Slashdot Mirror


TiVo Introduces Series2

KMFMS writes "Yesterday, TiVo introduced their Series2 line of TiVo DVRs. The TiVo web page for the Series2 states that it will have "2 USB expansion ports to connect to peripheral devices like... network adaptors..." " Presumably this will mean Tivo will have Broadband support to compete with the new ReplayTV 4000's. It also claims to support music and stuff too.

351 comments

  1. How long? by tempest303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How much more expansion and networkability are the MPAA and TV networks going to "allow" in these sorts of things? I keep wondering when the "other shoe is going to drop" and Tivo is either sued out of existance or DRM'd out of usefulness...

    1. Re:How long? by inerte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forever, specially when copying content from a device to another can be tracked (and charged). If we get to this situation, MPAA will surely profit of it.

    2. Re:How long? by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      I was under the impression that the newest versions of TiVo's software encoded the video stream more than previously (2.5 vs lower revs).

      I would guess they would have no problems with you moving files around from place to place, if the only way to view those files was using a single hardware decoder that only produced an analog signal. Moving files from place to place is still a useful thing from the standpoint of archival. I have 2x100GB drives in my TiVo, but I can see where having TB of space would be really handy.

      But then, I don't know enough about my TiVo's guts to know if hardware decryption to analog is what they will be able to do. AFAICT, that's the only way to keep the SellersOfContent from ripping them a new one.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    3. Re:How long? by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 2
      newest versions of TiVo's software encoded the video stream more than previously (2.5 vs lower revs).

      2.5 = VBR (+other stuff)

      --

      ______
      Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

  2. Upgrade? by Indomitus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sure I'm not the only one who wants to know if there's going to be an upgrade program/discount for owners of the now old school original Tivo boxes?

    I guess now that the Series1 prices are going to probably go into a freefall soon I can pick up an extra and finally for the 100gig drive upgrade. :)

    1. Re:Upgrade? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Enabled for future services in home entertainment

      Well, if those are still future services, why would I want to upgrade now? Why don't I wait until these services are actually available and I can be certain that unit, with add-ons, actually functions the way they claim it will.

    2. Re:Upgrade? by mikeylebeau · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree that one should not consider buying one of the Series2 boxes until there is a *reason* to.. However, it is understandable what TiVo is doing. Most likely, when ReplayTV released their 4000 unit with the broadband, TiVo was caught with their pants down and have been rushing since then to have something to show for CES, so that they don't appear to be behind in the development of their product as compared to Replay. This is a way of using what was pretty much already-existing technology in many Series1 boxes (see this comment within this article regarding technology which is already in the TiVo), but being able to say, "look we're doing what Replay did, but better!!"

      -mikey

    3. Re:Upgrade? by SysPig · · Score: 1
      I guess now that the Series1 prices are going to probably go into a freefall soon...

      This could go either way. If Tivo decides to incorporate "features" that make hacks more difficult, you could see prices go UP on older units...

    4. Re:Upgrade? by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 2
      Series1 prices are going to probably go into a freefall

      I have been findind 14hr refurb's for about 70$US. I don't know how much more "freefall" that can take.
      [The supply seems to be drying up as they are getting harder and harder to find, but the price hasn't escalated yet. I expect Series2 to have that effect.]

      --

      ______
      Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

    5. Re:Upgrade? by Indomitus · · Score: 1

      Well I guess I haven't been looking hard enough. :) I figured they were still up there but I don't think I was looking at refurbs. Off to ebay I go.

    6. Re:Upgrade? by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 1
      Most of the eBay stuff is either individuals or people buying units, upgrading them, and reselling them.

      You are a geek, right? As such, I expect that you would have no interest in buying a machine *someone else* hacked. WHere's the fun in that??

      Look at the clearing house type places, where manufatures dump equipment to clean out warehouses/inventory...

      --

      ______
      Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

    7. Re:Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in hell can you find them for $70? Even refurbs are going for $100+ on ebay. Amazon is out of stock on their $99 refurbs.... Are you getting these off the back of a truck somewhere or something? If so, which truck, and where? :)

    8. Re:Upgrade? by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 1
      Like I said, I wouldn't buy from eBay. Look at some of the larger companies that clear out old inventory. Also, they aren't selling them for a fixed price, so some people paid 99 for them, some 89, some paid 129 (idoits). Once I get my last one, I can give you a link.

      Also, I have heard of people having luck finding old units at Sears, Walmart, and the like, but that is a lot of trouble to go to...

      --

      ______
      Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

    9. Re:Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of God, man, where?!?!?! What clearinghouse, what larger company? Aghghghgh!!!! I'd gladly get a 14 hour refurb for $70-$99 to open it up and hack. I just need a shove in the right direction...

    10. Re:Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be great! Please do post a link as soon as you can!

  3. When will it have a DVD drive on it? by kcornia · · Score: 1

    If I could get this thing with a DVD drive, so I have one unit on top of the TV, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. But as it stands, I just don't think I watch enough TV to justify the cost.

    1. Re:When will it have a DVD drive on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want a TiVo with a DVD? How about MOXI? DVD and you can use wireless to broadcast to 3 additional TVs in the house.

      Wow. Starts testing this summer.

      http://www.moxi.com/product.htm

    2. Re:When will it have a DVD drive on it? by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Your post looks kind-of like a "plant," might you be employed by Moxi? The box looks way cool, but what I'd like to know is, will this box (or TiVo 2, for that matter) include "Digital Rights Management?"

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    3. Re:When will it have a DVD drive on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I've been bitching about the lack of a DVD drive in the Tivo since ti came out.

      This one has USB ports, so maybe an external DVD drive will work.

      Still sucks, though.

    4. Re:When will it have a DVD drive on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the poster was a "plant", I would have never known it without your message! Thanks for bringing it up! I went to their web site to check it out. The Moxi looks like the answer to my prayers.

      I have digital cable, a VCR, and a DVD player. It's a pain in the ass to record stuff from the digital cable box because the VCR has to be on channel three, and I have to leave the digital box on the channel I want to record. So much for setting up multiple recordings.

      The Moxi would let me combine them all together into one unit, and give me much better functionality. My uncle is the President of a cable company, so I'll have to ask him if he knows about this yet. I WANT ONE!

    5. Re:When will it have a DVD drive on it? by dickDragon · · Score: 1

      What do you need a DVD drive for?
      A TB of storage will put every movie ever made
      on you "Now Playing" list.

  4. Component Out? by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's unclear on that little blurb whether it will have HDTV outputs... anyone have any more information on this? It would be great to have the outputs so that I could use the empty component in on my TV.

    --

    WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

    1. Re:Component Out? by BRO_HAM · · Score: 1


      Well, component out doesn't necessarily mean HDTV, but I see where you're going. I don't think the image quality demands a component out yet on the tivo.

      Also, wouldn't the tivo moot the HDTV quality? IANAEE, but I would imagine the recording and compression to a hard drive would negate the quality of the HDTV broadcast. Maybe somebody knows definitively.

      --


      my sig is so witty and fun - it tickles almost everyone who reads it.
    2. Re:Component Out? by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but my main thing is that all of the regular inputs on my TV are filled, so I have to run it through the VCR instead of going straight to the TV...

      It wouldn't really do anything for quality, but it would make navigating all my inputs much easier. =)

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

    3. Re:Component Out? by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      No, you can encode a HD signal using MPEG2, but it must be at a much higher bit rate. DTV is going to be a 19.39 Mbps MPEG2 data stream.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    4. Re:Component Out? by jlower · · Score: 1

      Your TiVo has VCR in/out plugs. Plug the TiVo into the TV and the VCR into the TiVo. Works for me.

    5. Re:Component Out? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had the same situation. Solved it with a nice little $65 box from RCA that lets you switch video sources for your TV. Only feature lacking in this box is an s-video to rca or reverse conversion. Not all of my devices have s-video, you have to use all one or the other. There was a more expensive box, I think from Recoton, that did this, though.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    6. Re:Component Out? by whoknows55 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will Not have HDTV out. It has RCA and S-Video out

    7. Re:Component Out? by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, Pelican (maker of Playstation accessories) has a video switch which allows you to connect up to 4 different sources (either composite or s-video) to a single composite or s-video out. The only problem is that the box does not have a remote - you have to punch the appropriate button on the front. But for $20, it's most useful.

      I've used so my Dreamcast and Tivo can share the single s-video input on my TV. No problems.

      You can find the Pelican switch box next to all the other Playstation2 accessories at your local store.

    8. Re:Component Out? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      This RCA has a remote, sort of. You program it to recognize the IR remotes of the attached devices. When you power on your DVD via it's remote, the box switches to that device's input. The problem is that the TiVo doesn't really have a power on/off. I've programmed the rca box to recognize when I hit the 'tivo' button on the tico remote and switch to that source. Not perfect, but it gets the job done most of the time (the rest of the time I can manage to drag my @ss off the couch and change it myself).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    9. Re:Component Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hdtv?? R U kidding me, LOL..

      hdtv was the government plot that was doomed to failure. fyi, for the price of a hdtv, you can build two smp althon systems with four monitors and still have money left to take your girlfriend out to dinner!

    10. Re:Component Out? by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

      I could give a shit about HDTV, but progressive scan and 16:9 is worth the price of a scratch-and-dent unit.

      Nice try, though.

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

  5. They should get smarter by Whatthehellever · · Score: 0

    ...and add a 1394 firewire port to it. The first DVR vendor that does this will get my business.

    --

    ---
    IMHO, of course.
    May the SOURCE be with you.
    1. Re:They should get smarter by Cire · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome! Can you imagine being able to plug a firewire hd into your tivo and bring the simpsons whereever you wanted to?

      I'm sure they'd have some serious legal issues to deal with, though.

      But then again, since simpsons are already out on dvd maybe it's only useful for Iron Chef. :)

      Cire

    2. Re:They should get smarter by jargoone · · Score: 1

      But then again, since simpsons are already out on dvd

      The first season -- that is, the ones that weren't funny -- are. Who cares?

    3. Re:They should get smarter by rob.eberhardt · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Transferring video (or audio or whatever) over USB sucks hard.

    4. Re:They should get smarter by Invalidator · · Score: 1
      Personal Video Recorder (PVR) Pause and rewind live TV. Record and save up to 60 hours (or, hundreds of hours with expansion 1394 drives)

      From the moxi site. Got your wallet out yet?

      --

      ~_~ Not tonight, dear, I have a modem.

    5. Re:They should get smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't you just take a VCR tape over to your friends place with the simpsons on it?

  6. So how does this all work? by eaddict · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I install a USB device usually I have to add some software driver of some sort. How will this work? It would be cool to be able to support things like webcams, the new creative labs sound system, PCTiVo cable and more. I use USB for most all of my stuff on my PC and would love to see this capability on a set top box.

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
  7. RealNetworks by Corvidae · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So if you plug in a USB modem/broadband adaptor, you'd then be able to stream Real content onto a TiVO. It all makes sense now...

    --
    -Corvidae
    1. Re:RealNetworks by f00zbll · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it does make sense now. My guess in an earlier post wasn't too far off. I'm still skeptical though, they could still mess up and require hacking to get it to do what geeks want.

    2. Re:RealNetworks by Corvidae · · Score: 1

      Good call. And when has that ever stopped us before? ;)

      --
      -Corvidae
    3. Re:RealNetworks by jpostel · · Score: 2

      Content on demand that costs less than pay-per-view would be nice. I would even be willing to wait for the content to cache so that I could get the best signal resolution.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    4. Re:RealNetworks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, what if they "layer" the data, like that Ogg Vorbis feature that lets you strip down the audio to lower bitrates without re-encoding?

      The longer you wait, the more layers you get (and better quality) until finally the whole thing is as good as it will get.

      So you can stream right away, but if you give it some time, you get better results. Is anyone doing this yet?

    5. Re:RealNetworks by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really, he makes it sound link a bad thing (that we'd have to hack it). Heck, that was probably the biggest reason I got one in the first place, that you could hack it ( mine does ppp over serial to do updates over my cable, and I added a 75 GB to the 30 already in there).

      I was pretty interested in getting a PVR, but when I found out what you could do (there's something just so cool about being able to telnet to your TiVo), I wasted no time in talking the wife into getting one. (I've since done 2 other units, one for my brother-in-law and one for my brother).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    6. Re:RealNetworks by spudnic · · Score: 2

      How about content almost on demand? I certainly would use a system that allowed me to select movies from a huge list of available titles, have Tivo download them in the background and notify me when each was ready for viewing. I would assume that you got, say, three viewings and the content would be locked. You could either "rent" it again, or choose to delete it. It would be MUCH more convenient than going to the video store all the time, and no return fees!

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    7. Re:RealNetworks by jpostel · · Score: 2

      My wife and I were discussing the finer points of selling this concept. It would have to be a huge list, as you said, and it would also have to be better than PPV and Blockbuster prices.

      Todays PPV TV tends to show movies that are not yet out on DVD so they fall between the theater and Blockbuster for both releases and pricing. If this deal with Real and TiVo could pull off release times and prices to compete with either PPV or Blockbuster, they could make big bucks.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  8. Network adapters... by tRoll+with+Butter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and they're still going to charge ten clams a month for guide data that's freely available on the web? I'm willing to bet, the answer is yes.

    This is the ONLY reason I'm not a Tivo user. Sure, the hardware is cool and it would be great to set something to record Battlebots, the Crocodile Hunter and a few other *special* shows... But for $119.88 a year for freely available data? I think not.

    Oh well, maybe if the new features work without a subscription, I'll take a look.... But wait, didn't the release of extractstream (can't find link at the moment, I'll leave this up to you link-finders out there) make Tivo respond by saying the next version of the Tivo hardware would use millitary-grade crypto? So much for hackability.

    --

    ---
    Siggy, siggy, siggy, can't you see? Sometimes your puns just irritate me.
    1. Re:Network adapters... by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're not selling the data. They're selling the format and convenience of the data.

      You can buy a sunday paper and get the TV listings. Somehow TV Guide stays in business selling the same "data" to people, but usually in a better format.

      Not that i wouldn't love to be able to get all the stuff for free, but the key to tivo staying in business and making cool boxes is for them to make money somehow. If it would just go over my DSL IP connection I'd be happier than the whole dialing-in thing.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Network adapters... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can bet that TiVo will charge for their service. That is what they are selling.

      If you just want to record TV shows that you know are being shown, just use a VCR. If you like the "pause live TV" and other features like that, there are PVRs that don't have a subscription service.

      All new TiVo equipment will require a subscription to function. I don't mind, that is what I bought mine to do. I like how it just finds when my favorite shows are on and records them for me.

    3. Re:Network adapters... by mikeylebeau · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed, they're not just selling the data. Add to that the fact that the subscriptions are really the only thing that make TiVo a decent business model (the only things that come to mind from which TiVo might profit is (1) licensing the TiVo technology to box makers like Sony and Philips, (2) the subscription fees, and (3) content deals with big networks), I'm happy to fork over the cash in hopes that it might help a company succeed which deserves to succeed.

      Finally, think of it this way. Subscription fees are a way of subsidizing the cost of the set-top box. If you don't like that idea, you can just pay the extra $250 (it was $200 when I bought my TiVo) for lifetime service, and then you're essentially paying TiVo what it should cost to buy the box. Otherwise you can do that in monthly or annual increments down the line, but since I planned (and still do plan) on keeping my TiVo for many years to come when I bought it in June of 2000, I bought the lifetime, which, as of something like this March, will have paid for itself.

      -mikey

    4. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't know about the crypto, but Tivo is partially owned by some bigges in the copyright industry so they are beholden to interests that differ significantly from those of their paying customers so I wouldn't be surprised.

      On the other hand, ReplayTV is now owned by SonicBlue which is responsible for lots of neat toys like the (sadly defunct) empeg/riocar and other various "rio" mp3 devices. These guys are a lot more likely to have your interests in mind when making decisions about features. One side effect of this is that the current replaytv 4000 series is quite easily reverse engineered and we already have a combination of gui and command line utilities to access stored programs and play them directly on our PCs. These boxes are less than 2 months on the market and development of these tools has been relatively easy.

      So, rather than going out of their way to lock things down, Replay seems to be making it very easy for hackers to do their own thing with the data on stored on their boxes.

      Plus the guide data is "free" too (yeah, relative term and all that).

    5. Re:Network adapters... by CMiYC · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah I had the same attitude until I bought one. When you realize the power the guide data gives Tivo. you can easily appreciate paying $10 a month. Sure the data is free, but programming the Tivo is not. If you had to manually program the guide data every two weeks, I think that would suck. Otherwise, the Tivo is just a digital VCR. You can easily use your computer to just record tv shows digitally. The fact that the system keeps itself updated, tracks shows that you like, automatically record a show if it moves, etc. etc etc. Its more than just the fact you are getting free data. You are getting to use the power of Tivo with that data. It takes a lot of effort to make the data useful, and that is what you are paying for.

    6. Re:Network adapters... by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Or you could buy the lifetime package and be done with it.

      Do you boycott all products / services that package something freely available in a more useful form? Sure, I don't buy bottled water, but what about the newspaper? What about linux distros? Why go to the movies at the theater when they'll eventually be shown on broadcast tv stations like NBC or FOX?

      I find myself buying the newspaper rather than looking at the online version because I enjoy the portability and bathroom-readability of it. I purchase SuSE cdroms to support the improvement of the product without having to get my hands dirty writing code. I pay $7.50 to see movies in the theater because I want to see them on a big screen with a great sound system and share the experience with a few hundred other people.

      There often is a value-add in a company taking something that's freely available and selling it. If there wasn't, then there would be legions more people who share your perspective, and these companies wouldn't be able to stay afloat. In the case of TiVO, they have significant value-add with using the tv listings. It's not a box that simply displays the channel guide (channel 7 here in Austin, TX). Consider Tivo to be your TV administrator. It watches those listings like a damn hawk, swooping down and snatching up the programs you wouldn't have noticed were on. Unless, of course, you want to spend more than $10.00 of your time and energy each month monitoring those tv listings yourself. It has such value add as providing a hot-list of celebrities to watch for, so it'll record Conan Obrien whenever some hot chick you saw in Maxim is on there (or any other show she appears on).

      Look, I'm not trying to sell people a tivo. It's just my experience that some freely-available stuff can be improved and worth purchasing.
    7. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy to fork over the cash in hopes that it might help a company succeed which deserves to succeed.

      Why is that? This is not a charity. It doesn't need "help" - if it does, its business model is flawed (and I think it is, but that's for another discussion). Why do you feel enthused to pour down money into a company whose only purpose in life is to take your money?

    8. Re:Network adapters... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1
      Add to that the fact that the subscriptions are really the only thing that make TiVo a decent business model

      Don't forget reporting your viewing habits.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    9. Re:Network adapters... by portnoy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Believe it or not, I want TiVo to report my viewing habits. Hell, I want them to tell UPN that I follow Buffy faithfully, whether in repeats or first-run. I want them to tell NBC that even though I'll record Will & Grace, I'm more likely to delete it than watch it, whereas I'll watch an episode of West Wing twice before it goes to the bit bucket. I even want them to look at my season pass order and tell the WB that I'd watch Gilmore Girls religiously if they were bright enough to schedule it sometime other than when Buffy is on.

      Anything to let these networks know what I'm interested in seeing, and what they can do with all the crap they stuff down my pipeline.

    10. Re:Network adapters... by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      They're also selling software updates. Ask anyone who's had a tivo long enough to have run multiple versions of the software, the upgrades always add nice new features.

    11. Re:Network adapters... by droleary · · Score: 2

      Yeah I had the same attitude until I bought one.

      I actually had the opposite attitude when I bought one. I really hoped that my $10 would end up resulting in something more amazing than just a TV listing. The problem is that it doesn't. There are a number of shows locally that decided it's a good idea to start at 5 minutes after, but heaven help you if they decide to at the hour/thirty, because the TiVo listing were never updated and I was always missing the first 5 minutes of those shows. This was before you could adjust the start time, but I could still argue that my paying $10 means I shouldn't have to adjust the time ever.

      I was also really hoping that the TiVo listings system was smart enough to adjust for the fucking sporting events that stations seem to think is just fine to go over with and screw up the rest of the evening. Hell, ABC doesn't even have sporting events that I'm aware of and I still couldn't/can't rely on Politically Incorrect being in the time it's slotted for.

      So I dropped the service. As a VCR, the TiVo is still an excellent buy. But until they improve their listings or figure out a way to make money on the data they collect, they won't be collecting any more of my money. It'll take more than a couple USB ports to get me to buy the new hardware, too. If they had a clue, they would have added a FireWire port so I could drop an extra drive on or a DVD/CD-RW for archival purposes.

    12. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that the price for the hardware is subsidized by the fee. I got a hughes Directv-Tivo model this Christmas for $99. While I may complain if I had to buy it at $348 (hardware + lifetime) it really isn't that bad.

    13. Re:Network adapters... by gorgon · · Score: 2
      Hell, ABC doesn't even have sporting events that I'm aware of and I still couldn't/can't rely on Politically Incorrect being in the time it's slotted for.
      ABC has Monday Night Football, which is notorious for going long.
      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    14. Re:Network adapters... by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Gilmore Girls?! Will & Grace?! Yeesh! I guess TiVo isn't the only way to expose your embarrasing TV viewing habits.

    15. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you expected TiVo to adjust for the last-minute changes of the networks in real time, you are a fool. Nothing can do that until the networks and local stations get their act together; TiVo has no control over this. But for 99% of the shows, TiVo works. What more do you want?

    16. Re:Network adapters... by caferace · · Score: 1
      One side effect of this is that the current replaytv 4000 series is quite easily reverse engineered and we already have a combination of gui and command line utilities to access stored programs and play them directly on our PCs.

      I'm sorry... And you payed how much for that privilege? Replay boxes are just way too expensive. Sonicblue is also a little to litigation-happy as far as I'm concerned.

    17. Re:Network adapters... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      The $10/mo or $250 lifetime fee isn't just for the guide data. It enables most of the software features that make Tivo a "Tivo" - like the "Season Pass" and "Wishlist."

      So for $10/mo, I don't have to worry about the TV schedule. Shows may get moved around, run repeats, or reappear suddenly at really wacky times - I don't care. Tivo finds the shows I tell it to and records them for me.

      For instance, did you know 'Daria' is back on MTV...at 6am?!? Sure, you could have looked at TVGuide.com and found this - but that subscription fee means I don't have to waste my time poring over schedules figuring out what to record. Instead, I simply told Tivo to record Daria, if it was on. That's all. Took me all of 30 seconds.

      The convience is what you're paying for.

    18. Re:Network adapters... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Tivo does collect viewer information, but:

      1: You can call up Tivo and tell them not to collect data from you.

      2: The data they do collect is agragated across all their customers. This means they can say "100,000 people watched Buffy last night." but they don't know who those 100,000 were.

    19. Re:Network adapters... by CrabCakeJimmy2k · · Score: 0

      The info is not only available on the web, it's already being broadcast (more than likely) on your cable. I have a decent RCA TV with built in Guide Plus+ that recieves guide info right from the cable I already have. I have lived in three different towns with this TV (Mlps, a podunk LA town and Spokane) and all (even the podunk cable provider) provided the info the TV needed to build a three day guide for free. The TV come with an IR blaster to control my cable box and VCR, so you can tell the TV to record a show when it comes on or set reminders for the show, and it's all done automatically.

      So my question is, when is someone going to hack the series one TiVos to utilize the Guide info already being provided by the cable companies? Is this possible, anyone? If I'm not mistaken, PBS also broadcasts the same info OTA for those of you stuck with an antenna only.

    20. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support the competitor. ReplayTV has been giving me free service since I bought my Showstopper a year ago.

    21. Re:Network adapters... by snoozer20001 · · Score: 0

      'If you expected TiVo to adjust for the last-minute changes of the networks in real time'

      Actually TiVo can do this with over the air bumps from the networks. Too bad the networks hate the idea of TiVo and won't go along with it...

      --
      This space available at a low monthly rate...
    22. Re:Network adapters... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      buying the lifetime option is a dumb idea. the terminology "lifetime" does not mean what a normal sane person thinks it does... reading the contract it states, "the lifetime of the unit" and that is determined by who? TiVo corp of course. I have a IBMPC-XT in my basement, and I know it still works. I also have a TRS80 model 1 which I know still works, both of these devices are past their lifetime. and TiVO corp can deem 5 years to be the end of life for the unit you own, or even 24 months. if your unit get's stolen and you get a new unit, you have to buy another lifetime (no they will not transfer it, ask they gladly say NO!

      this is why I am going to get a TiVo and I am going to hack the data stream. I will not be forced to live by their rules for my property. The other TiVO hackers are afraid of hacking this feature but I am not. and it wont put the company out of business if I do and publish it. as 99.85% of all TiVO owners cant even pronounce Linux let alone set up the server that will be required.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    23. Re:Network adapters... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
      As others have pointed out, they are not selling the data. They are selling the formating of the data.

      However, if you get one of the integrated Tive/DirecTV receivers, and are willing to look around on the net to find some hacks, you can hack it to get the program data from the DirecTV guide. You then don't need to hook it up to a phone, either, which is a plus for some.

      I would guess that you could adopt that hack to work with the non-DirecTV units, if you give them some kind of network access. Grab the guide data from yahoo or gist or someplace like that, and write a perl script to convert it to Tivo's format.

    24. Re:Network adapters... by spudnic · · Score: 1

      And it's always cool to be in their beta programs. TiVo is a great company to deal with. They really listened to what we had to say.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    25. Re:Network adapters... by droleary · · Score: 1

      If you expected TiVo to adjust for the last-minute changes of the networks in real time, you are a fool.

      Then at least I'm not a fool. What I expected for my $10/month is an accurate listing, one that is at least if not more accurate than what I can get off the paper or the net. That was not the case. No, I didn't expect it to know that some broadcast of some guys prancing around in some area trying to move some ball to some smaller area would take some amount of time more than the network said it would (I mean, how could you know that something scheduled to bore you to tears for 3 hours would actually bore you to tears for an extra 13 minutes? It's not like they're professional, organized sports with a long history behind them of being televised . . .). But, fuck, it seems every listing in the world knew that SNL was switched locally from 10:35 to 10:30, yet the TiVo listings I payed for remained clueless for at least the three months at the end of my service. It may still be wrong, too; I no longer care, though.

      Nothing can do that until the networks and local stations get their act together; TiVo has no control over this. But for 99% of the shows, TiVo works. What more do you want?

      A set schedule works 95+% of the time, too. I want something of value for $10/month. The TiVo service did not provide that. As it turned out, all I was really doing was paying for them to collect information on my viewing habits. I decided to pass on that. Feel free to make your own decisions.

    26. Re:Network adapters... by spudnic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TiVo does the best it can do with the directory information it is given, and the problems aren't really that bad. There's not a whole lot they can do when a football game runs over, or some breaking news story overrides normal programming. The data is collected weeks before. And what if a station airs a show 5 minutes early each time it plays? They should put that information in their listings. Many already do.

      There is no way TiVo or any other company could keep track of the idiosyncrasies of every local channel in America. Want to make the problem a little easier to deal with? Contact the network or station that doesn't keep their times synchronized or publishes incorrect guide data and let them know how you feel about it.

      As PVR's become more pervasive, you will find that most broadcasters will pay more attention to detail if they want to keep their viewers happy.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    27. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As others have pointed out, they are not selling the data. They are selling the formating of the data.

      and of course, spammers are not selling "your" email address. They're selling the formatting of a few letters and numbers and the occasional "@" symbol that just happens to look a lot like you.

    28. Re:Network adapters... by spudnic · · Score: 2

      You must not have a job, or a life. Isn't your time worth anything at all? I know mine is. Yeah, I could research every two weeks if my cable company is making any lineup changes to the packages I subscribe to. I could go to one of the many online tv grids and figure out when my favorite shows are coming on and program all of those dates and times manually. I could write some app that compared the virtues of the shows that I recorded so it could figure out other things that I might be interested in. I could grep through the collected tv listings to find shows that contain words from my Wishlists.

      But I don't. You know why? Because it makes more sense to pay them $10 a month than to spend even an hour each month doing all this stuff manually.

      I'm going to assume that you are either a poor student, or someone just starting out. When you start bringing in a little more than sustinance wages you'll find that you're willing to pay for a bit of convenience.

      I got a TiVo because I thought it would be a cool toy. I was right, but there is so much more. I actually watch less TV now than I did before, but the quality of that TV time has increased dramatically. I get to watch what I want, when I want, and I don't have to think about planning it. That's what people want, even if they don't know it yet.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    29. Re:Network adapters... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yup have both, and hardware hacking is my hobby. I could say you dont have a life bacause you dont have a digital logic analyzer in your basement next to a 1ghz o-scope and a surface mount rework station. but I dont because I dont judge people's hobbies. AS for the data, it takes me 3.7 seconds to get my local listings for any date up to about 15 days out to be accurate. it's called yahoo or tvguide.com and a little knowl language called perl. hell the modules for that are already written and part of a perl program called misterhouse. all I need to do is monitor for about a month what is being sent and recieved by the TiVo (simple to capture and analyze modem communications.. you can find schematics from many hacker sites.. silicontoad used to have a bunch of this stuff) and i dont doubt that it's cool for you and you will forever pay your 9.95 a month. me? I'm that 3.517% that doesnt want to be relying on their information and their forced software updates. and unless they use pgp encryption for all communications to keep people like me from figuring it out (then I hack the software directly) it will take only a month or so to figure it out. (some people rather figure out a rock face, or build a boat in a bottle, me I like to crack corperate IP)

      as for a poor student or starting out... nope I'm an old dude that has a decent paying job, lots of expierience, and a hobby that is pretty darned cool. how about you?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    30. Re:Network adapters... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Oh and a side note, I also have horible typing skills (I go for speed and not accuracy), so I mistype :-) Someday slashdot will have spell-check.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:Network adapters... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      It looks like the new replays go for about $900 while one of these new tivos will be $650 ($400 + $250 lifetime guide fee). But the tivo will barely do 10mb/s while the replay will do 100mb/s (probably not flat out, but when you want to suck a 3GB file over the net every bit helps). It seems like Tivo is just as litigious and patent crazy as SB - just get a load of their new patents on networked multi-tivo boxes - a big old "duh!" but they got the patent.

      So, all in all a $250 premium for easy to hack, more consumer-oriented, faster data transfer rates and available at least a couple of months sooner isn't so bad. Better than giving my money to a child of the copyright industry - even if they do run linux.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    32. Re:Network adapters... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention all the p0rn it's recording (on it's own and at your request.)

    33. Re:Network adapters... by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Sorry about the generalizations I made, but you must admit that for MOST people it would be a burdon and well worth the $10 a month. I do plenty of things that other people might think are pointless wastes of time because an "easier way" to do it exists (Hey, I use vi!) just because I like it that way.

      If spending time recreating something you can get for $10 a month floats your boat, great. Some people might enjoy the challange. But it sounds like you are capable of using your time to come up with the next wheel instead of reinventing one that already exists. And I doubt you could make it as seamless and enjoyable as TiVo, self-gratification for a job well done aside.

      Peace.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    34. Re:Network adapters... by OrcSlicer · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend thinks I'm weird because I was complaining that I had to make a choice between Gilmore Girls and Buffy. It's nice to see I'm not the only one.

      --
      So, Lone Star, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
    35. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you've spent much time hacking tcp/ip communications. It can be a beast. Especially when the challenge-responses are checksummed. Believe me. It's going to be pretty damn tricky to spoof the Tivo server so your unit thinks it's connecting to the server but is really connecting to your own server. Good luck really pulling this off.

    36. Re:Network adapters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have very good news for you friend. You can go out and purchase yourself a brand new TiVo right now because you dont have to pay a dime a year to use it after you purchase it. See, you are very much able to schedule a show bassed on time alone.

      As a TiVo user you are paying for 2 things for that $5 bucks a month - software updates and show information. You dont actualy NEED any of them. Sure you will have to pay for updates but if you dont need the feature dont buy it!

    37. Re:Network adapters... by shokk · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. The TiVo has been around for close to a couple of years, if not over that, by now. A lifetime subscription was $200, early on, but lets use the current figure of $250. 25 months = 2.08 years. 25 months x $10/month = $250. You break even at 2.08 years, and consider it free service for the next few after that. I know that I would get considerable more use out of my TiVo and I don't watch all that much TV. Going with the monthly fee is just silly. After paying whatever it is that you paid for the unit, 90% of you are going to have it for over two years...think of that old VCR you still have under the TV. The other 10% are early adopters that buy everything new and get rid of their old units in favor of the newer and larger ones.

      Of course, not getting a TiVo at all means you save a bit of money of the bat, but if you can afford the convenience, it's a sweet device.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  9. Love it by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to get my hands on one of these puppies.

    As a Tivo owner, I've come to the conclusion that anybody who does any TV watching is an idiot not to have a Tivo.

    BTW, that set of idiots included me for a long time, which I cannot, for the life of me, now understand...

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:Love it by Catiline · · Score: 1

      As a Tivo owner, I've come to the conclusion that anybody who does any TV watching is an idiot not to have a Tivo.

      Or, like me, converted one of their Linux boxen to a Tivo work-alike with a video input card.

      That old PC works well for streaming MP3s and Video....

    2. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      Funny... I do a lot of TV watching and I always thought that anybody that spends hundreds of dollars to buy something, and then another $10 per month each month for it to keep on working the way it was intended to is an idiot.

      My philosophy is that you either give the hardware away for free and charge monthly fees, or you make people pay for the hardware and be done with it. Anything that tries to have it both ways (satellite radio, DIVX - the DVD lookalike, ...) is just not for me.

      I won't even get into the always looming possibility of the company closing shop...

    3. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I won't even get into the always looming possibility of the company closing shop."

      That is the reason why I have not purchased a unit. I would want to pay for the lifetime vs. $10 per month. If they go out of business I would want to be able to use the unit like a VCR with no subscription. I've heard people say that functionality would be added in that case, but what if it isn't?

    4. Re:Love it by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on this. I knew I would get some enjoyment out of it before I bought it, but I kept putting it off because I didn't think it would be that great. I finally bought it when they had a good rebate going, and now I don't know how I could watch TV without it. Its wonderful to get to watch what I want to watch when I want to watch it.

      Also, to all those that think it makes more sense to build your own out of a PC, I think you don't realize what you're missing. TiVO has a great interface, and you get more than just a TV schedule. You can record shows based on actors and subjects. You can pick up first run shows or repeats. As long as they have the proper info from the networks, it is smart enough to only pick up unique showings of shows like South Park in a given week. And it will allow you to schedule around conflicts with relative ease.

    5. Re:Love it by wurp · · Score: 2

      Umm, so you think they should follow the philosophy of all of the 'internet appliance' companies that sold the PC at under cost expecting users to not hack it? Where are they today? Or do you think that Tivo should give away their monthly service? It does cost them something (admittedly not much) to keep that service going. Eventually they would go out of business.

      Or do you just think that any business model that would require both that you own a piece of hardware, and that you pay for a subscription to get useful information for that hardware, should be outlawed?

      Didn't you use the internet to post that comment? Didn't you pay for a PC, then pay a monthly fee for your internet access? Are you an idiot?

    6. Re:Love it by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I guess I'm an idiot for buying a vcr that finds out what I want to watch, and not paying 10.00 a month.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Love it by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly, I'll be shocked if someone DOESN'T try to hack the TiVO protocol once the USB ethernet adapter comes out. There's gotta be a way to get the TV Listings off of Yahoo and send them to your TiVo.

    8. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I always thought that anybody that spends hundreds of dollars to buy something, and then another $10 per month each month for it to keep on working the way it was intended to is an idiot.

      Did your house come with lifetime electricity, gas, and water?

    9. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I suppose you don't have a cell phone then, since you obviously expect to buy a cellphone, and have it work magically, forever, without your paying any monthly fees?

    10. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Details, what exactly did you put together? What hardware, what software? What kind of performance do you get?

      Enquiring minds want to know...

    11. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US most carrier give you the cell phone for free (unless you want a super duper one - for which they'll just give you a discount).

    12. Re:Love it by Catiline · · Score: 1

      Well right now I'm still getting all the little pieces config'd (migrating hardware so this is in flux, mind you). Final setup will (probably) be my old Pentium 2 with a Haupauge card in it. Running Linux (of course); drivers for their chipsets are built into the kernel now (with v4l) so I won't waste processor cycles trying to display the video. Playback will probably be either on the same system (already clocked- for high quality video no speed loss) or on my new system where since all the hardware (sans video input card of course) is newer (playback therefore isn't a problem).

      This is not a surefire recipe; as with all things YMWV.

    13. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      The only thing they provide is the channel programming. There is at least a couple of thing they could have done with that:

      1. make the software configurable in such a way that it could download the program info for whatever source you want (including my own server at home if I choose to). There are plenty of places on the net you can get the stuff from.

      2. Like you suggest, take the "free appliance" route and take the risk that a small minority of people will hack it and take the loss on those people. The fact that most of these "free applicance" companies have indeed failed is because of a poor product (which I don't think Tivo is) not because of handful of slashdot types hacked their products.

      Of course Tivo's business model should not be outlawed. Who in the world suggested that it should? All I said, is that I don't like it and therefore I won't buy it. You have a problem with that?

      The fact of the matter is that Tivo makes the software (although a big chunk of it is GPLed) and, since they don't actually make the boxes (that's THEIR choice), their main revenue stream should be licensing the technology to Philips, Sony and whoever else uses it. If that's not the case, that's their problem.

      As far as you PC + internet analogy, it is flawed for two reason:

      1. PC cames before the internet. You're assuming that the only reason I bought my PC was to get on the internet. In comparison, the Tivo without the service in rather useless - especially after version 2 of their software.

      2. Providing me with an internet connection DOES cost real money. In my case, I have a cable modem. There is the wire, the wire maintenance, the email/news server farms ***AND*** the hardware (cable modem) IS included in the monthly fee. I do think it's fair to pay what I pay ($40/month) for that. In comparison, Tivo maintains a server (possibly a very small server farm) with program listings. As you admit yourself, the cost of maintaining this service must be very minimal and should be absorbed in their cost.

    14. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but your analogy is ridiculous.

      These are very concrete things. Things that you can touch. Things that cost real money to produce and/or transport. Not some "service" (channel listings) that cost close to nothing to maintain. And of course, the fact that THEY must maintain it was their choice to begin with.

    15. Re:Love it by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      I agree totally -- that's why i refuse to buy a car. They make you buy gas every few weeks just to keep it running, and change the oil and tires and stuff just to keep it doing what it was supposed to do in the first place!

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    16. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      Well, good for you!! I know you were trying to be sarcastic, but many people DO make that choice (not as much in the US for lack of alternatives). Just like I make the choice to not buy a TiVo.

      Of course, gas, tires, oil are really concrete/physical things not "services" that cost little to nothing to host so your analogy doesn't work anyway.

    17. Re:Love it by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 2, Troll
      Uh, you don't have to go a Certified Ford Dealer to buy Ford gas for your Ford. That means:

      • If Ford goes out of business, you can still drive your car.
      • There is competition for gas that brings the price down to a reasonable level.
      • Ford can't decide that you don't really need a stereo in your car anymore (a feature that you bought the car for) and secretly take it out while filling it up.
      If I buy a tivo with service, and then later on they decide they don't like to provide the service anymore, I have a $600 paperweight that's no better than my VCR.

      Don't get me wrong, they should sell service and make money off it. But you should be able to get the data from a variety of different places. Legally.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    18. Re:Love it by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Not to be rude, but you won't even come close. Sure, you may end up with a pretty cool DVR, but not much more.

      I once thought like you do. You have to own a TiVo for awhile to understand the little intricacies of what it does to fully appreciate it. I could type all day trying to convince you of this, but you wouldn't completely understand it until you tried it.

      Best of look to you. I'm sure what you come up with will be a great achievement and provide you with lots of entertainment. Just not as much as a TiVo. ;)

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    19. Re:Love it by spudnic · · Score: 2

      First of all, you're not just paying for guide data. You also get free updates to the software that, over the last 3 that I've gotten, have added some major functionality to the unit. You also get excellent customer support if it's ever needed.

      The guide data that they provide is not cheap. They have to pay quite a bit for it. Remember, it's not just when shows are airing on the major networks. It has to track every cable company in America. What packages they offer, and what channels are included in each package so they know what is available to you. And when lineup changes occur at each of these cable companies. And all the thousands of local channels they have to know everything about.

      It's really not as easy as it may appear.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    20. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      Software bux fixes and customer service is something I expect to get for free. Certainly I have never paid for a "firmware" upgrade for any hardware I have ever bought. I wouldn't mind paying for new features, but not on a subscription basis. If I want the upgrade, I am ready to pay a one time fee (if it's small otherwise I'll probably live without the upgrade).

      On the second point, even if I believe that it does cost them *ANY* money to collect the data you describe (channel lineups, etc) it would amount to pennies per customer (not $10/month) which should be built-in the price. Or better yet, like I suggested, they should let me choose where to get the lineup.

      Don't make it sound like this $10/month supports the infrastructure. It doesn't. It's a money making scheme (I don't think anyone, even them, would deny it) and I am not willing to fall for it.

      It used to be that TiVos (the first version) were functional enough without the service. Sure enough, if you bought one a few years ago, you are "grand-fathered" into that level of functionality. I could have lived with that, but unfortunately I missed my cue to buy it then. As their business model stands today, there is no way I would buy one for all the reasons described in the first post.

    21. Re:Love it by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Don't get me wrong, they should sell service and make money off it. But you should be able to get the data from a variety of different places. Legally

      I don't disagree at all -- if someone else sets up a network that lets you download the data Tivo shouldn't be able to stop you (although I'm sure they might pull a technical hack to do it if it were really cutting into their finances).

      But that's a different thing than saying "I paid $200 and want it to do everything forever". The original complaint was that Tivo users had to pay for the service, not that they were being prevented from using a competing service.

      However incidental the costs may be, it is an ongoing cost that Tivo must bear to run a network and do the data management to make all the "magic" work.

      If you don't want that ongoing magic (or don't want to pay for it), you've still got a box that is a heck of a lot more feature-rich than a standard VCR. Pausing live TV alone is a killer feature, being able to have it read your mind is just a value-add...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    22. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      I don't mind paying for the electricity that feeds the tivo (equivalent of the gas in your analogy) and if any of the hardware insides wears out from usage I have no problem paying for a replacement part (equivalent to the tires in your analogy).

      But I don't expect to pay a fee every month so that the speedometer keeps working past the first few weeks I bought the car (the equivalent of having to pay a fee after the short trial period that comes with it).

    23. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      You are prevented from using competing other service. There is no option to use other services (free or otherwise).

      I guess one could reverse engineer the data transfer or something, but quite frankly, I have no interest to reverse engineer my VCR.

      And yes! If I pay $200 for some A/V equipment I want to be able to do everything forever (well, until the hardware dies anyway)! What in the world is wrong with that? Do you expect anything else from your VCR or your DVD for example? Why would the Tivo be any different? All the features are self contained - except for the channel guide downloads, and THAT is not worth $10/month or much of anything really.

    24. Re:Love it by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      And yes! If I pay $200 for some A/V equipment I want to be able to do everything forever (well, until the hardware dies anyway)! What in the world is wrong with that? Do you expect anything else from your VCR or your DVD for example? Why would the Tivo be any different? All the features are self contained - except for the channel guide downloads, and THAT is not worth $10/month or much of anything really.


      But the only thing you lose by not subscribing is the download stuff. You lose the auto-scheduling, the suggestions, etc. The box still works fine with all the features that don't require downloading data. All the "self-contained" features do work regardless of you ever giving them another red cent beyond buying it. (the 2.0 boxes are said to be different but no one has seen yet how they will function without a subscription)

      And like I said, if someone sets up a competing service to offer the listings (as I understand the network-hacked boxes to use) then you can avoid paying for it. If you just demand that tivo give you the listings forever for free, then the price of the boxes will go up to include the lifetime subscription.

      Tivo is a software company, they exist to sell software and sell their listings. If you don't want to buy them, that's fine, but complaining because they won't give them away for free is just rather odd...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    25. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      Well, here we go! Now you understand!

      I won't buy them! That is ALL I said, along with the reason why...

    26. Re:Love it by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      I won't buy them! That is ALL I said, along with the reason why...

      No, you made inaccurate statements that you would own a "$600 paperweight" if you turned off the subscription -- you wouldn't.

      You'd still have a functional Tivo with several times more functionality than a normal VCR. The subscription services are icing on the cake -- but the cake is yours to eat with or without it.

      I'm not just responding to you personally, I'm also making things clear to the thousands of people who read this thread without posting, so that they don't get an incorrect view of how Tivo works. readers outnumber posters by several orders of magnitude...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    27. Re:Love it by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      But I don't expect to pay a fee every month so that the speedometer keeps working past the first few weeks I bought the car (the equivalent of having to pay a fee after the short trial period that comes with it).

      they're not selling you a speedometer. they are selling you constantly updated information. if you want to keep the original data on the machine, they won't stop you, but without the new information it can't do a lot of the scheduling stuff.

      The data is not free, and it doesn't come out of thin air. Tivo has to pay people for the data. Then they work on that data to make it function in their boxes. They do this every month that there are boxes out there for the data, until the company disappears. You only have to manufacture a speedometer once.

      if you went in to the dealer and demanded a tune-up every month they'd charge you, too. Tivo's data stream is a tune-up for the recording schedule.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    28. Re:Love it by u2mr2os2 · · Score: 1

      You are not prevented. There could be another listing service provider, they would just have to write all the software to operate your box and provide a way for you to wipe off the TiVo software and put theirs on in place of it. Now do you think TiVo is very interested in making that easy for another company to do?

      TiVo could eventually license the data format to companies to be TiVo service providers who would then compete with each other, and TiVo go to do other stuff.

      Part of the "everything" that it does is to record programs utilizing listing info provided by TiVo. If TiVo corp goes away, then that feature of your unit then becomes broken. Time to get another component. If you look at the initial price of the box plus lifetime (of the box or TiVo) service, ~$550 then you consider that the price of a high-end video component you just bought, and when it breaks (including TiVo service going away), you go get another one.

      Everyone seems to be looking at this wrong. Here's the deal:

      I liked the service that TiVo was providing. Sony made a box that lets me utilize that service. I bought that box and I subscribed to the TiVo service. If I had liked Microsoft's Ultimate TV service, I would have bought the other Sony box that let me utilize Microsoft's service and subscribed to it.

      There's also a lot of people not understanding overhead costs. After all, Slashdot doesn't have to pay for the information posted here, so why the banner ads generating revenue? Overhead and support.

      TiVo did the work of creating and maintaining the service that feeds the TiVo box. They should not be forced to give that service format to others who didn't do the work or don't pay a royalty to be able to provide service to the TiVo box.

      TiVo also did the work of creating and maintaining the TiVo software that runs the units that Philips and others sell. Those companies have to pay a royalty license for TiVo software for their machine much as they have to pay a license to JVC when they make a VHS VCR. That company can not be expected to give you the hardware. However, TiVo can rebate you some money if they like, to entice you to sign on to their service (like cell phone providers).

      The position of most Slashdotters who think paying for TiVo service is stupid, would be equivalent to me buying a GSM phone from somewhere and then walking into to the store of a GSM cell service provider expecting them to give me service for free. Better example: it's like buying a computer and expecting an ISP to give you Internet access for free, since it costs them "nothing" to provide it: there's no one who has to turn a crank to move the packets, they just put up FreeBSD on a bunch of boxes and turned them on right? No. There's electricity bills, rent, fiber service, tech support, configuring, maintaining accounts, paying for the equipment and new equipment, etc.

      I don't expect Handspring to allow me to use a comperting handheld OS on my Visor. That's not to say you couldn't put another one on, but I don't expect them to support me. They sold me a device that provided PDA functions using the Palm OS - not a general purpose handheld computer. Once I took off the Palm OS, I essentially would have deliberately broken the device, and they can't be expected to support that.

      You could take your TiVo box and put your own software on it to pull listings off a free service and use the MPEG2 hardware to make the recordings and playbacks and present the listings in an easy, readable display. I wouldn't expect Sony to support that box, and I certainly wouldn't expect TiVo to let me leech off their listings.

      You have a choice of what hardware to utilize the TiVo service. You have a choice of DVR listing services. At this time, the format for providing listing service to a DVR is proprietary (for all of them). It would be nice in a perfect world for that to be a standard, so I could combine the hardware I want with the service I want like the car I want with the repair shop I like. However, until the standard was absolutely nailed down, you would likely have trouble with many of the combinations, especially with MS in the game.

      In the end, the price per month for the programming guide service will be dictated by how much consumers are willing to pay for it. If too many don't want to pay $10, then the price will likely drop. If that price is lower than it costs to provide (which is likely higher than people here think), then that service will go away.

    29. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 1

      But it is the equivalent of a speedometer. Without the program guide, you're flying blind so to speak. And you have a glorified VCR with limited capacity and similar image quality (depending on what compression you choose).

      The data is free. You can find it any number of places for free. It's just not free to get it from them. Which would be fine, if they gave you a choice to use another source and keep all the functionalities that are based on it.

      Don't make it sound like the $10 goes mostly towards supporting some sort of elaborate infrastructure of theirs. It mostly goes towards their wallets since this is their business model.

    30. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 2

      it's like buying a computer and expecting an ISP to give you Internet access for free

      Not really. It's more like buying a computer and being told that you can only sign for this one overpriced ISP, and if you don't sign up, your computer can only be used as a calculator.

      Or to use your GSM analogy, it's like buying an expensive GSM phone and be told you can only sign up to this one company at some ridiculous rate. Otherwise, all you can do is play "snake" on it.

      Historically, when a device is tied to a specific service, one or the other is given away or GREATLY discounted (pennies on the dollar).

      Tivo should be making its money from sellings its software to its hardware partners. Just like Microsoft sells Windows to the OEMs, just like Palm sells the PalmOS to Sony. If that's not enough to keep them afloat, they've negociated bad deals.

    31. Re:Love it by Jasn · · Score: 1
      Software bux fixes and customer service is something I expect to get for free

      Well, previous poster wasn't talking about bug fixes but major upgrades to functionality ... i.e., something that was already cool got cooler, with more program info by far (original air dates, etc.) than you can get from free sources and more searchability now. And your context makes it seem like the whole fee goes to software fixes, rather than that being just a piece of the package.

      On the second point, even if I believe that it does cost them *ANY* money to collect the data you describe (channel lineups, etc) it would amount to pennies per customer (not $10/month)

      Anybody worked on a listings publication like TV Guide or your Sunday paper's insert? Just me? OK, then I can tell you it is insanely expensive. Not to mention one of the most NONtrivial things you could ever imagine. You really have to see the guts of the operation to realize just what people take for granted. BTW, before somebody says the networks should be subsidizing that, don't expect anything from them, they're like the phone company. They could use technology to improve DVR performance (standardized real-time start/stop signals, say?) but they're happy with inertia.

      Also, context again ... contrary to what you suggest, $10/month doesn't just get you listings. It gets you listings PLUS the functionality that comes with having regular listings PLUS the development of new functionality from a company that has been extremely responsive to customer demands/requests.

      Don't make it sound like this $10/month supports the infrastructure. It doesn't. It's a money making scheme

      Wow ... forgive them for trying to cover their burn rate. According to all their filings, they're burning cash at 300 percent their revenue, though that number is shrinking slowly. Of the companies out there, they're the best one to be a proof of concept and I for one want them around to bring us all the economies of scale that are out there one day.

      Bottom line is it's a market perspective. Saying the company should/should not be doing this/charging that takes a back seat to this consideration:

      1. If you have a job, determine how many hours of your labor $10 buys
      2. Adjust as you see fit to figure out how much of your time is worth $10
      3. Do you get more from having the subscription (whether in doing what you do now, or getting added utility) than you do without? If so, then go for it. I think the takeaway from Tivo-debates is that there are a lot of people saying, hey, this is worth it! Regardless of grumbling that says a) "I'll just roll my own! They won't take advantage of me" or b) "I've never tried this but here is a lot of details why it sucks and why they are criminals for not getting somebody else to pay for it."

      Not that you were saying those two things.

    32. Re:Love it by Jasn · · Score: 1
      The data isn't any more free on tvguide.com than it is in a copy of TV Guide that you find on the street (free to you). It's just paid for -- at very high cost, by the way -- by the primary customer, who can then give it to you on their terms (ad viewing, or any other type of "license.") Do you think tvguide.com would still give free listings if any significant chunk of people were scripting the listings and skipping their ads and branding?

      You could subscribe to TV guide for about $4/month. (If you didn't already have Internet service, it would cost a lot more than $4 to get it just for the "free" listings on tvguide.com or others.) Or for a few dollars more, you could come back from vacation to realize that even though Fox moved "The Simpsons" to Wednesday that week, the Tivo still got it and you didn't have to make any adjustment.

      So don't you make it sound like $10 goes to their wallets when the listings are more expensive to obtain than anyone realizes, and that there is a value-add they give beyond just sending listings, in making them an integral part of the service's functionality, not the "box's."

    33. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 2

      Well, previous poster wasn't talking about bug fixes but major upgrades to functionality ... i.e., something that was already cool got cooler, blah blak

      If you had read the rest of that paragraph, you would have seen that I have addressed that. I'll buy an upgrade if and when I want one. Just like I'll choose to upgrade my Windows box if and when I want to.

      Also, context again ... contrary to what you suggest, $10/month doesn't just get you listings. It gets you listings PLUS the functionality that comes with having regular listings PLUS the development of new functionality from a company that has been extremely responsive to customer demands/requests.

      No. It gets you the listings. Everything else is software within the TiVo (which I bought- hardware and software) that parses and uses the listings. I refuse to rent software. Again, if they do come up with some amazing new feature that I must have, I would consider paying once for the software upgrade.

      I have never said that TiVo should or shouldn't do anything. All I have said, is that I don't like it and I won't buy it. The bottom line, again, is that if I pay big bucks for a piece of hardware I expect to use anyway I see fit.

      About the rest of you post - well, fine. It costs them more than I thought for this service. If you have number to back to up, I'd love to see them, however it's largely irrelevant. I don't want to have to use their service. I'd like to be able to use another service (let's call it freelistingsdb.org) or do it myself. This is a chicken and the egg problem here. Their cash burn rate is to maitain the servers, but of course you have no choice but to use their servers.

    34. Re:Love it by avdp · · Score: 2

      I could get from the content provider's websites for free for example (right about every TV channel has a website). I doubt very much THEY would care considering it is in their interest that I watch their channels.

      Regardless, you're avoiding the central issue. They are not giving anyone a choice. If they did, who knows! Maybe some free provider (a la cddb) would pop up. Maybe the network provider would let the customer pull the info in some sort of XML format. Or maybe me and a bunch of friends would take turn to update our own database running on a home server. With enough people you'd only have to do it every once in a long while. There just is no saying what could happen...

      Also the alledged high cost for them to harvest the data is probably in large part due that the network have little interest to help another company make money off their backs. If it was a free service (call it freelistings.org) - who knows, maybe the networks would make it a lot easier.

      Bottom line. I won't buy an (expensive) piece of hardware that ties me in a specific service. But they way, what do you plan on doing if TiVo decides that their service is worth $25/month starting next month? Or $45 a year after that?

      If their business model is to sell the service, they should give the hardware (even if I have to return it when I cancel - just like a cable box).

  10. TV listings over networks by Cire · · Score: 1

    The one thing I'd really like to see, aside from not having to pay for the TV listings monthy (or lifetime subscribtion for those big spenders out there), is to be able to download the TV listings weekly over the internet, rather than having to connect it to a phone line.

    Not to mention have it download software updates via the internet as well.

    Cire

    1. Re:TV listings over networks by rtphokie · · Score: 1

      If you dont want to pay for listings, then buy a replay box. You'll notice that they are much more expensive, that is because both the TiVo and UltimateTV boxes are sold at a loss in anticipation of subscription revenues. The only use I'd have for a network interface is D/L programming to my PC. My guide updates via satellite and is always up to date (DirecTiVo)

    2. Re:TV listings over networks by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      You can download your listings and updates over the net (if you're a subscriber of course), if you're not afraid to open up your box and are passingly familiar with any *nix based system (a safe assumption on slashdot). The TiVoNet package($99 from 9thtee.com) puts an Ethernet card in your TiVo and a software change tells TiVo to grab its updates over that rather than dialing up.

  11. Built-in support by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    It will have built in support for several types of USB devices. The kernel in the only "series 2" device out there (the AT&T Tivo, availble right now thru Tivo's web page) appears to have compiled-in support for a few types of USB ethernet adapters, but it may not be enabled as of yet. In any case, so software drivers will be required, you just have to use the list of "compatible hardware" that they give. That list will likely be long, as it's just a matter of having the unit detect and load the necessary kernel modules (it's running Linux 2.4.something).

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Built-in support by Cramer · · Score: 2

      They updated to a modern kernel? Really? They've been using that spooged up 2.1.24(?) for ever. It'll be interesting to see how much trouble the tivo has with the VM in 2.4 -- tivo did a lot of magic to their kernel.

    2. Re:Built-in support by CatHerder · · Score: 1

      Otto,
      Does this mean that they're using a different code load on the AT&T than the rest of the current gen? My Sony SA running 2.5.1 is reporting "2.1.24-TiVo-2.5 (build@buildmaster17) (gcc version 2.8.1) #3 Fri Oct 5 10:19:51 PDT 2001".

    3. Re:Built-in support by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2

      All active TiVo devices have a connection to the outside world - so wouldn't it be easy enough for you SA TiVo to dial up and download the module - or your DirecTiVo to wait until it was broadcast over the sat?

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    4. Re:Built-in support by Otto · · Score: 2

      Yep, that's what it means. Someone posted strings and such over in the Tivo Underground from the ATT units. Everything I can see looks like it runs 2.4, including the kernel logs. Different software for different systems.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    5. Re:Built-in support by Otto · · Score: 2

      It's only the ATT boxes with the new kernel. Older boxes still currently have the spooged up 2.1.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    6. Re:Built-in support by Otto · · Score: 2

      Actually, it can be either/or. But in any case, this is irrelevant, their kernel is customized and they probably need to add support for various devices themselves. Their new model looks like it might be a pay for cooler features type of thing, so if it's something along the lines of hooking up a USB CD-ROM to rip cd's, then you'd have to pay some fee to get that software (which would then download and include the cd-rom modules and so on). Myself, I'll give MP3 playback on my Tivo a miss. :P

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    7. Re:Built-in support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would be a matter of loading the neccessary kernel modules for the usb devices. I'm sure Tivo could do this via the software update.

  12. Missing stuff? by sammy.lost-angel.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not firewire? It's a LOT faster, and besides, intel wants the market to move in this direction.

    And, for god sakes, why not have ethernet, or wireless ethernet build in? My television is nowhere near a phone line, which is part of the reason for not getting a tivo. Although the prices for series one will probably drop now.

    1. Re:Missing stuff? by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

      I agree... it doesn't necessarily have to be firewire (high speed ethernet would be acceptable too, even preferable in the current environment), but USB is way too slow for video transfer. Audio, peripherals, and some data would be pretty much ALL you could do with USB

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    2. Re:Missing stuff? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Indeed! I've not seen the insides yet, but I'm guessing the USB chipset is "free" as part of a PCI bridge. In any case, a USB chip is much cheaper than a firewire chip. I'd still rather have firewire for attaching hard drives for archival of recorded shows. USB is too slow for that.

      Ethernet is expensive. Wireless ethernet is very expensive and one hell of a pain to manage in a tivo. Sure, *we* know how to deal with it, but the average couch potato doesn't.

    3. Re:Missing stuff? by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Ethernet is not expensive. They could probably add it for $10 or less. As others have pointed out, they'd save the money that it costs them for dialup for users that already have broadband. They could even do cooler "enhanced functionality" things with the software since it'll have a continuous connection instead of an intermittent one.

      That said, I guess I can understand why it doesn't have an ethernet port yet. I expect to see one reasonably soon though.

      One of the things that makes the X-box cool is that it does have an ethernet port built in; It allowed my brother and me to play Halo with others over his cable modem for free - That's a definite edge over the PS/2, and that feature didn't cost them anything besides ethernet support (they didn't even write the tunnel software, it was 3rd party).

  13. Great. Just great. by irregular_hero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Tivo owner (and modifier), I can say that it's exciting that there will be an improved Tivo hitting the stores soon. I'm a little disappointed in a few things, though:

    The announcement doesn't indicate what, if any, connectivity options they intend to use by default for the Tivo2. USB ports are great and everything, but if it still requires a modem line to get guide data and uses the USB network adapter for its "extended services"... Yuck.

    And about the extended services: Why do I suspect that it'll be an extra charge for those?

    I'm also a bit put out that Tivo isn't doing anything to announce improvements in the following areas:

    - Show Send (a la ReplayTV)
    - Archival of recorded shows to media or PC
    - Show scheduling via Web page
    - Management of recorded items via Web
    - "Self-upgrade" capability via removable media

    These, given the platform it's based on, would be simple to achieve. In fact, some of the same things are out there now that others outside of Tivo have created! Why not rely on the experiences of the power users, and be a truly hip company by adopting and supporting some of their work? Isn't that how the Open Source model is supposed to work -- the Adoption of What Works?

    Or maybe I'm just mad that I spent all that time modifying my Tivo to add the above features and wish that I had the obviously superior Tivo2 hardware at the time.

    :)

    1. Re:Great. Just great. by rexmob · · Score: 1

      The reason TiVo most likely isn't responding to those new ReplayTV features is that TiVo would like to continue to be a viable business, and getting its pants sued off won't help that.

    2. Re:Great. Just great. by Psiren · · Score: 2

      And about the extended services: Why do I suspect that it'll be an extra charge for those?

      Hmmm.. let's see now. Could it be something to do with the fact that they're a business trying to make money?

    3. Re:Great. Just great. by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      Calm down. There is almost NO INFO on this webpage about the Series 2 hardware configuration, software changes, or what "future services" may entail (or cost!). This is vaporware, plain and simple.

      I for one am reserving my judgement for the actual, real product announcements, not the CES fodder.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:Great. Just great. by psxndc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'm not a TiVo owner/modifier, but if it has USB networking, couldn't it just be thrown on your home network? If it's on your home network, what's to stop you from accessing it's filesystem (someone somewhere will definitely write some code to do this) and archiving the stuff onto one of your machines? I'm not being snotty, I'm seriously asking this. I know you have to enable "sharing" of information (ala NFS/samba/whatever) but it's possible to do this isn't it using some TiVo hackery?

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    5. Re:Great. Just great. by stripes · · Score: 3, Insightful
      USB ports are great and everything, but if it still requires a modem line to get guide data and uses the USB network adapter for its "extended services"... Yuck.

      Well since the people who have hacked an ethernet into the older TiVos (or just used ppp over the serial port) have successfully used their own network connection to download schedule info (on subscribed TiVos), I don't see why TiVo would go to lengths to make it not work here.

      I'm also a bit put out that Tivo isn't doing anything to announce improvements in the following areas:

      I would guess they don't want to announce them until they have them working, a UI for them, and maybe even have them in beta testing. Plus of corse, they may not want to do some/all of those things.

    6. Re:Great. Just great. by beth_linker · · Score: 1
      The announcement doesn't indicate what, if any, connectivity options they intend to use by default for the Tivo2. USB ports are great and everything, but if it still requires a modem line to get guide data and uses the USB network adapter for its "extended services"... Yuck.
      According to the web page for the new AT&T Broadband co-branded Tivo [tivo.com] the new Tivo units do require a phone line for the guide data. The site very halfheartedly recommends a wireless modem adapter if you can't put your Tivo near a phone jack. I'm a little surprised because AT&T Broadband is a cable modem provider and I'd be more inclined to buy a Tivo through them if I could use it with the cable modem service that I already buy from them.
    7. Re:Great. Just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzt. WRONG. This new hardware is not vapor; it has been available for a few months now from AT&T. It is being marketed in a few test markets, but TiVo users on the TiVo forum (see AVS forum) have ordered and received many of these new AT&T TiVo boxes, which are identical to these new TiVo boxes the article mentions (apart from having the AT&T logo on them). In fact, if you go to the underground TiVo forums, you will see that the hackers have already started to mod these new TiVos. Ergo, this is real hardware, in real user's hands, RIGHT NOW. It is not vaporware.

    8. Re:Great. Just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short answer: yes.

      Long answer: go to the TiVo underground forums at avsforum.com.

    9. Re:Great. Just great. by Royster · · Score: 2

      Well since the people who have hacked an ethernet into the older TiVos (or just used ppp over the serial port) have successfully used their own network connection to download schedule info (on subscribed TiVos), I don't see why TiVo would go to lengths to make it not work here.

      Especially since the phone calls cost TiVo money. Why not just piggy back on someone's existing broadband line? Everyone is happy.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    10. Re:Great. Just great. by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      "- Show scheduling via Web page
      - Management of recorded items via Web "

      These features are available through TiVoWeb:

      http://tivo.lightn.org/

      If you're a TiVo hacker, these kinds of mods aren't that difficult to add.

    11. Re:Great. Just great. by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Re: Accessing Tivo's filesystem.

      While you can currentally use TivoNet to give your Tivo ethernet access, and shell, this doesn't mean you can access the recorded streams on the disks...

      Tivo doesn't store its video streams using a standard filesystem. This means you can't simply NFS-mount your Tivo and start copying or streaming the recorded programs.

      Someone did write a tool which allowed you to copy/convert a stream from Tivo's format to an MPG file on your local computer. However, when the 2.5 version of software was pushed to Tivo units, these streams are now encrypted. So far, I don't think anyone has managed (or bothered) to come up with a workaround.

      Now then... With series2 coming with USB ports, and supposedly supports USB-ethernet adapters, maybe they'll allow you to do a "Dump to VCR" over ethernet to your local machine where you can burn the resulting file to the format of your choice.

      Right now, there aren't a whole lot of details from Tivo so we'll just have to wait and see.

    12. Re:Great. Just great. by LoveMuscle · · Score: 1

      No they will just try and sell you a phone also... http://www.attbroadband.com/services/products/Tele phonyLearnMore.html

    13. Re:Great. Just great. by cdh · · Score: 1
      Yes you can. I do it every day. Any software DVD player can play the MPEG2 streams. See:

      ExtractStream for Unix

      TivoApp for Windows

      TivoApp relies on ExtractStream being installed on the Tivo, but it works like a champ. This is a 2.5.1 Tivo w/ the TivoNet setup connected to a WAP11.

      Very cool.

    14. Re:Great. Just great. by iamchris · · Score: 1

      Sony Tivo archives to Sony VHS automagically. Not sexy (by a longshot!), but it _is_ archived... One would think that archiving to videocd/dvd/backpack hdd would be a minor extension of that capability.

  14. 5.1 support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it support surround sound and all that cool stuff? After I invested all the money in all my surround sound equipment, to buy a TiVo that doesn't support 5.1 seems like a waste...

    1. Re:5.1 support? by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

      If a TiVo faithfully plays back NTSC stereo like a VCR does, your receiver ought to be able to unmatrix Dolby Pro Logic if it was broadcast.

      The only consumer-grade sources with Dolby Digital I can think of (since we can rule out TiVo ever getting away with recording content from a DVD) are broadcast or satellite HDTV, neither of which seem to be supported at all.

      Why doesn't TiVo accept HDTV input? Isn't ATSC (the US HDTV standard) based on MPEG2, and wasn't it being able to skip encoding that made DirecTiVo so cheap?

    2. Re:5.1 support? by sdo1 · · Score: 1
      The only consumer-grade sources with Dolby Digital I can think of (since we can rule out TiVo ever getting away with recording content from a DVD) are broadcast or satellite HDTV, neither of which seem to be supported at all.


      The DirecTiVo units do indeed support Dolby Digital. If you want them to, they will gladly record the dolby-digital audio track of any channel that supports it. Right now, there's only a hand-full of DD channels though... a couple of PPV, HBO, and STARZ channels.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    3. Re:5.1 support? by undie · · Score: 1


      Actually, DirecTV (non-HD) broadcasts Dolby Digital 5.1 signal on 7 or 8 channels (HBO, Starz, and Pay Per View movies).

      The DirecTivo combo receiver will even record the 5.1 stream along with the movie, and play it back later!

    4. Re:5.1 support? by porges · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the standalone TiVos, which must do their own a/v encoding in realtime, are said to degrade the subtle phase information on Pro Logic soundtracks, and the surround degrades (but is not eliminated). I haven't run A/B tests with my own ears on this. Other than that, the sound quality is excellent, to my non-golden ears.

      The DirecTiVos support DD 5.1, where the satellite programming is encoded with that.

    5. Re:5.1 support? by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the sites didn't mention that, and I moved and lost my southern exposure last year. So DirecTiVos have digital out?

    6. Re:5.1 support? by undie · · Score: 1


      There's an optical out on the back of my Philips DSR6000, it outputs PCM S/PDIF when you're watching normal TV, and Dolby Digital 5.1 on the channels I mentioned before.

      You don't get the funky menu sounds via optical though.

  15. Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by ndlxs · · Score: 1

    When is somebody going to get the brilliant idea to make a digital video recorder that does not require a phone line and does not have a monthly fee? That is a DVR I could like.

    --
    Andy Alexis Buy my CD: http://www.pineycreekweasels.net/cds.html Sacramento, CA. "The Pearl of the Central Valley"
    1. Re:Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2, Informative

      JVC, Panasonic, and Sony all make these, just look around.

    2. Re:Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its called replaytv 4000

    3. Re:Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by Monte · · Score: 1

      When is somebody going to get the brilliant idea to make a digital video recorder that does not require a phone line and does not have a monthly fee?

      Mine arrived a few weeks ago. It from these guys. Check it out.

    4. Re:Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by Putz19 · · Score: 1

      Umm, that would be replayTV. No fees, and Broadband connection.

      --
      CS majors, we are the geeks that run it all. Without us things die.
    5. Re:Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, boo hoo.

      Get the lifetime sub if you don't want monthly fees. Sheesh, some people never tire of whining about non-issues.

      As to ethernet, you can hack your TiVo to add this, and not only do away with the phone line, but actually remotely control the TiVo over the web in real time. The new TiVos will have ethernet add on option via the USB ports, so TiVo is obviously planning to add these features soon, for non-hacker users.

    6. Re:Phone Line/Fee Free DVR by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Sony makes a TiVo unit, which carries a subscription fee. You can get out of the monthly subscription fee by buying a lifetime subscription.

      With the JVC and Panasonic ReplayTV boxes, you are paying a subscription fee (don't kid yourself into thinking you're not). The difference is, you pay it upfront in the cost of the hardware.

      TiVo sells the hardware at a loss and their revenue model relies on subscription fees.

  16. Why not two tuners?!?! by Spoons · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I have had a TiVo for about a year now, and I love it! The only complaint I have about it is the inability to record two shows at once. Never have I said I would love to stream MP3s to my TiVo. Over and over I have cursed West Wing for overlaping with Enterprise, and Friends for coming on at the same time as Survivor. I want both! I know they already have this ability in the DirecTiVo, but not in the Stand Alone TiVos. This seems like the next logical evolution of their product, but alas TiVo is yet another company that has placed strategic partnerships above features.

    1. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd love to know the percentage of people who own DirecTiVo units who are actually using the dual tuners. I suspect that as a marketing feature, it was a necessary thing to add to compete against UltimateTV, but I think the reality is that only a small percentage of people are utilizing it.

      The added cost to a standalone TiVo of adding a second tuner is probably not trivial. For those systems, the TiVo is doing on-the-fly mpeg compression. Adding another tuner also means adding at least another compression co-processor. For the DirecTiVo versions, the signal is already compressed coming from DirecTV, so those are parts they didn't have to add. For a dual-tuner the thing needs to be able to handle three video streams at once... two recording/compression and one playback. That's a lot of number-crunching. The DirecTiVo only ever has to deal with set of number-crunching (for playback).

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    2. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by bruhmann · · Score: 1

      You need to get 2 tivos. A tivo doesn't have the capability to encode 2 streams at once into mpeg2. DirecTivo's don't have to encode the signal, it's already in mpeg2 format. So you would need 2 mpeg2 encoders, more processing power, and a second tuner. That's a lot of extra hardware for added functionality that a few people would rarely use.

    3. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by uslinux.net · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't (yet) own a Tivo, but I do own DirecTV (no cable where I'm at), and I would definitely like to be able to record two different shows at once. With DirecTV, if I want to record a movie on HBO, well, I have to *watch* the movie, or go find another TV. With dual tuners, I can record a movie and still watch the Simpsons (or vice versa). I've seriously considered a DirecTiVo unit just for that.

    4. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Indomitus · · Score: 1

      The problem with 2 tuners is that it would do nothing for most cable users (which I would guess is a large portion of their userbase). Even if my Tivo had 2 tuners, I still only have 1 digital cable box spitting out 1 signal to the Tivo so it wouldn't help me out at all. I so wish I could record 2 shows, or at least record 1 and watch another, but since I have to use a cable box it's not going to happen.

    5. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by grubby · · Score: 1

      I know I am one of those people who utilizes the dual tuners in my DTiVo... I think if you checked you would find out that just about every one of those boxes is setup for a dual lnb dish. You never realize how many shows overlap each other that you want to watch until you goto schedule another and it gives you a conflict. I even still get occasional conflicts with the dual tuners!

    6. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by barjam · · Score: 1

      Well... I think at one point something like 50% of the people that owned a tivo had a directivo (SA units junk compared to the directivo).

      From the response on the tivofaq forums right when 2.5 was launching (the dual tuner update) I say many, many, many folks were anticipating this. The directivo box even lists this as a feature.

      So I would guess that probably 25-40% of the folks with tivo use dual tuners.

    7. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

      I've got the two-tuner DirecTiVo unit, and I love it! It significantly reduces the chances of programming conflict, and I can play a prerecorded show while the two tuners are busy (there are infrequent, occasional playback glitches when I've got the system this busy, perhaps 1-2 for a 1 hour show).

      There's three main things I'd would like to see:

      1. Being able to get the TiVo data through my IP connection instead of through the phone line.

      2. 30-second commercial skip (or just skip the commercials all together, but I suspect the advertisers wouldn't go for that).

      3. Better control over my VCR so that I can build my own personal archives of my favorite shows

    8. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by DaSyonic · · Score: 2

      I use dual tuners DAILY. 2 Shows that I have a season pass on (usually during primetime) would otherwise conflict and be unable to record them both. Dual tuners makes that possible, and I don't have to do a thing to make it work. Many might say they dont think they use dual tuners, because TiVo is using it for them!

      And it has no problems crunching those numbers, I never experience any problems recording 2 shows and watching a third.

      Dual tuners not needed? Right. And you can pry the remote out of my cold dead fingers.

      --

      Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
      James Brents
    9. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife thinks the dual tuner is the best thing since sliced bread. If we are watch live TV (no flames please) and a comercial comes on I switch to the second tuner and flip away. When we go back to the live show we can rewind to the end of the comercial break and continue watch the first show in its entirety. Not to mention the fact that many good shows are scheduled at the same time. Dual tuners can watch one record the other or record both - too cool.

      We couldn't wait until the 2.5 update showed up and it was well worth it.

    10. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by stripes · · Score: 2
      I'd love to know the percentage of people who own DirecTiVo units who are actually using the dual tuners.

      100% of the people I know with DTiVo use both tuners, since it is free (but does require the extra cable run). I expect less then 100% of DTiVo ownsers use it though since many just buy DTiVo because it costs a lot less then the stand alone TiVo. You could go somewhere with lots of DTiVo users and post a poll. They don't seem to have one there already...

    11. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by stripes · · Score: 2
      With DirecTV, if I want to record a movie on HBO, well, I have to *watch* the movie, or go find another TV.

      With TiVo (Direct, or not) you can record that HBOP movie and watch anything else you have on the box at the same time, which is a significant improvement over video tape (you can also watch the start of the movie if you happen to get home, say, 45 min after the recording has started).

      That ain't as nice as having two tuners (so you can record two things at once that the networks carefully scheduled to be on at the same time...), but it is pretty nice...

    12. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Smitty · · Score: 1

      Don't know how much dual-tuner DirecTivos cost to make but Hughes is selling one now for 99 bucks!! (Yahoo) It has a Digital Optical output and up to 35 hours of storage. I just got one for Christmas.

      The menuing system is slower than dirt but I love the dual-tuners. Our old standalone Tivo used to interrupt our TV watching nightly to record something... Very annoying.

    13. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by maxoutrocketmail.com · · Score: 1
      I've got a DirectTivo and LOVE the dual tuners.

      We don't typically watch much broadcast TV, but two of the shows are Survivor and Friends which show in the same time slot. It's great not to have to fight to decide which to watch (after the kids go to bed).

      Heck, even after just setting up my wish lists I found that it was recording 2 shows that it recommended at the same time.

      It's a great feature!

      --
      -- Remember Johnny, .sigs are for lo^Hewsers
    14. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Fourier · · Score: 1

      The only complaint I have about it is the inability to record two shows at once.

      I'm with you on this one. I love TiVo, and I preach its benefits to anyone who will listen. But anyone who looks closely will notice that I have a nasty hack going on: the cable signal is piped through the VCR, then to the TiVo, allowing me to record two shows at once. The funny thing is, I can't sacrifice the TiVo functionality when I watch the show recorded on VCR, so I start the show playing about 20 minutes early. That way I can build up the Live TV buffer enough to skip commercials. :-)

      The only problem with this arrangement is that programming the VCR (with on-screen programming) is difficult when the visuals are slightly delayed by the TiVo buffering scheme.

    15. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by godscent · · Score: 1

      2. 30-second commercial skip

      There is a way to enable that, but it takes the place of your Skip-to-End button. I haven't tried it myself, but I think you just press Select-Play-Select-3-0-Select. That and more codes and backdoors can be found here.

    16. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      According to Tivo, the most requested feature is the ability to record 2 shows at once.

      I'd hardly call that a feature that very few people would use.

      DirecTivo supports two tuners, and nearly EVERYONE with one uses it...

      I agree, it is some extra hardware...but how much would an extra tuner and encoder cost? Probably not more than $50 in parts, and I know I'd gladly pay $100-150 on top of retail for this ability...

    17. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by shayne321 · · Score: 2

      1. Being able to get the TiVo data through my IP connection instead of through the phone line.

      I see this request a lot, but I seriously doubt it'll ever happen.. How long would it take for someone to stiff the packets in between the Tivo unit and the server and figure out the protocol? This paves the way for a "tivo proxy" which could conceivably hide 2 or more units behind it and act as 1 unit to Tivo's servers. Also in the integrated DirecTV units, pay per view purchases are reported via the phone line... A "tivo proxy" could conceivably strip pay per view purchase info out which would have DirecTV all in an uproar..

      For the DirecTV integrated units you get most of your guide data, showcase info, and even software upgrades over the satellite now with 2.5.. The only purpose the phone call serves is to upload pay per view purchases and your viewing habits (Tivo has stated they capture anonymous data on the viewing habits of their subscribers).

      Asside from the annoyance of having to run a phone line over to the Tivo, I really don't see what all of the complaining is about. The call takes like 10 minutes max and it does it between 2 and 5am.

      2. 30-second commercial skip (or just skip the commercials all together, but I suspect the advertisers wouldn't go for that).

      As others have pointed out, it's there in 2.5.. Look on the list of codes at tivocommunity.com for the code to enable it.

      3. Better control over my VCR so that I can build my own personal archives of my favorite shows

      Supposedly the Sony DirecTivo unit integrates well with Sony VCR's, but I haven't had any experience with this myself.

      Shayne

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    18. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      West wing and enterprise

      friends and survivor

      ????

      where are your priorities????

    19. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by sdo1 · · Score: 1

      I would say that it's maybe a mistake to make predictions about the usage based on the response from online sites. While many people (thousands) participate in the TiVo forums, those are the real enthusiasts... the ones who probably would set up the dual tuner. But the rest of the population of TiVo owners is many hundreds of thousands, I'm sure huge numbers of which got their TiVo through deals with the DirecTV installers or who are "casual" users.

      Maybe you're right, but I think 25-40% is probably on the very optimistic side. I'm guessing 10-20%.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    20. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by sdo1 · · Score: 1

      I played around with that. The 30 second skip is another nice marketing feature that ReplayTV has, but I find that I can get to where I want to quicker the way TiVo has things set by default than I can with the 30 second skip.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    21. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by sdo1 · · Score: 1

      That poll would be highly suspect since its "enthusiasts" who would be answering it. There's probably an order of magnitude more TiVo users out there who just aren't into squeezing the last bits of technology out of the products they use.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    22. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 second skip is available on version 2.5 of the TiVo software. To enable it, do this:

      Hit select, play, select, 3, 0, select. This will enable 30 second skip. You do lose skip-to-tick and skip-to-end, but the button becomes a 30-second skip button. To turn it off and gain skip-to-end/skip-to-tick back, do the same thing again.

      Enjoy!

    23. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by stripes · · Score: 2

      Yes it only answers the question "how many people who read a TiVo BBS use both tuners", but that is better then answering the question "I wonder what number I can make up"...

    24. Re:Why not two tuners?!?! by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Well over 50$ in parts. The encoder itself is over 100$ in quantity. Add in the cost of the memory it uses, the RF modulator, and various support components (including a faster processor to deal with 2x the traffic) and the cost will exceed 150$ in parts. The tivo already has over 300$ in parts in there. TiVo, Inc. is very cost conscious.

  17. Will this be the product integrated with Real? by dave-fu · · Score: 2

    If you're not in the know, Real and TiVo are in bed with one another which struck me as odd seeing as how Real isn't exactly known for being a champion of the Linux cause and that's TiVo's blood 'n guts.
    At any rate, I'm glad to see that non-standard, non-open digital "rights" management fomats are no longer solely the domain of Windows *cough* WMA/V *cough*.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
    1. Re:Will this be the product integrated with Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it can be hard to believe, but for some people Linux isn't the be-all and end-all in life

    2. Re:Will this be the product integrated with Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Real isn't exactly known for being a champion of the Linux cause...

      Sure, they don't release RealPlayer's source, but they've been releasing players for Linux forever. I remember 5 or 6 years ago downloading RealAudio for Linux. How many companies have been releasing products for Linux (for FREE) for so long? Of course they're not the only ones, but they're not as linux-blind as you seem to imply.

    3. Re:Will this be the product integrated with Real? by godscent · · Score: 2, Informative
      From TiVo's press release:
      1. RealNetworks' RealOne Player will be integrated into all TiVo Series2 DVRs, enabling TiVo subscribers to create and manage their music collection on TiVo's hard disc and subscribe to RealNetworks' RealOne Music service. RealOne Music will enable TiVo customers to download and stream music from the music catalogs of major and independent labels, listen to more than 2,000 Internet radio stations and view artist and album information. TiVo users will have the option to activate the RealOne Player when they activate the TiVo Service for an incremental monthly subscription fee.
  18. What about multiple tuners? by Timmy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My main gripe about Tivo right now is that I can't record one program and watch another at the same time. UltimateTV and even DirecTivo have this capability, or alternately the ability to record two shows at the same time.

    The specs for the new Tivo make no mention of this.

    1. Re:What about multiple tuners? by TwoStep · · Score: 1

      Apparently they said at the press conference that they have the ability to put 2 tuners in the new TiVo's, bu that they aren't planning on manufacturing 2 tuner TiVo's quite yet.

      Also, with one tuner you can watch one thing and record something else, you just have to watch something that has already been recorded. If you set up your TiVo in a certain way (with coax cable) you can even watch something live while TiVo records something else (equivalent to using a splitter).

      Twostep

      --
      There are 10 different types of people in this world... those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    2. Re:What about multiple tuners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you set up your TiVo in a certain way (with coax cable) you can even watch something live while TiVo records something else (equivalent to using a splitter)

      This is incorrect. The TiVo would need two tuners to do this: one for the live show it's recording, one for the live show it's showing, and as you pointed out the TiVo does not come with two tuners.

    3. Re:What about multiple tuners? by Foochar · · Score: 3, Informative
      Huh!?


      I've watched one thing and recorded something else with my Stand-Alone Tivo plenty of times its all a matter of having this wired up correctly! And I've got a cheap TV with only one input on it, the standard RF cable. If I felt like it I could actually have my Tivo record one show, be recording another show on my VCR and be watching a third on the TV.

      Wall Jack Tivo VCR GameCube TV.

      If your Tivo is in standby it is still picking the signal up off of the wire and recording the signal, but it also passes the signal on the wire through intact. Its like having your VCR record something and hitting TV/VCR so you can watch something else at the same time.


      As many people here have pointed out it would take a lot more then just another tuner to be able to record two shows at once. You'd have to have enough hardware in the system to encode two mpeg2 streams. The DirecTivo's get around this by recording the DirecTv mpeg2 streams without having to encode them.

      --
      "You can't fight in here! This is the war room" --Dr. Stra
    4. Re:What about multiple tuners? by stripes · · Score: 3, Insightful
      My main gripe about Tivo right now is that I can't record one program and watch another at the same time. UltimateTV and even DirecTivo have this capability, or alternately the ability to record two shows at the same time.

      That would require duplications almost every item the stand alone TiVo has. You need another set of IR blasters to go to another cable box. Another coax in, another antenna in, another RCA in set. You need another tuner (for the antenna in), another NTSC decoder. Another MPEG encoder.

      In other words you more or less double the SA TiVo's cost (er, except for the hard disk, and the rather inexpensive CPU).

      I would rather see a way to network multiple TiVos and have them seemlessly act as one big TiVo. Need a second tuner? Buy a second TiVo. Need more disk space? Get yet another. All three networks have their one best show at the same time, plus HBO's new series airs then too? Get four TiVos.

      That would be a lot more general, and not cost significantly more....

      (Why does the DTiVo and UTV have two tuners then? Well they only have one extra sat input, and no extra MPEG encoder, in fact they have zero mpeg encoders. So the extra cost was pretty small.)

    5. Re:What about multiple tuners? by stripes · · Score: 2

      Crap! Of corse I was talking about recording two things. The TiVo does (and always has) allowed you to record something and watch any other pre-recorded thing (or the currently recording thing...from the start if you like).

    6. Re:What about multiple tuners? by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      UltimateTV and DirecTiVo have this capability because they do NOT do any MPEG encoding. They just write the raw satellite stream to the hard drive.

      The CPU power required for a standalone unit to encode two MPEG streams on the fly is quite cost prohibitive. I seriously doubt we'll see this in a standalone TiVo any time soon (atleast one costing less than, say, $800?)

    7. Re:What about multiple tuners? by uradu · · Score: 2

      > I would rather see a way to network multiple TiVos and have them seemlessly act as one big TiVo.

      I was thinking about that, too. They should be able to discover each other on the (100Mb please!) network and integrate their saved shows into one large collection. One of them should be designated the master unit, that's the one you connect to the TV and control with the remote, the others simply act as auxiliary tuners and extra storage to the master. They could even implement some kind of scheduling mechanism where the master unit automatically finds a free unit to record a particular show.

      I guess the programmer in us is running away with this, fat chance of seeing something like this anytime soon.

      -

    8. Re:What about multiple tuners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two tuners is by far and away the biggest thing missing from my Tivo.

      There are way too many conflicts in the shows we watch and recording two at once would make life much easier. It would also solve the need for using multiple TV inputs when recording one show and watching something else.

      I would also like to see them add the ability to auto-format new hard disks, just like UltimateTV does. If I throw a new 120MB disk in there, it should just format it and continue working.

      Ethernet support would be nice, but 802.11 would be better for me - less wires and easier device positioning. Supporting a USB->802.11 dongle would be fine.

    9. Re:What about multiple tuners? by stripes · · Score: 2
      I was thinking about that, too. They should be able to discover each other on the (100Mb please!) network and integrate their saved shows into one large collection. One of them should be designated the master unit, that's the one you connect to the TV and control with the remote, the others simply act as auxiliary tuners and extra storage to the master.

      Well, I was kind of assuming you could continue to play back shows on any of them, so if you had a TV in the bedroom and one in the family room, you could play any recorded show on either of the TV sets. Of corse I only have one TV, so I won't be too upset if that never happens :-)

      They could even implement some kind of scheduling mechanism where the master unit automatically finds a free unit to record a particular show.

      I don't think they could avoid this since a big feature of the TiVo is you tell it what shows you want, and it goes about the process of finding them (you also get to tell it which are more important so it can handle conflicts "right").

      I guess the programmer in us is running away with this, fat chance of seeing something like this anytime soon

      Probbably not, but they did just finally get to the point where a TiVo doesn't cost more then the selling price. Maybe now they will be happier with a scheme that encurages multipe buys for a single house...

  19. Audio Support by Gedvondur · · Score: 2

    If it could do what the Turtle Beach Audiotron is doing and be my PVR too, that would be way cool. I view this with guarded optimism, they don't actually mention attaching broadband via USB. They just mention video on demand via broadband. Those could be seriously different things the the final shakedown. Still, its cool to see.

  20. USB for additional storage? Looks like no. by iiii · · Score: 1

    If you're going to have USB, why not provide the capability to use external storage? That would rock, but it doesn't sound like they are doing that. From the web page:
    2 USB expansion ports to connect to peripheral devices like digital cameras, network adaptors, MP3 and CD players, etc.
    Etc???

    --
    Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
  21. Nice, but... by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've bought 3 TiVo's in the last year. One for me, one for my parents, and one for my brother. All three were the cheap 20-hour units, upgraded with a 3rd party hard-drive.

    I sure as hell am not going through this again until they add HDTV support and dual tuners.

    I would also love to see:

    - 802.11b options, not only for downloading the updates via your local LAN, but also for streaming MPEG to other PC's and wireless devices on your LAN.

    - Optical digital audio outputs (to go with the HDTV support).

    - Newer video codecs with better quality (maybe they have added this in the latest release ... it says they have a new graphics engine)

    - Firewire output would be nice, also.

    Of course, my dream unit would be one that is integrated with TimeWarner's digital cable box, so that it can take advantage of the digital channels, much like DirecTiVo does. The integration with TW's channel guide alone would be awesome...

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:Nice, but... by kcurrie · · Score: 1

      802.11b isn't fast enough for streaming half decent video around your network. 11a should be though.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
    2. Re:Nice, but... by iceT · · Score: 2

      DirectTivo's already have optical outs...

      Oh, and just say no to digital cable... I mean, you want HDTV... what are THEIR plans to even PROVIDE HDTV?

      --
      -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    3. Re:Nice, but... by tswinzig · · Score: 1

      Oh, and just say no to digital cable... I mean, you want HDTV... what are THEIR plans to even PROVIDE HDTV?

      I'm not sure what you're talking about. I have a TimeWarner HD digital cable box in my living room right now with NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox, PBS, WB, HBO, and Showtime HDTV channels...

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:Nice, but... by GregGardner · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, the DirecTivo (DirecTV/Tivo combo box) already has dual tuners and digital optical out.

      Also, there are 802.11b USB adapters, so assuming Tivo supports the setup of these (which might be questionable since there is a bit of setup required for them with WEP, etc.), then it is possible that you could have 802.11b wireless ethernet on your Tivo2 box.

    5. Re:Nice, but... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      According to this site, "a nominal [throughput] rate for a DVD is 3.5 Mbps." Since you can get close to 11Mbps from 802.11b, how exactly isn't enough bandwidth for MPEG streaming?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:Nice, but... by brandonj · · Score: 1

      One must realize that HDTV is HUGE - at about 5GB for a 30 minute television show - you would need some serious hard drive space - not exactly in the price range of most consumers.

      Dual Tuner support is already there in the DirecTivos (which, in my opinion is the ONLY option if you have direcTV, the dual tuner support is awesome).

      The DirecTiVos also have optical audio outs.

      I'm sure there will be better codecs in this next version - undoubtedly with Real video support.

      802.11b actually would be very cool - but one still has to look at the cost (including supporting it).

      Firewire would be cool as well - being able to record things from your DV camcoder would be sweet!

    7. Re:Nice, but... by Xenu · · Score: 2

      I believe the DVD has a peak rate of around 10 Mbps. The average rate is 1/3 to 1/2 of the peak rate.

    8. Re:Nice, but... by uradu · · Score: 2

      > Since you can get close to 11Mbps from 802.11b

      Nope. It's half duplex to begin with, plus there are all kinds of other overheads. The effective throughput tends to be around 3-5 Mbps in most setups, and quite often less.

      -

    9. Re:Nice, but... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Nope. It's half duplex to begin with, plus there are all kinds of other overheads. The effective throughput tends to be around 3-5 Mbps in most setups, and quite often less.

      Regardless, I'm not talking about streaming DVD quality video, just standard 4:3 420x240 resolution video. Surely that must be possible with 3-5Mbps?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:Nice, but... by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Informative

      One must realize that HDTV is HUGE - at about 5GB for a 30 minute television show - you would need some serious hard drive space - not exactly in the price range of most consumers.

      Right now you could make a TiVo with about 320GB of space, using two 160GB Maxtor drives, and the hacks that are already available. Let's say you lop off 5GB for TiVo's OS installation, temp files, etc. That gives you 315GB, enough for a little over 30 HOURS of HDTV programming! Not to mention, most of the stuff you'd be recording probably would not be HDTV (at first).

      A 20 hour TiVo costs around $200 or less (if you can find one). The cost of drives varies and is dropping all the time. I'm saying in a year's time, TiVo should be able to come out with an HDTiVo unit that excepts firewire/component inputs for $500 or less. It should also have a tuner capable of decoding OTA HDTV.

      And of course, I'd love them to get an HDTiVo integrated with TimeWarner digital cable.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    11. Re:Nice, but... by Cramer · · Score: 2
      • there are 802.11b USB adapters
      Name one that works under Linux. I've yet to find one that's supported. And getting the specs from the vendor(s) is a slow and fruitless effort.
  22. All well and good... by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new features are all well and good, but I think the key to TiVo's long term success will continue to lie in its simplicity. Right now, it's something that your grandmother can use. It's simple, intuitive, and useful. While adding ports may up the "geek factor" to compete with ReplayTV, it really adds very little in the long run.

    If you really want a whiz-bang system with home networking and other features built in, the way to get that NOW is to roll your own PC based system. There's plenty of software available.

    If TiVo makes the mistake of over complicating their product and bogging it down with vaporware (see previous RealNetworks article), then they may have problems. Ask yourself what level of technology your non-technical friends and relatives are comfortable dealing with. Most can't even hook up their VCR correctly.

    I love my TiVo. It's easy to use and simply works great. I don't ever see myself being without some sort of PVR.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:All well and good... by wafath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried rolling my own. It didn't work to well. I used the NVidia unit that comes with the remote control and the break out box. I never got the sound syncing with the picture, and it was difficult to configure windows in such a way that you could see what was going on on the TV.

      Furthermore the long boot time and the large fan noise made it unplesent for the TV environment. I later got a panasonic showstopper (on sale it cost as much as the TiVo, but the service was free.)

      W

    2. Re:All well and good... by jacobito · · Score: 2
      If you really want a whiz-bang system with home networking and other features built in, the way to get that NOW is to roll your own PC based system. There's plenty of software available.
      I've been wanting to do this for a while, but I'm a little hesitant. Can anyone point me and others to good resources on the web for doing so? I wonder if anyone can relate some good experiences setting up a Linux box to record television. My understanding is that Hauppage TV cards are well supported by Linux hackers; I'm not familiar with the frontends that might be available, though.

      I could do this under Windows as well, but hardware manufacturers often can't keep up with drivers for new Windows versions as they are released, so that's a big concern.

    3. Re:All well and good... by sdo1 · · Score: 3, Informative
      You need to check out the AV Science Forum Home Theater Computers board. Most people there are less intested in using or not using a specific OS and are more interested in getting more out of the HTPCs. That said, most of the people are Windows users, though there are a few linux threads.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    4. Re:All well and good... by bughunter · · Score: 1
      Sounds like a good topic for an "Ask Slashdot" article.

      Gee, perhaps it's already been asked?

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:All well and good... by jacobito · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link! I'll check that out...

    6. Re:All well and good... by jacobito · · Score: 1
      Sounds like a good topic for an "Ask Slashdot" article.
      Gee, perhaps it's already been asked?
      Gee, I don't know; has it already been asked? Let's see, was it asked in "Can URL Transaction Tests Be Patented?" Or "Affordable Home Backups for 10-100G Systems?" Or "X.10 and Home Security?" Maybe "Neural Networks In The Home?" Urrgh... ;)

      Look, I have searched for this sort of thing on my own, but I didn't think it would hurt to see if anyone had any helpful input while we were more or less on the topic. Peace... :)

  23. Interesting compromise... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What's odd about this is the fact that they put USB there. A USB Ethernet adapter can handle all of 10Mbit ethernet - no 100 Mbit ethernet here. I have two Tivo's currently, and have a 10MBit ethernet card in my SA (Standalone Tivo) and it is honestly slow as ass to transfer a show over to my desktop. But that's an ISA adapter hack with an old ISA 10baseT card in it - the Real Deal ought to include a 100baseT built in ethernet to stream big movies.


    While it's true that for streaming over the internet directly from a Tivo it wouldn't matter, but it's pretty crazy to go around transferring full bitrate MPEG encoded movies - what most people want to be able to do is download video to their computer and re-encode or shrink it down to a reasonable archiveable size.


    This sketches me out - I have a strange feeling that something is going on behind the scenes here - remember the flap over the ReplayTV that could "share movies with your friends". Tivo is a saavy company when it comes to placating the media world. I have a feeling there is a reason they are putting USB on it rather than ethernet directly. But it doesn't quite click to me what it could be - other than that this allows them to assess the industry response to it, and choose to release or not release official ethernet-USB support at a later date without endangering the product itself, and surely some hackers will make ethernet work anyway to appeal to the gear head crowd.


    So I think this is a carefully considered business decision. I also know a lot of folks in the Tivo community and have no doubt that within weeks of these things hitting the stores all sorts of cool unintended uses for these USB ports will be thought up. I'll be first in line to buy one, as soon as the DirecTV-integrated version is out.

    1. Re:Interesting compromise... by DangerTenor · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 should be able to handle 100mbps no problem. If they're smart and put USB 2.0 ports on there then it should be OK. If not, well, my only guess is that they had no intention of allowing video transfer via the network--probably only guide data retrieval and perhaps network video games and/or music.

      --
      Check out our infosecurity industry blog: http://securitymusings.com/
    2. Re:Interesting compromise... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I have two Tivo's currently, and have a 10MBit ethernet card in my SA (Standalone Tivo) and it is honestly slow as ass to transfer a show over to my desktop. But that's an ISA adapter hack with an old ISA 10baseT card in it

      The problem is you're not even getting anywhere close to 10mbps with that setup. I believe the most people have been able to get is around 1mbps, due to the way the network hack works.

      I have a feeling there is a reason they are putting USB on it rather than ethernet directly.

      1. It's probably cheaper to add USB support. A couple of I/O ports must be cheaper than an ethernet chipset/port.

      2. It lets you add not only ethernet, but other types of devices to TiVo (why else would they include TWO USB ports if it was just for ethernet?)

      3. They can make money selling add-on USB devices designed to work with your TiVo. They are looking for more ways to make money...

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Interesting compromise... by stripes · · Score: 2
      I have two Tivo's currently, and have a 10MBit ethernet card in my SA (Standalone Tivo) and it is honestly slow as ass to transfer a show over to my desktop.

      The amazing kludge of an ethernet that people have put in the SA TiVo can't push 3Mbits. USB ethernets suck a lot too, but they push more like 6 to 8Mbits. That is more then enough to do a "best quality" stream at slightly faster then real time.

      I have a strange feeling that something is going on behind the scenes here

      Maybe, or maybe it was a choice between $10 for an ethernet that is only an ethernet, or $10 for USB that could be a (kinda lame) ethernet, talke to CD drives, MP3 players, and a bunch of other crap...

      Maybe the choice was even more lopsided, the USB might have been on the chipset that connects the CPU up to the memory and other crud anyway, so it was all but free (traces and connectors), while the ethernet would have been $10.

      have no doubt that within weeks of these things hitting the stores all sorts of cool unintended uses for these USB ports will be thought up

      AT&T has been selling them for about a month. As of a week ago nobody on the underground had done much with the USB, but they did strings the kernel and find which ethernets were supported, so maybe over the last week...

    4. Re:Interesting compromise... by Keeper · · Score: 2

      Using USB ports is a great idea. It's a standard, you don't have to pull open the computer to install it, you really arn't limited to just two devices (usb hubs), and nobody will fry their tivo trying to solder in an ISA adapter. :)

      I can see one of the first things people rig up to these things being a keyboard ...

    5. Re:Interesting compromise... by leandrod · · Score: 2

      What amazes me is that everyone seems to go getting cheapo. USB here is clearly a kludge, and even USB 2.0 wouldn't be much better. It was created as a serial bus for low performance peripherals like keyboard, mice, handheld scanners and the like, substituting both RS-232C and 1284 (Centronics and descendants).

      If it was a real quality product it would have one USB 2.0 port, one Ethernet 100 Mbps, and one 1394 (Firewire). At least one USB 1 and one 1394, because USB is cheap and 1394 is the standard for digital video, being the only adequate technology for high-performance devices besides SCSI, and much cheaper than SCSI.

      Essentially, there's no one one will get decent performance of even USB 2.0 network or mass storage adapters, but 1394 should be good enough, not to mention SCSI.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    6. Re:Interesting compromise... by mobius_stripper · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 outperforms ieee1394a (480Mbps vs. 400Mbps).

      FYI, here are the theoretical peak transfer rates of various buses.

      USB 1.0 => 12Mbps
      SCSI 1 = 40Mbps (5MBps)
      SCSI 2 => 80Mbps (10MBps)
      Ultra SCSI => 160Mbps (20MBps)
      ATA33 => 264Mbps (33MBps)
      Ultra Wide SCSI => 320Mbps (40MBps)
      ieee1394a => 400Mbps
      USB 2.0 => 480Mbps
      ATA66 => 528Mbps (66MBps)
      ATA100 => 800Mbps (100MBps)

      Krishna

      --
      --- I'd love to go out with you, but I have to study for a Turing test.
    7. Re:Interesting compromise... by leandrod · · Score: 2

      This numbers are misleading.

      First, technically theoretical peak transfer rates aren't the most relevant measure, but the capacity for concurrent, continued use of the bus in high loads without degradation. There SCSI and 1394 excel over ATA and USB.

      Second, politically the superior SCSI and 1394 are advancing at a lower pace than they should because their market~ and mindshare is being compressed between the lower quality and price ATA and USB standard and the high price, sometimes proprietary standards like SAN, IO2 and the such -- don't remember the names, IBM had its own also.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  24. What purpose does this thin serve? by halftrack · · Score: 1

    As a Computer/PC fan/freak/geek/. I've never bothered to take a closer look to things like the TiVo-thing nor do I belive I will. I'm just wondering what advantages such a device has got over a computer. Slap in a large HD, a TV-tuner-card and a graphiccard with a Composite connection and you'll have it all. Of course these things are cheaper, doesn't go out on date within the next 8 months and probably never crashes, but still modern man is separated from cows in three crucial points; opposing thumbs, speech and home-computers. Not many owns a computer today and those who don't doesn't really need a thing such as this. Some has probably never heard of the device either. But then again, what do I know? I'v never tried one.

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:What purpose does this thin serve? by jonv · · Score: 1

      You can implement the hardware feature of the Tivo with the PC setup you have described but you are forgetting the benefits from the software and listings service provided by Tivo.
      Features like Season Passes and Suggestions take the Tivo beyond anything that can currently be achieved by a PC setup.

    2. Re:What purpose does this thin serve? by Blackwulf · · Score: 2

      Mainly it's because I like using a remote on my couch to list through the TV shows I want to watch. I don't feel like continually standing up to go to the computer to watch a different show.

      And on that note, my computer is nowhere near my TV, so that'd be a lot of cabling to run through the house.

      And, for me at least, the composite out on my video card leaves a little black border and isn't as sharp as normal TV, however I have an old card (voodoo3 3500 TV) though, and it's been replaced already, so I don't know how the composite out on my new card is.

    3. Re:What purpose does this thin serve? by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      As a Computer/PC fan/freak/geek/. I've never bothered to take a closer look to things like the TiVo-thing nor do I belive I will.

      Now there's a contradiction. You're such a fan/freak/geek that you won't bother to check out some new technology? Especially when it's computer based (it's a PowerPC running Linux inside that box you know). Most "geeks" I know check out the latest technology and gadgets simply for the sake of playing with them. You sound more like a Luddite to me, "What I have works, why would I new some newfangled gadget to do it for me?" Nevermind the fact that it offers other features and convenience your PC simply can't offer. "Sure, cars are faster and easier to use, but my good old horse gets me anywhee I need to go." But then again, you've never even bothered to look up anything about them, so you wouldn't know that.


      I'm just wondering what advantages such a device has got over a computer.


      The software, of course. Not to mention it's a piece of self contained A/V equipment rather than a desktop computer system. Sure you could put together a video capture device in your PC, I have one, in fact, but would it be anything like a TiVo? No. Would it get guide data, figure out when and where what you've asked it to record is on, resolve conflicts if those things overlap and suggest (and automatically record) new shows you might like based on what else you watch and how you rate them (with the 1,2 or 3 thumbs up/down system)? Would it sit nicely in your A/V rack with all your other equipment? No, you would have to run cables across your house/room to where ever your computer is, or put another computer in your living room next to your TV.

    4. Re:What purpose does this thin serve? by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Very true; take it from someone who's learned the hard way. I bought one of those AIW cards with PVR functionality and tried to build a TiVo-killer box. Ignoring for the moment all the driver & SW issues I had to wrestle with, the TiVo still beats my PC solution hands down. Why? Because the program guide sucked. Sure, it would list programs, and even allow me to schedule recordings, but it just didn't have the advanced features (or even some basic features) needed to make it practical. I'm now in the market for a TiVo.

  25. Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by sh0rtie · · Score: 3, Interesting



    After reading this article i think ill stick to alternative devices, im not into paying someone to sell my viewing habits to advertisers if they are strapped for cash,
    im suprised so many pgp military encryption loving /. readers are so nieve or am i ....

    1. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by TwoStep · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you are so concerned, TiVo allows you to opt out of the data collection.

      Personally, I like that they collect what I watch. Maybe that will mean that the shows I watch don't get cancelled...

      Twostep

      --
      There are 10 different types of people in this world... those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    2. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by Milalwi · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are so concerned, TiVo allows you to opt out of the data collection.
      Yes, and it's composite data anyway, compiled by postal code, I believe. I think someone sniffed the data stream to verify this.

      Milalwi
    3. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Enough with the conspiracy theories. Who cares if they have your viewing habits? You're not as important as you think you are.

    4. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by Blackwulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually a bunch of folks on the TiVo Underground on the AVS forum actually sniffed the data.

      It sells composite viewing habits by area code. Basicailly, it knows that 25% of the TiVo Owners in zip code 30075 (for instance) watched Buffy on Tuesday night...But that's it. Nothing about your personal viewing habits - just your zip code's viewing habits.

      And it takes a whole whopping 5 minutes to opt out. Unfortunately, I actually like the fact that they know I have Babylon 5 and MST3K season passes. Call me dumb and naive, but I want these shows to stay on the air (and possibly make spinoffs to have new episodes!)

    5. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try reading the article linked:

      "The first file, which contains the viewing information, is sent to the "private" (bprv) directory and stored under a name that only identifies the subscriber's zip code. But the diagnostic log file goes to the "public" (bpub) directory, and is stored under a name that contains a TiVo unit's serial number - in this case 00840336485942. Both files clearly show the date of the transfer, 2001 01/24.

      Since both files are transferred to the same computer during the same phone call, this computer can easily reattach the subscriber ID to the viewing information file. In addition, it is standard computer security practice to keep a record of every FTP file that is transferred. These FTP records normally indicate both the name of the file transferred and the IP address of the computer (or TiVo unit) that initiated the transfer. Just by consulting this log file - even months or years after the fact - TiVo could easily reconstruct the subscriber ID that deposited a viewing information file. (We have no direct way to tell if FTP logging is on or off, but TiVo representatives indicated that FTP logging is disabled.)"

    6. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people who are concerned about their TV viewing habits being reviewed, are the same people that use a Safeway (grocery store) Club Card when making their weekly purchases. You really need to consider the information gathered when considering your privacy. If you use a CC or Check Card to purchase gasoline, you're tracked as well.
      If someone is tracking my name, or other identifier, then I get a little concerned. But if someone is tracking my demographic, then who really cares. If you are a TiVo owner, then you obviously watch TV. That being said, you are watching TV cause there is something to watch. Do you think it's just stupid luck that the television industry made a show YOU like?

    7. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      im suprised so many pgp military encryption loving /. readers are so nieve or am i ....

      You are. Sorry. You can opt-out of it, and on top of that, it's aggregate data. They don't know that sh0rtie watches porn all night, just that some guy in (whatever state you're in) watches porn all night.

      See, it's not so bad.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    8. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by stripes · · Score: 5, Informative
      After reading this article [privacyfoundation.org] i think ill stick to alternative devices, im not into paying someone to sell my viewing habits to advertisers if they are strapped for cash,

      Note you can opt-out, and it has been confirmed (via tcpdump) that once you do your TiVo sends your account number and date of last call, and nothing about your viewing, how much stuff is on the drive, or anything else.

      Opt-out is free (toll-free call, and no monthly service charge or anything). It's described in chapter 7 of my manual (which is all about privacy) in the same size print everything else is. I don't think TiVo is trying to pull a "fast one" which is how the privacyfoundation spins it. Which is a real shame because I think they have done a lot to hurt the only one of the 3 PVR companies that even lets you opt-out!

      I'll also note that both ReplayTV and UltimateTV sell your data, don't make claims about washing it first (that I know of), and don't have an opt-out number (that I know of).

    9. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by wasd! · · Score: 1

      This report by the Privacy Foundation actually spawned an inquiry by the FTC. The facts of the matter, summarized in TiVo's white paper here, were sufficient enough for the Commission to dismiss any further investigation into TiVo's practices. At best, the Privacy's Foundation's report was technically flawed. Judging from their agenda, however, it seems possible that it was deliberatly misleading.

    10. Re:Thanks but ill pass on TIvo...why ? by LafinJack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh my god, the CIA and the Illuminati are gonna find out I have a season's pass for Politically Incorrect, and watched an episode of the X FIles once! I'm on their list of the first people to be gathered up and executed when the aliens come to take over the world!

      But seriously folks, what's the big deal with this? I would much rather have them know what I watch, find out the patterns of my viewing habits, and then make more targeted advertising so they make more money, enabling them to create better shows and programmimg.

      There's a word for people that think everybody is out to get them. No, not perceptive: paranoid.

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
  26. Audio by shaka999 · · Score: 1

    Anyone see mention of audio improvements on this beast? I love my Tivo but the audio really sucks. Rear channels essentially disappear. I'm told this information is lost because the mpeg encoding algorithms see it as not being important.

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    1. Re:Audio by Milalwi · · Score: 1

      I love my Tivo but the audio really sucks. Rear channels essentially disappear.
      I think that should be "rear channel". Broadcast TV is Pro-logic, if I remember correctly, which has a single rear channel.
      I'm told this information is lost because the mpeg encoding algorithms see it as not being important.
      Based on what I've heard about MPEG, probably correct. Some of the spatial data gets lost.

      Milalwi
    2. Re:Audio by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      Your right, Rear channel is more correct. If I recall the rear channel is just encoded as a common signal between the fronts dropped by 3db.

      The -3db makes the mpeg audio think it isn't important and it filters it out. Tivo should look for this when encoding and adjust the levels somehow.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
  27. CDR? by TheCrunch · · Score: 1

    How long will it be before someone makes a USB CD writer mod and starts spreading near-perfect copies of TV programmes?

    If that happened the $hit would hit the fan for TiVo, surely..

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
    1. Re:CDR? by wackysootroom · · Score: 2

      Unless you have digital cable or HDTV, the TV Programs will be far from 'perfect'. Why does it matter anyway? You are already making 'copies' on the TIVO hard drive. A person could do this with any cature software and a capture card hooked up to a PC. It would be a hell of a lot easier than doing a USB CD-R(w) mod.

    2. Re:CDR? by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      People with the third party TiVoNet Ethernet adapter can already do this using a program called ExtractStream. Considering there are an awful lot of "near-perfect" copies of TV programs floating around Usenet already, obtained with a video capture card, the same way the were pre-TiVo, it hardly makes a bit of a difference.

  28. Another missing feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One feature I'd really like to see is the ability to decode digital cable.

    1. Re:Another missing feature by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      That won't happen with a standalone TiVo unit, sure you can technically buy your own cable equipment and use it legally, but the only people who do it in practice are those stealing service. TiVo would have to strike deals with each cable company and sell a combined box that the cable companies would install. They did this with DirectTV, but their only deal with a cable company, resulting in the AT&TiVo, is still standalone and requires a separate cable box.

    2. Re:Another missing feature by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Now that cable companies are moving to digital cable boxes, why not make a hybrid unit like they did with the satelite service?

  29. 2 USB expansion ports? Hmmm.... by fobbman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "2 USB expansion ports to connect to peripheral devices like digital cameras, network adaptors, MP3 and CD players, etc."

    Etc. could be a USB CD burner, perhaps? That popping sound was the MPAA's aneurism.

  30. "Sleeker Dimensions" by justinstreufert · · Score: 1

    At least every other bullet point on the new features list has been complained about in at least one message on this article so far, so I thought I'd pick on the last remaining nitpickable item in the announcement.

    They announced that the new device will be only 15" wide, rather than the standard 17". While seemingly inocuous, this means that any new TiVo I buy will look like a toy or a low-budget VCR in my equipment stack. And speaking of stacks, I currently have a 17" DVD player stacked on top of my TiVo, and this would no longer be possible with the new box.

    Oh, well. My TiVo already does everything I want it to anyway. Until an HD-TiVo comes out I think I'll be doing all my upgrading with a Torx screwdriver rather than my wallet.

    Justin

    --
    "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
    1. Re:"Sleeker Dimensions" by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      Man, I didn't even think of that. I hate when AV components that are non-standard sized. They really do screw things up in a cabinet.

      Maybe they should come out with a 15-17 inch adapter :).

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    2. Re:"Sleeker Dimensions" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already invented that; it's called a shelf!

  31. Still running Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing people seem to forget is that these don't necessarily have to be running Linux. Just because Series 1 Tivo's do, doesn't mean they have to use it for Series 2. Especially given the Realnetworks support. Kind of makes you wonder...

    1. Re:Still running Linux? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      Why would they change, that would mean rewriting their entire codebase. And what does linux have to do with Real support? They would not be including realplayer or anything, just the codecs. And the codecs woud not need to be open source to do this. Even TiVo's own software isn't open source.

  32. DirectTV info? by gmkeegan · · Score: 1

    Anybody know if the DirectTV receivers with built-in Tivo will be offering the 2nd generation features as well?

    1. Re:DirectTV info? by whoknows55 · · Score: 1

      Richard the Tivo guy who posts to avsforums says that the DirecTv version will be out "soon".

  33. Why it doesn't by Synn · · Score: 1

    The problem with the stand-alone unit having two tuners is that they may only have 1 data stream to record from.

    I have digital cable. So I get a digital stream from my cable provider to their box, which then goes through my Tivo to my TV. The Tivo can't record 2 shows at once because my cable box will only stream 1 show to the Tivo box.

    Maybe with analog cable Tivo could record 2 shows at once if it had two tuners, but analog cable is probably a dying technology anyway: the cable providers are pushing digital.

    What I'd LOVE to see is an integrated digital cable box + Tivo unit, like what they did with Direct TV. That way they could pop 2 tuners in the box and record 2 shows at once. The compressing onto the tivo storage might even be better because they wouldn't be going digital -> analog -> digital like they do now.

    1. Re:Why it doesn't by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

      Many digital cable systems, like Adelphia's here in Maryland, send out both an analog and a digital signal. The analog signal doesn't include the whole range of available channels, but it's usually pretty easy to find out which are exclusively digital. You can likely use a splitter and run seperate lines to different devices, and tune each seperately.

  34. Firewire? by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think they might have been better off if they had included a firewire port?
    USB is all fine and good, but unless it's v2 there isn't much bandwidth available for data transfers. I wouldn't want to wait hours...

    --

    Bah!
  35. Re:Hmm... by jargoone · · Score: 1

    I know you. You're like this guy. Be careful not to fall off your pedestal.

  36. Modded away by fm6 · · Score: 2
    As a Tivo owner (and modifier), I can say that it's exciting that there will be an improved Tivo hitting the stores soon. I'm a little disappointed in a few things, though:
    Don't get too excited. I think Tivo is moving away from its friendly relations with the Tivo hacker community. To say nothing of opening up content the way Replay has.

    This relationship was born more out of fellow feeling (the architecture of the Tivo is very hackerish) than of any practical value. But Tivo's business model is based on a close relationship with the Entertainment Industry. Not just to keep from getting sued, but to generate revenue by selling services to them. (Notice the "record this" option for some network promos. And I don't suppose logo insertion is free either.) That means they really can't afford to tolerate hacking, which will inevitably introduce features the Industry won't tolerate. Hence the disappearnce of backdoors. Expect Tivo to jump on the DMCA bandwagon soon.

    1. Re:Modded away by stripes · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think Tivo is moving away from its friendly relations with the Tivo hacker community.

      Is that baised on any actions taken by TiVo, or anything they have said?

      Last I visited the TiVo "underground" forum they were busy finding the AT&T TiVo (the first Series2 TiVo) just as hackable as the old ones. Sure the old tools for the most part didn't "just work", but that is because the CPU in the new one (some MIPS varient, I think at 200Mhz or so vs. the 50Mhz PPC in the old one) was running byte swapped (I assume to make talking to x86 byte order peripherials simpler).

      They had adding an extra drive working, and were pretty sure they could get the rest of the stuff working as well. The serial port still give access to a root shell. Nothing blows away your changes (except during an upgrade).

      They also had a list of which USB ethernet drivers were compiled in, but oddly nobody had acquired one to see if it "just worked".

      If TiVo was going to cut off the hackers why didn't they do it a month ago when they brought out the new hardware?

      Hence the disappearnce of backdoors.

      Er, which ones are gone?

    2. Re:Modded away by ThePixel · · Score: 1

      Hence the disappearnce of backdoors. Er, which ones are gone? All of them. in pre version 2.5, you could "enable backdoors" which gave you extra functionality, such as "Teach TiVO", which was wonderful. wince the latest software upgrade to version 2.5, the backdoors function is gone... or at least no one has found out what key sequence enables them.

      --
      People see the world as they are, not as it is.
    3. Re:Modded away by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      "Hence the disappearnce of backdoors."

      What? They took away the backdoors in my TiVo?

      *runs to check*

      Nope, still there. They may change the codes for each release, but the backdoors are ALWAYS THERE.

      In fact, the newest release for my DirecTiVo added the 30-skip function as a backdoor code. Where's your proof that they're being removed?

    4. Re:Modded away by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      Everyone here is talking about the "TiVo Underground" forum, but no one has posted a link. Let them see for themselves, right?

      http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/

  37. offtopic, but does it support digital cable? by rave77 · · Score: 1

    I'm dying to know the answer to this:

    ATT is advertising the first series TIVO with a $100 discount, but they'll never say if it'll cooperate with their digital tuner.

    Is the TIVO smart enough to change channels with the digital tv reciever? Or does it contain the reciever?

    My VCR wont change channels if the input is coming off the digital tuner. If the input isnt coming off the tuner, you can't see the premium channels.

    1. Re:offtopic, but does it support digital cable? by Initri · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. I have ATT Digital Cable, it uses the IR outputs from the Tivo and changes the channel just fine. Although, sometimes it won't change, but that's rare.

    2. Re:offtopic, but does it support digital cable? by bingeldac · · Score: 1

      Tivo uses an IR blaster to change channels (works great as long as your cat does not eat the IR blaster). All Tivo did was make create a marketing deal with ATT to sell Tivos.

    3. Re:offtopic, but does it support digital cable? by Blackwulf · · Score: 2

      You don't even need the IR blaster, really.

      The IR emitter is on the front panel of the TiVo. I have my AT&T Broadband Digital Cable box sitting on top of the TiVo, so what it does is blast the IR out, bounces off the wall, and comes back and hits the digital cable box - and it acts just like you used the remote control. (It has a bunch of remote control codes built into the TiVo already.)

      It takes about 3 seconds to change a channel (a second between each number just to be safe, I have it in slow mode) and it only drops a number if I'm standing in front of the TiVo at a weird angle where the IR bounces off of me and goes a different direction than the Digital Cable box.

  38. Another choice : Moxi Media Center. by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2

    Moxi presented their media center at the CES 2002 in Las Vegas on monday. Oh wait, it has already made slashdot headlines !

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  39. ReplayTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In response to many comments on here, ReplayTV units already have an ethernet port, free guide data, arguably better interface than Tivo, and more storage (up to 320 hours)....

    Take a look at http://www.replaytv.com

  40. Higher Tech Has Higher Support Costs by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 2
    Why do Firewire?

    The system has been functioning perfectly well with the non-existent (in comparison!) bandwidth of Plain Old Telephone Modems; there's no reason for the product they're selling to need Firewire.

    Doubtless the MPAA and related folks would be aghast at the thought of having fast interfacing to disk; that's just "piracy" asking to happen.

    If they can get USB cheaply on the motherboard, and that allows hooking up a number of cheap USB devices, that's quite enough enhancement for now.

    As for Ethernet, I agree that it would be pretty slick to throw that in. It would seem to me that dropping an Ethernet chip onto the motherboard and a port out the back would be a pretty good way to go, and would offer the merit that folks with ADSL or "cable modems" could then get their TV guide updates faster without needing the ISP service. (That saves TiVO some Actual Dollars, no doubt!)

    However, there are some technical hurdles to get thru in supporting the Ethernet-to-Some-ISP-connection strategy; it means:

    • Users of this have to have a router and/or hub;
    • Users of this have to have a bunch of spare Ethernet cabling (or wireless Ethernet; that's more expensive!!!;
    • Users that think of this as an appliance will need considerable handholding in the process of Integrating EtherTiVO into The Home Network Architecture



    I'd be comfortable with all this, but then, I've got a hub, firewall, and have my own 10BaseT cable-building equipment. I'm hardly the "appliance user" they're mostly selling to.
    Colour me unsurprised that they didn't want to just leap into that...

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:Higher Tech Has Higher Support Costs by Cow4263 · · Score: 1

      A potential problem with the ethernet is that you possibly bypass tivo altogether. For example, setup your router to redirect tivo.com to freetivo.org and get free updates and software upgrades, without the monthly service fee.

    2. Re:Higher Tech Has Higher Support Costs by Cramer · · Score: 1

      There's nothing stopping people from doing that already with the dialup connection. The problem is putting the guide data in the format tivo needs. Trust me, it's more work than it's worth.

  41. Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by Snowfox · · Score: 2
    Like many, I paid for a lifetime subscription to TiVo's services to avoid the recurring monthly fee.

    As I understand it, the subscription can be transferred only once, and only for warranty repair.

    If I upgrade to a new TiVo, am I screwed out of my lifetime subscription?

    1. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by Nerds · · Score: 2

      If I upgrade to a new TiVo, am I screwed out of my lifetime subscription?

      No, just put that TiVo in your bedroom or basement and but a new subscription for the new unit. Some people complain about this, but it's the only way TiVo the company is making money. They don't make or sell the hardware, so they don't get anything (or much) if you buy a new PVR.

      --
      My other .sig is 'The Art of Computer Programming'
    2. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by Snowfox · · Score: 2
      If I upgrade to a new TiVo, am I screwed out of my lifetime subscription?

      No, just put that TiVo in your bedroom or basement and but a new subscription for the new unit. Some people complain about this, but it's the only way TiVo the company is making money. They don't make or sell the hardware, so they don't get anything (or much) if you buy a new PVR.

      Your solution is all well and good if my goal is to subsidize TiVo's selling at no profit or a loss in order to dominate the marketplace.

      But if that's my only option, I'd rather not upgrade. It reeks too much of "'free' Microsoft browser," and we all know where that's gotten us.

      I wish it was still illegal to give away the razor and charge double for the blades.

    3. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative
      Like many, I paid for a lifetime subscription to TiVo's services


      No you didn't. You paid for a lifetime subscription for that box, not for yourself. That's an important distinction. If you give away or sell that box, that box is still subscribed. You've effectively added value to your unit. TiVo has always been upfront about selling subscriptions for boxes, not people/households.


      If I upgrade to a new TiVo, am I screwed out of my lifetime subscription?


      Of course not, that value never goes away, although it depreciates over time, as the box gets older and its value decreases. If you ever decide you no longer want your box you can sell it with the added value of a lifetime sub.

    4. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by stripes · · Score: 2
      But if that's my only option, I'd rather not upgrade. It reeks too much of "'free' Microsoft browser," and we all know where that's gotten us.

      Well the other option was to not buy the lifetime subscription in anticipation of a better future unit coming out in less then 2 years (life time fee of $200 vs. yearly of $100; or monthly fee for 20 months...7/8ths of a year at least).

      I wish it was still illegal to give away the razor and charge double for the blades

      Well in this case you bought the razor and a discount on a lifetime supply of blades, and are now upset that the new razor takes a different kind of blade, and your old razor still works. I don't see how making everyone buy the razor and lifetime supply of blades would help.

      P.S. I may sound smug here because I didn't get a lifetime sub, but I think I missed the perfect timing by a tad since my yearly plan would have been renewed last month. To do it right I would have switched to monthly in december and saved money. As it is, I get to pay the old lifetime cost, and not have service on the "backup" TiVo past the end of the year. I would have been ahead paying the $200 for the lifetime. Of corse I'm happy enough with the product that they could double my service fee and I would keep the thing. Don't you dare tell TiVo that though.

    5. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by axlrosen · · Score: 1

      Well the other option was to not buy the lifetime subscription in anticipation of a better future unit coming out in less then 2 years (life time fee of $200 vs. yearly of $100; or monthly fee for 20 months...7/8ths of a year at least).

      TiVo recently increased the lifetime service to $250 (at the same time as dropping the cost of the 30-hour box by $100), and dropped the yearly option. Now it's either $10/month or $250/lifetime.

    6. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by Nerds · · Score: 2

      But if that's my only option, I'd rather not upgrade. It reeks too much of "'free' Microsoft browser," and we all know where that's gotten us.

      What the hell are you talking about? Are you trying to be an asshole? They aren't giving away the razor, they don't even own the razors, Sony and Phillips do. TiVo the company is not making money just because you bought another piece of hardware, they're making money because you sign up for the service. If everyone could transfer their subscription when a new version came out, it would be difficult to maintain the business.

      Look, I understand that it's a lifetime subscription and you feel that it should apply to every PVR you buy throughout your life. I even understand that you might not care if TiVo is able to maintain their business. However, TiVo provides a great service, and to me it's worth it to buy a new subscription every few years when a new version comes out. It's worth it to support a company that puts out an excellent product (even if their service is misnamed). Microsoft does not make an excellent browser and it isn't even worth it to me to download the new one for free. As far as I'm concerned, it's worth $125 a year (if you buy a new lifetime subscription every two years).

      OK, so that was a bit rambly, but I'm tired.

      --
      My other .sig is 'The Art of Computer Programming'
    7. Re:Are lifetime subscriptions transferable? by Snowfox · · Score: 2
      But if that's my only option, I'd rather not upgrade. It reeks too much of "'free' Microsoft browser," and we all know where that's gotten us.
      What the hell are you talking about? Are you trying to be an asshole? They aren't giving away the razor, they don't even own the razors, Sony and Phillips do. TiVo the company is not making money just because you bought another piece of hardware, they're making money because you sign up for the service. If everyone could transfer their subscription when a new version came out, it would be difficult to maintain the busines
      TiVo may not make the hardware, but the own the technology, and every TiVo that ships ships with TiVo-owned software.

      If TiVo isn't making a profit when a new TiVo is sold, then TiVo is effectively giving away the product, then attempting to recoup by charging for the ability to use it. TiVo sets the price for the TiVo software and branding.

      The parallel to giving away the razor then charging for the blades is quite clear.

  42. They could've done much worse than Real by mgw1181 · · Score: 1

    At least Real releases Linux players. Can you say that for Quicktime or Windows Media?

  43. Hmm, more questions than answers for me by forgoil · · Score: 2

    What kind of bitrates does it support, what does it really save, what kind of quality, and why should I ever want to see anytyhing compressed with anything from real.*?\? And why can't I connect it to my computer and won't all nice satelite recievers have this from the beginning anyways?

    The idea is really great, but we all knew that since before;)

    1. Re:Hmm, more questions than answers for me by stripes · · Score: 3, Informative
      What kind of bitrates does it support, what does it really save, what kind of quality, and why should I ever want to see anytyhing compressed with anything from real.*?\?

      About the same as the older standalone TiVo (which I think is around 6Mbit/sec for "best" quality, and much lower like 1.5Mbit for "standard"). It is variable bit rate MPEG2 (with an option for CBR). "Best" and "High" both look fine for anything that doesn't have a lot of strobes or super quick cuts one after another. "Standard" works fine for cartoons most of the time. I don't think I ever use medimum.

      And why can't I connect it to my computer and won't all nice satelite recievers have this from the beginning anyways?

      Ask the MPAA...or head off to the TiVo underground and slap on an Ethernet, just don't let the MPAA know :-)

  44. How about CANADIAN SERVICE? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    I'd LOVE LOVE LOVE to have a Tivo, WITH SERVICE. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE! Bell just introduced PVR capability in their satellite receivers, so get ahold of Rogers and put out a digital cable terminal with a tivo built in! PLEASE!

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:How about CANADIAN SERVICE? by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could buy a DirecTiVo, no? There's TiVo dialups available for Canadian numbers (since the use UUNet POPs), although there's no guide data for Canadian broadcasting. With a DirecTiVo that's not a problem since the guide data for the DirecTV feed comes off the sat feed. And it's perfectly legal to hack DirecTV in Canada, didn't a fairy high court there rule that not long ago? Not a perfect solution, since you wouldn't get local channels, but that's a chronic DirecTV problem anyway.

  45. Hey TiVo, how about this feature? by casiel · · Score: 0

    Support for Canada!? You spend a little money getting the power supply and emissions approved and you get 30 million more customers.

    I can't believe it was cheaper to go to the UK, even if they have twice as many people. The differences between the US and UK (regulatory, electronic, marketing, telephone) are incredible compared to the differences between the US and Canada.

    If the problem is setting up local phone numbers, that's easy: LET THE TIVO CONNECT TO THE NET! Oh, wait, has that been suggested before?

  46. USB Speed & Network Features by KerosX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I noticed that a few people were talking about how USB is so slow. What if they were including a USB 2.0 controller? Theoretical speeds for 2.0 are above that of IEE1394.

    On the other hand, for the features that I'd love to see you may not need anything faster then 12Mbs. Personaly I would love to be able to use my cable modem connection to be able to update my show listings and maybe (I wish) be able to do some remote control from the Internet.

  47. Developer support now too? by Quikah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks like they are starting up some sort of developer program as well. You can sign up for it at the bottom of this page. Anybody know anything more about this program?

    I am not a deveoper my self I am just curious what it is about.

    --
    Q.
  48. Trying to catch up with Microsoft by uslennar · · Score: 1

    Sounds funny, but in this case it is very true. Ultimate TV has dual tuners, USB, a printer port, and WebTV. With this and XBox, I think Microsoft has stepped up with some solid consumer offerings (and on their first version).

    I read an interesting comment here some time ago. A person said he would never use UltimateTV because it didn't run Linux and therefore it couldn't be good. I think some peoples' irrational hatred of a company blinds them to some of the good products. Remember, Microsoft is composed of many semi-autonomous groups, some are better then others.

    It's also interesting that this is a story on Slashdot. "Company introduces mundane technology on the heels of other competitors."

    1. Re:Trying to catch up with Microsoft by nrc · · Score: 1
      Nonsense. UTV's USB and printer ports are virtually useless and there's no sign they'll add functionality for those any time soon. More importantly, UTV has yet to offer many of the PVR features that TiVo has had for years. If you want WebTV by all means go with UTV, but if you want the most capable PVR it's still TiVo by a mile.

      Meanwhile, a bug in UTV has caused many subscribers to lose access to multiple DirecTV channels and some UTV features. Those users have been without access to those channels for two weeks now. Microsoft thinks they have a fix, but it will take a couple of weeks to get it rolled out to all UTV users. Read about it in this AVS Forum thread.

      Yep, Microsoft has certainly thrown all their capability behind their digital home push. Buggy PVRs and broken Xboxes. No wonder Bill is started to make noises about using XP as the center of their digital home. Their efforts at convergence boxes continue to come up short and without an OS monopoly to force people to suffer through their miscues, it's just not working.

    2. Re:Trying to catch up with Microsoft by uslennar · · Score: 1

      My memory is fading. I forgot about all the "useful" devices I can connect to Tivo via the USB port. I also overlooked that fact that Tivo has no bugs. Must be because I love Microsoft so much...

  49. Re:2 USB expansion ports? Hmmm.... by droleary · · Score: 1

    Etc. could be a USB CD burner, perhaps? That popping sound was the MPAA's aneurism.

    No, it was the sound of my own as I die waiting for a USB burner to write even a 30 minute show.

  50. Re: Ehh... I was with you for a minute there.... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    But then you pointed out that among other things, you're another one of those Maxim readers. :)

    Seriously though, I'm all for value-added services - but only when the value part is really valuable. I guess it depends largely on how valuable your TV watching is to you?

    Myself, I find TV serves only as a temporary break in my schedule. Sometimes, I just want to be passively entertained for a little while, as I sit on my couch after work. Most often, I'd rather actively participate in something else (like maybe even Slashdot).

    Even if TiVo does an outstanding job of locating TV content that's of interest to me - I'm not sure I care. I'd still prefer to actively seek out content that interests me using a resource like the web, as opposed to being spoon-fed the content on TV programs. TV caters to the lowest-common denominator most of the time.

    (EG. Say I'm interested in cellphones, and want to buy a new one soon. My TiVo finds me several news stories on new cellphones, and a big program about the production of them. Fine, but it's still mostly marketing hype and watered-down facts that I have to now sit through 2+ hours of. In 10 minutes, I can go to the manufacturer web sites instead, and get complete technical specs on whatever new models they have out. Give me another hour, and I can read actual reviews from users of most of the choices to see which phones are best, and why.)

  51. Re: Real not a "champion of Linux"?? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Au contraire!

    I'd say Real Networks is one of the minority of companies that gives a nod to Linux on a regular basis. They had a streaming server that ran under Linux, and their player works in Linux.

    As someone else said, compare this to any of their competitors (MS and Apple) and see what kind of Linux support you get for their media formats.

  52. Nielvoson rating system by Esoteric+Moniker · · Score: 1

    Tivo could set up something like an opt-in Nielson rating system where users can volunteer for Tivo to report what they watch, when they watch it, how many times, etc. This could be a moneymaker for Tivo as well as giving Tivo customers some input into their favorite shows.

    --

    man RTFM
    No manual entry for RTFM.
    1. Re:Nielvoson rating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but for statistical purposes Opt-In does not equal random sampling. You can't exprapolate from the pool of opt-in's to the rest of tht TV viewing public. Real Nielson houses are randomly selected and carefully screened.

  53. Don't care about music OR broadband or whatever... by gnovos · · Score: 2

    ...I care about disk-size and tuners. Wheny they make a 7 tuner model with hot-swappable 80 gig drives I will be ever so happy.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  54. related links and info by bdavenport · · Score: 3, Informative

    this link on CNN has a little more info on what will be "new" for Series2.

    look for online games from the Jellyvision, maker of You Don't Know Jack and Smush.

    also look for some sort of video on demand by Radiance Technologies Inc.

    this is in addition to the Real Networks partnering and the USB support.

    not quite the networking capability that i was hoping for but something nonetheless that might be interesting.

    --
    /* Half alive and half dead too, work is for suckers and the sucker is you. - "Half-life" by Local H*/
  55. READ THE LINKED ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the linked article please before commenting !

    the same people that complain about RealPlayer,doubleclick and spyware are the same people that own a TIVO, where do you draw the line ?

    1. Re:READ THE LINKED ARTICLE by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      the same people that complain about RealPlayer,doubleclick and spyware are the same people that own a TIVO, where do you draw the line ?

      Well, do you TRUST the company in question? Does the company tell you - up front - what information it will gather, why it's gathering it, and what it will do with it? Does the company offer you a way to not participate in this gathering? And finally, does the company keep its word? If you opt-out, do they respect that?

      Real LIED. They don't tell you what information they're gathering - in fact, they don't tell you anything. You can't decline to have your information gathered. They don't tell you what they're doing with your information. They don't respect your wishes to privacy. Even if you click all their "Do not mail me - ever" options, guess what shows up in your mailbox down the road? If I can't even trust a company to understand a "Do not mail" request, what makes you think I can trust them with anything else?

      Yes, Tivo does gather information. They also have a very complete privacy policy - and unlike Real (and many other scummy companies) THEY FOLLOW IT. Companies that earn my trust, earn my business. Those that don't, lose me as a customer.

  56. Completely false by snopes · · Score: 2

    I'm as cynical as the next guy, but this is simply wrong. I have a brand new Sony SVR-2000 with the 2.5 code and it's fully hackable. Backdoors are on and I've enabled numerous hacks. For further info see Almost Complete Codes List. Now, what happens in the future is anybody's guess. However, based on the fact that the 30 sec. jump hack was removed in 2.0, then added back in 2.5, I'd say Tivo is still more sensitive to customer demand than anything else.

  57. Re:2 USB expansion ports? Hmmm.... by fobbman · · Score: 2

    Understandably we have been spoiled with the 24x internal CD burners, but when you are backing up a 30 minute show on highest-quality settings (~450 megs) it would take a 4x external burner probabably 30 minutes top to burn that 30 minute show.

    What's your hurry? I was in heaven when I got my 2x2x6 CDRW a couple years ago. Thirty minutes to record a 30 minute show is plenty acceptable.

    Kids these days...

  58. Does it still run *linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder Tivo is dying. It's running a
    dying operating system. If they would switch
    to BSD, then they'd be like Apple in reviving
    themselves. What a big mistake it was for Tivo
    to run a GPL-infected wannabe of a Unix operating system.

    1. Re:Does it still run *linux? by arielb · · Score: 1

      it doesn't take a Kreskin to...oh nevermind

      --
      ---
  59. Still no HDTV? by pyite69 · · Score: 1


    The most important feature that Tivo needs to add is HDTV
    support. I realize that it will take a ton of disk space, but it
    is worth it. Is there any estimation on when this might
    happen?

    I will not purchase any HDTV equipment until Tivo supports
    it.

  60. MP3 Jukebox with On Screen Programming by bay43270 · · Score: 2

    I've been waiting to get a MP3 player for quite a while now because I want something that can hold a large collection, but not require me to navigate an 8 character display. It sounds like this new Tivo will one day have this feature.

    I know it doesn't seem like much, but that kind of integration and ease of use is what made Tivo so popular in the first place. I could really see these things beating out game consoles as the first major entertainment "center piece".

  61. OT: Tivo in Canada by cdgod · · Score: 1

    Has anyone successfully had TIVO working in Canada with the proper listing for their Canadian cable service?

    They are missing a large market of early adopter here.

    ---

    --
    This .Sig is left intentionally humourless.
  62. False by snopes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Enabling Backdoor Mode

    The Backdoor mode can be entered using the remote by doing a "Browse By Name" for "0v1t" (TiVo spelled backwards with zero and one instead of "O" and "I") followed by the "Thumbs-Up" key. The only known way of exiting Backdoor mode is to reboot the TiVo (see "C-E-C Fast-Forward" below).

    The backdoor code for 2.0 systems is done the same way, except the code is "2 0 TCD". There is one space between the "2" and the "0", and another space between the 0 and the TCD".

    The backdoor code for 2.5 systems is done the same way, except the code is "B D 2 5". There is one space between each character.

    The backdoor code for V1.5.2 UK (latest) is: 10J0M (thats zeros and ones).

    Almost Complete Codes List

    1. Re:False by ThePixel · · Score: 1

      AWESOME! I apparently had missed that discovery. thanks!

      --
      People see the world as they are, not as it is.
  63. Consumer Electronics != Software by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really doubt it. It would be nice, but when was the last time you heard of a DVD player or television coming with an upgrade discount.

    As long as they keep providing service for the S1 TiVos, I don't see any reason to expect a discount on the new ones.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:Consumer Electronics != Software by shokk · · Score: 1

      I suspect they plan on springing a surprise on everyone. The S2 launch is a great time to change the service to being also based on capacity. If that is applied across the board, that would make prices for the S1 units go into freefall. If it's only on S2 units, the S1's become much more desirable. And if things like the tivonet cards will still work and larger drives can be added for the next couple of years without being disabled by new services, then the S1 units will also remain high (and possibly rise) while the S2, most likely hack free, will be less desirable to us and won't have such a great auction market value.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  64. Yeah yeah yeah... by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and they're still going to charge ten clams a month for guide data that's freely available on the web? I'm willing to bet, the answer is yes.

    Yeah yeah yeah. Call us when you've implemented a system that not only downloads that data into a regularized format for PVRs to read, but is smart enough to follow schedule changes on its own.

    In the meantime, please look up the definition of "value-add" in your nearest Business 101 textbook.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  65. Question about DirecTiVo by uradu · · Score: 2

    If you have both a stand alone and a DirecTiVo, do you pay two TiVo fees, or just one? I have a SA right now, but am considering getting one of those cheap Hughes DirecTiVos. I searched deja for an hour once, but couldn't find clear answers on this. I realize I have to pay DirecTV the second-tuner tax, but what about TiVo?

    -

  66. Um... Stuff? Wow. by shr3k · · Score: 1

    It also claims to support music and stuff too.

    Wow! I've always had problems getting stuff supported. I don't understand why more users haven't complained about their stuff not working under Linux and such. The fact that stuff is finally being considered by some of these big-shot manufacturers allows me to sleep better at night. I don't have to worry about moving wholesale to Microsoft-sponsored things.

  67. TiVo Hooker by telstar · · Score: 1

    "As with all TiVo standalone units, the TiVo DVR Series2 is compatible with and connects easily to virtually every television model available. It also works with VCRs, TV antennas, cable systems, and satellite systems."

    Yeah, but can I hook it up to my other TiVo?

  68. [off subject] scheduling information by catalyst-killed-the- · · Score: 1

    this is way off. but engineering-wise I never understood why Tivo needs to get the programming information using a modem. any DVB compliant stream is closed system in the sense that it contains the schedule information within the stream. I don't have a Tivo box and I'm wondering isn't this method more vulnerable to scheduling mistakes?

    --just a thought

    --
    who says micros~1 standards are bad?
  69. what an ambitious fellow you are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Gads man. Hack the data stream? You sure are out to slay a beast on this anti-corporate tantrum.

    All condencension aside, I recommend you hack the file system. It'll be more fruitful than the data stream. Likely the communication to the main server is tokenized and you're not going to be able to easily concoct a mechanism that will fool the client (your tivo box) into thinking it's connecting to the server while in fact it's receiving data your tool culled from web sites.

    Essentially you'll need to locate the data files on your Tivo box that store all the program listing info. Who knows what format it's in, but if you're ambitious enough to try to decode it in the 'data stream', you won't mind reverse engineering a likely proprietary database data file. Then you'll need to build your tool to get the program listings from free websites and write it in this DB file format that Tivo reads. You'll also need to find the spot where tivo tracks how much program data it has before its listings are out of date and you'll need to incr that. It could well be a deduction tivo makes reading the database file.

    I wouldn't be so quick to label "The other TiVO hackers" as being "afraid of hacking this feature". It could be that they respect a company who has brought an innovative product to market, based it on linux technology, and been very mature about user modifications (keeping their hardware free of physical anti-mod devices). Perhaps these other TiVO hackers perceive the TiVO company as hackers themselves and don't want to tread on their revenue stream.

    I support your right to customize the software that's running on the hardware you bought. I also agree that the 'lifetime' of a TiVO needs to be better clarified. After all, the boxes do have a hard drive and that's the only thing that's ever failed on ANY of my Macintoshes. I don't expect this device to last as long as my VCR or other applicances because of that, so I'd like to know what's to become of my 'lifetime' subscription. It's quite possible that the hard drive could fail one year and one day after the purchase of the device, and that lifetime subscription will have been the equivalent to a one-year-subscription.

  70. Already out?! by BlueOtto · · Score: 1

    This does not look much different than the '2nd-generation' Tivo that just came out - better known as the AT&T Tivo . This new Tivo also has USB ports, a smaller design. Although, it does only have 40 hours. I believe it's probably the same thing, though.

  71. TV over ethernet? by _01001001 · · Score: 1

    Now I'm just waiting to get my TV service, over my internet connection ;)

    --Frank

    --
    "Neither life nor happiness can be acheived by the pursuit of irration whims." --Ayn Rand
  72. Re: Ehh... I was with you for a minute there.... by EvlG · · Score: 2

    I never watched TV before I got TiVo - when I had time, there was never anything interesting to me on, and I sure as hell am not going to make time for TV watching.

    Once I got TiVo, I could watch what I want when I want - it gave me more control of that aspect of my liesure time. In addition to skipping commercials, it has made TV enjoyable for me.

  73. how slow/fast are usb ethernet adapters? by Benjiman+McFree · · Score: 1

    is it usb2.0 or 1.0? Bandwidth is an important and I suspect there are two reasons the IPDroids have allowed usb ethernet connections. The fist being competition to the major networks through rapidly improving digital imaging, commodity hardware prices and free software for video editing along with improving p2p systems, the second being opendivx and ogg vorbis, LOL..

    Don't you know they only cry monkey when doing the right thing doesn't put them in the right place in the market.. and this market is looking, well.. dry.

  74. And the odds of it appearing in the UK soon by mps1 · · Score: 1

    are about the same as the odds of me putting my hand in my pocket and buying a copy of WinXP.

    If / when it finally does arrive, no doubt it will cost the same in pounds as you lot pay in dollars too. That sucks.

    Tivo - do you hear me?

    M