The realtor doesn't actually own the property, while the used car salesman's company actually does own the car, in regards to liability that's all the difference in the world.
A seller on the other hand needs to fill out a full disclosure or they can get sued, so the laws are already in place?
What I'd really like to see is less "as is" properties and banks taking more responsibility for the shortsales and bank owned properties they sell, "as is" just isn't good enough from a trillion dollar company imo. I guarantee they won't move an inch till the law requires them to do so however.
OP is a dumbass, there aren't any legal complications here, just policy:
Kugler has a record for finding security problems. He's received two payments for US$4,500 from Mozilla for finding two problems in its Firefox browser and also was listed as a noted security researcher by Microsoft last month.
I thought the same exact thing, TFA is f'in stupid. What about motherboards, BIOS, DDR, harddrives & toasters? Moors law doesn't seem to apply there, so why should it here, what crappy journalism, let's apply w/e terms we want w/e we want and see who buys our BS.
Medium companies tend to be categorized by a willingness to grow and improve, small companies are more about making the owner rich and very little cross training or employee development. Big companies of course are categorized by structure and roles. That's what I've seen anyways. It's possible to have a good small company experience, but you've got to be on your toes and have a bit of salesmanship even.
He knew exactly what he was doing, maybe not the full extent of the consequences, but he should've known he was breaking at least some law and creating some sort of repercussion. Going public to his friends is where he f'ed up. So you statement:
Basically, your best option is not to tell anyone anything about or make records of; what you have done, are doing, or plan to do in the future.
Is best applied to things somebody is unsure of, in which case it is very good advice. It does however go against social human nature, so I'm pretty sure some people are just incapable of it, but then again those people usually aren't looking for trouble either.
"Now that I have pleaded guilty it is a relief to be able to say that I did work with Anonymous to hack Stratfor, among other websites"
He even admitted his guilt in TFA.
So establishing his guilt, yes the sentence is way out of proportion with the crime, and yes this is a tactic way too often used by prosecutors to "scare" a defendant into a plea bargain. The problem here is the underlying law allowing for the possibility for a 30 year conviction, while it seems like DA is doing their job in an unjust manner, they are doing their job within the confines of the law. Best option is still to not get caught.
Based on the nature of the internet... it could easily be US hackers hacking Iranian systems from which they could "test" US infrastructure and blame Iran in one fell swoop.
The scary thing here is my statement has as much plausible deniability built in as TFA.
First, you're going to want to set a segregated network that cannot talk to the main network (A DMZ), your router accomplishes this in most cases.
Second, there's 2 big options for you to look at: VMWare ESXi & Xen both are hypervisors that run on server hardware and can host as many VMs as the hardware can handle. Hyper-V may also be an option if you're part of the MSDN alliance. Install and configured chosen host software.
Third, set up individual VMs, you're on a DMZ, so giving root is fine, the main network cannot be reached. You should be able to create a template and spawn the rest of the VMs off that.
Nobody's saying they're in the right for doing it, but Ron Paul is CERTAINLY in the wrong here. If it's worth that much to him, he should pay 250k. The site owner is definitely a douche bag and probably knew what he was doing, but what about making Ron Paul take responsibility for being late to the domain name party? Where's that aspect of the discussion?
At this point, doing anything other than exactly what the school tells you is grounds for expulsion: senior pranks, fighting, bad science experiments, racist remarks can all get you expelled. And getting expelled for non-rich people can ruin lives. I get that the safety of the kids is important, but I can't help feel like the people responsible for that don't have any kids of their own.
A slashdot example of this would be an IT manager trying to run an IT department w an MBA and no IT experience.
She got to go to space camp because somebody felt sorry for her, somebody who had a similar brush in with the law under laxer standards. I believe the word to use here would be: irony.
Also, I'm amazed that the school is still debating whether to let her back in. I think somebody there needs to be shown the door ASAP and can perhaps find a better fit administrating a mental institution rather than a school.
They wanted 250k for the site, but they did legitimately own it. Now, nobody in their right mind would appraise the site at 250k based on its code base and email list, but... there's nothing to stop them from asking 250k or even 1 mil for the site. Not sure what Ron didn't get here, but it makes me wonder if he was just providing lip service to the people during his political career based on this move.
What's the alternative? We send soldiers in instead of drones and suddenly the soldiers are getting killed... by who? people who hate us.
Nobody in the army is proud of killing civilians I'm sure, but soldiers are just as likely to inflict collateral (calling in a plane to blow up a building), and can't be fixed and rebuilt like drones.
Based on that logic, anybody who decides to commit a crime, can write a memo stating that they're doing it for jihad before they do it and become a terrorist?
I'm with OP this is fear mongering by the media, won't stop the sheeple from crying terrorism and whatever else the media tells them though!
Completely agree, current game market can't utilize this. Furhter, the irony here is most games don't work well in a multi-monitor environment. I still find myself turning my other one off to avoid accidental misclicks. Only game I've played that effectively compensates is Starcraft II, everything else has been an alt tab PITA.
I think maybe where you get your money's worth here is you can fire up vlc, a game, and netflix together , which is basically what you're saying, but how many people is that worth 1k to? It'd be cheaper 2 buy 2 more wal-mart machines at that point.
Part of the problem is that most laws don't take morality into effect. Sure, some laws have a min and max punishment to help judge the severity, but there's no real system to say does this law apply or not in this situation. This starts at the highest levels of government (where they just buy their way out of any law), and trickles down to your motorcycle cop, who's more interested in making his/her quota then actually helping people and serving justice.
To be perfectly honest, I have no idea how to fix it, except remember we have min maxs for this reason as well as probation and parole. Probation is exactly that: you did wrong, so can you be good for a year or two now? There's many examples of it working, and it failing (ex. you get a DUI, but you keep drinking at home, probation finds out through a variety of ways, and now do 2-3 months of jail time, you get exposed to hardened criminals, etc...)
Right... because kids think exactly like you do and premeditate all their actions. I won't even go as far as to say it was stupid on her part, she simply didn't know, so it was ignorant.
She should've never been expelled, charged, or anything. No rewards, or punishments, maybe a warning and explanation, just kids being kids. The person who got scared the most by the experiment was probably her, and that's it... that's where it ends.
Everything else that happened in this case is adult humans failing left and right, the police, the school officer, the principal, bunch of f'in morons who aren't fit to work at a McDonalds yet hold positions of authority. That's the real problem here, and we are worse as a whole for it.
I completely agree, but I'll kindly refer you to my HR comment. You could do this, but 90% of the time it just doesn't get done for a million reasons. Changing w the winds requires strong communication and certain times of collaborative more open culture that just aren't present at 90% of organizations. So they choose to pay you instead.
Slashdot Mirror
The realtor doesn't actually own the property, while the used car salesman's company actually does own the car, in regards to liability that's all the difference in the world.
A seller on the other hand needs to fill out a full disclosure or they can get sued, so the laws are already in place?
What I'd really like to see is less "as is" properties and banks taking more responsibility for the shortsales and bank owned properties they sell, "as is" just isn't good enough from a trillion dollar company imo. I guarantee they won't move an inch till the law requires them to do so however.
OP is a dumbass, there aren't any legal complications here, just policy:
Kugler has a record for finding security problems. He's received two payments for US$4,500 from Mozilla for finding two problems in its Firefox browser and also was listed as a noted security researcher by Microsoft last month.
Mozilla had no problem paying him.
I thought the same exact thing, TFA is f'in stupid. What about motherboards, BIOS, DDR, harddrives & toasters? Moors law doesn't seem to apply there, so why should it here, what crappy journalism, let's apply w/e terms we want w/e we want and see who buys our BS.
Yes, I'd rather have the known that works than the unknown that nobody understands in regards to climate change and the glaciers melting.
Medium companies tend to be categorized by a willingness to grow and improve, small companies are more about making the owner rich and very little cross training or employee development. Big companies of course are categorized by structure and roles. That's what I've seen anyways. It's possible to have a good small company experience, but you've got to be on your toes and have a bit of salesmanship even.
find a small company for your first job, but not one that is going to burn you out.
It may be easier to prove that unicorns exist...
I think the key is to know when to get out... of course there can be other reasons for staying.
The downside is the lack of glacier, I'd rather have the glacier.
He knew exactly what he was doing, maybe not the full extent of the consequences, but he should've known he was breaking at least some law and creating some sort of repercussion. Going public to his friends is where he f'ed up. So you statement:
Basically, your best option is not to tell anyone anything about or make records of; what you have done, are doing, or plan to do in the future.
Is best applied to things somebody is unsure of, in which case it is very good advice. It does however go against social human nature, so I'm pretty sure some people are just incapable of it, but then again those people usually aren't looking for trouble either.
what exactly does finding the plants do for us?
You moron...
"Now that I have pleaded guilty it is a relief to be able to say that I did work with Anonymous to hack Stratfor, among other websites"
He even admitted his guilt in TFA.
So establishing his guilt, yes the sentence is way out of proportion with the crime, and yes this is a tactic way too often used by prosecutors to "scare" a defendant into a plea bargain. The problem here is the underlying law allowing for the possibility for a 30 year conviction, while it seems like DA is doing their job in an unjust manner, they are doing their job within the confines of the law. Best option is still to not get caught.
Ah CNN, the stuff rich white men like to read over a glass of scotch and laugh.
Based on the nature of the internet... it could easily be US hackers hacking Iranian systems from which they could "test" US infrastructure and blame Iran in one fell swoop.
The scary thing here is my statement has as much plausible deniability built in as TFA.
First, you're going to want to set a segregated network that cannot talk to the main network (A DMZ), your router accomplishes this in most cases.
Second, there's 2 big options for you to look at: VMWare ESXi & Xen both are hypervisors that run on server hardware and can host as many VMs as the hardware can handle. Hyper-V may also be an option if you're part of the MSDN alliance. Install and configured chosen host software.
Third, set up individual VMs, you're on a DMZ, so giving root is fine, the main network cannot be reached. You should be able to create a template and spawn the rest of the VMs off that.
Fourth, have the students remote into their VMs.
Nobody's saying they're in the right for doing it, but Ron Paul is CERTAINLY in the wrong here. If it's worth that much to him, he should pay 250k. The site owner is definitely a douche bag and probably knew what he was doing, but what about making Ron Paul take responsibility for being late to the domain name party? Where's that aspect of the discussion?
At this point, doing anything other than exactly what the school tells you is grounds for expulsion: senior pranks, fighting, bad science experiments, racist remarks can all get you expelled. And getting expelled for non-rich people can ruin lives. I get that the safety of the kids is important, but I can't help feel like the people responsible for that don't have any kids of their own.
A slashdot example of this would be an IT manager trying to run an IT department w an MBA and no IT experience.
She got to go to space camp because somebody felt sorry for her, somebody who had a similar brush in with the law under laxer standards. I believe the word to use here would be: irony.
Also, I'm amazed that the school is still debating whether to let her back in. I think somebody there needs to be shown the door ASAP and can perhaps find a better fit administrating a mental institution rather than a school.
It helps to have some background too:
http://politics.slashdot.org/story/13/02/11/1247252/ron-paul-asks-un-for-help-geting-control-of-ronpaulcom-domain-from-fans
He did not want to pay 250k.
It seems like Ron Paul was mad...
They wanted 250k for the site, but they did legitimately own it. Now, nobody in their right mind would appraise the site at 250k based on its code base and email list, but... there's nothing to stop them from asking 250k or even 1 mil for the site. Not sure what Ron didn't get here, but it makes me wonder if he was just providing lip service to the people during his political career based on this move.
What's the alternative? We send soldiers in instead of drones and suddenly the soldiers are getting killed... by who? people who hate us.
Nobody in the army is proud of killing civilians I'm sure, but soldiers are just as likely to inflict collateral (calling in a plane to blow up a building), and can't be fixed and rebuilt like drones.
Based on that logic, anybody who decides to commit a crime, can write a memo stating that they're doing it for jihad before they do it and become a terrorist?
I'm with OP this is fear mongering by the media, won't stop the sheeple from crying terrorism and whatever else the media tells them though!
Completely agree, current game market can't utilize this. Furhter, the irony here is most games don't work well in a multi-monitor environment. I still find myself turning my other one off to avoid accidental misclicks. Only game I've played that effectively compensates is Starcraft II, everything else has been an alt tab PITA.
I think maybe where you get your money's worth here is you can fire up vlc, a game, and netflix together , which is basically what you're saying, but how many people is that worth 1k to? It'd be cheaper 2 buy 2 more wal-mart machines at that point.
Part of the problem is that most laws don't take morality into effect. Sure, some laws have a min and max punishment to help judge the severity, but there's no real system to say does this law apply or not in this situation. This starts at the highest levels of government (where they just buy their way out of any law), and trickles down to your motorcycle cop, who's more interested in making his/her quota then actually helping people and serving justice.
To be perfectly honest, I have no idea how to fix it, except remember we have min maxs for this reason as well as probation and parole. Probation is exactly that: you did wrong, so can you be good for a year or two now? There's many examples of it working, and it failing (ex. you get a DUI, but you keep drinking at home, probation finds out through a variety of ways, and now do 2-3 months of jail time, you get exposed to hardened criminals, etc...)
Right... because kids think exactly like you do and premeditate all their actions. I won't even go as far as to say it was stupid on her part, she simply didn't know, so it was ignorant.
Let me present another viewpoint here:
She should've never been expelled, charged, or anything. No rewards, or punishments, maybe a warning and explanation, just kids being kids.
The person who got scared the most by the experiment was probably her, and that's it... that's where it ends.
Everything else that happened in this case is adult humans failing left and right, the police, the school officer, the principal, bunch of f'in morons who aren't fit to work at a McDonalds yet hold positions of authority. That's the real problem here, and we are worse as a whole for it.
I completely agree, but I'll kindly refer you to my HR comment. You could do this, but 90% of the time it just doesn't get done for a million reasons. Changing w the winds requires strong communication and certain times of collaborative more open culture that just aren't present at 90% of organizations. So they choose to pay you instead.