Dumbass, the distinguishment of the patent is in the claims, not the abstract.
The abstract is usually a pretty good guide. If not, then somebody is likely being even more unethical that usual, a behavior worth special attention in itself.
Why shouldn't Ukraine just give up Crimea for the sake of national unity?
Putin has already stated "if the violence spreads further in the eastern regions of Ukraine and Crimea, Russia reserves the right to defend its interests and those of the Russian-speaking population that lives there." IOW, no intention of stopping at Crimea. It does not require much imagination to understand the implication for other former USSR vassel states.
RTLinux as a solution is not (hard) realtime as they falsely claim it to be. Only the Hypervisor is realtime, but the Linux kernel running as a process is not, since it can't guarantee that it will respond in a deterministic manner. That's the problem with the PREEMPT_RT patch too.
With the Linux kernel, you get an average timeframe for an interrupt. With QNX or other proper realtime OS's, you get a Max timeframe.
Factual inaccuacies galore. RTLinux does not use a hypervisor, it uses a microkernel. Nobody claims that the Linux API in RTLinux is realtime, only the microkernel API, which incidentally is hard realtime with latency guarantees measured in microseconds. The PREEMPT_RT patch does in fact attempt to provide hard realtime, for example, interrupts become preemptible with real time priority. The question of whether PREEMPT is actually hard realtime or not gets into a debate over what hard realtime actually is. If measuring latency and finding that it never goes outside of strict bounds counts, then yes, PREEMPT_RT is hard realtime. If a mathematical proof is required, then no, however... nontrivial hard realtime systems that are fully proved are vanishingly rare.
Physics has the advantage. Clock scaling already ended, now feature size shrinking is grinding to a halt. The action has now shifted to ballooning core counts and power management strategy, where Intel has no compelling advantage. Intel's feature size advantage has not got long to live.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly. The same as abuse of big data. My point.
An excellent example is Li's copula, widely credited for triggering the 08 financial crisis.
Dumbass, the distinguishment of the patent is in the claims, not the abstract.
The abstract is usually a pretty good guide. If not, then somebody is likely being even more unethical that usual, a behavior worth special attention in itself.
I understand that Steve Jobs also felt obligated to park in the handicapped spot
if you think thats good business, well....
At least it makes me feel good about doing my part to put the south side of the "peak" into "peak apple".
Apple is not the problem.
Let me see, who was it that used the "thermonuclear" word?
I hope it doesn't get broken like kmail/akonadi.
Get your popcorn.
I really don't understand the fandom here.
Easy: closed garden = please die now.
As everybody knows, Linux is superior to FreeBSD :)
desperate for sales, and they're hoping to penetrate the Tablet market bigtime.
TFTFY.
iOS has the most web traffic and was rated number 1 at mobile world congress this year.
It's fun to watch those lines of defense fall one by one, isn't it?
Apple sells more than Samsung, Asus, Amazon, and Lenovo combined.
A rational person would regard the latter as a "healthy, diverse market".
What kind of moron would do music production or video on a tablet?
A moron who does not want to lug a laptop around, and knows that a tablet is actualy a computer as opposed to a mere media consumption device?
The regular Keurig machine makes filtered coffee; it is not an espresso machine.
Yes, and it tastes horrible, compared to decently made filtered coffee. I'm quite familiar with it, unfortunately.
Coffee from pods is an affront dignity anyway. Get a proper espresso machine, or use a press.
It was 1944, the Nazis were already in retreat. Crimea was no longer strategic, except for Stalin's Russification program.
Because the Tatars openly supported Hitler hoping to get their own country from the Nazis.
You're willing to take Stalin's word for that?
Why shouldn't Ukraine just give up Crimea for the sake of national unity?
Putin has already stated "if the violence spreads further in the eastern regions of Ukraine and Crimea, Russia reserves the right to defend its interests and those of the Russian-speaking population that lives there." IOW, no intention of stopping at Crimea. It does not require much imagination to understand the implication for other former USSR vassel states.
Russia has at least a superficially "legitimate" claim for Crimea, since some 60% of the population are ethnic Russians.
Only because Stalin deported 100% of the Tatars in 1944 (killing half of them)
And what if even the free version is a failure? Can't give it away...
RTLinux as a solution is not (hard) realtime as they falsely claim it to be. Only the Hypervisor is realtime, but the Linux kernel running as a process is not, since it can't guarantee that it will respond in a deterministic manner. That's the problem with the PREEMPT_RT patch too.
With the Linux kernel, you get an average timeframe for an interrupt. With QNX or other proper realtime OS's, you get a Max timeframe.
Factual inaccuacies galore. RTLinux does not use a hypervisor, it uses a microkernel. Nobody claims that the Linux API in RTLinux is realtime, only the microkernel API, which incidentally is hard realtime with latency guarantees measured in microseconds. The PREEMPT_RT patch does in fact attempt to provide hard realtime, for example, interrupts become preemptible with real time priority. The question of whether PREEMPT is actually hard realtime or not gets into a debate over what hard realtime actually is. If measuring latency and finding that it never goes outside of strict bounds counts, then yes, PREEMPT_RT is hard realtime. If a mathematical proof is required, then no, however... nontrivial hard realtime systems that are fully proved are vanishingly rare.
You trifle. ARM Ltd is the original ARM engineering team spun off from Acorn.
None of the dates are wrong. You're right that ARM was around in the 80s, but they weren't designing chips at the time.
Nonsense. ARM started designing chips in 1983
And Intel have the advantage there.
Physics has the advantage. Clock scaling already ended, now feature size shrinking is grinding to a halt. The action has now shifted to ballooning core counts and power management strategy, where Intel has no compelling advantage. Intel's feature size advantage has not got long to live.