indeed, but this will stimulate a further lack of confidence in the results of upcoming elections - bad news for democracy : a democratic government can only rule by grace of the populace.
Just because a group is elected does not mean that we can't turn a critical eye towards what they are doing. Couldn't agree more, but if the people doesn't agree, they can always vote them out, which you can't with a monopoly.
polarizing ? I would think it's rhetorical question. The answer is clear: the Eu is elected, so it has any power it wants over a non-elected institution(MS).
I'll bite : The material wealth created by the market is the means to ensure everybody gets a fair chance on happiness. So, market is by-product of our society.
so, it's very clear that 'bringing democracy' never, never was a priority in the middle east, it's all about oil, and it always will be. Peace will come when we switch to hydrogen/solar/wind/fusion.
Is the Russian world so much different from the western world ? I see many similarities. the world isn't divided east-west but vertically : people in power / people not in power.
"enemies". Your corporations needs you thinking like that so your government can spend a huge percentage of their money on weapons. Sir/madam, the world is not in black and white, although your government wants you to believe that.
What about purified silicon? Glass? Drywall? Aluminum, or any pure metal? Those things occur naturally in great quantities.
There are ways of neutralizing chemicals outside of biology. Man is too stupid and lazy to bring everything to the recycling center.
PDBEs are found in nature (with carbon isotopes not found in synthetic chemicals) SCALE! : one aspect of poisoning is dosage; we humans succeed in using chemicals in high concentrations and in high quantities.
I repeat : any chemical, that is not bio-degradeable, ends up on our plate and accumulates in the whole eco-system. Any material that is not biodegradable, stays in the foodchain for thousands of years. We are slowly poisoning ourselves. You think too small-scale.
yup, It's a story like the one about Asbestos and DDT. In the EU, there is even legistlation that goes (a lot) further, called REACH. People should be reminded that any chemical, that is not bio-degradeable, ends up on our plate and accumulates in the whole eco-system.
the question that arises : how much weapons should be allowed for personal defense ? a shotgun with 2 shells ? a small handgun with 6 bullets ? or a semi-automatic with 20 ?
Slashdot Mirror
I'll complete the quote.
"Opposite day ends at midnight, right?" "yes."
indeed, but this will stimulate a further lack of confidence in the results of upcoming elections - bad news for democracy : a democratic government can only rule by grace of the populace.
yeah, but they are trying to fix that, but i fear it will take a long time.
polarizing ? I would think it's rhetorical question. The answer is clear: the Eu is elected, so it has any power it wants over a non-elected institution(MS).
I'll bite : The material wealth created by the market is the means to ensure everybody gets a fair chance on happiness. So, market is by-product of our society.
The difference : the EU is ELECTED. MS is not, so : yes, the EU should be able to do anything to MS.
Oh, which brands? Cote d'Or? Callebaut? Or the more expensive ones ?
Nope.There's crap here also.
so, it's very clear that 'bringing democracy' never, never was a priority in the middle east, it's all about oil, and it always will be. Peace will come when we switch to hydrogen/solar/wind/fusion.
I'll call the last category "sheople".
Is the Russian world so much different from the western world ? I see many similarities. the world isn't divided east-west but vertically : people in power / people not in power.
funny, I read this and thought ... why would the US government try to constantly have an "enemy"
"enemies". Your corporations needs you thinking like that so your government can spend a huge percentage of their money on weapons. Sir/madam, the world is not in black and white, although your government wants you to believe that.
privacy, liberty: the history
http://fora.tv/fora/showthread.php?t=889
I repeat : any chemical, that is not bio-degradeable, ends up on our plate and accumulates in the whole eco-system.
Any material that is not biodegradable, stays in the foodchain for thousands of years. We are slowly poisoning ourselves. You think too small-scale.
yup, It's a story like the one about Asbestos and DDT. In the EU, there is even legistlation that goes (a lot) further, called REACH. People should be reminded that any chemical, that is not bio-degradeable, ends up on our plate and accumulates in the whole eco-system.
the question that arises : how much weapons should be allowed for personal defense ? a shotgun with 2 shells ? a small handgun with 6 bullets ? or a semi-automatic with 20 ?
yeah, everybody having guns would have solved this ...
also in the news : http://www.icasualties.org/oif/IraqiDeaths.aspx
I think we can make up for that by building aerodynamical houses and buildings. And we made up for it already by removing a hell of a lot of trees.
In Rod We Trust!