You extract Uranium-235 from the much more plentiful Uranium-238. Uranium-233 is not present in natural Uranium, but can be produced by bombarding Thorium-232 with neutrons. Uranium-233 is fissile, and is the basis of a Thorium fuel cycle in a nuclear reactor.
The USA has never restricted the use of encryption within its borders. Restrictions on use were discussed with the Clipper chip crap proposed by the Clinton administration, but that didn't go anywhere. What you remeber was the (pointless) limitation of export that was dropped by the Clinton administration in 1999 (?). Products with greater than 40-bit key support were prohibited from export. Eventually they figured out that this was simply hurting American businesses, since the US had no monopoly on strong encryption.
There *was* an ejection system, but it was removed after the first few flights since it only provided for the pilot/copilot. It was only there for the initial test flights. If they had kept it, the other crew would have been SOL, so they dropped it.
Is this incompetence or intentional deception?
on
Assault Weapons Ban
·
· Score: 1
The weapons' menacing looks, coupled with the public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons--anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun--can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.
This is part of the conclusion of "Assault Weapons and Accessories in America" from the Violence Policy Center. Also, in the conclusion, they mention the reason they started complaining about assault weapons is that they didn't get anywhere with registering or banning handguns. So they manufacture a bogus issue...and people like Kerry are at the forefront of pushing this crap (voted for every single "assault weapons" bill in the Senate, no matter what definition used).
Maybe you understand why gun owners don't trust Kerry or the Democratic Party in general. They lie about us and about gun issues when they can't get traction with the truth. I would personally like to vote for someone other than Bush, but I'm sure as hell not voting for Kerry.
Analog composite video is the native format on the disc. So, the TV input card would be the first A->D conversion. Even S-Video output on a LD player is created by an internal comb filter, and its quality is only better if the LD player's comb filter is better than your TV's.
In the whole of the US, apart from while driving, requiring ID is considered the same as any other search and seizure. Therefore a warrant and/or "probable cause" is required to compel someone to present ID.
It has probably been 4 or 5 years since I tried, and I could barely get reduced quality (downsampled) audio on a 486/120 or 133. Just my own experience, maybe you had better luck
I think, as other posters have said, that custom built cars only have to meet basic safety requirements (lights, size restrictions, ability to drive and maneuver adequately) in the US.
Such requirements are probably largely state law in the US, and as I live in Texas, here is Texas' vehicle equipment requirements as an example. Some states, probably California, might be stricter, at least in the emissions requirements.
(a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy. -
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the
owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
(1)
that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or...
IANAL, but in my opinion, that would cover the authorized use of GPL software on anyone else's computer, be it a friend's or an employer's computer.
a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy. -
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
(1)
that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or...
I believe the only rulings that are given any credence by US courts are those from other Common Law countries. However, I don't think they are binding, but they can be used as a justification for a decison.
Copyright (c) 1993-2000 the Wine project authors (see the file AUTHORS for a complete list)
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
Basically a BSD-ish license, so they have no requirement to release improvements to WINE.
My understanding is that Lindows is a product that includes a heavily modified WINE, a Linux kernel, etc. This isn't an application that runs over Linux, it's an application that includes Linux as a part of it.
You may very well be right that there is a GPL violation, but I doubt it. If they needed kernel extensions that they didn't want released, it is completely legal to make a binary-only kernel module for Linux as vmware did. The module itself can be under any distribution terms. Simply prepackaging a version of Linux to run a proprietary application (the Lindows compatability layer) would not make the Lindows compatability layer a derived work either. It would be considered "mere aggregation" on the CD.
Actually, TiVo does much the same thing as Lindows, and they're in the clear legally.
By that reasoning, there could be no closed source applications for Linux. You're wrong though. Here is the the message from Linus above the GPL in the Linux COPYING file at kernel.org
NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover user programs that use kernel
services by normal system calls - this is merely considered normal use
of the kernel, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived work".
Also note that the GPL below is copyrighted by the Free Software
Foundation, but the instance of code that it refers to (the linux
kernel) is copyrighted by me and others who actually wrote it.
Linus Torvalds
The main part of Lindows is exactly like WINE; simply a program that uses system calls. The only changes they have to release are changes to the Linux kernel, and not even those if they use binary-only modules to extend their version of the Linux kernel.
Slashdot Mirror
froggy got pw0n3d
You extract Uranium-235 from the much more plentiful Uranium-238. Uranium-233 is not present in natural Uranium, but can be produced by bombarding Thorium-232 with neutrons. Uranium-233 is fissile, and is the basis of a Thorium fuel cycle in a nuclear reactor.
The USA has never restricted the use of encryption within its borders. Restrictions on use were discussed with the Clipper chip crap proposed by the Clinton administration, but that didn't go anywhere. What you remeber was the (pointless) limitation of export that was dropped by the Clinton administration in 1999 (?). Products with greater than 40-bit key support were prohibited from export. Eventually they figured out that this was simply hurting American businesses, since the US had no monopoly on strong encryption.
There *was* an ejection system, but it was removed after the first few flights since it only provided for the pilot/copilot. It was only there for the initial test flights. If they had kept it, the other crew would have been SOL, so they dropped it.
Maybe you understand why gun owners don't trust Kerry or the Democratic Party in general. They lie about us and about gun issues when they can't get traction with the truth. I would personally like to vote for someone other than Bush, but I'm sure as hell not voting for Kerry.
Analog composite video is the native format on the disc. So, the TV input card would be the first A->D conversion. Even S-Video output on a LD player is created by an internal comb filter, and its quality is only better if the LD player's comb filter is better than your TV's.
In the whole of the US, apart from while driving, requiring ID is considered the same as any other search and seizure. Therefore a warrant and/or "probable cause" is required to compel someone to present ID.
See the relevant U.S. Supreme Court case.
It has probably been 4 or 5 years since I tried, and I could barely get reduced quality (downsampled) audio on a 486/120 or 133. Just my own experience, maybe you had better luck
I didn't think so. :)
I think, as other posters have said, that custom built cars only have to meet basic safety requirements (lights, size restrictions, ability to drive and maneuver adequately) in the US.
Such requirements are probably largely state law in the US, and as I live in Texas, here is Texas' vehicle equipment requirements as an example. Some states, probably California, might be stricter, at least in the emissions requirements.
IANAL, but in my opinion, that would cover the authorized use of GPL software on anyone else's computer, be it a friend's or an employer's computer.
Get a sky marshal to arrest the little punk for copyright violation!
Didn't IBM build a few large clusters in the last year or two?
The Intel RNG is in the 8xx series chipsets, not in the processor. You don't get it if you use a VIA or SiS chipset with an Intel processor.
IANAL, but,
I believe the only rulings that are given any credence by US courts are those from other Common Law countries. However, I don't think they are binding, but they can be used as a justification for a decison.
You are correct in that the records were one time pads containing random noise, but Sigsaly was digital, not analog.
/. story
NSA Paper
Someone posted .debs earlier, but here are some rpms I found on someone's site if anyone is interested.
Source RPM
and
i386 Binary RPM
They look like they're up to date.
How many of the 7,500 comments in favor of the settlement came from Microsoft?
/. readers?
And...
How many of the 7,000 "I hate microsoft" comments came from
Anyone?
:)
Basically a BSD-ish license, so they have no requirement to release improvements to WINE.
You may very well be right that there is a GPL violation, but I doubt it. If they needed kernel extensions that they didn't want released, it is completely legal to make a binary-only kernel module for Linux as vmware did. The module itself can be under any distribution terms. Simply prepackaging a version of Linux to run a proprietary application (the Lindows compatability layer) would not make the Lindows compatability layer a derived work either. It would be considered "mere aggregation" on the CD.
Actually, TiVo does much the same thing as Lindows, and they're in the clear legally.
The main part of Lindows is exactly like WINE; simply a program that uses system calls. The only changes they have to release are changes to the Linux kernel, and not even those if they use binary-only modules to extend their version of the Linux kernel.
At least Real releases Linux players. Can you say that for Quicktime or Windows Media?