Slashdot Mirror


Ever Wanted Your Own Land Speeder?

An anonymous reader writes "Be the first on your block to drive on of these! a StarWars Land Speeder. This used to be a 1988 Ford Escort and only has 880 miles since built." This is a surprisingly impressive conversion.

221 comments

  1. Better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's better than the ones from the films .... you can't see the wheels.

    1. Re:Better. by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Informative

      You saw wheels in the movie? You were smokin' the good stuff. The orginal speeder was mounted on a long horizontal boom wich was hidden by the camera view and is why it bounced a lot. No wheels.

    2. Re:Better. by Nighttime · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can recall watching a documentary about the newer versions of the original trilogy and the special effects they cleaned up. In the original footage they smeared Vaseline on the lens to blur the undercarriage of the Landspeeder to hide the wheels. They made the hover look more convincing when they did the clean-up a few years ago.

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    3. Re:Better. by WotanKhan · · Score: 1

      Both correct. The speeder on the boom was used for the scenes where Luke pulled up and exited the vehicle (thats why hes always moving in a arc in these shots). For the open desert shots a mirrored skirt was used to hide the wheels, and a gelatin solution applied to the lens to blur it.

  2. jedi mind trick by gmkeegan · · Score: 4, Funny

    This isn't the Escort you're looking for...

    Scoundrel? I can live with that...

    1. Re:jedi mind trick by bubblegoose · · Score: 2

      Is there an obvious moderation on /. ; )

      --
      I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    2. Re:jedi mind trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      stormtrooper magnet

    3. Re:jedi mind trick by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Redundant
      Ya know, that is probably one of the worst moderations I've seen in a long time.

      Look at this pic I just took

      The second parent post in the list (that matters) gets a redundant score. I HOPE someone gets to meta-moderate this one...

      I get mod points about every week-and-a-half to 2 weeks. I have been for 4 or 5 months now. I rarely even use them all (to be honest) becasue I use them the way they were intended: SPARINGLY. But this... this is just silly.

      Moderators, 3 things:

      I know I'll get modded to oblivion, that's fine (I've been capped for a few months now...).

      You folks really need to learn where your mose is clicking when (IF "redundant" wasn't meant.

      If reduntant WAS meant, I hope you get meta-moderated off the .

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    4. Re:jedi mind trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I moderated the above post as funny. However, those who modded it down as redundant are not wrong for doing so. It is a joke that is made in some variation or another every single time Star Wars is mentioned. For some, it is played out and no longer humorous. For others, like me, it is still very humorous.

    5. Re:jedi mind trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny

    6. Re:jedi mind trick by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      So in other words... This is not the moderation I was looking for...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:jedi mind trick by sirinek · · Score: 2

      Redundant moderations arent eligible for meta-moderation.

      Besides, moderation is a dumb idea for a site like this anyway. ACs should stay at 0 (I read at +1), trouble users should stay at 1, and there should only be a few people who can mod down the people who continuously post random offtopic crap.

      And finally, "Funny" should not give you a +1 bonus. We all appreciate humor, but come on, moderation as it exists currently should be to promote intelligent posts, and demote random crap goatse posts.

      siri

    8. Re:jedi mind trick by sirinek · · Score: 2

      I meant trouble users should stay at -1. Maybe I'll use the preview button next time. ;)

      siri

  3. Impresive by yasth · · Score: 2

    Impresive?

    As compared to what?

    But anyways that is impresive wish they said more about how it was built though (ie. in progress stuff like the mechwarrior tree fort)

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    1. Re:Impresive by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am not a SW fan. In fact, I hate all the movies w/a passion.

      This is just pimp though. Not likely that you would get SWARMED by anyone you would want to get swarmed by (I can't see you picking up hotties in your Ford Escort/Star Wars cruiser) but I could see that people would be interested.

      What fascinates me is the price. 880 miles and a real car and the guy is selling it for less than $5000 + 50% of the transport costs? Makes you wonder a bit.

    2. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      880 miles AFTER it became a starwars cruiser. 100k BEFORE it did.

    3. Re:Impresive by enigma48 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The donor car it was built on actually has 108k on it - the "Speeder" after built though, only has gone 880 miles.

    4. Re:Impresive by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2

      Um, that's 880 miles as a land speeder, and 102 000 miles as an Escort. Read the ad.

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    5. Re:Impresive by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny
      What fascinates me is the price. 880 miles and a real car and the guy is selling it for less than $5000 + 50% of the transport costs? Makes you wonder a bit.
      He says it's the best he can do. Since the XP-38 came out, they're just not in demand.
    6. Re:Impresive by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah drive that around and look like the biggest douchebag on the planet.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    7. Re:Impresive by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yep, only slashdot readers would be so cynical as to not find this cool.

      Cynical chic I guess; snipe at everything lest you be considered naive...

    8. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the ad, I just didn't read it closely enough apparently. Thanks for being an asshole.

    9. Re:Impresive by falzer · · Score: 1

      > Cynical chic I guess; snipe at everything lest you be considered naive...

      Damn straight. Same as "I already did this, 20 years ago. Obviously my penis and beard are longer than any of yours'."

    10. Re:Impresive by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      Impresive ... most impressive....

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    11. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Damn straight. Same as "I already did this, 20 years ago. Obviously my penis and beard are longer than any of yours'."

      Well, I did do that 20 years ago. But if you have more than one penis (or beard, for that matter), not matter how short ... then I concede to you.

      (No! you don't have to prove it!)

    12. Re:Impresive by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

      Note it has 880 miles since he built the add-on. It actually has 100k miles on it already.

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    13. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, only slashdot readers would be so cynical as to not find this cool.

      Err...I think you have that backwards. I think only slasdot readers are geeky enough to find this cool.

    14. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment might make sense if the sentence you were quoting said "penises and beards".

    15. Re:Impresive by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      Actually... it's on eBay, which of course means everyone will wait until the last few minutes to bid and increase it to what a Land Speeder/Ford is worth these days, whatever that is. And right now, it has 8 days left, so rest assured! It's not going to go for just $5000.

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    16. Re:Impresive by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      "Obviously my penis and beard are longer than any of yours'."

      Using a plural possessive pronoune like that can imply that he's talking to one person with many penises, or many people with one penis each. Obviously, he meant the latter, but it's not exactly clear.

      Meh, I thought it was funny.

    17. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly as "impresive" as your spelling.

      You have failed me for the last time WhiteKnight07.

    18. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't clear? Well, I don't know about you, but I don't regularly speak to one person, with many penises. (penisi?) I was pretty sure just by the fact that I know most males only have ONE penis, that he was speaking to many people who each had only one penis.

    19. Re:Impresive by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      *second* biggest douchebag. You're forgetting the slashdot pt cruiser!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    20. Re:Impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're being extrordinarily pendantic and literal, even reality can't stop us.

    21. Re:Impresive by sconeu · · Score: 2

      It was up to $8000US as of now (7998, actually).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  4. Um... by essiescreet · · Score: 1

    So, the escorts sucked, and if you put a fancy decoration on it, it's still a piece of shit...

    Or, as they say around here, if a cat had kittens in the oven, you wouldn't call em biscuts.

    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or as Bevis once said...

      You can't polish a turd

    2. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Someone needs to tell Linus.

      -- The_Messenger

    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, the escorts sucked, and if you put a fancy decoration on it, it's still a piece of shit...

      Where the fukin poop is around here? If you say "America", I'm going to kill myself and everyone else on this poopy airplane!

    4. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fukin poop! I meant to quote your down-home expression, not ur escort evaluation! poop!

  5. the chicks would dig it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yeah, could you just imagine

  6. Cool. Bad timing, though. by Animats · · Score: 3
    That should have gone on sale before Burning Man. Great art car for the playa.

    The interior is pure Ford Escort, though. The guy could have put some better seats in the thing, and reworked the dashboard.

    1. Re:Cool. Bad timing, though. by Sivar · · Score: 2

      If he can make a Ford Escort look nearly identical to Luke's land speeder, surely the buyer can tweak the interior a bit?

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  7. What I really want by starX · · Score: 1

    One of those there X-wing fighters... I wonder if the US Navy would be kind enough to donate an F-16 so I could do a simmilar conversion. Maybe not... but I bet I could pick up a surplus Mig for a bargain.

    1. Re:What I really want by slcdb · · Score: 2, Funny

      F-16? U.S. Navy? Good luck, since the Navy doesn't fly F-16s.

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    2. Re:What I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I hope he read that comment before he ACTUALLY tried getting the Navy to donate one then :)

    3. Re:What I really want by davilan · · Score: 1

      Actually the US Navy does / or did fly F-16N - Top Gun school in Miramar had them painted to look Soviet.

      These are the highest performance F-16 model due to the lack of the heavy gun.

      The Marine corps had one too.

      They couldn't fly from a carrier though so they weren't a big hit with the Navy.

    4. Re:What I really want by Raiford · · Score: 1
      adding to this, the Navy used F-5 Tiger IIs prior to the F-16Ns. The Tiger IIs were the aircraft that they were calling the Mig 28 (non-existent) in the movie TOP GUN ...

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    5. Re:What I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >they couldn't fly from a carrier though so they weren't a big hit with the Navy.

  8. Boooring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next

  9. Jiffy Lube by the_one_smiley · · Score: 1

    Before bidding, know that the Ford Escort already had 102K miles on it before it was "upgraded."

    - Smiley =)

    --
    "Never put off for tomorrow what can be avoided altogether"
  10. Is it actually legal to drive this? by jukal · · Score: 2
    Can you get this kind of thing "registered" in the US or whatever you need to do to a vehicle before it gets the permission to hit public roads? I believe that atleast here in Finland it would be almost impossible to get it registered and to go anywhere else than your own backyard with this. Naturally, you can register custom creations, but I don't believe this one would pass the regulations in here.

    How does this work in the US? Or is this just a backyard car?

    1. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, you can register almost everything if it's just a one-off. All you have to do is comply with certain basic regulations regarding ability to speed up and slow down reliably, fit certain size criteria, and have the proper lights and signals. If you want to start producing something, then you need to go through incredibly costly inspections and crash-testing and stuff, unless you are selling "kits" (there is some rule about what constitutes a kit-car/plane, but I don't remember it), which are relatively easy to register.

      jeb.

    2. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      It did mention that it was street legal. So, if the tabs are all paid up, it's all ready to drive.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    3. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Informative

      It says that it is street legal, and I don't doubt it. It looks like it has the proper lights on front and back, as well as mirrors and a windshield. That's pretty much all that is required for a vehicle to be street legal int he US -- if he were manufacturing these as an auto dealer he'd probably have to do more safety/impact tests of the body, but as-is, it's legally a Ford Escort.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by mgw1181 · · Score: 1

      I think, as other posters have said, that custom built cars only have to meet basic safety requirements (lights, size restrictions, ability to drive and maneuver adequately) in the US.

      Such requirements are probably largely state law in the US, and as I live in Texas, here is Texas' vehicle equipment requirements as an example. Some states, probably California, might be stricter, at least in the emissions requirements.

    5. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, the insurance company would probably freeze you in carbonite, metaphorically speaking...

    6. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Mearlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look at the Oscar Meyer Weiner Mobile. That thing is as odd as having a land speeder as a car. I don't doubt the US just says "lights, breaks, bumper, mirrors? Ok, give us money it's legal."

    7. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by SunPin · · Score: 1

      finnish regulations are why Finland is such a creative place--a center of art & culture... Finland can't make original cars but they did invent the brain cancer machine, a.k.a the CELL PHONE. That's the true measure of Finnish concern for safety... Nokia? JA!

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    8. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Of course, the insurance company would probably freeze you in carbonite, metaphorically speaking...

      Nah, they'd probably just cut your hand off.

    9. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.

      I've always wanted to comment on your .sig and I can't imagine I'm the first to do so, so unless you want wise-ass nerds as myself bothering you with useless drivel for ever and ever, you'd better change it this time.

      Here is why: Your sig is not recursive. It's a loop; recursion ends. I suggest you change your sig to:

      Recursive: Adj. See ecursive.
      ecursive: Adj. See cursive.
      cursive: Adj. See ursive.
      ursive: Adj. See rsive.
      rsive: Adj. See sive.
      sive: Adj. See ive.
      ive: Adj. See ve.
      ve: Adj. See e.
      e: done.

    10. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Raiford · · Score: 1
      Yes, the vehicle emissions requirement here in California would be be considerably stricter. However the requirement of having a valid driver's license appears to be somewhat optional ...

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    11. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Binome · · Score: 1

      lights, breaks, bumper, mirrors?

      Breaks, eh? Just a mistake, I'm sure... but that form of the word is probably more accurate with a Ford. Especially one with >100k miles.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Beowulf cluster imagines you!
    12. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

      "It's a loop; recursion ends"

      I hope you program something into your loops so that they also end. Perpetual loops of any type are a Bad Idea(TM) in any progrm.

      Recursion is formally defined as:
      http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=recursion&db= *
      When a function (or procedure) calls itself. Such a function is called "recursive". If the call is via one or more other functions then this group of functions are called "mutually recursive".

      Having an end is not a requirement for recursion. It might be a Bad Idea(TM) to not have an end, but it is not required. Recursion is a "recursive loop," or in other words a form of loop. The requirement is that the function or procedure calls itself.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    13. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Roll bar. This is classifyed as a convertable, and while it is not illegal to own a convertable without a roll bar, nor for a private citizen to sell one, if a dealership tried to sell it, they would be in deep trouble, and most likely face large fines for selling an "unsafe car". Which this car looks nothing like. the center of gravity is so low on something like that car, I don't think you could flip it very easily.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    14. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by jukal · · Score: 2
      > finnish regulations are why Finland is such a creative place

      Want to hear something even better, have a look at the notes sticked into any child toy, tobacco box, bike, car, condom, umbrella, mobile phone - anything sold in the US, and then think again - what is limiting the creativity in US ? :)

    15. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Fix Or Repair Daily!

    16. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found On Road Dead

      Especially an Escort...oy, what a donor car..

    17. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The requirement is that the function or
      > procedure calls itself

      (same stupid AC)

      You're right of course. I stand corrected.

  11. That is fricken cool! by azcoffeehabit · · Score: 0

    This is very well done! I would love to bee seen sitting in LA rush hour traffic in this thing! It is too bad the LA D.O.T probably wouldn't put it past inspection... But what a cool mod!

    --
    :)(smile)
  12. This is street legal ?!?!?! by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, in Europe (Italy to be more precise), where I'm originally from, there are *extremely* strict rules that define what is street legal and what is not (for example, most kit cars are not legal despite the fact that they've been tested, because you're building it yourself, so you can't, say, use the crash tests from a different one, because the manufacturer is different).

    Something like this would probably be laughed at before even starting the application process ;)

    Just curious, what are exactly the regulations that define street-worthiness in the USA? I'm thinking about things like

    - safety (if I want to install an impaling device on the front of the car, am I allowed to? or what about the always fun side-mounted scythe blades?)

    - safety (if I want to install a 10 foot tall flagpole that will make my car 99% flip over in a turn when there's wind, can I do it?)

    - safety (if I take my average car, install a couple thousand pounds worth of 'mods' and its braking distance shoots up fourfold, is it a problem?)

    - safety (what about being able to evade an accident? if my 'mods' make my car drive like a barge in a river, is that ok?)

    - safety (what about if sharp pieces of my 'mod' become unglued when going over a bump at speed, take off, and shatter the windshield of whomever is following me?)

    - safety (what about seatbelts? what if it rolls over?)

    I don't want to spoil the fun, but really, if a car doesn't pass *all* of the above (and more) IMHO it shouldn't be classified as 'road worthy' regardless of how cool it looks...

    just my 2c

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, none of your concerns disqualify a car from street-legality. I believe the rationale is "we haven't had a problem with this yet" and "if the person has it together enough to build the stupid thing, they probably will have it together enough to not make it undriveable". Personal responsibility and all that.

      However, some of the rules they *do* have there are weird: you can't have a Knight Rider-style red-sweepy light thing on the hood cause of it's similarity to a cop's lights. What's similar?

    2. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      it used to be a frigging Ford Escort. How much more could he fuck it up?
      • Horrible braking distance? Check.
      • Drives like a barge in a river? Check.
      • Pieces falling off? Check.
      • Rollover? Check.
    3. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just curious, what are exactly the regulations that define street-worthiness in the USA?"

      Regulation? In the USA? BWA HA HA! Regulation is for communists! the mantra now is 'deregulate!'

    4. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Salsaman · · Score: 4, Funny
      No need to worry about that...

      "Excuse me sir, is this your vehicle ?"

      "This is not the car you are looking for"

      "This is not the car we are looking for. Move along."

    5. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      In the U.S., the government is more concerned about things like legal bumpers, lighting, seatbelts, smog control, etc. than they are about some of the personal safety issues you brought up.

      However, that does not mean that it would be easy to legally drive this thing on the street. I simply can not wait to see the look on the insurance salesman's face. "You, uhhh, want me to insure THAT?"

      I believe almost any sort of machine mounted weaponry is not legal. Some people have gun racks, but that is a totally different topic.

    6. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by innerlimit · · Score: 0

      hows about taking it to a garage, for an overhaul

      "Fix my hyperdrive while you're at it!" (i.e. fourth gear)

    7. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not as simple as that, even. This is a 'kit car' (regardless of what he says, regardless of it being a one off, this is a kit car). The rules and regulations vary by state. And the odds of finding the rules in your state are... varied.

      Some states require only the VIN (Vehicle Identification Number), working lights and turn signals, etc. Other states require emissions testing and other things. But if you can fill out the right papers, there's not much you can't drive. I believe the thinking is "if you're stupid enough to drive it, you're stupid enough to die in it".

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by bm_luethke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think any of those things make the car illegal exactly. But you would be responsible for the damage caused by your mods. To summarize point by point (using what I know of tennessee law - not much):

      if I want to install an impaling device on the front of the car, am I allowed to? or what about the always fun side-mounted scythe blades?

      This will at least require a red rag to be tied to the end of them so other motorists can easily obtain depth perception from all angles on them.

      if I want to install a 10 foot tall flagpole that will make my car 99% flip over in a turn when there's wind, can I do it? if I take my average car, install a couple thousand pounds worth of 'mods' and its braking distance shoots up fourfold, is it a problem? what about being able to evade an accident? if my 'mods' make my car drive like a barge in a river, is that ok?

      Well, I suppose I have seen some form of all of those at one time so I would say it's legal.

      what about if sharp pieces of my 'mod' become unglued when going over a bump at speed, take off, and shatter the windshield of whomever is following me?

      This would be the same as if anything you were hauling was not securly fastened down - you are responsible for damages (even up to involutary manslaughter)

      what about seatbelts? what if it rolls over?

      Seatbealts are required (unless it is an antique). Rollover is worried the same as a convertable (your own damn problem, did you really think the windshield will save your puny head if the car flips?(note: the last line was not aimed at you - it is the govt's response if you die))

      Mostly similar to what our other rights are supposed to be (but are increasingly not). We have the right to bear arms - not shoot people. Just because something CAN do an illegal thing, even is LIKELY to do an illegal thing doesn't make the knowlege/device illegal, only the action is illegal.

      I do know that most kit cars are road legal here, it's quite a popular pastime for hot-rodders to assemble them in the area where I live. And this is of course why things such as the DMCA make many of us so mad.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    9. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by laserjet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Having my fiance owning an Escort, and having driven it, I commend you on your accurate description. I have never driven such a small car that felt like driving barge.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    10. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by zenyu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In most states in the US if you have the right lights, a mirror on the drivers side, and one either on the passenger or windshield you can get it registered and inspected. If the mod looks like it might weigh to much it might not pass inspection, or if you had that flagpole or whatever.

      You probably could get insurance to cover damage to your car but you could get liability as long as it passed inspection. In NJ, the only state I've had an inspection done, you need seatbelts and to pass emission. Even that could be gotten around by having it inspected at your local garage for a fee. The funny thing is if it's a classic car (over 20 yrs old) the emission standards are very low, and you even get registration and insurance for less. It's a sort of "Sunday Driver" clause, since they don't expect you do drive the thing everyday.

      Parts will come flying off on any car on some of the roads in the states. I lost a my muffler on a bridge that was being refurbished because my car couldn't clear the uneven road surface(NJ). It only cost a $1000 to have the undercarage repaired and the muffler reattached so I didn't bother filing for any kind of reimbursement. 10ft deep potholes are not uncommon in NYC, I just saw a brand new one on my way to work yesterday(4ft). It happens when there is a flood underneath the road surface. There congrete under the blacktop is 3ft thick in places but it isn't steel reinforced so if the earth beneath it is gone, the road eventually fails. A few months ago a delivery truck fell completely underground when the intersection collapsed. That one took 3 days to repair, a watermain had broken at least a week before underneath. My neighboorhood used to be a marsh 200 years ago, so it's not surprising when an buried river goes amuck.

    11. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by WizardX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most insurance agents NEVER look at a cehicle when they insure it. All they want is the Make, model, year, etc. If it has the frame of an Escort, it is an Escort, as that is the VIN number that is used to register it.

    12. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      If all you want is liability coverage, that is true. I've never gotten full coverage without them coming out to snap a few photos.

    13. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because something CAN do an illegal thing, even is LIKELY to do an illegal thing doesn't make the knowlege/device illegal, only the action is illegal.


      Unless of course if it's a device capable of copying a CD/DVD
    14. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by SunPin · · Score: 1

      Weaponry? I didn't see any weapons. What are you smoking?

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    15. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a 1977 Isuzu Opel, a car Isuzu only manufactured for a year because they found out that, technically, it's not a car. Here's a quick tip, no four cylinder vehicle should have a racing stripe.

    16. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      Weaponry? I didn't see any weapons. What are you smoking?

      Simply answering one of Marco's questions:

      (if I want to install an impaling device on the front of the car, am I allowed to? or what about the always fun side-mounted scythe blades?)

    17. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a '86 Escort that had 140k miles on it when I sold it.

      Awesome little car. The handling of an escort is actually not that bad. Of course it's no BMW, but what do you expect at that price?

      Ford has a long and successful rally racing history with the escort (RS and Cosworth).

      Of course I _maintain_ my cars...

    18. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a strange insurance agent or live in a strange place. Or maybe your record ain't so great.

      I've owned almost a dozen vehicles licensed in 4 states and NEVER had anyone need to look at the car to give me full converage.

      All that matters is the VIN and the records at the DMV show that you own that VIN.

    19. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      No-one has ever taken a picture of my car to give me insurance. They took some pictures once when I filed a claim for hail damage, but there were no "before" pictures to compare them with.

      Actually, it wouldn't be unreasonable for them to want to take the pictures when you get insurance. But I've never had them ask to do that.

    20. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

      My University's Solar Car Club built, well, a solar car, and it's street legal, insured, and they plan to drive it half way across the country some time next year. Of course, there will be a gas-powered car in front of it and one behind it the whole way, using more gas than they would if everyone just stayed at home.

    21. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

      Kit cars and classic cars are insured and registered differently than normal cars. This car would be considered a Kit-car, hence as long as the car it is based on is legal it is legal. Only basic requirements need to be met for registration, one mirror, seatbelts (actually only for post 1967 cars), most retain emissions controls for the era of the chassis, license plates, lights etc.

      As for insurance, as the owner of several classic cars, insurance for something like this is cheap and easy to get. Insurance for something like this, or almost any classic custom or kit car, is based on the logic that they are driven very little and owners are very careful with thier babys. Generally you are forbidden to drive more than 5000 miles a year. For instance this 1994 built Cobra has only racked up 4000 miles total. So the likelyhood of an insurance payout is very small. My insurance rates on my 1967 Austin Healy 3000, without seatbelts or bumpers, run about 150 dollars a year.

      I do drive it, though. Maybe 700 miles a year.

    22. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Actually it is legal to have flashy lights installed on your car. You just can't ever use them. I have a swich in my car that turns on a strobe light in my grille (turn it on at a stoplight and the light changes.)

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    23. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please! I have been in Italy for the last three years and live there at this moment. You know that we cannot bring Italian cars made for europe to America without about 2k-5k worth of safety upgrades?

    24. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
      Stop sniffing the emmissions from the tailpipe man.

      I realize that I am definitely getting trolled here, but... My previous car was an '86 Mercury Lynx. Basically a Ford Escort with Air-Conditioning and intermittent wipers.

      Having navigated it through Center City Philadelphia, parking garages, Lincoln Drive, and rush hour traffic, it did NOT handle like a barge. And unlike my Isuzu Impulse, er Chevy Spectrum, it's suspension did not snap like a twig in normal driving. Another fun car with shitty suspensions are VW's. Just about every friend of mine who owned a VW needed to get some part of the suspension replaced.

      I have yet to here of a compact car actually rolling over, beyond some idiot trying to turn 90 degrees at 50+ mph.

      The braking distance and parts fallign off are improper maintenance or simple trash talking.

      Alas I traded it in for my new war wagon, a 2000 Ford Focus. (Woo hoo, 6 more months of payments...)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    25. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
      Any yes, I do love the new car. It hauls ass.

      You just get attached to old cars no matter how many mornings the damn thing wouldn't start without popping the hood and shorting the starter motor to the battery...

      That said, I wouldn't trade the 5 speed overdrive attached to a 150hp engine they turns over every time, with working air conditioning and a sound system that can make your ears bleed before it will distort for the world.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    26. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wonders what is street legal... Has he seen this picture/story?

    27. Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by nathanm · · Score: 2
      The funny thing is if it's a classic car (over 20 yrs old) the emission standards are very low, and you even get registration and insurance for less.
      It's the same here in Minnesota. If your car is 20 yrs old, you can license it as a classic car, or an antique car if it's 40 yrs old. You pay less for licensing, lower insurance, and you could run the exhaust straight from the cylinder if you felt like it!
  13. LIfestyle choice by baby_head_rush · · Score: 1

    When I see a biker in full leather chaps and that fringey stuff I always think, man that's a real lifestyle choice.
    If I see you driving this thing I'll think the same thing.
    I'm not sure that I would respect you anymore or less than the biker though.

    --
    Oliver's army is here to stay Oliver's army are on their way And I would rather be anywhere else But here today
    1. Re:LIfestyle choice by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that I would respect you anymore or less than the biker though.

      Probably fear him a tad less though uh? ;- )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:LIfestyle choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can someone *not* have a certain lifestyle?

    3. Re:LIfestyle choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's do a quick comparison...

      Biker:
      probably has a bowie knife in his boot
      feels invincible because he's flying on angel dust
      has a buch of tough friends to back him up in a fight

      Jedi:
      probably has a lightsabe under his robe
      feels invincible because he can use the force
      has an army of clones to back him up in a fight

      You decide... ^_^

    4. Re:LIfestyle choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll add to that.

      Biker:
      Not fictitious.

      Jedi:
      Fictitious.

    5. Re:LIfestyle choice by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Biker:
      Looks like he would kill you for looking at him
      Would cry if you hurt his bike, not kill you
      Some of the nicest people I have ever met

      Jedi: Thinks he may get robbed, so he has a .357 in the car
      Thinks you want to rob him, so he's about to use that pistol
      Have never met a nice Jedi.

      I'll take the biker. His tats are usualy alot cooler anyways.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    6. Re:LIfestyle choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biker:
      Your doctor/lawyer/dad experiencing midlife crisis

      Jedi:
      Quiet loner from down the street, just waiting to go 'Columbine' on the cruel world that mocks him.

  14. One question... by YoJaUta · · Score: 0

    We were promised something... Now, just where the hell are all the flying cars?!?

    1. Re:One question... by Jeff+Fohl · · Score: 1
    2. Re:One question... by ugen · · Score: 1

      Looks like a scam.
      The catch is in that they attract multiple investors and then let them purchase more stock only during a short period following a "test flight" at the lower price. Clearly this is a period of heightened hype and coupled with the short timeframe for decision should bring a lot of money in to the "inventor".
      From what the video shows, however, the "hovercraft" is relying at least partially on the hoist from the crane to be suspended in the air, so it doesn't seem to be able to fly on its own.

    3. Re:One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really... Moller has been around for a long time - I remember reading about them in the late '80s some time. I haven't heard anything of them lately. The engines they use are pretty sweet.

      The hoist from the crane was for safety.

  15. what i'm really looking for... by mattbland · · Score: 0, Redundant

    is a car which speaks the binary language of moisture vapators.

    seriously, this isn't the car you're looking for.

    you want to go home and rethink your lifestyle.

    --
    /usr/bin/awake/too/long
  16. Trunk space by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    One owner. Sold in Mos Eisly. With ample room on the back for two droids.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  17. I can just see the conversation with the cop by CodeWheeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cop: Son, do you realize you were going 45 in a 25? License, and, um, registration please.

    Obi Wannabe: These are not the droids you are looking for.

    Cop: What?

    Obi Wannabe: Move Along.

    Cop: Get out of the car and place your hands where I can see them...

    --
    C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    1. Re:I can just see the conversation with the cop by Nkwe · · Score: 1

      Just what is the air speed limit for extremely low flying craft?

    2. Re:I can just see the conversation with the cop by Salsaman · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just what is the air speed limit for extremely low flying craft?

      What do you mean, an African or European low flying craft ?

      (Sorry, couldn't resist that one.)

    3. Re:I can just see the conversation with the cop by daeley · · Score: 2

      [waves hand] This isn't the Grail you're looking for.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:I can just see the conversation with the cop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      250 Knots below flightlevel 100

    5. Re:I can just see the conversation with the cop by jx100 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Laden or unladen

    6. Re:I can just see the conversation with the cop by Mithrandir · · Score: 1

      Past tense:

      bin laden

      --
      Life is complete only for brief intervals in between toys or projects -- John Dalton
  18. "Street Legal" only in the US? by The+Moving+Shadow · · Score: 1

    I think every european starwars fan will have a lot of trouble getting this car on the real road here in europe. All custom cars have to be individually tested by a traffic safety institute approved by the governement before you are allowed to drive in it anywhere outside your own (oversized) backyard. But then again, it would look pretty in my garden next to the R2D2 fountain and Ewok treehouse...

    1. Re:"Street Legal" only in the US? by kikta · · Score: 5, Funny
      it would look pretty in my garden next to the R2D2 fountain and Ewok treehouse...


      Don't you mean your parents' garden? ;-)
    2. Re:"Street Legal" only in the US? by Raven1 · · Score: 1

      So fix your psychotic, anal government.

  19. 102K Bait and switch by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    Only 880 miles on it? (Ignore the 102K behind the curtain.) Seller is suggesting that an escort will run for 182K miles? Yeah. Does look cool though.

    1. Re:102K Bait and switch by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Well, that's probably why he's selling it. He,s had his fun, and now he's looking for someone who wants the fun and has the money : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:102K Bait and switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, my old escort was at 360k miles before it was hauled to the junkyard...although it was overhauled twice. :)

    3. Re:102K Bait and switch by cswiii · · Score: 2


      102k = 102,000
      880 = 880

      102000
      + 800
      ------
      102880

      102880 ...and slashdot readers are programming for a living??

    4. Re:102K Bait and switch by cswiii · · Score: 2

      s/800/880/

      (This, of course, is why I'm on the QA side of things ;) )

    5. Re:102K Bait and switch by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      i think he was refering to the claim that it should hold up for another 80k miles.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    6. Re:102K Bait and switch by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1
      Read the original auction. Note this bit: (boldface added for emphasis)
      " The donor car is a 1988 Ford Escort and only has 880 miles since built. It is titled as a Ford. The engine runs strong and should be good for another 80,000 miles because the donor vehicle has 102k original miles on it.
      102k = 102,000
      880 = 880
      80,000 = 80,000

      102,000
      80,000
      + 880
      -------
      182,880
      In other words, yes, the seller is suggesting that the car will run for 182,000 miles.
      --
      I am not Herbert.
    7. Re:102K Bait and switch by mcflaherty · · Score: 1

      We had a '92 Escort Hatchback that made it to 165+K before we got rid of it. I think it could have made it farther except for some bad luck on a 100 degree day stuck on the interstate...

      So who knows, it might make it. Anyone with enough cash and time for this thing could probably maintain the engine block if they wanted it to last.

      --
      -- I am become sig, destroyer of posts.
    8. Re:102K Bait and switch by Nkwe · · Score: 1
      Poster was referring to two things actually:
      • The concept that by retrofitting you could magically erase 102K miles. (Yeah, the truth was in the detailed description, thus the bait and switch subject line.
      • Poking fun at the idea of adding another 80K miles for a total life expectancy of 182.8K on an escort.

      Poster forgot to use preview and also forgot to put in a couple of line break tags. Should have been formatted:
      Only 880 miles on it? (Ignore the 102K behind the curtain.)

      Seller is suggesting that an escort will run for 182K miles? Yeah.

      Does look cool though.
  20. What I want to know is... by messiertom · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will we pay for insurance on this? With credits?

    But really, serious question: would the insurance rates be at all affected by driving this? The link mentions it's "street-safe" but there's more regulations on driving than just having this required component and that required component.

    1. Re:What I want to know is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 2

      Blue Friend
      "Republic credits are no good out here. I need something more real"

      Frustrated Jedi
      waving hand

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:What I want to know is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Blue Friend
      "Republic credits are no good out here. I need something more real"

      Frustrated Jedi
      Waving hand
      "Credit will do fine."

      Blue Friend
      "No they won't!"

      Frustrated Jedi
      Waving hand, titching
      "Credit will do fine."

      Blue Friend
      "What? You think you're some kind of a Jedi, waving your hand around like that? I'm a Tractarian, mind tricks don't work on me, only money" rubbing fingers together

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    3. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read Books. Real Books. It's good for the brain.

      Go outside. Really outside. It's good for the social life.

    4. Re:What I want to know is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      You mean like go out, meet girl, marry girl, then watch money vanish?

      (by the way, I'm taking the wife to San Luis Obispo for Labor Day. It'll be fuin :)

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    5. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marry a wife with a job, who has her own money...

    6. Re:What I want to know is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Oh dang, you know, I did, but then her money's her money, and my money is also her money. Doesn't matter how much money is involved, it's just a matter of principle.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  21. Best part is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This work of art on wheels features... a reliable 4 cyl engine"

    RRRRiiiight. On an Escort. Gimme a break.

  22. Still has wheels.... by doomy · · Score: 1

    What would be nice is if one put hovers on it (like hovercraft), possibly damped the noise a bit, then it would be a real speeder.. I believe our current technology could make a working replica of the StarWars speeder if we wanted, we could even possibly exceed what the speeder did in Starwars... I've seen quite a few personal hovers but these tend to look more like golf cars and sound horrible.

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    1. Re:Still has wheels.... by delta407 · · Score: 2
      I believe our current technology could make a working replica of the StarWars speeder
      Yeah! I mean, seriously, doesn't EVERYONE have a repulsorlift or two in their garage? Sheesh.
  23. an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else want to put on a wookie cusatome and drive around flipping people off?

  24. yeah, but I'm still looking for an X-wing fighter. by thepoolguy · · Score: 1

    Tie fighters show up all the time on ebay, but I haven't found an X-wing yet.

    -tpg

  25. Hope he got permission... by chuckie86 · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to guess how much Lucas will demand in royalties from this sale?

    1. Re:Hope he got permission... by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Nope, he'll just make a really dumb one out of a 1960 Ford in 20 years.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
  26. nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is quite possibly the coolest thing i've seen in my life.

  27. 88 Escort by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    My last car was a 1988 Ford Escort. I don't see where someone would equate "Escort" and "speeder" in their minds, but whatever. At least they made it look better. :)

    1. Re:88 Escort by len_harms · · Score: 1

      he probably picked something cheap. so that way if it was totaly messed up he could just junk it. That he is getting 6k (at the time I looked) for a car worth about 1k is pretty good...

  28. Crash Arrrrrrgh ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After sailing up into the air, after crashing through the windscreen, the young Jedi realises his speeder dosen`t have seat belts.

  29. No reserve? by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    This guy is going to get screwed.. I bet he wont even get 10k for it, and it sounds like he's expecting over 100k .. Since he didn't put a reserve on the auction, if the highest bid is 7k, he'll have to sell it for that much. Ouch!

    1. Re:No reserve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or not sell it and just get bad eBay feedback. Or withdraw the auction before he isn't allowed to anymore. Or add a reserve price before he isn't allowed to anymore.

    2. Re:No reserve? by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean, come on, odds are he got the escort with 100k miles on it for next to nothing (say, a thousand bucks), he spent maybe another thousand bucks in supplies and spent a month (fulltime) tops working on it.

      If he gets 7K (I think he's gonna get at least 20K anyways, star wars, word of mouth and all that) by this quick seat-of-the-pants calculation, he could have made a good 5K with a month of work, which while not good enough to retire, is not exactly bad pay either, also considering the fun he had while making it (and driving the 880 miles to show it off).

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    3. Re:No reserve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You missed the fine print. "You may notice a bizarre smell eminating from the trunk. Please, do not open the trunk." I doubt those are dead Stormtroopers in there, boys.

      -- The_Messenger

    4. Re:No reserve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we wanted more than 100k then he should have started the bidding there. I never understood that reserve bid stuff. Why waste people's time bidding below what you're willing to sell for?

  30. Esthetic trash by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This thing... Needs some work. The dimensions appear a bit off. Nose too long, pods not quite the right size. Others have mentioned the obviously Ford dash. A trip to Dakota Digital could have quickly solved that. And a Grant steering wheel would have been nice. After spending this much money, they could have at least grabbed the seats out of an Escort GT.

    And what's with the nose? There is no reason to have those huge cutouts for the headlights. Either put them behind the grill, or let the grill roll up when needed ('69 Camaro among others). Please tell me it has this feature, and they were just rolled up for the pictures.

    Finding a competent glass shop isn't always easy. If you can find a Corvette specialty shop, you might be okay. Otherwise, you are stuck with boat shops. And most of them are more worried about the structural repair than the appearance.

    Still, a fun link for a Saturday afternoon.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Esthetic trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the pics actually look like they were taken in front of this place in san bernadino that is the best place in southern california to get fiberglass. and from the 818 area code, that's entirely possible.

  31. Yes. I must purchase this automobile. by multiplexo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then and only then will I be able to complete my transmogrification into the Comic Book guy from The Simpsons.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  32. Obviously is Re:This is street legal ?!?!?! by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
    Actually, I haven't checked the US regs, but in the UK, this car may not count as a Kit Car.

    Basically, it becomes a kit car if you take components from multiple cars. I don't see anything to suggest that with this car, although the windshield looks a bit suspicious.

    If he's just added plastic and such like, it probably counts as a 'body kit'. The rules are very different for that. The handling should be pretty much the same for example.

    It's been on a road for a while, so presumably it has passed any yearly mechanical test, so there's nothing very untoward here.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  33. Can your Ego bear such a beating? by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    I'll give props to anybody willing to drive this thing regularly and to places other than a convention. You know damn well it going to hide in the garage until the next Movie comes out so and then go right back in, so don't even bother placing a bid. And as for US driving regs, can the thing survive a 5-10 mph collision? Emissions standards?! Riiiight...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Can your Ego bear such a beating? by Arcturax · · Score: 2

      Hey, it gets better gas milage than my '95 Grand AM even after the conversion. So that's not too bad at all.

      As for emission standards, if the engine is in ok shape, no reason why it would not pass, no matter how it looks. I would be funny driving this into Ohio E-Check though and seeing their reactions :P

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    2. Re:Can your Ego bear such a beating? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding me?

      I'm such a nerd I would drive that damn thing everywhere. In fact there is an ex whose house I would drive by everyday until she noticed.

      Then again, I wouldn't drive it to a movie premier. That is almost as bad as wearing that Bobba Fett costume to the movie.

  34. This is the part that really gets me by multiplexo · · Score: 0, Troll
    This car is a one of a kind original, NOT a kit. It was not used in any of the Star Wars movies but definitely could have been! This beauty is almost BRAND NEW with only 880 miles and it is THE ONLY ONE OF ITS KIND FOR SALE IN THE WORLD. If you are the lucky person to get it you have a unique driving experience like no other. No matter where you are, when you pull up to a car show, a grocery store, a gas station, a restaurant...you will be the center of attention. My friends and I pulled up to the opening of the recent new Star Wars movie just to see what reaction we would get and we were SWARMED!

    Yeah, that's what I want. A car that will attract Star Wars geeks. Yes indeed this car does make a statement, unfortunately that statement is "I live with my parents and regularly masturbate over a life size cardboard cutout of Carrie Fisher from Return of the Jedi". If you want to make sure that you'll never reproduce buying this car will work better than anything short of castration.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  35. Add a couple of JATO units... by caferace · · Score: 2
    ...and you too could qualify for a Darwin Award.

    Alternatively, you could just drive it around East L.A. real slow blasting Eminem on the sound system (once you installed one :).

  36. Profiling? by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can bet your ass the first time I get pulled over I'm gonna say, "These are not the droids you're looking for," and pray that the cop finds it funny instead of realizing I just insulted his intelligence. =)

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  37. Dominos rules by cyberman11 · · Score: 1

    this would work great for my pizza delivery job.

  38. What forces are at work here... by davilan · · Score: 1


    High bid : darthvaderx

  39. this is awesome by liquid2k2 · · Score: 0

    but im not sure that its street legal everywhere in the world, here in quebec city im not sure its legal. well we'll see

  40. Re:Better. Electric. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too bad that Ford isn't building electric cars or else you could make a nearly silent model and still register it as a domestic car.

  41. That's Insane... by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    But I still like it. Now, if I could only figure out how to turn my Dodge into a street legal Guntank (from Mobile Suit Gundam)...

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  42. The landspeeders where automatics??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a disappointment!

  43. Two problems by flikx · · Score: 1
    • It's still a crappy Ford Escort underneath; with a high milage engine. (880 miles since conversion.)
    • No R2D2.
    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  44. Gutless, unreliable by f0dder · · Score: 1

    Any geek wanting to buy this POS I hope are good with tools and think driving is just a way of getting from point A to point B. The new Fords are bad enough let alone something from 1988.

    A quick check from Edmunds suggests 1990 Escort are valued around $1000. Says something about their worth.

    My neighbor has a newer model Focus and Explorer and they're frustrated with the breakdowns and dealer headache. Reliability aside my gut instinct tells me a 1988 Ford Escort is gutless and drives like crap. Add the extra weight of the trimmings and this thing handles like a steel tub. Outside of mebbe a geek parade this thing can't be that much fun to drive.

  45. Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (* it used to be a frigging Ford Escort. How much more could he fuck it up? *)

    I had a Ford Escort once. It indeed was a P.O.S. I had to write "NOT TO CLOSE" on the back because it would stall if I stopped on a hill and roll backward. It had an aluminum head-block that cracked every six months.

    If Richard Petty sins too much, an Escort is what God and/or Satan will give him to drive around in the afterlife.

    I hear that the *only* reason Ford sold Escorts is that by law the average gas milage on *all* cars a vendor sold had to average a certain gas milage. Ford sold Escorts to simply keep the average down so that they could sell more fat trucks. (This is why they had wimpy engines). They practically gave the things away and people *still* did not take them often enough.

    People would rather pay the same for a used Toyata with 55K than a new Escort. The post 55K is better in a Toyota than the first 55K on an Escort.

    They should make something that is half mini and half go-cart, then the engine would have decent pull. Don't try to dress it up as a real car, because Escorts ain't real cars. I hated renting the damned things too. It is a lawnmower in car body.

    1. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by kaustik · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Had to write "NOT TO CLOSE" eh? Stupid moron. People probably got even closer trying to figure out what they were not supposed to close.
      "Not too close" might have been a better idea.

    2. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Had to write "NOT TO CLOSE" eh? Stupid moron. People probably got even closer trying to figure out [why] they were not supposed to close. *)

      Well, at least I can say "I tried to warn you". Besides, you have no information about how big the letters were. They could have been a foot wide each. Thus, you are calling me a moron with having all the facts. You must be a PHB in training.

    3. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

      "I hear that the *only* reason Ford sold Escorts is that by law the average gas milage on *all* cars a vendor sold had to average a certain gas milage. Ford sold Escorts to simply keep the average down so that they could sell more fat trucks. (This is why they had wimpy engines). They practically gave the things away and people *still* did not take them often enough. "

      From 1982 to 1997, the Ford Escort was the worldwide sales leader in compact cars. They sold 5 million of these things and the fact that a compact car actually achieved 100k miles is a testament to their durability.

      Yes CAFE standards are based on average fuel economy and the existence of the Escort made the V8 Ford Mustang possible. Trucks are not a factor in CAFE.

      Yeah, the Escort and now the Focus suck, they are slow, wimpy, uncomfortable on long drives and really dont take too much abuse. Then again, they are not designed for any of this. They are designed as commuter cars. They do perform excellent for what they are designed for.

      FYI, the resale value of a 1990 Toyota Tercel versus a 1990 Escort is the same. Both are pretty much worthless.

      Disclaimer: I am not a wimpy car sympathizer, I own a v8 Camaro and a v8 Mustang, I would never buy a 4cyl FWD car. But that doesn't mean I cannot understand other peoples need for wimpy cars.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    4. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by shepd · · Score: 1

      >FYI, the resale value of a 1990 Toyota Tercel versus a 1990 Escort is the same.

      The Toyota is _still_ worth 10% more, even though it is a complete POS at that point (and Tercels are pretty crappy anyways [coming from someone who once drove one], if you want a cheap Toyota, you buy the tried and tested Corolla [driving one now] Just don't forget to get the improved sound system).

      Anyways, you can look it up in the Blue Book for yourself.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 2

      Ok, this argument is just to funny!

      --

      "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
    6. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      100k isn't that bad on cars. I am driving a manual transmission 1990 GMC Sierria with 188,000+ miles on it, and it runs like a champ. Sure, the thing is a tank -the cannon (though, that COULD be arranged), but still. For most automobiles (cars especally) 100,000 isn't a really big deal anymore...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    7. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
      FYI, the resale value of a 1990 Toyota Tercel versus a 1990 Escort is the same. Both are pretty much worthless.

      Hey--I own a '91 Tercel, and last I checked it's worth a bit over $2,000. Loses about $100 a month, though, and it's beginning to misbehave. I'm at that fun stage where I determine if I spend a thousand or so and get it running really well for the next dozen years, or skimp on the maintenance and hope it can last another three years.

      Front wheel drive is nice here in Colorado: much more difficult to skid out.

      Despite my 4 cylinders, I beat almost everyone off the line--even sports cars. Why? Because their drivers don't really care. Sure, if they applied the gas, they'd leave me miles behind. But they don't, and so I get the joy of seeing a Ferrari 100 yds. in my dust. It's a nice feeling:-)

    8. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Hey--I own a '91 Tercel, and last I checked it's worth a bit over $2,000. Loses about $100 a month, though

      So, in just under 2 years, you'll pay me a couple of hundred bucks to take it away from you?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I get the joy of seeing a Ferrari 100 yds. in my dust. It's a nice feeling:-)

      What a pathetic loser.

    10. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > From 1982 to 1997, the Ford Escort was the worldwide sales leader

      'worldwide' is a misnomer. The Escort sold in the US was nothing like the rest-of-world Escort. For starters, the first euro-Escort were rear-wheel drive, had the near-legendary Kent crossflow engine (know what a Lotus Seven is?), and was all around interesting little cheap box - whereas the US Escort was poverty car devoid of any redeeming qualities.

    11. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      heh... I'll second that. My 1995 Ford Crown Victoria just hit 160,000 and its running great (but its an old squad car, had 125,000 on it when I bought it three years ago)

      eats gas, though... those 80 mile trips (one way) every weekend to visit my gf are getting expensive.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    12. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I am not a wimpy car sympathizer, I own a v8 Camaro and a v8 Mustang, I would never buy a 4cyl FWD car. But that doesn't mean I cannot understand other peoples need for wimpy cars.

      Don't worry about it. We understand your need for macho cars. It's really nothing to be ashamed of.

    13. Re:Escorts: The Phantom Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAH LOL

  46. Your grip on reality is fragile, human. by centauri · · Score: 1

    It's the newer models that are in demand now, not these old ones. I shall probably have to sell it at a loss.

    1200 is all I can offer you.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
  47. It could get worse... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bust out the high end stereo system and blast the StarWars anthem as you cruise around town... I'm sure it'd have the same affect as having the Black Plague or Ebola... "Chicks? We don't need no stinkin... ch-- No, actually, we DO need some chicks... BOB!! CANCEL THE BID BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  48. Awaiting Darwin Award Applicant by Cable_Monkey · · Score: 1

    I forsee a new contestant for the Darwin Awards.

    1. Re:Awaiting Darwin Award Applicant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is so dangerous about selling a car on eBay?

  49. I saw this thing on the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend and I were driving down the road and saw this bad boy parked on the street. I had to jump out and get a photo:

    http://kevfinn.com/photos/index.php?PhotoCatId=1 0

    Seriously, it's amazing.

    -Kev

  50. Shouldn't the story's lead in start...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anonymous car body builder writes...
    I'm highly sceptical that anyone but the builder of such a thing would find this SO interesting as to have it /.'d

    Or did Cmdr Taco make the highest bid and now has Buyer's Remorse (or sobered up) and is trying to gen up a higher bid to get off the hook? Hmmm?

  51. I call bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did you not watch the intro on the special edition? It's explicitly stated that they put vaseline on the lens to blur out the wheels.

    And a quick Google search using George Lucas' exact words reveals that not one person on the entire internet has bothered to make a transcript of that. Slackers.

  52. What a world we live in by nolife · · Score: 1

    You can recreate the design of a vehicle from a movie, sell it, and no one minds. Create some original clip art of the same vehicle and try to sell it and you will must certainly face jail time. Strange how it makes a difference when computers are involved.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  53. he's also selling 2 of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out the retracted bid comments on the bid info page of the auction

  54. What's this world coming to? by sg3000 · · Score: 2

    So Ford pulls the plug on electric cars, but they're allowing this out?

    Forget hearing about how cool their trucks are; we need to a commercial with Ford's CEO William Clay Ford, with a public apology for building the Escort that transmogrified into this.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:What's this world coming to? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Actually we need Ford's CEO William Clay Ford explain why we should buy his products.

      The Ford family which rides that "Made In America" thing until it's old has never really explained why good ol' Henry was such an Anti-American during Dubya Dubya Two.

    2. Re:What's this world coming to? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that William Clay Ford should publicly atone for foisting the sad excuse for a football team that is the Detroit Lions on an unsuspecting NFL as a football team.

      FOR SHAME!

  55. Quit complaining? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Isn't it just cool that it's been built? Sure it's an Escort under the shell, and you could fix the interior but the guy is just a fiberglass man (remember that).

    But this bugged me:
    or let the grill roll up when needed ('69 Camaro among others).

    Yeah; that is all we need, a land speeder with the right headlight up during the day and the left one up at night.

    1. Re:Quit complaining? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      I agree that it's pretty cool that it was built.

      But you're wrong about the Camaro. It didn't have popup headlights. The RS model (?? Can't keep the RS, SS, and RS/SS straight) had grills in front of the headlights. Same on the '67-'71 Cougars. The grills rotated 90 degrees, up over the top of the headlight, still concealed by the rest of the car's nose. Look here for the Camaro and here for the cougar.

      Sorry I couldn't find any pictures with the grills up.

      FWIW, it's usually trivial to fix problems with headlight doors. In vacuum systems, it's an old, rotting vacuum line. In mechanical systems, you've got a shot bushing or bent linkage. Sometimes the motors crap out, but it's more likely to be one of the causes I listed, or a bad relay, fuse, etc.

      In any event, I'm not buying a $5500 fixer upper like this. If it were based on a Ford Fox body, maybe. But an Escort? Nope. Not having it. (BTW, I assume that the seller is using an American Escort, not a European Escort. The two are quite different.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  56. E-check... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    They destroyed my front two tires, brand new and when I left 0 tread was left.

    (interesting side note: the Ohio E-Check was lobbied to the state by the company whom owns the facilities. When the state wanted to pull out because of complaints the company pointed out that it would be better if the citizens paid their $20 fees instead of the state paying as the contract demanded millions)

    I personally think that something like e-check is a good idea but it's failed for two reasons. One, anyone paying 20 bucks to the attendant can pass; yes bribery. And two; if your car is a pollution machine like no other you eventually become exempt if you show receipts saying that you paid over $2000 (I believe) to try to fix it.

    I wish we could fix our pollution problems but those two examples show how politics and money just undercut honest efforts, even if they are only half way honest.

  57. Luke Just didn't understand the value of his toys by grofty · · Score: 1

    The bidding is already up to $7,000.00 US. I tell you...Luke really got ripped off! I guess that's what happens when you have to leave the planet in a hurry.

  58. The things people do to cars.... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Why not? Have you seen some of the things people do to cars? Remember the Cougar XR14? (that was an XR7 with TWO front ends, you couldn't tell if it was comming or going) How about the Dickmobile? (if you have to ask...just do a search on google for the pix. And I think there was a Pussymobile too. Maybe it had a headon with the Dickmobile?). I wonder who ended up with the TV Batmobile by the way? How about the Black Beauty? One more...Do you remember the Forchevamchrysvagon? That was the "anycar" made for a bank car loan tv ad.

    1. Re:The things people do to cars.... by pato+perez · · Score: 1

      Do you mean this?

      http://www.boners.com/grub/384173.html

      Besides this, Google turns up no pix, only a number of references to sports cars.

  59. Mac and VMware by sjanich · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like the idea of being able to run the MAC OS with VMware.

  60. Forbidden in Australia by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    This wouldn't be allowed in Australia. No Jedi stuff there.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  61. Maybe this is the car you're looking for by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Friend of mine has done something in the same vein, if not as dramatic (tho the "guns" do get second looks from passing highway patrolmen). See it at http://www.shawnandcolleen.com/shawn/Pages/hwing/

    BTW Shawn's car won "Best Hall Costume" at LOSCON in 2001.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  62. Re:Luke Just didn't understand the value of his to by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

    i bumped it up to that 7000 mark. i bet one of the original bidders has a proxy bid of 100000 placed already and will be the final winner at whatever the final price is.

  63. Re:yeah, but I'm still looking for an X-wing fight by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

    Yeah, probably because no one wants to sell their X-wing...

    --
    --Forest C. Adcock--
  64. Re:Is it actually legal to drive this? [you bet] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In California, all it takes to register your car is insurance (no problem..for liability only insurance, no agent needs to see the car), and emissions-testing.
    That's it..no safety inspection, no nothing. You could drive a tree as long as it passed smog. toss a couple lights on there so the Man doesnt hassle you..maybe a license plate..two if you're feeling generous.

    It's a little more rigorous in other states (probably because they have actual weather which might cause cars to deteriorate.. rust? what's that?)

    Only thing with this particular craft is that it looks a little wide - as long as it fits in the lane, seems okay to me.

  65. Martin Cooper the Finn? -nah I don't think so...: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol..the brain cancer machine...

    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/ce ll phone_000411.html

  66. This one probably not... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
    Actually it is fairly easy to get a kit car or a complete home built car certified in the UK. A friend has done two. It helps if the basic frame comes from a real car though. However, his conversion was quite radical (making a three wheeler out of a Mini subframe) and it was certified.

    Unfortunatelly, you see a couple of 'jets' at the rear of the car that stick out sideways. The inspection definitely doesn't like sticking out bits that may cause problems with other vehicles or pedestrians.

  67. I wonder if it has that special feature? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    My last land speeder had a small swithc in the hood that in one position made it solid while the other position it wobbled easily like all the shocks were removed..

    I want that switch!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  68. Re:I can just see the conversation going Python by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Shucks ....
    and I was just gonna subit:
    "Bin Laden or non-Bin Laden?"
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  69. No, Luke! It's too dangerous! by payndz · · Score: 1

    (Puts on whiny voice) "What a piece of junk!"

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  70. Here's one.. by Jhan · · Score: 1

    [Image]. Looks a bit tattered though.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.