      I have a couple gmail acounts. The spam they get, and its not alot so far, seems to be guess the name type.

      I run an email service, and it cracks me up everytime I get an email like this:

      "Hi, Please cancel my account - john. It gets way too much spam!"

      Umm yeah, SpamAssassin is good, but not that good.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    6. Re:guessing names spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I have a couple gmail acounts. The spam they get, and its not alot so far, seems to be guess the name type. The name in the "to" field is close but not exactly my address. I think gmail just delivers it but marks it instantly as spam so the spammers don't know which are "live" addresses and which are non existant ones."

      Agreed, I see this as well.

    7. Re:guessing names spamming by akadruid · · Score: 1

      I did know that, and I've used it. It's good, but a bit slow at times.

      Where the webmail interface really strikes (in addition to normal webamil advantages) is with things like conversation grouping and the search feature. I have to use Outlook 2k at work - and gmail is vastly superior, despite it's web-based nature.

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    8. Re:guessing names spamming by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I set up pop access for Thunderbird last week, but almost immediately didn't care that I could do that. It's nice I guess (I liked Thunderbird fine before, for my ISP account), but the gmail interface works rather well for me, I like the labelling and other features, so having it in TBird is just extra work since I still like to use the web interface from different locations. My ISP account is forwarded to my gmail as well, so I've got just one handy mobile package.

    9. Re:guessing names spamming by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      i'm a temp, and my present employer blocks gmail and all other webmail (strangely, they don't block slashdot, EXCEPT for linux.slashdot.org), so I've got my gmail account forwarded to my work e-mail address. I wish I could tell gmail not to forward messages it has identified as spam. So far it has identified all spam perfectly, I don't want to receive the spam at work anyway, and the company sends a lot of HTML formatted mail with images, so I can't really turn off inline images in outlook for security. Do you hear me google? A "do not forward messages identified as spam" checkbox would be nice...

    10. Re:guessing names spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't get is why they don't just delete the messages of non-existant usernames that are flagged as spam. I've probably received almost 20 in the last 2 weeks, before that, I had received 3 or 4 (Nigerian 409 fraud) in the previous 4 months. Of the emails I've received recently, 90% are for different usernames. Delete the messages that aren't sent directly to me, and for the average user, 2 or 3 spams is significantly less of a irritaiton than 15 or 20.

    11. Re:guessing names spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *only* spam I get on Gmail is mail with a "To" that does not match my Gmail address. Google apparently does a spelling correction and delivers the spam to me! It's ridiculous! I have twice asked them to stop doing this and have not received a reply either time.

      Google doesn't have to bounce the mail back to the spammers -- just keep it out of my account!

    12. Re:guessing names spamming by rscrawford · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the only true solution to the problem of spamming is not a reengineering of the Internet but a radical reconstruction of the human brain.

      --
      -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
    13. Re:guessing names spamming by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Some people didn't know.

      I also asked google to add an option to the conversation feature, so you can link seperate emails together in a conversation. I sometimes carry them between multiple email accounts and then forward the material to Gmail.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:guessing names spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I have to use Outlook 2k at work and I've found that hotmail is vastly superior despite its web-based nature and every other problem it has.. and I really fucking hate hotmail.

    15. Re:guessing names spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, how effective do you believe this spam is? It seems even average users know of it and delete it nearly subconciously now; yet it all keeps coming!

      Do these people really get their products across?

    16. Re:guessing names spamming by bulliver · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I was scratching my head about that myself. As a spam filter, gmail is excellent, but pretty muych useless because it forwards the spam too...I mean, why????

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
  6. I avoid spam on gmail! by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just don't use 'effin Gmail! GAH! Just because everyone and their cat has 50 gmail invites to give out doesn't mean that you have to use it.

    SpamAssassin is catching nearly 100% of the spam bound for my regular personal email account. I don't need Google's help with that.

    1. Re:I avoid spam on gmail! by mmkkbb · · Score: 4, Funny

      You, sir, must be a Microsoft support technician. The answer you have given is 100% correct and 100% useless.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:I avoid spam on gmail! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I just don't see the big deal about gmail at all. It's yet another free email service, all of which are totally useless to me. *shrug*

      This article could be "How to avoid spam on Yahoo" - just don't bother with Yahoo. :)

      (how'd you guess my profession anyway?) :P

    3. Re:I avoid spam on gmail! by black+mariah · · Score: 0, Insightful
      all of which are totally useless to me.
      The key phrase has been highlighted. Your post is totally useless to this thread, but you don't seem to care about that.
      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    4. Re:I avoid spam on gmail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't use 'effin Gmail! GAH! Just because everyone and their cat has 50 gmail invites to give out doesn't mean that you have to use it.

      SpamAssassin is catching nearly 100% of the spam bound for my regular personal email account. I don't need Google's help with that.


      I agree somewhat. On my home machine (connected via cable modem) I'm fetching POP, filtering out spam via procmail recipe that calls Spambayes, delivering it to my Maildir so its available to the IMAP server. I can easilly do this with my Gmail account. I think the advantage would be that if something happens with my cable modem connection and I can't reach my home server remotely, I can always log in to Gmail. Also, Gmail would be a perfect offsite backup for my e-mail.

    5. Re:I avoid spam on gmail! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Are you on mailing lists? Do you have long conversations with lots of replies?

      The grouping of replies is very nice. The rest is available in some fashion in other mail clients.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:I avoid spam on gmail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still say that'd be funnier if it were "you don't have to fucking tell me." ;-)

  7. Name by Return_of_the_Pyro · · Score: 1

    The subject always starts with my user as well... e.g. cmdr_taco4 have a Rolex, where cmdr_taco is my user (which it isn't). Wonder why, it can't just be personalisation; because it's obviously not intended for me; adding a number after the user doesn't help...

    1. Re:Name by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a minute, you're getting advertisements for Rolex Premium Replica Watches too? I thought I was just special. :-( Next thing you're going to tell me is that you get spam for Cialis too. I'm not exactly sure what Cialis is, but they sure want to sell it to me.

    2. Re:Name by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder why they think its a good idea to market "Viagra soft tabs". Seems like soft is the last thing they'd want associated with Viagra.

    3. Re:Name by Return_of_the_Pyro · · Score: 1

      Don't buy the Cialis! I made that mistake the other day, turned out to be fecal matter =S And my ads aren't for *Premium Replica* watches, they're for "Rolex Super Great Ultimate Real Not-Fake Watches"!!

    4. Re:Name by nearlygod · · Score: 1

      They must know something about your bedroom activities.

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    5. Re:Name by schtum · · Score: 1

      Because in focus groups, only about 10% of men expressed a willingness to swallow a ten-inch, rock-hard placebo. About half that number said they would take the pill in suppository form. Nobody asked them, they just sort of volunteered.

      Burn, karma, burn!

  8. My test by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was curious about how much spam gets auto generated. I have a fairly common name so I used one of my gmail invites with my normal gmail account to make an account with my firstname.lastname@gmail.com.

    I havn't used or given it out to anbody, the spam folder gets about 25 messages a day. Luckly google has done a perfect job with marking them all spam.

    1. Re:My test by koi88 · · Score: 1


      I have a fairly common name

      Fiction Pimp is a common name? Where are you from?

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    2. Re:My test by morzel · · Score: 1
      I have a firstname.lastname account at gmail that I only used to mail to one close friend (thanks for the invitation David ;-), and haven't communicated it to anybody else.

      My name is particular enough that when you search for it on google (i.e.: "Firstname Lastname"), almost all returned links are relevant so it wouldn't seem to me that auto-generated addresses should easily match and yet I get spam into my gmail inbox

      Boggles the mind...

      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    3. Re:My test by dargon · · Score: 1

      I've done the same thing, with much better results than you, only 38 messages since the 3rd of december

    4. Re:My test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fiction Pimp is a common name? Where are you from?
      I think it's Swedish.
    5. Re:My test by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

      I got a bunch of mails with a subject like this:

      Jens.xxxxxxxx yadda yadda yadda

      after looking at the mail headers, its fairly obvious that they tried to spam different combinations of firstname.lastname@gmail.com.

    6. Re:My test by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1
      I guess I'm fortunate to have an unusual enough combination of firstname.lastname not to be hit yet. I was a pretty early user of gmail, and I don't think I have ever received true spam that was directed at me. I get occasional spam through some mailing lists that redirect there. I do get anywhere from 10-50 messages a day being incorrectly classified by gmail as spam, so I have started adding those senders to my address book in the hope that it will convince gmail to leave them alone.

      I wish that gmail would learn from my "not spam" clicks and use that to influence future spam filtering --- I'd hoped that was what they were doing, and it's natural, but I've seen repeat misclassififications so I'm unconvinced.

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    7. Re:My test by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Yeah that seems to be the only spam I'm getting too. Allen.blahblahblahblah random generated crap as the subject. They're obviously all from the same people so I'm not sure why gmail didn't just block the IP.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    8. Re:My test by TarrVetus · · Score: 1

      Actually, the only spam I get is from some spammer ring that advertises suspicious-looking deals such as, "SpECIAL DeaL WINdows XP OnLy $50." These started hitting my Gmail address as soon as I registered, which makes me think my e-mail address was sold to generate some revenue for the whole project, which is fine by me seeing as the spam filter catches all of it.

      I also made my e-mail address using my name. After all, what sane person would hand someone a business card with the e-mail address "t8236gendalimuckersleap0O01ll1@gmail.com?"

    9. Re:My test by Aerion · · Score: 1

      I have a test account of lastname+firstinit (6 characters). Similarly, I've barely acknowledged the existence of the account, but it's only gotten 29 spam since November 30, and they were all the same type of subject line: "[random user name similar to mine] ['get first post every time!' or other sales pitch]"

      6 of the 29 actually have my username in there, and most of the others are seemingly valid usernames that are close to mine in the alphabet. I suppose that since my username is short, and I've used it other places (although not here), that it shouldn't be surprising that spammers are trying it.

    10. Re:My test by smacktits · · Score: 1

      Yea, I know exactly what you mean. I've used my Gmail account to send precisely one email message. The only reason I even have one is because a friend gave me an invite about a week after it was opened to invites. I just have no use for it.

      I never give it out, don't use it anywhere, and don't send email with it, yet at the time of my writing this, my spam inbox numbers over 300.

      I don't even get that on my ISP email any more (blueyonder.co.uk) despite having that email address for some four years.

      Having said that, though, they recently introduced spam filtering on their email servers. Now I get 8-10 spams per day as opposed to ~400.

      Much love to blueyonder.co.uk

    11. Re:My test by cmacb · · Score: 1

      I wish that gmail would learn from my "not spam" clicks and use that to influence future spam filtering --- I'd hoped that was what they were doing, and it's natural, but I've seen repeat misclassififications so I'm unconvinced.

      As far as I can tell the "Not Spam" button does nothing more than move the message(s) back into your Inbox. Placing the sender in your contacts list has no effect other than cluttering your contact list with names you never send to.

      If I have to CAREFULLY read through my Spam folder every day then they might as well not filter spam at all. Work is definitely needed in this area.

    12. Re:My test by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, and I agree. The good news in my case is that I don't have to carefully skim the spam folder -- I simply move things out as they arrive. If I got more spam it'd be an issue.

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    13. Re:My test by McBeer · · Score: 1

      I also have selected the firstname.lastname@gmail.com naming standard. Funny thing is, I have not received one single peice of spam (marked or otherwise) in the last 3 months. I use the account lightly and even occationally list it as my contact in web forms, and yet not one. Coundn't tell ya why I have been so lucky.

      --
      Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    14. Re:My test by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      My Gmail address is my first name and my last name. I've given it out to friends and family, but not used it on any websites. I received zero spam for the first few months, but now I'm receiving them at a rate of about one per day.

      It all goes straight into the spam folder though, and it always has a part or some variation of my name as the first part of the subject. Usually followed by garbage about cheap software :(

      I haven't received any Cialis spam yet, though my Hotmail address (different address entirely) gets probably 20 Cialis spams per day...

  9. Suggestions will not work by Kolisar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I receive some spam every day on my GMail account and, looking at the headers, it seems that the spammers are randomly generating the email addresses and my address, eventually, gets generated and receives spam. Fortunately, the GMail spam filter has successfully caught all of the spam.

    1. Re:Suggestions will not work by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Try this. It should be effective.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. no spam, but no email either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my address is ~[caps lock]{{}>>>@@gmail.com&$#((::>> seems to keep everything out of my inbox

  11. My gmail address has only been used to register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a troll account on Slashdot, and it has about 2 pages of spam now. From one /. account. Not used anywhere else. More proof of OSDN's true leanings

    1. Re:My gmail address has only been used to register by koi88 · · Score: 3, Funny


      My gmail address has only been used to register a troll account on Slashdot

      Is it Anonymous.Coward@gmail.com?

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    2. Re:My gmail address has only been used to register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ror i wish (checking to see if that address is available)

    3. Re:My gmail address has only been used to register by m50d · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that's because people like to spam trolls. The email address I used to get this account has no spam. If the address of that troll account isn't public, it's not OSDN that's selling your address to spammers, it's GMail.

      --
      I am trolling
  12. i love gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gmail is the best free-email-spam-catcher that i ever used.

  13. Gmail spam by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I signed up for gmail, and after logging into the account about four times, and having sent all of maybe a dozen emails, all of which went to personal friends, started receiving spam messages. Currently it's a trickle, something under 1 spam message per day, and they've all been caught by gmail's spam filter, but for some reason I still find it annoying to see ANY spam. I don't get spam at all on my fastmail accounts, and have been using them as my everyday mail account for better than a year now.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Gmail spam by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

      but for some reason I still find it annoying to see ANY spam

      I completely agree.

      I have written to gmail regarding the bolded "Spam (1)" but so far have not seen any change. I would like to see a setting that allows me to NOT be notified of new spam. Its a constant irritant for me to see that (1) and not do something about it.

      Help me out and write google that you would like more customization on the Spam filter settings!

    2. Re:Gmail spam by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's easy.

      If you use Mozilla 1.7.x or Firefox, you can install URIid. Then add this line to your userContent.css (or you can get ChromEdit):

      body#gmail-google-com span#ds_spam { display: none !important; }
      Of course, feel free to add any CSS.
    3. Re:Gmail spam by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

      At home I will try this. At work, alas, I cannot install Firefox. Thanks!

    4. Re:Gmail spam by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Bolding that lets you know there's something in there, in case there's a false positive. You're supposed to go in there and check when something comes in, and if you need it, pull it out. If you don't, ignore it or delete it.

    5. Re:Gmail spam by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

      I think I understand what the bolding is for.

      What's the purpose of the Spam folder then, if you have to check it anyway? All you are doing is adding an additional step if I have to look at them anyway. I would much rather get notified of Spam say monthly or weekly, and then I can sort through and look for messages that shouldn't be marked as Spam. Who wants to get notified every few hours (minutes for some unlucky people) that they have spam? What I'm sick of is always having it bolded with a number after it. I can think of a lot of possibilities that would be more useful:

      Daily/Weekly/Monthly/etc notifications with pertient information contained

      Don't delete automatically. Instead, create a threshhold (say 10 Messages/1MB/etc) that once you reach it, you then get notified that you have to deal with spam. You get to choose the threshold level. It could be both total size, or number of messages, or both.

  14. A good article, but... by Richie1984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a well written article, but I don't feel it brings anything new to the discussion. Yes, spammers were eventually going to target GMail because of it's popularity, but there isn't really any detailed information in the article as to how Google is defending itself, merely a lot of (interesting) specualtion.

    And while the same techniques are used to try and stop spammers from finding your account, there aren't any gmail specific ideas, which is what I hoped I would find int he article.

    --
    I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    1. Re:A good article, but... by theskeptic · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same thoughts. Just because it a "google" story, means slashdot editors go ga-ga over it(and expect readers so too.) The article just meanders. The link given to create a account that will not attract spam is ridiculous. As someone stated, who the heck will use such an account?
      A gmail article would be slashdot worthy IF gmail went public and/or introduced more features.

    2. Re:A good article, but... by tji · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. Who cares if spam is sent to my account. It only matters that GMail correctly identifies it as such and keeps it out of my Inbox.

      Especially since Google seems to be bringing their Groups (usenet) feature closer to GMail. Once you post a usenet message with your gmail account, spam detection is the game, not spam avoidance.

  15. suuuuureee by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Want less spam on Gmail (and likely others)? Try generating an account name using apg -M L -t""."

    This helps to get less email from your friends as well.

    1. Re:suuuuureee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F-r-i-e-n-d-s?

    2. Re:suuuuureee by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have a point there...

      I was just wondering why I don't get any mail from them even though I DO have a simple username...

      Then I realized...

      ouch

    3. Re:suuuuureee by MindTwister82 · · Score: 1

      What are you skizo? Which personality do you want us to contact?

    4. Re:suuuuureee by shokk · · Score: 1

      Why, do they have trouble using the address book on their email clients? The addition of auto-fill for email addressses in Yahoo Plus is a great thing that brings it closer in usefulness to things like Moz and Thunderbird - I still prefer my non-browser client. Anyway, they all allow one to type a real person's name - you know, the one we are really known by that doesn't have the @ in it? - and have it fill in the address or present a list of matches as you type.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  16. Password generator by ajs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For an account name, apg is fine. For passwords, I've created a far more flexible system which I distribute with documentation describing password generation from my site.

    The key to good password generation is allowing the user to describe how it's to be done. This increases the ability to memorize passwords and makes it harder for an attacker to guess.

    To that end, I have created a sort of reverse regular expression syntax where you describe the password to the program using general patterns. Try it out.

    1. Re:Password generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, you guessed my password, "gaptbrapla"!!! UR A 1334 h4x0r

    2. Re:Password generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your software is not good enough. More work needs to be done to allow more randomness in word selection especially.

    3. Re:Password generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm impressed - you post something totally offtopic which is also advertising for your own software and still somehow manage to get modded way up!

    4. Re:Password generator by ajs · · Score: 1
      Well, if you're going to cut-and-paste my own documentation like that, you might as well take the comments from the source, which provide more detail:
      # There are many statistical problems with this program, including:
      #
      # W3-4 chooses between 3 and 4 letter words 50/50, not based on
      # the number of 3 and 4 letter words available.
      #
      # S, T and C syntax needs to be overhauled to allow arbitrary percentages.
      #
      Enjoy ;-)
    5. Re:Password generator by ajs · · Score: 1
      • I don't think this was off-topic. The primary topic was gmail spam, but the posting also provided a link to a password generator. I provided a link to a different password generator, for those who might be interested. YMMV, but for what it's worth both programs could be used to generate gmail usernames. Mine even gives you more flexibility in generating usernames of a format that you want... if you want to use it for that, I recommend:
        mkpasswd -P -j 3 -n 10 -p WJ8-10
        mkpasswd -P -j 3 -n 10 -p x8-10
        and the like.
      • As for "advertising for your own software," I don't quite see why it shoudl be a problem that people mention their open source projects on Slashdot of all places. Would you have been upset if I had posted the same thing, but wasn't the author? Seems strange to me.
      • "and still somehow manage to get modded way up" ... perhaps others actually found the information useful? Just a guess.

    6. Re:Password generator by Shippy · · Score: 1

      Does mkpasswd (or any other generator someone knows of) allow you to generate a password that alternates hands with each letter? I used to have a generator that could do this, but lost it at one point and have never been able to find one since. I really don't care what the password is as long as I can do that. It makes typing it in much quicker.

      --
      -Shippy
    7. Re:Password generator by ajs · · Score: 1
      Yes, as I mention in the docs (though I don't get into specifics, so you might not have realized that this is what I was saying), a program also called mkpasswd that comes with the "expect" package does this. My mkpasswd pre-dates the other, but since mine wasn't out there to be seen at the time, the expect folks didn't realize they were conflicting with my name. Sigh.

      With my program you could easily just filter the results using grep. Something like:
      mkpasswd -P -n 100 -5 -r | grep -iE '^(([12345qwertasdfgzxcvb][67890\-yuiophjkl;nm,./] )*|([67890\-yuiophjkl;nm,./][12345qwertasdfgzxcvb] )*)$'
      for example, I just got, "biendnape7" doing that.

      Keep in mind, of course, that by doing this you severely limit the search space for passwords, so there is a trade off in terms of security. Also, passwords are sometimes just as easy (if not easier) to type if that have some repetition in terms of side of keyboard, but alternate overall. This would require a more complex pattern, but would limit the password space less, which is good.
  17. My experience by Underholdning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have two gmail accounts. One is myl33tusername@gmail - the other is firstname.lastname@gmail. Guess what - the latter is now swamped with spam. Granted, gmail properly files them all in the spam folder, but it shows that the spammers are already firing off massive dictionary attacks on gmail.

    1. Re:My experience by Badaro · · Score: 1

      Curiously enough, my account which is @gmail.com hardly gets any SPAM. I wonder if I have an unusual name or something.

      []s Badaro

      --
      My sig became obsolete, and I lack the imagination to create a new one. :(
    2. Re:My experience by Badaro · · Score: 1

      Damn, the e-mail in the previous post should read <lastname>@gmail.com.

      []s Badaro

      --
      My sig became obsolete, and I lack the imagination to create a new one. :(
    3. Re:My experience by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      This has happened to me as well - except my last name is NOT that common...

      I've given up all hope. If they guessed my full name, then they're guessing everything. Might as well go publish my e-mail address on usenet! :)

      --
      Berto
    4. Re:My experience by Inda · · Score: 1

      I have experience nothing but improvements. OK, there were a few days last month that were a bit heavy on the spam misses but I put that down to gmail testing something. It sorted itself out soon enough.

      When gmail started putting the spam count in brackets I was getting 6500 spam emails every 30 days.

      For the last month or so it has been around 3500 for 30 days.

      Gmail misses 10 a day and gives me a few false positives a month. The false positives would definitely be spam to most people. I wish they would improve the Netski bounces though.

      I forward 2 email old accounts here. One of them is 7 years old. I was glad to get it back as it was basically useless for day to day emailing.

      Spam is no longer a problem. Email is once again fun to use.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:My experience by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      I have two gmail accounts. One is myl33tusername@gmail - the other is firstname.lastname@gmail. Guess what - the latter is now swamped with spam. Granted, gmail properly files them all in the spam folder, but it shows that the spammers are already firing off massive dictionary attacks on gmail.

      I have two gmail accounts as well. one is a combination of initials and last name, with no special characters. Not simple to guess, but it has received about a dozen spams.

      The other is a completely random combination of two words that are not typically associated with each other. It has received 4 times as much spam as the other.

      I don't use these accounts at the moment, and hadn't even logged in to them for a while. I went to check them after reading this article.

      I don't think it's a dictionary attack: someone has figured out how to get a list of email addresses from Google.

      The other possibility is that someone has found those names as user IDs on popular (and obscure) websites, and used them for a pseudo-dictionary attack on gmail.com -- in the hope those names were used for gmail IDs as well.

  18. Spam vs False Positivies by echocharlie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The evidence is empirical. The conclusions are common sense. I'm surprised the article doesn't talk about False Positives, the bane of spam filtering. I usually sign up for a few mailing lists, and then create filters to automatically archive them. Recently, a lot of my mailing list traffic has been marked as Spam, even though my filter specifically says to archive all mail from the list.

    1. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the spam I get is from some mailing lists I subscribe to.
      So it is good to have spam filtering on the mails recieved from the
      mailing list too.

      Unfortunately you cannot have it both ways.

    2. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      But I'll bet you didn't even bother to designate the mail list traffic as not-spam...

    3. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      yesterday's discussion on antispam email tools stirred up a passing mention of the false-positives issue. The results you get appear to depend highly on what kind of traffic is comming in. The nice thing about gmail is that with its generous storage allotment, you have 30 days to scan the spam list before the mail is actually flushed. Personally, I only seem get email alerts from one source [that is heavily laden with adverts] mismarked. I am quite happy with gmail as it has no other misfires and easily beats my comcast, att and [while I had it] aol mail handling.
      You might want to consider the discussed vulnerability at that link above regarding how spammers ever find your gmail account in the first place. I used one of my invites to give myself a new account...that one has received absolutely 0 spam since Sep 1 [but yes the acct name is longer and not readily assembled from dictionaries].

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    4. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd have to agree. So far, my gmail account gets far more false positives than my yahoo mail and even hotmail.
      Hopefully they'll upgrade to a working bayesian system because despite the fact that I use the "not spam" button all the time, it still consistently marks the same type of messages as spam.

    5. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by Phoe6 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how no-body has observed this. As far I understand, Gmail seems to use Bayesian filter concept and the tendency of False Positives with Gmail is huge. I have a screenshot wherein a Y! groups with members only if the subject was like AMAZING! was classfied as SPAM. False Positives is one major concern with a good spam filter.

      --
      Senthil
    6. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for gramps, but personally I do.

    7. Re:Spam vs False Positivies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found the same thing -- it's kind of typical for Google: they give a nice clean presentation while leaving the messy stuff behind the scenes.

      In this case they give an impression of a clean and tidy inbox while sweeping the false positives conveniently into the Spam directory.

      At this point, although I like gmail's features, I can't afford to rely on it for important email traffic.

  19. check this email addy .. by jokach · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get an email address from here:

    http://www.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com/

    most spammers won't think you're serious.

    1. Re:check this email addy .. by Return_of_the_Pyro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither will most friends or family.

    2. Re:check this email addy .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anybody tested how effective using nospam@example.com as a real address is? I can imagine a lot of spammers simply filter out anything with nospam in.

    3. Re:check this email addy .. by Dreadlord · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      It's so long that...

      Some email software cannot be configured. ...


      Apparently it's so long that their scripts result in 400 Bad Request when I try to sign up.

      And who the heck modded this intersting? Funny yes, but interesting?

      *sigh* mods these days ;)

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    4. Re:check this email addy .. by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      It worked for me...

      --
    5. Re:check this email addy .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What browser/OS? Using Firefox 1.0 on Linux, server complains about the HTTP request.

    6. Re:check this email addy .. by soul_on_fire2001 · · Score: 1

      Now they do.

    7. Re:check this email addy .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the longest email address in the world... until I edit my name server config to create a few levels of 60-char subdomains. Zzzz.

    8. Re:check this email addy .. by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      Firefox 1.0 on Windows 2000

      --
    9. Re:check this email addy .. by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      I have the longest possible email address there :)

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789@abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com

      Feel free to drop me a line!

  20. Yes, but by Omicron32 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is apg digitally signed?

    1. Re:Yes, but by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Korea, only old people use digital signatures!

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    2. Re:Yes, but by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      just the other day I was installing Avid Xpress Pro 4.6 in one of our digital video labs.
      It turns out that a juggernaut like Avid didn't get a VeriSign license either, so I said *fuck it* and gave students sketch pads and pencils, so that they can make little flip cartoons.

      No untrusted software is running on my machines (Windows ME, IE, and Outlook only!), and to this day I haven't VISA had any 4593 2334 2302 2481 problems whatsoever. 01/08 459

      Just my 2 cents...

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:Yes, but by r3m0t · · Score: 1

      Mmm I don't get it. "No untrusted software"?

  21. Spam, by nature... by suso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think by nature, spam gets more and more like real messages. This means that eventually all spam filtering becomes ineffective. Someone could probably make a research paper out of this.

    1. Re:Spam, by nature... by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      But you, as receiver, will know what is spam and what is a real message. So you will instruct your spam filter to learn to make the same distinction.
      Your spam filter will become like you.

      (Evolving long enough, your spam filter will become a construct emulating your own mind - nice to leave behind when you're dead, people will still be able to send you e-mail!)

    2. Re:Spam, by nature... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Can I sign up for a mailing list to keep informed of the research progress? ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Spam, by nature... by quigonn · · Score: 1

      My friends don't want to sell me watches with interesting subject like "Ramadan time, Rolex time" (WTF?!).

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    4. Re:Spam, by nature... by suso · · Score: 1

      nice to leave behind when you're dead, people will still be able to send you e-mail!

      When you die, you stop sending e-mail.

    5. Re:Spam, by nature... by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      But you don't stop receiving spam!

      It would be a small step to turn an intelligent spam filter into a satisfying mail-replyer, considering what most people say in the mails I receive...

    6. Re:Spam, by nature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, through the process of evolution, spam will be *so* similar to your best friend's email that you wont mind receiving it at all..

    7. Re:Spam, by nature... by cpghost · · Score: 1

      When you die, you stop sending e-mail.

      Unless you use Eliza to send replies...

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    8. Re:Spam, by nature... by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      Spam will always be trying to advertise something. Very little legit mail does. You will always be able to detect the difference.

    9. Re:Spam, by nature... by FireBook · · Score: 1

      "Evolving long enough, your spam filter will become a construct emulating your own mind "
      I don't think theres a computer that could handle that much Depravity though.......

      --
      My other OS is also FreeBSD
    10. Re:Spam, by nature... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      Actually, greylisting is probably the best solution to SPAM yet. It increases the cost of sending it for the SPAMMER, and decreases the amount of it in my Inbox. Since 90% of spam comes from compromised machines, the idea of "reject first" works.

  22. the bad part is false positives by pravinvb · · Score: 1

    Every other week GMail marks a email from a friend as spam. On the brighter side it does mark all spam as spam. To me Yahoo!'s spam filter does a better job than GMail.

    1. Re:the bad part is false positives by adesm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The false positives is becoming an increasing problem for me also. I use GMail for mailing-lists, and more of the messages from those lists are now falling foul of the GMail spam-filters. The lists which show particular failures in this regard are debian-user and vim-user.

      I had hoped that there would be some way of keeping those messages from the GMail filter, but of course there isn't one. Bizarrely enough, the system was much better at the false-positives, it seems to have gotten worse as the volume of actual spam has mounted. There doesn't appear to be any consistency in those identified as spammers.

      I did note, however, in a recent thread on debian-user, that a supposed troll's emails consistently went into the spam-bucket. Perhaps GMail uses other users 'Mark as Spam' returns and automatically assigns spam-values on that basis?

    2. Re:the bad part is false positives by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo!'s filter sucks. I get more than 700 spam emails a day in my Yahoo! account (had account for 7 years), and usually, 100 or more of those are in my inbox, not the bulk folder. I'd rather scan through the spam folder really quick and designate 1 friend as "Not-spam" than to have to mark 100+ messages EVERY DAY as read, then designate them as spam, just to see the other 10 friends that emailed me. And what really pissed me off about Yahoo! is they are partly responsible for me getting spam in my Yahoo! account in the first damn place. At least Gmail's filter already recognized the spam. Yahoo!'s filter only assumes that which I have already designated as spam as such.

    3. Re:the bad part is false positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spammers are constantly formulating ways of bypassing spam filters as well. GMail onl'y worked well for a time, till the spammers caught up, it is and always will be a constant tug of war.

  23. RTFA by brunes69 · · Score: 1
    The article is about limiting spam *period*, not classifying spam, which GMail already does. The author even states this:

    First of all, I'll say that none of the messages which were marked as spam were legitimate messages. However, I'm not using these accounts very heavily yet. All of them have received under 10 legitimate messages since I set them up. So far, Gmail is doing a good job of classifying the spam.

    Your homebrew setup is no better off than a stock GMail account. And I don't have to maintain my own SpamAssassin, GMail does it for me.

    1. Re:RTFA by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      And gmail is no better off than a homebrew setup. These same "avoid spam" rules can be applied to *anything*

      Why this useless blog entry actually made it onto /,, who knows.. it's been happening more & more.

      It's a brain dead article. Yes, I read it. It should be filed under the "Well, duh.." category.

    2. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you can be mister huffypants all you want and live in your microcosm, but in the real world not everybody wants to purchase a domain and run their own mail server(s). It's just not practical for most people. That is, in reality.

    3. Re:RTFA by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      Your homebrew setup is no better off than a stock GMail account. And I don't have to maintain my own SpamAssassin, GMail does it for me.

      You might be amazed what you can do with a combination of SPF, SpamAssassin, and procmail. I cut out anywhere from 25% to 75% of my spam depending on the day, and all it took was an up-front time investment of a couple hours to save many many hours later on.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    4. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who can, run mail servers. Those who cant, bug me to host their account for them.

      Or at least in my experience.

  24. TOP SOFTWARE... by rokzy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I keep getting the same spam over and over which starts "TOP SOFTWARE...". It's mostly the only one I see and GMail recognises it as spam, but the same message keeps coming to my spambox several times a day. I wish they'd just ban it.

    1. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by jbarket · · Score: 1

      I get the same one. Just started not long ago. It's always to the first 4 or 5 letters of my username, and then it goes off into random land, but I still get it. At least it marks it as spam, but I was a lot happier when I was receiving absolutely 0 spam.

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
    2. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by terbor · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's my brand of spam too. For me, the first 6 letters match and then it goes off to random number land. But I get at least one of those a day. I send them off to Spamcop.net but their analysis seems to indicate the e-mails are coming from China. We all know their attitude about helping to stop spam...

    3. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      add a filter. I've found that a dozen or so well chosen filters takes care of 90% of spam. The best part is that it only takes a few seconds to write one and it's good forever.

      A couple of tips:
      - you almost always want to have "...and sender is not in my address book" as part of the filter expression.

      - For definite spam, I set the actions as "delete" AND "delete from server". This is particularly useful for webmail or other non-archiving clients. In my case I check my email from both Windows and Linux but only archive under Linux. (T-Bird for both FWIW).

    4. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Good to know that I'm not the only one getting this crap. I was already wondering how they got my username (as I gave the address only to my friends) but this confirms that they're using dictionary/random character attacks...

    5. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also the only gmail spam I've gotten so far. I've run traceroute on the originating IP addresses reported in 'Show Original', and it's come up with a bunch of places around the US as well as stuff that won't trace all the way. Looks like zombie boxen to me...

    6. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      No, I think you mean, "t0p s0f+warE!, r0kzy" or "Are the pain levels high?" Fucking spam...

    7. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      This is the same one I get as well :(

      Asshats. As if anyone is going to purchase their junk.

    8. Re:TOP SOFTWARE... by babybird · · Score: 1
      I get these too. As an interesting note, they did not start until I received the following message (my address removed because duh) and sent off a complaint to t35.com to the abuse address listed under the domain. I never received a response from that complaint, but over the next 48 hours I had received about 25 spams, all the same type, just as you describe, in my spam folder.

      I sent a complaint to ev1.net who hosts t35.com including copies of ALL the spam messages I'd received up to that point and explained how I'd had only 3 spams to my address up until then (address has been kept in the strictest confidence and never submitted anywhere online), and none of them had remotely resembled these new spams.

      These new spams also started arriving about 20 minutes after I sent my complaint to the t35.com abuse address. I'm 100% certain the spammer either runs this server, or has/had compromised this server. I doubt the compromise theory because my address was obtained from the abuse address, not the removal script (I'm not *THAT* dumb).

      I also submitted complaints to the ftc and tried to submit to the arizona attorney general since spamming is illegal here, but couldn't find any submition forms online or contact addresses for reporting spam here. Grrr!
      X-Gmail-Received:
      4eb2806511171eac5c4e9d3c78c9aee 12180b41f
      Delivered-To: ********@gmail.com
      Received: by 10.54.41.21 with SMTP id o21cs9025wro;
      Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:27:12 -0800 (PST)
      Received: by 10.54.27.79 with SMTP id a79mr99889wra;
      Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:27:12 -0800 (PST)
      Return-Path: <kcadailynewssubscription@gmail.com>
      Received: from gmail.com (virtua-cwb214-114.ctb.virtua.com.br [200.250.214.114])
      by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id 43si6240wri;
      Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:27:12 -0800 (PST)
      Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 200.250.214.114 is neither permitted
      nor denied by domain of kcadailynewssubscription@gmail.com)
      From: "Advertisements & News" <kcadailynewssubscription@GMAIL.COM>
      To: ********@gmail.com
      Subject: Subscription
      User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
      rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
      X-Accept-Language: en-us
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
      MIME-Version: 1.0

      Hello ********,

      Thank you for subscribe for our News. Also you will receive our daily
      advertisements and offers.

      Click here to unsubscribe: http://removal.t35.com/?********@gmail.com
      --
      Keith D.
  25. billgates + gmail = 1million spam mails in one sec by groups.google · · Score: 0

    my email is billgates@gmail.com
    ...and gmail's inteligent spam filters couldn't even filter ONE.. :S

  26. Is this a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maby try eProvisia LLC ?
    they claim removing 100% of spam, leaving legit mail alone

    http://eprovisia.coredump.cx/

  27. What Spam? by Icephreak1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was some weeks before I noticed I even had spam in my Gmail account. It has thus far filtered spam with one hundred percent precision. Best I've seen anywhere.

    - IP

    1. Re:What Spam? by halivar · · Score: 1

      It was some weeks before I noticed I even had spam in my Gmail account. It has thus far filtered spam with one hundred percent precision. Best I've seen anywhere.

      This is my experience, too. Out of the hundred or so spam messages I have received thus far, not a single one has escaped my spam folder. Also, no false positives, yet.

      BTW, doesn't GMail allott invites based on how much mail you receive? I have ten invites right now, the most I've ever had.

  28. More Useless News by PingXao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems to be a lot of that going around here these days. Another run-of-the-mill blogger thinks he's discovered something new and interesting and all of a sudden it's big news on /.

    Listen, spammers use dictionary attacks. They'll send their turdlets to any number of common names and words and variations thereof. It's the same for any email domiain. The phenomena certainly isn't unique to Gmail. You see it taking place on just about every ISPs mail servers. And God knows it's no big revelation that if your email address is hard to guess then you'll get less spam. For Pete's sake! I can't believe how lame this is. This is one of the lamest stories on slashdot I've seen in quite some time.

    1. Re:More Useless News by terbor · · Score: 1

      But I don't get dictionary attack spam on a major ISP domain that has the same e-mail address as my Google address. (Part before the @ is the same). Why do I get so many on Google but not on my other domain? What is Google doing different?

    2. Re:More Useless News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look on the bright side, at least it gives us a break from all the incessant potshots at the US and "Bushitler" from the Euroweenie crowd.

    3. Re:More Useless News by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      But I don't get dictionary attack spam on a major ISP domain that has the same e-mail address as my Google address. (Part before the @ is the same). Why do I get so many on Google but not on my other domain? What is Google doing different?

      According to TFA, the spam that does reach him via presumably dictionary shotgun spamming appears to be from the same source. So maybe he'll get to your ISP later.

    4. Re:More Useless News by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

      That's not all true. I host my own domain for e-mail only. My account is a catch-all for the domain and it receives absolutely no spam, and I have been using it for almost two years now.

      I also have no web presence for this domain, which may be preventing the address from being crawled and then used for dictionary spamming.

      --

      ÕÕ

  29. How Gmail is really delivering by jbarr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This brings up an interesting point. It seems that Gmail is trying to make a "best guess" as to who should receive these messages.

    For example, (actual account names changed) say I had a Gmail account of "user.name@gmail.com" I would receive spam to "used.names@gmail.com". The interesting thing is that when I click on "Show Original", there are zero references to "user.name@gmail.com".

    So why is this email getting routed to the "valid" address? Why is it not just bouncing? Is Gmail just making a "best guess"?

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by 68kmac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Erm, ever heard of BCC?

    2. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by benzapp · · Score: 1

      One technique spammers use is to note which addreses are invalid. By not bouncing messages, Google deprives them of this technique, thus raising their overall cost of doing business.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by bobstay · · Score: 1
      I suspect this is how it's actually working. The spammers have a big list:
      address1@gmail.com
      address2@gmail.com
      address3@g mail.com
      etc.
      They then send emails like:
      To: address1@gmail.com
      Bcc: address2@gmail.com
      Bcc: address3@gmail.com
      etc.
      Your address is one of the BCC addresses, so it's "to" some other random username that's near yours in their (alphabetical) list.
    4. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by uucp2 · · Score: 1
      Oh come on. Whether or not the messages are bounced, there is no reason to deliver a message to *wrong* address.

      But GP author could try this himself by sending mail to addresses found in his spam. I would be surprised if it was delivered.

    5. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, but then I realised, they just filled in the BCC fields.

      The addresses you are seeing are simply the first in the list of thousands. Your address is simply one of those.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by benzapp · · Score: 0

      Why don't you try and think about this a little longer. The reason messages are bounced back is so the sender KNOWS the message was sent to the wrong address and thus can fix their mistake. That system is no longer feasible in this spamming world.

      Google has done the next best thing by attempting to match a mistyped (or otherwise invalid) email address to the next closest valid address, that way the recipient still has a chance to receive their mail.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    7. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by rednip · · Score: 1
      I thought the same thing, but then I realised, they just filled in the BCC fields.
      That is not how SMTP works. To an SMTP server everything that you see in your email reader (headers and all) is simply the message itself. The typical SMTP server pays no real attention to the typical email header, although often it will add a couple of lines. It delivers mail based on the SMTP commands, which are never added to the email itself.

      An example copied from the FAQ page ('r' is the server and 's' is the client):

      R: 220 USC-ISI.ARPA Simple Mail Transfer Service Ready
      S: HELO LBL-UNIX.ARPA
      R: 250 USC-ISI.ARPA
      S: MAIL FROM:<mo@LBL-UNIX.ARPA>
      R: 250 OK
      S: RCPT TO:<Jones@USC-ISI.ARPA>
      R: OK
      S: DATA
      R: 354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
      S: Blah blah blah...
      S: ...etc. etc. etc.
      S: .
      R: 250 OK
      S: QUIT
      R: 221 USC-ISI.ARPA Service closing transmission channel

      The Data command starts the RFC822 message that you usually associate with your email.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    8. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I was thinking from a users perspective, not from the internal side.

      I know the bcc never ends up in the actual mail, but theres an entry field on the screen when a user is writing a mail.

      The mail software in use performs the actions you outlined, and spamming software does it automatically as we know.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    9. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Google has done the next best thing by attempting to match a mistyped (or otherwise invalid) email address to the next closest valid address, that way the recipient still has a chance to receive their mail.

      NO, you're completely wrong. I get lots of spam addressed to names close alphabetically to mine at my ISP, which is not GMail.

      There may be one name in the "To:" header, and hundreds of similar ones were in the "BCC:" header, which is not transmitted along with the message. However each of the "BCC" addresses generates a new message at the mail server which has the name attached to the "envelope" of the message, which is dropped when it's delivered to your mailbox.

    10. Re:How Gmail is really delivering by rednip · · Score: 1
      I was thinking from a users perspective, not from the internal side.
      The discussion was about how spam is sent, you seemed to indicate that spammers use the 'bcc' field, and I said that the 'bcc' field was just 'window dressing'.
      I know the bcc never ends up in the actual mail, but theres an entry field on the screen when a user is writing a mail.
      No, if the 'bcc' field is used, it does send up in the RFC822 message, and a 'proper' SMTP server relaying the message will use it for delivery.

      A user's address doesn't need to be in any of the headers, not the 'to', 'from', 'cc' or 'bcc', to recieve any particular message, as you seemed to indicate. It's easier to write a spamming tool that sends hundreds or thousands of 'MAIL TO:' with an otherwise static message, most anti-spamming tools take that into account in their 'spam calculations', so many spammers are now sending the email address either dynamicly in the message as the 'to' field, or as part of large static list in the 'bcc' field

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  30. My take on it by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm getting about 5 a day now. I have a sinking feeling I accidentally put my real email instead of a throw away one into some online something or other.

    On the other hand, Gmail marks every last one of them correctly.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:My take on it by bcmm · · Score: 1

      You could try googling for your email address.

      I do this regularly (well a URL monitor does it for me) as a precaution. A few months ago, Google told me that I had accidentally posted my real address on a forum, and I pleaded with the webmaster to remove it.

      They took it down, and that email address still only receives ~1 unsolicited email a week, usually from a friend with a virus.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    2. Re:My take on it by diogenes57 · · Score: 1

      No wonder you do, you have a free ipods link in your sig. You didn't realize that they were selling your address to every spammer under the sun?

    3. Re:My take on it by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. I've been on that site for months and only started getting spam to this address recently. I have the feeling Quizzilla (or a similar site) or military.com are the culprit

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  31. Use apg to generate a username! by Zangief · · Score: 3, Funny

    This can be paired with using your real name as a password, for extra security.

    Username: sds#SFD#4sdv_sd
    password: johnsmith

    That is gonna screw those crackers!

    1. Re:Use apg to generate a username! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my mothersmaidenname.mysocialsecuritynumber@aol.com as my address. Spammers should have a tough time figuring that out, since the information is not publicly available.

  32. Every spam I've gotten @ gmail recently... by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Spamcop reports as originally being from a "ajicccln.info" address. They're using a nameguessing system, too. I wonder why Google doesn't just block their IPs totally?

  33. I have an alternative approach by TractorBarry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well I got a GMail account especially so I can use it to sign up to bulletin boards, forums and to use when I order stuff over the web etc. etc.

    That way all the spam I get should start going to my GMail account thereby leaving my real email account (hosted on my home server) free for me to use with friends and family etc. (It's been 100% spam free in the nine months I've been using it)

    Previously I'd been using a "throwaway" domain name I bought specially for this (which gets redirected to a real account) but it's due for expiry soon and, now I have a GMail account, it can go ! So my top tip of the week is get several free web mail accounts and use them for everything but your private stuff.

    And on this note I'd never use my GMail account for any private stuff as, fer fecks sake, they're a SEARCH company. How long do you think it'll be before their new corporate shareholder overlords start doing some real intensive data mining on all your GMails ?

    "But dude, their motto is do no evil" I hear you squeak. Sorry, they're a publically listed company and will do whatever "the market" tells them to do...

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:I have an alternative approach by marafa · · Score: 1

      throwaway accounts for money? why not use hotmail or yahoo if u want the quota. hell i use http://www/dodgemail.com: no registration, automagically creates the user account and "unlimited" quota. some nice geek on slashdot pointed it out in his comment ps. can u pay for my domain name as a christmas present? pps. mod me a troll

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    2. Re:I have an alternative approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need a 1Gigabyte mail trap ?

      Why can't you just use Hotmail? Or use a false address?

    3. Re:I have an alternative approach by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      Have you ever taken a look at Spamgourmet

      http://www.spamgourmet.com

      It creates useable/disposable email addresses that are self-timed to destruct after a certain number of replies to the address. Very elegant solution to avoid the problems you describe.

      I use it all the time when signing up for forums, ordering online, etc... with no problems.

      hth,
      jeff

    4. Re:I have an alternative approach by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      And on this note I'd never use my GMail account for any private stuff as, fer fecks sake, they're a SEARCH company. How long do you think it'll be before their new corporate shareholder overlords start doing some real intensive data mining on all your GMails ?

      I really doubt they'd do that. However; I do think there is an excellent chance that Homeland Security will get a backdoor, say after the next mainland USA bombing.

    5. Re:I have an alternative approach by terrab0t · · Score: 1

      I agree. There is no such thing as a safe email address. As was pointed out in a post above, many email addresses are leaked to the wrong entities accidentally by purely innocent mistakes. You may think the address you only give to friends is safe, but eventually one of them will paste it into a list for an online greeting card or party invitation and your address will be in the wrong hands.

      SpamGourmet.com is also the solution to this. You give disposable addresses to your friends and enter them as trusted senders. If they leak the disposable to the wrong people, you disable that address for anyone but your trusted senders, or just let it expire on it's own.

      With SpamGourmet.com, the only spams you will see are the odd few that come through a compromised address before it expires, or (as the article points out) spams from those who dictionary attacked your mail provider to find your address. If you want to eliminate the dictionary attack problem, use a hard to guess account name as the article suggests. Nobody will have to remember it because they use SpamGourmet.com aliases to contact you. If by some chance your real mail address gets compromised, just switch to another one and have SpamGourmet.com forward to that instead.

      To anyone who can be trained to use it, SpamGourmet is a perfect solution to spam. I use it and I no longer recieve any. To me, problems with spam are a thing of the internet past. I still see the occasional one, but so long as I don't publish my real address and keep my safe senders list updated, the people I want to hear from can reach me while the spammers cannot.

      I think the ideal email application is one that uses the GMail web interface with SpamGourmet built in. Some of the things required to properly use a SpamGourmet account (keeping your whitelist updated, generating aliases to send mail through it) are a little tedious, but they could be made invisible if it were integrated into the mail app itself.

      In the meantime, it's still better than dealing with spam. Anyone reading Slashdot should be using it.

    6. Re:I have an alternative approach by AllNicksWereTaken · · Score: 0

      You appear to forget that only 10% of Google is publicly listed, so even if you bought all the shares, you wouldn't have much luck taking over them.

  34. As soon as.. by SpookyJim · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the Google weenies get off their butts and fix the annoying issues I'm experiencing with my account (incorrect # of msgs, not being able to open spam/trash folders, etc.), Spam is the farthest thing from my mind. FIX IT damn you!

    1. Re:As soon as.. by melandy · · Score: 1

      Not to not-pick, but it is in Beta. I would expect your ire were it directed at a "complete" and released product.

    2. Re:As soon as.. by KenBot_314 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, don't use it.
      It is a free beta, afterall... a privilege, not a right

    3. Re:As soon as.. by SpookyJim · · Score: 1

      So I guess that if I don't have to pay for a product, I should't expect it to work. I guess I shouldn't expect them to follow up on possible bug reports to better their Beta product either. Silly me!

    4. Re:As soon as.. by KenBot_314 · · Score: 1
      Your quote:
      "FIX IT damn you!"
      Hmm... I am pretty sure that if you had that attitude with ANY OSS project (for example) they would ignore you, too.
      As a sibling poster wrote, your attitude would be understandable if you had actually paid for the email service, or if they claimed it was a completed product.
    5. Re:As soon as.. by SpookyJim · · Score: 1

      I apologize for giving a few of the readers too much credit. Everyone, I wasn't really yelling at Google and I'm sorry for having bad OSS etiquette.

  35. Violating a basic rule of security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try generating an account name using "apg -M L -t"."

    You should never use a password as an account name!

  36. Published addresses? by dr_d_19 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Something I'd like to know (and this isn't stated in the article) is: which of his accounts has been published somewhere on the net (or available to the public in any harvesting kind of way).

    Doesn't matter if your account is simply garbage, as long as someone can spider it on the web. All honor to the dictionary attack, but as we all know, it doesn't take very long before someone finds your account on the web. Also, there are ways to prevent this.

    I never have my mailto clickable, and I use combinations of images to display it.

    1. Re:Published addresses? by JLyle · · Score: 1
      Doesn't matter if your account is simply garbage, as long as someone can spider it on the web. All honor to the dictionary attack, but as we all know, it doesn't take very long before someone finds your account on the web.
      Bingo. Gmail's spam filters are still doing a fine job of catching traditional spam (e.g. 419 scams and such) on my account. The new kind of "spam" I'm having to deal with lately on my Gmail account is from people asking for Gmail invites. These are people who clearly don't know who I am, and who have harvested my address from somewhere (most likely, newsgroup or mailing list posts). I've taken to reporting these as spam, but don't know if that's really going to influence Gmail's spam filters or not.
    2. Re:Published addresses? by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      >I never have my mailto clickable, and I use combinations of images to display it.

      Another good trick to use is to have a click-through that sends spambots to the web equivalent of a roach motel. (Want an example? See my sig!) };-)

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  37. For those without apg by Underholdning · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here's a sample output:
    ~$ apg -M L -t
    irpoynno (irp-oynn-o)
    padolchair (pad-olch-air)
    rheyghyab (rheyg-hyab)
    ledonoxi (led-on-ox-i)
    hiryisso (hir-yiss-o)
    ojfebthuff (oj-feb-thuff)

    I don't know about you, but suggesting people selecting rheyghyab@gmail as their email address seems pretty stupid to me. Granted, spammers will have a hard time guessing it, but everybody else will have a hard time remembering it.
    1. Re:For those without apg by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Most people use address books in their mail client, not their memory.

    2. Re:For those without apg by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      funny part.

      My spam poisioner that generates email addresses for harvester bots makes email addresses like that.

      every harvester bot will get 100 email addresses like the usernames you mentioned on every page they hit on my sites.

      Also, I am certianly not the only one doing this as I am using a project from sourceforge do do this, so making usernames like that is not effective.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:For those without apg by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      What about apg -M L -l ? :-)

      tango-yankee-zulu-echo-romeo-kilo-alfa@gmail.com , here I come! :-p

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:For those without apg by nickos · · Score: 1

      So then we just have to worry about our friends and colleagues getting viruses which steal the contents of their address books...

    5. Re:For those without apg by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      My username is hardly ever registered on places I sign up, because it's seemingly random like the results you posted, but is easy for me to remember. All you do is take a random character from a book, movie, videogame, whatever and remove the vowels. Easy to remember, easy to type, not so easy to tell friends, though. Hard to crawl/guess for spam bots, though.

  38. Best bet for anti-spam by Danathar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use Jetable.org (time expiring email relay addressess) to when signing up or doing something that I might suspect might get me on a spam list. This way email get's sent to my gmail (or any other account) for a limited time and if the spammer gets a hold of the jetable email address, it just expires after a set time period. VERY useful!

    And it's totally free!

    http://www.jetable.org/en/index

    1. Re:Best bet for anti-spam by evalencia1 · · Score: 1

      mailexpire.com also does this, and you can extend the 'lifetime' of that temporary email address.

  39. Spam activity after Ebay by Anderson+Fortaleza · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know if this is related but my spam on gmail exploded after I've used it as my primary ebay account email.

    1. Re:Spam activity after Ebay by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 1

      I've had the exact same experience. Ebay is a spam harvesters dream.

      --

      You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
    2. Re:Spam activity after Ebay by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      I don't normally post on Slashdot, but I just had to confirm this. I have a gmail account to, but when I signed up for an eBay account (last month) on an address of my own domain (not my gmail address), I started getting alot more smap too. The worse part is these additional spam got started getting though my Mozilla junk mail filters.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  40. Hiding email by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    In brief, is what the article proposes, so spammers will not reach you at least thru brute force approachs, that seem to be are very inefficient (and dumb, trying to guess all specifically gmail users when gmail will detect all their messages as spam shows that the sender is not only a spammer, is an idiot too).

    But your email worths nothing if noone knows it, and if enough people knows it in a way or another, at the very least some will be infected by worms or be part of botnets that will share your hard-to-guess email address with spammers, and will not matter how complex or simple is your mail address.

    Of course, measures can be taken to lower the probability to have spam, i.e. not have your email address in a clear way in web pages or participating in very public mailing lists with your mail without some obfuscation, and things like that, but the way proposed by the article only would work for, well, alternate mails for special uses, i.e. the backing up of data named in the article.

    The solution is not have a hard, meaningless email address, that can be forgotten. mispelled, etc by the people that makes sense to have an email address, is to have a good spam filter, at least as good as the gmail one.

  41. Maybe offer to pay them, by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    presuming you are getting email free from Google ?

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  42. A few key words might do the trick by had3l · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could try admin.(your name)@gmail.com or abuse.(your name)@gmail.com . Those are generally filtered out by spam companies, you could get less spam, but it still probably wouldn't stop it completely.

  43. easy way to avoid spam on gmail by dilby · · Score: 1

    Don't have a gmail address ( I guess I'm the only one left on /. that doesn't - dilbyswig@hotmail.com if you want to send an invite)

    --
    This post patent pending.
  44. worse? by psycht · · Score: 1

    I use my Gmail account for friends & family only. I have a yahoo account for my online subscriptions (including /.) and therefore don't really have a spam problem.

    That is, unless, your referring to the 3-4 spam messages my Gmail account gets per week.

  45. Free Invites by dahl_ag · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are looking for an invite, check out http://www.freegmailinvites.com/. It DOES actually work. That is where I got my gmail account. I just donated 10 new invites to the site.

    1. Re:Free Invites by Gunzour · · Score: 2, Informative

      I donate all of my invites to http://isnoop.net/gmailomatic.php.

  46. I'm annoyed too.. I wish... by dep01 · · Score: 1

    I wish you could set gmail to mark it automatically as "read" so you don't have that bolded Spam (1) in your menu... For anal-retentive bastards like myself, it will drive you nuts!

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  47. Say What? by PHanT0 · · Score: 1

    Dramatically worse? I've had my account fro almost six months now - not one spam yet.

  48. Filter your spam by ShiftlessXL · · Score: 1

    The fantastic thing about Gmail is its filters. I kept getting spam with un*su*bs*cr*ib*e in it. I just set a filter that would send it straight to the trash (skipping a step). So far, not one piece of spam has hit my Inbox, only the spambox.

  49. I avoid spam on regular personal email account! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't use 'effin regular personal email account! GAH! Just because everyone and their cat has 50 gmail invites to give out doesn't mean that you have to use it.

    Gmail is catching nearly 100% of the spam bound for my Gmail account. I don't need SpamAssassin's help with that.

  50. Single use "+" syntax? by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wonder if the spammers caught it yet. Gmail supposedly supports syntax of youraccountname+arbitrarytext@gmail.com and the email still gets delivered, plus can be filtered. If spammers don't get the idea tp cut the +...@ part off, you may easily post you+webpage001@gmail.com on your webpage and once harvested by spammers, change to you+webpage002, while blocking all emails with 001, etc. Same with "temporary stuff", like, say, logins to "suspect" sites, ebay auctions etc. Whenever it's not needed anymore, filter it off.

    Of course sooner or later spammers will learn to remove the + part. Then still putting periods at arbitrary places of your gmail u.s.ern.ame remains

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Single use "+" syntax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course sooner or later spammers will learn to remove the + part. Then still putting periods at arbitrary places of your gmail u.s.ern.ame remains

      No, they'll just remove all periods in the local part of the email address. The safest method is to use a +private address for your "real" address, and filter emails without any extension into your spam folder.

    2. Re:Single use "+" syntax? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Once the spammers start doing that, make your real address username+real@gmail.com

  51. WTF by LesDawson · · Score: 1

    Not to troll, but WTF ?

    "I get spam in my spam filter" - really don't see it as a problem when brute-force spam gets routed to my spam filter.

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Personally, I *don't* like that feature of google by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    For one thing, I suspect that the spammers could probably figure out what the base username is, and then just hammer your account with spam.

    Secondly, I've been noticing this week in the spam folder, that I'm getting a lot of copies of the exact same message, sent to myusernameXX where XX are just two random numbers.

    So now, instead of getting one copy of any given spam consuming my storage, I'm getting multiple copies sent to invalid addresses that just happen to start with my username.

  54. Russian by Huring · · Score: 0

    Gmails spam-filter works well, just wish there was a way to filter out languages... send($language) to spam-folder. I don't give out my gmail address, i use a domain that is re-directed to the account, but i keep getting spam in russian, addressed to the gmail addy.

    For temp & signup emails i use http://www.mailinator.com/, it seems to be down at the moment - because of the silly amounts of spam they recieve. It's a great service when it works, get a temp inbox with any addy you want. The box is deleted after a couple of hours, nothing to trace it back to you!

    --
    There is never, ever, any need for MS Comic Sans
  55. Free Invites Part II by jmole · · Score: 1

    I like using this site to give my invites away. About five minutes after I donate an invite someone gets it: http://isnoop.net/gmailomatic.php

  56. gmail spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I created a gmail account and within 1 day I have 6 spam messages. THe email address was not sent to anyone. THe name was however a common name and it appears the spam I am getting is just bulk sent to common names.

  57. The anti-spam idea? by seweso · · Score: 1

    Just create some sort of auto-reply which asks the sender to identify a generated picture and send the answer back. Then will the suspected spam message move to your inbox.

    The initial version doesn't even need a generated picture, a simple email like: "Your mail is clasified as spam, could you please resend this message by replying to this message.".

    Technically this will work along-side normal spam-filtering-tools, because you do not want to irritate people you frequently send mails to. So basically only auto-spam-reply's are sent to messages which are clasified as spam (or only for messages which might not be spam). Of course the system should sent some smart id with every outgoing mail (including with the auto-anti-spam-reply's) so that every genuine reply wont be clasified as spam.

    Bounced auto-reply messages should of course be ignored (you should not see them).

    You could also add an other way for people to prevent these irritating messages. The instructions will be displayed in the auto-spam-reply's:
    "Want to prevent these kind of anti-spam reply's? Then install iamnospammer software from iamnospammer.org".

    And people who buy things via spam should be beaten to death.

    1. Re:The anti-spam idea? by babybird · · Score: 1

      mailblocks.com already does this, but they hold a patent on it and it was fairly recently purchased by AOL after the founder died. Oh well, bye bye great email! :(

      --
      Keith D.
  58. Watch out! Random account names suck! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Don't use any random string generator for generating account names. I used one and look at what I got!

  59. Not bouncing messages is a good idea? by wannabgeek · · Score: 0

    If you think from spammer perspective alone, not bouncing messages for a wrong address is a good idea, but is it always oaky. What about the genuine cases. I make a mistake in typing the address and I do not get a bounce, so I will assume that the other person received the mail. I know I'll probably branded unworthy to be a /.'er for typing an address by hand. But is that a trivial problem - not knowing when a message has not been delivered?

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
  60. was gmail ever really spam-free/proof? by acroyear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or was it just the fact that all the email addresses on it are so new that they hadn't gotten propagated around on spam-lists.

    or is it that now that there are so many email addresses @ gmail, any random 6-8 character string @ gmail.com is likely to match up with *somebody*, so just flooding the system will get some through.

    gmail, like hotmail, will become a victim of its own success very quickly.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  61. very clever of you by IshanCaspian · · Score: 0

    Man, that was quite clever of you...you crack the joke, and then cash in on it with the +5 insightful for the mod points. Now all you need is some jackass to point it out, in hopes that he can get a +5 insightful out of it too...oh wait...

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
  62. I may be asking for trouble but... by uarch · · Score: 1

    It might change in the future but right now Gmail's spam filter is amazing.

    Out of curiousity I decided to forward all of my university accounts to Gmail (these accounts get 100+ spam emails a day). Gmail has correctly flagged EVERY single spam message and dropped it into the spam folder and I havent seen any false positives.

    As long as I never have to look at it I really don't care what people send me.

  63. Auto-delete SPAM by erykjj · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! Mail lets you auto-delete any SPAM. It would be nice for Gmail to give you that option. That way you wouldn't even notice the SPAM that get's sent and correctly classified as such.

  64. I get tons of spam in Gmail but by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

    it all goes into the spam folder. I have a quick review of that folder before nuking. I don't open any of it.

    Once something is flagged as spam it appears to flag it for everyone (least it looks like what it is doing). As spam dealing goes, Gmail has to be one of the best.

  65. how it seems to work by wrench+turner · · Score: 1

    I forward my long standing email address to my gmail and it gets lots of spam; 900 in last 20 days. That address seems to be on all teh spammers' lists.

    If I read my gmail early in the morning I see plenty of spam. If I don't check until later in the day I see dramatically less. Here's how it seems to work.

    If I wait and let others mark their morning batch of spam it helps gmail recognize and folder most if not all of my spam. If I log in earlier I mark my spam so gmail can folder them away for everyone else.

    It seems that once I see the spam in my index, it does not get foldered. But if I don't check my gmail until later, usually *all* spam has been moved to the spam folder.

  66. I Want...More by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    I've been saving all of my spam from 4 domains. Figured the more I have for Thunderbird to work on, the better it will do at filtering. I wondered what difference it would make if I avoided spam-attracting behaviors vs trying to attract as much spam as I could. I use my gmail account for that- I sign up for whatever mailing lists I find on google, and I respond to as many of the spam messages as I have the patience for. Playing with the 419ers is always entertaining. My goal is to see if I can get the rate of incoming spam to my gmail account to exceed that of the 4 domains. Hasn't happened yet, but it looks like it's getting closer and closer. If nothing else, i'll have a raft of extra spam for Thunderbird to chew on.

    1. Re:I Want...More by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I've been saving all of my spam from 4 domains. Figured the more I have for Thunderbird to work on, the better it will do at filtering.

      You'd think that would be the case, but you'd be wrong.

      The statistics of the source emails change over time (spammers come and go, you take part in different conversations, etc.) This extra data is just noise to the learning algorithm. Naive Bayes is a particularly dumb (but surprisingly effective) algorithm, and it has no way to take advantage of the mass amounts of crap you are dumping on it.

      In the world of data mining, "more" is not necessarily "better," and Bayesian learners are certainly no exception to that.

      Try restricting the training data to just the last 90 days or so instead of deluging the system with a bunch of irrelevant crap. I think you'll find the performance improves.

  67. Spam and PGP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never recieved any spam on my gmail account, until I published my PGP key for it. Now the bastard spammers even put my name in the emails they send me.

  68. GMAIL has just as much spam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get as much spam in GMAIL as I get anywhere else. The fact that I use my GMAIL account to post to Google Groups makes this certain. I previously used my YaHoo account, and the same thing is true there.

    But you know what? Both GMAIL and YaHoo filter out nearly 100% of the spam into my spambox.

    The real question is how good is GMAILS spam logic? I've seen about 3 of 50 spams make it past GMAIL in the last month. About the same percent at YaHoo (more spam, more false negatives.)

    I didn't receive ANY spam until I accidentally posted to NNTP using my GMAIL account. I didn't realize that the new Google Groups shared my e-mail login.

  69. Gmail SPAM by detachment2702 · · Score: 1

    I've had my gmail account since almost the day gmail came available to the public, and never once did I have a single SPAM email until around 2 or 3 weeks ago when I registered a domain with planetdomain.com and then I had about 30 spam emails about how I should use my domain to 'earn millions' and how I could 'get 25 million hits to your site... if you do this' type of emails. Luckily gmail has done a very good job of identifying these emails as SPAM.

  70. Don't be a doof by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

    "Rheyghyab"? Pfffft! Who isn't going to be able toremember the capital of Cabanastan?

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  71. I'd like less false positives by war3rd · · Score: 1

    What I'd like is for Google to stop sending my 'good' mail into the spam box, I seem to be getting a tremendous amount of false positives the more I use the account. One would think the opposite would happen as it click the 'not spam' button, but It's beginning to get frustrating and emails to Google meet with no response.

    --
    Got sushi? The Sushi FAQ
  72. All my Gmail spam is coming from one source by Cyburbia · · Score: 1
    In my Gmail box (not my main e-mail, I'm still experimenting with Gmail much like the rest of you), most of my spam comes from what seems lke randomly-generated Anglo/corporate-sounding names of people that sound like they "work down in accounting"; "Kerri Dolan" , "Sharon Winslow", "Marci Pratt", "Darrin Snell" and the like.

    All the spammed messahes all has titles like (something similar to my username) Popular software at low low prices and (something similar to my username) Extinguish pain with codeine. About 50% is for discount software, 40% drugs, 10% replica watches.

    In my limited experience, Gmail sends incoming e-mail that has a similar-appearing but nonexistent address into your box. Let's say there's an cyburbia at gmail d0t com. You may get mail for cyburban, cyburb or syburbia at gmail d0t com, even when those addresses don't exist.

    Even though I own my own domain, I have a few gmail accounts, just in case. Today, in my d[mylastname] at gmail d0t com account, I recieved a bunch baby pictures from someone I don't know; they were addressed to [my last name]s at gmail dot com, and my address is nowhere to be seen in the headers.

    1. Re:All my Gmail spam is coming from one source by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      In my limited experience, Gmail sends incoming e-mail that has a similar-appearing but nonexistent address into your box. Let's say there's an cyburbia at gmail d0t com. You may get mail for cyburban, cyburb or syburbia at gmail d0t com, even when those addresses don't exist.

      No, what's happening is that one message was sent to dozens or hundreds of addresses, but all except one were on the BCC line and so not part of the message as delivered. The name on the "To:" line may have been the first in that slice of the spammer's address list.

  73. Maybe they're using botnets by dannytaggart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    to send out their email, so gmail can't just block an IP address. Apparently, 70% of spam is generated by botnets.

    --
    PimpMyMazda.com - Crazy mods to a 2002 Mazda Protege DX.
    1. Re:Maybe they're using botnets by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      Well, here's at least one of the blocks they're consistently using:

      inetnum: 202.102.224.0 - 202.102.255.255
      netname: CNCGROUP-HA
      country: CN
      descr: CNCGROUP Henan province network

      If CNC had their own whois server published, I could look at information about which customer of theirs is spamming. However, it's all Chinese space, and frankly I don't care if they block the whole /19 until CNC stops knowingly hosting spammers. I'd have pasted more about the netblock, but /. doesn't like that idea.

  74. What About an Inside Job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all very interesting. . . but it doesn't seem to explain the spam I've gotten on Gmail: my gmail user name isn't a name or dictionary word, so could not be discovered via that kind of attack. I've never used the account except to send test messages to and from my own mail server, and I've only given out two invites, to family members. Nonetheless, I've been getting several spam messages per week--how is that possible? And yes, they are correctly classified by Gmail as spam, but that's not the point--how could I be receiving any in the first place? The only thing I can think of is that either some spammer has hacked into Gmail's database, or as happened to AOL some time ago, someone on the inside of Gmail has sold a copy of their account list to spammers. I've tried contacting Gmail to ask about this, but they just keep sending me automated replies directing me to their standard page of anti-spam suggestions.

  75. Gmail is OK, but YMMV. by momus_radar · · Score: 1
    From the article: Gmail has done a lot to radically change the whole web-mail world. Their user interface is amazing.

    No it hasn't & no it isn't. If you are using a publicly accessible browser you still have to log into, sort, log out and remember to scrub the browsers cache & history just like you would with any other web-mail service.

    The only significant difference is that you can archive dump-loads of messages on their servers instead of yours and use the Google search engine to weed through all your crap.

    Also, I know for a fact that some of my "archived" messages have disappeared with out me marking them for deletion, but since I have no access what-so-ever to the server, I have absolutely no way to recover them.

    Gmail is nice and all, but it certainly hasn't changed the whole web-mail world for me.

  76. whats the problem? by edgefield · · Score: 0

    gmail's spam filter works a treat for me...

  77. BETTER YET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't go near a computer and you'll never get spam!!

  78. Re:Best bet for anti-spam - Sneakemail.com by MaxPower582 · · Score: 1

    This sounds good. Another way is to use sneakemail.com. There a person can create a alias to their email account. The alias email address is the public email address. I create a new address each time I need one to give out. The system is easy to use and manage all the alias email addresses. That way if a person starts spamming that address or that address is sold to a spammer, I delete the address. This kills the spam email. Also, I know who sold the address to the spammer. For the name of the email address, I use the site and date like amazon.com.2004.12.21. This system works great and is easy to use.

  79. Simple answer: NO by krray · · Score: 1

    I simply have to say "NO". My email address is the SAME one I've had since 1988 or 1989 when it was setup originally (by me). In those days it was fed through a UUCP connection and has gone through various providers and types of feeds over the years.

    Of course today it's directly on the Internet fed with a 10Mbit wireless uplink in the 5Ghz range which is solid enough to have over taken my phone service (now VoIP based). My email is still the same.

    I still accept email to the .COM version of the domain, but for political reasons have since shifted to the .US flavor. My email is still the same though.

    I have done some very specific tests over the years, ranging from using address' on USENET, to posting on the web. And yes, I have specifically setup a Windows box, added one address to the Outlook address book, and watched closely as the system was infected, time and again, with it sitting on a DMZ'd type IP address. Ultimately your email _will_ be harvested and used as soon as somebody you know is infected. Not if, but when (today). Making it difficult to remember/type is a futile effort.

    I still run into old friends (usually from college days) that attempt to find me at my old email address -- and they do. Even though I may see 1-2 spams in front of me [inbox] every week. Behind the scenes the Mac is properly flagging/filing the junk that does make it with the Linux server eating that junk mail and blocking ~1,500 attempts daily with another 100 or so being dealt with through spam-trap address' along with it find ~200 (still daily) through its own means (hint: it talks a lot with the Mac :). The key in this mix is the lack of ... Windows. :) The problem is the virus infected Windows users out there.

    And my email is still the same. ~17 years now.

  80. Here's another way ... by e4ward · · Score: 1

    to avoid spam on gmail. Keep the gmail address private and use a disposable email address service such as (shameless plug alert) e4ward.com to forward mail to it.

  81. Plug for gmail spam detection by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I trusted Google to eventually get it right. There have been a few ups and downs but for me gmail is filtering my spam 99% correctly - it has been several weeks since a false positive and maybe one or two spams make it into the inbox each week.

    It would be nice to have one-click whitelists.

    The volume of spam has gone WAY WAY up. I'd say it's doubled since a month ago. It's coming to my "regular" email address though, not directly to gmail.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  82. The full joke by Plutor · · Score: 1

    A small, 14-seat plane is circling for a landing in Atlanta. It's totally fogged in, zero visibility, and suddenly there's a small electrical fire in the cockpit which disables all of the instruments and the radio. The pilot continues circling, totally lost, when suddenly he finds himself flying next to a tall office building.

    He rolls down the window (this particular airplane happens to have roll-down windows) and yells to a person inside the building, "Where are we?" The person responds "In an airplane!"

    The pilot then banks sharply to the right, circles twice, and makes a perfect landing at Atlanta International.

    As the passengers emerge, shaken but unhurt, one of them says to the pilot, "I'm certainly glad you were able to land safely, but I don't understand how the response you got was any use."

    "Simple," responded the pilot. "I got an answer that was completely accurate and totally irrelevant to my problem, so I knew it had to be the IBM building."


    (From math funnies, feel free to modify the company and the location for maximum hilarity.)

  83. How to catch gmail spammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its going to get worse though. As more people use it and when it goes out of beta and some spammers can start getting accounts and testing...

    So then when a particular spam starts infesting gmail, Google admins can search through all the gmail accounts, find the earliest occurrence of the offending message, and bust the spammer?

  84. Why even deliver messages thought to be SPAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hope they are eventually confident enough with their spam filters to simply delete the message rather than putting into a special folder. I know this option might not be reasonable for some accounts or even potentially touch on free speech issues, but I'd wager the vast majority of people would simply rather have the spam auto-deleted. This could be an opt-in feature.

    My experience has been that the spam filter rarely generates false positives, although it might miss a message here or there. I say, just go ahead and delete those messages!

  85. its a big problem by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    Sometimes e-mail annoucements to friends of mine get shoved into their spam folder. I've had numerous legitimate business e-mails put into my spam folder.

    The problem is that alot of people don't bother ever looking in their spam folder, because they assume the system is wisely only putting spam there. "Oh but I didnt get your e-mail" is something I hear alot, when its been falsely spam-positived.

    Weirdly enough, sometimes identical e-mails from nearly identical sources will have one marked as spam sometimes, and the other not.

    Getting spam is bad. Having non-spam marked as spam and dealt with accordingly is worse.

    I be sure and click the "not spam" button in gmail, in the hopes that actually does something akin to training the filter... but who knows if it really does.

    --

    -

  86. gosh darn it... by kcornwell · · Score: 1

    i want a gmail account :(

    1. Re:gosh darn it... by kcornwell · · Score: 1

      it's all i want for christmas :(

    2. Re:gosh darn it... by kcornwell · · Score: 1

      and one of these :(

    3. Re:gosh darn it... by kcornwell · · Score: 1

      I got a gmail account! deduction@gmail yea! Thanks Wayne, rock on!

  87. Biggest spam scam currently running. by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    google ads are running a highly dubious ad that typically catches you with something like this:

    "Test a Nintendo DS unit and keep it!"

    or

    "Test an iPod and keep it!"

    I fell into the trap and went through it.

    This is how the trap is setup: you punch in all your personal information: name, address, email, phone number and even birthday. You have to type that in first, then go through a survey, and then, here's the scam: you have to sign up with or puchase from six advertisers in order to get the "Nintendo DS" and they range from getting a new credit card to Vonage service to CDs and DVDs from Columbia House, etc. Don't fall into this trap (sadly I did) and sign away your soul for nothing.

    The reason they set it up like this is because they know that once you punch in your information, that's all they need and they'll then stack the odds against you from ever receiving the iPod, Segway, DS, PS2, or whatever they say they're giving away. So the old adage applies onces again -- if it sounds too good to be true, then it is.

    Once they have your email and address, you'll get not only the spam rolling in, but the occasional junk mail, or maybe even worse (who knows).

  88. Yes, but every every email address gets spam. by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    gMail happily detects this spam and puts it in the spam folder.

    Thats all it ever intended to do.

    You must realise that gMail could stop all spam so you would never see it (they would just delete it rather than putting it in the spam folder) but they elect to give you the opportunity to view it just in case their detection algorithm messes up. So whats the problem - just don't visit the spam folder.

    If you have received actual spam in your inbox folder, not your spam one then you might have something to complain about.

  89. More effective solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    or, you can "just" do what David Mazieres does, and have an email address that looks like a message ID:
    <12297.830286027.1@cs.nyu.edu> (just an example, not his actual address)

    More spammers have to filter those, or else they cull too many (?) bogus addresses.

  90. In Japan... by jotsuki · · Score: 1

    While I was studying abroad in Japan I met a few people with really bizarre (cell) email addresses. I asked why and they said to prevent receiving spam mail. Only problem was, I couldn't email them from my Hotmail or Yahoo accounts, I guess because of the strings of periods (i.e. ........@docomo.net). Anyways, I've also started getting a good amount of spam on my Gmail account after a couple months of nothing at all. Too bad.

  91. Most Gmail spam is coming from Korea .. by Cyburbia · · Score: 1

    ... according to a SpamCop scan. Here's the header of a typical Gmail spam: X-Gmail-Received: aa86efbb260d53672e5caa7bd305096b1dc98674 Delivered-To: me@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.48.62 with SMTP id v62cs1134wrv; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.96.68 with SMTP id t68mr104874rnb; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:57:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from 64.233.171.27 ([219.252.70.103]) by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id 70si1117986rnb; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 219.252.70.103 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of KJ@yahoo.com) X-Message-Info: PP145WS311Iirc0rTQBmjTUE079TWV1wspAdJO5 Received: from 96.142.247.15 by ip-171-112-38-54.ock.KJ@yahoo.com (AppleMailServer 03.6.9.3) id 77325056016 via NDR; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:57:10 +0600 Reply-To: "Roy Montoya" From: "Roy Montoya" To: "Someone else" Subject: Someone else Office XP - $60 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:53:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--874591855832788" REPORT SPAM TO: spamcop@kisa.or.kr;abuse@sknetworks.co.kr;postmast er@sknetworks.co.kr (219.252.70.103), SpamCop says. Korea. Spam. Where have I seen that before?

  92. Spamming -- the only solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think the only solution to spam is going to have to be ugly. Frankly it's getting to where I'm going to have to hire hitmen to hunt down spammers and strew their guts all over the street in order to make the appropriate example that I don't want unsolicited email for things that don't exist. Period.

    I mean, what other options have been tried that have worked? I guarantee you dead spammers won't be sending more email, and coming along behind ten guys who ended their life at the point of a machete isn't appealing for the kind of uncertain return spam provides. We need to make it so it's safer to deal drugs than it is to send spam email.

    But that's just my opinion.

  93. You forgot "plussing" by AllNicksWereTaken · · Score: 0

    You forgot about the undocumented plussing feature in Gmail...
    ---
    Gmail supports "plus" addressing, which means that if your address is maryhadda@gmail.com, you can receive e-mail at maryhadda+littlelamb@gmail.com or maryhadda+longaddress@gmail.com, etc. Why is this useful? Well, Mary (or you!) could use one, er, I'll call it a "plussing," for mailing lists ("maryhadda+lists"), and another for shopping online ("maryhadda+shopping") and so on, and then create filters to put useful labels on the different types of mail.

    Some have suggested that this could also be a useful spam deterrent (e.g., using maryhadda+2004q2 and then discarding e-mail sent to this address the following quarter), but I think this suffers from two key flaws:
    1) Spammers are probably smart enough to start stripping off the plussing :(.
    2) After a while, you'd have to create a LOT of filters, and -- at least for the moment -- we only get an allotment of 20 filters total. It'd be a shame to use those all up in a (likely futile) attempt to thwart spamjerks.

  94. Overlooked the obvious by ArtStone · · Score: 1

    Social engineering - people tend to use the same email ID for multiple email accounts... just as they ignore basic security procedures and use the same password on every account...

    All the spammers do is to use the email ID from known valid targets and append major freemail domains... so if [mysupersekritid]@myispname.com gets on a spam list, they try [mysupersekritid]@aol.com, @hotmail.com, @msn.com, etc... and now @gmail.com

    So they probably aren't random dictionary attacks at all - the article did pick up on the connection, but didn't see the obvious conclusion.

    --
    Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  95. the real villains are... by lxrhee · · Score: 1
    spammers really suck but I think we all realize that there will always be spammers, flamers, assholes, etc. (i really want to believe that human beings by nature are 'good' tho)

    the real villains aren't the spammers.. it's those idiots who actually buy stuff from spammers, or click the links in the e-mail. If no one ever paid attention to spam or bought stuff through it, it wouldn't eliminate spam (cos it's not like it requires a huge investment to spam) but i'm sure it would make a difference.

    it reminds me of the nyc subway. If no one ever threw trash onto the tracks, there would be no rats. but there's always one idiot who does, and then some other idiot comes along and spits, and it snowballs into the disgusting state things are in now, where every other station has rodent warnings posted up.

    "human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so" - Adams

  96. Spreading the risk (plus adressing on Gmail ...) by hadaso · · Score: 1

    On Gmail you can have many email addresses using "plus addressing": if your Gmail address is aaa@gmail.com then you can use addresses like aaa+whatever@gmail.com. You can share with different people different addresses and you can easily block ones that are found by spammers (perhaps block for everyone except the people you gave the address to). That way losing an address to spammers is not a big problem, and you don't have to forever hate your friend that stupidly compromised your precious secret email address! One problem with this might be the limit on the number of filters a user can have(perhaps it is possile to block many addresses with an "or" operation?) Using randomly generated addresses would require a lot of work to maintain, so I think a better way is to decide on a naming scheme that would allow addresses to be grouped for filtering. Then perhaps one can filter on groups of addresses by matching substrings. Has anyone here tried to employ such a naming scheme?

    The same thing can be done with other services, such as fastmail.fm that has a more flexible filtering system, or with addresses in one's own domain.

    One problem with using this approach is that after many addresses that deliver to your account are found by spammers, a lot of spam is directed at them, and even if you don't get to see the spam because it's automatically erased, it might load your system too much. this depends on the stage at which the filter blocks: before or after email is received. Tools for blocking before an email is received are more limited.

    Using randomly generated addresses is not very useful if you have to manually maintain them (they have to be written down on paper or to a file. They are useful if they are recorded an organized automatically such as in sneakemail.com. But if one wants to use multiple disposable addresses in one's own domain, or in one's subdomain provided by one's email provider, or just using plus-addressing, a naming scheme is needed. I have my own domain but I still use addresses supplied by sneakemail.com or spamgourmet.com because I cannot come up with a reasonabe naming scheme for addresses in subdomains of my own domain that would be flexible enough to allow many years of use despite many of them being lost to spammers. Does anyone have ideas for such naming schemes? (in spamgourmet I have a simple naming schemes prducing addresses like slashdot22dec04.post.hadaso@spamgourmet.com. But then on spamgourmet addresses self destruct so I don't worry too much about how to filter them in the future. The date part is just to ensure old addresses are not reused).

  97. How to GET spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would one actually go about getting spammed, if one wanted to? Would it be as easy as posting your email in some public forums? -Chase (spam@bullhorn.com)