Agreed, I wonder if there's something that can be done about the atmosphere itself. If not, this may all be for naught, as its not easily habitable if massive amounts of shielding are required to form even a basic settlement.
That's what I was thinking... 60 days is a bit long, it's more than enough to scope out a network, gain access, and execute the vulnerability. 7 days is a bit short, not enough time to test, validate, or run through QC. Not sure why google's leaning on the other extreme, but why not compromise at like 21 days with empathy towards more advanced development cycles.
I don't really watch TV for the news, I read slashdot for the lulz and news.google.com for actual news. CNN has some good stories, but reading their main articles I feel like they're trying to sway me towards their POV rather than saying what actually happened (ex. ban guns after every shooting).
LiveLeaks & VICE has interesting stuff sometimes too.
They wouldn't have been able to decrypt a portion proving ownership and reversing the judge's decision... unless they have a way to find hidden volumes now, doubtful, but that's why I said I'm curious what they broke.
AC, it's actually an NDA that makes the most sense that they would make him sign, a contract has a start and end date, an NDA can say something like no disclosure till the bug is fixed.
My point stands, there's no legal problem here as NDAs are not age specific.
I went from Java to.NET and I say I don't know how to code in Java to make people fuck off that think programmers know every language they've (the person) has ever come across.
I do agree completely also, flow and logic are the why of programming, while the syntax is the how and understanding the why things work will always get you faster further.
None of what you said has anything to do with the age of the bug researcher. Still a pretty stupid argument imo, name one law that would prevent a 17 year old from getting paid for finding a bug.
I do however agree that they are not the same company and would go about writing their policy around it differently, but that has nothing to do with the legality of it whatsoever.
Your "insightful" off point and irrelevant statement got mine downmodded you ho. J/k:)
And one more time just to be clear: corporate policy != law and amen for that.
I guess the $500 can be seen as a red flag when purchasing, If was a buyer in NY I would ask for the disclosure, not the $500. The $500 seems like its to cover the BUYER's inspection expense, but if the buyer backs out after the inspection, the seller won't be crediting them the $500, which makes me thing this law was written by morons who don't know anything about mortgage liabilities.
are you talking about buying seller insurance? If so, the buyer is still protected here, the seller just passes on the liability. Pretty sure those require an inspection to be done too by the seller, or insurance company.
Also, there are state and federal disclosure rules, lead based paint would be a federal disclosure applicable to all states.
Slashdot Mirror
so thorough QC is broken development process? ...oh gawd, you don't actually work in IT do you?
What are you posting off of?
Obligatory SMBC: http://www.smbc-comics.com/?db=comics&id=2508#comic
you don't really understand politics do you?
Ah, that's what that face is for.
especially after reading: http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/07/fbi_spyware?currentPage=all
Seems like they'll stop at nothing to catch their man, even if it means turning us into a police state.
Agreed, I wonder if there's something that can be done about the atmosphere itself. If not, this may all be for naught, as its not easily habitable if massive amounts of shielding are required to form even a basic settlement.
Oh ok, I get it, but an equally fitting article title would've been "Ubuntu gives up on desktop market due to increasing mobile presence".
Microsoft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC marketplace.
from TFA : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
He obviously missed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems
Here's the actual cheat:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitball
Pretty disgusting stuff.
In the long run it'll cost you A LOT more as they surface one by one.
That's how you wind up with 5 more holes, no thanks.
That's what I was thinking... 60 days is a bit long, it's more than enough to scope out a network, gain access, and execute the vulnerability. 7 days is a bit short, not enough time to test, validate, or run through QC. Not sure why google's leaning on the other extreme, but why not compromise at like 21 days with empathy towards more advanced development cycles.
I don't really watch TV for the news, I read slashdot for the lulz and news.google.com for actual news. CNN has some good stories, but reading their main articles I feel like they're trying to sway me towards their POV rather than saying what actually happened (ex. ban guns after every shooting).
LiveLeaks & VICE has interesting stuff sometimes too.
They wouldn't have been able to decrypt a portion proving ownership and reversing the judge's decision... unless they have a way to find hidden volumes now, doubtful, but that's why I said I'm curious what they broke.
Also, what do you mean:
truecrypt they can accuse you of using crypto
What does that even mean? lol
That's not a crime fool.
Don't care, that's not what I'm saying.
Truecrypt's plausible deniability hidden volumes?
You're a bit late to the party on that idea.
I too am curious what exactly they broke.
AC, it's actually an NDA that makes the most sense that they would make him sign, a contract has a start and end date, an NDA can say something like no disclosure till the bug is fixed.
My point stands, there's no legal problem here as NDAs are not age specific.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement
I went from Java to .NET and I say I don't know how to code in Java to make people fuck off that think programmers know every language they've (the person) has ever come across.
I do agree completely also, flow and logic are the why of programming, while the syntax is the how and understanding the why things work will always get you faster further.
None of what you said has anything to do with the age of the bug researcher. Still a pretty stupid argument imo, name one law that would prevent a 17 year old from getting paid for finding a bug.
I do however agree that they are not the same company and would go about writing their policy around it differently, but that has nothing to do with the legality of it whatsoever.
Your "insightful" off point and irrelevant statement got mine downmodded you ho. J/k :)
And one more time just to be clear: corporate policy != law and amen for that.
Can't wait for my mammoth burger and steak.
live in* New York.
I am so glad I don't like in New York anymore, we don't have that big gapping loophole in ours:
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/home-sellers-colorado-your-disclosure-obligations.html
I guess the $500 can be seen as a red flag when purchasing, If was a buyer in NY I would ask for the disclosure, not the $500. The $500 seems like its to cover the BUYER's inspection expense, but if the buyer backs out after the inspection, the seller won't be crediting them the $500, which makes me thing this law was written by morons who don't know anything about mortgage liabilities.
are you talking about buying seller insurance? If so, the buyer is still protected here, the seller just passes on the liability. Pretty sure those require an inspection to be done too by the seller, or insurance company.
Also, there are state and federal disclosure rules, lead based paint would be a federal disclosure applicable to all states.
are camera companies ripping people off and people are having to hack thing themselves to get an actual functional product?
by this logic, processor manufacturer's have been doing this since day 1.