Anybody with half a brain checks compatibility before doing business upgrades.
Anybody with a quarter knows how to run win 7 with xp mode to run xp apps. I don't believe #2 for a second, OLE / COM don't do anything special that would interfere with the virtualized IO of a VM. I honestly just think people blame the VM when they can't get networking to work. If it required special hardware components that required drivers that weren't on 7 and had no virtual equivalent, that I'd understand.
I wouldn't say anything, except I somehow feel like my tax dollars are getting indirectly wasted by incompetent IT.
Phones: Android, iOS, win 7/8 Games: all 3 have uniques, Linux can use wine, i'm sure there's an osx solution Servers: RedHat, win server 2000-2012, OSX server
I think you meant: There's plenty of businesses in hosting, supercomputing, science, robotics, software development, or some other little cottage industry.
Rather people pretending to associate with the organization and provide a public face for them. Surely this group of anonymous has nothing to do with the anonymous hackers. This little dilemma goes back to the definition of the word "anonymous".
People who don't know any better have been known throughout history to explain just about anything as magic. Why should computers be any different? Now, if you disagree, I will "re-program" my computer to shoot lightning at you across the internet!
I still however think that win 8 was mostly focused on as a competitive mobile platform rather than a PC OS. While it works as both, I can't think of a single bad thing I've heard recently about windows 8 mobile. 7 on the other hand was a monstrosity on anything mobile, it just wasn't designed for any of the unique challenges present by mobile devices like say... a touch screen?:) It makes perfect sense that the next iteration would focus on the market they're weak in.
Interesting, I haven't been to FPY recently. It does seem like they're restructuring though to give people a reason to use them. Gmail could really use some competition.
I remember back then... I switched to gmail because of the massively increased storage. It was massive enough to become a very rough "google drive" a decade before google drive came out.
I'd imagine most CEOs are involved in business continuity plans, which involve disaster recovery, so there's a very good reason CEO's get blamed often times (they're ultimately responsible).
and where would you be without the economy? Do you know how to build your own house by chance?
Society is based on compromise, take away the commercial sector's ability to do what it does and you better learn to build that house, might be good for you to do anyways.
I'd say being aware of the issue is a huge part of the battle, most people simply aren't. From there public outcry can reach a level prompting action from the company.
My money's on the prosecuting DA for the man this was traced to will spin this as an attempted domestic terrorist attack with the goal of mass murder of government officials and American citizens as well as an attempt to destabilize global markets.
seems like forever since we've had to worry about batteries exploding and leaking acid, but batteries are kind of import to us as a race, so some risk in the consumer use of this technology may ultimately benefit us as the technology matures.
The only person the finger should ever get pointed to is the CEO who couldn't justify a colo site for failover cause s/he are too busy stuffing their pockets w that money in the form of "bonuses". Both in-house and cloud suffer from this. But those that really don't want downtime, find it perfectly achievable, though not free.
Some would say they stabilized what they were trying to do in 95 in 98. 95 is where the term BSOD gained ground. The sever line really doesn't apply to this trend, just consumer OS. The servers have improved steadily in less frequent release cycles. Reason people say what I said in the scope of consumer OS is because your opinion of 95 seems to be a ways heightened.
Slashdot Mirror
Anybody with half a brain checks compatibility before doing business upgrades.
Anybody with a quarter knows how to run win 7 with xp mode to run xp apps. I don't believe #2 for a second, OLE / COM don't do anything special that would interfere with the virtualized IO of a VM. I honestly just think people blame the VM when they can't get networking to work. If it required special hardware components that required drivers that weren't on 7 and had no virtual equivalent, that I'd understand.
I wouldn't say anything, except I somehow feel like my tax dollars are getting indirectly wasted by incompetent IT.
Windows XP mode.
Must be: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=150352
And I could've sworn I said
i'm sure there's an osx solution
what part of that didn't you get?
you must be new to computers...
Phones: Android, iOS, win 7/8
Games: all 3 have uniques, Linux can use wine, i'm sure there's an osx solution
Servers: RedHat, win server 2000-2012, OSX server
You're right, a .NET software development shop is a myth, and this doesn't really exist: http://www.robotshop.com/ghi-fez-spider-net-development-starter-kit.html .
I think you meant:
There's plenty of businesses in hosting, supercomputing, science, robotics, software development, or some other little cottage industry.
Rather people pretending to associate with the organization and provide a public face for them. Surely this group of anonymous has nothing to do with the anonymous hackers. This little dilemma goes back to the definition of the word "anonymous".
People who don't know any better have been known throughout history to explain just about anything as magic. Why should computers be any different? Now, if you disagree, I will "re-program" my computer to shoot lightning at you across the internet!
what about matching a grainy image to a high resolution image from the DMV? Perhaps that's where the technology failed.
+1 insightful.
I still however think that win 8 was mostly focused on as a competitive mobile platform rather than a PC OS. While it works as both, I can't think of a single bad thing I've heard recently about windows 8 mobile. 7 on the other hand was a monstrosity on anything mobile, it just wasn't designed for any of the unique challenges present by mobile devices like say... a touch screen? :) It makes perfect sense that the next iteration would focus on the market they're weak in.
The real problem is that ZDNet is a fear mongering news website: http://www.zdnet.com/ . Does anybody actually read this garbage?
The day news sites start to dictate how our economy functions, I'm leaving... oh wait...
Interesting, I haven't been to FPY recently. It does seem like they're restructuring though to give people a reason to use them. Gmail could really use some competition.
I remember back then... I switched to gmail because of the massively increased storage. It was massive enough to become a very rough "google drive" a decade before google drive came out.
people still use yahoo?
I'd imagine most CEOs are involved in business continuity plans, which involve disaster recovery, so there's a very good reason CEO's get blamed often times (they're ultimately responsible).
and where would you be without the economy? Do you know how to build your own house by chance?
Society is based on compromise, take away the commercial sector's ability to do what it does and you better learn to build that house, might be good for you to do anyways.
I'd say being aware of the issue is a huge part of the battle, most people simply aren't. From there public outcry can reach a level prompting action from the company.
What exactly is wrong with that?
My money's on the prosecuting DA for the man this was traced to will spin this as an attempted domestic terrorist attack with the goal of mass murder of government officials and American citizens as well as an attempt to destabilize global markets.
Namely "safety issues" ,
seems like forever since we've had to worry about batteries exploding and leaking acid, but batteries are kind of import to us as a race, so some risk in the consumer use of this technology may ultimately benefit us as the technology matures.
The only person the finger should ever get pointed to is the CEO who couldn't justify a colo site for failover cause s/he are too busy stuffing their pockets w that money in the form of "bonuses". Both in-house and cloud suffer from this. But those that really don't want downtime, find it perfectly achievable, though not free.
Also... what exactly does skin contact with ricin do?
According to this, nothing:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/17/ricin-scare-in-washington-fast-facts-about-the-deadly-poison/
*plays "tool - vicarious" shaking head.
You guys are way off, let's just outlaw physical mail, who needs it with email now anyways.
You are 100% correct about the age:
http://www.businessballs.com/treeswing.htm
Have yourself a cookie!
Some would say they stabilized what they were trying to do in 95 in 98. 95 is where the term BSOD gained ground. The sever line really doesn't apply to this trend, just consumer OS. The servers have improved steadily in less frequent release cycles. Reason people say what I said in the scope of consumer OS is because your opinion of 95 seems to be a ways heightened.
Took out or never added?